2012-02-14 Albertville Planning and Zoning Packet
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Tuesday, February 14, 2012
7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL – ADOPT AGENDA
2. MINUTES
October 11, 2011 Planning and Zoning Meeting (pages 1-5)
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
None
4. OTHER BUSINESS
a. Discussion of City Vision Study (Future Community Goals and Issues)
(pages 6-24)
5. ADJOURNMENT
“A quorum of Council members may be present.”
PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES
October 11, 2011
Albertville Council Chamber 7:00 PM
CALL TO ORDER – ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m.
PRESENT: Chair Frank Kocon, Commission members Natalya Lindberg, Robert Olson, Brian
Totman, and Council liaison Dan Wagner
OTHERS: City Planner Al Brixius, Zoning Administrator/Building Official Jon Sutherland,
and City Clerk/Recording Secretary Bridget Miller
ABSENT: Commission member Dale Edgren
ADOPT AGENDA
P&ZCMs Totman/Lindgren motioned to approve the Tuesday, October 11, 2011 agenda as
presented, which will be scanned and an electronic copy will be kept on file in the office of the
City Clerk. Motion carried unanimously.
MINUTES
P&ZCMs Olson/Totman motioned to approve the Tuesday, August 9, 2011 regular Planning
and Zoning Commission minutes as presented, the minutes will be scanned and an electronic
copy will be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk. Motion carried unanimously.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
A PPROVE AN A MENDMENT TO THE P RAIRIE R UN P LANNED U NIT D EVELOPMENT (PUD) FOR
L OTS 1-13,B LOCK 2,P RAIRIE R UN A DDITION CHANGING THE REQUIRED SETBACK TO
ACCOMMODATE A VARIETY OF HOUSE DESIGNS FOR THESE LOTS
Chair Kocon opened the public hearing at 7:03 p.m.
1
City of Albertville
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
October 11, 2011
Page 2 of 5
City Planner Brixius stated that in 2004 Dean Johnson submitted a Development Application for
a residential layout in the southern part of Albertville off of CSAH 18 otherwise known as Jason
Avenue NE. The lots within Block 2 of the development were smaller lot sizes that were
designed for a specific unique housing style with garages in the rear yard.
Access to these homes would be via a private driveway with a cul-de-sac, which would be
maintained by a Homeowners’ Association. The approval was by Planned Unit Development
(PUD) that allowed restricted amenities, one being a 30-foot wide driveway that does not meet
the standard street width. Since City Council approval there have been only three (3) lots sold
and have had homes constructed on them.
With the real estate market turndown the developer, Dean Johnson, let it go. There was a
litigation between Gold Key Development and the City of Albertville. As an outcome of the
litigation the City became owners of ten (10) of the thirteen (13) lots in Block 2, Prairie Run
Addition.
Brixius shared that in review of the economy and the prior storms, the original housing design
needs to be re-defined allowing the housing pads for each of the lots to accommodate a variety of
house styles. There are a few lots that may require slab on grade homes to meet the high water
level elevations.
Brixius reviewed the five (5) key points being proposed for the conceptual house foot print. The
list of alterative designs follows:
1.Front Yard Setback.Twenty feet (20’) from the principal structure. This is slightly
larger than the original setback of seventeen feet (17’). Reducing the front yard setback
by three feet (3’) will not have a negative impact on the existing homes. Increasing the
setback will provide space for snow storage and traffic sight lines.
2.Garage Front Yard Setback. Similar to standards in the Towne Lakes subdivision, the
City would recommend a minimum twenty-five foot (25’) setback from garage door to
the front lot line. Moving the garage back an additional five feet (5’) reduces the visual
impact of the outdoor parking on the driveway, snow storage, and visibility for motorists.
3.Side Yard Setback. The original Planned Unit Development (PUD) that was approved
had a ten foot (10’) side yard setback. The platted side yard setback is acceptable;
however, the City wanted to provide additional building space. It is the Planning and
Zoning Commission along with the City Council’s decision to consider a ten foot/five
foot (10’/5’) standard. Between principal building (or living space) the side yard would
be ten foot (10’). It if is garage to garage the side yard would be a five foot (5’) setback.
4.Rear Yard Setback. Lots 3-6, Block 2, back up to CSAH 18 (Jason Avenue NE).
According to the original plat it provided a landscaped buffer yard to screen these homes.
To remain consistent with the plat approval, staff is recommending maintaining a fifty
foot (50’) rear yard setback from CSAH 18 (Jason Avenue NE).
Lots 8-13, Block, have lot depths that extend into adjacent wetlands and drainage ditches.
These lots were originally approved without a designated wetland buffer(s). Staff is
proposing a minimum structure setback from the wetland boundary. An alternative
would be to design a ten foot (10’) structure setback from the wetland boundary. In
2
City of Albertville
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
October 11, 2011
Page 3 of 5
addition to the ten foot (10’) wetland setback, within the space vegetation is to be planted
that would provide a ten foot (10’) filter strip beyond the wetland boundary.
5.Building Elevations. Within the 2005 Albertville Municipal City Code Appendix A
(Zoning Ordinance) Section 1000.9 establishes the City’s minimum structure elevations:
“1. For structure adjacent to ponds, wetlands, ditches, and other water
bodies: all low opening elevations shall be at least two feet (2’) above the
100-year flood level known as High Water Level (HWL); all low floor
elevations shall be at least one foot (1’) above Normal Water Level (NWL);
all low openings shall be at least two feet (2’) above the Emergency
Overflow (EOF).”
Brixius noted that all houses built within the Prairie Run Addition must meet these structure
elevation standards. Since Lots 8-13, Block 2 butt up against the wetlands and the ditch, these
homes may not be able to have a basement; therefore, suggest they be slab on grade.
