2002-12-20 Replacement Wetland ReportSVOBODA ECOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Providing the Sharper Edge in Natural Resources & Environmental Consulting,
December 20, 2002
Lisa Goeb
City Administrator
P.O: Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
RE: Project Name: Outlets at Albertville - Phases I and II (formerly known as
Minneapolis Factory Shoppes, Albertville Factory Shoppes, and
Albertville Outlet Mall in SER files)
Project Location: E 1/2 of Section 35, T. 121 N, R. 24 W, Albertville, Wright
County, Minnesota
SER Project No.: 2002-023-26
Project Description: Replacement Wetland Monitoring Report= Year IV (LGU
Version)
Dear Ms: Goeb:
Pursuant to Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) §8420.0620 and to the Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) permit issued for this project, Svoboda Ecological Resources (SER) staff
visited the above -referenced site on May 15, July 18, and October 8, 2002, for the purpose of
monitoring the progress -of the proposed replacement wetlands and wetland buffer seeding areas.
This is the fourth year of monitoring out'of the five years required by the WCA and by the Corps
permit to determine if replacement wetlands satisfy replacement -of functions and values lost by
permitted wetland, fill. The purpose of this year's field visits was to:
1) Obtain seasonal water level measurements between April and October;
2) Develop a list of dominant vegetation in the ,wetland; and
3) Takecolor photographs from the photo reference points- to document progress.
In addition, SER staff inspected the sites -for existing or potential problems with the progress of
the replacement wetland areas.
Approximately 113,691 ft2 (2.61 acres) of wetland fill is associated with this project. As a result,
170,320 ft2 (3.91 acres) of New Wetland Creation and 202,990 ft2 (4.66 acres) of Public Value
Credit was proposed under the Wetland Replacement Plan Application Revised Plan submitted
by the client. The Revised Plan proposed five new wetland creation areas located in the southern
and western portions of the site, and three areas of wetland buffer seeding area located on the -
western and southern portions of the development. To maintain consistency with the Revised
2477 Shadyv�ood Road • Excelsior, MN 55331
(952) 471-1100 (Office) • (952) 471-0007 (Fax)
Plan, these new wetland creation areas are labeled NWC-1, -2, -3, -4,,and -5. During our site
visits, these five proposed mitigated wetland areas were observed.
As was suggested in our 2000 and 2001 Local Government Unit (LGU) and Corps reports, our
first site visit was made early in the season to assist in determining if hydrology in these basins is
adequate for wetland formation. Results are discussed in the Conclusions section at the end of
the report.
The acreage of the mitigation areas were measured this year during the October site visit using a
sub -meter accurate Global Positioning System (GPS) unit. However, Wright County had an
unusually high amount of precipitation this year, even late in the growing season. The wetlands
onsite were extremely flooded in October, so complete boundaries were not obtainable: some
portions of every wetland's boundary was deemed inaccessible by the field staff visiting the site.
Due to these circumstances, SER estimated the remaining portion of the boundaries using aerial
photographs taken in 2000. Thus, we could only estimate total wetland acreage this year; it was
calculated to be approximately 166,674 ft2 (3.83 acres). This is a predicted deficit of ,
approximately 3,646 ft2 (0.08 acre) from what was intended, although it is still over the 1:1
minimum area required to mitigate for wetland impacts. A graphic with the GPS points on it in
red and the estimated boundaries on it in yellow is included as Appendix A. SER suggests that
the boundaries of these basins be re -measured using GPS next year in order to get a more
accurate determination of the amount of created wetland onsite.
OBSERVATIONS
NWC-1
This area was designed to provide 1.62 acres (approximately 70,567 ft2) of New Wetland
Creation (NWC) credit. SER approximates that this basin was 1.92 acre (83,604 ft2) this year.
This is potentially a surplus of 0.30 acre (13,037 ft2). The desired wetland type noted in the
Replacement Plan Application (RPA) was Type' 3 palustrine, emergent, seasonally flooded and
excavated (PEMCx).
The basin was classified as a Type 3 PEMCx wetland. In May, there was open water with some
filamentous blue-green algae in it ponded over 1 foot deep that covered 50% of the basin. In
July, ponded water containing water plantain (Alisma subcordatum) decreased to about 10% of
the basin. In October, open water over 1 foot deep covered 10% of the basin, and water plantain
covered an additional 5% of the basin. The basin was noted as appearing very flooded at the
time of the October site visit. Thus, the primary reason for the decrease in open water between
May and October seems to be an increase in vegetative growth. Please see Photos 1 and 2 of the
Photo Log at the end of this report.
