2011-02-08 PC Agenda Packet
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL – ADOPT AGENDA
2. MINUTES
January 11, 2011 Planning and Zoning Meeting (pages 1-7)
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. Particle Control to consider rezoning their property at 6062 Lambert Avenue,
Albertville, MN from B-3, Highway Commercial District to PUD, Planned Unit
Development and to consider site and building plans for the placement of silos on
this site (pages 8-22)
4. OTHER BUSINESS
a. Building Official Report (pages 23 to 25)
5. ADJOURNMENT
“A quorum of Council members may be present.”
1
PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES
JANUARY 11, 2011
Albertville Council Chamber 7:01 PM
CALL TO ORDER – ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m.
PRESENT: Chair Frank Kocon, Commission members Natalya Lindberg, and Dale Edgren
OTHERS: Council liaison Dan Wagner, City Planner Al Brixius, Zoning Administrator/
Building Official Jon Sutherland, and City Clerk/Recording Secretary Bridget Miller
ABSENT: Commission members Robert Olson and Brian Totman
ADOPT AGENDA
P&ZCMs Edgren/Lindberg motioned to approve the Tuesday, January 11, 2011 agenda as
presented, which will be scanned and an electronic copy will be kept on file in the office of the
City Clerk. Motion carried unanimously.
MINUTES
P&ZCMs Lindberg/Edgren motioned to approve the Wednesday, September 15, 2010 regular
Planning and Zoning Commission minutes as presented, the minutes will be scanned and an
electronic copy will be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. Motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
AMENDMENTS TO THE FENCE REGULATIONS, SECTION 1000.6.A AND SECTION 1006.J.
(TEMPORARY FENCES) OF CHAPTER 1000 OF THE ALBERTVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE
(APPENDIX A)
Chair Kocon opened the public hearing at 7:05 p.m.
City of Albertville
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 11, 2011
Page 2 of 7
2
City Planner Brixius began the discussion stating that in June 2010 the Planning Commission
reviewed the issues related to the placement of a temporary fence that was installed for the 2009-
2010 winter season. In 2009, the City received complaints regarding the location, appearance,
and the duration of a temporary fence from the neighbors.
Brixius continued noting that within the Albertville City Code Appendix A (known as the
Zoning Ordinance) in Section 1000.6 deals with fences. Under Provision A it states that it is
illegal for any person, except on a farm and related to farming, to construct or erect a fence
within the City without a fence permit. Based on this provision, the City has informed the past
violators that temporary fences are prohibited.
Brixius explained that in some cases temporary fences may be acceptable or necessary such as
those to secure a construction site. Yet, the question still remains “should the ordinance be
amended to make some accommodation for the allowance of temporary fences?”
Staff initially presented this information to the Commission in September 2010, with the
outcome to pursue the consideration to amend the Albertville City Code. The suggestions and or
recommendations to amend the regulations are as follows:
1. Construction site fences
2. Residential garden fences
3. Snow fences
Below are the proposed changes to the Albertville City Code, Appendix A (Zoning Ordinances)
Section 1000.6.
1000.6.J. Exception to Fence Permits. The following temporary fences may be installed or
erected without a fence permit:
1. Construction fences needed to secure a construction or excavation site, provided:
a. The project site has an active building permit, demolition permit, or excavation permit.
b. Said fence location is approved by the City Building Official.
2. Garden fences used to protect gardens, shrubs or landscaping from damage from animals
or ornamental fencing that accents a landscape feature may be allowed within a
residential zoning district provided:
a. Garden fences shall not exceed forty-two (42) inches in height.
b. Garden fences shall not be a boundary line fence and shall not be located closer than
five (5) feet from any lot line.
3. Snow fences for the purpose of controlling drifting snow shall be allowed provided:
City of Albertville
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 11, 2011
Page 3 of 7
3
a. Snow fences shall not be a boundary line fence and shall not be located closer than
five (5) feet from any lot line.
b. Snow fences shall not be located in the front yard of any residential lot.
c. Snow fences shall be of a temporary design. These fences shall not be installed prior
to November 15th and shall be removed no later than March 15th.
4. Any fences related to an active farm and/or permitted farming activity.
Staff has published the notice informing the residents there is a public hearing to express their
opinion on the temporary fence ordinance amendment.
