2004-07-26 EAW Revision,,
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
Meyer-Rohlin, Inc. fl Q Date: 712s/o4
Engineers & Land Surveyors Fax: (763) 682-9492 Job#: 04115EAW
1111 State Hwy: 25 N, Suite 205 Phone: (763) 682-1781
Buffalo, MN 55313 (800) 563-1781
Email: meyenohlin@sherbtel.net
To: Larry R. Kruse
City of Albertville
Mail To:
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
From: Dwight R. Gunnarson
Project Engineer
~~ Hunter's Pass EAW
EAW Revision
We are sending you:
Attached Concept
Addenda^ Plans
Change Order @ Specifcations
COPIES REV. DATE # of PGS DESCRIPTION
1 7/26/04 EAW Revision
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
For Approval ] For Your Use @ As Requested @ For Review and Comment
Remarks:
Larry,
Here is the revised EAW per the NAC comments. Please consider this for approval at the next
council meeting.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
Copy To: AI Brixious
Pete Carlson
Ijenclosures are not ns noted, kindly nofigy us at once. SIGNED:
Copy To:
Or Slzip To:
5975 Main Avenue N.E., Suite
Albertville, MN 55301
Monday, July 26, ?004 Created by Dwight R. Gunnarson
j' EAW Form Revised 2/99 Content Revised 7126/04
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET
Note to preparers: This form is available at www.mnplan.state.mn.us. EAW Guidelines will be
available in Spring 1999 at the web site. The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provides information
about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The EAW is prepared by
the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement
should be prepared. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data for -but should not
complete -the final worksheet. If a complete answer does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional
sheets as necessary. The complete question as well as the answer must be included if the EAW is prepared
electronically.
Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following
notice of the EAW in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of
information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS.
1. Project title
The Cove's of Hunters Lake, A Residential Planned Unit Development located in Albertville,
Minnesota
2. Proposer
Contact person:
Minnesota Development Agency
Matt Froelich
Title: President
Address: 201 West 7th Street
City, State, Zip: Monticello, MN 55362
Phone: (763) 295-4146
Fax: (763)295-4178
Email:
RGU
Contact person:
City of Albertville
Larry R. Kruse
Title: City Administrator
Address: 5975 Main Avenue N.E.
City, State, Zip: Albertville, MN 55301
Phone: (763) 497-3384
Fax: (763)497-3210
Email: albertvillecity2@earthlink.net
4. Reason for EAW preparation (check one)
EIS scoping Mandatory EAW Citizen petition X RGU discretion
Proposer volunteered
If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart number and subpart name
Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.1000 Subp.3 requires a Discretionary EAW be prepared for the
proposed project when the governmental unit with approval authority over the project
determines that, because of the location (shoreland district) of the proposed project, the project
may have potential for significant environmental effects.
5. Project location County: Wright County
'/4 '/4 Section: 36
City/Township: Albertville
Township: 121 Range: 24
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Government Lots One and Two of Section 36, T.121, R.24, Wright
County, Minnesota, except therefrom, tract conveyed in book 180 of deeds, page 116.
EAW Form Revised 2/99
Content Revised 7/26/04
Attach each of the following to the EAW:
• County map showing the general location of the project;
• U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries
(photocopy acceptable);
• Site plan showing all significant project and natural features.
6. Description
a. Provide a project summary of 50 words or less to be published in the EQB Monitor.
The Cove's of Hunter's Lake is a proposed Residential Planned Unit development for single
family residences located on 76.6 acres of farmland in the City of Albertville. It involves the
construction of approximately 105 single-family homes with supporting infrastructure. City
sewer and water will serve all homes.
b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction. Attach additional
sheets as necessary. Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that will cause physical
manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes. Include modifications to existing equipment or
industrial processes and significant demolition, removal or remodeling of existing structures. Indicate
the timing and duration of construction activities.
The existing site consists of rolling topography with interior wetlands and wetlands along the
entire shoreline of Mud Lake. The site has been laid out to minimize wetland impact. However,
some wetlands will be mitigated due to layout challenges. Additionally, some wetland in the
southeast corner will be impacted due to safety concerns with the access to MacIver matching
with the existing 67th Street.
Minnesota Development Agency is proposing a 105-lot cove style high-end single family housing
development on 76.6 acres of existing farmland in the City of Albertville, Wright County,
Minnesota. The site is bordered by 70th Street the north, MacIver Avenue to the east and Mud
Lake on the southwest. There is a 1-acre parcel located on the north property line adjacent to
70th Street.
