1997-09-22 CC Agenda/Packet1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
20
ALBERT%FILLE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
September 22, IL997
7:00 Phi
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL/ADOPT AGENDA
(Mayor/Clerk/Council)
MINUTES (counc:i:1)
a, September 2, 199'7, Special. Meeting
b , September 81 19'47 , Regular Meeting
AUDITING CLAWS (Council)
Check Vs .11210 - 11231
CITIZEN FORUM - ;!Lo_ Minute .Limit
Skateboard's ,_ citizen Complaint.'.
CONSENT AGENDA 'I[ * ] (Council)
a. Revenue/Expend,i :ure Repoz, t (August)
b, WWTF Operations Report (August}
C. Follow -Up Sheet as of September 8
DEPARTMENT BUSINESS
a. PLANNING & ZONING
c; ,s[ionOnl rs Berning/Vetsch,
Zoning Admi¢listrat::or Hale L?is .---Y
1} Performance Standards
2) Sign Ordinance
Billboards
Temporary real estate sign - size increase
ORDINANCE
3) ORDINA:NCE. #1997-15 iINNCE ANCEAREGULATINGNADVERTISING
#199'J1-9 T;ITLED AN ORD
DEVICES (BILLBOARDS) AND BUSINESS SIGNS AND
PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FORe VIOLATION)
4) Comp, Plan/Zoning Map
Botaa sides of County Road 19 starting at 50th
Street north t° 57th Street (500-600' to B-3
zone) - Design
5) Cedar Creek North (Phase! III Townhouses)
(pi'I ot: 'Land)
1
7.
b . PUBLIC WORKS
1) Loader Prices & Funding Options
2) Salt Shed
3) Drain catch basin by PW/Fire Hall Building
4) Drainage ditch, by sign (Main Avenue & CR 37)
5) Catch Basin Repair - Quote
C. ENGINEERING
1) Standards for Streets
2) WWTF Planning & Capacity - Discussion
3) Green'haven. Estates Drainage
4) Street Drainage - Kalenda Court
5) Drainage - Westwind 3rd Addition
6) Savitski Drainage
7) 1997 Northeast Sanitary Sere & Water Main Extension
8) Gravel Roads
9) 1997 Projects Update
d LEGAL
1) Don's Bus Garage Conditional Use Permit PUD
Agreement
2) Trails - Parkside 3rd & 4t.h Additions
e. PUBLIC SAFETY
1) ORDINANCE #1997-13 (AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE USE
OF BURGLAR: AND SAFETY ALARMS, ESTABLISHING A USERS'
FEE AND ESTABLISHING A SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION
2) ORDINANCE #1997-14 (ESTABLISHING FEES FOR FIRE
PROTECTION SERVICE AND/'OR EMERGENCY RESPONSE)
3) RESOLUTION #1997-43 (RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING
CHARGES, FEES AND PENALTIES AUTHORIZE;D BY ORDINANCE
#1997-13 AND ORDINANCE #1997-14
4) Appoint Scott Nadeau to Public Safety Committee
1) City Insurance Package - Arlan Middleton
2) Rebate for Sanitary Sewer Trunk Costs - Pilot Land
Development Company
3) Request for rebate of funds for Lift Station
abandonment - Pilot Land Development Company
4) Grace Peterson - Landfill Issues Presentation
5) Federal Emergency Disaster Relief/LIMCIT Insurance
Reimbursement
ADJOURNMENT (council)
rK
September 24
Staff Meeting
9:00 PM
September 29
Joint Powers Board
7:00 IM
October 6
Regular City Council Meeting
7:00IM
October 14
Planning & Zoning Commission
7:00 R4
October 20
Regular: City Council Meeting
7:00 R4
October 22
Staff .!Meeting
9:00 FM
October 27
Joint Powers ]Board
7:00 Hsi
October 28
Planning & Zoning Meeting (optional)
7:00 EM
November 3
Regular City Council Meeting
7:001M
M
ALBERTVILLE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL
September 2, 1997
Albertville City Hall 6:00 PM
PRESENT: Mayor Mark Olsen, Councilmembers Patricia
Stalberger, Duane Berning, Robert Gundersen, and John Vetsch, and
City Clerk Linda Houghton
Mayor Olsen called the special meeting of the Albertville City
Council to order. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the
possibility of operating a municipal :liquor store.
Berning made a motion to approve the agenda as presented.
Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Based on information received from the League of Minnesota
Cities offices stating that cities do not have the authority to
operate both a municipal off -sale liquor store and private off -sale
liquor stores, Councilmember Berning stated he is not in favor of
talking liquor licenses away from private operators. The Council
was in agreement that private off -sale liquor stores be allowed to
operate.
Olsen made a motion to table further discussion on operating
a municipal liquor store until state law is amended to allow both
municipal and private off -sale liquor stores. Stalberger seconded
the motion. Stalberger, Olsen, Berning and Gundersen voted aye.
Vetsch voted no stating his preference is to table the issue
indefinitely. The motion carried.
Berning made a motion to adjourn, the special meeting at 6:25
PM. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Mark Olsen, Mayor
Linda Houghton, City Clerk
1
ALBEEtTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
:September 8, 1997
Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM
PRESENT: Mayor Mark Olsen, Councilmembers Patricia
Stalberger, Duane Berning, Robert Gundersen, and John Vetsch, City
Administrator Garrison Hale, City Clerk Linda Houghton, City
Attorney Michael Couri, City Engineer Peter Carlson, and City
Planner Liz Stockman
Mayor Olsen called the regular meeting of the Albertville City
Council to order.
The agenda was amended as follows:
Add Item 5f. - Approve a Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor
License for the Albertville Lions at City Park from 5:00 PM to
11:00 PM on Friday, September 12, 1997, contingent upon completed
application, payment of fee and a certificate of insurance
Add Item 6g( 3) - Review and approve Maintenance Contract
for operation of the Joint Powers Water ,system.
Olsen made a motion to approve the agenda as amended.
Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to approve the minutes of the August 18,
1997, regular council meeting and the August 27, 1997, Special
Meeting as presented., Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted
aye.
Berning made a motion to approve payment of Check #Is 11167 -
11205 as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Keith Franklin addressed the Council during Community Forum.
Franklin wanted to know the status of a building permit for a
billboard for which he had applied. According to Franklin, City
Attorney Couri had advised him that the Council would need to take
action to issue the permit. Since Couri was not yet present, the
Council agreed to hear from Franklin later in the meeting.
Berning made a motion to approve the Financial Statement for
the period July 30 - .August 28 as presented. Gundersen seconded
the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to approve the WWTF Operations Report
for the month of July 1997 as presented. Gundersen seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to schedule a public hearing to discuss
revenue bonds for the senior housing development on October 6,
1997, at 7:00 PM. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
1
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 8, 1997
Page 2 of 5
Berning made a motion to schedule the! City's Truth in Taxation
Hearing for 7:00 PM on December 8, 1996, and the continuation
hearing on December 15,, 1997. Gundersen seconded the motion. All
voted aye.
Berning made a motion to schedule a public hearing to consider
a Tax Increment Financing Plan for Don's Bus Service. Gundersen
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to approve the 3.2 Non -Intoxicating Malt
Liquor License for the Albertville Lions at Albertville City Park
on Friday, September 12, 1997, from 5:00 PM to 11:00 PM, contingent
upon submission of a completed application form, proof of insurance
and payment of fees. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted
aye.
City Planner Stockman briefly reviewed the Comprehensive
Parks & Trail Plan recommended for adoption by the Planning
Commission. The only change to the plan since the Council met
jointly with the Planning Commission is that Cedar Park, located in
the area proposed for the golf course, has been eliminated.
Stockman explained that a public hearing must be conducted
prior to adoption of the park dedication and trail fees. A draft
ordinance was presented for the Council based on the
recommendations from the Planning Commission. The cash park
dedication fee was recommended at $1,300 per residential lot, or a
land dedication of 10% of a less than nine unit residential
subdivision and 11% of nine or more unit, residential subdivision.
The Planning Commission recommends a 10% land dedication, or cash
payment equal to 10% of the calculated fair market value for the
property, for Commercial and Industrial developments.
Stockman asked for input from the Council regarding the
proposed ordinance. The Council concurred that industrial and
commercial dedications be modified.
Olsen made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1997-36 titled
ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PARRS AND TRAILS PLAN with an map
amendment eliminating Cedar Park. The motion further directs the
planner to revise the draft ordinance regarding park and trail
dedications to require a 5% land or cash equivalent dedication for
industrially zoned developments. Berning seconded the motion. All
voted aye.
Don Jensen, Pilot Land Development Company, presented the
Cedar Creek Golf Course Planned Unit Development Concept Plan to
the City Council. The concept shows an 18-hole golf course,
2
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 8, 1997
Page 3 of 5
surrounded by single and medium density housing. The development
will proceed in phases. Rough grading of the course will occur in
1998, at the same time as the phase one properties are being
developed. If the rough grading is not completed, no further
residential land will be allowed to be platted until the rough
grading is finished. Opening of the golf course is anticipated in
the summer of 1999, and once established and opened, the other
phases of the residential phases.
City Attorney Couri presented the key points that will be
included in the PUD agreement for Cedar Creek. An abbreviated
developer's agreement will be prepared as each phase is developed.
Park dedication has not yet been negotiated for the PUD, but the
Planning Commission favors requiring land to be dedicated only
where shown on the concept plan, with the remainder in cash and
with the park dedication fee to be frozen at the level to be
adopted this year until December 31, 2001.
The Council received the Planning Commission's Findings of
Fact and Recommendation for Cedar Creek Golf Course for
consideration. Councilmember Vetsch would like to see the number
of town houses reduced. City Planner Stockman stated she sees no
problem with the town home developments presented because control
of common areas and overall maintenance of the project will be
through a homeowners association.
Jensen requested that the Council :review the materials again
and be prepared for action on the Concept Plan at the September 22,
1997, meeting.
City Engineer Carlson discussed a Pavement Management Plan.
He feels the plan would be nice to have but it is not necessary for
a city of Albertville's size. Carlson explained that the costs to
prepare the plan are initially high and the plan must be updated
every few years.
Carlson explained that he has put a plan to enclose the
Savitski ditch by installing 270' of 36"" diameter pipe. Estimated
cost of the pipe installation is $15,000, plus the cost of fill
material, estimated at.610,000. The Council agreed to have Carlson
to provide Savitski with the cost estimates to see if he is still
in favor of proceeding with the project.
Berning made a motion to approve the Center Oaks Grading
Agreement with Pilot Land Company as presented. Vetsch seconded
the motion. All voted aye.
3
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 8, 1997
Page 4 of 5
At the request of Don and Betty Barthel, Vetsch made a motion
to table discussion of the Barthel PUD Agreement to the September
22, 1997, meeting. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Mayor Olsen recognized Keith Franklin to discuss his request
for the Council to authorize: issuance of a renewed building permit
for a billboard. Franklin was issued a building permit in November
of 1996 for the site, but that permit expired after 180 days. He
has reapplied for the permit but the building official is requiring
Council approval before he issues the permit. City Attorney Couri
explained that billboards require both a city permit and a state
permit. Another sign company has the state permit, but Franklin
had been permitted by the City. Couri recommended that the Council
authorize the building official to issue the building permit,
contingent upon there is no advertising (faces) on the sign until
the D.B. Searles sign painted on a building is removed.
Berning made a motion to authorize the building official to
issue the building permit for a billboard to Franklin Outdoor
Advertising with the stipulation that no advertising can be placed
on the billboard until after the D. B. Searles sign is removed.
Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Councilmember Berning explained that Dean Spencer is no longer
willing to serve on the Public Safety Committee due to heavy work
and time constraints. Vetsch made a motion to table the
appointment of the citizen representative to the Public Safety
Committee at this time. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted
aye.
Olsen made a motion authorizing the Public Safety Committee to
research site for a Public Works and a Fire Department building.
Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to adopt ORDINANCE #1997-12 titled AN
ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE POSITION OF CITY ADMINISTRATOR AND
DEFINING DUTIES, amending Section 1.02 of Ordinance #1995-2.
Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to authorize the advertisement for the
position of city administrator with the closing date of October 15,
1997. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to authorize
position of maintenance worker II with a
15, 1997. Berning seconded the motion.
4
the advertisement for the
closing date of October
All voted aye.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 8, 1997
Page 5 of 5
Berning made a motion to adopt. ORDINANCE #1997-11 titled AN
ORDINANCE DEFINING THE: REQUIREMENTS AND PROCESSES THE CITY COUNCIL
SHALL FOLLOW IN CONDUCTING ITS MEETINGS AND COUNCIL BUSINESS.
Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to set the preliminary 1998 levy at
$590,000. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to approve the terms of the maintenance
contract for the Joint Powers Water System as presented, with the
recommendation that the Board's attorney review the insurance
figures. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to adjourn at 11:25 PM. Gundersen
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Mark Olsen, Mayor
Linda Houghton, City Clerk
5
3
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
B'ILL3 TO BE PAID
September 22, 1997
Vendor
Reason
Amount
Check No.
11210
Cassidy, Jim
Condemnation Hrgs
1,509.80
11211
Clarence Eull Appraisal
Condemnation Hrgs
1,273.20
11212
Ederer, Paul
Condemnation Hrgs
1,273.78
11213
Firstar Trust
89 GO/Ref Bond
274.50
11214
Gopher State One Call
Locates
31.50
11215
Granite Electronics
F. D. Pagers
1,548.40
11216
Hack's
City Hall Supplies 20.41
11217
Kennedy & Graven
TIF 7 & 8
2,264.97
11218
L.M.C.I.T.
Annual Premium
23,065.00
11219
Lyle H. Nagel Co.
Condemnation Hrg
1,530.00
11220
Miller Tree Removal
Stump Removal
65.00
11221
MinnComm
PW Pager Service
25.40
11222
Monticello Animal Control
August
54.00
11223
Monticello, City of
June/July/Aug
360.00
11224
Newman Traffic Signs
Parking Lot Signs
59.59
11225
NSP
Service
2,751.14
11226
Radzwill &: Couri
Legal Service
6,669.00
11227
Sprint
Long Distance Calls 30.87
11228
StarTribune
Admin/MW'2 Ads
783.85
11229
Temporary Assets
9/3 - 9/5
230.40
11230
Unlimited Electric
Locates
52.00
11231
Wright Recycling
August
1,028.50
Total $
44,901.31
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
City of Albertville
S542000
For the
Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97
Original Budget Mended
Budget
Annual Actual
Curr Nth Encumb Annual
Unenc. Balance t
Bud
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101
General Fund
Revenues
310.100
Current Taxes
.00
412,400,00
215,745.95
.00
.00
196,654.05
52.3
310.200
Delinquent Taxes
.00
.00
12,007.00
.00
.00
-12,007.00
.0
310.400
Tax Increients
.00
.00
-13,210.45
.00
.00
13,210.45
.0
320.110
Liquor Persits
.00
8,100.00
4,150.00
.00
.00
3,950.00
51.2
320.120
Beer Pertits
.00
200.00
110.00
10.00
.00
90.00
55.0
320.130
Atusements Licenses
.00
400.00
350.00
.00
.00
50.00
87.5
320.140
Cigarette Licenses
.00
250.00
250.00
.00
.00
.00
100.0
320.150
Sign Pertits
.00
3,525.00
3,375.00
.00
.00
150.00
95.7
320.160
OtherBusiness licenses/Permits
.00
200.00
5,833.18
.00
.00
-5,633.18
tzz,r
320.210
Building Pertits
.00
13,940.00
74,347.53
33,279.33
.00
-60,407.53
533.3
320.220
Aniial Licenses
.00
100.00
80.00
.00
.00
20.00
80.0
334.010
Local Governeent Aid
.00
82,672.00
41,569.50
.00
.00
41,102.50
50.3
334.020
HACA
.00
136,182,10
69,070.50
.00
.00
67,111.50
50.7
334,030
Local Perforiance Aid
.00
2,384.00
1,192.00
.00
.00
1,192.00
50.0
334.050
Police Aid
.00
3,000.00
DO
.00
.00
3,000.00
.0
334.060
Fire Aid
.00
7,899.100
.00
.00
.00
7,899.00
.0
336.000
Other Gov. Units Grants S Aids
.00
4,800.51)
2,812.70
839.20
.00
1,987.30
58.6
341.070
Special Assessfent Searches
.00
100.)O
410.00
50.00
.00
-310.00
410.0
341.090
Other Charges for Services
.00
3,000.00
1,570.20
.00
.00
1,029.80
65.7
341.095
Developer Escrows
.00
.01)
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
342,020
Fire Protection Services
.00
33,994.00
15,630.63
.00
.00
18,363.37
46.0
342.030
Park Rental Fees
.00
2,000.00
1,800.00
.00
.00
200.00
90.0
343.000
Store Sewer Fees
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
343.100
Penalites - Store Nater Bills
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
350.000
Fines and Forfeits
.00
100.OD
113.00
.00
.00
-13.00
113.0
362.000
Interest Earnings
.00
2,200.00
70,365.15
10,396.20
.00
-68,165.15
tml
364.000
Private Contributions/Donation
.00
.00
-919.53
.00
.00
919.53
.0
372.080
Other Revenues
.00
1,500.00
1,661.93
99.98
.00
-161.93
110.8
391.010
Sales of General Fixed Assets
.00
.00
2,988.91
.00
.00
-2,988.91
.0
392.030
Transfer -Capital Project Funds
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
392.050
Transfer Out
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
395.004
Lease Payment
.00
-----------------
-----------------
-----------------
----
REVENUE
----------------- -----------------
.00
719,896.00
-----------------
512,178.20
44,674.71
.00
207,717.80
71.1
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Time: 12:19pe
"City of Albertville Page: 2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- -----------------------------------
For the Period: 08/01/97 to 0$/31/47 Original Budget Amended Budget Annual Actual Curr eth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud
Fund: 101 General Fund
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------
Revenues .00 719,896.00 512,178.20 44,674.71 .00 207,717.80 71.1
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Time: 12:19pu
City of
Albertville
Page:
3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the
Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97
Original Budget Amended
Budget
Annual Actual
Curr Nth Encuab
Annual
Unenc. Balance %
Bud
-- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund:
101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept:
410.100 General Government -
Council
511.000
Wages - Regular Employees
.00
11,400.00
7,600.00
950.00
.00
3,800.00
66.7
522.000
FICA Contributions
.00
872.00
593.38
72.69
.00
278.62
68.0
523.000
PERA Contributions
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
526.000
Workers Compensation Insurance
.00
185.00
.00
.00
.00
185.00
.0
533.600
Planner: City Projects/Meeting
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
533.900
Other Prof. Contract Services
.00
51000.00
4,138.20
194.81
.00
861.80
82.8
552.000
Insurance Other than Eip. Bene
.00
4,900.00
.00
.00
.00
4,900.00
.0
555.000
Printing & Publications
.00
2,800.00
3,776.96
134.82
.00
-976.96
134.9
558,000
Travel
.00
309.00
.00
.00
.00
309.00
.0
561,100
General Supplies
.00
100.00
30.62
.00
.00
69.38
30.6
561.300
Training/Instructional Supplys
.00
300.00
290.00
.00
.00
10.00
96.7
591.000
Dues 8 Subscriptions
.00
2,150.00
675.00
.00
.00
1,475.00
31.4
599.000
Miscellaneous
.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
100.0
General Goverment - Council
.00
29,016.00
18,104.16
1,352.32
.00
10,911.84
62.4
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
City of Albertville
Date: 09/09/97
lite: 12:19ps
Page: 4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97 Original
Budget Amended
Budget
----------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Actual,
I ----------------------------------------------------------------
Curr Nth Encusb
Annual Unenc.
