2006-12-28 Wetland Monitoring ReportWestwood Professional Services, Inc.
~~~
TRANSMITTAL 3701 12th Street North
Suite 206
St. Cloud, MN 56303
Phone: 320-253-9495
Fax: 320-253-8737
Toll free: 1-800-270-9495
E-mail wps~westwoodps.com
Date: December 28, 2006 sr. aouD
TWIN CITIES/METRO
TO: Larry KrUSe BRAINERD
City of Albertville
5975 Main Avenue NE P O Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301-0009
From: Matt Vollbrecht
Regarding: Towne Lakes Wetland Monitoring Report
Proj. No.: 19990360.99
Items: No Description
1 2006 Wetland Monitoring Report
Purpose: For your approval
Remarks: Please find attached the 2006 Wetland Monitoring Report_for the Towne Lakes pro~ct._ Westwood __
Professional Services, Inc. requests the City of Albertville as the LGU for this site inspect and end _
_
_monitoring on wetlands M-1, M-2 and M-3 within the project as this re port concludes the_5th year of
monitoring on these wetlands.___
-
Del ivery: -Main--- - --- -----
.-N E;
Copy to: 3030 Center Point Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55428
Mr. David Weetman, Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
Mr. Fran Haugen, Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
Designing the Future Today...since 1972
X006 Wetland Replacement Monitoring Report
idential Development Phase
Towne Lakes Res
W ~/a of the SE '/4 and the NW '/4 of Section 36,T121 N, R24W
Albertville, Minnesota
December 2006
Local Governmental Unit City of Albertville
Mr. Larry Kruse
5975 Main Avenue NE
Albertville, MN 55301-0009
~~~~ ~ Phone: (763) 497-3384
sn,a~~ i;,,;,,~. ~,~ i~fc. Fax: (763) 497-3210
Project Proposer
Contractor Property Developers Company
Mr. Dave Hempel
3030 Centre Point Drive, Suite 800
~ ~~ ~~' Roseville MN 55113
Phone: (651) 556-4550
Fax: (651) 556-4545
Ci917tPile[urF'n~pw't~-fkRNlop~~t8l'nmpamc_
Prepared by
Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
3701 12th Street North, Suite 206
Saint Cloud, MN 56303
Phone: (320) 253-9495
Fax: (320) 253-8737
Project No. 19990360.99
Westwood Professional Services
3701 12th Street North
Suite 206
St Cloud, MN 56303
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 28, 2006
Re£: 19990360.99
TO: Mr. Larry Kruse, City Administrator, City of Albertville,
5975 Main Ave. NE, Albertville, MN 55301
Mr. Tim Fell, US Army Corps of Engineers
190 Fifth Street East, Saint Paul, MN 55101-1638
CC: Mr. Adam Nafstad, City Engineer, City of Albertville
5975 Main Ave. NE, Albertville, MN 55301
Mr. Dave Hempel, Contractor Property Developers Company
3030 Center Point Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55428
Mr. David Weetman, Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
Mr. Fran Haugen, Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
FROM: Matthew Vollbrecht, Environmental Scientist ~`',~
nnaiN 320-253-9495
Fnx 320-253-8737
To~~ Faee 1-800-270-9495
eNinu wpsC~westwoodps.com
www.westwoodps.com
RE: 2006 Wetland Replacement Monitoring Report for Contractor Property
Developers Company -Towne Lakes Phase I, Albertville, Minnesota, Year 5
The attached memo and documentation constitutes the 2006 year-end wetland
monitoring report for Contractor Property Developers Company's Towne Lakes Phase
I, located in the W '/Z of the SE '/ and the NW 1/ of Section 36, City of Albertville,
Wright County, Minnesota.
Construction of wetland replacement areas M-1, M-2 and M-3 was completed in May
2002. Seeding of all three wetland mitigation areas was completed on May 31, 2002.
Westwood Professional Services, Inc. initiated monitoring of the three wetland
replacement sites on June 06, 2002. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. monitored
the replacement wetlands three times during 2006: July 27, September 14, and Ocotber
17. Hydrological measurements, vegetative surveys and soils were inspected each
time. The findings were recorded onto data sheets and can be found in the attached
forms for each replacement wetland.
On June 20, 2002 Westwood surveyed the three wetlands using asub-meter accuracy
Trimble ProXR Global Positioning System (GPS). Results of the GPS survey indicate
that Wetland M-1 is 0.27 acres, Wetland M-2 is 0.24 acres, and Wetiand M-3 is 0.60
acres. The total New Wetland Credit created by these three wetlands is l .l 1 acres; the
amount proposed in the Wetland Permit Application is 1.03 acres. The wetlands are of
2005 Wetland Replacement Monitoring Report- Towne Lakes Phase I
December 28, 2006
Page 3
Westwood Professional Services Inc requests that the City of Albertville as the Local
Governmental Unit (LGUZprovide written confirmation that the three wetland
replacement areas constructed on the Towne Lakes Phase I site meet the requirements
of the Wetland Conservation Act. Please call me at (320) 253-9495 if you have
questions or require additional information.
Westwood- Professional Services, Inc. (320) 253-9495
2005 Wetland Replacement Monitoring Report- Towne Lakes Phase I
December 28, 2006
Page 2
an appropriate size for mitigation, and are in compliance with the mitigation plan. No
changes to the sizes of the wetlands were observed in 2003 or 2004. Wetland
vegetation is becoming more established in all three mitigation areas.
Photographs of the wetland replacement areas were taken on July 14, 2005, and soils,
vegetation, and hydrology data were collected during all three site visits. Detailed data
from these monitoring events are included in the attached Annual Wetland
Replacement Monitoring Forms.
Vegetation in Mitigated Wetlands M-1 and M-2 has become completely established.
Wetland M-1 is dominated by a fringe of emergent vegetation dominated by soft-stem
and river bulrush, narrow-leaf cattail, wool-grass and sedge species around an area of
open water dominated by flat-stemmed pondweed and common waterweed. Wetland
M-2 is dominated by a fringe area of emergent vegetation dominated by narrow-leafed
cattail, spike-rush, water plantain and reed canary grass around an open water area
dominated by flat-stemmed pondweed, common waterweed and northern water-
milfoil. The vegetation in Wetland M-3 has not become as completely established as
in Wetlands M-1 and M-2, but has increased in density from 2003 and 2004.
