1996-08-05 CC Agenda/Packetr
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
August 5, 1996
7:00 PH
7:00 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL/ADOPT AGENDA
(Mayor/Clerk/Council)
7 : 05 2. MINUTES (Council)
a. Regular City Council Meeting - July 1, 1996
b. Special Council Meeting - July 15, 1996
C. Special Council Meeting - July 24, 1996
7:10 3. AUDITING CLAIMS (Council)
7:15 4. CITIZEN FORUM - 10 Minute Limit
7 : 25 5. CONSENT AGENDA [ * ] (Counci 1)
a. Financial Statement - July
b. City Department Report
• C. WWTF Operation Report June 1996 (PSG)
d. Approve 1997 Assessment Contract with Wright County
Assessor
e. Economic Development Partnership of Wright County
Dues for 1996 - $500
f. Resolution #1996-49 (Appointment of Election Judges)
7:30 6. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. North Frontage Road Sanitary Sewer Project
(Engineer)
- Resolution #1996-50 (Ordering Project/Plan &
Specs)
- Resolution #1996-51 (Advertising Bids)
b. Sign Ordinance: Institutional Signs (NAC, Inc)
C. STMA Youth/Hockey Assn. Ice Arena
8 :15 7. NEW BUSINESS
a. Resolution #1996-52 (Resolution Adopting the Annual
Evaluation and Planning Survey for the Minnesota
Pollution Contral Agency) (PSG)
b. Parkside 3rd Addition Developer's Agreement
(Attorney)
C. Parkside 3rd Addition - Final Plat (Keno)
1
d.
Zoning Ordinance/Comprehensive Plan Update - Cost
Estimates (NAC, Inc.)
• e.
Request from WCCA to use old city hall an additional
day per month for WIC Program (WIC)
f.
Recommendation from P&Z to deny rezoning request for
All -Metro Builders
g.
Recommendation from P&Z to deny rezoning request for
Center Oaks
h.
Request from P&Z for Council to fund the portion of
survey costs for the Park & Trail Plan not covered
by donations
i.
Recall of 1988 Sewer & Water Revenue Bonds -
$119,173.75 Pay Off on December 1, 1996 (Consider
use of SAC Fund Balance of $501,490.85 as of
7 / 30/ 96) (Finance Committee)
j .
Robert Heuring property drainage (Attorney Bond)
k.
Consider offer on Barthel Industrial lot (Realtor)
1.
Request to use construction easement for 60th Street
NE Trunk Line Extension Project (Meyer-Rohlin, Inc)
9 :15 8. CCKWI L REPORTS (council)
•
9 : 30 9. ADJOURIGENT (council)
2
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
August 5, 1996
Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM
PRESENT: Mayor Michael Potter, Councilmembers Curt Muyres,
Duane Berning, John Vetsch, and Sharon Anderson, City Administrator
Garrison Hale, City Clerk Linda Houghton, City Engineer Peter
Carlson, and City Attorney Mike Couri
Mayor Potter called the regular meeting of the Albertville
City Council to order.
The agenda was amended by adding the following:
7c=1 Request from Kenco, Inc. to stockpile fill on Roden
property
7c-2 Title Problem on Water Tower Lot
7c-3 Excess monies in TIF Bond Fund from TIF's 2, 3, & 4
Berning made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Anderson
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 1,
1996, regular meeting, the minutes of the July 16, 1996, special
meeting and the minutes of the July 24, 1996, special meeting as
amended. Muyres seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Muyres made a motion to approve payment of Check Vs 10318 -
10359 as presented. Anderson seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Mayor Potter asked if anyone wished to address the Council
under Citizen Forum.
Several local youths requested the Council to consider
locating a place where skateboarding would be permissible.
Councilmember Berning suggested that the Council could consider
allowing skateboarders to use the basketball areas at City Park and
Four Seasons Park. Discussion occurred as to what liability the
City may encounter by allowing this use. The consensus of the
Council was to refer the question of liability to the city attorney
prior to further discussion at the August 19, 1996, meeting.
Muyres made a motion to approve the Financial Statement for
June., Anderson seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Muyres made a motion to approve the City Department Report as
presented. Anderson seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Muyres made a motion to approve the Wastewater Treatment
Facility Operation Report for the month of June as presented.
Anderson seconded the motion. All voted aye.
.-� Muyres made a motion to approve the 1997 Assessment Contract
with Wright County at a per parcel rate of $6.50 and to authorize
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
August 5, 1996
Page 2 of 7
the administrator to execute the contract. Anderson seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
Muyres made a motion to approve City membership in the
Economic Development Partnership of Wright County at a cost of
$500. Anderson seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Muyres made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1996-49 titled
APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES FOR THE PRIMARY AND GENERAL
ELECTIONS. Anderson seconded the motion. All voted aye.
City Engineer Pete Carlson reviewed the proposed North
Frontage Road Sanitary Sewer Project with the Council. A public
hearing was conducted on July 24 on the project.
Berning made a motion to order the North Frontage Road
Sanitary Sewer Project and to adopt RESOLUTION #1996-50 titled
RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD SANITARY SEWER PROJECT. Vetsch seconded the
motion. Berning, Vetsch, Anderson and Muyres voted aye. Potter
abstained. The motion carried.
Berning made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1996-52 titled
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE NORTH
FRONTAGE ROAD SANITARY SEWER PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT
FOR BIDS. Muyres seconded the motion. Berning, Muyres, Anderson
and Vetsch voted aye. Potter abstained. The motion carried.
Charles Van Heel, representing the STMA Youth Hockey
Association, addressed the Council with a request that the City of
Albertville consider owning and operating an ice arena to be
constructed on the Don Barthel property. In order to qualify for
the Mighty Ducks $250,000 grant, the arena must be a partnership
with a public entity, such as a city, a county or a school
district.
The total construction cost of the arena is anticipated to be
$1,000,000. Of that amount, Van Heel explained that $400,000, not
including the $250,000 grant, has been raised for the ice arena.
Highland Bank has shown interest in providing financing for the
balance of the project (approximately $400,000). The STMA Hockey
Association is also asking that the City consider issuing bonds for
$400,000 for construction of the arena.
Councilmember Muyres suggested that the Hockey Association
make a similar presentation to the City of St. Michael and the
I.S.D. #885 School Board.
Potter made a motion endorsing a joint partnership with the
City of Albertville, the City of St. Michael, the STMA Hockey
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
.-� August 5, 1996
Page 3 of 7
Association and I.S.D.#885, if possible, in an attempt to secure
the Mighty Ducks grant. Muyres seconded the motion. All voted
aye.
Kelsie McGuire and Kelly Browning of PSG reviewed the
Evaluation and Planning Survey of the wastewater treatment facility
with the Council. The survey must be submitted to the Minnesota
PCA after the Council has completed its review. Potter made a
motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1996-52. titled RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE
ANNUAL EVALUATION AND PLANNING SURVEY FOR THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION
CONTROL AGENCY. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
City Attorney Couri reviewed the draft of the Developer's
Agreement for the Parkside 3rd Addition. Couri explained that the
agreement provides for the City to reimburse the developer (Kenco
Construction, Inc.) for trunk sewer access charges that may be
collected in the future from properties that benefit from the trunk
sewer line installed and paid for by the developer. The City 's
obligation to reimburse the developer will cease after a period of
seven years.
Surety for the project is proposed as a combination of an
.-� irrevocable letter of credit and a performance bond. The letter of
credit represents 75% of the estimated cost of the improvements and
the performance bond represents 150% of the remaining 25% of the
cost of the improvements. The exact amount of the surety required
is unknown at this time, but Couri is comfortable with the Council
approving the formulas used in the draft agreement with the actual
amounts to be calculated based on the bid prices.
Park dedication will consist of 2.7 acres of park land
included on the plat and the balance in a cash payment to the City.
The Council agreed to have City Engineer Peter Carlson inspect the
proposed park property to ensure that the property is outside of
the wetland areas.
Don Jensen, representing the developer, explained to the
Council that Kenco has requested permission from Wright County to
improve County Ditch #9 by cleaning and adding detention/water
quality ponds at the developer's costs. The developer has not
received permission at this time.
Jensen further requested that the City not require payment of
the $400 per acre lift station portion of the trunk sewer access
fee at the time of final plat, but rather, make it payable on a 60
day notice of billing. Jensen also asked that the Developer's
Agreement be changed to extend the reimbursable period from seven
years to ten years.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
August 5, 1996
Page 4 of 7
Couri recommended that the Council deny the request to delay
payment of the Trunk Charges for Parkside 3rd Addition. He also
explained that the seven year period included in the draft
agreement was negotiable.
The Council agreed to extend the time line for installation of
silt fencing no later than 37 days after the curb is installed.
Anderson made a motion to approve the Developer's Agreement
for Parkside 3rd Addition with the following:
(1) The exact amounts of the sureties to be provided will be
determined as soon as costs are known.
(2) Park dedication fees will be adjusted by deleting the
commercial acreage in the formula used for calculating
fees.
(3) The trunk sewer fee will be recalculated.
(4) The plat meets all specifications.
(5) The dedicated park land meets the engineer's approval.
(6) The reimbursable time period for the trunk sewer charges
will be extended to July 31, 2006.
Potter seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Potter made a motion to grant final plat approval for the
Parkside 3rd Addition, contingent upon the developer entering into
a Developer's Agreement with the City. Vetsch seconded the motion.
All voted aye.
Couri reported that Kenco has rescinded the request to
stockpile dirt on the Beatrice Roden property and no action by the
Council is necessary.
Couri reported that a title defect has been identified on the
water tower lot. When the City purchased the property from the
Marx family thirty or so years ago, the title to the land was never
completed. Accordingly, the City of Albertville is shown to have
only a one -ninth interest in the property. Several of the other
parties listed are now deceased. Couri explained the City can
attempt to get a quiet title in court, but if the quiet title is
challenged, the issue would go to trial. The closing was scheduled
last week and the closing documents signed by the clerk state that
the City is responsible for "any or all" costs for securing a clear
title. Although Couri does not anticipate a lengthy or costly
process to secure a quiet title, he is uncomfortable with the
clause stating "any or all". He advised the Council to reject the
agreement at this time and in good faith attempt a quiet title
action. Should the buyers still wish to purchase the property
after the title is clear, the City would give them first rights.
^ The would-be purchasers of the lot explained that they have
expended approximately $5,300 in anticipation of purchasing the
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
August 5, 1996
Page 5 of 7
water tower lot. Their expenses include soil borings, a lot
survey, building plans for the house planned for construction and
improvements (siding, carpeting, and finished basement) to their
current home to improve chances of selling that home.
Muyres made a motion to void the closing contracts and to
request the Carlsons submit receipts for expenditures directly
related to the lot for consideration by the Council on August 16,
1996. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Couri explained that there are excess monies in the debt
service fund for the 1984A $270,000 Tax Increment Bonds of
approximately $180,000. The bonds financed TIF #'s 2, 3, and 4.
The bonds have been paid and the TIF's have been decertified. The
City cannot amend TIF districts that are decertified to make use of
the excess funds. Couri has been in contact with the State Auditor
and the Wright County Auditor regarding these funds. The County
and the school district portion of the excess TIF funds must be
returned to the County for normal tax disbursement. The City is
entitled to keep the City's normal share of the taxes,
approximately $60,000, to use for any purpose.
Anderson made a motion to table discussion of the Sign and
Zoning Ordinances due to the absence of the city planner. Vetsch
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Muyres made a motion to approve the request from Wright County
Community Action for use of the old city hall an additional day per
month for WIC services (Third Thursday of the month 8:00 AM to $:30
PM). Anderson seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council discussed the recommendation from the Planning
Commission to deny the rezoning request from R-1 to B-1 for the All
Metro Builders building located at 5667 Main Avenue.
Chuck Krchema, owner of All Metro Builders, explained that he
wants to make the entire building professional offices. He
provided a sketch plan of his ideas for the renovations and
improvements that he is proposing.
The Planning Commission has found that rezoning the property
would be "spot rezoning" and has recommended against rezoning.
Krchema suggested that if the Council chooses not to rezone the
property B-1, allowing professional buildings as permitted uses,
the Council consider amending the R-1 district to allow
professional buildings to be a conditional use.
Councilmember Muyres suggested that although it is not ideal
to have mixed uses in residentially zoned property, the Council
must deal with the past and allow spot zoning in the old areas of
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
^ August 5, 1996
Page 6 of 7
the City. The City would benefit from the increased tax base
created by the improvements Krchema is proposing.
A petition signed by residents within 350 feet of the property
was presented to the Council.. The residents are opposed to
rezoning the All Metro Builders property.
Councilmember Berning feels that spot zoning is a big issue
and should be avoided.
Based on the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the
planning consultant, Anderson made a motion to adopt the Findings
of Fact and Decision as presented and to deny the rezoning request
from All Metro Builders. Berning seconded the motion. Berning,
Anderson, and Potter voted aye. Vetsch and Muyres voted no. The
motion carried.
Don Jensen and Kent Roessler, representing Center Oaks, asked
the Council to refer their rezoning request back to the Planning
Commission. Jensen presented a letter to the Council requesting
the Council appoint two members of the Council and two members of
the Planning Commission to meet with the developers fact finding,
.� workshop oriented basis for a period of two months to attempt to
develop a master planning schedule and goals mutually beneficial.
Berning made a motion directing staff to notify Center Oaks in
writing of the necessity of a 60 day extension on their rezoning
request and to appoint Councilmembers Vetsch and Muyres to the
committee to discuss creation of a master plan of development.
Potter seconded the motion. Berning, Vetsch and Potter voted aye.
Anderson and Muyres voted no. The motion carried.
Anderson made a motion to table action on the request from the
Planning Commission to fund a portion of the survey costs for the
Comprehensive Park and Trails Plan to the August. 19, 1996, meeting.
Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Anderson made a motion to refer consideration of recalling the
1988 Sewer and Water Revenue Bonds to the Finance Committee.
Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Robert Heuring and his attorney, Andy Bond, presented a claim
for crop damages and ditch cleaning to the Council. Heuring claims
that the construction of the high school and the development of the
surrounding property has caused excessive amounts of storm water to
be directed onto his property, causing $5,000 in damages and losses
to his crop over the past three years. In addition, Heuring claims
he had spent $1,315 to improve the drainage ditch located on his
property in an attempt to get the excess storm water off his crops
and into County Ditch 9.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
August 5, 1996
Page 7 of 7
City Engineer Pete Carlson explained that the ditch Heuring
has cleaned is a private ditch and is not a part of the County
ditching system. Further, Wright County has recommended that
County Ditch 9 not be cleaned until problems down stream are
corrected.
City Attorney Couri told the Council the issue of drainage
from the high school is an issue between two private property
owners and he recommended that Heuring take his concerns to the
school board for consideration.
Potter made a motion to deny payment of the claims presented
by Heuring and his attorney. Anderson seconded the motion. All
voted aye.
Laurie Karnes, representing Land For Sale, presented an offer
on the Barthel Industrial Drive site from Eull Concrete Products,
Inc. in the amount of $22,974. The property was listed for sale at
$75,000. Mayor Potter indicated that he is more in favor of
directing the lot to the EDA for use as an incentive in attracting
a new business than sell the lot for $23,000. The Council also
discussed the fact that the City has more money tied into the lot
.-. than the what is being offered.
Muyres made a motion to reject this offer fromEull Concrete
Products in the amount of $22, 974, to propose a counter offer after
the City has determined its total costs involved in the lot, and to
order an abstract for the lot to ensure a clear title. Anderson
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Anderson made a motion to approve Meyer-Rohlin's request to
utilize the temporary construction easements associated with the
CSAH 19/37 Intersection Realignment Project to install the 60th
Street Sewer Trunk Line Extension. Vetsch seconded the motion.
All voted aye.
Because there is a question as to whether notice of the public
hearing to amend TIF District #5 was published as required by law,
Anderson made a motion to schedule a rehearing on September 16,
1996, at 7:00 PM. Muyres seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The meeting was adjourned at 12:25 AM.
Michael Potter, Mayor
inda Houghto Clerk
UPCQM I NG MEET I NGS/ IMPORTANT DATES
August 13
Regular
Planning & Zoning Meeting
7:00FM
August 19
Special
City Council
Meeting (WWTF Planning
7:00 Hsi
& 1997
Budget)
August 26
Regular
Joint Powers
Board Meeting
7:30FM
September
2
Legal Holiday
- City
Offices Closed
September
3
Regular
City Council
Meeting (Tuesday)
7:00FM
September
10
Regular
Planning & Zoning
Meeting
7:OOFM
September
16
Special
City Council
Meeting (if necessary)
7:00 PM
September
23
Regular
Joint Powers
Meeting
7:30FM
September
24
Special
Planning & Zoning
Meeting
7:00 1M
(if necessary)
October 7
Regular
City Council
Meeting
7:OOFM
G]
ALBS TVILLE CITY COUNCIL
July 1, 1996
Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM
PRESENT: Mayor Michael Potter (arrived 8:17 PM),
Councilmembers Curt Muyres, Duane Berning, John Vetsch, and Sharon
Anderson (9:50 PM), City Administrator Garrison Hale, City Clerk
Linda Houghton, City Engineer Peter Carlson, and City Attorney Mike
Couri
Mayor Potter called the regular meeting of the Albertville
City Council to order.
The agenda was amended as follows:
(1) Add Item 5e - Accept Fire Insurance Classification
(2) Add Item 6 - North Frontage Sanitary Sewer Project -
Discussion
(4) Add before Item 7e - Closed session (approximately 9:30
PM) to discuss annexation settlement
Berning made a motion to approve the agenda as amended.
Muyres seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The minutes of the June 3, 1996, meeting were amended to state
that Acting Mayor Berning called the meeting to order.
Muyres made a motion to approve the minutes of the June 3,
1996, regular meeting as amended and the minutes of both special
meetings conducted on June 17, 1996. Berning seconded the motion.
All voted aye.
Vetsch made a motion to approve payment of Check Vs 110251 -
10288 as presented. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Bunny Hall, Chair of the Relay for Life Committee, explained
the schedule of events to be conducted on July 26 at STMA High
School. The committee requested use of the city's tables and
chairs for the event. The Council agreed to allow the Committee to
use the picnic tables and chairs from City Park for the event.
Ernest Peake, attorney representing Balfany Development and
Bernard Roden, expressed his client's pleasure with the potential
annexation agreement as they understand it. The Council will
discuss the potential agreement later in the meeting.
Berning made a motion to approve the Financial Statement for
June. Muyres seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to approve the Follow Up Sheet from the
June 3, 1996, meeting as presented. Muyres seconded the motion.
All voted aye.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
July 1, 1996
Page 2 of 6
Berning made a motion to approve the City Department Report as
presented. Muyres seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to approve the Wastewater Treatment
Facility Operation Report for the month of May as presented.
Muyres seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to approve payment of the Central
Minnesota Initiative Fund Partners Pledge for 1996/97 in the amount
of $1,000. Muyres seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council reviewed Ordinance #1996-13. The Council agreed
to delete Section 2(c). Berning made a motion to approve ORDINANCE
#1996-13 titled AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF
SIDEWALKS, PROHIBITING THE USE OF DEVICES KNOWN AS SKATEBOARDS,
ROLLER SKATES/BLADES, AND SCOOTERS IN SIDEWALKS AND STREETS IN THE
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE as amended.
Muyres seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to approve ORDINANCE #1996-17 titled AN
ORDINANCE PROHIBITING LOITERING AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR
VIOLATION AND ENFORCEMENT THEREOF. Muyres seconded the motion.
All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to
Albert's Church on July 21, 1996,
Albert's Parish Center. Muyres
aye.
approve a 3.2 License for St.
from noon to 7:00 PM at the St.
seconded the motion. All voted
Berning made a motion to accept a $1000 donation from the
Knights of Columbus for park improvements. Muyres seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion ratifying and confirming the charges for
copies at $0.25 per copy. Muyres seconded the motion. All voted
aye.
Berning made a motion to accept the City Attorney's Project
Update reports as presented. Muyres seconded the motion. All
voted aye.
Berning made a motion to accept the Fire Insurance
Classification report for the City of Albertville as presented.
Muyres seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Potter made a motion to table action on RESOLUTION #1996-46
pending the outcome of the potential settlement of the annexation
agreement. Muyres seconded the motion. All voted aye.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
July 1, 1996
Page 3 of 6
Potter made a motion to allow the Relay for Life Committee to
use the available tables and chairs from City Park and Four Seasons
Park on July 26, 1996. Muyres seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council postponed discussion of the Concept Plan Agreement
Ofor the Sylvester Kolles property until the city attorney is
present.
City Engineer Carlson has recommended that the City Council
work with the School Board to create a park and a storm water
retention pond on the school -owned field behind the primary school
to correct the drainage problems in the area.
Muyres made a motion directing Mayor Potter to discuss the
issue of drainage and the City Engineer's recommendations for
correcting the problem with the -School Board. Berning seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
The Council postponed discussion of the Parkside 3rd Addition
Grading Permit Letter of Credit until the attorney arrives.
City Engineer Carlson will have plans and specs for the North
Frontage Road Sanitary Sewer Extension ready for the July 15, 1996,
special meeting.
City Attorney Couri reviewed the Concept Plan Agreement with
Sylvester Kolles for his entire property. Potter made a motion to
approve the Concept Plan Agreement as presented, contingent upon
the engineer's approval. Muyres seconded the motion. All voted
aye.
The Council discussed the Parkside 3rd Addition Grading Permit
and the appropriate letter of credit necessary to be held as
surety. Kent Roessler proposes to allow the letter of credit in
the amount of $21,450 still held by the City for Parkside 1st and
2nd Additions for the grading permit surety. City Engineer Pete
Carlson has recommended that the surety be in the amount of
$50,000. Roessler believes a $50,000 letter of credit is
excessive, but he will provide that amount.
Don Jensen, Development Director for Kenco Construction, has
proposed using a combination of a letter of credit to cover city's
expenses in the Parkside 3rd Addition and bond to cover the actual
construction and installation portions of the development. City
Attorney Couri stated that bonds are "developer friendly" but he
doesn't see the benefit to the City to use bonds. Collecting on
bonds is more difficult that drawing on a letter of credit.