Chair Kocon opened up the public hearing to the Commission members’ comments.
Commission member Lindberg asked why five (5) feet away from the property instead of two (2)
feet. Brixius commented the five (5) feet is the side yard setback.
Chair Kocon appeared to be in agreement with the proposed ordinance amendment; however,
Commission member Edgren inquired if this pertained to residential property or if it applies to
all property that would include the homes along CSAH 37 zoned commercial or agricultural.
Brixius noted this would apply towards residential more so than commercial or agricultural.
Chair Kocon opened up the public hearing to the general public.
There was no one in the audience to comment on the proposed language pertaining to signage
throughout Albertville.
Chair Kocon closed the public hearing at 7:12 p.m.
P&ZCMs Edgren/Lindberg motioned to approve Ordinance No. 2011-001 entitled an
Ordinance Amending Section 1000.6 (Fences) of Chapter 1000 (General Building and
Performance Requirements) of Appendix A (Zoning Ordinance) of the 2005 Albertville
Municipal City Code Relating to Temporary Fence Regulations as proposed. Motion carried
unanimously.
AMENDMENTS TO SIGN REGULATIONS, TITLE 10, CHAPTER 7 OF THE ALBERTVILLE CITY
CODE RELATED TO NUMBER OF TEMPORARY SIGNS PERMITTED
Chair Kocon opened the public hearing at 7:13 p.m.
City Planner Brixius began by commenting business owners approached staff in 2009 inquiring
about the possibility of increasing the number of temporary portable signs allowed in a year.
The maximum is four (4) per year per building. The US and other countries have experienced
City of Albertville
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 11, 2011
Page 4 of 7
4
tough times with the economic woes. Albertville amended the ordinance in 2010 to increase the
number to six (6) per year that expired December 31, 2010. Staff is suggesting extending the
allowance to December 31, 2012.
Chair Kocon opened up the public hearing to the Commission members’ comments.
Chair Kocon and Commission member Edgren were in agreement to allow business owners the
ability to have six (6) temporary portable signs for a temporary length. Commission member
Lindberg did not agree with the amendment and would like to keep it at four (4) per year.
Lindberg thought four (4) temporary signs per year would be sufficient.
Chair Kocon opened up the public hearing to the Commission members’ comments.
Business owner Joe Holtz of Neighbor’s Eatery and Salon commented that six (6) signs per year
does not allow many businesses to display specials or sales. Mr. Holtz also shared comments
about the possibility of amending the sign ordinance pertaining to off-premise signage.
Building Official Sutherland informed the Commission members that he did authorize and allow
Neighbor’s Eatery and Saloon to place a temporary portable sign on CSAH 37. As Sutherland
continued to explain, he noted that other business owners along CSAH 19 apply for a temporary
portable sign that is placed within the right-of-way not directly in conjunction with their
property. Taking those few businesses into consideration, Sutherland felt the approval or
authorization for the Neighbor’s Eatery and Saloon temporary portable sign at the end of Main
Avenue NE along CSAH 37 would be comparable to what the other sites have done in previous
years.
Council liaison Wagner made the suggestion that if you are going to increase the number
allowed why not go with eight (8). There are a number of strip malls in Albertville that house
multiple tenants, increasing the number to eight (8) per year per building, Wagner did not see it
would be that harmful to the City.
Wagner went on to inquire what other communities do when there are multiple tenants in a
building and or structure. City Planner Brixius did not have the information at the moment, but
would research for the Council meeting.
Chair Kocon closed the public hearing at 7:52 p.m.
P&ZCMs Lindberg motioned, no commission member seconded to approve Ordinance No.
2011-002 entitled an Ordinance Amending Section 7 (General Standards) of Chapter 7 (Sign
Regulations) of Title 10 (Building and Development Regulations) of the 2005 Albertville
Municipal City Code Relating to the number of Temporary and Portable Signs Allowed as
presented. Motion failed due to a lack of a second.
P&Z Chairman/CMs Kocon/Edgren motioned to approve Ordinance No. 2011-002 entitled an
Ordinance Amending Section 7 (General Standards) of Chapter 7 (Sign Regulations) of Title 10
(Building and Development Regulations) of the 2005 Albertville Municipal City Code Relating
City of Albertville
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 11, 2011
Page 5 of 7
5
to the number of Temporary and Portable Signs Allowed as amended increasing the number to
eight (8) per year until December 31, 2012. Chair Kocon and Commission member Edgren voted
aye. Commission member Lindberg voted nay. Motion carried.
