2006-02-22 Transmittal Site Plan, Survey, Landscape ...„-' 9300 Hennepin Town Road
~. ~ Eden Prairie, MN 55347 PROJECT #: 04154
(952) 278-8880
ARCH/TEClS Fax (952) 278-8822 DATE: 2'22'06
www.htg-architects. com
TRANSMITTAL LETTER
TO: City of Albertville MAIL
5975 Main Avenue NE
Albertville, MN 55301-0009
Attention: Bridget Miller
FROM: Phil Blasko
Andrew Benson
PROJECT NAME:
ENCLOSED:
State Bank of Long Lake
Albertville Office
FEDEX ^ PHONE:
COURIER ^ ARRIVE BY:
FAX ^ FAX #:
# OF PAGES:
COPIES DATE SHEET # DESCRIPTION
10 ea 1-17-06 Full Size Site Plan, Survey, Landscape Plan, Civil Plans (2), Floor Plan, Exterior Elevations
Li htin Plan of Site with hotometrics
4 ea 1-17-06 1 I x 17 size Site Plan, Survey, Landscape Plan, Civil Plans (2), Floor Plan, Exterior Elevations
Lighting Plan of Site with photometrics, Colored Exterior Elevations
3 sets sta led , 1 loose
REMARKS:
Application for March 6th, 2006 City Council Meeting.
Note: The shared access easement between LaBeaux Station and Bank Property is not yet recorded but will be soon; as well as the
additional 10' trail easement along south property line that the City is requesting has been mailed direct to you from Mike Byrne @
State Bank of Long Lake.
f;(': Mike Byrne, State Bank of Long Lake
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS. tNC.
• y 48dd Olsan Memorial Highway, Suite 2d2, Golden Valley, MN 56422
Telephone: 763.231.2555 Facsimile: 763.231.2561 planners@nacplanning.com
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Larry Kruse
FROM: Cassie Schumacher-Georgopoulos /Alan Brixius
DATE: January 3, 2007
RE: Albertville -Lake Community Bank Variance
Zoning Text Amendment
NAC FILE: 163.06 - 06.36
BACKGROUND
Color Sign Systems, Inc and Lake Community Bank have applied for a Variance for
. businesses ground signage at Lake Community Bank located at 11102 57th Street NE.
The sign in question is to be located on the property at the corner of 57th Street NE and
CSAH 19. Whether or not the Variance is approved or denied the applicant has also
applied for a text amendment to the current language for ground signs which was
currently amended in March 2006.
Mr. Dave Shannon (applicant) with Color Sign Systems and Mr. Jay Eull, Vice President
of Lake Community Bank addressed the City Council at the December 4, 2006 meeting.
Mr. Eull informed the Council that they have been working with Color Sign Systems for
a considerable amount of time to design their sign in conjunction with their logo, which
is part of Lake Community Bank's trademark. However, it was only after Color Sign
Systems applied for a sign permit on November 3, 2006 that the March 2006 Ordinance
came to their attention.
The proposed light-background illuminated sign is currently in place while the Variance
application is considered. Both Mr. Shannon and Mr. Eull have agreed to remove the
light-background illuminated sign if the variance is denied.
Attached for Reference:
Exhibit A Color Rendering of White Sign
Exhibit B Color Rendering of Brown Sign
. Exhibit C Letter from City Attorney Mike Couri
21
HISTORY
The applicant is requesting a white background to match Lake Community Bank's •
trademarked logo and feels the logo and lettering will not read to traffic if the dark
background is enforced. The applicant and property owner feel that the Zoning
Ordinance is creating a trademark infringement because the dark-background alters the
appearance/colors of the company logo.
According to the memo sent by City Attorney Couri (Exhibit C), there is no clear
controlling law in the 8th Circuit Court, which is Minnesota's jurisdiction, on whether a
city's ordinances requiring a business to modify its logo on an outdoor sign constitutes a
violation of the Latham Act for trademark protection. The issue on trademark violation
has arisen in the 9th Circuit Court on the West Coast and in the 2"d Circuit Court on the
East Coast with the separate courts taking different sides. In the 9th circuit, the court
ruled that a city's ordinance requiring a different color logo in an outdoor sign than the
color trademarked constituted a violation of the Latham Act. In the 2"d circuit, the court
ruled that requiring a change in the company's logo color did not constitute a violation.
