1988-03-07 CC Agenda/PacketCITY OF ALB ERTVILLE
P. O. BOX 131
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA 55301
PHONE: (612) 497-3384
COUNCIL AGENDA
-
MARCH 7, 1988
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
II. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
III. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES --February 9, 1988
--February 16, 1988
--February 12 and 29, 1988 (will be available
Monday evening)
IV. COMMUNITY FORUM
7:05 Ken Tiernan --Miss Albertville Float
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS (additional schedule information will be provided
on Monday evening)
7:30 (1) Street Maintenance Improvements
(2) Barthel Manor--2nd Addition
(3) Hackenmueller's Road Improvement
(4) Darkenwald's Improvements
VI. Department Business
** a. Engineering
- Feasibility Report on Braun's Addition
- Feasibility Report on Hackenmueller's Road Improvement
- Update on the PPM Water Problem
b. Legal
- Discussion regarding the City's options and obligations relating
to the Joint Power's Agreement pertaining to the expansion
of the trunk main
- Other business
c. Maintenance
- Other business
d. Administration
- Income Recieved and Bills to be Paid
- Approval of the Building Permits
Permit Type of Amount
# Name Construction Address of Permit
88-1 Barthel Const. New Home 5621 Lake Ave. $913.90
88-2 Truss Mfg. Remodeling 11920 53rd St. $297.60
88-3 J. Leuer Const. New Home 11700 57th St. $835.20
• - Memo regarding School Addition/Letter from Fire Department.
** fhe Council should have enough time to discuss the engineering
items prior to the start of the public hearings.
Make our City ........ Your City
We invite Home, Industry, Business
- Planning Consultant
- Purchase of Computer
- Legislatice Update
- Dog Catcher
r - Schedule of Work Meeting to discuss Fee Charges and
Developer's Agreement
- Other Business
VII. MEMBER'S REPORTS
VIII. OTHER BUSINESS
- Reports Available
** Citieis bulletin -- Weekly activities of the legislative
session
** State of the Cities-1988 -- An assessment of the financial
status of the 885 cities in Minnesota
** Materials on Property Tax Reform
- Mics. Items
IX. MOTION TO ADJOURN
•
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
P. O. BOX 131
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA 55301
PHONE: (612) 497-3384
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
MARCH 7, 1988
The regular meeting of the Albertville City Council was called to order
by Mayor Loretta Roden. Council members present included Donatus Vetsch
and Bob Braun. Council members Gary Schwenzfeier and Don Cornelius were
absent. Others present were Maureen Andrews, Brad Farnham, Thore Meyer,
Bob Sullentrop and Ken Lindsay.
The agenda for the evening's meeting was reviewed by the Council. A motion
was made by Bob Braun and seconded by Donatus Vetsch to accept the agenda.
All were in favor and the motion carried.
A motion to approve the minutes of February 9th was made by Donatus Vetsch
and seconded by Bob Braun. All were in favor and the motion carried. Bob
Braun made a motion to approve the minutes of February 16th. Donatus
Vetsch seconded the motion. All were in favor and the motion carried.
The minutes of February 12th and 29th were tabled until the next meeting.
Ken Tiernan, of the Albertville Lions, brought to the Council's attention
a matter concerning the Lion's float. It was pointed out that since Miss
Albertville is a City wide activity, the Lion's would like to be relieved
of purchasing the license for the float. The license has been paid for
by the Lion's in the past; however, now they would like the City to assume
the cost, approximately $14.00.
A question of liability was raised by Donatus Vetsch. Would the City's
insurance cover the responsibility of a float? It was agreed to check
into this and bring the findings to the next meeting. Also, since the
City has no storage, the float could continue to be stored at Barthel's
at the Lion's expense.
The Council next reviewed the feasibility reports for the 1988 improvement
projects:
Thore Meyer, the City's Engineer, reviewed with the Council the findings
on the improvements scheduled for Braun's Addition (1988-4). The project
is being proposed to be completed in two phases (as shown on the map included
with the feasibility report). The report discussed the improvements for
the entire area, but all the costs were broken down for the two different
phases. The improvements included:
Make our City........ Your City
We invite Home, Industry, Business
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
PAGE 2
SANITARY SEWER - will consist of approximately 2,550 feet of 8 inch PVC
pipe, which will discharge into the existing sanitary sewer main located
.� on C.S.A.H. #35. In addition, each lot will be serviced by a 4 inch line.
The report pointed out that there is one area of the collection system
that will require insulation over the line because of the lack of sufficient
ground cover.
WATERMAIN - will consist of approximately 2, 600 feet of 6 inch Ductile
Iron Pipe (D.I.P.), which when both phases are completed will loop from
C.S.A.H. #35 through the platted area and then back to C.S.A.H. #35.
It wi4include the necessary gate valves and fire hydrants which have
been requested by Joint Poweres. The service lines for each lot will
be 1 inch copper.
STORM SEWER - will consist of various sections discharging into existing
storm sewers on C.S.A.H. #35 and into Barthel Industrial Park (Lannon
Avenue). There will be additional drainage into an existing pond which
will have a controlled overflow into Barthel Industrial Park.
STREETS - the information regarding theptreets was broken down into two
phases per the direction of the developer. The cost for each phase are
as follows:
PHASE I $190,800.00
PHASE II $228,400.00
A more detailed breakdown is included in the feasibility report. It should
also be noted that these costs do not include any bonding costs.
Based on the recommendations of the engineer, a motion was made by Donatus
Vetsch and seconded by Loretta Roden accepting the feasibility report
for the Braun's Addition (1988-4). All were in favor and the motion carried.
The feasibility report on Hackenmueller's (1988-6) was reviewed next.
The City's Engineers pointed out to the Council that some general reshaping
of the road would be involved in the improvement. They would be adding
6 inches of gravel and 3 inches of bituminous which would allow the road
to be equivilant to a 6-7 ton road.
Thore pointed out that this road would serve as a temporary solution to
the problem of maintenance until such time the road would be upgraded
to a 9 ton road. It was also pointed out that at the time of an upgrade,
the City would likely be looking at making the road wider and providing
services (sewer and water) to the properties abutting the road.
It became clear that it would be necessary to assess the Hackenmueller
property for the upgrade at that time.
Brad Farnham suggested some kind of Developers Agreement be looked at
for when the other improvements are made so that the property will be
able to be assessed the second time. Brad also suggested that the agreement
be drawn up stating that this is not the standard 36 foot street, which
is the minimum in Albertville. The road proposed is 24 feet. It was
pointed out that the reason not to upgrade the road at this time was that
without water and sewer being in, there is no use in putting in a full
type street. Total costs for this improvement will be $12,000.00.
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
PAGE 3
'A motion was made by Bob Braun and seconded by Donatus Vetsch to approve
the feasibility report on Hackenmueller's Improvement (1988-6). All were
in favor and the motion carried.
Bob Sullentrop briefly updated the Council on the PPM water problem.
He stated that he had called on February 12th and again early last
week. A PPM representative told Bob they were changing chemicals because
of residue build up and that they would be submitting the necessary application
permits so that the drainage problem can be corrected. It was pointed
out that Maureen Andrews also spoke with the representative of PPM and
received the same information. The minutes should note that it appears
that a culvert is frozen shut and causing additional problems. A question
was raised by the Council as to whether or not the City wants to wait
another week before taking any type of legal action against PPM. Donatus
Vetsch suggested the Council wait until the next meeting before making
any decisions. Bob Sullentrop is to notify PPM of this decision.
The Council next reviewed the income received and the bills to be paid.
A question about the NSP power bill was raised by Donatus Vetsch regarding
why is it so high, and was told that it was because of the pond building
being all electric. It was agreed that the City needs to look into a
more cost effective way of heating the building.
After no other discussion, a motion was made by Bob Braun and seconded
by Donatus Vetsch to approve the bills. All were in favor and checks
8542 through 8579 were paid.
The Council next reviewed the memo regarding the elementary school addition.
Maureen Andrews spoke about the letter to Mr. DeMatteis regarding the
use of degreaser and the Fire Department's letter regarding the fire hydrant
installation.
Bob Braun pointed out that the Fire Department feels the fire hydrant
should take high priority. Therefore, they are turning down the request
to wait with the installation of the hydrant and want the fire hydrant
in as soon as possible. Bob Braun made a motion to approve David Vetsch's
letter to the architect from the Fire Department. Donatus Vetsch seconded
the motion. All were in favor and the motion carried.
The Mayor called the Street Maintenance Hearing (1988-5) to order. Maureen
Andrews then gave description of Notice of Hearing. Cost of the improvement
notice will be $70,000.00.
Thore Meyer spoke about the types of improvements that would be undertaken.
Tearing up, patching and overlays would be involved on the streets targeted
for high priority maintenance improvements. A type of high priority and
low priority seal coating would be done on other streets not requiring
major improvements. Plans would be drawn, bids taken, before the Council
will decide how work will actually be done.
Brad Farnham stated the cost included in the feasibility report was $80,000.00.
Albertville's Council remarked that even $50,000.00 sounded high. It
was explained that costs would be allocated:
$50,000.00 for major work
$11,000.00 for high priority seal coating
$9,000.00 for low priority seal coating
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
PAGE 4
A question from the audience was raised concerning curbs on 57th Street
across from the water tower which appear to be sinking. Thore pointed
^ out that these problems would be looked at and if needed these curbs would
be jacked uped and filled in. Some may have to be taken out and new ones
put in.
Maureen Andrews stated that the improvements would not be assessed at
this time but spread out over the general tax base, but that under 429,
the City is required to give notice of improvements.
