2015-07-14 PC Agenda Packet
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
Tuesday, July 14, 2015
7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL – ADOPT AGENDA
2. MINUTES
June 9, 2015 Planning Commission Meeting (pages 1-5)
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
a. Public Hearing to Consider a Request by Mike Huey for a Conditional Use Permit to
Relocate a Single Family Home from Plymouth, Minnesota to a Parcel Located at
4801 CSAH 19 in Albertville (PID 101500111101) (pages 6-22)
4. OTHER BUSINESS
a. Discuss the Need for Sign Regulations Update (pages 23-26)
5. ADJOURNMENT
Page 1
ALBERTVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, June 9, 2015
DRAFT MINUTES
ALBERTVILLE CITY HALL 7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER – ROLL CALL – ADOPT AGENDA
Chair Klecker called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
Present: Chair Klecker and Commissioners Dominick and Lindberg. Commissioner Barthel arrived
at 7:40 p.m.
Absent: Commissioner Edgren
Others Present: City Planner Alan Brixius and City Clerk Kimberly Olson
2. MINUTES
Klecker inquired about the timeline for Mr. Kolles to relocate his building. Brixius replied it was a
six month time frame.
Brixius informed the Commission that the DeMars, who were previously seeking a Conditional Use
Permit for a building relocation, have decided not to relocate the building and construct a new home.
Motioned by Klecker, seconded by Dominick, to approve the May 12, 2015 Planning Commission
meeting minutes. Ayes: Klecker, Dominick, and Lindberg. Nays: None. Absent: Barthel and
Edgren. MOTION DECLARED CARRIED.
Klecker reported that Building Permit Tech/Admin. Asst. Sue Schwalbe has been offered and taken
a new position at a different city. He recognized her work with the Commission and wished her the
best in her new endeavor.
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A. Consider a Request by Scannell Properties #227 LLC for Site and Building Plan
Approval for an Industrial Building at Lot 1, Block 2, Barthel Industrial Park 2nd
Addition and a Conditional Use Permit for a Parking Deferment
Brixius reported that Oldcastle Building Envelope (Oldcastle) had approached the City about their
needs for expansion. The City has offered a City-owned parcel for the expansion and Scannell
Agenda Page 1
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 2
Regular Meeting of June 9, 2015
Properties #227 would construct the building and then lease it to Oldcastle. Scannell has filed an
application with the City for site and building plans to construct at 33,750 square foot industrial
building on the lot. The City would sell the lot for $1.00 and then collect Tax Increment Financing
to pay back assessments and SAC/WAC charges.
Brixius reported the submitted plans are consistent with the City’s long range Comprehensive Plan.
Brixius reported Oldcastle plans to showcase their glass product in the building design. He stated
the applicant must demonstrate 90 degree cut sheets on their lighting. He stated the applicant has
requested to use landscaping rather than trash enclosures to shield the trash storage and he stated this
would be a cost savings to the applicant. He stated the applicant has also requested storage of semi-
trailers and he stated staff recommends striping of those trailer parking stalls.
Brixius stated that the applicant is requesting a CUP for deferred parking. The total parking required
is 62 and the applicant is seeking 31 parking stalls and has indicated 31 stalls exceed the amount
needed by the business. Brixius indicated that if on-street parking or additional parking in excess of
the deferred amount of stalls is utilized, the applicant will be required to install the remainder of the
62 stalls.
Brixius reported the City Engineer must approve the grading and drainage plans. He stated the
applicant must provide the City access to the drainage easement on the west lot line.
Brixius recommended approval of the plans. The Commission discussed additional landscaping on
the western side of the property that would include additional screening of the trash location.
Council member Hudson arrived at 7:22 p.m.
Klecker inquired if Marlowe Avenue NE, as a current dirt road, will eventually be paved. Brixius
replied not at this time and reported 52nd Street NE will handle the industrial traffic.
Klecker opened the public hearing at 7:24 p.m.
Dan Salzer was present from Scannell and stated it has been great to work with Oldcastle and City
staff.
Motioned by Klecker, seconded by Dominick, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Klecker,
Dominick, and Lindberg. Nays: None. Absent: Barthel and Edgren. MOTION DECLARED
CARRIED.
