1986-01-27 CC Agenda/PacketCITY OF ALBERTVILLE
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA 55301
PHONE: 497-3384
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
JANUARY 27, 1986
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES
SPECIAL BUSINESS
a. Transfer of General Fund Cash to new Budget
Catagories--Park and Fire Departments.
b. Possible donation to the STMA Senior Graduation
Party.
DEPARTMENT BUSINESS
a. Administration
•- Resolution Designating Depository of Public Funds..
- Appointment of an alternate to the Joint Powers
Board.
- Discussion on what to do with -the old copier.
- Charges for photocopies
- Additional telephone service features: -
-Call Waiting
-Call Forwarding
-Conference Calling
-Speed Dialing
b. Planning
Approval of plan and building permit for a twin
home in the Barthel Addition --Barthel Construction.
k Ch\1lb� Appointment of Bill Praught to the Planning Commission
to fulfill Pat Walsh's Appointment.
c. Legal
• - The Valerius Petition for Annexation.
- Extension of the Administrative Internship position.
- Job Discription for the Administrator's position.
Authorization to advertise the opening.
e. Engineering
- Update on the progress at the Wastewater Treatment
Facility Site.
Make our City........ Your City
We invite Home, Industry, Business
w. wtS-sword.. n.ds..ws Owed s s PEM r-.l ia..rr 107-1
MMWD" Ob.
AO-N
n
BE iT SRmr RE9oLYED, That the follou{nt named bank.....security State Bank of
�C.........R�. h#.t,..._.7..A..._G.g�ltrn1...AYe.�....E�.r...St.r.....Mich.aela .MN......asawrlsedtodoabanhinj
business in .Vtnatoota be, and hereby......, til................................. dedf naMd dePoet#Dr..x..... of the public f suds of
.................. ......................................... ..... ............ _._..._..._» ..._.........
dianty of .....wright ............................._. ........................... _............ , ,Kinnasota, for the bSrrn SsrnSnensant with the
_1st... �yof.....January„......................... ,188.6.....,and ondistwiththw.-....._let.
dais of..........a..a.D.uAry...................., ia.....7..., to -wit:
seeesi�wil� stt+ut�
.......................................................................................................... _........................ ......................................... _.... _.. OW&OPPOOlinwr
eNnw sreF tS�-wsSSS! �n �th. sttrituM
......................... .
,.t ~ ANN"
............................................................................................................_......._........................................- .. .•�►
................................................kww«..frto..arwt�*.ths.�lw/ba
............................................
............................ ................................................................... ..................................................................................... .......
s�,asy ttnsor
upon the terme and oondtttona foltowtnt, to-wtt:
That this dsettnatton is aubjeee to the ritht of said
G.� .k.Y•....y.l�...lAl.b.r.1....__ .__ ... ....... _._...............
to modify, vacate, and revola the Sane aceordinl to law:
y Ghat Irs aid dettusr to s .d.8 ....i.e�g a -.a
That ,the .............. _..... said dcPo.I Ira e r aLL r e cy o ee c appvwd by it an amount
of Albertvil•le_................................................. P
C i t...................................._......„......._...................a thersan at
at . cep .....�.�Q�,.4QQ t QQ .FnIc.... npe atttMt Itmtt above .peotAa to be deposited
any one time, conditioned accordant to law, and a wh other or additional bond on demand of Said
1:.�..t.Y.....4..f...Alb.t F_t.Y. 1 e...•...•..Is saes It shall deem said curdy issu#letent and the public Interok
iR 11M of Such bonds, Gait* bail• »»••••••--.
regrrW it; Provided, noubver, that Said depositarX.•-.•••••may, law for that pea►
City of A l b e r t v i 11 a and d With its treasurer seosrtttss odhortsed
by ...........................
no than at.
.......... Said
posts a total amount, computed at their market value, of at lead ten Per cost
tntate limit to be deposited
therein at any one time; and that it may, at its dioxvilon, fw %ish both
such Surety bonds and deposit such eollat mg semrities att"tatint owh amount, upon apPrroval of aatd
in which ease such oolUgomt securities shall not bo withdrawn with.
g..........,
out consent of the surety on such mrsty bond: shall interat at.. ne &o t i a t e d r a�
That the .............................. eaidy........ A�+Y M`�AdMfl'"'dMR'_............. ......
sMuarswsn etwwbdupoStArN��r
per cent per annum on all time deposits: thSrrLn aubjsd to par
That......the........................... _..... dspoatto*.y........ Shall pay on demand all deposits
msnt on demand, isitlr acewredI '-'ak
and pay on demand all time depoSiM therein► With GON" d
Interest, at or after the Snd of the psriodS for which the Same shall be dopes":
dPPVwd and adopted on Os ...........................................................day of......................................................................., it.........
at a........xag.ul.ax................................. j of Me City of Albertville
..................................................
of said....iC.i.ty.................................I........................ duly held by a majoitty rota of an the member
...............................
the sane.
dow.
Clark.
-VOTE: One or mars dgw4toria may be dal jnated at sans time. nU may be used by county, city,
rittajs, taom, or sehoot &Ortat; and after odopliow should be dined by the pm Wm , oh ,,m,,, or
01har PvWdImj ofJlesr, of the body adopttwj tt, attested by the clerk and )tled with him; and U should
be P"hsd it go tsar a ngrtrw.
n
1
e
�
140
4
e
n
MINNESOTA MUNICIPAL HOARD
165 Metro Square Building
7th and Robert Streets
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
In the Matter of the Petition of
Certain Persons for the Annexation of
Lands located within Wright County,
Minnesota.
--N--------------------------------- ---------------------------- -------------
TO; Council of the City of Albertville
Box 131
Albertville, Minnesota 55301
PETITIONERS STATE:
1. That we, the undersigned, are all of the owners of the
following-desoribed property lying in the Town of Otsego, County of Wright,
State of Minnesota:
Government Lots 1 and 2, Section 369 Township 121, Range 24
That said property is unincorporated, abuts upon the limits of the City of
Albertville, and is not included within any other municipality. That said
property is unplatted and does not exceed 200 acres in area. The acreage of
such area is 61.11 acres.
PETITIONERS REQUEST: That pursuant to M.S. 414.0331 said property be annexed to
and included within the City of Albertville.
DATED:
Alfred Valerius
Arthur Valerius
Gilbert Valerius
Martha Valerius by Alfred Valerius, her
attorney -in -fact
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
n
n
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA 55301
PHONE: 497-3384
INCOME RECIEVED
KEVIN LIDBERG
17.50
SEWER ACCOUNTS
229.00
DON'S AUTO
12.00
HACKENMUELLER'S, INC.
12.00
ALBERTVILLE BAR
227.00
152 CLUB
42.00
DON CORNELIUS
6.00
FRANKFORT TOWNSHIP
1,441.00
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP
3,133.78
TOTAL
BILLS TO BE PAID 5,120.38
ST. MICHAEL INSURANCE
CLERK TREAS. BOND
50.00
FHA POSITION BOND
50.00
BUSINESS AUTO POLICY
3,861.00
FRIST TRUST ST. PAUL
G.O. IMP. BOND 10-1-79
55,949.95
G.O. T.I.F. 1984-A
13,577.50
G.O. SEWER 1984-A
17,326.25
G.O. IMP. BOND 1985-A
22,961.48
NATIONAL CITY BANK
G.O. IMP. BOND
15,997.75
STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
58.00
NEWMAN SIGNS
2.74
VEHICLE REGISTRATION
74 DODGE
33.25
73 FORD
33.25
75 CHEV
33.25
69 CHEV
33.25
FRANKFORT TOWNSHIP
500.00
VIKING SAFETY PRODUCTS
8.43
CROW RIVER NEWS
267.30
MINNESOTA COPIER
50.00
HACKENMUELLER'S, INC.