Jensen also discussed Kenco's desire to obtain building
permits for three model homes in the Parkside 3rd Addition before
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
July 1, 1996
Page 4 of 6
the curb, gutter and street is completed. The homes would be
constructed on lots accessible to the existing gravel farm road.
The homes will be designed and constructed with a 5% slope to the
curb elevation to ensure that there is adequate slope after the
curb is installed. City Attorney Couri indicated that a separate
agreement should be drafted if the Council allows early
construction. Councilmember Vetsch is opposed to allowing building
permits to be issued prior to installation of the curb.
Muyres made a motion to approve the Grading Contract for the
Parkside 3rd Addition with a $50,000 letter of credit as surety,
and to direct the City engineer to draft an agreement allowing for
the early construction of three model homes in the Parkside 3rd
Addition. Potter seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council briefly discussed the letter of credit vs. bonding
for surety on the entire Parkside 3rd Addition. Councilmember
Muyres feels the Council may allow a combination of the two types
of sureties, provided the letter of credit covers the majority of
the project.
Engineer Carlson reviewed the North Frontage Road Sewer
Project and stated the main diameter could be increased from the 8"
proposed to serve a larger area. Potter made a motion to establish
a public hearing on the North Frontage Road Sanitary Sewer
Extension for July 24, 1996, at 7:30 PM at City Hall. Berning
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Carlson reviewed the project update list with the Council.
The Council directed Carlson to include paving the shoulder of
50th Street to the high school in the bid letting for the 1996
Street Overlay Project.
Carlson was directed to provide a cost estimates for a
handrail on 50th Street for the 1997 budget process.
The Council discussed the complaint regarding mowing at the
City Park. City Administrator Hale was directed to send a letter
to the mowing contractor regarding the problem areas.
The Council discussed problems encountered during Friendly
City Days with alcohol in the streets and occupancy limits exceeded
in the bars. The Council discussed limiting bar hours, leaving
Main Avenue open to traffic, and fencing beer garden areas as
possible solutions to some of the problems.
The Council concurred to conducting a Clean -Up Day in the fall
and directed staff to contact St. Michael and Frankfort to see if
there is interest in participating.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
July 1, 1996
Page 5 of 6
Potter made a motion to table discussion on the Consolidation
Committee budget requests at this time. Muyres seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
Potter made a motion directing staff to resume conducting
staff meetings with the city planner, engineer, developer and
others prior to scheduling a meeting with the Planning and Zoning
Commission and/or Council. Staff meetings will be conducted on the
fourth Wednesday of the month at 9:00 AM. Berning seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
Muyres made a motion to approve the purchase of 240 yard of ag
lime for the City Park ballfield from Dennis Fehn Gravel and
Excavating at a cost of $15.50 per yard ($3,720.00) and bobcat and
loader costs of $950.00, for a total of $4,670.00. Vetsch seconded
the motion. All voted aye.
Councilmember Muyres reported that the Finance Committee has
agreed with a proposal to ladder approximately $770,000 in
investments to meet future debt service needs. The funds will earn
between 5-7% interest.
City Administrator Hale reported he has reviewed the
performance of PSG after six months and has found some inadequacies
that he has directed to be correctee. PSG personnel have been
reassigned and Hale will continue to observe their performance.
Councilmember Anderson arrived at 9:50 PM and reported that
installation of the playground equipment at Westwind Park will
begin on July 13 and should be completed the next week.
At 9:52 PM, the Council convened in a closed session to
discuss the potential annexation agreement with Special Counsel
Schmitz via telephone conference.
Mayor Potter reconvened the public meeting at 10:30 PM.
Muyres made a motion to approve the annexation settlement
agreement with the following amendments:
(1) Section 9, Paragraph d on Page 10 will be deleted.
(2) Proper exhibits will be added to the final agreement.
(3) Legal descriptions will be corrected.
Anderson seconded the motion. Muyres, Anderson, Potter and Berning
voted aye. Vetsch voted no. The motion carried.
Councilmember Vetsch stated he objected to the settlement
offer because he believes the eastern border should be been
expanded.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
July 1, 1996
Page 6 of 6
Anderson made a motion to adjourn at 10:35 PM. Muyres
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Michael Potter, Mayor
Linda Houghton, Clerk
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
SPECIAL MEETING
Jul? 15, 1996
Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM
PRESENT: Mayor Michael Potter (7:18 PM), Councilmembers Duane
Berning, John Vetsch and Sharon Anderson, City Attorney Mike Couri,
City Engineer Pete Carlson and City Administrator Garrison Hale
Acting Mayor Berning convened the special meeting for the
purpose of considering: TIP amendment related to use of surplus
Debt Service Bond Fund Proceeds, Parkside 3rd Addition Model Home
Agreement, confirm recall of 1991A and 1991B G.O. Improvement
Bonds, Award Bids for Overlay Improvement Project, North Frontage
Road Feasibility Study for Sewer, WWTF Future Expansion,
Recommendation from Public Works Committee regarding telephone
system and Optech III-P Eagle Vote.
Moved by Anderson, supported by Vetsch, to adopt agenda with
addition of Item 2j - Subdivision Ordinance Standard Plates for
utility and street construction. All voted aye.
Acting Mayor Berning convened the public hearing at 7:08 PM
for a proposed TIF amendment that would authorize the use of
available funds and amend the budget to utilize the funds for the
CSAH 19/37 Intersection Realignment Project. Also, an expansion of
the development boundaries to include the city limits as of record
on July 15, 1996 (pre -annexation).
Acting Mayor Berning requested public comment. No person was
present to comment.
Mike Couri explained the TIF District could be terminated
early but the City would lose the use of funds.
Moved by Anderson, supported by Vetsch, to close the public
hearing at 7:18 PM. All voted aye.
Acting Mayor Berning turned the meeting over to Mayor Potter
at 7:19 PM.
Moved by Berning, supported by Anderson, to adopt RESOLUTION
#1996-47. All voted aye.
Mayor Potter moved to an agreement allowing for early
construction of model homes.
City Attorney Couri explained the agreement which allowed for
an early construction of model homes in the Parkside 3rd Addition.
Developer needs to have completed model homes for the Parade of
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
July 15, 1996
Page 2 of 4
Homes. Final Plat is scheduled for August 5, 1996, which is too
late. Under the agreement the developer will not receive a
variance if errors in elevation for construction are found. The
need for a gravel road permitting emergency access is required.
Homes cannot be conveyed until a final occupancy permit is issued.
The building official will only issue Limited Occupancy Permit with
no one staying overnight, bottled water and porta-potty will be
provided on site. Insurance standards satisfactory to the city.
Mike Potter explained the rationale on model homes and the
taking part in Parade of Homes.
Moved by Potter, supported by Vetsch, to authorize "Agreement
Allowing Early Construction of Model Homes City of Albertville
Parkside 3rd Addition". Three aye, 1 nay Anderson, 1 Absent
Muyres.
City Attorney Couri, based on a recommendation of the Finance
Committee to recall early Special Assessment Bond Issues of 1991A
and 1991B G.O. Bonds, explained it was fiscally responsible to call
early and stop the accrued interest. Call dates are August 1 and
September 1, 1996. Both Highland Banks and First National Bank of
Elk River have agreed to waive 90 day notice requirement and
cooperate on an early call.
Councilmember Berning asked about a third bond issue that
dealt with SAC Fees and was it callable early. No recall on a
third bond issue.
Moved by Potter, supported by Anderson, to confirm recall of
1991A and 1991B G.O. Improvement Bonds. All voted aye.
City Engineer Carlson recapped bids for 1996 Street Overlay
Project including City Hall parking lot. Carlson mentioned the
shoulder by the high school need to be added by supplemental
agreement. Estimate is $4,000.
Moved by Potter, supported by Berning, to receive the
following bids:
Buffalo Bituminous $28,787.75
W B Miller Inc. $29,068.75
Hardrives Inc. $29,355.00
Bauerly Brothers Company $29,998.75
Lan -Dar Inc. $43,082.50
Further, to adopt RESOLUTION #1996-48 awarding bid to Buffalo
Bituminous for $28,785.75 for the 1996 Overlay Improvement Project.
All voted aye.
Pete Carlson moved to the North Frontage Road Sanitary Sewer
Extension Project. This project is to provide sanitary sewer
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
July 15, 1996
Page 3 of 4
service to the properties on the 62nd Street frontage road. Line
size was proposed to be 8 inch.
Carlson recommended accepting the feasibility report and offer
trunk charges. Hale discussed the number of parcels available for
assessment.
Moved by Berning, supported by Anderson, to adopt RESOLUTION
#1996-49 Accepting the Feasibility Study for the North Frontage
Road Sanitary Sewer and ratifying the previous council action of
ordering a public hearing for July 24, 1996, at 7:30 at City Hall.
All voted aye.
Engineer Carlson moved to WWTF Future Planning. Purpose was
to layout a preliminary "Urban Service Area" for sanitary sewer.
The proposed annexed areas were included.
Pete Carlson discussed the new city limits and showed
additional areas for service that were in the City of Otsego and
the new City of St. Michael. These areas were included due to the
ability of the City of Albertville to more easily provide service.
The engineer is seeking Council direction on formal final lines to
lock in for an urban service area. Carlson stated we would be
providing sewer service outside the city limits which could lead to
competition from neighboring communities using the city's service.
Councilmembers discussed sewer availability and timing.
Engineer Carlson suggested the City could service on its own
schedule. Joint powers agreement could be required to ensure
everyone understood their responsibility. Discussion looked at 40
hookups a year and providing services beyond the limits to maintain
number of hookups. The urban service area helps define the
ultimate requirements of the treatment plant.
Attorney Couri reviewed the idea of an agreed upon contractual
agreement to be used in providing service to other communities.
Further Council discussion centered on directing the city
engineer to design the sewer districts and truck lines for
consideration at the August 5, 1996, meeting. The future plans do
not require actual pipe installation. The "urban service area"
could be viewed as a planning tool and include surrounding
property.
City Administrator Hale stated the end result is a
"Comprehensive Sewer Plan".
Engineer Carlson explained the urban service area will guide
the future WWTF size and options.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
July 15, 1996
Page 4 of 4
Mayor Potter introduced telephone system quotes as follows:
Sprint United
- Northern Telecom Norstor 3X8 $1,740.00
Communication Sales & Lease
- Northern Telecom Merlin 3X8 $1,766.00
Communications Sales & Lease
- AT & T Partner Plus 2X6 $2,698.00
Northland Communication Corporation
- Toshiba Strata PK8 $2,440.00
Interior Communications Sale
- Telrad 818 System 2X16 $2,695.00
Moved by Anderson, supported by Vetsch, to receive the quotes,
to authorize the purchase a Northern Telecom Norstor 3X8 for
$1,740.00 plus tax from Sprint United Telephone Midwest and to
authorize the mayor to execute a sales agreement. Further, to
approve surplusing the present AT&AT Spirit telephone system and
advertising for seal bids to be opened at the August 19, 1996,
Council meeting. All voted aye.
Mayor Potter introduced the concept of an electronic voter
tabulation system comparable to the Wright County standards.
Moved by Anderson, supported by Vetsch, to approve purchase of
Optech III-P Eagle Electronic Voter Tabulation System from Business
Records Corporation at a cost of $5,515.00 with budget source of
funding recommended by the Finance Committee at a later date. All
voted aye.
Engineer Carlson presented standard plates for utilities and
street design and construction that he would like to incorporate
into the City of Albertville Subdivision Ordinance standards.
Moved by Potter, supported by Anderson, to authorize City
Engineer to prepare Standard Engineering Plates for the Subdivision
Ordinance. All voted aye.
Moved by Berning, supported by Anderson, to adjourn the
meeting at 9:22 PM. All voted aye.
Michael Potter, Mayor
Garrison Hale, Deputy Clerk
ikT-BMTVILLE CITY COUNCIL d;;?CWO
SPECIAL. MEETING
Jul= 24, 1996
Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM
PRESENT: Mayor Michael Potter, Councilmembers Duane Berning,
and John Vetsch, City Attorney Mike Couri, City Engineer Pete
Carlson and City Clerk Linda Houghton
Mayor Potter called the special meeting to order.
The agenda was approved by consensus of the Council.
Mayor Potter opened the public hearing for the purpose of
considering the North Frontage Road Sanitary Sewer Extension.
City Engineer Pete Carlson reviewed the project with the
Council. Carlson explained he had researched sizing of the
proposed trunk line to service the portion of Frankfort Township
that will be annexed to the City of Albertville. He found that
homes north of 58th Street in the Greenhaven Addition cannot be
served by the trunk line without a lift station. He proposes to
construct an eight inch trunk sewer line at a normal depth along
the frontage road with a jack under Country Road 37. A lift
station can be constructed at some time in the future to serve the
other areas. Carlson indicated five properties could be assessed
for the project costs.
Carlson stated that the North Frontage Road Sanitary Sewer
Extension Project is necessary, cost-effective and feasible.
Dick Mlodzik, representing Hoglund Sign Company, asked if
their property was considered assessable. The Council and Carlson
indicated that no assessment on their property was being
considered.
Berning made a motion to accept the recommendation from
Carlson to revise the Feasibility Report to include the statement
that the project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible.
Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
There was no other comment from the audience.
Berning made a motion to close the public hearing at 8:20 PM.
Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Since there was not a complete Council present, Berning made
a motion to place acceptance of the project, ordering plans and
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
July 24, 1996
Page 2 of 2
specs, and acceptance of plans and specs on the August 5, 1996,
Council agenda. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
City Attorney Couri advises the Council to award the contract
for the project contingent upon there being no contested
assessments.
Berning made a motion to approve a $1500 donation to the
Albertville Villains. The Albertville Lions have donated that
amount to the City for recreation purposes.
Berning made amotion to adjourn at 8:30 PM. Vetsch seconded
the motion. All voted aye.
Michael Potter, Mayor
Linda Houghton, Clerk
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
FOLLOW-UP SHEET
As of August 5, 1996
DATE
ACTION TO BE TAKEN
PERSON
7/95
Personnel - Ordinance/Policies
Akin/
Ongoing
CbLrr_il
7/95
Cohen Development - Industrial
P&Z/
On Hold
Staff
01/96
Fire Relief Retirement Fund
Mayor/
In Process
FD/Clk
01/96
SAC Fee - Cash Flow
Eng./
Ongoing
Trunk Access Fees
Cbuxil
04/96
JMJ Properties (Commercial)
Staff
In Process
04/96
Comprehensive Park & Trail Plan
P&Z/
In Process
cancil
05/96
WWTF Planning
Eng.
In Process
05/96
Sidewalk Repairs
CoM it
In Process
EN Gtrn,
05/96
Drainage -- Culvert Lowering under RR Tracks
Eng/
In Process
FWCom.
06/96
Albertville Primary Drainage & Park Project
Staff/
In Process
ISD885
06/96
Sign Ordinance - Institutional Signs
P&Z/
In Process
plate
07/96
Westwind Park Improvement Project
Council
In Process
8/96
CSAH 19/37 Intersection Realignment Project
Staff/
On Hold
CbLxxzl
08/96
Barthel Industrial Lot (1.54 acres)
EDA
08/96
N. Frontage Road Sanitary Sewer Project
Cbincil
In Process
Eng
08/96
1997 Budget & Levy
C=Kil
'-` In Process
FinCtm
08/96 City Planning & Zoning Projects Filing System Atty/
In ProcessUpdate Clerk
08/96 Parkside 3rd Addition Eng.
In Process
08/96 Consultants Coordinating on Council Packet Time
Lines
08/96 C1eanUp Day September 21, 1996, 9:00 AM-1:00 PM Alb/StM
In Process
08/96 Brittany Kay Estates Addition Cbtxic:il
Dev.
I
CITY OF ALBERTV I LLE
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
June 29 - July 31, 1996
Beginning Cash Balance June 29, 1996
INCOME (June 29 - July 31)
Beer Licenses
10.00
Building Permits
12,189.36
Fire Contracts
17,117.80
HACA
67,273.00
Interest (June & July)
464.44
LGA
34,245.50
Loan Payment - Fraser
689.06
Planning Fees
4,153.56
Sewer License
45.00
Sewer/Storm Water
43,305.73
Special Assessment
2,910.18
Tax Settlement
348,227.77
TIF Payments
50,631.80
Title Search
40.00
Miscellaneous
201.00
TOTAL INCOME
Transfer from Savings
EXPENSES (June 29 - July 31)
Check #10251-10288
(Approved 7/1/96) 24,147.64
Preapproved Checks 123,669.36
(List Attached)
TOTAL EXPENSES
581,504.20
50,000.00
147,817.00
$14,772.50
Ending Cash Balance July 31, 1996 $498,459.70
INVESTMENTS:
CD #9226 - Alb. Development Corp. matures 8/6/96
CD #10412 - matures 12/27/96
CD #10190 - matures 3/1/97 @ 5.4%
CD #10203 - matures 3/29/97 @ 5.4%
Dain Bosworth Investments (7/30/96)
TOTAL INVESTMENTS
Money Markey Savings Acct. (7/31/96)
7,132.58
14,310.65
121,443.91
404,451.33
1,269,114.64
$1,816,453.11
$340,184.46
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
BILLS TO BE PAID
August 5, 1996
Check
No. Vendor _
Reason
Amount
10318
Albertville Fire Relief
1/2 City Contrib.
4,500.00
10319
AT&T
Long Distance Calls
36.88
10320
Berning's Mill
Tree/Shrubs City Hall
88.31
10321
CarQuest
Parts/Supplies
86.80
10322
Crow River Rental
Sandblaster/Cmprs.
160.79
10323
DJ's Total Home Care
Supplies
370.75
10324
Dominos
Westwind Park
127.00
10325
Earl F. Anderson
Westwind Park Eq.
23,609.24
10326
Fehn Gravel & Excavating
Lions Shelter
139.35
�-. 10327
Fraser Steel
TIF Taxes
16,491.39
10328
Hack's
Supplies
18.90
10329
Houghton, Linda
Mileage
16.53
10330
Joint Powers Board
Street Sweeping
58.36
10331
Kennedy & Graven
TIF Legal Service
621.60
10332
LaPlant Sanitation
July Service
89.87
10333
Larson Publications
June Legal Notices
1,079.88
10334
Minnegasco
Service
45.24
10335
Minnesota Copy Systems
Copy Use 5/20-7/19
134.69
10336
Minnesota UC Fund
Benefits D. Koch
194.00
10337
MN Dept. Trade/Econ
PFA Loan Payment
49,965.26
10338
MN WW Operators Assoc.
Two Years' Dues
25.00
10339
NAC, Inc.
Planning Services
7,549.69
^ 10340
Pat's 66
Gas
76.61
10341
Post Office
Postage
300.00
10342
Rogers Electric
Coil Cord
15.67
10343
Schmitz & Ophaug
Special Counsel
4,959.15
10344
SEH, Inc.
Engineering
1,410.83
10345
Simonson Lumber Co.
Hockey Boards
652.20
10346
Smith Tire Transport
Disposal of Tires
103.75
10347
Southam Business
1996 Overlay Bids
102.60
10348
Sprint
Telephone Service
345.56
10349
Sprint
Telephone System
1,740.00
10350
Steffens Meats
Meat/Cheese Tray
44.98
10351
Town & Country Fence
Fencing at Parks
1,380.00
10352
Wr. Co. Highway Dept.
Cold Mix
172.96
10353
Fehn Gravel & Excavating
Sand
58.00
10354
Newman Traffic Sign
Westwind Park
127.48
10355
PERA Life Insurance
Payroll Deduction
12.00
10356
Radzwill & Couri
July Legal Service
3,605.00
10357
Valerius, Bill
Fire Dept. Tools
455.63
10358
Vandal, Mary
Refund Damage Deposit
100.00
10359
Weber Oil Company
Diesel
46.81
TOTAL BILLS $121,118.76
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
PREAUTHORIZED CHECKS ISSUED
July i -- July 31, 1996
Check No.
Vendor
Reason
Amount
10289
Delta Dental
Group Insurance
102.15
10290
Highland Bank
Federal Taxes 2,268.96
10291
Medica
Group Insurance
829.25
10292
MN Dept. of Revenue
State Taxes
396.24
10293
MN State Treasurer
2nd Qtr. Surcharge
454.53
k,�y _Period 6/22 .-- /5
P1624
Gary
997.01
P1625
Linda
826.40
P1626
Ken
897.01
10294
PERA
^ 10295
USCM Midwest
Pay Period 7/6 - 7/19
P1627-1629
VOID
P1630
Gary
P1631
Linda
P1632
Ken
10296
Affordable Sanitation
10297
Albertville Villains
10298
American Bank
10299
AT&T
10300
CMIF
10301
Dleta Dental
10302
First Trust
10303
First Trust
10304
Highland Bank
10305
Highland Bank
6/22 - 7/5 343.73
Payroll Deduction 92.00
997.01
826.40
897.01
Parks
117.15
Donation
1,500.00
1988 GO Adv Ref
5,557.50
Long Distance Calls 27.02
Pledge
1,000.00
Group Insurance
102.15
93B GO Imp Bond
3,000.00
93A GO Imp/Ref
10,611.25
91B GO Imp Bond
62,100.00
94 GO Imp Bond
2,407.50
10306
Highland Bank
92 GO Ref/Imp
2,062.50
10307
Medica
Group Insurance
829.25
10308
MN Assoc of Small Cities
Dues
396.80
10309
NSP
Service
2,583.53
10310
PERA
7/6- 7/19
343.73
10311
PSG
August
7.519.16
10312
Sentry Systems, Inc.
Park Alarm
57.51
10313
Steve's Lawn & Snow
June
690.00
10314
USCM Midwest
Payroll Deduction
92.00
10315
Wr. Co. Sheriff's Dept.
June
5,018.75
10316
Wright Recycling
June
931.50
10317
Diversified Inspection
Inspections
5,810.84
Council/Boards/commissions
- July 1996
P1633
Sharon Anderson
198.55
P1634
Duane Berning
161.61
P1635
LeRoy Berning
18.47
P1636
Jim Brown
18.47
P1637
Rod Fraser
18.47
P1638
Howard Larson
18.47
P1639
Curt Muyres
87.73
P1640
Michael Potter
244.73
P1641
Pete Scherer
18.47
P1642
Donatus Vetsch
18.47
P1643
John Vetsch
180.08
TOTAL $123,699.36
400 %W L„ ft/ vow_ V V .d `r
1 p� ?_�..
