The URL can be used to link to this page

2000-03-20 B-2 and B3 Permitted Uses~ ~~ ~~ 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 `~ Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 plannersC~nacplanning.com Mr. Reg Plowman RJ Marco Construction 75 W. Viking Dr. Suite 104 Little Canada, MN 55117 Re: B-2 and B-3 permitted uses. Dear Reg: As we discussed enclosed please tmd the regulations for the B-1, B-2 and B-3 zoning districts. In review of the City approval the term multi-retail services was used to describe permitted uses, this is rather vague. I have discussed this with the City Administrator and we believe the intent was to allow uses that are permitted in the B-3 zone, which includes permitted uses in the B-2 and B-1 zones. I believe the exception to this is the restaurant use that was specifically discussed by the Council and was Limited to a coffee shop. I hope this information clarifies the permitted uses for the multi-tenant building. Please contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, NORTI~WEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS /~ // /t ~/l~/ y~~/~~ fah f)~ /~.~/~%'d..~/~~ f> Cindy Sherman Senior Planner c. Linda Goeb Mike Cauri 3 ~ 1 _ 1, • .W ~ ~ U F x x a ~ 7 ~ ~ t ~ 3 ~ !_ E ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ i a~ 9 --- b ~ 1~ l i iiE i~-li `..b 1; q~b ,s M~~ ~ a ~ 15g ~E~E~~ {~ ~I'' 1111 ~1~(1 1 ~~~~ IN~. Ij III~~ ili ~' ~~i~I~ 1111l 1 ~ I I t 1 f 1''s ~! {; ~ y t~ U I W 1 V t~i ~ ~ '1 1 t ~ ~ j If, ~ ~~ ~ B ~ • $ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~'' ~ ~' ~ pp NI 3bd'aei '' ii`~i:;li~ it EE;: ~ g . $ ~ Q 1 ! li s ~~ O ~ ~'~ ---- ----- ,_~ , /• t •t G• ~ ~ jai/-~ ; ; . ~'kt• , ~ ~ . // . 1 1 J P ./• Y .~ A l M-II I ~~ ``~ ~ M r M M M WPM I ~~ ~ '~ •~- x,T, \~~ ,t~ i i ~ ~ ' Ipt ~ I ` ~ \ ` 9 1 1 1 1 ' ~ h J ~ ~~ - I 1; 1 ~ ~ 1 ~ i~ ~- ---..-- _'--'_- \ ,, 111 1 ;~ i~ 1 ~ ~~ ~iM 1 6 ; { .. ~ ~ fit., ' 1 '~ 1 ~' ~ `1 ~~\-ae \ /1 1 ', ~ 1 i 7i ~~ .. 1 1 ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ t / { , i ` ~~ Al ~ ~ ~ ~~ /~ ~' ~ _ .~ 04 ,~,,~, ~ S . 'w ., 8 ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ IIJ.111~N '1'd3 • .f `~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ by ~.. \ 0f e~/ a 1N ~9 ~~ ` o \ ,~ ~ \ ~~ ~~~ _. ~ ~ r qq pp ' }~~rJ 1{'r -~ H , y U X' ~ s~l7 ~ s§!: ~~•~ ~Ie68A18 Iliii~r~l~r~ ~li~. 7 S - --.~ c Q ! ' 1 uW ~ 8 ~x ~ Exhibit D Adjacent Property Legal Description Exhibit E Private Easement Descriptions W F ~ ~ (E~`(~~'t1~ ~ 1 Vf i W a"' x ~ 73 9 f•I II:e ~ ~ g~ ~ }!I•'I G, tl`l. ~ j ~,I ~. Q. U z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' ~r I---- I, "~~ ~ E61~~~ ~E~I~!r(lliq r I f ~ ~ -- -- - ~ ~ ~ a, ~}; ~ '-__• ---III N ~ I~ 1; ~ , - ~ ~ ( ~ ~ B ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ _"'~ ~ Mrdddddd iil;i!!li~'I~ lE~! t g ~ e Q ' } ~ ~ f uaaoN ~~ i o ~~ N h ~ ~ ~/ h O ~, c~ / ,, f '~ ~ .w ~ ~ ~ O; ® ~ ai ,` ~.~' ~ ~\ ~ ~j ~\ ~ / ~ Sod ~~b ~ ° 3 - a~ A' //' ' c V.`• q J ~ - V 0 U $~ Q ~- S _ ~~ \V\' ~ 'ozl s --------- _ ~° ~ N a41 1 - -- r, 11, ~ -~ -- _ - -- -- -- _' __ ` ~ V ~- O ~ time/ P :~. ~ N N o'ci2~ 2"~ ~ \ / ~~ ~ ~~ a ~ J~° ° ~ ~ u -c O ~ ~~ o / 01 Jd\ / 3` ~\ rL" / ~ ~ // • v r~ \ ~ Yl } d\ 0 0 o O ~~ ~ U ` Cn ~ -' // /~ N' 0 ~ ~ Q \ }. •. ~ ~ 1. V ~ Oy1Np OO ~ - \ \ ~J\\ yi ! ~ Qd C' \ \\ ',J ~ ! ~ ° O ~ dd~~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ Ve \ ~ ;~ ~ v ~~ ~ ~ ~. ~O ~S w W ~~ O~ ~ ~' ~ O J~ ~~ z 1 O // ~P \ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ O S~~ 0 \ ~ ~ ~~7 O ?V ~~ -, \ \ Q~~ FBO~. \ ~ ny \ \ ~.\ ~o bps, , \ , ~ \ ~ ~ ~ '@ ~O° \ q\ J O~ ~~ .~ ~ J~ q \~~ ~ a~ 9 ~ ~ \ ~~-~ Z ~a~ ~~i O G$ p \ ~ \ t~v \. \ v- '' ~~\ ..`fh. ~ ~ -~ _ __ ~ ~ ~ --~ - - ~o ~aa~ ~~~;~ SNdld 3dAlOlOad OZ t~NW ~ " N a ~ ~ --° ----~ ~a"' ~ ~~ '~NI'W31SAS ~JNISIH~NVdd ll3Alfl~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a= x 3 t l ~ $ 'w~'uge/j Oi1NV~wlwM~9 p WMPwMMaMpMnpotlwwVR+I~q q /eol ww~Wl Npl~pW wpw MM MMIINN4 %/ 'Mw ew01W e~Mw4Ve-0wVw W'wp'W~q AIMw4 wmw nm enienmu wens u wwe wu~~ ~~~~..~... E /------I: ~~----~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ ~ i ~~ i - - -,I / ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~= ~~ _~ i_--~ g I ~.~ Y ~ ~~ >~~ ~~ ~~ @~~ Y ~ Ye ~y~ ~} ~~ ~; ~~k ~~ pp4 d~ ~~ 6 g ' ~ ;< - ~J o +°~ Sa h ,lw¢i ~ 4 ~ ~s ~&d a ~ ~ Z IO 5 ~ ~ `~ '7 ~ ~ ~ Z7 ~ t ~~ ~ ~ ~ . U iN ~ ~ ~i ~ !J ~ ?~ d~t`' ~ ;, 'i' O \~ ~ z e, Y 3 ~ ~ i r F ~ ~ Q ? Yn9 3 C ~ ~, i ~~~ ~_~ x - a r ~ ~~ ~ Y ~ ~§ J ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~~ ~ `~ ~ 8 ~~ F~ ~~~ ~ ~= ~_~ a `~~ ~ ~~ i r ~ I I ;~ I f ~o ~ ~~ h ~ W IV ~~ ~ f0 g" ~ 5l Iy r ~ 9!„ N a ---~ ~~ .~ .. ~ Z 0 F V ~ N ~ N o ~' O °. ~ q: ~ m ~! M ~X. F-~ ~, S M WMMI F~mFI ODDS-t0 M IIgD111g1 OS9l-ll k ugeMeY wa ~N ~~ M d ~°~W ~. ~ ~ ? W ~ ~ 1 ~ Z 'eW'wlafp aAel4~l~e+MO MuelAuuaYWN OnuYOdu» DIInADu7 N 1YIU YuSUMIMpuO~elyeWAeupl aMPN ND %i '4M1 wDIDV eNeOeD OWOme DN wl'SWNW bS~NUeN ~Wtlp m weipxe emlol weed Kwl auuiuuvu, 3€ 8 ~~ i -- ~ 1 ~ __ ~1~~< 9 ~p~~ $~~~ s~s~~~~ /__ ~ ~' ~ (J.l °~ 3 ~ ~+ ~ ~ ~ :~ ~a . F-6o y ~~ ,z~ ~ , ~ a ~ ~ W W a~ - ___ ~ ~J ~, may, -- Wa ~y ~ d~ ® p A ~ e - y3 ~ r~~~~ ~S ~~ ~ ~ ~ e- ~ ,y. ° ~ Z Q ~ Rai ~ R 'ei ,~ ~~ ~~ J i~ ~4¢s `, ec h ~ ~~~ o W ~ ^ - t ~ - _ ~~~ ~ 4 ~ Q_•11 ~ JJ W (~ ~~ u Y 'a K ~ at ~ ~~ gg ~ a~~NS~ ~ _ n ! W V ae p~ ugtl hl ~~ nY 3i^ ~` ~'9 3 I ~ 9- i, ~ I I } ; ~ ;,. E ; 1 -_ ~ - z -- - ~ f1 ~~ ~ `I Q q VN ~ $ 5 o ¢ `7 ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ a" ~•_._._ -- - „! W u, Z N I P~ a'~~i~ R 3 3 d ~ z ~. ~ ~ 1 ~- ; i• ' '~ gal I ~ ~ ~u ~ g~5 ~~ ~i~~ ~~ } ; ~ ® _ if ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 `z ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ J E ~ , ~~ Sa ~? ~~ y y I ~~ k y~ ~~ el ! Q ~~ ~ ii _~ ~~ ,~~ ~ y qq ~~ ~R9 ~9 s~ ...n _ __ Q ~ ~3 99 ~ e~ ~~ ~~q e~ FS ~ ~~ ii __- _. ~ k -_ - ~ ~ LU q ~ ( ~ ~ ~~ I ~ ~. ;q~ N ~ c I - j~ gy ~'i=• ~ yell ~~~~ .~~- y EE ~ W 1 z - - 3~ !a ~~ =ui ~ ~ r s5 Z LL1 ~ 4 ~-' 7G .. -_ , ~ ~~ ,~ ~ O 4 ~e a5 a: ~ ~.7 ~ =t ~ a ~i ~ A 11 ~ 3 1 ^ / ~ 5~ ( J ~ f ~~'. Y J ~~ 6a t ~ V ~ U h ~x ~ 3 ~, , ~ ~ '~ -' 9NNww lnlme oom-w aij ~ y m ~' ~'~~""' "~° ~~~~~ ~~ SNtJId 3dAlOlObd OZLNW o z ~ ~ M NbWfllgd !~I! a ~ C ~ • o / ~ 2 a Iq,,.tl „~ '~NI'W31SAS JNISIH~N\1Hd »3Alft~ ~ ~ a ~1~ ~ Ila '+w'Imlayl fwro a 11Nrm11nu rnlw+vawfEn n MInY11Mq amrn.w,rargro«n<nsll ans m ue on ~.I.n...........,, ....._~.._ __._.. ~.._._..-_._.-- --. .. .. _-•-•....---..-.-..-.-- .-r ..-r.e •wrw.ynRV Pm Wnpn np fpwalgO BntlL:IBMNtlYM ~~___-_- - ~ aza ar , ~5 _ nNNp AO awl»m 8 ItU9]JIYIYDO EV~kNq:Yl - i ~.~ 1 ~ ~ 1 4 ~ ~' - ~ I ~ FS ~ 1 - jgypj ~ 4 i~ i ~5 ~ ~ I ~~ d~ ~~ T _~ "~~ ---1 I G y ..b .A ,. ~- Q ~ sa, aannc ~ i ~~` ~ ~~ sitlu r:e1~11 - ~ YiWKY5VJ101 ~ _ -_- ~~o ~~ f4bffPlwl diN R p g `x ~. NCAf 1'FMWU ~l ~ ~~ ~~.~ ~~ •. ~ Al IlO MVV ~Af4- aiia- Y7r1N810 ~ "'~A~ ~ '4 Y3tlV d3tl <.OSI OIf NOlrl~l "~ q~ 3 11'~ II N ~ ~ # - OWIiE ~NwY.rd HFN 1 1 \ ~ ~~ ~? -- - 'S ~ 1 I ~_ ~5 B-r _=---- ~- 7DY/IBr .90f M\~1f r¢af a~a:~:l..e ~i ;r 110 y - Y ~--- .~. ~. / - P (16111011G9iflNrl U,ql-.GL QqI • ~ ~~ ~_ - IN'JIIrJ(1t UIII iGf ~ 3N3LN ~ ~ f lYfl r-.a ---~I ~ ~~ ~ i y 1 T __I} t I `I -- ® S U 1 i3n3 ~ ~ \ F4 ~ ri ~ i I ~ I 'taut tlaaud uari"oisno ~ t -s d ~ B ~~ ,,. ~~ ~ ~~ ~ e .,, ., ~ ' F~ ~~ {. `d , o- , Z R ~.:: .:4 RI _ k 6"a ~ f ^ .{r ~3 ~' 1`J 1 `1 1 o r ~~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ .~ _ ~ ~ >~ o ~ '' a Z ~~~ ~~ !~ N - _ K~ ~m~~- -- Z •~ I --- a = -- J 4 ~~'~.~ p l1f~Ifl Q o I ana.osaxn _ J __ _I _ ~I C ~ F~G- ~ \ --- ~ I ;, „ ., ... ., J . , ~K F -Y ~. ' ~ a 4 1 ! it. E~ y8 "f-_ _, ~ 1 ~ ll~~~~~~~ili~ l i _; I W 1 ~ ° S ~ ,l ~d qz. ~19~~11 ~ II I1 9 F„ ~ z '' w ~ i 4 6 E~T -r-,~ -- ~ p ~~~ ~1i1 ~I ~ r~ ~ ~~ a W ~ ~ z ~ § ~ " # ~ $~~ ~ ~° it `'f~ l~1~ 1FF~f~f ~''Ijfi~~iG• !l~ E V } '~~ °a p` Y 1 +` C ~ D ~ w " Z $ ~ , _ ~, I ~ p~~ !tl 6~1 ~i~,l I.ili 1 ~' ~ ~ l ~d~ U t B! tl ypde8ddd !lulu~ll;I! `E 71 ! tl Q ~ I S IIJ tlON e o ~tl 1 ~' _ D .N ~ ~ ~ i 9 ~~ ! ~ ~ a ~° a~ per / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 3~ xE Y ~ W ~ J ~'~ ~i ~ ~ a ~ tl~ ~~ c ~ ~ ~ ~~i~~~~~9~3i , ~ a ~ ~5~:uzaYS.~a i / ~- /~ / bZ 'a6a 'OZl 'd. - -- - - -- - ~ ~ ;O b/l 3N a41 1~ ------- -- -/- ~-~---e--- ~ / ~ -- . a /+ ------------- 'ti a ~ -~~ .. ---- o ~, ~~ O yN N / r \ ° 1', ~ MM ~'~\yT// ~ ~ O 1.0 . 3 ~ r~ U ~ \ 1,~ t rr,,..~~ ~ ~ `mil %~ ~, I ~ C~ '- rn ~ ~o / i}. P Cn \ ~ ~• t v \ / aO0 in \ I ~ r a ~. ~ ~ , <-.., ~ \ - / ~~ ~ + .. ~ ~ ~. \¢ ~ ~ ~~ _._ _ ~ ~ £ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~- O `' ~ ~ ~ .. f' ~ `\, ~ ; p,119~5909 ~ \ O~ .,0~~, \V~ ~ ~'~ ~ ~6 x ~ 1~ '~, ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ - , ~ ~ ' y Exhibit H Lot 3 Lighting Plan Exhibit I Lot 3 Signage Plan ~ i 4 C j ~ O N t„ x v x ~ q QR~ @ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ dal /,4 $ i--- ,b ~ L ~, l~3 +._.._.._.'-Ydg ' a 3 g ~ g~ph g ~$ts ~IlEl~~il1~ ~,~{.;~~IE~jtrr~''' ~I' ~ ' i ~, I i~ ~ ~ 1 ~ < ~ ~ ~ • V ~ ~,i ~ ~ ~ N ~ 1 ~ . ~ 1 a 8 . $ ! ~ -- -- ~ -1 ------I p M l o aaaaaa ~} ! If iil~i::i;(:Q i~~ ! E.' ~ ~ ~ - - ~ E 1 q9 g Q ~ ! ~ i ¢ \O~ \ \ VI<W <Y WaN I 1 ~/ ~ \ -,,~ ~ °~p \\ j as // _ I \ ~ \ ` / ' \ ~d ~~ \ ~ S'~ p ~N 'O~ ~ ~ ~\ (~ D `~ \ \ ~ I I I ~ ~ (~ 'C~ \ ~~ ~ WO G \ 1 \ I ; 1 ~ 1 ~ A d ~ id N ~ F ,.j o a -~ ~.s., ul Daso .. ~ ~ K- ~ ~ n --- I 00 \ ' r ' ( 1 '1 1 U~ ° ~ [ ' / O I i I~ , ~1 j ~ w 2 t~ o "~ ~ ~ o }. E ~ q 1 atid~ ~~ \ E I ~ / ~ ~ 9 1 fl~ ~\ ~zaspsS ~~ ~ \ \ / 1 1 I 1 ~ j • ~ ... ~ , 1 ~ I ~ ~ 1 g ~ 1 / I ~/ ii 1 a ~ /' i ~ O S4\ ski ~b~~~` o ~ ' U \\a,h; . ~ ~~ :~ j 10 ~'~' $ ~ 1 ~ g °~ ~ 1 ,,,.,, y..o ~i~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ P. Y \\ t „ / +~I yun ~~ ''~~~.. '2 G/ ti a "4~0 °rq, ~i"er, ~~ r ' ~ ~ \ voax rssH i \• / / ~ O ' cy) ~ ~'' •~' /~ ~ ''w'4., ti ~ ~~ ~ \ ~\~ry b' ~ ; ~ n ~ y ~r ~ ~ H1110N ~ ~ ~+ \ ~ ~ ~~~N ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ \ Z N B ' . o O,~ ~~- ~Ni~ ~~ y ~ ~' ~X ~- v .. O~ W~ - --~ ~ ~~~a 7~ ~ ~• •~ 2 1~'1 W p:~ ~• ••w +.~ i e.