Because of the uncertainty of the 8th circuits decision Attorney Couri is recommending
that the City's change the Ordinance in a manner that would not require a change in
color of a company's logo, but would achieve the same result of reducing the glare
coming from on premises signs at night.
VARIANCE •
The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 10-7-8 A.3:
Subd. i Ground Signs. In business districts, ground signs shall have a background
which is dark in color in contrast to the sign lettering or message which is light in color to
create a sufficient contrast and be clearly legible. No ground signs with lightly colored
backgrounds shall be permitted.
In accordance with Chapter 10-7-9 of the Zoning Ordinance, variances are allowed
where there are practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships in the way of carrying out
the strict letter of the provisions of the Sign Ordinance, the City Council has the power
to vary the requirements of this chapter in harmony with the general purpose and intent
hereof, so that the public health, safety and general welfare may be secured and
substantial justice done.
The request and conditions of the variance are not unique to this particular business.
Since the Ordinance was requested by and approved by the City Council, Albertville has
seen several new businesses come into the community and alter their signs to fit the
requirements of the Ordinance. Also allowing the variance for the sign may start other
businesses to question the validity of the sign requirements they were held to.
The Ordinance was established by the Council to reduce the negative visual impact
large white signs had on the City at night. We do not feel that enforcing this Ordinance
would be providing an undue hardship for the applicant in review of the following:
22
• 1. There are no special conditions unique to the property. Several businesses have
come into the community seeking the same requests as the applicant, but have
been able to follow the current ordinance. Therefore, the ordinance is not
denying the applicant the rights other business owners have had after the
ordinance was approved.
2. The applicant has illustrated the ability to create a sign that would follow the
Ordinance (Exhibit B).
3. We feel that the hardship would be solely economic in nature. A portion of the
economic hardship would have been caused by the applicant due to the
applicant creating anon-conforming sign prior to the receipt of an approved sign
permit.
4. Granting the Variance will give special privileges to the applicant, which is denied
by the Ordinance to other business owners in the same district.
Recommendation
We feel that the request of the Variance lacks the ability to present a hardship imposed
by the current Ordinance. Therefore, our recommendation is to deny the Variance and
seek a Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment to resolve any possible trademark
violations.
ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT
The applicant has not proven to have favorable conditions for a variance; therefore, the
City's alternative is to allow them to apply for a text amendment to change the
Ordinance as requested by the City Attorney.
The Ordinance in question is Section 10-7-8 A.3:
Subd. i Ground Signs. In business districts, ground signs shall have a background
which is dark in color in contrast to the sign lettering or message which is light in color to
create a sufficient contrast and be clearly legible. No ground signs with lightly colored
backgrounds shall be permitted.
This language was approved by the City Council on March 6, 2006 after the City
Council had requested the addition of the language to the Ordinance.
' Option 1 -Repeal Section 10-7-8 A.3 Subd. j of the Albertville Sign Ordinance and
allow all light-background signs.
Option 2 -Limit signs with light-backgrounds to be illuminated at a low ambient level of
0.4 foot candles measured 10 feet from the sign face. The measurement shall take
place in a controlled environment so not to be effected by surrounding light sources.
23
The measurement shall be verified by the manufacturer and measurements details shall
be submitted with the sign permit application.
Recommendation
While Option 2 would be a possible solution to replacing the Ordinance currently in
place, it could also prove to be impractical to measure and enforce. Completely
repealing the Ordinance leaves the City with the same struggle with light-background
illuminated signs they had in the past. We would like to have the input of the Planning
Commission and the City Council to determine how the City would like to progress.
cc. Mike Couri
Bridget Miller
Adam Nafstad
Jon Sutherland
App/icant: Dave Shannon, Color Sign Systems, Inc,
11096 61St Street NE, Albertville, MN 55301
Owner.' Lake Community Bank, Attn. Jay Eull,
11120 57th St NE, Albertville, MN 55301
24
•
GROVND SIGN
6'8"
Iz~ A ~_~ I SHAZAM ATM Imo`' ~ ~ --~t
..