Brixius summarized, staff’s alternative design promotes a more traditional neighborhood that
allows flexibility in housing styles and individual lot capability. In addition, staff is
recommending negotiating a sale of Lot 13, Block 2 with Majestic Builders. Majestic Builders
may want to examine the lot with the aforementioned new standards to determine if it meets their
needs.
Chair Kocon shared that he is familiar with the development site. Kocon expressed strong
concerns with the interior lots that butt up against the wetlands as well as those in the cul-de-sac
that have wetland in the rear yard. Kocon noted that during 2003 and in about 2006 and 2007
there was amountable rainfalls that caused flooding issues in the area. Kocon recommended
going with staff’s thought of slab on grade for Lots 8-13, Block 2. If the people that buy the lots
decide they want to construct a basement they are sure to have water problems.
Chair Kocon opened the discussion to the Commission members to hear their reaction and
response to the proposed improvement in the Prairie Run Addition.
Brixius acknowledged Kocon’s concern with the water that has been of a concern for Albertville.
The stormwater detention pond on the STMA School property to the west was designed to help
take care of future flooding in the area.
Brixius demonstrated that staff’s alternative design allows for a slightly larger building pad for
these homes to potentially accommodate the slab on grade home. Brixius commented that the
homes in the area may be smaller than usual homes, which will appeal to a select area of
individuals interested in this style of home.
Kocon continued to share his concern with this development, even more so hearing that these are
City owned lots. Kocon wants to make sure both the City and the future/potential buyer will be
satisfied with the structure that will be allowed or restricted to. He doesn’t want to hear the new
homebuyer is experiencing water problems in the lower level.
3
City of Albertville
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
October 11, 2011
Page 4 of 5
Council liaison Wagner agreed with Kocon about putting the flood elevations in the Developer’s
Agreement. That way, when the builder submits the building permit the City or Building
Official will have the documentation to demonstrate the flood elevations for the area. Wagner
continued by adding the comment that this may not be the best solution, but is being upfront with
the condition of the lots that are below grade so additional fill will be needed prior to
construction of a house.
City Engineer Nafstad was in the building and shared with the Planning and Zoning Commission
that the four (4) lots to the north of Block 2 are buildable lots.Nafstad confirmed that these will;
however, need to be limited to structures on grade. These homes will not be able to
accommodate a basement.
Chair Kocon opened the discussion of the public hearing to obtain comments from the general
public. There were no members of the public attending the meeting.
Chair Kocon closed the public hearing at 7:40 p.m.
P&ZCMs Olson/Lindberg motioned to approve an Amendment to the Prairie Run Developer’s
Agreement Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Lots 1-13, Block 2, Prairie Run Addition
changing the required setback to accommodate a variety of house designs for these lots with the
City Planner’s and Building Official/Zoning Administrator’s recommendations in the October 2,
2011 Report that included the following:
1.The Planning and Zoning Commission has determined and City Council must determine
that the proposed garage roofing must be the same material and consistent with the
existing roof on the balance of the single-family home. The roof slope must be increased
in order to accommodate shingles and to be compliant with building code and
specifications.
2.No Home Occupation or commercial business shall be operated out of the residential
garage.
3.The lowest floor elevation shall be no lower than as identified by the City Engineer, and
the floor elevation shall be identified to be consistent with the requirement prior to any
construction past the foundation top of block (at the threshold of the rear overhead door).
Motion carried unanimously.
4
City of Albertville
Planning & Zoning Commission Minutes
October 11, 2011
Page 5 of 5
OTHER BUSINESS
City Planner Brixius commented that Neighbor’s Eatery and Salon is considering adding an
outdoor dining area to the existing establishment and doing some improvements to the parking
lot surface. Staff has met with Mr. Holtz, owner of the business, to go over some of the
requirements he needs to meet in order to accomplish what he wants to do.
This may be coming up on the November meeting, provided the applicant submits the material
by the required due dates.
ADJOURN
P&ZCMs Totman/Lindberg motioned to adjourn the October 11, 2011 regular Planning and
Zoning Commission meeting at 7:45 p.m. Motion carried unanimously.
_______________________________________
Bridget Miller, City Clerk/Secretary
5
MEMORANDUM
TO: Larry Kruse
FROM: Alan Brixius
DATE: February 9, 2012
RE: Albertville – Visioning
FILE NO: 163.16
In December 2011, the Albertville City Council approved the attached work program for
a Vision Study to define the City’s future community and land use goals. The Planning
Commission will be an integral part to this visioning process. Attached for Planning
Commission review and discussion are the following:
1. Visioning Study Work Program
2. Existing Land Use Plan and Acreage Summary
3. Albertville Proposed Land Use Map
4. Albertville Subdivision Map
5. Albertville Zoning Map
6. Albertville NWI Map
7. Albertville Sanitary Sewer Map
8. Albertville Water System Map
c: Bridget Miller
Adam Nafstad
Mike Couri
Jon Sutherland
Sue Schwalbe
6
MEMORANDUM
TO: Larry Kruse
FROM: Alan Brixius
DATE: November 30, 2011
RE: Albertville – Visioning Study / Comprehensive Plan
FILE NO: 802
In February 2011, NAC presented a proposal to update the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
In reviewing the proposal with the City Council, it was not accepted due to financial
constraints faced by the City. In recent months, the City has had a number of inquiries
from property owners regarding the land use and transportation issues pertaining to the
development of their properties.Some of the meetings included:
Meeting with Scott Dahlke regarding the Leuer property at the corner of County
Roads 19 and 18. The issues surrounding this property include access and
street networks to and through the property. The property’s development will
also impact the Psyk’s properties to the north and east.
Meeting with Leann Daniels regarding the immediate and long range land use
and transportation patterns for her property and the balance of the land in
northeast Albertville. The issues surrounding this area are the availability of
utilities, street patterns, and land use impacts from St. Michael and Otsego.
