Loading...
1996-07-15 CC Special1. 2. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL July 15, 19% 7:00 PH CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL/ADOPT AGENDA (Mayor/Clerk/Council) a. Public Hearing - Modified Tax Increment Plan for TIF District #5 and a Modified Development Program for Development District (City Attorney) RESOLUTION #1996-47 (RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND A MODIFICATION TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5 b. Agreement allowing construction of model homes - Parkside 3rd Addition (Attorney) C. Confirm recall of 1991A and 1991B G. 0. Improvement Bonds (Attorney) d. RESOLUTION #1996-48 (ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE 1996 OVERLAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT) (Engineer) e. North Frontage Road Feasibility update (Engineer) f . Sewer - Trunk Access Charges (Engineer) g. WWTF Future Expansion Planning (Engineer) h. Recommendation from Public Works Committee to update telephone system (PW Committee) i. Optech III-P Eagle Vote Tabulation System (City Clerk) 3. ADJOURMIM (Counci 1) ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL FETING July 15, 1996 Albertville City hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor Michael Potter (7:18 PM), Councilmembers Duane Berning, John Vetsch and Sharon Anderson, City Attorney Mike Couri, City Engineer Pete Carlson and City Administrator Garrison Hale Acting Mayor Berning convened the special meeting for the purpose of considering: TIF amendment related to use of surplus Debt Service Bond Fund Proceeds, Parkside 3rd Addition Model Home Agreement, confirm recall of 1991A and 1991B G.O. Improvement Bonds, Award Bids for Overlay Improvement Project, North Frontage Road Feasibility Study for Sewer, WWTF Future Expansion, Recommendation from Public Works Committee regarding telephone system and Optech III-P Eagle Vote. Moved by Anderson, supported by Vetsch, to adopt agenda with addition of Item 2j - Subdivision Ordinance Standard Plates for utility and street construction. All voted aye. Acting Mayor Berning convened the public hearing at 7:08 PM for a proposed TIF amendment that would authorize the use of available funds and amend the budget to utilize the funds for the CSAH 19/37 Intersection Realignment Project. Also, an expansion of the development boundaries to include the city limits as of record on July 15, 1996 (pre -annexation). Acting Mayor Berning requested public comment. No person was present to comment. Mike Couri explained the TIF District could be terminated early but the City would lose the use of funds. Moved by Anderson, supported by Vetsch, to close the public hearing at 7:18 PM. All voted aye. Acting Mayor Berning turned the meeting over to Mayor Potter at 7:19 PM. Moved by Berning, supported by Anderson, to adopt RESOLUTION #1996-47. All voted aye. Mayor Potter moved to an agreement allowing for early construction of model homes. City Attorney Couri explained the agreement which allowed for an early construction of model homes in the Parkside 3rd Addition. Developer needs to have completed model homes for the Parade of ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL July 15, 1996 Page 2 of 4 Homes. Final Plat is scheduled for August 5, 1996, which is too late. Under the agreement the developer will not receive a variance if errors in elevation for construction are found. The need for a gravel road permitting emergency access is required. Homes cannot be conveyed until a final occupancy permit is issued. The building official will only issue Limited Occupancy Permit with no one staying overnight, bottled water and porta-potty will be provided on site. Insurance standards satisfactory to the city. Mike Potter explained the rationale on model homes and the taking part in Parade of Homes. Moved by Potter, supported by Vetsch, to authorize "Agreement Allowing Early Construction of Model Homes City of Albertville Parkside 3rd Addition". Three aye, 1 nay Anderson, 1 Absent Muyres. City Attorney Couri, based on a recommendation of the Finance Committee to recall early Special Assessment Bond Issues of 1991A and 1991B G.O. Bonds, explained it was fiscally responsible to call early and stop the accrued interest. Call dates are August 1 and September 1, 1996. Both Highland Banks and First National Bank of Elk River have agreed to waive 90 day notice requirement and cooperate on an early call. Councilmember Berning asked about a third bond issue that dealt with SAC Fees and was it callable early. No recall on a third bond issue. Moved by Potter, supported by Anderson, to confirm recall of 1991A and 1991B G.O. Improvement Bonds. All voted aye. City Engineer Carlson recapped bids for 1996 Street Overlay Project including City Hall parking lot. Carlson mentioned the shoulder by the high school need to be added by supplemental agreement. Estimate is $4,000. Moved by Potter, supported by Berning, to receive the following bids: Buffalo Bituminous $28,787.75 W B Miller Inc. $29,068.75 Hardrives Inc. $29,355.00 Bauerly Brothers Company $29,998.75 Lan -Dar Inc. $43,082.50 Further, to adopt RESOLUTION #1996--48 awarding bid to Buffalo Bituminous for $28,785.75 for the 1996 Overlay Improvement Project. All voted aye. Pete Carlson moved to the North Frontage Road Sanitary Sewer Extension Project. This project is to provide sanitary sewer ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL "- July 15, 1996 Page 3 of 4 service to the properties on the 62nd Street frontage road. Line size was proposed to be 8 inch. Carlson recommended accepting the feasibility report and offer trunk charges. Hale discussed the number of parcels available for assessment. Moved by Berning, supported by Anderson, to adopt RESOLUTION #1996-49 Accepting the Feasibility Study for the North Frontage Road Sanitary Sewer and ratifying the previous council action of ordering a public hearing for July 24, 1996, at 7:30 at City Hall. All voted aye. Engineer Carlson moved to WWTF Future Planning. Purpose was to layout a preliminary "Urban Service Area" for sanitary sewer. The proposed annexed areas were included. Pete Carlson discussed the new city limits and showed additional areas for service that were in the City of Otsego and the new City of St. Michael. These areas were included due to the ability of the City of Albertville to more easily provide service. The engineer is seeking Council direction on formal final lines to lock in for an urban service area. Carlson stated we would be providing sewer service outside the city limits which could lead to competition from neighboring communities using the city's service. Councilmembers discussed sewer availability and timing. Engineer Carlson suggested the City could service on its own schedule. Joint powers agreement could be required to ensure everyone understood their responsibility. Discussion looked at 40 hookups a year and providing services beyond the limits to maintain number of hookups. The urban service area helps define the ultimate requirements of the treatment plant. Attorney Couri reviewed the idea of an agreed upon contractual agreement to be used in providing service to other communities. Further Council discussion centered on directing the city engineer to design the sewer districts and truck lines for consideration at the August 5, 1996, meeting. The future plans do not require actual pipe installation. The "urban service area" could be viewed as a planning tool and include surrounding property. City Administrator Hale stated the end result is a "Comprehensive Sewer Plan". Engineer Carlson explained the urban service area will guide the future WWTF size and options. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL July 15, 1996 Page 4 of 4 Mayor Potter introduced telephone system quotes as follows: Sprint United - Northern Telecom Norstor 3X8 $1,740.00 Communication Sales & Lease - Northern Telecom Merlin 3X8 $1,766.00 Communications Sales & Lease - AT & T Partner Plus 2X6 $2,698.00 Northland Communication Corporation - Toshiba Strata PK8 $2,440.00 Interior Communications Sale - Telrad 818 System 2X16 $2,695.00 Moved by Anderson, supported by Vetsch, to receive the quotes, to authorize the purchase a Northern Telecom Norstar 3X8 for $1,740.00 plus tax from Sprint United Telephone Midwest and to authorize the mayor to execute a sales agreement. Further, to approve surplusing the present AT&AT Spirit telephone system and advertising for seal bids to be opened at the August 19, 1996, Council meeting. All voted aye. Mayor Potter introduced the concept of an electronic voter tabulation system comparable to the Wright County standards. Moved by Anderson, supported by Vetsch, to approve purchase of Optech III-P Eagle Electronic Voter Tabulation System from Business Records Corporation at a cost of $5,515.00 with budget source of funding recommended by the Finance Committee at a later date. All voted aye. Engineer Carlson presented standard plates for utilities and street design and construction that he would like to incorporate into the City of Albertville Subdivision Ordinance standards. Moved by Potter, supported by Anderson, to authorize City Engineer to prepare Standard Engineering Plates for the Subdivision Ordinance. All voted aye. Moved by Berning, supported meeting at 9:22 PM. All voted aye. by Anderson, to adjourn the Michael Potter, Mayor Garrison Hale, Deputy Clerk Approved by city Council , 1996 MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 and MODIFICATION TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA July 15, 1996 This Instrument Drafted by: KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED 470 Pillsbury Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 337-9300 SJB107121 AL141-21 SECTION I. MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1. .............. 1 Subsection 1.1. Subsection 1.2. Subsection 1.3. Subsection 1.4. Subsection 1.5. Subsection 1.6. Subsection 1.7. Subsection 1.8. Subsection 1.9. Subsection 1.10. Subsection 1.11. Subsection 1.12. Subsection 1.13. Subsection 1.14. Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Statement and Finding of Public Purpose . . . . . . . Statutory Authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Statement of Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Estimated Public Costs and Supportive Data . . . . . Environmental Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proposed Reuse of Property . . . . . . Public Improvements and Facilities to be Constructed Within Development District No. 1 . . . . Administration and Maintenance of the Development District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rehabilitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Relocation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Open Space to be Created . . Boundaries of the Development District . . . . . . . . Parcels To Be Acquired or May be Acquired In Whole or In Part Within the Development District . . . . . . 1 1 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 SECTION II. MODIFICATION TO TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5. ............................................. 5 WB107121 AL141-21 i SECTION I. MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1. Subsection 1.1. Definitions. For the purposes of the Development District Program, the following terms shall have the meanings specified below, unless the context otherwise requires: "City" means the City of Albertville, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota. "Comprehensive Plan" means the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the objectives, policies, standards and programs to guide public and private land use, development, redevelopment and preservation for all lands and water within the City. "City Council" or "Council" means the Albertville City Council; "City Development District Act" or "Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134, as amended. "County" means Wright County, Minnesota. "Development District" means Development District No. 1 which was initially approved by the Council in April, 1981 pursuant to and in accordance with the City Development District Act, and as it has been or may be modified. "Development District Program" or "Program" means the program for development of the District adopted by the City pursuant to the Development District Act. "Project Area" or "Project" means the property within Development District No. 1, as described in the Development Program. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended. "Tax Increment Bonds" means any general obligation or revenue tax increment bonds or notes issued by the City to finance the public costs associated with Development District No. 1 as stated in the Program and in the Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Tax Increment Financing Districts within Development District No. 1, or any obligations issued to refund the Tax Increment Bonds. "Tax Increment Financing District" or "TIF District" means any Tax Increment Financing District created and established pursuant to the TIF Act within Development District No. 1. "Tax Increment Financing Plan" or "Plan" means the TIF Plan adopted by the Council for any TIF District within Development District No. 1. Subsection 1.2 . Statement and Findin of Public Pur ose . The Council of the City determines that there is a need for development and redevelopment within the corporate limits of the City and within the Development District to provide employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the State. It is found that the area within the District is potentially more SJB107121 AL141-21 useful and valuable than is being realized under existing development, is less productive than is possible under this program and, therefore, is not contributing to the tax base to its full potential. Therefore, the City has determined to exercise its authority to develop a program for improving the Development District of the City to provide an impetus for private development, to maintain and increase employment, to utilize existing potential and to provide other facilities as are outlined in the Development Program adopted by the City. The Council finds that the welfare of the City as well as the State of Minnesota requires active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to carry out its stated public purpose objectives. Subsection 1.3 . Statutory Authority. The Council reaffirms its determination that it is desirable and in the public interest to establish, develop and administer a Development Program for the Development District in the City, pursuant to the provisions of the Act. Funding of the necessary activities and improvements in the Development District may be accomplished in whole or in part through tax increment financing in accordance with the TIF Act. The City has designated a specific area within the corporate limits of the City as Development District No. 1 as authorized by Section 469.126 of the Act, as outlined in this document. Within the Development District, the City has previously created TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6. The original Development Program for Development District No. 1 was approved in April, 1981 and has been modified subsequently. On July 17, 1989, the Development Program was modified to expand the area of the Development District. That expand area has sometimes been referred