Adjacent slopes ranged between 3:1 to greater than 3:1 (a gentle slope). Frogs were noted using
the site in May. A snake and frogs were noted in July.
Vegetation in this basin was dominated by approximately 40% ,narrow -leaf cattail (Typha
angustifolia) in May. Approximately half of the cattails were dead at this time. In July, the
basin was covered by 50% narrow -leaf cattail. Narrow -leaf cattail made up 25% of the basin in
October. Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) coverage increased from only 10% in May
to 40% in July. Only 25% reed canary grass was noted in October. Other plants noted in the
area included Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) and needle rush (Eleocharis acicularis).
Plants noted in the adjacent upland area included wood sorrel (Oxalis stricta), dandelion
(Taraxacum ofcinale), reed canary grass, Kentucky bluegrass, goldenrod (Solidago sp.), yellow
sweet clover (Melilotus ofcinale), white clover (Trifolium repens), pineapple weed (Matricaria
matricarioides), cow vetch (Vicia cracca), Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), daisy fleabane
(Erigeron annuus), and common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia).
NWC-2
This area was designed to provide 1.14 acres (approximately 49,658 ft2) of NWC credit. SER
approximates, that this basin was 0.63 acre (27,366 ft2) this year. This is potentially,a deficit of
0.51 acre (22,292 W). The desired wetland type noted in the RPA was Type 3 palustrine,
emergent, seasonally flooded and excavated (PEMCx).
The basin appeared to be a Type 3 PEMCx wetland at the time of the two site visits. In May,
there was open water ponded over 12 inches deep covering 45% of the site. In both July and
October, there was approximately 20% open water ponded over 12 inches deep, although the
basin was noted to be very wet. This basin has less open water than last year, when open water
covered 80% of the site in May and 70% of the site in June. However, the reason for this
decrease in open water seems to be an increase in vegetative growth, especially an increase in
narrow -leaf cattail. Please see Photos 3 and 4 of the Photo Log at the end of this report.
Adjacent slopes ranged between 3:1 to greater than 3:1 (gentle slope). Frogs were found using
the basin in both May and July. Geese were found using the basin in May. A great blue heron
and a green heron were found using the site in October.
Narrow -leaf cattail covered about 306/o of the site in May, although 20% of the basin was dead
cattails. By July, the basin was covergd'by 70% narrow -leaf cattail. Narrow -leaf cattail covered
50% of the basin by October. Reed canary grass decreased from 25% in May to 10% in July and
5% in. October. Water plantain was noted in July and October. Kentucky bluegrass was noted in
October.
,Plants in the adjacent upland area that were noted included reed canary grass, dandelion, sumac
(Rhus sp.), Canada thistle, goldenrod, alfalfa (Medicago sativa), white clover, strawberry
(Fragaria sp.), and Kentucky bluegrass.
NWC-3
This area was designed to provide 0.50 acre (approximately 21,780 ft2) of NWC credit. SER
approximates that this basin was 0.40 acre (17,371 ft2) this year. This is potentially a deficit of
0.10 acre (4,409 ft2). The desired wetland type noted in the RPA was Type 3 palustrine,
emergent, seasonally flooded and excavated (PEMCx).
Frogs were found using both parts of the basin during May and July-. A rusty, 1 inch diameter
cable was found in the 3A portion of the basin in May, but was not noted in July.
It was noted in 2000 that NWC-3 had been divided into two areas by a berm leading to a
billboard on the site. Vegetation on the western side (3A) of this berm was examined separately
from vegetation on the eastern side (3B) of this berm.
This basin appeared to be a Type 3 PEMCx wetland on both -sides of the berm. On both sides of
the berm, there was over 12 inches of ponded open water. Open water covered 80% of 3A in
May and 20% of 3A in July. Open water covered 90% of 3B in May and 55% of 3B in July. As
was the case last year, the decreases in open water coverage were due primarily to increases in
vegetative growth, especially narrow -leaf cattail. See Photos 5 and 6 of Basin 3A, and Photos 7
and 8 of Basin 3B in the Photo Log at the end of this report. Although the amount of open water
in 3A decreased between May and July, this part of the basin was noted to be wetter overall in
July than in May. In May, some filamentous blue-green algae was noted in the open water of 3A.