7.89
BARCO (BLADES)
263.20
'KEN LINDSAY
562.67
MAUREEN ANDREWS
472.60
MEYER, NELSON AND MILLER
1,005.00
MEYER-ROHLIN (PROFESSIONAL SERVICES)
WASTEWATER TREATEMENT FACILITY
34,983.31
S&L EXCAVATING
9,330.62
BUFFALO BITUMIOUS
5,257.21
182,675.90
Make our City........ Your City
We invite Home, Industry, Business
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
Y sa WASHINGTON, D.C. 20226
17N.
DIRECTOR
��OFFICE Of REVENUE SHARING
9401 E STREET. N.W.
COLUMMA FLAIA
January Be 1986
REF: 5132-RL
Dear Chief Executive Officer:
On November 25, 1985, President Reagan signed legislation
[Public Law 99-1601, which authorized funding for Entitlement
period 17 (October 1, 1985-September 30, 1986) of the Revenue
Sharing Program. Entitlement Period 17 (EP17) is the last
entitlement period authorized in the 1983 renewal of the Revenue
Sharing Program.
The legislation submitted to the President appropriated
$4,185,000,000 to the Revenue Sharing Trust Fund for payments to
local governments during EP17. This amount is approximately
an 8.35 percent reduction from the amount appropriated for
EP16 (October 1, 1984-September 301 1985). In accordance with
the requirements of the legislation, the entire 8.35 percent
reduction will be withheld from the final payment of EP17.
Entitlement Period 17 Amount
Since funding for EP 17 was not appropriated until late
November 1985, there was not sufficient time to advise you of
the amount of your EP17 entitlement prior to the January 1986
payment. Fie plan, however, to distribute the "Recipient Account
Statement" to all governments in late January, and this form
will include the amount of your EP17 entitlement, information
describing the data used to calculate your allocation, and any
adjustments from prior entitlement periods. It should be noted
that because this is the final period of the Program, the EP17
entitlement information provided in the Recipient Account State-
ment is preliminary and may be revised during the entitlement
period.
Entitlement Period 17-First Quarter Payment
On January 8, 1986, we made the first of four quarterly
payments for Entitlement Period 17. The remaining payments for
EP17 are scheduled for April 7, July 8 and October 7, 1986.
Your January payment was made directly to a designated
bank or other financial institution if you have so authorized.
Otherwise, your government's payment was in the form of a check.
- 2 -
Unfortunately, some governments were not paid at the
regularly scheduled time because they did not submit a State-
ment of Assurances (SOA) Certification Card for EP17, or adjusted
tax and intergovernmental transfer data for fiscal year 1983
and/or fiscal year 1984 on time. All forms received at the
Office of Revenue Sharing and processed prior to December 60 1985
were accepted for the regularly scheduled January payment. If
you have not received the SOA package or submitted the appropriate
tax and transfer data, please call our Intergovernmental Relations
Division for replacement forms.
Some governments were not paid because the amount of their
allocation for Period 17 is less than the $200 minimum for a
twelve-month period required by the Revenue Sharing Act, or
because they have voluntarily waived their entitlement payments.
Another group of governments were not paid because they
have not met the audit, public participation, or civil rights
provisions of the legislation. These governments either have
not submitted required audit reports, have not responded to
requests from either the Audit or Civil Rights Divisions concern-
ing possible noncompliance, or have been found in noncompliance
with the Revenue Sharing regulations and have not not yet complied.
If you did not receive your payment in January and do not
know why your government is not being paid, please write or call
our Intergovernmental Relations Division (202) 634-5200 for more
information and assistance.
Audit Commentary Mailed
A revised Audit Commentary was mailed in mid -November to
local governments wh ch receive $25,000 or more in Revenue Shar-
ing funds annually. These governments are subject to the audit
requirements of the Revenue Sharing Act and will find the Com-
mentary to be a useful explanation of the technical aspects of
the audit requirements.
Handicapped Regulations Must Be Fully Implemented
By October 1986
Governments are reminded that structural changes necessary
to make Revenue Sharing funded programs or activities accessible
to the handicapped must be completed as soon as possible but not
later than October 17, 1986. The Revenue Sharing regulations do
not require a government to make every facility fully accessible
to the handicapped. Rather, structural changes are required
only as a last resort where no other method is available to pro-
vide appropriate access to Revenue Sharing funded programs or
activities.
- 3 -
Many government officials are asking if they must continue
to budget money to complete structural modifications since the
authorization for the Revenue Sharing Program expires on Septem-
ber 30, 1986. As long as a recipient government receives and
uses Revenue Sharing funds, it must continue to comply with all
of the restrictions and prohibitions contained in the Revenue
Sharing Act and regulations. Appropriate enforcement of all
Program requirements will continue after the termination of the
Program.
Davis -Bacon Wage Determinations
On January 31 1986, the U.S. Department of Labor ceased
the monthly publication of general wage determination in the
Federal Register. The Government Printing Office (GPO)_ now
has available for purchase an annual-ilbcument, General Wage
Determinations Issued Under the Davis -Bacon and Related Acts.
The annual publication will contain current wage eterminations.
Thereafter, the GPO will issue weekly updates to subscribers by
first class mail. Updates also will be published on a weekly
basis in the Federal Register. For governments not wishing to
purchase a subscription, the publication and updates will be
available at all 80 Regional Government Libraries and many of
the other 1,400 Government Depository Libraries across the nation.
Inquiries regarding the availability and cost of this new
publication should be directed to the Government Printing Office,
Superintendent of Documents, Order Desk, at (202) 783-3238. For
additional information concerning these new procedures contact
Mr. Alan Moss, or Mr. Ronald Merten, U.S. Department of Labor,
Division of Wage Determinations, at (202) 523-7531.
Should you have questions regarding the Revenue Sharing
program, please call our Intergovernmental Relations Division
at (202) 634-5200.
Sincerely,
Michael F. Hill ,
ILW La
rson Publications Inc.
33 Second St. N. E., Box 296 Osseo, Minnesota 55369 (612) 425-3323
Don R. Larson, president Carole J. Larson, vice president
Jan. 21, 1986
Mayor and City Council
City of Albertville
5964 Main Ave. N.E.
Albertville, Minn. 55301
Dear Mayor and City Council:
Thank you for again designating the Crow River
News as your official newspaper.
Deadlines and procedures for legal notices are
the same in 1986 as they were in 1985. The deadline
for notices is 3 p.m. Thursdays for the following
Tuesday's edition. You may drop off your notices at
the News office, Security State Bank Building, St.
Michael, or mail to: Box 286, Osseo, Minn. 55369.
Notices received after the deadline will be held for
the following week's edition. Notices are published
once unless otherwise specified.
If you need a lengthy ordinance published,
please contact us to make arrangements for
publication. Lengthy ordinances may require additional
production time.
Whenever we may be of assistance to You, please
contact us.
PUSLISHIRS Oft
*CROW an= NrWS NORTH
St. Midleol
*CROW KIVU NWS SOUTH
Rockford
*DILANO RAGLI
Delano
Sincerely,
David Pedersen
Crow River News
*OSSIO MAPLI GROVII PRM
Osseo and Maple Greve
*CHAmPUM DAYTON PROS
Champlin
*STIARNS MORRISON BNMP%ln
ARMnY and HeIdIneord
munow SIACON
Melrose
4
inne
A NEWSLETTER
FOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS
MINNEGASCO WON'T HAVE RATE INCREASE
I s or year.
Minnegasco has announced that it
will not have a rate increase in
Minnesota through this winter's
heavy heating months.
This marks the third consecutive
year that Minnegasco has not had a
general rate increase in Minnesota.
Minnegasco's last general rate
increase in Minnesota was in July
of 1982.