to as "Modification No. 2" or "Development District No. 2." Nevertheless, the City's intent has been to consider such expanded area part of Development District No. 1. The City has now determined that, in order to address changing development needs throughout the City, it is in the public interest to expand the boundaries of Development District No. 1 to include the entire City. This modified Development Program is intended to restate and expand on the original program and all prior amendments hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. Nothing in this modification is intended to supersede or alter the activities described in the original Development Program. Subsection 1.4 . Statement of Objectives . The Council determines that the Development District will provide the City with the ability to achieve certain public purpose goals not otherwise obtainable in the foreseeable future without City intervention in the normal development process. The public purpose goals include: restore and improve the tax base and tax revenue generating capacity of the Development District; increase employment opportunities; realize comprehensive planning goals; remove blighted conditions; revitalize the property within the Development District to create an attractive, comfortable, convenient, and efficient area for industrial, commercial and related use. The City and Council seek to achieve the following Development District program objectives: 8J81o7121 AL141-21 1. Promote and secure the prompt development of certain property in the Development District, which property is not now in productive use or in its highest and best use, in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the minimum adverse impact on the environment, and thereby promote and secure the development of other land in the City. 2. Promote and secure additional employment opportunities within the Development District and the City for residents of the City and the surrounding area, thereby improving living standards, reducing unemployment and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor and other human resources in the City. 3. Secure the increase of commercial/industrial property subject to taxation by the City, Independent School District No. 885, Wright County, and other taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such entities to pay for governmental services and programs required to be provided by them. 4. Provide for the financing and construction of public improvements in and adjacent to the Development District, necessary for the orderly and beneficial development of the Development District and adjacent areas of the City. 5. Promote the concentration of commercial, office, and other appropriate development in the Development District so as to maintain the area in a manner compatible with its accessibility and prominence in the City. 6. Encourage local business expansion, improvement, and development, whenever possible. 7. Create a desirable and unique character within the Development District thorough quality land use alternatives and design quality in new and remodeled buildings. 8. Encourage and provide maximum opportunity for private redevelopment of existing areas and structures that are compatible with the Development Program. 9. Encourage redevelopment of substandard buildings, to improve employment opportunities in the Development District and the City, where compatible with other planning and development goals . Subsection 1.5. Estimated Public Costs and Supportive Data. The public costs and development plans for the Development District have been described in detail in each TIF Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference. The City now anticipates additional public costs to be financed in part with tax increments from TIF District No. 5. Estimated costs and related data for such efforts are set forth in the modification to the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 5 attached to this modified Development Program . Subsection 1.6 . Environmental Controls. The proposed development activities in the Development District do not present significant environmental concerns. All municipal actions, public improvements and private development shall be carried out in a manner consistent with existing environmental standards . Subsection 1.7. Proposed Reuse of Property. The proposals for reuse of property within the Development District are described in the documents referenced in Section 1.5 herein. The City may acquire additional parcels for redevelopment, as identified in Section 1.14 herein. 9JH1o7121 AL141-21 Unless otherwise specified, the Development Program does not contemplate the acquisition of private property until such time as a private developer presents an economically feasible program for the reuse of that property. Proposals, in order to be considered, must be within the framework of the above cited goals and objectives, and must clearly demonstrate feasibility as a public program. Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property, the City Council will require a binding contract, performance bond and/or other evidence or guarantees that a supporting tax increment or other funds will be available to repay the public cost associated with the proposed acquisition. It is the intent of the City to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever necessary. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any land sale contract to which the City is a part. Subsection 1.8 . Public Improvements and Facilities to be Constructed Within Development District No. 1. The public improvements and facilities to be constructed within Development District No. 1 include: (a) off -site improvements, including streets, water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer; and (b) on -site utilities, soils correction, parking and landscaping. All public improvements are more particularly described in the documents referenced in Section 1.5 herein. Subsection 1.9. Administration and Maintenance of the Development District. Maintenance and operation of the public improvements will be the responsibility of the Administrator of the City who shall serve as Administrator of the Development District. The Administrator will administer the Development District pursuant to the provisions of Section 469.131 of the Act; provided, however, that such powers may only be exercised at the direction of the Council. No action taken by the Administrator pursuant to the above -mentioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the Council. Subsection 1.10. Rehabilitation. Owners of properties within the Development District will be encouraged to rehabilitate their property to conform with the applicable state and local codes and ordinances, as well as any design standards. Owners of the properties who purchase property within the Development District from the City may be required to rehabilitate their properties as a condition of sale of land. The City will provide such rehabilitation assistance as may be available from federal, state or local sources . Subsection 1.11. Relocation. The City does not anticipate the need to relocate any residents or businesses, but if such need arises, provisions for relocation will be made in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.50 through 117.56 and any rules adopted by the City Council. Subsection 1.12. Open Space to be Created. The City, in carrying out the objectives of the Development Program, proposes to encourage the beautification of open spaces through the development of criteria which shall be incorporated into any land sale or development agreements entered into by the City of Albertville . Subsection 1.13. Boundaries of