'r -- -
,.,-' ;-
`%7 ~ -.
~~ .~i
~~~ ~ `§ '
ILLUMINATED ATM PANEL z• "
STONE VENEER TO
~~ c~`_' ".' MATCH BUILDING
.~
r ~:~ ~ i
to -- 1 e'
-,a rs(
,~
Y, i t' ~ J
at ~ ,_n ffw~^^' ~ t S f ~~~~.
Z'~
~H@°MPl iH9®~ i®~i i ~6. ~i
This Is a proprietary design of Cator Slgn Systems, Inc., designed
specf41ca11y far this project. It is !!legal and unethical to distribute
to a»y other entity for copy or use. This design cannot be used
without the written tonsent of Color Sign Systems, Inc.
r.o. aoa i24
~®LK)tR SYG.i4T ~iY$'I'~It11 ~%~ Albertville M1tn 55301
~ 1
3
~ a ~ ® 3us: 763.4
7.!374
t•'ax: 783:i~J7.t375
tix;NNO. ~x);cu~ scut narL
'1-74U7D.I iJi 5Ji6"r l'
i022.Q6
(1 [EN'P _
UIYi'. A•1(iK. E)EDIf NEIi CHECkEE) Eil'
LAKE COl41D1UNITY i3~NK
- StiAIYNON ERICiGSON
LO(':1T1ON CLtENT,1PPKOb:'1L CLIE[vTP.U{!
ALBERTL'tLLE, 3tN
EXHIBIT A
25
GROUND SIGN
•
b'8"
A
4'4"
~y ~i: _~
~ c: ~1
12 , s =- {
r'~
y kn;
~~
~~ ~~~~
~~ - -
~~~
~~ ~ ~~
~~ ~'.'
~:T3`~
1.8"
E~
•iMPORTANT NOTICES
This Is a proprietary design o! Color Sign Systems, Inc., designed
speciflcaily for this project. It is illegal and unethical to distribute
to any other entity for copy or uso. This design cannot be used
wkhout the wMtten consent of Color Sign Systems, Inc.
DURADC-NlC DARK BRONZE PAN
FORMED FACE WITH APPLIED 4QGQ
SERVICE bOOR$ QN BQTN
ENDS OF CABINET-
{
_ ;;q
`~~
{3
~~ ~ t°_~{
~,
=~~;':ry STONE VENEER TO
~'~"`~~~ w-<~ MATCH BUILDING
>tt
P-,`~;'
~~ti~ ~~
r
i:3
~~~ E~
CC ))
Y~1+Y
I PS:,:" Sd 63?
mua~s:>
o e o e ~a ;e a P.O. Box 124
~ ~ ~ a COI.OIt $IGN SY I11IG Atbcrtviue ntn 55201
~~
• s e e f Bue: 762.-1J7.137A
A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ _ >:~: 7sa.~fl7aaa5
~~~~~
SIGN NU. NU /Ut SCALE UATG
T-7907D.l 1/1 ; 5/IG^al~ 11.21.06
CIJEN'P DIS"1: hiGR. 17FSIGNER CHkC:KEI)!3Y
LAKE COMAiUNITY BANK SHANNON • ,£RICKSON
LOCATION CllENT,1PPR(7VAL CUEN'f P.OM
ALBERTVILLE, MN
EXHIBIT B
26
9•{J"
lb~rty~ ~ Building Department
5975 Main Avenue NE • P.O. Box 9 • Albertville, MN 55301
senor'raw~ u~~9. e~ ~q~ urn. Phone: 763-497-5106 • Fax: 763-497-2068
DATE: January 18, 2006
TO: Jon Sutherland, Building Official
Al Brixius, City Planner
Mark Kasma, City Engineer
Mike Couri, City Attorney
Steve Long, Fire Department
Scott Futrell, Futrell Fire
FROM: Bridget Miller, City Clerk
Tori Leonhardt, Permit Technician
REF: State Bank of Long Lake
Site and Building Plan Review Application - Case# 2006-03
Date Filed: 1/17/06
Lot 1, Block 1 Albertville Crossings 3'~ Addition
Pages Included: Al, C1, C2, Lot Survey, L1, PEI, A2.land A3
Please find the attached plans and Site and Building Plan Review Application from HTG
Architects for State Bank of Long Lake.