�'� ► i fir, -L.r,T1, '- --
• V b m 'j. n Id ro
cam. .+ N i N O A W N N �-•` i i A O O O O O O O Q G C ••�
0 0 6 0 O O 0 0 0 O •11�� O N_ 1•+ 1-` .•� �••` '-- J► N O d rt i
S O co O O O O S O O p o O O O
to -
A r N 0 .•" T V+ X C" 'p T CDt1� T -C i r D O V1 !i D co —< O f� O - I
rn fD n1 rt O �• rt rt d r.• rt V ✓- C. O
rn N tD t N (D -� d -t ar lD (D !) (D (D 9 N H (D O/ tq .•+• -� L7 1 I
Z (D w [n d H N s ,-.- -y .--• y ("f ✓ d d.
C rt co .-•• •-O d D (D Co A
rn v o 70 lD CO) o+ V+ rt N m -s C') .—• GS (D h c rt rn 1 •• I
d -1. <D rt O (D cD N O O S 0. D O r (q y (•► •-< �O
< C f7 O_ _ (A i <► rt d D� C .•- .-• S A rt 9 � O --1 d 1 O I
fnN
's cD > > d T 1 r• C7 (G
(D O C rt 1 O (•+ <D <D (a co
Rl O cn (D to
y .-• • -h O ,"* !D <D O to 1-<- CD (D ,-1 • /y h <A s< O \ 1
d Q O <D O <D <D En rh r (D N 0. 1 .O
.--•- C m �-' • "1 to (A O cn 1 P
N IA CDC.
1 (+
<�D- N O- H O I I CD
C7 1
7i O
4 'J• (D CD to CD
<D = <D I O
I w y 1
1 P
f i
1 , i
1 r♦p • I
1 �
�
1
I
1
'
i
1
1
1 O
�
p p
O p
1 O
0 0
I
0 0
O O
O p <
,
1
1 I
1 I
�
1
1
'
1
t
p•
1
m
1 ! S
S S
O S
O a
O
.a►
O
O
1 O OO O 6
1
O O
O O O O <
, I
1 I
1 i
i
1
1
i
I '
I
oWp
Op
I W
P
N
op - ..--
r-r W,1 P r
O O
OD O r-1W OO c
O
1 <l+ b
W W CD
i 0
P b �:l N O •+
uh
O O cy
P O
O<
OD
I O O V VCc)
0 0
I
i I
1
I I
1
1
1
1
1
0>
1
JI
I
I
N
P
N
N
1
N
O
N
W i
1
1
N U
O
W
N O
CO
O O
N
Y O<
V
1 O
U V
O O
w S
O <
I
,
1
1
1
I
�
1
I
1
�
'
I
I
1
1
1
1
I
I
1
I
OD
I
1
►+
i6L
1
U
W
U
W <
I
W
P
A U
a
O pp W pp
P O
W O <Y•
N O<
N
1
1 O i P
O O
W O
N
1 O V V Ct> GC
O O i
OO O O<
1
A
U N
U
V
I U W
1 O I P
i 0
W v U a co j
U U b V O
I
1
i
i
i
<�-
co b i V O f
►o��oo�ao$oo:
ILA i W W
F O
0 o r
0 (
I
O O O O <
0 0 S O O(
01 W �
•••t«rrr�1���111 A
N
A <
U <
C O O S O O(
S S S o <
0 0 o p
�'C>
S S O <
g $ o o <
<
r 6 O <
r O O <
m
a
40
r-
� I
� I
I', I
C
1
1
i
r"
G I
a
� I
C
e
cl
h
co
to
d
to
K
W
C
d i
O
b
A
O
40 v �, V
_o�51 51;: _ 4
I
i I
1 I
I
I
i
J
vao �w W w �o j 140
J OI U A W N 1J 10 ID J U U A W N O � � J •T A W NI
.1 J O1 1
� 1
A C 1
� d
d •• ? 1
I I A 1
(+ ,
?D c > V P O n O m " C O `O 1
A = � b C C C c A A ►. '. A Am A � � A t
IT IT IS IT 7 a A —• 1 O'
AN (► 10 1"r fit- _ w G"f 1 A
O i m G7 c Q) Q) O
+ A
Q � "� (D N N y t•r 1"� K T 1 1 (g
�.. Iv (n
O .�.. e-r m d `•C
r► �r• go
Co1pi-• N A fA W C 0 I sr n=-
\ • O \ 1
S 1 <C- CD A tD
1 L:1 1•+• A 1 r Or �. �. � b b C7.
Oco
P 1
1 Y 1
t I 1
1 1
1 I ,
t m 1
t C t
t m0 1
1 1
1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O 0 0 r•r j
1 O O O O OO O O O O O O O O f
I i
1 D 1
1
i O t
Cl- 1 I �
1
1 b W W
1 N V N O O a m (Jt 4 M / c\
I N (T N 4 00 .O .O V+ O O N ((.�� A
O co � �-+ 1.+ O O O O (JI Q` (•► 1 < x
1
m
f M. C. 0 0 00 0
t 1 17
t t O m
1
TJ
1 c 1 m m
1 I 1--• 1 70
/ 1 m
1a. W _V .r o�
1
1 W N V ; O W W -< W n•M O v7 -N a P N
1C >1 (Jt (T 0 A V (T V c71 00 OO tJ. a tr W I b 1
1 OC. O .O •ci 00 co c I
0 000 • .O P
O O N O� �• O .O O
T 1
1
1 I 1
1 t
1 n 1
1
1 1 1
� 1 l
1 'o QCYw y r tf*. V W a .0 N ? 1
1 O O
O .O P O U't 611 1
i Cs a 8 0 0�
p o o c
a O O C
I
� I
n I
C I
I
i 1
tS' 1
1
a 1
� 1
b 1
1
1
1
1 O p
1
1
C t
7 1
A 1
� 1
�
1
4J N
W t
O N
1
(fit f71 r
1
w 1
1 P V
OD O
J t
(7 1
A 1
I v
1
r
A
1
H 1
c
1
ao r
V .p b 1 d 1
CI?! aF ALHERWILLE
R ION #1"5-59
ES 'ABLISW�T OF A CRPITAL IMPANEMPT PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Albertville is
desirous of establishing a Capital Improvement Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council in interested in
determining the priorities for capital improvements within the
City of Albertville.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, adopts the attached Capital
Improvement Plan Priorities List.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 12TH
DAY OF DECEMBER, 1995.
l
Michael Potter, Mayor
l ATTEBT: ,
Linda Houghton, City rk
-----------------------
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN PRIORITIES
PROJECT RANK
-------------------------------------------------------------------
N. Frontage Sewer 1
GF Working Capital 2
I-94/Frankfort Drainage 3
Westwind Park 4
Walking Paths 5
CH Parking lot 6
CSAH 19/37 7
N(E) Frontage Rd g
& I-94 Water Cross
S(W ) Frontage Water 9
Fire Hall 10
F eeway Ramp 11
P Building 12
Str/Util-BIP 13
WWTF Paving 14
Marx Drainage 15
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
Cost/ Fund/ City/
Expense Revenue Revenue PROJECT
$1,350,000
$ 4 , 900
$1,000,000
$70,000
$2,400
CSAH 19/37 INTERSECTION
County State Aid
City Special Assessment
$280,000 City General Fund
PIARX DRAINAGE DITCH
Marx/Hennum
$2,400 City General Fund
CITY PUBLIC MORKS
$100,000 BUILDING/LAND
$100,000 City General Fund/WWTF/
Lease Purchase Option
$400,000 FIRE HALL - NEW
$400,000 City General Fund/
Community Contracts based
on Tax Capacities
$1,400,000 I-94/CSAH 19 FREEWAY RAWS
f0 MNDOT
$0 Wright County
(City General Fund
$1,400,000 (TIF Local/State
(Other Communities
$32,000
f9,000*
$24,000
I-94/FRANKFORT DRAINAGE
*MNDOT (25%)/City Storm
Draiange Fund
TIF
$1,000 62nd ST NE STREET LIGHTS
$1,000 City General Fund
NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD
$78,350 SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION
$78,350 Special Assessments
STFIT'S/UTILITY IMPRUVUENT
$590,184 BARTHEL INDUSTRIAL PARK
$590,184 City General Fund/Special
Assessments
$42,000 WESTWIND PARK
$42,000 City Park Dedication Fees
$19 , 800
COMP PLAN UPDATE
$19,800
City General Fund
$10,000
SALT SHED
$10,000
City General Fund
$15,000
WALKING PATH TO SCHOOLS
$15,000
City General Fund
$5,000
CITY HALL PARKING LOT
$5,000
City General Fund
$24,000
WWTF PAVING
$24,000
WWTF Fund
NORTH (EAST) FRONTAGE ROAD
i I-94 CROSSING WATER
$172,500
EXTENSION
$172,500
City General Fund/Special
Assessments
SOUTH (WEST) FRONTAGE ROAD
$42,200
WATER EXTENSION
$42,200
City General Fund/Special
Assessments
6EIiERAL FUND RESERVE FOR
WIM I N6 CAPITAL (SIX MONTH
$231,860 OF CURRENT YEAR BUDGET
$231,860 City General Tax Levy
$4,518,694 $1,150,750 $3,367,944
MEMORANDUM
TO: GARY HALE, CITY ADMINISTRATOR, CITY COUNCIL
FROM:! MIKE COURT, CITY ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: PROJECT UPDATES.
DATE: AUGUST 1, 1996
Below is,a status update on various projects pending in the
City;of Albertville:
1. *ighway 07/19---Appraisals are expected back in the first week
of August. The public purpose hearing was held on July 19th
in Distx ct Court. Because the County does not need the
,properties until mid -September, I asked. the judge to delay
'issuing his order for 30 days to allow the City time to
;,negotiate with the land owners once the appraisals come back.
,.If we can settle the cases before the judge issues his order,
;the City will save several thousand dollars in condemnation
fees. Either way, the City will need to pay each landowner
before the City gets title to the new right-of-way. I expect
;that many of these payments will be made in August or early
:September.
At this point the County is at least a month behind in
;finishing the plans and specs for the project. While a 1996
construction of Highway 37 through John George, Inc.'s
property' is possible, it is increasingly unlikely. I am
;currently working with John George, Inc. regarding a
;construction date early summer, 1997.
2. ParksideiII1--A final draft of the Developer's agreement has
;been prepared and is being reviewed by Kenco. The agreement
'anticipates that the City will adopt a trunk charge ordinance
!and will refund some of the future trunk charges to Kenco.
3. �LDCO--The letter of credit for this plat expired this spring,
before the grading work was performed. The City can still
recover the costs by assessing the landowner (as permitted
!under the Developer's agreement). To do so, the City must
!first bill MLDCO for the costs incurred. If the costs are not
paid in 30 days, the City can assess the Marx property for the
1costs incurred.
4. �oncept
ittle Mountain Development --Sylvester Kolles has submitted a
plan which is currently being reviewed by City staff.
!Once approved by City staff, the concept plan agreement will
'be executed by all parties.
! 1
S. IXi proposed Retail Development --Nothing new to report. The
Developer will be in town next week to meet with the City
Administrator and myself to discuss development costs.
f. ice Hockey Arena --The City Administrator and I have met with
!some of the members of the STMA Hockey Association regarding
!City assistance with the proposed arena. STMA is discussing
'Various alternatives, including a joint -powers arrangement to
Help with Mighty Ducks funding (a $250,000 state grant
,program). and a possible bond issuance to help finance the
arena. The City Administrator and myself indicated that a
!bond issue by the City of Albertville for arena construction
would be unlikely in light of the City's current debt load and
'infrastructure demands. STNA will discuss the matter with the
'school district and St. Michael before determining how to
;proceed.
7. `:8lection Law Requirements --Currently working with the
Secretary of State and the County Auditor to comply with state
law requiring the City to notify all newly -annexed residents
;of a change in their polling place (i.e. they now vote at the
'City of Albertville rather than Otsego or Frankfort) . Notices
to residents must be sent by mid -August on a form approved by
!the Secretary of State.
2
I PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES GROUP, INC.
ALBERTN ILLE WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITY
JUKE 1996
MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT
se,
Submitted b : ► ' `
Kelly Browning
Date: July 23, 1996
DA TFs :
M E M O R A N D U M
Mayor and Council
PSG, Houston
Garrison Hale, City
Kelsle McGuire, PSG
August 1, 1996
Administrator —/�X7
RE Wastewater Treatment Facility O&M
We met on 7/29/96 to review and discuss project quality
at the wastewater treatment facility. Our meeting was
followed by a tour. The facility is exceptionally clean,
effluent quality is well within discharge standards, and
maintenance is up to date_ All and all, the facility is
in excellent condition. This has been accomplished by
effort exerted on the part of both parties in the true
spirit of the public/private partnership that we had
hoped to form. We have worked to establish frequent and
open communication and believe that we have accomplished,
to date, the goals and objectives that the Council and
PSG have established for us to maintain.
Thank you.
Albertville Wastewater Treatment Facility
Monthly Operations Report
June 1996
Executive Summary
The plant had an average influent flow of 0.203 MGD for the month of June 1996.
All NPDES permit requirements were met with the discharge having an average
total phosphorous of 0.716 mg/l, CBOD of 2.9 mg/l, and TSS of 26 mg/I. Fecal
coliform was less than 10 MPN/100 mi.
No major operational problems were encountered the month of June 1996.
Operations and Maintenance
Thorough cleaning was performed in and around the facility. The residual from
the polymer system was cleaned up from the clarifier, in addition to a thorough
cleaning of the troughs and weirs. The operations building was thoroughly
cleaned and reorganized, including the purchase of some shelving units for
storage. A new weather station was also installed outside for daily weather
monitoring. All laboratory equipment was cleaned and calibrated.
Again, there were no major operational problems encountered in June. The U-V
system was experiencing some trouble with a circuit board and the intensity
probe, although these issues were addressed immediately and corrected as soon
as the problems could be isolated. The system was also thoroughly cleaned.
The lift station at 52nd Street has experienced some vandalism recently. The 4.
alarm light was repaired, and vandals proceeded to damage it again that same
night. A more durable fixture will be installed. In addition, the lock on the cover at
this lift station was replaced with a more secure setup.
Regulatory Compliance
All permit requirements have been met for the month of June 1996.
Client / Public Relations
Project Manager from Pine River spent two weeks in Albertville to provide
technical and project support. Larry Breimhurst, Vice President of Corporate
Training for PSG, visited the facility and spent some time evaluating process
performance. Bob Black, Vice President of Client Services for PSG also visited
Albertville in June, along with the Area Manager. Regular communications
between the City Administrator, Mayor Potter, and PSG are ongoing.
Safe
Safety training is ongoing.
ALBERTVILLE WWTF LOADINGS
Contract Values & Triggers
Ave-
0.1580 MGD
Ave-
307 i
Ave-
187 i
High-
0.1896 MOD
High-
368 f
High-
224
Low-
0.1264 MGD
Low-
246 #
Low-
150 #
Design:
0.3150 MGD
368 #
368 0
FLOW
12 mo % of
TSS
12 mo
% of
CBOD
12 mo
% of
1f11.YYf.YYMf ....
MGD Avg. Design
MYYH 11 f♦fHHIrf.f11fHHf11HIYYYYYkJYIYffYYYYIH1fHY•♦ff♦f11f11f1f1HYH11Hf.YYf
mgA
Lbs.
Avg.
Design
YYfYY.IflfHrf11f..Y.1ff.fHHfffYHf1HfHfH•11H
mgA
Lbs.
Avg.
HH.1HHfH•Hff•
Design
1996 Jan
0.161
384
483
240
302
Feb
0.143
285
339
184
219
Mar
0.164
288
394
191
261
Apr
0.177
99
145
92
136
May
0.172
274
392
148
212
Jun
0.163
232
315
133
181
Jul
0.152
222
281
154
195
Aug
0.174
288
418
136
197
Sep
0.165
234
322
100
138
Oct
0.161
294
395
122
164
Nov
0.163
78
106
68
92
Dec
0.156
406
527
234
304
1996 Jan
0.161
0.1626 51.61%
250
336
331
89.93%
175
235
195
52.87%
Feb
0.159
0.1638 52.01 %
433
671
360
96.16%
178
235
196
53.21 %
Mar
0.179
0.1651 52.41 %
312
466
356
96.79%
221
330
202
54.78%
Apr
0.188
0.1660 62.70%
336
527
388
105.43%
131
205
207
56.36%
May
0.198
0.1682 53.39%
388
641
409
111.05%
169
279
213
57.87%
Jun
0.203
0.1715 64.44%
354
599
432
117.48%
151
256
219
59.57%
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
ZI
PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES GROUP, INC.
July 19, 19M
Municipal Section
Water Quality Derision
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
520 Lafayette Road Noritr
St. Paul, Minnesota 5515&41"
Please find enclosed Albertville's Monthly Discharge Monitoring Report for the month of June
19N, with its required addendum's.
it you should have any questions about this report, please contact me at (812) 497-8309.
7Sincer*y,
Kelsie L. McGuire
Area Manager
...:,r .._...,,,.... spa-*<..-_. ....... �.,,....._.....
W •-+
Lt
-cc
t 1
.En
-�
Wr�
r'�
tlC
Q
r
M:
_)
rn
VNQ'
A
<C O Z
LL ►-+
C3im
LL t7C
Z
to C3
Q N
X: L- �
0 � a
w -*
2� b O
Qz
w
HO
cc1=
z
U,
Q2
W
ct
Q= O ¢
a
N b
G O
Z
g
OE
d
J
d
3:
w
==
C
, \
U
\
CL
J
\
t i
Z
LA.
N�
tC
Y
Cl1
J_
O
W
El
�,J
Wr
W
CJ
�
Wr
VZ
Q
-n
WH
C3Z
W
lJ
..p
WF--
�JZ
..0
WH
C1
«.CD
�J
..O
�,,p
r'.-..CD
��
3iF
3 Y
3M
3E
C) <
3
3F_
�
cl
U
LL
rt
Q` J
C`t
N
t7• J
R- J
rt" -�
O
w
�•.
~
..a
..r
,a �,
U
LL
(_,!
e`er
'a'
C7
S.'f
X
Q X
•
'
q
Z
»
#
VVV
C] Q
tT Q
Z d
!il Y
+ Y
W
O
abi
X-
ar_
tt
g
F- Cl
OCO
O
�1
b
x
XElq
a
a.
F
L L •s
E
CJ
X:
o
t]
C)
=
F-
1`
#
#
a
cc
W
W
lax:en
#
#
#
#
lk
#
iC
C
/�
• C7
p
<
tY�
O
w
¢
*
k
*
*
Z
o
tu
x
¢
g
#
#
r Z
ID
0—
k
#
Vv
Ll E
CL %
l
#
*
#
k
k
J
o
Z
k
»c
Q
W
•
11J
»
#
,.
#c
#
etc
AL
w
-
*
so
ixrmcc
z
a
o
Z
#
#
#
#
*
*
>
cn
c7
co -Cc
a
#
#
lk
#
lk
#
x
:k
r*4K*
#
W
*
*
#
*
4.
lk
k
#�
R
*
�k
Q
Eo`am
'
♦
r
r+
v♦
ir
a
#
*
#
A.
*
#
O
r E t o m
z
rz
i
rz
Z
W
ri
Z
W
W
W
E m
W
J g
~ g
W
~
WW
J z
~ f
J g
~ f
W
J
~
W
J g
~
W
J
W
~
d W
i W
d W
i W
1 W
Cc
g W
6 W
W
1 W
�L W
1 W
i W
6
IX
St W
wily
1
faAy
d
d
yy
0.
Q
a0
<
2O
yy
Q.
�()
i
E$w
¢
cc
Cc
cc�
w
...
W
W
¢ �a
1
.= )
J
w ¢
J
J a1.8
F
a
3 LC-4 0 (1)
_1 Cl Cn
Cl W
b U
t CD W
D
Cl
to
C] O (n
!— .• Ln
c= rn
Q U]
O cn
cn
J
J
, c a Ri
>
W i' �7 Cr-
C1) O I-3 CC
O LL.
Z) [L
1--- Cl LL
1— C) iC
O Ct:
in
5 3 O
o o
3 . to
C] i_I
'
Cn
ra Z
Q ��,�
T�gWZo
.E-4Gz
Q W Z
Z
3
Z
G 7C�
I] Z
t� Z
2 0y Q
ft r_ l u.l
Z W
uJ
w
cri Z W
S W
U. 3
3
W O
W (:::IO
[tJ
C)
C] W c' C(l
C.3 111 0
It If) O
a w
CL
L �+
{J G _t
C�
r _i
+ t1. C'1
L M J
trl -O J
_J
V C) U-
>- M LL
' t 3
Kr t1
J Lo U)
.J Ls) U') Ll
C3 -O U..
N g LI) y
WUiC)
->< 0U.x
(D<
OL,-
(0 Z)C-c
0 ::)oU-z
OL.L,.
rA
�r
W
U
�
( 1
Q
t I
r-
40
W
w
}
d
V
J
[f1
dCC) ?_
LL r-4
0
Ix !i of
Z
co C7
*+ ::) I Z
Q En
2
0
LL
-4
O
t�7
u'a
u�
L
W W
6 -! J
N _JJJ
LU
tY S
w Y w
a 4Y.tF-w
z J►+J
i_
O�
Z
Z
LL
t
CL
W
zP
LL
Ix
o
V
o
m
C
T
a ❑
0
w ►—
S.JZ
>-
r
J
w ►—
Z
w t—
f...) Z
LU µµ
O
F�
CD
\0
\1
a4
LL
a
..J
••
F
f') F
Nf
cl
O^ J
J
9
J
J
('\J
J
1
O<
z
Qx
¢
M
A
¢
Z
zJ
¢
Z
(1(�
1"
etx
�d
OY
cW7
oX:
^n
0-
O
i3E
.
I-
a
00
1-- 0
v)
x
N
p
Z
Cl �
F-
1--
H
O
a
cc
Wa
`V f�
O
Cr U
fr U
IX 0
C7
p
Z
O W
O
O:
O>
O:>
Ln D-
O¢
OL7
CLd
CL <I
LL<
W
lai
w
w
LL
Q
*
*
\
crt—
*
*
*
x
Wa
J
�
CJ
*
#
«
#
z
#
*
*
*
w
t
#
*
W
pie
LY;
Ic
#
cc
U
a
LLO
W
j
z
Z
C7
c7
O
�tEo�
o .c
W
♦'
1e
.k
k...