the Development District. Boundaries of Development District No. 1 are modified to include the boundary of the City as a whole. Subsection 1.14. Parcels To Be Acquired or May be Acquired In Whole or In Part Within the Development District. The City may acquire any parcels in the TIF District or in the Development District as a whole if necessary to carry out the goals and objectives of the Development Program. SJB107121 AL141-21 4 SECTION II. MODIFICATION TO THE TIF PLAN FOR TIF DISTRICT NO. 5 Background The City Council approved the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 5 on July 17, 1989. The budget of expenditures was modified, without increasing the total authorized amount, on October 14, 1992 and June 5, 1995. The City has now determined a need to modify certain aspects of the TIF Plan in order to accomplish additional development and redevelopment goals for the expanded Development District. TIF Plan Modifications Section II. of the TIF Plan is hereby modified as follows: II. Statement of Objective In addition to previously identified objectives, the City seeks to accomplish the following objectives through this TIF Plan: • Facilitate improvement of Highways 37 and 19, in order to provide adequate access for commerce and industry and stimulate further economic development in the City. • Assist commercial and industrial development in order to increase tax base and employment. Section V . of the TIF Plan is hereby modified as follows: V . Financing Plan A. Estimated Public Development Cost In addition to all costs previously authorized to be financed in part from tax increments generated from TIF District No. 5, the following public costs may be incurred: County Highways 19 and 37 Improvements Site improvements in connection with commercial and industrial development in the Development District Administrative Costs, including cost of bond issuance TOTAL $400, 000 The City reserves the right to allocate expenditures among the categories listed above. Of the total amount authorized, no more than $200,000 is expected to be paid with tax increments (see Section B, below) . Total administrative expenditures will not exceed 10 percent of all tax increment expenditures authorized in this TIF Plan, as amended, or the total actually expended, whichever is less. The budget also includes capitalized interest, if needed, in connection with any bonds issued for such costs. The amount of any capitalized interest will be determined at the time of bond issuance. SJB107121 AL1A1-21 5 The City has determined that the highway improvements noted above are necessary in order to improve access for commercial and industrial enterprises in the City, and to stimulate further development. The improvements are not financially feasible without tax increment assistance, as the entire cost may not be assessable, and the assessment burden would be prohibitive. Similarly, the City will provide on -site assistance for particular commercial or industrial developments in situations where, but for such assistance, the developments would not be reasonably likely to occur in the foreseeable future. B . Tax Increment Bonds -- Source of Revenue In addition to all bonds previously authorized or issued in connection with TIF District No. 5, the City may issue bonds for costs identified in this TIF Plan, in a maximum principal amount of $400, 000. The City anticipates that no more than $200, 000 in principal amount of bonds will be paid by tax increments from TIF District No. 5. The balance of bonds will be paid with special assessments levied against property benefited by public improvements, and by a general City debt levy for the City's share of such improvements. J. Estimated Impact on Other Tax Jurisdictions This modification to the TIF Plan will have no adverse fiscal impact on other taxing jurisdictions. The City does not anticipate additional captured tax capacity in TIF District No. 5. Rather, the modification allows the City to use tax increment currently being generated to finance improvements that benefit the City as a whole, which will facilitate development outside the boundaries of any TIF District. As such, the modification will potentially create additional tax base immediately available to all jurisdictions. &M 107121 AL141-21 6 Mt. 1:C July 15, 1996 5975 Main Avenue N.E. P.O. Boa 9 Albertville, MN 55301 (612) 497-3384 Fax: (612) 497-3210 Darla Groshens County Auditor/Treasurer Wright County 10 N.W. 2nd Street Buffalo, MN 55313 RE: City of Albertville, TIF District No. 5 Dear Ms. Groshens: On July 15, 1996 , the, City Council l of they,- Cjty of Albertville._ . - approved a modified Develvpmant_Program for Development District. No. 1 and a nux4, fication. to the. TIF Plan for TIP District &o.,. . The TIP plan modification is.s budget change only: it .does not change the boundaries of the district. 'The Development District, boundaries have been modified to include the City as a whole. Enclosed for your records is a copy of the modified plans. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Garrison L. Sale City'Administrator Enclosures cc: Stephen Bubul, Kennedy & Graven 5975 Main Avenue N.E. P.O. Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301 (612) 497-3384 Fax: (612) 497-3210 W I July 15, 1996 Mr. Jerome Silkey Assistant Director Local Government Services Minnesota Department of Revenue 653 Cedar Street St. Paul, MR 55145 Dear Mr. Silkey: By resolution dated July 15, 1996, the City Council of the City of Albertville approved.a modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plant for Tax Increscent Financing (TIF) District No. 5 Within Development District no. 1. A copy of the resolution and the TIP Plan modification are enclosed'. The City intends by this letter to file the TIF Plan modification with your office pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, subd. 2. Please contact see if you have any questions. Sincerely, Garrison L. Hale City Administrator Enclosures cc: Stephen Bubul, Kennedy & Graven CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION NO. 1996-47 RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND A MODIFICATION TO THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 5 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ("Council") of the City of Albertville, Minnesota ("City") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The City has previously established its Development District No. 1 pursuant to Minn. Stat . , Section 469.124 through 469.134 ("Development District Act") and within that area has established Tax Increment Financing District ("TIF District") No. 5 pursuant to Minn. Stat., Section 469.174 through 469.179 ("TIF Act") . 1.02. The City has determined a need to modify the Development Program for the Development District, and to modify the tax increment financing plan ("TIF Plan") for TIF District No. 5, and to that end has caused to be prepared a document titled "Modified Development Program, Development District No. 1 and Modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan, Tax Increment Financing District No. 5, City of Albertville, Minnesota," dated July 15, 1996. 1.03. The Development Program and TIF Plan were, in accordance with the Development District Act and TIF Act, referred to the Albertville Planning Commission, which found that they conform to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. 1.04. Estimates of the fiscal and economic implications of the TIF Plan were provided to Independent School District No. 885 and Wright County at least 30 days before the Council's public hearing on the TIF Plan. 1.05. This Council has fully reviewed the contents of the modified Development Program and TIF Plan and on July 15, 1996 conducted a public hearing thereon at which the views of all interested persons were heard. Section 2. Findings; Development District. 