Balance %
Bud
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 410.300 Gen. Govt.- City Administrator
511.000 Wages - Regular Employees
.00
42,000.00
27,461.46
3,230.76
.00
14,538.54
65.4
521.000 Group Insurance
.00
3,780.00
2,744.94
347.81
.00
1,035,06
72.6
522.000 FICA Contributions
.00
3,213.00
2,100.69
247.14
.00
1,112.31
65.4
523.000 PERA Contributions
.00
1,882.00
1,230.29
144.74
.00
651.71
65.4
526.000 Workers Compensation Insurance
.00
231.00
.00
.00
.00
231.00
C
552.000 Insurance Other than Esp. Bene
.00
500.00
.00
.00
.00
500.00
.0
558.000 Travel
.00
300.00
D0
.DO
.00
300.00
.0
561.100 General Supplies
.00
200.00
335.52
.00
.00
-135.52
16M
561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys
.00
300.00
245.00
.00
.00
55.00
81J
574.300 Capital Outlay-Furnituressrx::
.00
200.00
.00
.00
.00
200.00
C
591.000 Dues & Subscriptions
.00
300.00
105.00
.00
.00
195.00
35.0
599.000 Miscellaneous
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
C
Gen. Govt.- City Administrator .00 52,906.00 34,222.90 3,970.45 .00 18,683.10 64.7
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
City of
--
Albertville
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
jil@i 12:19pi
---
For the
Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97 Original
Budget hended
Budget Annual
Actual
Curr Nth Encumb Annual
Unenc.
Balance %Bud
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 410.400 Gen. Govt.- City Clerk/Tress.
511.000
Wages - Regular Eiployees
.00
32,240.00
21,196.25
2,480.00
.00
11,043.75
65.7
512.000
Wages - Tetporary Eeloyees
.00
5,600.00
1,952.25
1,228.80
.00
3,647.75
34.9
513.000
Wages - Overtire
.00
500.00
116.25
.00
.00
383.75
23.3
521,000
Group Insurance
.00
3,780.00
2,744.93
347.81
.00
1,035.07
72.6
522.000
FICA Contributions
.00
2,933.00
1,653.37
189.72
.00
1,279.63
56.4
523.000
PERA Contributions
.00
1,717.00
949.56
111.10
.00
767.44
55.3
526.000
Workers Coapensation Insurance
.00
215.00
.00
.00
.00
215.00
.0
533,300
Accounting
.00
.00
1,475.00
.00
.00
-1,475.00
.0
533,400
Auditing Services
.00
6,300.00
6,425.00
.00
.00
-125.00
102.0
533,700
Copy Machine Maitenance
.00
1,200.00
587.98
170.42
.00
612.02
49.0
533.900
Other Prof. Contract Services
.00
750.00
.00
.00
.00
750.00
.0
543.100
Repairs/Mainteance - Equiptttt
.00
500.00
195.16
.00
.00
304.84
39.0
544.200
Equipient Rental
.00
1,000.00
545.28
.00
.00
454.72
54.5
552.000
Insurance Other than Eip. Bene
.00
3,000.00
.00
.00
.00
3,000.00
.0
558,000
Travel
.00
500.00
34.80
.OD
.00
465.20
7.0
561.100
General Supplies
.00
3,300.00
1,488.30
396.34
.00
1,811.70
45.1
561.300
Training/Instructional Supplys
.00
300.00
.00
.00
.00
300.00
.0
561.400
Postage
.00
1,200.00
662.20
.00
.00
537.80
55.2
574,300
Capital Outlay-Furnituretttttt
.00
200.00
.00
.00
.00
200.00
.0
.,
591.000
Dues & Subscriptions
.00
50.00
30.00
.00
.00
20.00
60.0
592.000
Elections
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
744.000
Capital Outlay - OfficemUtt
.00
2,500.00
.00
.00
.00
2,500.00
.0
-----------------
Gen. Govt.- City Clerk/Tress.
-----------------
.00
----------
67,785.00
40,056.33
4,924.19
.00
27,728.67
59.1
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Time: 12:19pi
,� City of Albertville Page: 6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97 Original Budget Amended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encuab Annual Unenc. Balance I Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 410.550 Gen. Govt.- Assessing
531,100 Assessing Contract Services .00 5,450.00 6,610.50 .00 .00-1,160.50 121.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------
Gen. Govt.- Assessing .00 5,450.00 6,610.50 .00 .00 -1,160.50 121.3
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Tiae: 12:19pi
City of Albertville
Page: 7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97 Original
Budget Aiended
Budget
Annual Actual
Curr Nth Encuab Annual
Unenc. Balance % Bud
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 410.600 Gen. Govt. - City Attorney
533.500 legal Service: General/Meeting
.00
29,000.00
13,753.00
1,791.50 .00
15,247.00 47.4
533.501 Developer Reiibursible
.00
.00
2,075.00
125.00 .00
.2,075.00 .0
533.502 Reiibursible - Capital Project
.00
.00
2,264.82
.00 .00
-2,264.82 .0
Gen. Govt. - City Attorney
.00
29,000.00
18,092.82
1,916.50 .00
10,907.18 62.4
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Tile: 12:19PI
:ity of Albertville
Page' 8
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
J or the Period: 08/0t/97 to 08/31/97
Original Budget Asended
Budget
Annual Actual
Curr Nth Eocuib Annual
Unenc. Balance % Bud
---------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General fund
Expenditures
Dept: 410.700 City Engineer
533.100 Engineer: Projects/Meetings
.00
24,000.00
7,793.81
123.50
.00
16,206.19 32.5
533.101 Reiabursible - Developer
.00
.00
7,106.71
.00
.00
-7,106.71 .0
533.102 Reiibursible -Capital Projects
.00
.00
1,762.72
.00
.00
-1,762.72 .0
535.100 Contracted Services
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00 .0
535.102 delete this account
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.DO .0
City Engineer
.00
24,000.00
16,663.24
123.50
.00
7,336.76 69.4
REVENUE/EXPENOITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Time: 12:19pm
City of Albertville
Page: 9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97 Original
Budget Amended
Budget
Annual Actual
Curr Nth Encumb Annual
Unenc. Balance % Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 410.800 Economic Development Authority
511.000 Wages - Regular Employees
.00
500.00
320.00
40.00
.00
180.00 64.0
522,000 FICA Contributions
.00
39.00
24.48
3.06
.00
14.52 62.8
558.000 Travel
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00 .0
561.100 General Supplies
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00 .0
561,300 Training/Instructional Supplys
.00
100.00
.00
.00
.00
100.00 .0
599.000 Miscellaneous
.00
1,885.00
1,844.26
.00
.00
40.74 97.8
Economic Development Authority
.00
2,524.00
2,188.74
43.06
.00
335.26 86.7
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Tiae: 12:19pt
City of Albertville
Page:
10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97
Original Budget Aiended
Budget
Annual Actual
Curr Nth Encuib Annual
-
Unenc. Balance %
Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------•-----------------------------
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 410.910 Gen. Govt. - Planning 8
511.000 Mages - Regular Esployees
toning
.00
1,000.00
940.00
100.00
.00
60.00
94.0
522.000 FICA Contributions
.00
77.00
73.44
7.65
.00
3.S6
9S.4
533.600 Planner: City Projects/Meeting
.00
15,000.00
18,747.90
2,552.89
.00
-3,747.90
125.0
533.601 Reiebursible - Developer
.00
.00
7,569.38
500.86
.00
-7,569.38
.0
533.602 Reisbursible - Capital Project
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
$58.000 Travel
.00
500.00
.00
.00
.00
500.00
.0
561.100 General Supplies
.00
200.00
47.54
.00
.00
152.36
23.8
561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys
.00
500.00
178.00
.00
.00
322.00
35.6
Gen. Govt. - Planning & toning
----------------------------------
.00
17,277.00
----------
27,556.36
3,161.40
.00
10,279.36
159.5
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date:09/09/97
Tiae: 12:19pi
City of Albertville
I• ----------------------------------------------
Page:
11
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97
Original Budget Asended
Budget Annual
Actual
Curr Nth Encuab Annual
Unenc.
Balance %
Bud
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 410.920 Gen. Govt. - Buildings 3
Plant
542.000 Refuse Disposal
.00
600.00
360.18
dd.00
.00
543,100 Repairs/Mainteance - Equiptttt
.00
540.44
395.70
.00
.04
104.30
lOd.34
79.1
79.1
543.200 Repairs/Mainteance - Building
.00
12,000.00
82.23
82.23
.00
11,917.77
.7
552,000 Insurance Other than Eip. Bent
.00
3,500.00
.00
.00
.00
3,500.00
.0
553.000 Telephone
.00
2,500.00
1,883.13
266.88
.00
616.87
75.3
561.100 General Supplies
.00
800.00
748.29
49.19
.00
51.71
93.5
562.100 Natural Gas
.00
2,000.00
685.07
13.09
.00
1,314.93
34.3
562,200 Electricity
.00
2,500.00
11510.91
258.32
.00
989.09
60.4
572.000 Capital Outlay - Buildingsim
.00
2,500.00
432.39
.00
.00
2,067.61
17.3
573.000 Capital Outlay/Non-buildingstt
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
574.100 Capital Outlay-Mach/Equipttttt
.00
500.00
.00
.00
.00
500.00
.0
574.300 Capital Outlay-FurnitureMM
.00
200.00
.00
.00
.00
200.00
.0
599.000 Miscellaneous
.00
41.00
210.00
.00
OD
-169.00
512.2
Gen. Govt. - Buildings S Plant .00 27,641.00 6,307.90 714.65 .00 21,333.10 22.8
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Tioe: 12:19PI
;ity of Albertville Page: 12
I------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
or the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97 Original Budget Asended Budget Annual Actual Carr Mth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fund: 101 General fund
-xpenditures
Dept: 421.000 Public Safety - Police
531,200 Police Contract Services .00 62,963.00 46,993.79 5,246.88 .00 15,969.21 74.6
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----
Public Safety - Police .00 62,963.00 46,993.79 5,246.88 .00 15,969.21 74.6
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
ty of Albertville
Date: 09/09/97
Time: 12:19pm
Page: 13
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FFor the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97 Original Budget Amended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encumb Annual Unenc. Balance x Bud
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 422.000 Public Safety - Fire
510,200 Wages - Fire Chief
Si0.300 Wages - Assistant Fire Chief
510.400 Firemen's Training Reimbursemt
SIO.500 firemen's Medical Training
512.000 Wages - Temporary Emloyees
524.000 Pension Fund Contributions
526.000 Workers Compensation Insurance
529,001 firemen Physicalstttuttttttu
529.100 training/Instruction
529.200 ENT Trainingtttttttttttttttut
529.300 First Responders Traininguttt
533,410 Audit - Firemen's Relief Assoc
543.100 Repairs/Mainteance - Equiptttt
S52.000 Insurance Other than Emp. Bene
553.000 Telephone
558.000 Travel
561.100 General Supplies
562.100 Natural Gas
562.200 Electricity
562.600 Gasoline and oil
572.000 Capital Outlay - Buildingstttt
S74.110 C/O - Hosetutttututtttttut
574.120 C/O - Turnout Geartttttt M"
514.130 C/O - Air Packsttttttttttttttt
574.140 C/O - PagerstMUM"ttutu
574,160 C/O - Toolsttttttuttuuuttt
574.200 Capital Outlay - Vehiclestutt
591.000 Dues & Subscriptions
599.000 Miscellaneous
Public Safety - fire
.00
600.00
.00
.00
.00
600.00
.0
.00
300.00
.00
.00
.00
300.00
.0
.00
8,250.00
52.50
.00
.00
8,197.50
.6
.00
2,250.00
.00
.00
.00
2,250.00
.0
.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
.00
12,171.00
6,636.00
.00
.00
5,535.00
54.5
.00
2,8SO.00
.00
.00
.00
2,850.00
.0
.00
500.00
1,135.31
.00
.00
-635.31
227.1
.00
3,600.00
904.50
400.00
.00
2,693.50
25.2
.00
750.00
805.35
.00
.00
-55.35
107.4
.00
1,000.00
11525.00
.00
.00
-525.00
152.5
.00
1,200.00
675.00
.00
.00
525.00
56.3
.00
1,000.00
972.62
37.64
.00
27.38
97.3
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.00
900.00
347.02
48.94
.00
552.98
38.6
.00
1,500.00
603.20
.00
.00
896.80
40.2
.00
2,500.00
548.41
34.58
.00
1,951.59
21.9
.00
1,400.00
1,176.25
14.42
.00
223.75
84.0
.00
900.00
513.87
53.18
.00
386.13
57.1
.00
800.00
442.87
162.52
.00
357.13
55.4
.00
25,000.00
.00
.00
.00
25,000.00
.0
.00
1,500.00
.00
.00
.00
1,500.00
.0
.00
2,500.00
.00
.00
.00
2,500.00
.0
.00
2,600.00
1,470.00
.00
.00
1,130.00
56.5
.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
.00
30,000.00
.00
.00
.00
30,000.00
.0
.00
200.00
169.50
.00
.00
30.50
84.8
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
-----------------
.00
.0
------
---------------------
.00
-----------------
107,271.00
-----------------
17,979.40
-----------------
751.28
.00
89,291.60
16.8
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Time: 12:19pa
City of Albertville Page: 14
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97 Original Budget Amended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 424.000 Public Safety -Bldg. Inspection
533.200 Bldg. Inspection Contract Sery .00 .00 .00 .00 .04 ..0
535.100 Contracted Services .00 .00 9,446.67 .00 .00 9,446.67 .0
---------------------------------- ---------------
Public Safety -Bldg. Inspection .00 .00 9,446.67 .00 .00 -9,446.67 .0
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Tise: 12:19pi
'City of Albertville Page: i5
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97 Original Budget Atended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encusb Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 427.000 Public Safety - Aniial Control
535.100 Contracted Services .00 1,750.00 1,494.00 .00 .00 256.00 85.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------
Public Safety - Anilal Control .00 1,750.00 1,494.00 .00 .00 256.00 85.4
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
City of Albertville
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: 09/09/97
Tiie: 12:19pt
Page: 16
----------------
or the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97 original Budget Mended Budget Annual Actual Curr Mth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance x Bud
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 431.000 Public Works-Highways,Streets
511,000 Wages - Regular Elployees
512.000 Wages - Tevporary Etloyees
513.000 Wages - Overtire
521.000 Group Insurance
522.000 FICA Contributions
523.000 PERA Contributions
526.000 Workers Cospensation Insurance
529.000 Other Eiployee Benefits
533.900 Other Prof. Contract Services
543.100 Repairs/Maintennce - Equipm:
543.300 Repairs/Maintenace-Paved Roads
543.310 Ice Retoval
543.320 Snow Plowing
543.330 Sand & Gravel
543.340 Seal Coatingtl'UHIm:oast
543.360 Street Sweeping
$43.400 Repairs/Maintenace-Unpaved Rds
543.500 Reapir/Maintenance - Sidewalks
543.600 Repairs/Maintenance-CatchBasin
553.000 Telephone
558.000 Travel
561.100 General Supplies
561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys
562.100 Natural Gas
362.200 Electricity
562.600 Gasoline and Oil
572.000 Capital Outlay - Buildings:ttt
574.111 Tractor/Loaders:tt:tut: m"
574.170 Street Overlayienttt:utttt:tt
574.180 Street Signsttttttttttttttutt
574.211 hower:tttttt:t::tttttt::ttutt
574.311 PickUpt:UMIU t:oast:
574.411 Snow Plowtttttttttttttttttttt:
574.511 Misc. C/O Equipient::tt:ttt:t:
591.000 Dues & Subscriptions
Public Works-Highways,Streets
.00
31,055.00
21,605.62
2,388.81
.00
9,449.38
69.6
.00
8,320.00
5,253.88
.00
.00
3,066.12
63.1
.00
500.00
1,175.75
.00
.00
-675.75
235.2
.00
3,780.00
2,745.00
347.82
.00
1,035.00
72.6
.00
3,050.00
2,054.75
182.74
.00
995.25
67.4
.00
1,787.00
962.34
107.02
.00
824.66
53.5
.00
L,471.00
.00
.00
.00
2,471.00
.0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.00
9,100.00
1,399.41
621.96
.00
7,700.59
15.4
.00
7,000.00
2,113.77
.00
.00
4,886.23
30.2
.00
6,000.00
5,317.73
749.11
.00
682.27
88.6
.00
3,000.00
1,964.72
.00
.00
1,035.28
65.5
.00
5,750.00
3,672.88
.00
.00
2,077.12
63.9
.00
500.00
458.65
.00
.00
41.35
91.7
.00
8,000.00
.00
.00
.00
8,000.00
.0
.00
2,500.00
2,682.83
.00
.00
-182.83
107.3
.00
6,000.00
262.50
.00
.00
5,737.50
4.4
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.00
600.00
531.00
47.89
.00
69.00
88.5
.00
100.00
.00
.00
.00
100.00
.0
.00
1,500.00
1,580.46
133.68
.00
-80.46
105.4
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
.00
575.00
392.07
4.80
.00
182.93
68.2
.00
300.00
171.29
17.72
.00
128.71
57.1
.00
1,500.00
1,855.45
74.67
.00
-355.45
123.7
.00
7,500.00
.00
.00
.00
7,500.00
.0
.00
2,000,00
.00
.00
.00
2,000.00
.0
.00
50,000.00
1,161.00
930.00
.00
48,839.00
2.3
.00
300.00
249.48
.00
.00
50.52
83.2
.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
.00
3,000.00
.00
.00
.00
3,000.00
.0
.00
4,000.00
.00
.00
.00
4,D00.00
.0
.00
2,500.00
686.51
.00
.00
1,813.49
27.5
.00
250.00
215.00
.00
.00
-----------------
35.00
86.0
------
---------------------
.00
-----------------
173,938.00
-----------------
58,512.09
-----------------
5,606.22 '
.00
115,425.91
33.6
REVENUE/EXPENIIITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Tiie: 12:19pi
City of Albertville Page: 17
-------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97 Original Budget hended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encuab Annual Uneoc. Balance % Bud
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 431.600 Public Yorks - Street Lighting
562.200 Electricity .00 27,000.00 17,812.13 2,277.44 .00 9,187.87 66.0
Public Yorks - Street Lighting .00 27,000.00 17,812.13 2,277.44 .00 9,187.87 66.0
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Time: 12:19pm
City of Albertville Page: 18
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ror the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97 Original Budget Amended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encumb Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General fund
Expenditures
Dept: 432.300 Public Yorks - Recycling
535.100 Contracted Services .00 12,345.00 8,177.98 1,028.50 .00 4,167.02 66.2
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------
Public Yorks - Recycling .00 12,345.00 8,177.98 1,028.50 .00 4,167.02 66.2
REVENUE/EXPENOITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Time: 12:19pe
City of
Albertville
Page:
19
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the
Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97
Original Budget Amended
Budget
Annual Actual
Curr Nth Encuab Annual
Unenc.