The decision, part of a continuing
effort by the company to keep
natural gas competitively priced in
the marketplace, was the result of
ongoing expense management
7,000 NEEDY
HELPED BY
HEATSHARE
More than $1,600,000 has been
distributed from the HeatShare
fund since it was established in
n
WELCOME TO
"MINNEGASCO
This is our first issue of:
Minnegasco—A Newsletter for
,Public Officials:'
The newsletter was designed to
enhance communications
between Minnegasco and
government officials in our
three -state service area of
Minnesota, Nebraska and South
Dakota.
We hope you find this news-
letter —and future newsletters —
informative.
programs throughout Minnegas-
co's three -state service area.
Because of those expense manage-
ment efforts, and the decreased
cost of natural gas at the wellhead,
Minnegasco's customers have seen
their annual natural gas bills
decline over the past three years.
The annual natural gas bill of a
typical Minnegasco residential
customer in Minnesota currently is
$764—down $55 since May of
1984, and down $60 since May of
1983. The typical Minnegasco
customer uses about 140,000 cubic
1982 to help 7,000 needy residents
in Minnegasco's three -state service
area pay their heating and energy -
related bills.
HeatShare is a cooperative effort of
The Salvation Army and Minne-
gasco, Inc.
HeatShare is funded by pledges
from Minnegasco's customers,
suppliers and employees, and is
administered by The Salvation
feet of nature ga p
That annual bill includes natural
gas used for both home and water
heating.
Effective December 27, Minnegasco
will implement another price
reduction for its customers —the
result of a purchased gas decrease
from Northern Natural Gas
Company, Minnegasco's major
supplier of natural gas. That reduc-
tion will amount to a savings of
about $26 annually for the typical
residential customer, and will
reduce the average annual natural
gas bill to $738.
Army.
The program assists people on low
and fixed incomes who do not
qualify for government assistance.
HeatShare funds were used to help
the needy pay their heating bills
(natural gas, fuel oil, electric,
propane, etc.), make emergency
repairs to furnaces, and to repair
windows and doors for better heat
retention.
SOMROCK ELECTED
PRESIDENT OF MINNEGASCO
John D. Somrock has been
elected President and Chief
Operating Officer of Minne-
gasco, Inc., the
natural gas distri-
bution company
of Diversified
Energies, Inc.
(DEI).
His appointment
was effective s
August 1. som► ck
Somrock, 43,
succeeds Albert D. Etchelecu as
President of Minnegasco. Etche-
lecu, 47, was elected Chairman
of the, Board of Minnegasco and
continues as the company's
Chief Executive Officer. Etche-
lecu also is President and Chief
Executive Officer of DEI.
Somrock is a native of Minne-
sota and has been with Minne-
gasco for 17 years. Prior to this
promotion, he was Senior Vice
President of Operations.
Somrock is based at the compa-
ny's headquarters in
Minneapolis.
IDENTIFYING
A NEED.. .
MEETING
A NEED
As the number of senior citizens'
programs increased in the Minne-
apolis area and its surrounding
suburbs, Minnegasco saw a poten-
tial challenge there for the senior
population: Transportation needs.
How were the seniors to get to the
centers and their programs?
What about other transportation
needs?
Many of the citizens for whom
programs are designed are no
longer able to drive a car or use
public transportation by
themselves.
Through its corporate contributions
program, Minnegasco set out to
see if we could help.
We called upon our fleet manager,
who could coordinate the purchase
of two large vans, to be donated to
the Senior Citizens Centers of
Minneapolis.
The center's staff is working with
many multiple senior residences
and the various senior citizen
centers to coordinate maximum
use of the vehicles.
The vans will be large enough to
carry up to 11 passengers and are
equipped with hydraulic lifts to
accommodate wheelchairs.
They are to be primarily operated
on natural gas, which is also being
furnished by Minnegasco, but they
can also use regular gasoline.
When both vans are in use as
planned, over 1000 seniors will be
able to be a bit more independent
than before.
mINNEGASCO
EMPLOYEE
SAVES A LIFE
WITH
CPR SKILLS
In 34 years for Minnegasco Meter
Reader Joe O'Brien it was the first
time he had been called upon to
use his CPR skills.
While on the job, the veteran
employee came through in saving
a South Minneapolis man's life
when the latter suffered cardiac
arrest on Sept. 4.
O'Brien had cardio pulmonary
resuscitation (CPR) training at
Minnegasco several years ago.
On his route, O'Brien saw a small
group of people gathering around a
construction worker who was on
the ground.
Someone called out, "Does anyone
know CPR?" Joe quickly stepped
forward and applied pressure to
the man's chest, while another
breathed into his mouth at
O'Brien's command. In a moment,
the man began regaining
consciousness. He had been
unconscious for a minute or two,
O'Brien estimates.
The man's earlobes and fingertips
had turned blue, he had stopped
breathing and he had no heart
beat. "It's not likely he would have
pulled through, unless someone
would have done something;'
recalls Joe. In a few minutes, the
area's fire department arrived and
took over in assisting the man, who
is in his 50's.
"They did a great job;' said Fire
Captain Richard Will, whose squad
handled the call. "The man is a
former heart surgery patient, so it
was especially critical."
NATURAL
GAS:
WHAT IS IT?
- Natural gas is used in more than
40 million homes in the United
States. It is one of the safest and
most reliable home heating fuels
available.
- Natural gas is primarily methane
with small amounts of other hydro-
carbons. It is colorless. It is
odorless.
Because it is odorless, Minnegasco
adds a chemical agent to the natu-
ral gas that it delivers to customers'
homes and businesses. The chemi-
cal produces a distinctive odor that
can be detected when even the
slightest amount of natural gas
escapes into the air.
- Natural gas is non-polluting. It
burns clean —producing only heat,
carbon dioxide and water vapor
when burned with proper air
mixtures.
- Natural gas is not toxic or poison-
ous. It is lighter than air.
- Natural gas is easily compressed,
and will liquify when cooled to
—260°F. Minnegasco liquifies natu-
ral gas in the summer and stores it
in liquid form for use during
extremely cold winter days.
- Compressed natural gas can be
used as a vehicle fuel. Minnegasco
currently operates 86 of its
company fleet vehicles on
compressed natural gas.
/'IN
LIU
FACTS Af3UU I
MINNEGASCO
CUSTOMERS'
ATTITUDES
TOWARD
MINNEGASCO
For the past three years, the
national survey firm of Yankelov-
ich, Skelly and White has been
asking Minnegasco's residential
customers to grade the company
on the services that it provides.
This year's survey showed that
about 90 percent of Minnegas-
co's customers rate it highly for
providing effective, reliable and
friendly service.
"While that may sound good, we
aren't satisfied;' said John D.
Somrock, President and Chief
Operating Officer of Minne-
gasco. "We want every contact
that we have with our customers
to be a positive one."
To help achieve that goal, the
company has implemented addi-
tional programs that make it
easier for customers to do
business with Minnegasco, and
that enhance the quality of serv-
ice that Minnegasco provides:
•
"Bank Pay was established to
make it easier for customers to
pay their bills. Bank Pay allows
customers to have their banks
electronically transfer funds
/�
from their checking or savings
accounts to pay their monthly
bills to Minnegasco.
• A consumer roundtable was
established to solicit customer
input and to foster better
communications and under-
standing between Minnegasco
and its customers.
• Implementation of the new
Customer Information System
(CIS) was completed through-
out Minnegasco's three -state
service area. CIS allows the
company to respond faster and
more effectively when custom-
ers call for information about
their natural gas bills or for
energy -related information.
About 750 Minnegasco custom-
ers in Minnesota, Nebraska and
South Dakota participated in the
most recent survey.
Customers said Minnegasco is a
company that cares about its
customers, can be trusted, and
that contributes to the quality of
life in the communities in which
it does business:'
Minnegasco is the 13th largest
natural gas distribution company in
the United States.
In addition to its natural gas distri-
bution operations, Minnegasco
engages in non -regulated
businesses of selling and servicing
heating and cooling equipment and
appliances.