The project involves the construction of sanitary sewer, watermain, storm sewer, and a sanitary
sewer lift station on the southeast corner. All of the interior large utility work will be done via the
open cut method of construction. There will also be construction of streets, curb and gutter,
sidewalks, and site ponding for stormwater management and throughout the interior of the
development. The City of Albertville will be providing a watermain trunkline coming from the
southwest and will be directional drilled under Mud Lake.
Best management practices (BPMs) will be used during grading, utility construction, and road
construction including erosion control with the use of silt fence, fiber blankets, and temporary
sediment basins as required to ensure minimal impact to the lake, wetlands, and surrounding
areas. All construction and grading will be subject to the National Pollution Discharge and
Elimination System (NPDES) and the new MPCA requirements for erosion control.
The grading for the entire project is expected to start in the fall of 2004 and to be completed in the
Spring of 2005. Revegetation procedures will begin immediately after completion of the work in
an area. Revegetation will include the seeding and mulching of all green areas including lots and
boulevards. Special revegetation methods will be conducted in the wetland mitigation areas
according to wetland permit that will be applied for at a later date. The natural features of the
site will be preserved to the maximum extent practicable. Building construction is expected to
begin in late Spring of 2005; housing construction on the site will continue through 2008.
c. Explain the project purpose; if the project will be carried out by a governmental unit, explain the need
for the project and identify its beneficiaries.
EAW Form Revised 2/99
Content Revised 7/26/04
The purpose of this development is to provide single-family homes to help satisfy increasing
housing demands in the City of Albertville. The development is intended to be an upper scale
community that will provide numerous amenities such as parks, trail system, diverse architecture,
and appealing landscapes. It will benefit Albertville by providing economic growth and increased
tax revenue.
d. Are future stages of this development including development on any outlots planned or likely to
happen? _Yes X No
If yes, briefly describe future stages, relationship to present project, timeline and plans for
environmental review.
The entire project will be graded at one time. The streets and utilities will most likely be built in
two phases. It is expected the street and utilities for the second phase will start two building
seasons after the first phase installation. This EAW will cover both phases of the entire project.
e. Is this project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? _Yes X No
If yes, briefly describe the past development, timeline and any past environmental review.
Project magnitude data
Total project acreage: 76.6 Acres Approximately 40 acres to be disturbed
Number of residential units: 105 unattached N/A attached N/A maximum units per building
Commercial, industrial or institutional building area (gross floor space): total square feet N/A
Indicate areas of specific uses (in square feet):
Office Manufacturing
Retail Other industrial
Warehouse Institutional
Light industrial Agricultural
Other commercial (specify)
Building height If over 2 stories, compare to heights of nearby buildings
8. Permits and approvals required. List all known local, state. and federal permits, approvals and
financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review
of plans and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax
Increment Financing and infrastructure.
Unit of Government Type of application Status
City of Albertville Concept Plan Complete
City of Albertville Preliminary Plat In Process
City of Albertville Planned Unit Development Rezoning To Complete
City of Albertville Final Plat To Complete
City of Albertville Rezoning To Complete
City of Albertville Grading Plan Approval To Complete
City of Albertville Street & Utility Plan Approval To Complete
City of Albertville Building Permits To Complete
City of Albertville WCA Wetland Replacement Plan Approval To Complete
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Letter Permit To Complete
Minnesota Department of Health Site Plumbing Permit To Complete
Minnesota Department of Health Watermain Extension Permit To Complete
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency NPDES Permit To Complete
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency ~ Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit To Complete
' EAW Form Revised 2/99
Content Revised 7/26/04
9. Land use. Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands.
Discuss project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses. Indicate whether any potential
conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazards due to past site
uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks, or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid or
gas pipelines.
The previous land use for the property has been for cultivated agricultural purposes since 1937.
The current condition of the site is natural grass and has not been farmed for 2-3 years. The
current use directly south of the property is the City of Albertville's Wastewater Treatment
Facility.
According to the Phase I Environmental Study Assessment (ESA) completed by Braun Intertec
dated April 22, 2004, there are no indications of recognized environmental conditions in
connection with the site.