Vegetation in Wetland M-3 consists of a fringe area of emergent vegetation dominated
by blunt spike-rush, soft-stem bulrush, sandbar willow saplings, cottonwood saplings,
blue vervain and scattered small patches of reed canary grass. This emergent fringe
surrounds an open water area dominated by flat-stemmed pondweed, northern water
milfoil, common waterweed and water smartweed.
Wetland M-2 was drier than previously noted during the August 8 site visit. The area
that has been shallow open water during previous visits in 2003, 2004 and 2005 was
saturated but no standing water was observed. The soils were still saturated and no
change to the landscape that would account for a loss of water in the wetland was
observed. This was most likely a temporary condition during an extremely dry portion
of the summer. If similar conditions are observed during monitoring in 2007 a more
detailed analysis of the hydrology in the wetland will be conducted.
The wetland mitigation areas for Phase II of the Towne Lakes Development were
completed late in 2004, but seeding has not taken place. Seeding did take place in
2005, but some final construction around the wetlands was not complete until late
2005. The As-Built surveys have been completed and Westwood Professional
Services, Inc. did initiate wetland monitoring on the Towne Lakes Phase II wetland
mitigation areas in 2006 and these two wetland basins (M-3 and M-4) are included in
this report. Wetland GPSing was not conducted due to the extreme drought condition
and will be completed in the Spring of 2007.
Westwood Professional Services, Inc. (320) 253-9495
MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT
WETLAND REPLACEMENT MONITORING
2006 ANNUAL REPORT FORM
PROJECT SUMMARY
Wetland value replacement monitoring and annual reports are required for five [5] years following the completion of the
wetland replacement project to ensure that the replacement wetland achieves the goal of replacing lost functions and values.
Date(s) of monitoring: 7/27/06, 9/14/06,10/17/06 Basin ID: M-1
Project name/number:
Replacement design:
^ Restore D Create
Construction method: D Excavation
^ Restore and Create
^ Impoundment
[check one]
[check one]
Report prepared by: Q Applicant ^LGU [check one]
Report must be submitted on or before December 31, 2006 [mm/dd/yy]
Project replacement construction completed May 2002 [mm/yy]
ANNUAL REPORT
The report must include the following information and other site -specific information identified by the LGU:
W 1/z of the SE 1/ and the NW 1/ Section
Project location: 36, T121N, R24W
[township, range, section [1/4], lot, block]
Current wetland size: 0.27 [nearest one-tenth acre]
Method of size estimation: GPS as-built
Current wetland type (classification): Ty pe 2/3 Circular 39 and
Designed wetland type (classification): Ty pe 2/3 Circular 39 and
PEMB/C Cowardin
PEMB/C Cowardin
Compare as-built specifications vs. design specifications. Note similarities or discrepancies related to slopes, contours,
wetland shape, and water levels [required for first annual plan only]:
Created wetland matches designed wetland Slopes appear to be correct outlet is in proper location and seeding was
completed on Ma~31, 2002 Shape and size of wetland match the shape and size on the plans Water levels have
been within six inches of the outlet on all three monitoring visits and wetland type matches the proposed wetland
t e•
Albertville Towne Lakes Phase I
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-1
Page 2
Describe rationale for SIGNIFICANT CHANGES to original design [if applicable]:
No significant changes were made from the original design
Provide SEASONAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS taken during the period April through October based on seasonal
water elevations or areal coverage measurements.
Date [mm/dd/yy] Water Based On [Check One]
Level
947.4 D Relation to outlet invert elevation ^ Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
7/27/06 point
9/14/06 946.3 p Relation to outlet invert elevation ^ Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
10/17/06 944.8 p Relation to outlet invert elevation ~ Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
List the DOMINANT VEGETATION found in the wetland and upland area. Estimate the percent coverage of each type
present. Include the common and scientific names of the vegetation that exceed 20 percent coverage.
SAMPLE POINT D Proposed Wetland Area
Common Name Scientific Name Ind.
Status Stratum % Cover
CATTAIL, NARROW-LEAF T ha an ustifolia OBL H 20
WOOL-GRASS Scirpus c erinus OBL H 20
MILKWEED, SWAMP Ascle ias incarnata OBL H 20
BULRUSH, RIVER Scir us uviatilis OBL H 10
BULRUSH, SOFT-STEM Scir us validus OBL H 10
SEDGE, WOOLY Carex lanu inosa OBL H 10
of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks /Other Plants Observed < 20 %: uptight sedge, boneset, blue vervain
Giant goldenrod, bungleweed
SAMPLE POINT D Adjoining Upland or ^ Upland Buffer [check one]
Common Name Scienti ac Name
.f Ind.
Status
Stratum
% Cover
PLANTAIN, COMMON Planta o ma'or FAC+ H 20
CLOVER, WHITE Trifolium re ens FACU+ H 20
SUSAN, BLACK-EYED Rudbeckia hirta FACU H 20
CLOVER, RED Tri olium ratense FACU+ H 20
BLUEGRASS, KENTUCKY Poa ratensis FAC- H 20
of Dominants FAC or wetter: 20 Remarks /Other Plants Observed < 20 %: common dandelion, annual
ragweed
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Fon»
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-1
Page 3
List the SOIL COLOR AND TEXTURE for a soil profile located inside the wetland boundary, but within five feet of the
wetland edge.
SAMPLE LOCATION ^ Marked Soil Sample Location or D Other: At Photo Reference Point[check one]
Depth
(inches) Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Abundance /
Size /Contrast Texture
0-15 A 10YR4/2 10YR2/1 Few/medium faint Mucky loam
15-30 B 10YR5/1 10YR5/8 Common fine/distinct Silty cla
Remarks:
Terms to use in describing the abundance, size and contrast of redoximorphic features.