Another question was asked as to how many years would the bond costs be
spread over. Brad stated that this fact had not been discussed but probably
over as many as necessary - possibly 4 to 5 years. It is not the City's
intention to drag it out longer than that.
A member of the Council stated that it is possible that more mills may
need to be added to the levy to pay for the improvements.
There were no other questions or comments regarding the improvement.
A motion was made by Donatus Vetsch to approve Street Maintenance (1988-5),
and seconded by Bob Braun. All were in favor and the motion carried.
The Barthel Manor - 2nd Addition (1988-1) Improvement Hearing was called
to order by Mayor Loretta Roden.
Maureen Andrews then gave description of Notice of Hearing.
The City's engineers then explained what types of improvements are scheduled
for Barthel Manor - 2nd Addition. The project will include blacktop, curb
and gutter as described in the feasibility report. The estimated costs
will be $137,900.00 which is less than originally thought. The general
work for this type of improvement (street, curb and gutter) is usually
a two year process.
A question was asked about an apron for the park for off street parking
on Barthel Industrial Drive. Thore said that he would like the Park Board
to discuss the driveway apron and the possibility of using the B-618 curb
and the South side of the park to reduce problems of people driving onto
the parkland.
Brad Farnham pointed out the fact that assessments would run a 12 year
period for the City. The interest rate would be passed on to the property
owners.
With no other questions, a motion to approve Barthel Manor - 2nd Addition
(1988-1) was made by Bob Braun and seconded by Donatus Vetsch. All were
in favor and the motion carried.
The Hackenmueller Improvement (1988-6) was called to order. Maureen Andrews
gave description of Notice of Hearing.
Thore pointed out what would be done. The present road will be upgraded
and reshaped to a 24 foot wide road, which will be narrower than the standard
36 foot street. It will have a 3 inch blacktop overlay. Thore went on
to explain the issue discussed earlier in the meeting since the owners
were now present. It was pointed out the road will not be the full 9
ton road that needs to be there, but is, and will be, a serviceable street.
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
PAGE 5
It was suggested that a waiver might be necessary stating that the road
will not be a 9 ton road but serviceable as a 6-7 ton road until some
future date. When sewer and water come in, the road can be upgraded to
a 9 ton road by adding 6 inches more of gravel for a total of 12 inches
of gravel and widened to 36 feet.
Brad Farnham suggested a Developer's Agreement be drawn up between the
City and Hackenmueller's before going ahead on the improvements, which
could leave room to bail out if necessary.
Brad also pointed out that it would make no sense to spread the estimated
cost of $11,400.00 (high estimate) over ten years. The owners would pay
as much in interest costs as the principle over that many years. Something
more feasible, like five years, could be worked out with the City.
There were no questions concerning this improvement, so a motion was made
by Donatus Vetsch and seconded by Bob Braun to approve the Hackenmueller
Improvement (1988-6). All were in favor and the motion carried.
The last hearing called to order by the Mayor was the Darkenwald Improvement
(1988-3).
Maureen Andrews gave description of Notice of Hearing. She also stated
the estimated costs for Phase I would be $715,000.00
Thore Meyer explained that Phase I would service west Albertville with
sewer and water. In addition, because of the project, the City would
be building a new lift station, major trunks and force main. The estimated
cost of improvements for the entire package of lift station, sewer and
water and storm drains will be $215,000.00 of which $42 - $43 thousand
would be allocated for the water main.
A question was raised about who will pay for the main trunk line, and
how is the City going to treat the lift station, etc. in terms of costs.
Brad pointed out that none of the $215,000.00 would be considered for
special assessment. He mentioned that a connection charge would be considered
to pick up some costs as well as a trunk charge which everyone will pay
at the time of getting a building permit. This would be paid for by the
people who come into the community to live. Brad also stated that a variation
of two different types of connection or trunk charges may be considered
where the costs would not be assessed back to the owners. It appears
that the connection charges (SAC) could go on indefinately. Thore pointed
out the only other alternative would be to assess the costs over the entire
area, which the City does not want to do. Brad stated that legislature
has acknowledged trunk facilities as a special cost and has allowed the
City to do these types of improvements without assessing back. It was
also pointed out that in any case, the City has to be competitive with
surrounding areas.
It was decided to have one more workshop with the Council to finalize
the different charges. The City's engineer also commented that all estimated
costs are kept a little high so no one is surprised over the costs.
There were no other questions, so a motion was made by Bob Braun and seconded
by Donatus Vetsch to approve the Darkenwald Improvement (1988-3). All
were in favor and the motion carried.
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
PAGE 6
The Council next heard some discussion on the computer. One of the Council
members thought it might be better to lease for several months instead
of buying right away. It was pointed out that leasing will cost approximately
10o more than purchasing the equipment outright. If the computer is purchased,
it will be necessary to have a purchase agreement and at least a 90 day
warranty on the equipment. It was suggested that a computer demonstration
be set up for next work meeting. No action was taken.
Maureen Andrews brought to the Council's attention that a dog catcher's
contract with the City of Monticello was included in the Council packet
for review by the members. This matter will again be discussed at the
next regular meeting.
Maureen also pointed out that the water and sewer fee charges and developer's
agreement had been included for review by the Council.
Donatus Vetsch brought to the Council's attention that the Albertville
Lions have money available for use. The balance must be allocated for
by June 30, 1988 or 1540' goes to the State.
A question was raised as to whether the City has any projects in mind
to spend the money on. Possibly for a new City Hall or Community banquet
hall. The Lions would like to turn the money over to the City to invest.
The president of the Albertville Lions will be at the next meeting for
input from the Council.
Another matter discussed was the street lights at Hack's and County Road
37. Maureen will check on this as the lights were ordered some time ago.
A work meeting was scheduled for Tuesday, March 15th at 7:00 p.m.
Ken Lindsay brought to the Council's attention that Elroy Barthel has
a 1 1/2 car garage available for storage to the City, and would like the
Council to consider purchasing it. He also asked that garbage be disposed
of properly after events at the City Hall, with the possibility of it
being picked up the next day so that dogs don't get into it. Maureen
is to contact each group about this.
Ken also asked the Council whether he should go the Annual Wastewater Operations
Seminar both days or just the day he was to speak, which is March 24th.
He stated he will be attending ponds school and collection systems school,
and that ponds school would possibly be good for Mike to attend as well.
Ken also asked if there was any problems with the Council if the PCA were
to come out and experiment on the ponds this spring. They would like
to do some tests and take some samples. It was agreed by the Council
that there would be no problem with having the PCA come out.
The problem of not having a stub on the paychecks was also brought to
the Council's attention. Ken feels that it is necessary that withholding
knowledge is known and made available to employees. Donatus Vetsch commented
that employees are entitled to see the amounts withheld. Maureen stated
that the City's checks are not set up in such a way to have a stub at
this time.
COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
PAGE 7
One other problem brought up by Ken Lindsay was the matter of the phones.
He feels that his phone is not being answered because the lines are busy,
therefore, he is missing calls and Maureen is missing calls. There is
no solution to the phone problem with the way they are set up now. Ken
suggested a possible 3 line phone on Lorie's desk to accomodate calls
coming in.
Maureen will check into some phone systems to see if the problem can be
alleviated.
There was no other business so a caution to adj n the meeting was made
by Donatus Vetsch and seconded by Bob Braun. All were in favor and the
motion carried.
4y-)a��HL��
4
YCC/kc� /�5/SrL�crrc...c.-w
Albertville
RmflyCareCmter
5975 Main Ave. N.E., P. O. Box 220, Albertville, MN 55301-0220
January 18, 1988
Mr. Mario DeMatteis
St. Michael -Albertville Hlgh )ol
101 Central Avenue West
St. Michael, MN 55376
Dear Mr. DeMattei.:>:
I am writing this at the request of a family who receives medical
care fro,D our office.
They have indicated concern to me about safety in the school
during the construction and remodeling process.
They inform me they would like safety information made available
to them regarding the construction materials used at these sites
and the likelihood of their children being exposed to these
materials or other risk situations related to construction.
I am certainly not trying to stir up trouble nor am I trying to
contribute to any inappropriate public fears or concerns. On the
other hand, I am aware of the many new construction techniques and
materials and some of the potential toxicities and precautions
that are necessary in their use. I am aware that many substances
are regulated by OSHA and that information sheets are available
for certain materials. I am also aware of the complexities in
trying to carry out a construction program during the school year
and that there may be times that students are exposed to some of
these substances.
Many of the substances used and the exposures may be perfectly
safe and the public should be reassured. If more hazardous sub-
-stances are being used, npprnnriste precautions woiild need to be
made or the public notified. Certain children may be more sus-
ceptible to exposure to some materials, such as those children with
upper or lower respiratory problems.
As a representative of my patients and as the Albertville City
Health Officer, I am merely suggesting that these concerns may
warrant your thoughtful attention and consideration as appropriate.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
.David E. Ehlenz, M.D./
g
cc: Nancy Bistodeau
ID"A'PfD1`IL%lAir� PFEIFER, M.D.
Diplomates, American Board of Family Practice
Phone. (612) 497-2850 / 24 Hours a Day
r-
"EMPLOYEE
RIGHT TO KNOW
ACT OF 1983910
Prepared by:
THE DEPARTMENT OF
LABOR & INDUSTRY
INTRODUCTION
The Employee Right -To -Know Act was passed by the State
Legislature during the 1983 session and will be enforced as
part of the Occupational F 4y and Health program in the De-
partment of Labor and Industry. This brochure will briefly high-
light the main points of the law. It is not intended to cover all of
the technical aspects involved.