The land adjacent to the west, north, and east sides is also agricultural. However, preliminary
plans have been approved by the City of Albertville for single-family development on the west
side and preliminary plans have been approved by the City of Otsego for high density residential
on the north and east sides across 70th street and MacIver Avenue respectively. Therefore, the
proposed use is consistent with the surrounding areas.
10. Cover types. Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the following cover types before and after
development:
Before After
Wooded/forest 11.0 0.6
Brush/Grassland 5.3 1.0
Cropland 35.3 0.0
Lawn landscaping 0.3 27.2
Impervious surfaces 0.3 17.3
Type 1 & 3 Wetlands 26.5 30.1
Stormwater Ponds OA 2.g
TOTAL 78.7 78.7
If Before and After totals are not equal, explain why:
11. Fish, wildlife and ecologically sensitive resources
a. Identify fish and wildlife resources and habitats on or near the site and describe how they would
be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid impacts.
The are no designated fish and wildlife resources on or near the site.
b. Are any state-listed (endangered, threatened or special concern) species, rare plant communities or
other sensitive ecological resources such as native prairie habitat, colonial waterbird nesting colonies
or regionally rare plant communities on or near the site? Yes X No
If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the
resources has been conducted and describe the results. If the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame
Research program has been contacted give the correspondence reference number: .Describe
measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts.
The DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program has concluded that there are no
known occurrences of rare species of natural communities in the area. The correspondence
reference number is ERDB 20040910
EAW Form Revised 2/99
Content Revised 7/26104
12. Physical impacts on water resources. Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration
- dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, and impoundment - of any surface
waters such as a lake, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? X Yes No
If yes, identify water resource affected and give the DNR Protected Waters Inventory number(s) if the
water resources affected are on the PWI: .Describe alternatives considered and proposed
mitigation measures to minimize impacts.
A wetland delineation report has been completed by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company
Inc. and the report project number is No. 2004-026
Approximately 3.5 acres of wetland will be impacted in the development. In four locations,
construction of the roadways will result in the filling of Type I wetlands. In three locations,
construction of the roadways will result in the filling of the Type III wetland. Most of the impact
in the Type III wetland is due to the city requirement of connecting the east access with 67`~
street. This is because of a safety concern from a traffic standpoint. The roadway alignments
have been adjusted to minimize the size of the affected areas. All impacted wetlands will be
mitigated according to the regulations of the RGU.
13. Water use. Will the project involve installation or abandonment of any water wells, connection to or
changes in any public water supply or appropriation of any ground or surface water (including
dewatering)? X Yes No
If yes, as applicable, give location and purpose of any new wells; public supply affected, changes to be
made, and water quantities to be used; the source, duration, quantity and purpose of any
appropriations; and unique well numbers and DNR appropriation permit numbers, if known. Identify
any existing and new wells on the site map. If there are no wells known on site, explain methodology
used to determine.
According to the Phase I ESA prepared by Braun Interec, project No. BL-04-03134, there is
currently a water well and septic system on site. Both will be abandoned in accordance with
local, state, and federal regulations. An additional well was recently abandoned at the site.
The project will be served by city water, which is now available on the southwest side of Mud
Lake. The City of Albertville will be extending the water supply main under Mud Lake to the
southwest corner of the property. The installation of all watermain will be done per city and
state standards.
It is anticipated that construction dewatering will be necessary, but will not meet or exceed
lmillion gallons in total per one year duration. This will require application to the DNR for
coverage under DNR General Permit 97-0005 for Temporary Water Appropriations.
14. Water-related land use management district. Does any part of the project involve a shoreland
zoning district, a delineated 100-year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wiYd or scenic river
land use district? X Yes No
If yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibility with district land use restrictions.
A meeting was held between the developer, City of Albertville, and the DNR to discuss shoreland
district requirements. It was determined that the shoreland district setback is 75-feet from the
ordinary high water mark of 947.3, set by the DNR.
EAW Form Revised 2/99
Content Revised 7/26/04
The southern part of the development is within the Shoreland Management Overlay District of
Mud Lake. Mud Lake, which is in the process of being renamed to "Hunter's Lake", is classified
by the DNR as a Natural Resource Lake (No. 86-0026). The Cove's of Hunter's Lake
Development meets or exceeds the required setbacks, lot size, usage, and density requirements by
the City of Albertville and DNR.
15. Water surface use. Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body?
_Yes X No
If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or
conflicts with other uses.
Watercraft are not allowed on Mud Lake.