Let contact Bridget. or myself if you have any questions.
TL
[SEC 1 2 2006
~h
f~UET'tV1~~E
5975 Main Ave NE
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301-0009
(763) 497-3384 fax (763) 497-3210
,z~ ~.~~~~~tznz~,s
RECEIVED STAMP
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION
Please read carefully and answer all questions thoroughly. Only complete applications will be
accepted after validation by the City Clerk and. prior to acceptance of required processing
fees/deposits.
Type of Request(s):
Zoning
Site and Building Plan Review
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Text Amendment
Rezoning f,
Variance l i~(1~~rJ
Conditional Use Permit
Interim Use Permit
PUD Concept Plan/Amendment
PUD Rezoning or PUD/CUP
Case No: ~~~0~
Base Fee:
Escrow Amt: Pd.
Date Filed:
Subdivision
Minor Subdivision/Consolidation
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
Subdivision Grading Plan
Other
STAFF MEETING DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: 1 q p']
PROJECT PLANS DUE DATE: ~ Z, ~ CITY COUNCIL DATE: ~
Address of Subject Property:
Name of Business:
Legal Description of Property (attach additional sheet if necessary):
Lot: Block Plat#
Subdivision: PID#
Current Zoning Classification (circle): Al A2 R1-A R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 RMH
B2 62-A B3 B4 BW 11 12 P/I
Owner: Name. 1,4~i~ L~l~.yayi% ~~~s
Address. l//Zo S'7- ~'?_' ~t2~
City. ~~i State. yl9liy Zip. ,5~i~/
Telephone (Home). ~ ,~31 ~(Business)~~)3,3/-3~~0 (Fax)
Applicant (If other than the owner):
Owner: Name. ____ C~olor~ ~,r~ Stis7~rs .~•
Address. /l6yt ~i. r S~ ~,~'
city. ,tx,BUrI~?/.~ State. J~lt~. Zip. Se~~/
Telephone (Home). (Business) ~71k3) >~i7- /39y (Fax)
Description of Request(s): L~~(iT~ ~~s.~o~ ey ~,g~rs %j ~vi~~ 2~<s~r~'J
6/j9.0.C ~
EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use will have on property in
the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, light, smoke/odor, parking, and describe
the steps taken to mitigate or eliminate the impacts:
Reason Why Request Should Be Granted: L~Du dv/J ~ iv~u .c~0% ~aq,(L?~
~~~~~ lI% o~,0iy~~ ~c ~lQacwn-~^
Existing Use of the Property /Nature of Facility or Business: fZ~T~iL P.>A~,Y/~
If a request for planning/zoning action on the subject site or any part thereof has been
previously sought, please describe it below:
What? .ua~'~1~.~ A,~ct,~,rt/~a- ~
When?
Project Name, if applicable:
I hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the information and materials
submitted with this application are in compliance with City Ordinance and Policy Requirements
and are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
l understand that the application will be processed for the next available meeting agenda after
review of the information submitted to determine if any other data is needed and after
completion of a staff report.
l understand that all City incurred professional fees and expenses associated with the
processing of this request are the responsibility of the property owner and/or applicant and
should be promptly paid. If payment is not received from the applicant, the property owner
acknowledges and agrees to be responsible for the unpaid fee balance either by direct payment
or a special assessment against the property. If the property fee owner is not the applicant, the
applicant must provide written authorization by the owner to make application.