SUMMARY OF THE LAW
The Employee Right -To -Know Act is intended to ensure that
employees are aware of the dangers associated with hazard-
ous substances, harmful physical agents, or infectious
agents (in hospitals and clinics) that they may be exposed to in
their workplaces. The Act requires employers to evaluate(
their workplaces for the presence of hazardous substances,`
harmful physical agents, and infectious agents and to provide
training to employees concerning those substances r agents
to which employees may be exposed. Written information on
�-. hazardous substances, harmful physical agents or infectious
agents must be ram( accaesi t o employees or their repre-
sentatives. Employee�e a conditional right to refuse to
work under imminent danger conditions or if the required in-
formation and training are not provided by the employer. La-
beling requirements for containers of hazardous substances
and equipment or work areas that generate harmful physical
agents are also included in the Act.
f
WHO THE LAW APPLIES TO:
All places of employment in Minnesota which have gross
revenue in excess of $1,000,000 or that employ more than 20
full-time employees (or that employ part-time employees who
work the equivalent hours of more than 20 full-time employ-
ees).
EXCEPTIONS:
1. (a) Farms with more than 10 employees or those that op-
erate a temporary labor camp must comply.
(b) Farms with 10 or less employees need only furnish,
upon request, information from labels of containers
containing hazardous substances to which employ-
ees are exposed.
2. Waste service employers regulated under the Federal Re-
source Conservation and Recovery Act must develop a
training program, have that program approved by the Com-
missioner of Labor and Industry, and ensure training of
their employees in accordance with the approved plan.
3. Hospitals and clinics of any size must comply with the "In-
fectious Agents" requirements.
:,,,:;:,•,;,;;,,;�„,:�a=:.;.Ar�r,,4rn;,.r:>K q, "Technically qualified individuals" working in labs or
health care facilities (those persons who, because of pro-
fessional or technical education, training or experience,
understand the hazards involved prior to the time of expo-
sure) are exempt from some requirements of the law.
`. 2
.t"
HAZARDS LISTS
• The Employee Right -To -Know Standard includes lists of
hazardous substances, harmful physical agents and infec-
tious agents to aid employers in evaluating their work-
places. The lists are not all-inclusive and will not always be
up-to-date; therefore, employers must evaluate their work-
places to determine if other substances or agents are
present in the workplace.
• The hazardous substance list contains approximately 750
substances coded to refer to a document that has occupa-
tional exposure information on the particular substance.
• The harmful physical agent list contains four physical
agents: heat, noise, ionizing radiation, and non -ionizing ra-
diation.
• The infectious agent list, which contains approximately 70
bacterial, viral and fungal agents, is also coded to refer to a
document that contains information concerning the partic-
ular agent
3
1
REQUIREMENTS
1(
Informational data sheets covering the hazardous effects
and properties of "Hazardous Substances" to which employ-
ees may be exposed must be readily accessible at the work-
t place.
9 Training must be provided to all employees assigned to jobs
1 in which they are routinely exposed to "Hazardous Sub-
stances" or "Harmful Physical Agents." The training must
cover:
1. Names of the substances or agents.
2. Hazardous level, of exposure, if known, and the acute
and chronic effects of exposure.
3. Symptoms of the effects.
4. Potential for flammability, explosion, and reactivity
(with other chemicals or substances).
5. Proper conditions for use and exposure.
6. Appropriate emergency treatment.
7. Procedures for cleaning up leaks and spills.
8. Name, phone number, and address of a manufacturer of
the substance or agent.
9. Availability, in the hazardous area, of a written copy of
the above information.
Hospitals and clinics must provide training to their employ-
ees cn infectious agents to which those employees are rou-
tinely exposed. The training program must include the chain
of infection, techniques to avoid self -contamination, hazards
to special at -risk groups, recommended immunization prac-
tices, and how to obtain additional information.
4
't.
ok,•jt .t
4
EMPLOYEE RIGHTS
;:.s4;i? j�t?i?M �t:�i�,,r?i? Nr�!��:a? 1V►riiy!
• To receive information and training on "Hazardous Sub-
stances," "Harmful Physical Agents," or "Infectious
Agents" to which they may be exposed.
• To be trained on the hazards of the above.
• To refuse to work under imminent danger conditions or if re-
quired information and training are not provided by the em-
ployer.
EMPLOYER RIGHTS
• To assign employees to alternative jobs until hazardous
conditions can be eliminated or until proper training has C
been provided.
• To request a signed statement from employees verifying
that training was received.
• Protection of trade secrets.
3
W
( EFFECTIVE DATES
JANUARY 1, 1g84
I. Written information on all hazardous substances, harmful
Physical agents, and infectious agents used in the work-
place must be accessible to employees.
2. New employees assigned to jobs in which they are rou-
tinely exposed to "Hazardous Substances," "Harmful
Physical Agents," or "Infectious Agents" must be given
training on the hazards involved.
MARCH 1, 1 g84
1,
1. Waste service employers must implement their training
programs.
Ii
i
JULY 1, 1884 I
1. All employees routinely exposed to "Hazardous Sub-
stances," "Harmful Physical Agents," or "Infectious
Agents" must be trained on hazards involved.
i
2. The right to refuse to work provisions become effective.
JUNE 1, 1 g85 ,
1. Farms with more than 10 employees or
s of any size
that operate a temporary labor camp mustncomply with
training requirements.
6
++111 L•r �
INFORMATION
For more information about the law, you may contact any of
the following Department of Labor and Industry offices.
St. Paul Office
444 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, MN sa 101
Phone: (612) 286-2116
Duluth Office
108 Government Services Center
320 West Second Street
Duluth, MN 55802
Phone: (218) 723-4678
Brainerd Office
413 N.E. Washington
Brainerd, MN 56401
Phone: (218) 828-2455
Mankato Office C
410 South Fifth Street
Mankato, MN 56001
Phone: (507) 388-6301
Minnesota Health Department
717 S.E. Delaware
PO Box 8441
Minneapolis, MN 55440
Phone: (612) 623-5334
Printed by the Minnesota State Printing Office.
7
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
P. O. BOX 131
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA 55301
PHONE: (612) 497-3384
ALBERTVILLE, MN
COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
FEBRUARY 16, 1988
MEYER PHILLIPS 66 STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE
BACKGROUND
On November 16, 1987, the City of Albertville was approached to consider
the use of tax increment financing assistance on the Patrick Meyer Project
(A Phillips 66 Station and Convenience Store). The Council received a cost
breakdown (attached) which suggested a total project cost of $748.000.00.
The Council indicated that the project was generally acceptable to be considered
for Tax Increment Assistance, but that further review by the City's Tax
Increment consultant, Holmes & Graven, was required; along with a deposit
of $1,000.00 to initiate the City's review of the project.
On January 4, 1988, Christine M. Chale of Holmes & Graven, outlined the
details of the project (see attached memo).
She indicated the developer was asking for $50,000 to $90,000.00 in public
assistance to finance special disbursements and land acquisition costs.
(The Developer has an option to purchase the land).
It was suggested the project would generate between $3,500 and $6,500 in
increment beginning in 1989.
The City would need to amend its existing district or create a new district
to accomodate this project.
The Developer also proposed utilizing $25,000 in excess project funds from
the 1984A Issue to fund costs associated with this project. A Plan Amendment
would be required.
A meeting was scheduled to discuss this project but was delayed due to difficulty
with the Wright County Assesor's Office in establishing a value for the
project (see attached).
That data was forwarded to Holmes & Graven, and on January 28, 1988, Christine
forwarded another memo (attached) to the City regarding this proposed project.
The increment range was projected at $3,135 to $8,180.00 beginning in 1990.
Christine Chale outlined two options for discussion. A General Obligation
Bond Issue. Or, a pass thru arrangement, whereby public assistance is provided
.-. the developer in smaller amounts over time, only if arit' as tax increment
is received.
Make our City........ Your City
We invite Home, Industry, Business
n
COUNCIL ACTION ITEM
PAGE 2
A copy of all documents relative to this project were forwarded to Brad
Farnham with Juran and Moody, Inc. for his review and comment as the City's
Financial Advisor.
On February 1, 1988, the Council met with Mr. Farnham to discuss his reaction
to the project. He advised that the City not issue its General Obligation
Bonds to assist this project. He recommended that the Council only consider
pass thru I assistance annually over a period of time, only if, and
as, tax increment is received.
He cautioned the City Council against accessing the 1984A Bond Issue excess
project funds as the Developer had requested at this point in time.
He pointed out that the projected increment of between $3,100 and $8,100
would support less than $50,000.00 in Bond Proceeds before expenses of issuance.
Between $35,000 and $40,000 would be available after expenses were paid.
He felt the increment was too marginal to justify the sale of bonds.
The Developer and his attorney, John Gries, appealed for the assistance,
indicating that City participation was needed to complete the financing
package......
The City's costs to amend the plan to allow the pass thru assistance were
estimated at $10,000.00. The City was asked to consider repayment of those
costs over time as the increment was received. The Council did
not accept that plan.
Action was not taken, and the Council decided to schedule a workshop to
discuss this project and to review use of Tax Increment Assistance histori-
cally, and for the future.
The workshop was held on February 9, 1988.
The Meyer Project was discussed.
It was determined that:
1. It would cost $8,000 to $10,000.00 to amend the City's plan
to accommodate this project. The City felt this should be
paid up -front by the Developer rather than over time.
2. The Tax Increment Assistance is very small for this project.
$3,500 annually over 8 years.
$3,500 x 8 - $28,000.00
The Council wondered how stable this project was, if $28,000 in cash over
eight years was going to "make or break" this project.