AMENDMENT TO NON-CONFORMING USE REGULATIONS, SECTION 900.2 OF CHAPTER 900 OF
THE ALBERTVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE
Chair Kocon opened the public hearing at 7:55 p.m.
City Planner Brixius informed the Commission members that a single-family home along 60th
Street NE lost their garage due to a fire. According to the Albertville Zoning District map, this
property is zoned B-4 General Business District making the re-establishment of a garage non-
conforming use within the site.
Building Official/Zoning Administrator Sutherland advised the homeowner that Minnesota State
Statutes 462.357 had been amended a few years ago to allow the reconstruction of a legal non-
conforming use or structure lost to fire or peril. Amending the Albertville City Code Appendix
A (Zoning Ordinance) to include language similar to the Minnesota State Statutes would give the
homeowner the ability to reconstruct the garage if a building permit is submitted in 180 days of
the event.
Staff continued commenting that the second part of the change is amending the City Code
dealing with extending the time period for abandoned non-conforming use or occupancy to one
(1) year.
Chair Kocon opened up the public hearing to the Commission members’ comments.
Commission accepted staff’s recommendation to take measures to correct the current language
relating to non-conforming use in the various areas of the 2005 Albertville City Code as
proposed below:
SECTION 1. Section 900.2 (Provisions) of Chapter 900 (Non-Conforming Buildings,
Structures and Uses) is hereby amended as follows:
900.2. Provisions.
If at any time, a non-conforming building, structure or use shall be destroyed to the extent of
more than fifty percent (50%) of its fair market value, said value to be determined by the City, it
may be re-established to its prior size and form, but not expanded, if the property owner applies
for a building permit within one hundred eighty (180) days of the damage event. If no building
permit is applied for within the specified time period, then . . .
Chair Kocon opened up the public hearing to the members present in the audience, which there
were no additional comments made.
Chair Kocon closed the public hearing at 8:00 p.m.
City of Albertville
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 11, 2011
Page 6 of 7
6
P&ZCMs Lindberg/Edgren motioned to approve Ordinance No. 2011-003 entitled an
Ordinance Amending Section 900.2 (Provisions) of Chapter 0900 (Non-conforming Building
Structures and Uses) of Title Appendix A (Zoning Regulations) of the 2005 Albertville
Municipal City Code as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
AMENDMENT TO SIGN REGULATIONS, TITLE 10, CHAPTER 7 OF THE ALBERTVILLE CITY CODE
RELATED TO LOCATION OF WALL SIGNS
Chair Kocon opened the public hearing at 8:01 p.m.
City Planner Brixius reported that Space Aliens recently requested to place a business sign on a
wall that does not abut a public right-of-way. According to the Albertville City Code, allowing a
business to install a sign on an exterior wall of a building that does not face a street is not
allowed.
As staff analyzed the City Code, they felt revising Title 10, Chapter 7, Section 8 allowing greater
flexibility in the placement of business walls signs. Allowing business wall signs to be placed on
the side of a building or tenant bay not facing a street right-of-way, provided that no sign is
located on the side of a building where the lot directly abuts a residential zoning district.
Chair Kocon opened up the public hearing to the Commission members’ comments.
Commission members presented accepted staff’s recommendation to take measures to correct the
current language relating to signage in the various areas of the 2005 Albertville City Code.
There was no one in the audience to comment on the proposed language pertaining to signage
throughout Albertville.
Chair Kocon closed the public hearing at 8:09 p.m.
P&ZCMs Edgren/Lindberg motioned to approve Ordinance No. 2011-004 entitled an
Ordinance Amending Section 8 (Permitted Business Signs) of Chapter 7 (Sign Regulations) of
Title 10 (Building and Development Regulations) of the 2005 Albertville Municipal City Code
as presented. Motion carried unanimously.
OTHER BUSINESS
Appoint 2011 Planning and Zoning Commission Officers
City Planner Brixius commented that the Chairperson and Vice-chairperson positions expired in
December 2010. Since there was no meeting in December 2010 it is recommended that the
Commissioner’s nominate and appoint those members this evening. The following nominations
were made to fill the two (2) positions on the Planning and Zoning Commission.
