Loading...
2003-07-20 Signed Surveyor for plat . , ~ : C [TY OF t=LBERTVI LLE FAX NO. : 7634973210 Jul. 20 2003 02:01PM P6 . -- ,.- To the plat of: ALBERT VILLAS Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 505.174 Laws of Minnesota, 1957J Ernest O. Rud, the lmdersign~ a Licensed Land Surveyor in and. for the State of Minnesota, declares as follows: L 'That I prepared the plat of ALBERT VILLAS dated August 1511I.2000. and filed on August 1 gUt, 2000 in the office of the County Recorder Wright County. Minnesota, in Cabinet No. 1198, Document No. 717183. . 2. That said plat contains errors, omissio~ or defects in the following particulars., t{)- wit: Edina Development C..orporation, Inc., a Minnesota co-rporl!ltion 3. That said pIal is hereby corrected in the following particulars., to wit: Edina ~lopment Corporation. a Minnesota corporation Dated 7.-IS-B"03 ~~p Ernest G. Rud, Land Sl.lt\'eyot Minnesota License No. 9808 The above Certificate of Correction to the plat of ALBERT VILLAS was approved by the city council o~tbc City of Albertville, Minnesota at a meeting held this day of 4).~ ~,~L3 Mayor 9L" i i j~! \ -~_t~/cj~- Administrator This Certificate of Correction has been checked and approved this day of ,2003. Wright County Surveyor This Certificate of correction to the plat of ALBERT VILLAS W,.i$ illed in this office fur record on the dayof_.. , 2003, at o'clock .M., and was duly recorded in Book On page County Recorder. Wrighl County r .. Comments Regarding AlbertViIlas Planning Commission, January 11, 2000 · Commissioner Meyer opposed to the layout for parks. · Commissioner Budde opposed to the layout of parks and concerned about lot widths and also future road connections. · Commissioner Brown requesting Park A become an outlot for stormwater drainage and no park credit. Requesting a 30' ditch maintenance easement to be shown on the preliminary plat. Requesting lots 1-5, Block 14 be eliminated and made park. Requesting that Lot 1, Block 12 be eliminated due to Amoco pipeline easement. · Commissioner Franklin requested lots 1-5, Block 14 be eliminated and made park. He noted park A not be credited and no part of Park B that has storm water retention be credited for Park. He also suggested that this pond be reconfigured and squared. · Commissioner Bauer was opposed to the current Park layout, however did indicate she preferred that lots 1-5, Block 14 be eliminated and made park. Overall, the consensus of the Planning Commission was lots 1-5, Block 14 be eliminated and made park and the other comments above be considered in the Council's decision to deny or approve the preliminary plat. Please provide a copy of this note to the applicant so they may prepare a revised preliminary.