+ Oro a w+.a~. S w YlOS3NNIW '3111A1tl3BlV m ~ Q ~ S ~ ~ yw• x w AY pwbN y!u • •~•N ~. ~w,. ~ ,~ „„»• w,»r ~ vzvia ~~inta3eiv , 6 ~ ~ a~ r ~ = ~ a~ . m e I .o-3i N M ~ Ex ~= Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~,~ ~ I ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ k~ _ _`___- _- SNOI1Vn313 a01a31X3 ~S ~ 3 333 n V ----e ~- " rios3NNin •3nuia3eiv s N ~y~SW .w,-.°wNw . ba, """°' ~~° . ~ °"."" ~ vz~nd 3~inia3eiv " o ~ o ~ s ~ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ _ ~ ~ i ~ ~ G ffi ~ ~ ~ a W `i ~ ~ 9 ~ ~G 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z d I Z ~ ~ ~ ~ Z W \ N ~ I \` \\ ° ~ ~ g `~ $$ P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ ~ ~\ ~ - ~,: ~_ __~. I x~~} {i ~ r ~ i f;,,tr..~ . L- z 0 z o _. I z ~ _. z o a a ~ I~ a W y~j ~ H p J W Fq J J W F N M -1 ~i 'f ti ~ ~ ~ ti x ~ (W 6. 6 ~., W H_ z U z ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ an pp ~ I g~_ •., _ ~; ~~~ !6~ ~ l~~~ili~d~l~ ;il ' R,~~3 ~r e~ a ~i =~~ A@r+!E1 !l;t~~l~tli 3;jj. ! ~ ~ 7 ~a'_ - _.._.._...~' M~~ g~lIIS~= 1t~~1,~~I~~rd! ~ 1=~ aa!! a !! s i o A i dbAddd !d' II ~i#:~d {!.r r 8 d ~ B ~ } a V ~ O H Q (~~ ~f +'1~ 1~ J~i r d ~Zd ~~~ i~ a 8 qp 6 8 ~~~~~ ~~ ~~¢, ''@H n 30 ~'< ( a 33 I ~. ~ I ~ ~~ ~~_ I ~I M` ~ P d~ a ` ~~~i~is r~ re v. n^ec mmm~ O 2 ~~°6 3 F- W cn 5 ~pi w w 4 U ~~~~ [~ Z ~ secs a 0. ~ Cod„ 1 `~ ~ '~1 s.. sB Nb~,~~N N ~ ~~ ~ x.wox ~ b o ., ~d y `~N )bye a __ . _ _. ... J aL_~ ~X~ t ~ ~, Exhibit K Lot 1 Landscape Plan Exhibit L Lot 1 Lighting Plan ~ ~ 1 ~ MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE AND THE OWNERS OF LOTS WITHIN ALBERTVILLE PLAZA ADDITION FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ~- border FOODS City Clerk City of Albertville, MN 5959 Main Avenue NE PO Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301 RE: CUP and. Site Plan. Submittal New Build Taco Bell Hwyl9&37 965 Decatur Ave N Golden Valley, MN 55427 Direct Telephone: 763-489-2970 Direct Fax: 763-489-2971 December 18, 2006 Via Fax and Mail Please withdraw our application for a CUP and Site Plan approval for a new Taco Bell at Hwy 19 & 37. Thank you. ~~~ ll--. >~arb Schrt~id~t~ ~~ Vice President of Development POSt-it®F x Not 7871 Date To From Co./Dept. - Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # Post-it® Fax Note 7871 Dated pages T ~ ~ t } From- Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # Fax # Fax # Border Foods, Inc. is a franchisee of YUM! Brands /~ S 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com September 25, 2003 Mr. Dick Erickson Central Bank 3585 124' Avenue NW. Coon Rapids IO~Zn. 55433 RE: Albertville Plaza zoning compliance letter. Job no. 163.05 Dear Mr. Erickson, You have inquired as to the zoning compliance status of the building located on Lot 1 Blockl Albertville Plaza Addition in the city of Albertville. This lot is zoned commercial Planned Unit Development (PUD). Development approval for this property was given in February 2001. The site has been developed in compliance with the PUD zoning standards and the city's approval conditions. The site and building exist in a legally conforming condition. If you have any further questions please contact me at your convenience. Sincerely. NORT T ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC. y ~~~~~ ,\ ~~ Alarf R. Brixius, AICP Principal Pc: Linda Goeb ~iu'~e~c'~' Ll~'~, ~~~~~~ ~9(1~1~21 G2~K. F ~~ ., ~~~'nf~ B~fI~C ~a$S 124th A~~ruo i~'arthwes~C Cao~. Rag:ds, ~T ~'S~33 , Tot J t1' Lfl /~~ C~• f ~ "~ ~'hona; Pax r..hvne: '~ ~' 3 - 'Sf '3"7 ~ ,~ .~ l Cy ') GC: .~ ~~'. / `~~C /' I'il)~~O~G ~'~ Dare: ~ - ~.~ ~ ~ Number oFgages L~clt~ding cavez ehe~t: Framt 4 ~r`G I~ ~.~ ~ c. /G S f~ ~-t.J Phone: ~ 763-780~J484 Faz phone: 783-?53-1863 0 Por yoiu zeview ~G.Rep1y A: AP ~ Pltae~ taaxmant ~. ~fC~is 'J~ ?C~~~ 4~4?~~Yi ~~P ~?~~a ~I OCi ~Ik ~I l•, [~~~ F~ LENIFORIVI LAND USE CONFIRMATION FARM Clnfarrttation to bye supplied by person requegtirrg Information:] (submit 2 copies of this form) A, Sub,]ect Property 1101161°t Street NE- Albertvilie,lVlleT, SS341 (Address) 13. Lot 1 and I.,ot 2 Block 1 and Cwtlot A Wri ht Count Nlinnesata (Complete Legal) C, Property Tas+ ID # Lot 1 - 101-078-001010, Lot 2 - 101-078-001020; autlot A - 101- 078-000010 D. Dick Erickson. Vicc 17residcnt l~+Tame of Person Req,ueating Information Central Bank 9S 85 124 Avenue Iti W Coon. Rayids. MN SS433 763.784-0484 -Telephone - 763.783-1863 Fait E. Response Requested 6y FAX and regular mail (A1low Minimum of 3 Working bays) F. The use of the Subject Property is described as (please be specific and describe the project located or to be lxated on the Subject Property); B.etail Strip Mall Clufarmation to be Supplied by Municipality:] 1. The Subject Property is designated in the Comprehensive Plan as: 2. The current zoning classification for the Subject Property is; 3. There are ,_,lare no_ applications filed for the Property (e~g„ zt~ning, subdivision, special use permit, conditional use pernut, variance site plan approval, ete.) (For a brief description of filed applications, sec Comments). 4. The use of the Property as described in paragraph F, above, is; Yes No a, Permitted b> Conditional (See Comments or attached documentation) ~;ug,?6~ 203 ~~48Pr~i we~t~ai Bank c. Nancanforming (see Comments) ~-- (?his section will not be completed if detailed information not supplied in paragraph F+, above.) Yes No 5, There are records in the City files of unsatisfied zoning violation(s). If "Yea" is checked, see Comments) 5, Variances have been granted for the Propcrty .____. (documentation attached) 7, Property contains sufficient number of parking spaces as required by City Code $, Flood Insurance Rate Map {pIYtM): Property Appears to be in zone{s) Community Panel No. Dated: _ ~. CaYnmcnts: 1Q. This information was researched by the undersigned, on request, as a public service. The undersigned certifies that the above information in paragraphs 1-9 is believed to be accurate based on or relating to the information supplied in paragraphs A, B, C and F; however, neithtr the undersigned nor the City assumes liability for errors and omissions. All information was obtained frown public records which maybe inspected during regukax business hours. Title Signature /rib9~~ Y4 • SQNn` khtCt $gY05S ~~• Date r 7-1-02 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: Arrow Sign Company for 2"d Wind Exercise Equipment Request: The applicant wishes to have additional signage of 200 square feet on the northwesterly wall of amulti-tenant building. City Council Meeting Date: July 1, 2002 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and decision: 1. The legal description of the subject property is Lot 1, Block 1 Albertville Plaza. 2. The applicant has an existing wall sign of 140 square feet and one freestanding sign 75 feet in height and 200 square feet in size. 3. The Albertville Plaza site is not unique or does the site present a hardship that can be overcome by additional signage. The site already is afforded signage above and beyond a typical B-3 site through the PUD approval (i.e., the 75 foot tall freestanding sign and front wall sign). 4. The Council finds that the proposed variation is based in part on the desire to increase the value or income potential of the business. The applicants own description of need represents that this is one of the driving interests in pursuing the variance. 5. The Albertville Plaza building location allows the individual wall signs as well as the freestanding signs to provide excellent visibility to the building. As such, there is no physical hardship that is unique to this site which creates a need for additional signage. 6. The introduction of a 200 square foot illuminated wall sign on the northwest corner of the building would introduce additional lighting into the adjoining residential neighborhood. As such, it would have a negative impact on the adjoining properties and would be inconsistent with the intent of the conditions outlined in the original PUD agreement which state that no wall signage shall be allowed on the rear of the buildings facing residential zoned areas. Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for sign variance has been denied based on review of the criteria and the most current plans and information received to date. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 1St day of July 2002. Attest: 2"d Wind Sign Variance Page 2 of 2 ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~h ~~~4 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 plannersC~nacplanning.com December 26, 2001 Mr. Reg Plowman R7 Marco Construction, Inc. 75 W. Viking Dr. Suite 104 Little Canada, MN 55117 RE: Albertville Plaza Lighting Issues File No: 163.06-00.37 Dear Mr. Plowman: Thank you for sending me the lighting plan for the. Albertville Plaza Multi-tenant building. As we discussed, according to the plan the foot-candle standard of 0:4 is met at the property lines. However, there is an on-going glare issue at the site. In discussions with the City Council they have directed staffto work with you to resolve the glare issue. There are three things to be addressed. First is the screening' of the wall packs on the building. Either some type of shield needs to be constructed to direct the light downward or a different type of fixture needs to be placed on the building. Secondly is the parking lot lighting. The heads on the posts need to be adjusted to direct the light at a 90-degree angle. After this adjustment we will assess if any cut-off shields will be necessary on the lights. The third issue is the freestanding sign for 2nd Wind. The sign is internally illuminated but it is very bright. The City has a regulation that requires that the sign not be illuminated between the hours of 11:00 pm and 7:00 am, when the use is not open for business. It is imperative that the sign be regulated with some type of timing device so that the sign is consistently off during these hours. The Council is willing to review each step incrementally to assess the impact on the lighting reduction. For example, first adjust the heads on the poles, if that is not adequate then. shields will be required. Once adjustments are made, the City will require that an as-built lighting plan with measurements of foot-candles be provided. I have included a copy of the relevant portions of the ordinance regarding lighting of the parking areas as well as the sign. Please contact me with a schedule for modifications at the site. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. ~' Cindy Sherman Senior Planner c. Linda Goeb Mike Couri December 26, 2001 Letter to Reg Plowman . Page 2 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Linda Goeb /John Sutherland FROM: Alan Brixius DATE: November 21, 2001 RE: Albertville - Atb~rtville Plaza fighting FILE NO: 163.05 -General At the November 19, 2001 City Council meeting, Council member Berning raised the issue of building and parking lot lighting at the Albertville Plaza shopping center, citing that it the lighting is not directed downward, rather it casts glare into the adjoining residential properties creating a nuisance for those residents. In review of our case file, we find that no lighting plan was submitted showing details for lighting types or lighting contours as part of the PUD review. Section 1000.10, Glare of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance, requires any light used to illuminate an off-street parking area, sign or other structure shall be arranged as to deflect light away from an adjoining residential zone or from public streets. Direct or sky reflected glare whether from spotlights or from high temperature process such as combustion, welding, shall not directed into any adjoining property... The source of light shall be hooded or controlled in some manner so as not to light adjacent property. Bare incandescent light bulbs shall not be permitted in view of adjacent property or public right-of-way. Any light or combination of lights which cast light on a public street shall not exceed one foot candle meter reading as measured from the centerline of said street. Any light or combination of lights which cast lights on a residential property shall not exceed .4 foot candles meter reading at said property line. In view of this ordinance requirement, and the non submission of a site lighting plan, we would advise the City to notify the owner of the Albertville Plaza that they should submit a lighting plan showing cut sheets for each lighting fixture as well as a photometric plan showing the foot candle contours on the property. This plan should demonstrate that all lighting, parking lot and building is directed downward and away from sensitive areas. The lighting plan should also demonstrate that the sale I gohte~ge oes not exceed .4 foot candles at the property line of the adjoining residents p p If you have any further questions on this, please contact me at your convenience. pc: Mike Couri PUNCH LIST OWNER City of Albertville DATE OF CURRENT ISSUE 11/08/01 CONTRACTOR. R. J. Marco DATE OF ORIGINAL ISSUE 10/03/01 SEH NO. A-ALBEV 0201 D37 OWNER NO. N/A SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION FINAL COMPLETION PROJECT 2001 Albertville Plaza, Albertville, MN Below is a list of items which must be completed or corrected prior to final acceptance of the subject project. A completion of these items does not in any way relieve the Contractor of the responsibility to complete the project in accordance with all Contract Documents. Item Date Date No. Item ____ Reviewed Comments Acce ted All hydrants need factory new paint, flag _ 1 installed "candy sticks", detector wire installed to flag bolts, and valve boxes 11/06/01 11/06/01 adjusted to 1 /2" below finish grade. Hydrant in northwest corner of 2 development needs to have head turned 11/06/01 11/06/01 toward road. 3 Raise MH 1 on service to strip mall to 11 /06/01 Internal chimney seal needs grade above sod. to be installed. 4 Fix busted valve boxes on water main at 11 /06/01 Top seal at bottom Sta 0+00 Sta 0+00 and @ Sta 3+80. still busted. All manhole castings must be of the 5 "self sealing cover". Every manhole 11/06/01 11/06/01 needs to be changed. Manhole Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 have their Manhole 6 -still slides off, 6 castings slid off cone or ring section by 11/06/01 and no chimney seal on No. 3 inches or more. 6. MH 3 has Class- 5 and clay piled in 7 invert and down pipe. Clean and set ~ 11/06/01 11/06/01 appointment with City to flush. 8 CB2 has bushed rings under casting. Rings not grouted. 11/06/01 11/06/01 MHS has Class 5 in pipe invert and on 9 bench plus cast too high for snow 11/06/01 11/06/01 plowing. Lower by 1 inch. 10 Rip rap in ponds silted over. Area not 11 /06/01 No seed on boulevard for seeded-erosion evident. unsold lots. No attempt! 11 12 Item No. .Item Date Reviewed Comments Date Acce ted PROVIDE 48 HOURS NOTICE PRIOR TO THE START OF THIS WORK. THIS WORK SHOULD BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 3 (CONTRACT TIME) OF THE AGREEMENT. REMARKS: Issued By: Mike Czech Title: RPR mdh c: Pete Carlson, SEH Manager Mike Czech, SEH Linda Goeb, City of Albertville Tim Guimont, City of Albertville \\SEHSC3\SCCV\ALBEV\D37 ALBERTVILLE PLAZA\PUNCHLIST.DOC Mike Couri, City Attorney Cindy Sherman, City Planner Reginald Plowman, R. J. Marco Construction Jeff Shopek, Loucks & Assoc. 2 III November 7, 2001 Reginald Plowman Project Manager R.J. Marco Construction, Inc. 75 W. Viking Drive, Suite 104 Little Canada, MN 55117 Dear Mr. Plowman: RE: Albertville, Minnesota Albertville Plaza SEH No. A-ALBEV0201.00 D37 Reference is made to my October 3, 2001 letter to you, which informed you of punch list items that needed to be corrected at the Albertville Plaza site. You were also requested to submit a schedule outlining when the work would be completed. To date I have not received the requested schedule. The site was inspected today and found not to be in compliance with the approved .grading and erosion control plan. For the most part, turf has not been established in the unimproved area or in the storm water detention pond. Because of the time of year we can no longer expect turf to be established until the spring of 2002. Leaving the site in its present condition over the winter is unacceptable. Silt fence will need to be placed around the unimproved areas and wood fiber blankets will need to be placed on the slopes of the storm water ponds. This erosion control needs to be placed by Wednesday, November 21, 2001. As allowed in the developer's agreement, if the erosion control is not placed by November 21, 2001, the City will hire a contractor to complete the work and deduct the cost from yourletter of credit on file with the City. City Engineer mdh c: Linda Goeb, City of Albertville Mike Couri, City Attorney Jeff Shopek, Loucks & Associates Mike Czech, SEH w:\albev\d37 albertville plaice\plaza.doc 1200 25th Avenue South, P.0. Bax 1717, St. Cloud, MN 56302-1717 320.229.4300 320.229.4301 FAX architecture engineering enuiron~aental trans~iortation Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Your Trusted Resource Equal Opportunity Employer t7ct 06 01 12:46p Mik~c Geatz ~ ~~r~ch ~~ ~.~ October 5, ?00 I City pf ~11krCvillc 5975 Merin Ave. N1v l~,C7. liox 9 Albcrdvillc, MN 5534)1-0UOs~ Uc~tr Sirs, 763.494.8898 p.l 1518 64`" Pi. N.. Maple Grove, MN 553'I1 Tel: 612.310.5246 Fax: 208.248.8056 geatzmw@att. net As a risult of the Aibetlville r~lanni~~;; ~~ 7onin;; COmtnlssion CO r~~:c~mmend a~;lltlst Ot7r sire plan, we would like tt~ withdlytiv our a17~rlication for a Tacn .lnhn's rc.rtaurant to Ix lacatcd at l,nt?, Block 1, Albcrtwif!e Pl:ua. Anw remaining pro•rellu upp1lCUlion !ue ni<<y lx sent to our aCtitrc;xs uf`rccard. Sincerely, ,~ 1 ~„ ~~ MIGIlSCI W. tJekll1 =SEN Gctober 3, 2001 Reginald Plowman Project Manager R. J. Marco Construction, Inc. 80 Minnesota Avenue Little Canada, MN 55117 Dear Mr. Plowman: 1200 25th Avenue South, P.O. Box 1717, St. Cloud, MN 56302-1717 320.229.4300 320.229.4301 FAX architecture engineering environmental transportation RE: Albertville, Minnesota Albertville Plaza SEH No. A-ALBEV0201.00 D37 Enclosed is a Punch List of items that need to be corrected at the Albertville Plaza site. This work needs to be completed before the bituminous wear course is placed on the driveway and parking lots. You should be aware that any bond or escrow held by the City of Albertville will not be released until this work is completed. Please send me a schedule of when this work will be completed. The site will be reinspected upon written notification that the work is complete. S' ely, Peter J. Carlson, P.E. City Engineer djg Enclosure c: Linda Goeb, City of Albertville (w/enclosure) Tim Guimont, City of Albertville (wlenclosure) Mike Couri, City Attorney (w/enclosure) Cindy Sherman, City Planner (w/enclosure) Jeff Shopek, Loucks & Associates (w/enclosure) Mike Czech, SEH (w/enclosure) \\sehsc3\sccv\albev\d37 albertville plaza\100301-rj marco-Ldoc Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Your Trusted Resource Equal Opportunity Employer ~z ~~~~~~ES~ ~SSa~~~,~E~ cc~n~s~L~t~~a~s~ w~tc. r_ ~~?5 ttVa~z~ta B~sule~ard, Suites ~~5, St. L©uis Park, tlr9R1 ~s541 ~ Telephone; 952.~~5,963~ Facsi€r~ile; 952.~~~.~8~7 naca~?