Meeting with Opus and Darkenwald related to land use and transportation
patterns in northwestern Albertville.
The January 2011 proposal also identified other issues that were identified by staff that
should be addressed through a Comprehensive Plan process. The January 2011
proposal outlined a specific work program and a limited budget. In review of this
proposal, we are willing to offer the same budget estimate if the Council is interested in
pursuing the Comprehensive Plan update.
7
If the budget amount is still too great to undertake the Comprehensive Plan at this time,
an alternative would be to undertake a Vision Study for the City Council to identify land
use and development ambitions for the City. Through the visionary process, various
community issues will be presented to the City Council related to land use, economic
development, housing, transportation, utilities, and finance. The Council will
collectively define the City’s vision for the next 10 and 20 years, providing direction to
staff with regard to community priorities, policies, and goals. The vision process is
outlined in the following steps:
I. INVENTORY
NAC, with the help of City staff, will assemble the following inventory items to provide a
basis for identifying community issues and opportunities. The inventory will be gathered
using existing City map information and the 2010 Census. The inventory will give the
Council a snapshot of existing conditions within the City providing a base of information
by which future plans can be made.
A. Social Profile
1. Population and Household Information
2. Age Characteristics
3. Income Characteristics
4. Employment Data
B. Physical Profile
1. Existing and Proposed Land Use
2. Zoning Data
3. Housing Information
a. Housing Type
b. Housing Tenure/Own/Rent
c. Housing Conditions
4. Transportation
a. Streets and Trails Map
5. Utilities Map
6. Environment
a. Lakes
b. Wetlands
c. Drainageways
II. TACTICS INTERVIEWS
A. Staff Interviews. NAC will conduct 30-45 minute interviews with the following City
staff members to identify community issues and opportunities from each
specialized department. The staff interviews are held first to help expand the
inventory and to frame interview questions for the City Council to elicit Council
direction for each department.
8
Larry Kruse, Administrator
Tina Lannes, Finance Director
Bridget Miller, City Clerk
Jon Sutherland, Building Official
Tim Guimont, Public Works
John Middendorf, Waste Treatment
Mike Couri, City Attorney
Adam Nafstad, City Engineer
B. Property Owner Interviews. NAC will conduct 30-45 minute interviews with the
following landowners/developers to solicit their ideas and issues related to the
development of their properties in Albertville:
John Darkenwald
Fay Family
Lenz Family
Mike Leuer
Mike Potter
Douglas Psyk
Zachman Family
C. City Council/Planning Commission Interviews. Using the inventory information
and background from the staff and property owner interviews, NAC will conduct
30-45 minute interviews with each of the Planning Commission and City Council
members to solicit their opinions as to the future vision of Albertville in areas of
community image, land use, transportation, economic development, and housing.
D. Interview Summary. Upon the conclusion of the individual interviews, NAC will
prepare an Issues and Opportunity Summary and Issues Map. This summary
will identify both majority and minority opinions on each topic issue. This
information will be shared with each interview participant.
III. WORKSHOPS / GOAL SETTING
NAC will conduct a workshop with the City Council, Planning Commission and City staff
to review the Issues and Opportunities Summary. Within the workshop, the City will be
asked to identify the most pressing concerns and goals for the City and rank them in
priority order. The workshop group will also be asked for ideas to implement the
identified goals.
The community priorities will be added to the Issues Summary report. NAC will work
with staff to prepare a summary of the next steps for implementing the community
goals.
9
IV. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
The City will advertise public hearings for the presentation of the Vision Plans to the
public. Public hearings will be held by the Planning Commission. Upon closing the
public hearings for the Vision Plan, the Planning Commission will make a
recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of the plan. The City Council
will be asked to review the final document and formally adopt the document as the
foundation for future decisions.
BUDGET
Based on the January 2011 work program, we estimate that the Visioning Study would
have a budget of $6,200.
SUMMARY
The current Council was not part of the original comprehensive planning process. As
such, they have never had the opportunity to outline their goals and visions for the
community. The City has changed dramatically since 1996 and the community issues
have changed and require new attention. The Vision Study would be an initial step in a
Comprehensive Plan update and would have the Council give direction to City staff in
the matters that require priority attention with regard to service, investment, regulations,
or capital improvements. The process outlined in this memo gives everyone a voice,
both individually and collectively, in defining the future vision for Albertville.
10
MEMORANDUM
TO: Larry Kruse
FROM: Alan Brixius
DATE: January 11, 2011
RE: Albertville Comprehensive Plan
FILE NO: 802
Albertville’s Comprehensive Plan was prepared in 1995 and revised in 1996 with the
dissolution of Frankfort Township. In 1994, Albertville’s population was 1,917 and had a
household count of 681. Over the years, the City has amended its land use plan a
number of times to reflect a desired change in its land use composition, however these
map changes only address specific geographic areas.
The 1996 plan addressed issues of fast growth, sizing and extension of utilities, housing
stock composition, and the expanding need for services. The 1996 plan established
goals and policies to give the City direction to address those issues.
Following its Comprehensive Plan, Albertville has grown over the past 14 years to a
population of approximately 6,500 and approximately 2,400 households. The City now
has established neighborhoods and a limited supply of residentially zoned land
remaining. There are significant commercial areas with remaining vacant land and
large areas of industrially guided land.
As the City progresses toward 2020 and beyond, the community issues will move away
from the fast growth policies of the 1996 plan and will need to focus on infill
development, maintenance of existing neighborhoods and appropriate land uses.
Redevelopment may be an option as the City continues to mature. With small parcels
for development, the City will need to outlines its intentions for land use, quality of
development, utility needs, and transportation. In brainstorming with staff, the following
areas will need attention as the City grows to saturation:
City-Wide Issues:
Protection, maintenance, and code enforcement within the City’s established
residential neighborhoods.
