2000-09-13 PC Minutes
.
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
MINUTES
Wednesday, September 13,2000
(1) CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL - ADOPT AGENDA
PRESENT: Chair Jim Brown, Commission Members Carolyn Bauer, Ed Budde,
Ray Meyer, Ron Klecker, and Council Liaison John Vetsch, Zoning Administrator
Kevin Mealhouse, City Planner Cindy Sherman, City Engineer Pete Carlson, and
Deputy Clerk Bridget Miller
Chair Brown called the regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission to
order. Amendments to the Agenda are as follows:
Move Item 4.B. to 2.B. on the agenda
Add Item 4.D. - Consider Special Meeting on the Agenda - BK Concept Plan
Bauer made a motion to approve the amended agenda. Brown seconded the motion.
All voted aye.
. (2) MINUTES
a) August 9, 2000, regular meeting
Bauer made a motion to approve the minutes. Budde seconded the motion. All
voted aye.
Chair Brown asked John Vetsch to report on the Council's decision was on the
Park Dedication fees. John Vetsch reported that the Council approved $1,500
per residential unit and $7,385 per acre for commercial/industrial properties.
b) Outlets at Albertville II - Site Plan
Chair Brown asked JMJ Developers to present their site plan. Bobbie Morse
shared with the commission and members of the audience the success of the
Outlet stores. He anticipates that it will start to slow down some with the winter
season coming up in a few months. It will be busy again with the holiday season.
.
Chair Brown then asked the City Planner and City Engineer to share their
concerns or issues regarding this site plan. City Planner Sherman apologized for
not grabbing the report Deb Garross had prepared. She did go over the issues
that were covered in the Memo presented in the packet. The main concerns
were: the lot size, increasing the building size for the original plat, parking
spaces decreased by 2-3 stalls and the traffic.
.
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
September 13, 2000 Minutes
Page 2 of 6
City Engineer Carlson presented the commission and JMJ Developers with a
layout of the traffic flow that could possibly work. He informed them to keep an
open mind. This is what SEH/RCM had drawn up for suggestions on the flow of
traffic in and around the mall. He did mention that there would be additional
traffic lights on CSAH 19. A traffic count study has been done on the left turn
lanes entering the mall off of C8AH 19. With the diamond shaped design on
CSAH 19 it would allow for two (2) left turn lanes into the mall. With the layout
he has presented there would be some need to fill in the wetlands area. He is
working with the DNR as to the concerns on this issue. The wetlands area near
this development is not as endangered as others that are out there. Therefore
would not be much of an issue if we filled them in.
.
City Engineer Carlson also reported that the MnDOT is doing a study on I-94's
corridor from the metropolitan area to 81. Cloud. It will not be completed until
2001. MnDOT is looking at the number of interchanges there are on 1-94 and
wheres the best location for future interchanges. MnDOT would consider
approving the interchange for C8AH 19 but will not aid in the cost of the
interchange. You would be working with the Federal government on this and the
timeframe you are looking at would be about 3-4 years. Then add an additional
1-2 years for construction on top of that. You would be looking at about 5-6
years for completion of the interchange.
Chair Brown wanted to know more about this information and more details. City
Engineer Carlson told the commission that he is working on a report to present to
the City Council at the October 2, 2000 meeting. At that time he would pass the
information on to the Planning and Zoning Commission members.
Chair Brown asked about the possibility of having the back entrance marked for
emergency entrance only. City Engineer stated that it could be done. Whether it
would benefit from it or not, he didn't know.
Council Liaison Vetsch asked if there was going to be a sidewalk or some type of
pedestrian walkway off of C8AH 19 going into the mall area. City Engineer
didn't know anything about that. He did state that there would be some kind of a
trail going down C8AH 19 in the ditch area.
.
Commission member Klecker asked if the first entrance into the parking lot for
Building C could be moved more towards the middle of the building. JMJ stated
that is what they had proposed allowing the customers to go either left or right to
fill in the parking spaces.
Bridget's computer C:\My Documents\P & Z meetings\M 9-13-00.doc
.
.
.
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
September 13, 2000 Minutes
Page 3 of 6
Council Liaison Vetsch asked if there were going to be any additional fire
hydrants. JMJ explained to the commission that there are sprinkler systems in all
of the stores. Zoning Administrator Mealhouse informed them that it would be a
costly expense to put an additional fire hydrant in for the existing buildings A
and B. The Fire Chief did look over the plans and felt it met the requirements
necessary in case of a fire.
Chair Brown made a motion to approve the Site Plan contingent on City Planner
Garross's report, the Fire Department issues, and the City Engineer's issues on
traffic. Bauer seconded the motion. Bauer, Klecker, Brown and Budde voted
aye. Meyer voted no.