!
M-
r
is
r
.k
9 $' n
W
k
#
«
•k
*
*
«
«
E o�o o
>
a
Y
o
i
ro,�a m
t E t 3 a
=
Z
z
Z
J g
J 2
J
r
J 2
F.
J 2
J
F
J 2
-
a W
� W
¢
d•W
¢
� W
¢ ¢
a W
f ¢
i W
¢ ¢
a W
g ¢
� W
¢ ¢
4 W
¢
'L W
¢ ¢
d W
g ¢
� W
Q ¢
a W
g Ir
i W
Cc cc
< y
NQ
pW, D
O
Q y
N<
a 7
O
< y
N6
a 7
O
Q N
NQ
a 7
O
a y
NQ
a O
a y
N<
y 7
O
a y
y Q
y 7
O
d Y
0 U
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
u!
W
_
Ixi
¢
¢
i
cc
cc
¢
cc0
y
p W
a
c..( w
F—
F— w
liJ
J
Z'4'7 _JCrZ
ix:Z :D
W
¢
J
_J
Cfi
(.n <c
v& Z O
_J
•-r
+
CJ ?_
I'D
a Tz W
< J O M
D F- 0 Lu
7 F- O M
LU (D Wit
C7 tLO
� cn
a
a
C.JF- U)GZ
>a
IJ
J m
;p
PFoF_
W Li.. a
Z w ,I
Z w rD
d J
d J
LL. r+Cr0£_OLLCDF_n-
IXZQ0Lj-ZQC)tr
W fJ
L? I- G
�-l F- 11
(, q ?_
C.J rD .:]
3aJC)0
p cc (n
Z
¢ —
4
i_] 0.4 �-+
1:Q C J
a
<L--+I-ZJAJr,--...Z_
W,F-
iC ra'�x
-+1-
iY CL Z
0 ca W
�-+ i C �
F-- W
I t_ Z
F-- W
<C ^ 3
rJ ? LJJ
Q- Z
r,,,,� U_I
a > O
LL
r_n
O ��
¢ J [n
¢ C a >>z
g
+ W Cl -J
3 'D U-)
_-r 7 to J
O o)
^ C] n] _J
a
z[
17-C•a W
OOYO=iC7ii
GA
Cl Z)3O
C;]U.
0 QlLi_
J =C)<C
_JTr.)LL(D47r}
2047C),Li..
f
W
s
0
U
iV Q
C? 2
O
i !L s
r 3
J
O LL
CL--
LJ c: o
ccr` ,
0
Z_
i
cc
O
Z !
O
W
CC lJ 1 H
_ UJ uW
(aU-)a
(n 'D
25 CD
2
O
LL
Lta LLJ
I-- = I—
I L. LI:
�;r u
<C u
¢
I
r
w
u
\
a
¢ -
`
a
cr
❑
z 0
UJ
WZ
v
W Z
WL
W2
W
LUZ
80
Z
:' E
Z x\
z E
2�
Z z
z�
O
O
0
O
CJ
O
C7
\ z
`
�
`
O
H
� a
� U
LL
V
*
4 - i
CJ- _1
CT -j
CA J
[? J
W
F
#
*
F-
*
#
*
*
#
*
#
#
*
k
*
*
*
*
CW7
+k
*
*
K
#
*
*
*
*
t
*
a
LLA
\ a
O
w
F—
it
K
*
M
*
#
K
*
T
*
O
r
LL ��
Ir e�l
V�
iC
�Y k.7
a
¢
Q
'V i
O
Z0
C3
1] >
M >
pp
ca i
Y
O D.
Q
W
4
W
tr
*
*
�k
*
X
k
W
tY
W
LY
^
W
tL
'
W
LY
7-
,�
�1�
(`
�
V
o
J
'2>-
W
c
K
h
k
*
*
0
a
x
¢
D
k
*
h
*
1'
W
a
Z
Li_
a
U
LL
U.
O
W
O
Ku,
j
N
C7
*
cr r
K
k
*
*
M
*
h
*
K
a
*
*
V
Ci I--
x
*
*
r
*
*
W U7
*
*
*
*
#
K
z
O
E o m
r o c
£gcm
��
.c Et�o`0
z
z
z
z
z
z
=
z
z
z
z
� °c
E m
�i
t�
LU
�i
tf
W,g
t�
i
�5
to
�3
t2
�2
t1
�3
rWey
�w
nw
Se¢
Sw
¢¢
nw
ij
gw
W¢
aw
�j
u
WC
nw
gj
Sew
¢G
�a
aw
Sw
K¢
�a
nw
j
Scw
4g
aw
j
RR
T
U)
a
�¢
ao
rnQ
na
yWt
H¢
0
Ch
Q
a
0Z
3
¢
2
G
i
¢
a
¢
i
2
E
i
¢
i
uJ
O
tr Q
W•—
J
i•J
uJ 1•:i
CJ
O
LY Z
W2�
2
2:
Z
Q �-•
J 2
2 �-+
<t Z
U-) +
W
LU
1— Lti
=
.. iL::
a • •
u-1 LY
►-•
iY_
►-+ iC:
Q L.C.'
iL
I-- -CC L2:
•�
d W f�
Z G):>
u
[J.*
OG]
(�.+-�
iJ
cm w
¢�
3 CG (Dr
�• , I
J t� r-
O r
is C. H-
_J O r
Z Co r
acz n�
n
a
a
Q rti
. v r r
I:D r y
J .
W r a
"11
. ti
W C Q
~��-
- LLC Z
<<
ICJ Z
¢ <_
:� -- ':
-- L
uJ r
J
I.LJ 0 L-3
U (_) N 171
IJJ C.) " =e
r ►V CI
Q Z IV 1 7
Y Z r-4 J
) W r-4 CJ
- — 0 0 �
LU
r
W e-+
a
r I I
- CfJ
- Li7
!l
a c a w z p
F- Z N �
LY LZ N t:
N 17
W fv r-
Z d IV L
Z 1 /V �
•� N �
U EQr- Z?
dLU d
d Q
<L'
-LJ d
W- .<W
asUJ
Q
c-r>2O
O¢
x Q W
1L. + W
Z W
LO Z W
e_:J uj
r_I Ll1
I— -1 W
-J
It Lu
W (Di.r=ulM
LYLLI
Oii1=t
W OCCI3JOIxC)—iU-)cc
1x
o <
g
LL - + f-
Z t i f,, f
e-D t=. r
•-. IJ_ C'J f-
L is <r •-, F—
Lt Q i V I—
CC r C7 r--
'0 Z z
.r
(�c�cn•x����ul
c•)u,_jcnu-)u)rr--0Ln►-F-
O[n1--0-0LO
ewzo
4L W V i_1Li.!
.J ;*X
;;Ie.'-i--J.:.)OZ—CJ�
, Z
CiuZ�-+I—L::e
i
N N¢
Ln
H 1
O
qr
1
n
0
O
u�
n-
In
(1)
Cl
4
O
*
w
a
a
c.�
CV aC
A
c� z
�.
o
..JLCI-Lx
Z
N (J
cc LL a
a. 0 �jW
LU �% O
cc h I
I
Z_
I
x 1
0
f"
Z I
0
W
0 �
a:
Q Q
i V W
U u7 a
U G
21
2
O
IE
d
cn
Ua
U")
a s
<C
u
<
\
w
z
LL
x
VVV
lL
�.L
W
a
❑
3
(�;�a
(�w�z,
�j��
w
ol
�a
0
�LL
U
«
+
41
x
W
cc
a
z!-
�-
E
tY
U
Lu
O
iL
1 [
i1
cr
O
O �
C3 �
0 >
Q
L L ¢
W
(�
Ll Q
w
L1. ¢
w
>
o
x O
CC LJ
CC rJ
LL
U.
O
E
�
�
>
�:
♦
U
O
Q
W
*
*
*
k
Q
O
U.
Z
=
�
U
ly
U.
O
z
* *
* *
* k
* *
* #
* *
z
* *
*
k *
z
C7
C7
X
*
•K
*
,fc
a
*
*
4
Cm
n D
)
cs
_ D Q
*
*
*
*
*
E o D tv
4
#
a
a
o =a tcc
Dc
£ ° ^ N
�
rz
~
ri
Z
z
z
F-
z
z
z
V Q c `0 V
W
J
W
g
W w
J
F- W
2
W
J
r W
W
J
W
J
r W
W a
J
W
J
f-
g
Y E N
6�
S�
52
¢¢_
muj
g¢
gw
¢¢_
t1W
g¢
gW
¢¢_
t1W
g¢
gW
t1W
g¢
gW
¢_¢
t1W
S¢
gW
¢¢
GW
g¢
gW
¢¢
a s
o
y N
a=
o
ajL'
=
o
tail'
a
1¢I¢_
�+ 0
o
tail '
a
a=
a
oily
a
S�
a
N y
a
a j
o
L }
o U
a
W
S
W
¢
a
W
S
W
cc
a
W
g
W
¢
W
S
W
W
S
W
¢
W
S
W
¢
W
S
W
¢
E .$ Z
p W
C7
2 8.Q
LLl
� _J
z
L
•-�
« t z
a
q
l
Cr
Ci l CJ
E O N F-
?I pl V n W
S Z J
IL
LI
Ul UJ S
.J ;
:D C i
;tJ2LU
rL w z �
=) q
>-
LD F—
Cc — N E
= 1_1
Lt L-: ry
p E
0 sL
CL. <C
C) Q 4
~ K
o w O
S uJ
[D w
s uJ
L T(n LL Q
Cl. lfl 1L
it O LY
Lr_. J f� Li
3 o W a
z J
uj 1J r-
CD hl r-
lJ! Q r
v a Z
r z o r
C7 r0 LJJ
-J i J
u 1 U7
`c
"I
J r
N I
Lu
s
,J
f-2
E
h
ai ¢
z
Z;
tii ...
W LL
0 <C
•i�IMYIM71.bam._
J
iF71
U-
L
IU iV Q
►- O Z
�- C;: U- ir-
J :D 1 Z
ltX:
a'+
w o
CC r- o
(5 O
z
W
cr a
O 0
z
z O
z
O
W g
CC u7
Q
iT-
g
_ � W
U U) a
i�
g
0
fE
It
3
LL
It
s
W
d
T
�w
X
-
T
w
TEl
wLD
T
wz
_/�
w _
w
a
J (
� ! w
j
.1 �
_.� w
c- J
\�L'
(
` _ 1
�
"
ZL
Z'
Z
ZED
\
Zz
p
O
`
0
C7
O
C7
`
t�
O
U
L
cc
U
3�
W
*
�-
�k
*
«
is
�jc
�Fc
>♦c
*
�
*
*
O
2
O
2
a
Z
�V1
N
Ca :>
LL 4
d
«
i
k
tJ >
0- 4
C) ?
u. aC
C] .
i - ¢
r
C) :+
il_ <(�
O :I -pc
LL <
U
w
*
*
w
w
w
w
w
S
^`
<
rYO
*
sO
O
FYu
irO
sr
sQ
LL
T
�
V
v
W
t
«
*
tr
o
f
:4c
#
i t L
4L
*
«
Ac
k
*
#
x
a
Q
U
.
LLo
p
W
_
k �k
'«
IF
H
«
*
r
«
*
*
ul
-a
S S�
4'
4
41
i'
o
k
d
4•
a
k
4
m m c
N C b m
O C pI.H
�i
r
F
r
F
f
r
F
r
I
r
m 0 C) U
U
W
Jg
W
~g
W
Jg
W
~i
W
W
�"g
W
wg
tu
~%
W
Jg
W
'=i
W
Jg
UJ
tg
W
J2
W
~g
E m Y E m
0. W
i W
a W
g W
."'.+g
6 W
d� W
a W
g ul
a W
g W
a W
g W
L u
g W
g¢
Qar
SK
�
g�
acn
ccE
i�
g¢
ay
¢¢_
a�
gm
aw
¢¢
a�
gIr
ay
¢¢
n�
g¢
acn
¢¢_
IL
g¢
¢(1i
¢¢_
CL
Na
O
ya
a
Na
O
Na
d
Na
a
Ha
O
ya
O
OU
a
a
2
m
2
¢
a
¢
¢
2
¢
g
s
E0z
0 0LU
cr k <
it
z
z
_
c I z O
W ►-gyp
�+
a
.-Z-,
iaG En —}
ma
►-
w
t Y
iL
<C it
r- <L it Q 1X.
C
E LO O
daV w
¢W u�
A H
i_:
_J u F--
QZ
[;.7 1—
va4
r_J F—
u
_J O F•-
i-JF-
:c;. i� F-- C7 -.D ►^
a c Z rn
cj
-: `
U t F- t' li 2_
t_ _ ¢ F ¢
W l.7 rJ CA
Lr) L.) t`J t.;�
I-- fV CJ
«; Z N L J
Y rV LJ
Li N Cl •- r•J C
J p O V-
lS: "•+ E
k74 �-
:_I .�
._J I.:.J .i CIl U7 1
3 L J cr Ul !n
a 0
F—
A
I— u
U)
- cn
CL Q
v
p n, �WZ
-9 9
F— .Z "�
<C W ¢-
r, ?-.
<L
W r-1 V
- i Q
Z Q N J�
W ^-' Q
Z< N Z
W Q
�••+ rV � LE M f:
W Q O Q
.0E<
o• F W
LL Q W
L LLi
z W
.-D w
e 1 ui
J 2 W
� W
��
w 0CC
WCDtiGWc3ir0-10kYO_JU")Lf
�< cr- U')ir
a
w .,r-
� C) 0 U)
�r-..u.r�r
>- C 1 in
.j u) u-I Ul
iLa �F-I%
F- r- -� Cl i
L!'F F-ii
P- 1-- L [n
t-i1-r17 U1aZgaz
r CD -O Ins O -o U-1
l.J .2"
I. -I ._.,
L"I L.. ..i_
�_ )"-- r...) I <
CL
Ak)
J
u
Li
ti
c:
iG J
V id a
O Z
t7 r-•
LO 1 2
r Li- £
HLL
{
� W a
CL
w o
cr r� O
� O
Z
W
cc a
O O
h- z
z O
z
LLA
L
Q rs f
= cD
U U') a
£
2
O
cc
U.
O
C')
U)
u)
wz
k;:-.
W
f•-
0
w
___i
L11
2
M
Z
L-3
2
z
h
<t
a
CO
t 7
i s
► q
`
C]
Q
�
G7
w
z
V
X,
x
j��
w
uj
0
W-
L
W1
T
ilJZ
W
=
wZ
2
WZ
W
LL >-rJ
( 1 LJ
L-
rJ C]
C.J l
Z
\
Z E
m\
Z
\
Z E
C)
�-
z z
C)
\
.Z
z
C:)
`
Q
O
U
N
d•
Q- J
O J
U
O`
O- _i
L
. •. \
G f.i
W
U
*
*
#
►
*
*
k
4
#
,k
#
#
#
#
V�
z
�K
41
lk
+
*
#
+k
K
yn
*
*
0
*
R
#
+
*
a
W
O
`\
FF
x
a
D
#
K
*
►-
r
r
r
�
►-
I--
JZ
cr
�:
O
¢
CD
cc
w
V
W
*
ll
CL
CL Q
Q
U
Q
#
W
W
U' Cl1c
W
C3
W
x O
♦
w
u: 0
w
17
LL
O
I J:
-
.•
*
*
*
cc
o
S
�(�
X z
1�
*
k
k
w
*
k
*
41
*
i
*
cc
2
i1
*
#
x
#
#
k
*
*
k
*
#
*
O
W
LL
RE
CL
LL
p
LL
w
LkL
cc
# *
* #
» *
* *
* *
* *
* #
z
z
0
0
#
*
*
*
K
K
*
#
W
*
*
*
+
#
Q
O
C
m
t o c
o) 22
�--
a a)
?` lu
t p
z
F
Z
z
r
r
~
r
r
at o °no
U
W W
�y W
J 2
yw
~ 2
W
J 2
W
H 2
J
Z
f
W
J
Z
H
W
J
W
H=
W
J
z
~
C Y E m
gJ
d
2W
SW
2W
w
2W
G.W
2W
d¢
2w
GW
2w
}
< N
a j
Q N
n.3
a
a?
4
a 3 Q
a N
a j
Q
a j
Q y
a j
Na
O
Na
0
'�a
a
'na
V
fAa
o
y a
o
Na
o
$Z
2
2
cc
2
a
2
cc
2
Cc
2
¢
2
cc
E
4
6 w
cc
Lil
'� J
cc
z
z
z
¢
J x
X
Q z
U= U)
z
fit
w iL
LC'
r-.
► • Cr
= lY
►-•
F- <t 0,
-1 "'
¢ t G
it
gw
E S
<S<S
> tJ
C a
.: C_
i7 O
y
4 rn V i w
O h-
LD 4D r-
.-i O r-
z O r--
CO (D-
i
4
c z U)
Cn ry r..)
r fJ C')
a: '� hJ C)
'': Z h1 ['_)
-.!) w hJ LJ
- IV L3
y !V a
.- J O O F
T
„"• L7 X:
L-3 I:
:r_
x
__j C.-J I-_
U.4 in I_-
CD
T jE Q w �
ul
- (n
C1
¢
-i i:4
aqcawzp
0.E
►V
¢
W fV �
-a ¢w
Z < fJ .�
- ¢w-
;i KC fV �
<rw
+�+ r-/ z
<ro
Lr '•-' tJ .�
a
LL w fV
r ¢
F r-g Z
o > C,Z
wU)z
w'-3
W
t3 WF-
J wZ
W
£ Q
L�yQ-�
W CD
W C.)itL7�clxL3JU*llL
-+<L C7CCiJ
ISJ�Y
Q£a-
3�LU
a
+_.7 C7 h
�-+ U- M01-
--1: �+ ►-
iG ¢ IN
ur r t) t-
M -o
w — O r
v � z Ja z
>- C) if)
_J Cf) U7 irl
r I in
1- h- .4 Gn
h O -U [n
O -O U)
x r Cl
a
x OZu::G
�•-••t�V i''•--�
WO z�t—G�
T i:)zrU7'�7'
N2(n
C�j 4
• -
r ..
..
-. r r.
i
W
W
ZD
O
W
i
¢
W
iL
w
z
W
w
cc
V
O
r-3
w
U)
O
Q
'j-
z
J
w
.x
cn
C�iJ<L'
U Z
,_3XLLI
LtJ 1:Z i
w.
r-
O a
w cr o !�
z
Ft
O
F-
z
O
2
w r
Q Cry �
a
it,
`
w
cta
3
z
¢
¢
s
¢
¢
Q
.L
iC
tr
ti
cJ_
a
z2
•-3-_\
LY
LZ
\
Z
La`
C3
O
O
C)
Cal
I 1
<
CT
iJ J
CT J
Q
a
Z
u
O
¢O
*
#
0
¢
LAJ
W
W
w
w
LL
w
>
,0
W°
LL
W
5
cc
CL cz,k
#
#
#
z
Q
La
u.
o
z
* *
* *
#
C7
y
O
#
#
F
*
k
*
*
k
*
x
m n D
Q
♦
#
♦
O D
.y.
..
a
4
k
o.
♦
.a.
m U m
Q).yai
Z t m c m
ri
w
i
w
i
i
i
p n w
y�
JW
ti
J W
~�
J W
tf
W i
m¢
f-2
jZ'
t�
'm
t-2
wm
Fw
C d Y E m
2 Q
�j
W
W S
6.
i�
a W
g]
a W
¢_G
4 W
g¢
i w
KQ_
d W
ifL
W
¢OC
1 w
a¢
f W
!YS
!nw
aw
y W
1 W
rn a
I¢yy,1¢
a0
yy
d
NN
d
NQ
ad
as
ftdda
dQ
F^
F
S
a
s
a
¢
¢
a
¢
a
a�C
S
O}
: y w
L
w.,
CC
2
J
w
¢
Z
o ..
Z
f.
z
¢ ...z
J Z
..scn
Q z
FWD
W
W 1.[
..a
i 1
Lad
L:7 ;
c;
F- c
,
O F-
E O F-
C t G F-
as c' Z n cwii
r-�
S
0 `-+
_..j �--• ;1=
�-•
Ltj r-.
• ►-�
I-- ..�
7 3 Q W J
L
CJl z
Q
$- :'.
77 Z
UJ F-
i L %
~
Cn O ry O F-
N i _+
ct ": , 1V L_j
_� Z N L]
O W ry C1
- N L
t ¢ cr
c J p O H
L_1
lJ E
L,J n+ :�..
? <L' rV 1-
Z r.,
r+ N L:
i Iv
c o d k Z 2
x
- ¢
� > I a
w 4X
LLJ ¢
w ¢ L
7 a
m � � w .
Z w LO
u., .�
W +_J
W F-
J Lu
S Li
>- F
{
••
W OLYC1Ld0CcLD
tOL:CIDJU7[
<CDCcLL
4-)
>.o
LL
Z
CD
4 ►—
" U_ In F-
w . r-. r
w ¢ iy t-
X F-- Ci F U7
-U F-
��ZgaZ L
F-
?- MU-1JLnU-)L11F-
1-•..0CI)h-F-
-GCI)1-p--oCfiL7
.0U"
F-
x O Z L=i
_-1 G Z
+ 1� iJ z ��
CD CD t
1, - C;, Z
Z' c7 :c'_
yc•z_o
(n a U) Q C
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GROUP
ALBERTVILLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
JUNE 1996 MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT
............
....
......... .
DATE
CBOD5
m I
TSS
m /I
DATE CBOD5 TSS T. PHOS.
m I m /I m I
F. COLI.
MPN/100m1
6,Jun-96
20-Jun-96
108
193
244
464
6-Jun-96 5.7 42 0.716
20-Jun-96 <2 10.0
<10
<10
6-J u n-96
20-J u n-96
CBOD5 TSS
CBOD5 TSS
95% 83%
100% 98%
T. PHOS
m I
ORTHO P.
m I
NO3+NO2
m /I
TKN
m /I
NH3 CHLOR.A. TSS
m /I m I m I
D.O.
m
SECCHI
meters
0.203
0.148
<1.0
3.85
3.85 2 4
13.1
1.0
Ti1:;•:
::.•:.:
T. PHOS TSS NO3+NO2 TKN NH3 D.O.
m l m /l m i m I m I m /l
0.253 2.0 <1.0 2.29 0.88 10.75
......