Motioned by Lindberg, seconded by Klecker, to recommend approval of the site and building plans
and conditional use permit for deferred parking with the following conditions:
Site and Building Plan:
1. The site and building plan illustrate a “striped-out” area on the parking lot next to the Fire
Department connection to prevent obstruction from automobile parking.
Agenda Page 2
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 3
Regular Meeting of June 9, 2015
2. The applicant provides cut sheets of all exterior light fixtures to demonstrate that they meet
the City’s 90 degree cutoff standard.
3. The applicant must identify any building roof top equipment and provide screening to meet
the City Code.
4. The site plan / landscape plan be revised to include 6 additional coniferous trees (minimum
of 6 feet tall) extending along the west property line to screen the exterior trash / recycling
requirement. No structural trash enclosure will be required.
5. The City reserves the right to access its drainage easement on the west side of the property
without warning and at the property owner’s expense. Applicant shall provide an access
easement over the west paved loading area in favor of the City to access the adjoining
drainage ditch, ponds, and wetlands.
6. Subject to comments and revisions required by the City Engineer.
7. The truck and trailer parking stalls shall be striped and clearly marked as truck and trailer
parking. The area must also indicate that no other outdoor storage or parking is allowed.
Conditional Use. Deferred Parking:
1. If the parking associated with this site occurs on-street or in areas of the lot not designed for
parking, the City may require the property owner to construct a portion or all of the proof-of-
parking area as a condition of this conditional use permit approval.
Ayes: Klecker, Dominick, and Lindberg. Nays: None. Absent: Barthel and Edgren. MOTION
DECLARED CARRIED.
A. Consider a Request by the City of Albertville to Amend Title 2, Chapter 2, Planning
Commission, of the City Code to Establish Language for Meeting Absences
Brixius reported there has been some concern over meeting absences and the importance of having a
quorum at the meetings to ensure a thorough and timely review of applications submitted. He stated
that the new language in the Code would state that three unexcused absences, three consecutive
absences, and four absences in a year would be grounds for removal, which may be done by a 4/5
vote of the City Council. Brixius noted that advance notice of absences should be given at least four
days before a Planning Commission meeting.
Dominick felt it is a reasonable amendment to the City Code and a reasonable expectation for the
Commission members.
Brixius reviewed the development schedule that identified the meeting dates of the Planning
Commission for the year.
Motioned by Dominick, seconded by Lindberg, to amend Title 2, Chapter 2, Planning
Commission, of the City Code to Establish Language for Meeting Absences. Ayes: Klecker,
Agenda Page 3
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 4
Regular Meeting of June 9, 2015
Dominick, and Lindberg. Nays: None. Absent: Barthel and Edgren. MOTION DECLARED
CARRIED.
4. OTHER BUSINESS
A. Amendments to the Central Park Master Plan
Brixius reported the Parks Committee has recommended changes to the Central Park Master Plan
and he would like the Planning Commission to review them before they are brought to the City
Council. He stated the following were changes to the plan:
• Entrance moved south away from railroad tracks
• Corridor for pedestrians and/or service vehicles for Friendly City Days or the Farmers
Market
• Hard surface plaza area in front of proposed stage
• Service drive around the caboose and depot
Dominick inquired if parking will be maintained to the west of the park and Brixius replied it would.
Klecker stated he had concerns with a hard-surface plaza and Brixius replied the hard surface was
recommended to reduce wear on the grass and would be placed in a decorative arrangement. Hudson
stated the Parks Committee had concerns that traffic amounts would lead to landscape issues at the
park.
Motioned by Klecker, seconded by Dominick, to recommend approval of the revised Central Park
Master Plan. Ayes: Klecker, Dominick, and Lindberg. Nays: None. Absent: Barthel and Edgren.
MOTION DECLARED CARRIED.
Commissioner Barthel arrived at 7:40 p.m.
B. Albertville Premium Outlet Mall Exterior Lighting Changes
Brixius reported that Lindberg had asked for the photometric of the lights the Albertville Premium
Outlet Mall (Outlet Mall) would be installing on their premises. Brixius stated the lighting would be
at 95degrees rather than 45 degrees and will be a major improvement to the property as the City has
received complaints regarding the glare of the lighting from the Outlet Mall.
Barthel inquired if it will dim light pollution in the night sky and Brixius reported that it should and
the lights are recessed in the hood.
Lindberg thanked Brixius for the information.