In July, some floating -leaf pondweed (Potamogeton natans) was noted in the open water portions
of both 3A and 3B.
On the 3A portion of this basin, vegetation was dominated by 10% dead narrow -leaf cattail and
10% reed canary grass in May. In July, narrow -leaf cattail increased to 60% of the basin, while,
reed canary grass stayed at 10% of the basin. On the 3B portion of the basin, 10% of the basin
consisted of reed canary grass in May. Reed canary grass increased to 20% and narrow -leaf
cattail made up 20% of 3B in July.
By October, the area was so flooded that the berm had been covered. Thus, data were taken for
the two portions of the basin as a whole. Open water over 12 inches deep covered 60% of the
area. Narrow -leaf cattail covered about 20% of the area. Water plantain and Kentucky bluegrass
each covered about 5% of the area.
The adjacent uplands consisted of reed canary gras$, common plantain (Plantago major), redtop
(Ag-rostis alba), goldenrod, dandelion, Kentucky bluegrass, smartweed (Polygonum sp.),
staghom sumac (Rhus typhina), and common ragweed.
NWC-4
This area was designed to provide 0.26 acre (approximately 11,326 ftZ) of NWC credit. SER
approximates that this basin was 0.22 acre (9,456 ftZ) this year. This is potentially a deficit of
0.04 acre (1,870 ftZ). The desired wetland type noted in the RPA was Type 3 palustrine,
emergent, seasonally flooded and excavated (PEMCx).
This basin appeared to be a Type 3 PEMCx wetland. In May, there was open water ponded over
10 inches deep covering 40% of this site. Open water decreased to 20% in July. The open water
contained lesser duckweed (Lemna minor) and water plantain in July. Only 10% open water
with lesser duckweed was noted in'October; water was ponded to 12 inches and the area was
noted as being very flooded. As with the other basins, the decrease in open water between
months is due to an increase in vegetation. See Photos 9 and 10 in the Photo Log at the back of
this report.
Adjacent slopes were primarily greater than 3:1 (gentle) but were closer to 2:1 (steep) on the
western side of the basin (where PVC-1 was built). Despite this steep slope, no problems
associated with erosion were noted at this time. Mallards were found using this site in May, and
red -wing blackbirds were found using this site in May and July.
In May, narrow -leaf cattail covered 50% of this basin. This increased slightly to 60% of the
basin in July and October. Reed canary grass increased slightly from 10%. in May to 20% of the
basin in July, -but then decreased to 10%, again in October. There is less reed canary grass and
more narrow -leaf cattail in this basin this year than there was last year. Other plants noted in the
basin included water plantain and Kentucky bluegrass.
Plants in the buffer area (PVC-1) included reed canary grass, common mullein (Verbascum
thapsus), dandelion, Kentucky bluegrass, fescue (Festuca sp.), red clover (Trifolium pratense),
Canada thistle, bull thistle (Cirsiurrt vulgare), white clover, and alfalfa. Buffer plants seemed to
be well -established.
NWC-5
This area was designed to provide 0.39 acre (approximately 16,988 ft2) ofNWC credit. SER
approximates that this basin was 0.66 acre (28,877 ft2) this year. This is potentially a surplus of
0.27 acre (11,889 ft2). The desired wetland type noted in the RPA was Type 3 palustrine,
emergent, seasonally flooded and excavated (PEMCx).
This basin appeared to be a Type 3 PEMCx wetland. In May, there was over 12 inches of water
ponded over about 50% of this basin. In July, porided water was still noted to be over 12 inches
deep, although its coverage decreased to less than 20%. Open water ponded at about 12 inches
covered 25% of the basin in October. There was lesser duckweed found in the open water in July
and October. The overall decrease in open water since May is mostly due to an increase in
vegetative coverage, primarily narrow -leaf cattail - the basin was noted to be very wet in July and
October. See Photos 11 and 12 in the Photo Log at the end of this report.
Adjacent slopes ranged between 3:1 to greater than 3:1 (gentle slope). Geese and redwing'
blackbirds were noted using this area in May. Frogs were found in this area in July.