Balance
% Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 451.000 Parks and Recreation
511.000
Wages - Regular Employees
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
521.000
Group Insurance
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
522.000
FICA Contributions
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
523.000
PERA Contributions
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
526,000
Workers Compensation Insurance
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.DO
.0
542.000
Refuse Disposal
.00
600.00
360.13
44.93
.00
239.87
60.0
543.100
Repairs/Mainteance - Equiptttt
.00
1,500.00
3,405.16
262.75
.00
-1,905.16
227.0
544.200
Equipment Rental
.00
2,500.00
1,005.88
191.70
.00
1,494.12
40.2
552.000
Insurance Other than Emp. Bene
.00
3,300.00
.00
.00
.00
3,300.00
.0
553.000
Telephone
.00
700.00
347.44
25.01
.00
352.56
49.6
S61.100
General Supplies
.00
800.00
716.52
29.33
.00
83.48
89.6
562.100
Natural Gas
.00
1,200.00
615.98
2.14
.00
584.02
51.3
562.200
Electricity
.00
2,800.00
1,772.02
235.37
.00
1,027.98
63.3
562.600
Gasoline and Oil
.00
100.00
8.09
1.34
.00
91.91
8.1
572.000
Capital Outlay - BuildingsMI
.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
573.000
Capital Outlay/Non-buildingsit
.00
2,000.00
2,218.43
.00
.00
-218.43
110.9
574.100
Capital Outlay-Mach/EquiplIM
.00
1,000.00
274.93
.00
.00
725.07
27.5
599,000
Miscellaneous
.00
3,800.00
2,170.84
.00
.00
1,629.16
57.1
Parks and Recreation
.00
21,300.00
12,895.42
792.57
.00
8,404.58
60.5
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Tire: 12:19PI
City of Albertville
Page: 20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97
Original Budget hended
Budget Annual Actual
Curr Nth Encusb Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 455.000 Culture/Recreation
591.000 Dues S Subscriptions
.00
750.00 .00
.00 .00 750.00 .0
535.000 Friendly City Days Donation
.00
2,600.00 2,600.00
.00 .00 .00 100.0
Culture/Recreation
.00
3,350.00 2,600.00
.00 .00 750.00 77.6
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 09/09/97
Time: 12:19pi
City of Albertville Page: 21
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 08/01/97 to 08/31/97 Original Budget Amended Budget Annual Actual Curr Mth Encuab Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
rund: 101 General fund
Expenditures
Dept: 490.000 Working Capital
590.000 Working Capital Reserve .00 54,380.00 .00 .00 .00 54,380.00 .0
Working Capital .00 54,380.00 .00 .00 .00 54,380.00 .0
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------
Expenditures .00 719,896.00 345,714.43 31,908.96 .00 374,181.57 48.0
ALBERTVILLE WASTEWATER
TREATMENT FACILITY
August 1997
MONTHLY OPERATIONS RFpnRT
Submitted by:
Date: September 15, 1997
Professional Services Group
3320 Lander Avenue, NE
St. Michael, Minnesota 55376
(612) 497-8309 Fax: (612) 497-8312
ALBERTVILLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY
Monthly Operations Rem
August 1997
Executive Summary
Albertville met a// of it's NPDES permit requirements for the month of August. Effluent
Biochemical Oxygen Demand averaged 2.2 mgA and Total Suspended Solids aven3ged 5.6
mgA. Total Phosphorous averaged 0.26 mgA in the effluent and fecal coliform was <10
MPN/100ml.
Operations
Unusually high algae concentrations early in the month in the ponds have resulted ;fn a need for
increased aeration and alum use in order to maintain compliance.
A replacement flowtube for the influent flowmeter has been ordered and will be installed
immediately upon arrival. Due to this unit currently being down, there is no influent flow data
available. Effluent flows, however, give some indication of influent flow, but due to evaporation
and rainfall events, these numbers should not be used to assume influent flow.
Near month end, Pond #3 clarity improved considerably.
The streams are flowing again, therefore insitu analysis, sampling, and measurements were
performed. Lakes were also sampled and analyzed.
Large amounts of daphnia are present in the ponds and clarifier.
Vandalism to the ditch along main road by a vehicle was reported to the Sheriffs Department. A
sunroof and license plate was found to be left behind. The status of the case is stilf unknown.
Several calls have been made to the Sheriff's Department to request an update, but calls have
not been returned as of yet.
Maintenance ,
The backup generator ran for a short time on August 4 due to a power loss from a blown line
fuse.
Alum pump was disassembled, cleaned and reassembled to clear plug and stop small leaks.
Alum piping was also tightened and sealed to prevent leaking.
Routine mowing and trimming was performed. Due to frequent rains, at one point the lawn grew
to a length higher than we would like to see, but was promptly attended to when weather
allowed.
The industrial park lift station filters were cleaned and lines were purged.
The clarifier was sprayed for bugs and motor was serviced (oil and lube).
Cleaned UV channel and bulbs.
Sprayed Pond #1 dikes for weeds again. One area seemed to have regrowth near the watees
edge.
The lawn mower maintenance was completed, including oil change, and all zerks were greased.
Batteries were replaced on the velocity meter for stream gauging.
Influent flowmeter is still down, and new flowtube has been ordered.
Safety
Two safety trainings were held in August. 'Attitude for Safety' -a safety awareness session -was
held. The second training was `Electrical Safety, which was conducted in two parts. Our Site
Safety Coordinator presented the first half, and Wes Olson of Olson's Electric presented the
hands-on portion of the training. The electrical training included hazard prevention and electrical
troubleshooting techniques. Lock-out/Tag-out Training was held last winter, but will be held
again this year in a separate training session, to include other energy sources such as
hydraulics, pneumatics, and gas.
NPDES Discharge Monitoring Report
Client / public Communlcations
Regular communications have been maintained between PSG and Gary Hale.
Financials
Financial report reflects all activity in the budget year. The financial data does not reflect August
bills paid in September.
NPDES Discharge Monitoring Report
DMR Addendum's
Loadings Summary
Client Status Report
ALBERTVILLE VWVTF LOADINGS
�,ontroct
Values d Triggers.
Contract Values
S
Triggers,
Ave-
0.1580
MGD
Ave-
307
0
187 !
Hgh-
0.1890
MGD
4gn-
388
*
224 0
Lot*
0.1284
MGD
Low-
246
!
150 S
Design.
0 3150
MGD
388
#
388 •
FLOW
12 mo
% of
TSS
12 mo
% of
CBOD
% of
...............
MGD
.....................
Avg.
Design
......................................
mgA
Lbs
Avg
...............................................
Design
mgA
Lbs
Avg
.....................................
Design
1995 Jan
0 151
384
483
240
302
Feb
0 143
285
339
184
219
Mar
0.164
288
394
191
261
Apr
0.177
99
145
92
130
May
0 172
274
392
148
212
Jun
0.163
232
315
133
181
Jul
0 152
222
281
154
195
Aug
0.174
288
418
136
197
Sep
0.185
234
322
100
138
Oct
0.161
294
395
122
164
Nov
0.163
78
106
68
92
Dec
0.158
405
527
234
304
19% Jan
0 181
0 1626
51.61%
250
336
331
89 93%
175
235
195
52.87%
Feb
0.158
01638
52.01%
433
571
350
95.16%
178
235
196
53.21%
Mar
0.179
0.1651
52.41%
312
468
356
96.79%
221
330
202
54.78%
Apr
0.188
0.1880
52.70%
336
527
388
105.43%
131
205
207
58.36%
May
0198
0.1882
53.39%
388
841
409
111.05%
169
279
213
57.87%
•Jun
0203
0.1715
54.44%
354
599
432
117.48%
151
256
219
59.57%
Jt1
0.181
0.1723
54.68%
248
333
437
118.65%
129
173
217
59.07%
Aug
0.141
0.1695
53.81%
558
858
458
124.04%
179
210
218
•59.37%
Sep
0 141
0.1875
53.17%
825
735
491
133 40%
145
171
221
60.11%
Oct
0.163
0.1677
53.23%
274
372
489
132.89%
144
196
224
80.83%
Nov
0 250
0.1749
55 53%
244
W9
523
142.01 %
141
294
241
65.40%
Dec
0.171
0.1782
55.93%
309
441
515
140.06%
323
461
254
68.94%
1997 Jan
0.179
0.1777
58.40%
432
645
541
147.06%
180
269
258
69 70%
Feb
0.183
0.1798
57 06%
225
343
522
141.92%
148
226
258
69.50%
Mar
0.198
0.1813
57.57%
309
510
526
142.92%
176
291
252
68.61%
.Apr
0.162
0.1792
56.88%
238
322
509
138.27%
129
174
250
67.91%
May
0 074
0 1888
53.60%
322
199
472
128.27%
160
99
235
63.82%
June
0 137
0.1633
51.85%
244
279
445
121.01%
139.........159
227
61L63% ................... _._...
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
FOLLOW-UP SHEET
As of September 8, 1997
DATE ACTION TO BE TAKEN PERSON
05/96
WWTF Planning
Eng.
In Process
(July - September 1997)
08/96
CSAH 19/37 Intersection Realignment Project
Staff/
In Process
cbxril
09/96
STMA Ice Hockey Arena
Admin/
In Process
Atty
09/96
Cedar Creek Golf Course (Center Oaks)
Keno/
In Process
Comm.
02/97
PW Maintenance Building - New or Used
Staff/
On Hold
Cbxx::il
04/97
Frankfort Drainage - Greenhaven
Eng./
In Process
Couldl
06/97
Budget 1998
FinOq/
In Process
Couuril
06/97
Cedar Creek South
P&Z
07/97
Storm/Sewer Management Plan/Grant
Eng./
Cka ricil
09/97
City Staffing
Czar it
(Administration/Public Works)
09/97
FEMA Disaster Relief Application
Almin.
ALI
PLANNING ZONING COMISSION
September 9, 1997
Albertvi City Hall
PRESENT: air Howard Larson,
Brown, and Dan Robertus, Zoning
City Planner Liz Stockman
7:00 PM
Commissioners Carolyn Bauer, Jim
Administrator Garrison Hale and
Chair Larson convened the regular meeting at 7:00 PM.
Moved by Bauer, supported by Robertus, to adopt the agenda as
presented. All voted aye.
Moved by Brown, supported by Bauer, to approve the minutes of
the August 12, 1997, minutes. All voted aye.
Planner Stockman started discussion on performance standards.
Commissioners discussed increasing the market value of homes
in the community. Items discussed: exterior finish; floor area;
lot area not including wetlands, trees in subdivisions as a
requirement such as a minimum of one tree in the front yard;
sodding or seeding within one years' time and use of escrow holds
to ensure compliance; screening between residential abutting
commercial/industrial; garage sizes 440 to 900 square feet; and
commercial/industrial being required to screen loading/disposal
areas with front of buildings.
Consensus of the Commissioners was to recommend these ideas to
the Council based on the Comprehensive Policy Plan Goals.
Chair Larson and the Commission agreed to consider Comp
Plan/Zoning Map Amendment discussion related to possible changes.
Commissioners opened discussion and wanted to know where the
property owners were related to the issues for change. Once
property owner was present.
Moved by Brown, Supported by Larson, to terminate further
discussion on Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Map Amendments for both
sides of County Road 19 from 50th Street to 57th Street. All voted
aye.
Planner Stockman turned to performance standards on commercial
buildings. Brown wanted no pole buildings and 50% non-metal
Immkman to research.
ers moved to a discussion on billboards. What would
be the approach to reduce the number? Discussed principal use with
1,000 feet spacing. There would be a phasing in over time.
Consideration will be given to pre-existing signs until time is up
under phasing program.
Commissioner Larson discussed a fee change in the sign fees to
cover time by staff, planner and attorney.
Commissioners focused on: (1) thinning out signs, (2) fee
charges; (3) size limits and dealing with protrusions; (4)
surcharge for sign protrusions; and (5) principal use.
Commissioner Brown wanted the land owners to be notified.
Commissioners reconfirmed recommendation that windloading go
from 40 to 30 pounds and not to see items more than once when a
decision has been determined.
Chair Larson opened discussion on Barthel Industrial Park For
Sale as an example.
Zoning Administrator Hale discussed the need to review the
sign ordinance on "temporary" "for sale" signs for industrial
properties on land abutting freeway.
Commissioners discussed with Planner Stockman the concept and
al be different from industrial.
rown, supported by Bauer to recommend ordinance
amendment for commercial/industrial properties within 100 feet of
interstate where a real estate sign shall be allowed through a
conditional use permit (annually) not to exceed 100 square feet for
t purrpro pos-e of the sale of property. Al l voted aye.
discussed budget
- NAC for planning items and research
- Agenda established to keep costs down by having the
planner only stay for the maximum of one meeting charge
- Use time limits on public hearings (Chair to control)
- Enforcement activities by staff and attorney (not
planner) ,
'Consensus of Planning Commissioners was to as a ounce e
part of administrator selection process.