Minnegasco serves about 585,000
residential, commercial and indus-
trial customers in Minnesota,
Nebraska and South Dakota-
530,000 are residential, and 55,000
are commercial and industrial.
Of those customers, 434,000 are in
Minnesota; 37,000 are in South
Dakota; and 115,000 are in
Nebraska.
In 1984, Minnegasco's natural gas
sales to industrial and commercial
customers represented 54.7
percent of the company's total
sales.
The company's natural gas supply
situation is excellent. The compa-
ny's two natural gas suppliers —
Northern Natural Gas Company
and KN-Energy, Inc. —have abun-
dant reserves that assure secure
long-term natural gas availability.
Minnegasco is a company of Diver-
sified Energies, Inc. (DEI), a Minne-
apolis -based energy services
corporation. DEI is traded on the
New York Stock Exchange under
the symbol: DEI.
In addition to Minnegasco, DEI's
other companies and operations
are:
• Dyco Petroleum Corporation: Oil
and gas exploration and
production.
• Cai Dive International, Inc.:
Subseas oilfield services.
• E.F. Johnson Company: Mobile
communications and electronic
components.
• DEI Energy Systems, Inc. (ESI):
Energy measurement.
• Minneapolis Energy Center, Inc.
(MECI): Energy management.
• The Preserve of Eden Prairie, Inc:
Land development.
CIS GIVES FASTER SERVICE
TO CUSTOMERS
During 1984, Minnegasco
completed implementation of a
new Customer Information
System (CIS) throughout its
Minnesota, Nebraska and South
Dakota service area.
CIS is a state-of-the-art computer
system that stores and updates
bill payment records and natural
gas usage data for all of Minne-
gasco's 585,000 residential,
commercial and industrial
customers.
CIS is centralized at Minnegas-
co's headquarters in Minneapo-
lis. Through a network of on-line
terminals, Minnegasco employ-
ees can instantaneously access
information for customers who
call with questions about their
natural gas bills, service
contracts, or other energy -
related matters.
"Our customers' time is valua-
ble;' company officials said.
"?he new system eliminates
customer inconvenience of
having to wait for information —
and just makes it easier for
our customers to do business
with us."
The system also allows Minne-
gasco to implement expense
management measures that will
help in the company's overall
efforts at maintaining stabilized
natural gas prices for custom-
ers —without jeopardizing qual-
ity of service to customers.
One of those expense manage-
ment measures is the closing of
13 of Minnegasco's 22 offices in
Minnesota between September 1
and December 1, 1985.Offices
are being closed in Benson, Blue
Earth, Le Sueur, St. James, Little
Falls, Glencoe, Sleepy Eye,
Morris, Belle Plaine, Sauk
Centre, Litchfield, Pipestone, and
New Prague.
Customers currently served
through those offices will be
served through a centralized
Customer Information Response
Center in Mankato. Customers
affected by the closings have
been notified and have received
toll -free telephone numbers and
other information regarding the
Response Center.
"It's always hard to close down
an office;' a company official
said. "We've been in some of
those communities for a lot of
years:'
In Nebraska and South Dakota,
all accounting and billing opera-
tions have been centralized into
CIS in Minneapolis.
Minnesota
Association of
Small Cities
8Q
LL T
:veteran
-ram! ] U 01 -, .
ll�L.��---1�f1
wM
s
611 Iowa Avenue, Staples. Minnesota 56479 January, 1986
FROM THE DESK OF MAYOR MILTON A. ARNESON, ROSEAU
V.P. Region 1
Since the August issue of Small Talk, your Small Cities Board has bean
involved in Regional Meetings, 19BB Legislation, Membership, the dw-
lopment of the Minnesota Center for Small Communities, City Insurance,
to mention just a few of the issues of importance to Smell Cities.
Our maior disappointment was the cancellation of our Minnesota
Association of Small Cities Annual meeting and Workshops. Lack of pre-
registration forced cancellation. Our workshops involved a number of our
Minnesota Representatives and Senators, a wall as State Department
Heads, and out of sate speakers, and indications from pre -registrations
wan that our guests would haw out numbered the number attending from
our small cities, thus it would haw been highly inappropriate to hold the
meeting. As you read this, think about your city, you as city mayors and
council persons need to be updated on what is going on in the Legislature,
to get involved, to hew the opportunity to confront our leaders and
policy makers. Now how can this best be done? If we are unable to
generate enthusiasm for Workshops and the Annual Meeting, if we are
unable to get our small cities out for Regional meetings, what kind of
meetings should be conducted to get you involved and informed.
Region 1 held its Regional meeting in September and with five (5)
cities attending, the discussions were lively end informative. 1 appreciate
te`pose who took the time to attend the Regional meeting and those who
,olunteered to serve their regional Small Cities a Assistant Vice President
Membership Chair, Legislative Chair, and Communications Chair. Their
names are identified in this issue of Small Talk.
Your Board is continually searching for ways to improve our
communications with each of our Smell Cities. We solicit your idea.
After all this is your Association, the MAOSC exists only because of
Small City needs and concerns, and your right as a Small City to be treated
fairly and with equity on all issues relating to Cites in Minnesota.
We are concerned as to whether you are receiving your copy of Small
Talk, was publish 5,000 copies of each publication, six times a you. It is
sent to every Small City addressed to the City Clerk, with 6 copies, one
copy for the Mayor and each of the Council and one for the City Clark.
With regards to the survey on City leeem a we sent each city in the
August issue of Small Talk, I'm sorry to say only five (5) cities responded.
Either you did not receive that issue of Small Talk, or the issue isn't as
grow as your MAOSC Board was led to believe. We only send surveys
when there is and expressed concern on the put of some Small Cities,
and we need to know your concerns in order to effectively legislate FOR
YOU, THE LEADERS OF OUR SMALL CITIES. As was proceed into
1986, may our endeavors and envolvement increase, may the success and
knowledge gained enhance the ability of the Mayors and Councils to better
serve their city, an may we, together, dedicate ourselves to a rural
Minnesota full of opportunities and resolve.
HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALLI
REGIONAL MEETINGS ,
The Board of Directors and our Legislative Liaison haw held and are
scheduling Regional Meetings to update Small Cities on the legislative
issues and Small Cities Activities and to hold elections. To date Regional
meetings have been held in the majority of the Regions, however some
scheduled meetings had to be cancelled due tq,Winter Weather, currently
those cancelled are being rescheduled. Those Regions where meetiggs
were held, elected city leaden to designated Regional positions. ?heir
willingness to serve the Small Cities of their Region and throughout Min-
nesoa is deeply appreciated.
FROM THE DESK OF MYRT WEGENER,
LEGISLATIVE LIAISON MAOSC:
Guidelines haw been established for the Revenue, Finance, and Tax
Commissions for the Veer 1986. The Tax Policy Group has been charged
with the overall responsibility for recommendations and alternatives for a
comprehensive tax package. The Chairman is Tom Triplett, Revenue Com-
missioner. Individual turns will study specific area of taxation among
which is o team studying Property Tax and Local Aids Policy. This team is
headed by John Haynes, An't Commissioner of Revenue. This Team is
charged to consider a comprehensive reform and simplification of the
property tax and local aid system with the goal of:
1. Reducing the number of classy of property
2. Reducing the tendency of any aid program to encourage property
tax increases.
3. Increase local accountability. Clarify what is a state government re-
sponsibility and what is a local responsibility.
4. Reduce effective tax rates on those clay of property which currently
have extremely high effective tax rates.
5. Redesign aid programs so that the State can control and budget for
the costs of the programs.
S. Use the Latimer Commission report as a guideline.
We will keep you posted on the team activities.