ACTION ITEMS:
1. The Council finds that the Tax Increment generated by the Meyer Project
is not of a magnitude to warrant public assistance consideration.
2. The Project is similiar to 2 existing adjacent businesses who have not
been assisted with Tax Increment Financing. AsqRfpnce to the Meyer
Project could give the appearance of unfair advort.'
3. The Council supports the Meyer Project, but will ob't, over time, subsidize the
$10,000.00 in City expenses to assist the project.
BARTHEL CONSTRUCTION, INC.
21370 John Milless Drive, Rogers, MN 55374
Phone: (612) 428-4381
November 16, 1987
COST BREAKDOWN
RE: PATRICK MEYER PROJECT
BUILDING--------------------$200,500.
BUILDING - OUTSIDE ---------- 195,000.
BUILDING - INSIDE ----------- 50,000.
INVENTORY ------------------- 35,000.
SITE WORK ------------------- 74,500.
SUBTOTAL----------$555,000.
LAND------------------------$127,000.
SUBTOTAL----------$682,000.
START-UP --------------------$ 32,000.
CONTINGENCY -----------------$ 34,000.
TOTAL-------------$748,000.
n
Christine M. Chale
Attorney at law
Direct Dial (612) 337-9210
January 4, 1988
Ms. Maureen Andrews
City Clerk -Treasurer
City of Albertville
City Hall
Albertville, Minnesota 55301
Re: City of Albertville
Patrick Meyer Project
Dear Ms. Andrews:
OOLMES & GRAVEN
CHARTERED
470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(612) 337-9300
You have asked use to review a tax increment project proposed to be constructed
by Patrick Meyer. We have received from the Developer's attorney, John Gries,
drawings and specifications, a cost breakdown of the project, and a survey of the
property.
The total project costs have been represented by the Developer to be as shown on
the attached letter. The Developer has requested $50,000 to $90,000 in City tax
increment financing in order to go forward with the project. The Developer has
indicated that they have certain public development costs attributable to the
project including special disbursements and land acquisition costs. If the Developer
is already the owner of the land, a land writedown is difficult to structure.
Based on the information provided to us and conversations with the county
assessor's office, it appears that the project upon completion will generate
approximately $3,500 to $6,500 in real estate taxes. For discussion purposes, even
using an original assessed value of $0 and assuming the project is completed in 1988
and fully assessed in 1989, the annual increment generated beginning in 1989 would
be $3,500 to $6,500.
The project is located in Development District No. 1 of the City but is not in a
current tax increment district. If the City expands an existing tax increment
financing district to include the project, the increment would be available until
April 1992, for District No. 1, or until 1993, for District No. 2.
If the City created a new tax increment financing district for the project, the
increment would be available for 8 years from the date of receipt of the first
increment or 10 years from approval of the tax increment financing plan,
whichever is less.
The Developer has also proposed that the City use $25,000 in excess project funds
from its General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds, Series 1984A to pay for a portion
of the project. The City would be required to amend the tax increment plan for
the original project to permit such an expenditure. The original bonds mature in
the years 1987 to 1994 at rates from 9.6% to 10.5%, and are not callable prior to
their maturity. If the City determines that available increment is sufficient to pay
the outstanding bonds as they become due, the excess funds may be devoted to
another purpose authorized pursuant to the tax increment financing plan and
C.
applicable laws. They must be used for public costs which are authorized costs for
an economic development district project.
In summary, the City has the following options:
(1) Amend an existing district plan to include the project and capture
increment for up to the remaining 4 to 5 years;
(2) Create a new district and capture increment for up to 8 years;
(3) With option 1 or 2, either issue bonds to finance public project costs
up front, with the bonds to be retired from tax increment generated
by the project, or agree to pay for such project costs over time as
increment is generated;
(4) Amend the prior financing plans to permit the use of all or a portion
of the excess $25,000 in bond proceeds for the project; or
(5) Determine that the City does not wish to finance any costs of the
project at this time.
Obviously the above options involve differing costs to the City relating to
amending tax increment plans, creating a new tax increment plan and financing
costs.
Please let me know if you would like to discuss these options further or if you
would like us to begin work on any of the proposed plans. A new or amended tax
increment financing plan as described above would require a public hearing.
Very truly yours,
Christine M. Chale
CMC:tk
OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR
WRIGHT COUNTY COURTHOUSE
BUFFALO, MINNESOTA 55313
Telephone: 682-3900 (Ext. 100)
Metro: 339-6881
January 20, 1988
Mr. Walt Hartman
7731 West 22nd Street
Minneapolis, MN 55426
DOUGLAS M. GRUBER,
COUNTY ASSESSOR
Orland Kreitlow, Asst. County Assessor
Duane Swenson, Appraiser
Randal DesMarais, Appraiser
Re: Tax Estimate for Proposed Convenience Store, ID #101-500-011200
Dear Mr. Hartman:
This estimate is meant to replace my previous letter of January 14, 1988.
As I stated in our phone conversation, I will give you a range of value
that this property once improved would probably fall into.
Land: 1.53 acres @ 30o, per square foot = $ 20,000
Building: 2,500 sq. ft. @ $26 = $ 65,000
Total estimated market value, _ $ 85,000
Land: 1.53 acres @ $1.00 per sq. ft. _ $ 66,600
Building: 2,500 sq. ft. @ $45.50 = $113,800
Total estimated market value = $180,400
Presently, we do not have any property in Albertville along I-94 valued
at $1.00 per sq. ft. The per sq. ft. value used on the higher estimate
is out of Marshall and Swift Valuation Service using a Class C, Good
Convenience Store rate.
The property tax that would be generated at the above value if payable in
1988 would be as follows:
EMV Assessed Value Mil Rate
$ 85,000 $ 27,550 122.924
$180,400 $ 68,572 122.924
*Does not include special assessments.
If you have any further questions, feel free to contact me.
incerely,
D( la M. Gruber
W t County Assessor
Estimated Tax*
$ 3,385
$ 8,430
e
HOLMES & GRAVEN
CHARTERED
Christine M. Chale 470 Pillsbury Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Attorney at Law (612) 337-9300
Direct Dial (612) 337-9210
January 28, 1988
Ms. Maureen Andrews
City Clerk -Treasurer
City of Albertville
City Hall
Box 131
Albertville, Minnesota 55301
Re: Pat Meyer Convenience Store
Dear Ms. Andrews:
Enclosed please find revised estimates of the county assessor's office regarding the
expected valuation of the proposed project. He indicates a possible range of
market values from $85,000 to $180,400 depending on the valuation measures
ultimately used. He has calculated the high range based on a national valuation
standard which is typically adjusted for application in a particular graphical area.
Based on the assessor's letter and our conversations with them, it appears unlikely
that the assessor will ultimately assess the project at the high end of the market
value range given.
Based on the assessor's market value figures and the current mill rate, the
estimated tax collected from the Project would be $3,385 to $8,430 annually. The
original assessed value of the parcel is approximately $7,300, and that figure would
be increased by 7% per year pursuant to an inflation adjustment formula applied to
economic development districts. The collected increment would therefore range
from $3,135 to $8,180.
Assuming approval of a plan in spring 1988, completion of construction in 1988' full
assessed value on January 2, 1989 and taxes initially collected in July and
December of 1990, increment would be available from 1990 to Spring of 1998,
providing for seven to seven and one-half years of receipt of increment.
If the City chooses to finance the Project, it has several options as outlined in my
letter of January 4, 1988.
The City could amend an existing district plan to include the project
and capture 4 to 5 years of remaining increment, or approximately
$15,675 to $40,900. Administrative costs to prepare the amendment
would be somewhat lower than for a new plan ;but the increment
amount would be significantly lower.
Ms. Maureen Andrews
January 28, 1988
Page Two
The City could instead create a new district and capture 7 1/2 years
of increment, or approximately $23,512 to $61,350. For your
planning purposes, our fees for preparation of a new tax increment
plan for this project would be approximately $4,500.
2. The City could issue general obligation bonds to capture the
increment and pay the bonds with increment as received, or could
fund the improvements over time. If the City issued general
obligation bonds to finance the public improvements based on the
high end of the estimates, and the actual taxes are lower so that not
enough increment is produced, the City would be required to use its
general funds or, if they are insufficient, to levy a tax to pay the
bonds. To avoid this potential problem, the City could choose to
finance either a smaller amount based on the lower estimates or to
finance the improvements only as increment is received. In that
case, the company would be required to fund the improvements and
receive payments from the City over time but only if and as tax
increment is received.
3. As discussed previously, the City could amend its prior financing plan
to permit the use of all or a portion of its other excess project funds.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
Ve.sy trul yours,
(f'
N' -
Christine M. Chale
CMC:tas
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Robert Miller
'1 February 15, 1988
MEMO TO: City of Albertville City Council
FROM: Loren Kohnen Oel t
Building Inspector
RE: Albertville School Building Addition
All plans for public schools must be reviewed by the State Building Code
Division. The plans for the above school addition and materials for the
project from footings to floor coverings have been reviewed by the State
Building Code Division and myself. According to State law, these plans
were approved by the State and myself.
The plans were drawn by a state registered architech and the building is
be constructed by a bonded and reputable contractor.
The contractor is using customary methods and materials.
If any problems arise from this project, it is the sole responsibility
of the contractor, architect and building owner to correct any and all
problems.
The City of Albertville nor the building inspector have no control over
methods or procedures of applying and installing any or all materials and
cannot accept any responsibility of same.