Signature(s) of Own ~ Date: ~/~2/oL
Date:
Signature of Applicant(s): Date: AZT/z D
I~~LJ~.P~) ~ i~8 Y~ Date:
Approved _ Denied by the Planning Commission on: Date:
Approved _ Denied by the City Council on: Dafe:
Distribution
City Planner: Building/Zoning Official: Fire De t.:
Cit En ineer: Public Work/Parks: Other: i
2
• Building Department
1 b~rty~ {'. 5959 Main Avenue NE • P.O. Box 9 • Albertville, MN 55301
smon r~:~~~ ur~9. s;9 c~cN urn. Phone: 763-497-3384 • Fax: 763-497-3210
DATE: December 13, 2006
TO: Jon Sutherland, Building Official
Al Brixius, City Planner
Adam Nafstad, Assistant City Engineer
Mike Couri, City Attorney
FROM: Bridget Miller, City Clerk
Tori Leonhardt, Permit Technician
REF: Case # 2006-24
Minor Variance for Signage
Lake Community Bank
11102 57th Street NE
Plans Included: Original Ground Signage Proposal and Sign Proposal that City
will allow (per applicant).
Please find the attached plans and Minor Variance Application from Color Sign Systems, Inc for
the signage to be located at Lake Community Bank for your review and comments.
Please address comments to Jon Sutherland and Al Brixius.
Let contact Bridget or myself if you have any questions.
TL
4'4"
6'8"
1=«
LAKE
COMMUNITY
BANK
__ __.
__
~ ~ --
li.LYMiNATEd ATM PANEL
^
_~
IMPORTANT'NC'~TICE:
Th1s Is a proprlotarlt design of Calor Sl;n Systems. inc., dasiprwd
speeNlealty for this..protect. It is illegal and unethical to distribute
to any otltier enaey Ior copy or use. 71tis design canAOt 6e used
without the written tonzeM of Dolor Sfgn Systems, tom.
WHITE PAN FORMED FACE
WITH APPLIED LOGO
SERVICE DOORS ON 80TH
ENDS QE CABINET
-r_T_ - _
STONE Y"ENEER TO
~ ~ MATCH Bti#LtiM46
~~.~
m
~
ossz_a~~ P.O.Box124
a o a~ a
`a s a Ct1LAR SIGN AlbertvllleMa55301
~tYS'T~M~
~C. En
763
7
1
~~~• s
.49
.
s:
374.
a * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~=
~~~rux Fax: 763.497.1375
SlfaNN(1, NO;Oi' SCALE llATF
T-7407D.1 1 / 1 5/ 16".1' 10.22.06
CUt;NT {3llT'. hti;f.. C1~SI[.!YER i,.HECkED ftY
LAKE COMMUNITY BANK SHANNON ERICKSON
Lf)CATION Ci.IENT AYPR(14:A1. CL1E1vT Fp#
ALBERiI'ILLF„ ;11N
-. p ,c , ,,; , t ; ~ ~kr - ..
ti _ N 4 `;r, _ 5
1'1 t"
4.,1..
12"
DURADONIC DARK BRONZE PAN
FORMED FACE WITH APP4IED LOGO
SERVICE DCWRS ON BOTH
ENDS OF CABINET
:._-: ;:
`~=x ~.
r
...
^ ': 3 ~ '~
' ~~
~ "~
~ l~~
1 F:w+: iv'.
i ~~~
~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~,
ATM IANfI ^.=s .
.~_ STONE YI£tiEE11 TO
~: ' ~ MATC!# BUi44lMt~
r`. ~
~~ ~~; ~`
all ~ ~:,~,~ :.;;,~^.. ,
~~ _ „
IMPORTANT NOTICE:
TMs b a propdaeary dui of tebr 816n 5lrstams, Ine.~ daa~nad
spacMcalllr for t1Nt P'rM~ It b NN~ai and. unagNeN ~ eMstrlbub
ca any otMr .nd~ty fer eopir w~ uw. Tide aNlp~ earwwe ba wad
wkhaas t~ written eontant of Color 31ln SpsbNrK. ine.
l~.fi
s`as•*r
P.O.Box 12#
• • • COLOR $I6N ING Albertville Ma 35301.
s ~ s • S~Y$TE>M~ B
763
#57
137#
~ ea:
.