~,vinternet.ccam MEMORANDUM TO: Albertville Mayor and City Gouncil FROM: Cindy Sherman DATE: May 17, 2001 RE: Albertville Plaza -Landscaping and Screening Plan FILE NO: 163.06 - 00.37 Staff continues to work with the applicant on modifications to the screening and landscaping plan. We hope to have a revised plan to review with the Council at the meeting. We have scheduled a meeting with the neighbors Monday prior to the Council meeting. A full report will be provided at the Council meeting. c. Linda Goeb Albertville Plaza, Site Improvements Watermain Plan No. 012220 Page 2 May 7, 2001 Authorization for construction in accordance with the approved plans may be withdrawn if construction is not undertaken within a period of two years. The fact that the plans have been approved does not necessarily mean that recommendations or requirements for change will not be made at some later time when changed conditions, additional information, or advanced knowledge make improvements necessary. Approved: 3 'cc,t, ~ce_L ~ y'}'7~cLn.r~-- - l1"'°'~/(,~~ ~r - v J Douglas J. Mandy, P.E., Supervisor Administrative Unit Section of Drinking Water Protection P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0975 651/215-0757 DJM:CMK:cac cc: City of Albertville Loucks & Associates, Inc. File Chad M. Kolstad Public Health Engineer Section of Drinking Water Protection P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, Minnesota 55164-0975 651/215-0792 SE~JT $Y: GWOT~! LAW PIRM, LTG.; R6NALD M. 13R~?TH 612 349 6210; rE8 2C 01 i:10PNi; PAS= 213 GROIN LAW FIRM, LTD. ni rorwEV ar I.aw SUITE 4956 2.22 SOUTH NINTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55402-3301 TEiEPHONE 612.339-467 FdCSIMitE 812.34~J-621 Fcbruaey'~0, ?107 i'Y1r. Nlichacl C. Couri Attorney at Law 705 Cenfral Avenue East P O Box 369 S#. Michael: 5~37b-03fi~J ~Y IKACS111~liL~: Rc: tk]bertville Plaza,l~1~ (Signage Restrictions) DeKrr 144r. Court: q.LrhYetl 1n Iowa and Mirnaaola As you kng~v, I represent Albertville Pixua, LLC,'. The laurpase of this letter is to place yore and the C`'ity c~fAlbertville on notice that even though my client is executing the Developer's A~;rcetnent that it does nat necessarily accept the si,~eagc restriction an the pylou5 to lae limited to ~U!) square feeir. D;upendin~ upon future uses of the subject property, my client cuay aslr the C.otfrl.ci4 to recnnsiclet'that issue to meant more Signagc. Very truly }ours, v-~. ~~~- Ronald H. Groth r~ urn -~._ iu int. vi cc: A]berir~lle Yiaza, LLC CITY OF ALBERTVILLE 02-05-01 City Council Findings of Fact & Decision Site Plan Applicant's Name: RJ Marco Construction Inc. Request: RJ Marco Construction has submitted as application for Site Plan review to allow the construction of a multi -tenant building to be located in the Albertville Plaza PUD which is located just south of County Road 37 and west of County Road 19. Planning Commission Meeting Dates: January 9, 2001 City Council Meeting Date: February 5, 2001 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following finding of fact and decision: A. The legal description of the subject property will be Lot 1, Block 1 Albertville Plaza, Wright County, Minnesota. B. The Planning Report dated January 31, 2001 from Northwest Associated Consultants is incorporated herein. C. The City Council finds the requested Site Plan in conformance with City's Zoning Ordinance and provisions of the PUD. D. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. E. The requirements of Section 1500 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance have been reviewed in relation to proposed plans. F. The proposed actions have been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and have been found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. G. The proposed development will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. H. The proposed use conforms to all applicable Zoning Ordinance performance standards. 1 Albertville Plaza Site Plan CC Findings of Fact & Decision Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the City Council APPROVES the Site Plan based on the most current plans and information received to date subject to the following conditions: 1. The site shall be modified to provide the maximum setback possible to the west property line adjacent to residential uses. 2. The south wall of the building shall include additional decorative banding or architectural features to enhance the appearance. The change shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. 3. A sign plan shall be submitted for the monument sign. Wall signage shall be limited to the sign band as identified on the building elevations presented to the Planning Commission January 9, 2001. 4. A Landscaping Plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the building permit subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. Security guaranteeing the installation of the landscaping shall be provided as required by ordinance. 5. Alighting plan shall be submitted that meets the ordinance and is subject to the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of the building permit. 6. Final plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. The trash enclosure shall be relocated on the site subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 5th day of February 2001. City of Albertville By; Attest: ;~~ ,,-~ ~_ ~ A .- .. ,~ , By: ~ ~ ~~--,,~ :____ Linda Goeb, City Administrator 2 Albertville Plaza Site Plan CC Findings of Fact & Decision CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Applicant's Name: Albertville Plaza LLC Request: 02-05-01 City Council Findings of Fact & Decision PUD Preliminary/Final Plat Albertville Plaza LLC has acquired the property located at the south and west intersection of County Roads 37 and 19. The site is zoned PUD and was approved for unrestricted commercial development as part of the Westwind PUD. The current application is to amend the PUD and implement a development plan with specific uses with an internal system of shared access. The application also includes platting the property. Planning Commission Public Hearing Date: January 9, 2001 City Council Meeting Date: February 5, 2001 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following finding of fact and decision: A. The legal description of the subject property will include Lots 1-3, Block 1 and Outlot A, Albertville Plaza, Wright County, Minnesota. B. The Planning Report dated January 31, 2001 from Northwest Associated Consultants is incorporated herein. C. The City Council finds the requested Development Plan in conformance with City's Zoning Ordinance and provisions of the PUD ordinance. D. The proposed uses can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. E. The requirements of Section 2700 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance the Subdivision Regulations have been reviewed in relation to proposed plans. F, The proposed actions have been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and have been found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 1 Albertville Plaza PUD and plat CC Findings of Fact & Decision G. The proposed development will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. H. The proposed use conforms to all applicable Zoning Ordinance performance standards. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the City Council APPROVES the Amended PUD, preliminary and final plat based on the most current plans and information received to date subject to the following conditions: 1. The PUD shall be limited to two multi-tenant ground signs at 75 feet in height, not to exceed 1033 elevation, with 400 total square feet of signage. 2. Each lot may have one ground sign not to exceed 10 feet in height and 40 square feet in area. 3. No wall signs shall be allowed on the rear of buildings facing residentially zoned areas. 4. Wall signs shall be consistent with the City sign regulations. 5. Uses on the site shall be restricted as follows: 6. Lot 1: Multi tenant retail, office, and coffee shop. 7. Lot 2 and Outlot A: professional office, bank, hotel/motel, daycare, restaurant, auto service, and retail sales. 8. Lot 3: Restaurant 9. Any other uses will require an amendment to the PUD and all uses are subject to site plan review. 10.A11 restaurant uses may be required to include odor reduction equipment as determined by the City. 11. Utility/storm water management plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 12.Access and related improvements are subject to the review and approval of the County Engineer. 13.A PUD agreement incorporating all conditions of approval and acceptable to the City and the developer shall be drafted by the City Attorney and shall be executed by all parties prior to recording the plat. 2 Albertville Plaza PUD and plat CC Findings of Fact & Decision 14. The developer shall record easements for utility and street access on all lots. 15.The underlying zoning of the plat is B-3 and is subject to the above-mentioned land use restrictions. 16. The developer agrees to provide reciprocal access to the property lying south of the plat. 17.The City will maintain the private streets in the plat as mutually agreed to in the developer's agreement. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 5th day of February 2001. City of Albertville By: Attest: ,rr'' __ _ Linda Goeb, City Administrator 3 Albertville Plaza PUD and plat CC Findings of Fact & Decision l~~~'~#~'E~~" ~~~flCA~'Et~ ~t3N~t~t.TAt~~` s,, ~. '!N' 07`5 `v'~~~~z~ta Ei~uteuar~, Suite 55v, SL. ~ Dais Park,. ~~~ 5~~'{~ e~. ~eir~}~I~~r~~- 95~.:~a~~,~~~~"z ~acsirr~~f~: 9~~:~~~.~~~~ r~~c~cuefiri~ter,-~~t.c~ar~i PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville City Council FROM: Cindy Sherman DATE: February 1, 2001 RE: Albertville -Albertville Plaza Amended PUD /Preliminary and Final Plat FILE NO: 163.06 - 00.36 REQUEST Albertville Plaza LLC has acquired the property located at the south and west intersection of County Roads 37 and 19. The site is zoned PUD and was approved for unrestricted commercial development as part of the Westwind PUD. The existing PUD also allowed pylon signs consistent with the Sign Ordinance allowance for lots abutting the freeway. The current application is to amend the PUD and implement a development plan with specific uses with an internal system of shared access. The application also includes platting the property. ATTACHMENTS • Site location • Development plan • Preliminary Plat PRELIMINARY PLAT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN The preliminary plat consists of three lots and one large outlot: Lots 1 and 3 currently have development proposed that are subject to site plan review later in the agenda. Lot 2 will be subject to site plan review in the future. Outlot A may become more than one lot and will be subject to platting and site plan review in the future. The uses on the parcels under the amended PUD are praposed to be restricted to restaurant, automobile service, professional office, bank, motel, daycare and retail sales. The uses praposed are subject to the ability to provide a site plan with reasonable setbacks, lot coverage and parking ratios. All perimeter setbacks shall be consistent with the ordinance for B-3 zoning and parking. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission recommended that no restaurants or auto service be permitted on lots 1, 2 or on Outlot A. Stormwater Management/Utilities. An overall design has been submitted regarding stormwater management and utilities on the site. The City Engineer is reviewing the information and will provide comments prior to the Commission meeting. Access. The entire development will be served via two accesses, one to County Road 37 and one to County Road 19. The access points, designs and any additional improvements are subject to the review and approval of Wright County. The internal system will be a private road through the site with individual accesses and parking for each use. Cross easements for access and parking will be recorded for the entire PUD. Landscaping. Same berming and landscaping was installed with the residential portion of the PUD. Additional plantings will be required on the commercial side but this will be addressed with the individual site plans. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter and they recommend approval of the amended PUD to be known as Albertville Plaza with the following conditions: 1. The PUD shall be limited to two multi-tenant ground signs at 75 feet in height and 125 feet in area. 2. Each lot may have one ground sign not to exceed 10 feet in height and 40 square feet in area. 3. No wall signs shall be allowed on the rear of buildings facing residentially zoned areas. 4. Wall signs shall be consistent with the City sign regulations. 5. Uses on the site shall be restricted as follows: 6. Lot 1: Multi tenant retail, office, and coffee shop. Albertville Plaza Amended PUD Page 2 of 3 7. Lot 2 and Outlot A: professional office, bank, hotel/motel, daycare and retail sales. 8. Lot 3: Restaurant 9. Any other uses will require an amendment to the PUD and all uses are subject to site plan. review. 10.A11 restaurant uses may be required to include odor reduction equipment as determined by the City. 11. Utility/storm water management plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 12. Access and related improvements are subject to the review and approval of the County Engineer. 13. A PUD agreement incorporating all conditions of approval shall be drafted by the City Attorney and shall be executed by all parties prior to recording the plat. Albertville Plaza Amended PUD Page 3 of 3 CITY QF ALl3ERTVILLE Applicant's Name: Albertville Plaza LLC Request: 02-05-01 City Council Findings of Fact & Decision PUD Preliminary/Final Plat Albertville Plaza LLC has acquired the property located at the south and west intersection of County Roads 37 and 19. The site is zoned PUD and was approved for unrestricted commercial development as part of the Westwind PUD. The current application is to amend the PUD and implement a development plan with specific uses with an internal system of shared access. The application also includes platting the property. Planning Commission Public Hearing Date: January 9, 2001 City Council Meeting Date: February 5, 2001 Findings of Fact:. Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following finding of fact and decision: A. The legal description of the subject property will include Lots 1-3, Block 1 and Outlot A, Albertville Plaza, Wright County, Minnesota. B. The Planning Report dated January 31, 2001 from Northwest Associated Consultants is incorporated herein. C. The City Council finds the requested Development Plan in conformance with City's Zoning Ordinance and provisions of the PUD ordinance. D. The proposed uses can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. E. The requirements of Section 2700 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance the Subdivision Regulations have been reviewed in relation to proposed plans. F. The proposed. actions have been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and have been found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 1 Albertville Plaza PUD and plat CC Findings of Fact & Decision G. The proposed development will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. H. The proposed use conforms to all applicable Zoning Ordinance performance standards. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the City Council APPROVES the Amended PUD, preliminary and final plat based on the most current plans and information received to date subject to the following conditions: 1. The PUD shall be limited to two multi-tenant ground signs at 75 feet in height and 125 feet in area. 2. Each lot may have one ground sign not to exceed 10 feet in height and 40 square feet in area. 3. No wall signs shall be allowed on the rear of buildings facing residentially zoned areas. 4. Wall signs shall be consistent with the City sign regulations. 5. Uses on the site shall be restricted as follows 6. Lot 1: Multi tenant retail, office, and coffee shop. 7. Lot 2 and Outlot A: professional office, bank, hotellmotel, daycare and retail sales. $. Lot 3: Restaurant 9. Any other uses will require an amendment to the PUD and all uses are subject to site plan review. 10. All restaurant uses may be required to include odor reduction equipment as determined by the Gity. 11. Utility/storm water management plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 12. Access and related improvements are subject to the review and approval of the County Engineer. 13. A PUD agreement incorporating all conditions of approval shall be drafted by the City Attorney and shall be executed by all parties prior to recording the plat. 2 Albertville Plaza PUD and plat CC Findings of Fact & Decision Adopted by the Albertville Gity Council this 5th day of February 2001. City of Albertville By: Attest: By: Linda Loeb, City Administrator John A. Olson, Mayor g Albertville Plaza PUD and plat CC Findings of Fact & Decision ~ ~ ~ ~ -\ REVISED 10-18-00 ^ A-1, Agricultural Rural ^~ R-6, Residential High Density ^ A-2, Agricultural Transitional ~%^ R-7, Special Purpose High Density ~ ^ R-1A, Low Densifij Single Family ^ R-8, Mixed Housing ~. ^ R-1, Single Family ^ R-M H, Manufactured Housing Residentiai~ R-2, Single & Two Family ^ B-1, Neighborhood Business ~~~ R-3, Single &Two-Family ^ B-2, Limited Business v R-4, Low Density Multiple Family ^^ B-3, Highway Commercial ~~~~ .# ~ ~I~i~'~f~~VEST A-SSC?~I~~ED C~3l~lS~LT~11~71<Sp 1~~. ~~J'~~ VVa~~~a~a ~oufe~ard, vutt~ 5~5, Wit. Louis Park, 1l'}PJ ~~~'f-~i Tr~iep4~~:n~: ~v2,~L~5.~~3~ ~acsirr~le: J~a4.595.9~~7 e~~c(~vvirtt~rnet.~,cari^t PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville City Council FROM: Cindy Sherman DATE: January 31, 2001 RE: Albertville -Multi tenant @ Albertville Plaza Site Plan Review FILE NO: 163.06 - 00.37 BACKGROUND. RJ Marco Construction Inc. has submitted as application for Site Plan review to allow the construction of an 11,800 sq. ft. Multi-tenant building to include, among other uses, retail sales and a liquor stare to be located on the west side of County Road 37. The site is zoned PUD and the uses are permitted under the PUD. The site is approximately 2.41 acres in size and the Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Commercial Development. Attachments: • Site Location Map • Site Plan • Landscape plan • Floor Plan • Exterior Elevations Issues Analysis Zoning. The property is zoned PUD and the use is consistent with the development plan for the area. Lot Area, Setback, Height and Coverage Proposed PUD District Pro used Lot Area 2.41 acres Lot Width A rox. 450 feet Setbacks Front 105 feet Side 150 feet Rear 60 feet Buildin Hei ht Maximum 20 feet Maximum Lot coverage of 8.9 Structures The proposed improvements are in compliance with the PUD. Site Access/Circulation: Access into the site will be from the internal private road. Circulation will be provided around the entire building. The proposed fast food site includes adrive-through lane separate from the rest of the on-site circulation. The drive aisle areas and parking on the west side of the site is adjacent to residential uses. Staff would like to see the maximum separation that can be accommodated in order to provide a meaningful buffer. Parking: The ratio for shopping center was used to calculate .parking space. This requires 5.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of space which works out to be 65 spaces required, 69 spaces are provided. The parking as proposed .should. be adequate for the uses proposed. Shared parking will be available under the PUD agreement. All areas will be bounded with concrete curb and gutter with bituminous surfacing. All spaces shall be at least 8 'h` x 20' with 24' drive aisles. Parking shall also be provided to meet ADA regulations. Building type and construction: The proposed building will have an exterior consisting of rockface block and burnished block with an accent band. The front of the building utilizes glass storefronts with colored awnings proposed over. the individual tenant spaces. The south elevation is very plain and some additional banding or mix of materials should be provided to create a nicer view from the public road and the main entrance into the site. The .roof is flat with a parapet wall along the front. Albertville Plaza Multi-Tenant bldg. Site Plan Page 2' Signage: A monument sign is shown on the site plan but no detail has been provided. There is a sign band shown on the front of the building that will allow wall signs up to 5% of the total wall area, the sign ordinance allows up to 15°I°. Wall Signage shall be limited to the areas identified on the exterior elevation plan submitted and a date of approval will be provided following City action. Exterior Storage/Screening: No exterior storage is proposed as part of the application. The trash area shall be enclosed and is to be constructed of materials to match the building. Because of the proximity to the residential use west of the site staff recommends that the trash enclosure be moved to a different location on the site. Any roof top equipment shall be screened as appropriate. Grading/Drainage/Utilities: The final plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Landscaping Plan: A landscaping plan has been submitted that shows a number of plantings but there are no labels on the plan. A buffer a minimum of 6 feet in height as required by the ordinance shall be included in the revised landscape plan. Special attention should be given to screening headlights since the circulation pattern directs traffic so that it may create headlight issues. A revised plan shall be submitted subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. The applicant shall post the appropriate landscape guarantee as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Lighting: A lighting plan has not been submitted. This shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit and is subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. RECOMMENDATIQN The application is .proposed under a Planned Unit Development.. The Planning Commission reviewed this request and they recommend approval with the conditions outlined below. 