FEASIBILITY STUu�(
For
Barthel Manor Seccnd Addition
Street lmpro>{MT;.�nt
City of .Albertville
FESRIJARY I. I9R8 E--aac:I —j
E-1
0
Cl
0
9
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR
BARTHEL MANOR SECOND ADDITION STREET IMPROVEMENTS
E-8801-B
February 1, 1988
I hereby certify that this plan, specification,
or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Thore P. Meyer
Reg. No. 6218
Ja
9
4
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC.
ENGINEERS -LAND SURVEYORS 1111 Hwy. 25 N., Buffalo, Minn.55313 Phone 612- 682-1781
February 1, 1988
City of Albertville
c/o Maureen Andrews, Administrator
Box 131
Albertville, MN 55301
Re: Barthel Manor Second Addition Street Improvements
Honorable Mayor and City Council:
As requested, we have completed the Feasibility Study for
the above referenced project.
Project Location
The project is located in the southeast quadrant of the
City of Albertville, see attachment 1, and consists of Lansing
Avenue and Locust Court, within Barthel Manor Second Addition,
51st Street Northeast from 53rd Street Northeast to Barthel
Drive and Barthel Drive from 52nd Street Northeast to a point
approximately 225 feet south of 51st Street Northeast.
Street Improvements
The proposed street improvements would consist of the
installation of surmountable curb and gutter, 37 feet from back
to back of curb on the above described areas, with the exception
of Barthel Drive. Barthel Drive, due to the collector and
industrial road status, would be improved with B-618 curb and
gutter, 45 feet from back to back of curb. The street surfaces
would consist of a 3 inch bituminous pavement with the exception
of Barthel Drive which shall have 4 inch. Minor gravel
placement and shaping of the existing gravel street will be
required prior to paving the road. All boulevard areas shall be
shaped with black dirt and seeded.
Estimated Cost
Below you shall find the estimated costs for the above
described improvements. We have broken these numbers down in
Thore P. Meyer, Professional Engineer Robert Rohlin, Licensed Land Surveyor
this manner to provide your bond representatives an easier to
read cost summary.
Construction $114,900
Engineering (13%) $ 14,900
Legal (City Attorney) (1%) $ 1,150
Administration (1%) $ 1,150
Contingencies (5%) $ 5,800
Project Cost $137,900
Please be aware that bonding and financing costs must be
added to the above figures to provide a total project cost by
which preliminary assessments may be calculated.
Conclusion
The above described improvements are feasible and will
result in a benefit to the adjacent properties.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
sl
File: 8801-B
Sincerely yours,
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC.
Norman Gartner
Professional Engineer
1 it 1 4.
C
F
\ i 1
I L
L Ell L
CITY OF
ALE3ERTViLLE
LOCATION MAP
11 Proj�ct
W, ir, F, Are&
8
RTOEq
Mj ]NOR
S CINDIAD
ITION
Attachment I
E-
PROP SED B618 CONCRET
CURB ND GUTTER
AND BITUMINOUS STREET
PROPOSED SURMOUNTABLE
d-
COWC-RETE CUR B
AND GUTTER ANDi 11
d—BITU M-1-N-O U S S T R E E �o�R
, �o cus ,
� z I ,
I
Attachment 2
FEASIBILITY STUDY
For
Psyks Fourth Addition
Street Improvement
City of Albertville
MEYER -ROHLIN,1HC
ENGINEERS-LA,ND SURVEYORS
1111 Hwy. 25N., Buffalo, Minn. 5 53 1y
FEBRUARY 1.1938 E-8801-C
FEASIBILITY REPORT
FOR
PSYKS FOURTH ADDITION STREET IMPROVEMENTS
E-8801-C
February 1, 1988
I hereby certify that this plan, specification,
or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
Thore P. Meyer
Reg. No. 6218
iY I�il
n
OEYER-ROHLIN, INC. O O
ENGINEERS -LAND SURVEYORS 1111 Hwy. 25 N., Buffalo, Minn.55313 Phone 612-682-1781
February 1, 1988
City of Albertville
c/o Maureen Andrews, Administrator
Box 131
Albertville, MN 55301
Re: Psyks Fourth Addition Street Improvements
Honorable Mayor & City Council:
rAs requested, we have completed the Feasibility Study for
the above referenced project.
Project Location
The project is located in the central section of the City
of Albertville, see attachment 1, and consists of 54th Street
Northeast from Lannon Circle to Lambert Avenue Northeast,
Lambert Avenue Northeast, 541 Street Northeast and Lander Avenue
Northeast from 54th Street Northeast to 55th Street Northeast.
Street Improvements
The proposed street improvements would consist of surmoun-
able curb and gutter, 37 feet from back to back of curb or-, t:)e
above described areas. The street surface would consist of a
inch bituminous pavement. Minor gravel placement and shaping of
the existing gravel street will be required prior to paving the
road. All boulevard areas shall be shaped with black dirt and
seeded.
Estimated Cost
Below you shall find the estimated costs for the above
described improvements. We have broken these numbers down in
this manner to provide your bond representatives an easier to
read cost summary.
Thore P. Meyer, Professional Engineer Robert Rohlin, Licensed Land Surveyor
Construction
$ 82,800
Engineering (13%)
$ 10,800
Legal (City Attorney) (1%)
$ 800
Administration (1%)
Contingencies (5%)
$ 800
$ 4,200
Project Cost
$ 99,400
Please be aware that bonding and
added to the above figures to
financing costs must be
provide
which preliminary assessments could be
a total project cost by
calculated.
Conclusion
.
The above described improvements are feasible and will
result in a benefit to the adjacent
properties.
.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely yours,
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC.
Norman Gartner
Professional Engineer
sl
File: F-8801-C
M
�I
I
i
11
-- i - -�
I
I `
1
I ' I � ;
-� -- I
� I
i Project - --- _► _. �. _ _ _ . \�\\
I Area
PSYKS FOURTH ADDrTION_I
I I F I
I11
' I I CITY OFE ALBRTViEILL
I - - I x.HIONT COIINTvI41NN..0 TA I
I � T
'.
I �
I LOCATION MAP Attachment I
I
PROPOSED
SURMOUNTABLE _CONCRE
CURB D ANGUTTER
AND BITUMINOUS STREET
2 W
- 2
Q W
I -
� W W
J
I
ST `
N KE
Cr z
i
SSTM I I ST. NE i
_ W� w
i
_ - Attachment 2
FEASIBILITY STUDY
Of The
HIGHWAY 37 INTERCEPTOR,
LIFT STATION & FORCEMAIN
For
Albertville, Minnesota
E-8801 D
MEYER- ROHLIN, INC
44 ENOIHEERS-L &D SURVEYORS
1111 Hwy. 25H., Buffalo, Minn. 55313
FEASIBILITY STUDY
OF THE
HIGHWAY 37 INTERCEPTOR, LIFT STATION & FORCEMAIN
FOR
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC.
ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
1111 HIGHWAY 25 NORTH
BUFFALO, MINNESOTA
February, 1988
E-8801-D
I hereby certify that this plan, specification
or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
re P. Meyer
Reg. No. 6218
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC.
. ENGINEERS -LAND SURVEYORS 1111 Hwy. 25N., Buffalo, Minn.55313 Phone 612-682-1781
0
N
City of Albertville
c/o Maureen Andrews, Administrator
Box 131
Albertville, MN 55301
February 15, 1988
NRe: Highway 37 Interceptor, Lift Station, and Forcemain
. Honorable Mayor and City Council:
As requested, we have completed the Feasibility Study for the
above referenced project.
Project Location
The project is located in the northwestern section of the City of
Albertville, see attachment 1, and consists of the construction of
an interceptor to run along County Road 37, crossing County Road
19, and then running along the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks
rto the lift station. A forcemain will cross the railroad tracks
and terminate in an existing manhole on Lambert Avenue Northeast.
Interceptor
The interceptor will be a 2450-foot, 12-inch gravity line. It
will service the Darkenwald development area originally, and will
also connect into the existing 12-inch pipe which crosses
Thore P. Meyer, Professional Engineer Robert Rohlin, Licensed Land Surveyor
0
page 2
Interstate 94. This will allow for future sanitary sewer service
for the area north of the interstate.
Lift Station
The lift station will be a submersible pump lift station. It will
contain 2-175 gpm pumps. It will service most of the remaining
undeveloped land in Albertville.
Costs provided in this study do not include costs for a standby
generator or a building to house the lift station controls.
Initially a standby generator will not be necessary since there
will be storage in the sewer lines and lift station. As more
connections are added, a generator will be needed to insure
reliability. A portable generator will probably be recommended at
that time, since it could be used at both of the auxiliary lift
stations.
The City's wastewater operator, Mr. Ken Lindsay, has requested
that a building be added to house the controls and an alarm system
be provided that is similar to the one under order for the main
lift station. A building for the controls would provide a safer
working environment for the wastewater operators. A prefabricated
metal building could be supplied at minimum cost. There is also
available a fiberglass reinforced plastic power module type of
structure which may be even less expensive. Although we do not
consider a building or module to be absolutely essential for this
type of lift station, we will provide cost estimates for either of
these options at the City's request.
Forcemain
— The forcemain will be a 6-inch ductile iron pipe. At the railroad
crossing we propose to utilize a 30-inch casing and place both a
6-inch pipe and a 12-inch pipe inside of this casing. The 12-inch
t
page 3
pipe would then be available when flows increase beyond the
capability of the 6-inch pipe.
Estimated Cost
Below you shall find the estimated costs for the described
improvements. We have broken these numbers down in this manner to
provide your bond representative an easier -to -read cost summary.