5. ADJOURNMENT
Motioned by Dominick, seconded by Lindberg, to adjourn the meeting at 7:47 p.m. Ayes: Klecker,
Barthel, Dominick, and Lindberg. Nays: None. Absent: Edgren. MOTION DECLARED
CARRIED.
Agenda Page 4
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Page 5
Regular Meeting of June 9, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
___________________________________
Kimberly A. Olson, City Clerk
Agenda Page 5
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Adam Nafstad
FROM: Alan Brixius / Ryan Grittman
DATE: July 9, 2015
RE: Albertville – Huey House Moving Conditional Use Permit
FILE NO: 163.06 - 15.08
BACKGROUND
Mike Huey has requested approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) to allow the
relocation of a single family home to property located west of County Road 19 (Labeaux
Avenue NE). According to the City Code, a conditional use permit is required for all
permanent relocation of residences and for the relocation of any building requiring a
permit in the City. He is also requesting an administrative permit for an attached garage
that exceeds 1,000 square feet in floor area on a lot greater than one acre in area.
The subject site is zoned A-1, Agriculture Rural and is presently a vacant lot. Single
family houses are a permitted use within the A-1 District. The home to be relocated
(from the City of Plymouth) is a single story rambler with an attached garage.
Attached for reference:
Exhibit A: Site Plan
Exhibit B: Building Photographs
Exhibit C: Tax Record
Exhibit D: Travel Route
Exhibit E: Building Mover License
Exhibit F: Mover Insurance
Exhibit G: St. Michael Letter / Utility Plan
Exhibit H: City Engineer’s Review
ISSUES ANALYSIS
Performance Standards. Section 1400.4 of the City Code establishes a specific set of
standards which must be satisfied in the consideration of building relocation requests
(via CUP). The following is a listing of the various performance standards followed by a
City Staff response:
Agenda Page 6
A. Upon relocation, the building shall comply with the applicable
requirements of the State Building Code.
Staff Comment. As a condition of CUP approval, the home to be located must
comply with the applicable provisions of the State Building Code. Proposed
improvements would include a new foundation (basement). As part of the
application for building permit, the submission of detailed building plans will be
required. This issue will be subject to further review and approval by the City
Building Official.
B. The proposed relocated building shall comply with the character of the
neighborhood in which it is being relocated as determined by the City
Council.
Staff Comment. The subject site is bordered by low density single family
residential and a public park. The site is also adjacent to single family homes in
the City of St. Michael. The proposed home is a low density use. Exhibit B is the
photographs of the home. The photos indicate that the new home will be
consistent with the character of the adjoining area. It is the opinion of City Staff
that the home to be relocated will be compatible in appearance with existing
homes in the area.
C. The relocated use will not result in a depreciation of neighborhood or
adjacent property values.
Staff Comment. Considering that the home will be large in size and similar in
appearance of other homes in the area, and that Building Code compliance will
be made a condition of CUP approval, the proposed use is not expected to
depreciate neighborhood property values.
D. The relocated structure shall be similar to the market valuation of adjacent
principal structures as determined by the City or County Assessor.
Staff Comment. The home to be relocated has a ground floor footprint that
appears to be larger than most homes in the neighborhood. Exhibit C is the
2015 tax record of the home to be relocated. In 2002, the hold sold for $620,000.
In 2015, the home had an estimated market value of $812,600. These values
exceed the values of the adjoining residential homes.
E. The relocated structure shall be ready for occupancy within six months
from the date of location on the site.
Staff Comment. As a condition of CUP approval, the relocated structure will be
required to be occupied within six months of the date of City Council approval.
Agenda Page 7
F. The travel route of the building move must reflect proper capacity of the
street with regard to load bearing capacity, will not interfere with utilities,
and will not create congestion or traffic safety issues on the public street.
Staff Comment. As required, the applicant has described the proposed travel
route from the site in the City of Plymouth (Exhibit D). The move is expected to
take place on Thursday July 23rd from midnight to 5:00 AM. As a condition of
CUP approval, the proposed travel route and related timing should be subject to
approval by the City Engineer. The company performing the move (Otting House
Movers, LLC) is licensed by the State of Minnesota. Exhibits E and F are proof
of license and insurance.