(3) PUBLIC HEARING
a) Albert Villas 4th Addition
- continue Public Hearing to October 10th meeting
Chair Brown opened the Public Hearing at 7:55 p.m.
City Planner Sherman reviewed the report presented in the packet. She went
over the PUD and the only benefit to the City would be the narrow lots.
Matt Davich, representing Albert Villas, brought forth a larger scale of the
concept plan.
The Commission members went through the eight items that were purposed for
the PUD.
A. Innovations in development. . . . .
Staff noted that there was nothing out of the ordinary presented with
this issue.
B. Higher standards. . . . .
Staff noted that there was nothing out of the ordinary presented with
this issue.
C. More convenience in location. . . . .
Staff noted nothing out of the ordinary - more efficient.
D. The preservation. . . . .
Protected the ditch and lake shore, minimum wetland fill.
Bridget's computer C:\My Documents\P & Z meetings\M 9-13-00.doc
.
.
.
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
September 13, 2000 Minutes
Page 4 of 6
E. A creative use. . . . .
Staff noted nothing out of the ordinary.
F. An efficient use of . . . . .
Chair Brown and staff noted this is repetitive to other items above.
G. A development pattern in . . . . .
Staff noted that a PUD is not intended as a means to vary applicable
planning and zoning principles.
H. A more desirable and . . . . .
There is less street therefore providing more useable land.
Chairs Brown suggested the developer continue with the explanation.
City Planner Sherman did reaffirm the Chair that it is up to the Commission to
approve the PUD or leave it zoned RI-A.
Commission member Budde questioned if there would be sidewalks along both
sides of the street. It could be a plus to the development.
Commission members Bauer and Meyer had concerns with the lot widths.
Commission member Klecker would like to stay with the RI-A zoning setbacks.
Commission member Budde would consider working something out. Work with
some of the lot widths; possibly eliminating some of the lots.
Chair Brown also commented on the lot widths - he would not go any lower than
95' lot widths.
Zoning Administrator Mealhouse quickly counted and figured about 2/3 of the
lots are about 100' widths or wider.
Council Liaison Vetsch was leaning towards the 15' side setbacks in the RI-A
zoning versus the 10' setback set for the PUD zoning.
Commission members would like to see 50% of the lots with a width of 100';
and 50% of the lots with a width of90'.
They would like to see a 30-40' trail comparable to the trail connecting to St.
Michael.
Bridget's computer C:\My Documents\P & Z meetings\M 9-13-00.doc
.
.
.
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
PLANNING & ZoNING COMMISSlON
September 13, 2000 Minutes
Page 5 of 6
Chair Brown suggested making a motion to continue the concept plan to the
October 10, 2000 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.
Chair Brown closed the Public Hearing at 8:40 p.m.
Budde made a motion to continue the Concept Planning to the October 10, 2000
meeting. Bauer seconded the motion. All voted aye.
(4) OTHER BUSINESS
a) Concept Plan - Leuer Munstertieger Property
Chair Brown asked the audience who was here representing this development.
Scott Dahlke got up and briefly went over what they had proposed. They are
asking the Commission to consider re-zoning from B-2 to B-3. This would allow
the option of a restaurant or a motel on the lot.
Chair Brown recalls it initially was zoned R -1 and when the Comp Plan came
through it was re-zoned to B-2 to compromise the rest of the areas around it.
Scott Dahlke presented what they would like to see in the Concept Plan.
Chair Brown does not see them rezoning it to commercial or B-3.
The Commission has expressed their concerns and wishes to leave it zoned as B-
2 at this time. Once there is more details as to who or what they want to put into
the outlot - then the commission would consider looking at re-zoning it to B-3.
The Commission noticed the dotted line on the concept plan. They questioned
what there intents for this was. Dahlke commented that they would like to add
67' to the existing B-2 zoning.
The developer would like to have the Commission's insight as to how to present
the concept plan to the Council.
The Commission wanted to ensure that when they came in to discuss the
Commercial Outlot piece there would be a buffer along the border of the
residential zoning and the commercial zoning.
Bridget's computer C:\My Documents\P & Z meetings\M 9-13-00.doc
.
.
.
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
September 13, 2000 Minutes
Page 6 of 6
b) Schedule Public Hearing to Consider Increasing Maximum Garage Size and
Minimum House Size
Commission will schedule on the October 10, 2000 agenda to consider increasing
the maximum garage size and minimum house size.
c) Commission to Consider Special Meeting to Discuss the Burger King
Concept Plan
A motion was made to move the Burger King Concept Plan to the October 10,
2000 meeting. They did not want to schedule a special meeting.
(5) ADJOURNMENT
Bauer made a motion to adjourn at 9:30 p.m. Klecker seconded the motion. All
voted aye.
Bridget's computer C:\My Documents\P & Z meetings\M 9-13-00.doc