City of Albertville
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
January 11, 2011
Page 7 of 7
7
Chairperson and Vice-chairperson
P&ZCMs Edgren/Lindberg nominated and motioned to appoint Commission member Frank
Kocon to serve as the 2011 Chairperson on the Albertville Planning and Zoning Commission.
Motion carried.
P&Z Chairman/CMs Kocon/Lindberg nominated and motioned to appoint Commission
member Dale Edgren to serve as the 2011 Vice-chairperson on the Albertville Planning and
Zoning Commission. Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
P&ZCMs Edgren/Lindberg motioned to adjourn the January 11, 2011 regular Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting at 8:15 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
_______________________________________
Bridget Miller, City Clerk/Secretary
8
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Larry Kruse
FROM: Alan Brixius
DATE: February 3, 2011
RE: Albertville – Particle Control Rezoning and Site and Building Plans
FILE NO: 163.06 – 11.01
BACKGROUND
Particle Control is a family-owned business located at 6062 Lambert Street. They are a
dry food processing business that specializes in milling, blending, air classifying,
screening, and packaging dry food ingredients. Particle Control approached the City
with a request to place up to two storage silos on their site to accommodate a new
customer that required the handling of bulk materials.
In review of Particle Control’s request, we discovered that their site is zoned B-3,
Highway Commercial District. Their industrial use is a legal non-conforming use within
this district, which may continue to operate in the same size and manner it existed as
when the zoning changed. The B-3 zoning prevents the expansion of this existing
industrial use.
Their site is zoned B-3 based on the City’s ambition to promote commercial
development along I-94 and County Road 37. Planning District 5 of the Albertville
Comprehensive Plan calls for the phasing out of non-conforming uses in favor of
commercial development. The plan recommends actively working with developers and
landowners to achieve the desired redevelopment of non-conforming or incompatible
land uses.
Particle Control is a clean, quiet industrial land use that has been a good neighbor to
the surrounding properties. The City has no nuisance complaints of this business.
Additionally, it provides both industrial tax base and local employment opportunities. In
the current economic climate, neither Particle Control or the City is prepared to seek
redevelopment of this site. In light of these conditions, staff evaluated methods to
accommodate Particle Control’s continued on-site growth and success, while protecting
the City’s long range commercial goals for this area of the City.
9
REZONING
The first option was to rezone the property to an I-1, Limited Industrial District. This
option was reflected due to the range and intensities of the industrial uses that are
allowed in this district. While Particle Control has demonstrated that it is a good
neighbor, the reuse of the property for another I-1 use may not be as favorable.
The alternative zoning option is to rezone the property to PUD, Planned Unit
Development. Through the PUD zoning, the City may define the range of appropriate
land uses and development performance standards unique to the proposed property.
Following staff direction, Particle Control has submitted an application for rezoning to
PUD and a site and building plan for the placement of up to two silos.
In considering any change of zoning, the following criteria (Section 300.1.F) are
applicable:
1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and
provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City
Comprehensive Plan.
Comment: As mentioned earlier, the Albertville Comprehensive Plan guides
this site for commercial land uses and includes recommendations for the
relocation of non-conforming uses and redevelopment of these sites. Particle
Control exists as a legal non-conforming use within the current B-3 Zoning
District, however, neither Particle Control or the City is currently in the position of
site redevelopment.
To maintain the objective of the Comprehensive Plan goals, the proposed PUD
would identify the following limited range of land uses that may be permitted on
the site:
• All permitted, conditional, and accessory uses of the B-3 Zoning District.
• Industrial processing of dry food ingredients limited to milling, blending, air
classification, screening, packaging, warehousing and storage.
Through this list of land uses, the City preserves the long range commercial
redevelopment goals, while making accommodation to continue operation and
growth on the site. This strategy attempts to preserve and grow the City’s
industrial tax base, local job opportunities, and hopefully will encourage Particle
Control to relocate within the City when the business outgrows the site.
2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of
the area.
Comment: As noted earlier, Particle Control has not presented any
compatibility issues for the surrounding properties. The site design locates the
10
buildings in a manner that all traffic and operations are on the north side of the
site, away from the residential properties. The proposed silos would also be
located on the north end of the building. This takes truck deliveries and silo filling
away from the adjoining land use.