.
~ ~ s s s • a ~ Fax: 763.#97.1373
ifi®!
slcra wo. no.roF scAL~ DATE
T-7#®7D.2 _ ~ i/t 5/18"•1' ~ 11.21.06
CLIENT I)~3"C MIiR. DESIGNER CHF,CKF.D HY
LAKE_COMMUNITY BANK ;SHANNON BRICKSON ,
LUCATION __
CLJENT APPROVAL CElEIKI' POM
ALBERI'VILLE, MN _ _ _. _
I
" N~7-RTHET A55-4CIATfD ~~iN5ULTA1dT5, IIN.
~~„~~
~~ ;: Est}(} Cason Memoria3 Highway. quite 2C~2, golden V~~tley, 1ViN ~4~2
~~~;. Teiehone: 7~.a3~231.2655 ~acsirrt~ile: 783.231.~~f3"~ p~ar~r~er:,~r~~?lanninf~.~t>
MEMORANDUM
TO: Larry Kruse /Jon Sutherland
FROM: Alan Brixius
DATE: October 27, 2006
RE: Albertville -Albertville Crossings/Midland Shopping Center
FILE NO: 163.05
Background
On October 6, 2006, the City was contacted by Jolene Forsberg from Artisan Salon in
Albertville Crossings. She is concerned with the parking and traffic circulation patterns
at the entrance to her business. Ms. Forsberg states that traffic from her neighboring
tenant, the dance school, has congested the parking lot to the extent of it becoming
unsafe. Ms. Forsberg has suggested that the City re-evaluate a parking lot connection
between their lot and the Midlands Shopping Center to the south.
History
In December 2003, as the Midlands Shopping Center was being considered for
development. City staff recommended that cross access easements be established
between the two properties. Midlands Development Inc. explored connecting the two
sites with a driveway with Gary Janish, then owner of Albertville Crossings. Mr. Janish
stated that he would grant the cross access easement with the following conditions:
1. That Midlands pay for the cost of curb cuts and replacing the curbs and paving.
2. That Midlands implement an exclusion on their property that would restrict
Midlands from leasing to anyone with a business competing with any that Mr.
Janish already leased to.
Mr. Janish indicated that the cross easement benefiting Midlands but not him. Midlands
agreed to condition #1 but not to condition #2. Mr. Janish did not grant the cross
access easement.
When the Midlands application went to City Council for consideration in January 2004,
the City Council did not require the cross easement at the request of the applicant and
Mr. Janish.
Recommendation
Past lack of cooperation between property owners stopped a good idea. The parking lot
connection between these two retail buildings would be beneficial to both. The City has
no authority to require these properties to be connected. However, we would be
supportive of this connection if both properties were in mutual agreement and presented
a plan that demonstrated that the driveway connection would work.
The new owners of Albertville Crossings should contact the Midlands owners and
determine if this connection is practical, how it may be engineered, and how it may be
paid for. The City would need to approve an amendment site plan, cross easement
documents, and maintenance agreements.
c: Bridget Miller
Mike Couri
Adam Nafstad
2
lb~rtvi ~ Building Department
5975 Main Avenue NE • P.O. Box 9 • Albertville, MN 55301
smog Town ur,,,9. e~ cie~ ur.. Phone: 763-497-5106 • Fax: 763-497-2068
DATE: February 24, 2006
TO: Jon Sutherland, Building Official
Al Brixius, City Planner
Mark Kasma, City Engineer
Mike Couri, City Attorney
Mayor Don Peterson
Council Member LeRoy Berning
Council Member Tom Fay
Council Member Ron Klecker
Council Member John Vetsch
FROM: ~il;~' ~'
Tor Leonhardt, Permit Technician
REF: Building and Site Plan Review -State Bank of Long Lake
Application for March 6`h City Council Meeting
Plans included: Site Plan, Survey, Landscape Plan, Civil Plans (2), Floor Plan,
Exterior Elevations, Lighting Plan of site with photometric.
Please find the attached plans, pages listed above, from the State Bank of Long Lake for your
review.
