Loading...
1997-05-20 CC Agenda/PacketALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA May 20, 1997 7:00 PM 7:00 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL/ADOPT AGENDA (Mayor/Clerk/Council) 7:01 2. SPECIAL ORDER - PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Cottages of Albertville - TIF #7 (Atty) Resolution #1997-32 (Resolution Approving Modified Development Program for Development District No. 1 and a Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 7 b. Vetsch Custom Cabinets - TIF #8 (Atty) Resolution #1997-33 (Resolution Approving Modified Development Program for Development District No. 1 and a Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 8 7:20 3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS None 7:21 4. NEW BUSINESS a. Approve 3.2 Malt Liquor License for Albertville Jaycees at Albertville City Park June 13 - 5:00 PM to Midnight June 14 - 9:00 AM to Midnight June 15 - Noon to 8:00 PM b. Request to allow Life in Christ Lutheran Youth Group to hold car wash at Park & Ride site on June 14 C. Consider amendment of Ordinance #1995-7 (An Ordinance Defining the Requirements and Processes the City Council Shall Follow in Conducting Its Meetings and in Passing Ordinances and Resolutions) regarding two meetings per month (Councilmember Berning) 8: 0 0 5. ADJOUR1012 P (council) SECTION I. MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1...................................... Subsection I.I. Subsection 1.2. Subsection 1.3. Subsection 1.4. Subsection 1.5. Subsection 1.6. Subsection 1.7. Subsection 1.8. Subsection 1.9. Subsection 1.10. Subsection 1.11. Subsection 1.12. Subsection 1.13. Subsection 1.14. SECTION II. A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. S. T. U. V. W. Definitions Statement and Finding of Public Purpose ................... Statutory Authority .................................. Statement of Objectives ............................... Estimated Public Costs and Supportive Data ................. Environmental Controls ............................... Proposed Reuse of Property ............................ Public Improvements and Facilities to be Constructed Within Development District No. 1 ....................... Administration and Maintenance of the Development District ................................ Rehabilitation ...................................... Relocation........................................ Open Space to be Created ............................. Boundaries of the Development District .................... Parcels To Be Acquired or May be Acquired In Whole or In Part Within the Development District ............ 1 1 2 2 2 3 4 4 rd 4 4 5 5 5 5 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 7............... 6 Statutory Authority ....................................... 6 Statement of Objectives .................................... 6 Statement of Public Purpose .................................. 6 Development District Program ................................ 6 Description of TIF District ................................... 6 Development Contracts .................. . ................... 7 Classification of TIF District ................................. 7 Modification of TIF Plan .................................... 7 Use of Tax Increment ...................................... 7 Excess Tax Increment ...................................... 8 Limitation on Collection of Increment ........................... 8 Limitation on Administrative Expenses .......................... 9 Limitation on Boundary Changes .............................. 9 Relocation..............................................9 Parcels to be Acquired Within the TIF District ..................... 9 TIF Account ............................................ 9 Estimate of Project Costs .................................... 9 Estimate of Bonded Indebtedness ............................. 10 Original Tax Capacity and Original Tax Capacity Rate .............. 10 Estimate of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment .............. 10 Duration of the TIF District ................................. 11 Estimate of Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions .................. 1 I Annual Financial Report ................................... 11 DJG121132 AL141-23 i X. Notification of Prior Planned Improvements ........................ Y. Assessment Agreements .................................... 11 Z. Local Government Aid/Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (LGA/HACA).......................................... 12 SECTION III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 8.............. 13 A. Statutory Authority ...................................... 13 B. Statement of Objectives ................................... 13 C. Statement of Public Purpose ................................. 13 D. Development District Program ............................... 13 E. Description of TIF District .................................. 14 F. Development Contracts .................................... 14 G. Classification of TIF District ................................ 14 H. Modification of TIF Plan ................................... 14 I. Use of Tax Increment ..................................... 15 J. Excess Tax Increment ..................................... 15 K. Limitation on Collection of Increment .......................... 15 L. Limitation on Administrative Expenses ......................... 16 M. Limitation on Boundary Changes ............................. 16 N. Relocation ............................................. 16 O. Parcels to be Acquired Within the TIF District .................... 16 P. TIF Account ........................................... 16 Q. Estimate of Project Costs ................................... 17 R. Estimate of Bonded Indebtedness ............................. 17 S. Original Tax Capacity and Original Tax Capacity Rate .............. 17 T. Estimate of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment .............. 18 U. Duration of the TIF District ................................. 18 V. Estimate of Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions ................... 18 W. Annual Financial Report ................................... 18 X. Notification of Prior Planned Improvements ...................... 19 Y. Assessment Agreements .................................... 19 Z. Local Government Aid/Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (LGA/HACA).......................................... 19 DJG121132 AL141-23 11 f "Y Development Program approved by City Council , 1997 TIF Plan, TIF District No. 7 approved by City Council , 1997 TIF Plan, TIF District No. 8 approved by City Council , 1997 MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 and TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLANS TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 7 and TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 8 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA This Instrument Drafted by: KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED (DJG) 470 Pillsbury Center 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 337-9300 , 1997 DJG121132 AL141-23 SECTION I. MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1. Subsection 1.1. Definitions. For the purposes of the Development District Program, the following terms shall have the meanings specified below, unless the context otherwise requires: "City" means the City of Albertville, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota. "Comprehensive Plan" means the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the objectives, policies, standards and programs to guide public and private land use, development, redevelopment and preservation for all lands and water within the City. "City Council" or "Council" means the Albertville City Council; "City Development District Act" or "Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.124 through 469.134, as amended. "County" means Wright County, Minnesota. "Development District means Development District No. 1 which was initially approved by the Council in April, 1981 pursuant to and in accordance with the City Development District Act, and as it has been or may be modified. "Development District Program" or "Program" means the program for development of the District adopted by the City pursuant to the Development District Act. "Project Area" or "Project" means the property within Development District No. 1, as described in the Development Program. "State" means the State of Minnesota. "Tax Increment Financing Act" or "TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended. "Tax Increment Bonds" means any general obligation or revenue tax increment bonds or notes issued by the City to finance the public costs associated with Development District No. 1 as stated in the Program and in the Tax Increment Financing Plans for the Tax Increment Financing Districts within Development District No. 1, or any obligations issued to refund the Tax Increment Bonds. "Tax Increment Financing District" or "TIF District" means any Tax Increment Financing District created and established pursuant to the TIF Act within Development District No. 1. "Tax Increment Financing Plan" or "Plan" means the TIF Plan adopted by the Council for any TIF District within Development District No. 1. DJG121132 AL141-23 Subsection 1.2. Statement and Finding of Public Purpose. The Council of the City determines that there is a need for development and redevelopment within the corporate limits of the City and within the Development District to provide employment and housing opportunities, to improve the tax base, and to improve the general economy of the State. It is found that the area within the District is potentially more useful and valuable than is being realized under existing development, is less productive than is possible under this Program and, therefore, is not contributing to the tax base to its full potential. Therefore, the City has determined to exercise its authority to develop a program for improving the Development District of the City to provide an impetus for private development, to maintain and increase employment, to utilize existing potential and to provide other facilities as are outlined in the Development Program adopted by the City. The Council finds that the welfare of the City as well as the State of Minnesota requires active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry, housing, and commerce to carry out its stated public purpose objectives. Subsection 1.3. Statutory Authority. The Council reaffirms its determination that it is desirable and in the public interest to establish, develop and administer a Development Program for the Development District in the City, pursuant to the provisions of the Act. Funding of the necessary activities and improvements in the Development District may be accomplished in whole or in part through tax increment financing in accordance with the TIF Act. The City has designated a specific area within the corporate limits of the City as Development District No. 1 as authorized by Section 469.126 of the Act, as outlined in this document. Within the Development District, the City has previously created TIF District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. The original Development Program for Development District No. 1 was approved in April, 1981 and has been modified subsequently. On July 17, 1989, the Development Program was modified to expand the area of the Development District. On July 15, 1996, the Development Program was again modified to expand the area of the Development District. The City has now determined that, in order to address changing development needs throughout the City, it is in the public interest to provide for additional expenditures and development within Development District No. 1. This modified Development Program is intended to restate and expand on the original program and all prior amendments hereto, which are incorporated herein by reference. Nothing in this modification is intended to supersede or alter the activities described in the original Development Program. Subsection 1.4. Statement of Objectives. The Council determines that the Development District will provide the City with the ability to achieve certain public purpose goals not otherwise obtainable in the foreseeable future without City intervention in the normal development process. The public purpose goals include: restore and improve the tax base and tax revenue generating capacity of the Development District; increase employment and housing DJG121132 2 AL141-23 opportunities; realize comprehensive planning goals; remove blighted conditions; revitalize the property within the Development District to create an attractive, comfortable, convenient, and efficient area for industrial, commercial and related use. The City and Council seek to achieve the following Development District program objectives: 1. Promote and secure the prompt development of certain property in the Development District, which property is not now in productive use or in its highest and best use, in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the minimum adverse impact on the environment, and thereby promote and secure the development of other land in the City. 2. Promote and secure additional employment and housing opportunities within the Development District and the City for residents of the City and the surrounding area, thereby improving living standards, reducing unemployment and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor and other human resources in the City. 3. Secure the increase of commercial/industrial property subject to taxation by the City, Independent School District No. 885, Wright County, and other taxing jurisdictions in order to better enable such entities to pay for governmental services and programs required to be provided by them. 4. Provide for the financing and construction of public improvements in the Development District necessary for the orderly and beneficial development of the Development District and adjacent areas of the City. 5. Promote the concentration of commercial, office, and other appropriate development in the Development District so as to maintain the area in a manner compatible with its accessibility and prominence in the City. 6. Encourage local business expansion, improvement, and development, whenever possible. 7. Create a desirable and unique character within the Development District thorough quality land use alternatives and design quality in new and remodeled buildings. 8. Encourage and provide maximum opportunity for private redevelopment of existing areas and structures that are compatible with the Development Program. 9. Encourage redevelopment of substandard buildings, to improve employment opportunities in the Development District and the City, where compatible with other planning and development goals. Subsection 1.5. Estimated Public Costs and Supportive Data. The public costs and development plans for the Development District have been described in detail in each TIF Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference. DJG121132 3 AL141-23 The City now anticipates additional public costs to be financed in part with tax increments from TIF District No. 6, TIF District No. 7, and TIF District No. 8. Estimated costs and related data for such efforts are set forth in the TIF Plans for TIF District No. 6, TIF District No. 7, and TIF District No. 8. The TIF Plan for TIF District No. 6 was previously approved by the City and is on file with the City. The TIF Plans for TIF District No. 7 and TIF District No. 8 are attached to this modified Development Program. Subsection 1.6. Environmental Controls. The proposed development activities in the Development District do not present significant environmental concerns. All municipal actions, public improvements and private development shall be carried out in a manner consistent with existing environmental -standards. Subsection 1.7. Proposed Reuse of Property. The proposals for reuse of property within the Development District are described in the documents referenced in Section 1.5 herein. The City may acquire additional parcels for development, as identified in Subsection 1.14 herein. Unless otherwise specified, the Development Program does not contemplate the acquisition of private property until such time as a private developer presents an economically feasible program for the reuse of that property. Proposals, in order to be considered, must be within the framework of the above cited goals and objectives, and must clearly demonstrate feasibility as a public program. Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property, the City Council will require a binding contract, performance bond and/or other evidence or guarantees that a supporting tax increment or other funds will be available to repay the public cost associated with the proposed acquisition. It is the intent of the City to negotiate the acquisition of property whenever necessary. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse and redevelopment of property shall be incorporated into any land sale contract to which the City is a part. Subsection 1.8. Public Improvements and Facilities to be Constructed Within Development District No. 1. The public improvements and facilities to be constructed within Development District No. 1 include: (a) off -site improvements, including streets, water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer; and (b) on -site utilities, soils correction, parking and landscaping. All public improvements are more particularly described in the documents referenced in Subsection 1.5 herein. Subsection 1.9. Administration and Maintenance of the Development District. Maintenance and operation of the public improvements will be the responsibility of the Administrator of the City who shall serve as Administrator of the Development District. The Administrator will administer the Development District pursuant to the provisions of Section 469.131 of the Act; provided, however, that such powers may only be exercised at the direction of the Council. No action taken by the Administrator pursuant to the above -mentioned powers shall be effective without authorization by the Council. Subsection 1.10. Rehabilitation. Owners of properties within the Development District will be encouraged to rehabilitate their property to conform with the applicable state and local codes and ordinances, as well as any design standards. Owners of the properties who purchase property within the Development District from the City may be required to rehabilitate their DJG121132 4 AL141-23 1... T properties as a condition of sale of land. The City will provide such rehabilitation assistance as may be available from federal, state or local sources. Subsection 1.11. Relocation. The City does not anticipate the need to relocate any residents or businesses, but if such need arises, provisions for relocation will be made in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.50 through 117.56 and any rules adopted by the City Council. Subsection 1.12. Open Space to be Created. The City, in carrying out the objectives of the Development Program, proposes to encourage the beautification of open spaces through the development of criteria which shall be incorporated into any land sale or development agreements entered into by the City of Albertville. Subsection 1.13. Boundaries of the Development District. Boundaries of Development District No. 1 include the boundary of the City as a whole and are unchanged by this modification. A map of the Development District is attached at Exhibit A. Subsection 1.14. Parcels To Be Acquired or Ma by e Acquired In Whole or In Part Within the Development District. The City may acquire any parcels in any TIF District or in the Development District as a whole if necessary to carry out the goals and objectives of the Development Program. DJG121132 AL141-23 5 II. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 7 A. Statutory Authority Pursuant to the TIF Act, the Authority seeks to create TIF District No. 7 and adopt a TIF Plan for that TIF District. B. Statement of Objectives The objectives for the Development District set forth in Subsection 1.4 of the Development Program are incorporated herein by reference. C. Statement of Public Purpose In adopting the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 7, the City Council will make the following findings: 1. Anticipated development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and therefore the use of TIF is necessary; 2. The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the Authority as a whole, for development of the District by private enterprise; and 3. The TIF Plan conforms to general plans for development of the City as a whole. Finding No. 1 is demonstrated by the economic analysis on file at City Hall and the Council's knowledge of the site and development within the City generally. The proposed development consists of rental housing for low and moderate income seniors, which is not economically feasible without substantial public assistance. The City has determined that such housing is needed in the City and has not been developed in the past without public assistance. D. Development District Program Actions taken with regards to TIF District No. 7 will be fully consistent with the Plan for Development District No. 1, as modified. E. Description of TIF District TIF District No. 7 consists of the property described in Exhibit B. A map of the approximate boundaries of TIF District No. 7 is included in Exhibit A. DJG121132 AL141-23 F. Development Contracts The Authority has not yet entered any development contracts regarding property within the TIF District. G. Classification of TIF District The City finds that TIF District No. 7 is a housing district pursuant to Section 469.174, Subd. 11 and 469.1761 of the TIF Act. All of the development anticipated within the TIF district consists of housing intended for occupancy by persons or families of low and moderate income as defined in chapter 462A, Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934, the National Housing Act of 1959, the United States Housing Act of 1937, as amended, Title V of the Housing Act of 1949, as amended, any other similar present or future federal, state, or municipal legislation, or the regulations promulgated under any of those acts. The City also reasonably anticipates that the TIF District will be a "qualified housing district" as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399, Subd. 1(c) because the only property receiving tax increment assistance will be residential rental property that meets all the requirements for a low-income housing credit under Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. H. Modification of TIF Plan The TIF Plan for TIF District No. 7 may be modified by the City, provided that any reduction or enlargement of geographic area of TIF District No. 7, increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a determination to capitalize interest on the debt if that determination was not a part of the original plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized, increase in the portion of the captured assessed value to be retained by the City, increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures, or designation of additional property to be acquired by the City, shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original plan. I. Use of Tax Increment 1. Pursuant to Section 469.176, Subd. 4 of the TIF Act, all revenues derived from the tax increment from TIF District No. 7 shall be used in accordance with the TIF Plan. The revenues shall be used to finance or otherwise pay the capital and administrative costs of development activities within the Development District as identified in the TIF Plan. 2. All revenue derived from tax increments from TIF District No. 7 will be used solely to finance the cost of "housing projects" as defined in Section 469.174, Subd. 11 of the TIF Act, which costs may include the cost of public improvements directly related to the "housing project" and allocated administrative expenses. All such expenditures, anywhere within the Development District, will be considered activities within the TIF District, as provided in Section 469.1763, subd. 2(b) of the TIF Act (requiring that 80% of revenues derived from tax increment be spent within the TIF District). DJG121132 AL141-23 7 3. Revenues derived from tax increment will be expended in accordance with the five-year rule as set forth in Section 469.1763 of the Tax Increment Act. J. Excess Tax Increment Pursuant to Sections 469.176, Subd. 2 of the TIF Act, in any year in which the increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the TIF Plan, the City will use the excess amount to do any of the following, in the order determined by the City: 1. Prepay the outstanding bonds; 2. Discharge the pledge of tax increment therefor; 3. Pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of bonds; 4. Retained by the City for future development purposes; or 5. Return the excess amount to the Wright County auditor, who shall distribute the excess amount to the City, the County and Independent School District No. 885 in direct proportion to their respective tax capacity rates. In addition, and subject to the limitations set forth in Subsection I herein, the City may choose to modify the TIF Plan in order to provide for other public improvements within the TIF District. K. Limitation on Collection of Increment 1. No increment shall be paid to the City from TIF District No. 7 after three years V,,'OV(from the date of certification of the original tax capacity of the taxable real property in the TIF (�U'la` District by the county auditor unless within the three year period (a) bonds have been issued in aid of Development District No. 1 pursuant to Section 469.178 of the TIF Act or any other law except revenue bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 469.165, or (b) the City has acquired property within TIF District No. 7 or (c) the City has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvements within TIF District No. 7. 2. If, after four years from the date of certification of the original tax capacity of TIF District No. 7, no demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation of property or other site preparation, including qualified improvement of a street or right-of-way adjacent to a parcel but not installation of underground utility service, including sewer or water systems, have been commenced on a parcel located within TIF District No. 7 by the City, or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the TIF Plan, no additional increment may be taken from that parcel, and the original tax capacity of that parcel shall be excluded from the original tax capacity of the TIF District. If these activities subsequently commences, the City will so certify to the county auditor, and the tax capacity of the property as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue will be added to the TIF District's original tax capacity. 3. No tax increment will in any event be paid to the City from TIF District No. 7 after 25 years from the date of receipt of the first increment. Mrv�'""9Y DJG121132 AL141-23 8 13 L. Limitation on Administrative Expenses Pursuant to Section 469.176, Subd. 3 of the TIF Act, administrative expenses are limited to 10 percent of the total tax increment expenditures for Development District No. 1. Each time the City increases the budget of TIF District No. 7, the amount of tax increment money allocated to administrative costs may be increased as long as the total of administrative expenditures does not exceed 10 percent of the total budget of the TIF District. M. Limitation on Boundary Changes The geographic area of TIF District No. 7 may be reduced, but it may not be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original tax capacity by the Wright County auditor. Thus, the TIF District may not be enlarged after approximately June 1, 2002. N. Relocation While no relocation is currently anticipated, the City accepts as binding its obligations under state law for relocation and will administer relocation services for families, individuals and businesses displaced by public action. O. Parcels to be Acquired Within the TIF District The City may acquire any property within the TIF District in order to carry out the objectives of this TIF Plan. P. TIF Account The tax increment received with respect to TIF District No. 7 shall be segregated by the City in a special account on its official books and records or held.by a trustee for the benefit of holders of bonds issued to finance development activities. Q. Estimate of Project Costs The City intends to facilitate development of a rental housing facility for low and moderate income seniors. The total estimated costs to be financed in part with tax increments are as follows: Land Acquisition () Site Improvements VJr(grading, excavation, landscaping) ✓� Soil corrections Parking T� Sewer, water and storm sewer utilities TOTAL DJG121132 AL141-23 9 The above are estimates, which may shift among categories, provided that the total costs will not exceed the total listed. Costs within each category are deemed to include capitalized interest which will vary depending on when or if bonds are issued, but in any event will not exceed three years as required by Minn. Stat. Ch. 475. In addition to the costs listed above, the City may retain ten percent of the total tax increment collected each year for administrative expenses, subject to the limitation that no more than 10 percent of total tax increment expenditures may be expended for administrative costs, as described in Subsection L hereof. R. Estimate of Bonded Indebtedness F The City may finance the project costs identified in this TIiPlan through issuance of revenue notes, pay as you go obligations in any form, or general obligation bonds in a principal amount not to exceed approximately $390,000. S. Original Tax Capacity and Original Tax Capacity Rate At the time of the request for certification, the original tax capacity of property within TIF District No. 7 is expected to be $971. This is the value of the property as of January 2, 1996, and assumes that the request for certification will be filed before July 1, 1997. The original tax capacity rate of TIF District No. 7 is estimated to be 123.582%. This rate is an estimate of the aggregate tax capacity rate applicable to property within the TIF District for taxes payable in 1997. The County auditor will increase or decrease the original tax capacity of TIF District No. 7 as a result of. 1. Change in the tax exempt status of property within the TIF District; 2. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the TIF District; 3. Reduction of valuation by means of a court -ordered abatement, stipulation agreement, voluntary abatement made by the assessor or auditor or by order of the Minnesota commissioner of revenue; or 4. Change in the classification of property within the TIF District to a classification that has a different class rate. T. Estimate of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment The City expects the first phase of improveme m the TIF District to be completed by January 2, 1998. As of that date, the captur apa is estimated to be $36,910. Accordingly, the first full tax increment is estimated to be 5, payable in 1999. A complete schedule of estimated tax increment from the TIF District is shown in Exhibit C. DJG121132 AL141-23 10 k Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subd. 2 of the TIF Act, it is found and declared that all of the captured tax capacity generated within TIF District No. 7 is necessary to finance or otherwise make permissible expenditures authorized by Section 469.176, Subd. 4 of the TIF Act. U. Duration of the TIF District In accordance with Section 469.176, Subd. l(b) of the TIF Act, the City may continue to receive TIF payments until 25 years after the date of receipt of the first increment. V. Estimate of Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions The City believes that, because the development would not have occurred without tax increment assistance, the TIF District has no impact on other taxing jurisdictions. However, assuming the development would have occurred without tax increment assistance, making the anticipated captured tax capacity available to other jurisdictions, the hypothetical impacts on other jurisdictions are presented in Exhibit D. W. Annual Financial Report The City will file the annual reports with the State Auditor regarding all TIF Districts in the City, as required in Sections 469.175, subds. 5, 6, and 6a of the TIF Act. X. Notification of Prior Planned Improvements Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 4 of the TIF Act, the City reviewed its records with regard to the property within TIF District No. 7 and found that no building permits were issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the City. Y. Assessment Agreements Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 8 of the TIF Act, the City may execute an assessment agreement in recordable form with the developer which establishes a minimum Market value of land and improvements for the duration of TIF District No. 7. The Assessment agreement, if any, shall be presented to the Wright County assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the improvements are to be constructed and so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears in the judgment of the assessor to be a reasonable estimate, the assessor may certify the minimum market value agreement. The assessment agreement shall be filed of record in the office of the county recorder or the registrar of titles of Wright County. Recording or filing of an assessment agreement complying with the terms of Section 469.177, Subd. 8 of the TIF Act shall constitute notice of the agreement to any subsequent purchaser or encumbrance of the land or any part thereof, whether voluntary or involuntary, and shall be binding upon them. DJG121132 AL141-23 11 Z. Local Government Aid/Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (LGA/HACA) The City anticipates that the TIF District will be a qualified housing district, and will thus be exempt from loss of local government aid and homestead and agricultural credit aid, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399, subd. 6(c). DJG121132 AL141-23 12 III. TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 8 A. Statutory Authority Pursuant to the TIF Act, the Authority seeks to create TIF District No. 8 and adopt a TIF Plan for that TIF District. B. Statement of Objectives The objectives for the Development District set forth in Subsection 1.4 of the Development Program are incorporated herein by reference. C. Statement of Public Purpose In adopting the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 8, the City Council will make the following findings: I. Anticipated development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan; 2. The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the Authority as a whole, for development of the District by private enterprise; and 3. The TIF Plan conforms to general plans for development of the City as a whole. Finding No. I is demonstrated by the economic analysis on file at City Hall and the Council's knowledge of the site and development within the City generally. Without tax increment financing assistance, public improvements necessary to serve the site would not be feasible, and no other development would be expected to occur. Further, the site is characterized by severe soil problems that make development infeasible without substantial cost. Thus, no market value increase would be reasonably expected absent tax increment financing. D. Development District Program Actions taken with regards to TIF District No. 8 will be fully consistent with the Plan for Development District No. 1, as modified. DJG121132 13 AL141-23 E. Description of TIF District TIF District No. 8 consists of the property described in Exhibit E. A map of the approximate boundaries of TIF District No. 8 is included in Exhibit A. F. Development Contracts The Authority has not yet entered any development contracts regarding property within the TIF District. The Authority expects to enter a development contract with Vetsch Cabinets providing for the development described in more detail in Section Q of this TIF Plan. G. Classification of TIF District The City finds that TIF District No. 8 is an economic development district pursuant to Section 469.174, subdivision 12 of the TIF Act because the proposed tax increment assistance will discourage commerce, industry, and manufacturing from moving their operations from the City, will result in increased employment within the State, and will result in the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the State. Further, revenue derived from tax increment from the TIF District will not be used for to provide assistance in any form to developments consisting of buildings or ancillary facilities if more than 15 percent of the buildings and facilities (determined on a square footage basis) are used for a purpose other than: 1. the manufacturing, storage and distribution of tangible personal property, including processing resulting in the change in condition of the property; 2. warehousing, storage and distribution of tangible personal property, excluding retail sales; 3. research and development related to the activities listed in clause 1 or 2; 4. telemarketing, if that activity is the exclusive use of the property; 5. tourism facilities (if the conditions specified in Section 469.174, subd. 22 are met); and 6. space necessary for and related to the activities listed in clauses 1 to 5. H. Modification of TIF Plan The TIF Plan for TIF District No. 8 may be modified by the City, provided that any reduction or enlargement of geographic area of TIF District No. 8, increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a determination to capitalize interest on the debt if that determination was not a part of the original plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized, increase in the portion of the captured assessed value to be retained by the City, increase in total estimated tax increment expenditures, or designation of additional property to be acquired by the City, shall be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearing and findings required for approval of the original plan. DJG121132 AL141-23 14 I. Use of Tax Increment 1. Pursuant to Section 469.176, Subd. 4 of the TIF Act, all revenues derived from the tax increment from TIF District No. 8 shall be used in accordance with the TIF Plan. The revenues shall be used to finance or otherwise pay the capital and administrative costs of development activities within the Development District as identified in the TIF Plan. 2. Pursuant to Section 469.1763, Subd. 2 of the TIF Act, at least 80 percent of the revenue derived from tax increments paid by properties in TIF District No. 8 will be expended on activities ("Activities") in the TIF District or to pay bonds, to the extent that the proceeds of the bonds were used to finance Activities in the TIF District or to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds (as defined in the TIF Act). No more than 20 percent of the revenue derived from tax increments paid by properties in TIF District No. 8 will be expended, through a development fund or otherwise, on Activities outside of the TIF District but within Development District No. 1 except to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds. 3. Revenues derived from tax increment will be expended in accordance with the five-year rule as set forth in Section 469.1763 of the Tax Increment Act. J. Excess Tax Increment Pursuant to Sections 469.176, Subd. 2 of the TIF Act, in any year in which the increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized by the TIF Plan, the City will use the excess amount to do any of the following, in the order determined by the City: 1. Prepay the outstanding bonds; 2. Discharge the pledge of tax increment therefor; 3. Pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of bonds; 4. Retained by the City for future development purposes; or 5. Return the excess amount to the Wright County auditor, who shall distribute the excess amount to the City, the County and Independent School District No. 885 in direct proportion to their respective tax capacity rates. In addition, and subject to the limitations set forth in Subsection I herein, the City may choose to modify the TIF Plan in order to provide for other economic development activities within the TIF District. K. Limitation on Collection of Increment 1. No increment shall be paid to the City from TIF District No. 8 after three years from the date of certification of the original tax capacity of the taxable real property in the TIF District by the county auditor unless within the three year period (a) bonds have been issued in aid of Development District No. 1 pursuant to Section 469.178 of the TIF Act or any other law except revenue bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 469.165, or (b) the City has acquired property within TIF District No. 8 or (c) the City has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvements within TIF District No. 8. DJc121132 15 AL141-23 2. If, after four years from the date of certification of the original tax capacity of TIF District No. 8, no demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation of property or other site preparation, including qualified improvement of a street or right-of-way adjacent to a parcel but not installation of underground utility service, including sewer or water systems, have been commenced on a parcel located within TIF District No. 8 by the City, or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the TIF Plan, no additional increment may be taken from that parcel, and the original tax capacity of that parcel shall be excluded from the original tax capacity of the TIF District. If these activities subsequently commences, the City will so certify to the county auditor, and the tax capacity of the property as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue will be added to the TIF District's original tax capacity. 