Construction
12" PVC (14'-16')
12" PVC (18'-201)
6" DIP Class 52 (8'-101)
12" DIP
48" Manhole (0-8')
Manhole Extra Depth
Lift station, pumps, S
controls
Crushed rock
12" boring (24" casing)
12" boring (24" casing)
12" & 6" boring
(30" casing)
Density Tests
Seeding & Mulch
Engineering (13%)
Legal (City Attorney) (1%)
Administration (1%)
Contingencies (5%)
Project Cost
Qty.
Unit
Unit Price
Total Price
1450
l.f.
$ 22.00
$31900.00
1000
1.f.
26.00
26000.00
600
1.f.
14.00
8400.00
75
l.f.
23.00
1725.00
6
each
1100.00
6600.00
58
l.f.
75.00
4350.00
1
each
72000.00
72000.00
300
ton
11.00
3300.00
30
l.f.
120.00
3600.00
65
1.f.
120.00
7800.00
60
l.f.
150.00
9000.00
100
each
30.00
3000.00
3
acre
700.00
2100.00
Subtotal
179,775.00
23,370.00
1,800.00
1,800.00
8.990.00
215,735.00
Page 4
Please be aware that bonding and financing costs must be added to
the above figures to provide a total project cost.
Conclusions
The above described improvements are feasible and will result in
a benefit to the adjacent properties.
If you have any questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely yours,
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC.
Bob Sullentrop
Professional Engineer
File: E-8801-D
w
jr
FEASIBILITY STUDY
For The
PROPOSED DARKENWALD DEVELOPMENT
PHASF_
City of
Albertville, Minnesota
E-8801 D
MEYER- ROHLIN,
ENGINEERS-Ud0 SURVEYORS
1111 Hwy. 25N., Bulfalo, Minn. 55313
FEASIBILITY STUDY
FOR THE
PROPOSED DARKENWALD DEVELOPMENT
PHASE 1
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA
February, 1988
E-8801-D
I hereby certify that this plan, specification,
or report was prepared by me or under my direct
supervision and that I am a duly Registered
Professio al Engineer under the laws of the
y/ State of Minnesota.
Thore P. Meyer
Reg. No. 6218
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC.
14 ENGINEERS -LAND SURVEYORS 1111 Hwy. 25 N., Buffalo, Minn.55313 Phone 612-682-1781
February 15, 1988
City of Albertville
c/o Maureen Andrews, Administrator
Box 131
Albertville, MN 55301
Re: Proposed Darkenwald Development Phase I
Feasibility Study
Honorable Mayor & City Council:
As requested, we have completed the Feasibility Study for the above
referenced project.
Proiect Location
The project is located in the northwestern section of the City,
south of County Road 37 and west of County Road 19. It is within
part of the Southeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 121N, Range
24W, and part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 120N,
Range 24W. See attachment 1.
Sanitary Sewer
The sanitary sewer system would consist of 2800 feet of 8-inch PVC
pipe. Sewer services will be 6-inch for the apartment lots and
4-inch for the residential lots. The system will discharge into
the proposed Highway 37 interceptor. See attachments 2 and 3.
Thore P. Meyer, Professional Engineer Robert Rohlin, Licensed Land Surveyor
^ page 2
' Watermain
The water system would consist of 1450 feet of 8-inch ductile iron
pipe (DIP) trunk watermain from the intersection of County Roads 19
and 37 to the First Phase of the Proposed Darkenwald development.
The watermain within the plat would consist of 1550 feet of 8-inch
DIP and 1400 feet of 6-inch DIP. The service lines would be 1-inch
copper for the residential lots and 6-inch DIP for the apartment
lots. See attachments 2, 3 and 4.
Storm Sewer
The storm sewer shall consist of 12-inch to 33-inch pipe located to
' convey the storm water runoff from the low areas and other critical
drainage points to the proposed future street running east and west
through the middle of this development. The storm sewer would
discharge at this time into the existing ditch running south-
westerly across the property. See attachment 5.
Street
The street improvements would consist of a 3-inch bituminous
pavement and surmountable curb and gutter placed over a 12-inch
gravel base. All disturbed areas in the boulevard and utility
easement areas will be restored by seeding or sodding as required.
See attachment 5.
Cost Estimate
Below are the estimated costs for the above described improvements.
We have broken these numbers down in this manner to provide your
bond representatives an easier -to -read cost summary.
page 3
Sanitary Sewer
$ 94,500
Watermain
124,600
Storm Sewer
59,000
Street Construction
222,500
Common Excavation
16,500
Subtotal
$517,100
Engineering (13%)
67,200
Legal (City Attorney) (1%)
5,200
Administration (1%)
5,200
Contingencies (5%)
26,000
Project Cost $620,700
Bonding and financing costs must be added to the above figures to
provide a total project cost.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the above described improvements are feasible and
would be a benefit to the properties herein described.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact us.
Sincerely yours,
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC.
Norman Gartner
Professional Engineer
sl
File: E-8801-D
"AMR
---------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --
- - - - - - - - - -
... -------------
04
elIN
co
Mr IL Ur %r L-
I �
I I
I I
I �
I I
I I
I
I
I I
I I
I I
I
I
i I I
vih!
I
_ 1
jj
i
I I '
I
I '
I
I
L �
i
W.
C
J ! I
a--'
-5 9IL
F ¢ '
�W
J_Q
i
!
uQ;3:ii!
---------------
I
-----------
i
It
r
ADDITIONAL INCOME
FEBRUARY 16, 1988
SEWER ACCOUNTS
GEORGE YANKOUPE
D.J.'S HEATING AND AIR CONDITION,., , INC.
SUBTOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
ADDITIONAL BILLS
FEBRUARY 16, 1988
CHOUINARDS
MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS, INC.
BARCO MUNICIPAL PRODUCTS, INC.
MOTOROLA INC.
SUBTOTAL
GRAND TOTAL
MIKE MERGES
GRAND TOTAL
T
1 Brian
Fredrickson
I Quest Information Systems,Inc.
30.00
100.00
343.45
$ 473.45
$2,074.99
28.38
53.50
41.55
$ 345.43
$54,445.59
334.20
$54,779.79
a
0
2uesf 5normallon CS ems .,Inc.
(612) 470-0707
CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
We understand that council meetings can have pretty full agendas
and that time is very important to all of you. So, I have put
together this brief summary concerning the Quest Utility Billing
System. It is intended to cover information regarding this system
that your clerk has already viewed and discussed with me.
The following list of items are available for you to look at in
detail if you wish.
Proposal - Stating all hardware and software costs with a
separate page for financing alternatives.
Reference List - Listing of all our customers by city, contact
name and phone number.
Hardware Specs - Detailed information on our hardware.
UBS Report Pamphlet - Includes samples of reports, billing cards
and the actual menu selections you would see on the computer.
Benefit Listing - Specific benefits of the Quest UBS system.
System Features - Complete listing of what the Quest UBS system
can do for your city.
Future Developments - Introduction to some of the software Quest
will be marketing in the near future.
Quest Information Systems,Inc. is known in the industry as a full
service computer vendor. This means that we are involved with
every aspect of your computer purchase. The followin
pa
illustrates what you can expect from Quest should you decide to
purchase our system.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Respectfully Submitted,
Xf
Brian Fredrickson
Quest Information Systems,Inc.
1
QUEST PROCEDURE FOR NEW CUSTOMERS
This step by step procedure begins immediately after approval
from council. The entire process takes two to three days. You can
use your system immediately, and in most cases, in time for the
next billing.
1. I begin the process by obtaining your Billing information that
will be entered into the system by our support staff. We also
schedule an installation/training date that fits your schedule.
2. I submit your proposal that states all of your computer
hardware and software needs to our support staff.
3. The computer hardware is then setup and tested to assure it is
in proper working condition.
4. All of your rate tables and city information is entered in to
your UBS software program.
5. The support staff continues by testing the software with your
information on it, and sets up your main screen on the computer.
6. Your manual is then put together, including our sheet
indicating the types and prices of supplies we offer for your
computer.
7. We give you a call confirming the time of installation.
S. The system is delivered and installed.
9. Training begins for everyone interested in using the computer.
10. With training completed, we recap the session and make sure
you are comfortable with the workings of the computer and
software.
il. Our toll -free number is given to you for any questions,
problems or supply orders you may have in the future.
There you have it. One company, providing your city with
professional hardware, software, service and support. Now that is
what you would expect from your computer company, isn't it?
QUEST... SEARCHING -PROVIDING -SUPPORTING CITIES AND WATER ASSOC'S.
a
2uesf 512 OPmaflon 6 ems, Jnc.
16 7 2) 470-0707
THE [QUEST UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM
PROPOSAL FOR
ALBERTVILLE, MN
February 10, 1988
Hardware Overview
Multitech Acer 710 Computer
12MZ Clock: Speed
768K RAM/Clock Calendar
360K Floppy Disk. Drive
Amdek Amber Monitor
20MB Hard Dist; Drive
IBM XT Style keyboard
All Computer Cabling
Epson FX286e Printer (Wide Carriage)
TOTAL HARDWARE COST $2,494.00
Software Overview
Enhanced Version QUEST Software
THE UTILITY BILLING SYSTEM
2 , 7G0 , CJC1
Annual Software Updates and Rate Changes 250.00
Electronic Spreadsheet
149.00
Computer Care Package 700-00
TOTAL SOFTWARE COST
$3 , 299 . (00
TOTAL SYSTEM COST
$5,793.00)
The system comes complete with all hardware literature, as well
as software literature and system manuals. Also included is a
training manual and training diskettes loaded on your system. The
computer care package includes the following ''ems: Box of paper,
2 spare printer ribbons, 20 diskettes, dust coA rs and the
Friendly Writer word processor. The followinq.page illustrates
your lease rates and optional hardware you mwY wish to purchase.