. ....... .
T. PHOS
TSS
NO3+NO2
TKN
NH3
FLOW
D.O.
m l
m I
m I
m /I
m I
cfs
mgn
0.743
10.0
<1.0
5.6
3.4
0.95
9.95
T. PHOS
TSS
NO3+NO2
TKN
NH3
D.O.
mg1l
m/l
m I
m/l
m/l
m I
2.58
<2.0
2.0
2.65
1.22
7.85
TOP MID BOTTOM
MUD LAKE 21.0 21.0 21.0
INLET 21.0 21.0 21.0
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GROUP
ALBERTVILLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
JUNE 1996 MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT
POND CONDITIONS
_ _
DATE
3-Jun-96
10-Jun-96
17mJun-96
24- Jun-96
CONDITION
__
_
=:::::.none:::
ODORS
none"
none•__
none:<:
AQUATIC PLANTS (X)
none
none
none
FLOATING MATS (%)
none
none
POND WATER DEPTH (in.)
74
none
none
none
74
74
74
MUSKRATS,ETC.
none
none
none
none
DIKE CONDITION
ok
ok
ICE COVER %
0
0
ok
ok
0
0
17•Ju
"-w
AQUATIC PLANTS (X)
none
none
none
none
none
FLOATING MATS (%)
none
none
none
POND WATER DEPTH (in.)
nond
74
none
none
none
MUSKRATS,ETC.
74
74
74
DIKE CONDITION
none
none
none
none
ICE COVER X
ok
ok
ok
ok
0
0
0
0
DATE 3-Jun-96 10-Jun-96 17tn-96 24-Ju
V1-
AQUATIC PLANTS (%)
none
none
none
none
none
FLOATING MATS X
(%)
none
none
none
POND WATER DEPTH (In.)
nond
74
none
none
none
MUSKRATS,ETC.
74
74
74
DIKE CONDITION
none
none
none
none
ICE COVER (%)
ok
ok
ok
ok
0
0
0
0
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GROUP
ALBERTVILLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
.TUNE 1996 MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT
DAILY WEATHER MONITORING
DATE MAX
MIN PRECIP.
TEMP
TEMP
F
F Inches
.. ..
. . ............ .
1
0.00
2
0.05
3
0.00
4
0.60
5
0.00
6
0.00
7
0.00
8
0.00
9
0.00
10
0.00
11
0.00
12
0.00
13
0.00
14
0.00
15
0.73
16
0.88
17
0.01
18
0.20
19
0.00
20
0.00
21
1.30
22
0.00
23
0.25
24
0.00
25
0.00
26
0.01
27
0.01
28
0.00
29
0.00
30
0.00
TOTAL
4.04
MIN
0.00
MAX
1.30
AVG.
0.13
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GROUP
ALBERTVILLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
JUNE 1996 MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT
RAW WASTEWATER PLANT EFFLUENT
UAIt
FLOW
pH
MOD
Std.
1
0.168
2
0.203
3
0.195
4
0.162
5
0.168
6
0.210
7
0.188
8
0.155
9
0.332
10
0.203
7.82
11
0.217
12
0.181
13
0.153
14
0.170
15
0.157
Is
0.215
17
0,233
18
0.316
19
0.214
20
0.192
21
0.288
22
0.220
23
0.295
24
0.148
7.46
25
0,234
26
0.189
27
0.190
28
0.189
29
0.181
30
0.171
TOTAL
MIN
0.148
7.46
MAX
0.332
7.82
AVG.
0.203
7.84
DATE
FLOW
pH
TEMP.
D.O.
MGD
Std.
° C.
mgn
......................
:::._:::::::.:•::
1
0.143
2
0.153
3
0.152
4
0.131
5
0.141
6
0.178
7
0.162
8
0.128
9
0.157
10
0.132
7.18
17
9.95
11
0.273
12
0.129
13
0.097
14
0.210
15
0.114
16
0.149
17
0.168
18
0 390
19
0.159
20
0.178
21
0.290
22
0.284
23
0.339
24
0.204
7.840
19
9.25
25
0.274
26
0.244
27
0.244
28
0.220
29
0.195
30
0.176
TOTAL
MIN
0.000
7.18
17
9.25
MAX
0.000
7.84
19
9.95
AVG.
0.000
7.51
18
9.80
i SCR=+1:aPSC
P.S.C. Inc. / MAE
Svcs. Inc,
DATE
6/29/96
d
MONTHLY
CLIENT
REPORT
TIME
8:51PK
THROUGH PERIOD
08-96, ENDING
6/21/96
PROJECT MGR: IPVS) PRESTf)N VAN SCREW
DISTRICT
MGR: KLM
EELSIE MCGUIRE
Prof ect: C6241.A ALBERTVILLE
REGIONAL
MIiR: MAC
BILL COLEMAN
Start. bate:
1/01/9h End
Date: I'2l31/96
PROJECT
MGR: PVS
PRESTON VAN
SCHEPEN
TOTAL
==-====
CURRENT PERIOD
=======
====== PROJECT TO DATE =======
BUDGET
ACTUAL
BUDGETED
VARIANCE
ACTUAL
BUDGETED VARIANCE
ibor and Benefits
27,289
2,563
2,123
1440)
11,992
13,649
1,666
lectricity
IU,227
885
853
(32)
6,171
51118
(1,0531
Lher Utilities
11983
0
166
166
11357
996
13611
Aicals
10,874
0
906
906
3,476
5,136
1,959
aintenance and Repairs
350
36
29
17)
63
174
100
utside Services
5.h22
332
469
136
2,239
21814
574
ravel and Meals
600
0
50
50
349
300
(49)
It Other
6,589
517
550
2
5,627
3,300
(2,327)
llorations and Scope Adiust.ients
2,286
232
191
(41)
31522
11146
12,376)
verhead
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL DIRECT COST
65,819
41597
5,337
739
34,790
32,933
11,857)
BASE FEE
20,30,11
11649
11699
0
10,191
10,194
0
TOTAL PROJECT
86,210
6,296
7,036
739
41,984
13,127
(1,857)
S VRIMPSG
P,S.d. Inc. i NAE Svr,s. Inc.
DATE hi29196
?
MONTHLY
CLIENT REPORT
TINF 8:51PN
THROUGH PERIOD
08-96, ENDING 6121/96
PROJECT MGR: IPVS) PRESTON VAN SCHEPEN
DISTRICT
NGR: RLM
EFLSIE NCGUIRF
Project: C6241,R ALBERTVILLE RAR
REGIONAL
NCR: NAC
BILL COLEMAN
Start Date:
1/01/96 End
Date: W3106
PROJECT
NCR: PVS
PRESTON VAN SCHEPEN
TOTAL
--:-::: CURRENT PERIOD
::::===
::-::: PROJECT TO DATE :::::::
BIIDGET
ACTUAL BUDGETED
VARIANCE
ACTUAL
BUDGETED VARIANCE
laintenance and Repairs
4,02(1
222 335
112
720
2,010 1,289
)verhead
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
TOTAL DIRECT COST
4,0ZO
222 335
112
720
2,010 11289
BASE FEE
0
0 0
0
0
0 0
TOTAL PROJECT
41020
222 335
112
720
2,010 1,289
JNT Y pA
= m
'�-fimo
19 dy
78555
Garrison Hale
Albertville City Administrator
5975 Main Avenue NE
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
RE: 1997 Assessment Contract
Dear Garrison:
DOUGLASM.GRUBER
Wright County Asses,
Wright County Gouernment Center
10 2nd Street N. W. • Room 240
Buffalo, Minnesota 55313-1183
Phone: (612) 682-7367 / (612) 682-7368
FAX. (612) 682-6178
July 17, 1996
Enclosed is a contract for the assessment work for the 1997
assessment.
The proposed fees for doing the assessment work for 1997 is $.25
per parcel higher than 1996. The current parcel count for your
City is 845 parcels.
If you have any questions or concerns about the enclosed contract
or about the quality of our work, please feel free to contact me.
We look forward to your continued cooperation and support of our
office and staff.
,Sincerely,
Doug-las M. Gruber
Wright County Assessor
Enclosure
DMG/df
Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
TO: Garrison Hale
Albertville City Administrator
5975 Main Avenue NE
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
RE: 1997 Assessment Contract
I, Douglas M. Gruber, Wright County Assessor representing Wright
County, do hereby contract with the City of Albertville to perform
the duties of City assessor for said City for the year of 1997.
Contract price is $6.50 per parcel which will include all expenses.
Payment is due after the 1997 City Board of Review.
� )P4' -� /�'
Dough M. Gruber
Wrigh County Assessor
Date: July 17, 1996
Garrison Hale
City Administrator
City of Albertville
Date:
mi-Ev""4;
Economic Development Partnership
of Wright County, Inc.
A non-profit private/public partnership
City of Albertville
Attn: Garrison Hale
5975 Maine Ave. N.E.
P. O. Box 9
Albertville Minnesota 55301
280t
Mo
AL
Phone • (612) 271-5166
FAX • (612) 295-1421
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE MEMBERSHIP DUES FOR 1996 - $500.00
PLEASE MAKE PAYABLE TO:
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP
REMIT TO: SUSAN VERGIN, TREASURER
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP
P. O. BOX 278, HANOVER, MN 55341
The following dues structure has been approved by the board of the Partnership:
Entity
Wright County
Municipalities - Under 1000
1000 - 2500
2500 - 5000
Over 5000
Townships
Utility Companies
Telecommunication Providers
Banks & Lending Institutions
Honorary Members
(Non -Voting - Receives mailings only)
Associate
(Includes non -business, non-profit, schools
and civic organizations)
Business - 1 to 4 Employees
5 to 10 Employees
11 to 20 Employees
21 or More
Dues
$ 10 cents per capita
$ 100.00 plus 10 cents per capita
$ 500.00
$ 500.00 plus 10 cents per capita
$1000.00 plus 10 cents per capita
$ 100.00 plus 10 cents per capita
$1000.00 plus 10 cents per capita
$1000.00
$ 250.00 (Deposits up to $25 Million)
$ 500.00 (Deposits of $25 M to $50 M)
$ 750.00 (Deposits of $50 M to $75 M)
$1000.00 (Deposits over $75 M)
$ 25.00
$ 50.00
$ 75.00
$ 100.00
$ 150.00
$ 200.00
Number of employees includes active owners and management and pertains to regular
employees (over 20 hours per week). Part-time employees of 20 hours or less to be
counted as 1/2 employees.
Per capita rates are to be based on the 1990 census for governmental units. If you have
any questions concerning your dues, they may be directed to Sue Vergin, Treasurer, at
(612) 497-3777. If you have already paid your dues, please disregard.
DUE WITHIN 30 DAYS OF RECEIPT
THANK YOU
Sf
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
RESOLUTION #1996-49
APPOINTMENT OF ELECTION JUDGES
FOR THE PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS
WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council is desirous of
appointing election judges to serve in the primary and general
elections for 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council is appointing election
judges to serve the primary election to be held on September 10,
1996, and the general election to be held on November 5, 1996.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ALBERTVILLE appoints the following persons to serve in the
capacity of election judges at $7.00 per hour.
Denise Beaudry, Deputy Chief Judge
Elaine Engstrom
Kathy Hansen
Linda Houghton
Michael Potter
Donatus Vetsch
Jeanne Vetsch, Chief Judge
Charlene Zachman
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 5th DAY
OF AUGUST, 1996.
Michael Potter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda Houghton, City Clerk
"" 1 1 :' 00li.
CIS! OF 11I.BERT{IILLE
Bb90LiTtIal1 #1996-50
RESOLUTION OPMERING ION aF Pl.AW AIM
SPWIFICATIOM FOR THE MOR 21 L i'tI ROAD
SAKITAR? SEMER PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council has received a copy of
the feasibility study for the proposed installation of a sanitary
sewer line to service the properties along the north frontage road;
and
WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council has determined there is
a need for the proposed sanitary sewer line;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, orders that Short, Elliot,
& Hendrickson, Inc. prepare plans and specifications for the making
of such improvement.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 5TH
DAY OF AUGUST, 1996.
Michael Potter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda Houghton, City Clerk
60.
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
RESOLUTION #1996-51
RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
FOR THE NORTH FRONTAGE ROAD SANITARY SEWER
PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISMIENT FOR BIDS
WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council has received the plans
and specifications for the installation of a sanitary sewer line to
service the properties along the north frontage road (62nd Street
NE); and
WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council has determined there is
a need for the proposed sanitary sewer line.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, hereby approves the plans
and specifications for the North Frontage Road Sanitary Sewer
Project as presented and orders that Short, Elliot, & Hendrickson,
Inc. prepare advertisement for bids for the project to be received
by the City 1996.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 5TH
DAY OF AUGUST, 1996.
Michael Potter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda Houghton, City Clerk
F��A
C
Northwest Associated Consultants
C O M M U N I T Y PLANNING DESIGN e MARKET R E
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albertville Mayor and Ci Council
FROM: David Licht
DATE: 16 July 1996
RE: Albertville - Sign Ordinance: Institutional Signs
FILE NO: 163.06 - 96.09
From the Planning Commission's 9 July meeting packet, you have or will be provided with
a memorandum from our office providing background information on institutional signs in
a number of communities in and around the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. This material
was considered by the Planning Commission and direction was given to work with an
industry representative on drafting of a sign ordinance for consideration at the August
Planning Commission meeting.
At the Planning Commission session, we attempted to define the issues involved in this
matter and identified four specific subjects upon which direction is being sought. These
are:
1. Size of sign.
2. Type of sign (monument or pylon).
3. The acceptability of electronic message board signs.
4. If electrical message signs are acceptable, should there be a limitation on the
message frequency and movement.
The Planning Commission, as well as our office, concur that the current restriction on the
size of institutional signs is too restrictive and needs to be increased. A concept similar to
that in Otsego where the sign size is increased with the increase in property size was
suggested as an example to follow. The Commission felt that pylon signs were acceptable
and in some cases, preferable to monument signs. On the issues related to electronic
reader board signs and their message, there was mixed direction received.
5775 Wayzata Blvd. • Suite 555 • St. Louis Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595-9636•Fax. 595-9837
So as to move this matter along and avoid or minimize any potential rework, we would
appreciate your commenting on these four subjects at your August Council session. Any
consensus which can be reached will be of benefit in drafting a proposed regulation to
subsequently be considered by the Planning Commission and your body.
As it relates to motion electronic reader board signs, we still question the advisability of
such communication devices, especially in the location currently being considered with the
high school. It was pointed out by the industry representative that many state
transportation bodies utilize electronic reader board messages for informing the public of
traffic conditions. We would point out, however, that these signs are located typically in
the right-of-way and in many cases, above moving traffic on bridge structures. In such
cases, there is no distraction of the driver's view from the roadway which we view as a
significant issue with a property identification and advertising sign.
In any case, should you have questions or comments prior to the August Council meeting,
do not hesitate to contact either Ms. Stockman or me.
PC.. Garrison Hale
Linda Houghton
Michael Couri
Kevin Mealhouse
Dave Shannon
2
PROPOSED SIGN ORDINANCE TERMINOLOGY
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA
7/18/96
Abandoned Sign
A sign which no longer correctly directs or exhorts any person, advertises a bona fide business,
lessor, owner, product or activity conducted or product available on the premises where such sign
is displayed.
Accessory Sign
(See "On -Premise Sign")
Administrator
The Code Administrator or his designated representative.
Advertising Message
That copy on a sign describing products or services being offered to the public.
Animated Sign
Any sign which includes action or motion. For purposes of this Code, this term does not refer to
flashing, changing or indexing, all of which are separately defined.
Architectural Projection
Any projection not intended for occupancy which extends beyond the property line, not including
signs, canopies or marquees.
Area of Copy
entire area within a single,
continuous perimeter composed of
squares or rectangles, which enclose
itThe
the extreme limits of the advertising
message, announcement or decoration
on a facia or wall sign.
AREA OF COPY = A B + C x D
Area of Sign
1j
The area of the largest single face of
D
the sign within a perimeter which
B
forms the outside shape including any
L
_ t-- F-+
T
frame, forms an integral part of the
-C i G
display, but excluding the necessary
i
supports or uprights on which the sign
- - 4
may be placed. If the sign consists of
more than one section or module, all
areas will be totaled.
Area of Off -Premise Sign
Where poster panels or bulletins are installed back to back, one face only is considered as area. If
there is a difference, the larger face will be counted.
Awning
A temporary shelter supported entirely from the exterior wall of a building and composed of non-
rigid materials except for the supporting framework.
Background Area
The entire area of a sign on which copy could be placed, as opposed to the copy area, when
referred to in connection with facia or wall signs.
Banner Sign
A temporary sign composed of lightweight material either enclosed or not enclosed in a rigid
frame, secured or mounted so as to allow movement of the sign caused by movement of the
atmosphere.
Billboard
See "Off -Premise Sign," "Off -Site Sign" or "Outdoor Advertising (Posters and Bulletins)."
Bi-Annual
Every two years.
Building Face or Fall
All window and wall area of a building in one plane or elevation.
Building Frontage
The linear length of a building facing the right-of-way or the linear length of the right-of-way
facing the building, whichever is smaller.
Building Sign
A sign lettered to give the name of a building itself, as opposed to the name of occupants or
services.
Bulletin
See "Off -Premise Signs," "Off -Site Sign" or "Outdoor Advertising."
Canopy (or Marquee)
A permanent roof -like shelter extending from part or all of a building face over a public right-of-
way and constructed of some durable material such as metal, glass or plastic.
Canopy or Marquee Sign
Any sign attached to or constructed in or on a canopy or marquee.
Changeable Copy Sign (Manual)
A sign on which copy is changed manually in the field, i.e., reader boards with changeable letters
or changeable pictorial panels.
Changing Sign (Automatic)
A sign such as an electronically or electrically controlled public service time, temperature and
date sign, message center or readerboard, where different copy changes are shown on the same
lamp bank.
City
City, means the city, town or municipality of Albertville.
Comprehensive Design Plan
Building design and signs integrated into one architectural plan, the comprehensive plan being
complete in all other building, structural and electrical requirements.
Copy (Permanent and Temporary)
The wording on a sign surface either in permanent or removable letter form.
Copy Area
The area in square feet of the smallest geometric figure which describes the area enclosed by the
actual copy of a sign. For facia signs, the copy area limits refer to the message, not to the
illuminated background.
Council
The City Council of Albertville.
Detached Sign
See "Free-standing Sign" or "Ground Sign."
Directional Sign
Any sign which serves solely to designate the location or direction of any place or area.
Directly Illuminated Sign
Any sign designed to provide artificial fight either through exposed lighting on the sign face or
through transparent or translucent material from a light source within the sign.
Electrical Sign
Any sign containing electrical wiring which is attached or intended to be attached to an electrical
energy source.
Embellishment
(a) Letters, figures, characters or representations in cut-outs or irregular forms or similar
ornaments attached to or superimposed upon the sign.
(b) Embellishment (Decorative Only - A purely decorative embellishment on a free-standing
sign.
Erected
This term shall mean attached, altered, built, constructed, reconstructed, enlarged or moved, and
shall include the painting of wall signs, but does not include copy changes on any sign.
Exempt Signs
Signs exempted from normal permit requirements.
Facelift
The remodeling of a building's frontage which is visible from a public right-of-way, so that the
building material, door frames, window frames and signs are designed in harmony with each
other.
Face of Sign
The entire area of sign on which copy could be placed.
Facia Sign (or Wall Sign)
A sign attached to or erected against a wall of a building, with the face horizontally parallel to the
building wall.
Flashing Sign
Any sign which contains an intermittent or flashing light source, or which includes the illusion of
intermittent or flashing light by means of animation, or an externally -mounted intermittent light
source. Automatic changing signs such as public service time, temperature and date signs or
electronically controlled message centers are classed as "Changing Signs" not "Flashing Signs."
Free -Standing Signs
See "Ground Signs" or "Detached Signs."
Freeway or Controlled Access Highway
This term shall mean a highway in respect to which the owners of abutting lands have no right or
easement of access to or from their abutting land, or in respect of which such owners have only
limited or restricted right or easement of access and which is declared to be a freeway as provided
by the highway authority.
Freeway -Oriented Sign (Controlled Access Highway Sign)
Any sign identifying premises where food, lodging, or places of business are located that engage
in supplying goods and services essential to normal operation of motor vehicles, and where such
businesses are directly dependent upon the adjacent freeway for business.
Frontage
The length of the property line of any one premises parallel to and along each public right-of-way
it borders.
Ground Level
Street grade.
Ground Sign
A sign erected on a free-standing frame, mast or pole and not attached to any building. (See
"Detached Sign" or "Free -Standing Sign.")
Height of Sign
The vertical distance measured from the adjacent street grade or upper surface of the nearest
street curb other than an elevated roadway, which permits the greatest height to the highest point
of said sign.
Identification Sign
A sign which is limited to the name, address and number of a building, institution or person and to
the activity carried on in the building or institution, or the occupancy of the person.
Illuminated Sign
Any sign which emanates light either by means of exposed tubing or lamps on its surface, or by
means of illumination transmitted through the sign faces.
Indirectly Illuminated Sign
Any sign which reflects light from a source intentionally directed upon it - for example, by means
of floodlights, gooseneck reflectors or externally mounted fluorescent light fixtures.
Individual Letter Sign
Any sign made of self-contained letters that are mounted on the face of a building, top of a
parapet, roof edge of a building or on top or below a marquee.
Interior Property Line
Property lines other than fronting on street, road or highway.
Lintel
In this context, the line above the display windows and below transom windows (if any) on a store
(usually approximately 9'0" from grade).
Lot
A parcel of land which meets any of the following requirements:
(1) A sub -division map recorded with the assessment department of land registry office;
(2) A Record of Survey map approved by resolution of the Council or other legislative body.
Maintain
To permit a sign, structure or any pare of each to continue or to repair or refurbish a sign,
structure or any part of either.
Marquee (or Canopy)
A permanent roof -like shelter extending from part or all of the building face over a public right-
of-way and constructed of some durable material such as metal, glass or plastic.