16. Erosion and sedimentation. Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to
be moved: Approx. 40 acres ;Approx. 280,000 cubic yards
Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. Describe any
erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after project construction.
Because the project will involve more than one acres of land, coverage under the NPDES
General Permit for Construction Activities shall be obtained from the Minnesota Pollution
Control agency. This permit requires that best management practices (BMPs) be used to control
erosion and that all erosion controls be inspected after each rainfall exceeding 0.1 inch of
precipitation. Erosion control practices to be used on the site may include but are not limited to
the following.
i. Silt-fence installed at the construction limits in erosion prone areas prior to the initiation of
earthwork and maintained until all exposed soil is stabilized.
2. Construction of temporary sedimentation basins in the locations proposed for the ponds, and
development of these basins for permanent use following construction.
3. Construction of diversion ditches and temporary sedimentation and detention basins at sites
deemed necessary during construction.
4. Immediate seeding & mulching after construction in an area
17. Water quality: surface water runoff
a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe permanent
controls to manage or treat runoff. Describe any stormwater pollution prevention plans.
The quantity of runoff from the site after development will not be changed due to the addition of
stormwater ponds.
The quality of site runoff will change negligibly post construction. Current agricultural runoff
containing crop pesticides, herbicides, and sediment will be replaced with typical urban runoff
containing lawn chemicals. Runoff from hard surfaces as well as from the lawns of most
proposed homes will first enter one of the water quality ponds before entering the existing
wetlands or lake.
A restrictive covenance in the development will regulate the use of phosphorus lawn fertilizers in
order to reduce the amount of yard pollutants.
b. Identify routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site; include major downstream water
EAW Form Revised 2/99
Content Revised 7/26/04
bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters. Estimate impact runoff on the quality of receiving
waters.
As discussed in Part a. above, the impact on the quality of receiving waters will be negligible.
The use of storm water ponds to treat site runoff will help mitigate the effects of adding
impervious surface area to the site. The ultimate receiving water body (Mud Lake) is not
expected to be negatively affected by the project with the use of BMPs per the required permits.
18. Water quality: wastewaters
a. Describe sources, composition and quantities of all sanitary, municipal and industrial wastewater
produced or treated at the site.
Only normal domestic sewage wastewater will be produced at the site. The estimated maximum
potential daily wastewater flow volume for 105 single family homes is 28,770 gallons per day.
This estimate is based on the methods outlined in the Service Availability Charge (SAC)
Procedures Manual (Metropolitan Council Environmental Services, 1996}. One SAC unit equals
274 gallons of maximum potential daily wastewater flow volume. Wastewater flow was based on
assigning one SAC unit per residential unit.
b. Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of composition
after treatment. Identify receiving waters, including major downstream water bodies, and estimate the
discharge impact on the quality of receiving waters. If the project involves on-site sewage systems,
discuss the suitability of site conditions for such systems.
Not applicable. All normal domestic sewage is to be routed into the sanitary sewer system and
transferred to the Albertville Wastewater Treatment Facility directly to the south of the
property.
c. If wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, describe
any pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the volume and composition of
wastes, identifying any improvements necessary.
Domestic sewage will be routed via the sanitary sewer system to the Albertville Wastewater
Treatment Facility located directly south of the project. An interior lift station will be installed
to transfer the wastewater to the facility. No wastewater pretreatment is needed. There has
been no indication from the city that the wastewater treatment facility has inadequate capacity
to accommodate the additional waste produced by the development.
d. If the project requires disposal of liquid animal manure, describe disposal technique and location
and discuss capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure. Identify any improvements
necessary. Describe any required setbacks for land disposal systems.
Not applicable.
19. Geologic hazards and soil conditions
a. Approximate depth (in feet) to ground water: 7 feet minimum 10 feet average
Because of the close proximity to Mud Lake, ground water depth is based on the normal pool
elevation.
to bedrock: 100 minimum 250 average
EAW Form Revised 2/99
Content Revised 7/26/04
Depth to bedrock is noted in the Soil Survey of Wright County, Minnesota (USDA 1968) as
ranging from 100 to more than 400 feet deep. The above minimum and average depth is
estimated based on this information. No site specific information on bedrock depth is
immediately available.
Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site
map: sinkholes, shallow limestone formations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or
minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards.
No such geological hazards have been identified or are known to occur on the project site.
b. Describe the soils on the site, giving MRCS (SCS) classifications, if known. Discuss soil granularity
and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils.
Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination.
Soil series present on the site according to the Soil Survey of Wright County, Minnesota (USDA
1968) are shown in the following table along with an estimate of their approximate percent
coverage on the site.
Soil Series Estimated % Coverage of Project Site
Hayden Loam 22,'7%
Glencoe Loam 21.1%
Dundas Loam 19.6%
Cordova Loam 11.6%
Marsh 25.0%
In general, soils on the site are fine textured and have relatively low infiltration rates. This
decreases the risk for possible groundwater contamination from surface chemical spills and lawn
chemicals. Additional aspects of the development that reduce the risk of groundwater
contamination include the maintenance of permanent vegetative cover after development, the
addition of impervious surface area that reduces infiltration, and the use of storm water ponds to
intercept, treat, and detain surface runoff.
20. Solid wastes, hazardous wastes, storage tanks
a. Describe types, amounts and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes, including solid animal
manure, sludge and ash, produced during construction and operation. Identify method and location of
disposal. For projects generating municipal solid waste, indicate if there is a source separation plan;
describe how the project will be modified for recycling. If hazardous waste is generated, indicate if
there is a hazardous waste minimization plan and routine hazardous waste reduction assessments.
No hazardous wastes, solid animal manure, sludge, or ash is anticipated to be produced during
and following project completion. Municipal solid wastes typical of residential development will
be produced. Based on the solid waste generation study known as the AB 939 Plan Commercial
Generator Strategies (City of Los Angeles, 1990), the maximum potential solid waste generation
for the development is estimated at 105 tons per year. This estimate is based on a single family
residential unit producing one ton of solid waste per year.
The development will incorporate a restrictive covenance that dictates the development"
association will use the same solid water disposal and recycling provider. Therefore, there will
be uniformity in the solid waste disposal. Also, the City of Albertville provides recycling
services.
Types of solid waste generation expected and the relative percentage of each type (by weight) are
estimated in the following table.
EAW Form Revised 2/99
Waste Type Residential
Paper 31
Other Organicsl 22
Yard Wastes 19
Other Wastes2 10
Plastics 7
Metals 5
Glass 5
Special Wastes3 1
Total 100
Content Revised 7/26%04
lOther Organics include such items as food wastes, textiles/clothes, wood, and rubber
products.
ZOther Wastes include items such as inert solids and household hazardous wastes.
3Special Wastes include items such as ash, asbestos, and oversized bulky wastes.
b. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identify measures to be
used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. If the use of toxic or hazardous materials will
lead to a regulated waste, discharge or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or
eliminate the waste, discharge or emission.
No toxic or hazardous materials other than vehicle fuels, household cleaners, and lawn care
chemicals are expected to be used on the project site.
c. Indicate the number, location, size and use of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum
products or other materials, except water. Describe any emergency response containment plans.
No above ground or below ground tanks are anticipated on the site.
21. Traffic. Parking spaces added 0 .Existing spaces (if project involves expansion) 0
Estimated total average daily traffic generated 301
Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and time of occurrence
31 trips during one hour between 4 and 6 pm
Daily and peak hour trip generation for the site was calculated using the 6`h Edition of Trip
Generation (Institute of Traffic Engineers, 1997). As shown in the following table, total daily
trip generation after full development is estimated at 1005. PM peak hour trip generation is
estimated at 106.
Tri Generation Table
Use Unit # of Daily PM Peak Daily Trip PM Peak
Units Trips/Unit Hour Generation Hour Trip ~
~ ~ ~ Tri s/I7nit Generation '~
Single
Family Dwelling 105 9.57 1.01 1005 106
Residential
EAW Form Revised Z/99
Content Revised 7/26/04
Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic
improvements necessary. If the project is within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, discuss its impact
on the regional transportation system.
The current conditions of 70th Street and MacIver Avenue are minor collectors with 70th still
being gravel. The project will have two access point off of 70th Street to the North and one off of
MacIver Avenue to the West. The locations of access points have been dictated by the City of
Albertville.
However, according to the Eastern Wright County Transportation Study conducted by Wright
County, Albertville, and Otsego have warranted upgrades to both roadways. The City of Otsego
will begin construction of a 2-lane collector (with future 4-lane width) on MacIver Avenue.
Construction will be in Summer of 2004. The City of Albertville and Otsego will jointly upgrade
70th Street to a 2-lane collector (with future 4-lane capacity). Wright County has future plans of
redesidnating 70th Street as the new County Road 37.