2.01. It is hereby found and determined that there is a need to modify the Development Program for the Development District by expanding the boundaries thereof, in order to improve the tax base and employment opportunities, and to provide an impetus for industrial and commercial development. 2.02. It is further specifically found and determined that: a) the land within the Development District, as expanded would not be made available for development without the public intervention and financial assistance described in the Development Program and TIF Plan; SJB107155 AL141-21 b) the modified Development Program will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Development District by private enterprise; and c) the Development District and modified Development Program conform to the general plan for development of the City as set forth in the comprehensive municipal plan. Section 3. Findings; TIF District No. 5. 3.01. It is found and determined that it is necessary and desirable for the sound and orderly development of the Development District and the City as a whole, and for the protection and preservation of the public health, safety, and general welfare, that the authority of the TIF Act be exercised by the City to provide public financial assistance to the TIF and Development Districts. 3.02. It is further found and determined, and it is the reasoned opinion of the City, that the development proposed in the modified TIF Plan for TIF District No. 5 could not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefore the use of tax increment is deemed necessary. 3.03. The proposed public improvements to be financed in part through tax increment financing are necessary to permit the City to realize the full potential of the TIF and Development Districts in terms of development intensity, employment opportunities and tax base. 3.04. The Plan for TIF District No. 5 conforms to the general plan of development of the City as a whole. 3.05. The Plan for TIF District No. 5 will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the TIF and Development Districts by private enterprise. 3.06. TIF District No. 5 remains an economic development district under Section 469.174, subd. 12 of the TIF Act, as determined upon creation of the District on July 17, 1989. 3.07. Reasons and facts supporting the findings herein are set forth in the TIF Plan. The City has also relied upon the reports and recommendations of its staff as well as the personal knowledge of members of the City Council in reaching its conclusions regarding TIF District No. 5. Section 4. Development Program and TIF Plan Adopted; Certification; Filing 4.01. The modified Development Program and the TIF Plan are hereby approved and adopted. 4.02. The geographic boundaries of the Development District and of the TIF District are described in the Development Program and TIF Plan therefor, respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference. SJB107155 AL141-21 2 4.03. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to file a copy of the Development Program and the TIF Plan with the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue as required by the TIF Act. Adopted this 15th day of July, 1996. Mayor Attest: City Administrator SJB107155 AL141-21 3 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) Ss. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting City Clerk -Treasurer of the City of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and foregoing Resolution Approving the Modified Development Program for Development District No . 1 and Modification to the Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No- 5, with the originals thereof on file in my office and the same are full, true and complete copies thereof. WITNESS My hand officially as such City Clerk -Treasurer and the corporate seal of the City this day of ( SEAL) . 1996. City Clerk -Treasurer Albertville, Minnesota 4 ///0?C /;'`i;fo 7 CZ6 AGREEMENT ALLOWING EARLY CONSTRUCTION OF MODEL HOMES CITY OF ALBERTVILLE PARKSIDE 3RD ADDITION jTHIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of , 19961by and between Kent Roessler and Kenco Construction, Inc., collectively referred to herein as "Developer"; and the CITY OF ALB7TVILLE, County of Wright, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "City"; WITNESSETH: ,WHEREAS, Developer is the fee owner and developer of a parcel or parcels of land described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, a portion of which parcels of landiare proposed to be subdivided and platted for development as "Parkside Third Addition" and may sometimes hereinafter be referred to as the "Subject Property;" and WHEREAS,; the City has given preliminary approval of Developer's plat of Parkside Third Addition contingent upon compliance with certain City requirements including, but not limited to, matters set forth herein; and WHEREAS,- the City normally requires that, certain public improvements including, but not limited to, grading, sanitary sewer, water,storm sewer, curb and gutter, and streets (hereafter "Municipal Improvements") be installed to serve the Subject Property prior to the commencement of construction of homes on the Subject Property; and j ;WHEREAS, the Developer has requested that it be allowed to begin construction on 3 model homes on the Subject Property prior to final platting and prior to installation of Municipal Improvements; and 1WHEREAS, the City has agreed to allow construction of said mode homes subject to the terms contained in this agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AND HEREIN MUTUALLY AGREED, in cons deration of each party's promises and considerations herein set orth, as follows: 1. �Developer shall be allowed to construct 3 model homes, one home each to be constructed within the confines of lots , and respectively, as shown on the Parkside 3rd Addiion Pre�lYm ni ary Plat as approved by the City and on file with the City Clerk. i 1 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Said model homes shall be constructed at elevations of no less than #I and feet above sea level, respectively, and each home must be constructed such that the foundation grade of each home (as measured from the top of the garage floor) is at least 18 inches above the top of the curb. If the foundation grade to curb differential is less than 18 inches, Developer will raise the entire home as necessary (at Developer's expense) to achieve said 18 inch differential. Developer shall not modify the height of the curb without the prior written permission of the City. Developer shall at all times maintain a gravel surfaced roadway to the three model homes. Said roadway shall be passable.at all times and shall be of sufficient quality to support a fully loaded fire truck tanker and other necessary emergency vehicles. Said roadway shall be of sufficient width to allow the passage of two emergency vehicles side -by -side at the same;time. Developer shall bear all expenses related to said road and its maintenance until such road is dedicated to the public and accepted by the City. !Developer agrees not to show any of the models to the general public until Developer has received a limited' occupancy permit ,from the'City. The limited occupancy permit shall issue at ;tie discretion of the building inspector, but under no jcircumstances shall it be issued for any home if any ;unfinished portion of the home presents a safety hazard, nor will a limited occupancy permit be issued unless the curb and gutter has been installed and at least a class 5 gravel base adequate to support necessary emergency vehicles has been installed in the roadway, unless such provisions are waived by the city'Engineer. Developer shall provide the City with proof of general Ill ability insurance insuring against personal injury or other damage to the general public as a result of the showing of said homes while under a limited occupancy permit. Said insurance shall be in an amount and form acceptable to the City Attorney. Developer shall not show said homes to the general public until said proof of insurance has been provided to: the City. t Developer agrees to indemnify the City for all expenses incurred (including attorneyrs and other professional fees) or monies paid as a result of any claims made against the City by any third parties, where such claims arise in whole or in part from the construction, showing or existence of said model homes. Developer also agrees to indemnify and hold the City harmless, from any and all claims of Developer, Developer's employees, agents, contractors or assigns which are in any way 1related to the construction or showing of said model homes. 