Marquee Sign (or Canopy Sign)
Any sign attached to or constructed in or on a canopy or marquee.
Message
The wording or copy on a sign.
Multi -Prism Sign
Signs made with a series of triangular vertical sections that turn and stop, or index, to show three
pictures or messages in the same area.
Nameplate
A no sign identifying only the name and occupation of profession of the occupant of
premises on which the sign is located. If any premises include more than one occupant, nameplate
refers to all names and occupations or professions as well as the name of the building and
directional information.
Non -Accessory Sign
A sign which directs attention to a business, commodity, service or entertainment not related to
the premises at which the sign is located, or to a business, commodity, service or entertainment
which is conducted, sold or offered elsewhere than on the premises of which the sign is located.
Non -Electrical Sign
Any sign that does not contain electrical wiring or is not attached or intended to be attached to an
electrical energy source.
Non -Conforming Sign (Legal)
Any advertising structure or sign which was lawfully erected and maintained prior to such time as
it came within the preview of this Code and any amendments thereto, and which fails to conform
to all applicable regulations and restrictions of this Code, or a non -conforming sign for which a
special permit has been issued.
On -Premise Sign (Off Site Sign)
This is a third party sign. It is a sign that advertises goods, products, services or facilities or
directs persons to a different location from where the sign is installed.
Outdoor Advertising Sign (Off -Site Sign)
Outdoor advertising signs which advertise goods, products or services not necessarily sold on the
premises on which the sign is located, are of three main types:
(1) Poster panels or bulletins normally mounted on a building wall or free-standing structure
with advertising copy in the form of pasted paper.
(2) Multi -prism signs - same as above, and alternating advertising messages on the one display
area.
(3) Painted bulletins, where the advertiser's message is painted directly on the background of a
wall -mounted or free-standing display area.
Owner
A person recorded as such on official records and including duly authorized agent or notary, a
purchaser, devisee, judiciary; any person having a vested or contingent interest in the property in
question.
Parapet or Parapet Wall
That portion of a building wall that rises above the roof level.
Person
Any individual, corporation, association, firm, partnerships, and the like, singular or plural.
Pole Sign
See "Ground Sign" or "Free -Standing Sign."
Portable Sign
Any sign not permanently attached to the ground or a building.
Premises
An area of land with its appurtenances and buildings which, because of its unity of use, may be
regarded as the smallest conveyable unit of real estate.
Projecting Signs
A sign, other than a wall sign, which is attached to and projects from a structure or building face.
The area of double faced projecting signs are calculated on one face of the sign only.
Public Right -of -Way Width
The particular distance across a public street, measured from property line to property line. When
property lines on opposite sides of the public street are not parallel, the public right-of-way width
shall be determined by the city engineer.
Public Service Information Sign
Any sign intended primarily to promote items of general interest to the community such as time,
temperature and date, atmospheric conditions, new or traffic control, etc.
Real Estate or Property For Sale, Rent or Lease Sign
Any sign pertaining to the sale, lease or rental of land or buildings.
Roof Line
The top edge of the roof or the top of the parapet, whichever forms the top line of the building
silhouette.
Roof Sign
Any sign erected upon, against or directly above a roof or on top of or above the parapet of a
building.
Rotating Sign
Any sign or portion of a sign which moves in a revolving or similar manner, but not including
multi -prism indexing signs.
Seasonal or Holiday Signs
Signs such as Christmas decorations, those used for an historic holiday and installed for a limited
period of time.
Sign
Any identification, description, illustrauji, or device illuminated or non -illuminated which is
visible from any public place or is located on private property and exposed to the public and
which directs attention to a product, service, place, activity, person, institution, business or
solicitation, including any permanently installed or situated merchandise; or any emblem, painting,
banner, pennant, placard or temporary sign designed to advertise, identify or convey information,
with the exception of window displays and national flags. For the purpose of removal, signs shall
also include all sign structures.
Sign Legend
See "Copy."
Sign Sticker
A sticker affixed either to the face or the channel of a sign visible from the street denoting the
name of the manufacturer or designated servicing company for purpose of identification by city
officials.
Sign Structure
Any structure which supports, has supported or is capable of supporting a sign, including
decorative cover.
Special Purpose Sign
Any sign other than a business, non -accessory, identification sign, including but not limited to
traffic signs.
Street
A public highway, road or thoroughfare which affords the principal means of access to adjacent
lots, measured from property line to property line.
Swinging Sign
A sign installed on an arm or spar, that is not, in addition, permanently fastened to an adjacent
wall or upright pole.
Temporary Sign
A sign which is not permanently affixed. All devices such as banners, pennants, flags (not
intended to include flags of any nations) searchlights, twirling or sandwich type signs, sidewalk or
curb signs and balloons or other air or gas filled figures.
Temporary Window or Building Sign
A sign painted on the interior of a window or constructed of paper, cloth, or other like material
and attached to the interior side of a window or displayed on the exterior of a building wall in
order to direct attention of persons outside the building to a sale of merchandise or a change in
the status of the business
Under Canopy or Marquee Sign
A sign suspended below the ceiling or roof of a canopy or marquee.
Unlawful Sign
A sign which contravenes this code or which the administrator may declare as unlawful if it
becomes dangerous to public safety by reason of dilapidation or abandonment or a non-
conforming sign for which a permit required under a previous code was not obtained.
Use
The purpose for which a building, lot, sign or other structure is arranged, intended, designed,
occupied or maintained.
Wall Sign (or Facia Sign)
A sign attached to or erected against the wall of a building with the face in a parallel plane to the
plane of the building wall.
Window Sign
A sign installed inside a window for purposes of viewing from outside the premises. This term
does not include merchandise located in a window.
Underwriters' Laboratories (48)
In the United States, a non-profit organization which establishes standards for electrical and
mechanical equipment and materials and is commonly referred to as "UL." The electrical section
is known as "Underwriters' Laboratories (48)."
i :� :�
V21
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
RESOLUTION #1996-52
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ANNUAL EVALUATION
AND PLANNING SURVEY FOR THE
HIMESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature adopted a law that requires
municipalities to annually complete an evaluation and planning
survey of their wastewater facilities for MPCA review, and
WHEREAS, the City of Albertville is required to participate in
the annual evaluation and planning survey by completing a copy of
the survey report; and
WHEREAS, the annual evaluation and planning survey report has
been completed, presented and reviewed by the City Council of
Albertville on August 5, 1996.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, that the annual evaluation
and planning report as prepared is accurate to the best of our
knowledge and ability, based upon reports and work of the City
staff and Professional Services Group (consultant) and is
authorized to be submitted to the MPCA.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 5TH
DAY OF AUGUST, 1996.
Michael Potter, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda Houghton, City Clerk
MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY
WATER QUALITY DIVISION
ANNUAL EVALUATION AND PLANNING SYSTEM
Municipality Name
Today's Date ,
U ,jjr2 "X 4 aCiu(E09
1 , 3 4 f5 CC�.CC
�'X,fl A4 JSDC',CE0
j!-aO;6CCC
0 1' ;2_' 3 0 5. 6 '�7D (D8 1)
MARKING INSTRUCTIONS
• Use No. 2 pencil.
• Do not use red ink or felt tip pens.
• Make solid marks that fill the response completely.
• Make no stray marks on this form.
• Do not tear or mutilate this form.
• KEEP A COPY OF THE COMPLETED FORM FOR YOUR RECORDS
Incorrect Marks f
Correct Mark
•
0■ ■■■■■■■ ■ _ 5114
PLEASE DO NOT MARK IN THIS AREA
SECTION ONE: WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PHYSICAL CONDITION
All Systems
1. Age of the _D .• 2 3 + > s > a - 9 (This is defined as the number of years since the last construction
facility: 7-)_ _ •_) + -, s - s •) ! to increase the organic or hydraulic capacity of the facility.)
2. Are there any valves, piping, pumps, etc. that will require major repair or replacement within the next five
years?......................................./...........................................��R
3. Identify items needing repair or replacement:
Mechanical Unit Processes .................................................. NA
If not applicable, go to question 5.
4. For the Processes listed below, indicate whether equipment, structures, etc., will require major repair or replacement
within the next five years:
4.1
4.2
Activated Sludge ....... .... ........................ ...........
Chemical Feed Equipment (including phosphorus removal, pH adjustment, etc.)
..................
..................
v + •
• N NA
v • NA � 4;4f-
4.3
Clarifiers (including primaryry, secondary, Imhoff tanks, etc.) ..................................
dechlorination)
y • NA cytc-J
4.4
Disinfection (including ..................................................
4.5
Effluent Filters......................................................................
r .jT •
4.6
4.7
Incineration................................................................
Intermittent Sand Filters ................. ....................... ....................
Y �T
4.8
Preliminary Treatment (including grit removal, comminutors, screening, etc.) ....................
:N •
r •N •
4.9
Rotating Biological Contactors........................................................
v_,N
4.10
Sequencing Batch Reactors............................................................
v •
4.11
Sludge Composting.................................................................
;�
N,0
4.12
Sludge Dewatering.................................................................
Y N •
4.13
Sludge Digesters....................................................................
Y •
4.14
Sludge Thickening ................................................................
Y :E •
4.15
Trickling Filters/Biofilters............................................................
Pond Unit Processes (such as Stabilization, Aerated, Polishing, Sludge Storage, etc.) ...... NA
If not applicable, go to question 8.
5. Is there any deep rooted vegetation (e.g., cattails, etc.) in ponds or dikes? ............................ Y •
6. Are there any burrowing rodents living in the ponds or dikes? ...................................... Y •
7. Will any of the following need major repair or replacement within the next five years?
7.1 Liner or seal........................................................................ Y. i
7.2 Lift stations........................................................................ • N
7.3 Ri�rap............................................................................ Y: •
7.4 Dikes............................................................................. r, 1
7.5 Control structures....................................................................`1 N
7.6 All-weather road.................................................................... v, 1
Soil Treatment Systems (such as Spray Irrigation, Rapid Infiltration, Drainfields, etc.) .... •
If not applicable, go to question 12.
8. During dry weather conditions, are there soft spots, seepage or pooling of water on the ground surface? .... Y N
9. Is there any unusual growth of vegetation in or near the soil treatment system area (e.g., cattails, plush green
areas, etc.)? .............................................................................. Y N
10. Is there established vegetative cover on the soil treatment system? .................................. Y N
11. If present, are the ground water monitoring wells up to Minnesota Department of Health codes? .......... Y N
12. Will any other equipment identified in Section One require major repair or replacement within the next five
years?........................................................ .,-,..................... v N
13. Identify items in Section One needing repair or replacement:�i.- '�-af7L,e'ti-t /-5---
necessary:.------1�Li�i GrJ
14. Additional comments on wastewater treatment system physical condition, if
0
M M
No
SECTIONTWO: •PERFORMANCE
Soil Treatment Systems (Spray Irrigation, Rapid Infiltration, Drainfields) .............. •
If not applicable, go to question 25.
15. The influent design flow for your soil treatment system is:
16. The influent design biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) for your treatment system is:
17. In the last year, how many months did the following exceed 90 percent of the design values listed above:
17.1 0 1 — ---
' 0, 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9
17.2 o 1
• I 0 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9J
18. In the last year, how many months did the following exceed the design values:
18.1 0 1
' 0 1 2 3 4 5 8 7 8 9
18.2 •I 0 1
� 0 1' 2 (3 4 5 6 7 8 9
19. Were the design hydraulic application rates exceeded on any sites? .................................. v_' N
20. Were there any discharges to surface waters in the past year? ...................................... r N
21. Does the system have enough site acreage to accept all of the water received? .......................... ? A
22. Do leasees ever refuse to accept water per their lease agreements? .................................. v .N Na)
23. Did any monitoring well sample results exceed: ...................................................... f+a
23.1 250 mg/L chlorides? ................................................................ :F
23.2 10 mg/L nitrate-nitrogen?.............................................................JD
24. Additional comments on wastewater treatment system loadings and performance, if necessary:
❑■ ■■■■■■■ ■ = 5114
PLEASE 00 NOT MARK IN THIS AREA
SECTIONCOLLECTION
25. How many days in the last year did emergency bypasses or overflows occur? (Regional systems answer to the extent of
available information.)
25.1 In any part of the sewer collection system?
i_- - ----
_ l l i 5 i J
1 4 3 a 7 1 9
_ 4 i 6 7 8 9
25.2 At the treatment system?
1 2 3 4 5 5 3 9
2 7 3 5 6 3 91
26. Of the number listed in 25.1 and 25.2, how many were due to:
26.1 Rain or Snow Melt (Infiltration/Inflow)
B. 9
0. 1 2 3 J 5 6 7 3 9
0 2 3 4 5 5 7 3 9'
26.2 Equipment Failure
0 1 z s 6 7 a —
1 2 S' d A 6 7. 0. 9
0 t 2.. 3 3': 5, 6. 7 8. 9
27. Does a plan exist to remove any infiltration or inflow? ............................................ Y AW
28. How many rainfalls in the last year caused basement backups? (Regional Systems answer to the extent of available
information.)
1 .9
J,J_P 3 4 T- .-1 7 8 9
29. Are lift stations adequately maintained and operated? ............................................ • y,
30. Does a scheduled preventive maintenance program exist for the collection system? ...................... 40 N
31. Does a routine inspection program exist for the collection system? .................................. • N
32. Describe any major repairs or equipment replacement that were made to the collection system in the last year. Do not
include if the system is less than one year old (as indicated in question 1).
33. Additional comments on collection system, if necessary:
If not applicable, go to question 42.
db
34.
For biosolids that are land applied:
34.1 Does the system employ a certified Type IV waste system (sludge) operator? ......................
. v
34.2 Does the system contract with a certified Type IV waste system (sludge) operator? ................
Y N
34.3 Does the system have at least six months of storage? ........................................
Y N
34.4 What storage components exist? Digester Drying Beds
Storage Tanks Other _ _
34.5 Are an adequate number of MPCA approved acres available to apply the system's biosolids production
forthe next year?..................................................................
Y N
34.6 Will any new landspreading sites be applied for in the next 12 months? ........................
Y N
34.7 Have any site complaints been received regarding biosolids?..................................
Y Y
34.8 Are biosolids spread on frozen or snow covered ground? ....................................
Y
35.1
In general are the EPA/503 regulations understood? ..............................................
Y N
35.2 Are pathogen reduction to Class B standards met? ..........................................
Y N
35.3 Are vector attraction reduction requirements met? ........................................
r' N
36.
Are monitoring wells in place at any landspreading locations? ......................................
r ry
37.
If the biosolids are not land applied, are they transferred to another facility? ..........................
K N- NA
37.1 If yes, list the name of the receiving facility:
38.
List total annual biosolids generated (not landspread) in dry tons:
o_` "i z . a s s i `a 9
0'1e, "8 4 ,5 fi 7 8 .9
39.
Will any other equipment identified in Section Four require major repair or replacement within the next five
years?..................................................................................
r N
40.
Identify items in Section Four needing repair or replacement:
_
41. Additional comments on biosolids, if necessary:
0
❑■ ■E■EEM■ ■ - - 5114
PLEASE 00 NOT MARK IN THIS AREA
If not applicable, go to question 49. NA
42. How many individual sewage treatment systems exist within the service area? 1 2 3 4 s 6 - i s 9
103 1 5 5 4 9
_..1dP 1 2 J 4 5 6 8 9
43. Have the individual systems' septic tanks been pumped in the last three years? .......................... • N NA
44. Is septage accepted in the treatment system? ................................................... �dp N
45. Does the municipality have a septage disposal plan? .............................................. Y I+' •
45.1 Is the septage disposal plan in accordance with the permit? .................................. Y N 40
46. Will any other equipment identified in Section Five require major repair or replacement within the next five
years?.................................................................................. Y N
47. Identify items in Section Five needing repair or replacement:
48. Additional comments on septage, if necessary:
0 M M
M0
SECTION•
System Operation
49. How many days per week is the wastewater treatment system staffed?
0 1- 2 3 .1_.-9_-6 AV
50. How many hours per day is the wastewater treatment system staffed?
o t is LIST THIS AS A TOTAL PER DAY (I.E., HOURS), NOT A TOTAL PER PERSON
0 'i z. tj PER DAY.
51. Total daily flow measurement:
51.1 Has the influent (or effluent) flow meter that measures total daily flow been calibrated within the last
year?............................................................................ • N NA
51.2 If total daily flow is determined by running time meters on lift station pumps, were the pumps
calibrated within the last year?.......................................................... Y N !
51.3 If flow is not measured using a flow meter or running time meters, how are total daily flows measured?
52. Have any significant mechanical or process -related operational problems been experienced within the last year? v • NA
53. Please describe:
54. If item 52 is yes, were any of the problems attributable to commercial or industrial discharges? ............ r` ! NA
55. Is your laboratory work conducted at a certified laboratory (excluding dissolved oxygen, pH and chlorine
residual)?.............................................................................. ! N
System Maintenance
56. Does a scheduled preventive maintenance program exist for the treatment system? ...................... i ,R
57. Is the preventive maintenance schedule being adhered to and are accurate records being maintained? ...... ! N: NA
58. Were any major repairs or equipment replacement made in the last year? Do not include if the system is less
than one year old (as indicated in question 1)................................................... _v: •
58.1 Please describe:
Operator Certification and Training
59. What is the treatment system's classification (mark one) ........................................ a. C ! 6.
60. Is the operator in responsible charge of the system certified at a class equal to or greater than the system's
classification?............................................................................ ! N
61. Has the above operator attended any training within the last year? .................................. ! N
62. How many operators does the system employ?
Q 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 9
0 1 2 3. 4 5 6 7 6 9
0 1_ ! 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
63. How many of those operators are certified?
0 1. 2 3 4 5. 6 7 8 9.
0 1� ,2 3 4 5 6 7 3 9 1
0 1! 3 4 5_ 6 7 8 9.1
64. Does an ongoing safety training program exist? ................................................... N
65. Additional comments on treatment system operation and maintenance, if necessary: _
�� M M M
ORDINANCESECTION SJV*Aj�- OUWIAL AND
66. Please complete the following for the entire wastewater system using information from the last fiscal year.
REVENUES
EXPENDITURES
• ,
Operation
7
-.• 2- 3
0 3
4 "i
1 s
6 - 3 -9-
i• '
User
•
7
�t 0
• 1 Z 3
-
4 i
6 7 3 3
Charges
I>
Maintenance ./
•= 3
1 s
i 7 3 9.
$
1. 1 3
2 1
4.
5 7 3 9;
---• _
Q.---
23 4 5 6 7 3 9-.
2 J 4 5 6 7 3
9
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
-7k 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 40 8
9
Taxes .Q
_ 4 i i 7 3 9
Depreciation _ 3 40 3 3
I
9
D
3 9 1
1
).= 3 4 5 5 3
+$
3
---:
f$
4 i i ' 8 9
'3 2 340 5 5 7 3
9
-4
--_
-3 4 5 6 7 8 -9
( '� 3 1 2 40 4 5 5 7 .8
9_
2 3 4 5, 7, B; 9
Other _s'1_• 1 2. •3 <0''L;�1�(Y,(D
_% 1+ 2 3. 4 5. 8. 7, F 9
+$ / 10 1 2 .3, '.4 (La'.r ob C
0 2 3 4._- -0- j T. 9
2 3 4 5 j: 'r T- y9
Please list: _ L L4&j, ftUa;
ice_ 0 1• 3 4 4. 8 7 ($4 t,$.
Total -; 20 4 s 6. 1 a s
- 2 3 4 5 6' • if 9 1
3 4` 6 7 8 9
=$ -- 2 40 4 5 6 7 8 9
3 4.
Q . 1
C....m 10 1* -1
• 1
Replacement
p b I� 1
2.. 3.
3, 1.9'
2 3
:2 'a
{ k 6
4 .0'. b
4, S. 6. 7: 8 9
:4_ s 3: .'CC
+$ _dP I
1
2 3
2 3
4
4 5 6
7- 8_ 9.
• 1 2 3 .4, 5
Debt 0 1, 2
0 1- 2. 3 Q 5• 7 8 9
Service F_ 6 1 2 3. 4 40 6 7: '.!{.
+$ (,,. 0 1 2, 3 4 5. 7 8 9
0 f 240 4 5 6 7 8 9
j 1
2 3
4 3
6. 7
8.
9,
Q 140 1
2: '-3
'4::5,
.8'(7
a
Other 1
2. 3
4 5.
6. Z
8.
4,
^0
+$ 1
2 3
4 5-
6 7
8.
9
e • 1
i
2 3.
4• 5
8 7.
8
•9]
p� a +
3
4 5
6 7
8
9
Please list:
002 3 4 5 6 7 8, 9.1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 401
! Total 00 2 3 4 5 5 7 8 9
0 2 J 4 5 S 7 3, •:
a$ C> • 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9!
3 4 i 5 3 9
PLEASE DO NOT MARK IN THIS AR
5114
am 0
WW
67. Did expenditures for operation and maintenance significantly exceed user charges? ...................... r dw
68. Did user charges significantly exceed expenditures for operation and maintenance? ...................... V dp�
69. Does the municipality have an equipment replacement account? .................................... • "
70. Are revenues and expenditures for the wastewater treatment systems kept in accounts separate from non -sewer
accounts (e.g., water utilities, public works, etc.)? ................................................ do
71. What was the year of the last rate adjustment?
1
YEAR 9
2 3 7 do
-/'- ' - ' --'-
72. Monthly Residential User Rate
72.1 Base Rate $ 31,
72.2 If you use a per unit charge: 1 --,5f / S / OC D
Per 1,000 gallons $ 2 %-d _ x 8 = $
Or Per 100 cubic feet $
x 10.67 = $
72.3 Total Residential User Rate (based on an average
8,000 gallons per household per month) (72.1 + 72.2) _ $ 0 Z .- I - s 6 i s 9 i
0 1 :.2 S 4. s 6 7 . 8 9
.4 J 6 7 8 9
r4 8, l8 ,7. `8 179,
73. Is there a fee for a new connection to the sewer system? .......................................... • N
73.1 If yes, please list the fee in whole dollars: $ Z of i_ _z.; 3- a s_ s s ;9
74. Are all users charged proportionately to their use? ................................................ ! N-
75. Does an industrial user rate schedule or surcharge rate exist? ...................................... .
76. Has the municipality adopted a sewer use ordinance? ............................................ a N.
If yes, does the ordinance:
76.1 Control new connections......................................................... • N
76.2 Prohibit clear water connections.....................................................: • N
76.3 Prohibit toxics ........................................................................• N
76.4 Allow the municipality to require pretreatment ...........................................: ff N. 76.5 Require annual notification of cost to all users ............................................ • N d •••�•
76.6 Provide for enforcement of the ordinance ...............................................: • W
77. Does the municipality have pretreatment agreements/permits with significant industrial users? ............ v_ N •
77.1 If yes, do the agreements have limits?. ........................................v- N
77.2 Have there been any violations of limits in the last year? .................................... v if,
78. For individual soil treatment systems: .............................................................. !
78.1 If a sewer use ordinance exists, does it address routine maintenance for individual sewage treatment
systems and proper disposal of the se tage? ...... ... ..... . Y N 0-6
.................... . .. .. . .. .