Pro er Descri tive Term Definition
Abundance Few Features occup < 20% of ex osed surface
Common Features occupy 2 - 20% of exposed surface
Man Features occupy > 20% of exposed surface
Size Fine Features < 5 mm diameter
Medium Features 5 - 15 mm diameter
Coarse Features > 15 mm diameter
Contrast Faint Matrix and redox. features have closel related hues and chromas
Distinct Matrix and features differ b 1 to 2 hues and several units iri chroma and value
Prominent Matrix and features va several units in hue, value, and chroma
Attach COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS of the project area taken anytime during the months April through October.
See attached Exhibits for photographs.
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-1
LGU MONITORING
The City of Albertville [LGU] is responsible for the following:
Has the project been constructed according to design specifications? Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has the LGU certified compliance with the construction specifications? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Page 4
Have access rights to inspect the project during the construction & monitoring period, and to assess the long-term
viability of the replaced wetland been available? Yes No
If no, explain:
Has the applicant advised that the construction specifications have been certified complete and any bond or other
security provided by the applicant returned? Yes No
If no, explain:
Has corrective action been ordered taken during the required monitoring period [i.e. LGU
has determined that approved replacement plan goal(s) will not be met?] Yes No If yes, explain [attach
plan]:
Has applicant prepared an amended wetland value replacement plan for review and approval by the Technical
Evaluation Panel [attach amended replacement plan]?
Yes _ No If no, explain:
Does the amended plan describe in adequate in detail the corrective measures to betaken to achieve the goal of
replacing lost wetland functions and values? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has the replacement plan goal(s) been met [requires site evaluation]? _ Yes _ No If no, what corrective
action(s) have been ordered?
Should the monitoring period be extended? Yes _ No
How long? Comments?
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-1
Page 5
One or more of the following actions must be required if during the monitoring period the goal of replacement plan
will not be met [circle number(s)]:
1. Order the applicant to prepare and implement a new replacement plan
2. Issue a CDO on the draining/filling activity if it has not been completed
3. Order restoration of the impacted wetland
4. Obtain forfeiture of a bond or other security and use the proceeds to replace the lost wetland values
5. Ask the district court to order the applicant to fulfill the replacement plan
6. Other actions that the LGU determines necessary to achieve the replacement plan goal
7. Other [explain]:
SIGNATURE(S)
Authorized LGU Official
Applicant
Date
Date
MINNESOTA WETLAN® CONSERVATION ACT
WETLAND REPLACEMENT MONITORING
2006 ANNUAL REPORT FORM
PROJECT SUMMARY
Wetland value replacement monitoring and annual reports are required for five [5] years following the completion of the
wetland replacement project to ensure that the replacement wetland achieves the goal of replacing lost functions and values.
Date(s) of monitoring: 7/27/06, 9/14/06,10/17/06 Basin ID: M-2
Project name/number: Albertville Towne Lakes Phase I
Replacement design: ^ Restore D Create ^ Restore and Create [check one]
Construction method: D Excavation ^ Impoundment [check one]
Report prepared by: Q Applicant ^LGU [check one]
Report must be submitted on or before December 31, 2006 [mm/dd/yy]
Project replacement construction completed May 2002 [mm/yy]
ANNUAL REPORT
The report must include the following information and other site -specific information identified by the LGU:
W'/ of the SE 1/ and the NW 1/ Section
Project location: 36, T121N, R24W
[township, range, section [1/4], lot, block]
Current wetland size: 0.24 [nearest one-tenth acre]
Method of size estimation: GPS as-built
Current wetland type (classification): Type 2/3
Circular 39 and PEMB/C Cowardin
Designed wetland type (classification): Type 2
Circular 39 and pEMB Cowardin
Compare as-built specifications vs. design specifications. Note similarities or discrepancies related to slopes, contours,
wetland shape, and water levels [required for first annual plan only]:
Created wetland matches designed wetland. Sloues appear to be correct. outlet is in proper location and seedinE was
completed on Mav 31.2002. Shane and size of wetland match the shave and size on the plans. Wetland tune matches
the proposed wetland type.
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-2
Describe rationale for SIGNIFICANT CIIANGES to original design [if applicable]:
No significant changes were made from the original design.
Page 2
Provide SEASONAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS taken during the period April through October based on seasonal
water elevations or areal coverage measurements.
Date [mm/dd/yy] Water Based On [Check One]
Level
7/27/06 947.5 ^ Relation to outlet invert elevation D Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
09/14/06 946.8 ^ Relation to outlet invert elevation Q Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
10/17/06 944.2 ^ Relation to outlet invert elevation Q Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
List the DOMINANT VEGETATION found in the wetland and upland area. Estimate the percent coverage of each type
present. Include the common and scientific names of the vegetation that exceed 20 percent coverage.
SAMPLE POINT Q Proposed Wetland Area
Common Name Scientific Name Ind.
Status Stratum % Cover
GRASS, REED CANARY Phalaris arunclinacea FACW+ H 40
CATTAIL, NARROW-LEAF T ha an sti olia OBL H 20
WATER-PLANTAIN, BROAD-LEAF Alisma Tanta o-a uatica OBL H 10
SPIKERUSH, BLUNT Eleocharis obtusa OBL H 10
of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks /Other Plants Observed < 20 %: uptight sedge, boneset, blue vervain
SAMPLE POINT ^ Adjoining Upland or D Upland Buffer [check one]
Common Name Scientific Name Ind.
Status Stratum % Cover
GRASS,REED CANARY Phalaris arundinacea FACW+ H 40
PLANTAIN, COMMON Planta o ma "or FAC+ H 20
SUSAN, BLACK-EYED Rudbeckia hirta FACU H 10
MILKWEED, COMMON Ascle ias s riaca UPL H 10
RAGWEED,ANNUAL Ambrosia artemisiifolia FACU H 10
of Dominants FAC or wetter: 40 ~ Remarks /Other Plants Observed < 20 %: common dandelion
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-2
Page 3
List the SOIL COLOR AND TEXTURE for a soil profile located inside the wetland boundary, but within five feet of the
wetland edge.
SAMPLE LOCATION ^ Marked Soil Sample Location or D Other: At Photo Reference Point[check one]
Depth
(inches) Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Abundance /
Size /Contrast Texture
0-28 A 10YR2/1 10YR5/8 Few/medium faint Mucky clay
28-30 B 10YR7/1 10YR5/8 Few/medium/faint Clay
Remarks:
Terms to use in describing the abundance, size and contrast of redoximorphic features.