Please contact Bridget or myself if you have any questions.
TL
~bE1'tV,~~E
1~IED
JAN 17 ~~~+
~a~c~fv~t~ sTr~t~ri
^ DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATfON
5975 Main Ave NE Case No: d ~" ~_~_
P.O. Box 9 Base Fee: ~ C~~ ~ -~~~
A{bertviile, MN 55301-0009 Escrow Amt: ~ C~ Pd
(763) 497-3384 fax (763) 497-3210 Date Filed:_ i -- ('7- Q ~O
Please read carefully and answer all questions thoroughly. Only complete applications will be
accepted after validatian by the City Clerk and prior to acceptance of required processing
fees/deposits.
Type of Request(s):.
Zoning
~_ Site and Building Plan Review
Comprehensive Plan
Zoning Text Amendment
Rezoning
Variance
Conditional Use Permit
Interim Use Permit
PUD Concept Plan
PUD Rezoning or PUD/CUP
Subdivision
Minor SubdivisionlConsolidation
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
Subdivision Grading Plan
Other
STAFF MEETING DATE: , ~Z_ ~._ ® PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: 2-I'y-
PROJECT PLANS DUE DATE: (- ~~-(J CITY COUNCIL DATE: "~-- ~ ~ - p~
Address of Subject Prop
Name of Business:
Legal Description of Property (attach additional sheet if necessary):
Lot: ~ Block ~ Plat#
Subdivision: A71/%LL~ ~ C>~' /,fi,/(; PID#
~ R ~ A~~+r'o-~
Current Zoning Classification (circle}: Al A2 1-A R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8 RMH
B2 2-A~ B3 B4 BW 11 12 P/l
Owner: Name.
Address.
City. ~
Telephor
Applicant (If other than th owner :
Owner: Name: T(~ ~'/., ~ ~~rt~~ ~~
Address. .3c~ ~ ~~ r i sir/
City. " ~ d.Ys ~ State. ~~i
Telephone (Home). (Business)9~
Zip. S5LL 3Y ~
;Fax) 9s~-~7F ~~~?.
Description of Request(s): J~ ~~ Play'! ~ ~5c~~~Jd~
7
EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED USE: List impacts the proposed use wili have on property in
the vicinity, including, but not limited to traffic, noise, li ht, smoke/odor, arking and d sc~'be
th steps to en to mitigate or eliminate the impacts:,4 i~' 1.~~1 !V3 a~-
jX ~h ~ ~I~D'tJ~ %a-~d~t~~~~n~~' ~ rrrf !~'%~ iyr,®a~ ; rc~eu f~'S'.
Rea on Why nest Should Be Granted:`~y~ ~ ~Ct /Y!~ 7`5 ~rlh /- ~/~~P/yje~71~
~ r/ t_S i, ,b~ ~~iS",~ cf C ss 1
~ ~E'r-51 ~1 ~ ~~ htotirh~' rz°S Cep ~Ctlcf~rj~ . OrM C.t~a J f~ T~~rr~~
Existiing Use of the Property /Nature of Facility or Business: ~i ~it'Vc' D ~t"d
If a request for planning/zoning action on the subject site or any part thereof has been
previously_sought, please describe it below:
What?
When?
Project Name, if applicable:
1 hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the informafion and materials
submitted with this application are in compliance with City Ordinance and Policy Requirements
and are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
understand that the application widl be processed for the next available meeting agenda after
review of the .information submitted to determine if any other data is needed and after
completion of a staff report.
1 understand that alt City incurred .professional fees .and expenses associated with the
processing of this request are the responsibility of the properly owner and/or applicant .and
should be promptly paid. if payment is not received from the applicant, the property owner
acknowledges and agrees to be responsible for the unpaid fee balance either by direct payment
or a special assessment against the property. If the property fee owner is not the applicant, the
applicant must provide written authorization by the owner to make application.