�Y
Move rown, supporte y Bauer, to adjourn. at 9:00 PM.
All voted aye.
Howard Larson, Chair
q*40j�
Garrison Hale, Zoning Admen.
�z'7
r.. NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONS LI
r
% COMMUNITY PLANNING DESIGN MARKET R
INC
f.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council
Albertville Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Elizabeth Stockman
DATE: 29 July 1997
RE: Albertville - Sign Ordinance
FILE: 163.05 - 97.08
The City Council directed the Planning and Zoning Commission to review the City's regulations
regarding billboards and other advertising devices and make a recommendation as to whether
changes should be made or not. Apparently, the issue is the excessive number of billboards in
the City. We should have an updated inventory of existing signs and their locations in the City
at the 12 August meeting for discussion. Given the political nature of billboards, we are asking
that you come up with a list of objectives for us to use in formulating recommended changes, if
there are any. If the intent is to phase out existing billboards, it is a lengthy process governed by
federal statutes which typically require ten or more years for this to occur. If more detailed
information is desired prior to you making a decision, we must involve David Licht and Mike COuri
to benefit from their knowledge and past experience.
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6
PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837
ALBERTVILLE BILLBOARD INVENTORY
6 August 199
h 4 }
4
bM24
lei
rl
r.:
A 4
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS. INC.
13
I
15
7'1
ALBERTVILLE BILLBOARD INVENTORY
6 August 199
Al_ -
A .A
23
z ,
1E
M.
2
22
24
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS. INC.
Q(a)
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
COUNTY OF WRIt1IT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE #1997-15
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE #1997-9
TITLED AN ORDINANCE REGULATING
ADVERTISING DEVICES (BILLBOARDS) AND BUSINESS
SIGNS AND PROVIDING A PENALTY FOR VIOLATION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA, ORDAINS:
Section 5 shall be amended to add the following:
Subd. 2 Interim Moratorium.
No application for billboard advertising devices shall be accepted,
nor shall any billboard advertising device permits be issued for
ninety (90) days from October 5, 1997, except:
1. Permits for routine maintenance or replacement of an existing
billboard advertising device;
2. Non -billboard advertising devices advertising a business
located on the same premise as the advertising device;
3. Any application for permits which were received prior to 4:30
PM on July 7, 1997.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 22nd
DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1997.
Mark S. Olsen, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda Houghton, City Clerk
FILOT-
LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
September 16, 1997
Mr. Mayor & City Council Members
City Consultants
c/o Mr. Gary Hale,
Citv Administrator
5975 Main Avenue NE.
Albertville, MN 55301
RE: Revision to Townbome Area A of the Master plan and PUD aipytQval,
Dear Council:
This letter serves to confirm our testimony regarding the final plans and PUD document.
Pilot Land Development has attached a 16 unit TH, plan, to this letter which incorporates
the only suggested change of the Council from our meeting of September 8 1997. Since
that time, some have expressed a change of opinion regarding this area. We believe the
plan as revised solves the request and is a reasonable transition from the R-5 to the R-1A.
With your approval of this area, all of the large exhibits can be consistent.
Also attached is a further summary of the protection covenants and home owners
associations provide to a neighborhood. Every question I have heard raised by Council
and Planning Commission about Town homes is typical of virtually every flown home
(over 20 in 15 Cities) proposal I have been a part of over the last 7 years. The facts
surrounding completed developments simply don't match the concerns regarding
assumptions of poor character, crime, messiness and disrepair. Every City can find a few
bad examples in projects over 10 years old, but these racist be put into the context of how
many excellent law abiding positive projects and dwelling units also exist.
[f you believe single family is immune from these same concerns, review your agenda
over the last year to see if the Council dealt with more single 'family problems or attached
housing problems? It only takes one bad apple in a single family neighborhood to drag
down appearance and the City has minimal ability to change it. In are association, the
procedural timelines to deal with a problem owner are dramatically faster.
In order for Mike Cotui, Pilot and our consultants to conclude exhibits to be referenced
by the PUD document on the October 6 agenda, we will need a motion of approval to
accept the plan exhibits as proposed without further changes on September 22. This
motion will allow Pilot to close on our affected parcels of the golf course, will allow
Couri and us to conclude our review of the PUD document for approval on October 6th.
13736 Johnson Street NE • Hann Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094
SEP. 1 1957 11 : c.1AN k:ENCI:J NO. 0b1 P. 3
Without a Council motion to accept the plans, too many small details referenced by the
PUD document will remain vague and unable to be evaluated correctly, continuing to
delay the project and jeopardizing its feasibility to go forward. We have made lots of
reasonable changes and tradeoffs to date. Concluding the plan portion of the master plan
will allow us to better analyze business points such as parks investment, trails, and sewer
charges for a golf course, Please contact us with any questions you may have at any time.
Thank you in advance for your comments and approval.
Sincerely.
G'
Donald lens
Land Development ]director & Consultant to Center Oaks
Attachments: sketch plan revision to Cedar Creek TH. Area ,A, district
NO.06-i F.S
1
v
V
i
z
Zzz
h�
trN C}o"n
,oV N,
Lm
LD
: : a : :
: : :
y
Lo
fi
q
�
:yam ,m
4 �
�i•�:m�i
-j
Zs b
�n ELI.)dam
s,
m6-ti�'
yizcb
p-
C
II
�*73ab
ocG
a 2�
a
bb G>
hti
.•a
b
-,L-lii ,
1
SEP. 13. 1 99r 11: _DAM F 1=f IC; CIO.061 6
homeowner
l 1 is
Subject to .A. rova
'th ovenants
Copingl:
�V1
If you believe your home •rs your castle,
restrictive covenants m6 y chafe your
sense of personal freedom, But they
can also maintain your neighborhood's
aesthetics and property value..
retty in pink wasn't quite what neigh-
bors thought when a Washington cou-
BY. pie recently painted their house a rosy
hue. In fact, more than 100 angry rek-
SHAWN P dents complained about the "eyesore:'
GIL LIAM Still, the house remain3 pink.
Several thousand miles away-, an Oklahoma
homeowners' association filed suit recently
against a resident who painted his house pink.
The color will probably change. Two pinks, two
problems, two outcomes. The difference? The
Washington couple's community architectural
control committee, acting in accordance with a
restrictive covenant, approved the paint job
ahead of time. The Okiahorna association didn't.
v\, hat IS a covenant',.'
_ Expressing yourself through your home --in
forms such as exterior paint color —is more
10
NO may be a fine nue
your daughters- nursery, but
you might not care for it as
the color of the house next
door. Restrictive Covenants regulated now than -
sometimes regulate what ever. The Community
color development residents Associations Institute
may paint their homes, (CAI) estimates that at
least 50 percent of
new homes in the country's largest metropolitan
areas fall under restrictive covenants. According
to recent American blousing Surveys, the number
reaches more than 70 percent in communities
such as Houston and Anaheim, California.
Restrictive covenants specify what you can
and cannot do with your house's exterior and the
surrounding yard, and how you can take action if
your neighbors dons t fallow the same rules.
Not a new concept
Covenants have protected aesthetics since
Colonial tinges in communities such as
Williamsburg, V rginiz� where every home's yard
requited special fencing. Condominium develop-
ers, however, were the first to create private, non-
profit organizations called community associa-
tions to enforce covenants. The idea soon spread
to communities and subdivisions of single-
family homes. While; community associations
for condominiums manage and maintain com-
mon structures and spaces, covenants for single-
family developments cover both common areas
and individuals' lots and house exteriors.
Community associations ensure the mainte-
nance of a subdivision's aesthetics by enforcing
restricrive covenants after the developer has sold
Ndo st restrictive
covenants dead Adth
architeCtUral controls
or aesthtdcs, especially
concerning exteriors.
ALLrAMERICAN HQME PANS 1M
MO.061
t T
M v
L L yy G 4 r • a •• G �!
�D C .0 O Y0 •Ld a 4 C M
.*' O A ^ni „y'E v '7L' ^3 ;7 y) .�- "� A' n C c 'a"F ,l „ c
L ti }}.
.�.+ �Ci w Z d
�r ucu�� ?A � ,a •� w � Q � 9 �'� •i e � ,` C7 y � _ C � y:('y � O 0 � y„�1'N
tL
-4
r�r-i� e r�'� A � � ., y❑� a �r oA w� u 'cn'^1 7 y E E •�,
IN
'...+ i+ � C Y � � � yo, d a � •` � 4 G � o W d � .� :d �. .� f'" 'II � y L P J � 4
a y3y N r
`�"� d = � � ^ C �' C7 �' � 'D •� r u 4 � 5 � O � . i z. +•' •y,• � .ai u E � f•. u U � � � ti7
;n v1. a
may cuo L°$� �vi`..
v, of p ° °' Y '+ `� u °• a, 4 0 y ,�, 'Kr
ri c ixy �, 6'ca e A nl+•
c •u G y V4) w •1tl•� O
A i, av •ter• C g
.•i--r p c }` c,,,�. .a. E n r; A El ry, "' ,c tl e� •� +mow G ^ G+me
l) 4�= �_� � A• y y y R c V � S� y p� A
a� c ,
-
C
P.r
c.�
C
CD
C
�U
C�
G�1)
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: September 18, 1997
TO: City Council
FROM: Ken
As the City of Albertville grows, so do the needs of the City.
One of those needs is snowplowing. At present we have a 1979 Ford
plow truck with plow, V-plow, wing and sander. We also have a 1989
Chevy pickup with a plow.
With new streets being constructed every year, it is taking
more time to plow the streets. Last year it took approximately 20
hours to plow the entire city. This winter we will have several
additional streets to plow.
We owe it to the residents of Albertville to provide safe,
plowed and passable streets as soon as possible after a snowfall.
When the plow truck breaks down (as happened last year), we have no
other equipment to use to plow the streets. Most contractors in
our area are not equipped to plow streets. Surrounding cities have
all they can do to plow their own streets and have neither the time
or manpower to plow our streets. The Council has discussed
purchasing another snow plow for the past several years and money
has been budgeted and reserved for that purpose. This year we need
to take action.
Gary and I outlined the needs of the Public Works Department.
Since we already own a plow/dump truck, another plow truck would be
used almost exclusively for plowing. A loader could be used year
round for multiple jobs and we believe a loader would best serve
our needs.
We have looked at a wheel loader. During the winter months,
the loader would be used to plow streets, cul-de-sacs, and parking
lots. It would also be used for pushing back snow drifts. In the
spring and summer, we would use the loader for dirt work, loading,
leveling, etc., as well as mixing salt and sand for winter use.
Estimated cost of the loader is $55,000, plus tax. Adding the wing
and plow to the loader would cost around $15,000, plus tax.
Linda and I reviewed the budgeted and reserved funds to
determine if purchasing a loader is feasible. Our recommendation
for funding the loader, plow and wing follows:
FUNDS NEEDED:
Wheel loader $55,000
Wing & Plow 15,000
Total $70,000
Sales Tax @ 6.5% 4,550
Grand Total 74 550
FUNDING OPTION #1:
Tractor/Loader Capital Outlay $18,000
Snow Plow Capital Outlay 22,000
Unspent 1997 Snow Plowing Budget 2,000
FEMA Disaster Funds 7,000
Seal Coating Budget 8,000*
Street Overlay Budget 17,550**
Total Funds Available 74 550
* Carryover to the 1998 budget would be $0.
** Carryover to the 1998 budget would be $7,000.
FUNDING OPTION #2:
Tractor/Loader Capital Outlay $18,000
Snow Plow Capital Outlay 22,000
Unspent 1997 Snow Plowing Budget 2,000
FEMA Disaster Funds 7,000
Seal Coating Budget 4,000*
Street Overlay Budget 12,000**
Working Capital Reserve 9,550***
Total Funds Available 74 550
* Carryover to the 1998 budget: would be $4,000
** Carryover to the 1998 budget. would be $12,000
*** 1997 Working Capital Reserve would be $44,830
The question of where to store the additional piece of
equipment was also discussed. Since there is currently no room in
the Fire Hall/Public Works building at this time, we contacted
Don's Bus Service and have made arrangements to rent space in one
of their buildings for this winter. Storage will not be an issue
if a new fire hall or a maintenance building is constructed.
"f
TRACK 11CORPORATION
September 16, 1997
Ken Lindsay
City of Albertville
5975 Main Ave.
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
Dear Ken:
As per our phone conversation, I am enclosing pictures and a complete description as follows:
Used 1988 Caterpillar IT-28B Integrated Tool Carrier S/N 1HF910 equipped with ROPS
cab, heater, air conditioning, lights, wipers, roof mounted strobe, rear view mirrors, ether
starting aid, counterweights, 3rd valve hydraulics, quick attach system, 2.25 cu. yd. GP
bucket with bolt -on cutting edge S/N 9V8955, 17.5 X 25 Toyo fabric tires that are 50%
and matched, exchange engine installed about 1 year ago. 110 H.P., cleaned & painted.
Price FOB Lakeville, MN
$55,000.00
This machine is due into the paint shop next week. Please let me know of your further interest
and thank you for letting Track II be of service with your equipment needs.
Very truly yours,
TRACK II CORPORATION
O
Craigllson
Sales
encls.
21716 KENRICK AVENUE • LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55044
(612) 469-3456 • FAX (612) 469-3474 • TOLL FREE U.S. (800) 633-2332
AUG.-15'9'(FRI) 12.29 RDO BURNSVILLE TEL:612 890 7046 P,002
i D06
EQUVW14 CO.
12M Nvant Ave S
e MN 55337
612-090-SM
August 15, 1997
sTapw
6700" 10 NW
Sak ARMd$ MN 56379
320-259-6Z22
City of Albertville
Attn: Ken Lindsey
Dear Ken:
MANKM
1910 L"w DH q 700 dit AVWKN NW 703 OnWW Reed
Mw1h Menkft MN 56003 R06ft er MN M901 Mvahod MN $6236
W-307•1036 5074E2468a W-02-MA
I am pleased to quote you the following Loader:
One (1) 1994 John Deere 544G Loader
Equipped as follows: 1
Approximately 2000 Hours
20.5 x 25 Tires - 40%
2.5 Cu. Yd. Bucket with Bolt On Edge
Cab with Heater
Front Hydraulic Differential Lock
JRB Quick Coupler
Falls 12' Reversible Plow
SELLING PRICIE $95,000.00 Plus Tax
Thank you for the opportunity to quote you the above machine, I look forward to hearing from
you soon.
Bob Stuewe
John Deere Sales
6340 Highway 101
Shakopee, MN 56379
(612) 445-6400
(800) 795.9274
FAX: (612) 445-0365
QUOTATION
E Q U 11P M E N Ti Locations at:
Shakopee, Minnesota
Duluth, Minnesota
Iron River, Michigan
LaCrosse, Wisconsin
St. Joseph, Wisconsin
Black River Falls, Wisconsin
To: Gt �� E�R';'V! LLB Date:
'%�
Quoted
Attn: 1�4✓N i.1 N b S�F► pug g s c� Jo - y 5 iU�ntiltion va1iO
CASE, (O21 A"k;tcv4'n1-"
19g0
wtjf✓" Lo Olt v i✓f-
5300 f�a s. �1PPQox .
S//J JAK oo ?.13n2-
N cw PpIr,dl,
cab g, 14"itK
2,9 _5, X 7 ! 2
2-lq 10. PLI,-Post 16nep-41-
&I. 37fiNU�tltO 6Q01Pm» kil-
Applicable Sales TarAdditional
Subject to terms and corditlons of our customary order form
Quoted By: A'
ApMved By:
Accepted By:,
Title:
Fi m:
Date:
1Rtc� `�("'gvo-DC
-toq$.So '"4
66 3.
#v,,Jrc l {'flL. Lf-fl 5 f-
60 ►MaNTI1s C-5-
'/ R�ot
ST. JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT, INC.
6340 Hwy 101
Shakopee, MN 55379
Tel (612) 445-5400
Fax (612) 445-0365
Industrial & Construction Machinery
WARRANITY:
Standard Base Warranty 12 Months on Unit
24 Months or 2000 His. Engine
EXTENDED Power Train Warranty:
Provides coverage on engine and drive train components up to
5 years or 5000 hrs. on unit.
(Please add 4750.00 to the cost of unit for extended warranty)
Example of Case Municipal Lease Program:
Price
88.7205.00
Tax
5,733.33
Fees
65.00
Total
94,003.33
MOMTHLY PAYMENT: 1545.88 5.9% APR
REQUIREMENTS:
1 ST Payment in advance 72 Month Program
Insurance Certificate
Availability: 90-120 days from date of purchase
American Coupler 60" Pallet Forks W/Coupler Price 3990:00
Thank you for the interest in our Case 621 BXT Loader. If you have any
questions, please feel free to give me a call.
Sincerely,
ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT, INC
Gunnar Sjolander (Sales Representative)
ST. JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT, INC.