Pro ert Descri tive Term Definition
Abundance Few Features occu < 20% of ex osed surface
Common Features occupy 2 - 20% of exposed surface
Man Features occupy > 20% of exposed surface
Size Fine Features < 5 mm diameter
Medium Features 5 - 15 mm diameter
Coarse Features > 15 mm diameter
Contrast Faint Matrix and redox. features have closely related hues and chromas
Distinct Matrix and features differ by 1 to 2 hues and several units in chroma and value
Prominent Matrix and features v several units in hue, value, and chroma
Attach COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS of the project area taken anytime during the months April through October.
See attached Exhibits for photographs.
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-2
Page 4
LGU MONITORING
The City of Albertville [LGU] is responsible for the following:
Has the project been constructed according to design specifications? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has the LGU certified compliance with the construction specifications? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Have access rights to inspect the project during the construction & monitoring period, and to assess the long-term
viability of the replaced wetland been available? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has the applicant advised that the construction specifications have been certified complete and any bond or other
security provided by the applicant returned? Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has corrective action been ordered taken during the required monitoring period [i.e. LGU
has determined that approved replacement plan goal(s) will not be met?] _ Yes _ No If yes, explain [attach
plan]:
Has applicant prepared an amended wetland value replacement plan for review and approval by the Technical
Evaluation Panel [attach amended replacement plan]?
Yes _ No If no, explain:
Does the amended plan describe in adequate in detail the corrective measures to betaken to achieve the goal of
replacing lost wetland functions and values? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has the replacement plan goal(s) been met [requires site evaluation]?
action(s) have been ordered?
Should the monitoring period be extended? _ Yes _ No
_ Yes _ No If no, what corrective
How long? Comments?
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-2
Page 5
One or more of the following actions must be required if during the monitoring period the goal of replacement plan
will not be met [circle number(s)]:
1. Order the applicant to prepare and implement a new replacement plan
2. Issue a CDO on the draining/filling activity if it has not been completed
3. Order restoration of the impacted wetland
4. Obtain forfeiture of a bond or other security and use the proceeds to replace the lost wetland values
5. Ask the district court to order the applicant to fulfill the replacement plan
6. Other actions that the LGU determines necessary to achieve the replacement plan goal
7. Other [explain]:
SIGNATURE(S)
Authorized LGU Official
Applicant
Date
Date
MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT
WETLAND REPLACEMENT MONITORING
2006 ANNUAL REPORT FORM
PROJECT SUMMARY
Wetland value replacement monitoring and annual reports are required for five [5] years following the completion of the
wetland replacement project to ensure that the replacement wetland achieves the goal of replacing lost functions and values.
Date(s) of monitoring: 7/27/06, 9/14/06,10/17/06 Basin ID: M-3
Project name/number:
Replacement design:
^ Restore D Create ^ Restore and Create
Construction method: Q Excavation
Report prepared by: D Applicant
Report must be submitted on or before
Project replacement construction completed
ANNUAL REPORT
^ Impoundment
^ LGU
December 31, 2006
Mav 2002
[check one]
[check one]
[check one]
[mm/dd/yy]
L~Yy]
The report must include the following information and other site -specific information identified by the LGU:
W 1/ of the SE 1/ and the NW 1/ Section
Project location: 36, T121N,1Z24W
[township, range, section [1/4], lot, block]
Current wetland size: 0.60 [nearest one-tenth acre]
Method of size estimation: GPS as-built
Current wetland type (classification): Ty pe 2/3 Circular 39 and
Designed wetland type (classification): Ty pe 2/3 Circular 39 and
PEMB/C Cowardin
PEMB/C Cowardin
Compare as-built specifications vs. design specifications. Note similarities or discrepancies related to slopes, contours,
wetland shape, and water levels [required for first annual plan only]:
Created wetland matches designed wetland Slopes appear to be correct, outlet is in~roper location and seeding was
completed on May 31, 2002 Shame and size of wetland match the shape and size on the Plans. Wetland type matches
the proposed wetland type. Outlet culverts were installed after 10/21/02 and wetland is currently maintaining a
Albertville Towne Lakes Phase I
constant elevation.
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-3
Page 2
Describe rationale for SIGNIFICANT CHANGES to original design [if applicable]:
No significant changes were made from the original design.
Provide SEASONAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS taken during the period April through October based on seasonal
water elevations or areal coverage measurements.
Date [mm/dd/yy] Water Based On [Check One]
Level
07/27/06 948.0 D Relation to outlet invert elevation ^ Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
09/14/06 947.1 Q Relation to outlet invert elevation ~ Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
10/27/06 946.4 p Relation to outlet invert elevation ~ Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
List the DOMINANT VEGETATION found in the wetland and upland area. Estimate the percent coverage of each type
present. Include the common and scientific names of the vegetation that exceed 20 percent coverage.
SAMPLE POINT D Proposed Wetland Area
Common Name Scientific Name Ind'
Status Stratum % Cover
GRASS, REED CANARY Phalaris arundinacea FACW+ H 20
COTTON-WOOD, EASTERN Po ulus deltoides FAC+ T 20
WATER-PLANTAIN, BROAD-LEAF Alisma lanta o-a uatica OBL H 20
SPIKERUSH, BLUNT Eleocharis obtusa OBL H 20
WILLOW, SANDBAR Salix exi a OBL S 10
BULRUSH, SOFT-STEM Scir us validus OBL H 10
of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks /Other Plants Observed < 20 %: boneset, blue vervain
SAMPLE POINT D Adjoining Upland or ^ Upland Buffer [check one]
Common Name Scientific Name Ind'
Status Stratum % Cover
GRASS, REED CANARY Phalaris arundinacea FACW+ H 20
CLOVER, WHITE Trifolium re ens FACU+ H 20
SUSAN, BLACK-EYED Rudbeckia hirta FACU H 20
CLOVER, RED Tri olium ratense FACU+ H 10
RAGWEED, ANNUAL Ambrosia artemisii olia FACU H 10
of Dominants FAC or wetter: 20 Remarks /Other Plants Observed < 20 %: common dandelion, curly dock
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-3
Page 3
List the SOIL COLOR AND TEXTURE for a soil profile located inside the wetland boundary, but within five feet of the
wetland edge.