2 7. �Developer understands that it is constructing homes prior to ;receiving final plat approval from the City, and that Developer shall bear all expenses and risk associated with such activity. Should said model homes need to be moved, ;removed, rebuilt or otherwise reworked in order to conform to Ithe final plat requirements as well as all other subdivision and zoning requirements in the City, Developer shall voluntarily undertake such corrective action at its own !expense to bring said homes into compliance with the applicable final plat, subdivision or zoning ordinances. Developer shall not be granted variances from said subdivision or zoning requirements for the purpose of conforming the model homes to'the existing zoning or subdivision ordinances. S. The City ;reserves the right to deny approval of the final plat of the Subject Property for any valid reason. 9. Developer shall provide the City with an as -built elevation Isurvey for each model home. Said survey shall delineate the height of the foundation grade of each home (as measured from the top of the garage floor) and the height of the top of the curb. No occupancy permits shall be issued until said surveys tare provided to the City. 10. Developer shall provide bottled water in each model home and shall make available on site a satellite toilet at all times during the showing of said homes. 11. !Developer may not sell or otherwise convey any of said model ,homes until the final plat of the Subject Property has been approved'by the City and recorded, and until a final occupancy permit has been issued by the City. 12. should Developer fail to obtain final plat approval from the City for !the Subject Property by November 31, 1996, Developer shall remove the model homes by January 31, 1997. 13. Developer agrees to keep any and all City streets clean which are used as access points for construction equipment engaged in the construction of the model homes. 14. +Developer shall pay all City costs incurred in preparing this agreement, and shall pay any and all City costs, including attorneys fees and other professional fees, which may be iincurred by the City in enforcing this agreement. 15. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the representatives, heirs, successors and assigns of the parties ,hereto. i Dated: i I 3 STA the Cle the CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, By Its Mayor By Its Clerk DEVELOPER, KENCO CONSTRUCTION, INC. Ey Kent Roessler Its President OF MINNFsSOTA ) ;OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledgedI before me this da of 1996, by Nichael Potter as Y o f the city of Albertville, a Minniesota munic;ip& 1 ration, on behalf of the city and pursuant to. the authority CC it+y Council. Notary Pub is OF MINNESOTA ) } ss. OF WRIGHT ) Tide foregoing instrument was acknowledgedbefore me this day of , 1996, by Linda Houghton as !of the City of Albertville, a Minn,asota muniolpsl ration, on behalf of the city and pursuant to the authority of ,ity Council. Notary Public 4 STATE OF MINNESOTA 5 ACO M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 11, 1996 TO: City Council FROM: Linda SUBJ: Recall of 1991A and 1991B G.O. Bonds The City Council and the Finance Committee have both discussed the need to reduce the City's bonded indebtedness. Consequently, all have agreed to pay off special assessment debt as soon as possible without incurring prepayment penalties. The 1991A G.O. Bond that funded Westwind 2nd Addition is callable on September 1, 1996. Mike Couri and I have worked together to proceed with calling this bond. The Finance Committee decided to cash in Certificate of Deposit $8579 in the amount of $177,497.87 on its maturity date in late June to make payment. Those funds are currently in the Savings account earning approximately 4.8% until the date of recall. The debt service fund balance for the 1991A bond as of June 30, 1996, is $214,765.02. The amount necessary to recall the bond is $204,286.50 (which includes the principal and interest payment due September 1, 1996). The balance of $10,478.52 can be transferred by Council resolution to any other fund, including the General Fund, after the bonds are paid. The 1991B G. O. Bond which funded the Parksedge Addition is callable at any time. All special assessments on the project have been paid in full already and there is more than an adequate fund balance to call the bonds. Since the next principal and interest payment is due on this bond on August 1, the entire bond will be called on that date. The debt service fund balance for the 1991B bond as of June 30, 1996, is $127,227.75. The amount necessary to recall the bond is $62,100.00 (which includes the principal and interest payment due August 1, 1996). The balance in the debt service fund of $65,127.75 can be transferred by Council resolution to any other fund after the bonds have been paid. 5975 Main Avenue N.E. e P.O. Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301 (612) 497-3384 Fax: (612) 497-3210 July 11, 1996 Mr. Paul Ederer Highland Banks 701 Central Avenue East St. Michael, MN 55376 RE: $95,000 Albertville G. O. Bond Issue Dear Mr. Ederer: Please find enclosed a notice of calling of bonds for early redemption relating to the City of Albertville Series 1991B General Obligation Bond. This bond was originally issued on December 30, 1991, in the amount of $95,000.00. The bond is callable at par at any time. The next principal and interest payment of $12,100.00 on this bond is due on August 1, 1996. The amount of principal remaining on the bond after the August 1, 1996, principal payment will be $50,000 ($10,000 x 5 years remaining). The City would like to prepay this amount on August 1, 1996, along with the regular principal and interest payment. It is my understanding that the Bank has agreed to waive the 90 day notice period required by the bond in favor of the enclosed notice. We at the City appreciate your cooperation in this regard. Accordingly, the City will provide the Highland Banks with a check in the amount of $62,100.00 on August 1, 1996, in complete payment of all monies due on the 1991B bond. I would expect that the Bank will provide the City with the original bond stamped "Cancelled" or "Paid in Full" at the time of payment. If the Bank requires certified funds or some other financial arrangement prior to delivering the cancelled bond, please let me know. I would appreciate it if you would also provide a cover letter to accompany the cancelled bond for our records. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the bond redemption process. Again, the City of Albertville appreciates your assistance in retiring this bond. Sincerely, Linda Houghton City Clerk NOTICE OF CALLING OF BONDS FOR EARLY REDEMPTION TO: HIGHLAND BANKS ST. MICHAEL, MINNESOTA PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City of Albertville hereby calls for early redemption all outstanding debt owned under that bond known as the City of Albertville Series 1991B General Obligation Bond, issued December 30, 1991, as follows: Date of Redemption: August 1, 1996 Amount of Redemption: $50,000.00 Any questions regarding the early redemption of said bond should be directed to Ms. Linda Houghton, Clerk, City of Albertville, P.O. Box 9, Albertville, MN 55301. Dated: July 11, 1996 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Linda Houghton, City Clerk 5975 Main Avenue N.E. 6 P.O. Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301 (612) 497-3384 Fax: (612) 497-3210 U July 11, 1996 Mr. Richard Gongoll, President First National Bank of Elk River 729 Main Street Elk River, MN 55330 RE: $330,000 Albertville G. 0. Bond Issue Dear Mr. Gongoll: Please find enclosed a notice of calling of bonds for early redemption relating to the City of Albertville Series 1991A General Obligation Bond. This bond was originally issued on December 30, 1991, in the amount of $330,000.00. The bond is callable at par on September 1, 1996. The next principal and interest payment of $39,286.50 on this bond is also due on September 1, 1996. The amount of principal remaining on the bond after the September 1, 1996, principal payment will be $165,000 ($33,000 x 5 years remaining). The City would like to prepay this amount on September 1, 1996, along with the regular principal and interest payment. It is my understanding that the Bank has agreed to waive the 90 day notice period required by the bond in favor of the enclosed notice. We at the City appreciate your cooperation in this regard. Accordingly, the City will provide the Bank of Elk River with a check in the amount of $204,286.50 on September 1, 1996, in complete payment of all monies due on the 1991A bond. I would expect that the Bank will provide the City with the original bond stamped "Cancelled" or "Paid in Full" at the time of payment. If the Bank requires certified funds or some other financial arrangement prior to delivering the cancelled bond, please let me know. I would appreciate it if you would also provide a cover letter to accompany the cancelled bond for our records. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the bond redemption process. Again, the City of Albertville appreciates your assistance in retiring this bond. Sincerely, Linda Houghton City Clerk NOTICE OF CALLING OF BONDS FOR EARLY REDEMPTION TO: FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ELK RIVER ELK RIVER, MINNESOTA PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City of Albertville hereby calls for early redemption all outstanding debt owned under that bond known as the City of Albertville Series 1991A General Obligation Bond, issued December 30, 1991, as follows: Date of Redemption: September 1, 1996 Amount of Redemption: $165,000.00 Any questions regarding the early redemption of said bond should be directed to Ms. Linda Houghton, Clerk, City of Albertville, P.O. Box 9, Albertville, MN 55301. Dated: July 11, 1996 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Linda Houghton, City Clerk 2d CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RE�4LU?ION #1996-48 WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared final plans and specifications for the 1996 Overlay Improvement Project, and such plans and specifications have been presented to the City Council for approval. WHEREAS, said project has been duly approved and ordered, and bids for said project have been advertised for the period requires under state statute; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE as follows: 1. All bids for the 1996 Overlay Improvement Project were duly opened at City Hall on Monday, July 15, 1996; and 2. The bid of _ amount of $ in accordance with the for bids is the lowest accepted. in the _ for the construction of said improvement plans and specifications and advertisement responsible bid and shall be and hereby is 3. The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with said bidder for the construction of said improvements for and on behalf of the City of Albertville. 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except the deposit of the successful bidder. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 15tb DAY OF JULY, 1996. Michael Potter, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Houghton, City Clerk e I P.+8. 9 July 7, 1996 TO: City Council FROM: Pete Carlson, City Engineer SUBJ: North Frontage Road Feasiblity update Sewer - Trunk Access Charges WWTF Future Expansion Planning 2. d. North Frontage Road Feasibility Study - I will discuss status of the project. With land areas now defined, we should be able to move ahead subject to property owner input. Notices were sent to the subject properties. e. Sewer - Trunk Access Charges - since land areas are defined we can focus on real costs and establish charges. I will bring the information to the meeting. f. WWTF Future Expansion Planning - at the Public Works Committee Meeting of July 10, 1996 we were able to define an "Urban Service Area" with two phases. I will present the findings and discuss what this means to the city. Hopefully, we can establish a future direction from this. More at the meeting. _j*Sprint Unrted Telephone -Midwest CUSTOMER: SYSTEM: DATE: SALES REP: City of Albertville Norstar 3 x 8 September 20, 1995 Jeanne Davis EQUIPMENT AND SERVICE QUOTED: QUANTITY EQUIPMENT AND SERVICE DESCRIPTION 1 Norstar Key Service Unit - (Capacity 3 x 8) 4 M-7310 Key Telephones 1 Ground Bar 3 250V Analog Live Protector PURCHASE OPTION: Equipment Total $1,740.00 plus tax �h Direct sale includes installation, training, and a one year warranty on all parts and labor. Thereafter, optional maintenance is available. TELIMAGINE RENTAL OPTION: 36 Month Term S74.00 per month "Pending Credit Approval Accidental Disconnect Protection Answer Buttons Auto Set Relocation Autodial Keys Auxiliary Ringing Background Music Busy Lamp Indication Button Inquiry Call Duration Timer Call Forward Call Log Calling Name Display Calling Number Display Camp On Central Answering Position Centrex Feature Transparency n� NORSTAR FEATURES CLASS Interface Class of Service CO Voice Mail Message Waiting Indication Conference Contrast Adjustment Delayed Ring Transfer Dial-0 Sets Direct Station Select Buttons Disconnect Supervision Discriminating Ringing Distinctive Ringing Cadence Do Not Disturb Flexible Numbering Plan Group Listening Handsfree Headset Compatibility Hearing Aid Compatibility Hold Hot Line Language Choice Last Number Redial Line Pools Multiple Line Appearances On Hook Dialing Paging PBX/Centrex Reach Through Prime Line Prime Set(s) Priority Call Privacy on Lines Pulse to Tone Conversion Release Restrictions and Overrides Not inclusive of all features. All features not available on all models. M7100 M7208 M7310 Norstar Telephones are available in Black, Ash and Gray. Meridian, Norstar, and StarTalk are trademarks of Northern Telecom. m Northern Telecom 1992. Printed in U.S.A All information is subject to change. Northern Telecom reserves the right, without notice, to change its products as progress in engineering or manufacturing methods or other circumstances may warrant. Ringing Line Preference Saved Number Redial Selective Line Redirection Service Modes Set Speed Dial System Speed Dial Startup Templates Telephone Admin. Lock Time/ Display Transfer Trunk Answer From Any Station Voice Call (manual, automatic) Voice