State Aids - There is still a battle going on between the Legislature, Ad-
ministration and the Small Cities. The Small Cities went Sate Aids settled
In 1986 session, the Revenue Department and the Tax Department want to
wait one more year. The Legislature has failed to fullfill their promise to
the 700 Small Cities to straighten out the Sate Aids mess during the 1983,
a
1984, and 1985 interims. At this time we have temporary alineme t
formula with Mpls. and St. Paul. We worked on this the pat sumntar,
all that is needed now is for the Legislature to do its part. We need mayors
and Council from the 700 cities to scream for help from their hone town
Legislator. Remember, next year is election year. Nothing will be ac-
complished without YOUR HELP.
Gas Tax - In order to get the Legislature to help Cities under 5000 get a
fair then of the Gas Tax, the some as cities OVER 5000, Small Cities will
again have to talk to Legislator. As soon as you all take part and help, this
can become a reality. Small Cities will continue to pros for fairness in dis-
tribution. ,
Insurance - Small Cities oreworking on a solution to the High Insurance
rates Small Cities are facing. A notice will be published as won a we have
something concrete. This may be as soon as January 15,1986.
Minnesota Center For Small Communities - A report by Dow Fricke,
Executive Director of Minnesota Townships is included in this issue, and I
agree with Deve that 1986 will be a new ere for Small Cities and Town-
ships in Minnesota. The creation of the Minnesota Center for Small Com-
munities is exciting. Deve and 1 haw long dreamed of working together and
we look forward to it being a reality. We have spent a lot of time this fsN
contacting Foundations in Minnesota for funds to operate this new organi-
zation. On December 18, 1985 we met with Foundation people who were
looking for projects to assist rural Minnesota, and rural governments. The
interest of the Foundations is tremendous and exciting. We will have more
information nal soon.
A Happy and Prosperous Now Year to All - Myrt Wagemar
FROM THE DESK OF HOWARD NELSON,
LEGISLATIVE LIAISON, MAOSC.
Let me point to a few interesting comments mede at two House Sub -
Committee hearings which particularly attracted my sttantion, namely
the P.C.A. Tads Force of the House Local and Urban Affairs Commits
desired by Rep. Becklin, and the House Appropriationrsub-eommittm on
fees and Dedicated Revenue chaired by Rap. Virgil Johnson, hearings
which were held this fall and early winter.
Then is a real need to "stnemline" the grant process. M.P.CJL review
time for grant applications have run as long as twelve (12) and fifteen (15)
months (the State Board of Health has 3 weeks). Then has ban a lack of
consistency in M.P.C.A. reviews. Too often the M.P.C.A. communications
were oral either at the meetings or by telephone but not confirmed in
writing. Communications were with the consulting anginser but net with
the municipality. Some cities say "the M.P.C.A. hall taken punitive action
to penalize cities who do not knuckle under to orders or demands."
Chairman Becklin said based on their several hearings reports, then is a
real lack of communications for one thing.
Notwithstanding the above criticisms "the motives and the people of
M.P.C.A. are good" said one party, "but the grant process needs to be
simplified." Ninety percent (90%) grant cities compete with cities getting
fifty percent (50%) or no grant at ell for industry. It was suggested that a
screening committee review changes in M.P.C.A. specifications for con-
struction. To "certify that then will never be any overflow in the system"
and "if then is, grant funds are withdrawn", "ws can't guarantee that"
sated one witness.
A financial consultant stated "assuming sewn (7) Veers from beginning
of grant applications to grant funding" (and some take longer then that)
'It might have been cheaper for the city to ban gone ahead on their own."
Or. George Harrison (see story elsewhere in this issue) reported on the
C.C.B.A. process (Chemical, Coordinate, Bonding, Absorption) rather
briefly, but he did explain how this type of waste water treatment plant
could be constructed for an approximate cost of eighty cents I&SO) per
eel par day capacity as compared with seven dollars ($7.00) or eight
dollars ($8.00) per gal per day cost for the conventional biological type
sswege treatment plants (ponds), that is about ten percent (10%), In other
words a 90% savings in costs of construction (Conservatively I would say
a 76% reduction could be achieved). He explained how an experimend
pilot C.C.B.AI plant has been in operation in Sentes, California for about
18 months with very favorable results. The operations and management
can be handled at greatly reduced costs. From the dots obtained, it is
projected that at a Clarifier Retention Time of less than 60 minutes, a 95%
reduction in suspended solids (ss) and a 90% reduction in biological oxygen
demand (bod) should be achievable. Total phosphates were reduced by
95% and total nitrogen by 43%. Additionally, the water recovered Is of
recreational quality, is fishable and swimable, and the aggregate which Is
derived from the solid waste is valuable for use in concrete, and other uses,
as compared to the accumulated sludge from conventional plants which
is becoming a greater problem as time goes on. (Isn't it time a pilot plant Is
constructed in Minnesota?)
Pat Fe" at Testimony at the M.P.C.A. hearing on faas to dim
charge water were In opposition or a request for delay In Implanantation.
According to Information available, neighboring wta do not charge a
fee. We, in the MAOSC, stated we object to a charge for ilk arginng water,
the permit fess. Asked If our city charges fen, the answer was 7 for
sewer and water, however, for that he we deliver the water and tf ohs
sewage away from each party served.
Privatketiawisrivatization of Waste Water tmounent was discussed, the
statement was made that a Ism-purchm agreement is often atbactM and
a buy back privilege should be another douse. In such an arrangement as
print@ ownership, operation and management, the private vendor mamas
most of the ds kL
A number of legal obstacles apparently exist to privatization and Ispiolo-
tion would have to be enacted. Currently federal law provides that grant
money can go only to a publicly owned facility. It was indicated that
Insurance would probably be a greater problem for Municipal owned
facility than print@. A system should be approved ofu performa n
stonderds edy. Construction standards and design must not be controlled
or regulated by an agency of government. Agency regulation on design and
construction dendards leads immediately to harassment and delay In im-
plementation on the premise that they an improving the facility. This has
been a problem with regulatory agencies of government In many areas. It
only serves to give the agency an opening for "make work" programs and
an appearance of the need for a large staff and lots of paperwork.
The MAOSC sated its support for enabling legislation for privatization
of facilities for cities. Right now we an concerned with wan war and
solid waste handling facilities and the prohibitive cost of construction,
operation and management.
PLANNING AND ZONING WORKSHOPS OFFERED
Do you know what role appointed officials can take in zoning, land use
and water control Issues? What are the constitutional rights of land
owners? When do city, county and township powers end and legislative
powers begin?
The answers to these and other important questions will be addressed
at these seminar which will mvaiw zoning authorities, soil
water quality, land use planning, responsibilities and procedures. gin
an tailored for people in leadership positions: city, county, township
planning commissioners and officials, city and township boards of appeal
and adjustment and people who deal with zoning boards and city councils.
Authorities on than Issues will lead the sessions, including David A.
Fricke, Executive Director, MAT; Robert Snyder, University of
Minnesota Extension Land Economist; Gunner Isberg, Planning Con-
sultant and author; Kim Bo wn, Soil & Water Conservation and Les
Star, Planner, City of Coon Rapids.
January 27 - Holiday Inn, North Mankato
January 28 - Sunwood Inn, St. Cloud
January 29 - Holiday Inn, Grand Rapids
January 31- Earl Brown Center, St. Paul Campus
Choose from four conveniently located daylong seminar= beginning at
9 a.m. The registration fa is $18 and includes noon luncheon.
For mom Information contact the Office of Special Programs, 1612)
373-0725.
BUSINESS DIRECTORY
Please support theradvertisers who support your Small Talk
Mu" city t�tlf'1q
Consulting Engineering, Chemical Analyals
and Construction Quality Contra
Mankato Rochester St. Ckwd St. Paul
(507WS-8211 (507►288-7060 (612)225-M14 (612*4"Wi
SOIL EXPLORATION COMPANY MERGES WITH
TWIN CITY TESTING
President Norman E. Henning of Twin City Tasting Corporation (TCT).
formerly known as Twln City Testing and Englrleering Laboratory, Inc
announew the mareing of toll txploratlon Company ("01 with -ref
effective October 1, 1948. The two firm@ have been OaFa6wies sister
corporations since 1956. and from 1936 to 1958, SEC was a division of
TCT.