11
Type, quality and location of Albertville’s future commercial and industrial
development.
Implementation of the City’s Comprehensive Stormwater Drainage Plan.
Extension of utilities to unsewered areas of the City.
Transportation Issues:
The City has a number of important transportation issues that require attention including
but not limited to:
I-94/County Road 19 Interchange. The City’s preferred design should be part of
the Comprehensive Plan. This inclusion is helpful in pursuing Federal or State
funding in that it represents the City’s commitment to the project.
Collector streets that will require future attention will include:
th
1. The future design, timing and construction of 70 Street.
2. The County’s desire to turn back County Road 37 to the City.
th
3. Future design, timing and construction of 50 Street.
4. Define the City’s position on the extension of Main Street.
5. Design, timing and construction of County Road 19 improvements north of
I-94.
Local street issues include:
rd
1. Future alignment and extension of 53 Street to County Road 19.
th
2. Design and location of LaCenter Drive frontage road from 57 Street to
th
50 Street to accommodate commercial development.
3. Street access to the Otsego Tool/Oman Bros. site.
th
4. Street access to the Fay property off of 67 Street.
5. Street access to the Zachman property south of the Greenhaven
neighborhood.
th
6. Extension of Kassel Avenue from Albert Villas 6 Addition to County Road
18.
th
7. Future street access to the remaining Psyk land north of 50 Street.
Land Use Issues:
The City recently updated its Comprehensive Plan for northwest Albertville.
These changes will be included in the plan update.
Greenhaven subdivision and surrounding area of the City must guide the land
uses in this area with the anticipation of the extension of utilities.
12
Land use transition area between the County Road 19 commercial areas and the
residentially zoned Psyk property.
Infill development of the Psyk farm.
rd
Access and design for the commercially zoned Leuer property north of 53
Street and west of County Road 19.
Future land use and access for property at the southeast corner of County Road
19 and County Road 18.
Future land use and access to the property south of the middle school.
Future land use and access to City land north of the City’s waste treatment plant.
Future land use ambitions for commercial areas along Main Street and County
Road 37.
This list of issues represents a sampling of items that may be addressed in the
Comprehensive Plan update. We recognize that the planning, development and
economic cycles seldom align and that the current state of the economy makes it hard
to allocate funds for planning. This being said, the Comprehensive Plan update is more
than a land use plan. Through this process, the City will establish its long term vision
and incremental goals for the community that will guide future investment and create
strategies for financing.
Undertaking the plan update during the current lull in the economy will give the City the
change to outline its ideas for assisting property owners and businesses through this
recession and also clearly define its long range land use, transportation, and
infrastructure objectives. The following work program has the Council and Planning
Commission guiding the process, but gives opportunities to the general public for
feedback and comment through a community survey, neighborhood open houses,
community-wide open house, and public hearing. In preparing this work program, we
have attempted to be sensitive to City costs. Typically, an entire Comprehensive Plan
would cost twice the price listed. In 2009, NAC prepared a plan for Waverly, MN for
$31,050. However, with our history with Albertville and the previous planning efforts, we
believe we can deliver a quality planning document for this reduced price.
We will be available to discuss this proposal with the City Council at next Monday’s
workshop.
13
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WORK PROGRAM
TACTICS INTERVIEWS
Individual interviews with City staff, Public Works, Planning Commission, Park
Committee, and City Council. The Tactics interviews provide background and
perceptions as to the City functions, utility capacity, and future growth goals and
opportunities. The Tactics interviews will define the scope of the Comprehensive Plan.
Following the interviews, a summary of community issues and opportunities will be
prepared. This summary will present both majority and minority opinions on each issue.
The issue and opportunity summary will provide the foundation for goal setting.
INVENTORY
The City Inventory identifies the physical parameters that will define the City’s long
range planning consisting of:
1.Social Profile. City demographics including population, households, and age.
For Albertville, we will use current State demographic information. Forecasts will
be based on a community build out of remaining land translated into future
household numbers and population. This information will be evaluated against
the capacity of City utilities and services.
2.Physical Profile. The physical features within the City that influence growth,
land use, service delivery, transportation and utilities including:
a. Physical barriers.
b. Existing land use, available vacant land.
c. Zoning.
d. Housing stock/age.
e. Utilities capacity.
f. Streets.
g. Park system.
h. Environment, stormwater/wetlands.
With City planning efforts related to stormwater planning, I-94, County Road 19
interchange, and street improvements, we are hoping that we can abbreviate much of
the Inventory collection and not duplicate past efforts.
COMMUNITY SURVEY – DECISION RESOURCES
A Community Survey will be crafted and conducted to solicit public opinion on the City’s
existing operations and conditions, as well as the future issues that require attention as
the City grows through 2030.
14
COMMUNITY WORKSHOPS
At the completion of the Tactics interviews, Inventory and Community Survey, a
Community Workshop will be held with the City Council, Planning Commission, Park
Committee and City staff. We will present the Tactics summary, Community Survey
results, and Inventory to identify key issues and opportunities for the City.
Through the workshop session, the Council and advisory committees will be asked to
set and prioritize goals for the City to pursue through the year 2030. These goals and
objectives will be the basis for the City’s Policy Plan and Development Framework.
NEIGHBORHOOD OPEN HOUSE
We would propose to conduct the following neighborhood open house meetings:
NE Albertville: Towne Lakes, Hunters Pass, Greenhaven
SW Albertville: Albert Villas, Cedar Creek, Kolleville
th
Central Albertville: Psyks, Main Street, 50 Street
Commercial/ NW Albertville, County Road 19, County Road 37,
Industrial: Barthel Industrial Park
Through the neighborhood open houses, staff will present information from the
Community Workshop with regard to the City’s 2030 goals and objectives. Staff will
solicit feedback on the goals and information on issues within individual neighborhoods.