Narrow -leaf cattail cover increased from about 40% in May (half of which were dead) to about
80% in July. Only 30% of the basin was covered by narrow -leaf cattail in- October. Other plants
found in this area included goldenrod, willows (Salix sp.), Kentucky bluegrass, water plantain,
white clover, daisy fleabane, sedges (Carex sp.), and reed canary grass (10% of the basin in May,
not noted in July, 5% of the basin in October).
The upland plants included dandelion, reed canary grass, Kentucky bluegrass, thistle (Cirsium
sp.), aster (Aster sp.), mint (Mentha sp.), common mullein, hawk's -beard (Crepis tectorum), tall
goldenrod (Solidago altissima), daisy fleabane, curly dock (Rumex crispus), alfalfa, raspberry
(Rubus sp.), white clover, sweet clover (Mehlotus sp.), common plantain, and a nettle species
_(Urtica sp.).- A small amount of bare ground was noted in October. Buffer plants seemed to be
well -established.
CONCL USIONS
There are a couple of management concerns that SER deemed necessary to address this year:
s
• In 2000, it appeared that most of the areas are drier than what was proposed in the RPA.
The 2001, and 2002 site visits revealed an increase in hydrology in. these basins. The
major factor that caused this change was probably precipitation. In 2000, precipitation
was lower than normal during the preceding winter, causing a deficit in snowmelt runoff
available for basin recharge: In 2001 and 2002, precipitation in May and June was
normal to above -normal. The preceding winter also provided plenty of runoff water for
the spring recharge of these basins. Hydrology seems to be adequate for creation and
maintenance of wetland conditions in all basins.
These basins should be examined early in the season the last year of monitoring (April or
May 2003), as they were this year, to monitor early post-snowmelt conditions and ensure
that hydrological conditions will be adequate in future years.
a
• Reed canary grass is present in most of the created basins. As can be seen in the table
,below, the amount of reed canary grass in the mitigation basins has tended to fluctuate
over time, occasionally peaking but then decreasing again.
Table 1. Reed canary grass coverage, as noted in the mitigation monitoring reports, over the last 3 years.
Monitoring Year H
Monitoring Year III
Monitoring Year IV.
Area
Visit 1
Visit 2
Visit 3
Visit I
Visit 2
Visit 3
Visit 1
Visit 2
Visit 3
NWC-1
15%
20%
60%
15%
15%
15%
10%
40%
25%
NWC-2
<J0%
15%
15%
15%
<10%
<10%
25%
10%
5%
NWC-3A
<10%
<10%
<10%
<10%
<10%
<10%
10%
10%
0%
NWC-3B
15%
30%
30%
<10%
<10%
<10%
10%
20%
0%
NWC-4
10%
10%
10%
15%
35%
25%
10%
20%
10%
NWC-5
<10%
<10%
<10%
<10%
<10%,
<10%
0%
10%
5%
Note: <10% generally means that the species was noted, but that no percentage of coverage was noted.
The pattern of change can be'seen on the graphic included in Appendix B. The amount of
reed canary grass in NWC-3A and NWC-5 have remained relatively stable or -decreased
over the last three years. InNWC-1, NWC-2, NWC-3B, and NWC-4, there was a relative
peak in reed canary grass coverage during some part of the season. Reed canary grass
cover was 20% or higher in each of these basins during some time in summer; the highest
was in NWC-1 in July, when it reached 40%.
Thus, reed canary grass coverage is high enough to warrant control in NWC-I. It would
be beneficial to control reed canary grass in NWC-2, NWC-313, and NWC-4. SER
recommends spot -treating patches of reed canary grass in the aforementioned basins with
Rodeo next spring.
There is a small amount of filamentous blue-green algae in the open water areas of some
of the basins. However, the amount noted was always relatively small. No remedial
measures are deemed necessary at this time.
