1990-08-09 PC Minutes
"
.
.
~
,.,
.
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
AUGUST 9, 1990
The regular meeting of the Planning Commission was called to
order by Chairman Tom Haller. Members present included LeRoy Berning,
Donatus Vetsch and Mark Daleiden who arrived late. Others present
included Maureen Andrews and Kevin Mealhouse.
The Planning Commission first went through Kevin Mealhousers
finding regarding the soil conditions existing on the Yanish property.
The report indicated that poor soils did exist on the site and that
footings would be required to be installed 96 inches below existing
grade, noting that normal installation of footings is at 42 inches.
Kevinrs report also indicated that special building techniques would
have to be used to build an addition on to the existing garage.
.
Because of
justification to
foot storage shed.
these findings the Planning Commission had the
grant the Conditional Use Permit for the 4~ square
The next issue discussed was the location of the proposed
building site. As noted in the Planning Report, Mr. Yanish was
proposing to locate the building in the side yard which is not allowed
under the ordinance. It was suggested in the report and at the meeting
that the building should be relocated to the rear of the property to
conform with the Zoning Ordinance.
Ron Yanish, who was present at the meeting, noted that the
location of the shed was in the side yard because of the location of
the catch basin which is located on the north property line. He went
on to say that drainage from the 4 lots south of his drain across his
back yard and would make it impossible to locate the shed in the rear
of his property.
After some additional discussion, it was decided that the
Planning Commission needed to review the problem first hand so the
members went out to the site to inspect the problem.
After looking at a variety of options, including the relocation
of the building to the rear of the lot and Ronrs proposed location. It
was decided that neither would work for the following reasons:
.
.
.
.
Jf+
~
..
.
\,'
.
1. Location of the shed in the rear yard. Because of improper
drainage of the lots south of the Yanish lot the location of
the shed in the rear would disrupt the current drainage flow
or would be located in such a fashion that Ron would not be
able to get to the shed any time it rained.
2. Side yard location of shed, per the Yanish plan. Kevin noted
that because of the slope of the side yard that the shed
would have at least 4: feet of exposed footings on the north
side of the building and would disrupt the look of the
neighborhood.
After some additional discussion the possibility of locating the
addition within 5 feet of the existing garage with a false front was
reviewed. It was noted that this option would make the shed look like
it was part of the e isting garage, would eliminate the problem of
trying to attach the ne structure onto the existing garage and would
not look like a second g rage on the site.
It was suggested
within five feet of the
joints which would allo
It was noted that the
space in between the
purposes.
that Ron build the additional storage shed
garage and then place siding between two slip
for the buildingrs shifting if there is any.
itches of the roofs could be the same and the
two buildings could be there for maintenance
It was suggested hat the shed would then be sized 16r X 22r to
allow for the gas me er and the air conditioning units existing
locations. It was also reed that the overhead door would not exceed
9 feet.
Hearing no other
and seconded by Donatu
and size of a storage s
the existing garage prov
that rises up to the
addition, the following
discussion a motion was made by LeRoy Berning
Vetsch to recommend approval of the location
ed (16r X 22r) to be located within 5 feet of
ded that it is constructed with a false front
sofet line with a slip joint construction. In
tipulations were made:
1. That the overhe d door shall not exceed 9 feet.
2. That the roof of the addition would be the same as the
existing garage
3. That new plan are brought in for Kevinrs review and the
structure is bu It to code.
All were in favor and the motion carried.
Hearing no other comments or discussion, a motion was made to
adjourn the meeting. The motion was made by Donatus Vetsch and
seconded by LeRoy Berning. All were in favor and the motion carried.
PAGE 2
~"'------- ......
I
I
i
r-----,----'-'-
i
i
~ - ,
~-----~
II L
,,"llii~E'SS, A~ .di~ "f .~.. fDy"'~~ fiXi~~
__ :.:tM~R- &i\s ~ ~ ~~~M~ fJp~_
ili c ,- -- · u.)LulL.h~ i:lF~'W hJ.E. ~;MJ\Jit;{ fJ.4. It ..JfA?d:
i ' fl( -,,' 'J :;.. ~ ~ ' .,~ ;.:r' .' . ,." . '
_ :~ ("'(~ ~ 9~ "~"A. _.'1--.'
, a4. ;
_~, _' 7FtF
I
~~--
i
I
,
i- .
---~--~~"-
: i
'~'..>. .',
~- - - -" . - - - - -- :
~-'.- - -' ,---~......
, '
~.......-~~~-...-- . 4 -
:~,;t.:;-_~<:~_i?;!'
,'.'if. _ .
~ - _,' ;';',;" li~-:.;'
~\:i~-~;;~~~;{;--::;~,~.-'.-'":f:}~7.,;A:~_';~- - .
,t1".i.'i~;,::?~-
, ~,,' >~ \\~f-~~~'-:~':::::--~-:~;~~~:_;;:: _:;~.-:
,
~
--'
----~~-- ---
~ili~>'~~v~~~<"H .
. _~"~l' -~~~,,:, :-,~ _:-~:jl~~~;;;~/i~-:
--<--~-~
"?ii:-,J!