78.2 Does the municipality require individual systems be inspected and brought up to code at the time of
building permit application, point of sale or complaints? .................................... P '►i: NAG
78.3 Does the municipality restrict the discharge of non -domestic waste to individual sewage treatment
systems? .. , it N
78.4 Does the municipality allow newly constructed homes to be served by individual sewage treatment
s stems?
y ........ V N Na
78.5 If yes, does the municipality have ordinances and an inspection program to ensure that the new system
is properly located, designed and built? .................................................. Y N
79. Additional comments on financial and ordinance status, if necessary:.
00 0
SECTION EIGHT: FUTURE NEEDS
80. What is the expected increase in the average wet weather (maximum monthly) flow over the next five years?
00 /, /^�yhJ (million gallons per day) i". `c C' 111,14
81. What is the expected increase in the maximum monthly loadings for the following five years?
81.1 Biochemical Oxygen Demand �82_L _ (pounds/month)
81.2 Total Suspended Solids �� %Q (pounds/month)
81.3 Ammonia NA (pounds/month)
81.4 Phosphorus AIA (pounds/month)
`82. Will the five-year projected average wet weather flow rate exceed the system capacity? •
83. Will the five-year projected average maximum monthly loadings exceed the system design capacity? . - - •
E.U6E .
84. Are any major treatment facility or collection system improvements or expansions planned in the next five
.,
years? ...............................................
v
84.1 If yes, please complete the following: o?Q7�GLO J f�-�J
Treatment System * S v
41, Additional Capacity
?0 /CIO f
%n cc.41
r Rehabilitation of Present
System
• Rehabilitation to Meet New.
Standards
(Not for additional capacity)
Other:
Estimated Year of Construction Start
Q :L X. I
0 `j �T 4 4 f 8 7' B 9,
Q 1 X X 4 6 6 f-C 9
Estimated Year of Construction Start
X+'JL Z
Q .1 L2_ ;3 4 .5 .6
0 1 2 3 4. 5 8 7 8 9.
Estimated Year of Construction Start
0 1 2
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
0, 1 2 3 4 5_ 6. 1 8 9,
1, 2 3 4 5 6. ,7.
Estimated Year of Construction Start
J ✓ 19)
3 4 6 6 7 IF 9_
.3 4 5 6 7 8 9,
0 1 :2 13',4 5 '6 7 ,6
Shtd itd . FAwat; s c.c.L
l;k..e.ly
Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars
$l 0 1, 2 3
3 4" _5
• ; 0 f 2 3 4 5. 8 7 4 9
I 10 .1, 2 3_ J_ 5.
0. 1. 2. 3 4. 5
Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars
$�I 0 1 2 3 4 5_ 6 7 8: 9
0 1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 `8 9.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7$ 9
5 g L7`(X X
0 1 2 3 4 5 8 7' L 'T
i 0 ' 1 2 3 4' 5 L 6_ -X ',!
!Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars
i0. 1 2 3 4 5, 6. 7 4. 9
0_ 1 2 3 4 5_ 6 7 If 1
.0. 1_ 2 3 3 5' 6_ 7 .$ 9
;0 tt '.2' 3 !4 S. 6 7 X.
0 1, 2. 3 4' S, 6 L
I (:. i. f ' 12 3 d' S 6,
Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars
$l .0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7).8; ,9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
.0 1 2 J 4 5 6 71 .8 9
'.0. .1 2 3 4 5 6, 7 JI 9
0 1_ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9.
I '0 1 2 3 4 5 ,6.:7, 8 f
; S
w
`n
❑■
■E■NNE■ ■
PLEASE DO NOT MARK IN THIS AREA
5114
SECTION EIGHT: FUTURE NEEDS (CONTINUED)
Collection System
• Sewer Extension Estimated Year of Construction Start
Rehabilitation due to
inflow/infiltration
Rehabilitation due to all
others
Other:
Sludge
Additional Capacity
Rehabilitation of Present
System
_ Rehabilitation to Meet New
Standards
(Not for additional capacity)
Other:
6 8 9.
5 6 8. 9
Estimated Year of Construction Start
3 i 2 3 4 5 6
l 1 2 3 4 i 6 7 8 .2
2 1 4 5 5 7 8_
Estimated Year of Construction Start
0, 1 2
0 1_ 2 3 _4, 5 4 7 8
0 -1 2 3 4 5
b ,1 .3� L3. 4 5 • Q C� ' 9 t�,,
Estimated Year of Construction Start
0_ 1 2
Q 1L 2 3 4 .S. B 7 ,8 '9.
9 .7 .Q
Estimated Year of Construction Start
0 1 2
(Q.' 'IC 2 1• r. C 16 7 8 C
0 )._ 2.
Estimated Year of Construction Start
o 'f• 7u (,f a s' 3 3
6 2 'J[ 4 5, 6 J1 8 1-1
Estimated Year of Construction Start
0. 1: ' J. a 5 6. 7
0 1 2 2. 4 5 6 7 9 Q
.6 5 6 7_ T; 9
Estimated Year of Construction Start
0 1 2
�~ 0 1 2 3 4 5 5 7 6 9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9-
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars
$ f0 1 -i--3 4 i 5 3 9 1
0 1 2 3 1 i i 3 9
0 1 2 1 1 i i @ 9.;
0 t 2 3 4 5 i i 9
0 1 2 3 i i 3 9
1 0 1 2 3 1 3 i __"_ 3 9
Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars
0 1- 2 3 3 i i 7 8 9
0. 1_ 2 3 4, 5 1 3 3.
0 1 2. 3� 4 5_ i
T^ 0� f 2 3 4 i 3 8 9
o O i 2 3 4 5 5 8 9!
1 0_ ,1 '. 2, 3. 3 s, 6, 6 i I
Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars
0 1 2 3 4 5_ 5 d. 9
0 1- 2 3 4. 5. 5 6 9"
0_ 1_ 2, 7_ 4 5 d 7 6 9 j
3, -; 5 4
Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars
s 0 1 ,2 3_ 4 5 6 7 9 C
E� 0 1 2`.3, 4 5 6, 7 8 9
Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars
$ ` p ?; 3 4 C 6 7 8; 9
I (4,C:i2 C3 4 C _7. 8 9
6 .1 '2 3 4 5 5_ 7 8 _9_ 1
3�cT`5''6J2: -6i 9'
,0, 1 F 3 r -5 6 7 �8, C
Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars
$0 3 j_ T 5 9 7 8,'9
FvC (4 a X ,7 8�C
0 L 2. 3 4 5 8 7 8 9
3 4 ,5 '6 8 C
Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars
$! 0 2_' 3 i 5_ 6 7 4_ 9
0 1 2 J 4 5� 6 7 8.9
Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars
0 1 2 3 4 5 5 8_ !
0 1- 2. 3 4 i i
0 1 2 3 4 3 i 7 C 9 1
0, 1_ 2 3" 4 5 67. '6 9.
0 1 2 3 4 5 6. ' $, 9-
6. ,1 2 .3_ 4 5 8' 7 8_ '9
wo III Ili
84.2 Name, author and date of document that listed the cost estimate on previous 2 pages (e.g., facilities plan,
engineering
/report, engineer study, etc.) Write "None" if estimate was not documented.
___11l_OLAIE
85. Do any Plans exist to connect any of the unsewered homes in the service area to the municipal treatment system
withinthe next five years?.................................................................. dP N NA
85.1 If yes, how many?
i 1 2 J 4 5 6 —
S 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 8 8 9:,
0 1 2 . 4 5 6 7 3 3_
85.2 Total estimated cost of sewer extension in millions: $ _�,• 2 3 1 5 6 7 8 9 .
dp 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1
0. 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 9
dP 1 2 3 4 i 6 7 8 9
Q� M 1 2 3 4 5 3 9
J • / A Qw/ 1 2 3 4 5 _5 77 3 9
86. If future construction project(s) were identified in 84, are you interested in receiving information regarding
financial assistance through the State Revolving Loan Program? ...................................... y_ W
87. Additional comments, if necessary:
88. Completed by:
If you have questions concerning this document, please contact:
Deb Lindlief
Water Quality Division
1-800-65 7-3864
(612) 296-8766
Copyright '0 1994 National Computer Systems. Inc. All 11gntS reservea.
'rinted n U.S.A. )Hark Reflex`) by NCS Nh1104681-.321 AGS09
❑M MMMMMMM 0 5114
PLEASE DO NOT MARK IN THIS AREA
M M M MM
Airgarim p1b
AdaIdsw 113 S. FIFTH AVENUE, PC. BOX 1717 ST CLOUD, MN 56302-1717 320 252-4740 &---w , , , -- , AX
w�AOEN ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION
TO: Garrison Hale
City Administrator
Albertville, MN
FROM: Peter J. Carlson, P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: July 22, 1996
RE: Final Street and Utility Plan Review
Parkside 3rd Addition
SEH No. A-ALBEV 9701.00
I have reviewed the final plans and specifications for the above referenced project and have the
following comments:
1. Storm sewer crossings shall be shown on the sanitary sewer and water main sheets. Insulation
is required where the separation is 2 feet or less.
2. On Sheet 4, the high point in the water main at Station 23+50 shall be eliminated.
3. The water main crossing CSAH 19 shall be jacked -in -placed.
4. On Sheet 7, the direction of the sanitary sewer should be reversed to flow towards Kahler Drive.
This would eliminate the need for a drop manhole in Kalenda Drive.
5. On Sheet 8, C136 shall be relocated to avoid interference with the proposed hydrant.
6. On Sheet 8, C132 shall be relocated to avoid a future driveway.
7. On Sheet 9, CB 15 shall be relocated to avoid interference with the proposed hydrant.
8. On Sheet 11, CB 25 shall be relocated to avoid interference with the proposed hydrant.
9. On Sheet 11, a catch basin is required in the northwest quadrant of 58th Street NE and 57th
Street NE. This catch basin shall be located to avoid interference with proposed hydrant.
10. Since PVC water main is specified for this project, a tracer wire is required. A section detailing
the installation of a tracer is required in the Specifications.
dj g
c: Linda Houghton, City Clerk
Elizabeth Stockman, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
Mike Couri, City Attorney
(GAALBEV\C0RRVL-22A.96)
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC. ST. PAUL, MN MINNEAPOLIS, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISON, WI LAKE COUNTY, IN
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
PARKSIDE 3rd ADDITION LOT AREAS
BLOCK 1
Lot
1 -
16,737.84
square
feet
Lot
2 -
17,361.26
square
feet
Lot
3 -
16,993.19
square
feet
Lot
4 -
14,809.80
square
feet
Lot
5 -
14,653.00
square
feet
BLOCK 2
Lot
1 -
13,500.00
square
feet
Lot
2 -
13,500.00
square
feet
Lot
3 -
13,500.00
square
feet
Lot
4 -
13,500.00
square
feet
Lot
5 -
16,959.87
square
feet
BLOCK 3
Lot 1 - 12,886.45 square feet
Lot 2 - 12,510.00 square feet
BLOCK 4
Lot
1 -
12,510.00
square
feet
Lot
2 -
13,014.30
square
feet
Lot
3 -
14,885.35
square
feet
Lot
4 -
14,625.85
square
feet
Lot
5 -
13,016.19
square
feet
Lot
6 -
13,004.24
square
feet
BLOCK 5
Lot
1 -
12,510.00
square
feet
Lot
2 -
15,494.63
square
feet
Lot
3 -
12,664.54
square
feet
Lot
4 -
12,510.00
square
feet
BLOCK 6
Lot 1 - 13,061.49 square feet
BLOCK 7
Lot
1 -
12,545.17
square
feet
Lot
2 -
14,566.73
square
feet
Lot
3 -
13,840.50
square
feet
Lot
4 -
13,736.47
square
feet
Lot
5 -
13,252.75
square
feet
Lot
6 -
12,817.58
square
feet
Lot
7 -
12,600.00
square
feet
Lot
8 -
12,600.00
square
feet
Lot
9 -
12,600.00
square
feet
Lot
10 -
12,873.15
square
feet
Lot
11 -
13,181.83
square
feet
Lot
12 -
13,181.83
square
feet
Lot
13 -
13,592.33
square
fet
Lot
14 -
13,201.86
square
feet
Lot
15 -
12,939.20
square
feet
Lot
16 -
13,737.11
square
feet
Lot
17 -
13,897.36
square
feet
Lot
18 -
13,109.84
square
feet
Lot
19 -
14,656.57
square
feet
Lot
20 -
13,784.08
square
feet
Lot
21 -
13,367.42
square
feet
Lot
22 -
13,171.76
square
feet
Lot
23 -
13,123.88
square
feet
Lot
24 -
13,172.09
square
feet
Lot
25 -
12,892.30
square
feet
BLOCK 8
Lot
1 -
19,764.66
square
feet
Lot
2 -
15,324.94
square
feet
Lot
3 -
12,538.31
square
feet
Lot
4 -
13,330.54
square
feet
Lot
5 -
12,961.46
square
feet
Lot
6 -
12,502.36
square
feet
Lot
7 -
12,502.11
square
feet
Lot
8 -
12,502.11
square
feet
Lot
9 -
12,939.10
square
feet
Lot
10 -
12,817.60
square
feet
Lot
11 -
13,185.40
square
feet
Lot
12 -
13,836.00
square
feet
Lot
13 -
14,152.49
square
feet
Lot
14 -
14,381.00
square
feet
Lot
15 -
12,630.39
square
feet
Lot
16 -
12,517.01
square
feet
Lot
17 -
12,874.51
square
feet
Lot
18 -
12,738.10
square
feet
Lot
19 -
12,502.11
square
feet
Lot
20 -
12,502.10
square
feet
Lot
21 -
12,501.85
square
feet
Lot
22 -
12,713.13
square
feet
Lot
23 -
14,869.22
square
feet
Lot
24 -
13,715.22
square
feet
Lot
25 -
13,788.20
square
feet
BLOCK 9
Lot
1
- 13,567.43
square
feet
Lot
2
- 13,564.78
square
feet
Lot
3
- 12,791.20
square
feet
Lot
4
- 12,847.00
square
feet
Lot
5
- 12,536.27
square
feet
Lot
6
- 13,530.73
square
feet
Lot
7
- 14,406.74
square
feet
Lot
8
- 13,694.67
square
feet
Lot
9
- 12,672.71
square
feet
Lot
10
- 14,497.24
square
feet
Lot
11
- 12,995.27
square
feet
Lot
12
- 12,510.00
square
feet
Lot
13
- 12,510.00
square
feet
Lot
14
- 12,646.32
square
feet
Lot
15
- 12,641.06
square
feet
Lot 16 - 13,019.73 square feet
Lot 17 - 12,985.41 square feet
BLOCK 10
Lot 1 - 13,137.77 square feet
Lot 2 - 12,968.30 square feet
Lot 3 - 12,815.68 square feet
Lot 4 - 12,721.68 square feet
Lot 5 - 12,726.32 square feet
Lot 6 - 13,190.55 square feet
Lot 7 - 13,580.86 square feet
Lot 8 - 12,954.01 square feet
Lot 9 - 15,118.23 square feet
OUTLOTS
Outlot A - 275,077.16 square feet
Outlot B - 291,392.82 square feet
Outlot C - 47,185.51 square feet
Outlot D - 23,674.85 square feet
Outlot E - 447,473.31 square feet
Outlot F - 11,136.62 square feet
Outlot G 35,073.85 square feet
Outlot H - 7,843.15 square feet
Outlot I - 6,097.56 square feet
PARK - 123,506.49 square feet
Ict
COST ESTIMATE
Comprehensive Plan Update
Item to be Updated
Task
Hours
Cost*
TEXT WORK
Comp. Plan
Policy Section and Development
12 hours
$540.00
Framework, affecting Planning Districts
1,4,5,7 and 8
MAP WORK
Address Map
Created per existing map, inclusive of
8-10 hours
$450.00
changes
Base Map
Incorporate new half sections and
5 hours
$225.00
wetland data (obtain National Wetland
Inventory map)
Land Use Plan
Generate two preliminary land use
2-3 hours
$135.00
concepts, finalize one
Zoning Map
Update based on land use map chosen
1-2 hours
$90.00
District Maps
Update Districts 1,4,5,7 and 8
6-8
$360.00
PRINTING COSTS
Printed in color @ 24x30 inches (each)
$90.00
Duplicate copies (each)
-printed in color (8'/Z x11)
$1.50
-printed in black/white (8'/ x11)
.15
-printed in black/white (24x30)
$3.00
[ESTIMATED TOTAL COST
* $2,000.00
* All costs are estimates; you will be billed hourly.
IaQol9111601i0d04
• / � 1AdOn a6a 'i
� ,>yae >aaa■
p�■a� � �9����ano1�Z1
oe�■0■96D as a Dneq O� n L
00 OQC aO >• a �V--�y . is
• {t �1 ,i� � � fin n uOai ��+nCc'acrl p
OniO✓iMe .:rau•i6.eFJ�u
Zw
:� �� w� )[H]J1r0��{{C•O � i� .1i71S!i.IL'IL
Mai
44 r rr i' i 'd • •
an so owNSI-ft
,1 auQ�
d
■ .ne o �
- "'1(!illll�iii�la S��t:sa`e n , �tlq�d'
1 I fill
lulu
� eo YJ
a�
�v � d
F Northwest Associated Consultan -
C O M M U N I T Y PLANNING DESIGN M A R K E T
MEMORANDUM
TO: Gary Ha
FROM: David Li
DATE: 22 July 1996
RE: Albertville - Zoning Ordinance Revision:
Comprehensive Update
FILE NO: 163.05
Liz Stockman communicated to me that you were looking for an estimate to undertake a
comprehensive revision and update of the Zoning Ordinance. This would include items
directed by the Comprehensive Plan as well as other more, mundane items such as
procedures and processing requirements dictated by the State and other various matters
resulting from legislation or advanced techniques in handing development matters.
Given the fact that a substantial amount of work has already been done in such areas as
adult use, the R-1A District, etc. the revision is anticipated to be limited, although will
encompass the entire document. In such cases, it is difficult to project the total list of
matters which must be addressed. As a consequence, I am suggesting that the technical
work involved will cost up to $8,500. We would propose to do the work on a time and
materials basis, thereby allowing the City the protection that if work can in fact be done at
a lesser amount, it will be accomplished with a cost savings. This figure does not include
meeting attendance which we would anticipate to be under our technical assistance
contract, nor does it include copying of materials for distribution for public meetings and
the final product which results from the effort.
As a means of comparison, you might be interested that our standard fee for a zoning
ordinance revision is from $17,000 to $20,000. The maximum amount ever received for
such zoning work is $42,500, which is our current contract with the City of Plymouth on
their ordinance revision.
5775 Wayzata Blvd. • Suite 555 • St. Louis Park, MN 55416 • (612) 595-9636•Fax. 595-9837
Once you have had a chance to review this matter, do not hesitate to contact me should
you care to discuss further. I would also note that we require clarification as to whether this
work should proceed at this point in time or if it is to wait until 1997. If the work is to be
delayed due to budgeting considerations, we are open to proceeding with work but holding
billing until the new fiscal year. Again, we can discuss further once you have had time to
consider the overall matter.
VA
il
1
July 23, 1996
Albertville City Council
c/o Linda Houghton, City Clerk
City Hall, PO Box 9
Albertville, Mn 55301
Dear Council Members:
130 West Division Street • P.O, Box 787 • Map
Telephone (612) 963-6500 • Fax (612) Yo,)-,)/-4.,
Minnesota Relay TDD 1-800-627-3529
I am writing to request permission to use the Old City Hall building an additional
day each month.
Currently, we are using the building each month on the Friday following the
third Wednesday. This request is to also be there on that same Thursday. Hours for
each day would be from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. I am enclosing a calendar highlighted
to clarify the days requested.
Participation in the WIC Program by Albertville area residents has significantly
exceeded our expectations, necessitating this request. Allowing us this extra day will
allow us to better serve the residents of the Albertville area.
Please feel free to contact either myself or Mark G. Sexton, Executive Director,
at (320)963-6500.
I look forward to your reply.
Sincerely,
Dale Erickson
WIC Program Manager
DE/It
Enclosure:
I\19%\WICICORSPNDOLETTER.DE SERVING THE COMMUNITY SINCE 1965
HEAD START • WOMEN, INFANTS & CHILDREN • FAMILY FOCUS • HOME REHABILITATION/WEATHERIZATION • EMERGENCY FOOD/SHELTER
HOUSING INFORMATION • FIND (SELF-SUFFICIENCY) • FAMILY SERVICES • COMMUNITY INITIATIVES • YOUTH EMPLOYMENT
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Ln 0 A
M r T1
V O W 0
cn
s
0 )
c
C
4ow0
N N -•
V
CO A
(NONUiO'`
O W 00N IT
-• A V O W Icf)
w N (J1 co
Cn
N
O
A V O W�
._..'�
A
A
cr
Cn O0 1
(C
1
Q) (D N c n
v o 0
T
o1Av
j(n
40W
N
O
(NONCrp»
Q
fD
_
1
OW 0(DN
? V 1 W
-1
(N71 OD A
T
0 )
'�
v o W
c/) Z
• O
A
�
CT O� 1
fD
0)
-+ 3
Q
v o ca 0
00
NiV �--• co 1 -n
CO N` JU
OW 07ON Cn
(DN(TO1
c
C
O W00N
�
fD
--AvoW
O Cn
-i
N
N 0
O
.n
oNONAv
Cn
PLaWiAc & zauiac CaMissiaK Iff Sh
July 9, 1996
Albertville City Hall 7:00 PH
PRESENT: Chair LeRoy Berning, Commission Members Howard
Larson, Donatus Vetsch, Jim Brown, and Sharon Anderson, and Zoning
Administrator Garrison Hale
Chair Berning called the meeting of the Planning & Zoning
Commission to order.