3. No tax increment will in any event be paid to the City from TIF District No. 8 after 9 years from the date of receipt of the first increment, or 11 years from the date of approval of this TIF Plan, whichever occurs first. L. Limitation on Administrative Expenses Pursuant to Section 469.176, Subd. 3 of the TIF Act, administrative expenses are limited to 10 percent of the total tax increment expenditures for Development District No. 1. Each time the City increases the budget of TIF District No. 8, the amount of tax increment money allocated to administrative costs may be increased as long as the total of administrative expenditures does not exceed 10 percent of the total budget of the TIF District. M. Limitation on Boundaa Changes The geographic area of TIF District No. 8 may be reduced, but it may not be enlarged after five years following the date of certification of the original tax capacity by the Wright County auditor. Thus, the TIF District may not be enlarged after approximately June 1, 2002. N. Relocation While no relocation is currently anticipated, the City accepts as binding its obligations under state law for relocation and will administer relocation services for families, individuals and businesses displaced by public action. O. Parcels to be Acquired Within the TIF District The City may acquire any property within the TIF District in order to carry out the objectives of this TIF Plan. P. TIF Account The tax increment received with respect to TIF District No. 8 shall be segregated by the City in a special account on its official books and records or held by a trustee for the benefit of holders of bonds issued to finance development activities. DJG121132 16 AL141-23 Q. Estimate of Project Costs The City intends to facilitate development of a cabinet manufacturing facility at a site that is managed by poor soils and inadequate public services. The total estimated costs to be financed in part with tax increment are as follows: Land acquisition Site improvements (grading, excavation, landscaping) Soil corrections Sanitary sewer, water and storm sewer utilities Footings (necessitated by soil problems) Parking TOTAL $75,000 The above are estimates, which may shift among categories, provided that the total costs will not exceed the total listed. Costs within each category are deemed to include capitalized interest which will vary depending on when or if bonds are issued, but in any event will not exceed three years as required by Minn. Stat. Ch. 475. In addition to the costs listed above, the City may retain ten percent of the total tax increment collected each year for administrative expenses, subject to the limitation that no more than 10 percent of total tax increment expenditures may be expended for administrative costs, as described in Subsection L hereof. R. Estimate of Bonded Indebtedness The City may finance the project costs identified in this TIP Plan through issuance of revenue notes, pay as you go obligations in any form, or general. obligation bonds in a principal amount not to exceed approximately $75,000. S. Original Tax Capacity and Original Tax Capacity Rate The property in the TIF District has been owned by the City for at least five years, and therefore will have a tax-exempt value of zero until the property is transferred to a private developer. Upon such transfer, the City anticipates that the estimated market value of the property as determined by the assessor as of the date of transfer will be approximately $13,000, for an adjusted original tax capacity of $390. Because the property has been tax exempt for the past five years, there has been no increase in market value for the purposes of determining the "inflation adjustment factor" under Section 469.177, subd. l(f) of the TIF Act, and no inflation adjustment is anticipated. The original tax capacity rate of TIF District No. 8 is estimated to be 123.582%. This rate is an estimate of the aggregate tax capacity rate applicable to property within the TIF District for taxes payable in 1997. DJG121132 17 AL141-23 in The County auditor will increase or decrease the original tax capacity of TIF District No. 8 as a result of: 1. Change in the tax exempt status of property within the TIF District; 2. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the TIF District; 3. Reduction of valuation by means of a court -ordered abatement, stipulation agreement, voluntary abatement made by the assessor or auditor or by order of the Minnesota commissioner of revenue; or 4. Change in the classification of property within the TIF District to a classification that has a different class rate. T. Estimate of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment The City expects the improvements in the TIF District to be completed by January 2, 1998. As of that date, the captured capacity is estimated to be $10,301. Accordingly, the first full tax increment is estimated to be $12,730, payable in 1999. A complete schedule of estimated tax increment from the TIF District is shown in Exhibit F. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subd. 2 of the TIF Act, it is found and declared that all of the captured tax capacity generated within TIF District No. 8 is necessary to finance or otherwise make permissible expenditures authorized by Section 469.176, Subd. 4 of the TIF Act. U. Duration of the TIF District In accordance with Section 469.176, Subd. l (b) of the TIF Act, the City may continue to receive TIF payments until the earlier of 9 years after the date of receipt of the first increment, or 11 years after the date of approval of this TIF Plan. V. Estimate of Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions The City believes that, because the development would not have occurred without tax increment assistance, the TIF District has no impact on other taxing jurisdictions. However, assuming the development would have occurred without tax increment assistance, making the anticipated captured tax capacity available to other jurisdictions, the hypothetical impacts on other jurisdictions are presented in Exhibit G. W. Annual Financial Report The City will file the annual reports with the State Auditor regarding all TIF Districts in the City, as required in Sections 469.175, subds. 5, 6, and 6a of the TIF Act. DJG121132 AL141-23 18 X. Notification of Prior Planned Improvements Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 4 of the TIF Act, the City reviewed its records with regard to the property within TIF District No. 8 and found that no building permits were issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan by the City. Y. Assessment Agreements Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 8 of the TIF Act, the City may execute an assessment agreement in recordable form with the developer which establishes a minimum Market value of land and improvements for the duration of TIF District No. 8. The Assessment agreement, if any, shall be presented to the Wright County assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the improvements are to be constructed and so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears in the judgment of the assessor to be a reasonable estimate, the assessor may certify the minimum market value agreement. The assessment agreement shall be filed of record in the office of the county recorder or the registrar of titles of Wright (jaunty. Recording or filing of an assessment agreement complying with the terms of Section 469.177, Subd. 8 of the TIF Act shall constitute notice of the agreement to any subsequent purchaser or encumbrance of the land or any part thereof, whether voluntary or involuntary, and shall be binding upon them. Z. Local Government Aid/Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid (LGA/HACA) Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399, subd. 6(d), the City elects to make a local contribution to pay costs of the project financed under this TIF Plan, in the amount equal to 10 percent of the annual tax increment. Therefore, the City anticipates that the TIF District will be exempt from LGA/HACA loss. The local contributions will be made from unrestricted funds of the City, and not from tax increments or developer payments. The local contribution will not be used for general government purposes or for improvements or costs that t.� (_:,r the City planned absent the project. The City currently anticipates that the contribution will be made in part in the form of conveyance at less than market value of the property now owned by the City, which property was not acquired with tax increments. Any additional contributions, if necessary will be paid to the developer for costs specified in Section Q of this plan or for any other costs in connection with the proposed development that are authorized by law. DJG121132 19 AL141-23 EXHIBIT A MAP OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. I and TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 7 and TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 8 DJG121132 A-1 AL141-23 EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 7 DJG121132 AL141-23 B-1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION That part of the East 500.00 feet of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 120 North, Rang, 24 West, Wright County, Minnesota, that lies south of Parkside Third Addition, a duly recorded plat on Me and of record in the Office of the county Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota (less County Road 19 Right of Way, to be taken by the City of Albertiville); . To be platted as: Lot 39, Block 1, Cottages of Albertville; and Outlot B, Cottages of Albertville EXHIBIT C TAX INCREMENT SCHEDULE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 7 DJG121132 AL141-23 C-1 u4 17 3, 15 U.i (CRI t., k I `— Tax Increment Financing -Summary Report City of Albertville, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Housing) District No 7 Senlor Housing Protect Type of Tax Increment Financing District Maximum Durat:cn of T!F District Certification Request Date Decertification Oate of TIF District Qualified Housing 26 years from 1st increment 06/01r97 12.'01; 2023 (25 Years of Increment) Loan Amount ® 6.00% $396,600 Future P.V. Value @ 6.00% Bond Issue (g 0 000% (NIC) NA - (Taxable) Admin (10.00%) $114,050 $43.348 Loss of LGA/HACA 0 0 Eligible Project Costs NA Loca! Contributions 0 0 Capitalized !nterest NA -- Underwriters Discount NA Gross Surplus (Sha+tage) S114,050 $43.948 COVAdministrative NA Local- Effort TIF 0 0 Other NA - --- Net Surplus (Shortage) $114,050 $43,948 Less, Less- Plus: Annual Annual Admin. State Auditor Annua; Annual Local Annual Projected Perlod Gross Tax Retainao_e Deduction Net Tax Contribution Net Loss of Ending Inere"Fit 10.00% 3,10% Increment 0.00% Revenue ! LGA?HACA {1) I (2) -- --- _-�(3) (4) (5) . _ (6) (7) I- (8} �. -- - 12l31/97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12/31/98 0 0 0 0 C 0 12/31/99 45,615 4.562 46 41.007 0 41,007 0 12/31/2000 i 45,615 4.562 46 41.007 0 41,0071 0 12/31/2001 45,615 4,562 46 41.007 0 41.007I 0 12131 /2002 1 45, 615 4.562 46 41.007 0 41,007. 0 12/31/20031 45,615 4,562 46 41.007 0 41,007I 0 1213112304. 45.615 4.582 46 41,007 0 41.007 . 12/31/2005 43,615 4.582 46 41.007 0 41.007 0 12/31/2006 45,615 4.562 46 4 1. 00 7 0 41.007. 0 12/31/2007 i 45,615 4,562 4e 41,007 0 41.007 0 12/31/2006' 45,615 4.562 46 41,hi7 0 41.007 0 12/31/20091 45,915 4.562 46 41,007 C 41.007 C 12/31/2010 45,615 4.562 46 41.007 0 41,007 0 12/31/2011 45.615 4.562 46 41,007 0 41.007 0 12/31/2012 45,615 4.562 46 41.00'r 0 41.007 0 12/31/2013 45.615 4,562 46 41.007 0 41.0071 0 12/31 /2014 i 45.615 4„62 46 41.007 0 41,0071 0 0 12/31/20161 45,615 4,562 46 41.007 0 41.007 12/31 /2016 45.615 4 562 46 41.007 0 41.007 0 1213112C17 45.815 4,562 46 41,007 0 41,007 0 12/31/2018 45,615 4,592 46 41,007 0 41,007, C 12131,*20191 45.615 4.5e2 46 41.007 0 41,007I 0 12/31/2020 4S.615 4,562 46 41007 0 41,007 0 1 2/31/2021 i 45,615 4.662 46 41.007 0 41.007 0 12/31/2022 45,615 4.592 46 44,007 0 41.007 0 C 12/31/2023 45.6t5 4.562 46 41.007 0 41,007t 12,131/2024 0 l- 3 0 0 0 0, 0 12/31/,2025 0 0 -- 0 - 0 0 01 _-- 0 -- $1,140,375 5c $1,150 $1,025,175 $0 $1,025,175 $0 Prepared by: Sprtngsted Incorporated ( 17-Apr-97 ) U4. 17 37 15: US FAX 612 223 3UU2 ,PR1V,5TEb Assumptions Report City of Albertville, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Housing) Distract No. 7 Senior Housing Project Type of Tax :ncrement Financing district Maximum 0-.,ration of TIF Distnct Certification Request Date Decertification Date Base Esti;r,ated Market Value Times. Section 42 Class Rate Structures 2.301% Land 3.40% Original Net lax Capacity Base Estimated Market Value Increase in Estimated Market Value (1) Total Estimatea Market Value Times: Section 42 Class Rate Structures 2.30% Land 3.40% Total Net Tax Capacity Qualified Housing 25 years from 19! AC•e,"nent 06i01,`97 12/01,2023 (25 Years of Increment) 199611997 $28.545 0 971 $971 - - - - - _ - Assessment/Collection Year - - - - - - 1997/1998 1998/1909 1999/2.000 2000/2001 $28,345 $28.545 i $28,645 $28,545 0 1,505.455 1,505,455 1,505,455 $28.545 $1,534,OGO $1.534,00C $1,534,C00 0 29,847 29,847 29,847 971 6,034 81034 8.C34 $971 $37,551 $37,861 $37,881 ease Inflation Factor NA Local Tax Capacity Rate 123.582% Fiscal Disparities Contribution From TIF 0Mwict C.0000% Administrative Retainage Percent (Maximum = 10%) 10.00% Pooling Percent 0.00% City Tax Rate (Only if Local -Effort TIF) NA Bonds Bonds Dated NA First Interest Date NA Underwriters Discount NA Principal a Interest @ NA LGA/HACA Loss: Will Annual Local Contnbut on Be Made (Yes or Nc;? I.S.D Equalized Tax Capacity Rate (#885) I.S.D Sales Ratio (#885) City Sales Ratio Taxable Net Tax Capacity Present Value Date Present Value Rate (1) AssumeS 100%construction in 1997. Loan (Pav-As-Ycu-Gc). Loan Dated 0e/01197 :oan Ra!e 8.00% No NA NA NA NA 08,01197 8.00% Prepared by: Springsted Incorporated (17-Apr-97 ) uA 17 37 15:ud FAX 61= s_3 311,- ipRINGa?EL, ".(. t- , !C E J= 'a - --- OOnhnhhhnt' t�h.hhnnn n h � S m �hhn00� tf! _8_�$g�8ggg88g�$888$8$ iUl '` I 3 r i - ,�C. �^ 1 Q Q Q sT Q' Q Q Q v Q Q c0 be 000000000000 G O O 4 G Q a O Q O 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 OtJf G.JO B IC I oq �nt�n hl.nnnr nnr�nr-n r-nnr-�+hl.n0oi -A � �rEo $888�$$$8$888$88888.88888.8 r V. vv-s'vvvvvaQ�vvcQv�v�QQaQQQ r o r V Z .�' �_� 0,0 v voo Oo�`q�`�`ct`Q•c�•`V Vit`�"�vvt°vvvvvv v' n � O C 1 Z- C O Cif) If7 v v Q C V 7 c v 4 v It -ti Ili to Q -t 'a' V C' qd I-F IY C Q 'C — Ln------- c ctt tG s0 1D sG s0 10 0 47 c[O� cD b cO cO SD tG (� O Ld i C? E �' Q V �7 � r v et �V V A C V Q Q C Q Q �+ Qcn c o --- _ _ Qe -OR O-R ip- ae ae ae of ae o of ae 3e ae ee ae 3e ae ;2 d; ae se d' •rj = Co%yjNN CVN NN N CJ NN NNN�� 3�bNN:V�t c�C", q:' C2 bi o� C 6CCg EC,�pp�C}�pp�2C a L vj0mMair)m0:Mm Ceih^',0m0C chC:C 7M NMMNNN NNNNNNNCdNNNC\NNNNNNNN RNti 6% .- .- .- •- r r r r r r r • r y� F � y 6� ;000cs0000000000000000000000000 rpatparpy5 T�prr r r r rr r r r r ISC—% rp,—MCrhrnep91 s�ccflcc cG�coco �c�it7e4��chch�t�l:+1�c'fMC9�Q:t`)C���:MMc.MM �a ��i a�$e oa00000000000000aocoa00000000 (A 0 hC-nhl�hn xr P.C1>'li 010�9f Of Of OfC�OlOfal Jla�t�6saSC? bQ)Q1L701C 00000 C— 0ZL) rrr m bmbbit0����� g�tC�00040rhnl`f�n �b�griminmv) MM V. Z n .� yyq�ha� OrN!7QsAtOhK�Of CrNM�tlf� ooS00000 a Q s�������iNNCV NNNNNCV N�V�1NoNo0�1 C ¢¢Cl►��•I .-.+rr..rr r r� .-rrrrrrrrrr.- �GW sN_NNMcH M»M:Oc�i(�fM�����j�� r N N N N N N N N N N N N N h N N N N N N N N N N N N • r.r-r�-r.r rr.-r•rrrrrrrrrrrrr rr U4 17 .37 1:;.,I,i �Loan -Cash Flow Report (Pay City of Albowills, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Mousing) District No. 7 Senior dousing Project Loan Data. 06/olio? Loan Rats- 8 00% Amount $386,600 Semi -Annual Loan Not Capialued 841ance Date Proncpal ,nterest P 81 Revenue Interest Outstanoing (1) (2) (3) (4) _ (s) (6} (7) 02101/98 0.00 000 O,CO 0.00 20,618.67 407,218.67 ¢8101/98 0.00 coo 0 GO 0.00 16.288.75 423,907.42 J2i01,19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.940.30 440.447.72 08/01t99 2,885,50 17,617 91 20.503.501 20,503.50 0.00 437,502.13 02r01,2030 3,W1 01 17,502 49 20,503.50 20,:�03.50 0.00 434.561.12 08101/20c0 3,12:.06 17,332 44 20,SC3.50 2C,503.50 :.00 4:1,440.08 C210112001 32:5.90 17.2.57.60 23,503.50 20.503,50 000 428,194.16 08,101.12C01 3.375.73 17,127 77 20,503 50 20.503.50 O.M. 424,818 43 C2/O'.2002 3,51076 16,392.74 20.503.50 20,503.E-0 J.00 421,307.67 08101,10C2 3,811.19 1.6,652 3 t 20.503 50 20,E-03 50 0 00 417,656.48 M_/01!i20C3 3 777.24 1d,7-t3.26 205011.50 20,503,50 0.00 419,859.24 08/01120C3 3.949.13 1.8,554.37 20.503 50 20,503.50 0.00 409,91,1.11 02,'Ot!2OC4 4,107.10 ' 9,396 40 20,503.50 20.503 50 O.CO 405,8C3.01 08101,2004 4,27138 18,2321.2 20,503.50 20,503.E-0 0.00 401,E-31.63 08/012005 4442.23 1,a"m1.2? 20,503.50 20,543.E-0 0.00 2MI709.40 08/01,2CO3 4,919.92 15.543.56 20,503.50 20,503 50 0.00 392,469.48 02/01;2006 4 3C4.72 15,f198 78 20,503.50 20.503.50 0.00 367,584.70 08/01,2006 4,998 91, 15,506 59 20,503.30 20,SO3 50 0.00 382,667,85 02/01n007 5,196.79 1S,XS.71 20,503.E-0 20,503.50 3,00 377.471.06 08111)1/2007 5.404.60 15.OS8.84 20.503.50 L0,503.50 0.00 572,066,40 O2i01/2005 5,62084 14,822 86 20,503.50 20,503.50 C 00 386,445.58 08i01;2008 5,845.68 14,657.82 20.E-03.50 20,E-03.50 C.00 350,599.88 02.r'01/2009 6,C79.50 14,424.�M 20,503.50 20,503.50 000 354,520.38 OSicil=9 6,522,65 14,180.52 20,503.50 20,50350 0.00 348,-,97.-0 02;01/2010 6,5?5.59 1.3927.91 c0,503.50 20503.50 0.00 3=1,622.11 08i01/2010 6838.62 13,66400 20,503.E-0 20,.`03.50 3. 0 334,783.49 J2/01t20t 1 7.112.18 13,391 34 2C.503.50 20.503.50 0.00 327,671.33 U6/Ot �U11 ? 3�5 65 13.1 Xe5 20 503,50 20,503.50 000 320274 Se 02.0:;2012 7,692.5t 12,61069 20.503.50 20.503.E-0 0.03 312,582,17 081,0112012 d,=.1.21 12,5C2 29 20,503 50 20 503.50 0.00 304,581 95 02,03i2013 6,320.22 12,183.28 20,503,50 20,50350 G00 296,23'14 C8/01,2013 6.653.33 1.1.850.47 20,E-03 50 20 5C3.50 0 CO 267,608-71 O2J01i2014 8,999.15 11,504.35 20.503.50 20.503 50 O CO 278,6% 56 CSiO1,2014 9..E-59.12 11,144 38 20.503.50 20.503.50 000 289 250.44 02/01,2015 9,733-48 10.770,02 20,503.50 20,503.50 0.00 259.518.96 0801.2015 10122.82 10,380.68 2C,503 90 20,303.E-0 000 249,394,14 02i01 i2016 1 C,527 7'- 9,97S.77 20.503.50 20,50310 C 00 236.666.41 08/Gii2018 10,948.84 3,z_54.66 -.0,503.36 20,503.E-0 000 227,017 57 02,101!2017 11,386.80 9.116.70 20.503.50 20,903.50 2 CO 218,530 77 08/01;2017 11,842.27 3,66123 20,503E-0 20,503.50 000 204,686.50 02/01;2018 12,315 26 S.167.54 20,503.50 20.503.50 ..00 192,372.54 08%01;2018 12,838.60 7,89490 .Sr3 .,350 20.103SO 0.00 178,563.94 0,--C 1 "2019 13.320.94 7 182.E-8 20.503 50 20,503.50 0.00 166,243 00 08,'01'2019 13.853.79 6349.72 20 50350 20,503.50 0 OC :52,38922 021C1i2020 14;437.93 H.Cb5 57 29,�03.50 20,543.E-0 0.00 137.981.29 08/C/;202C 14,48425 5 519 2E- 1�0,503 50 20 5C3 53 060 122 997.04 02/01.2021 15,583.92 4.9- 9.88 20,E-03 50 20 5C3.50 0.00 1 G7.4' 3,2 08,'01;2021 162C5 98 4,296.54 20,E-03.50 20,503.50 0.0: 91.208.46 02iOl;2022 16,855.24 3648.26 20,503 50 20,533 50 0.00 74,3E-1.22 C8!01;2022 17.529.45 2,974.05 20,503.E-0 2C,503.50 000 58,821.77 02101r'2023 18.230.63 2,272.87 20,503.50 20,5C3.50 0.00 38.59114 O8i01r2023 18,9E-9.b5 1,543.63 M,303.30 20,5C3se 000 .9.83129 02101;-2024 19,831.25 78525 20.416 54 2C,418.54 0.00 coo 06i01,2024 3 00 C 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02,101,2025 0.00 o.00 _— —o.co _ 0.00 0.00 000 44C,447.7;: 554.640.32 1 1.-25 088.04 1,C2=,.88.04 53,84?.72 Excess Tax Increment _ 88.96 Total Net Revenue 1,025,175.00 Prepared oy: Sp(?rigs/ed Incorporated ( 17-Apr-97 ) EXHIBIT D IMPACT TABLE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 7 DJG121132 T-1 AL141-23 L 0r .1 li 3i 15.le F.i_1 ISI_ ,.,t,_ t :F,-.1 %�.,IIt: I. V rIA V C O V 01 W G v c y •,� U of C m � � a m' z Scxa � U H -E IR ° c m r (a Cl a M a o o a �F- rm =o a� U '7 m r O (0 O v R v CO r- m b X O to :f) co N r. rn O � O r QS x Z�2"; r tm ui a © o 0 G CL of (M th M aac&Izui I m cA C� 0 (6n^ ui U! 8° l M r- N :R OR � 3- 1 6-1 Go CN90 r- N 0 co 0� Ln CV � O N r .� � Oa&. o f-. Cu x N a,, co m ) .Mtn N rn r� L Q 1 m ro c m v_ c a u91 m p t V too to 'chi N O r°- a 0 '� m _m �o U ro f7 Gi x p X yCQ�I -gym) > r d f0 R L C CU G G t j p C rL ao O c c -0 in d nt .H n rp ro c LL. m t7t o r ~ o x mC •% w O c C m N 0 A d (1 .G N LL 7C R y ` o z c o c r a v C m E _ i y a A 7 m U edi Ci E :: U a U o' m ;e X C C 17 07 R O C N Q Z cu Z ts O y a d o m o LA O m o c ' au O c O y a x S - c E 3 tY (q r cV N CI 41 m � N N H TN U. EXHIBIT E DESCRIPTION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 8 [to be added] DJG121132 AL141-23 E-1 EXHIBIT F TAX INCREMENT SCHEDULE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 8 DJG121132 AL141-23 F-1 fl 04/17/37 12:34 FAX 612 223 3002 SPRINGSTED INC. 11007/011 Tax Increment Financing Summary Report City of Albertville, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development) District No. 8 Vetsch Cabinets Project Type of Tax increment Financing District Economic Development Maximum Duration of'nF District lesser of 11 years from approval of TIF plan --or- 9 years from let increment Certification Request Date 06/01/97 Decertification Date of 11F District 12/ol/2007 (9 Years of Increment) Moan Amount @ 6.00% $70A00 Future Value P.V. @ 8.00% Bond Issue (W 0.000% (NIC) NA Admin. (10.00%) - $11.450 $7,17 (Taxable) Loss of LCA/HACA 0 0 0 EligibleProjed'Costs NA Local Contributions (11,448) (7,17 Capitalized Interest Underwriters DLacount NA NA Gross Surplus (Shortage) $77 COI/Administrative NA Local-EffortTIF 0 Other NA Net Surplus (Shortage) $9 +� $7 Annual Annual Less: Admin. Less: State Auditor Plus. Annual Annual Local Annual Projected Period Gross Tax Retainage Deduction Net Tax Contribution 1omo% Net Revenue toss of LGA/HACA Ending Increment 10.00% o.10% increment (6) M {8) (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) -.- - 12/31/97 - -. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12131 /98 0 12131IN 12,730 0 1,273 0 13 0 11,444 1,272 12.71E 0 0 1 "1 /2000 12,730 1,273 13 11,444 1,272 11,444 1.272 12,716 12.718 0 12/31 /2001 12,730 12/31/2002 12,730 1,273 1,273 13 13 11.444 1,272 12,716 0 12/31 /2003 12,730 1.273 13 11,444 1,272 1,272 12.716 12,716 0 0 12/31 /2004 12.730 12131 /2005 12.730 1,273 1,273 13 13 11,444 11,444 1,272 12.716 0 12/31/2006 12,730 1,273 13 11,444 1,272 11.444 1,272 12.716 12,716 0 12/31/2007 12.730 1,273 13 0 0 12/31 /2005 0 0 0 14,570 $11,457 __.. $117 $102.90 $11,440 $114,444 $0 Prepared by, Springsted Incorporated (17-Apr-97 ) 04/17/37 12:34 FAX 612 223 3002 SPRINGSTED INC. g-- % Q 008i011 r Assumptions Rs art City of Albertville, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development) District Na. 8 Vetsch Cabinets Project Type of Tax Increment Financing District Economic Development Maximum Durartion of TIF District Lesser of 11 years from approval of TIF plan —or— 9 year: from 1 st increment Certification Request Date 06/01/97 Decertification Date 12/01/2007 (9 Years of Increment) 199M 997 Base Estimated Market Value $13.000 Times: First $100,000 3.00% 390 Excess 4.60% 0 Y Original Net Tax Capacity $390 — — — — - — — Assessment/Collection Year — — — — — j 1997/1998 199011999 199212000 , 2000=01 4Sue Estimated Market Value $13,000 $13,000 $13,000 $13.000 Increase In Estimated Market Value (1 ) 0 254,200 254,200 254,200 Total Estimated Market Value $13,000 $267.200 $267,200 $267.200 Times: First $100,000 3.009E 390 0 3,000 3,000 3,000 7,691 7,591 7,691 Excess 4.60% Total Net Tax Capacity $390 $10.691 $10,891 $10,691 Base Inflatidl9Factor 0.00% Local Tax Capacity Rate 123.5829E Fiscal Disparities Contribution From TIF District 0.0000% . Administrative Retainage Percent (maximum = 10%) 10.00% Pooling Percent 0.009E NA City Tax Rate (Only if Local —Effort TIF Bonds I Loan Day —As —you —Go) Fonds Dated NA Loan Dated 06/01/97 First Interest Date NA Loan Rate 8.00% Underwriters Discount NA Principal & Interest @ NA LG/VHACA Loss: Will Annual Local Contribution Be Made (Yes or Na)? Yes I.S.D Equalized Tax Capacity Rate (*885) NA 4 I.S.D Sales Ratio (*885) NA City Sales Ratio NA Taxable Net tax Capacity NA Present Value Date 08/01/97 Present Value Rate 8.00% (1) Assumes 100% construction in 1997. W*... Prepared by. Springsted Incorporated (17—Apr-97 ) � 4 04/17/37 12:35 FAX 012 223 3002 SPRINGSTED INC. ooam�oomomaomo rrr-.err rr • (�til�l�l�f�titif� NNNNNNLVNN rrrr.-rr r G p Q N N N N N N p ti ti^^ ti m- n p�� O r N�NN�NNN rrrr^rrrr I^s N gg $ .ra. rrrr -rrrr 6 rrrr rrrr ��±± v u C r 00 W Ml!��+lMM W 0000 f- r r W. r r r r r r r D Z� O l7 40 0 0 7� 0 0 M � P.f� cp.NNNl1! N q corose Ob S O m E �L oaO o0 1pf�j 0 0 m Dd 7 E� NNNNNNNNN rr.rrrrrrr r E O i SV C R c C Fw- Nin Wv� r�Mdjpjoic�rl03ag D C � V NNNNNNNNNNNN r�-.-r-rrrr�rrr D � C pp...pp-pp-prpprpprprprpr0 MPJW L91�Q1��i d. LL �$+ ' O O Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 �UZU 0 p�p0 pp ppp� p pog OZ� p0p�0pf'-rr®rara.QQ-®®r®r®�rpr� O O O D O O O G O F-ZU" �L ug N Q 009/011 04/17/37 12:35 FAX 612 223 3002 SPRINGSTED INC. Q 010/011 Loan Cash Flow Report (Pay. -As -You -Go) Clty of Albertville, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Economic Development) District No. 8 Vetsch Cabinet' Project Loan Date: 06101/97 Loan Rate: 8.00% Amount $70.600 Semi -Annual Loan Net Capftlized Salance Date Principal Interest P & I Revenue Interest Outstanding (1) (2) (3) (4) _ (� (� (7) 70,600.00 02/01/96 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,765.33 74,365.33 08/01/98 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,974,81 77,339.94 02/01/99 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,093.60 50,438.54 as/01/99 3,140.66 3.217.34 6,358.00 6,30.00 0.00 0.00 77,292.88 74.025.80 02/01/2000 08/01/2000 3,266.20 3,39&94 3,091.72 2,961.06 6,35&00 6,358.00 6,35e.00 6,36&00 0.00 70,629.66 02/01/2001 3,532.81 2.82&10 6,35&00 6,358.00 0.00 0.00 87,096.85 63,422.72 05/01/2001 3,674.13 2,W&e7 2,538.91 6,35&00 6,35&00 6,35&00 8,358.00 0.00 59,601.63 02/01/2002 00/01/2002 3,821.09 3,97&93 2,384.07 6.35&00 5,368.00 0.00 65,627.70 02/01/2003 4,132.00 2,225.11 6,858.00 6,358.00 0.00 51.494.51 08/01/2003 4,29&21 2.059.79 5,358.00 6.358.00 0.00 47,196.50 02/01/2004 4.470.14 1,887.88 6.358.00 6,358.00 0.00 0.00 42,726.46 38,077.52 i 06/01/200j,'. 4,64&94 1,709.05 6,35&00 6,350.00 6,35a.00 0.00 33,242.62 02/01/2005 08/01/2005 4,834.90 51028.30 1,52&10 1,329.70 6.355.00 6,358.00 6,360.00 0.00 26,214.32 02/01/2006 5,229.43 1,128.57 6,35&00 6,358.00 0.00 0.00 22,964.89 17,548.29 08/01/2006 5,438.60 5,65&15 919.40 701.35 6,358.00 6,35&00 6,358.00 6,35&00. 0.00 11,890.14 02/01/2007 08/01/2007 5.882.39 475.61 6,358.00 6,358.00 0.00 6,007.75 02/01/2008 6,007.75 240.31 8,248.06 6,24&06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 i 08/01/2008 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 02/01/2009 _ 30.433.64 93,900.52 114,334.06 114.334.06 9,83&54 BMWs Tax Increment 109.94 Total Net Revenue 114.444.00 10.. . Prepared by: Springsted incorporated (17-Apr-97) ( 0 r EXHIBIT G IMPACT TABLE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 8 DJG121132 AL141-23 G-1 04/17/37 12:33 FAl 612 223 3002 SPRINGSTED INC. Q 011/011 1 s w O m "- a 0 C g 5 • o a s c e ja u C7 a"►a C 7 v a s ti C O u E I p C lLL Rocc,;z = H a G u r m iIle 0 CL U -0 i a �- m m N W) i N O I m G O C O min d O W. 8 m q N — co O m N 0 N W V o U N 0 La I CO N O O O b r V- . N W m a; v c m N N O .01 O N M N Imo N m 0i le G co {9 N go ui a d 1 m o�A LOe � m 10- N O ,a N d X C Q! O m pr_p it v Ci C y� w m r e � z m g a m m a o 0. a t=�.nw -6 v W mV a w c u- ��pp O U. W C Cl w yO} r O L C 7 N m m 0- @o G A 0(3U. U 0 n m o o Z ► r o o 3m m — x .L�.. a 0Rn CL E A U 0 "0 X U o m c -0 A m WW ►- n a ;� cn m oz d)-13 c m m H a 0 a 40 e n� U m 'o c% C m C d a 'ic « 4 L a r N w V- Y J CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION NO. 1997-32 RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. AND A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 7 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ("Council") of the City of Albertville, Minnesota ("City") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The City has previously established its Development District No. 1 pursuant to Minn. Stat., Section 469.124 through 469.134 ("Development District Act"). 1.02. The City has determined a need to modify the Development Program for the Development District and to create TIF District No. 7 (the "TIF District") therein pursuant to Minn. Stat., Section 469.174 through 469.179 ("TIF Act"), and to that end has caused to be prepared a document titled "Modified Development Program, Development District No. 1 and Tax Increment Financing Plans, Tax Increment Financing District No. 7 and Tax Increment Financing District No. 8, City of Albertville, Minnesota," dated May 20, 1997. 1.03. The Development Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan for TIF District No. 7 ("TIF Plan") were, in accordance with the Development District Act and TIF Act, referred to the Albertville Planning Commission, which found that they conform to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. 1.04. Notice of the City's intent to establish the TIF District was delivered to the County Commissioner who represents the site at least 30 days before publication of the notice of public hearing. 1.05. Estimates of the fiscal and economic implications of the TIF Plan were provided to Independent School District No. 885 and Wright County at least 30 days before the Council's public hearing on the TIF Plan, and the county commissioner representing the site was duly noticed in accordance with the TIF Act. 1.06. This Council has fully reviewed the contents of the Development Program and TIF Plan and on this date conducted a public hearing thereon at which the views of all interested persons were heard. DJG121768 AL141-24 Y i a Section 2. Findings, Development District. 2.01. It is hereby found and determined that there is a need to modify the Development Program for the Development District, in order to improve the tax base and employment opportunities, and to provide an impetus for related housing development. 2.02. It is fiirther specifically found and determined that: a) the land within the Development District would not be made available for development without the public intervention and financial assistance described in the Development Program and TIF Plan; b) the modified Development Program will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Development District by private enterprise; and c) the Development District and modified Development Program conform to the general plan for development of the City as set forth in the comprehensive municipal plan. Section 3. Findings, TIF District No. 7. 3.01. It is found and determined that it is necessary and desirable for the sound and orderly development of the Development District and the City as a whole, and for the protection and preservation of the public health, safety, and general welfare, that the authority of the TIF Act be exercised by the City to provide public financial assistance to the TIF and Development Districts. 3.02. It is further found and determined, and it is the reasoned opinion of the City, that the development proposed in the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 7 could not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that therefore the use of tax increment financing is necessary. 3.03. The proposed public improvements to be financed in part through tax increment financing are necessary to permit the City to realize the full potential of the TIF and Development Districts in terms of development intensity, employment opportunities and tax base. 3.04. The Plan for TIF District No. 7 conforms to the general plan of development of the City as a whole. 3.05. The Plan for TIF District No. 7 will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the TIF and Development Districts by private enterprise. 3.06. TIF District No. 7 is a housing district under Section 469.174, subd. 11 of the TIF Act, based on the findings described in the TIF Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference, and other records on file with the City. WG121768 2 AL141-24 3.07. The City anticipates that TIF District No. 7 will be a "qualified housing district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399, Subd. 1(c), based on the findings described in the TIF Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference, and other records on file with the City. 3.08. Reasons and facts supporting the findings under this Section are stated in the TIF Plan. The City has also relied upon the reports and recommendations of its staff as well as the personal knowledge of members of the City Council in reaching its conclusions regarding TIF District No. 7. Section 4. Development Program and TIF Plan Adopted; Certification,• Filing. 4.01. The modified Development Program and the TIF Plan are hereby approved and adopted. 4.02. The geographic boundaries of the Development District and of the TIF District are described in the Development Program and TIF Plan therefor, respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference. 4.03. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution together with a certified copy of the Development Program and the TIF Plan to the Auditor of Wright County with a request that the original tax capacity of the property within TIF District No. 7 be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, subd. 1 of the TIF Act, and to file a copy of the Development Program and the TIF Plan with the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue as required by the TIF Act. Adopted this 20th day of May, 1997. Mayor Attest: City Administrator DM121768 AL141-24 3 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION NO. 1997-33 I 5-2c)—%% RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 8 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council ("Council") of the City of Albertville, Minnesota ("City") as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The City has previously established its Development District No. 1 pursuant to Minn. Stat., Section 469.124 through 469.134 ("Development District Act"). 1.02. The City has determined a need to modify the Development Program for the Development District and to create TIF District No. 8 (the "TIF District") therein pursuant to Minn. Stat., Section 469.174 through 469.179 ("TIF Act"), and to that end has caused to be prepared a document titled "Modified Development Program, Development District No. 1 and Tax Increment Financing Plans, Tax Increment Financing District No. 7 and Tax Increment Financing District No. 8, City of Albertville, Minnesota," dated May 20, 1997. 1.03. The Development Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan for TIF District No. 8 ("TIF Plan") were, in accordance with the Development District Act and TIF Act, referred to the Albertville Planning Commission, which found that they conform to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. 1.04. Estimates of the fiscal and economic implications of the TIF Plan were provided to Independent School District No. 885 and Wright County at least 30 days before the Council's public hearing on the TIF Plan. 1.05. This Council has fully reviewed the contents of the Development Program and TIF Plan and on this date conducted a public hearing thereon at which the views of all interested persons were heard. Section 2. Findings, Development District. 2.01. It is hereby found and determined that there is a need to modify the Development Program for the Development District, in order to improve the tax base and employment opportunities, and to provide an impetus for related housing development. 2.02. It is further specifically found and determined that: WG121771 AL141-23 r Y , a) the land within the Development District would not be made available for development without the public intervention and financial assistance described in the Development Program and TIF Plan; b) the modified Development Program will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Development District by private enterprise; and c) the Development District and modified Development Program conform to the general plan for development of the City as set forth in the comprehensive municipal plan. Section 3. Findings; TIF District No. 8. 3.01. It is found and determined that it is necessary and desirable for the sound and orderly development of the Development District and the City as a whole, and for the protection and preservation of the public health, safety, and general welfare, that the authority of the TIF Act be exercised by the City to provide public financial assistance to the TIF and Development Districts. 