PLAN FORMULATION
Upon completion of the aforementioned tasks, NAC will prepare a complete draft plan
that includes:
1. Issues Identification
2. Goals and Policy Plan
3. Development Framework
a. Land Use
b. Transportation
c. Utilities/Community Facilities
d. Planning Districts
4. Implementation Plan
15
FINAL PLAN REVIEW AND ADOPTION
The draft plan will be reviewed, edited and adopted through the following process:
1. Second Community Workshop meeting where the draft plan will be presented.
We take any comments and revisions and work them into the plan.
2. Community Open House. Schedule an open house to present the draft plan to
the general public for comments.
3. Public Hearing before the Planning Commission.
4. City Council meeting plan review and Council resolution adopting the plan.
BUDGET AND SCHEDULE
The aforementioned work plan outlines a process that considers a new Council and the
need for public participation in the formulation of the Comprehensive Plan. Fortunately,
the City has undertaken an effort to inventory and document its streets, utilities, and
stormwater planning. This should reduce time and efforts in the Inventory process.
Based on the aforementioned work program, the following budget is proposed:
Tactics Interview & Summary $3,600
Inventory2,800
Community Survey N/A
Community Workshop 800
Neighborhood Open Houses (4) 1,600
Plan Formulation 6,000
Community Workshop 800
Community Open Houses (2) 800
Planning Commission Presentation/
300
City Council Action
Sub-Total16,700
10% Contingency 1,700
TOTAL$18,400
Tactics Interviews/Summary February – March 2011
Inventory February – March 2011
Community Survey ----
Community Workshop April 2011
Neighborhood Open Houses (4) May – June 2011
Plan Formulation June – August 2011
Second Community Workshop August 2011
Community Open Houses (2) August – September 2011
Planning Commission Public Hearing October 2011
City Council Presentation November 2011
16
REYAM
XRAM
NOSAM
NITRAM
LLAHSRAM
EWOLRAM
EWOLR
AM
ETSEHCNAM
R
EIZNEKCAM
VICAM
RE
RE
VICAM
NON
NAL
NONNAL
EKAL
EKAL
EGRAL
E
GRAL
EGRAL
EG
RAL
NIAM
REDNAL
TNOMAL
TREB
MAL
AL
OWEK
DOT
REBMAL
NAMHCAL
NAMHCAL
AMHCAL
N
DOOWNIL
ERTNEC
AL
XUAEBAL
RE
LYK
DNALLAK
ILAK
RELHAK
NILTIAK
NEMRAK
NILEAK
NAGAK
LHAK
EDLAK
R
TS17
Albertville 2011
Existing Land UseAcresPercentage
Low Density Residential75925.0%
Medium Density Residential772.5%
High Density Residential160.5%
Commercial165.55.5%
Industrial893.0%
Semi Public/Public167.55.5%
Park/Open Space29910.0%
Agriculture/Vacant740.525.0%
Water2277.5%
Right-of-Way468.515.5%
Total3,009100%
Number of Vacant Parcels314
18
19
EN EVA EWO
LRAM
EN EVA EIZNEKCAM
M
EN EVA REVICA
EN EVA NOMYL
E
N
RI
C
AID
Y
L
NE
IR
E C
LL
ASA
L
E
N
R
I
C
G
N
I
S
NE
AVE
SING
NLAN
A
L
EN RIC
NONNA
L
EN E
VA NONNAL
EN E
VA EKAL
EN EVA E
KAL
E
N
LN
E
ER
M
N
N
LY
EN
EVA EGRAL
EN E
VA EGRAL
EN EVA EGRAL
EN RIC H
T45 EN RIC
EN RIC DR35
HT55
20
E
N
R
D
E
N
EN
WEVA NIAM
O
T
EEN EVA NIAM
EKE
AN EVA NIAM
N
L
T
N
S