6340 Hwy 101
Shakopee, MN 55379
Tel (612) 445-5400
Fax (612) 445-0365
Industrial & Construction Machinery
July 14, 1997 Ttie C►Ty of� ALjYfF rVlLL1�, cAN
Tpµc RoVRN rArfa ; Or "rK 51)rn£
City of Melrose Pluro4dRt- TrIRY w£ Ogg PPe0.0,wri'y
225 East First Street No. woRglac> tv I-rA A-T `+IE Ct'TI of
Melrose, MN 56352-0216 044�w Wotfvr+dWT)-
ATTN: Mr. Don E. Salzmann Supt. Of Public Works
Vog IN f:bgMrq-r1o4 ON J+%'vPjsC4 PAL
Dear Mr. Salzmann, cprk.c_ 1-0 0 1 ASH £ 402" -r o a�
S
I am pleased to provide the following information on our Case 621 BXT
Articulated Wheel Loader, under the Case Corporation's Municipal Lease
Program.
Unit equipped in the following manner:
All standard equipment
Cab, Heater, Defogger, Air Pressurized
4 Spool Control Valve
Cold Start Aid
Heavy Duty Batteries
2500 # Counterweight
West Coast Mirrors
Ride Control
20.5 X 25 Michelin Radial Tires
Sun Visor
American Coupler Male Master W/2 1/2 Yd General Purpose Bucket
Bolt -on -Edge
AM -FM Radio
Strobe Light Switch
Parts, Operator and Service Manuals
Delivered to Melrose
List Price $1421917.00
City of Melrose Cost 88,205.00 plus tax
Phone 612/389-3273
Fax 612/389-2550
ANDERSON, INC.
32032 125th Street
Princeton, MN 55371
We specialize in quality used
4WD Loaders - Crawlers
Cranes & Road Graders
930
i9113
,9� CPa-:4�
gcv �O
00s�e O-le
99-
5�p -
��a-y��� —
` cQ�
:Sent 0y: TRACK II CORPORATION 8124693474
09/03/97 2:40PM Job 219 Page 1/2
TRACK 11CORPORATION
September '), 1997
Ken Lindsay-
City of Albertville
Dcar Ken:
As per our plione conversation. 1 am enclosing a complete description as follows:
Used 1983 Caterpillar 930 Wheel Loader S/N 41K12256 equipped with BOPS cab,
heater, lights, wiper, R.V. mirrors, back up alarm, counterweights, Balderson quick
attach system, 2.25 cu. yd. Balderson GP bucket with bolt -on cutting edge, 2.0 cu. yd.
Cat GP bucket with teeth, Cat 4' adjustable forks, 17.5 R 25 Goodyear radial tires
that are 70% and snatched, 1,500 hours on an engine 0/11 by the former owner, a
very clean and tight 930.
Price FOB Lakeville, NIN $42,500.00
Used 1992 VNiF,/N1ichigan L 70 Wheel loader S/N 61219 equipped with .BOPS cab,
heater, lights, wipers, suspension seat, 2.25 cu. yd. GP bucket with bolt -on cutting
edge, bucket quick attach system., 17.5 X 25 Nlichelin XHA radial tires that are 70%,.
automatic powershift transmission, Volvo TD45B 4 cylinder Diesel engine @ 110 11.13.,
2,878 original hours.
Price FOB Lakeville, NIN $57,500.00
Used 1988 Caterpillar rr-28B Integrated Tool Carrier S/N 1HF910 equipped with
RODS cab, heater, air conditioning, lights, wipers, roof mounted strobe, rear vieN%
mirrors, ether starting aid, counterweights, 3rd valve hydraulics, quick attach system,
2.25 cu. yd. GP bucket with bolt -on cutting edge S/N 9V8955, utility adjustable pallet
forks, Pemberton I"WE log forks with top clamp, 17.5 X 25 Toyo fabric tires that are
50% and matched, exchange engine installed about l year ago. 110 11.P.
Price FOB Lakeville, NIN $56.500.00
21716 KENRICK AVENUE • LAKEVILLE, MINNESOTA 55044
ta4_.q456 e FAX (612) 469-3474 • TOLL FREE U.S. (800) 633-2332
Sent by: TRACK II CORPORATION 6124693474
09/03/97 2:42PM Jot) 219 Page 2/2
TRACK 301CORPORATION
Used 1992 Caterpillar IT-18B Integrated Tool Carrier S/N 4ZD1272 equipped with
ROPS cab, heater, lights, wipers, directional signals, counterweights, 3rd valve
hydraulics, quick attach system, 2.0 cu. yd. GP bucket with bolt -on cutting edges, Cat
3204 engine @ 90 H.P., 17.5 R 25 Michelin XGL radial tires that are 30�7 and
matched, cleaned and painted, in excellent condition.
Price FOB Lakeville, 1IN $59,500.00
I
All of these units are in our yard. They all have a quick attach system. 1 will finda plow set up
for you. please let me know of your further interest and thank you for letting Track I be of
service with your equipment needs.
Very truly yours,
i
i TRACK 11 CORPORATION
Craig Olson
Sales
encls.
21716 KENRICK AVENUE - LAKEVILLE. MINNESOTA 55044
169-3456 FAX (612) 469-3474 - TOLL FREE U.S. (800) 633-2332
SEP- 4-97 THU 8:23 SWARTZ EQUIP. CO. INC.
NEW & USED FARM & CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT
S--1
�war _z_�
fQJ U/PCO.
612 231 0363 P.01
HWY. 12 EAST - P.O. BOA; 974
WILLMAR, MN 56201
Otfice/Pwra"h?-231-0565
pm 0 5%
WE BUY, SELL, TRADE %OOD CLEAN' IRON'
Atbe.r-v; lie'
01-- q�j - �2-lo
?Cl ' CASE 1(h( LOADERS
B. Scott Swartz
Z�� bk�. I CA�' ham. �:c i��S� I'1, xZ`� #;�-e5 F►f'= '?o`'ra 4 = ?.od
�,l,;lr\�dQ a t glass �a� c1 ;r C��v new loA�iEr; t t 0� kp
Nnllr+ar
a$ISE vJ-2a
Z a by , 31rl valve
6`)3 15
P 19
nee d . h
A.' p
tS
STRUCTURAL BUILDING
129261st Street • Becker, MN 55308
Phone: 261-41% or Toll Free: 1-800.535-9722 Fax: 612-261.4414
City of Albertville
Attn: Ken
September 17, 1997
Dear Ken:
Listed below you will find a revised quote for your new structure_ 1f you have any questions,
please contact me.
20' x 30' x 16' Salt Storage Fatility
A) 30# Live Load
$) 1/12 Pitch Single Slope Roof
C) Poured Footings
D) Solid Columns 4' O.C.
E) Shingled Roof
F) 2" x 6" Treated T&G
Price $15,650.00
Credit for Columns (2320.00)
Supplied by Owner
$13,330.00
Si
Larry Te
STRUC ff BUILDING
12926 rst Street
Becker, MN 55308
113 S. FIFTH AVENUE, P 0. BOX 1717,, ST. CLOUD, MN 5830R 1717 3X 262•4740 800 572-0617 320 251-87610 FAX
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION
TO: Garrison Hale
City Administrator
Albertville, MN
FROM: Peter J. Carlson, P.E
City Engineer
DATE: November 21, 1996
RE: Fire Station Parking Lot Drainage
SEH No. A-ALBEV 9701.00
The City is currently stockpiling sand/salt mixture, used during snowplowing, in. the parking lot east
of the fire station. Due to the flat grade in the parking lot, storm water is draining onto the adjacent
bank parking lot.
To prevent storm water from draining onto the bank parking lot, two options are available to the
City:
1. Extend storm sewer from an existing line that is connected to the catch basin on Main Street
to a new catch basin that would be installed at a low point adjacent to the sand pile. Also, a
small berm should be constructed along the property line to direct the storm water to the
catch basin.
2. Regrade the driveway from the sand pile to Main Street. A small berm should also be
constructed to direct the storm water to the driveway.
Constructing the stone sewer is the best option to improve the drainage 'in the parking lot. It is also
probably the more expensive option. Regrading the driveway will work, however, ice will probably
build up adjacent to the building since this area is usually in the shadows. In the spring, the driveway
will probably stay soft until the weather warms up and the driveway dries out.
djg
c: Linda Houghton, City Clerk
(1:\ALBEVC0KR\N0-2I B.96)
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC. ST. PAUL. MN MINNEAPOLIS. MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISON. WI LAKE COUNT
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
7
--- ---- - ... - ... .-... -... - ... - ...
--\
60TH ST NE
Ex Cl
� I
IZ
I------
c
I
CQC
L
=SEN
/.n0/albov/9701/firaatcb.d0n Nov. 2S. 1916 09:16:32
'ROP
I" PVC Cl
GRADE
'ROPOSED 27"
IIAMETER CB
P DEEP
ROPOSED 27'
METER CB
59TH ST NE
FIRE STATION DRAINAGE PLAN
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA
i
9
1>
io
k-i
!o
lo
it
10
t
1 � i
i
tr
!Ib
in
U)
OD
Ln
10
i
U)
i
lot
J%q
CD CD
10
j(D
1z
I
lui
0
4j LOLO
00
w Lij
�?�
®/
<c
O
ZN
s
To'd
ko
m
ty
tv
K
■
i
I
oi
co
141
I
Amr_—
F-0 , ci
0
.c'SEN
September 9, 1997
Mr. Scott Dahlke, P.E.
Project Engineer
Meyer-Rohlin, Inc.
1111 Highway 25 North
Buffalo, MN 55313
Dear Scott:
c G)
113S. FIFTH AVENUE, PO BOX 1717, ST CLOUD, MN 56302-1717 320 252-4740 800 572-0617 320 251-8760 FA X
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION
RE: Albertville, Minnesota
Center Oaks
SEH No. A-ALBEV 9804.00
The street pavement section in the Fairfield Addition and Parkside 4th Addition were increased due
to poor subgrade soils. As development continues south and west of Parkside 3rd, I anticipate
encountering the same poor subgrade soils. Due to the poor subgrade soils, I believe the City's
standard street pavement section should be modified similar to the City of Rogers standard street
pavement section. The standard details for both cities are enclosed. I will be discussing this issue
with the Albertville City Council on. September 22, 1997.
Si41y,
Peon, LP.E.
City Engineer
djg
Enclosures
c: Gary Hale, City of Albertville (w/enclosures)
Mike Couri, City Attorney (w/enclosures)
1:\ALBE V\9803\CORR\SE-09A.97
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC. Sr PAUL, MN MINNEAPOLIS, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISON, WI LAKE COUNTY, IN
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
:m
R/W
I4'/F OO T
•v.:
NOTE: ALL ORGANIC OR OTHER UNSUITABLE
MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM
BENEATH THE ROADWAY.
rem
30'
30' R 1W
16' OR 19.5' B/C i16' OR 19.5' B/C
6" CROWN
(3% MINI
i
1
SURMOUNTABLE
CONCRETE CURB
�.4' /FOOT
DRAIN TILE
SEE STO-12
— 1-1/2" — 2331. TYPE 41A
BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE
— 2-1/2" — 2331. TYPE 31B
BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
— 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE.
100% CRUSHED
— MIN 18" — SUBCUT BACKFILL WITH
GRANULAR MATERIAL•MNDOT 3149.2B
— GEOTEXTILE — MIRAFI 50OX
BITUMINOUS STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
STANDARD DETAIL TYPICAL SECTION
FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS - URBAN SECTION
ROGERS, MINNESOTA
CITY OF ROCERS � T R - 7
C
(_7
R/W
NOTE: ALL ORGANIC OR OTHER UNSUITABLE
MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM
BENEATH THE ROADWAY.
i
30' 30' R/.W
4' 18.5' 18.5' 14'
(
SURMOUNTABLE
CONCRETE CURB
AND GUTTER
1/4"/FOOT I 3% MIN
Q:1 (
1 -1 /2" - 2331, TYPE 41 A
BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE
2-1 /2" - 2331, TYPE 31 B
BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
12" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE,
100% CRUSHED
4" TOPSOIL
BITUMINOUS STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
STANDARD DETAIL TYPICAL SECTION
FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS - URBAN SECTION
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA
STR-7
PILOT -
LAND
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
September 8, 1997
Mayon' and Council Members
City Consulting Staff
c/o Mr. Gary Hale
City Administrator
5975 Main Avenue iNE.
Albertville, MN 55301
RE: Changes in Standard road design as pronose_d_b_y SEFF
Dear Mr. Hale:
This letter serves to confirm Pilot's opposition to an across the board change in standards to the
street section proposed, In all of the Cities where we have had previous experience (Eden
Prairie, Chanhassen, Burnsville, Inver Grove, New Brighton, Fridley, Minnetonka. Hugo, St.
Francis, Andover, Coon Rapids, Blaine, Plymouth, Brooklyn Park, Cottage Grove, Buffalo, and
Ramsey) standards have been used for the average condition, Additional details such as
proposed are for the nonstandard condition.
SEH incorrectly stated why we directed our contractors to leave the street 2' low for sand, Here
are our reasons:
1. The site was short good material and to import the clay from our B-3 site required an
assessment of whether we would have a dry or wet summer. Since 1996 was perfect, we
assumed this year 1997 would not be. Since the original grading was performed in December of
1996 to enable a gas line feed to Parkside Third, we also knew we may have some difficulty with
density tests This assessment about the weather turned out to be correct.
2. Since the street would be re -excavated for a 20 foot deep trunk sewer, the chance for
additional moisture was present at more than one time during construction, again leading us to
leave the street 2' low,
3. Since highway 19 was to be torn up, not losing additional time to weather factored into this
decision to minimize our chance of a roll test failure, as we wanted to progress as.fast as
possible to curb and gutter and pavement. Finally, since sorxze of the road grades were minimal
percent, we choose again to leave room for sand instead of suitable engineered fill (clay).
13736 Johnson Street NE • Ham Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 - Fax: 757-4094
Wd
LFrt'9T'd3S
In summary, the detail 1proposed by SEH could and should be an alternative in locations
where s fter su it are encountered where time of year or wet cycles minimize drying time,
or where heavier loads are anticipated such as minor collectors. In locations where good subsoil
is present, when good construction time is available, and when there is little risk of high water
tables, the detail is overkill and needlessly raises the cost of construction. We have asked ITT
and Braun, two geotechaical firms who advise engineers on soils and details such as this one to
comment further on this proposed change. Policy decisions made on the heels of a 29' rainfall
summer are typically suspect. Albertville has plenty of roads which were built using the current
standards which remain flat, are not roller coasters, and have plenty of life left in them. Just as
we have many sizes of a variety of products, so should a City have many standards for different
soil types. To preach a one size fits all concept is irresponsible over design.
Sincerely,
Donald Tens
Land Development Director
CC: JQbn Carlsoxa - Braun, Pat Johnson - ITT Fete Carlson - SEH
03H31 W�L�:3 �a6ti'9t'd3S
SEP-10-97 WED 12:31 MEYER-ROHLIN. INC. 612 682 9492 P.03
ON
141
�I bt �a«d Ceh+me�a�s
R/w
—T
!
', 4"/FOOT
NOTE: ALL ORGANIC OR OTHER UNSUITABLE
MATERIAL SHALL BE REMQVEQ FROM
BENEATH THE ROADWAY.
30`
i 30,
16' OR 19.5' (3/C 16' OR 19.5, G/C
I 6" CROWN
1 Q% MIN)
I
R/W
SURMOUNTABLE
CONCRETE CURB
SEE' SNTOI 1 H aM4 slaf- Of > � Alt.' ► '
C,m o �.f 46 s u m 'Se{ O v
---- 1-1 /2" -- 2331. TYPE 41 A
BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE
2--1/2" - 2331. TYPE 31B
BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
G" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE,
100% CRUSHED
MIN 18" - SUBCUT 13ACKFILL WITH
G ANUI,AR MATERIAL•MNDaT 3149.2E
a I io'elr— 0 T 4 11
"gyp B Pt�t jl;o.o W/C4Ti E061L
R.tiaGl 6�GT�ti
BITUMINOUS STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB AND CUTTER
STANDARD DETAIL TYPICAL SECTION
FD RESIDENTIAL STREETS —URBAN SECTION
RQGERS. MINNESOTA
OF lwxps Ayt%
"f'��.' OF %� S 7R —7
a
c
36P—A w-7! w=.0 AA i.7i 11161& -.
o.� ooc a•,74 r. as
CJ
R/W
NOTE: ALL ORGANIC OR OTHER UNSUITABLE
MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM
BENEATH THE ROADWAY.