3.02. It is further found and determined, and it is the reasoned opinion of the City, that anticipated development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan; 3.03. The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for development of the District by private enterprise; and 3.04. The TIF Plan conforms to general plans for development of the City as a whole. 3.05. The proposed public improvements to be financed in part through tax increment financing are necessary to permit the City to realize the full potential of the TIF and Development Districts in terms of development intensity, employment opportunities and tax base. 3.06. TIF District No. 8 is an economic development district housing district under Section 469.174, subd. 12 of the TIF Act, based on the findings described in the TIF Plan, which are incorporated herein by reference, and other records on file with the City. 3.07. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399, subd. 6(d), the City elects to make a local contribution to pay costs of the project financed under this TIF Plan, in the amount equal to 10 percent of the annual tax increment. Therefore, the City anticipates that the TIF District will be exempt from LGA/HACA loss. WG121771 AL141-23 2 3.08. Reasons and facts supporting the findings under this Section are stated in the TIF Plan. The City has also relied upon the reports and recommendations of its staff as well as the personal knowledge of members of the City Council in reaching its conclusions regarding TIF District No. 8. Section 4. Development Program and TIF Plan Adopted; Certification; Filing. 4.01. The modified Development Program and the TIF Plan are hereby approved and adopted. 4.02. The geographic boundaries of the Development District and of the TIF District are described in the Development Program and TIF Plan therefor, respectively, and are incorporated herein by reference. 4.03. The City Administrator is authorized and directed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution together with a certified copy of the Development Program and the TIF Plan to the Auditor of Wright County with a request that the original tax capacity of the property within TIF District No. 8 be certified to the City pursuant to Section 469.177, subd. 1 of the TIF Act, and to file a copy of the Development Program and the TIF Plan with the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue as required by the TIF Act. Adopted this 20th day of May, 1997. Attest: City Administrator Mayor DJG121771 AL141-23 3 (612) 497-3384 Fax: (612) 497-3210 APPLICRTION FOR "-INTOXICATING NRLT LIQtMR LICEKSE The undersigned certifies that it complies with Minnesota Statutes, Section 340.001, Subdivision 7, in that it qualifies as a "Bona Fide Club" within that section, and that this appli- cation makes petition for a limited license as a "Bona Fide Club" for a limited, non -intoxication male liquor license. A license fee of $10,00 per day is required to accompany this application. 1. Name of Applicant: �t�l7e�'i'V� fl<_ Ytr« 2. Name and Address of President and Secretary of Applicant: AeA_VI_I1J.I_ pv-1:5. /7, 3. Purpose for which funds derived will be used: 4. Date of activity: Jame 5. Premises from which non -intoxicating malt liquor will be dispensed on said date: 6. Hours of operation: Jkt 13 5 '�j�n 4�� �Jti�2 ly 9 - ��.,.'r�t J°.,� 7. Number of previous license obtained this calendar year: 8. Name, address, telephone number an=z),P,11W1,',e1, ionheld with Club of person signing this application: Date: Si ftp'ant(s) . C^ U JV6 May 6,1997 To the Albertville City Council; I am the director of the Life in Christ Lutheran Church youth group. We would like to have a car wash on June 14th at the park and ride on the corner of Co. Rd. 19 and Co. Rd. 37. DJ's hardware has agreed to let us use their water. You can reach me during the day at work on 540-1292 or at home after 3:30 on 497-4716. Sincerely, Claudia J. Wagner Youth Director CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE #1995-7 AN ORDINANCE DEFINING THE REQOIREMENTS AND PROCESSES THE CITY COUNCIL SHALL FOLLOW IN CONDUCTING ITS MEETINGS AND IN PASSING ORDINANCES AND RNBOLUTIONS The City of*Albertville does ordain: Section 1. Authorization. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes and this ordinance, the city council is prescribing the processes to be used for its conduct of meetings and in passing ordinances and resolutions. Section 2. Types of Meetings. The City Council shall conduct Regular, Special, Adjourned and Emergency Meetings. A) Meeting Information. The city council shall annually, -at its regular meeting in January of each year designate and official newspaper; select one acting mayor; select an official depository; review the councils ordinance prescribing its meetings, processes, ordinances and resolutions; renew all annual appointments other than city personnel (handled at time of initial appointment to the city service); assign committee duties to members; approve official bonds filed with the city clerk; and city law enforcement through the use of resolution(s). B) Committee establishment. The city council shall have at a minimum three standing city council committees comprised of two city council members and the city administrator (if there is one). Committees established are for Finance, Personnel and Public Works. This section also allows for the establishment of additional committees on a temporary basis as may be required from time to time with the membership including at least two city council members and other participants as determined by the council as a whole. Section 3. Meeting Processes and Procedures. The following prescribes the requirements for quorum and open meeting law. A) Quorum: State law requires the presence of any three members of a statutory city council. B) Open Meeting Law. All meetings of municipal and other public bodies and any committee, sub -committee, board, department or commission of the governing body to be open to the public. C) Citizen Participation. Anyone may attend council meetings. Citizens cannot speak or otherwise participate in any discussion unless the mayor or presiding officer recognize them. The council by motion may decide to hear one or more speakers from the audience in the event the A( '. M mayor or presiding officer does not recognize them. D) Proper notice. In compliance with state law (M. S. 471.705) the council shall post notice three (3) days before holding a special meeting and will post proper notice at an official location in city hall as determined by formal action (motion or resolution) of the council. Section 4 Presiding Officer. The mayor by statute serves as the presiding officer whenever present. In the mayor's absence, the acting mayor serves or in the acting mayor's absence the other members of the council may elect one of their members to serve. Other public bodies, committees, sub -committees, board, department or commission shall have a president/chair and may have a vice president/vice chair to serve as the presiding officer or as elected by the other members to serve. Section 5. Maintaining Order. Although meetings must be open to the public, no person who is noisy or unruly has a right to remain in the council chambers. The mayor or presiding officer subject to overrule by the council or board/commission or committee shall order removal from the room. In the event the mayor or presiding officer fails to act, the council or board/commission or committee should order the removal. Section 6. Rules of Procedure. Subdivision 1. Meetings. The city council shall conduct one regular meeting per calendar month to be held on the first Monday at 7:00 o'clock p.m. in the City Hall Council Chambers. Special meetings may be conducted as required by the business at hand with preference to utilizing the third Monday in a month at a time and place determined by the call for the meeting. Adjourned and Emergency meetings follow the requirements of the special meeting.. Subdivision 2. Agenda. The council prescribes the order of their business to be established for regular meetings as follows: Call to Order/Roll Call/Adopt the Agenda; Minutes; Auditing Claims; Citizen's Forum; Consent Agenda; Special order; Unfinished Business; New Business; Council Reports and Adjournment. Special, Adjourned, and Emergency Meetings are topic specific as to purpose and shall be so stated on notice and agenda(s). Subdivision 3. Time Lines. The city council is prescribing that all matters scheduled for consideration at their regular meetings shall he submitted to the City Clerk no later than five (5) calendar days in advance of the actual meeting date (generally Wednesday previous to the council meeting on the first Monday of a calendar month. Special, Adjourned and Emergency meetings shall be dependent on the nature of the meeting, matters submitted shall need to meet the posting and notice requirements and will be received by the City Clerk. Subdivision 4. Auditing Claims. Claims for payment shall meet the time lines for regular meetings as contained in Section 6, Subdivision 3 of this ordinance, with the exception of preapproved claims such as utility bills, contract payments and so on. Section 7. Parliamentary Procedure. in all points not covered by this ordinance, and statute shall be governed in its procedure by "Roberts Rules of Order." Section S. Motion, Resolution and Ordinance. A motion is a matter of -parliamentary procedure and will be sufficient for most simple administrative acts. Resolutions will be used for any temporary routine or administrative nature. Ordinances will generally be used for regulation or governance of people of property and includes a penalty for its violation (i.e. police power) as well as provides for permanent rules for the organization and operation of the council. Section 9. Effective date_of ordinance. The effective date of this ordinance is upon publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF ZLina oughton, City Jerk THE CITY OF M&9E3TYILLE =IS Michael Potter, ayor Published in the Crow River News on February 13, 1995. r -g;6 2) The Meadows - Preliminary Plat Approval 3) Cedar Creek Business Park - Preliminary Plat 4) Center Oaks - Rezoning request from R-lA to PUD 5) Center Oaks - Preliminary Plat and Final Plat Approval for Outlots >S_l�!rj 6) Cedar Creek North - Rezoning of the currently zoned R-lA portion only to PUD -47) Cedar Creek North - Preliminary Plat Approval 8) ORDINANCE #1997-2 (AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2500 OF THE ALBERTVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING THE REGULATION OF ANTENNA (COMMUNICATION RECEPTION/TRANSMISSION DEVICES) 9) ORDINANCE #1997-3 (AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS A- 500 AND A-600 OF THE ALBERTVILLE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING SKETCH PLANS AND PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUIREMENTS AND ESTABLISHING A SECONDARY STREET ACCESS REQUIREMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS) b. PUBLIC WORKS None C. ENGINEERING 1) 1997 Street Overlay & Patching Project 2) Project Updates d . LEGAL /0"20 1) Approval of appraisal of Peterson property - 2) Grading Agreement for Cedar Creek Business Park 1#;,V 3) Veteran's Preference Hearing Update e. ADMINISTRATION 1) Consider Joint Powers Board Wa termai n Ownership/Responsibility Concept Plan ORDINANCE #1997-8 (AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDINANCE 1997-4 TITLED NOISE, EXEMPTING CIVIC a CELEBRATIONS THEREFROM) Discuss 1998 Budget preparations N"' l 8. ADJOL (Council) 2 • UPC OKING MEfrINGS/ IMPORTANT DATES June 10-.x Planning & Zoning 7:00 R4 June 17 City Council Meeting 7:00 R4 June 23 Joint Powers Board Meeting 7:00 R4 June 24 Joint Council/Zoning Commission Meeting 7:0o R4 July 4 Legal Holiday - City offices Closed July 7 City Council Meeting 7:00 Hsi July 8 Planning & Zoning Meeting 7:00R4 July 21 City Council Meeting 7:00 R4 July 22 Special Planning & Zoning Meeting 7:0o R4 (if required) August 4 City Council Meeting 7:Oo R4 11 ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL May 6, 1997 Albertville.City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor Mark Olsen, Councilmembers Patricia Stalberger, Duane Berning, Robert Gundersen, and John Vetsch, City Administrator Garrison Hale, City Clerk Linda Houghton, City Engineer Peter Carlson and City Attorney Mike Couri Mayor Olsen called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to order. The agenda was amended by adding Item 8d - Safe Community Grant presented by Commissioner Judie Rose. Berning made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. The minutes of the April 1, 1997, minutes were amended as follows: Paragraph 1, Page 4 - The STMA Men's Softball Association agree to drag and chalk the ball field for an annual fee of $250. Olson made a motion to approve the minutes of the April 1, 1997, meeting as amended and to approve the minutes of the April loth and April 15th meetings as presented. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to approve payment of Check Vs 10900 - 10950 as presented. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Nancy Overstake, manager of the Albertville Meadows apartments, requested the Council consider an increase in patrol hours. She stated that the property located next to the apartment building (owned by School Street Development) has been neglected. There is debris spread on the lot and children between the ages of 6-16 congregate on the lot. A neighbor who lives on Kahler Drive presented a petition to the Council asking that the property be cleaned up. She included pictures of the lot showing the condition of the property. Berning made a motion directed the city administrator to send a certified letter to School Street Development giving 30 days in which to grade, seed and raise the fire hydrant on the lot. If the property owner fails to perform, the City will make arrangements to clean up the property and assess the costs to the property. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Carolyn Bauer requested that the Council allow her to purchase 17 lilac bushes to replace the three evergreens that were damaged on her property by snow removal operations. The cost of the lilac bushes would be less than the cost of replacing the three ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL May 6, 1997 Page 2 of 7 evergreens. Berning made a motion authorizing Bauer to purchase lilac bushes to replace her damaged evergreens at a cost to the City not to exceed $115.00. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mayor Olsen moved to the Consent Agenda. LeRoy Berning, representing the Albertville Friendly City Days Committee, asked the Council to amend his request for street closing to include the Locust Court area on Saturday, June 14th, for a go-cart race (approximately two hours) and Lander Avenue to the Parish Center for a pedal pull event. Fire Chief Albert Barthel presented a letter from the Fire Department requesting that the City consider purchasing five acres of land abutting the proposed 57th Street currently owned by the Marxes for a new fire hall site. The Council received the letter but took no action. Olsen made amotion to adopt the consent agenda deleting item 51. Vetsch seconded the motion, All voted aye. Because the tournament has been postponed, Item 51 (3.2 license) was removed from the agenda. Olsen made a motion to approve the April Financial Statement as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Olsen made a motion to approve the Follow -Up Sheet from the April 1, 1997, meeting as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Olsen made a motion to approve the Wastewater Treatment Facility Operations Report as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Olsen made a motion to establish a special City Council meeting for May 20, 1997, and to establish a meeting with the Wright County Sheriff's Department on May 28, 1997, at 7:00 PM in the Wright County Courthouse in the Sheriff's Department. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Olsen made a motion to approve membership in the Economic Development Partnership of Wright County for 1997 at a cost of $500. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Olsen made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1997-28 titled APPOINTMENT OF PERSONNEL as amended. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL May 6, 1997 Page 3 of 7 Olsen made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1997-30 titled AMENDMENT TO PAY STEPS AND WORK SCHEDULES as amended. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Olsen made a motion to approve the request from the Albertville Friendly City Days Committee to close the following streets as follows: 58th (Main to Lander) June 9-16 All Day Carnival Lander (58th to Barthel June 12-16 All Day Carnival driveway) Main (59th to 57th) June 13-14 5:00PM - Event 1:00 AM Locust Court (between 50th June 14 2 hours & 51st) Lander to Parish Center June 14 Driveway June 14, 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM - Parade Main (57th to 56th) 56th (Main to Lander) Lander (56th to 57th) 57th (Lander to Main) June 14, 12:00 Noon - 4:_00 PM - Parade Main (60th to 50th) 59th (Main to Barthel) Barthel (59th to 51st.) 60th (Lachman to Main) Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Olsen made a motion to grant a variance to Albertville Friendly City Days Committee to extend city parks hours on June 13 and June 14 to 1:00 AM. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council agreed to remove the variance request from the Noise Ordinance from the Consent Agenda and to direct staff to draft an amendment to the Noise Ordinance which will cover Friendly City Days. Mayor Olsen opened the public hearing on the Center Oaks Industrial Park sewer and water main extensions project. City Engineer Carlson reviewed both options for the extension of water and sewer mains to serve the Center Oaks Industrial Park -- Option 1 shows the sewer and water mains crossing the Sylvester Kolles property, and Option 2 extending the mains along County Road ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL May 6, 1997 Page 4 of 7 37. Carlson indicated that Option 2 would probably require TIF financing in order to make the project financially feasible. Carlson prefers Option 1 since there is more lateral assessment. He reviewed the estimated costs of each of the options with the Council. Trunk sewer and water charges will be collected only at the time the benefitted properties develop. Gary Lehn, the owner of the Wright County Bag Company, stated he has his own water and septic system and he can see no benefit to his property by the extension of sewer and water. Sylvester Kolles stated he does not want the sewer and water on his property. Members of the Pat Riley family were present and stated their opposition to the extension at this time and asked the Council to vote "no" on the project. Kolles stated that he will be able to serve his property from the sewer and water lines being installed for the Fairfield Addition and, therefore, is not benefitted from the extension of the mains over the northern portion of his land. City Engineer Carlson stated that the potential benefit of Option 1 would be gone if Kolles can serve the rest of his property from Fairfield. Berning made a motion to close the public hearing at 9:25 PM. Gundersen seconded the motion. Berning, Gundersen and Stalberger voted aye. Olsen and Vetsch voted no. The motion carried. Berning made a motion to table RESOLUTION #1997-31, ordering the improvement and directing the preparation of plans and specs for the Center Oaks Industrial Park, indefinitely. Further, in the event the project is considered by the Council in the future, all property owners will be notified again by mail. Stalberger seconded the motion. Berning, Stalberger, Gundersen and Olsen voted aye. Vetsch voted no. The motion carried. Wright County Commissioner Judie Rose and Allina Representative Sonja Carlson explained the $180,000 Safe Community Grant Program received by Wright County. The grant is intended for studies to reduce injuries in accidents. The City of Albertville will be included in the program. The grant is comprised of funds from the federal government and privately Allina Health Services. Carlson reported on the meeting held with the property owners in the Greenhaven addition. Those present were in favor of fixing the drain tile line and indicated they would dedicate easements along the tile line. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL May 6, 1997 Page 5 of 7 Carlson stated the next step is to prepare plans for the line and the acquire the necessary easements. Berning made a motion authorizing the city engineer to proceed with preparations of the plans and specs, and to proceed with easements for the Greenhaven Drainage project. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Carlson presented a map identifying the areas for the 1997 overlay improvements. Areas proposed for improvements are patches to Kalland Drive and overlays to 54th Street west of Main Avenue and 54th Street east of Main Avenue. Berning made a motion to authorize the city engineer to prepare plans and specs and to advertise for bids for the 1997 Overlay Project as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Carlson discussed the replacement of the culvert under the railroad tracks. The old culvert will not be removed but will be vulcated at each end and filled with sand. A permit has been granted from Burlington Northern Railroad for the project. Carlson estimates the project cost at $24,900, which could be paid through the storm water fund. Berning made a motion authorizing the engineer to secure quotes for the culvert replacement project under the Burlington Northern Railroad. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council discussed an amendment to the city's gambling ordinance. The amendment will allow the City Council to license and out-of-town, non-profit organization in the City in the event that no local, non-profit organizations choose to operate charitable gambling. Stalberger made a motion to adopt ORDINANCE #1997-7 titled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 3 OF ORDINANCE 601 TITLED AN ORDINANCE REGULATING CHARITABLE GAMBLING IN ESTABLISHMENTS HOLDING A LIQUOR LICENSE AND ESTABLISHING A FEE. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Vetsch made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1997-32 titled RESOLUTION APPROVING AN OFF -SITE CHARITABLE GAMBLING LICENSE FOR MINNETONKA VOITURE 1281 OF LA SOCIETE 40 HOMMES ET 8 CHAVAUX. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Attorney Couri reviewed the proposed Joint Powers Agreement between the Cities of St. Michael and Albertville and ISD #885. Because there are still some concerns with the school district's ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL May 6, 1997 Page 6 of 7 ability to participate fully in a joint powers agreement without being a part of the Mighty Ducks application, Couri advised the Council to table action on the agreement until all issues can be resolved. Berning made a motion to table the Joint Powers Agreement for the STMA Ice Arena until the school district has determined their legal level of participation. Stalberger seconded the motion. Berning, Stalberger, Gundersen and Vetsch voted aye. Olsen voted no. The motion carried. Couri reviewed the Developer's Agreement for the Fairfield Addition with the Council. Berning made a motion to approve the Developer's Agreement for the Fairfield Addition with the surety amounts adjusted to the actual bid price, and the form of surety to be approved by the City Attorney. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to approve payment in the amount of $3,293.52 to PSG for the over budgeted 1996 expenditures in the repair and maintenance areas of the PSG contract. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Kelly Browning of PSG presented prices from several companies for the purchase of a lawnmower for the wastewater treatment facility. Vetsch made a motion authorizing PSG to purchase a self- propelled, walk behind lawn mower for the wastewater treatment facility and to use the 1997 repair and maintenance budget for the purchase. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Olsen made a motion to contract mowing with the lowest responsible bidder, David Aaron Eull at $150.66 per time, contingent upon the contractor's ability to meet the contract terms within five business days. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council discussed the proposal from The Brimeyer Group for a Strategic Planning Seminar at a cost of $1,150. Olsen indicated he is in favor of a seminar in order to set a clear set of goals for the city. Vetsch made a motion to table further discussion on a strategic planning seminar at this time. Stalberger seconded the motion. Vetsch, Berning, Stalberger, and Gundersen voted aye. Olsen voted no. The motion carried. i �2 ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL May 6, 1997 Page 7 of 7 Vetsch made a motion to approve payment of Check #10856 to Maple Grove Glass and Glazing in the amount of $3,598.40. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to adopt ORDINANCE #1997-5 titled AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE OPERATION OF SNOWMOBILES AND OTHER RECREATIONAL MOTOR VEHICLES. Gundersen seconded the motion. Gundersen, Stalberger, Berning, and Olsen voted aye. Vetsch voted no. The motion carried. Berning made a motion to extend final plat discussion of the Brittany Kay Estates preliminary plat until July 7, 1997. Stalberger seconded the. motion. All voted aye. The Council recessed the meeting at 12:05 AM to enter into a closed session to discuss potential litigation with the Petersons. Mayor Olsen reconvened the open meeting at 12:40 AM. Olsen made a motion to adjourn at 12:41 AM. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mark Olsen, Mayor Linda Houghton, City Clerk ALMMTVILLE CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL 19MING Mar 20, 1997 Albertville City Hall 8:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor Mark Olsen, Councilmembers Duane Berning, John Vetsch, Patti Stalberger, and Robert Gundersen, City Attorney Mike Couri, City Administrator Garrison Hale and City Clerk -Treasurer Linda Houghton Mayor Olsen called the special meeting of the Albertville City Council to order. Attorney Couri requested the agenda be amended with the addition of a closed session to discuss the potential Peterson litigation. Berning made a motion to adopt the agenda as amended with a closed session. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mayor Olsen opened the public hearing to consider the creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. 7 and a Tax Increment Financing Plan for the TIF District, and modification of the Development Program for existing Development District No. 1. City Attorney Couri explained the proposed TIF District No. 7, a housing district, whose purpose is to facilitate development of a rental housing facility intended primarily for low and moderate income seniors. The district will be certified for twenty five (25) years. Since this is a housing district TIF, there is no LGA/HACA penalty to the City. The TIF Plan covers only the 5.12 acre parcel developed into rental units in the proposed Cottages of Albertville plat. The tax increments generated by this development will reimburse the developer for $390,000 of his land acquisition, site improvements, soil corrections, parking, and utilities costs. The district proposed is established as a pay-as-you-go TIF, i.e. when tax increment revenue is received from the County, the City will pay the developer. City Clerk Houghton reported there had been no written or oral objections received at city offices. Mayor Olsen called for comment from the floor. Bernard Marx stated he is opposed to the proposed TIF plan and the Statement of Public Purpose detailed on Page 6 of the Development Program. Marx stated that he is currently working on a private senior housing project on the Marx property that will not require a TIF Financing Plan. He also feels his location, which is closer to the churches and the downtown area, has been the 4 �T ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL May 20, 1997 Page 2 of 3 preferred location for senior housing. There were no other comments from the audience. Berning made a motion to close the public hearing. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1997-32 titled RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 7. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mayor Olsen opened the public hearing to consider the creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. 8 and a Tax Increment Financing Plan for the TIF District, and modification of the Development Program for existing Development District No. 1. City Attorney Couri explained the proposed TIF No. 8 is an economic development district, whose purpose is to facilitate development of a cabinet manufacturing facility. TIF #8 is also established as a pay-as-you-go TIF. Because it is an economic development district, there is a penalty on the LGA/HACA payments to the City. However, the City may opt to provide 10% of the project costs and avoid the LGA/HACA penalty. The purchase agreement has been written to sell the two acre site for approximately $1,800. The parcel has an assessed market value of $13,000, according to the Wright County Assessor. The approximate $11,000 difference could be used as the City's contribution to the project. City Clerk Houghton reported there had been no written or oral objections received at city offices. Mayor Olsen called for comment from the floor. There was no public comment. Stalberger made a motion to close the public hearing. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Councilmember Berning removed himself from the City Council at 9:25 PM because of a potential conflict of interest. Stalberger made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1997-33 titled RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND A TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 8. Gundersen seconded the motion. Olsen, Stalberger, Gundersen and Vetsch voted aye. Councilmember Berning returned to the City Council at 9:27 PM. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL May 20, 1997 Page 3 of 3 Vetsch made a motion to approve a 3.2 Malt Liquor License for the Albertville Jaycees at Albertville City Park on June 13, June 14, and June 15. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Vetsch made a motion to approve the request from the Life in Christ Youth Group to hold a car wash at the Park & Ride site on Saturday, June 14. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Councilmember Berning explained that he is in favor of amending Ordinance #1995-7 detailing when the Council meets and how the agenda is set. He feels that the Council needs to conduct two regular meetings a month as had been done prior to the ordinance adoption. Berning also believes the agenda must be restructured into departments to create a better flow for the meetings. City Attorney Couri suggested the Council try the proposed format for meetings a month or two before the ordinance is amended. This may eliminate more than one ordinance amendment. Berning made a motion to establish two regular Council meetings in June and to have the agenda reformatted, reviewed and revised by the mayor, acting mayor, administrator and clerk. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mayor Olsen recessed the public meeting to convene a closed session to discuss pending litigation over the Shirely Peterson property. The meeting was adjourned at 10:30 PM. Mark Olsen, Mayor Linda Houghton, Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE BILLS TO BE PAID June 3, 1997 Check No. Vendor Reason Amount 10965 Affordable Sanitation Portable Toilets 191.70 10966 AirTouch Cellular F.D. Cell Phone 6.58 10967 Brock White Company Gauge/Freight 151.55 10968 CarQuest Monthly Charges 163.45 10969 Crow River Rental Air Compressor 786.41 10970 Delta Dental Group Insurance 112.65 10971 DJ's Total Home Care Monthly Charges 187.19 10972 Gopher State One Call Locates 26.25 10973 Gruys, Borden Carlson Fire Relief Audit 675.00 10974 Hack's Supplies 8.80 10975 Houghton, Linda Mileage 34.80 10976 Kennedy & Graven TIF's 7 & 8 3,052.65 10977 KDV Audit/Accounting 2,775.00 10978 Larson Publications April Legals 878.35 10979 Mast, MacPhail & Assoc. Court Reporter 984.20 10980 Medica Group Insurance 930.79 10981 Minnegasco Service 36.03 10982 MN Copy Systems Copy Use 178.75 10983 MN Playground, Inc. Park Equipment 274.93 10984 MN Clerks/Finance Officers Membership 60.00 10985 Newman Traffic Signs Signs 125.67 10986 NAC, Inc. Planning Service 6,952.34 10987 Pat's 66 Monthly Charges 3.58 K 10988 Pitney Bowes 10989 Precision Auto 10990 PSG 10991 Radzwill & Couri 10992 Randt Filter Disposal 10993 Randt Oil Company 10994 Schulte's Greenhouse 10995 Sprint 10996 Sprint -United Telephone 10997 Weber Oil Company 10998 Wr. Co. Treasurer Lease 195.64 Pick-up 77.36 June 7 ,782.59 May Legal 10,272.50 Clean Up Day 350.00 Clean Up Day 200.00 City Hall Flowers 63.56 Long Distance 34.78 Monthly Service 333.57 Diesel Fuel 64.14 Assess. Contract 6,610.50 TOTAL $44 , 581.31 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT 97 City of Albertville age. 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For the Period: 04/01/97 to 04/30/97 Original Budget Amended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud Fund: 101 General Fund Revenues 310.100 Current Taxes .00 412,400.00 2,066.92 .00 .00 410,333.08 .5 310.200 Delinquent Taxes .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 310.400 Tax Increments .00 .00 -16,474.90 .00 .00 16,474.90 .0 320.110 liquor Permits .00 81100.00 4,150.00 1,350.00 .00 3,950.00 51.2 320.120 Beer Permits .00 200.00 20.00 .00 .00 180.00 10.0 320.130 Amusements licenses .00 400.00 350.00 .00 .00 50.00 87.5 320.140 Cigarette licenses .00 250.00 250.00 .00 .00 .00 100.0 320.150 Sign Permits .00 3,525.00 3,375.00 .00 .00 150.00 95.7 320.160 OtherBusiness licenses/Periits .00 200.00 5,743.18 135.00 .00 -5,543.18 zzz.z 320.210 Building Permits .00 13,940.00 19,172.72 5,760.65 .00 -5,232.72 137.5 320.220 Animal licenses .00 100.00 20.00 10.00 .00 80.00 20.0 334.010 local Goverment Aid .00 82,672.00 .00 .00 .00 82,672.00 .0 334.020 HACA .00 136,182.00 .00 .00 .00 136,182.00 .0 334.030 local Performance Aid .00 2,384.00 .00 .00 .00 2,384.00 .0 334.050 Police Aid .00 3,000.00 .00 .00 .00 3,000.00 .0 334.060 Fire Aid .00 7,899.00 .00 .00 .00 7,899.00 .0 336.000 Other Gov. Units Grants 6 Aids .00 4,800.00 1,973.50 798.25 .00 2,826.50 41.1 341.070 Special Assessment Searches .00 100.00 210.00 50.00 .00 -110.00 210.0 341.090 Other Charges for Services .00 3,000.00 .00 .00 .00 3,000.00 .0 341.095 Developer Escrows .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 342.020 Fire Protection Services .00 33,994.00 .00 .00 .00 33,994.00 .0 342.030 Park Rental Fees .00 2,000.00 1,150.00 450.00 .00 850.00 57.5 343.000 Storm Serer Fees .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 343.100 Penalites - Storm Pater Bills .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 344.000 Stori Serer Connection Fees .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 350.000 Fines and Forfeits .00 100.00 37.00 .00 .00 63.00 37.0 362.000 Interest Earnings .00 2,200.00 34,477.06 23,783.71 .00 -32,277.06 zzz.t 364.000 Private Contributions/Donation .00 .00 -677.08 -5,576.00 .00 677.08 .0 372.080 Other Revenues .00 1,500.00 1,498.50 171.50 .00 1.50 99.9 391.010 Sales of General Fixed Assets .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 392.030 Transfer -Capital Project Funds .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 392.050 Transfer Out .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 395.000 lease Payment .00 950.00 475.00 475.00 .00 475.00 50.0 ----------------- REVENUE ----------------- .00 ----------------- 719,896.00 ----------------- 57,816.90 ------------ 27,408.11 -------------------- .00 662,079.10 ------ 8.0 ----------------- Revenues ----------------- .00 ----------------- 719,896.00 ----------------- 57,816.90 ----------------- 27,408.11 ----------------- .00 662,079.10 ------ 8.0 ----------------- General Fund ----------------- .00 ----------------- 719,896.00 ----------------- 57,816.90 ----------------- 27,408.11 ----------------- .00 662,079.10 ------ 8.0 Grand Total: .00 719,896.00 57,816.90 27,408.11 .00 662,079.10 8.0 ,t REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 05/28/97 City of Albertville lime: 1:19pmPage: - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 For the Period: 04/01/97 to 04/30/97 Original ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Budget Amended Budget Annual Actual Carr Nth Encumb Annual Unenc. Balance t Bud Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 410.100 General Government - Council 511.000 Wages - Regular Employees .00 11,400.00 3,800.00 11900.00 .00 7,600.00 33.3 522.000 FICA Contributions .00 872.00 302.62 157.24 .00 569.38 34.7 523.000 PERA Contributions .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 526.000 Workers Compensation Insurance .00 185.00 .00 .00 .00 185.00 .0 533.600 Planner: City Projects/Meeting .00 5,000.00 .00 .00 .00 51000.00 .0 533.900 Other Prof. Contract Services .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 552.000 Insurance Other than Emp. Bene .00 4,900.00 .00 .00 .00 4,900.00 .0 555.000 Printing & Publications .00 2,800.00 609.93 144.17 .00 2,190.07 21.8, 558.000 Travel .00 309.00 .00 .00 .00 309.00 .0 561.100 General Supplies .00 100.00 30.62 .00 .00 69.38 30.6 561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys .00 300.00 290.00 .00 .00 10.00 96.7 S91.000 Dues & Subscriptions .00 2,150.00 175.00 .00 .00 1,975.00 8.1 599.000 Miscellaneous ----------------- .00 1,000.00 11000.00 .00 .00 .00 100.0 General Government - Council .00 ---------------------------------- 29,016.00 ----------------- 6,208.17 ----------------- 2,201.41 ----------------- .00 22,807.83 ------ 21.4 Dept: 410.300 Gen. Govt.- City Administrator 511.000 Wages - Regular Employees .00 42,000.00 14,538.42 4,846.14 .00 27,461.58 34.6 521.000 Group Insurance .00 3,780.00 1,701.51 385.36 .00 2,078.49 45.0 522.000 FICA Contributions .00 3,213.00 1,112.13 370.71 .00 2,100.87 34.6 523.000 PERA Contributions .00 1,882.00 651.33 217.11 .00 1,230.67 34.6 526.000 Workers Compensation Insurance .00 231.00 .00 .00 .00 231.00 .0 552.000 Insurance Other than Up. Bene .00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .0 558.000 Travel .00 300.00 .00 .00 .00 300.00 .0 561.100 General Supplies .00 200.00 335.52 .00 .00 -135.52 167.8 561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys .00 300.00 245.00 245.00 .00 55.00 81.7 574.300 Capital Outlay-Furniturmttt: .00 200.00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 .0 591.000 Dues & Subscriptions .DO 300.00 .00 .00 .00 300.00 .0 599.000 Miscellaneous ----------------- .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 Gen. Govt.- City Administrator .00 ---------------------------------- 52,906.00 ----------------- 18,583.91 ----------------- 6,064.32 ----------------- .00 34,322.09 ------ 35.1 Dept: 410.400 Gen. Govt.- City Clerk/Treas. 