E
R
W
G
DR3 S'KYSP
C
A
L
I
DN2
L
EN EVA REDNAL
NAMHCAZ
EN
EVA REDN
AL
E
N
T
C
D
R
3
5
EN EVA TNOMAL
EN LP H
T45
EN EVA
TREBMAL
EN RD DOOWEKAL
EN EVA TREB
MAL
E
N
T
S
N
E DN2 ECALP
D
N
I
L
WEIVK E RAP
N EVA NAMHC
AL
EN EVA NAMHCAL
CAL
EN EVA NAMH
EN RD DOOWNIL
NOITIDDA DN2
NOITIDDA DR3
SEKAL ENWOTSEKAL ENWOT
SEKAL ENWOT
TA SEPPOHSTA SEPPOHS
TA SEPPOHS
EN EVA ER
TNECAL
DR3 GNISSORC
BAL
)91 HASC( EN EVA XUAE
DN2 SGNISSORC
ELLIVTREBLA
ELLIVTREBLA
)91 HASC( EN EVA
XUAEBAL
GNIDLIUB
NUR EIRI
ARP
LACIDEM
TA SEPPOHS
ELLIVTREBLA
EN EVA
RELYK
KRAP SSENISUB
ER
AUQS-T
EN EVA
DNALLAK
EN EVA DNALL
AK
NE
ND CT
ALLA
E K
N
R
D
D
EN
A
N
L
L
T
A
C
K
A
D
N
E
L
E
A
N
KN
L
A
D
E
NN EVA ILAK
E
L
A
K
EN EVA ADNELAK
E
N
R
D
A
D
N
E
L
A
K
NELAK
RD AD
E
N
N
L
R
E
S
I
A
K
K
AHLER
DR NE
EN RD RELHAK
E
N
R
D
R
E
L
H
A
K
EVA E
NOTSYEK
KAITLIN AVE NE
E
N
E
V
A
A
D
N
E
L
A
K
E
N
E
V
A
EN EVA LHAK I
L
A
K
NE
N KARMEN AVE NEEN E
LVA R
THESIA
64K
E
N
E
V
A
N
O
T
S
R
A
K
E
N
T
S
HT
46
EN YAB
RELHAK
TC NOTSRAK
NE
CT
LER
AH
K
ON COVE NE
KARST
EN EVA NAGAK
EN EV
A LHAK
NE
E
V
A
N
GA
A
K
EN EVA RELDAK
EN EVA REDLAK
MP 43:91:4 2102/03/1 :devaS etaD
dxm.71x11 paM noisividbuS tblA\\2102\\spaM\\IRSE\\pamesaB_\\TBLA\\sig\\1revrescrA\\\\ :tnemucoD paM
EN EVA EWO
LRAM
EN EVA EIZNEKCAM
M
EN EVA REVICA
EN EVA NOMYL
E
N
RI
C
AID
Y
L
NE
IR
E C
LL
ASA
L
E
N
R
I
C
G
N
I
S
NE
AVE
SING
NLAN
A
L
EN RIC
NONNA
L
EN E
VA NONNAL
EN E 21
VA EKAL
EN EVA E
KAL
E
N
LN
E
ER
M
N
N
LY
EN
EVA EGRAL
EN E
VA EGRAL
EN EVA EGRAL
EN RIC H
T45 EN RIC
EN RIC DR35
HT55
E
N
R
D
E
N
EN
WEVA NIAM
O
T
EEN EVA NIAM
EKE
AN EVA NIAM
N
L
T
N
S
E
R
W
G
C
A
L
I
L
EN EVA REDNAL
EN
EVA REDN
AL
E
N
T
C
D
R
3
5
EN EVA TNOMAL
EN LP H
T45
EN EVA
TREBMAL
EN RD DOOWEKAL
EN EVA TREB
MAL
E
N
T
S
N
E
D
N
I
L
E
N EVA NAMHC
AL
EN EVA NAMHCAL
CAL
EN EVA NAMH
EN RD DOOWNIL
EN EVA ER
TNECAL
BAL
)91 HASC( EN EVA XUAE
)91 HASC( EN EVA
XUAEBAL
EN EVA
RELYK
EN EVA
DNALLAK
EN EVA DNALL
AK
NE
ND CT
EALLA
K
N
R
D
D
EN
A
N
L
L
TA
C
K
A
D
N
E
L
E
A
N
KN
L
A
D
E
NN EVA ILAK
E
L
A
K
EN EVA ADNELAK
E
N
R
D
A
D
N
E
L
A
K
NELAK
RD AD
E
N
N
L
R
E
S
I
A
K
K
AHLER
DR NE
EN RD RELHAK
E
N
R
D
R
E
L
H
A
K
EVA E
NOTSYEK
KAITLIN AVE NE
E
N
E
V
A
A
D
N
E
L
A
K
E
N
E
V
A
EN EVA LHAK I
L
A
K
NE
N KARMEN AVE NEEN E
LVA R
THESIA
64K
E
N
E
V
A
N
O
T
S
R
A
K
E
N
TS
H
T4
6
EN YAB
RELHAK
TC NOTSRAK
NE
CT
LER
AH
K
ON COVE NE
KARST
EN EVA NAGAK
EN EV
A LHAK
NE
E
V
A
N
GA
A
K
EN EVA RELDAK
EN EVA REDLAK
MP 90:61:4 2102/03/1 :devaS etaD
dxm.71x11 gninoZ tblA\\2102\\spaM\\IRSE\\pamesaB_\\TBLA\\sig\\1revrescrA\\\\ :tnemucoD paM
E
N
E
W
OL
R
A
M
EN EVA EWOLRAM
MACKENZIE AVE NE
REVICAM
EN EVA
LYMON AVE NE
E
N
RIC
AI
D
YL
EN
TS
H
T76
E
VE N
ING A
ANS
L
EN RI
C NONN
AL
EN EVA N
ONNAL
EN EVA EKAL
NEEN EVA EKAL
N
L
E
R
E
NM
N
LY
EN EVA EGRAL
EN EVA
EGRAL
EN EVA
EGRAL
EN RIC HT
45
EN RIC EN RIC D
HT55 R35
22
E
N
R
D
E
N
W
OEN EVA NI
AM
T
E
EN
KEVA NIAM
EAEN E
LVA NIAM
NT
S
NE
W
R
G
C
A
L
I
L
LANDER AVE NE
E
N EVA RE
DNAL
LAMONT AVE NE
E
N LP HT45
EN EVA TREBMA