SEC, which has speclallzed In consulting geotechnlcal enginsering.Rd
environmental studies, will continue to provide these services unor Is
name of TCT. Other areas of testing services offered by the 15 , Jr
Midwest locations of TCT Include: acoustics, chemistry, construction
materials, consumer products, metallurgy, nondestructive testing and
quality assurance programs.
Also effective on October 1 Is the retirement of two principals - Robert
F. Wittman, SEC Executive Vice President, associated with the firms for
34 years, and Albert C. Holler, TCT Vice President for Chemistry. with
37 years of service in the firms.
z SMALL CITIES VOLUNTEER FIRE FIGHTERS OPPOSE
CERTIFICATION
'We went to be professional, but we went to control that," Hoke acid
after tha mosting. "We went to control our own destiny."
The following article appeared in the Hutchinson Leader, December 3,
1986 and is reprinted with the permission of Wayne Kasich - Publisher.
,*�Ths Minnesota Association of Small Cities Board on December 14, 1986
went on record as opposing any proposal to develop mandatory THE HISTORY OF
certification for Volunteer Fire Fightere. MINNESOTA STATE AIDS
AREA FIREFIGHTERS OPPOSE CERTIFICATION PROPOSAL
A decision by the Minnesota State Fire Chiefs' Association to require
certification of firefighters has caused concern at area volunteer fire
departments.
The decision, made at the association's convention in October, overruled
a stand taken last June by the Fireman's Association against the
certification.
More than 35 representatives from 16 area fire departments met Nov.
25 at the Hutchinson Fire Station to discuss the implications of the
decision.
What emerged were concerns about maintaining volunteers if special
training is required, costs and consistency. The group voted unanimously
to oppose the mandated certification.
Robert Scheidt of Glencoe and Louis Groupmenn of Plato, president
and secretary of the central Minnesota region of the Fire Chiefs'
Association, will carry the concerns expressed to the next association
meeting in January.
Jerry Powelk, Lester Prairie fire chief and the regional representative,
said the measure passed at the October conference because of a lack of
volunteer chiefs. But he feels the question of certification should be-
long to to firefighters. He questioned whether the Chiefs' Association
oven had the right to make such a decision.
Professional departments, such as those in metropolitan areas, went
the certification so volunteer firefighters will be capable of filling any
full-time openings. Although that makes sense, Powelk said, 'That
^doesn't fit our volunteer fire departments in rural Minnesota."
The program simply would mean job security for the State Deport -
Mont of Education, Hutchinson Fire Chief Butch Henke said. Currently,
training and certification is left up to individual departments. Hutchinson
conducts a one -day, rookie school that covers the basic techniques, rules
and regulations. The candidate then works individually with captains and
lieutenants.
But the most common training is on the job.
Hutchinson considered initiating a Firefighter I course through the
vocational -technical institute for $85 per person, Assistant Chief Dick
Popp told the group. But the class was merely preparation for certification
by the state, and for $85 per person, the city's volunteer department
figured it could do its own paperwork.
"The cost was way out of line for what they were giving us."
In the long run certification might be good, Dan Piepenburg of the
Bowl Fire Department said "but right now it's been put on us by people
we can't even talk to." Therefore, he said, he's against it because of a lack
of information.
The issue wasn't even on the agenda at the chiefs' meeting, Piepenburg
said, and it was slipped in late in the afternoon. 'There were some hard
feelings later in the owning."
Another firefighter asked the group, "Are we against the certification?
Is it around the comer? Do we let a state agency handle it and tell us what
to do?"
"If certification is going to make problems in rural Minnesota,"
Piepenburg said, '1Me better stand up and say so."
Another local fire chief said that strict certification might mean a lack
of volunteers. "I wouldn't have two guys on the department any more."
The group agreed that testing is important but they trust the veterans of
each department. A Vo Toch would ask someone to teach, Henke said, and
chances are it would be someone from the local fire department. 'They
(individual departments) might as well be teaching their own."
Those attending agreed that while they may not be in favor of cert-
ification, they're open to standardizing training.
Members expressed fear about possible involvement by the Legislature,
affected by lobbyists for the professionals. The group agreed to seek
exposure by sanding letters to local legislators, and to ask city councils
and county boards to do the some.
The dollars allocated to State Aids or Revenue Sharing es it is often
celled, increased considerably in Minnesota in 1971. Two other States
followed suit, Wisconsin and Michigan. The reason was to vet beck on Real
Estate Texas which in 1971 were the highest in the notion.
In 1971 the Legislature repealed the personal property taxes and also
took the liquor and cigarette tax away from the Counties. The Legislature
replaced this revenue loss with State Aids obtained from an humsess in
Soles and Income Taxes. Because the increase in Sales and Income Taxes
created income to the state in excess of what was anticipated, end because
the income exceeded the amounts collected by counties on liquor and
cigarette tax, and the state on personal property tax, there was a later
reduction in real estate taxes. The real estate tax reduction helped cities
who had very little industry to maintain the some quality of life as Cities
with a lot of industry.
From 1971 to 1980 State Aids were paid out on a per capita basis. All
Cities were satisfied with this until Minneapolis and St. Paul lost popula-
tion. In 1979 the Legislature approved a new formula bead on the 1979
mill rate, instead of population. So if a City spent a lot of money and had
a high mill rate, it received a lot of State Aids. This formula was brought to
the Legislature by the Longue of Minnesota Cities and Minneapolis. Today
State Aids are still being paid on the 1979 millrete, and the LMC/Minnea-
polls formula.
Because of the unfairness in the LGA distribution formula the Minnesota
Associatiop of Small Cities was organized. The goal was to attempt to bring
some degree of equity to the 1979 formula. To date, 700 Cities out of 856
we not receiving their fair share of State Aids. The Legislature has prom-
ised Small Cities for three years that the Tax Committees in both Noun
and Senate would develop a new formula and so for they have not.
In the 1985 Session the Legislature adopted a formula that Rep. Bill
Schriber authored in the House. It was so bad the Tax Conference Com-
mittee put a Sunset clause in the State Aids law for after lose. Since
this happened Minneapolis and the Small Cities have boon working at a
new formula based on population, mill rate, and assessed valuation. This is
almost the some formula as the Small Cities started with in 1983. Every
City in the State will have a copy of the new formula as soon a it is
approved by the Board of Small Cities and the Minneapolis Council.
All the 160 Cities who are doing very well now, will receive no less state
aids then they are now receiving. If this becomes a reality soon, we will
ask you to talk to your Legislator and insist that this new formula become
law for 1986.
Paying out state aids such as Minnesota is doing will only work if every
City in the State gets their fair share. The Small Cities in Minnesota will
continue to work for equity for all Cities on every issue, not only State
Aids.
MINNESOTA CENTER FOR SMALL COMMUNITIES
The following is an excerpt from the Executive Director Report in the
Minnesota Township News of November - December 1985. David A.
Fricke is the Executive Director and granted permission to reprint. The
Board of the Minnesota Association of Small Cities has been actively work-
ing with the Minnesota Township Association to establish a center to assist
small cities and townships in making small local governments vital. It is
an exciting venture and all small cities should be elated over this develop-
ment.
"We will be bringing to reality a cooperative effort to crests the Minn-
esota Center for Small Communities.
My vision of Association activities in 1986 is highlighted by the creation
of the Minnesota Center for Small Communities. Smell city and town
officials in Minnesota have traditionally not had to cope with the frustra-
tions of dealing with large bureaucracies. Today the likelihood is that city
and township officials will be confronted with such unsettling aspects
(Continued on next page)
THE HISTORY OF
GASTAX DISTRIBUTION IN MINNESOTA-
IS IT FAIR?