The agenda was amended by deleting Item 3c (Public Hearing for
rezoning of 79.32 acres of property located in the City of Otsego)
and adding Item 5a (Resolution relating to TIF Budget Amendment).
Motion by Anderson, supported by Brown, to adopt the agenda as
amended. All voted aye.
Motion by Vetsch, supported by Larson, to approve the minutes
of the June 17, 1996, 6:45 PM meeting. All voted aye.
Motion by Larson, supported by Vetsch, to approve minutes of
the June 17, 1996, 7:00 PM meeting. All voted aye.
Motion by Larson, supported by Vetsch, to approve minutes of
the June 17, 1996, 9:05 PM meeting. All voted aye.
Chair Berning convened the continued public hearing on the
rezoning of residential properties along 60th Street NE from R-3 to
B-3. Planner Stockman explained there were mixed uses in the area.
Rezoning was proposed to B-3 and serve as a connection with the new
CSAH 37/19 commercial corridor. Concern by residents was related
to mortgage financing and resale ability. Also ability to rebuild
if a loss occurs. The city's point of view was to promote area the
area for commercial uses. At the June 16, 1996, special meeting,
the Council allowed the property to remain a R-3 zone although the
Land Use Plan shows the property as commercial.
City Planner Stockman proposed a modified B-4 with a provision
for residential.
Residents were present and expressed concerns about a rezone
to B-4 leaving them without a future as residents.
Dave Licht City Planner was concerned that the city not have
a commercial use mixed in with residential uses causing disruption.
Planning Commission members were concerned about devaluation
of the property by having a mixed use of commercial/residential.
Brown explained value changes up or down could be affected by geography.
PLANNING 6 ZONING COMMISSION
July 9, 1996
Page 2 of 5
Larson felt B-4 now was the long term solution. Brown
requested criteria to ensure that the residents were protected.
Larson wanted to ensure residents were protected but that the long
term goal is commercial use.
Lee Kasper concerned about a devaluation of neighborhood.
Licht stated new public hearing for rezone and text amendment
for a B-4 zone would be required.
Motion by Larson, supported by Anderson, to close the public
hearing at 7:38 PM. All voted aye.
Motion by Brown, supported by Larson, to withdraw option of R-
3 to B-3 and pursue the option of R-3 to B-4, notice, and prepare
an ordinance that includes criteria that best protects property
owner and the city's desire to achieve a commercial zoning
district. Three aye, two nay. Berning, Vetsch.
Chair Berning opened the public hearing on a request to rezone
5667 Main Avenue NB from R-1 to B-1. Stockman explained there was
a mixed use structure that was non -conforming use according to
City's zoning. The Comprehensive Plan update finds the present use
a contradiction to the newly approved Comprehensive Plan approved
on June 17, 1996. The building is surrounded by R-1 residents.
Further, lacks in parking, outdoor storage, and fencing. Planner
recommends denial.
All Metro Builders representative Chuck Kirchema explained he
met with city staff and planner last year (1995). Kirchema felt
even though the building improvements proposed were in excess of
the 50% requirement, the building would be an improvement to the
area.
Presently four businesses in the building. Insurance, mailing
service, and contractor according to Kirchema.
Chair Berning is concerned about not being so strict that we
drive away existing businesses. What is the future? How do we
handle this? Wants to save Main Street Central Business District.
Commissioner Brown would like to hear from neighboring
properties. All Metro Builders proposes to pave the parking lot,
install a privacy fence, and keep use of building as commercial.
David Licht explained use of building cannot intensify.
Legal, non -conforming use must remain equal to or less than use
before use became legally non -conforming. Stockman discussed truck
traffic. Discussion included building being updated to ADA
standards. City Building Official Kevin Mealhouse would support
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
July 9, 1996
Page 3 of 5
present use but doesn't want a zoning district change opening the
door to other uses or an increase in the intensity of use.
Chair Berning and Planner Licht discussed parking. All Metro
Builders want a paved lot and use of second floor as commercial.
Future concerns of Commissioner Vetsch related to building being
sold. What happens to use?
Commissioner Larson wants zoning for R-1 to keep the city on
track with the new Comprehensive Plan. LeRoy Berning has not heard
complaints about present use.
Commission Brown asked about some control options. Planner
Licht said use of variance is not legal. Dave Licht explained land
use harmony should be maintained so be careful of zoning change.
Do not establish a precedent.
Commission members discussed the need for more information.
Basic question is the All Metro Builders building appropriate for
a business designation .or not and should a rezone of Main Avenue NE
take place down to and including All Metro Builders building?
Brown wanted to see it used. Larson wants to control. Licht
states the building can be used as it is today with offices on
first floor and the second floor being residential. Look at use
and precedent with more commercial coming into the mix. Discussed
contract zoning not a good approach. Reminder that the 60 day rule
is running. Dave Licht explained All Metro Builders could maintain
the property.
Motion by Vetsch, supported by Brown, to close the public
hearing at 8:23 PM. All voted aye.
Motion by Brown, supported by Vetsch, to recommend denial of
the rezone request to B-1 from R-1 of .the All Metro Builders
building at 5667 Main Avenue NE. Aye 3, Nay 1, Berning, and
abstained Larson.
Chair Berning moved to open public hearing on property for
Center Oaks. Liz Stockman explained request from R-1A to R-1.
City updated Comprehensive Plan June 17, 1996, and adopted R-lA
Zoning. Previously the property was agriculture (A-1). R-1A
equaled 15,000 square feet with 100' wide lots. Liz Stockman
explained that R-1 is attractive to developers as it permits more
lot intensity with 12,500 square feet and 90 foot frontages. The
city planner recommends against zoning change.
Don Jensen, Development Director for Kenco, presented for
Center Oaks a concept plan for the 70+ acres. Mixed lot sizes
and/or PUD to assist city with its goals and the developer meeting
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
July 9, 1996
Page 4 of 5
their needs. Trail plan would coordinate with Parkside 3rd.
Jensen discussed the physical concept plan layout and
transportation access with access street at 55th Street. Jensen
believes lot sizes of Center Oaks should back up to Parkside 3rd
lots of same size. Lot sizes of R-lA would be part of the
development backing to the wetlands.
Brown concerned about maintaining larger lot concept. Demand
for services is higher on snaller density lots.
Chair Berning recognized Commissioner Anderson who reconfirmed
Comprehensive Plan of June 17, 1996. Anderson reminded everyone
that it has taken almost one year to complete the plan and it is
time to stick with the plan.
Larson discussed increased density affecting student count.
Rent Roessler gave a history of Kenco's interest in
Albertville. Mr. Roessler explained how he planned most of the
area west of CSAH 19. Kent Roessler explained 90' or 100' lot
widths do not mean larger, more valuable houses. More green space
and amenities rather than larger lots means higher market values.
The market will bear upon who will live in town. Tax base should
support infrastructure.
Jim Brown restated residential is not going to pay. So, we
want a mix of housing stocks (starter homes, ongoing homes, and
senior housing). Life cycle housing. Less density overall.
Roessler felt 90' front feet and depth sufficient to 15,000
square feet on land up to CSAH 19.
Jim Brown inquired about R-1A deleting 100 front feet.
Kent Roessler discussed the past concept plan which included
90 foot lots. Dave Licht explained pattern to city development.
Small lots east side of CSAH 19 and larger lots on west side.
Licht took the audience back to the Comprehensive Plan of 1996.
LeRoy Berning asked about 100 feet lot width vs. 90 foot. Liz
Stockman talked about housing design with spacing between units.
The Commission discussed the matter with an idea of 15,000
square foot lot average.
Moved by Anderson, supported by Larson to close public hearing
at 9:28 PM. All voted aye.
Licht recapped the question and zoning.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
July 9, 1996
Page 5 of 5
Moved by Brown, supported by Anderson, to recommend denial of
a request to rezone approximately 70 acres (John Roden farm) from
R-lA to R-1. 4 ayes and 1 abstain Vetsch. Motion carried.
Moved by Brown, supported by Brown, to table removal of the R-
3 moratorium to August 13, 1996, meeting. All voted aye.
David Licht opened discussion on Sign Ordinance amendment.
Issues: size, present ordinance, appropriateness of sign
ordinance, increase sign size, design and the reader board
(electronic message board and motion signs).
Dave Shannon of Color Sign explained message signs are not a
safety issue. Dave Licht stated 75 cities' sign ordinance have
flashing/movement restrictions. Mr. Shannon had done a study of
nine communities and disagreed. The City of Rogers allowed bigger,
taller signs and more restrictions as you move inland from freeway.
Moved by Brown, supported by Larson, to draft a sign ordinance
amendment for institutional signs. Further, to direct the City
Planner, in cooperation with Color Sign Systems David Shannon to
prepare the draft sign ordinance amendment with easily understood
criteria. Guidelines include a percentage basis for reader boards
and a look at types of areas. All voted aye.
Zoning Administrator Hale and City Planner David Licht
discussed standards for housing. Focused on Comprehensive Plan
which made recommendations that the City may want to see developers
put in more amenities. Commissioner Larson asked how design
standards are enforced. Licht discussed pride in properties.
Zoning Administrator Hale reviewed financial status of the
Comprehensive Parks and Trail Plan.
Moved by Anderson, supported by Brown, to refer the complete
funding of Parks & Trail Plan to Finance Committee for balance
remaining. All voted aye.
Moved by Brown, supported by Larson, to adopt RESOLUTION
#1996-5 titled RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND A MODIFICATION TO THE TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.
5. All voted aye.
Moved by Vetsch, supported by Anderson, to adjourn the meeting
at 10:30 PM.
LeRoy Berning, Chair
Garrison Hale, Zoning Adm.
Center Oaks
July 11, 1996
13"6 Johnson St. N.E.
Mr. Mayor & Members of the City Council
c/o Mr. Gary Hale
City Administrator
5975 Main Avenue NE.
Albertville, MN 55301
Ham Lake, M
RE: Rezoning of Center Oaks parcel from R-1A to R-1 south of Parkside 3rd
Addition: Case # 3b
Dear Mr. Hale:
79
This letter serves to confirm our conversation today regarding the Planning Commission's
denial of the Center Oaks request for rezoning. We request the following data and this
letter be added to the Councils packet when this item becomes scheduled which we
understand will occur on August 5. During the Planning Commission meeting, quite a bit
of discussion occurred which dealt with the lack of specific criteria which was available
regarding the R-lA zone prior to the municipal rezoning, and creation of the zone by the
City. Center Oaks had an understanding that a large lot zoning district was being
contemplated by the City. However, neither Center Oaks or Kenco received any backup
data or proposed language regarding the specific criteria which defined the site planning
objectives of the new zone.
Center Oaks primary reason to request the R-1 zone was to preserve the 90 foot frontage
minimum at the setback line. Center Oaks does not have opposition to preserving the
larger area requirement of the R-lA requirement for the balance of the property west of
the proposed extension of Kalenda Drive.
In summary, Center Oaks requests the following: Table indefinitely the
request to rezone 100% of the property from R-1 to R-1 A, and remand the
request back to the Planning Commission to require a sketch plan.
Center Oaks 13736Johnson St. N.E.
Ham Lake, MN 55304
Said plan would illustrate how a more appropriate zoning transition could be
achieved between the B-3 zoned Kenco land, Highway 19 and the proposed R-1A
zoned lands; and to request the City adopt an amended text for the R-1A to include
the following:
90 'minimum lot width at the front setback.
Preserve the minimum front yard setback of 35 feet, and allow for greater
setbacks if at least 30' of the lot touches a City right of way, i.e. flag lot;
Maintain a 15,000 SF minimum area requirement,
We appreciate the City being willing to work with Center Oaks on this rezoning request.
Our intent is to maintain reasonable planning boundaries between zoning districts while
being able to reasonably develop the land according to the many concept plans which
were required during 1995 and early 1996. Many of these plans were reused throughout
the latest Comprehensive Plan update process. Please contact us with any questions you
may have. We will be at your meeting on Monday to discuss these items. Thank you in
advance for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Donald Jense
Land Development Consultant
Attachments: sketch plan
ANDY L. BOND
ATTORNEY AT LAW
500 PARK PLACE CENTER
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD
ST. LOUIB PARK, MINNESOTA 55416-1231
TELEPHONE (612) 525-0704
FAX (612) 525-1247
July 10, 1996
City of Albertville
5975 Main Ave. NE
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
RE: Robert Heuring
Dear Sir:
Please be advised that I represent Robert Heuring, the owner
of the property located in the East 1/2 of the Southeast Quarter
of Section 2, Township 120, Range 24. This property is on the
west side of LaBeaux Avenue NE and is located northwest of the
St. Michael Albertville High School and west of property which
has been extensively developed on the east side of LaBeaux Avenue
Northeast.
The construction of the high school and the development of the
surrounding property has caused excessive amounts of storm water
to be directed on to my client's property with resulting crop
damage/loss of approximately $5,000.00 over the last three years.
In addition, my client has spent $1,315.00 the last two years
to improve the drainage ditch located on his property to try
and move this excess storm water off his crops and over to County
Ditch No. 9. Also, the drainage ditch directly west of the
high school needs to be improved to drain the excess storm water
from the swamp to Ditch No. 9.
Since my client is charged for storm water by the City as are
the school district and the other land owners in the area it
would appear appropriate that the City reimburse my client for
his out-of-pocket costs to remove the storm water which has
been routed onto his property by the City and for the City to
pay for the crop loss he has sustained because of the excess
storm water. In the future, the City could be responsible for
keeping the drainage ditches on my client's property open so
that the excess storm water does not collect on his property.
Very truly nyours,
0 L. �k,
Andy . Bond
ALB : clf
cc: Mr. Robert Heuring
I + 7k
LAND FOR Laurie E. Karnes, Broker
SALE, INC. A real estate company specializing in land.
P.O. Box 1958, Maple Grove, MN 55311
Phone: (612) 420-4757 Fax: (612) 420-9792
OFFER PRESENTATION
Barthel Industrial Drive
August 5th, 1996
Once upon a time the City of Anoka owned some land they had intended to
use for a park. It was a pretty piece of land and it was more wet than dry. And then
the Muni Board Fairy waved her magic wand and the boundaries changed. So the City
of Anoka's park land was now in the City of Coon Rapids. The Wise Men on the
Anoka Council decided they would much rather have a nice new swimming pool in
Anoka instead of a park in Coon Rapids. In 1994 they hired Mr. Appraiser, who's
magic wand got clogged with a too much stardust, and he said the land was worth
$1,300,000. So they called Mr. Realtor and listed it for $1,300,000 and waited,
and waited and waited. Until a bright young realtor named Laurie came along with
an offer for $700,000. The Wise Men of the Anoka Council, though patient
people, were tired of waiting and wanted their new swimming pool. So they accepted
the offer from Mann Theaters so they can watch 14 screens of happily ever after
when their done swimming in their new aquatic center.
MORAL OF THE STORY: Appraisals don't mean that much.
REAL ESTATE 101: How do you value property?
By looking at "comparables" of what "similar property" in the same community
have recently sold for. Also, in land, buyers only pay for "buildable" land.
Your appraiser did his best on the Barthel Industrial Drive property. The
problem, as he stated, was the lack of true comparables. Now we have one.
The Sieg properties on Country Road 19/School Lake were commercial
properties with the ability to get water and sewer and with freeway visibility and access
equivalent to the Barthel Industrial Drive property. These properties, as verified by
soil tests, are buildable with no obvious wetland areas. They sold this year for
$ 14,91 8/acre.
Thus the true comparable for the Barthel Industrial Drive parcel is $14,918 x
the buildable 1.54 acres = $22,974, which is the offer 1 present to you tonight.
PURCHASE AGREEMENT
Date: July 25, 1996
Received of C, I 1 Cyr C-c=e Pro ci ,-i --t, or Assigns the sum
ofDollars ($ � o(, ) check as earnest money to be
deposited upon acceptance of Purchase Agreement by all parties, on or before
the next business day after acceptance, in the trust account of Land For Sale
Inc., Broker but to be returned to Buyer if Purchase Agreement is not accepted
by Sellers. Said earnest money is payment of the purchase of the property
located at Barthel Industrial Drive in the City of Albertville, County of Wright,
State of Minnesota as legally described in Exhibit A, attached. This land is
represented by Selelrs to be 8.32 acres.
Sellers have this day agreed to sell to Buyer this property and all of the
rights that go with it to Buyer for the sum of $ ,,)a , Cf-T-1 , cash, of which the
balance of $?,� i'►�{ in addition to the $ sc,O earnest money is to be paid
on or before s b , �qcc 6 , the day of closing.
If, prior to closing, this property becomes subject to
condemnation/eminent domain by a government authority then at Buyer's
option this Purchase Agreement is null and void and earnest money is returned
to Buyer.
Sellers warrant they have no knowledge of known hazardous materials or
underground storage tanks on this site. Existing wells, if any, shall be disclosed
by the Sellers and properly sealed by the Sellers at the request of the Buyer
according to the State of Minnesota regulations.
Buyer and Sellers acknowledge that this contract creates a Dual Agency
with Broker. This means that Broker owes a fiduciary duty to both Buyer and
Sellers. Because Buyer and Sellers may have conflicting interests, Broker is
prohibited from advocating exclusively for either party. Broker cannot
represent both the Buyer and Sellers in this transaction unless both the Buyer
and Sellers agree to this dual agency. By signing this Purchase Agreement you
are agreeing to this dual agency and you acknowledge and agree that
confidential information communicated to Broker which regards price, terms or
motivation to buy or sell will remain confidential unless Buyer or Sellers
instructs Broker in writing to disclose this information about the Buyer or
Sellers.
Upon performance by Buyer, Sellers shall deliver a General Warranty
Deed conveying marketable title, subject to: A) Building and zoning laws,
ordinances, State and federal regulations; B) Restrictions relating to use or
improvements of the property without effective forfeiture provision; Q
2
days after receipt for examination of title to make any objections, which shall
be made in writing or deemed waived. If any objection is so made, Sellers shall
be allowed 120 days to make title Marketable. Pending correction of title,
payments thereunder required shall be postponed, but upon correction of title
and within 10 days after written notice to Buyer, the parties shall perform this
Agreement according to its terms. If title is not corrected within 120 days
from the date of written objection, this Agreement shall be null and void, at
option of Buyer, neither party shall be party for damages hereunder to the
other, and earnest money shall be refunded to the Buyer.
Sellers warrants that prior to the closing, payment in full will have been
made for all labor, materials, machinery, fixtures or tools furnished within the
120 days immediately preceding the closing in connection with construction,
alteration or repair of any structure or improvement to the property.
Sellers warrants that Sellers have not received any notice from any
governmental authority as to violation of any law, ordinance or regulation.
RISK OF LOSS: If there is any loss or damages to the property between
the date hereof and the date of closing, for any reason including fire, vandalism,
flood, earthquake the risk of loss shall be on Sellers. If the property is destroyed
or substantially damaged before the closing date, this Purchase Agreement shall
4
become null and void, at Buyer's option, and earnest money shall be refunded
to Buyer; Buyer and Sellers agree to sign cancellation of Purchase Agreement.
This constitutes the entire Agreement, with any attached addendums
signed by the parties. This Purchase Agreement can be modified only in writing
signed by Sellers and Buyer.
Default: If Buyer defaults in any of the Agreements here, Sellers may
terminate this Purchase Agreement, and payments made hereunder may be
retained by Sellers as liquidated damages. If this Purchase Agreement is not so
terminated, Buyer or Sellers may seek actual damages for breach of this
Agreement or specific performance of this Agreement, and as to specific
performance, such action must be commenced within six months after such
right of action arises.
In Signing this Purchase Agreement Buyer and Sellers acknowledge that
in case of any disputes arising out of this Agreement cannot be resolved between
Buyer and Sellers that Arbitration will be used to settle disputes
5
We, the undersigned owners of the above land, do hereby approve the above
Agreement and the sale thereby made.
Linda Houghton, City Clerk, City of Albertville Date
We hereby agree to purchase the said property for the price and upon the terms
above mentioned, and subject to all conditions hereby expressed.
Date
M
Exhibit A'_.
'` at
a
'
4 a; s
f
F �
� 4
f
Y
:64
rt,
PO
?f r 'tic
^j�t W L7 jiv- r. r Q'fiv ��
rz
CW,Z1 t N m .4 -4 O.00
xr yr0.4rn �, pO i
LA 0
t i Ilm
Q O'n x'
,..
to
.'�7or-4 �o p� `tea+Ito -4
;;
rt=N�UANO
Q is
7bT0copw
Loapr
W'
�.
L
z..
�`�or �+ 4
w
r _
Vl-
, Irk•
�� �•s
' •:mot', �I� I
r.
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC.
ENGINEERS -LAND SURVEYORS 1111 Hwy. 25 N., Buffalo, Minn. 55313 Fax 612-682-9492
Phone 612-682-1781 1-800-563-1781
July 31, 1996
City of Albertville
c/o Garrison Hale, City Administrator
PO Box 9
Acrt � l l
rc,
"�uJ 55301
RE: 60th Street NE Trunk Line Extension Project
Dear Gary:
As you are aware, the above -referenced project will install a
sanitary trunk line within existing 60th Street and CSAH 19 rights -
of -way to provide sanitary sewer service for areas west of CSAH 19
in Albertville.
Please accept this letter as a request to utilize the temporary
construction easements associated with the CSAH 19/37 Intersection
Realignment Project that are being obtained by the City. It is my
understanding that these easements are for roadway and utility
construction purposes, of which the sanitary trunk line project
complies. The installation of the sanitary trunk line is to be
completed this year. All areas affected by the construction are to
be restored to pre -construction conditions.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC.
Scott Dahlke
Professional Engineer
cc: Don Jensen-Kenco
Wayne Fingalson-Wright County
Pete Carlson-SEH
-Mike Couri-Radzwill & Couri
file 96182
re P. Meyer, Professional Engineer Robert Rohlin, Licensed Land Surveyor