Additional right-of--way and money will be put up by the developer to accommodate the future
expansion of both roads.
22. Vehicle-related air emissions. Estimate the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality,
including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation
measures on air quality impacts. Note: If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult
EAW Guidelines about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed.
The increased traffic will generate a corresponding increase in carbon monoxide levels and other
vehicle-related air emissions. As noted under item 21, development in the project area is not
expected to have a significant negative impact on regional traffic operations and therefore is
expected to have a negligible impact on air quality. No measures to mitigate air quality impacts
are planned. Because no commercial parking stalls are being proposed, the project will not
require an Indirect Source Permit for air emissions.
23. Stationary source air emissions. Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any
emissions from stationary sources of air emissions such as boilers, exhaust stacks or fugitive dust
sources. Include any hazardous air pollutants (consult EAW Guidelines for a listing) and any
greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone-depleting chemicals
(chloro-fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons or sulfur hexafluoride). Also describe
any proposed pollution prevention techniques and proposed air pollution control devices. Describe the
impacts on air quality.
The proposed project does not include any stationary sources of air emissions.
24. Odors, noise and dust. Will the project generate odors, noise or dust during construction or during
operation? X Yes No
If yes, describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities or intensity and any proposed measures to
mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify locations of nearby sensitive receptors and estimate impacts on
them. Discuss potential impacts on human health or quality of life. (Note: fugitive dusk generated by
operations maybe discussed at item 23 instead of here.)
Dust and noise will be created short term during the construction of the project. There are no
sensitive receptors in the area, and all such construction activity will occur during daytime hours
for which construction is permitted. Water will be applied as necessary for dust control and
routine street sweeping will be conducted to minimize potential erosion problems.
EAW Form Revised 2/99
Content Revised 7/26/04
25. Nearby resources. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site?
Archaeological, historical or architectural resources? _Yes X No
Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? _Yes X No
Designated parks, recreation areas or trails? _Yes X No
Scenic views and vistas? _Yes X No
Other unique resources? _Yes X No
According to the email dated June 18, 2004, from the Minnesota State Historic Preservation
Office there are no findings of any archeological sites within the project. The correspondence
refers to report numbers THY-73-O1 and WR-93-02.
If yes, describe the resource and identify any project-related impacts on the resource. Describe any
measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts.
26. Visual impacts. Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation? Such
as glare from intense lights, lights visible in wilderness areas and large visible plumes from cooling
towers or exhaust stacks? Yes X No
If yes, explain.
27. Compatibility with plans and land use regulations. Is the project subject to an adopted local
comprehensive plan, land use plan or regulation, or other applicable land use, water, or resource
management plan of a local, regional, state or federal agency? X Yes No.
If yes, describe the plan, discuss its compatibility with the project and explain how any conflicts will
be resolved. If no, explain.
This project area is currently zoned R-lA Low Density Single-Family and within the Shoreland
Overlay District. This project is consistent with the City of Albertville's Comprehensive Land
Use Plan and compatible with adjacent and present land uses. Any conflicts will be resolved
during the plat approval process and with the conditions imposed on the project in the
Developer's Agreement.
28. Impact on infrastructure and public services. Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other
infrastructure or public services be required to serve the project? X Yes No.
If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure or services needed. (Note: any infrastructure that is
a connected action with respect to the project must be assessed in the EAW; see EAW Guidelines for
details.)
The impact of this project on the existing infrastructure has been preliminarily reviewed and
complies with the city standards and capacities. The interior road access points will match the
adjacent intersections, the watermain will be looped according to city requirements and a
sanitary sewer lift station will be installed and will discharge to the wastewater treatment facility
to the south.
29. Cumulative impacts. Minnesota Rule part 4410.1700, subpart 7, item B requires that the RGU
consider the "cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining
the need for an environmental impact statement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable
future projects that may interact with the project described in this EAW in such a way as to cause
cumulative impacts. Describe the nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available
information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due
to cumulative impacts (or discuss each cumulative impact z~nder appropriate item(s) elsewhere on this
,form).
EAW Form Revised 2/99 Content Revised 7126/04
No additional development beyond the homes proposed for this development will occur on this
property. No adverse cumulative effects are anticipated from this incremental growth.
30. Other potential environmental impacts. If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts
not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation.
No additional adverse environmental impacts are anticipated.