18.5'
3% MIN
3 0' R/. W
3 1
SURMOUNTABLE
CONCRETE CURB
AND GUTTER
A•1 1
�-1
1 --1 /2" — 2331 , TYPE 41 A
BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE
— 2-1/2 1? — 2331, TYPE 31 B
BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
12" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE,
100% CRUSHED
4" TOPSOIL
BITUMINOUS STREET WITH CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
STANDARD DETAIL TYPICAL SECTION
FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS URBAN SECTION
6171" OKI Sell ci ALBERTVILLE • MINNESOTA
a • a
UAW -piv� op OOH3i1
AdIV
a
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DRIVE, 200 SEH CENTER, ST PAUL, MN 55110 612 490-2000 800 325-2055
AAWASE" ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION
September 17, 1997 RE: Wastewater Treatment Facility Plan
Albertville, Minnesota
SEH No. P-ALBEV9805.00
Mayor Mark Olsen and Council Members
City of Albertville
City Hall
5975 Main Avenue, P.O. Box 9
Albertville, Minnesota 55301
Dear Mayor Olsen:
Pete Carlson and I met with the Albertville Public Works Committee in August to discuss the requirements for a
Wastewater Treatment Facility Plan. The Facility Plan is a comprehensive study which evaluates the City's current
and projected wastewater treatment needs. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) requires a Facility Plan
if funding for a wastewater treatment plant project will be requested from the State Revolving Loan Program. This
is not a grant program but a low interest loan program. This program is administered by the Public Facilities
Authority (PFA) and provides loans for the following steps of a project if the City meets eligibility requirements:
• Facility Planning (Study)
• Design (Plans and Specifications)
• Construction and Construction Related Engineering Services
The project must be listed on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Project Priority List (PPL) to obtain a loan
for either Facility Planning or Design. To be eligible for the PFA loan for construction, the project must be on the
PPL and the Facility Plan must have received preliminary MPCA approval. To receive preliminary approval, the
Facility Plan must be a detailed study of the plant needs, and must comply with extensive MPCA requirements. All
MPCA review comments must be adequately addressed.
The following Scope of Services for a Facility Plan was formulated around the MPCA guidelines.
SHORT ELLIOTT
HENDRICKSON INC. MINNEAPOLIS, MN ST CLOUD, MN CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI MADISON, WI LAKE COUNTY, IN
EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
City of Albertville
September 17, 1997
Page 2
Existing Conditions
Describe existing collection and treatment system.
Provide a wastewater treatment plant site map indicating surrounding features.
Evaluate design and treatment capacity of existing treatment plant processes and facilities. The existing facilities
include the main pumping station and forcemain, the three stabilization ponds, the final clarifier, the chemical feed
system, ultraviolet disinfection and the effluent outfall.
Analyze existing residential and non-residential wastewater flows using water records provided by the City and
compare those flows to the metered wastewater flows.
Prepare a desktop Infiltration/Inflow (1/1) analysis using existing flow records. Determine approximate rates of
infiltration and inflow entering the collection system. Determine if it is most cost-effective (per MPCA guidelines)
to remove or to treat excessive 1/1. The MPCA guidelines state that if the highest 7-day average daily flow recorded
during periods of high ground water exceed 120 gallons per capita per day, the applicant (City of Albertville) must
conduct a Sewer System Evaluation Survey (SSES) to determine the quantity of infiltration and cost to eliminate it.
There are similar requirements for inflow which occurs during rainfall events. A separate scope of work would need
to be identified and cost estimated if an SSES is required.
Determine current wastewater influent and effluent suspended solids, BOD, and phosphorus loads based on existing
records. Compare loads to expected loads based on typical per capita waste contributions.
Estimate volume and concentration of sludge in the existing stabilization ponds. SEH will estimate sludge depth and
collect sludge samples, with City staff assistance, at various locations throughout the ponds. The depth of sludge at
each location will be recorded. Samples will be sent in to an independent laboratory for determination of solids
concentration. Based on data obtained, SEH will determine the volume and weight of dry solids in the sludge. A
sludge sample from each pond will be analyzed for other chemical components required by MPCA for land
application of sludge.
Future Conditions
Describe the planning area and indicate on a USGS map.
Contact regional planning agencies for projected population growth. Contact local developers regarding current and
future development plans.
Contact local industries regarding current and future potential wastewater contributions. A letter will be sent to each
of the major contributing industries identified by the City requesting information on expansion plans. These letters
will be sent as part of the Facility Plan.
Project future residential and non-residential flows for the years 2010 and 2020. The MPCA under Minnesota Rules
Chapter 7077 requires evaluation of treatment alternatives capable of meeting the applicable effluent, water quality,
and public health requirements for 20 years. Two periods are looked at to determine if staging a project would be
beneficial. Flows must be presented in the methodology and on the forms required by the MPCA. Flows would-be
estimated for average dry weather, average wet weather, peak hourly wet weather, and peak instantaneous wet
weather flow conditions.
City of Albertville
September 17, 1997
Page 3
Project future residential and non-residential BOD, suspended solids and phosphorus loads for the years 2010 and
2020. Determination of design loadings must be done in the methodology and on the forms required by the MPCA.
Verify effluent requirements for continuous discharge with the MPCA after developing future flow and load
conditions. Effluent limits will be requested for discharge to alternate locations including the current discharge to
Mud Lake and to the Crow River.
Alternative Analysis
Provide a discussion and evaluation of potential treatment plant alternatives with continuous effluent discharge. The
alternatives considered will incorporate continued use of the existing ponds, clarifier and ultraviolet disinfection
facilities. Alternatives will include oxidation ditch/activated sludge process, rotating biological contactors,
sequencing batch reactors, and aerated ponds with effluent filters. Biological phosphorus reduction will be evaluated
with the oxidation ditch alternative. Chemical phosphorus reduction will be evaluated with all alternatives. Existing
stabilization ponds will be evaluated for use as equalization basins and sludge storage.
The effluent outfall sewer route for discharge to the Crow River as proposed in the 1992 Feasibility Study
Improvement Project (Wastewater Treatment Facility Expansion) will be the route used in this Facility Plan.
Evaluate/identify sludge handling, treatment, storage, and disposal options. Review and evaluate impact that the EPA
503 sludge regulations and MPCA Chapter 7041- Sewage Sludge Management Rules have on proposed sludge
treatment and disposal systems. Evaluate using the existing ponds for long-term sludge storage.
Review recommended wastewater treatment plant reliability in accordance with published MPCA Reliability
Guidelines.
Present a construction sequence to identify how interim treatment will be accomplished during construction to meet
permit effluent requirements.
Prepare a projected timeline for the project accounting for design, MPCA review and approval, advertising and
bidding, construction and obtaining start-ups/operation.
Cost Analysis
Estimate capital and operation and maintenance costs of the treatment facility alternatives and process options.
Develop a present worth cost analysis incorporating capital costs, operation and maintenance costs and salvage value.
The present worth analysis will be applied to the treatment process alternatives per MPCA requirements.
Review the existing annual sewer service charge and estimate charges based on costs resulting from plant
modifications.
Contact the PFA to discuss financing options and possible rates for low interest loans.
Informational Meetings
Meet with City staff at beginning of project to clearly identify specific concerns and needs. Discuss work program
with staff.
Meet with City staff to discuss the Facility Plan prior to submitting the plan to the MPCA.
City of Albertville
September 17, 1997
Page 4
Meet with MPCA staff to discuss project details.
Assist the City in conducting a public hearing.
Excluded Tasks
The Scope of Services identified in this letter proposal, includes several tasks which can be more feasibly done by
the; City. Tasks which are excluded from the Scope of Services to be done by SEH and from the estimated cost are
as follows:
• Treatment plant flow monitoring or metering.
• Conducting a detailed infiltration/inflow analysis or sewer system evaluation survey beyond that identified
under "Existing Conditions" of this proposal.
• Sampling and analysis of soils, sewage, sludge, soil borings and laboratory tests. The City will pay for the
laboratory analyses of the sludge samples. SEH will assist in collecting sludge samples.
• Preparing a sludge management plan for disposal of sludge from the ponds or identifying sites for disposal.
This task would be done during the plan and specification phase.
• Performing hydrogeologic studies.
• Conducting archaeologic and historical surveys.
• Preparing an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) of the recommended project. The State requires
completion of an EAW for any existing treatment plants which increase in design wet weather capacity by
50% or more. This EAW must then be placed on public notice and ultimately approved by the MPCA before
they will give final approval of the Facility Plan. The scope of an EAW will vary significantly for continued
discharge to Mud Lake as compared to constructing an outfall sewer to the Crow River. The Scope of the
EAW will be best identified after an alternative is selected and public hearing on the Facility Plan is
completed.
• Advertising for a public hearing and paying related publication costs.
• Furnishing certified land surveys or surveying the existing treatment plant and surrounding features or
proposed outfall sewer routes/alignment.
• Interviewing industries for future growth and expansion plans. SEH will send the initial letter requesting
growth and expansion plans.
• Developing treatment agreements with major contributing industries.
• Additional services in connection with the Facility Plan not otherwise provided'for in the Scope of Services.
Data Furnished by the City
SEH will need the following data and information from the City prior to preparing the Facility Plan. City staff will
assist SEH in recording depths of sludge and obtaining sludge samples at various locations throughout the existing
stabilization ponds.
1. Plans of existing wastewater treatment facilities including the main pumping station and forcemain.
2. Other pertinent reports such as soil boring reports on the existing plant site.
City of Albertville
September 17, 1997
Page 5
3. Three years of water use data broken down by quarter and classification
— residential
— commercial
— industrial
— public authority
— schools
4. Three years of Daily Monitoring Reports (DMRs) as much BOD, TSS, and phosphorus data as possible.
5. Three years influent flow records.
6. List of industries with addresses (Looking for number of out-of-town employees).
7. School information — how many students are transported in from out of town.
8. Wastewater operating records — expenses and revenue summaries.
9. Lift station information — number, sizes, locations.
10. Miles of sewers broken down by size.
11. City population information from 1950 (census years) to current estimated.
12. Subdivision information — new approved additions, number of units.
13. Number of building permits issued per year, last five years.
14. Comprehensive plan.
15. Archeological survey done for existing plant location.
16. Name and telephone number of developers currently active in the area.
Project Schedule
The following presents a proposed schedule for completion of the Facility Plan:
Request Placement on MPCA Project Priority List
September 30, 1997
Discuss Facility Plan with City Staff
October 1997
Discuss Facility Plan Draft with City Staff
March 1998
Submit Facility Plan to MPCA
April 1998
Assist City with Public Hearing
April 1998
Identify Scope for/and Prepare EAW
May 1998
Respond to MPCA Review Comments
July 1998
(Based on MPCA 90 day Review Period)
Meeting the proposed schedule necessitates receiving all data/infonnation from the City during October. Sludge
sampling should also be done during October.
This schedule provides a six (6) month period to prepare and submit the Facility Plan to the MPCA. Following
preliminary MPCA approval of the Facility Plan, the MPCA will notice the EAW for public comment. This is
separate from the public hearing which the City must hold as shown in April 1998. This schedule allows for the plant
facilities to be designed during the fall -winter of 1998-99. Construction could start in the summer of 1999, and be
completed with facilities being operational in the year 2000.
City of Albertville
September 17, 1997
Page 6
Estimated Cost
Our estimated cost for preparing the Albertville Wastewater Treatment Facility Plan as identified in this letter
proposal is $50,000.
We thank you for this opportunity and look forward to working with the City of Albertville on this project. If this
proposal meets your approval, we will prepare an Agreement for Professional Services for preparing the Facility
Plan.
Sincerely,
Short Elliott Hendrickson I
/r!
?ohn. Stodola, P.E.
Manager, Wastewater Department
smm
c: Peter Carlson, P.E., SEH-St. Cloud
F:\MARKETIW W\SUBMITLS\1997\ALBE V 805. WPD
0-1: - 6PN FROrI Pa.dzui i i 1 21 o_ r i L -u 0++ i TO
;4a^ ,�IQ0 P.01
;yk's Fifth Addition that, at the time of payment by Psyks,
e not permitted by the MPCA for hookup to the Albertville
sewer system. As to any amounts refunded, the Psyks agree to
pay said refunded monies back to the City immediately upon
authorization from the MPCA to allow connection of said lots
to the Albertville sewer system. With regard to those lots in
Psyks Fifth Addition that are unable to connect to the City
sewer system, no interest shall accrue to the City while those
lots are not permitted to connect to the sewer system, and no
interest shall accrue to the City on monies .refunded to Psyk
asaresult of this paragraph.won
8. The City shall guarantee that sufficient c&pacity will be
available to connect the fifty-seven (57) lots that make up
Psykfs Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Additions tolthe Albertville
sewer system, said guarantee shall extend until December 31.,
1998. The City shall agree to extend the! period of 429
financing; eligibility limited in paragraph five (5) above on
a one -to, -:one basis for the amount of time :that Psyks are
unable to connect lots in either Psyk's Fifth, Sixth or
Seventh Additions to the Albertville sewer system (e.g., if
connection is delayed for 1.0 months in !Psyk's Seventh
Addition, the 429 financing period shall run an additional 10
months, to October 31, 2001), provided that for any addition
to which lots are unable to be hooked up Psyk',has submitted a
preliminary plat which has been approved by
the City. In
addition, ;the City shall agree to defer the re aining sanitary
sewer assessments for any lots in the Fifth, Sixth or Seventh
Addition that have been preliminarily platted and are delayed
in being able to connect to the City sewer due to a lack of
capacity at the City wastewater treatment plant. Said
deferment' shall exist only for the period during which
connection is not allowed, with any amounts `,deferred to be
paid to the City upon granting of authorization to connect to
the sewer. system.' During the deferment period, if any, no
interest shall accrue on the assessments for those lots whose
payments are deferred.
9. As an integral part of this agreement, and in return for the
Ci.ty's performance as agreed above, the PsyksIhereby agree to
dismiss in its entirety and for all time, their assessment
appeal against the City of Albertville filed in the Wright
County District Court on January 5, 1993 and known as case
number C9-93-000013. Said dismissal, shall, be with prejudice
and all claims of or by the Psyks, asserted! or unasserted,
relating to the assessment of City of Albertville project
number 1991-2 to the Psyks land, as well as all claims of or
by the Psyks relating to the acquisition of easements by the
City from the Psyks and the construction and installation of
said improvement by the City of Albertville shall be forever
barred.
P.01
09/16/97 08:55 FAX 13202518760 SEH ST. CLOUD ALBERTVILLE CITY ZOO 0
MEMORANDUM
❑ ST. PAUL, MN ❑ MINNEAPOLIS. MN ■ ST. CLOUD, MN ❑ CHIPPEWA FALLS, Wl ❑ MADISON, 141 ❑ LAKE COUNTY, IN
TO: Garrison L. Hale
City Administrator
Albertville, Minnesota
FROM: Peter J. Carlson, P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: September 16, 1997
RE: Street Drainage
Kalenda Court
Albertville, Minnesota
SEH No. A-ALBEV9801.00
On September 11, 1997 I inspected Kalenda Court for drainage deficiencies. The street was designed
to drain to CSAH 37 with a 1.5% street grade. During construction the grade was changed to 0.5%.
This appears to have been done to match the parking lot grades for the apartments on the east side
of the road. Since the road was built there has been some settlement of the curb and gutter, however,
there is still adequate grade for drainage to CSAH 37.
The concrete curb and gutter is in good condition except in the driveway areas where it is in very
poor condition. Due to settlement in isolated areas, water probably ponds in several areas, but the
street still generally drains to CSAH 37. The only way to eliminate the ponding is to reconstruct the
street.
Please call me if you have any questions.
c: Linda Houghton, City Clerk
G: \OFflPERS\CARLSONUCALENDA. WPD
An Affirmative Action,
Equal Oppornmiry Employer
09/16/97
08:56 FAX 13202518760 SEH ST. CLOUD 444 ALBERT'VILLE CITY 2 002/ 0
MEMORANDUM
p ST. PAUL, MN ❑ MINNEAPOLlS. MN a ST. CLOUD, MN c CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI O MADISON, W7 LAKE COUNTY, IN
TO: Garrison L. Hale
City Administrator
Albertville, Minnesota
FROM: Peter J. Carlson, P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: September 16, 1997
RE: Drainage
Westwind Third Addition
Albertville, Minnesota
SEH No. A-ALBEV9801.00
On September 11, 1997 I inspected the detention pond in the Westwind Third Addition. The water
level in the pond is above the normal water elevation designed for the pond. In fact water is standing
on the adjacent parking lot. The design outlet for this pond is a ditch along the west property line
of the Westwind Third Addition. This ditch then drains to the CSAH 37 ditch.
It appears that the property owner filled in the outlet ditch when the vacant lot was graded to
eliminate a nuisance condition. To provide proper drainage the owner should be directed to install
a culvert or regrade the ditch.
Please call me if you have any questions.
c: Linda Houghton, City Clerk
G:,OFF,PERS,CARLSOMWESTW 1ND.WPD
An AJjirMulke Action.
Equal OPPorruniry EMPloycr
d�r)
DON'S BUS GARAGE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT dated September , 1997, by and between the CITY OF
ALBERTVILLE, a Minnesota municipal corporation ("City"), and Donald and Betty Barthel
(collectively, "Developer").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer has submitted plans for the expansion of Don's Bus Garage
located at 6000 LaBeaux Avenue NE, Albertville, MN, ("Subject Property") and legally
described as:
A tract of land in Section _; Township _, Range ___, described as follows:
Lot 1, Block 1, Barthel Commercial Park, Wright County, Minnesota.