511.000 Wages - Regular Employees .00 32,240.00 11,576.25 3,720.00 .00 20,663.75 35.9 512.000 Wages - Temporary Emloyees .00 5,600.00 .00 .DO .00 5,600.00 .0 513.000 Wages - Overtime .00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .0 521.000 Group Insurance .00 3,780.00 1,701.50 385.36 .00 2,078.50 45.0 522.000 FICA Contributions .00 2,933.00 885.59 284.58 .00 2,047.41 30.2 523.000 PERA Contributions .00 1,717.00 499.95 166.65 .00 1,217.05 29.1 526.000 Workers Compensation Insurance .00 215.00 .00 .00 .00 215.00 .0 533.400 Auditing Services .00 6,300.00 51000.00 S,000.00 .00 1,300.00 79.4 533.700 Copy Machine Maitenance .00 1,200.00 238.81 102.15 .00 961.19 19.9 533.900 Other Prof. Contract Services .00 750.00 .00 .00 .00 750.00 .0 543.100 Repairs/Maioteance - Equipttt: .00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .0 544.200 Equipment Rental .00 11000.00 259.64 .00 .00 740.36 26.0 552.000 Insurance Other than Emp. Bene .00 3,000.00 .00 .00 .00 3,000.00 .0 558.000 Travel .00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .0 561.100 General Supplies .00 3,300.00 249.36 105.54 .00 3,050.64 7.6 561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys .00 300.00 .00 .00 .00 300.00 .0 561.400 Postage .00 1,200.00 412.20 412.20 .00 787.80 34.4 574.300 Capital Outlay-Furniturett::tt .00 200.00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 .0 591.000 Dues & Subscriptions .00 50.00 .00 .00 .00 50.00 .0 592.000 Elections .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT ' Date: 05/28/97 Tile: 1:19pe City of Albertville Page: 3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 04/01/97 to 04/30/97 Original Budget Aiended Budget Annual Actual Carr Nth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 410.400 Gen. Govt.- City Clerk/Treas. 744.000 Capital Outlay - Officer::utt .DO 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 .0 -------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ----- -------------------- ------ Gen. Govt.- City Clerk/Treas. .00 67,785.00 20,823.30 10,176.48 .00 46,961.70 30.7 Dept: 410.550 Gen. Govt.- Assessing 531.100 Assessing Contract Services .00 5,450.00 .00 .00 .00 5,450.00 .0 ----------------- Gen. Govt.- Assessing ----------------- .00 ----------------- 5,450.00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 5,450.00 ------ .0 Dept: 410.600 Gen. Govt. - City Attorney 533.500 legal Service: General/Meeting .00 29,000.00 5,081.00 1,981.00 .00 23,919.00 17.5 533.501 Developer Reiebursible .00 .00 1,625.00 1,150.00 .00 -1,625.00 .0 533.502 Reiabursible - Capital Project .00 .00 2,264.82 .00 .00 -2,264.82 .0 ----------------- Gen. Govt. - City Attorney ----------------- .00 --- 29,000.00 ----------------------------- 0,970.82 ----------------- 3,131.00 ----------------- .00 ------ 20,029.18 30.9 Dept: 410.700 City Engineer 533.100 Engineer: Projects/Meetings .00 24,000.00 1,551.55 659.42 .00 22,448.45 6.5 533.101 Reiibursible - Developer .00 .00 7,106.71 645.40 .00 -7,106.71 .0 533.102 Reiibursible -Capital Projects .00 .00 1,762.72 .00 .00 -1,762.72 .0 535.100 Contracted Services .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 535.102 delete this account .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 ----------------- City Engineer ----------------- .00 ----------------- 24,000.00 ----------------- 10,420.98 ----------------- 1,304.82 ----------------- .00 ------ 13,579.02 43.4 Dept: 410.800 EcomicOevelopient Authority 511.000 Wages - Regular Eiployees .00 500.00 160.00 80.00 .00 340.00 32.0 522.000 FICA Contributions .00 39.00 12.24 6.12 .00 26.76 31.4 558.000 Travel .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 561.100 General Supplies .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys .00 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 .0 599.000 Miscellaneous .00 1,885.00 .00 .00 .00 1,885.00 .0 ----------------- Econoeic Developient Authority ----------------- .00 ----------------- 2,524.00 ----------------- 172.24 ----------------- 86.12 ----------------- .00 ------ 2,351.76 6.8 Dept: 410.910 Gen. Govt. - Planning 8 Zoning 511.000 Wages - Regular Eiployees .00 1,000.00 460.00 240.00 .00 540.00 46.0 522.000 FICA Contributions .00 77.00 36.72 19.89 .00 40.28 47.7 533.600 Planner: City Projects/Meeting .00 15,000.00 9,194.55 4,173.39 .00 5,805.45 61.3 S33.601 Reiebursible - Developer .00 .00 2,187.86 1,172.35 .00 -2,187.86 .0 533.602 Reiibursible - Capital Project .00 .00 .00 .00 .DO .00 .0 558.000 Travel .00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .0 561.100 General Supplies .00 200.00 47.64 17.02 .00 152.36 23.8 561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys .00 500.00 178.00 .00 .00 322.00 35.6 ----------------- Gen. Govt. - Planning S Zoning ----------------- .00 ----------------- 17,277.00 ----------------- 12,104.77 ----------------- 5,622.65 ----------------- .00 ------ 5,172.23 70.1 Dept: 410.120 Gen. Govt. - Buildings 5 Plant 542.000 Refuse Disposal .00 600.00 180.43 45.61 .00 419.57 30.1 543.100 Repairs/Mainteance - Equipm: .00 500.00 318.90 .00 .00 181.10 63.8 543.200 Repairs/Mainteance'- Building .00 12,000.00 .00 .00 .00 12,000.00 .0 552.000 Insurance Other than Emp. Bene .00 3,500.00 .00 .00 .00 3,500.00 .0 553.000 Telephone .00 2,500.00 867.18 266.71 .00 1,632.82 34.7 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 05/28/97 City of Albertville like: 1:19PIPage: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4 For the Period: 04/01/97 to 04/30/97 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Original Budget Amended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 410.920 Gen. Govt. - Buildings & Plant 561.100 General Supplies .00 800.00 194.31 68.35 .00 605.69 24.3 562.100 Natural Gas .00 2,000.00 563.36 88.32 .00 1,436.64 28.2 562.200 Electricity .00 2,500.00 738.93 155.88 .00 1,761.07 29.6 572.000 Capital Outlay - Buildingszu: .00 2,500.00 432.39 .00 .00 2,067.61 17.3 573.000 Capital Outlay/Non-buildingszz .00 .00 .00 .DO .00 .00 .0 574.100 Capital Outlay-Mach/Equipzuz: .00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .0 574.300 Capital Outlay-Furniturezz:z:z .00 200.00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 .0 599.000 Miscellaneous .00 41.00 .00 .00 .00 41.00 .0 Gen. Govt. - Buildings & Plant Dept: 421.000 Public Safety - Police 531.200 Police Contract Services Public Safety - Police .00 27,641.00 3,295.50 624.87 .00 24,345.50 11.9 .00 62,963.00 26,006.27 5,246.88 .00 36,956.73 41.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ .00 62,963.00 26,006.27 5,246.88 .00 36,956.73 41.3 Dept: 422.000 Public Safety - Fire 510.200 Wages - Fire Chief .00 600.00 .00 .00 .00 600.00 .0 510.300 Wages - Assistant Fire Chief .00 300.00 .00 .00 .00 300.00 .0 510.400 Firemen's Training Reimburseit .00 8,250.00 52.50 52.50 .00 8,197.50 .6 510.500 Firemen's Medical Training .00 2,250.00 .00 .00 .00 2,250.00 .0 512.000 Wages - Temporary Eiloyees .00 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 .0 524.000 Pension Fund Contributions .00 12,171.00 4,500.00 .00 .00 7,671.00 37.0 526.000 Workers Compensation Insurance .00 2,850.00 .00 .00 .00 2,850.00 .0 529.001 Firemen Physicalsz:zuz::z:z:: .00 500.00 965.31 965.31 .00 -465.31 193.1 529.100 Training/Instruction .00 3,600.00 .00 .00 .00 3,600.00 .0 529.200 ENT Trainingzus::szzzzz::z::: .00 750.00 565.35 285.00 .00 184.65 75.4 529.300 First Responders Trainingz::z: .00 1,000.00 225.00 225.00 .00 775.00 22.5 533.410 Audit - Firemen's Relief Assoc .00 1,200.00 .00 .00 .00 1,200.00 .0 543.100 Repairs/Mainteance - Equip:::: .00 1,000.00 377.30 .00 .00 622.70 37.7 552,000 Insurance Other than Esp. 8ene .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 553.000 Telephone .00 900.00 154.17 50.65 .00 745.83 17.1 558.000 Travel .00 1,500.00 603.20 226.20 .00 896.80 40.2 561.100 General Supplies .00 2,500.00 483.32 162.49 .00 2,016.68 19.3 562.100 Natural Gas .00 1,400.00 1,033.07 193.65 .00 366.93 73.8 562.200 Electricity .00 900.00 286.86 57.35 .00 613.14 31.9 562.600 Gasoline and Oil .00 800.00 138.04 19.47 .00 661.96 17.3 572.000 Capital Outlay - Buildings:::: .00 25,000.00 .00 .00 .00 25,000.00 .0 574.110 C/O - Nosezzzz::z:zz:::::::::: .00 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 .0 574.120 C/O - Turnout Gear:zzzz:::::z: .00 2,500.00 .00 .DO .00 2,500.00 .0 574.130 C/O - Air Packs:z:z::::u:::z: .00 2,600.00 .00 .00 .00 2,600.00 .0 574.140 C/O - Pagersz:z:zz::::z::::::z .00 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 .0 574.160 C/O Toolszz:s:zz:zz:zzzzzz:: .00 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 .0 574.200 Capital Outlay - Vehicleszzzzz .00 30,000.00 .00 .00 .00 30,000.00 .0 591.000 Dues & Subscriptions .00 200.00 94.50 .00 .00 105.50 47.3 599.000 Miscellaneous .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 ----------------- Public Safety - Fire ----------------- .00 ----------------- 107,271.00 ----------------- 9,478.62 ----------------- 2,237.62 ----------------- .00 ------ 97,792.38 8.8 Dept: 424.000 Public Safety -Bldg. Inspection 533.200 Bldg. Inspection Contract Sery .00 .00 .00 .00 .DO .00 .0 535.100 Contracted Services .00 .00 9,446.67 .00 .00 -9,446.67 .0 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT I.. `x Date: 05/28/97 Tile: 1:19PI City of Albertville Page: 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 04/01/97 to 04/30/97 Original Budget Amended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encueb Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 424.000 Public Safety -Bldg. Inspection ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Public Safety -Bldg. Inspection .00 .00 9,446.67 .00 .00-9,446.67 .0 Dept: 427.000 Public Safety - Animal Control 535.100 Contracted Services ----------------- .00 1,750.00 1,152.00 108.00 .00 598.00 65.8 Public Safety - Animal Control ----------------- .00 ----------------- 1,750.00 ----------------- 1,152.00 ----------------- 108.00 ----------------- .00 598.00 ------ 65.8 Dept: 431.000 Public Yorks-Highways,Streets 511.000 Wages - Regular Employees .00 31,055.00 14,829.26 4,278.78 .00 16,225.74 47.8 512.000 gages - Temporary Etloyees .00 8,320.00 .00 .00 .00 8,320.00 .0 513.000 Wages - Overtime .00 500.00 1,175.75 145.57 .00 -675.75 235.2 521.000 Group Insurance .00 3,780.00 1,701.54 385.37 .00 2,078.46 45.0 522.000 FICA Contributions .00 3,050.00 1,134.44 327.33 .00 1,915.56 37.2 523.000 PERA Contributions .00 1,787.00 534.26 167.05 .00 1,252.74 29.9 526.000 Yorkers Compensation Insurance .00 2,471.00 .00 .DO .00 2,471.00 .0 529.000 Other Employee Benefits .00 9,100.00 .00 .00 .00 9,100.00 .0 533.900 Other Prof. Contract Services .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 543.100 Repairs/Maintennce - Equip:::: .00 7,000.00 1,363.00 16.25 .00 5,637.00 19.5 543.300 Repairs/Maintenace-Paved Roads .00 6,000.00 .00 .00 .00 6,000.00 .0 543.310 Ice Removal .00 3,000.00 1,964.72 812.03 .00 1,035.28 65.5 543.320 Snow Plowing .00 5,750.00 3,672.88 1,128.75 .00 2,077.12 63.9 543.330 Sand & Gravel .00 500.00 458.65 458.65 .00 41.35 91.7 543.340 Seal Coating:::::::::::::::::: .00 8,000.00 .00 .00 .00 8,000.00 .0 543.360 Street Sweeping .00 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 .0 543.400 Repairs/Maintenace-Unpaved Rds .00 6,000.00 .00 .00 .00 6,000.00 .0 553.000 Telephone .00 600.00 318.60 53.56 .00 281.40 53.1 558.000 Travel .00 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 .0 561.100 General Supplies .00 1,500.00 759.99 284.39 .00 740.01 50.7 561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 562.100 Natural Gas .00 575.00 344.35 64.55 .00 230.65 59.9 562.200 Electricity .00 300.00 95.63 19.12 .00 204.37 31.9 562.600 Gasoline and Oil .00 1,500.00 1,235.16 160.66 .00 264.84 82.3 572.000 Capital Outlay - Buildings:::: .00 7,500.00 .00 .00 .00 7,500.00 .0 574,111 Tractor/loader:::::::::::::::: .00 2,000.00 .00 .00 .00 2,000.00 .0 574.170 Street Overlayient:::::::::::: .00 50,000.00 .00 .00 .00 50,000.00 .0 574.180 Street Signs::::::::::::u:::: .00 300.00 .00 .00 .00 300.00 .0 574.211 Mower::::::::::::::::::::::::: .00 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 .0 574.311 PickUp:::::::::::::::::::::::: .00 3,000.00 .00 .DO .00 3,000.00 .0 574.411 Snow Plow::::::::::::::::::::: .00 4,000.00 .00 .DO .00 4,000.00 .0 574.511 Misc. C/O Equipaent::::::::::: .00 2,500.00 686.51 686.51 .00 1,813.49 27.5 591.000 Dues & Subscriptions .00 250.00 215.00 .00 .00 35.00 86.0 ----------------- Public Works-Highways,Streets ----------------- .00 ----------------- 173,938.00 ----------------- 30,489.74 ----------------- 8,988.57 ----------------- .00 ------ 143,448.26 17.5 Dept: 431.600 Public Works - Street lighting 562.ZOO Electricity .00 27,000.00 8,706.87 2,182.51 .00 18,293.13 32.2 ----------------- Public Works - Street lighting ----------------- .00 ----------------- 27,000.00 ----------------- 8,706.87 ----------------- 2,182.51 ----------------- .00 ------ 18,293.13 32.2 Dept: 432.300 Public Works - Recycling 535.100 Contracted Services .00 12,345.00 4,063.98 1,028.50 .00 8,281.02 32.9 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 05/28/97 City of Albertville 1iie: 1:19piPage: 6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 04/01/97 to 04/30/97 Original Budget Aiended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 432.300 Public Yorks - Recycling ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Public Works - Recycling .00 12,345.00 4,063.98 1,028.50 .00 8,281.02 32.9 Dept: 451.000 Parks and Recreation 511.000 Wages - Regular Eoployees 521.000 Group Insurance 522.000 FICA Contributions 523.000 PERA Contributions 526.000 Workers Coepensation Insurance 542.000 Refuse Disposal 543.100 Repairs/Mainteance - Equipnu 544.200 Equipient Rental 552.000 Insurance Other than Emp. Bene 553.000 Telephone 561.100 General Supplies 562.100 Natural Gas 562.200 Electricity 562.600 Gasoline and Oil 572.000 Capital Outlay - Buildingsim 573.000 Capital Outlay/Non-buildingsss 574.100 Capital Outlay-Nach/Equip====i 599.000 Miscellaneous Parks and Recreation Dept: 455.000 Culture/Recreation 591.000 Dues 6 Subscriptions 595.000 Friendly City Days Donation Culture/Recreation .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 .00 600.00 180.40 45.61 .00 419.60 30.1 .00 1,500.00 2,932.16 2,768.48 .00 -1,432.16 195.5 .00 2,500.00 239.08 .00 .00 2,260.92 9.6 .00 3,300.00 .00 .00 .00 3,300.00 .0 .00 700.00 132.47 24.55 .00 567.53 18.9 .00 800.00 235.03 91.26 .00 564.97 29.4 .00 1,200.00 582.07 69.22 .00 617.93 48.5 .00 2,800.00 977.37 285.39 .00 1,822.63 34.9 .00 100.00 6.75 .00 .00 93.25 6.8 .00 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 .0 .00 2,000.00 2,218.43 .00 .00 -218.43 110.9 .00 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 11000.00 .0 .00 ---------------------------------- 3,800.00 340.00 ----------------- 340.00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- 3,460.00 8.9 ------ .00 ----------------- 21,300.00 7,843.76 3,624.51 .00 13,456.24 36.8 .00 750.00 .00 .00 .00 750.00 .0 .00 ---------------------------------- 2,600.00 ----------------- 2,200.00 ----------------- 2,200.00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- 400.00 84.6 ------ .00 3,350.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 .00 1,150.00 65.7 Dept: 490.000 Working Capital 590.000 Working Capital Reserve .00 54,380.00 .00 .00 .00 ----------------- 54,380.00 .0 ------ ----------------- Working Capital ----------------- .00 ----------------- 54,380.00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 .00 54,380.00 .0 Dept: 493.100 Operating Transfer Out-Genfund 545.000 Construction Services .00 .00 .00 .DO .00 .00 .0 ----------------- Operating Transfer Out-GenFund ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 .00 ------ .0 Dept: 499.000 Reserve 500.000 Reserved for Working Capital .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 ------ ----------------- Reserve ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 .00 .0 ----------------- Expenditures ----------------- .00 ----------------- 719,896.00 ----------------- 179,567.60 ----------------- 54,828.26 ----------------- .00 539,928.40 ------ 25.0 ----------------- General Fund ----------------- .00 ----------------- 719,896.00 ----------------- 179,967.60 ----------------- 54,828.26 ----------------- .00 539,928.40 ------ 25.0 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 05/28/97 Tite: 1:19Pi City of Albertville Page: 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- for the Period: 04/01/97 to 04/30/97 Original Budget hended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Grand Total: .00 719,896.00 179,967.60 54,828.26 .00 539,928.40 25.0 SA CITY OF TVIT,T FINANCIAL S a I III r lea= 1 - Mar 27, 1997 Beginning Cash Balance May 1, 1997 $ 65,329.18 INCOME (May 1 - May 27) 3.2 Licenses 40.00 Building Permits 24,790.47 Dog License 10.00 Donations 2,100.00 HACA 41,569.50 Interest - April 141.73 LGA 69,070.50 Loan Payment - Fraser 689.06 Park Rent 150.00 P & Z Fees 3,100.00 Sewer/Storm Water 33,357.07 Title Search 50.00 Miscellaneous 26.70 TOTAL INCOME 175,095.03 EXPENSES (March 25 - Apr. 30) Check Vs 10856 & Check Vs 10900-10950 (Approved 5/6/97) 55,578.12 Preapproved Checks 21,710.90 (List Attached) TOTAL EXPENSES 77,289.02 Ending Cash Balance May 27, 1997 $163,135.19 CD #9226 - Alb. Development Corp. matures 6/2/97 CD #300116 - AFD - matures 6/27/97 @ 4.2% CD #22202 - matures 4/07/98 @ 6.12% Dain Bosworth Investments (3/31/97) TOTAL INVESTMENTS Money Markey Savings Acct. (4/30/97) 7,368.16 24,113.92 554,777.10 1,316,190.63 $1,902,449.81 $303,158.45 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE PREAiMORIZED CHECKS ISSUED May 1 - May 28, 1997 Check No. Vendor Reason Amount Payroll Ending 05/09/97 Ck. #1866-1874 4,406.87 10951 AirTouch Cellular FD/PW Cell Phones 12.60 109521 AT&T Long Distance 5.49 10953 EDP of Wright Co. Membership 500.00 10954 First Trust Sewer/Water Rev. Bond 3,463.75 10955 Monticello Animal Con. April 90.00 10956 NSP Service 2,586.29 10957 Norwest 90 GO Imp. Bond 87.50 10958 Norwest, 90 TIF Bond 87.50 10959 Norwest 90 GO Imp Bond 5,708.75 10960 PERA Life Insurance Payroll Deduction 12.00 10961 PERA 4/26 - 5/9 362.86 10962 Pitney Bowes Service Contract 90.00 10963 USCM Midwest Payroll Deduction 92.00 10964 Wright Recylcing April 1,028.50 Payroll Ending 05/23/97 Cks #1875-1879 3,176.79 TOTAL $ 21,710.90 SSG ALBERTVILLE WASTEWATER TREATNvIENT FACILITY April 1997 MONTBLY OPERATIONS REPORT 15dr r r 14"01 wf off;; fin i subn ed KeMj Browning Date: May 16, 1997 Professional Services Group 3320 Lander Avenue, NE St. Michael, Minnesota 55376 (612) 497-8309 Fax: (612) 497-8312 ALBERTVILLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY Monthly Operations Report April 1997 Executive Summa Albertville met all of its NPDES permit requirements for the month of April. Average Biochemical Oxygen Demand in the effluent was 4.9 mg/I and the average Total Suspended Solids concentration was 11.2 mgA. Total Phosphorous averaged 0.53 mg/i. Flows averaged 0.162 million gallons per day. Operations Ice broke up on all three ponds in April. This resulted in algae blooms and higher Dissolved Oxygen levels. The phosphorous levels in all three ponds continue to drop, due to decreased viscosity of the water at warmer temperatures. Ferric was decreased accordingly, and alum addition was then resumed with no problem. Phosphorous levels are normal. The larger mixer is still being used. This should provide more cost effective use of all chemicals. The previous mixer had very little mixing capability. First sampling of the season was done on the lake and streams. Dock was damaged by ice during the winter and will need repair. in the meantime, operators wade out to open water to launch boat and proceed around lake. Maintenance • Oil was changed on the floc motor in clarifier. • Monthly generator exercising was performed and work order completed. • Small mixing chamber mixer seized up and was removed from service. • Granite electronics made some adjustments to the dialer / alarm system due to some interference's causing false alarms. • #13 Aerator failed. It was replaced with the spare. The repair to the failed aerator will cost approximately $1800. • Alum metering pump and lines were prepared and set up for return to alum addition. • Performed spring maintenance on unit heaters. • Metering pump for alum was repaired twice. • UV channel and bulbs were cleaned. • UV cleaning rack was removed from basement and placed by UV channel and covered. Salt PSG Regional Safety Manager, Sherry Tompkins, performed SCBA training, emergency response training, and chemical awareness training. Reaulatory Communications NPDES Discharge Monitoring Report Client / Public Relations Thanks very much to John Vetsch for alerting PSG staff to a false alarm problem at the plant one evening. Regular communications have been maintained between PSG and Gary Hale. PSG would also like to plan an open house at the wastewater facility soon to provide an opportunity for Councilmembers and Mayor Olsen to tour the facility and learn a little more about operations and possible future needs. Details will be provided as soon as a date can be arranged. Financial report reflects all activity in the budget year. The financial data does not reflect April bills paid in May. Appendices NPDES Discharge Monitoring Report DMR Addendum's Loadings Summary Client Status Report Phosphorous Study Update 1 r ALD!'R? UE WWfF LOADING3 Controat V4k M 6 Thgp M: Conbvd Vduos 6 Trigpors: ^W 0.1500 MGO AAW 307 0 187 Hgt- 0.1090 MGO Hgl} 308 0 224 ! Low. 0.1284 MOO Low- 248 * 150 0 Design: 0.3150 MGO 368 1 308 s FLOW 12 = % of TSS 12 mo % of Cf3OO % of MOD Avg. Design m9A Lbs. Aw9. Design m9A Lbs. Avg. Oesi9n ....... ... ..... ............ ......... .... ........ .... ..... ........ ......... .«................. .... ... ........... ......... ........ ..... ....... .... 1995 Jon 0.151 384 483 240 302 Feb 0.143 285 339 184 219 Mar 0.164 288 394 191 281 Apr 0.177 99 145 92 136 May 0.172 274 392 148 212 Jun 0.163 232 315 133 181 Jut 0.152 222 281 154 195 Aug 0.174 286 418 130 197 Sop 0.185 234 322 100 138 Oct 0.181 294 395 122 164 Nov 0.183 78 106 68 92 Doc 0.156 405 527 234 304 1998 Jon 0.161 0.1626 51.61% 250 3W 331 89.93% 175 235 195 52.87% Feb 0.158 0.1838 52.01% 433 571 350 95.16% 170 235 195 53.21% Mar 0.179 0.1851 52.41% 312 488 350 06.79% 221 330 202 54.78% Apr 0.188 OAM 52.70% 336 527 389 IM.43% 131 205 207 58.30% May 0.198 0.1602 53.3996 388 841 409 M AO% 169 279 213 57.07% Jun 0.203 0.1715 54.44% 354 509 432 117.48% 151 250 219 50.57% JW 0.161 0.1723 5COM 248 333 437 118.85% 129 173 217 59.07% Aug 0.141 0.1695 53.81% 558 W6 456 124.04% 179 210 218 69.37% Sep 0.141 0.1675 53A7% 625 735 491 133.40% 145 171 221 W.11% Oct 0.183 0.1877 53.23% 274 3T2 489 132.89% 144 198 224 60.83% Nov 0.25 0.1749 55.53% 244 509 523 142.01% 141 294 241 65.40% Doc 0.171 OA762 56.93% 309 441 $15 140.06% 323 461 254 68.94% 1997 Jan 0.179 0.1777 56.40% 432 645 541 147.00% 180 269 258 69.70% Feb 0.183 0.1798 57.06% 225 343 522 141.92% 148 228 250 89.50% Mar OA98 0.1813 57.57% 309 510 526 142.92% 178 291 252 68.61% Apr 0.162 OAM 56.88% 238 322 509 138.27% 429 174 250 87.91% n 6co 5975 Main Avenue N.E. P.O. Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301 (612) 497-3384 Fax: (612) 497-3210 A"LICATION FOR NOW- INOXICATING HRLT LIQUOR LItCEMSE The undersigned certifies that it complies with Minnesota Statutes, Section 340.001, Subdivision 7, in that it qualifies as a "Bona Fide Club" within that section, and that this appli- cation makes petition for a limited license as a "Bona Fide Club" for a limited, non -intoxicating malt liquor license. A license fee of $10.00 per day is required to accompany this application. 1. Name of Applicant: st. MD C13 0�ur C\r\ 2. Name and Address of President and Secretary of Applicant: 3. Purpose for which funds derived will be used: 4. Date of activity: a 5. Premises from which non -intoxicating malt liquor will be dispensed on said date: 6. Hours of operation: \ \ : Dp 7. Number of previous license obtained this calendar year: 8. Name, address, telephone number and position held with Club of person signing this application: Date: 023 Signature Rf Applicant(s) 1 MAY 23 ' 97 09 a 57 P.2 THE CATHOLIC MUTUAL RELIEF SOCIETY 4223 CENTER ST, OMAHAj NE 68105 CERTIFICATE OF COVERAGE ------------------- �__M--- -r----W W--r.+.r--r ­---------- ----- ------------ This is to certify that.the following coverage is in force issued in the name of ARCHDIOCESE OF ST PAUL-MINNEAPOLIS CHANCERY OFFICE 226 SUMMIT AVENUE ST PAUL, MN $5102 Certificate Number: 8589 Term: 7/01/97 -' 7/01/98 Covered Premises: Location/Property ST ALBERT CHURCH, P 0 BOX 127, ALBERTVILLE, MN 55301-0127 Real Property Personal Property Deductible General Liability 500,000 (Combined single limit) Coinsurance Medical Payments (Each person -excluding school students) Excess Liability 500,000 COMMENTS: COVERAGE EXTENDS TO ST. ALBERTS CHURCH FESTIVAL TO BE HELD ON PARISH GROUNDS ON JULY 20, 1997. LIQUOR LIABILITY INCLUDED. In the event of cancellation of this coverage the Society will mail notice thereof to: CHANCERY OFFICE ST PAUL, MN Should any of the above described coverages be cancelled before the expiration dates thereof, the carrier will endeavor to mail 30 days written notice to the certificate holder, but failure to mail such notice will impose no obligation nor liability upon the Society. Dated at OMARA, NEBRASKA This 23RD Day of MAY BY F, 0 =,W10' - i 1997 I., MHY 23 '97 09:57 P.1 Catholic Mutual Group 4223 Center Street Omaha, Nebraska 68105.2498 (402) 661-8765 1800) 228-6108 Facsimile (402) 561-2943 TELECOMMUNICATION COVER PAGE Please deliver the following page(s) to: 612/497-3880 Name: Francis Beaudry 444 Total number of pages (including cover page): 3 Date: May 23, 1997 From: Vicki Masilko -Member Services X-318 Message: Per request from our St. Paul Office, here is certificate for your Church Festival on July 20, 1997. tf you need anything further, contact Ann in St. Paul directly at 612/290- 1605. Thank you. If you don't receive all the pages, please call back as soon as possible to (809) 228.6108. FAX Number. (402) 551-2943, RICOH FAX 60 The information In this facsimbe transmission belongs to Catholic Mutual Group and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. it may contain attorney work product or privileged or confidential information exempt from disclosure, under applicable law. You are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, use of, or reliance on the contents _..u�._.._L��_.-.,e...i..ea_aL.s.. L.-.......:1.: ♦r..wn.w.n�.:�n i.. n..,.. • 1 1 a 9 5975 Maia Albertvii,c, Mull -T-TUA APPLICATICK FOR NON —INTOXICATING DIAL? LIQUOR LI432M (612) 497-3384 Fax: (612) 497-3210 The undersigned certifies that it complies with Minnesota Statutes, Section 340.001, Subdivision 7, in that it qualifies as a "Bona Fide Club" within that section, and that this appli- cation makes petition for a limited license as a "Bona Fide Club" for a limited, non -intoxicating malt liquor license. A license fee of $10.00 per day is required to accompany this application. 1. Name of Applicant: 2. Name and Address of President and Secretary of Applicant: �ppU�✓i/�n �`-i4,- �/t C,/g7r 2iSr% `S/ ✓%�lrGhn�G N S�i'7G �d6 //i�itr C/gJy03r /- _&, //� , -),7 Al Xr 30l 3. Purpose for which ..funds der/dived will be used: 4. Date of activity: 0 � /q 5. Premises from which non -intoxicating malt liquor will be dispensed on said date: -S/ 1�lhPr t A,r, (A (e,l,,— 6 . Hours of operation: -7 ' ooPM . _ /Z-100 4-,y, 7. Number of previous license obtained this calendar year: 8. Name, address, telephone number and position held with Club of person signing this application: Date: -:0 uv9,% Si at re of Applicant(s) z 5h PRECOCIOUS PYROTECHNICS, INC. 4420-278th. Ave. N. W. Belgrade, MN 56312-9616 (320)346-2201 or Fax (320)346-2403 An Agreement Entered this day of , 1997, by and between Precocious Pyrotechnics, Inc., a Minnesota corporation with its principal place of business at 4420-278th Avenue N.W., Belgrade, Minnesota 56312-9616, herein referred to as Precocious Pyrotechnics, Ed Hackenmueller OF City of Albertville hereinafter referred to as Sponsor. Whereas the parties have entered into an oral agreement relating to the display of fireworks which they desire to have set forth in writing. Now therefore, the parties agree as follows: 1. That Precocious Pyrotechnics intends to enter into a display of fireworks with appropriately authorized individuals. 2. Sponsor agrees to pay a display price of $ 000.00 for the display agreed upon which will be exhibited by Precocious Pyrotechnics on Friday, June 13 19 97 . The approximate time for the display is 10 : 3 0 P.M. Full payment is due within ten (10) days of display date. 3. Sponsor agrees to furnish police and crowd security persons, insuring adequate patrol of the danger zone as roped and secured by its agents until Precocious Pyrotechnics advises that the security is no longer necessary. r 4. Precocious Pyrotechnics reserves the right to terminate the display in the event that persons entered the secured danger zone and security is unable or unwilling to enforce the safety regulations. 5. Sponsor will immediately make application to the local municipality or other issuing authority for the purpose of securing a permit, if required. 6. Precocious Pyrotechnics will clean up the area the best that they can after the display, but full and final clean up is the responsibility of the Sponsor. 7. In the event of inclement weather, the display will be rescheduled to a mutually agreed date, and Sponsor will secure extension of the permit from the local municipality. Postponement fees are ten percent (10%) of the contract price. 8. Fee for cancellation of display is twenty-five percent (25%) of the contract price, should the Sponsor elect not to select another display date. 9. Precocious Pyrotechnics, upon acceptance of this proposal in writing, agrees to fulfill the contract in a workmanlike manner and further to provide` proof of liability insurance coverage in the amount of three hundred thousand dollars (S300,000.00). In the event of a claim, the deductible will be payable by the Sponsor. 10. Precocious Pyrotechnics reserves the right to substitute shells of equal or greater value in the event substitution is necessary. ACCEPTED this 7 day of , 19 � on behalf of Precocious Pyrotechnics, Inc on behalf of Sponsor MLL11111 SMLIALir INSURANCE, INC* 10451 GULF BOULEVARD, TREASURE ISLAND FL* 33706 ToLl. Free 1-800-237-3355 Nat Iona L 1-800-282-6776 Florida Certificate Number: 16011111 CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE FIREWORKS DISPLAY NAME & ADDRESS OF INSURED; rAVV IT IGNALO INSURED: Precocious Pyrotechnics. Inc. A 0, 3c"i ­­ " R. R. tlp Box 117A OF: A -rAcalllz BeLgradet MN 56312 COMPANY; T.H.E. InsuranceFri bAy S L-11M Company ;? ?OLICY NVot 6LG92999 i_IA81L-TTY LIMIT AI/Po OCE: AGO: I a Cox Mass B Pr oduc ts: POLICY PER IOY�; From; 06/13/96 To: 06/13/97 In the event of any matey is L change i n, or !the Company wILL endeavor to give writ -ten nertificate Is issued, but failure to give LlabILIty or ObLigation upon the company. (-c;e 4o Saw r;rr,F Xcess of 00/00/00 00/00/00 00/00/00 00/00/00 * - COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT cancel Lation of said PoLIcy( ies) notice to the party whom this such notice shaLl, impose no DATE OF DISPLAY** ,RA IN-:- DATET T-f art DISPLAY AMOUNT111 -El 26 c--- : I I s a c o n d I t I on of T h e p 0 1. 1 Cy' 1 n a ! a 1 ; 0 1 sp L a ys be reported t o the Company a t _east 24 hours In advance of the d i sp Lay date, rhIs certificate neither affirmativeLy Dot negativeLy amends extends or atteri;� the coverage afforded by the po Licy( ies) describod hereon, N6TE; In the event that rain or IncLement weather prohibits this diwptayt coverage wILL apply on nubsesuent date on which the dispLay is held, w i t h i n the terms of the P o L icy a on trac t. Cleanup and policing of the di play P-e the responsiblLity of the no nsor s, the folLowing are additional insureds: Any fair or exhibition, association, sponsor I ng organization or committee, the owner or Lessee of any premises use:_1 oy the Named Insured, or any public authority granting a permit to the Named znsured, but only as respects accidents arising out of the negligence of th-,? Aamed Insured or the Named insured'ampLoynes acting in the course and scopr..-! 4 their employment, ALso, as additional Named insured, any Independent contractor who fires the dlGptay on behalf of the Named Insured# nhis insurance does not appLy to any faiLure to police or cleanup the AISPLaY, or LlabiLity arising there from. :overage under the policy is conditionad upon fuLL compLiance by aLL insured,.s jIth aLt appLicabLe Nat ionat Fire PrOteLtion Association (NFPA) codes and standards in effect at the time of the disptay, rhis certificate is not valid unless an original signature appears be Low. :Copies Not VaLido) 7 A 16-8 HE it ALUED SPECIALPY INSURANCE, !NC. e 5975 Main Avenues L,.r,. P.O. Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301 (612) 497-3384 Fax: (612) 4974210 APPLICI,TIOR FOR NON-INTOXICRTING PffiLT LIQUOR LICENSE The undersigned certifies that it complies with Minnesota Statutes, Section 340.001, Subdivision 7, in that it qualifies as a "Bona Fide Club" within that section, and that this appli- cation makes petition for a limited license as a "Bona Fide Club" for a limited, non -intoxication male liquor license. A license fee of $10,00 per day is required to accompany this application. 1. Name of Applicant: 2. Name and Address of President and Secretary of Applicant: 3. Purpose for which funds derived will be used: 1q,46C_-;V7-c.//e e_E Co?!yn1llax"r Tz"/ l%iJ��'i--5- 4. Date of activity: /-3 - /Z/- /Sf ig 9 5. Premises from whic)Vnon-intoxicating malt liquor will be dispensed on said date: ll (Gu%`�l�L v,�lju✓ �� 6. Hours of operation: ��'69CI912) 7. Number of previous license obtained this calendar year: 8. Name, address, telephone number and position held with Club of person signing this application: �z,12 y �� r/^/ Date: ��" � Signature of Ap ants) OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. BOX 218 - ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA 5530' TT (612) 497-3000 • 800-221-4144 "Outdoor advertising SELLS for you all day, every day." May 27, 1997 Mr. Gary Hale City of Albertville 5795 Main Ave. Albertville, MN -55301 RE: Purchase of excess city property Dear Mr. Hale: I wish to purchase the property the city owns adjacent to our place of business in Albertville. I understand this needs the City Counsel's approval. I am submitting a Certificate of Survey along with this letter. This property is a part of the old 152 road bed which was left over after the construction of I-94. The County Assessor, Mr. Gregory Kramber, estimated the county would be able to receive $407 per year in taxes if this was sold. I would suggest a selling price of $500.00 for the parcel. I also would like to purchase a tax forfeit parcel the city owns. I am enclosing a map for your convenience. The parcel number is 011100. This also would generate additional tax revenue for the county and City of Albertville if sold. The entire parcel is wetlands. I would suggest a selling price of $500.00. Please let me know what my next step in this process. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. Sincerely, a o'f Keith Franklin KAF/jmj enclosure: N / ` ST.� a,,, o �rj r, w 0 01 J � O oV', O ST. ry° m h ///•» / 'kilo 0o iee /ems 'r" •; ^LR7S ly t { SL)C` ,�- 3r� �'! / - ,. Lit • `+ CANNONS cIRCLE y N CA / p o O • / / /. _ o • p t, *ems / a zss. s3 • I M • CITY OF ALBERTVILLE D rA `',, 0 4 4-0 co .0 L L_J to '0 4.) • • • -i 0 - N G W 1 (a a M v (a >+ to r-( C N •r( 0 4) N O .k4 U O O .0 l0 cf) .a (a �", a) >>'d 3 4-4 4-4 -H C 0 'Z+ C .0 4J Sr -H M 4.) of . . •• 3 ::3 N N O -H O C N S4 Cr -H 4-) t)) RS W 0 S.. C O 0) U �', $-+ > oc � O .0 0 4J H S.. C a. W Z C 0 0 (n U) O> W •, � +) f~ •ri m r-( .N >% C fu H 0 r( G ,.� M Cl •-) j, O (a U d> >� Q U CU r•I N r-I b � cd to 0 Cd �U �tiC � U °ObM)QX-)UA0M 4.0tV0IS)i .r•NCS O O O •C (D N •r-P W 'Cr-i U) t7l o V) e'% O - �• r1 N ro r-( C S. (0 4-)(a S.r 4-) 4 O �+ .) 4-.)O � 0 � -u m 3�rn WH o-i c-P 3 Nro �'+' a�+' a) as, S4 4.) >, o U o to 0 LO i•+ m•Cr(y,>>�' .0 u M O N (4-4 N t)) r-1 4) U) ri 4) W '0 .) cd cd 4.) C .N 0 Ucn 0 t7) r 4) W 0 tJW C � 4--) E CY N r♦ (a •r( 0 0 O �C Or a ' 0 0. 3 .) �W C N -H of.0O o Na0 -u os4 r� (a -r(rt s. taro>� > uz0s, p� a�i '° ai 'o o >, 'a O f�..O N •�( a' � ¢, a) a) ° CO - ap N C S. 4J N •ri O >, 0% '-)>z0W --) N Q C 10 > N OS O f> % W H O O OA U W E wr O ].4-1 J O 4) Ua) o E C M O Sr •4-) N0)y : 4 0 O to N `t O 11 O > cdN1 0 b1 4 U .0 O OW W0 �O�°,jVia'° �EC S> o, %J a0,Dr, O�r � >• 3 4-4 a ice. W Ul O) >, C. O . .0 U) 0) N 0 UN 4-) 0 3 cd O cd -r( cd m *�•1 to - f+ 0 i. r( ,C > r 4 a p w x H A •r 0� N N O (a C U C M y U) N rt Q '0 U) r (a ro r" -)) O r-1 M 44 2 s~ U) >+ r� 0) .N O •r ( N •C 0 r+ ro y-402: b4 0 0 P Q•�'0 U U4��� N a r. u� o a�i 3 Mo tn° -(' r-i10 CD off w (a 3 Q' U (a � •ri S~ U - -H N C 4) 4) U) U) i0. 'O .Co (ar-Iu)0s40U44kDMWroova)•r•(•r-+ . E+ E-r (a •0 U M U A Z (a 0 0 U) 3 -u W W '0 rO r I r-4 i _ Al n Q to, t �N (n 4� M 'CrQ'�5 d IL lz J ?SNP e v 3� � d oo r ---^• • n) �.JvV ICfi•6Z2?,l22g -tom 'b NZ, �0 � - /eye J $ten. •� (��� p . � o � z w w w 2 w D 0 Z N 2 O 2 w Z J O Q ct: v N V w O = F a 0 a z cr w O o 0 to 0 PLANING & ZONING COMMISSION May 13, 1997 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Chair Donatus Vetsch, Commissioners Carolyn Bauer, Howard Larson, and Dan Robertus, Zoning Administrator Garrison Hale and City Planner Liz Stockman Chair Vetsch convened the regular meeting at 7:00 PM. Moved by Larson, supported by Robertus, to adopt the agenda as presented. All voted aye. Moved by Larson, supported by Robertus, to approve the minutes of the regular April 8, 1997 meeting, and the special meeting of April 29, 1997. All voted aye. Larson wants a list of completion, i.e. a follow-up sheet. The Planning & Zoning Commission used to have one. Moved by Larson, supported by Vetsch, to open the public hearing on the Green Haven rezoning question at 7:12 PM. Liz Stockman refreshed everyone present on the status of the property. Robertus wants to know why we have to rezone. Stockman explained why it is recommended to rezone from A-2 to B-3 due to its inclusion in the Comprehensive Plan approved December 16, 1996.. Resident Patti Stalberger expressed concerns about having the property zoned to B-3 and wished the City would be conservative. Robertus wanted to know if there is'a billboard ordinance concerning sign size. Stockman looked up Sign Ordinance Section 8 where maximum size is 750 square feet double faced with a maximum height of 30 feet. Moved by Robertus, supported by Larson, to close public hearing at 7:30 PM. All voted aye. Moved by Larson, supported by Bauer, to recommend approval to B-3 Highway Commercial to the City Council. Roll call - Ayes: Bauer and Larson; Nayes: Robertus and Vetsch. The motion failed. Moved by Robertus, supported by Larson, to recommend to the Council to rezone Lots 2 and 3, Greenhaven Estates, to B-1. All voted aye. Moved by Larson, supported by Robertus, to open public hearing on "The Meadows" at 7:33 PM. All voted aye. Tom Louck, President of Louck and Associates, was present to present "The Meadows" on behalf of Lyman Development. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION May 13, 1997 Page 2 of 5 Adjacent property owner Bob Heuring requested no street access from The Meadows into his property. Mr. Heuring requested access off of County Road 118 and use the ridge through the property to the back as access. Heuring also desires buffering between The Meadows and the Guido Heuring property. Commissioner Brown (absent) submitted written comment on buffering adjacent to County Road 19. Bob Heuring desired screening to keep snowmobiles off private property. Planner Louck reviewed the memo from NAC and focused on trail location and lot size variance. Commissioners discussed reduced lot size to accommodate trail. Questions came up over need for cul-de-sacs. City desires not to have them. Don Jensen of Pilot Land Development discussed sharing with Lyman Development for an outlot trail if the city prefers. Commissioners discussed further ideas on trails and locations. Larson was open to not having a trail in the back of the houses adjacent to Center Oaks. Flexibility is the concept. Run trail down Kalland Drive (center street). Sidewalk to Kalland Drive. Stockman discussed variances for lot lines. No economic hardship so no reason for variances. Commissioners want streets and lot lines to be radial or perpendicular in accordance with subdivision ordinance. Tom Louck does not want lot lines with bends in it. Liz Stockman stated the ordinance is open to interpretation. Moved by Larson, supported by Robertus, to close public hearing at 8:38 PM. All voted aye. Moved by Larson, supported by Bauer, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of The Meadows to the City Council, incorporate Findings of Fact and Recommendations dated May 13, 1997, NAC memo dated May 6, 1997, and SEH memo dated. All voted aye. Chair Vetsch moved to Cedar Creek Business Park. Discussion was held on road width of 80 feet right of way versus 60 foot right of way and 44 feet back of curb pavement. Don Jensen followed City Engineer's recommendation on street width. Design strength of road at 9 ton etc. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION May 13, 1997 Page 3 of 5 Judy Roden asked a question about Riley's property future development. She inquired as to long term needs. Donatus Vetsch concerned about tractor trailer units accessing street. Jensen proposes a 44 foot paved street in a 60 foot right of way. Jensen explained lot size is important on development for industrial sites. Moved by Larson, supported by Robertus, to close public hearing at 9:25 PM. All voted aye. Moved by Robertus, supported by Larson, to recommend preliminary plat of Cedar Creek Business Park, incorporating Findings of Fact and Recommendations dated May 13, 1997, NAC memo dated May 5, 1997, and SEH memo dated . All voted aye. Moved by Robertus, supported by Larson, to open public hearing on rezoning and preliminary plat requests for Center Oaks at 9:29 PM. All voted aye. Don Jensen discussed findings related to curved linear street. Crossing on easements. Liz Stockman read Jim Brown's comments (absent) and stated we're going PUD to get flexibility for the gold course. Need to secure golf course before moving ahead on related adjacent plats. Rich Harrison discussed "coving", land use and utilities. Jensen discussing large lots loops, passive open space and lots fronting golf course. Pilot Land will withhold final plat of Phase 3 to insure the golf course. Vetsch has suggested that the P&Z be allowed to see the PUD on Center Oaks before the Council because of previous PUD's to insure compliance with Planning & Zoning requirements. Moved by Vetsch, supported by Larson, to close the public hearing at 9:50 PM. All voted aye. Moved by Robertus, supported by Bauer, to recommend rezoning for the Center Oaks 1st Addition property from R-lA to PUD. All voted aye. Moved by Robertus, supported by Bauer to recommend to the City Council approval of the preliminary plat of Center Oaks, incorporating Findings of Fact and Recommendations dated May 13, 1997, NAC memo dated May 7, 1997, and the SEH report dated May 13, PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION May 13, 1997 Page 4 of 5 1997. All voted aye Moved by Robertus, supported by Larson, to open the public hearing for the Cedar Creek North preliminary plat at 9:55 PM. All voted aye. Planner Stockman stated City Attorney Couri indicated we do not vacate our half of Kadler Avenue until the City of Otsego vacates their half. Robertus referred to Brown's letter (absent) on his concerns rezoning to PUD before the golf course is approved. Moved by Larson, supported by Vetsch, to close the public hearing at 10:15 PM. All voted aye. Moved by Robertus, supported by Larson, to recommend rezoning the Cedar Creek North property from R-lA to PUD. All voted aye. Moved by Larson, supported by Vetsch, to open the public hearing for the preliminary plat of Cedar Creek North at 10:20 PM. All voted aye. Moved by Robertus, supported by Vetsch, to close public hearing for the preliminary plat of Cedar Creek North at 10:21 PM. All voted aye. Final approval from Couri. Easement will be discussed along Kadler Avenue. Moved by Larson, supported by Robertus, to recommend approval of the preliminary plat of Cedar Creek North incorporating the Planning report dated May 7, 1997, and the SEH Engineering Report dated May 13, 1997. All voted aye. Moved by Robertus, supported by Vetsch, to open public hearing on the Parkside 4th Addition replat at 10:22 PM. All voted aye. Jensen noted that road was moved to avoid wetlands. Modifying lot lines per Pete Carlson's approval. Robertus wants us to review this problem with lot lines that are not in conformance with the subdivision ordinance. Moved by Larson, supported by Vetsch, to close public hearing on Parkside 4th Addition at 10:27 PM. All voted aye. Moved by Robertus, supported by Bauer, to recommend approval of the replat of Parkside 4th Addition as amended. All voted aye. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION May 13, 1997 Page 5 of 5 Planner Stockman stated that Resolution 1997-19 and Ordinances #1997-2 and #1997-3 should remain unchanged. The Commissioners were in agreement. Moved by Robertus, supported by Bauer, to recommend to the Council adoption of Resolution #1997-19. All voted aye. Moved by Robertus, supported by Vetsch, to recommend adoption of Ordinance #1997-2 as presented. Robertus, Bauer, and Vetsch voted aye. Larson abstained. The motion carried. Moved by Robertus, supported by Larson, to adopt Resolution #1997-3. All voted aye. The Commissioners agreed to schedule a special meeting on May 27, 1997. Discussion of the Parks & Trails Plan was tabled to May 27. Moved by Larson , supported by Robertus, to establish May 27, 1997, at 7:00 PM in City Hall as a special meeting solely for the purpose of the Comprehensive Parks & Trails Plan. Further, to table this agenda matter to that meeting. All voted aye. Moved by Larson, supported by Robertus, to table the TIF resolution for Vetsch Custom Cabinets to the next meeting. All voted aye. Moved by Larson, supported by Robertus, to approve Resolution #1997-6, approving the Tax Increment Plan for Cottages of Albertville. All voted aye. Donatus Vetsch has stated that, for medical reasons, he needs to step out of the position of chair. Matter to be placed on the June loth agenda. Moved by Bauer, supported by Robertus, to adjourn the meeting at 11:02 PM. All voted aye. Donatus Vetsch, Chair Carolyn Bauer, Secretary May 27, 1997 i Mr Garrison Hale City Administrator Cify of Albertville 69YS Main Avenue P.Q. Box 9 Albertville, MN 86301 1 John P. Dodger 15698 Loop Road South Burnsville, MN 66908 612-892-0220 RE:; 0-3 Rezoning application for Lot 2 Block 4 Qreen Haven Estates- Tony Lucas property i Degr Mr. Hale: i Th' City Council on June 3, 1997 will review our rezoning application. The application is for rezoning the lot from A-? Agrioultural Transitional, to 0-3 Highway Cowmeroial. Welhave a signed purchase agreement on the property, subject to;rezoning to B-3. 1 am the buyer and Tony Lucas the seller. The Planning Commission on May 13, 1997 voted 2 to 2 on rezoning to IS-3, then passed a 8-1 rezoning by a 4 to 0 vote. i We are requesting the City Council to review the 0-3 Highway Co mercial rezoning request, as applied for. We did not re uest the 9-1 zone. The property has D-3 zones on both aides of it. Yfthere are any questions please contact me. Thank you. 1 3igoereiy, Jot'jn P. Bodger CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: Tony Lucas Request: Rezoning request from A-2, Agricultural Transition to B-3, Highway Commercial is desired to designate the property as a commercial use like it was prior to annexation from Frankfort Township. City Council Meeting Date: 3 June 1997 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1) The legal description of the subject property is as follows: Lots 2 and 3, Block 4 of Greenhaven Estates 2) The Memorandum dated 15 April 1997, prepared by NAC, Inc. is incorporated herein. 3) On 13 May 1997 the Albertville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the applicant's request, preceded by a published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that the City Council approve the project. Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for rezoning to B-3 has been denied because the B-3 District uses are not considered to be compatible with the existing residential neighborhood. The array of commercial uses allowed under the B-3, Highway Business District designation would unnecessarily impact the existing residential neighborhood by attracting a significant amount of vehicular traffic. Additional traffic which would be generated by B-3 District uses is not within the capabilities of a local, cul-de-sac street. The Planning and Zoning Commission has alternatively approved rezoning to B-1 based on the most current information received to date. The B-1, Neighborhood Low Intensity District will allow the desired billboard to be constructed while limiting potential commercial development to less intensive uses so as to impact the existing residential homes as little as possible. The B-1 District is compatible with present and future land uses of the area and is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 3rd day of June 1997. City of Albertville M Mark Olsen, Mayor Attest: Linda Houghton, City Clerk PC: Gary Hale, Linda Houghton, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson 5-14-97 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Planning Commission Findings of Fact & Recommendation Applicant's Name: Tony Lucas Request: Rezoning request from A-2, Agricultural Transition to B-3, Highway Commercial is desired to designate the property as a commercial use like it was prior to annexation from Frankfort Township. Planning Commission Meeting Date: 13 May 1997 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1) The legal description of the subject property is as follows: Lots 2 and 3, Block 4 of Greenhaven Estates 2) The Memorandum dated 15 April 1997, prepared by NAC, Inc. is incorporated herein. Recommendation: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for rezoning to B-3 has been denied because the B-3 District uses are not considered to be compatible with the existing residential neighborhood. The array of commercial uses allowed under the B-3, Highway Business District designation would unnecessarily impact the existing residential neighborhood by attracting a significant amount of vehicular traffic. Additional traffic which would be generated by B-3 District uses is not within the capabilities of a local, cul-de-sac street. The Planning and Zoning Commission has alternatively approved rezoning to B-1 based on the most current information received to date. The B-1, Neighborhood Low Intensity District will allow the desired billboard to be constructed while limiting potential commercial development to less intensive uses so as to impact the existing residential homes as little as possible. The B-1 District is compatible with present and future land uses of the area and is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Land Use Plan. Adopted by the Albertville Planning Commission this 13th day of May, 1997. Attest: City of Albertville 91 Linda Houghton, City Clerk Donatus Vetsch, Chairman PC: Gary Hale, Linda Houghton, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS NF,NkcGCOMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM TO: Albertville Planning Commission — rIAY 1 3 A6-EtjPA FROM: David Licht DATE: 15 April 1997 RE: Albertville - Rezonings ( �-uco5 r rope rfi. — Lo-ts 2 3 FILE NO: 163.05 gloci,.:f -+ -greeoPi avec-i Fs+) Elizabeth Stockman advised me of your concern of the approval of a rezoning without the benefit of a designated use and accompanying site plan. Please be advised that imposing such a requirement and "compelling" the applicant comply with such a limitation goes beyond the bounds of City authority and is typically referred to as contract zoning. Actions which are so judged are readily subject to legal challenge. When confronting a rezoning request, City officials are to be guided by the Comprehensive Plan. Within this context, there may be some latitude with respect to uses or intensity of activity which is afforded by differing use districts in the Zoning Ordinance. For example, if the Comprehensive Plan designates a certain property as commercial, a variety of commercial zoning districts are available for application. City officials are relatively free to determine which of these are most applicable and appropriate to the site. Our recommendation in such decisions is to evaluate the "worst case" scenario which can take place in a given zoning district. If this use and impact is acceptable to the site and area in question, the district rezoning is apparently satisfactory. In very limited cases, there is also the ability to rezone property to PUD. We caution, however, that it is preferable, whenever possible, to utilize conventional zones to govern the use of property. This minimizes confusion, costs, and administration for all concerned. Should you desire more discussion of this matter, please advise Mr. Hale and I will schedule to attend your next meeting. pc: Mayor and City Council Gary Hale Linda Houghton Michael Couri 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837 Permit No. _ CITY OF ! ✓/��'I�/� BUILDING PERMIT 11. DATE CONTRACTOR LIC. It � � ' � O -7 2. SITE ADDRESS I -7 0 1 Mac k�nz-; e 3. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROPERTY 1.0. NO. L. o + a Green e L0 -;W a o 7 l a Ll 0o Lf o co�-o SECTION I LOT BLOCK ADDITION PLAT NUMBER—._�%PARC.-E�7`L��NUMBER 4. OWNER (Name // / �iw1 ' 1 No S �/G /�/ry) t 1v?. JS�, t /`p'/ 70AY 4ucas 5o r hM �_ n P. o. Qo�[ %Iilik , �6 a 9s�-�3yS6 S. ARCHITECT (Namel (Address) (Tel. No.) 6. BL LDER IN s) (Address (Tel. No.) 7. TYPE O00WORK Fireplace C1 Septic ❑ Heating ❑ Plumbing ❑ Reroofing ❑ New Constniction x Alterations ❑ Addition ❑ /❑ - Finish Attie ❑ Residing ❑ Finish Basement Porch ❑ Garage ❑ Chimney ❑ Mi.. ' S. SIZE OF STRUCTURE (Hsi ht)A (Width) # (Oecithl 9. NO. OF STORIES � / � 10. ESTIMATED VALUE 8 1 r 0,,• If O 000. 11. COMPLETION DATE 12. PROPERTY DIMENSION 13. NO. OF JF�A%MILIES (if applicable) �J/'� �• .• Width Depth • 1 • /� 14. PROPOSED ELEVATION IN 15. PROPERTY AREA OR ACRES 16. CULVERT SIZE RELATION TO CL)RS OR WATERWAY.—ELEV. Sq. Ft. Yes No 17. FRONT YARD set back 16. REAR YARD set back 19. SIDE YARDS set back from rose propert s r f s / C Ft. /11 Ft. Right Sd. _Is_ Left Sd. 20. FLOOR AREA APPORTIONMENT USE AREA Sq. Ft Sq. Ft Sp. Ft Sq. Ft 4. ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND SIGNATURE: The undersigned hereby agrees that, in case such permit is granted, that all work which shall be done and all materials which shall be used shall comply with the plans and specification the efor herewithlbmitted and with all the ordinances of said City T�W 1'yrL `r applicable thereto. T1ZNAjTURE OF APPLICANT Date FEES PERMIT PLAN CHECK FEE PENALTY FEE_ DRIVEWAY PERMIT FEES. ENGINEERING FEES SITE FEE CULVERT S-- PLUMBING FEE_ SEPTIC FEE - WATER FCE�_ WATER METER FEE SEWER FEE MECHANICAL FETE SURCHARGE FETE OTHERS TOTALFEE CODE ANALYSIS TYPE OF CONST. USE OF SLOG. OCCUPANCY GROUP OCCUPANCY LOAD ZONING DISTRICT VARIANCE GRANTED, DATE OFF STREET PARKING SPACES REO._ SPACES ON PLAN MATERIAL FILED W/APPLICATION SOILS REPORT ❑ Borings ❑ Percolation ❑ Compaction tuts PLANS AND SPECS. ❑ Sets SURVEY O Copies ENERGY CALCULATIONS O PILING LOGS ❑ FIRE SPRINKLERS REQUIRED O YES ONO SPECIAL APPROVALS TONING FIRE DEPT HEALTH DEPT. _..._ PUBLIC WORKS _ COUNTY OTHER CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ISSUED DATE .BY CITY OF ALBERTVILLE law, Planning COL___________. Findings of Fact & Recommendation Applicant's Name: The Meadows. Loucks and Associates for Lyman Development Request: Loucks and Associates, Inc. on behalf of Lyman Development Company have submitted a preliminary plat for the subdivision of 69 single family lots. The plat, named The Meadows, is located adjacent to CSAH 19 on its west side to the south of Parkside.3rd Addition and the senior housing project. The property is zoned R- 1 A, Low Density Single Family. Planning Commission Meeting Date: 13 May 1997 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1) The legal description of the subject property is as follows: (see attached) 2) The Planning Report dated 6 May 1997, prepared by NAC, Inc. is incorporated herein. Recommendation: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for preliminary plat approval has been approved based on the most current plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: The side lot lines which are not perpendicular to straight streets and radial to curved streets as is required by the Subdivision Ordinance are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 2. Wright County reviews and approves the plat in relation to the dedicated amount of right- of-way needed along CSAH 19. 3. Kalenda Avenue is renamed in accordance with the County street naming system and correctly shown on the final plat. Kalland Drive is changed to Kalland Avenue and also shown on the final plat. 4. The submitted Grading and Drainage Plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 5. A plan is submitted which shows the areas of wetland mitigation and replacement which must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. 6. As part of the park dedication requirement, an eight (8) foot trail is constructed by the developer along the west side of Kalland Avenue from 53rd Street to 54th street. The trail shall continue to the west on the north side of 54th Street where it will progress northwest through Outlot A to make connection with the southern access to Oakside Park. 7. The eight (8) foot trail along the north side of 53rd Street is relocated to lie fully within the street right-of-way and shall be constructed as part of the park dedication requirements by the developer. All trails shall be constructed to City standards. 8. The remainder of park dedication is satisfied via the submission of a cash contribution. Adopted by the Albertville Planning Commission this 13th day of May, 1997. City of Albertville M Donatus Vetsch, Chairman Attest: Linda Houghton, City Clerk pc: Gary Hale Linda Houghton Pete Carlson Mike Couri Michael St. Martin, Loucks and Associates Steve Ryan, Lyman Development Co. 2 5-19-97 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: The Meadows Loucks and Associates for Lyman Development Co Request: Loucks and Associates, Inc. on behalf of Lyman Development Company have submitted a preliminary plat for the subdivision of 69 single family lots. The plat, named The Meadows, is located adjacent to CSAH 19 on its west side to the south of Parkside 3rd Addition and the senior housing project. The property is zoned R- 1A, Low Density Single Family. City Council Meeting Date: 3 June 1997 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1) The legal description of the subject property is as follows: (see attached) 2) The Planning Report dated 6 May 1997, prepared by NAC, Inc. and the SEH memo dated 19 May 1997 are incorporated herein. 3) On 13 May 1997 the Albertville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the applicant's request, preceded by a published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that the City Council approve the project. Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request has been approved based on the most current plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: All side lot lines are revised to be in conformance with the City Subdivision Ordinance as stipulated by the City Engineer and City Planner. All lot lines within the plat must be perpendicular to straight streets and radial to curvilinear streets and must be shown as a single line segment from front to rear. 2. Wright County reviews and approves the plat in relation to the dedicated amount of right- of-way needed along CSAH 19. 3. Kalenda Avenue is renamed in accordance with the County street naming system and correctly shown on the final plat. Kalland Drive is changed to Kalland Avenue and also shown on the final plat. 4. The submitted Grading and Drainage Plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 5. A plan is submitted which shows the areas of wetland mitigation and replacement which must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. 6. As part of the park dedication requirement, an eight (8) foot trail is constructed by the developer along the west side of Kalland Avenue from 53rd Street to 54th street. The trail shall continue to the west on the north side of 54th Street where it will progress northwest through Outlot A to make connection with the southern access to Oakside Park. 7. The eight (8) foot trail along the north side of 53rd Street is relocated to lie fully within the street right-of-way and shall be constructed as part of the park dedication requirements by the developer. All trails shall be constructed to City standards. 8. The remainder of park dedication is satisfied via the submission of a cash contribution. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 3rd day of June, 1997. Attest: City of Albertville in Mark Olsen, Mayor Linda Houghton, City Clerk pc: Mike St. Martin, Steve Ryan, Gary Hale, Linda Houghton, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson r UUUUC) U UUUUUUUUUQa a aaQaaaaQa0Lo UUC)C) aaaaaaa¢aaaa 0-rM00tnd-d'M MM d tr)-.4 trn't • ' 0MNNNNMO , . •OCMmt Ln oto m � M . 0)� � 00 O O O O O O O 000000000000 r mwcrCr -woc ��O w wOC� -Wmw >vcrpCw O 000000000 000000000000 1- ►- � l l~iWL N LL LL L LL. LL. I.� _ L�. LL LL. LL- L� Li Li LL.lt_ p ( 0 0000oC3C3ClC3(/)t Z O �ClCiCJC�000 � NU)U)U)U)U)U)u)(1) N 0000 000000oto(n(nU)(n M r^pryp•giptoMd' -r, -Nwo U pNNNd l-�MI-000Or N MMow NtoOCY?r MNmOmopoO MtnOrd• LLJ u) _ 00 r to N I,- I� I� to (D C) O M ^ In � r _ M !� I, I, to I LL Q Oo00rN NNMNM p0 N-�•-•- -r.- 4N II z tC', NNNNNNNNN M II II II II II II U 11 it II w ON Ld O II II II II II II 11 11 II It it �NMd tnc0r-co Q cD � Z i-- -NMd tncDI,00MO�N p Y to J OOOOOOOOOC Y h-^F-1-1-I-h-h-F--►-��� U JJJJJJJJJ- 000000000 0 J J J J OJ J O 0 Z J J J J J O O t- - m Q m J wZ F--- o Q =) U U W Q UUUVUc UUVUUUU U ¢¢¢ U 0 ►- U U U U ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ W w cZ� I- M,ndd��iDrnO r F=- 3 J d MMMMMMdM 00000LL ' Z p - OO O OOOQOOOOp WWcrw� or- xcr Cr- �Cr- � � 00000 _ �tY0 p00000000 I- WN 00 O LLJ O F- Li Li l t LL11 Li- CD X D �- �- LL lt_ LL. li LL LL- L~i l~i U~ L~i - W a Q Q 0 0 0 cr c n cn cn cn u 00 Vn/naoa d V) (1) 0 N d U) O aN O N (� N 000 N I-, 00 O d' 0 OMO prOOC Od W`- Nt+)00C0-Nm NM tDO00C;C:) - - ^ CD- . - Lr) to to L = F- CL to d _ - - ,n to to Ln to tf) N cfl - -- -- CoII CO Lr) II II It Z Z W 3 It It II II II it II II II 11 It N rM d- to to Imo- 00 0 J M O -- _ N J N ►- F- F- F- F¢- Y F- F- F- f- t- O U OOOO ~ c) 000000000 ►- O Y 00 00 v0 JJJJJJJJJ v0 J J J m J �p m NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS NINC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council Albertville Planning Commission FROM: Elizabeth Stockman DATE: 6 May 1997 RE: Albertville - The Meadows Preliminary Plat FILE: 163.06 - 97.06 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Loucks and Associates, Inc. on behalf of Lyman Development Company have submitted a preliminary plat for the subdivision of 69 single family lots. The plat, named The Meadows, is located adjacent to CSAH 19 on its west side to the south of Parkside 3rd Addition and the senior housing project. The property is zoned R-1A, Low Density Single Family. Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Preliminary Plat Exhibit C - Existing Conditions Exhibit D - Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan Exhibit E - Preliminary Utility Plan Exhibit F - Recommended Park and Trail Layout Recommendation Based on the review of submitted plans in relation to Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance criteria as discussed herein, we recommend approval of The Meadows preliminary- plat subject to the following conditions: 1. A variance is approved to allow side lot lines which are not perpendicular to straight streets or radial to curved streets or the plat is revised to be in conformance with this Subdivision Ordinance requirement. 2. The plat is revised to provide for future access to the Guido Heuring property via a local stub street which should be provided as an extension of Kalenda Avenue to the southern border of the plat. 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@WINTERNET.COM AW A A� �ZASEN 113 S. FIFTH AVENUE, P O. BOX 1717, ST. CLOUD, MN 56302-1717 320 252-4740 800 572-0617 320 251-8760 FAX ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION TO: Garrison Hale City Administrator Albertville, MN FROM: Peter J. Carlson, P.E. City Engineer DATE: May 19, 1997 RE: Preliminary Plat, Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plan The Meadows SEH No. A-ALBEV 9701.00 I have reviewed the above referenced plans and have the following comments: Preliminary Plat 1. Numerous side lot lines are not perpendicular or radial to the street and shall be revised. Grading Plan 1. Walk -out elevations of all building pads shall be a minimum of 2 feet above the high water elevation of any pond or wetland. 2. Tile lines are required on all lots that are, not adjacent to a detention pond or wetland. 3. The City standard street is 36 feet wide. The typical street section shown to be 32 feet wide shall be removed from the plan. 4. The building pad setbacks shown are greater than the standard 30 feet and shall be revised. Utility Plan 1. The storm sewer shown between Lots 11 and 12, Block 5 will short circuit the NURP pond and shall be revised. The catch basins can drain to the storm sewer between Lots 8 and 9, Block 5. SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON INC. ST. PAUL, MN MINNEAPOLIS, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISON, WI LAKE COUNTY, IN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Mr. Gary Hale May 19, 1997 Page 2 2. Combine storm sewer manholes shown between Lots 3, 4, 11 and 12 to one manhole and one outlet into the detention pond. 3. Locate additional gate valves at the following locations: a. 53rd Street at Katydid Drive b. 53rd Street at Kalland Drive c. Kalenda Avenue between Lots 5 and 6, Block 3 d. 54th Street at Kalland Drive e. Katydid Drive at Katydid Circle 4. All water main shall be on the north and east sides of the sanitary sewer. Storm sewer shall be on the south and west sides of the sanitary sewer. Wetland Mitigation Plan 1. Submit the plan to Wright Soil and Water Conservation District for review and approval. Please call me if you have any questions. djg c: Linda Houghton, City Clerk Elizabeth Stockman, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Mike Couri, City Attorney Loucks and Associates (J:W.BEV\CORR\MY-19B.97) 'L(Z17" & '-Affl dd s, May 28, 1997 Mr. Garrison L. Hale City of Albertville 5975 Main Avenue NE Albertville, MN 55301 Re: The Meadows Albertville, Minnesota Loucks Project No. 97-105 Dear Mr. Hale: I'I_ANNERS ENGINEERS SURVEYORS DESIGNERS ARCI IAEOLOGISTS We are submitting the revised Preliminary Plat for The Meadows, per staff comments. The following items are included for your review.: ➢ 1 sets of the Preliminary Plans ➢ 8 - 11x17 reduced sets of the Preliminary Plans Please call if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, LO�UCCKS & ASSOCIATES, INC. Michael J. St. Martin, P.E. Civil Engineer MJS/cros Encs. \97105\corresp\halesubldoc cc: Stephen T. Ryan, Lyman Development Co. Peter J. Carlson, P.E., SEH Elizabeth Stockman, NAC 7200 HEMLOCK LANE. SUITE 300, M,vILE GROVE, MINNFSOT,�\ 55369-5592 TEL: (612) 424-5505 F,wc: (612) 424-5822 E. 54 o n z a 41um it i ittlill W A Z M i7 � � M 1 cs r M w c W S d 0 z W W J 4 �p O W > W C O iW- (� W f t U, >> JJ < Zy �N W ? 2 i FW- K L O S S W V LL d m N= < <i <a° Ir o ww Gi V= N U S N N= N O N O N C H O W z z zo o q6 z00 E• x �� a-� oz2z� � P4 04 Jd ak a {[iWGs7� I I III 1 I V U U U U O U z W Qa LO(D� r� Ito W�dO I W �Af ozo o �-7 �ro)wa oz Po a ca�o�W� z NuEW�c w<zoo c�i o"`4 z !Z [. 0 rya3� R1 W I -Uz0.4 l�l "e oulP. g 41 mil!! i '� , a ' . Ma $� o N pp t g iiQRp{ �j icy XS4 I IsmilS Ilk! J ��{ !IiO ji;7 F IW; M< 1 o 0304 mz CJ �1lI 1-410� 01 I M X E.01 MZ f i �q Oki6 ,l I ,I j � � � o _ eq 11 I IH / -- 11 IT -_ �'QU +Sl V norm i1- ----- -- — -------------- ------- -------�-- I \ %-.,I J L__J L_ �ypPrn+O r�— e yMr. l , I :; I I`"' n;~ 11 I I •» �, I I I I 1 1 0 b }` I II Ill II II II II --I, I---- mt .._. _...__ r---I r=`---r I II I �«� I I I I �.�• I I I ce ti w r y.. -_- r nu mrrariiunn%, I I I J e`aLAL _ n J a�a i n I i{a i to —� L — — — J / I r— _r---, r-- I 1 "�'' I I•"o, I I "';wo; I I "» o;> I I "" o;- I I "'�I I� I i �_�} I ml L L---J J L__J L_ r-- 1 l r----1 F---1 F- L� �.._• ,� -� I "�, i I "-;�o;• I I •^'•• o, I I ., I I � o, I I «� I r--- � I \ `__J L__J L__J L---J L___j �----I L.--� =a W a ) L---� I ummyr I J 1 �- �• r� _ I I "'�a 1101 101 I o, •_.3v'• o�� I :---��I I o I I n I I t I „ J I I L__"J �_—I I — --- —�-- L---J ------ _ L — _ L____J I I I w 1 O �� I I �ffiifl •f I Imo..' ^' I I' �i -----j 0 all jil S _I., HEM 3 E x N YYStStSiYY Y � St ,'. YYYYYIYYYYYY Y YY@YYYSiYSt@flYY@9YYY Y R:IR='-S:. � w� 8• 6 u � q.=22=222 22 2 060000000000 ri 000000ew000-000000 a gRRa RRR R � $ �� •„4 .~s. i9 �I� 88588888ffE8li S Ry�RgRRggg€BS€8588lF tC�tCw�CtCCC G tCttCtttGCCCCC�GtC B� Bass .«S��RR$ S{ $RR4R$.4�$R9�i9$9b{A$ $ �Rn4anS S Y o FN owaR^nnR+ n e Y 2 �+!9 a-Cd l$R n G4oeP«n.8ejnAl9re"-Roo 3 p rryeggn n n1S7?, R R@ E 3 R 3 s m H Fa.-�({ A OIR _ �w x IEp�R ''!$_ < job-npnpp.4gFnse_n p� ns�pnpenpepe==p�p��pnpapwpe Qj miS �R�J 9 R R •� tin �,>} ZJJf JJJJJJJJJOOg F `�Ou]( jJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJJ ~ J J J J J J J J o C C C O IL c YY Y YYYYYYYYY Y YYYYYYYYYYYYYY Y Y9�YY@YYYY♦Y♦YY^Y Y R a$ g« na V �'1n :.R R° :RXn.SX.S.'.R n :.RRXX7,�'.7�nnnn3 8 . XnxXnR.« On G 00 O 000000000 A 00000000000000 n 000000000 0000 N 55 $ €S8€69SSfi5 S S85ff81f5R8ffiS$$•ff S 55S$SSlE68gR€85 b .Y..rwrsr : r:LL ►.CCCC44 t r:C:CCCCt �d R IL29 R nnQ+ g kl ni St8$�8$�R� SS{�STSt�SStR$bt & SIHS$��SSiS�»R9Si a , �a '9 n= RRI;8nn aYs z $ ld gdl ee e.igO�f Ong + OApp�O�n^TO OO.== ---� ~ 3 j 2� 7 n 8 » 1 »nVnOwne n-enVOewesO nnfOewne---2- 5�S pwpppppQQppppwQQ.pp p�p �j pppp pppppp gp G3 jyj - ppppeepp pppp O e d e d ps 9 s C Ti 'LO� �I JJ F i{I JJJJJJJJJ F jl JJJJJJ§JJJJyJ �• JJJJJJJJJJJ JJJ �• 8 12 (xyryn Oty 2 (sdQ I woz r corozi r roots r . fo: r' _ ", r �b 3b1 , ; ,Vw o I,r .+. $ i " I-. o ��31 I a �I II I I •�`•� 31 I a 'h I• i I of J �— 'I �� I 31 II N n I : gi �m I,! � �Ir a l I. a N I _ (, co_ozl ' l L co oolJ L ro Sul J (+ £� oolJ ool ; £b odd► % / Izo.+1 I$ iI I I II I `` -ElkJ L r J L Crrool J (� co J L co ooi (� rs ic. 4.OV.U7.UUK loud 4�r _y �:M bye CITY OF ALBERTVILLE 14(3) Planning CVim moa,vii Findings of Fact & Recommendation Applicant's Name: Cedar Creek Business Park. Pilot Land Development Co. Request: Pilot Land Development Company has submitted a preliminary and final plat for subdivision of a six lot business park. The property is located near the western city border between CSAH 37 and Interstate 94. The property is zoned 1-1, Limited Industrial. ' The property encompasses 10.02 acres and currently contains a farmstead which will be removed. Planning Commission Meeting Date: 13 May 1997 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1) The legal description of the subject property is as follows: (see attached) 2) The Planning Report dated 5 May 1997, prepared by NAC, Inc. is incorporated herein. Recommendation: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for preliminary and final plat approval has been approved) based on the most current plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. The side lot line between Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 is revised to be in conformance with the City Subdivision Ordinance as stipulated by the City Engineer and City Planner. All lot lines within the plat must be perpendicular to straight streets and radial to curvilinear streets and side lot lines must be shown as a single line segment from front to rear. 2. The side lot line configuration between Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 3. The 60 foot right-of-way width is changed to 80 feet as required under the Subdivision Ordinance and shown on the preliminary and final plats. 4. Wright County reviews and approves the amount of right-of-way to be dedicated from the centerline of CSAH 37 (50 feet as shown on the plat). 5. The grading, drainage, and erosion control plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 6. The wetland mitigation plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. 7. At the time of site plan approvals for individual lots, the setback, coverage, and height requirements of the 1-1 District are met. 8. Park dedication is satisfied via the submission of a cash contribution. Adopted by the Albertville Planning Commission this 13th day of May, 1997. Attest: City of Albertville am Linda Houghton, City Clerk Donatus Vetsch, Chairman pc: Gary Hale, Linda Houghton, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson, Don Jensen 4 5-19-97 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: Cedar Creek Business Park. Pilot Land Development Co. Request: Pilot Land Development Company has submitted a preliminary and final plat for subdivision of a six lot business park. The property is located near the western city border between CSAH 37 and Interstate 94. The property is zoned 1-1, Limited Industrial. The property encompasses 10.02 acres and currently contains a farmstead which will be removed. City Council Meeting Date: 3 June 1997 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1) The legal description of the subject property is as follows: (see attached) 2) The Planning Report dated 5 May 1997, prepared by NAC, Inc. is incorporated herein. 3) On 13 May 1997 the Albertville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the applicant's request, preceded by a published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that the City Council approve the project. Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request has been approved based on the most current plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. The side lot line between Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 is revised to be in conformance with the City Subdivision Ordinance as stipulated by the City Engineer and City Planner. All lot lines within the plat must be perpendicular to straight streets and radial to curvilinear streets and side lot lines must be shown as a single line segment from front to rear. 2. The 60 foot right-of-way width is changed to 80 feet as required under the Subdivision Ordinance and shown on the preliminary and final plats. 3. Wright County reviews and approves the amount of right-of-way to be dedicated from the centerline of CSAH 37 (50 feet as shown on the plat). 4. The grading, drainage, and erosion control plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 5. The wetland mitigation plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. 6. At the time of site plan approvals for individual lots, the setback, coverage, and height requirements of the 1-1 District are met. 7. Park dedication is satisfied via the submission of a cash contribution. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 3rd day of June 1997. Attest: City of Albertville Mark Olsen, Mayor Linda Houghton, City Clerk pc: Don Jensen, Gary Hale, Linda Houghton, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson 14 1 . 0 N 0 ()C► LN an y I&IPD,y -- NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council Albertville Planning Commission FROM: Elizabeth Stockman DATE: 5 May 1997 RE: Albertville - Cedar Creek Business Park Preliminary and Final Plats FILE: 163.06 - 97.08 Background Pilot Land Development Company has submitted a preliminary and final plat for subdivision of a six lot business park. The property is located near the western city border between CSAH 37 and Interstate 94. The property is zoned 1-1, Limited Industrial. The property encompasses 10.02 acres and currently contains a farmstead which will be removed. Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Preliminary Plat Exhibit C - Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Exhibit D - Wetland Mitigation Plan Exhibit E - Final Plat Exhibit F - Otsego Industrial Park Concept Issues and Analysis Zoning. The property is zoned 1-1, Limited Industrial and thereby permits business operations involving the manufacturing, fabrication or assembly of a wide variety of products that produce no exterior noise, glare, fumes, wastes, or other disturbances or objectionable impacts. In addition, warehousing, offices, machine shops and lumber yards are permitted uses within this district. Under the 1-1 designation, the minimum lot requirements are as follows: Lot Area: None, except as determined by parking, loading, setback, building coverage, and other requirements. 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@WINTERNET.COM Lot Width: 100 feet Front Setback: 35 feet Side Setback (corner): 35 feet Side Setback (interior): 10 feet Rear Setback: 20 feet Site Coverage (buildings and structures): 30 percent Site Coverage (impervious surface area): 85 percent Maximum Building Height: 35 feet Minimum District Size: 5 acres with minimum frontage of 300 feet The proposed subdivision is in compliance with all minimum lot size, width and district size requirements as indicated above. At the time of site plan approvals for individual lots, the setback, coverage, and height requirements will be verified. Street Alignment. The location of the access point on CSAH 37 is good, located between the Kolles property access and the Cedar Creek North access on the south side of CSAH 37. The proposed project must be considered in relation to the adjacent industrial land in Albertville (to the west) and yet further west into Otsego. The planned plat configuration of the industrial land in Otsego on the west side of Kadler Avenue is attached as Exhibit F. The Cedar Creek Business Park concept would allow the continuation of 66th Street slightly west where it could turn south and again meet CSAH 37 as a U-shaped street. Assuming that Wright County would permit another access onto CSAH 37, this would allow the vacation of Kadler Avenue on the north side of CSAH 37, so future industrial lots would back up to the Otsego development. If another access will not be allowed onto CSAH 37, it would be beneficial for 66th Street to continue into Otsego where it could join other industrial areas. Termination of the street via a cul-de-sac is not possible given the established length limitation of 600. Review and approval of this plan as it relates to street alignments must be performed by Wright County. Right -of -Way Width. The proposed plat shows a street right-of-way width of 60 feet with a forty- four (44) foot paved surface (back of curb to back of curb). The Subdivision Ordinance requires eighty (80) feet of right-of-way for commercial and industrial areas (with the same paved width). While this subdivision in itself is small and may not be negatively impacted by the reduced right- of-way width, if extension of the street is required into Otsego and becomes part of a system to serve a larger industrial area, the right-of-way width issue should be re-examined (under this scenario, traffic levels will likely increase). Either way, the City Engineer shall review and approve the roadway design. If deviation from the right-of-way width is to be allowed, a variance is required from the Subdivision Ordinance standard. A second item to be reviewed and approved by Wright County is the right-of-way width of CSAH 37. As the plat currently shows, 50 feet has been designated in this location. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control. The submitted Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 2 Wetland Mitigation Plan. The proposed subdivision plans include the filling of an existing wetland on the east side of the property to allow for street construction and more usable lot area. The drainage flow is to be diverted under the proposed roadway and along a shared lot line. The submitted Erosion Control Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. Soils. At the time of development on the Long Haul trucking site to the west in Otsego significant soil corrections were necessary in order to construct building and parking lot improvements. This item has been brought up only as a precaution in the interest of the developer in that it may indicate potential problems on the Pilot site. Park Dedication. Commercial and industrial park dedication requirements require that an amount equal to five (5) percent of the City's calculated fair market value for the property as zoned 1-1. Fair market value shall be determined as of the time of the final plat approval based upon a current appraisal or as determined by a recent selling price of the parcel in question. Recommendation Based on the review of submitted plans in comparison to Subdivision and Zoning Requirements as contained herein, we recommend approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat for Cedar Creek Business Park subject to the following conditions: A variance is approved to allow a 60 foot right-of-way width rather than 80 feet as required under the Subdivision Ordinance or the plat is revised as necessary. 2. Approval is obtained from Wright County to allow a second access onto CSAH 37 from the land owned by Pilot or a concept plan is prepared in cooperation with Otsego land owners showing how 66th Street could continue into the adjacent industrial area. 3. Wright County reviews and approves the amount of right-of-way to be dedicated from the centerline of CSAH 37 (50 feet as shown on the plat). 4. The grading, drainage, and erosion control plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 5. The wetland mitigation plan is reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. 6. At the time of site plan approvals for individual lots, the setback, coverage, and height requirements of the 1-1 District are met. 7. Park dedication is satisfied via the submission of a cash contribution. pc: Gary Hale, Linda Houghton, Pete Carlson, Mike Couri, Don Jensen t] CITY OF ALBERTVILLE PROPOSED OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ❑ A-1, Agricultural Rural ❑ R-6, Residential High Density !_ B-W, Business Warehouse ❑ A-2, Agricultural Transitional ❑ R-7, Special Purpose High Density _ I-1, Light Industrial ❑ R-1A, Low Density Single Family ❑ R-8, Mixed Housing ❑ I-1A, Limited Industrial ❑ R-1, Single Family z R-MH, Manufactured Housing Residential 1-2, General Industrial © R-2, Single & Two Family ® B-1, Neighborhood Business L- PUD, Planned Unit Development R-3, Single & Two -Family B-2, Limited Business Pll, Public/Institutional R-4, Low Density Multiple Family ❑ B-3, Highway Commercial ! S, Shoreland Overlay ❑ R-5, Medium Density Multiple Family ❑ B4, General Business ❑ , W, Wetland Overlay CEDAR CREEK BUSINESS PARK' 0 1000 2000 SCALE IN FEET 12-3-96 EXHIBIT A PRELIMINARY PLAr CE®A R CREEK R USIMES. 101500-J52100 8fr.^ara Roosn •~ Tv`,p 10395 70tn saes: n' E. )` A:Ofr(ri/Ip, M.Y SSJO! % I 2 \� ti a 1.78 Acres _ j ! _ -t 22 _-. --'�r7EV�J. .-.99 ii CrfS _ J JE CV _t00 CO 66 1.02 Ac s E r� R'rei e:a' �, :EVPORARY rap— - - S V. ar <vOn„! AE j ARCM/.mVD EASEY_ .' r-.. J."( �' 1 rl - IS'LMP t� q• ^ q h •-' 1.69 Acres + O 8 1 Of500 35240u^ t� A 1 14 res __.. \�2 �elB%yGntr Road>J7 N_ � 7.44 AZr f;r - ... _ _ . _ _ - - - '... _. __. -... �. - ., . -.... � _ J� � ,.r::•, yam'!' - / % • , 1S• / •. I y. h_ 89 'JB'J2' IOr 5CO-353:00 rC•500-J53200 Sires ror ✓oafs - P. o: Leno Le.e'^a •nfn; 1049J C .—(y Road 37 •._ 137J6 � ^saw S:. •+. E. A�aertd/aM.Y 55J0: Nor- La �- arY 55304 EXHIBIT B 1 -— 50" 2 a% " 0-1 - '4r,' 6� / 6FH 196 0; 813. -,fl '�'6 63 -,d 2119 15 60 *49'52' C t- I9, 2J N 60 1 62 61 IS 51 7"26' f THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAr, INE r. LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 'hE NORTHWFSr 114 OF, sEcncN 0 100 200 300 1121, R.24, wRIGHr couNry 'LSOTA, IS ASSUMED W BEAR i '.18'J2' E. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND 0 DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET R.L.S. NO. 74J9 EXHIBIT E INC. PRELIMINARY PLAr CH",A% AW CAUEZIC A3 USIMES., 2 1 7BA r rSa 5J Key A..-,e IE A4OUAJD EASfW�li7 956. q 507, - --------- - E,lSri,C :l: 956, 1. 9 Acre —C. wv. _ ' �M 'o iM2100 4 (Z) I Co�, t, R." .1 .14 A7&e�f 4 0 a ­ —V 958.0 - - - - - - - - . . . . . . 1.11500-.353200 f R - f--5 10?500-35X00 S,4 ­xt` Ko)#eg 10487 C-1 Roca J' Mb, ,71,. MN 55301 EXHIBIT C �., 7. ' ., .. ' {' � EXHIBIT D 4vl rCET 100 0 y N% .......... ILLUSTRATE ESTABLISH DRAIN AGE RESUBDIVISION & UTILITY EASEMENTS �\ POTENTIAL Itup. I—DE—S RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH MUST REFLECT CITY ACTION ON VARIANCE REQUESTj: Pck,o A DATA / . ac ncc-,c rii LOT 2 N. NAME INTERIOR STREET .... ...... ig 0 I ONE-- AREA-- 3'i* -77 777 a 112 ew V) 0 Q_ ow ADJUST LOT LINES—* ..... . H LOT 1 6 ACRES ILLUSTRATE RESUBDIVISION POTENTIAL ................ ........ DEDICATE 50, R.O.W. FROM COUNTY ROAD CENTERLINE Yl EXHIBIT F PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY May 12, 1997 Members of the Council & Planning Commission c/o Mr. Gary Hale City Administrator Albertville, MN 55301 RE: Cedar Creek Business Park Dear Staff, Council & Commission members: Pilot Land has received a copy of the NAC report dated May 5, 1997. Pilot accepts conditions # 3- 7 and requests changes to #1, and #2 which should be struck from the findings of fact.. Regarding condition # 1, we are attaching the approved plat for the Barthell business parks. All existing I-1 land parcels in the City operate with 60 foot right of ways and 36 foot roads. To require a 44 foot roadway width and an 80 foot road right of way renders the incubator business park subdivision uneconomical. In order to position Albertville for growth of small business, correct market designs indicate that a standard road width, with an increased road strength to 9 ton is appropriate. At the site plan approval stage, appropriate entrance radius designs are used such as 35' to 45' rather than the 25' to 30' typical of most residential subdivisions. County Rd. 37 meets the City ordinance goal of an 80' road for primary movement of goods & products. Condition # 2 must be struck since no other development parcel in Albertville requires looped roads when adjacent parcels can accommodate a rational extension of the circulation system. In this case, the attached sketch shows that 66th street extended to the west creates a loop to the current existing Kadler. The use of a temporary cul de sac is typical of all subdivision construction when an applicant of property owner provides access to an adjacent parcel. This circulation pattern was approved by staff at our pre -application meetings and is rational and understandable. We will be at the meeting to provide further testimony as needed to clarify our request. Pilot desires the approval of the plat configuration to continue to expand our marketing of the sites to the business community. Without an approval of the 6 lot concept, we can not officially represent to potential buyers that an approval is possible. With your approval of the conditions as proposed, we can augment the lots available in Albertville and hope to provide places for business to grow as Kenco has done with residential land. Sincerely, Donald Jensen, L nd Development Director Cc: Liz Stockman, NAC Pete Carlson - SEH Attachments land dev: cedbusap.doc 13736 Johnson Street NE • Ham Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094 avd Dev COP 6.81 AC L =x 4.07 AC 6.20 AC L:' ! -•'a is �� 2-71 AC y • 3 y a! _•^ _ :t� -.� ^ •` ".^A2,'•�; I ` •yam... Y .�' .�. - f 3 _ 3 .` 6.51 AC 2.08AC 7.81 AC u j� I( 282 AC Jj 6.20 AC {. c :t 2.89AC �\ ik :3+� � � / dry i •b� \ �f 4� -_� ._ - i' 3.T8 AC i• ' ' 3.76AC / ,. LTO AC Ut s•7+me1e ' ' , n - � I I I 2.76 AC I tiT-! �: �! .• . :�\ •S� 4.15 AC I J A•^_ ra ,''ry ' ��" =V \`✓./� 3.21 AC ' 1 8.46 AC 10 SS AC H.-... ! •• ! • fit., , i2 k . w.:� as •' '� "I r i• Wpow wv ..n.. I•, `ej }' ^': ^i,f i „^.Z2i� :i�, 4.99AC a �• Wf FA • - ICounor• � Na•ss•2s•w`�.a... -�' �'•� •-_��" v� -�� \ i l 6.61 ACr Ila 9 'N s� t � Pri�!'III� able 37. .,, I� I.00AC 12 ----"Np•3faw----rrw:r:�=-�1+'y,•ryf�w----�� _OCS �_ "-=_J_—• - -h 1 �i "'I / /.'J % VI / i0 z w °j z � 4 W . ¢o a w N J m �/ / •/ / .t W v J ........... N m w j�o. w I-- r W. w • ��j` �I `C �; II r _ • ��- ' �! •� I � ai/ern. - -iii �I 3 ��I 1 I � 2 LL _9 I I IIr� TA IIIQ '.0# 05-01-1997 03:31PM I FROM Radzwill & Couri Law Offi TO 49732100 P.02 TO: DA MEMORANDUM ALBERTVU.,LE CJW COUNCIL; GAILY HALE, ALBERTVII.LE CTrY ADMINISTRATOR MIKE COM CITY ATTORNEY POTENTIAL TI17 FOR CEDAR CREEK BUSAVESS PARK APRIL 18,1997 In response to Gary's'request for potential TIF options in r0gard to the planned Cedar Creek Business Parr I have the following suggestions: 1. Any:TIF established on this property would be an economic �develo�aent TIF, which would last no more than s years. N *c p mperty has not been do gr eeea acres within the Iast fiive veam the City can TIF the following uses: 2. (1) the ' g or production of taagt'ble Mson .Property, including proses wg resulting in the change in coadition of the property; (2) wm-chousing, storage, and distribution of tan&1e petsdnd:' properly, excluding few sales; (3) research and development related to the activities listed in clause (1) or (2); (4) telemarketing if that activity is the exclusive use of the piopaV, (5) tourism facilities; or (6) space necessary for and related do the activities listed in clauses ('1) to (5). If the property has been in green acres within the last five yearrs, the,* City can only 'TIF naannfacturing facilities on this site. Capttred TIF increments can be spent on site improvements, installation of utilities, public improvements, soils corrections, Parking facilities, and some other mmor site related costs. TIF fimds cannot be used to construct the bufldmgs, buy -equipment, etc. 1 t 05-01-199^ 03:32PM FROM Radzw1II & Couri Law Offi TO 49732100 P.m 3. 75% of the captured TIF increment must be spent on the project site (i.e. on the TIF parcel itsel). 25% of the TIF fiords can be spent on public not on the site. The off -site fiords do not have to be directly related to the project; and most likely can ianclude expenditures for items which generally enhance business in the City (e.g. drainage projects, street improvement projects, water/sewer upgrades, etc-). 4. I The ; exact anwwa of 17 increments captured will depend upon the value of the constructed on the TIFed parcel. These values will not: be known until a potential business steps forward with a detailed building desi g* 5. Notq that if the City sets up an economic development TIF, the City mast contrite 10°/a of the estimated captured tax increment to the project as a "locai match," or the City will experience a reduction in its LGA/HACA of approximately 33% of the estimated captured tax increment. The local matcW by the City can be either cash or property in kind, but must come from general revenue finds. ; As an example, if a TIF project captured $35,000 per year in tax increment, the City would1ave to contribute the equivalent of $3,500 per year to the project. 6. 1 Given these restrictions, there are several viable scenarios for developing these properties.. The most obvious use of TIF increments would be to pay for sanitary sewer/water extension to the property. Because of the 75% restriction noted above, no more than 25% of the TIF funds could be used to pay for sewer/water improvements on properties which are not part of the TIF (e.g. the Kolles property„through which the sanity sewer may nor). I have not seen the numbers yet; but would expect that 25% of tide TIF fiords would not cover all of the cost of installing sewmtwater on properties which are not part of the TER The Developer may have to lack in :some money to cover these costs, or the costs could be assessed against benefiting properties, such as the Koller property, with the Developer funding some or all of the interest on a defmTed assessment against benefiting properties. Note that: TIF monies can also be used: to fund other public improvements" to the TIFed parcel, including streets, storm sewers, etc. 7. An alternative scenario is to have the Developer install the se!, r ater systems, and I have, the City "write down" (pay for) the cost of the land which the business will locate on. This has the effect of malting the land `tree" to the business, since. the City o reimburses the business for what it paid for the land. This scenario makes it easier for the. Developer to attract potential businesses to the site. 8. Without a specific business development proposal before the City, we can only speculate on how the TIF may be structured and how the TIF monies may be spent. 2 " 05-01-1997 03:33PM FROM Radzwill & Court Law Offi TO 49732100 P.04 a 10. cc: MY r I - - standing of the City Conncil's positim an using 17 as a tool to attract businesses is that the City is in favor of using TW, Provided that thei potential business is one which the City finds desirable and the `Koval match" will not significantly the CkY's genend budget. From, here I would suggest that the City and Developer ea�nine all .of the potential develop t costs related to Cedar Creek Business Park Imdudibg . streets, sewa% water, soils, etc-) We can then break the costs down by those are "an site" for TIF'poses and those which are "off site for of the 7150 % Vai&S limitationsthi . Once s is dew, we Can. get a ballpark feel far what amount of building valuation would be needed to pay for a set amonmt of public and/or site t& The Developer will then have a better idea as'to hoi v it can market the property to potential businesses. 1 •'itii 1 : •�1�: It,�!: • - • / It �1 ti 11 .11:.r M:1! • 1 � • ► 1 1 I1 1 'tint+�: • • � �'Jit 1• Y. .•1 1 - 1 : • 1 ' '1 1 1 ti �• • }K E / • • It :all 1 • / 1 ' W. Pete Carlson Mr. Doan► Jensen 3 N W,6#% em% NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS IS COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council Albertville Planning Commission FROM: Elizabeth Stockman DATE: 7 May 1997 RE: Albertville - Center Oaks Preliminary Plat FILE: 163.06 - 97.09 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Pilot Development Co. has submitted a preliminary plat for the subdivision of 108 single family lots. The plat, named Center Oaks, is located immediately south of Parkside 3rd Addition on the west side of CSAH 19. The plat contains two outlots (B and C) which will be sold for construction of the senior housing development. The property is zoned R-1 A, Low Density Single Family but rezoning is requested to Planned Unit Development in order to accommodate the unique "coving" design within which lot sizes, lot widths and structure setbacks vary from the standard R-1A requirements. Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Preliminary Plat Exhibit C - Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Exhibit D - Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan Exhibit E - Wetland Mitigation Plan Recommendation Given the array of land use variables which may be considered acceptable under a Planned Unit Development designation and differing opinions relating to conformance with the R-1 A District standards, the decision to rezone the property from Low Density Single Family to Planned Unit Development and approval of the preliminary plat is considered a policy decision to be determined by the City Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. The detailed parameters which will govern the Planned Unit Development can and should be set by these governing bodies. Should the decision, which requires 4 of the 5 votes, to approve the project occur, it is recommended that such action be subject to the following conditions: 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM 1. The City Council finds the requested rezoning from Low Density Single Family to Planned Unit Development acceptable and in conformance with the rezoning criteria contained in the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. Lots 1-3 of Block 3 and Lots 3-4 of Block 4 are acceptable with areas of less than 15,000 square feet. 3. Lot widths varying between 75 and 155 feet with 36 percent of the lots at or above the R- 1A (100 foot) lot width is acceptable. 4. Front structure setbacks varying from 30 feet to 90 feet are acceptable and are set as the minimum requirement as shown on the plat. 5. Side yard setbacks for all lots shall be ten (10) feet for interior lots and thirty (30) feet for corner lots. Rear yard setbacks on all lots shall be twenty-five (25) feet. 6. Twenty-five (25) percent site coverage shall be used as the maximum amount of lot area that can be occupied by the house and other structures. 7. The maximum building height shall be set at 35 feet for all lots. 8. The dedicated right-of-way for CSAH 19 is reviewed and approved by the Wright County Engineer. 9. The submitted Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 10. The submitted Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 11. The submitted Wetland Mitigation Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. 12. The thirty (30) foot trail access easement shown across Block 2 is changed to an outlot and dedicated to the City as parkland. 13. A Planned Unit Development agreement is prepared which includes all development plans and specifications, shall set forth specific land use and performance standards which must be adhered to throughout the life of the Planned Unit Development, and shall be approved by the City Attorney. 14. Any other conditions as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. 2 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Zoning. The property is zoned R-1 A, Low Density Single Family. The applicant is requesting rezoning to Planned Unit Development to accommodate the unique "coving" design within which lot sizes, lot widths, and structure setback requirements deviate from the standard R-1A requirements. As a means of comparison, a summary of lot data has been provided for your reference: Lot Area: The majority of lots encompass 15,000 square feet of land or greater, with the exception of Lots 1-3. Block 3 and Lots 3-4, Block 4. These five lots meet the R-1 District minimum size of 12,500 square feet and are grouped in the area of Kalland Avenue and Kantar Court, thereby separating the larger lot sizes from the senior housing town homes. The developer is requesting this deviation because the land upon which these five lots are located was included in the concept plans that were drawn at the R-1 standard at the time Parkside 3rd Addition was considered and to some degree are limited by the 495 foot land dimension between Parkside 3rd and The Meadows. Lot Width: The proposed lots vary in width from 75 feet to 155 feet as measured at the designated (varying) building setback line. The lot which contains the existing Roden farmhouse is the only one which is less than 80 feet at the front setback line. Forty-three (43) lots are between 80 and 89 feet wide, twenty-five (25) lots are between 90 and 99 feet wide, twenty-eight (28) lots are between 100 and 119 feet wide, and ten (11) lots are over 120 feet wide. Thirty-six (36) percent of the lots are at or above the R-1A lot width (100 foot) standard and 60 percent of the lots are at or above the R-1 lot width (90 foot) standard. Setbacks: The front setback within the proposed Planned Unit Development varies between 30 feet (R-1A standard) and about 90 feet. The varying setbacks have been set as shown on the plat. Side and rear yard setbacks have not been indicated, but based on the lot widths which have been proposed a ten (10) foot side yard interior setback, a thirty (30) foot side yard corner setback and a twenty-five (25) foot rear setback are recommended. Site Coverage (buildings and structures): No site coverage limitation has been proposed, thus it is recommended that the R-1A standard of 25 percent be used as the maximum amount of lot area that can be occupied by the house and other structures. This requirement shall be stipulated in the development agreement. Maximum Building Height: The maximum building height shall be set at 35 feet, consistent with the R-1 A standard. Density. The proposed plat has an overall density of 1.52 units per acre as based on the proposed 108 lots and 71.04 acre parcel size. This density is considered low and is therefore in compliance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan which designates low density single family development in this portion of the City. 3 Vehicular Circulation. The plat appropriately makes provision for 53rd Street which is designated as a minor collector route in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The street is shown at the proper 70 foot right-of-way width and will have a 36 foot paved surface (back of curb to back of curb). At the point where 53rd Street intersects with Karston Street, Karston Street continues to the north and west as the required 70 foot collector route. A series of local streets provide access throughout the remainder of the subdivision, making connection to the existing Parkside 3rd neighborhood to the north. Between 59.07 and 61.52 of right-of-way has been shown on the plat as being dedicated to Wright County for CSAH 19. The plat must be submitted to the County Engineer who should review and approve this configuration. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan. The submitted Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan. The submitted Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. Wetland Mitigation. The submitted Wetland Mitigation Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. Park Dedication. The plat shows a park area which will be added to Oakside Park which was created at the time Parkside 3rd was approved. The parcel encompasses 94,608 square feet (2.17 acres) and will provide a total land area of 5.01 acres for Oakside Park. This configuration is adequate to serve both the existing and planned neighborhoods in the vicinity up to a one-half ('/2) mile radius surrounding the park. The addition of land will change the park's status from a Neighborhood Playground to a Neighborhood Park as is consistent with the City's Draft Park and Trail Plan. The park includes a "leg" or strip of land which progresses to the southern boundary of the plat where it is intended to make connection via an overland trail through The Meadows plat and to 53rd Street. This "leg" tapers from 30 feet on the north end to 12 feet at its narrowest point, but again widens to 75 feet in width on the south end. The park has 113 feet of frontage on Kantar Court and is capable of accommodating vehicular parking and associated screening as desired. The 2.17 acres of land being dedicated represents 61 percent of the total 3.55 acres which could be required, but is not necessary in its Neighborhood Park classification. The remaining 39 percent of the park dedication requirement shall be satisfied with a cash payment, less the cost of constructing trails as designated. Trails are planned to follow 53rd Street along its entirety, continuing to the north west along Karstan Street as well as to the east on Karston Street and across Block 2 to access Oakside Park and finally to the north along Kaller Avenue into Parkside 3rd Addition. All trail routes are in compliance with the City's Draft Park and Trail Plan, except that the trail access across Block 2 is shown as a 30 foot easement rather than a 30 foot outlot as has been specifically dictated by the Planning and Zoning Commission on 8 April 1997. The outlot provides additional setbacks from future homes to the trail and allows space for screening as 4 necessary. Furthermore, the overland trail as intended provides an alternate form of pedestrian circulation which varies from the standard grade -separated and on -street trail classifications (which are predominant in Albertville) by not being associated with/parallel to the street right-of- way. At a length of 411 feet, 30 feet wide, the trail outlot will add 12,330 square feet (.28 acre) of land to the overall park dedication amount for a total of 2.45 acres (69 percent of the total required park dedication). Planned Unit Development Agreement. The City Attorney will draft a Planned Unit Development agreement which will include all development plans and specifications. The agreement shall set forth specific land use and performance standards which must be adhered to throughout the life of the Planned Unit Development. City Staff will review and comment on the development agreement which will then be approved and finalized by the City Attorney. CONCLUSION The proposed Center Oaks plat has changed little since its introduction to the City Planning and Zoning Commission last winter. At that time the Commission was drawn to the "coving" concept with its curvilinear streets and deviation from standard subdivision design, however, the long term goal to provide larger lots in the community for the establishment of middle to upper -end homes and conformance to the City's Comprehensive Plan has always remained foremost. Given the array of land use variables which may be considered acceptable under a Planned Unit Development designation and differing opinions relating to conformance with the R-1 A District standards, the decision to rezone the property from Low Density Single Family to Planned Unit Development and approval of the preliminary plat is considered a policy decision to be determined by the City Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. The detailed parameters which will govern the Planned Unit Development can and should be set by these governing bodies. Should the decision, which requires 4 of the 5 votes, to approve the project occur, it is recommended that conditions of approval as listed in the Executive Summary of this report be incorporated in to the approval. pc: Gary Hale Linda Houghton Pete Carlson Mike Couri Don Jensen 61 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ❑ A-1, Agricultural Rural ❑ R-6, Residential High Density !] B-W, Business Warehouse ❑ A-2, Agricultural Transitional ❑ R-7, Special Purpose High Density 1-1. Light Industrial ❑ R-1A, Low Density Single Family ❑ R-8, Mixed Housing ❑ I-1A, Limited Industrial ❑ R-1, Single Family ❑ R-MH, Manufactured Housing Residential:, 1 1-2, General Industrial R-2, Single & Two Family B-1, Neighborhood Business ❑ PUD, Planned Unit Development EJ R-3, Single & Two -Family B-2, Limited Business ❑ P/I, Public/Institutional R4, Low Density Multiple Family ❑ B-3, Highway Commercial ❑ S, Shoreland Overlay ❑ R-5, Medium Density Multiple Family ❑ B4, General Business U W, Wetland Overlay gr+c;F£ET •`••-- -- I-1 `• I-1 B 3 +• zl ;2-1A R 1A ' w --- NFAG X ;• 0 1000 20CC MUD �w SCALE IN FEET m ' B-3 LAKE RS I PUD R-5 SCHOOL u P/1 r— R-1A P D ------•------------ T P/1 B3 R-1A �- Aj PUD _ ---� P/I R-1 13-3 I`.,. B 3 PII A I RJi "i,84 R({ F e 1 R-1A y �l rF t tI 1 5TfH STREET N B-3 IIP/l R-1 Center Oaks Plat i UI Rom. 1/i11 • „05/29/97 08:84 FAX 13202518760 SEH ST. CLOUD -►-►-► ALBERTVILLE CITY Q 001/004 AdW AW 113S. RRHAVENUE. P. Q 80X 17i7 ST, CLOUD, MN5B9 4717 3202524740 8W $72-0817 320251-8760 FAX ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING • ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION TO: Garrison Hale City Administrator Albertville, MN FROM: Peter J. Carlson, P.E. City Engineer DATE: May 13, 1997 RE: Preliminary Plat, Grading, Drainage, and Utility Plan Center Oaks SER No. A-ALBEV 9701.00 I have reviewed the above referenced drawings and have the following comments: Preliminary Plat 1. There area number of lots that do not meet the 100-foot width at the setback line required for the R IA zoning. It is my understanding the proposed PUD zoning would be established with the construction, of a golf course. Within the PUD, a minimum lot width should be established. As shown, there are a number of lot widths that are less than 90 feet, which is the minimum required in the R-1 zone. Please verify the minimum lot widths with the City Attorney and City Planner. Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan 1. Identify the positive overflow elevations for the detention ponds and low rear yard areas in Blocks 2 and 6_ Set walkout elevations a minimum of 2 feet above the positive overflow elevation- 2. Dwain, file lines will be required in all rear yard areas that do not back onto a detention pond or wetland. 3. Grade the rear lot area of Lots 22 - 26, Block 7 to drain to the proposed detention pond. SHORT ELLlorr HENORCXSON INC. Sr PAUL. MN MINNEAPOLIS MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISM 1M LAKECOUNTK W .05/29/97 08:35 FAX 13202518760 SEH ST. CLOUD -►-►-+ ALBERTVILLE CITY IM002/004 Mr. Garrison Hale May 13, 1997 Page 2 4. House pads should be perpendicular to the street It is my understanding that the "coving" concept being utilized with this development allows for variable setbacks- However, there are several building pads shown that are also skewed to the street. In my opinion, with the proposed narrow lots, this will have the look of trying to "shove in" one more lot along that particular street when there isn't room. 5. Submit drainage calculations used to size the detention ponds for review. Because of downstream drainage issues with County Ditch 9, the allowable discharge from the ponds will be limited to half the predevelopment rates. 6. On Lot 6, Block 2, the pedestrian trail is shown 10 feet from the building pad. A wider corridor should be created for the trail. Preliminary Utility and Street Plan 1. The proposed street pavement section shall be according to the City Standard Detail and shall be revised accordingly. Wetland Mitigation Plan 1_ Submit plan to the Wright Soil and Water Conservation District for review and approval. If you have any questions please call me. dig c: Linda Houghton, City Clerk Elizabeth Stockman, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Mike Couri, City Attorney Meyer-Rohlin, Inc. (JAALBMC0RRWY-13A.97) CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Applicant's Name: Center Oaks. Pilot Development Co. la Planning t vrnmission Findings of Fact & Recommendation Request: Pilot Development Co. has submitted a preliminary plat for the subdivision of 108 single family lots. The plat, named Center Oaks, is located immediately south of Parkside 3rd Addition on the west side of CSAH 19. The plat contains two outlots (B and C) which will be sold for construction of the senior housing development. The property is zoned R-1 A, Low Density Single Family but rezoning is requested to Planned Unit Development in order to accommodate the unique "coving" design within which lot sizes, lot widths and structure setbacks vary from the standard R-1 A requirements. Planning Commission Meeting Date: 13 May 1997 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1) The legal description of the subject property is as follows: (see attached) 2) The Planning Report dated 7 May 1997, prepared by NAC, Inc. and the 13 May 1997 report prepared by SEH are incorporated herein. Recommendation: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for rezoning, preliminary and final plat approval has been approved based on the most current plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Council finds the requested rezoning from Low Density Single Family to Planned Unit Development acceptable and in conformance with the rezoning criteria contained herein. 2. Lots 1-3 of Block 3 and Lots 3-4 of Block 4 are acceptable with areas of less than 15,000 square feet. 3. Lot widths varying between 75 and 155 feet with 36 percent of the lots at or above the R- 1A (100 foot) lot width is acceptable. 4. Front structure setbacks varying from 30 feet to 90 feet are acceptable and are set as the minimum requirement as shown on the plat. 5. Side yard setbacks for all lots shall be ten (10) feet for interior lots and thirty (30) feet for corner lots. Rear yard setbacks on all lots shall be twenty-five (25) feet. 6. Twenty-five (25) percent site coverage shall be used as the maximum amount of lot area that can be occupied by the house and other structures. 7. The maximum building height shall be set at 35 feet for all lots. 8. The area of the plat located east of Kalland Avenue shall be shown on the preliminary and final plats as Lot 1, Block 1 (first phase rental community and private street access to Kalland) and two outlots for future owner occupied community. 9. The dedicated right-of-way for CSAH 19 is reviewed and approved by the Wright County Engineer. 10. The submitted Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 11. The submitted Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 12. The submitted Wetland Mitigation Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. 13. The thirty (30) foot trail access easement shown across Block 2 is changed to an .outlot and dedicated to the City as parkland. 14. The third phase of the Center Oaks development shall not be approved until the adjacent golf course is approved by the City Council and graded in. 15. A Planned Unit Development agreement is prepared which includes all development plans and specifications, shall set forth specific land use and performance standards which must be adhered to throughout the life of the Planned Unit Development, and shall be approved by the City Attorney. 16. The Planned Unit Development agreement shall be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review prior to approval by the City Council. Adopted by the Albertville Planning Commission this 13th day of May, 1997. Attest: City of Albertville in Donatus Vetsch, Chairman Linda Houghton, City Clerk pc: Gary Hale, Linda Houghton, Pete Carlson, Mike Couri, Don Jensen 2 M 5-19-97 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: Center Oaks. Pilot Development Co. Request: Pilot Development Co. has submitted a preliminary plat for the subdivision of 108 single family lots. The plat, named Center Oaks, is located immediately south of Parkside 3rd Addition on the west side of CSAH 19. The plat contains two outlots (B and C) which will be sold for construction of the senior housing development. The property is zoned R-1 A, Low Density Single Family but rezoning is requested to Planned Unit Development in order to accommodate the unique "coving" design within which lot sizes, lot widths and structure setbacks vary from the standard R-1 A requirements. City Council Meeting Date: 3 June 1997 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following findings of fact. and recommendation: 1) The legal description of the subject property is as follows: (see attached) 2) The Planning Report dated 7 May 1997, prepared by NAC, Inc. and the 13 May 1997 report prepared by SEH are incorporated herein. 3) On 13 May 1997 the Albertville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the applicant's request, preceded by a published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that the City Council approve the project. Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request has been approved based on the most current plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: The City Council finds the requested rezoning from Low Density Single Family to Planned Unit Development acceptable and in conformance with the rezoning criteria contained herein. 2. Lots 1-3 of Block 3 and Lots 3-4 of Block 4 are acceptable with areas of less than 15,000 square feet. 3. Lot widths varying between 75 and 155 feet with 36 percent of the lots at or above the R- 1 A (100 foot) lot width is acceptable. 4. Front structure setbacks varying from 30 feet to 90 feet are acceptable and are set as the minimum requirement as shown on the plat. 5. Side yard setbacks for all lots shall be ten (10) feet for interior lots and thirty (30) feet for T �< corner lots. Rear yard setbacks on all lots shall be twenty-five (25) feet. 6. Twenty-five (25) percent site coverage shall be used as the maximum amount of lot area that can be occupied by the house and other structures. 7. The maximum building height shall be set at 35 feet for all lots. 8. The area of the plat located east of Kalland Avenue shall be shown on the preliminary and final plats as Lot 1, Block 1 (first phase rental community and private street access to Kalland) and two outlots for future owner occupied community. 9. The dedicated right-of-way for CSAH 19 is reviewed and approved by the Wright County Engineer. 10. The submitted Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 11. The submitted Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 12. The submitted Wetland Mitigation Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. 13. The thirty (30) foot trail access easement shown across Block 2 is changed to an outlot and dedicated to the City as parkland. 14. The third phase of the Center Oaks development shall not be approved until the adjacent golf course is approved by the City Council and graded in. 15. A Planned Unit Development agreement is prepared which includes all development plans and specifications, shall set forth specific land use and performance standards which must be adhered to throughout the life of the Planned Unit Development, and shall be approved by the City Attorney. 16. The Planned Unit Development agreement shall be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review prior to approval by the City Council. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 3rd day of June 1997. Attest: City of Albertville Linda Houghton, City Clerk Mark Olsen, Mayor pc: Don Jensen, Gary Hale, Linda Houghton, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson E Mi 13N oil J. 3 > W / Z/l S W Jo �u1 !ro3 h 61 vN 4-46N-3 lv��r 3 9„Z/,6.! N_..__. e I lJ a'a . W) 1jl 1 � �g i W Z�� tiU b'p8�m•3` \ 00 co Ln �c RQ N Q2� H4�o°4 t0 J J ? 0 , W V II °/ Illy Q Z SZ� t OQ k rY vuc iouo CL QI-~lily O �hoo2hv qoj \ -------- .