1. The site shall be modified to provide the maximum setback possible to the west property line adjacent to residential. uses. 2. The south wall of the building shall include additional decorative banding or architectural features to enhance the appearance. The change shalt be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. 3. A sign plan shall be submitted far the monument sign. Wall Signage shall be limited to the sign band as identified on the building elevations presented to the Planning Commission January 9, 20Q1. 4. A Landscaping Plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the building permit subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. Security guaranteeing the installation of the landscaping shall be provided as required by ordinance. Albertville Plaza Multi-Tenant bldg. Site Plan Page 3' 5. Alighting plan shall be submitted that meets the ordinance and is subject to the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of the building permit. 6. Final plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. The trash enclosure shall be relocated on the site subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. Should the Council find. the application consistent with the PUD then a recommendation for approval should be subject to the conditions as outlined in the findings of fact. Albertville Plaza Multi-Tenant bldg. Site Plan Page 4' 02-05-01 GITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Fact & Decision Site Plan Applicant's Name: RJ Marco Construction Inc. Request: RJ Marco Construction has submitted as application for Site Plan review to allow the construction of a multi -tenant building to be located in the Albertville Plaza PUD which is located just south of County Road 37 and west of County Road 19. Planning Commission Meeting Dates: January 9, 2001 City Council Meeting Date: February 5, 2001 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence .received, the City Council now makes the following finding of fact and decision: A. The legal description of the subject property will be Lot 1, Block 1 Albertville Plaza, Wright County, Minnesota. B. The Planning Report. dated January 31, 2001 from Northwest Associated Consultants is incorporated herein. C. The City Council finds the requested Site Plan in conformance with City's Zoning Ordinance and provisions of the PUD. D. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. E. The requirements of Section 1500 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance have been reviewed in relation to proposed plans. F. The proposed actions have been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and have been found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. G. The proposed development will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. H. The proposed use conforms to all applicable Zoning Ordinance performance standards. 1 Albertville Plaza Site Plan CC Findings of Fact & Decision Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the City Council APPROVES the Site Plan based on the most current plans and information received to date subject to the following conditions: 1. The site shall be modified to provide the maximum setback possible to the west property line adjacent to residential uses. 2. The south wall of the building shall include additional decorative banding or architectural features to enhance the appearance. The change shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. 3. A sign plan shall be submitted for the monument sign. Wall signage shall be limited to the sign band as identified on the building elevations presented to the Planning Commission January 9, 2001. 4. A Landscaping Plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the building permit subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. Security guaranteeing the installation of the landscaping shall be provided as required by ordinance. 5. Alighting plan shall be submitted that meets the ordinance and is subject to the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of the building permit. 6. Final plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. The trash enclosure shall be relocated on the site subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 5th day of February 2001. City of Albertville By: Attest: By: Linda Goeb, City Administrator John A. Olson, Mayor 2 Albertville Plaza Site Plan CC Findings of Fact & Decision ~brsrkvi lft p(~.2~ ~; ~.~ P(Ah ~~~cu u ~{ ~~ A-1, Agricultural Rural A-2, Agricultural Transitional R-1A, Low Density Single Family R-1, Single Family R-2, Single & Two Family R-3, Single &Two-Family R-4, Low Density Multiple Family R-S, Me~tiam Density Multiple Family ^1 R-8, Residential High Densit• R-7, Special. Purpose High D ^ R-$, Mixed Housing R-MH, Manufactured Housing ^ B-1, Neighborhood Business ^ B-2, Limited Business ^ B-3, Highway Commercial ^ B-4, C-mineral Business,_~ -7 0 ~ L- °' _ o NORTH H .- °o d~ m a~RC/tior ~ST9T~ 4 Z o~ ,~ 8g ~~,4 b opTtiFR 4b I ti9 N N <P »fs < ~ ,, ~ ~ ' Ro hie 3 ... ~ ~ Y j -qg otiS ~ ice/ ~ V~ ~'"i' Y \, '~ h o~ a ~, ~ ~.~ % ~ ~. -.~ ~ 'r? ~ NSy / ~ ~ ~ ~ \.~ ~ , 620. ~ / \ ~ +~~ \ ~ ~\ 'P``he ' 626 ~ [~7 ~~, °~, i ~\ bc"ti I .~~ Ae Bf \~~ 9 ~PPo .~ U~ " ' ~/ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~2~~ ~ ~ ~~ n~ D f Gbh ~.~ IIi ~ n a /y s\ i O ~ 1 N 61 ewe `~' ~ , r ~ `, >~ , _- '~ ~ ~ ~` 1 y f ~~` ~ \ ~\ gg , Oi9f \ _ ~n - -- ~ it = 1 o.d ~. ~~ - _. ~ si°o ~ - D o ~ ~ ~ I . H I'G I-r~ .I ~ ~ I I m ~ (~yj ~~~ppp ~1-'y 1 ~ / I1 ~ - i . i ~ • i _ -r , a o i ' ~~ i ~ i ,• I . z y `- _.- ._ _ ~ ~+ ~ °'• 9 ~ ~ p z i ° ~~ ~ ~ O ~(~Tn S ~~~.~yy .• Irv & Egress E s ?~ni - I ~ _ ; I ~ -i Q. P'' ~ E ti MCI ~ m Ie. ProPoseE_9ress __ J D ~ ~ ~ C17 y m I~ p i ~ I -.< <- H ~~~ l J f a~ N z (n ' o D w !- . - ~ r ~ fit. `' \ r ~ p aw I~ I -' c~ ~ -I ~ v` T 'o - o g v ~`" ~ a !, _ Icn C7 I \ ~ ~°w, i I N O O C m$ A I ~ I < / o ~,~~ 9~ I O Wp1 w~ ro I ~ n y ~o ° isi ~ I / $ m ~ v 9V O ~ .~ ~ ^, 60650\ts \~ t70 i cn /i y~tl`d / I \ ~ \ ~ ~Q / / ~ ~/ ~,\ ~ ~, ~ ~. , o ~,_~ ~ i ~ gi ~! ~ v •. \•\ 9 9 ~ W W ~ ~ ~ PTO 6 O 1 i O ~ , I Q` g I _ ~ ~ ~ `y ~ N _ ~p ~ I ~ C v o I ~, ~ m ~ h 1 NNy ~ 1 c Y \ wc; I ~ o tr h .. ~ F/ !• I ~a H ~oa ~~,"fY m°i• ,. 1 _._.__.. ~, :K I I t0 ~ \ ~ ~ - / - I ~ ~ ~ ` / ,~ Soulh Iine of the SE 1/4 0! / .; V I I o o ~ ~^ `r Sec 35 Twp t21, Rqe. 24 M~+ ~ ~ 2. r - ------ k / F __ _ __~ ! I I ~ - -- ----------- ~ ------ I I -{- - --- ____.___- 1- ' 1` _ -_ _ _ I o. me of the NE 1/4 er / - \\ - - - - I 1 _-_- -. 'Se 2, TWP_ 120, Rge 24 \ `IJor(h I'ne of the NV! 1/4 al - I .. _..' ~ ~j I ~ F --..~~••!!" Sec. 1, Twp. 120, Rge. 24 / I LI ~~ / ~ T'- 1 4 I ~R / ~ / 1 -.. .. .. ~ io / r L _. __ . k .. _... - - 60227 --- - ' u a'e 3 0 i ~ ~ ~~e. °i M~ ~~ U~ e e ° _ a e„q ae - ~ ° ~ ° & ~ ° vA~ a3~ m2in a. E~~ ®~ ~~ e~ ~p w r M• n ~. S = Eats _ ~ : a °~?- I §€~j~',~#R~~ ~ F $~d9 gg~%s i. a~ °g° 36.~.g~;\g ~f i~~ms=~?~ O 4~~ ~3% ~ 2 d ~g~~~~ y s ~ ~ ~ ~-._.._..- ~~ ^ ~$' i~ i'~ z~---- ~ I ~ 4 ~ _..--.~ / 'a° ~'-`---gag .. g ~ ~ 9 O o o ° D~ c ?~ z° i p v ~ O ° A `~ Z ~I rr ~'J ~~~rorrr ~ ~ .b I E € z n ~ 9 ~:Au,IN00WS~GesktoLA"R,7 ~eCi5\4gCM1TEC~V4Lbh:",a L-a:.dn _.:. 3,' 1 i6' ...... o 0 m ~ --___i-__.___ 80'-G__ .___ __ ______~ . Ii ~ _.~O-C~__ 3~-C" _-__ I. -.x---_-.-__________ _,.__.___,I,_ o ~ I Z ~ i i I ~ i , ~ ~ I i ~ I I '. .. . --- - I I I ~ s>~ i Q ~°°~ I I i '~ N I i I i I i --- ~ ~ ~ ~ ----~F o I --- - -- - --- i-- ------ - -- - - - w ~ ~ I I~ ~ r-- $I--- 0~ ,~'' ~~ ~ i I ~ I 11 a , ' j ~ I ~ ~ - ~_ ° f W I I ~ z ~ ~ -------~-,'~ L- 0 A --- v i ~~ , ,, A N ~ wyz O°°c>z IN I -+ i ~ i I z ----- ,.--- -- i O x r -- -- - -- --- - ---- -- --- ~ - ------ -- ---- m z, i X \ ____ P (1 ~ oOpD (1 Z m y I, 1 _ __ G __-_.____ i I +~ __-___ _-_ _ __ i 10'-G" __-..- _-______-__ 70 0' m > ~ _ > ~ ALBERTVILLE PLAZA I hereby cadity that this plan, specilicafion o (~ m ~ F w report was prepared by me or under my direct ~ m c, ~'S ° m ~ O mm ~~ii ^ ~ supervision and that I am o duly registered roN ° m ` ~ ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA ____~ndar the lave or the "" > ~ S Sicta of am n i ion f AA RI Z< ofl 1 I ; o c~^~m oU z n ti N ~oz o ~ An Signature ~ 7 1 ~n FLOOR PLAN _____ _ __ U ~ = A O Dm ~!y Date Registration Number ~ ~ C7 ~ S ~ ~, C ~~ m r m O ' z .~~~~ n #7 / ~ ~ `` io `\ O1z ~OZ ~z i I ~~ ~~ I~ ,~ > ~ e r I I~ Iii O ~~ m A - m m P U D A S+ W - G _ A .U m L m y c ~~ ~ a v o rp _ ~ r i m O m ~ G ~~. W ~T' Z cl~~, _ I i m D o z r ~z ~~°~ ~ iIIz z ~_~I !l ~~~ ,~ i, l I CJ m 7 _~ m p C1 U h _ C r. _ ~> ~ ~ w 2 G ~ m z `D c ~ n n y _ , ~ - a R1 Z, m n r 0 N m O s 2 _ z U o ~ Y 0 ~S. m - o U1 :n, c -c pyZ m I m A ~ n o, x ,, m jm ~+ ~ SD m i A ~ m p~ C p - 7 n ZN ~_ -o ° ~ ~ ®~ -~ ~ o z m s ~ m ~ z m~ m r- © G ~ mr - n O , r C) ' Z () ~ x ' (~ z rm F D r m D m n m m A m ° " ° ALBERTVILLE PLAZA ~ g 5 I hereby certify fhai ihls plan, specHicoilon o 'z m report was prepared by mm ar under my direct mm m m m ~ ° supervision and thot I a o duly registered ~n~ D C ° ~ m _ _______under the laws of the ao n~ S m o < ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA siate-of > ~ z~n mA N p o ~° ~~o ____ _ow = n N~~ ~ ~ ~ Si furs _.