3. The proposed use conforms with all performance standards contained herein.
Comment: The current land use and building location are legally non-
conforming in the current B-3 Zoning District. The change in zoning will allow the
use, however, staff proposes to retain the B-3 District required setbacks. The
existing buildings will remain legally non-conforming as shown below. Any new
expansion, such as the silos, will be required to meet all B-3 District setbacks
and height restrictions.
Setback Required Existing Compliant
Front – North 35 feet 11.6 feet No
Side – West 20 feet 51.9 feet Yes
Side – East 20 feet 10.0 feet No
Rear - South 20 feet 7.5 feet No
The proposed silo location meets required front and side yard setback standards.
Architectural Standards. The B-3 District restricts building height to 35 feet. The
district also mandates that 50 percent of all building walls must have an exterior
finish of brick, stone, replicas, etc. Currently, the building meets the B-3 height
standards, but fails to meet the exterior finish standards. Staff is recommending
that through the PUD, the following architectural standards be applied:
(1) All buildings shall not exceed 35 feet in height. This will limit the silo
height to existing standards.
(2) Within the approved PUD shall be the following standards:
(a) Any and all permitted conditional and accessory uses allowed
within the B-3 Zoning District shall meet the architectural standards
of Section 4400.8 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance.
(b) Industrial processing of dry food ingredients buildings may have a
metal exterior finish provided the color of any new building or
structure matches the color and design of the principal building.
This PUD flexibility will preserve the appearance of Particle Control while
accommodating the existing conditions. The new silo will need to match the
color of the principal building. The addition of the site will not immediately
increase employment. No additional parking is required. No parking lot
improvements are necessary.
11
4. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is
proposed.
Comment: Particle Control is a long standing industrial use on this site. The
continuation of the use through the rezoning to PUD is not anticipated to
depreciate the values of the surrounding properties. The PUD zoning will
accommodate the continued operation and growth of Particle Control, while
maintaining the City’s long range objectives for commercial redevelopment.
5. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will
not overburden the City’s service capacity.
Comment: The Particle Control site has access to public utilities. The process
of dry food ingredients is not a high water user. The existing use and proposed
silos will not overburden City utilities or services.
6. Traffic generation by the proposed use is within the capabilities of streets serving
the property.
Comment: The addition of the silo is not anticipated to dramatically increase
traffic to the site. The site is accessed via 60th Street. The traffic generation is
within the capabilities of the streets serving the site.
RECOMMENDATION
The requested rezoning is a means for the City to retain and grow a local industry, while
retaining its long range ambitions for commercial redevelopment along County Road 37.
Absent a current viable redevelopment/relocation alternative, staff is recommending
approval of the applicant’s request for rezoning from B-3 to PUD and approve the
applicant’s site and building plans to construct up to two silos on the site. The
approvals are recommended with the following conditions:
Planned Unit Development. In establishing the PUD Zoning District, the following use
and performance standards shall be applied:
1. Uses. Within the approved PUD, land uses shall be limited to the following:
a. All permitted conditional and accessory uses allowed within the B-3
Zoning District. Any change of use from existing conditions shall be
processed through the appropriate development applications called for by
the Albertville Zoning Ordinance.
b. Industrial processing of dry food ingredients limited to milling, blending, air
classifying, screening, packaging, warehousing, and storage per the
approved site plan received December 2010.
12
2. Setbacks. All new development and any further expansion of the existing
building shall comply with the following setbacks:
a. Front Yard. Thirty-five (35) feet.
b. Side Yard. Twenty (20) feet or thirty-five (35) feet where abutting an “R”
District.
c. Rear Yard. Twenty (20) feet or thirty-five (35) feet where abutting an “R”
District.
3. Building Height. Thirty-five (35) feet.
4. Architectural Standards. Within the approved PUD, architectural standards shall
be the following:
a. Any and all permitted conditional and accessory uses allowed within the
B-3 Zoning District shall meet the architectural standards of Section
4400.8 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance.
b. Industrial processing of dry food ingredients buildings may have a metal
exterior finish provided the color of any new building or structures match
the color and design of the principal building.
These PUD standards shall be used to process any future additions or redevelopments
to the site.