L
EKAL
EN RD DOOW
EN EVA
TREBMAL
E
N
T
S
N
E
D
N
I
L
EEN EVA NAMH
CAL
N
R
D
T
H
G
I
L
P
M LACHMAN AVE NE
A
L
EN EVA NAMHCAL
EN RD DOOWNIL
LAKETOWNE PL NE
EN EVA ERTNE
CAL
)91 HASC( EN EVA XUAEBAL
)91 H
ASC( EN EVA XUAEBA
L
EN E
VA RELYK
E
N
R
I
C
D
N
A
L
L
A
K
E
N EVA DNAL
LAK
EN EVA D
NALLAK
CT NE
LAND
KAL
EN EVA ILAK
EN EVA DNALLAK
E
N
R
D
A
D
N
E
L
A
K
LAK
RD ADNE
E
N
N
L
R
E
IS
A
K
E
N
E
V
A
KAHLL
ER DR N
EE
S
S
A
K
EN RD RELHAK
E
N
N
L
A
M
A
K
EVA ENOTSYEK
KAITLIN AVE NE
E
N
E
V
A
N
O
T
S
R
E
A
K
N
N
EN EVA LHL
AK
N
O
S
A
J
E
KARMEN AVE NEN EVA
RESI
AK
E
N
E
V
A
N
O
T
S
R
A
K
EN
T
S H
T4
6
EN YAB RE
LHAK
KARSTON AVE
E
N
E
V
A
N
O
T
S
R
A
K
COVE NE
KARSTON
EN EV
A NAGAK EN EV
A LHAK
E
N
E
AV
N
A
AG
K
EN EVA RELDAK KALDER AVE NE
Date Saved: 2/6/2012 1:47:43 PM
Map Document: \\\\Arcserver1\\gis\\ALBT\\_Basemap\\ESRI\\Maps\\2012\\Albt NWI Map 11x17.mxd
EN EVA EWOLRAM
EN EVA EIZNEKCAM
REVICAM
EN EVA
EN EVA NOMYL
EN
RI
C
AI
DY
L
NE
CIR
LLE
SA
LA
E
N
T
S
H
T
0
6
O
T
4
9
I
B
W NE
G AVE
NSIN
LA
E
N
E
V
A
N
O
C
RIN
EN
N
L
NA
ONA
N
L
EN
EVA NONNAL
EN E
VA EKAL
EN EVA EKA
L
NE
N
L
E
R
E
NM
N
LY
EN EVA EGRAL
EN EVA EG
RAL
EN EVA E
GRAL
EN RI
C DR35
EN RIC
EN R
IC
HT
45
H
T55
E
N
R
D
E
N
WEN EV
A NIAM
O
T
E
KEN EVA NIAM
AEN
LEVA NIAM
T
S
E
EW
N
R
I
C
W
E
I
V
E
EN EVA
K
A
L
REDNAL
EN
EVA REDN
AL
23
EN EVA TNOMAL
EN
LP HT45
EN EVA TREBM
AL
EN
RD DOOWEKA
L
EN EVA TREBMAL
EN EVA N
AMHCAL
EN EVA NAMHCAL
N EVA NAMHCAL
E
OWNIL
EN RD DO
EN EVA ERTNECAL
A XUAEBAL
)91 HASC( EN EV
)91 H
ASC( EN EVA XUAEBA
L
EN EVA REL
YK
EN EVA
DNALLAK
EN EVA DNA
LLAK
NE
ND CT
KALLA
EN EVA ILA
K
EN EVA ADNELAK
E
N
R
D
A
D
N
E
L
A
K
R
E
IS
A
KNELAK
RD AD
E
N
N
L
EN RD RELHAK
E
N
E
V
A
EVA
N
I
L
ENOTSYEKT
I
A
K
E
N
E
V
A
N
O
T
E
S
N
R
A
E
K
V
A
L
H
AE
N
K E
V
A
IL
A
K
EN E
VA R
ESIAK
64TH LN NE KARMEN AVE NE
E
N
E
V
A
N
O
T
S
R
A
K
EN
T
S )
HT
46
8
1
H
A
S
C
(
E
EN YAB
N
E
TC NOTSRAK RELHAK
V
A
N
O
S
EA
NE
JR CT
N HLE
KA
R
D
N
O
EN EVA
TLHAK
EN
EVA NAGAK
NE
SE
AV
N
A
EN EVA NOTSRAKRG
KA
KARSTON COVE NE
A
K
EN EVA RELDAK
EN EVA REDLAK
MP 62:51:3 -- 1102/11/3
)dxm.71x11 yratinaS tblA\\1102\\spaM\\IRSE\\pamesaB_\\TBLA\\sig\\1revrescra\\\\( :tnemucoD paM
(
(EN EVA EWOLRAM
(
(
1
"2
(
"21
EN EVA EIZNEKCAM
(
"21
REVICAM
EN EVA
(
EN EVA NOMYL
(
(
EN(((
RI
C (
AI
DY
L
6"
(
(
("6(
(
(
(
"(
"6
6
"6
"6
"
6
(
(
((
((
"6
(
(
(
6"
(
"
(
(6
NE
CIR
LLE
SA(
LA(
((
(
"6
(
(("
("6
((6
(
(
(
(
(
(
("6
E
(
((N
( "
(
T 6
(
"
S(
6(
H
T
(
(0
6
(
"(
"
O 6(6
(
T
4
9
I
"
6 B(
W" NE
G AVE
6 NSIN
( LA
("
(6(
(
(
(
(
(
("6
"4
E"6
(6"(
N
"6
E
(
V
(
A
(
"N
6
"
6
O
C
RIN
EN
((
N
(L
NA
ONA
N
L
(
"6
((
((
"6
"
"
(
66
"6
((
(
EN
""6 EVA NONNAL
6
(
EN E
VA EKAL
(
(
((
(
(
("6
8"
(
"(
"6
8
(
(
(
((
("
(6 EN EVA EKA
L
(
NE
N
L
E (("6
R
E
NM(
N
LY(
"6(
"6
EN EVA EGRAL
(
((
"6
EN EVA EG
RAL
"EN EVA E(
8 GRAL
(
"6
(
(
"6
(
6""6((
"
(
6
EN RI
C DR35
"6
"6
"
6
((
((
(
((
(
(EN RIC"6"6
((
(
"EN R"
8 IC 6
"6((
(HT
45
(((
((H
(T55
((
"6
(
("
"(
(6
6
((
"(
((
6(((
"6
((((
(
("6((
(
E((
(((
N(
R((
((