In 1956 a Constitutional Amendment to the Constitution of Minnesota
was passed that distributed the Gas Tax to State and Local Governments
as follows:
Out of the total 100% of tax, 5% is set aside for disaster and research
accounts in Cities over 6000, the remaining 95% of the total is divided up
to give the State Highway Department 62%, County Highways 29%, and
Cities over 5000 population 9%.
The concern of Small Cities under 5000 population is - if it is right for
Cities over 5000, why not Cities under 5000? Why the 5000 cut-off?
There is a misunderstanding among County Commissioners and City
Councils regarding the 29%. All Cities share in the County -State Aid
(CSAH) Highway funds, but ONLY FOR County State Aid roads that go
through or into their cities. The State funds their State owned roads within
a City with STATE Aid monies (the 62%). Cities _Over 5000 population
share in the 9% with 50% paid out according to population and 50% paid
according to the needs on streets for schools, farm to market streets, etc.
An important action took place in the 1983 Legislative Session that
should be of special interest and concern to Cities under 5000 Five
)cities whose population dropped below 0
00 continued
to receive the amount of money from the 9% they
ereceived when
they were over 5000 population.
Small Cities are saying that if it is right for the 5 cities who dropped
below 5000 population to receive Gas Tax money, why not all cities in the
State? If the Gas Taxes collected from every community in the State
cannot be distributed to ALL THE CITIES, why should any City receive a
share of the 9%?
Cities under 5000 should have a share of the 9% that now goes to Cities
over 5000, the real question is - considering the total population of the
cities over 5000 versus the total population of the cities under 5000, could
we muster sufficient votes on a change to the constitution to make the
Gas Tax Distribution include ALL cities?
OR as an alternative should the Smell Cities develop legislation to set
aside the excise tax on automobiles to establish a fund which would
distribute an amount of gas tax monies to small cities equivalent to what
they would receive if the 9% were distributed to all cities.
YOU, THE 759 SMALL CITY GOVERNMENT LEADERS, MUST
DETERMINE THE FUTURE ON THIS ISSUE.
A NEW SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
FOR SMALL CITIES REASONABLE AND EFFECTIVE
George C. Harrison, a research chemist, formerly with 3Mhas found a
way to convert raw sewage into construction blocks, roofing tiles, and
other uses, and clean, yes clean, water. A pilot plant is in operation in
California - the Santee Wastewater Reclamation facility.
Efforts are underway to develop three (3) Pilot plants in Minnesota,
one each in a city under 5000 population, one in a city 6000 to 50,000
population and one in a city over 50,000 population. Indications ere
that these plants can be built for 15 to 20% of the construction costs of
the traditional sewage dispoHslel system. Here's a ODEN ASSETS IN port on this system.
RAW SEWAGE?
Raw sewage a valuable natural resource? The some stinking stuff we pay
to have piped away and treated?
Right, because now we know what raw sewage actually is, waste water -
ninety-nine gallons out of every 100 of which can be recovered, recycled,
and reused. And in every million gallons of watts water floats a ton of
waste material which we now know how to mold into useful construction
blocks. Sewage is a valuable resource)
Let's put our sewage date into understandable number:.
A town of 3,000 generates an acre-foot of sewage each day (sewage
covering one acre to a depth of one foot). This amounts to a foot of waste
water over seven city lots. Over one year, this daily waste water will ex-
pand into a lake one mile long, five city blocks wide, and five feet deep.
To find the size of a wastewater lake for the Twin Cities Metro Area,
population 2,000,000, multiply the small-town lake by 700.
That reeking lake of sewage, however, doesn't appear so aweso than
we can separate the solids out of the liquid wastes and leave wat: Glean --
enough to drink. The idea is not as impractical as it might sound. We riow
have the scientific, engineering, and economic know-how to reelaim water
from sewage for irrigation, recreation, and - with a little more effort -
ewn for drinking water.
The process leaves a residue of solid materials. Including the materials
used to treat the water, this solid matter, or sludge, can be used to mav-11
a construction aggregate for the building trades similar to cement blocks.
A 100,OOO-11allon per day sewage plant at Santee, California, is now
producing the aggregate. Research for the process was completed in
Minnesota.
Assets is Sewage
Called CCBA (pronounced seebah), the name comes from the first letters
of Chemical and Coordinate Bonding and Absorption.
Clay, Alum, Glue. Here's how the process works.
The first step in the CCBA process is to add a small amount of clay
to the waste water. We use an amount of clay twice as heavy as the dry
solids suspended in the water. Clay and sewage are mixed in a blender
we call a "tea cup."
The sewage, with clay dispersed throughout, moved to a second unit
called a "sheet flow mixer." In the mixer, we add chemical alum and
polymer polyscrylic acid, a super -glue base for attracting and binding
particles.
The sewage wastes react with the clay, alum, and polymer to produce
organic particles which, in turn, absorb liquid organic wastes. Water carries
the particles to a "decay gradient flocculator." Here particles grow in size
before flowing into a settling tank. Clean water flows over the edges of the
settling tank; the particles settle to the bottom to become "sludge."
The overflow water is ready for final clean up or for pumping into
natural bodies of water. The sludge is pumped to a filter, pressed into
a "cake," and dumped into a mixer. More dry clay is added and, after
mixing, the clay waste is pressed out through dies - much as spaghetti is
made - and cut into pellet -size particles. After tumbling in a drum, the
pellets come out round.
The pellets are placed in a kiln and heated to over 2,000 degrees F. AU
organic matter is completely destroyed long before the temperature
reaches 2,000 degrees. At this high temperature, the clay becom►",
ceramic pellet which incorporates both the common ash of burning
the heavy metals sometimes found in waste water. So completely banded
into the ceramic are these materials that water and the strongest acid
conditions in nature will not extract them.
Blocks and Tits. At this point in the CCBA process, almost all damaging
elements of waste water and sludge are harmless to the environment. The
pellets are lighter then stone pebbles the same size.
In cement work, concrete blocks made from CCBA pellets are as strong,
and much lighter, than standard concrete stool-
renforced concretesacweightkL The f
structures can be greatlyreduc d whenthepellets
are used.
Clay products made with CCBA pellets as filler are much lighter. They
can be used to make fireproof roofing tiles. A rich brick color, the pellets
make an ideal mulch around perennial plants. They can also be used to
Wanket road meridians and to control wash on road embankments.
When sewage has been transformed into clean water and pellets, there is
nothing left to damage the environment. CCBA plants are smaller than sewage Plants using microbiology, such
as the Metro Area waste water plants, to purify waste water. They are
also simpler in design and less costly to build. Today, the science is at
hand to change an enviromental nuisance, raw sewage, into a valuable
resource.
CCBA INFORMATION
PACKETS AVAILABLE
An informational packet describing CCBA plants and related activities
is available from: CCBA Volunteer Committee, Attention: Bob Smith,
3rd W-995, First National Bank Bldg., St. Paul, MN 55101. A donation of
fit it cover duplicating and ng costs sciencce clll be asses and inacivics clepacket
ai^9n
is suitable for use in high School
public -policy decision making.
An engineering report on the CCBA Santee, California, plant suitable for
use by local government and sewage -shad officials and engineers it also
available for a donation of $3.
1.
_ - MAOSC OFFICERS
k TM off leem and staff of your association are available to
assist you on issues of concern to your city. PNose uses Nigh
MAOSC BOARD MEMBERS
MGM 1
Ifierw Rglaarl a Tray
REGION a
�eaN'eld? Ind w um
ill _ 3 1 N
earn, WI Will •>lla In 12e1 Naar
some."
Chindwin odow Soic Aat V.P.
1111418117
MY%ti
VIVA
REGION 2
W W Own KWON, hailNt
REGION a
!tit eaNww, CMA A6rMi,tha/r, MF VA
NqW AM:6^ aql" V.P.