Setbacks and Lot Requirements. The following is a listing of minimum A-1 District
principal building setback requirements as well as setbacks proposed by the applicants:
Required Proposed Compliant
Setback
Front 150 feet 220 feet (approx.) Yes
Side (South) 20 feet 20 ½ feet Yes
Side (North) 20 feet 30 feet Yes
Rear 50 feet 70 feet (approx.) Yes
Wetland
Boundary
30 feet 30 feet Yes
Lot Area 10 acres 3 acres No*
Lot Width 300 feet 330 feet (approx.) Yes
*The lot is an existing lot of record and is therefore still considered a buildable lot
in the City of Albertville.
The site in question meets all the required setbacks for the A-1 District.
Garage. The City limits a residential garage to 1,000 square feet. The proposed house
moving includes a four car garage that measures approximately 1,012 square feet. The
applicant is requesting an administrative approval for the garage size that exceeds
1,000 square feet per Section 1000.4.B.3 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance:
• The parcel is one acre or greater in size.
Staff Comment. The proposed site is three acres.
• Any accessory building does not exceed the ground coverage of the
dwelling.
Staff Comment. The attached garage is approximately 1,012 square feet and the
house footprint is approximately 1,895 square feet. The garage will be smaller
than the principal structure.
Agenda Page 8
• Any accessory building shall be screened from adjacent residential
property.
Staff Comment. The proposed location of the garage will face the northeast,
adjacent to the wetland area on the north and east side. The garage will be
partially screened from adjacent residential properties to the south. The 12
square feet of floor space above the 1,000 square foot standard will not be
noticeable.
• Any accessory building shall be constructed of the same or similar design
and material as the principal building.
Staff Comment. The garage is attached to the principal structure being
relocated. The materials match the principal structure as seen in the photos
submitted by the applicant.
• Commercial and home occupation uses are prohibited in any accessory
building.
Staff Comment. As a condition of approval, the applicant shall agree not to
conduct business out of the garage. Staff recommends administrative approval
of the garage size based on the preceding comments.
Landscaping. It is assumed that the home relocation will significantly impact existing
site vegetation (turf and landscaping). In this regard, it is recommended that the
following conditions be imposed as conditions of CUP approval:
1. The impacted lot area around the home after providing for foundation, driveways,
sidewalks, patios, deck, building site and/or other requirements shall be sodded
or seeded prior to issuance of a certificate of building occupancy.
2. If the subject property does not contain a shade or evergreen tree, one shade
tree or evergreen tree shall be provided on the property consistent with the
permitted species list and minimum size requirements of Section 1000.7.B of the
Zoning Ordinance.
3. The preceding requirements be satisfied within six months of building occupancy.
4. Erosion control and turf restoration between the house and wetland area must be
established to prevent erosion into the wetland.
Driveway Access. The site in question already has a curb cut to allow access to the
property from Labeaux Avenue NE (at the southeast corner of the property). The
proposed site plan shows the driveway connecting to the curb cut. This issue will be
subject to approval of the County for an access permit.
Agenda Page 9
Utility Connections. The City of Albertville has indicated that they will not be able to
service the site with sanitary sewer. However, the City of St. Michael has agreed to
provide sanitary sewer service to the site. The applicant has received a letter from the
City of St. Michael that they will be able to provide sanitary sewer. Exhibit G illustrates
the utility plan. The applicant shall enter into a written agreement with the City of
Albertville and the City of St. Michael stating that they will install sewer and water
connections to the specifications of both Albertville and St. Michael. The property
owner shall be responsible for all fees and costs associated with the extension of utility
service to the house. This approval is also subject to an agreement between Albertville
and St. Michael, outlining the reimbursement of St. Michael for provision of utilities and
continued payment of user fees.
RECOMMENDATION
Provided certain conditions are imposed, we believe the relocated home can compatibly
exist within the neighborhood in which it is proposed. As a result, and based on the
preceding review, our office recommends approval of the administrative accessory
building size and location; and the requested conditional use permit subject to the
following conditions:
1. The home to be located shall comply with the applicable provisions of the State
Building Code. This issue shall be subject to further review and approval by the
City Building Official.
2. The relocated structure shall be occupied within six months of the date of City
Council approval.
3. Prior to moving the house, City Attorney review and approval of the moving
company’s license and insurance.
4. The proposed travel route (of the home to be relocated) and related timing shall
be subject to approval by the City Engineer.
