Loading...
2011-04-25 E-Mail Prairie Run Design Alternative Jane Arnoldy From:Jon Sutherland Sent:Monday, August 29, 2011 11:37 AM To:Sue Schwalbe Subject:FW: Albertville - Prairie Run Design Alternative Attachments:Prairie Run Lots Memo Aug 23.pdf fyi From: Larry Kruse Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2011 6:36 AM To: billo@majesticbuildersmn.com Subject: Albertville - Prairie Run Design Alternative Bill, Attached are revised requirements for the Prairie Run lots. As discussed, we are interested in selling the most easterly lots first and developing to the west. City Planner Brixius has expanded the building pads on the northerly lots providing for individual driveways. I believe the Council will accept $20,000 per lot including all assessments. If I recall, basically the lots would be selling for the cost of improvements. Let me know if you are still interested. Larry R Kruse 5959 Main Avenue P.O. Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301 (763) 497-3384 ext 100 Hello Larry, It was good talking to you today. As discussed, we have a potential buyer that is looking at building a one level home, either full basement or slab on grade type. They have expressed an interest in the St. Michael, Albertville area and the detached lots that the city owns in Prairie Run are an area they would like to explore. Once you meet with staff on July 6th about our discussion please let us know if the city would be interested in selling a lot at this time and what price the lot would be. Also we would need to know if there is an association set up or plans for one in the future. My contact info is listed below if you have any questions. Thanks again. Thank you, Bill Orttel Majestic Builders Inc. 2809 110th Ave NE Blaine MN 55449 763-786-0113 Office 763-786-5543 Fax 612-715-2455 Cell billo@majesticbuildersmn.com www.majesticbuildersmn.com 1 2 MEMORANDUM TO: Larry Kruse FROM: Alan Brixius DATE: August 23, 2011 RE: Albertville – Prairie Run Single Family Lots FILE NO: 163.05 – 11.05 BACKGROUND Lots 1-13, Block 2 of Prairie Run subdivision were approved in 2004 as a planned unit development (PUD). These lots were designed for a specific, unique housing style (garages in the rear yard). Through the PUD, the City approved the smaller lot sizes, lot widths, and front yard setback flexibility. Additionally, Block 2 is served by a 30 foot private cul-de-sac. Only three homes were sold and constructed before the housing market downturn. The City acquired Lots 3-6 and 8-13, Block 2 of Prairie Run in a negotiated arrangement with the mortgage holder. In review of the Prairie Run PUD, it became evident that the original housing design limits the potential market for sales. To provide a broader market appeal, City staff has undertaken a study to define buildable housing pads for each of the lots that may accommodate a variety of house styles. ISSUES The following physical constraints define setback and housing performance standards: 1. The final plat established the lot sizes and widths. 2. Future neighborhood design must be integrated with the existing three established homes. 3. Wetlands and floodplains along the north and west edges of Block 2 will dictate house styles, first floor elevations, and setbacks from the wetland boundary. 2 4. The original PUD approved a 17 foot setback from the private street, with all garages located at the rear of the property. To allow for more variety of housing and flexibility in the design of individual lots, our study assumes individual driveways for each lot. PRAIRIE RUN ALTERNATIVE DESIGN The attached Prairie Run design alternative illustrates proposed building pads that offer greater flexibility in house design and site access. The following setbacks are proposed: 1. Front Yard Setback. Twenty feet for the principal structure. This is slightly larger than the 17 foot setback of the original PUD. It will not negatively impact the existing homes. The 20 foot setback will provide for snow storage and traffic sight lines for property owners backing into the street. 2. Garage Front Yard Setback. Similar to standards in the Towne Lakes subdivision, we would recommend a minimum 25 foot setback from garage door to the front lot line. This greater setback for garages reduces the visual impact of the garage on the streetscape, provides outdoor parking spaces away from the street, and provides for snow storage. 3. Side Yard Setback. The original PUD was approved with 10 foot side yard setbacks. This is acceptable. The lots are generally 75 feet wide, resulting in a 55 foot building pad. If the City wanted to provide additional building area, the Council may consider a 10/5 standard. This would be 10 feet side yard setbacks for the principal building and a 5 foot side yard setback for an attached garage. 4. Rear Yard Setback. Lots 3-6, Block 2 back up to County Road 18. The original plat provided a landscaped buffer yard to screen these homes. Consistent with this plat approval, we recommend maintaining a 50 foot rear yard setback from County Road 18. Lots 8-13, Block 2 have lot depths that extend into adjacent wetlands and drainage ditches. The plat was approved without a designated wetland buffer. As such, we are proposing a minimum structure setback from the wetland boundary. The alternative design proposes a 10 foot structure setback from the wetland boundary. We would also recommend that within the 10 foot wetland setback, vegetation be planted that provides a 10 foot filter strip beyond the wetland boundary. 5. Building Elevations. Section 1000.9 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance establishes the City’s minimum structure elevation as follows: 3 “1. For structure adjacent to ponds, wetlands, ditches, and other water bodies: all low opening elevations shall be at least two feet (2’) above the 100-year flood level (HWL); all low floor elevations shall be at least one foot (1’) above the normal water level (NWL); all low openings shall be at least two feet (2’) above the emergency overflow (EOF).” All houses built within this subdivision must meet these structure elevation standards. Due to the wetlands and ditch abutting Lots 8-13, Block 2, these lots may not be eligible for basements. CONCLUSION The Prairie Run design alternative illustrates a more traditional neighborhood design that provides flexibility in housing styles and individual lot design. Due to the lot sizes, all structures must meet the following setbacks: Front Yard: Principal Structure 20 feet Front Setback to Garage 25 feet Side Yard: Interior Lot Line 10 feet Corner Lot 20 feet Rear Yard: Setback From C.R. 18 50 feet Setback from Wetland Boundary 10 feet The City will need to amend the Prairie Run PUD to establish these new setbacks and accommodate alternative housing styles. This process will require a public hearing and Council action. We would also recommend negotiating a sale of Lot 13, Block 2 with Majestic Builders. They should examine the lot with the aforementioned new standards to determine if it meets their needs. This first home may spark interest in the balance of the properties. c: Adam Nafstad Mike Couri Jon Sutherland EXISTING PLAT