REGION a
�M•
NNW MAaa G` ra` , swig+Vl.
1ai w. a5h 0. M. darlr, NN 1fN2
3
REGION 3
6aan6m haul A er141111, Rwanl V./.
W40241M
REGION to
Nabs Vow. M,W I LYM". RO&" VA
MGM 4
wilu$4m 0116 3R4w N71NI1 EIMI
Nort Low%NNE SM • 31ti2 W? Nava
a1aYW frank Cerr" NVA
■ewAds Iran, NN faAWLM • 284364ri7
REGION 11
Mlarfdd,, N M/aN. Ww v!.
REGION 5 y�
ra«rMM.RN arrtrN.lwaw
OFFICE
1MN m (0)
F.
AWL Vplen,
n1,Oil
,wNI 603
MINNESOTA CENTER FOR SMALL COMMUNITIES (Continued from WOW
of running local government es the Fair Labor Standards Act, Dws Bacon
Act, Hazerdoue Materials Storage regulations, Surface Water Management
n Act, Agriculture Land Preservation Act, Shorsland Management Act,
Rood Plan Management, Feedlot regulations, Solid Waste regulations,
Public Employee Retirement, Employee Right To Know regulations,
Veterans rights and labor negotiations. And all these issues and many more
are dealt with on a hit and min beds because our inadequately -
financed small governments do not haw the luxury of having full time staff
to administrate Own the most simple tasks. Their relationship with an
attorney, engineer, planner and program specialist in tenstive at best.
To help small city and town officials handle these problems and take
advantage of opportunities for the development of rural communities, the
Minnesota Association of Townships and the Minnesota Association of
Small Cities are responding to the needs of shall communities in Minn-
Osots by creating the Minnesota Center for Small Communities -
The Center will carry out programs of rural leadership development;
do research on rural issues; provide technical assistance for local officials;
coordinate mining and informationahering; and create state public owers-
a n campaigns. ifucant private toundstiam and
Best of all, the Center represents sign
associate memberships.
The first check to the Center for $1,000 was presented by Phillip Martin,
General Manager of United Power Association. Discussion with the Blandin
Foundation, McKnight Foundation, 3M and others have been initiated.
This new center will provide a great opportunity for small communities
in Minnesots."
Waseth Smith Nolting &' A5sociates, Inc.
aMONaEENia. ANCN11a610, a LAND 6114110EVORe
Al 1 \ ^ 31 0 south Third Il""I
eRIArIENO. MN iMOt
r :,e-O�►s11T
S ! I MG south Mae street Init "edit Noaorns
CnooKSTOlt, MN Selig ALEX.NONAAJMIS IN 5a3Oe
1te-311146t:
ADVISORS TO THE MAOSC BOARD
t'Iwrare NNwn, L.aWt ,V, Llalwa
UaOWaah, MN i6065 • lute@fT•1510
MW agate, L.O.A. Coordnator
=ykj Cry/W. MN 66056 •507.726.1093
Urrion
Oman.I '16A= �665a
6N M6
PAST PRESIDENTS
Willard Vetter - Skyline, MN. Region 10
Matt KaPslh . Babbitt. MN, Region 4
Milton Arneson - Roseau. MN, Region 1
1 1@191
aATNER.WjGFOSE. WOLSFEL.D. JARVIS. GARDNER. INC-
pLANW4 / TRANSPORTATION i ENCMIEERe6G / ARCFNTECTURE
2M UNIVERSITY AVE SE. MIMIEAPOLIS. MN 55414
612 / 379-7878
�(u1 JURAN & MOODY, INC-
Spocialiats in Municipal Financing
Minnesota Mutual Lila Building (612( 224.1500
400 North Robert —Suite SM Minn. Toll Free
Saint Paul. MN 56101 14i00.M 4986
l
Engineers, Architects,
C9V Planners, G Land Surveyors
CONSl1LTN6 Suite 200
ENGNEERS 7200 Hemlock Lone North
Mople Grove. MN 55069
DIVERSIFIED NC (612) 425-2181
A D010hUS Cw,%"V XX iL
aAA
N Bart n-
o Aschman Associates, Inc.
Community. Transportation & EnvMonmlentel Planning
Civil • Trattic Engineering
Landscape Archheetwe
1610 South Slash Street. 110111nneapob. Mrwtewta 56454 16121 M-0421
ry"
Civil. Transportation
commim I r Electrical • Mechanical a Structural
um SkIN14101101 Land Surveying • Land Planning
RAMM
llisd�
ORR-SCHELEN-MAYERON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Division o/ Kidde Consultants, Inc.
2021 East Hennepin Avenue
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413
512/331-BS60
McCombs -Knutson Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers — Surveyors — Planners
SEVAGE COLLECTION d TREATMENT
HIGHVMYS - BRIDGES
NMTER SUPPLY, DISTRWJT10N i
1ANTER RESOURCES
TREATMENT
DRAINAGE
SOLIDS & HAZARDOUS HASTE
LEAK DETECTION
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Wr126110 kulla srW Palk 8 W. • Ptymap4 MN 654t1 a e12-69"M
fIiCHOW" Q MACHMP4a INC.
ENGINEERS• SURVEYORS• PLANNERS
BOIL TESTING
aardlsxis
ergnms
MCI) associates, Inc. larFd surieyas
Un Ird cruses Souls hopkMn, mllnnesots 65343 604* M
a hopkins a braMterd a gsylord a It CI01t1)
ILPauly a Olsen
Associates
Traynor,
Hermanson 113 eoUTH 111h AVENUE
& Hahn, Ltd. 4T• CLOUD. MMe1. SIGN
architect✓enginears alane: ar
Streets and Highways
Wastewater Stabilization Ponds
Wells Water Systems
Sanitary and Storm Sewers
Individual 7tsatment Systems
GMHCo
A ►IIOI $"AL "NV04ATION OF 9190TI/IRD ►YaLIC Ar: MANTANTa
Providing audit and management services
w government units since 1947
George bi, Hansen Company, P.A.
176 SOUTH PLAZA NUILGING
MINNLAPOLIS, MN 50416 612/946.2564
EARL F. ANDERSEN b ASSOCIATES, INC.
9864 James Circle — Bloomington. MN 55431
(612) 884-7300 WATS:1-800-862-6026
STREET, TRAFFIC AND SIGN PRODUCTS
PARK AND RECREATION EQUIPMENT
BLEACHERS/STADIUM SEATING
EHLERS AND ASSOC, INC.
INDEPENDENT FINANCIAL SPECIALISTS
Long.aernl capita Mnenciinp end acqula W /
of funds f>, a + Mras+t tMcipa
W atria,. mom sinners,. atessa s airs
loom 01" U64M
(6121546- 7601 -10550 WAYZATA BLVO. - MWNETONKA. MN 55343
AO -IN
�P
Rs
'yam
T i/
G
yW
Oyu
ya s1
YJ
O
►~�r m ' C
iCaJ
•i�0+ O
•�
yyyE
y a d Y
90
u
: to Q
-rv; icb
cm
C
x os
G
c°
Sac
m
at+ y
Q
C a w 7
j1
•.
O
�C
f
c
V
y d p
Z
ooa'�
aCi v
M
O T
V d
l:
VJ b
W U) 0
yp
c
c
c►u-
°eEo
CFA
i
•� nOi
Cl 0 N
r+
O
7
G t N
0�
c
•
to
a
u
-0..y.
3
->u
y
g004v o.
m c
w
= H
C
ad O ry
Ow d
Z O
.0
O
aid
oy
e
WE
——-g�
�.
u - go CL
o
di �
a7i �
N ui ao a
cc cc
Cc VA
!aI
IM
A I I I Novas Olt Al IV is
4�
I all a] ve i
3 A �; s •
c cti
■�� rsa o9 P RON
tjC13��
O � �i aa11fig . ills � �� �$ � aOC�� I