- ra Cl i-Ai -.� C'l r�i ,tCYrr Yt'CC t.r YYYYCY,�rr ry�i;�YYYYrYCCYCt rSrr -- j�� J ,I IMI i• O$%R7tR««k«A%R%%«;R%%R -R%«%R �RRRY«YZ%7«RffR%�R%ft«%7t;%R x . , � sJ7N9'J��t---1 _ � 1�`;y%�,� _• _ _ \ � ;� � i :� „� � r^�1; ��< n�����x ��_����nRn�������'�n��e��e�h�_�o��zaNa_c^�=r_a o zeo eo`eoee•e,° "` 4 Y c,r'i I I h n bJnn J+'JJ J Jnn nnnnnnnnhnn n^Nnnnw^^n � _ _ ,obbbHb•abnnbnnbon^ cm� I C I 1 Q Q, x a�ax xx pax �a �oox3ax�ax>xx& a'��a x�a 9xxx*a�aaa m����madd ��mammam� �:: ��1e�mea �.i I �� I 410� _ _.., 0�„� � rCi' YCCt;rr '>;Cr s:r ": YCrCi �rCY 'YC :YtYrCYrt�CCCr Yrr2:CC CC rGl- O^ Wn^°beon.N$'.St--__" Sb_h � z 5 € b € xe�, _��$nn�^^ Zn$e H .�$^�°�'b "e " t,y ✓ x - ,<z a .a c a oaa00000axoo o `s`s°��s`��`s`s�s`§ `� ' I.. i \ ,l J ..-=� 4jq ma<� ✓Dc2p 05 b� 0� �+1-bC 0�y �i-�_NNNNNNNNhhh NNNNhhhN vHHHHHHHHH HH HHHHHHHHb°bbb b,e j 11 , o� Qk tiw9a °bF c �°v.b x&kdXxxxXx�x�axkxx&4`axi<axxisxk�axx�k�axz3xkxx�akxsxIIk�x •�.\ ! / -� 1 ��.\. pQ oY,'Ri $r-n-'i "'e o 9;i $ a' mmm�mma�oZmxxxb+b&��iiS dfi3m�m�°i&��daa���+E�b���3E��✓g3A�26 ib381n28d3d J "o ° 4�1- r.., �/I 3s zvl / K „O t y' �-• I1 ; !(/ _ —.�. Y°JAI MN V 71 Is 3 r 1. , 'i `w't y r 1 � 1• < e I 'p �' i , I N �a I i N{ i I �- 1'7 sny�J : I `.?• j `�',/ _ rf_, / �"" � m �'i� 1}\• ,I I "�/ ! II Po_.._ I -__ _ -_ - -.. 1 1 & , -._..A i 1p .'tl•� ql ... l :Jb; $ .i4._.\} lb I l kl I I I I I . •� R g§ �� 41 i_ ( -' �%' • \ , / y' � :f .<•,, a,r \ e\., ` � ✓;�f ,bT,/ /.�' � �-� ¢erg.-•... w.r r O�+VF, �:, , � 81 t^1 � \ oaf; L i � 0 i 1; j I i 1 R '%3•bD I g i I I s I I JAP u la . 1 1 � I ( ."` c""�' •. `. .. set._ .' ar ar �`,+t - /// �. 1 (%'-an _ 1 1 _ m, Y � r, �-)-- v ♦ice it I ., \ 1 } �\ ' I / / a % ` ,�,, '� 9r N / i h %� ' / ,.'•� .. f 1 - / // /Q�,/ (- 'O N �.. YZ `` od-: I 1 Sr_...1 i -2. IT h a q9 } I I � N. fV r 'fir �Y V- //,•l /\_ -'1- _�i�. p1\ ,a> >, ,,%', <u .r I �� � � • a � s., 950 � J OnA� �i,� N /• ;r �� i11 `•' $II ,�, �i' �- a� `�� �i ri � `\\ �. I � %/ �' r � _ ` 't Y/1 3N .41 ,o 9/1 S W1 I. -w P" J, ., IS, SS.O N ' 'z 'acS fo 3/f MS' oV1 fo i/i MN or4 fo +u7 !s Al --�� S. setts wrreruw is .ri-wo st-if - SN rat -4- n -_ \ OO/tdo*oDLlol \ . ORw N o z 0 M ^-^ Z i� m y h 41 .Z aa5//o //! 3N •V7 J. f/ /o o4'I lro3 ~ 3 _ LIJ 61 ory .(o"V6!N 'off 1— - N — ----- - - $ 0 -- _-- ---- L L c I M V-11 P toOc Q� z �22N "Q20 Q W��� v,Woti r, 3 O`" v p W�N� o�N� owl U^'ia a iwz o�oW II s a- m m. \\ is J:�Cem camas •ues Pu�lle31 i ♦� _ 0 `I! _.-• .. ...^ - ^ / _.._.—__. ._�..... y _r. 1/IMN+4i/x oNll�l—°12 — .rV aQ N / Nro ' N w m 3 cjk. / Z=p ja C, — 10 to 'Al Ytps � �"+ r • 1 - I m T+ .ter C7 rQAM � 3 b ri/- '\ \ '._/" j / N //<- •P A�Kr< ; ai „ �\ ro ro. _rrr / l i im San. at 0.40% 14 00 UL- carp g� N I 0 60 wl hC Z wS I ,0Wi 3N o47 /o Z/i S �V7 /o awi 7�N11 Z '>05 /o WI MS �4! Io Y/i MN +47 to ow7s Al O Gj Lu z �E N ,Q z' i v5 I rA IN -we Z.'I 1 r4l IO ow, l..o) I N a _ V w a xPcz c C nib i �"h • � 1 � i � � - ., '._' .. E - . ! i 1,6 40 uj 3°' •- ;? :ado 'ti.':.'' �°i ". i 1 1 k ' ' a rn "•i: �� � .� i't i 1` ;:-_".'�®'"_;�'C .;: rE i{ � X _ �' — oc 17 es s l O \ �� ��,� 9e9 a��y` ,�" -�jfl•—�°'b -� �, .�� qv0 (` ._ .. s. fm;m �,",s^�` .; 9�b�' / 'x' q;' I ��11 des �%r ,. i�' j • �� °'' "oc9 � I !� � � �� � .� � v • ! S 31Q a4P', ` ,985A� ;B834aJ .bg9H �'�4•y' '''`a '..' '%r �f1 ,,- .�__._ - � .'1}'J" '_� __. _ _. . v6 ;Al 98o"? D, ♦ \ 9� 2Sy < :'\ r i 4 �,= `!� -,C 9o0A Qill e! ' 1�yo. O'9y8 �� • S'ISF 9� ._. 0 . 1 I e9 DN� '� ;,� - � �' io 7.m i�,, ...,.:. _ I , Imo; \ _ � � • �U-�, .n: 's . . ;+ —.. h \ c 963za. Rjs ghs' .. ? •, /:=."y....d«» -� c,c i j 1 \\ Nux 9830, 9829 . Iryr. � u.l •N y y d. / s Dry 962.A: .r<. y+ � 1F. OM �K. � a�l➢ 958 .\ , ����i2R? � / \. IO,N * I .Id :q mla 'a i.c O. ' 0h C'rs- 3: 9524 1 t952.6ar .m953.0 s 955/ \. ,:, c H9Hm IN: a sea;,_ m 4/. �, Ah�� ! �`tb `�_'_ N `,ter .•' 98 co il•LL9H Z�"• c :. .wK:.... �•.. ' 6 r'i 1 ��, t : f. - \ ..,•''.fir _ oy hb "•i co , . a.t w �VI• rr.11� , ...,. 3 �. \ C 01 N, 4f 06 -`\'toil'tCB '�1 p. R:bSg✓ !, , rsjs�j - wcn al w !n, 0 S6�r 9'►98a l3 O�� ,� SEA.,O\ m 0-:0rr0512 Ngg40' a b w v oe 96,61/ ' Z '�ri !e r�l IN s47 to �i $ rLl IO xlh+M gO� ' i • 'B�RTVii LE Applicant's Name: Cedar Creek North Pilot Developmen 7a 6V ? Pianning t oimmnsrsion Findings of Fact & Recommendation Request: Pilot Development Co. has submitted a preliminary plat for the subdivision of 90 single family lots. The plat, named Cedar Creek North, is located on the south side of CSAH 37 at the western City limits. The plat contains four outiots, three of which (A, B, and C) are zoned R-5, Medium Density Multiple Family and will be developed in the future. Outiot D will be part of the future Cedar Creek South plat which will incorporate the golf course and additional housing. The property is zoned R-1 A, Low Density Single Family but rezoning is requested to Planned Unit Development (not including outiots) in order to accommodate the unique "coving" design within which lot widths and structure setbacks vary from the standard R-1A requirements. Planning Commission Meeting Date: 13 Mav 1997 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1) The leaal description of the subject property is as follows: (see attached) 2) The Planning Report dated 7 May 1997, prepared by NAC, inc. and the 13 May 1997 report prepared by SEH are incorporated herein. Recommendation: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for preliminary plat approval has been approved based on the most current Plans and information received to date, subiect to the followina conditions: The City Council finds the requested rezoning from Low Density Single Family to Planned Unit Development acceptable and in conformance with the rezoning criteria contained in the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. The vacation of existing Kadler Avenue is approved by the City Council's of the City of Albertville and the City of Otsego. The developer must petition both cities for vacation of this street. No temporary or permanent access shall be allowed from the Cedar Creek North plat to Kadler Avenue. 3. The lot labeled access easement which is intended to provide future access toifrom the excepted Becker parcel shall be platted as an outiot. Such outiot shall be deeded to Becker upon vacation of Kadler Avenue to provide access to Karstan Drive/Avenue. 4. Ali lots within the plat which include a portion of Kadler Avenue (assuming its vacation) shall be revised to be exclusive of this existing roadway in terms of lot area and shall contain a minimum of 15,000 square feet. The Kadier Avenue right-of-way shall be shown on the plat as a thirty-three (33) foot roadway easement which upon approval by the City Council may be abandoned. 5. Lot widths varying between 80 and 188 feet with 38 percent of the lots at or above the R- 1 A 0 00 foot) lot width is acceptable. 6. Front structure setbacks varying from 30 feet to 90 feet are acceptable and are set as the minimum requirement as shown on the plat. 7. Side yard setbacks for all lots shall be ten (10) feet for interior lots and thirty (30) feet for corner lots. Rear vard setbacks on all lots shall be twenty-five (25) feet. 8. Twenty-five (25) percent site coverage shall be used as the maximum amount of lot area that can be occupied by the house and other structures. 9. The maximum buildina height shall be set at 35 feet for all lots. 10. The dedicated right-of-way for CSAH 37 is reviewed and approved by the Wright County Engineer. 11. The two main street names within the plat shall be changed to Karstan Avenue and Karstan Drive so as not to cause confusion with existing Kadler Avenue. 12. The submitted Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 13. The submitted Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 14. The submitted Wetland Mitigation Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. 15. The configuration of Winter Park and dedication size of 5.09 acres is acceptable to the City Council with a credit of 1.09 acres to Cedar Creek South. 16. Trail access is provided to Winter Park from Karstan Avenue between Lots 6 and 7 of Block 1 via a 30 foot trail corridor and an eight (8) foot paved trail to be constructed by the developer. 17. The developer constructs the eight (8) foot grade -separated trail as shown along the north/ east side of Karstan Avenue. Where the trail lies outside of the street right-of-way, an easement shall be established and shown on the final plat. 18. The deveioper agrees that the third phase of the Cedar Creek North plat (to be platted as an outlot on the final plat separate from the first and second phases) shall not be subdivided or developed until the adjacent goif course is approved by the City Council and graded in. The golf course and/or its adjacent development must incorporate an eight (8) foot overland trail which provides connection between Karstan Avenue and Karstan Drive in the southern portion of the Cedar Creek North plat to Highway 118 and the planned club house area. 19. A Planned Unit Development agreement is prepared which includes all development plans and specifications plus all standard development agreement data, shall set forth specific land use and performance standards which must be adhered to throughout the life of the Planned Unit Development, and shall be approved by the City Attorney. 20. The Planned Unit Development agreement shall be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review prior to approval by the City Council. Adopted by the Albertville Planning Commission this 13th day of May, 1997. Attest: City of Albertville Donatus Vetsch, Chairman Linda Houghton, City Clerk pc: Gary Hale, Linda Houghton, Pete Carlson, Mike Couri, Don Jensen 3 t � A 5-19-97 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: Cedar Creek North Pilot Develo ment Co. Request: Pilot Development Co. has submitted a preliminary plat for the subdivision of 90 single family lots. The plat, named Cedar Creek North, is located on the south side of CSAH 37 at the western City limits. The plat contains four outlots, three of which (A, B, and C) are zoned R-5, Medium Density Multiple Family and will be developed in the future. Outlot D will be part of the future Cedar Creek South plat which will incorporate the golf course and additional housing. The property is zoned R-1 A, Low Density Single Family but rezoning is requested to Planned Unit Development (not including outlots) in order to accommodate the unique "coving" design within which lot widths and structure setbacks vary from the standard R-1 A requirements. City Council Meeting Date: 3 June 1997 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1) The legal description of the subject property is as follows: (see attached) 2) The Planning Report dated 7 May 1997, prepared by NAC, Inc. and the 13 May 1997 report prepared by SEH are incorporated herein. 3) On 13 May 1997 the Albertville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the applicant's request, preceded by a published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that the City Council approve the project. Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request has been approved based on the most current plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. The City Council finds the requested rezoning from Low Density Single Family to Planned Unit Development acceptable and in conformance with the rezoning criteria contained in the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. The vacation of existing Kadler Avenue is approved by the City Council's of the City of Albertville and the City of Otsego. The developer must petition both cities for vacation of this street. No temporary or permanent access shall be allowed from the Cedar Creek North plat to Kadler Avenue. s 3. The lot labeled access easement which is intended to provide future access to/from the excepted Becker parcel shall be platted as an outlot. Such outlot shall be deeded to Becker upon vacation of Kadler Avenue to provide access to Karstan Drive/Avenue. 4. All lots within the plat which include a portion of Kadler Avenue (assuming its vacation) shall be revised to be exclusive of this existing roadway in terms of lot area and shall contain a minimum of 15,000 square feet. The Kadler Avenue right-of-way shall be shown on the plat as a thirty-three (33) foot roadway easement which upon approval by the City Council may be abandoned. 5. Lot widths varying between 80 and 188 feet with 38 percent of the lots at or above the R- 1A (100 foot) lot width is acceptable. 6. Front structure setbacks varying from 30 feet to 90 feet are acceptable and are set as the minimum requirement as shown on the plat. 7. Side yard setbacks for all lots shall be ten (10) feet for interior lots and thirty (30) feet for corner lots. Rear yard setbacks on all lots shall be twenty-five (25) feet. 8. Twenty-five (25) percent site coverage shall be used as the maximum amount of lot area that can be occupied by the house and other structures. 9. The maximum building height shall be set at 35 feet for all lots. 10. The dedicated right-of-way for CSAH 37 is reviewed and approved by the Wright County Engineer. 11. The two main street names within the plat shall be changed to Karstan Avenue and Karstan Drive so as not to cause confusion with existing Kadler Avenue. 12. The submitted Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 13. The submitted Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 14. The submitted Wetland Mitigation Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. 15. The configuration of Winter Park and dedication size of 5.09 acres is acceptable to the City Council with a credit of 1.09 acres to Cedar Creek South. 16. Trail access is provided to Winter Park from Karstan Avenue between Lots 6 and 7 of Block 1 via a 30 foot trail corridor and an eight (8) foot paved trail to be constructed by the developer. E 17. The developer constructs the eight (8) foot grade -separated trail as shown along the north/ east side of Karstan Avenue. Where the trail lies outside of the street right-of-way, an easement shall be established and shown on the final plat. 18. The developer agrees that the third phase of the Cedar Creek North plat (to be platted as an outlot on the final plat separate from the first and second phases) shall not be subdivided or developed until the adjacent golf course is approved by the City Council and graded in. The golf course and/or its adjacent development must incorporate an eight (8) foot overland trail which provides connection between Karstan Avenue and Karstan Drive in the southern portion of the Cedar Creek North plat to Highway 118 and the planned club house area. 19. A Planned Unit Development agreement is prepared which includes all development plans and specifications plus all standard development agreement data, shall set forth specific land use and performance standards which must be adhered to throughout the life of the Planned Unit Development, and shall be approved by the City Attorney. 20. The Planned Unit Development agreement shall be forwarded to the Planning and Zoning Commission for review prior to approval by the City Council. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 3rd day of June 1997. Attest: City of Albertville Mark Olsen, Mayor Linda Houghton, City Clerk pc: Don Jensen, Gary Hale, Linda Houghton, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson 3 8+00 47 c L O .c •,.- a� 000,�Q O Q O !- QrJ p t Z O 0 . c v C O �' �^ O j q) Lc) O pC6�� • Q� q) �✓ v U J •+-� C O U U �• {,_ firr,` `4� ~� y'� •C /�`� U Q) .. L o OU JO i. � Qi J U ' O� O Q� C O r V) U (b U O O U i • U Q� •_ .C .a Q O O O Q rJ J Q Ln Q) J J UCQ iL -05/29/97 08:36 F.AX 13202518760 SEH ST. CLOUD -►+-► ALBERTVILLE CITY Q004/004 Mr. Garrison L. Hale May 13, 1997 Page 2 2. Identify positive overflow elevations for detention ponds. Set walkout elevations a minimum of 2.0 feet above the positive overflow elevation. 3. Drain file lines will be required in all rear yard areas that do not drain into a detention pond or wetland. 4. Drainage from the rear yards of Block 2 needs to be addressed. As shown, the drainage flows to the proposed park with no other improvements shown. This situation is unacceptable and shall be revised. 5. Submit drainage calculations used to size the detention ponds for review. Because of downstream drainage issues with County Ditch 9, the allowable discharge from the ponds will be limited to half the predevelopment rates. Preliminary Utility and Street Plan I . The sanitary sewer may have to be revised to extend north to the proposed industrial park. 2. Show utilities to extend into Outlots A, B, and C. 3. Revise street pavement section according to the City's standard detail. Wetiand Mitigation Plan I . Submit plan to 'Wright Soil and Water Conservation District for review and approval. Please call me if you have any questions. di g c: Linda Houghton, City Clerk Elizabeth Stockman, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Mike Couri, City Attorney Meyer-Rohlin, Inc. (1: WLBEV%CQRRwy-13B.97) NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council Albertville Planning Commission FROM: Elizabeth Stockman DATE: 7 May 1997 RE: Albertville - Cedar Creek North Preliminary Plat FILE: 163.06 - 97.03 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Pilot Development Co. has submitted a preliminary plat for the subdivision of 90 single family lots. The plat, named Cedar Creek North, is located on the south side of CSAH 37 at the western City limits. The plat contains four outlots, three of which (A, B, and C) are zoned R-5, Medium Density Multiple Family and will be developed in the future. Outlot D will be part of the future Cedar Creek South plat which will incorporate the golf course and additional housing. The property is zoned R-1A, Low Density Single Family but rezoning is requested to Planned Unit Development (not including outlots) in order to accommodate the unique "coving" design within which lot widths and structure setbacks vary from the standard R-1A requirements. Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Preliminary Plat Exhibit C - Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Exhibit D - Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan Exhibit E - Wetland Mitigation Plan Recommendation Given the array of land use variables which may be considered acceptable under a Planned Unit Development designation and differing opinions relating to conformance with the R-1A District standards, the decision to rezone the property from Low Density Single Family to Planned Unit Development and approval of the preliminary plat is considered a policy decision to be determined by the City Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. The detailed parameters which will govern the Planned Unit Development can and should be set by these governing bodies. Should the decision, which requires 4 of the 5 votes, to approve the project occur, it is recommended that such action be subject to the following conditions: 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 612-595-9636 FAX 612-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@WINTERNET.COM 1. The City Council finds the requested rezoning from Low Density Single Family to Planned Unit Development acceptable and in conformance with the rezoning criteria contained in the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. Lot widths varying between 80 and 188 feet with 38 percent of the lots at or above the R- 1A (100 foot) lot width is acceptable. 3. Front structure setbacks varying from 30 feet to 90 feet are acceptable and are set as the minimum requirement as shown on the plat. 4. Side yard setbacks for all lots shall be ten (10) feet for interior lots and thirty (30) feet for corner lots. Rear yard setbacks on all lots shall be twenty-five (25) feet. 5. Twenty-five (25) percent site coverage shall be used as the maximum amount of lot area that can be occupied by the house and other structures. 6. The maximum building height shall be set at 35 feet for all lots. 7. The dedicated right-of-way for CSAH 19 is reviewed and approved by the Wright County Engineer. 8. The submitted Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 9. The submitted Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. 10. The submitted Wetland Mitigation Plan will be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. 11. The vacation of one-half (33 feet) of existing Kadler Avenue is acceptable to the City Council as is reestablishment of new Kadler Avenue slightly to the east. 12. The configuration of Winter Park and dedication size of 5.09 acres is acceptable to the City Council 13. The plat is reconfigured to accommodate an overland trail along the south portion of vacated Kadler Avenue or an alternative arrangement for overland trail access is provided in this vicinity and the trail is constructed by the developer. 14. The existing homestead property is included as part of the plat and combined with the new access strip. The final plat should reflect this change which will allow for a lot and block description of the parcel. 15. Trail access is provided to Winter Park from new Kadler Avenue via a 30 foot trail corridor and an 8 foot paved trail to be constructed by the developer. 2 16. The developer constructs the 8 foot grade -separated trail as shown along the north/ east side of new Kadler Avenue. 17. A Planned Unit Development agreement is prepared which includes all development plans and specifications, shall set forth specific land use and performance standards which must be adhered to throughout the life of the Planned Unit Development, and shall be approved by the City Attorney. 18. Any other conditions as set forth by the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Zoning. The property is zoned R-1 A, Low Density Single Family. The applicant is requesting rezoning to Planned Unit Development for the single family portion of the development (not including outlots) to accommodate the unique "coving" design within which lot widths and structure setback requirements deviate from the standard R-1 A requirements. As a means of comparison, a summary of lot data has been provided for your reference: Lot Area: All lots are 15,000 square feet or larger. Lot Width: The proposed lots vary in width from 80 feet to 188 feet as measured at the designated (varying) building setback line. Thirty-seven (37) lots are between 80 and 89 feet wide, nineteen (19) lots are between 90 and 99 feet wide, fifteen (15) lots are between 100 and 119 feet wide, and nineteen (19) lots are 120 feet wide and over. Thirty-eight (38) percent of the lots are at or above the R-1 A lot width (100 foot) standard and fifty-nine (59) percent of the lots are at or above the R-1 lot width (90 foot) standard. Setbacks. The front setback within the proposed Planned Unit Development varies between 30 feet (R-1 A standard) and about 90 feet. The varying setbacks have been set as shown on the plat. Side and rear yard setbacks have not been indicated, but based on the lot widths which have been proposed a ten (10) foot side yard interior setback, a thirty (30) foot side yard corner setback and a twenty-five (25) foot rear setback are recommended. Site Coverage (buildings and structures)• No site coverage limitation has been proposed, thus it is recommended that the R-1 A standard of 25 percent be used as the maximum amount of lot area that can be occupied by the house and other structures. This requirement shall be stipulated in the development agreement. Maximum Building Height: The maximum building height shall be set at 35 feet, consistent with the R-1A standard. Density. The proposed plat has an overall density of 1.61 units per acre as based on the proposed 90 lots and 55.97 acre parcel size (excluding the R-5 area and Outlot D). This density is considered low and is therefore in compliance with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan which designates low density single family development in this portion of the City. 3 M Park Dedication. The plat shows a park area (named Winter Park by the Planning and Zoning Commission) which provides separation between the R-5 medium density development and the low density residential development being considered at this time. Winter Park has a gross area of 8.01 acres and a net area (minus wetlands) of 5.09 acres. In addition to the 5.09 acres used to satisfy the park dedication requirement, the developer will also be required to install the trails within the plat area. This includes the grade -separated trail adjacent to the new Kadler Avenue on its north/east side and the overland trail within the old Kadler Avenue right-of-way in the south west portion of the plat. Besides resolution of the overland trail issue as discussed in previous sections of this report, the only other outstanding recreation issue is the provision of access to Winter Park from the new Kadler Avenue. Because the western most corner of Winter Park is virtually land locked by a wetland, trail access is crucial and is recommended somewhere between 63rd Street and Kadler Drive. The trail access should be dedicated as part of the park as a thirty (30) foot corridor within which an eight (8) foot trail will be constructed. As it is, there is only about a twelve (12) foot passage within the park between the adjacent lots and the wetland through which to access the remaining park area. The Planning and Zoning Commission should review and comment on this issue. Planned Unit Development Agreement. The City Attorney will draft a Planned Unit Development agreement which will include all development plans and specifications. The agreement shall set forth specific land use and performance standards which must be adhered to throughout the life of the Planned Unit Development. City Staff will review and comment on the development agreement which will then be approved and finalized by the City Attorney. CONCLUSION The proposed Cedar Creek North plat has changed little since its introduction to the City Planning and Zoning Commission last winter. At that time the Commission was drawn to the "coving" concept with its curvilinear streets and deviation from standard subdivision design, however, the long term goal to provide larger lots in the community for the establishment of middle to upper - end homes and conformance to the City's Comprehensive Plan has always remained foremost. Given the array of land use variables which may be considered acceptable under a Planned Unit Development designation and differing opinions relating to conformance with the R-1A District standards, the decision to rezone the property from Low Density Single Family to Planned Unit Development and approval of the preliminary plat is considered a policy decision to be determined by the City Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. The detailed parameters which will govern the Planned Unit Development can and should be set by these governing bodies. Should the decision, which requires 4 of the 5 votes, to approve the project occur, it is recommended that conditions of approval as listed in the Executive Summary of this report be incorporated in to the approval. pc: Gary Hale, Linda Houghton, Pete Carlson, Mike Couri, Don Jensen '61 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ❑ A-1, Agricultural Rural O'L R-6, Residential High Density _ B-W, Business Warehouse ElA-2, Agricultural Transitional (❑ R-7, Special Purpose High Density _ 1-1, Light Industrial ❑ RAA, Low Density Single Family ❑ R-8, Mixed Housing I-1A, Limited Industrial ❑ R-1, Single Family 0 R-MH, Manufactured Housing Residential 1-2, General Industrial 0 R-2, Single & Two Family B-1, Neighborhood Business _I PUD, Planned Unit Development R-3, Single & Two -Family ' B-2, Limited Business P/I, PubliGlnstitutional ® R4, Low Density Multiple Family ❑ B-3, Highway Commercial L-i S, Shoreland Overlay ❑ R-5, Medium Density Multiple Family ❑ B-4, General Business _ W, Wetland Overlay Cedar t North 0 1000 2000 SCALE IN FEET 12-3-96 EXHIBIT A %4 PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY May 12, 1997 Members of the Council & Planning Commission c/o Mr. Gary Hale City Administrator Albertville, MN 55301. RE. Cedar Creek North PUD aynroval Dear Staff, Council & Commission members: Pilot Land has received a copy of the NAC report dated May 5, 1997. Pilot accepts conditions # 1- 6, and 8-11, 13, 15-17 and requests condition #17 to reference SCAH 37, condition #12 to reference appropriate credit to other subdivisions for excess land dedication, and #14& #18 to be struck from the conditions of approval and findings of fact.. In no case or project is it appropriate to accept an open ended condition such as & 18. If the planning commission or council suggests a reasonable additional condition which is deemed reasonable, as all other conditions are viewed, then Pilot will accept and incorporate them into the approvals and the plan. Condition # 14 was not part of the application, has been provided an access within the preliminary plat and is therefore incorporated by design. It is not legal to request or require its incorporation by condition. Until Albertville and Otsego agree to vacate their access, they can not be made part of the plat. At such time as phase 3 or four proceeds, a road is not available for their use regardless. We will work to create an appropriate access from "Winter Park" to get to Kadler either through the outlots or through the housing lots. We will be at the meeting to provide further testimony as needed to clarify our request. Pilot desires the approval of the plat to continue to expand our marketing of the sites to the builder community. Without your approval of the concept, we can not officially represent to potential buyers that an approval is imminent. With your approval of the conditions as proposed, we can augment the lots available in Albertville and hope to provide new places for families to grow. Sincerely, 4�� Donald Jensen, Land Development Director Cc: Liz Stockman, NAC Pete Carlson - SEH Attachments land dev: ctroksap.doc 13736 Johnson Street NE • Ham Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094 0) 11Z r') kr) to to 4% � -� 1 (n-W) q- 0 1 N %Z: I i LU Cj N -5 CO 8 Q� tc N V) —is J. WIT, -Z r;gg X-AV Will 4Md ZWZ&T-OOv101 lorzsr-o"jol mo— * —A�K - 7 10) 4 7Y1 IV. Asr 13 rq 41 NO Fr, -P1 id it q A jj 5r 64 --rz lo - - - - - - - - - - - - - all - - - - - - - ol RL r .4 lo _In UJ nr;= P - - - - - - - - - - - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . .35 io fa-- ij tt�,!iroe --960 *A1 I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - r — ozm wwqlfn 'Is -W -,is PIT Ill IC, 69.69 Ar ---a v --" oollao 10. owezo-wPol W ' ` W y 'ri Z ;li of 03 ti h d U ti Q U Z y 11_ � Its {p rr 'di its Le Ili � ;_ is �;•, ; ! � �--r s " Lr 0 N A O O C A= O� � dp ao C 7 OA A 21 E W N to U.. N C H to Z N a a rn Vl o M g M o z z a 6 U y ookO ho oz pp2tn `o �2 i a O4i4i `ohm QZY� NlnNto OQ2 3 � � J � Q `� ; N J � W ✓l Bum COI 0.-�24 4 iW=a i - o 1 h \ \ IP _ - Ilk 10 Z i - / % _ i ...I — \_. � '\\� � � - � � �b ,- �d'G\ t. I a _ " n , � � i �2t� .E / Ar zwo 6B / I 9.1 no r. ,._ a, � \ `fit � /� �\ N \ b / / o t. . `\ \\ •\ .' a`�`%-•'\ � \ � �•.. i. Ro at ell 19 ,� �����; Y�%- ''� ate_``• �� •�� � � o � ' _ --~ _, \�--� �� S<•d S • �0,�N /� i5t vSa•�N b AI „ OD OQ 06 S N 25 9� Ica N • • \ i /, I \ b q _s•Do', 00,6SN � 4� M= h W(; •q� ��at QC.t C�r4J�0 �i?o I LijL N L / 1 -6- f-G Jr; .. r1.. 9Y.&V ."> .. &, 80i } y NI m.. s9ao moo. 0 i c t \ 1 , R � � W a 1`�cnn � r � �Y r � �r r - 4 �i - 1 -� 1 Y � � l i •5 '1 its 7/ y V't9e�M' SOUS` N J. AI„OU, lIU,SSN 0 a � C � Y 3 C y C � d s x_ a 3 y - 79` o = C x V7 PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY May 12, 1997 Members of the Council & Planning Commission c/o Mr. Gary Hale City Administrator Albertville, MN 55301 RE: Center Oaks PUD approval Dear Staff, Council & Commission members: Pilot Land has received a copy of the NAC report dated May 5, 1997. Pilot accepts conditions # 1- 13, and requests condition #14 to be struck from the conditions of approval and findings of fact.. A sketch is attached to show how we can accomplish condition # 12. In no case or project is it appropriate to accept such an open ended condition. If the planning commission or council suggests a reasonable additional condition which is deemed reasonable, as all other conditions are viewed, then Pilot will accept and incorporate them .into the approvals and the plan. Without any specific legal basis in land use law, with the zoning and subdivision ordinance goal to protect the general public health safety and welfare as a basis for creating conditions of approval, an open condition is no different than me asking each of you to buy my car as a condition of selling you a shirt. We will be at the meeting to provide further testimony as needed to clarify our request. Pilot desires the approval of the plat to continue to expand our marketing of the sites to the builder community. Without your approval of the concept, we can not officially represent to potential buyers that an approval is imminent. With your approval of the conditions as proposed, we can augment the lots available in Albertville and hope to provide new places for families to grow. Sincgfply, Donald Jensen, Land Development Director Cc: Liz Stockman, NAC Pete Carlson - SEH Attachments land dev: ctroksap.doc 13736 Johnson Street NE • Ham Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094 46 O h� i t Fur I tp 6,Idt <e I � i In. U I ci • `�Q� 1 t l l l 6 66 e ^( / Ad .N �1 5+ ) rr(,b, • (tD i r ,. o f n I 1 Br 9 i J I` & B6 fi �ll7r6 0 I d /i BL Al f i 1 Z j )U f, rh' � it8 66 I � t I to 0 � VN�'} 10 �~I I� 50 t5q I I 65 h ` I 691N� (�, 9 19 0�3 N f j ro (lb Cb 'JO O^• �� Ih O O I I hI W O BB 10 O'l"6.01 0 9n I Lr j6 qq g w ` oe 60 SO Sf S(' 19 jl elfCtI 41 Cj � *� 1 • � � III• � I I �/ ^'/ v) r H ► I vl I z� _ 1 I_ azi �` r I 4ow Off' i96, k1 t 3N •'47 /o ,/1 s l !f Q � ' O O ' 9l f SS NIY'ROYNYY IS -71V 1—IS PA' Lfl wpatl n f)DILolz ZO -009101 �► � VIE 3 o N WWI% em"* NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS I CC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council Albertville Planning Commission FROM: Elizabeth Stockman DATE: 7 May 1997 RE: Albertville - Cedar Creek North Preliminary Plat FILE: 163.06 - 97.03 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Pilot Development Co. has submitted a preliminary plat for the subdivision of 90 single family lots. The plat, named Cedar Creek North, is located on the south side of CSAH 37 at the western City limits. The plat contains four outlots, three of which (A, B, and C) are zoned R-5, Medium Density Multiple Family and will be developed in the future. Outlot D will be part of the future Cedar Creek South plat which will incorporate the golf course and additional housing. The property is zoned R-1A, Low Density Single Family but rezoning is requested to Planned Unit Development (not including outlots) in order to accommodate the unique "coving" design within which lot widths and structure setbacks vary from the standard R-1A requirements. Attached for reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Preliminary Plat Exhibit C - Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Exhibit D - Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan Exhibit E - Wetland Mitigation Plan Recommendation Given the array of land use variables which may be considered acceptable under a Planned Unit Development designation and differing opinions relating to conformance with the R-1A District standards, the decision to rezone the property from Low Density Single Family to Planned Unit Development and approval of the preliminary plat is considered a policy decision to be determined by the City Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. The detailed parameters which will govern the Planned Unit Development can and should be set by these governing bodies. Should the decision, which requires 4 of the 5 votes, to approve the project occur, it is recommended that such action be subject to the following conditions: 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM Planning and Zoning Commission recommended appro on 3-11-97 and again on 5-13-97 with typo errors correct_ 5-14-97 ORDINANCE NO. 1997-2 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2500 OF THE ALBERTVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING THE REGULATION OF ANTENNA (COMMUNICATION RECEPTIONITRANSMISSION DEVICES). THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE ORDAINS Section 1. Section 200.02 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (Definitions) is hereby amended to delete the following definitions: (60) Essential Services (148) Satellite Dish (149) Satellite Dish Height Section 2. Section 200.02 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (Definitions) is hereby amended to add the following definitions: (5.1) Antenna Related: (a) Antenna, Personal Wireless Service. A device consisting of a metal, carbon fiber, or other electromagnetically conducive rods or elements, usually arranged in a circular array on a single supporting pole or other, structure, and used for the transmission and reception of wireless communication radio waves including cellular, personal communication service (PCS), enhanced specialized mobilized radio (ESMR), paging and similar services and including the support structure thereof. (b) Antenna, Public Utility Microwave. A parabolic dish or cornucopia shaped electromagnetically reflective or conductive element used for the transmission and/or reception of point to point UHF or VHF radio waves in wireless telephone communications, and including the supporting structure thereof. (c) Antenna, Radio and Television, Broadcast Transmitting. A wire, set of wires, metal or carbon fiber rod or other electromagnetic element used to transmit public or commercial broadcast radio, or television programming, and including the support structure thereof. (d) Antenna, Radio and Television Receiving. A wire, set of wires, metal or carbon fiber element(s), other than satellite dish antennas, used to receive radio, television, or electromagnetic waves, and including the supporting structure thereof. (e) Antenna, Satellite Dish. A device incorporating a reflective surface that is solid, open mesh, or bar configured and is in the shape of a shallow dish, cone, horn, or cornucopia. Such device is used to transmit and/or receive radio or electromagnetic waves between terrestrially and/or orbitally based uses. This definition shall include, but not be limited to, what are commonly referred to as satellite earth stations, TVROs (television, receive only) and satellite microwave antennas and support structure thereof. (f) Antenna, Short -Wave Radio Transmitting and Receiving. A wire, set of wires or a device, consisting of a metal, carbon fiber, or other electromagnetically conductive element used for the transmission and reception of radio waves used for short -wave radio communications, and including the supporting structure thereof. (g) Antenna Support Structure. Any pole, telescoping mast, tower, tripod, or any other structure which supports a device used in the transmitting or receiving of radio frequency energy. (h) Tower, Temporary Mobile. Any mobile tower, pole, or structure located on a trailer, vehicle or temporary platform intended primarily for the purpose of mounting an antenna or similar apparatus for personal wireless services, which is commonly referred to as Cellular on Wheels (COW). (i) Tower. Any ground mounted pole, spire, structure, or combination thereof, including supporting lines, cables, wires, braces, masts, intended primarily for the purpose of mounting an antenna or similar apparatus above grade. (60) Essential Services. The erection, construction, alteration or maintenance by public utilities or municipal departments of underground or overhead telephone, gas, electrical, communication, water or sewer transmission, distribution, collection, supply or disposal systems, including poles, wires, mains, drains, sewers, pipes, conduits, cables, fire alarm boxes, police call boxes, traffic signals, hydrants and other similar equipment and accessories in connection therewith for the furnishing of adequate service by such private or public utilities or municipal departments. Transmission/reception support structures and antennas shall not be considered an essential service. (150.1) Secondary Use: A use of land or of a building or a portion thereof which is subordinate to and does not constitute the primary use of the land or building. 