SAMPLE LOCATION ^ Marked Soil Sample Location or D Other: At Photo Reference Point[check one]
Depth
(inches)
Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Abundance /
Size /Contrast
Texture
0-28 A 10YR3/1 10YR5/8 Few/medium/faint Mucky clay
28-31 B 10YR7/1 10YR5/8 Few/medium/faint Clay
Remarks:
Terms to use in describing the abundance, size and contrast of redoximorphic features.
Pro er Descri tive Term Definition
Abundance Few Features occu < 20% of ex osed surface
Common Features occupy 2 - 20% of exposed surface
Man Features occupy > 20% of exposed surface
Size Fine Features < 5 mm diameter
Medium Features 5 - 15 mm diameter
Coarse Features > 15 mm diameter
Contrast Faint Matrix and redox. features have closel related hues and chromas
Distinct Matrix and features differ by 1 to 2 hues and several units in chroma and value
Prominent Matrix and features vary several units in hue, value, and chroma
Attach COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS of the project area taken anytime during the months April through October.
See attached Exhibits for photographs.
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-3
Page 4
LGU MONITORING
The City of Albertville [LGU] is responsible for the following:
Has the project been constructed according to design specifications? Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has the LGU certified compliance with the construction specifications? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Have access rights to inspect the project during the construction & monitoring period, and to assess the long-term
viability of the replaced wetland been available? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has the applicant advised that the construction specifications have been certified complete and any bond or other
security provided by the applicant returned? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has corrective action been ordered taken during the required monitoring period [i.e. LGU
has determined that approved replacement plan goal(s) will not be met?] _ Yes _ No If yes, explain [attach
plan]
Has applicant prepared an amended wetland value replacement plan for review and approval by the Technical
Evaluation Panel [attach amended replacement plan]?
Yes _ No If no, explain:
Does the. amended plan describe in adequate in detail the corrective measures to be taken to achieve the goal of
replacing lost wetland functions and values? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has the replacement plan goal(s) been met [requires site evaluation]? _ Yes _ No If no, what corrective
action(s) have been ordered?
Should the monitoring period be extended? _ Yes - No How long? Comments?
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes. Basin M-3
Page 5
One or more of the following actions must be required if during the monitoring period the goal of replacement plan
will not be met [circle number(s)]:
1. Order the applicant to prepare and implement a new replacement plan
2. Issue a CDO on the draining/filling activity if it has not been completed
3. Order restoration of the impacted wetland
4. Obtain forfeiture of a bond or other security and use the proceeds to replace the lost wetland values
5. Ask the district court to order the applicant to fulfill the replacement plan
6. Other actions that the LGU determines necessary to achieve the replacement plan goal
7. Other [explain]:
SIGNATURE(S)
Authorized LGU Official
Applicant
Date
Date
MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT
WETLAND REPLACEMENT MONITORING
2006 ANNUAL REPORT FORM
PROJECT SUMMARY
Wetland value replacement monitoring and annual reports are required for five [5] years following the completion of the
wetland replacement project to ensure that the replacement wetland achieves the goal of replacing lost functions and values.
Date(s) of monitoring: 7/27/06, 9/14/06,10/17/06 Basin ID: M-4
Project name/number:
Replacement design:
Construction method:
^ Restore D Create
D Excavation
Report prepared by: D Applicant
Report must be submitted on or before
Project replacement construction completed
ANNUAL REPORT
^ Restore and Create
^ Impoundment
^ LGU
December 31, 2006
October 2005
[check one]
[check one]
[check one]
[mm/dd/yy]
[~yY]
The report must include the following information and other site -specific information identified by the LGU:
W'/ of the SE 1/ and the NW 1/ Section
Project location: 36, T121N,1Z24W
[township, range, section [1/4], lot, block]
Current wetland size: 0.60 [nearest one-tenth acre]
Method of size estimation: GPS as-built
Current wetland type (classification): Type 2/3 Circular 39 and PEMB/C Cowardin
Designed wetland type (classification): Type 2/3 Circular 39 and PEMB/C Cowardin
Compare as-built specifications vs. design specifications. Note similarities or discrepancies related to slopes, contours,
wetland shape, and water levels [required for first annual plan only]:
Created wetland matches designed wetland. Slopes appear to be correct, outlet is in uroner location and seeding was
completed in the Fall of 2005. Shane and size of wetland match the shape and size on the clans. Wetland type
Albertville Towne Lakes Phase I
matches the proposed wetland type.
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-4
Describe rationale for SIGNIFICANT CIIANGES to original design [if applicable]:
No significant changes were made from the original design.
Page 2
Provide SEASONAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS taken during the period April through October based on seasonal
water elevations or areal coverage measurements.
Date [mm/dd/yy] Water Based On [Check One]
Level
07/27/06 948.0 D Relation to outlet invert elevation ^ Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
09/14/06 947.1 [.~ Relation to outlet invert elevation ^ Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
10/27/06 946.4 p Relation to outlet invert elevation ^ Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
List the DOMINANT VEGETATION found in the wetland and upland area. Estimate the percent coverage of each type
present. Include the common and scientific names of the vegetation that exceed 20 percent coverage.
SAMPLE POINT D Proposed Wetland Area
Common Name Scientific Name Ind.
Status Stratum % Cover
OPEN WATER 40
COTTON-WOOD, EASTERN Po ulus deltoides FAC+ T 20
WATER-PLANTAIN, BROAD-LEAF Alisma lantago-a uatica OBL H 20
SPIKERUSH, BLUNT Eleocharis obtusa OBL H 20
WILLOW, SANDBAR Salix exi ua OBL S 10
BULRUSH, SOFT-STEM Scir us validus OBL H 10
of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks /Other Plants Observed < 20 %: boneset, blue vervain
SAMPLE POINT Q Adjoining Upland or ^ Upland Buffer [check one]
Common Name Scientific Name Ind.