-_.___._____._..__..__.____ i I oy m rnyb ~i A EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS x~ )T1~ Dale Re9istro}ion Number ~ N o ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ m m -, , t 1~ Q p o ~ C L-. ~C s ~ z r 1= m ° ~ i . m z b ~ y ~ ' ~ my ~ ~' Iz ~s ,, N ~A 1 ~, , '~ A 1A -~ -1 ~ ~ i I r ~~ r I < I l i < ~~ D I II D ' ~ i I ~ I I o i ~ ° , ~I z z n n Z~ A ° s °.< Y c - n n m nl a m n fn n ~ t= z c c c ~ ^ G y A O U u z c r-° z m ° - z CITY OF ALBERTVILLE ^ ZONING REQUEST APPLICATION 5975 Main Avenue NE P.O. Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301-0009 (612) 497-3384 fax(612) 497-3210 Please read carefully and answer all questions thoroughly. Only complete applications will be accepted after validation by the City Clerk and prior to acceptance of required processing fees/deposits. Street Location of Property: N/A Legal Description of Property (Attach additional sheet if necessary): Owner: Name: Albertvill Plaza L.L.C Address: 75 West Viking Drive City: Little Canada Telephone (Home): Applicant (If other than owner): Owner: Name: Same Address: City: Telephone (Home): State`. (Business): Type of Request(s): ~''C. % x Site and Building Plan Review Minor Subdivision/Consolidation g X Preliminary Plat .z~~ X Final Plat Comprehensive Plan or Ordinance Amendment Zip; (Fax}: Rezoning Variance ~ ~ ~, Conditional Use Permit ~ Interim Use Permit Planned Unit Development Other Description of Request(s): Proposed Development -for culvers store & 10,$00 Sq. Ft. Retail Case No: Base Fee: Escrow Amt: Pd. Date Filed: fo State: Mn Zip: 55117 (Business): (651) 484-5635 (Fax):484-5701 Center. Page Two, City of Albertville Planning/Zoning Application Reason Why Request Should Be Granted: Continuation of Px; st; ng P iT P (~IPXr PracP~._ Existing Us of the Property /Nature of Facility or Business: Vacant If a request for aplanning/zoning action on the subject site or any part thereof has been previously sought, please describe it below: What? When? N/A Project Name, if applicable: 1 hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the information and materials submitted with this application are in compliance with City Ordinance and Policy Requirements and are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. 1 understand that the application will be processed for the next available meeting agenda after review of the information submitted to determine if any other data is needed and after completion of a sta~'report. I understand that all City incurred professional fees and expenses associated with the processing of this request are the responsibility of the property owner and/or applicant and should be promptly paid. If payment is not received from the applicant, the property owner acknowledges and agrees to be responsible for the unpaid fee balance either by direct payment or n special assessment against the property. (If the property fee owner is not the applicant, the applicant must provide written authorization by the owner to make application.) Sixty (60) Day Waiver: The City hereby noizftes the app&cant that development revie-v may not be completed within the required 60 days due to public hearing. requirements and agency review; .therefore, the ~Y is taking. an automatic 60-day extension for development revie-u Development review will be completed within IZO days unless the applicant approves additional review extensions Signature(s) of Owner(s): '~~ Date:~ ~%~' ~ /~1~,~,~u~r'~-c~ Date: Signature(s) of Applicant(s): Approved Denied by the Planning Commission on: Approved Denied by the City Council on: Date: Date: (Date) (Date) Nf~RTHWEST ASSi~C1AT~D CC?NSULTANTS, IhC. 5775 Wayzata Boufevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville Planning Commission FROM: Cindy Sherman DATE: January 4, 2001 RE: Albertville -Albertville Plaza Amended PUD /Preliminary and Final Plat FILE NO: 163.06 - 00.36 REQUEST Albertville Plaza LLC has acquired the property located at the south and west intersection of County Roads 37 and 19. The site is zoned PUD and was approved for unrestricted commercial development as part of the Westwind PUD. The existing PUD also allowed pylon signs consistent with the Sign Ordinance allowance for lots abutting the freeway. The current application is to amend the PUD and implement a development plan with specific uses with an internal system of shared access. The application also includes platting the property. ATTACHMENTS • Site location • Development plan • Preliminary Plat PRELIMINARY PLAT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN The preliminary plat consists of three lots and one large outlot: Lots 1 and 3 currently have development proposed that are subject to site plan review later in the agenda. Lot 2 will be subject to site plan review in the future. Outlot A may become more than one lot and will be subject to platting and site plan review in the future. The uses on the parcels under the amended PUD are restricted to restaurant, automobile service, professional office, bank, motel, daycare and retail sales. The uses proposed are subject to the ability to provide a site plan with reasonable setbacks, lot coverage and parking ratios. All perimeter setbacks shall be consistent with the ordinance for B-3 zoning and parking. Stormwater Management/Utilities. An overall design has been submitted regarding stormwater management and utilities on the site. The City Engineer is reviewing the information and will provide comments prior to the Commission meeting. Access. The entire development will be served via two accesses, one to County Road 37 and one to County Road 19. The access points, designs and any additional improvements are subject to the review and approval of Wright County. The internal system will be a private road through the site with individual accesses and parking for each use. Cross easements for access and parking will be recorded for the entire PUD. Landscaping. Some berming and landscaping was installed with the residential portion of the PUD. Additional plantings will be required on the commercial side but this will be addressed with the individual site plans. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the amended PUD to be known as Albertville Plaza with the following conditions: 1. The PUD shall be limited to two ground signs at 75 feet in height and 125 feet in area. 2. Each lot may have one ground sign not to exceed 30 feet in height and 40 square feet in area. 3. Wall signs shall be consistent with the City sign regulations. 4. Uses on the site shall be restricted as follows: a) Lot 1: Multi tenant retail, office, and restaurant. b) Lot 2 and Outlot A: Restaurant, automobile service, professional office, bank, hotel/motel, daycare and retail sales. c) Lot 3: Restaurant 5. Any other uses will require an amendment to the PUD and all uses are subject to site plan review. Albertville Plaza Amended PUD Page 2 of 3 6. All restaurant uses may be required to include odor reduction equipment as determined by the City. 7. Utility/storm water management plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 8. Access and related improvements are subject to the review and approval of the County Engineer. 9. A PUD agreement incorporating all conditions of approval shall be drafted by the City Attorney and shall be executed by all parties prior to recording the plat. Albertville Plaza Amended PUD Page 3 of 3 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE ^ ZONING RE UEST APPLICATION 5975 Main Avenue NE Case No: ____ P.O. Box 9 Base Fee: ~.5 Pd. ~~ Albertville, MN 55301-0009 EscrowAmt: ~ Pd. ~ (612) 497-3384 fax(612) 497-3210 DateFiled: Please read carefully and answer all questions thoroughly. Only complete applications will be accepted after validation by the City Clerk and prior to acceptance of required processing fees/deposits. -~ L/ Street Location of Property: ~~~ ~+~ ~ ~1ra w~ ~~~ ~ ~, ~ A K ~ -~` ~! Legal Description of Property (Attach additional sheet if necessary): S~c' ~ ~ ~ c~ '~~ ~~ '~'~-~ Owner. Name: ~ ~ STa.~L /¢S't'oc ~Qrzs' ~~ Address: ~7r SAS /~~c-: c~ ,~.~L~/y .rJ City. ~.rJ~1.d.t~~ __ State: ~t~ 7~p; .S5^t~Q2 S Telephone (Home): ~ Z ~2 Z ~ (Business): ~'~f ~ jS (Fax): ~~S! ~5~ Applicant (If other than owner): Name: «" ~.J /~j~ ~-~- v /I 'f r~ ~T (a Address: City: L-t ~C ~ ~~ u cll Gt.. v State: /~ / Zip: ~~ Telephone(Home): (Busme~~,' r~y'.Sl~ ~ ~ (Fax): ~ ~/ ` ~ ~~ S ~ a Type of Request(s): Site and Building Plan Review Minor Subdivision/Consolidation Preliminary Plat Final Plat Comprehensive Plan or Ordinance Amendment Description of Request(s): Rezoning Variance Conditional Use Permit Interim Use Permit Other /> Reason Why Request Should Be Granted: Page Two, City of Albertville Planning/Zoning Application F,~dsting Use of the Property /Nature of Facility or Business: ~' ~1 ~-e2 ~ )f a request for a planninglwning action on the subject site or any part thereof has been previously sought, please describe it below: What? When? Project Name, if applicable: I hereby appty for the above consideration and declare that the information and materials submitted with this application are in compliance with City Ordinance and Policy Requirements and are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the application will be processed for the next available meeting agenda after review of the information submitted to determine if any other data is needed and after completion of a staff report. I understand that all City incurred professional fees and expenses associated with the processing of this request are the responsibility of the property owner and/or applicant and should be promptly paid If payment is not received from the applicant, the property owner acknowledges and agrees to be responsible for the unpaid fee balance either by direct payment or a special assessment against the property. (If the property fee owner is not the applicant, the applicant must provide written authorization by the owner to make application.) Sixty (60) Day Waiver: The City hereby Holt; fies the applicant that development review may not be completed within the required 60 days due to public hearing requirements and agency review; therefore, the City is taking an automatic 60- day extension for development review. Development review will be completed within 120 days unless additional review extensions are approved by the applicant Signature(s) of Owner(s): Date: __~7=~„ ~~isT~•r/G ~.rdGt2T~S Date: Signature(s) of Applicant(s): Approved Denied by the Planning Commission on: Approved Denied by the City Council on: Date: Date: (date) (date) ,h Existing Property Description as Shown on Survey by RLK Kuusisto, Ltd. Dated August 6, 1999 The Southeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, lying South of the Burlington Northern Railroad and Easterly of Line B, described below: Also, that part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 120, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of said Line B and North of Line A, described below: Also, the North 169.