Site Plan. The following conditions shall be required for installation of the proposed
silos:
1. Silo shall not exceed 35 feet in height.
2. Silo shall be located on site per the approved site plan dated December 2010
and provide a minimum setback of 35 feet from the north lot line and 20 feet from
the east lot line.
3. The exterior finish of the silo shall match the color of the principal building.
c: Bridget Miller
Jon Sutherland
Tori Leonhardt
Mike Couri
Adam Nafstad
Particle Control
13
particle
control . inc.
:p:
RECEIVED
JAN 1 1 2011
Building Isspectioar
Particre Control, a family owned business, began opwatiorts in August of 1980. We are a
custom food processor, specializing in milling, btending, air-classifying, screening and packaging
of dry food ingredients. Our facility is FDA and AfB inspected and certified to handle Kosher and
organic ingredients.
Bill Arns is the president and sole proprietor. Particle Control currently employs seven
full time and thee part time workers, some of which have been with us for 15 years or more.
Particle Control is a nationally known food processing company. Some of our biggest
customers include the NutraSweet Company, General Mills, ADM, Con-Agra, and others.
Recently, one of our customers has inquired about having the ability to handle bulk materials,
which would require us to erect a bulk silo at our facility. This would be a smooth wall bofted
(non-permanent) structure. Being able to handle bulk materials would be a significant addition
to the company for it would create new opportunities.
Looking to the future, Particle Control may be seeking to expand our services which
would require us to hire more employees. We look forward to being able to offer employment
opportunities for our local community of Albertville.
6062 Lambert Lane, PO. Box 135, Albertville, MN 5530 1 Phone: 763-497-3075 Fax: 763-497- 1773
14
particle
15
4 aslo. pier~ria, , . .
7, *. . .-+ ci -, u - -\i
PARRCEE CL 'L~rnnnbri), -
Vihgng *r&e $i9 ;s and 4i't ~~r--ike,,
Lan rerp~ unviahted tybtsi, or* .
$@rs$e'fraction can .? 4
We? i "-lbtating'&r, licrL-.
7MULTANEOUS THE~IVIAL-
2ROCESSING 1 GRINDING I
Controlled temperaturelhumidity
systems can heat, cool, dry or coo
istantaneously during the pul, izing
process.
Cnnfidentia ..., -- %
lined Personnel
Quality-Control Lab
Stainless Stee' -yst
FDA Inspectec
AlB Inspected
sher Appro\
I State Licensed
. lant #3
s to - New Product Develop
* Test M&k@t Prad6ciion
16
processing areas and 6 : ?--
separate storage are "
totaling over 33,OO
mare feet,
Storage area #5
PF-DUCT EVALUATION
Mi-
Free Computer-Assisted
1st Analysi rom yoilr
20 Ib. samplc
Computerized Bank
Processing Data for 1 C s of
materials &;gr3 - I
d;-
Storage. area #I
17
INC. is a family-owned Custom
.. -u34'& br6&essing business wifi~four generations and nearly 100 years
combined experience. We began this business in 1980 and we are ..' . li
.<.;, .' located in Albertville, MN, just 20 miles northwest of Minneapolis. -::A, rn
?. ?:<
C r Please feel free to contact us at the numbers listed below. -- . -.I* - 'I
. - Y. ,
L . h. - > -3-
. . . . .. .. . . . . .
I -. . . . . .. -
. ..m . 8 -. . L
-. particle b.:.<:,'.> ,.. . . . -:, ..>.. . , .<;.>- :.:,= > .
--I... .. . . , , r .. . . J , , . control . ..
- -- -- ~ - . -.
. . - *.,.P .-- . ,t~noXi? . I
..I . -
P.O. Box 135 6062 Lambert Street Albertville, MN 55301
CONTACT:
BILL ARNS
PRESIDENT
PHONE: 763-497-3075 612-275-7681 FAX: 763-497-1773
E-MAIL: particIeco@aoI.com
18
FOR lnt nwnta I uu~u~ T, muat ttttulrt a i;ua I ttni;~t~~
DRY FOOD STORAGE SOLUTIONS
vp- .--r- w
I.. . . . . . . . . .1
ly Smoothwall Bolted Silr
Factory Welded Tank!
e leading manufactu
lrequirements and are fabricate( I I
in IS0 9001 certified facilities.
Our factory baked on coatings
are approved by the FDA and] I
for its individual application!