5. The garage not be used for business or commercial purposes.
6. The following landscaping-related conditions shall be satisfied:
a. The lot area disturbed by the house moving after providing for driveways,
sidewalks, patios, building site and/or other requirements shall be sodded,
seeded and mulched prior to issuance of a certificate of building
occupancy.
b. If the subject property does not contain a shade or evergreen tree, one
shade tree or evergreen tree shall be provided on the property consistent
with the permitted species list and minimum size requirements of Section
1000.7.B of the Zoning Ordinance.
Agenda Page 10
c. The preceding landscaping-related requirements shall be satisfied within
six months of building occupancy.
7. The existing driveway curb cut be used to connect the driveway to the street.
The applicant obtain an access permit from Wright County.
8. The applicant enter into a written agreement from the City of Albertville and the
City of St. Michael for the provision of utility connections to the site. The
agreement must also outline the terms for collection and compensation of St.
Michael for their utility connection and ongoing user fees. The written agreement
shall be prepared by the City Attorney of the City of Albertville. The property
owner shall be responsible for all fees and costs of utility extensions and
connections.
9. Subject to the City Engineer comments of July 8, 2015 (see Exhibit H).
c: Kim Olson
Cara Hotchkiss
Paul Heins
Mike Couri
Mike Huey (via email)
Agenda Page 11
EXHIBIT AAgenda Page 12
Front (facing East to Hwy 19)a
Facing North East toward Highway 19 and 18 intersection)
Facing West
Facing South to the St. Michael Border Agenda Page 13EXHIBIT B
Property information search result
The Hennepin County Property Tax web database is updated
daily (Monday Friday) at approximately 9:15 p.m. (CST)
Search By:
HOUSE or BUILDING #:
6140
STREET NAME:(at least first 3
characters)
Lawndale
UNIT # (if applicable)
Search Clear
records per page
Parcel Data for Taxes Payable 2015
Click Here for the 2015 State Copy to be used when filing for the 2014 M1PR State Refund (statetax.jsp?pid=0511822220001&year=2015)
Print (printdetails.jsp?pid=0511822220001)
Property ID: 0511822220001
Address: 6140 LAWNDALE LA N
Municipality: PLYMOUTH
School Dist: 284 Construction year: 1994
Watershed: 2 Approx. Parcel Size: IRREGULAR
Sewer Dist: 03
Owner Name: RANDAL K LUSH & MARY JO LUSH
Taxpayer Name
& Address: RANDAL K LUSH & MARY JO LUSH
6140 LAWNDALE LA N
PLYMOUTH MN 55446
Sale Information
Sales prices are reported as listed on the Certificate of Real Estate Value and are not warranted to represent armslength
transactions.
Sale Date: September, 2002
Sale Price: $620,000
Transaction Type: Warranty Deed
Tax Parcel Description
The following is the County Auditor's description of this tax parcel. It may not be the legal description on the most recent conveyance document recording
ownership. Please refer to the legal description of this property on the public record when preparing legal documents for recording
Addition Name: UNPLATTED 05 118 22
Lot:
Block:
First Line Metes & Bounds:COM AT THE NW COR OF NW 1/4 TH S
Full Metes & Bounds:
Note: To read full tax parcel description, click here.
Abstract or Torrens: ABSTRACT
Subscribe Jobs Employees Media Contact
Home
Information and services Regulations and
opportunities
Leadership and
engagement
Transactions and
applications
Residents Business
Your
government
Online
services
EXHIBIT CAgenda Page 14
Value and Tax Summary for Taxes Payable 2015
Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2014
Estimated Market Value:$812,600
Taxable Market Value:$812,600
Total Improvement Amount:
Total Net Tax:$11,753.16
Total Special Assessments:
Solid Waste Fee:
Total Tax:$11,753.16 (https://www16.co.hennepin.mn.us/taxpayments/taxesdue.jsp?pid=0511822220001)
Property Information Detail for Taxes Payable 2015
Values Established by Assessor as of January 2, 2014
Values: 1 2
Land Market $495,000
Building Market $317,600
Machinery Market
Total Market:$812,600
Qualifying Improvements
Veterans Exclusion
Homestead Market Value Exclusion
Classifications: 1 2
Property Type RESIDENTIAL VACANT LAND
RESIDENTIAL
Homestead Status HOMESTEAD NONHOMESTEAD
Relative Homestead
Agricultural
Exempt Status EXEMPT
Hennepin County is providing this information as a public service.