2 (167.1) Structure, Public. An edifice or building of any kind, or any piece of work artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner which is owned or rented, and operated by a federal, state, or local government agency. Section 3. Section 1100.3 (b) of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (height exceptions) is hereby added to read as follows: (14) Antennas and antenna support structures as regulated by Section 1226 of this Ordinance. Section 4. Section 2500 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (communication reception/transmission devices) is hereby amended to read as follows: COMMUNICATION RECEPTION/TRANSMISSION DEVICES Section 2500.1 Purpose 2500.2 General Standards 2500.3 Accessory and Secondary Use Antennas 2500.4 Personal Wireless Service Antennas 2500.5 Satellite Dishes 2500.6 Commercial and Public Radio and Television Transmitting Antennas, and Public Utility Microwave Antennas 2500.1 Purpose. The purpose of this section is to establish predicable, balanced regulations for the siting and screening of wireless communications equipment in order to accommodate the growth of wireless communicating systems'within the City of Albertville while protecting the public against any adverse impacts on the City's aesthetic resources and the public welfare. 2500.2 General Standards. The following standards shall apply to all personal wireless service, public utility, microwave, radio and television broadcast transmitting, radio and television receiving, satellite dish and short -wave radio transmitting and receiving antenna. (a) All obsolete and unused antenna shall be removed within twelve (12) months of cessation of operation at the site, unless an exemption is granted by the City Council. The removal shall be the joint responsibility of the tower owner or communication provider and land owner. 3 (b) All antenna shall be in compliance with all City building and electrical code requirements and as applicable shall require related permits. (c) Structural design, mounting and installation of the antenna shall be in compliance with manufacturer's specifications and shall be;verified and approved by a registered professional engineer. (d) Unless the antenna/antenna support structure and land is under the same ownership, written authorization for antenna erection shall be provided by the property owner. (e) No advertising message shall be affixed to the antenna structure. (f) Antennas shall not be artificially illuminated unless required by law or by a governmental agency to protect the public's health and safety. (g) When applicable, proposals to erect new antenna shall be accompanied by any required federal, state, or local agency licenses. (h) If a new antenna support structure is to be constructed, it shall be designed structurally, electrically, and in all respects, to accommodate both the applicant's antennas and comparable antennas for at least one additional user, including but not limited to other personal wireless service companies, local police, fire and ambulance companies. The antenna support structure must be designed to allow for future rearrangement of antennas upon it and to accept antennas mounted at varying levels. (i) Antenna support structures under two hundred (200) feet in height shall be painted a non -contrasting color consistent with the surrounding area such as: blue, gray, brown or silver, or have a galvanized finish to reduce visual impact, unless otherwise allowed by federal law. (j) Except as may be applicable in cases where a conditional use permit is required, antennas and support structures for federally licensed amateur radio stations and used in the amateur radio service are exempt from sub -paragraphs C, F, and I above, and must comply with Subd. K. below. (k) Amateur radio support structures (towers) shall be installed in accordance with the instructions furnished by the manufacturer of that tower model. Because of the experimental nature of the amateur radio service, antennas mounted on such a tower may be modified or changed at anv time so long as the Published allowable load on the tower is not exceeded and the structure of the tower remains in accordance with the manufacturers specifications. E 2500.3 Accessory and Secondary Use Antennas. The following standards shall apply to all accessory and secondary use antennas including radio and television receiving antennas, satellite dishes, TVROs two (2) meters or less in diameter, short -wave radio dispatching antennas, or those necessary for the operation of electronic equipment including radio receivers, federally licensed amateur radio stations and television receivers. (a) Accessory and secondary use antennas shall be allowed as permitted accessory uses in all zoning districts. The installation of more than one (1) support structure per property shall require the approval of a conditional use permit. (b) Accessory or secondary use antennas shall not be erected in any required yard (except a rear yard) or within public or private utility and drainage easements, and shall be set back a minimum of ten (10) feet from all lot lines. (c) Guy wires or guy wire anchors shall not be erected within public or private utility and drainage easements, and shall be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from all lot lines. (d) Accessory or secondary use antennas and necessary support structures, monopoles or towers (either ground or structure mounted) ;may :'not exceed the height limitation of the zoning district in which they are located, except support structures and antennas used in the amateur radio service may extend a maximum of seventy (70) feet above grade, as defined in this Ordinance, in any zoning district. 2500 4 Personal Wireless Service Antennas. Personal wireless service antennas shall be allowed in all Commercial, Industrial and Public/Institutional Districts of the City subject to the following standards as may be applicable: (a) Antennas Located Upon A Public Structure. Personal wireless service located upon a public structure shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of Section 1500 of this Ordinance (site/building plan review) and comply with the following standard. (1) Consideration shall be given to the location of existing as well as planned public structures (ie: Joint Powers water towers) to take advantage of co -location opportunities and avoid potential interference problems. (2) Transmitting, receiving and switching equipment shall be housed within an existing structure whenever possible. If a new equipment building is necessary for transmitting, receiving and switching equipment, it shall be 5 situated in the rear yard of the principai use and shaii be screened frorn view by landscaping where appropriate. Where receiving and switching equipment does not require an equipment building for protection from the elements, it may be housed at the base of the. tower provided it is screened from view by fencing or other man-made materials (in the case of an antenna located upon a structure) or landscaping (in the case of ground mounted antenna). (b) Antennas Not Located Upon A Public Structure. Personal wireless service antennas not located upon a public structure shall require the processing of a conditional use permit and shall comply with the following standards: (1) A proposal for a new commercial wireless telecommunication service tower shall not be approved unless it can be demonstrated that the telecommunications equipment planned for the proposed tower cannot be accommodated on an existing or approved tower or building within a one (1) mile search radius (one-half (Y2) mile search radius for towers under 120 feet in height and or one -quarter (1/4) mile search radius for towers under 80 feet in height) of the proposed tower due to one or more of the following reasons: a. The planned equipment would exceed the structural capacity of the existing or approved tower or building, as documented by a qualified and licensed professional engineer, and the existing or approved tower or building cannot be reinforced, modified or replaced to accommodate planned or equivalent equipment at a reasonable cost. b. The planned equipment would cause interference, materially impacting the usability of other existing or planned equipment at the tower or building as documented by a qualified radio frequency engineer and the interference cannot be prevented at a reasonable cost. C. Existing or approved towers and buildings within the search radius cannot accommodate the planned equipment at a height necessary to function reasonably as documented by a qualified engineer. d. In spite of its best efforts, within 60 days, the applicant was unable to obtain approval to co -locate on an existing or approved tower or building. The applicants efforts must be documented in writing, including who was contacted and their written denial of the request. M. Z e. Other reasons that make it impractical to locate the planned telecommunications equipment upon an existing or approved tower or building. (2) The applicant shall provide a scale map of the city and surrounding locality which shows the coverage area of the proposed antenna. (3) The antennas shall be located on an existing structure, if possible, and shall not extend more than fifteen (15) feet above the structural height of the structure to which they are attached. (4) If no existing structure which meets the height requirements for the antennas is available for mounting purposes, the antennas may be mounted on a single ground mounted pole provided that: a. The pole not exceed one hundred (100) feet in height, unless it can be demonstrated that the extra height is necessary to optimize coverage, allow greater siting flexibility/co-location opportunities or to eliminate the need for multiple (shorter) towers. b. The setback of the pole from the nearest residential structure is not less than the height of the antenna. Exceptions to such setback may be granted if a registered structural engineer specifies in writing that any collapse of the pole will occur within a lesser distance under all foreseeable circumstances. (5) Transmitting, receiving and switching equipment shall be housed within an existing structure whenever possible. If a new equipment building is necessary for transmitting, receiving and switching equipment, it shall be situated in the rear yard of the principal use and shall be screened from view by landscaping where appropriate. Where receiving and switching equipment does not require an equipment building for protection from the elements, it may be housed at the base of the tower provided it is screened from view by fencing or other man-made materials (in the case of an antenna located upon a structure) or landscaping (in the case of ground mounted antenna). (6) Unless the antenna is mounted on an existing structure, a security fence not greater than eight (8) feet in height with a maximum opacity of fifty (50) percent shall be provided around the support structure. F (7) The conditional usQ permit nrovisions of Section. 400 of this Ordinance are considered and determined to be satisfied. (c) Temporary Mobile Towers. Personal wireless service antennas located upon a temporary mobile tower used on an interim basis until a permanent site is located and permanent tower is constructed shalt require review and approval by the City Administrator and shall comply with the followinq standards: (1) Temporary mobile towers are exempt from co -location and permanent tower structure design standards contained in Section 2500.2(h) and (i) and Section 2500.4(b)(1). (2) The termination date of the permit shall not exceed one hundred and twenty (120) days. Temporary mobile towers located on a site longer than one hundred twenty_ (120) day_ s shall require approval of the City Administrator. (3) Guyed towers are prohibited. (4) Mobile units shall have a minimum tower design windload of eighty (80) mile -per -hour, or be setback from all structures a distance equal to the heiaht of the tower. (5) All towers shall be protected against unauthorized climbing. (6) The heiaht of the tower shall not exceed ninety (90) feet. 2500.5. Satellite Dishes. (a) Residential District Standards. Single satellite dish TVROs greater than one (1) meter in diameter located within any Residential zoning district of the City shall require the processing of a conditional use permit and shall comply with the following standards: (1) All accessory and secondary use provisions of Section 2500.3 of this Ordinance are satisfactorily met. (2) The lot on which the satellite dish antenna is located shall be of sufficient size to assure that an obstruction -free receive window can be maintained within the limits of the property ownership. (3) Except where the antenna is screened by a structure exceeding the antenna height, landscape buffering and screening shall be maintained on R' all sides of the satellite dish antenna in a manner in which growth of the landscape elements will not interfere with the receive window. (4) The satellite dish antenna is not qreater than three (3) meters in diameter. (5) The conditional use permit provisions of Section 400 of this Ordinance are considered and determined to be satisfied. (b) Commercial. Industrial. and Public/Institutional District Standards. Commercial, private and public satellite dish transmitting or receiving antennas in excess of two (2) meters located within any Commercial, Industrial, or Public/ Institutional zoning district of the City shall require the processing of a conditional use permit and shall comply with the following standards: (1) All accessory and secondary use provisions of Section 1226.03 of this Ordinance are satisfactorily met. (2) The lot on which the satellite dish antenna is located shall be of sufficient size to assure that an obstruction free transmit -receive window or windows can be maintained within the limits of the property ownership. (3) Except where the antenna is screened by a structure exceeding the antenna height, landscape buffering and screening shall be maintained on all sides of the satellite dish antenna in a manner in which growth of the landscape elements will not interfere with the receive window. (4) The conditional use permit provisions of Section 400 of this Ordinance are considered and determined to be satisfied. 2500.6. Commercial and Public Radio and Television Transmitting Antennas. and Public Utility Microwave Antennas. Commercial and public radio and television transmitting and public utility microwave antennas shall comply with the following standards: (a) Such antenna shall be considered an allowed conditional use within the INS, Institutional District of the City and shall be subject to the regulations and requirements of Section 400 of this Ordinance. (b) The antennas, transmitting towers, or array of towers shall be located on a continuous parcel having a dimension equal to the height of the antenna, 9 transmitting tower, or array of towers measured between the base of the antenna or tower located nearest a property line and said property line, unless a qualified structural engineer specifies in writing that the collapse of any antenna or tower will occur within a lesser distance under all foreseeable circumstances. (c) Unless the antenna is mounted on an existing structure, a fence not greater than eight (8) feet in height with a maximum opacity of fifty (50) percent shall be provided around the support structure and other equipment. (d) Antennas regulated under this section shall not interfere with neighboring property communication/reception transmission devices of any kind. Section 5. Section 3250.3 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (R-1A District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the following: (b) Radio and television receiving antennas including single satellite dish TVROs two (2) meters or less in diameter, short -wave radio dispatching antennas, or those necessary for the operation of household electronic equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed amateur radio stations and television receivers, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. Section 6. Section 3250.4 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (R-1A District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the following: (b) Single satellite dish TVROs greater than one (1) meter in diameter as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. Section 7. Section 4200.2 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (B-1 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the following: (e) Personal wireless service towers and antennas if located upon a public structure, including necessary equipment buildings, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. Section 8. Section 4200.3 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (B-1 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the following: (c) Radio and television receiving antennas including single satellite dish TVROs two (2) meters or less in diameter, short -wave radio dispatching antennas, 10 or those necessary for the operation of electronic equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed amateur radio stations and television receivers, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. Section 9. Section 4200.4 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (B-1 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the following: (c) Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located on a public structure, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. (d) Commercial and public radio and television transmitting antennas, and public utility microwave antennas, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. (e) Commercial, private and public satellite dish transmitting or receiving antennas in excess of two (2) meters in diameter, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. Section 10. Section 4600.2 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (1-1 District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the following: (e) Personal wireless service towers and antennas if located, upon a public structure, including necessary equipment buildings, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. Section 11. Section 4600.3 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (1-1 District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the following: . (c) Radio and television receiving antennas including single satellite dish TVROs two (2) meters or less in diameter, short -wave radio dispatching antennas, or those necessary for the operation of electronic equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed amateur radio stations and television receivers, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. Section 12. Section 4600.4 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (1-1 District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the following: (c) Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located on a public structure, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. 11 (d) Commercial and public radio and television transmitting antennas, and public utility microwave antennas, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. (e) Commercial, private and public satellite dish transmitting or receiving antennas in excess of two (2) meters in diameter, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. Section 13. Section 4850.2 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (P/I District Permitted Uses) is hereby amended to add the following: (1) Personal wireless service towers and antennas if located upon a public structure, includina necessary equipment buildings, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. Section 14. Section 4850.3 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (P/l District Accessory Uses) is hereby amended to add the following: (f) Radio and television receiving antennas including single satellite dish TVROs two (2) meters or less in diameter, short -wave radio dispatching antennas, or those necessary for the operation of electronic equipment including radio receivers, federal licensed amateur radio stations and television receivers, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. Section 15. Section 4850.4 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance (P/I District Conditional Uses) is hereby amended to add the following: (o) Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located on a public structure, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. (p) Commercial and public radio and television transmitting antennas, and public utility microwave antennas, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. (q) Commercial, private and public satellite dish transmitting or receiving antennas in excess of two (2) meters in diameter, as regulated by Section 2500 of this Ordinance. 12 Section 16. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. ADOPTED by the ALBERTVILLE City Council this day of 1997. ATTEST: By: Linda Houghton, City Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE 13 Mark Olsen, Mayor 4f) (Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval o 3-31-97and again on 5-13-97 with no changes.) 5-14-97 ORDINANCE NO. 97-5 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS A-500 AND A-600 OF THE ALBERTVILLE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE REGARDING SKETCH PLAN AND PRELIMINARY PLAT REQUIREMENTS AND ESTABLISHING A SECONDARY STREET ACCESS REQUIREMENT FOR RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE ORDAINS: Section 1. Section A-500.1 of the Albertville Subdivision Ordinance (Sketch Plan Requirements) is hereby amended to add the following: (d) Street layout on and adjacent to plat. Where the subdivider owns property adjacent to that which is being proposed for the subdivision or where adjacent lands will be impacted by the proposed subdivision, it shall be required that the subdivider submit a sketch plan for the adjacent property so as to show the possible relationships between the proposed subdivision and future existing or potential adjacent subdivisions and land uses. Section 2. Section A-500.2 (e) of the Albertville Subdivision Ordinance (Preliminary Plat Requirements) is hereby amended to add the following: (e) Platting Adjoining Lands. A preliminary plat shall contain the entire tax parcel to be platted plus all of the owner's contiguous lands unless such lands are subject to a Planned Unit Development or the City Planner and City Engineer agree to waive such requirement. The final plat may cover only a portion of the preliminary plat, provided it is in conformance with the approved preliminary plat, development contract, and other requirements herein. Section 3. Section A-500.2 (f) of the Albertville Subdivision Ordinance (Supplementary Information) is hereby amended to delete the following: ;.III KMJ VI,.l 0 WAMF.: I r.- - OM W-PI - .... ;. Section 4. Section A-600.5(f) of the Albertville Subdivision Ordinance (Streets) is hereby amended to add the following: (f) A residential plat within which single or multiple roadways are to be continued in the future as subsequent development phases are implemented shall not create dead-end access situations limited by a single location for ingress and egress to major collector or arterial roadways. (1) No more than 25 units on local streets and no more than 50 units on minor collector streets may be developed within a single plat without providing a second street access into/out of the subdivision. The developer shall be limited by the issuance of building permits as regulated by the City Building Inspector. (2) Upon issuance of the 25th building permit within a plat, the developer shall be required to construct a secondary access street. No other building permits will be issued within current or future phases of the plat until the secondary access road is in place. The limitation on building permits shall not prevent the developer or land owner from planning or platting land unrelated to the affected plat and located in other portions of the City. (3) Under this provision, all streets to provide either the primary or secondary access shall be constructed to city standards and paved with asphalt. The required secondary access street shall coincide with the approved plan for permanent street location. (4) In no case shall an abutting land owner be allowed to plat new residential lots adjacent to a plat whereby the addition of lots would increase the number of units located on a dead-end street or intensify the negetative effects upon adjoining, established neighborhoods. Adjacent development by adjoining land owners shall be permitted if the plat provides for the second access required herein. (5) Without the provision of adequate vehicular access, the remaining portions or phases of the subdivision may be deemed premature according to Section A-400 of this Chapter. Section 5. This Ordinance shall become effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. ADOPTED by the ALBERTVILLE City Council this day of , 1997. ATTEST: 0 Linda Houghton, City Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE 0 Mark Olsen, Mayor r. GRADING CONTRACT Cedar Creek Business Park AGREEMENT dated May , 1997 by and between the CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, a municipal corporation ("City"), and PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., a Minnesota corporation (the "Developer"). 1. REQUEST FOR GRADING APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve the grading for Cedar Creek Business Park (a future plat referred to in this contract as "Cedar Creek"). The legal description for Cedar Creek Business Park is described on the attached Exhibit "A", and the Developer wishes to grade Cedar Creek before preliminary plat approval. 2. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the grading on the condition the Developer enter into this Contract, abide by its terms and furnish the security required by it. 3. GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN. Cedar Creek shall be graded in accordance with the Grading and Drainage plan dated April 22, 1997 and on file with the City of Albertville. The plan shall not be attached to this permit. If the plan varies from the written terms of this permit, the written terms shall control. 4. THvIE OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall complete the grading, erosion control, and seeding by September 15, 1997. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. 5. EROSION CONTROL. Developer shall implement all erosion control measures detailed on the Grading and Drainage plan (including construction of all ponds) in the order required by the City Engineer. Developer shall also implement any additional erosion control measures required by the City Engineer or the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded forthwith after the completion of the work in that area. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be rye grass or other fast-growing seed suitable to the existing soil to provide a temporary ground cover as rapidly as possible. All seeded areas shall be mulched and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and/or the requirements of the City Engineer or Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within thirty (30) days, the City may draw down the letter of credit to pay any costs. No development will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless Cedar Creek is in full compliance with the erosion control requirements. 1 6. GRADING PLAN. Cedar Creek shall be graded in accordance with the Grading and Drainage Plan. Within thirty (30) days after completion of the grading and before the City releases the security, the Developer shall provide the City with an "as constructed" grading plan. 7. CLEAN UP. The Developer shall promptly clean dirt and debris from streets that has resulted from construction work by the Developer, its agents or assigns. 8. SECURITY. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this permit and to reimburse the City for any damage to public property as a result of the grading permitted herein, the Developer shall furnish the City with a cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit from a bank ("security") for $10,000.00. The bank and form of the letter of credit shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. The letter of credit shall be for a term ending June 30, 1998, and shall be renewed annually by the Developer until all grading is complete as specified herein. The City reserves the right to draw on the letter of credit anytime within 45 days of its expiration if the Developer does not provide the City with a renewal or an acceptable substitute letter of credit. 9. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the grading and erosion control, including but not limited to Soil and Water Conservation District charges, legal, planning, engineering and inspection expenses incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the permit, the preparation of this permit, and all costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring and inspecting the grading and erosion control. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting form permit approval and work done in conjunction with it. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages and expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys fees. C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this permit, including engineering and attorneys fees. D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this permit within thirty (30) days after receipt. If the bills are not paid on time, the City may halt all work and construction. 10. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer is first given notice of the work in default not less than 48 hours in advance. This permit is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 2 11. PLAT APPROVAL. The City's approval to grade Cedar Creek is given without prejudice to the City's right to approve or deny the preliminary and/or final plat. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE BY: Mark Olson, Mayor AND Linda Houghton, City Clerk DEVELOPER PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. BY: Its President STATE OF M[NNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1997, by Mark Olson as Mayor of the City of Albertville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the city and pursuant to the authority of the City Council. Notary Public 3 STATE OF UD ESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1997, by Linda Houghton, as Clerk of the City of Albertville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the city and pursuant to the authority of the City Council. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1996, by Kent Roessler, as President of Pilot Land Decelopment Company, Inc. THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: Michael C. Couri Radzwill & Couri P.O. Box 369 705 Central Ave. E St. Michael, MN 55376 Notary Public 4 JOINT POWRRS BOARD May 14, 1997 Albertville City Hall 7:00 NM BOARD MBMBRUS PRESENT:. Bruner, Potter, Duerr, Lane,. Irvine, J. Vetsch WARD MAWS ABSBNl: Chairman Potter opened the meeting at 7104 pm. Others present at the special meeting: Bob Gunderson, Albertville alternate; Bret Weiss; Jeff Roos and John Hemming. The Hoard discussed the current policy and procedure for the responsibility of the watermains consisting of the Board operating, maintaining and repairing all the watermain and having full responsibility of the EDA watermain put in service in 1978. The Board, also, discussed the respective communities being responsible for the looping, replacement and oversizing of the watermains in their respective community except for the EDA watermain. The Board discussed the current water rates and hook on fees and if they were sufficient to handle the distribution and supply of the system as questioned by Bret Weiss, Hanover's engineer. Jeff Roos, St. Michael's engineer, discussed the 3oint powers agreement made between Crystal, Golden Valley and New Hope with the respective cities handling distribution and billing with 'the water board charging a oase rate for supply. Roos suggested that this could eliminate the duplication of services for developments, the coordination of two parties in respect .to water & other repairs simultaneously. The Board discussed the other advantages to the above suggestion. The Board discussed getting a rate study done by their financial advisor. Kipka suggested that if all the Hoard members present agree - to this concept of the watermain responsibility issue that a concept agreement should be approved by all three communities before proceeding further. A motion to approve the following concept plan regarding watermain responsibility/ownership was made by Lane, seconded by Duerr. All present voted aye. 1. Each respective community in the Joint Powers' Agreement would own all the watermain in their community with the exception of the EDA watermain placed in service in 1978. The Joint Powers Board would be responsible for the supply, storage & treatment of water of similar quality to each community and for the repair, replacement, maintenance and operation of the EDA watermain. JP8 NAY 14, 1997 MINUTES PAGE 2 2. The Joint rowers Board would distribute $484,231.00 to the three communities in proportion to be based on the account ratio of Albertville 32% or s154,954.00., Hanover 90 or $43,581.00 and St. Michael 59% or $285,656.00- 3. The Joint Powers Board would do the billing for each community with each community deciding the water rate above the Joint Powers' base rate and whether to include if any other charges they deem necessary for water, sewer, garbage, streets, etc. The Board directed Kipka to type up the concept agreement and forward to the three communities requesting their consideration with approval -of the concept only. A motion to adjourn was made by Zane, seconded by Bruner. All present voted aye. The special meeting was adjourned at 9:13 pm. Respectively Submitted, Donna Kipka, Secretary WATERMAIN OWNERSHIP/RESPONSIBILITY CONCEPT PLAN WHEREAS, the Cities of Albertville, St. Michael and Hanover, entered into a Joint Powers Agreement and subsequently adopted an Operating and Authorization Agreement which has been amended from time to time; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to proceed with the concept plan regarding watermain ownership/responsibility to amend the Agreement and the Operating and Authorization Agreement dated August 1, 1977 and December 13, 1977 respectively, as follows, 1. Each respective community in the Joint Powers' Agreement would own all the watermain in their community with the exception of the EDA watermain placed in service in 1978. The Joint Powers Board would be responsible for the supply, storage & treatment of the water of similiar quality to each community and for the repair, replacement-, maintenance and operation of the EDA watermain. 2. The Joint Powers Board would distribute $484,231.00 from their Operating Capital CD to the three communities in proportion based on the account ratio as follows: Albertville 32% or $154,954.00, Hanover 9% or $43,581.00 and St. Michael 59% or $285,696.00. 3. The Joint Powers Board would do the billing for each of the three communities with each community deciding the water rate above the Joint Powers' base rate and whether to include, if any, other charges they deem necessary for water, sewer, garbage, storm sewer, streets, etc. The above concept plan was approved unamiously by the Board at their May 14, 1997 special meeting. Dated; CONCEPT PLAN APPROVED BY: 1997 Dated; , 1997 Dated; , 1997 CITY OF HANOVER By; Mayor By Clerk By: CITY OF ST. MICHAEL Mayor By. Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE By: Mayor By: Clerk 0 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COMP OF WRI(W STATE OF MINN ZMA ORDI19JKE #1997-8 AN ORDIRKRCE AMEWING SECTION 1 OF ORDIX NCE 1997-4 TITLED NOISE, EXEl PTING CIVIC CELEBRATIONS THIMESN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Z Section 1. Section 1 of Ordinance 1997-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 1. PUBLIC NUISANCE NOISE PROHIBITED. Except in conjunction with a civic celebration recognized by the City Council, no person shall make, continue, or cause to be made, any loud, unnecessary, or unusual noise, or any noise which unreasonably annoys, disturbs, injures, or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, safety, or welfare of others, precludes their enjoyment of property, or affects their property value. This general prohibition is not limited by the specific restrictions of Section 2. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 3rd DAY OF JUNE, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Houghton, City Clerk �e z CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COtmY OF WRIGHT STATE OF HIl--E.SOTA ORDIZVACE #1997-8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1 OF ORDIJUMCE 1997-4 TITLED NOISE, FXFI�TING civic CELEBRATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section-1 of Ordinanc 1997-4 is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION 1. PUBLIC NUISANCE NOISE PROHIBITED. Except in conjunction with a ci vi c celebration recogni zed by the City Council, no person shall make, continue, or cause to be made, any loud, unnecessary, or unusual noise, or any noise which unreasonably annoys, disturbs, injures, or endangers the comfort, repose, health, peace, safety, or welfare of others, precludes their enjoyment of property, or affects their property value. This general prohibition is not limited by the specific restrictions of Section 2. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 3rd DAY OF JUNE, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Houghton, City Clerk„ 7C,3 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 29, 1997 TO: City Council FROM: Finance Committee SUBJ: Budget 1998 - Preparation It is that time of year -when the City needs to plan the budget for the next year's activities. I am officially placing this item on the agenda for approval to start the process and to try and define with the council as a whole how you would like to proceed. Let's plan on discussing the matter and working out a plan with a council motion defining the process. Ultimately, the council as a whole will review the budget starting in mid -August. Please consider this matter. Thanks!