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of Section 1, Township 120, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, lying Westerly of the centerline of Wright County Highway 19. Line A and Line B: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of Section 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 07 minutes 12 seconds West along the East line of said Northeast Quarter, a distance of 169.00 feet to the point of beginning of said Line A to be described; thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes OS seconds West, a distance of 626.98 feet and said Line A there terminating being the point of beginning of said Line B; thence North 24 degrees 36 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 544.00 feet; thence North 11 degrees 00 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of 115.00 feet; thence North 9 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 157.00 feet; thence North 40 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 78.00 feet; thence North 59 degrees 11 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 46.20 feet; thence North 29 degrees 11 minutes O1 seconds East, a distance of 398.00 feet of the Southerly right of way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad and said Line B there terminating. Except for the part thereof taken for highway right of way purposes as shown on the Wright County Right of Way Plat No. 30 and Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 34 according to the recorded plats thereof. -'!,,i r~ h t. ;r'v Suite 30 -(+sir.~! ? i~c'~ -+ t , _; Existing Property Description as Shown on Survey by RLK Kuusisto, Ltd. Dated August 6, 1999 r t~~.: i t. .~' , , "..r.r ~i G3.~'+.5~0; ~ .t. Planning Fax 'G3.a~=i.58?: Civil Engineering ,` humeC~ luucksmela~an.wm Land Surveying www.!oucksmcla~an.com Environmental Archaeology The Southeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, lying South of the Burlington Northern Railroad and Easterly of Line B, described below: Also, that part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 120, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, lying Easterly of said Line B and North of Line A, described below: Also, the North 169.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of Section 1, Township 120, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, lying Westerly of the centerline of Wright County Highway 19. Line A and Line B: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of Section 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 07 minutes 12 seconds West along the East line of said Northeast Quarter, a distance of 169.00 feet to the point of beginning of said Line A to be described; thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes OS seconds West, a distance of 626.98 feet and said Line A there terminating being the point of beginning of said Line B; thence North 24 degrees 36 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 544.00 feet; thence North 11 degrees 00 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of 115.00 feet; thence North 9 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 157.00 feet; thence North 40 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 78.00 feet; thence North 59 degrees 11 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 46.20 feet; thence North 29 degrees 11 minutes O1 seconds East, a distance of 398.00 feet of the Southerly right of way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad and said Line B there terminating. Except for the part thereof taken for highway right of way purposes as shown on the Wright County Right of Way Plat No. 30 and Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 34 according to the recorded plats thereof. ,~I.. _. ?.lin~,eap„ii,. Sc. I'.iul ''..: fi s, `linnr.tpulis, iSj(r 1~r1 ,b i.-i'45~0~ Planning Fax ?63.+_'~.582~ Civil Engineering home<?~iuucksmc(agan.~om Land Surveying w~~tiv.loucls!ndaoan.wm Environmental Proposed Description of Parcel A (North Parcel) (July 20, 2000) That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 121, Range 24, the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 120, Range 24 and the North 169.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of Section 1, Township 120, Range 24, all in Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of Section 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 07 minutes 12 seconds West along the East line of said Northeast Quarter, a distance of 169.00 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point A; thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes OS seconds West, a distance of 626.98 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 24 degrees 36 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 544.00 feet; thence North 11 degrees 00 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of 115.00 feet; thence North 9 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 47.74 feet, to a point hereinafter referred to as Point B; thence North 09 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 109.26 feet; thence North 40 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 78.00 feet; thence North 59 degrees I I minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 46.20 feet; thence North 29 degrees 11 minutes O1 seconds East, a distance of 306.12 feet to the southwesterly line of Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 30; thence southeasterly, northeasterly, southeasterly and southwesterly along said southwesterly line and along the westerly line of said Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 30 to the intersection with a line between the aforedescribed Point A and the aforedescribed point of beginning; thence westerly 615 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning and there terminating. Excepting therefrom that part taken for highway right-of--way purposes as shown on Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 34. and which lies northerly of the following described line and the easterly and westerly extensions thereof: Beginning at the aforedescribed Point B; thence North 80 degrees 31 minutes 30 seconds East, a distance of 224.84 feet to the aforedescribed southwesterly line of Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 30 and there terminating. Archaeology \(i!tncalw~i~. ~t. l'auI .,: '(lll E?cmlo~l: L.uic ,', un~ QUO r ~~~ , \linne;tpoli,,, LIB ~ ~',.~ i~j(_ '• . ya:..~ ~, r vez,.. iei b.).'i ~~U~ ~ _ ~ _ Planning ,e Eat ~b3.-t'4.?i3?? Civil Engineering home:+-louektimda~an.com Land Surveying ~~ti~~~.loud<smclagatt.com Environmental Proposed Description of Parcel B (South Parcel) (July 20, 2000) That part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 121, Range 24, the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 120, Range 24 and the North 169.00 feet of the Northwest Quarter of Section 1, Township 120, Range 24, all in Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of Section 2; thence on an assumed bearing of South 1 degree 07 minutes 12 seconds West along the East line of said Northeast Quarter, a distance of 169.00 feet to a point hereinafter referred to as Point A; thence South 89 degrees 42 minutes OS seconds West, a distance of 626.98 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described; thence North 24 degrees 36 minutes 35 seconds East, a distance of 544.00 feet; thence North I 1 degrees 00 minutes 45 seconds East, a distance of 115.00 feet; thence North 9 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 47.74 feet, to a point hereinafter referred to as Point B; thence North 09 degrees 28 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 109.26 feet; thence North 40 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 78.00 feet; thence North 59 degrees I 1 minutes 30 seconds West, a distance of 46.20 feet; thence North 29 degrees 11 minutes O1 seconds East, a distance of 306.12 feet to the southwesterly line of Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 30; thence southeasterly, northeasterly, southeasterly and southwesterly along said southwesterly line and along the westerly line of said Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 30 to the intersection with aline between the aforedescribed Point A and the aforedescribed point of beginning; thence westerly 615 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning and there terminating. Excepting therefrom that part taken for highway right-of--way purposes as shown on Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 34. and which lies southerly of the following described line and the easterly and westerly extensions thereof: Beginning at the aforedescribed Point B; thence North 80 degrees 31 minutes 30 seconds East, a distance of 224.84 feet to the aforedescribed southwesterly line of Wright County Highway Right of Way Plat No. 30 and there terminating. Archaeology a, ~r,~,~,e.~E,~>i~,.