31. Summary of issues. Do not complete this section if the EAW is being done for EIS scoping; instead,
address relevant issues in the draft Scoping Decision document, which must accompany the EAW. List
any impacts and issues identified above that may require further investigation before the project is
begun. Discuss any alternatives or mitigative measures that have been or maybe considered for these
impacts and issues, including those that have been or maybe ordered as permit conditions.
The primary issue is the conversion of agricultural use to a residential development; since
residential development has been approved on three sides of the project now, it is very likely
that this site will eventually be subdivided into residential lots. Other issues include wetland
impacts, storm water runoff, surface and ground water quality, and increased traffic. All of
these impacts can be adequately mitigated through proper design, permitting, and construction
practices. The natural features of the site will be preserved and enhanced in this project setting.
RGU CERTIFICATION. The Environmental Quality Board will only accept SIGNED Environmental
Assessment Worksheets for public notice in the EQB Monitor.
I hereby certify that:
• The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my
knowledge.
• The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components
other than those described in this document, which are related to the project as connected
actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules, parts 4410.0200, subparts 9b and 60,
respectively.
• Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list.
Signature
Title
Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared by the staff of the.. Environmental Quality Board at
Minnesota Planning. For additional information, worksheets or for EAW Guidelines, contact:
Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar St., St. Paul, MN 55155, 651-296-8253, or
www. mnplan. state. inn. us
.. ,.
µ
~
..
a$
_. .._ _._
- ~ E; ~.._
..
- ~
~.. ,.-_ 1 / Tx~IP
. ~,.
.
__..
i ~ ~.°
i
.....,
~
?
t L?
".~8
..,
c .
` s~z
:..
:
,
~
,: _. f
~
aY
i6 }
-_ .<
_,Y
,:
i_
.
..:
'
.,
<,..~
.. ~ '
- 1x?g
~rzE~eN?A
. a..
~ ~ ..
' _._
.„;;
,.~~ _
` :
. -
_._ ..: . ~ -
~° -~,- . _...~,ds s ~ <
- s $e-"'mac'
.,..~._
€
`
' _' ,~~ ~
f
j~ I ~{.
~ ..,.~- ~.;,~ ~ry
~.._ Z
..... ~v,~~
............._ >-.~ , .~,
sav S.
^'. - ~?~~ 13 1351
C''UY ~
~ b :_..
~ .,_. 101 -•-
E ,. ~
`^+
~ ~-
~
J~
i~
. ~'.. .. +. _ i
~ ;
_.. 2
^.
w #
; i.
~
~_.. .-
~
_
~.._
~- R ~
s {lam ~Y ~. ,..L
_ ~ 4 E
~, w
i^
~~
~.
S '~
t
~ i _
-.. :. ~ .. ~
_ 1 1 i2~~d #.s£Eii
?Ee3Pd ~
~
., _. T~fP s_
_.. .: -e:... X t -i- J
:ji
...
.
~ rv
- r
~
Su(_5. Q
~: St:
) .i.
.. y
........._ f
1 ...;} }.
-I A
~
~.
5 z4 '
., v
.. ,
s
2 ~ e
>>:~
~
~.
~~ _ :.
~&S~ka 14 _
£`f3~~°i~` iQe. • oy.
ur
~d,°P yr% ~"aF~ = x _~
_ z "
~ . c
a a '
.., .,.
S
~,~tG. -
~
~
~
--
13]
,{. ~
__ -Y
!. ~, .
~
~
~
~
~a?zilPdSd~a n .
,~
; ~..
S qF..
k
~ ...
lr7 .
~
.~
., ,,.,-, --..,._..
>~
:~ ~
._.. .. ..
,.
"~
, ;.
„ N., .. _
.-.
.._. `T1hP
-: -
R.:
. y
. ..- .~
S >.:.
n
,._.
.A
3L•,Cr3i~a~`PE -~,
~
_
-
~ y >
'€34
a<{' - ice;
_ -
_.. _..
,. .. ...
.
,. .._
.
„
IdEx ,
~ ._
. ._
- .
..._.. z,
_. .
~;
„~^!; ..:
R 29~W ~
'-.; R28 Yl_.. ~
( :~. ~ ::
(; _ i ~ -- `
f. ;- ~ _..
.~
. .~
1.
,~ 3` ~ ~{
i .`
- , y ~ ~ ,.
t `~
~ J. ~ { '
r ~~
... Y ~ - -. - ~ __.,, g ... .
r -- - 1
~- v
__
~ -
~-
_, _ ~.