Signature(s) of Owner(s): - Date: (- / ~- UG
~-~~~ Date:
Signature of Applicant(s): Date: %-r7 -~ln
~ ~~ PC Date:
Approved ~ Denied by the Planning Commission on: Date;
Approved _ Denied by the City Council on: Date
Distribution
City Planner: Building2oning Official: Fire Dept.:
City Engineer: Public WorkfParks: Other:
2
__ _ _ _ --
~
+ r
8 ,
F
m
a ~
_, ~
C 5.
£ ~ _ _
I
_
si -
L 3
;
S E
~ I ~
I I
~ ~f h
I I
~ ~ I
rv I I I `
I ~ i ~ s
a
_ 1
1
~ ~ ~ x
I
~ %
~ ~
~ I
I e
~~ ~
~
'I E~
_
T
0
jU
E
t
3
2
Ry.
~fi
x
E ~
x
e ~ s'
~'
t'n
Y e
i -_
s'
-
i yi fr
i
- '
~ ~%e ~.~ '.
9 - ~ ~
~ S
5 E
h
. . - Ys
.~
a
s ~ I
a
' ^
.F.
3: a
~ ;2
I F
F
- -
;,I q
- 's ro
,
3 :~ o a
3
y 5.~
_ - ~ °£'
_ _ _ _ _
C~
5 ~ ~;
~ F Ea'"'S
la
~~
.: ~
sI
~' ~
a
f
a
w ~
3 ~
I
I Y ~ ~
~
I i I
I d I
s ~
I I
I j
Q ~
.~ .,
Q k
~ I
`~
^ 1
_
' d
_ :v
'`.~ xa ~
i
I
Q
v ~I
P . ,
3 s I ay
^= eG
E € k~ & i
~%~ ,~,F
~~ _
,E ~
~E
3. .~
3 3` E.
- 9.23::
..
~~ I I ~
so oat m el oc oos .
-~ ~
/
/ ~ ~
'. '
}.
/ R I ~
i 4 / '
.,
:{~ i, I
E ~ 'r
` I
I
~
~~
'r I
I
~=
~~ I:, ~ I
I
I
T Q . ,. ..
I L
_
_ _ _
, _
i ..<
w u_a
'-
~ @ °'
~~e
..
4
~ -~
,.,
_._
,
~ °I~ .
,.
4
~~ ~,~.: ,-
ti
y I ,.
4
OC
, ~ -
~ a I
I
.
o
.~ .. -
I
$
o ~ i ,. -
v ~ _ i ...
W ~ L=----
_ ,
°. '~ ° ~
.
~
~F.I ~
_ _ __
_ _ I
2
`
m __ s.:>s.
*_
I ...
^
~
a I .
I ..
I
- F ~
o o
N ~ ..
i
~ I~ ~~.
-
I
I ~' 4L'LBC 3.80~40,ODN -
J o .
1. 'MI 1bl.l %.bM-iC-.ka!b .~YMHOIN :.iNnO:l .b
____.__.__.__L_______________ f+IbM
~.
_______~
_--_____
',
N.1
N
__
_-_
__ _ -
~
••• ~
-_ - w9006f M EI OE,005 I
'
1 I
~
. ~
tt
/ I _ ~~
'
I
/
x\ `
.. ~~
t
'
}
; N
" (
I
I
~ ~ ~
f
Z !I I
O r ~ ~.
°
LL
...
t
.o.: .....
_. ,
~ S
m
Q _, o -
I ~ -
Q ,~
,J __
I
%
~
F~- o
„~
C'3 I
~ ~ :: s I -
~ I '
J i ..
i
~
.
-
..
~ L _
--- x
~
W
__
--- ...
-
~ - - - ,, . _ , ~;8 I _ ~_
I ..,
i j
~~~
o ~ ;
o ,
I d "•
I
6l OK 'A"
' ~l
VS D a..f.
r . '~
~, •,
I ~..
i _-____ __ __ _
I\~' 9L'LBC 3,BO~10,ODN
~C '[iN 1Y'I.i
k: Ho-1NIIIH !.YMN91H !.1Nf~0.,
:.M
.~. .. .. ._. ~v; ~
-~
.lIBIBM ~. L
...
a
NNgq
"I