Tax related questions: taxinfo@hennepin.us (mailto:taxinfo@hennepin.us)
Hennepin County, Minnesota Open government (http://www.hennepin.us/your
government#opengovernment) | Privacy
(http://www.hennepin.us/yourgovernment/open
government/accessibilityprivacysecurity.aspx) |
Copyright 2015
EXHIBIT CAgenda Page 15
House Move Route to Lot A1 in Albertville
Agenda Page 16 EXHIBIT D
EXHIBIT EAgenda Page 17
EXHIBIT FAgenda Page 18
Agenda Page 19 EXHIBIT G
Utility Plan from Meiny’s Diggers, Inc.; 12231 43rd St NE, St. Michael, MN 55376
(763) 497-2236
Agenda Page 20 EXHIBIT G
Albertville City Hall ● 5959 Main Avenue NE, PO Box 9 ● Albertville, MN 55301 ● (763) 497-3384
M E M O R A N D U M
Date: July 8, 2015
To:
Cc:
Al Brixius, City Planner
Paul Heins, Building Official
Virgil Hawkins, P.E., County Engineer
Marc Weigle, City of St. Michael
From: Adam Nafstad, P.E., City Engineer
Subject: CUP Site Review
4800 LaBeaux Avenue N.E. (assumed future street address)
Wright County PID No: 101-500-111101
The Site Plan for the above referenced property, dated 6-16-15, has been reviewed and approval is recommend with the following conditions: Permits
1. Applicant shall secure all required permits (State, County, etc.) to move the structure
onto the site.
2. Applicant shall secure any County required permits and coordinate the proposed CSAH
19 driveway access with the County.
3. Applicant shall secure required St. Michael sewer connection permit.
Wetland
4. Applicant has submitted a Type and Boundary WCA application to the TEP. Any
requirements of the TEP and LGU shall be a condition of CUP approval.
5. Once the wetland boundary has been approved, Applicant shall update survey to depict
approved wetland delineation.
General Site Requirements
6. The wetland shall not be disturbed at any time.
7. The site shall be graded such that there is positive drainage away from the proposed
structure.
8. The lot shall be graded such that surface water runoff is not conveyed onto the adjacent
residential lot. A swale along the southerly boundary may be needed.
9. Yard grades shall not exceed a 3:1 slope. Contractor shall call Gopher One Call prior to
excavation
10. Any and all excess material (soil, dirt, and debris) shall be disposed of at a site secured
by the Applicant or Contractor. Disposal of any material within the City limits of
Albertville requires approval and a permit. Non-permitted dumping is not allowed and is
subject to fines and restoration fees.
EXHIBIT HAgenda Page 21
4800 LaBeaux Ave NE
7/8/15
Page 2
Erosion Control
11. Prior to any excavation, the Contractor shall construct silt fence, or approved equal,
around the property such that all areas to be disturbed are enclosed; and shall construct a
crushed rock construction entrance The Contractor shall be responsible for the
maintenance of all erosion control until turf is established.
12. The street and gutter shall be kept clean at all times.
13. Rip Rap at the outlet of the driveway culvert extending from the invert to the normal
water level will be required.
14. The Contractor shall construct a crushed rock construction entrance.
15. 6-inches of topsoil under all turf areas is recommended.
Sewer and Water Services
16. Albertville does not have municipal sewer available for this property. St. Michael is
willing to serve the property with sewer and Albertville is currently drafting an
agreement regarding connection and monthly fees. Applicant will be responsible for
utility fees per final agreement.
17. All construction and materials for sewer and water services shall be per Albertville or St.
Michael standards.
18. Water service tap shall be approved by Joint Powers Water.
19. Water service curb stop shall be located in utility easement.
Structure Requirements
20. The lowest floor/lowest opening elevation shall be a minimum of 959.00, as proposed.
21. The sump pump discharge line shall be day-lighted at a location that discharge flows will
not impact the adjacent properties
22. No permanent structure or portion of the house shall be constructed within the drainage
and utility easements.