Status Stratum % Cover
GRASS, REED CANARY Phalaris arundinacea FACW+ H 20
CLOVER, WHITE Trifolium re ens FACU+ H 20
SUSAN, BLACK-EYED Rudbeckia hirta FACU H 20
CLOVER, RED Tri olium ratense FACU+ H 10
RAGWEED, ANNUAL Ambrosia artemisii olia FACU H 10
of Dominants FAC or wetter: 20 Remarks /Other Plants Observed < 20 %: common dandelion, curly dock
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-4
Page 3
List the SOIL COLOR AND TEXTURE for a soil profile located inside the wetland boundary, but within five feet of the
wetland edge.
SAMPLE LOCATION ^ Marked Soil Sample Location or D Other: At Photo Reference Point[check one]
Depth
(inches) Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Abundance /
Size /Contrast Texture
0-22 A 10YR2/1 10YR5/8 Few/medium/faint Mucky clay
22-31 B 10YR6/1 10YR5/8 Few/medium faint Clay
Remarks:
Terms to use in describing the abundance, size and contrast of redoximorphic features.
Pro ert Descri tive Term Definition
Abundance Few Features occu < 20% of ex osed surface
Common Features occupy 2 - 20% of exposed surface
Man Features occupy > 20% of exposed surface
Size Fine Features < 5 mm diameter
Medium Features 5 - 15 mm diameter
Coarse Features > 15 mm diameter
Contrast Faint Matrix and redox. features have closel related hues and chromas
Distinct Matrix and features differ b 1 to 2 hues and several units in chroma and value
Prominent Matrix and features va several units in hue, value, and chroma
Attach COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS of the project area taken anytime during the months April through October.
See attached Exhibits for photographs.
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-4
Page 4
LGU MONITORING
The City of Albertville [LGU] is responsible for the following:
Has the project been constructed according to design specifications? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has the LGU certified compliance with the construction specifications? Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Have access rights to inspect the project during the construction & monitoring period, and to assess the long-term
viability of the replaced wetland been available? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain•
Has the applicant advised that the construction specifications have been certified complete and any bond or other
security provided by the applicant returned? _ Yes No
If no, explain:
Has corrective action been ordered taken during the required monitoring period [i.e. LGU
has determined that approved replacement plan goal(s) will not be met?] _ Yes _ No If yes, explain [attach
plan]
Has applicant prepared an amended wetland value replacement plan for review and approval by the Technical
Evaluation Panel [attach amended replacement plan]?
Yes - No If no, explain:
Does the amended plan describe in adequate in detail the corrective measures to be taken to achieve the goal of
replacing lost wetland functions and values? Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has the replacement plan goal(s) been met [requires site evaluation]?
action(s) have been ordered?
_ Yes _ No If no, what corrective
Should the monitoring period be extended? _ Yes No How long? Comments?
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-4
Page 5
One or more of the following actions must be required if during the monitoring period the goal of replacement plan
will not be met [circle number(s)]:
1. Order the applicant to prepare and implement a new replacement plan
2. Issue a CDO on the draining/filling activity if it has not been completed
3. Order restoration of the impacted wetland
4. Obtain forfeiture of a bond or other security and use the proceeds to replace the lost wetland values
5. Ask the district court to order the applicant to fulfill the replacement plan
6. Other actions that the LGU determines necessary to achieve the replacement plan goal
7. Other [explain]:
SIGNATURE(S)
Authorized LGU Official
Applicant
Date
Date
MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT
WETLAND REPLACEMENT MONITORING
2006 ANNUAL REPORT FORM
PROJECT SUMMARY
Wetland value replacement monitoring and annual reports are required for five [5] years following the completion of the
wetland replacement project to ensure that the replacement wetland achieves the goal of replacing lost functions and values.
Date(s) of monitoring: 7/27/06, 9/14/06,10/17/06 Basin ID: M-5
Project name/number:
Replacement design:
Construction method:
Albertville Towne Lakes Phase I
^ Restore Q Create
Q Excavation
Report prepared by: D Applicant
Report must be submitted on or before
Project replacement construction completed
ANNUAL REPORT
^ Restore and Create
^ Impoundment
^ LGU
December 31, 2006
October 2005
[check one]
[check one]
[check one]
[mm/dd/yy]
[~YY]
The report must include the following information and other site -specific information identified by the LGU:
W 1/ of the SE 1/ and the NW 1/ Section
Project location: 36, T121N, R24W
[township, range, section [1/4], lot, block]
Current wetland size: 0.60 [nearest one-tenth acre]
Method of size estimation: GPS as-built
Current wetland type (classification): Type 2/3 Circular 39 and
Designed wetland type (classification): Type 2/3 Circular 39 and
PEMB/C Cowardin
PEMB/C Cowardin
Compare as-built specifications vs. design specifications. Note similarities or discrepancies related to slopes, contours,
wetland shape, and water levels [required for first annual plan only]:
Created wetland matches designed wetland. Slopes appear to be correct, outlet is in prover location and seeding was
completed in the Fall of 2005. Shape and size of wetland match the shape and size on the plans. Wetland type
matches the proposed wetland type.
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-5
Describe rationale for SIGNIFICANT CIIANGES to original design [if applicable]:
No significant changes were made from the original design.
Page 2
Provide SEASONAL WATER LEVEL ELEVATIONS taken during the period April through October based on seasonal
water elevations or areal coverage measurements.
Date [mm/dd/yy] Water Based On [Check One]
Level
07/27/06 948.2 Q Relation to outlet invert elevation ^ Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
09/14/06 946.1 Q Relation to outlet invert elevation ^ Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
10/27/06 945.4 Q Relation to outlet invert elevation ^ Relation to ground at hydrology monitoring
point
List the DOMINANT VEGETATION found in the wetland and upland area. Estimate the percent coverage of each type
present. Include the common and scientific names of the vegetation that exceed 20 percent coverage.
SAMPLE POINT Q Proposed Wetland Area
Common Name Scientific Name Ind.