Columbian TecTank can provide
foduct testing to determine
he exact criteria needed ] 1
o design your silo for efficient
and reliable product
flow. Our combination 1 1
bf product knowledge, -
design expertise, 1 1 1 1 11 kngineering and
nufacturing makes
TecTank th~ I I
19
-2 Factory welded silos with food grade welds (no cracks
or crevices in weld profile) - Flush and polished welds per BISSC requirements
-3 Factory welded silos from 500 to 12,000 cubic feet
-3 Bolted smoothwall silos with factory applied coatings in sizes
up to 900,000 cubic feet
-3 Large XL flat bottom storage silo up to 200 diameter (2.5
million cubic feet) have the strength and durability for high
throughput operations. An exceptional and economic alternate
to other permanent storage systems
20
Smooth Wall Silos - 10 O Roof
NBE, Inc. - Forward Thinking. Real Results. Page 1 of 2 1
Capacity Usable
Maximum Air w130 degree pounds Height to Shipping
Hopper Capacity angle of (based on 35 center of Weight
Model Diameter Slope (ft.3) repose (fL3) ~bslft.~) roof lid (Ibs.)
16-9451 9 45 299 245 8,575 13' 2,122
16-9452 9 45 488 434 15,190 16' 2,392
16-9453 9 45 677 623 21,805 19' 2,662
16-9454 9 45 866 812 28,420 22' 2,890
16-9455 9 45 1,055 1,001 35,035 25' 3,202
16-9456 9 45 1,244 1,190 41,650 28' 2,661
16-9601 9 60 367 313 10,995 16' 2,279
16-9602 9 60 556 502 17,570 19' 2,548
16-9603 9 60 745 691 24,185 22' 2,818
16-9604 9 60 934 880 30,800 25' 3,085
16-9605 9 60 1,123 1,069 37,415 28' 3,359
16-9606 9 60 1,312 1,258 44,030 31' 3,811
16-12451 12 45 597 456 15,960 13'-4" 3,043
16-12452 12 45 933 792 27,720 16'-4" 3,403
16-12453 12 45 1,269 1,128 39,480 19-4" 3,764
16-12454 12 45 1,605 1,464 51,240 22'-4" 4,669
16-12455 12 45 1,941 1,800 63,000 25'-4" 5,100
16-15601 15 60 1,354 1,064 37,240 19'-7" 6,952
16-15602 15 60 1,879 1,589 55,615 22'-7" 7,402
21
NBE, Inc. - Forward Thinking. Real Results.
-
Page 2 of 2
View Other !
++
mooth Wall Silo Specs
22
Mayor and Council Communication
C:\nac\Clients\Albertville\PC Packet Feb 11\BO Report December 2010.doc
January 4, 2011
Brief Description Building/Zoning Dept Report December, 2010.
Recommended Action None
Background Activity Report for Council review. The report has additional
information than normal in order to provide greater detail for the
new Mayor and Council member
• Construction Activity in December is typically a slow month; however, this year it was better
considering the economy. We had a total of 17 permits issued in December for a value of
$1,304,309. We had 241 permits for the year with a total permit value of $3,361,990.
December’s residential activity included one (1) Single-family Dwelling located at 10141
Karston Court NE, five (5) more furnace/AC replacements, several window and door
replacements, and a water heater.
• Commercial activity included an interior door for Patty J’s new Restaurant at 5262 Kyler
Avenue NE, Westwind Apartments obtained a commercial alteration permit for building
maintenance and improvements at 10740 CSAH 37, Summit Chiropractic installed an x-ray
room at 10904 57th Street NE. We also had several commercial mechanical and plumbing
permits. I worked with the League of MN Cities Insurance agent and the contractor
regarding the replacement of the City Hall skylight that was damaged by hail. I also worked
with the sub-contractor who has submitted a proposal to repair the water damage to City Hall
due to the leaking skylight.
• New Laws enacted by the State Legislature, I reviewed new laws relating to building codes,
contractors, and additional duties of the Building Official and the City that are now required
by these laws (Mike Couri is our expert and advised me of the ramifications of these laws or
unfunded mandates).
Agenda Item No. 6.D.1.