Call Deny Volume Control M7324 fft not"wen rn Northern Telecom Inc. Small Business Marketing Division 565 Marriott Drive, Suite 300 Nashville, Tennessee 37214 Tel:1-800-321-2649 920110 11/92 *1 BUSNESS RECORDS CORPORATION November 29, 1995 Mr. Garrison Hale City of Albertville PO Box 234 Albertville, MN 55301 Dear Garrison: The purpose of this letter is to inform you and your council/board of recent developments in the acquisition of our Optech III-P Eagle Vote Tabulation System in Wright County. Currently in Wright County, the Cities of Buffalo, Monticello, Otsego, Cokato, Delano and Rockford along with Rockford Township have used our system in their elections. Recently, the Towns of Monticello, Maple Lake, and Marysville have purchased our system and the City of St. Michael has put money in their budget for the purchase of the system. We at Business Records Corporation (BRC) have come up with special pricing on our Optech III-P Eagle and Maintenance Agreement to encourage jurisdiction's to adopt the latest in voting technology. I have included a proposal for this system along with a maintenance agreement and a Minnesota User list. If you have any questions on the proposal or would like to see a demonstration of this remarkable system, please call me a 1-800-800-8225. Sincerely, Michael Hoversten Sales Representative Enclosures 7227 Third Street South, P.O. Box 1082, St. Cloud, MN 56302 Phone: 612-253-2170 Optech III-P Eagle Proposal Wright County, Minnesota Quantity Description Price 1 Optech III-P Eagle $ 5,200 each Includes: Optech III-P Eagle Prom Pack Steel Ballot Box Licensed Software Training 1 Back Up Prom Pack $ 315 each (Required by State of MN) 1 Model VI Voting Booth (Optional) $ 219 each TOTAL 5 515.00 All prices are F.O.B. Berkeley, California MAINTENANCE WARRANTY This shipment is warranted against defective components and workmanship for a period of one year from date of delivery, provided that it is in accordance with BRC recommended procedures/ specifications and BRC approved ballots. During the warranty period, BRC will repair or replace equipment or components that arc defective. No other warranty is expressed or implied. * OPTECH III-P Eagle Includes OPTECH III -PE MAINTENANCE COSTS All parts, labor and access to backup equipment and preventative maintenance checks. ELECTION TRAINING AND SUPPORT Includes: Unlimited Training Telephone Consultations Hot -Line Support Priority Access to Staff Software Maintenance Diagnostic Testing Consultation Pre -Election Seminar Test Deck Support Problem Analysis Newsletter Documentation Updates $440/each 2 Yr. Agreement Included Agreement MINNESOTA OPTECH CLIENTS BUSINESS RECORDS CORPORATION MIDWEST COMPANY PAGE 1 OF 1 1 City of Ada 2 City of Albany 3 City of Albert Lea 4 City of Alexandria 5 City of Apple Valley 6 City of Arden Hills 7 City of Austin 8 City of Bass Brook' 9 City of Baudette 10 City of Bayport 11 City of Bloomington 12 City of Birchwood Village 13 City of Brainerd' 14 City of Brooklyn Center 15 City of Brooklyn Park 16 City of Buffalo 17 City of Burnsville 18 City of Champlin 19 City of Chanhassen 20 City of Chisago City 21 City of Chisholm 22 City of Cokato 23 City of Cold Spring 24 City of Corcoran 25 City of Cottage Grove 26 City of Crystal 27 City of Dayton 28 City of Deephaven 29 City of Delano 30 City of Dellwood 31 City of Dodge Center 32 City of Duluth 33 City of Eagan 34 City of Eden Prairie 35 City of Edina 36 City of Excelsior 37 City of Falcon Heights 38 City of Farmington 39 City of Foley 40 City of Forest Lake 41 City of Glenwood 42 City of Golden Valley 43 City of Greenfield 44 City of Hanover 45 City of Hastings 46 City of Hermantown 47 City of Hibbing 48 City of Hopkins 49 City of Hoyt Lakes 50 City of Hugo 51 City of Hutchinson 52 City of Independence 53 City of International Falls 54 City of Inver Grove Heights 55 City of Kasson 56 City of Keewatin 57 City of Lake Elmo 58 City of Lakeland 59 City of Lakeville 60 City of Lauderdale 61 City of Lilydale 62 City of Lindstrom 63 City of Little Canada 64 City of Long Lake 65 City of Loretto 66 City of Mahtomedi 67 City of Maple Grove 68 City of Maple Plain 69 City of Maplewood 70 City of Medina 71 City of Mendota Heights 128 Fort Snelling 72 City of Minneapolis 129 Hibbing ISD z701 73 City of Minnetonka 74 Ciry of Minnetonka Beach 130 Becker County 75 City of Minnetnsta 131 Benton County 76 City of Monticello 132 Canton County 77 City of Moorhead 133 Carver County 78 City of Mound 134 Chippewa County 79 City of Moundsview 135 Clay County 80 City of New Brighton 136 Crow Wing County 81 City of New Hope 137 Dakota County 82 City of Newport 138 Freeborn County 83 City of North Branch 139 Hennepin County 84 City of North Oaks 140 Itasca County 85 City of North Saint Paul 141 Lake of the Woods County 86 City of Oak Park Heights 142 Nobles County 87 City of Oakdale 143 Olmsted County 88 City of Orono 144 Pipestone County 89 City of Osakis 145 Polk County 90 City of Osseo 146 Ramsey County 91 City of Otsego 147 Rice County 92 City of Paynesville 148 Saint Louis County 93 City of Plymouth 149 Washington County 94 City of Proctor 150 Wilkin County 95 City of Rice 151 Wright County 96 City of Richfield 97 City of Robbinsdale 152 Alexandria Township 98 City of Rochester 153 Baytown Township 99 City of Rockford 154 Carlos Township 100 City of Rogers 155 Dovre Township 101 City of Rosemount 156 Duluth Township 102 City of Roseville 157 Forest Lake Township 103 City of Saint Anthony 158 Fredenberg Township 104 City of Saint Sonifacius 159 Glendorado Township 105 City of Saint Cloud 160 Gnesen Township 106 City of Saint James 161 Grand Lake Township 107 City of Saint Joseph 162 Grand Rapids Township 108 City of Saint Louis Park 163 Harris Township 109 City of Saint Paul 164 Hassan Township 110 City of Saint Paul Park 165 LaGrande Township 111 City of Sartell 166 Lakewood Township 112 City of Sauk Centre 167 Langola Township 113 City of Sauk Rapids 168 Maine Prairie Township 114 City of Shoreview 169 May Township 115 City of Shorewood 170 Mindon Township 116 City of South Saint Paul 171 New Scandia Township 117 City of Spring Park 172 Rice Lake Township 118 City of Stillwater 173 Rockford Township 119 City of Tonka Bay 174 Rockville Township 120 City of Vadnais Heights 175 Saint Cloud Township 121 City of Virginia 176 Saint Joseph Township 122 City of Waconia 177 Stillwater Township 123 City of Waite Park 178 Wakefield Township 124 City of Wayzata 179 Watab Township 125 City of West Saint Paul 180 West Lakeland Township 126 City of White Bear Lake 181 White Township 127 City of Woodbury 182 White Bear Lake Township Pevlsed in Sr Cloud on 611195 C p44'4KTGA40V•USE1qS BUSINESS RECORDS CORPORATION Optech III-P Hardware Optech III-P Eagle Hardware As part of its continuing service plan to BRC election customers, BRC offers several hardware maintenance plans. These plans are tailored to meet the variety of customer needs within BRC. Hardware/Labor & Parts/BRC-Site • Two preventive maintenance inspections at BRC site • Client determines what year (s) inspections occur • Problem analysis • Modification and upgrades to Optech units as determined by BRC (ex. engineering changes - stickers) • All labor - full service - covers all work performed • All parts, excluding ribbons, batteries, other consumable • BRC will provide loaner units for equipment failing to operate through fault of BRC within 24 hours • Access to back-up units for election night • Replacement of lithium batteries in prom packs - client pays for battery • BRC will automatically replace batteries that are over 42 months old, unless client requests otherwise • Batteries must be replaced depot, only - client will send prom pack to BRC.