,~ _
n1 r(
\ " i
,~ ~ ~ _..._. ' ~ ~-. _ _ ~~,~~ k - -
j `
i
~ -' PH
-~ ~ ~~
~ ,. _...... .,?Q'-. t ~ -
~7
1
i 1 E' Z' !
1 /`- c ! ~ _
~ ~.,
..~
c
_. ._..:
I 1 ,
( _..
~'~- _ -
r ~ /
V`Z ~
lr s+ i -~ r• ~ { 933
i
y~ r~
ty
i ~ r -:\
__.
_ ~ ~~
,~
,. c ~'-~
..
i 3 ~.
t ~ -....
f , ~ ~ -.` ~,, Q a _. _ _ _ ~ ~~~~~
.- ,.
_ ~
' ~ ~ ,, y ,
.~.. j: ` ~:~ ~. . ~~ ,/ ~~ fir.. <~ ~ ~` 1
G~ ,
.~ d ~F r fs41 _.. ~5+3~ 3t1._ '~~ -
t'. .. fx", ;~
y. ~- ,..,.. ~ =,.nom... ~J "~" }"' f
'~J'J .
1 f
~ ,
:.
\.~~ -i
. -.. i
I
f. ..~
~.
~~ ~ ~~
. ski _~
.. _ ~ `
I
,.,,
+. ~ ~ ,
a
~ ~ _ `- ~
~.
F 111
--- -- o
,.- ~ .- ~ _
Eft ....
.._ ~+- ~ 956 ..-^ ~ ... a~ f, `~,~ _•_._.~•~ ~ \ M ~J< _ ~.~ ..
,- y
1 .,~_ _ _, ..,
~ ~,
_\
~~ .
^v ~ Z
< -_..
~ ~ ..,,,. C ~ ,a, -' ~ 7`5
81d~ ~ ' - a. _ ! .~~.., 5958 ~„
,. :.~7i :- r _ ~aso~
z ~ _
i.
i - = ~ ~''~ ....
~ _ 'ti..
-, i ~
I ,' ... '` ~, .~ _
~.
---- C
i ~
-, 0' .i V ~~ ~~ _~~ ~ t
~,
,w~ { G'~ ~
1
,._. .. ~
,._ ..
,. ..
3 t ~ 1 ~- 8Nh ~~ ~ _ jDravosei ~'.,~.._''~ "'~....• ! ~ i ~1 ,
s
edt~ :~ , ,
_,: `~ r -_ - set jam--_ z..;:. ---- ~ ~ , ~ ~Y ~ ~
. Towers' ,..... ~ }~ + ~ • :.,~' :,` t Albert .`.,~... 'o..- ~/ ~ -
4
-, .,
Cnm 9e>• !. •• ~...
~ j
, ,._.
I 9t 9
_.
- ..•~
~. L
~.
. ~,1
_.:,
~ ~ I ~ sr~ AlbrJtville ~? ~!'~~*s:" i ~
__
._
T~ ~ I ~~mm
. _ ! ,
--~---'-
~t _ ~
~ ~,,,~~~ ~-.` `~. ~ ~ ' ~ ~"` ' ~ i gas _ ~\``~ ` .:, , ~,~ i t
.,
tz- -~ t ,- .. , ~
~ +.
--
~~ ~ ,-.
~ .: ~ .~ ~
s, ..~ ,~
~ ~ ~ ~',
V'
~~
.' ,Y' ~ f
..
^,.
_.._ 1..__.__ .,,
9ATl ~ .r-~=-" ~-~ i~ ~ ~,1,~ sea r; _ '~ ~'tr'~~
0*,,,,~. i_. ~_,~~4''~i~ ~~ _ .. _ ?ar . •.. ~,.~ ~~re ~ ~ '- ~.-. ~ `siT~_ _- -7.a'; ice`
~~ ~ ~ - _
_._
v
1 •)
~-
_^7"_ _ ,
f r - - ~ I .
/~"l~
•' 36' _
... _ i _ ,
„: - .~ y~
~ - ~ _ `~
• ~ - -
.4
~ t
~~ i o t
I ,-..I~r ~ - ~ '
_~_ ~^"
i
l
f h ~.
938. } ~ s -. _
Copyright (C) 1997; Maptech, Inc
~~~ ~~~~
I