Meeting Date February 7, 2011
• Planning and Zoning; December was another busy month for planning and zoning activity
and we responded to various issues including but not limited to; general inquiries related to
commercial exterior storage (Scherer Bros. Lumber), developers agreements and
maintenance of improvements and stormwater ponds (Kollville Estates), discussion of
defunct associations and plowing of Streets (Prairie Run – 51st Street), landscaping
requirements and enforcement (Emma’s Express). Staff assisted the planner who prepared
zoning ordinance changes that will be submitted to the Planning Commission in January. We
reviewed a proposal for a new sign at Space Aliens and staff will propose a sign code
modification for interdepartmental review and bring this to the Planning Commission for
input. We conducted a zoning review of the Particle Control site at 6062 Lambert Avenue
NE and met with the owner, Bill Arns who is interested in erecting two (2) silos on the
property. We responded to inquiries regarding mail boxes that were damaged by vehicles
23
Mayor and Council Communication – January 4, 2011
Building Official – December 2010 Monthly Report Page 2 of 2
C:\nac\Clients\Albertville\PC Packet Feb 11\BO Report December 2010.doc
and or the snow plow and who and what is required by the City to repair them. Staff
discussed if fences are required when a person is required to have a private dog kennel
permit.
• Ordinance Enforcement; issues include sign code enforcement, removing signs from the right
of way, enforcement of commercial temporary signage, building code violations, water
drainage/water problems, refuse in the ditch, continued work with Pro-Tech Marine and
Emma’s Express regarding Council CUP approval. We worked on dog kennels, wetlands,
and fences.
• Foreclosures; our work continues with vacant foreclosed houses with registration and
inspections. Foreclosure work includes investigation, registration, inspection, and follow up.
A few of our foreclosures are apparent because their driveways may not be plowed this time
of year. Many housing maintenance, building, electrical, mechanical, and plumbing code
items are being addressed through the enforcement of the Vacant Property Registration
Ordinance.
• Rental Housing inspections; rental licensing, and inspections continue; we obtain many
corrections to rental housing violations including but not limited to safety, gas leaks, smoke
and carbon monoxide detectors, and electrical code violations. Our local state electrical
inspector assists me with resolving the electrical code violations with the rental properties.
Some foreclosures are turning from owner occupied into rentals and this could be a concern
for the Council.
• Fire Department; I continue to assist the Fire Department with the Fire Code enforcement
and general assistance with their program. We continue to work with Burger King, the
Outlet Mall, and other businesses.
Submitted through: Larry Kruse, City Administrator
Originated by: Jon Sutherland, Building Official/Zoning Administrator
Reviewed by: Tori Leonhardt, Certified Building Permit Tech
Attachments: Building Dept. Revenue
Agenda Item No. 6.D.1.
Meeting Date February 7, 2011
24
2
0
1
0
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
D
e
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
Y
e
a
r
E
n
d
Re
v
e
n
u
e
R
e
p
o
r
t
Va
l
u
a
t
i
o
n
Pe
r
m
i
t
F
e
e
s
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
Pe
r
m
i
t
s
1,
3
0
4
,
3
0
9
.
0
0
$
24
,
6
9
3
.
3
0
$
Le
s
s
S
A
C
,
W
A
C
St
o
r
m
W
a
t
e
r
,
S
&
W
&
M
e
t
e
r
7,
5
9
6
.
0
0
$
Le
s
s
S
i
g
n
s
-
$
De
c
e
m
b
e
r
T
o
t
a
l
17
,
0
9
7
.
3
0
$
Ye
a
r
t
o
d
a
t
e
S
u
b
T
o
t
a
l
(
J
a
n
u
a
r
y
-
D
e
c
e
m
b
e
r
)
64
,
3
4
8
.
2
1
$
20
1
0
R
e
n
t
a
l
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
12
,
9
4
0
.
0
0
$
20
1
0
V
P
R
O
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
Re
g
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
s
79
a
t
$
1
0
0
e
a
c
h
7,
9
0
0
.
0
0
$
Re
-
I
n
s
p
e
c
t
i
o
n
s
34
a
t
$
5
0
e
a
c
h
1,
7
0
0
.
0
0
$
20
1
0
T
e
m
p
S
i
g
n
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
34
a
t
$
2
5
e
a
c
h
85
0
.
0
0
$
20
1
0
T
o
t
a
l
Y
e
a
r
t
o
D
a
t
e
R
e
v
e
n
u
e
87
,
7
3
8
.
2
1
$
25