SER examined the data from this and previous years to determine if the mitigation basins
have become increasingly dominated by cattail. Although cattail is a preferred wetland
plant to many other wetland species commonly found in mitigation basins (e.g., reed -
canary grass, purple loosestrife, etc.), it tends to dominate wetlands over time by creating
dense monotypic stands. Cattail dominance may decrease plant diversity in wetlands,
which seems to be a trend in the aforementioned basins: fewer plant species were
documented in these basins this year than there were last year. When cattail growth
decreases open water coverage in a wetland, it decreases the wetland's value to wildlife
such as migrating waterfowl. However, a dense stand of cattail might help retard surface
water flow, provide flood or storm water attenuation, decrease water energy to allow
settling of suspended materials, and increase uptake of dissolved nutrients. Cattails tend
to outcompete other species in environments high in nutrients like phosphorous, so cattail
dominance seems to be linked with high nutrient levels. Thus, although the increase in
cattail is not a problem in and of itself, it essentially results in a decrease of wildlife
habitat and vegetative diversity/integrity values but may increase water quality, as "well as
flood and stormwater storage and attenuation.
Our examination of these data revealed no distinct, steady pattern of cattail increase and
open water decrease. If you look at the graphs in Appendix C, the only obvious pattern is
that as cattail increases; open water decreases and vice versa.
As mentioned before, the basins should be re -measured using GPS next year. Next year
will be the fifth year of monitoring and should be the final year of monitoring. An
accurate measurement of wetland coverage would be needed by the LGU prior to
determining whether the wetland monitoring can be terminated for this site.
Based on our observations, it was quite apparent that all replacement wetlands and all wetland
buffer seeding areas did exist at the time of the visit. The mitigated wetlands will continue to be
monitored according to the monitoring plan outlined in the Wetland Replacement Plan
Application and the Corps permit issued for this site.,
If you have any questions or need additional information regarding this site, please feel free to
contact us at (952) 471-1100. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Svoboda Ecological Resources
Franklin J. S.voboda, CWB, PWS Laura E. Eklov
Vice -President Ecologist/Project Manager
cc: Robert Morse, JMJ Properties
Danielle D. Cerza, Chelsea Property Group, Inc.
Joe Yanta, Army Corps of Engineers
Attachments: Photo Log
Appendix A - Aerial Photo with GPS and Estimated Boundaries
Appendix B - Changes in Reed Canary Grass Coverage During
Monitoring
Appendix C - Cattail vs Open Water Coverage
PHOTO 1: NWC-1, facing east. Photo taken in May. This photo is similar to Photo 1 of the 2000
and 2001 reports.
PHOTO 2: NWC-1, facing east. Photo taken in July. This photo is similar to Photo 1 of the 2000
and 2001 reports and to Photo 1 above. Note that there is significantly more vegetation and less open
water in this basin in July than there was in May.
PHOTO LOG OF SITE
t
r S V O Q O DA Outlets at Albertville - Phases I and II
Ecological Resources Page 1 of 5
PHOTO 3: NWC-2, facing east. Photo taken in
May. This photo is similar to Photo 2 in the 2001
report. Note the new building erected since last year
(on the right hand side).
PHOTO 4: NWC-2, facing east. Photo taken in
October. This photo is similar to Photo 2 in the 2001
report and to Photo 3 above. Note the increase in
cattail coverage since May.
PHOTO 5: NWC-3A, facing west. Photo taken in
May. This photo is similar to Photo 3 of the 2000
and 2001 reports.
PHOTO LOG OF SITE
SVOBODA
Ecological Resources
Outlets at Albertville - Phases I and II
Page 2 of 5
PHOTO 6: NWC-3A, facing west. Photo taken in July. This photo is similar to Photo 3 of the
2000 and 2001 reports and Photo 4 of this report. Note that the amount of cattails has greatly
increased and the amount of open water has greatly decreased in this basin since May.
PHOTO 7: NWC-3B, facing west. Photo taken in May. This photo is similar to Photo 4 of the
2000 and 2001 reports.
PHOTO LOG OF SITE
�lI,' SV O p O DA Outlets at Albertville - Phases I and II
,F Ecological Resources Page 3 of 5
PHOTO 8: NWC-313, facing east. Photo taken in July. This photo was taken in the opposite
direction of Photo 6. Note the increase in cattail coverage in this basin since May.
PHOTO 9: NWC-4, facing north. Photo taken in May.
PHOTO LOG OF SITE
�1 SVOBODA
,Jt Ecological Resources
Outlets at Albertville - Phases I and II
Page 4 of 5
PHOTO 10: NWC-4, facing north. Photo taken in
July. This photo was taken in the same place as
Photo 8 of this report. Note the significant growth
of vegetation since May.