23. Any cracked or damaged sidewalk or curb shall be replaced prior to C.O.
24. Applicant shall verify that soil conditions are suitable for the proposed construction. Soil
conditions unsuitable for constructed shall be corrected.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
EXHIBIT HAgenda Page 22
MEMORANDUM
TO: Adam Nafstad
FROM: Alan Brixius
DATE: March 26, 2015
RE: Albertville – Sign Regulations
FILE NO: 163.05 – 15.04
BACKGROUND
The City would like to review current zoning and development regulations to determine
if they address the needs of the residents, businesses, and City at large. Staff
determined the Sign Regulations would be a good starting point for the following
reasons:
1. Review of the Sign Regulations reveals that its format and structure is disjointed
and difficult to use.
2. The City has undertaken numerous Sign Regulations amendments over the last
10 years. The regulations review will be undertaken to ensure the past
amendments have been properly incorporated.
3. The City has approved a number of comprehensive sign plans for the Outlet Mall,
Albertville Crossing, and Shoppes at Towne Lakes. These comprehensive sign
plans offer some innovative sign treatments that may be beneficial to some of the
City’s freestanding businesses.
In review of the Sign Regulations, we would recommend the following changes:
The format of the current Sign Regulations does not function well. We would propose
the following outline to make the ordinance less confusing and easier to use. We have
also included suggested changes within the following outline.
Agenda Page 23
SIGN REGULATIONS OUTLINE
Sign Regulations Purpose Statement
Definitions
General Provisions
Building Code Requirements
Illumination Standards
Sign Location / Setbacks
Sign Conditions
Sign Height Provisions
Permitted Sign Without a Permit
Government Signs
Address Numbers
Political Campaign Signs
Non-Commercial Opinion Signs
Holiday Displays
Construction Signs
Real Estate For Sale / For Rent Signs / Open Houses
Flags and Memorials
Garage Sale Signs
Window Signs
Directional Signs
Prohibited Signs
Signs That Mimic Traffic Control Devices
Signs That Obstruct Traffic Visibility
Motion of Flashing Signs
Signs Mounted on Trees, Utility Poles, etc.
Signs Mounted on Vehicles or Trailers
Non-Conforming Signs Provisions
This section will reflect State Statutes for the treatment of non-conforming
structures.
General District Standards
DISTRICT
USE
A-1, A-2 Agriculture
R-1A, R-1, R-2, R-3 Low Density Single Family
R-4, R-5, R-6, R-7, R-8, RMH Medium and High Density
B-1, B-2, B-3, B-4 Commercial
I-1, I-2 Industrial
P/I Public/Institutional
Agenda Page 24
Currently, Albertville Sign Regulations do not specifically address agricultural or
residential districts. We must look at the sign needs of the residential properties
and the non-residential conditional uses in these districts (i.e., golf courses).
Within the commercial districts, we would like to address the following sign
options:
Double Frontage Lots
Pedestrian Blade Signs (similar to Outlet Mall)
Projecting Signs
The Sign Regulations do not address the Public/Institutional Zoning District. This
will be addresses with this ordinance review.
Special Sign Standards
Within this section, we would include the following:
Signs for Gas Stations
Temporary Signs (Special Events)
Temporary Off-Premise Signs
Dynamic Signs (we would like to change the illumination standards)
For Sale / For Rent Signs
Billboards
Comprehensive Sign Plans
Administration
Permit Requirements
Variances
Enforcement Penalties
Through this review process, we can also address other sign issues identified by City
staff, Planning Commissioners and City Council members. To facilitate the Sign
Regulations review, we would propose the following steps:
1. Take the current regulations and re-organize it under the aforementioned format.
2. Proposed/new language would be introduced into the draft regulations in a
highlighted fashion for ease of review.
3. Work sessions with the Planning Commission to ensure that the sign regulations
language is acceptable and comprehensive in addressing local sign issues.
4. Through the Planning Commission work sessions, staff will provide ancillary
information (i.e., approved comprehensive sign plans, photos of signs, sample
Agenda Page 25
regulations) to assist the Planning Commission in their review of the Sign
Regulations.
5. A joint City Council/Planning Commission session to present the initial draft
regulations to ensure that the proposed changes can be supported by both the
Planning Commission and City Council.
6. Publication and public hearing on the Sign Regulations by the Planning
Commission to garner public opinion. The City may wish to forward copies of the
draft regulations to commercial and industrial property owners prior to the public
hearing.
7. Council review at a City Council meeting for final adoption.
Agenda Page 26