El
APPLICATION FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING
To:
City
Council of the
City of Albertville
From:
John
F. Darkenwa.ld
and George W. Yankoupe
The undersigned George W. Yankoupe, individually, and on
behalf of John F. Darkenwald, hereby applies to the City of
Albertville for Planned Development Zoning pursuant to the
provisions of Section 420 (15A) of the City ordinances.
Attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference is a
copy of the Petition for Local Improvements and Rezoning
previously submitted.
I. The legal description is set out on Exhibit A of the
attached Petition for Local Improvements and Rezoning. The
site contains approximately 105 acres.
2. Site plans with reference to individual parcels pursuant
to Section 420 (10A) will be filed with applications for
building permits. Exhibit B attached hereto shows typical
single family lots with placement of structures within
proposed set back lines.
3. Concept plan demonstrating the proposed development and
use of property hereto attached as Exhibit C.
4. The projected use of property is single family
residential with some duplex lots, multiple residential in
form of apartments, park and recreational area and commercial
uses adjacent to County Road 19 and intersection of County
Roads 19 and 37.
S. The underlying basic zoning is presently agricultural,
but the proposed uses fit the long range guide plan
classifications.
6. The single family residential area is divided into 3
Phases with Phase I development occurring as soon as all
municipal services are available this spring. We project
that Phases 11 and III will develop over the following 2 or 3
years. We project immediate start of apartments for multiple
residential and will continue as market demand dictates. We
Project that Commercial development will follow other
development since growth of residential is essential to
stimulate commercial development; however, some limited
commercial development may occur as soon as sites are
available.
7. City utilities are essential for development and have
been petitioned for pursuant to Minnesota. Statutes, Chapter
429 for Phase I. Other utilities such as gas, electric and
telephone are readily available. Extension of city utilities
to Phases II and III will occur as market demand dictates and
may be installed either by petitions pursuant to Minnesota.
Statutes, Chapter 429 or directly by developer.
S. Applicant will comply with the re irements of all
applicable ordinances. ii z,--
Dated:
Geor,te W. Yankoupe
J& ou')Wys
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
Re: Petition for Local Improvements and Rezoning
To: City Council, City of Albertville
From: Petitioners Michael R. Becker and Trudy A. Becker,
Owners, and John F. Darkenwald and George W. Ya.nkoupe,
Option Holders.
Petitioners are the owners and purchasers of the property
described on the attached Exhibit A. The property is being
purchased from the Clemens Dehmer Estate by Michael R. and
Trudy A. Becker by Contract for Deed and said Beckers have
granted an option to John F. Da.rkenwald to purchase said
premises. George W. Yankoupe now holds an interest in the
option. It is the intention of the Option Holders to pay off
the Dehmer fee interest immediately following final plat
approval and prior to the public hearings on final plat.
Petitioners are the owners of all of the property (subject to
the interest of the Dehmer Estate as above set out) abutting
the streets proposed to be platted as Phase I in the property
described in the attached Exhibit A and we hereby petition
_ that such streets be improved by constructing water mains,
sanitary sewers, storm sewers and streets pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 and that said lands be
rezoned pursuant to city ordinance No 1975-5, as amended,
into the appropriate single family, multiple dwelling and
commercial classification in order to a.ccomodate the Planned
Development Zoning which petitioners will request.
Signatures of Owners Address
Petitioners hereby waive their right to a public hearing
Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statures 429.031 and
authorize the City to assess the entire cost of the
improvement project against our property abutting said
improvements based on benefits received without regards to
cash valuation.
Examined, checked and found to be signed by the required
number of owners of property affected by the making of the
improvement petitioned for.
Date
City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
To Petition to City of Albertville for Local Improvements and
Rezoning.
The North 169 feet of that part of NW 1/4 of Sect. l-
120-24 lying west of County Road #19; the north 35 acres
of NE 1/4 of Section 2-120-24 except tract described in
book 254 of Deeds page 724 and tract described in boot:
278 of deed page 317; that part of the SE 1/4 of Sec.
35-121-24 hying South of railway, containing 105 acres
more or less, according to the Government Survey
thereof,
The property identification numbers of the affected parcels
are as follows:
I. See attached Exhibit A
2. #101-500-354300
3. #101-500-021102
4. #101-500-012201
February 3, 1988
Mayor Loretta Roden
City Council Members
City of Albertville
5964 Main Ave. NE
Alberville, Minnesota 55301
Dear Mayor Roden and Council Members:
Consistent_ with our agreement, Jones Intercable is happy to submit to you
a check that represents three percent 0%) of the gross revenue in your
city for 1987.
Jones Intercable acquired this system in May 1987 and therefore the
check enclosed, covers May through December (1987). The first four (4)
months, January through April, were previously paid by Rite Cable
Company in August (1987).
For your convenience we have added a month -by -month computation of revenue,
from payments that were received during 1987.
We will continue to work hard to provide excellent service to your resi-
dents.
Regards,
James Daniels
General Manager
30 First Avenue N.E., Buffalo, MN 55313 612/682-5980
X
January 20, 1988
City of Albertville
Albertville, MN 55301
Ref: 1403 Buffalo
Dear Sirs:
Enclosed is our franchise fee check based on the following computation.
For the period ending December 31, 1987:
Gross Receipts
January
$ 0.00
February
0.00
March
0.00
April
0.00
May
3,391.56
June
2,726.28
July
2,480.36
August
2,244.02
September
2 364.95
October
3,685.29
November
3,168.08
December
3,697.54
$23,758.08 @ 3%
Payment:
Sincerely,
JONES INTERCABLE, INC.
Catherine Aper
Fund Accounting Manager
CA;gkz
Enclosure
M
9697 E. Mineral Avenue, Englewood, Colorado 80112 303/792-3111
FORMATION REPORT
oua�FsY: O. J. ARLIEN
WRIGHT COUNTY AUDI
R
March 1987
1�
'S WHERE YOUR MONEY GOES
AVERAGE 1987 TAX LEVY
THE ABOVE SHOWS THEVERAGEoPERTY PAY
•�pT WRIGHT COUNTY TAX DOLLAR
WNERS
WILL HAVE THEIR CURRENTCITY,
DIVIDED TO PJJOOL AY FOR COUNTY, DISTRICT TIP S
TOWNSHIP, S AND SPECIALDISTRICT
POWERLINES
$ERVZCES,
of County
Total
SPECIAL DIST*
WATER -RIVER WATERSHED
CLEAR
CLEA
AVERAGE MILL RATE:
20.800
COUNTY
15.999
CITY1` Vp•
53.112
SC%100L DIST .
1.632
SPEC, DIST.
0,045
10% POWERLINES
2.651
TIP S
94.239
r.
i_� � _ '•-1 ._; '' �_ �. _ i �.: , a _. --:1__r.'. .� � a 1_1- tl�.- -• . r� ..:.. --r-� _��r. �:. • _`1 � _1 • - _` �J �
WRIGHT COUNTY PER CAPITA COST ANALYSIS FOR POLICE PROTECTION 1985;
County population estimates per planning and zoning
Total County Assessed Valuation $358,798,000.00
County Mill Rate 19.719 Proceeds 7,074,952.00
Sheriff Department Costs $2,455,573.00
Deduct from this the revenue generated 686,835.00 Est.
from contract fees, Civil Process, DNR
and other State Aid, Portion of fines, 1,786,738.00 Rounded off the cost of
etc. BALiNCE
t. amount to 25% of the County mill rate proceeds.
Operations in the Sheriff's Dep
s in -
es 27.10 Dercapita
°nthe with thenty as a exceptionhofe. These contractingrforepatrol
This averages o $ p
elude all of the Sheriff s duties
services. i.e. County Patrol, Invectal, recordsrkeeping, warrane tsandmtns,
ransport
County Jail, Administration, cleri
etc.
sections indicate the county patrol areas, Note that sectors la and 140
The o ulations while 125 and 135 havi larger areas
have smaller orulat onslarger p p
but smaller p p valuations large
some jurisdictions you wilt note hatcthe
t asses essive. This isedue rto
In ears that the Per Capita the valuation
and thus it appears increasing
industry or in some there are many lake in1e population.
utthe
but the owners are not residents and do not show up
on was accumulated as an addition to the 1985 Sheriff's Annual
report as an .1nas an item of public information.
rep
4
Explaination: County wide patrol function of the Sheriff's Dept. as to how
it is deployed and who indirectly pays for it by jurisdiction.
1987 The tax proceeds to the county amounted to $8,501,997.47
The Sheriff Total budget $2,773,730.00 Total hra worked for all personnel
will be 138000.
This amounts to an average base level of 20.06 per hr.
Contract hours 31,300 X 20.06 = 627,878.00 subtract this from total budget
Balance 2,145,852.
County Wide patrol hours amount to 32000 X 20.06 = 647,938.00 this is
some 30% of the Sheriff's budget.