Status Stratum % Cover
BULRUSH, SOFT-STEM Scir us validus OBL H l0
WATER-PLANTAIN, BROAD-LEAF Alisma Tanta o-a uatica OBL H 20
WILLOW, SANDBAR Salix exi a OBL S l0
SPIKERUSH, BLUNT Eleocharis obtusa OBL H 20
of Dominants FAC or wetter: 100 Remarks /Other Plants Observed < 20 %: boneset, blue vervain
SAMPLE POINT Q Adjoining Upland or ^ Upland Buffer [check one]
Common Name Scientific Name Ind.
Status Stratum % Cover
GRASS, REED CANARY Phalaris arundinacea FACW+ H 20
CLOVER, WHITE Tri olium re ens FACU+ H 20
SUSAN, BLACK-EYED Rudbeckia hirta FACU H 20
CLOVER, RED Tri olium ratense FACU+ H 10
RAGWEED, ANNUAL Ambrosia artemisii olia FACU H 10
of Dominants FAC or wetter: 20 Remarks /Other Plants Observed < 20 %: common dandelion, curly dock
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-5
Page 3
List the SOIL COLOR AND TEXTURE for a soil profile located inside the wetland boundary, but within five feet of the
wetland edge.
SAMPLE LOCATION ^ Marked Soil Sample Location or Q Other: At Photo Reference Point[check one]
Depth
(inches) Horizon Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist) Mottle Abundance /
Size /Contrast Texture
0-22 A 10YR2/1 10YR5/8 Few/medium/faint Mucky clay
22-31 B 10YR6/1 10YR5/8 Few/medium faint Clay
Remarks:
Terms to use in describing the abundance, size and contrast of redoximorphic features.
Pro ert Descri tive Term Definition
Abundance Few Features occup < 20% of ex osed surface
Common Features occupy 2 - 20% of exposed surface
Man Features occupy > 20% of exposed surface
Size Fine Features < 5 mm diameter
Medium Features 5 - 15 mm diameter
Coarse Features > 15 mm diameter
Contrast Faint Matrix and redox. features have closely related hues and chromas
Distinct Matrix and features differ b 1 to 2 hues and several units in chroma and value
Prominent Matrix and features vary several units in hue, value, and chroma
Attach COLOR PHOTOGRAPHS of the project area taken anytime during the months April'through October.
See attached Exhibits for photographs.
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-5
Page 4
LGU MONITORING
The City of Albertville [LGU] is responsible for the following:
Has the project been constructed according to design specifications? Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has the LGU certified compliance with the construction specifications? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Have access rights to inspect the project during the construction & monitoring period, and to assess the long-term
viability of the replaced wetland been available? _ Yes No
If no, explain:
Has the applicant advised that the construction specifications have been certified complete and any bond or other
security provided by the applicant returned? _ Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has corrective action been ordered taken during the required monitoring period [i.e. LGU
has determined that approved replacement plan goal(s) will not be met?] _ Yes _ No If yes, explain [attach
plan]
Has applicant prepared an amended wetland value replacement plan for review and approval by the Technical
Evaluation Panel [attach amended replacement plan]?
Yes _ No If no, explain:
Does the amended plan describe in adequate in detail the corrective measures to betaken to achieve the goal of
replacing lost wetland functions and values? Yes _ No
If no, explain:
Has the replacement plan goal(s) been met [requires site evaluation]?
action(s) have been ordered?
Should the monitoring period be extended? _ Yes _ No
How long? Comments?.
_ Yes _ No If no, what corrective
Wetland Replacement Monitoring - 2006 Annual Report Form
Albertville Towne Lakes, Basin M-5
Page 5
One or more of the following actions must be required if during the monitoring period the goal of replacement plan
will not be met [circle number(s)]:
1. Order the applicant to prepare and implement a new replacement plan
2. Issue a CDO on the draining/filling activity if it has not been completed
3. Order restoration of the impacted wetland
4. Obtain forfeiture of a bond or other security and use the proceeds to replace the lost wetland values
5. Ask the district court to order the applicant to fulfill the replacement plan
6. Other actions that the LGU determines necessary to achieve the replacement plan goal
7. Other [explain]:
SIGNATURE(S)
Authorized LGU Official
Applicant
Date
Date
{ .. •4 s 1Y ~~„r. -;~S •- , ~ a ~' 9 ~ .~ f.K ~ ~r?'T 5 ~ '~X?,~'•h~3 .- ~ ty:,;t i ~ ''~k'N~!.~
! s t r-
:r ~ f r J ba 'th ~~ ~ 1 L '~'' -: f r~} ~ r ti < S -~ ; k ~ r
tr 4 4,' y s~i, ~ yM a~ ~ .. ~ F `I P ~ '~.3 ~ ° r ~'c'} (( 'S r 1~
~. 3.', r~ ,~ ! ~ ~ '"c'~ ;~ k%-'k.. ~ ..; ~=i' + ~1 +'~ '' mss. +r ~, Y •~ ~~-.~I
T Id ~ T^ -~}n r ,: F» r [y Y- ae - 1? _ '~ sk, ~ r k 4'i r a. 1 Wyk C ~L
.. r w'~ 17 ~ v, `"~~-tF` }~~' r 1 ~`f :rte` ~'~ k ~ - >~~ ~-:t?
~~ .2 "~ 2 ~p1 ~ ,.,~Y t ~ -+1,~ r....' ~ f ~ t~ 1 ~ n f r s ~r gt~+4
.., ~` t .} '~ ~ ~,{~~ a r"Y ^~.~p>,• 3i'r ~ f~ ~ 5 6+~ ~• ~ ~ >3`~,~n y eq ~~* Yr
r ~ ~t fi ~ t4 ~{fi~r"s-k`""~''d.`r,~'c~'} ~~ ;'ey1 ^ .~ C ~ `.:sue r e ~'y i ~'. "'-: ~„'~ ter:- ~~,,gg~~#~ ~r;
b '~.,,t~txa'3 4 v '~ hi f'~k`+- i F - r r 2 r "rJ4~,~ v ~ 6; ~ ~, . t~, 'r ` '~ ~.
