Loading...
2010-04-29 Taxes & Special Assessments on 19 LotsMemo Attorney Client Co =unig&n To: Albertville City Council; Larry Kruse, City Administrator; From: Mike Couri, City Attorney Date: April 29, 2010 Re: Prairie Run/Alpine Capital litigation Gold Key has failed to pay the taxes and special assessments on 19 lots in the Prairie Run subdivision. The City has made a claim on the $217,500.00 letter of credit issued by Alpine Capital, but Alpine Capital has refused to pay the claim as its creditors are requiring it to pay back their loans to it and are in a lengthy process of orderly liquidating the company by selling off the properties it repossessed from Gold Key and other developers. The City has sued Alpine for the monies due, and Larry Kruse and myself have met with Alpine on three occasions in an attempt to work out a solution that avoids the expense and uncertainty of trial. We have come up with a settlement concept that Larry and I support. Before proceeding further with it, we would like to present it to the Council for comment and feedback. While Alpine is cash poor, it does have assets in the form of a significant inventory of vacant lots. Of those lots, 8 of them are in Prairie Run, are owned free and clear by Alpine, and have all of the special assessments paid. These lots are located on the farthest west cul-de-sac in Prairie Run, on the street that is owned and supposed to be maintained by the Homeowner's Association. They are smaller lots, intended for "detached townhomes." There are currently three such detached townhomes built on this street. Alpine's proposal is to sell these lots and give the proceeds directly to the City in exchange for the City ultimately dismissing the lawsuit and returning the letter of credit when all of the lots are sold. Alpine estimates that the lots will probably net about $20,000.00 each, but may take some years to sell. We estimate that the City will net around $150,000 to $160,000 from the sale of the lots. That would represent approximately a 75% recovery on the amount of the letter of credit. The City would use the proceeds to pay some of the delinquent special assessments on the 19 lots that have not paid their special assessments. That would pay down the specials by $7,000 to $8,000 per lot. The majority of these lots had original assessment amounts of $21,394, which have since grown to $34,000+ with penalties, interest and delinquent real estate taxes. As noted above, these lots are also thought to be worth about $20,000 each. Even if the City paid down the specials by $7,000 per lot, the back taxes and specials would still exceed the value of the lots and the lots would likely proceed to a tax sale. Once the properties come back into private hands through the tax sale process, the City can reimpose the special assessments on the properties. However, given the low market value of these lots, City Staff expects that the City will likely have to forgive most if not all of the special assessment interest and penalties that have accrued on these lots in order to bring the special assessments in line with the actual market value of the lots. In short, if we realized $150,000 from the sale of the Alpine lots, we would probably end up breaking even on the principal amount of the special assessment, but would not recover much, if any, interest on our money. The advantage of the settlement is that the letter of credit would be secured by real assets, the eight lots in question. While we do not know the exact value of the lots, we know that they at some point they will be saleable. If we proceed to court, we may end up with a judgment, but the question would then be whether we could collect on it. Since Alpine is essentially being liquidated by their creditors now, collecting on a judgment would likely be dicey at best. This entire settlement concept is contingent upon Alpine's banks agreeing to the proposal. We told Alpine that we would discuss this with the Council first, and if the Council approves the concept, Alpine will then take it to its banks for approval. A final settlement agreement would follow later. One additional benefit of the proposed settlement is that we would require Alpine to reinstate the homeowners' association on the lots on this private cul-de-sac. Of the thirteen lots, Alpine will own ten of them, and Alpine believes that the owners of two of the other three will join the association. No one has had contact with the owner of the last lot as that lot has been going through the foreclosure process. Reestablishment of the homeowners' association will provide a funding mechanism for the maintenance of the private street. As you may recall, Dean Johnson 0 Page 2 terminated the prior homeowners' association, leaving no funding mechanism to pay for maintaining the private street. Neither the City nor Alpine can figure out why Dean Johnson terminated the homeowners' association. Both are in agreement that it needs to be reinstated. 0 Page 3