PHOTO 11: NWC-5, facing west. Photo taken in
May. This photo is similar to Photo 6 of the 2000
and 2001 reports.
PHOTO 12: NWC-5, facing southwest. Photo taken
in July. Note the significant increase in vegetative
growth since May (above photo).
PHOTO LOG OF SITE
�" SK?BODA
Ecological Resources
Outlets at Albertville - Phases I and II
Page 5 of 5
Appendix A
z �
C
cc
0
O
O
O
m
a
Mir
a
0
0
0
N
g.
N
O
O
N
NW C-1 -Reed Canary Grass % Cover Over Time
70
60
50
40
U
C'
30
20
10
0
`'3
�R y`^�
J�h el
Visit Num ber
NW C-3A - Reed Canary Grass % Cover Over Tim e
70
60
4_ °,6 RCG
50
40
U
K
;e 30
20
10
0
ry000,
ry000, ry000,
ry00�, ry00^. �00^, ry00ry,
ry00ry, ry00ry.
Visit Num ber
NW C-4 - Reed Canary Grass % Cover Over Time
70
60
50
40
c>
30
20
10
0
ry00 �00
,LOO
,LO
O` • O` - O` 00" Off" • 00'
�O �O ry0 ry0 ,ti0
Visit Num ber
a SV060DA
Ecological Resources
NW C-2 • Reed Canary Grass % Cover Over Time
70
60
50
U 40
U
30
20
10
0
�R tlb �. �ti tilb tlb
ell
Ory. Ory. Ory.
ry0 ,y0 ry0 ry0 ,y0 ry0 ,y0 �O ry0
Visit Num ber
NW C-36 - Reed Canary Grass % Cover Over Tim e
70
60
% RCG
50
40
U
K
;q 30
20
10
0
4
J`h 4 ;�h ;�h
J`h 4
ry00
ry00 ry00
�00 ry00 ry00 �00
ry00 ry00
Visit Num ber
NW C-5 - Reed Canary Grass % Cover Over Tim e
70
60
50
40
tt
o:
30
20
10
0
Ib
J`h J�
ry00 ry00 ry00 �00 ry00 ry00 ry00 ry00 �00
Visit Num ber
Appendix B. Reed canary grass coverage for all basins.
Outlets at Albertville - Phases I and II
NW C-1 - Cattail vs. Open Water Coverage
90
60
—♦—%
Cattail
70
% Open
War-
60
cOi 50
� 40
30
20
—
10
0
N
.�9
Jay
,
,
,
,
, ,
ryooll
ryoo�
ryoo0
ryoo^
ryoo^
ryoo^
ryoory,
ryoory,
e"',
Visit Num bar
NW C-3A - Cattail vs. Open Water Coverage
90
60 % Cattail
70 %Open Water
0 5_
O 50
40
30
20
10 —
0
J.y Jay J.y Jay Jae ;�°, Jay Jos Jae
Visit Number
NW C-4 - Cattail vs. Open Water Coverage
90
60 % Cattail _
70 % Open Water _
60
v
50
40
30
20
10
0
�ry �9 �N Y �'b
J.y Jay ,.e J.5 4 J0y Jae J 0 Jay
ryoo0 , ry000 , ryoo0 , ryoo� , leo , ryoo^ , e, e", e,
Visit Num bar
NW C-2 - Cattail vs. Open Water Coverage
90
60 —�—% Cattail
70 % Open Water
60
t7 50
V
40
30
20
10
0
ry ry ry lb
j`'� -4ip
Visit Num bar
NW C-3B - Cattail vs. Open Water Coverage
90
60 % Cattail
70 % Open Water
60
� 50 �—
U
40
30
20
10
0
�'b �� �ry ,,'b
ryoo� , ryoop , ryoo� , ryoo^ , ryoo^ , ryoo^ , ryoory, ryoory, ryoory.
Visit Num bar
NW C-5 - Cattail vs. Open W star Coverage
90
60 % Cattail
70 % Open Water
60 �-
50
40
30
20
10
0
ryoo� , ryoo0 , ry000 , ryoo^ , ryoo^ , ryoo^ , ryoory, ryoory, ryoOry.
Visit Num bar
Appendix C. Cattail and open water coverage for all basins.
�fS V O B O DA Outlets at Albertville - Phases I and II
,�, Ecological Resources