WHEREAS, said Subject Property is currently zoned B-3, Highway Commercial,
with which this use conforms; and
WHEREAS, the placement of an additional building for storage and maintenance
space for additional buses on the Subject Property will result in several buildings being
located on the Subject Property, as well as a shared access/parking arrangement, which in turn
requires the establishment of a planned unit development through a conditional use permit
process;
WHEREAS, the City has granted Developer's request to place a fourth building on
the Subject Property to provide storage and maintenance space for additional buses and
generally to accommodate the growing business, contingent upon completion and continuing
compliance with certain City requirements including, but not limited to, matters set forth
herein; and
WHEREAS, the City further requires that certain site improvements be installed by
the Developer within and about the Subject Property, and that the Developer at all times
comply with certain other restrictions related to the use of the Subject Property as detailed in
this agreement;
WHEREAS, this Agreement is entered into for the purpose of setting forth and
memorializing for the parties and subsequent owners, the understandings and agreements of
the parties concerning the use of the Subject Property;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AND HEREIN MUTUALLY AGREED,
in consideration of the City's granting of the Planned Unit Development, Developer agrees as
follows:
Request for Planned Unit Development Approval. The Developer has asked the
City to approve a Planned Unit Development (PUD) overlay district on the Subject
Property.
2. Conditions of Approval. The City hereby approves the Planned Unit Development
district on condition that the Developer enters into this Agreement and complies with
its terms and conditions.
3. Use of Premises. Developer agrees that it shall use the Subject Property for the
operation of a bus garage. Developer agrees that the use of said Property shall be
strictly limited to the uses described herein unless otherwise agreed by the City and
Developer.
4. Changes in and Application of Official Controls. Nothing herein shall be interpreted
as limiting the City's ability to amend its Comprehensive Plan, official controls,
platting or dedication requirements enacted after the date of this Agreement, as they
apply to this Agreement or otherwise. Unless otherwise specifically contradicted by
the terms of this agreement, all official City controls and ordinances presently existing
or hereafter enacted shall apply to the Subject Property.
5. Development Plan. The Subject Property shall be developed in accordance with the
following plan, attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit A.
6. Future Development/Change in Use. Further development of the Subject Property
shall require City Council approval and agreement amendment. Major development
additions or a change in use beyond that established in this Agreement shall require
detailed development plan review, City Council approval and a PUD amendment.
7. Property Development and Use. Development and use of the Subject Property shall
comply with the following performance standards:
a. Deciduous trees shall be planted along 60t' Street from the existing trees on the
west end of the site to the east end of the site near the corner of 60'' Street and
Lachman Avenue.
b. Sixtieth Street and the remainder of Lachman Avenue shall be platted in a
2
width and configuration acceptable to the City engineer and sixtieth street and
Lachman Avenue constructed in accordance with City standards for a
commercial street (this requirement shall not apply to the north forty feet of
Outlot A, which has been conveyed to the City). Adjacent lots shall be platted
to the extent possible. These items must be completed prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy and will be subject to review and approval by the City
Engineer.
C. The parking lot shall be curbed unless waived by the City Engineer for
drainage purposes.
d. Landscaping shall be provided by the Developer upon request by the City
Council.
8. Surety.
a. Developer will provide the City with cash or an irrevocable letter of credit as
security that the obligations of the Developer under this contract shall be
performed. Said letter of credit must meet the approval of the City attorney as
to form and issuing bank. Said letter of credit shall be in the amount of
$ representing the 100% of the estimated construction and
engineering costs for the installation of the Site Improvements.
b. The City may draw on said letter of credit to complete work not performed by
Developer, to reimburse itself for costs incurred in the drafting, execution,
administration or enforcement of this agreement, or to otherwise fulfill the
obligations of Developer under this agreement.
c In the event that any cash, irrevocable letter of credit, or other surety referred to
herein is ever utilized and found to be deficient in amount to pay or reimburse
the City in total as required herein, the Developer agrees that upon being billed
by the City, Developer will pay within thirty (30) days of the mailing of said
billing, the said deficient amount. If there should be an overage in the amount
of utilized security, the City will, upon making said determination, refund to
the Developer any monies which the City has in its' possession which are in
excess of the actual costs of the project as paid by the City. All monies
deposited with the City shall be used by the City at the City's discretion to
defray the City's costs and expenses related to the project(s) referred to herein.
d. Developer hereby agrees to allow the City to assess Developer's property for
any and all costs incurred by the City in enforcing any of the terms of this
agreement should Developer's letter of credit prove insufficient or should
3
Developer fail to maintain said letter of credit in the amount required above
within 30 days of mailing of written request by the City. Should the City
assess Developer's property for said costs, Developer agrees not to contest or
appeal such assessment and waives all statutory rights of appeal under
Minnesota Statutes.
e. That portion of said cash, irrevocable letter of credit, or other surety with
respect to the performance of Site Improvements shall be released upon
certification of the City Engineer and approval of the City Council that all such
items are satisfactorily completed pursuant to this Agreement.
f. Periodically, as payments are made by the Developer for the completion of
portions of the site improvements, and when it is reasonably prudent, the
Developer may request of the City that the surety be proportionately reduced
for that portion of the site improvements which have been fizlly completed and
payment made therefor. All such decisions shall be at the discretion of the City
Council. The City's cost for processing reduction request(s) shall be billed to
the Developer. Such cost shall be paid to the City within thirty (30) days of the
date of mailing of the billing.
9. Surety Release. The developer may request of the City a reduction or release of any
surety provided for in conjunction with the Site Improvements as follows:
a. When another acceptable surety is furnished to the City to replace a
prior surety.
b. When the final cost amount minus previous payments for work
performed becomes less than the surety provided, thus allowing the
surety to be reduced to a sum commensurate with the remaining amount
of the project.
C. No reduction shall be made which would result in the surety held being
less than thirty-five percent (35%) of the original surety until the final
costs are known.
It is the intent of the City and Developer that said letter of credit shall be released in its
entirety when all site improvements to the Property are completed as detailed in this
agreement.
10. Draw on Expiring Letter of Credit. In the event a surety or other form of guarantee
4
referred to herein is in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, which by its terms
may become null and void prior to the time at which all monetary or other obligations
of the Developer are paid or completed, it is agreed that the Developer shall provide
the City with a new letter of credit or other surety, acceptable to the City, at least forty-
five (45) days prior to the expiration of the expiring letter of credit. If a new letter of
credit is not received as required above, the City may declare a default in the ternrs of
this Agreement and thence draw in part or in total, at the City's discretion, upon the
expiring letter of credit to avoid the loss of surety for the continued obligation. Such
irrevocable letter of credit must contain a provision stating that the letter of credit shall
automatically renew for a one-year period unless the issuer of the letter of credit
notifies the City of the issuer's intent not to renew the letter of credit within sixty (60)
days prior to the expiration of said irrevocable letter of credit. The form of said
irrevocable letter of credit shall be approved by the City Attorney prior to its issuance.
11. Developer's Expense. Installation of all site improvements required by this agreement
shall be at the sole expense of the Developer.
12. Right of Entrv. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and
contractors an irrevocable right to enter the Subject Property to perform all reasonable
work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with the granting of
this PUD.
13. Clean Up. The Developer shall daily clean dirt and debris from public streets that have
resulted from construction work by the Developer, their agents or assigns.
14. Responsibility for Costs.
a. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred
by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the PUD. Developer
shall pay all reasonable costs and expenses incurred by the City in monitoring
and inspecting development of the PUD, including but not limited to, legal,
engineering and planning expenses.
b. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless
from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs
incurred resulting from PUD approval and development. The Developer shall
indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages, or
expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims,
including attorneys' fees.
C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for any and all costs incurred in the
enforcement of this agreement, including reasonable attorneys' fees.
5
d. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for
obligations incurred under this agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt.
If the bills are not paid on time, the City may cease all PUD development work
and construction, including but not limited to the issuance of building permits,
until the bills are paid in full. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue
interest at the rate of eighteen percent (18%) per year.
15. Miscellaneous.
a. The Developer represents that to the best of its knowledge, the PUD complies
with the city, county, metropolitan, state and federal laws and regulations,
including but not limited to zoning ordinances and environmental regulations.
If the City determines that the PUD does not comply, the City may, at its
option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the PUD until the
Developer does comply. Upon tlne City's demand, the Developer shall cease
work until there is compliance.
b. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Agreement.
C. Breach of the teens of this Agreement by the Developer shall be grounds for
denial of building permits or revocation of the PUD.
d. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this
Agreement is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portion of this Agreement.
e. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to
the provisions of this Agreement„ To be binding, amendments or waivers shall
be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the
City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this
agreement shall not be a waiver or release.
f. This Agreement shall nun with the land and may be recorded against the title to
the property.
g. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and
in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or
hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other
agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or
otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such
6
order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the
right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy.
16. Violation of Agreement.
a. In the case of default by the Developer its successors or assigns, of any of the
covenants and agreements herein contained, the City shall give Developer
mailed notice thereof, and if such default is not cured within the immediately
following thirty (30) day period, the City is hereby granted the right and the
privilege to declare this PUD terminated, and/or to bring legal action against
the Developer to collect any sums due to the City pursuant to this Agreement,
plus all costs and attorney's fees incurred in enforcing this agreement. The
thirty (30) day notice period shall be deemed to run from the date of deposit in
the United States Mail. The City may thence immediately and without notice
or consent of the Developer use all of the deposited escrow funds, irrevocable
letter of credit or other surety funds to complete the Developer's Site
Improvements, and to bring legal action against the Developer to collect any
sums due to the City pursuant to this Agreement, plus all costs and attorney's
fees incurred in enforcing this agreement.
b. Paragraph 16a. of this Agreement shall not apply to any acts or rights of the
City under paragraph eleven 10. above, and no notice need be given to the
Developer as a condition precedent to the City declaring a default or drawing
upon the expiring irrevocable letter of credit as therein authorized. The City
may elect to give notice to Developer of City's intent to draw upon the surety
without waiving the City's right to draw upon the surety at a future time without
notice to the Developer.
17. Developer Bound by Contract.. Developer shall be personally liable for the
fulfillment of all obligations under this Contract. Assignment of this contract shall not
relieve Developer of its obligations related to the construction of the Site
Improvements described herein.
18. Attorney's Fees. The Developer will pay all reasonable attorney's fees incurred by
the City and as fixed by the Court in the event a suit or action is brought to enforce the
terms of this Agreement. The Developer will also pay all reasonable attorney's fees
incurred by the City in the event an action is brought upon a bond or letter of credit
furnished by the Developer as provided herein.
7
19. Agreement Effect. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the
representatives, heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
20. Notices. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either
hand delivered to the Developer or mailed to the Developer by registered mail at the
following address:
DEVELOPER:
Don and Betty Barthel
6000 LaBeaux Avenue NE
Albertville, MN 55301
Notices to the City shall be in writing and mailed to the City by registered mail or
hand delivered to the city clerk, at the following address:
Albertville City Clerk
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
Bv:
Mark Olson, Mayor
Bv:
Linda Houghton, City Clerk
N.
BETTY BARTHEL
STATE OF NIINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this _ day of
1997, by Mark Olson, Mayor of the City of Albertville, a Minnesota municipal corporation,
on behalf of the City and pursuant to the authority of the City Council.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this _ day of
1997, by Linda Houghton, Clerk of the City of Albertville, a Minnesota municipal
corporation, on behalf of the City and pursuant to the authority of the City Council.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this _ day of
1997, by Mr. Donald Barthel, personally.
9
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledge before me this _ day of ,
1997, by Mrs. Betty Barthel, personally.
DRAFTED BY:
Radzwill & Couri Law Office
PO Box 369
St. Michael, MN 55376
10
Notary Public
e a)
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE #1997-13
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING
THE USE OF BURGLAR AND SAFETY ALARMS'
ESTABLISHINGA USERS' FEES AND
ESTABLISHING A SYSTEM OF ADMINISTRATION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. SCOPE AND PURPOSE.
Subdivision 1. This section regulates the use of burglar and
safety alarms, established users' fees and establishes a system of
administration.
Subdivision 2. The purpose of this section is to protect the
public safety services of the City from misuse of public safety
alarms and to provide the maximum possible service to public safety
alarm users.
SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS.
For purposes of this ordinance, the terms defined in this
subsection have the meanings given to them.
1. "Alarm System" means an alarm installation designed to be used
for the prevention or detection of burglary, robbery, heat,
smoke and fire on the premises which contain an alarm
installation. Automobile alarm devices are not an alarm
system.
2. "Alarm User" means a person in control of any building,
structures or facility wherein an alarm system is maintained.
3. "False Alarm" means an alarm signal eliciting a response by
fire personnel when a situation requiring a response does not,
in fact, exist, and which is caused by the activation of the
alarm system through mechanical failure, alarm malfunction,
improper installation or the inadvertence of the owner or
lessee of an alarm system.
rr�
SECTION 3. USER FEES.
Subdivision 1. A public safety alarm system that reports more
than three (3) false alarms to the City in a single calendar y—e&t
and that has received notice of such violations will cause the
alarm user to be charged a user fee. Fees will be established by
$nfi�i�Y �tbf3ntA t�@OM�flafayi;�eo�itKeCFY]?@l�htLlt.wil1 be reviewed
Subdivision 2. An alarm user that is required by the City to
pay a user fee as the result of a false alarm may make a written
appeal of the false alarm charge to the Fire Chief within ten (10)
days notice by the City of the false alarm charge. Following
review and determination by the Fire Chief, the decision may be
appealed to the City Council, who will make a final determination
as to whether the user is to be charged with a false alarm.
Subdivision 3. User fees collected from false alarms shall be
credited to the Albertville Fire Department's Youth Education
Programs.
SECTION 3. PAYMENT OF FEES -
Subdivision 1. Payment of user fees are paid to the City
Clerk -Treasurer within thirty (30) days from the date of notice by
the City to the alarm user. Failure to pay the fee will cause the
alarm user to be considered delinquent and subject to a penalty of
an additional five percent (5%) of the unpaid fee for each
additional thirty (30) day period that the fee remains unpaid.
Subdivision 2. The City Clerk -Treasurer shall prepare an
assessment roll of the delinquent amounts against the respective
properties served and deliver the assessment roll to the City
Council for adoption on or before octeber 15th of each year/ The
assessment roll shall' be filed with the Wright County Auditor by
the City Clerk -Treasurer and the County Auditor shall thereupon
enter such amount as part of the tax levy on said premises to be
collected during the ensuing year.
SECTION 4. ALARM REPORT.
If an alarm user has incurred five (5) false, alarms within one
calendar year, the alarm user shall submit a written report to the
Fire Chief within ten (10) days after being notified of the fifth
false alarm, describing actions taken or to be taken to discover
and eliminate the cause of the false alarms. Failure to submit the
written report is a violation of this section.
SECTION 5. ADMINISTRATIVE RULES.
Subdivision 1. The alarm user is required to post below the
alarm system control the telephone number(s) of personnel to be
contacted when, or if, the fire personnel cannot reset the alarm
and it must be silenced.
Subdivision 2. The Fire Chief shall prepare other rules as
may be necessary for implementation of this section and present the
proposed rules to the City Council for consideration as an
amendment to this section.
SECTION 6. CONFIDENTIALITY.
Subdivision 1. Information submitted in compliance with this
ordinance will be held in confidence and exempt from discovery to
the extent permitted by law.
Subdivision 2. Subject to requirements of confidentiality,
the Fire Chief may develop and maintain statistics for the purpose
of ongoing alarm systems evaluation.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 22ND
DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1997.
Mark S. Olsen, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda Houghton, City Clerk
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE #1997-14
ESTABLISHING FEES FOR FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE
AND/OR EMERGENCY RESPONSE
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. ESTABLISHMENT OF SERVICE FEES- The City
Council shall by resolution establish fees for fire protection
service and/or emergency response which are not otherwise specified
by contract. Said fees shall be established at a fixed rate for
certain specific types of incidents or for actual costs incurred by
the Fire Department in responding to the incident.
Subdivision 1. False Alarms. Fees for response to false fire
alarms and false carbon monoxide alarms shall be charged to the
property owner or tenant for any incident after the third (3rd)
call to the property within twelve (12) month period.
Subdivision 2 Chemical/Hazardous Materials Spills. Fees
incurred by the City of Albertville for response to chemical spills
on roadways and at fixed private facilities within the Albertville
Fire Service Area shall be charged to the owner of the chemical,
the owner of the vehicle in which the chemical is being shipped or
is a part thereof, or to the owner of the facility where the spill
occurred.
(a) Fees shall include, but shall not be limited to, actual
manpower costs for all personnel that respond to the
incident (minimum of one hour) and the cost on a per hour
basis for each fire apparatus or other City mechanical
equipment that responds to the incident (minimum of one
hour per unit).
(b) An addition, the bill for service shall include any cost
of clean-up of any contaminated equipment and/or repair
of any equipment damaged during the incident or its
replacement, along with replacement of any disposable
equipment, supplies, and/or communication equipment, and
administrative costs to be established at ten percent
(10%) of the total bill.
Subdivision 3. Fire Watch. Fees for personnel to stand by on
fire watch due to unusual fire hazards, while waiting for property
owner or tenant to respond to the scene following a fire incident
and/or fire alarm, may be billed to the owner of the property or
the tenant on a per hour basis with a one (1)
fifth (1/5) of the fee shall be retained
administrative costs, and four -fifths (4/5)
paid to fire personnel standing fire watch.
established at a property, the watch shall be
owner of the property, the tenant, or
representative arrives at the property
responsibility for monitoring fire safety.
hour
by
of the fee
If a fire
maintained
his/her
and to
minimum. One -
the City for
shall be
watch is
until the
designated
kes over
Subdivision 4. Preventative Fire Watch. When Fire Department
personnel provide fire watch protection, the fees for such
personnel may be billed to the owner of the property or the tenant
on a per hour basis with a one (1) hour minimum. One -fifth (1/5)
of the fee shall be retained by the City for administrative costs
and four -fifths (4/5) shall be paid to fire personnel standing fire
watch. Preventative fire watch is required in any place of
assembly or any place where people congregate where public safety
is at risk due to the number of persons, or the nature of the
performance, exhibition, display, contest, or activity, or due to
unusual fire hazards.