D
E(
(((
((N(
(("
WEN EV
A NIAM
O 6
(T
E
KEN EVA NIAM
AEN "8
L"6 EVA NIAM
T
S
"E(
6(
EW
(N
(
R
I
C(
((
(
W
E
I
"
(6
V("6
(
E(
EN EVA(
(
K(
(("
((((6
(A(
"(
L(
REDNAL (
6
"6
(
EN "8
EVA REDN
AL
(
(
(
(
"
8
24
(
(
((
(
(
(
(EN EVA TNOMAL
(
"86"
(
("
(6
(
(
(
EN
(LP HT45
"6
"6(
("
6
(
"
(
6 EN EVA TREBM
AL
(
(
"
(6
EN 1
RD DOOWEKA
(L
"6
((
((((
(("6
((((((
((
(
"01
(
"6
EN EVA TREBMAL
(
(
(
("
((
(
8
(
(((EN EVA N(
(AMHCAL
"(
(
6
((
(
((((
"6((
"
6
(
(((
(
"8
((
(
(
(
6"(
(
(
((
(((
(
("6"
"(
6(((6"(
(6
EN EVA NAMHCAL (
(
""21
(
("
(6(
6(
(
(
(
(("6
(
((
((((
"""
(6
((((
6(6
"6(
((((
(
(
(((
(((
(((
(((N EVA NAMHCAL( (
(E(
(((
(
(
((
((
(
OWNIL "
EN RD DO((
6
"6
(((
(
6
"
(((
(
(
"6
(((((
((
((
(
(("8
(
(
((
((
(
((
"8(
((
((
(
((("
("6(6
(
"6
((
(
(
(((
(
(
((((
((
(
((
(("(
"6((
(
((6"
(((6
(
(
((
(("6
"
(((((
((
2
"6 EN EVA ERTNECAL
(
1
6"
(((
((
(
((
A XUAEBAL
)91 HASC( EN EV
(
(
"6
((
(
(
(
"(((
((
"21
6((
(
"6((
((((
)91 H(
ASC( EN EVA XUAEBA
L
(
"
(2(
((("61
((((((
(((1
(
((
(
(
"(
"8
"02
8
(
(((
"6
((
(
(
(
(((
(
(
(((
((((
(((
"6(((
(((((
(
8"(
(("6
((
((
"8
("01
"8
(
EN EVA REL
YK
"6
"6
((
(
((
(
"8(
(
(
(
(
((
"6
(
(
((
(
(
(((
(((
((((
"((
((((((6"
(((
6(
(
(""
6
(((
(6(
(
"6 EN EVA
DNALLAK
((
EN EVA DNA
(LLAK
( NE(
ND CT
KALLA
(
("
8
(
("6
(
(
((
(((
((
(
(
(
(
((
("(
(((
"6
8(
("8
"
6 EN EVA ILA
K
"
""8(
68
(
(
(
(((
(((
(
((
(
(
EN EVA ADNELAK
((6"(
(
((E
N
(
R
D
(A
(D
(
N
""E
8 L
A
6 K
(
((
(
(
(((
("((
(
((
6
(
"((
("(
6
(6
(
R(
(E"6
(
IS
A(
KNELAK
RD AD
((
E((
((
( N
(N
(L((
"6
(
((
(
(
"(
((6
(
(
6"((
((
(
(
(
"
6
((
(
((
(
("
(8
"(
6(
((
"(
"6"(((
6(8(
(
"6
(((
(
(
(
"
6
(
"
6(
(
(
(
"01(
((
EN RD RELHAK (((
(
(
(
(
(
((
((
"((
(((6
(
(
"6
"8
((
(
(
"
(
6
(
((
((
(
(
(
((
(
"
6"6
(
(
6"
(
(
(
(
(
(
((
(
(
(
((
(
6"
(
"
6(
E(
(
N(
( (
(
("(
(E(
(
((6
V(
(A
" (
EVA 6
"(N
01 I
((
L
ENOTSYEK"T((
I(
6(
A
((
(
K
(
(
"
"
6"
(6
6
(
(
((
E(
N
(
E
(V(
A
N(
O(
(T
E
(S
"N((
6 (R
A(
E
K(
V(
A ("6
(
L
"8
H
AE
N
K E
V
("A (
6 IL
A
K
(
(
(
(
(
((
(((
("6
(
"
6
"6
("
EN E
VA R
(0 ESIAK
(1
(
((
((
(((
(
((
(
(
(
(
64TH LN NE KARMEN AVE NE
((
("
6"(
(
6
(
(
((
(
("
6
((
"
"6(
"21"68
(
(
(
(
(E
N
(
(E
"8((V
(A (
N
(
O
T
S(
(R
A((
(K (
(
8"("
"((
66
((
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
EN(
T
S )
HT
46
"6 8
1
( (
(6"
(
(
(H
(A
""
"
6 S(
88(
((
(
C((
"6
(
"6
""(
6(6
E"8
EN YAB
N
(
((
E
TC NOTSRAK "RELHAK
(
(V 0
(
((
1(
(A(
"8 8"(
(
(
((
N
(((
"6
O
S
(
"
E 6 A
NE
JR CT
N HLE
KA
((
R
(
"
(
6(D
(N
(
(((
((
(((O(
((EN EVA
TLHAK
EN
EVA NAGAK
(NE
S(E
(AV(
(N
(A
EN EVA NOTSRAKR((G(
(((KA
(
KARSTON COVE NE(((((
A((
((
(
"
((K
8
"8"0
(1
"6
(
EN EVA RELDAK "6
EN EVA REDLAK
"6(
((
(
"
8
(
((
((
(
"6"6
(
(
((
(
((
((
(
((
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(((
(((
(((
((
(
(
"8"1
(
(
(
"(((
("
6
5
".
((
(6"1
(
0
1
"6
((
(
(
(
("6
(
"
"6
1
(((
""
66
(
(
(
(
"
6
((
"
6
(
(
(((
(
(
(
MP 91:23:3 -- 1102/11/3
)dxm.71x11 retaW tblA\\1102\\spaM\\IRSE\\pamesaB_\\TBLA\\sig\\1revrescra\\\\( :tnemucoD paM