(some figures on following page rounded out)
Patrol costs
Annual hrs Due
Dail_ y hrs Due
130 District
264,695.00
13,190
36
140
151,600
7,570
20:30
125
118,400
6,070
16
135
1080900
5,445
16
0
a
a
M r-
N M N N
N c, 1 O O M O�
o�noOW\OOOW\000
��- MM MMM� MMM
�p p�
•-
M M M M
(V j N [� M
•- �- - M N
A W
N
ti
� ►
oo
�
0000$0^
o-t�0m�o� o�
�� o"oo�-NM0c-m
m-(v cv
"0`OM�
CO Mtto N
N jN jMMc—'0
-t CV N jjj� jjjr
�
8
8880880888
p
88018C,8
88808
0 888p8
N 8 K N MN
-Q N0w
Mjjto tV\MVl
O O
O N -t O,
-t �
MV .-t
w
t- m
-t as O, [- ry n cp
-
w8
wOw w w wOw Ow
w jw OP:
coj, O O1O1
M NN N
shy
p
O
p
O
p
O
p
o
cOOi
88885
88858
�8�-88888g8�8D
Cn 888
y
0rIu
wO ^%^�O
w w w w
V\jD N V\
w w w w .w w w w w
M %D O M N VN rO
j80.-r88888
M CO -t -t - N N U� - M C j
n M M m M M M M
Coaw
rl
�N t- t-
tr-
V\ N V\t-- `
r-
M N O` v\
o
� U
N
b CQ
8
8
8
$
U N
to C1 %D to M u1
O, � j M W\ j �O
N .- .- O L j
a` N t- M t� m
tj N CO tO tO W1 W\ M •-
(V �O j p [I- O�
N tO to CO O CO Q� O O, N CO
O.
��v\M0` O�.-
O` V1N%D O CO
00 N O OlC-O,
O, -3 uN Ln'D N ccoo ON �O N �O
-0 O O NCO O,w Lr\O�Nw
o r-i
a
w w w
M8 N
'Oj t0
w w w w w w
NNN
w w w
w1OIO
8
w w w w w w w w w w w w
-t N C�Ow O, M O O VN
N - M N M
O O O
N .- j N tom- M
M �O N N O, 'D t` �O
N .-- N
-0 .- u, N N N M N M M M
.- .- - .- - r-
C, O
N
8
S
8
M - �T w M o $ N
.- to N M t- O%
LA 'D M t- -* t-
O Cr, O, M V\ j
N CO -t M t,- -f m W\
N N M M �D VN — 000 [�
R
;
O, .- CO CO O, O, M CO V� O� r-
q
0 t0 ON %D to N t- ID
j O` Q` M Q` to
O� O M M t - �- O �- �O �D
t- N N V\ %D j .10 O 10 to M
D
43
w w w w w w w
N �j N V\ j w M M
C- CO O CO
w w w w w w
� j j
8 p N O
w w w w w w w w w w
j D` �O .- O tf1
CO p N .- t� C- �-
M M tom- •D N O t- N j to �D N
w w w w w w w w w % w w
- �D j �-- %D ,,D 'D C- O" O O%
N t� C N
CO N j t0 .-
N 8 t` %O O �O O� N
O
MjC0 N t0 t0 jt'\r-
H
w w w w w w
�O ti M N j M V�
w w w w w w
O j- O N j
w w w w w w w w w
%O M �' �O .j %O O` to N
- -
O. M 10 N Ca O O V\ N �" r- M
w w w w w w w w w w w w
Cd
O r- - -
•- N - M
V\ N N V\ NO ID u1ID %D ID
a
UUUUUE+E+N
UUUUHHHHE+E-4
UUUUHE+HHt-4HI-4H
D
O
1 1 1 1
U U E+ E'' E+
Y I I I
1 1 �41 1 1 1 34 ,)9 1
V
o O o
� 1
r-1 O 1 1
0 0
I I
c
I~ u u a o u
se O .x
a r' �o
�o
Ea
rO-I 1 .�
x
+� A A I b
a
q �
Ly �,
o cci H s~ 4 o
V d q U 4
�7 s~
o o c. -H
.� c�
�e , ] x .0
.0�
b,
o r� 1+ ce 4) � o 0 ;o
m
n
i o
�
0 � t00.� 5
u .0 e�i .mac
U .�� ° 0
+' f�p� � N° a� d
r c c m
,40L�
r:
� U 4r w C)
CIO " 0 O� 0
3-H
4 C
D +> r4 cd rd O 1.4
0 0 O L.
.-4) J�CO r�0 rA
0 x �0 3� � C 0 N.
=v)-4xr)=ri.0
I:a&4A Wrm.
du�cU) uc-)xcnU)
♦3
h
m � m M A
c0 A Q N A
1-1
"RIO xdN
D~i W � `Q p O" ~ p
,t. O C pi :K Fes+
1 0 0 N O M C n fOC u
O M
A I H A I I~r O A.
r•
n
A th F+ C+
F+
w y y I I A
O AA
b ti
0 a
00
In
N N W In N N
00 O W N A U1
00
N Ln W
In
D U1 D W ►+ O�
V
A+
A W V A V W W}
W
N
W ►+ W A V i�
00
N V ►-� ►-•
N,
O
►.'
W O A �D A
O
�•+
co
(D
•
r r r r r
r
A W ►•• W 0% �D
v
u
A
r
W 0oLn
A
r r r v v
�N N►-.000
�
v+
•• o� Ln o 000
"LA v,
00 V O% "D OD In
LA LA r Oo V �D
v v r r r
V
V W In .1 W �D ON c�.
v
00% M w 9o w
'Ili"00 id i./ r1- V,
P)
W
�O
Nv000otJ
�
O
O 00 M r 00 N In
V O
ANkn
Ln 00f.+A
H
0
0
000000
000000
0
00000000�
0
00000000N.
0
0
►+
r
N
~
00
O
N N 0% W I—
V O V �D 00 V
r
1.n
r
N N N N LAV NODOk O�NW V
C+
W
'•
41,O V ►+NCr
v v v v r
A
O%Q1
x
N
O
4.1Na,ol In
0% 00 V O 00 �.D
•
V
W
r v r r r r v
VO►r V�Oo--WO�
F'
00
N V N 00 Uf A
0% 00 00 0 4 r
W W W W 0- LA W A
f'
O
O
O O O O O O
000000
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 00
�p
O
00000000.
A 0
�o V W O%
W
4-
00 m In OD V 0% IV
� 9
V
4- V �D i� i� 00
V
O� W O� N W OD In N
C+
N
O
00 O+ V CO ► + Op
V LA W N V V
W
W
V V W .D In O% r
Vq %.0
C) 00 VI V c+
0
(b
m
to
A
W A %D 00 00 V
r
N
P.
.9s
W O% %D O%
Ot
W
O
V
M N ZO 0l W 0,
►1
N ►+ W O A N
W
'-D M 00 N O C% " JA
d
m
'C+
0 w
i�V
rrN►~-�
y
rO0
V 00-P%V
y 0
010,
l-V
o al oo ow
w �'
OOr
W ►•'N00
O� M Otn
C+
O O
0 0 0 0
•
0000
CD
(0 O
N W
pr N ►-• W
'!
�o�o
0 %DOor
i n
O O% In m
H. C+
C+
M
W
0
G
~
~ 4
14
�D
C7 c+
•
O
�
�D
co
A
N N A V N A
Nr W AOo0
Nr►•� r W ANW
►' W O% W 00 W %D V
N %0 O% N ►+
�Otr OD N0"00
W
O�
00
M 0 "R:xC c.4 �cx=p
fP O O ry � m O n C n 0 0
n O rt w m F- i-+ O h M M n
a'oo0 44:j ol arA
I "
HH I m I HO 1 7Cn
1 y l l y A A
1
H H y n
r r+
00N1.0000►-"O A00w rN.
W0%or-.VONtn V 000�O�r
►-
•NW p`ANW OOA�O�O
ar�o�o�o�v�v+utN�..uty
+ + + + + + + + + + + +
rw►-• pin►-•00000��now
V7 r+ O A V V In Wt V w w
004 V OO►••�DQ•V
V 00V �DI-nr...��00p
W 00 -o %D ON N O O
:-� V N �O O W N ll OI W V . V
. • • . . . • . . . .
000000000000
000000000000
NNN►�NN�•••►`lnW �oi�
V A0�D�D►+V11�Nr+�DA
v v • + v v + v v + v v
W WI 41 to O, W► O' W O W O`
OA00i� N0%w W 001.DN1. W
O N O N W 0o O% 00 W O W W
000000000000
000000000000
�WprQ�Nr0ai I.AIIV
MV+�DAVN0 WAD
►+NW W -•NNNN 000%
•N.. vV700rV+Q`V,O,v000o
• • • • • • rrOO�O�D NCO
w N 00 N 00 to O O� N r 0
1
0
0 0)
.. ct
W .r rr N ►+ ►+ �-+ ►+ ►+
V O W O N ',D 0% V N W 1,
0o InLn4-v+w0a-0►rO"
r or.-�v�ov4..-00w00 �..
GO
v ►.• ►� `�
O w Vt O% Al. w r ut W1 rV La
A
10 1000 W AA10 aO1L1 V rp
►+ W N V Wt 0` A O O In jS
V i"•' W O ►-• T N W N V W
�-• V ut 1.0 O% %D W Wn 00 �,o p,
A V V 0% W 0 A A 00 1
In ►-• to G
0 0000000000
0 0000000000�
O
07
+
-�o
V N 00 O% W ►— P� O V1
00
vrO%Vm4.1-j O+r
A
�-+ 00 V V 10 00 N co O, W N.
.+
�LAJ ON Co Ln�D000W A I'
O•
N V1 w N �o �o O 00 W In I-
O
0000000000 .-.
O
0000000000 .p
v
�D
`d
Q %D 00 O% O% 00 -P, 0%
r+ In A
. . . . . . . . . . .
00 00
V A►''O W P+
N
N ►•N W r•rNtJ
W W r-•O V I►O�O�JaO�
• �O N p A Wl W OD N W O
v W 0N01,W 41.0%D0 W
O% N
w�C)v�O��+O�O;o
Iw0N0%WOb0—%00w
0
L2
z
"d
n
H
N
Cl)
O
on
14
pw
H
h
H
h
'+1
O
"d
O
r
H
C�
DO
•+e
O
O
x
as