Subdivision 5. At least annually, the Fire Chief shall
recommend to the City Council the fees to be charged.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 22ND
DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1997.
Mark S. Olsen, Mayor
ATTEST:
Linda Houghton, City Clerk
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
RESOLUTION NO. 1997-43
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING CHARGES,
AND PENALTIES AUTHORIZED BY
ORDINANCE #1997-13
AND
ORDINANCE #1997-14
ea)
FEES
WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council is desirous of
establishing charges, fees and penalties established in Ordinance
#1997-13 titled AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE USE OF BURGLAR AND
SAFETY ALARMS, ESTABLISHING A USERS' FEE AND ESTABLISHING A SYSTEM
OF ADMINISTRATION and Ordinance #1997-14 titled ESTABLISHING FEES
FOR FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE AND/OR EMERGENCY RESPONSE; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is determining the following fees
are necessary.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, hereby adopts this
resolution and approves the following fee schedule:
TYPE OF CHARGE CONDITIONS
FEE OR PENALTY AND TERMS AMOUNT
False alarms
Fire Watch
Chemical Spills
Manpower
Fire Apparatus
Repair, Clean Up
Disposable Equipment
Administrative Costs
$100 after the third
call in one calendar year
and progressing in
increments of $100 per
additional false alarm.
$25/hour
1 hour minimum Actual Cost
1 hour minimum $100/hour
per apparatus
Actual Cost
Actual Cost
10% of total
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1997.
Mark S. Olsen, Mayor
Attest:
Linda Houghton, City Clerk
MIDDLETON & ASSOCIATES INSURANCE AGENCY---�
Arlan M. Middleton, CIC
13 Central Avenue
P.O. Box 249 (k7�
St. Michael, Minnesota 55376-0249
St. Michael: (612) 497-4420
INSURANCE QUOTATION
FOR
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
WHIM
League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust
Berkley Risk Services, Incorporated
920 Second Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Policy Dates
10/01/97 -- 10/01/98
(i)
SECTION # 1 --- PROPERTY
Changes for 97-98
Location # 1
1) $168,000.
One story approved roof, frame metal
+ 8,000.
Building occupied as Fire Barn &
Maintenance Building.
"
2) $
50,000.
Contents in Building #l, consisting of office
+ 5,000.
Furniture, equipment and supplies.
"
3) $
10,000.
Property in open at Location 91
Same
"
4) $
5,000.
Extra Expense Coverage at Location #1.
Same
Location #2
5) $
96,500.
One story approved roof, joisted masonry
+ 4,500.
building, occupied as a Picnic Shelter and
Warming House.
"
6) $
10,000.
Contents in Picnic Shelter
Same
"
7) $
6,000.
One story approved roof, frame building
+ 1,000.
occupied as a gazebo in park.
"
8) $
30,000.
Property in open at Location #2.
Same
"
9) $
5,000.
Extra Expense Coverage - Location #2.
Same
Location #3
10) $380,000.
One story metal clad building occupied
+ 20,000,
As Sewer Treatment Plant.
"
11) $
65,000.
Contents within Sewer Treatment Plant.
+ 20,000.
"
12) $
12,000.
One story frame building occupied as a
+ 2,000.
storage garage.
13) $
5,000.
Contents within Storage Garage consisting
Same
primarily of Christmas Decorations.
14) $
48,000.
One story metal clad building, occupied
Same
As a generator building, including electrical
equipment and generator.
"
15) $168,000.
One story masonry/concrete building with
+ 8,000.
fiberglass domed roof, including equipment
installed consisting of clarifer equipment.
SECTION #1— PROPERTY
CONT'D
Changes for 97 -- 98
Location 93 16) $ 45,000. One story masonry/concrete building with + 3,000.
UV disinfecting equipment installed.
"
17) $
25,000.
Property in open at Location #3.
+ 5,000.
"
18) $
5,000.
Extra Expense Coverage Location 43
Same
Location #4
19) $
28,000.
One story frame building occupied as
+ 3,000.
a Picnic Shelter.
"
20) $
6,000.
Contents of Picnic Shelter.
+ 1,000.
"
21) $
25,000.
Property in open at Location #4.
+ 5,000.
"
22) $
5,000.
Extra Expense Coverage - Location #4.
Same
Location #5
23) $
48,000.
Lift Station — Sunrise Commercial Park.
+ 3,000.
Location #6
24) $
48,000.
Lift Station — Sewer Treatment Facility.
+ 3,000.
Location #7
25) $
48,000.
Lift Station — Barthel Industrial Park.
+ 3,000.
Loc. 5-6-7
26) $
5,000.
Extra Expense - Loc.# 5-6-7
Same
Location #8
27) $
258,000.
One story non-combustible building
+ 12,000.
occupied as City Hall.
" 28) $ 100,000. Contents consisting of office furniture, equipment + 5,000.
and supplies in City Hall.
" 29) $ 5,000. Extra Expense Coverage at Location 98. Same
Location # 9 30) $ 30,000. One story frame construction occupied + 5,000.
as Park Shelter.
" 31) $ 10,000. Contents of Picnic Shelter. + 2,500.
" 32) $ 5,000. Extra Expense Coverage at Location #9. Same
33) $ 40,000. Property in open - Westwind Addition Park + 15,000.
Comprehensive Perils including Theft & Replacement Cost; $250 Deductible
SECTION # II --- INLAND MARINE
Mobile Equipment:
1) Ford Utility Tractor w/blade, bucket, & blower $9,000.
M#: 535 S#: D5NN6015G
(Blower - Farm King 840SB S# 9020210)
2) Portable Pump #2 S#: 3KRIVA-07-315755 M#: D692 $12,000.
3) 1987 John Deere Tractor 1 + Cab M#: 855 4WD with mower $10,500.
Mdl#: M00855D43666 (with blade) S#: M00296X537138
$ 31,500.
Miscellaneous Equipment:
1) Bauer Air Compressor M#: VCE-1 S#: 20157 $ 9,600.
(Compressor to be used by Fire Department to fill Air Tanks for
Portable Air Pacs.)
2) Sewer Treatment Facilities Aerators (7 c@ $5,400) $ 37,800.
3) 1985 Weeres 18' Pontoon Boat with $ 6,000.
Chemical Applying Tank & Equipment.
4) Optech III - P Eagle Vote $ 5,500.
Counting Machine S#: 413327
$ 58,900.
* * * NOTE --- Change of Coverage:
Policy now automatically included Unscheduled, Movable or Miscellaneous Equipment,
not to exceed $S, 000 any one item / $500 deductible.
SECTION # II --- INLAND MARINE
Valuable Papers:
1) Valuable Papers located within City Hall Building $ 40,000.
Computer -.EDP Equipment:
1) PC Tailors Computer with keyboard S#: R0121391-1477 $ 1,450.
Packard Bell Monitor S#: 8548V900
2)
Epson Printer M#: FX 286E S#: 03003164
$
500.
3)
Acer Computer - 20 MHZ M#: 1120SX S#: 80386SX
$
2,600.
4)
Panasonic Printer M#: KX-P2624 S#: ACJ626KXP2624
$
450.
5)
Software & Media
$
5,000.
6)
IBM "486" Computer Model 19C S#: 23p8551
$
1,500.
Including Keyboard & Monitor
7)
Panasonic Printer M#: KX-P2023
$
450.
Total $ 11,950.
a) 3 - Wood Frames —'Welcome to Albertville"
Signs are at each entrance to Albertville 3 a $1,000. $ 3,000.
b) 1 - Electric Marquee Sign $ 2,500.
(used. for Public messages at north entrance to Albertville)
Comprehensive Perils; Actual Cash Value; $ 250 Deductible
SECTION # III --- COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY & PUBLIC OFFICIALS LIABILITY
Limits --- Each Occurrence Limit
$ 600,000.
Products/Completed Operations Annual Aggregate Limit
$ 600,000.
Failure to Supply Annual Aggregate Limit
$ 600,000.
Fire Damage Limit
$ 50,000.
Land Use Regulation Annual Aggregate
$ 600,000.
Medical Expense Limit
$ 1,000.
Medical Expense Aggregate
$ 10,000.
Limited Pollution Liability Annual Aggregate
$ 600,000.
Lead or Asbestos Claim Annual Aggregate
$ 200,000.
Claims Made Forms: (prior Acts Coverage - Public Officials 12/l/85)
$250 deductible - All Claims
15 % on Land Use Regulation Claims including Legal Costs & Less Adjustment Costs
SECTION # IV --- COMPREHENSIVE AUTOMOBILE COVERAGE
Limits: $ 600,000.
$ 600,000.
$ Basic
$ 250
$ 500
CSL (BI & PD)
UIM & UM
Personal ijnjury Protection
Comprehensive
Collision
Vehicle Schedule:
1)
1979
Ford Equipment Van
2)
1979
Ford Fire Truck
3)
1985
Chev Fire Truck
4)
1989
Chev PU
5)
1979
Ford Dump Truck
6)
1995
Int'l Fire Truck - Tanker
Replacement Cost applies to Unit#6 - Only
SECTION # V --- MISCELLANEOUS EQUIPMENT ON TRUCKS
(Blanket coverage for Miscellaneous equipment in and temporarily away from trucks)
No Limit / Subject to $ 5,000. Max any one Limit.
SECTION # VI --- COMMERCIAL MUNICIPAL EXCESS LIABUTY
Limit: $ 1,000,000. Occurrence/Aggregate
Retained Limit: $ 10,000.
Coverage to folllow, form includes Public Officials liability — City "does not waive" the
monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statues 466.04.
SECTION # VII[ --- OPEN MEETING LAW DEFENSE COVERAGE
Limit: $ 20,000. Defense Costs Per Lawsuit / Per Official
$ 20,000. Agreement Term Aggregate - Per Official
SECTION # VII I --- BOILER & MACHINERY
Limit: $ 5,000,000. Limit per any "One Accident".
Combined Property Damage & Business Interruption and Extra Expense
$ 250. Deductible.
SECTION # IX --- BONDS
Blanket Public Employee Faithful Performance & Employee Dishonesty Coverage
Limit: $ 200,000. / $ 250 deductible.
SECTION #X --- GLASS COVERAGE ---- OPTIONAL
Location #2 --Bldg. #1 Picnic Shelter & Warming House $ 4,140.
(6@$690.)
Location #8 -- Bldg. #1 City Hall - Misc. Windows $13,875.
(Base Policy allows $100. / Window
$500. / Occurrence for Glass Coverage)
The proceeding'has been a coverage overview, all parts are subject to policy conditions and terms.
I
RECAP OF PREMIUMS
93 - 94
94 - 95
95 -96
SECTION #I --- Property
$3,443.00
$ 3,685.00
$ 3,239.00
SECTION # II --- Inland Marine
442.00
608.00
671.00
SECTION # III --- General Liability
5,476.00
7,069.00
6,733.00
SECTION # VV --- Comprehensive Auto
1,959.00
2,916.00
3,033.00
SECTION # V --- Misc. Equipment on Trucks 630.00
563.00
Included
SECTION # VT ---- Excess Liability
1,999.00
2,475.00
1,808.00
SECTION # V H --- Open Meeting Law Defense 500.00
500.00
442.00
SECTION # VTII -- Boiler & Machinery
---------
324.00
333.00
SECTION # EK --- Bonds
---------
519.00
426.00
Total
$ 16,685.00 (10 month premium pd.
$ 14,449.00
$ 18,659.00
$ 20,022.00 (Annual Premium)
96-97
97-98
SECTION # I ----- Property
$ 3,764.00
$ 4,679.00
SECTION # I[ ---- Inland Marine
$ 465.00
$ 929.00
SECTION # III --- General Liability
$ 10,218.00
$ 8,174.00
SECTION #hV --- Comprehensive Auto
$ 3,228.00
$ 4,067.00
SECTION # V ---- Misc. Equipment on Trucks Included
Included
SECTION # VI --- Excess Liability
$ 2,395.00
$ 1,942.00
SECTION # )II --- Open Meeting Law Defense $ 500.00
$ 500.00
SECTION # VIII --- Boiler & Machinery
$ 400.00
$ 400.00
SECTION # IX ---- Bonds
$ 529.00
$ 529.00
SECTION ## X ---- Optional Glass Coverage
$ 1,845.00
TOTAL $ 21,499.00 $ 23,065.00
a
PILOT
LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
August 14, 1997
Mr. Gary Hale
City Administrator
5975 Main Avenue NE.
Albertville, MN 55301
RE: Rebate for Sanitary Sewer trunk costs
Dear Mr. Hale:
-FCC)
This letter requests that Kenco be paid back its agreed upon share of $900 per acre for the
following projects:
• "Fairfield" by Little Mountain Development
• "Cottages of Albertville" by Feneis
Please let us know when we can expect the pass through checks to be issued for
budgeting purposes.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Donald Jensen' -'
Land Development Director
1
avtrunk.doc
13736 Johnson Street NE • Hain Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094
PILOT
LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
August 8, 1997
Mr. Gary Hale
City Administrator
5975 Main Avenue NE.
Albertville, MN 55301
RE: City rebate of funds for lift station abandonment
Dear Mr. Hale:
During the last several months, we have been discussing the issue of the lift station abandonment
in Parkside - Westwind. At issue was whether the components would become the property of
Pilot Land or the City. The rationale for property becoming Pilots was as follows:
• If the City consultant could not guarantee that the pieces of the lift station are reusable, then
the abandonment was to be paid for by Pilot and the abandoned equipment is salvage.
We have always been interested in having the City acknowledge that the components would
be reusable at another location. If so, then the City would keep the components and rebate
Pilot the cost of abandonment since it is a "trunk expense" of the sanitary sewer system.
Kenco paid all costs of initial installation and has now created an opportunity to remove
ongoing maintenance costs to Albertville for the lift station. We certainly don't feel it would
be fair to be charged three times. (lift station, trunk extension through Barthell, removal)
• Given the possibility that salvaged components may become "lost" or become obsolete while
at the City, Pilot believes they would be able to find a new home for components faster than
the City and use up the remaining life of the pumps and electrical components sooner; Unless
In light of the current golf course proposal, we have the following recommendations:
1. City keeps lift station but commits to a lift station design in the Cedar Creek project which
can make use of the abandoned components until such time as their useful life is completed.
2. City then rebates Pilot the associated costs for the abandonment, design,'and cost of money
which Pilot has used to complete the project. This rebate will come from or be allowed to be
held back from the $500 per acre charge that Parkside Fourth generates. The City has still
received a bonus for future lift stations from the development.
The City in passing a trunk sanitary sewer ordinance clearly contemplated spending money on
costs associated with the creation of the sewer master plan. We have reviewed the feasibility
study which identified the original area charges. To date, well over $30,000 has been charged
L-
and accepted by Albertville as a fee for future improvements to sewers and lift stations.
(Parkside 3rd, 4th, Cottages, Little Mountain)
1 i ftsta.doc
13736 Johnson Street NE • Ham Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094
As was stated in the Cedar Creek Master Plan proposal, we believe that this pot of money will be
more than enough to start and finish a final plan and working drawings for the lift station portion
of the sewer ordinance. We believe that this is a responsible and fair course of action. At the
conclusion of working drawings, hard estimates could be prepared for bid purposes and the
ordinance per acre charge could be adjusted up or down.
We believe that the major funders, i.e. development companies and land owners have a right to
hear how the $500 per acre charge in additional facilities will be paid for and when.
Sincerely,
Donald Jense
Land Development Director
cc: Liz Stockman - NAC
Mike Couri, City Attorney
Peter Carlson - SEH
MEMORANDUM
TO: GAR Y HALE CITY ADMINISTI:ATOR, CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: MIKE COURT, CITY ATTORNE' Y
SUBJECT: OWNERSHIP OF TEMPORARY LIFT STATION
DATE: AUGUST 7, 1997
It is my understanding that Pilot Land Development is seeking clarification
regarding the ownership of the temporary lift station located in the Westwind
development. This lift station will not be needed upon the connection of a gravity
sanitary sewer line flowing south into Parkside 4`b addition, and Pilot would prefer to
salvage the lift station for its own use.
It is my opinion that the City owns the temporary lift station. Upon the dedication
of the sewer and temporary lift station (sometime in 1993), the City took over ownership
and maintenance of the sanitary sewer lines, including the temporary lift station. As a
dedicated City utility, the City owns the lift stab on in the same manner that it owns water
mains, storm sewer pipes, etc. The fact that the lift station may no longer be needed in its
present location does not strip the City of its ownership of the lift station. If the City
desires to dispose of the lift station, I recommend that it solicit offers from interested
parties or advertise the sale of the lift station.
i0'd OiZ� ,t6b �i9
31II+'ti12:133"lO d0 h1IO WH i i : 0i NOW 2-6-TT-on"