Loading...
2006-04-14 Chelsea Meeting Outstanding IssuesLarry Kruse From: Darryl Gugig (Roseland) [dgugig@cpgi.com] Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 9:30 AM To: Larry Kruse Cc: abrixius@nacplanning.com; Mike Couri; Greg Link (Roseland); Steve Cupelli (Woodbury) Subject: RE: Chelsea Meeting - Albertville Larry/Al/Mike - We've reviewed Al's memo concerning outstanding issues. While I agree that it is an exhaustive list, there are a couple of items that I do not think are appropriate for inclusion as topics of discussion when we come out next week - specifically, the Burger King issues and the Road Issues. Burger King is not our tenant - they are an outparcel owner. We think the City should be dealing directly with Burger King to resolve whatever your issues are with them. Road Issues. While your inclusion of this item does not call for any particular discussion or action by Chelsea, we want to be clear that we are vehemently opposed to any plan by the City to use our internal roadways for through traffic. We would like to meet with Larry and Al at the property at 4pm if you are available to discuss the remaining issues informally, in advance of the meeting. We are trying to ascertain the dollar value of the berm removal cost. Assuming it is not an absurd amount, I think we could likely make a deal along the lines outlined in Al's memo (i.e. the non -removing party to reimburse the other party its share of reasonable and documented costs). On the fence, we agree with Al's point 2A and could agree on some landscaping to address 2B(1), but have serious objections to 2B(2). For the Pedestrian Traffic issues, we would like to discuss with you the notion of having our traffic engineer review the situation with Chelsea to implement the recommendations of our engineer. The sight lighting issue is entirely new and was a surprise to us. Nonetheless, we would be willing to re -point our lights so long as we can maintain 3 lumens at all points within the lot. Finally, on the trash receptacles, we would like to discuss possible landscape enhancements to improve the appearance of our property, but we would also like to point out that the hospitality business behind Phase III came AFTER us, and we think our property compares favorably to the appearance of many other commercial properties in the City. Please let me know if you could do an on -site at the property at 4pm on the 25th. I'm looking forward to seeing you in person. Regards, Darryl Darryl E. Gugig, Deputy General Counsel Chelsea Property Group 105 Eisenhower Parkway Roseland, New Jersey 07068 Direct Dial: (973) 364-6510 Facsimile: (973) 228-7148 email: dgugig@cpgi.com This transmittal may be a confidential attorney -client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you suspect that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this message and all its attachments. Any unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message----- 1 From: Larry Kruse [mailto:lkruse@ci.albertville.mn.us] Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 2:49 PM To: Darryl Gugig (Roseland) Cc: abrixius@nacplanning.com; Mike Couri Subject: RE: Chelsea Meeting Darryl, The meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, April 25th at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Attached is a summary of the issues to be discussed. At one time, we received a letter from Chelsea agreeing to resolve the majority of these issues. If possible, it would be nice if we could have a pre -meeting phone conference to try and reach agreement on a number of these prior to the meeting. Please let me know if you think this is a good suggestion. Larry Kruse Albertville City Administrator -----Original Message ----- From: Darryl Gugig (Roseland) [mailto:dgugig@cpgi.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 3:16 PM To: Larry Kruse Subject: Chelsea Meeting Importance: High Larry, Greg Link, Steve Cupelli and I are book on flights that put us in your neighborhood for the purpose of meeting with the City Council in Workshop Session on April 25th at 6:OOpm. Please confirm the meeting. As we discussed, please send me a draft agenda in advance of the meeting. I look forward to seeing you then. Darryl E. Gugig, Deputy General Counsel Chelsea Property Group 105 Eisenhower Parkway Roseland, New Jersey 07068 Direct Dial: (973) 364-6510 Facsimile: (973) 228-7148 email: dgugig@cpgi.com This transmittal may be a confidential attorney -client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you suspect that you have received this email in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this message and all its attachments. Any unauthorized review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. -----Original Message ----- From: Linda.Meyerson (Roseland) Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 11:48 AM To: Darryl Gugig (Roseland) Subject: FW: Complete -----Original Message ----- From: NJAgents [mailto:NJAgents@vtstravel.com] Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 11:47 AM To: Linda Meyerson (Roseland) Subject: Complete 860 WYCKOFF AVE MAHWAH NJ 07430 SALES PERSON: F9 ITINERARY/INVOICE:ITIN DATE: MAR 27 2006 2 JNTY OA � z = m 'd� O dy 7855 WRIGHT COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS "IMPROVING SAFETY THROUGH SOUND ENGINEERING DECISIONS" September 29, 2006 Wright County Public Works Building 1901 Highway 25 North Buffalo, Minnesota 55313 Adam Nafstad, P.E. Assistant Albertville City Engineer Bolton & Menk, Inc. 12224 Nicollet Avenue Burnsville, MN. 55337-1649 Re: CSAH 19 Pedestrian Issues @ Albertville Outlet Mall Dear Adam: Jct. T.H. 25 and C.R. 138 Telephone: (763) 682-7383 FAX- (763) 682-7313 WAYNE A. FINGALSON, P.E. Highway Engineer (763)682-7388 VIRGIL G. HAWKINS, P.E. Assistant Highway Engineer (763)682-7387 RICHARD E. MARQUETTE Right of Way Agent (763)682-7386 Our Traffic, Access Management, and Signing Committee has reviewed the Cities request to install insurmountable fencing, either in the center median or on the west side of CSAH 19 between the trail and curb. We have determined that we must deny this request for the following reasons: There is insufficient space to accommodate snow storage during the winter months; A fence, in this close of a proximity to the roadway, would be susceptible to damage by snow coming off of the snow plow; and Placing a fence in this location would require the removal of already existing and necessary signing. We see the problem of pedestrians wanting to cross at mid -block, as an internal problem of the outlet mall. Two things are currently causing this problem: 1. The opening in the berm, directing eastbound pedestrians to the trail, encourages them to cross at mid -black; and 2. The line of sight from this point, focuses the pedestrian to look directly at what appears to be an opening and venue for the pedestrians to walk to (see attached photos), to get to the outlet shops on the east side of CSAH 19. Our recommendations to correct this problem is as follows: 1. Have the outlet mall close the current access to the pedestrian trail (fill in the berm) and construct a sidewalk within the outlet mall property that would direct pedestrians to the traffic signal. Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer CSAH 19 Pedestrian Issues Page 2 September 29, 2006 2. Construct a fence or screen that would block the sight line of an opening to the shops on the east side of CSAH 19 (see attached photo). If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely, Virgil Hawkins, P.E. Assistant County Engineer Enclosures: Photos Cc: Wayne Fingalson, County Engineer Bill Cordell, Senior Traffic Technician Elmer Eichelberg, County Commissioner I