~ =~ ~ , .~ j ~. ~~~4 ~t tin~'~f.~ k Pt ~ ~ ~ "n. K pry
~]qu ,~ T~`~ Y. t~. Mfr ~s'FY~
~_ ~ F c x 7 r 'i
f ~` ~~
s .r r ~
' iE
5 t:,y r ~ ~» t r ~ ~ ~ ;
r ~v r3 - r ('' - r s'rL i! 2 ~'~
ti - ~, ,~ z
~~A. ~
a - ~ t ~~, t ,~ # ai~3 r 1 ~+,. btc ! r , ,~[ ~. is ,~
,; f , ~ t ~ a z ~aU, 3 ~ ~:_ ¢ d~,~~~r ,xtr ~~a~~'c~ r ~ h s. s rp,E
,..s~ ~'.; y#:s - i,~4i~• ~ , 's~~ a ±1"~'t. ~ ~ r ~"- a• ,' k~.. i s~ ~ ~
y~ 1. v ~, ~~, d.i '4 4 ~~..z y.¢, g > F F'}, 3' ~ "~'#~
'i r ~r
){ ~h y* i F t ~~ br-~r ~ ,~a~,' ~ ..~ 4L } ~,~ ~~ , ~~ ,?4, - ] d t.;,~ ~„•'~3;,, mac... ~ ,~ .~ ~-y~~~'?Y ti i s
~ ~: }'''~ ~ t ?a .~{' t r .,Ari x' x _ '!7 d r I/''` Y ~ ~ ~ ~. r sC'. •. , n*, k}, ~ ': 'Y
. ~! 'F :"'.~> ~l ~` ~Y,V~ It ~~ Y X !a# ~ fii *': 7
' n ~ .: ~` '~7.k ~ F ~ . ~ W t iY ~ 5 ~,ei ~ t ~.~ rc~ ~ e r, tr
7 u : r t1r, I { '11 ~ t 4
~' 1
- r X3+=1 f. i". K K -- d ~ ~ " tie
1 t- # 7 Y,f `SY
F :~ pa
`6.ST rf.~1 31 k ~ :
~.l h ~ T _ u
~' r , 7
r ~' ti~ ~ ~ M ~ +t ,f r
~,,: ~ } { r-5~.~ c r a _ v ~ izw c is '~+ y Y ~ 5 -r t s~ !t .' } x a ~
:..~ c, >.~r ~
~, .. }. ~ ~-,,~, d. 3- -
L 4 ::_! ~ ~ '' ~.~~H.~ K~~" ~*' ?~ aiT+ ~. e~yH, ~ ' ;.~t ~ .l + s£" ~~ `~r.`~~ ~kz ~- ~ .' ~ ~ of 4
~'` ~; _ vY fit. ~ .1~. 1 "hl'~+" ~ T v.`. +C~ yl 1y~~ ; f. J la}.
#~~F tiw~~ -+d~~.. n a., '~`V-~' } %"d r',_ ppls~y'f"7ca t '`
kF ..+L ,Y C" +~ } ~~ ice, .. ~ i3Y i S' h 1'
Y. i-r,-`4 ~1A'f R i ~~v t l~~ S•~ "~ l '~$~ ,~`Y' ~C..''qt
~ k' 1 ~
-~ '~Y' ~ T R ~ '~` ~ 'rte
~5.,. ~ ~ ~t `" `~S'!~' £ ~~r ~{~ ~~ eta ;' ~ 't~ ~ 'r `uv`, ;, ` ~.~`,
~( rY ~
.~ ~ f. 4 t R ~ R.2,.t
a{ r x~ _,~ '~' ~` F~~ c'~ ~ y '' ! t r~ 4~ c. +i i~~ ~~.1~.j~~~Er;,'. ,~ ff_i~
`A'~ s~•Yrr C~ ~"~'~~l~t`Y''` 1~1y 4". '~ '' i C3. K ~~x}' y} ~ ~ '~~'?1,
1 F t . T N~ F.#
v, wf J r ~~ '.F i-r ' b.,.,~v f'%t~ .•` ~i ~ r f f y~~ ~' ;~t ~' L .e1'_
~~ ry ~ rl:y-r r x.aiLr _: ~ •..-i ~ t J. : ~
7y .'~ R3Y~ Pi. I ~ {~r r -r.::~ x ~ fif f~, t'n:r r~±'.
F ?o- ~ ~5'} ~dt ~~ Y7'r`~~rr~.4r: ~; 14`~#,~t~y~i~~ ~ o-5."
~ s~ '~? ra'4~ 1ti ~~ ,~ ~ ~ ~ .q~ g. r~5,~ ~ ,,
~ r `~ F
~' - x } 1, 4.y n~ ~';6
k°`i• ?~ v ~_ ~ _ f 3' tai e 4 .
Towne Lakes, Albertville, Minnesota
Reference Photo for Wetland Replacement
2006
Reference Point 1
Basin M-1, facing north
Reference Point 2
Basin M-1, facing east
® ~~_n~x..~.
''~;°% Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
,.
3701 12t'' Street North, Suite 206
St. Cloud, MN 56303
Towne Lakes, Albertville, Minnesota
Reference Photo for Wetland Replacement
2006
Reference Point 1
Basin M-2, facing north
Reference Point 2
Basin M-2, facing west
'"~'~'' Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
!~ 3701 12t'' Street North, Suite 206
St. Cloud, MN 56303
Towne Lakes, Albertville, Minnesota
Reference Photo for Wetland Replacement
2006
Reference Point 1
West half of Basin M-3, facing north
Reference Point 3
East half of Basin M-3, facing south
Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
3701 12"' Street North, Suite 206
St. Cloud, MN 56303
Towne Lakes, Albertville, Minnesota
Reference Photo for Wetland Replacement
2006
Reference Point 2
Westwood Professional Services, Inc.
3701 12"' Street North, Suite 206
St. Cloud, MN 56303
Reference Point 1
Towne Lakes, Albertville, Minnesota
Reference Photo for Wetland Replacement
2006
Reference Point 1
Basin M-S, facing north
Reference Point 2
Basin M-S, facing east
;~'~`~ ~ Westwood Professional Services, Ina
;~ `D 3701 12`" Street North, Suite 206
St. Cloud, MN 56303