The URL can be used to link to this page

1997-11-17 CC Agenda/PacketALBBRTVI LLB C I. TY CXMC ]C L AGENDA November ill, 19,97 7:00 PM 1, CALL TO ORDER/ROLL Q1hLL/ADOPT (Mayor/Clerk/Council) 2. MINUTES (council) November 3, 1997, Regular Meeting 3. AUDITING CLAIMS (council) Check Vs 10000 - 10031 4. CITIZEN FORUM lo_M_inute Limit AGENDA 5. CONSENT AGENDA [*1 (council) a. Revenue/Expe:nditu.re Report for October b. Follow -Up Sheet C. Department Report: d. RESOLUTION #1997-54 (A RESCLUTION MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE CEDAR CREEK'. PROJECT) e. American Education Week Resolution 6. SPECIAL ORDER " Cancelled Public Hearing on 1997 Northeast Sanitary Sewer And Water Main Extension Project reschedule to December 15, 1997 7. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS a. ENGINEERING 1) Update on county Ditch No. 9 2) Standard, Street Sect.iorl Update 3) Barthel Industrial Drive Easement b . LEGAL - None C . PLANNING & ZONI;NG 1) Consider Findings of Fact & Decision re: Rezoning of the property from R-1A, Low Density Single Family 1 Residential, to Planned. Unit Development - Cedar Creek Golf Course 2) ORDINANCE #1997-16 (AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLE SIGN ORDINANCE (1987-3) RELATING TO BILLBOARDS) 3) ORDINANCE #1997-17 (.ANORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLLE ZONING ORDINANCE:, (1988-12) RELATING TO MINIMUM GARAGE SIZE, SCREENING, LANDSCAPING, BUFFER YARDS, STRUCTURE PLACEMENT ABOVE HIGH WATER ELEVATIONS, USABLE OPEN SPACE'., BUILDING CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, PARKING STANDARDS, AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS) d . GENERAL GOVERNMM 1) Trail Construction within Parkside Third addition on Kalenda, 57th Street and, Kahler 2) Queen Committee Representatives 3) Approval to close City Offices December 23, 24 & 26 4) Request to appoint Council representative to committee to meet Wednesday, November 19, at the high school to discuss establishment of a Community Athletic Support Club 5) RESOLUTION #1997-56 (A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING UNCOLLECTED SEWER AND STORM WATER BILLS TO WRIGHT COUNTY FOR COLLECTION WITH REAL ESTATE TAXES) 6) Strategic Planning/Visioning - Establish dates Saturday Nov/Dec 97 8. AD JOURMCM (council) UPCOMING H13ETINGS/ It' PORTANT DATES November 20 Transportation Committee Meeting at Otsego 7:00 PM November 24 Joint Powers Board - Water 7:00 FM November 26 Special ")'pint: Powers Wat.ei. E: oard 7:00 IM November 27 Thanksgiv,JMg Day - Legal K.,)1iday - Office Closed November 28 Legal Hol-iday - Office Clo ,,i:�!d December 1 Regular Cil.ty Council ME!eti�irq[ 7:00 Hsi December 8 Truth in 9['axation Hear:i.rLg 7:00 R4 December 8 Joint Powers Board - He.;>ckey Arena 7:00IM December 9 Planning S, Zoning Commission 7:00 PM December 15 Continuat-ion of Truth :i..r!: ^.f'.xation 7:00 EM (if necessary) December 15 Regular City Council Mleeti°:r of 7:00 H4 December 22 Joint Powers Board - Water 7:00 PM December 25 Christmas Day - Legal h0liChLy January 5 Regular City Council ,Me:!eti:n<;i[ 7:00 FM January 13 Planning & Zoning Comrr:i.ssi0I-,L 7:00 EM ALBERTVILLE SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL November 17, 1997 Albertville City Hall 6:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor Mark Olsen (6:45 PM), Councilmembers Patricia Stalberger, Duane Berning, Robert Gundersen, and John Vetsch, and City Clerk Linda Houghton Acting Mayor Berning called the special meeting of the Albertville City Council to order. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the 1998 budget. The Council reviewed the proposed 1998 budget and the preliminary levy set at $590,000. Of that amount $93,500 is levied for Debt Service and $496,500 for the General Fund. Expenditures must be decreased to balance the revenue/expenditure sides of the budget. The Council discussed the request for $2,366 for the River Rider Program. Councilmember Stalberger reported that Commissioner Rose has indicated that due to the lateness in making the request, the City could have the service provided for one-half the cost. Councilmember Berning stated that in his discussions with several senior citizens he was advised that the seniors are not interested in the program. The Council agreed not to fund the River Rider Program in 1998. Mayor Olsen arrived at the meeting at 6:45 PM and Acting Mayor Berning turned the meeting over to Mayor Olsen. The Council discussed the increase in sign permits from $75 per face to $100 per face for billboards. Keith Franklin stated that the sign permit fee must be tied to actual City costs and he was vehemently opposed to increasing the permit fee for the purpose of collecting more money. The Council concurred that the permit fee in 1998 would remain at $75 per face. The Sign Permit Fee line item in the revenue budget was decreased to $3,375. City Clerk Linda Houghton reported that the 1998 contracts for fire service are actually $36,495. Vetsch made a motion to increase the Friendly City Days donation from $2,200 to $4,250, designating $1,250 for scholarships for the Albertville Royalty, $200 for Junior Royalty $100 savings bonds, and $2,800 to the Friendly City Day Committee for general expenses. The motion also eliminates the $3,500 line item for the Queen Committee. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to eliminate the additional engineering and legal fees previously budgeted in the working Capital Reserve 1. department totaling $16,000 and to reduce the Working Capital Reserve line item by $13,560 to $72,370. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. The proposed 1998 budget is balanced with expenditures and revenues at $886,025. Berning made a motion to adjourn at 7:00 PM. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mark Olsen, Mayor. Linda Houghton, City Clerk K ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL November 17, 1997 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor Mark Olsen, Councilmembers Patricia Stalberger, Duane Berning, Robert Gundersen, and John Vetsch, City Administrator Gary Hale, City Clerk Linda Houghton, City Attorney Michael Couri, City Planner Liz Stockman, and City Engineer Peter Carlson Mayor Olsen called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to order. The agenda was amended as follows: Item 3 - Pull Check #10018 until the Transportation Committee meets on November 20th Item 3 - Approve payment to CompressAir in the amount of $420.30 Add Item 7a(4) - 60th Street Damages/Repairs Add Item 7d(7) - Joint Powers Hockey Board request for $1,000 start-up funds Add Item 7d(8) - Snow Plowing personnel Add Item 7d(9) - Planning & Zoning Commission appointment Add Item 7d(10) - Appoint contact person for developers Berning made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The minutes of the November 3, 1997, meeting were amended on Page 4, Paragraph 3 to add the sentence "Carlson estimated the cost of having the area surveyed to be $700." Berning made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 3, 1997, meeting as amended. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to approve payment of Check #'s 10000 - 10018, Check Vs 10019 - 10031 and to issue a check to Compress Air in the amount of $420.30. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. Since several members of the Queen Committee were present at this time, the Council explained that $1,250 was allotted for a scholarship fund for the Albertville Royalty as requested in the proposed 1998 budget and that funding for purchasing a float was denied. Steve Breingen was present to request the City reimburse him $860 in costs to have his sewer line repaired. The actual repair was required in the right of way on the City side of the connection. The breakage appeared to have been caused by a rock 1 settling on top of the line and cracking the line. Breingan explained that he has had problems with his sewer line for several years. The Council directed City Engineer Carlson to inspect the property and to speak to Ken Lindsay, who Breingen said was on -site when the line was dug up and make a report to the Council at the December meeting. Berning made a motion to approve the Revenue/Expenditure Report for the month of October as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to approve the Follow -Up Sheet as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to approve the Department Report as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1997-54 titled A RESOLUTION MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE CEDAR CREEK PROJECT. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to adopt the AMERICAN EDUCATION WEEK RESOLUTION as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. City Engineer Carlson reported that a meeting has been held with Wright Soil and Water Conservation Board regarding Center Oaks 2nd Addition and County Ditch #9. The WSWC approved the wetland mitigation plan for the addition and have agreed to help to get County Ditch #9 cleaned. Carlson also reviewed the standard street sections. Some areas of the City require heavier street sections because of poor soils, etc. Carlson recommended the Council might want to approve two street sections and direct the engineer to determine which section is required in different areas. Councilmember Berning suggested that the Council use the heavier street section standard and require the developer to prove that the heavier section is not required. The Council directed Carlson to bring two separate standard street specs to the December meeting for Council decision. Carlson reported that the section of Barthel Industrial Drive property by Franklin Outdoor Sign has an 80' right-of-way but the City has no easement outside of that right-of-way. City Attorney Couri recommended that the issue of an easement across the parcel Franklin is purchasing from the City be dropped as unnecessary. The Council concurred that the 80' right-of-way is sufficient for snowmobile use and no further easement is required. The Council directed City Engineer Carlson to notify Wright County that there were damages to 60th Street resulting from the r, CSAH 19/37 construction. Olsen made a motion to approve the City Council Findings of Fact & Decision dated November 171, 1997, approving the rezoning from R-1A, Low Density Single Family Residential to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for the Cedar Creek Golf Course and to adopt ORDINANCE #1997-18 titled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY'S ZONING ORDINANCE #1988-12 (MAP AMENDMENT). Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. City Planner Liz Stockman reviewed the amendment to the Sign Ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission. The amendment makes very minor changes to the billboards regulations. Those changes are as follows: Section 8 (1)(a): A clarification was made to definitively state that billboards shall only be allowed within 100 feet (adjacent areas as defined in this Chapter) on either side of I-94 except that no billboards shall be allowed south of CSAH 37 and west of the I-94/CSAH 37 interchange. Section 8 (1)(b): The distance required between billboards structures erected in the City has been changed from 500 feet to 1000 feet. Such distance shall be measured on the same side of the highway facing traffic proceeding in the same direction.' Section 8 (2)(a): A billboard can no longer be constructed on agriculturally zoned land. Stalberger made a motion to adopt ORDINANCE #1997-16 titled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLE SIGN ORDINANCE (1987-3) RELATING TO BILLBOARDS as described above. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stockman then reviewed the ordinance amending the zoning ordinance relating to minimum garage size, screening, landscaping, buffer yards, structure placement above high water elevations, usable open space, building construction, parking standards, and planned unit development regulations as recommended by the Planning Commission. The Council made the following changes to the proposed ordinance: Section 1. Section 1000.4(b) Increase the maximum garage size to 1000 square feet. Section 2, Section 1000.7 relating to sodding regulations The boulevard is required to be sodded within 30 days of building occupancy and the other portions of the yard be seeded or sodded within 90 days of building occupancy. The property owner may petition the City Council for a 60-day extension of time. Berning made a motion to adopt ORDINANCE #1997-17 titled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE (1988-12) 3 RELATING TO MINIMUM GARAGE SIZE, SCREENING, LANDSCAPING, BUFFER YARDS, STRUCTURE PLACEMENT ABOVE HIGH WATER ELEVATIONS, USABLE OPEN SPACE, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, PARKING STANDARDS AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS as amended. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made her motion to rescind the motion adopting ORDINANCE #1997-16 (AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLE SIGN ORDINANCE (1987-3) RELATING TO BILLBOARDS) and to table discussion on the ordinance to the December 1, 1997, meeting. Gundersen rescinded his second. All voted aye. Berning made a motion directing the city engineer to prepare plans and specifications for trail construction, with the Parkside 3rd Addition being given priority for construction. Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Vetsch made a motion to close city offices on December 23, December 24, and December 26 due to vacation schedules. Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1997-56 titled A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING UNCOLLECTED SEWER AND STORM WATER BILLS TO WRIGHT COUNTY FOR COLLECTION WITH REAL ESTATE TAXES. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Don Jensen of Pilot Land Development informed the Council that a groundbreaking ceremony for the golf course is tentatively planned for December or January. The Council will be invited to participate. Berning made a motion to authorize the mayor to sign the CMIF Grant Agreement and the administrator to sign "The Brimeyer Group: Agreement for $1,150 but to table discussion on establishing a date for Strategic Planning/Visioning Session until the first meeting in January. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Councilmember Vetsch and Mayor Olsen, representatives on the Joint Powers Hockey Board, requested each participating entity authorize a cash advance in the amount of $1,000 as start-up cash to pay for legal notices and fees, etc., involved in establishing the operations and by-laws of the board. Gundersen stated he is opposed to giving the Hockey Board $1,000 since the hockey association supposedly has already raised money for the ice arena. Berning pointed out that Monticello is rumored to be planning an ice arena of its own. Based on the proforma provided by the Hockey Association, a large portion of the income was to be derived from selling ice time to Monticello. There has also been discussion on relocating the ice arena from the Barthel Commercial Park site to St. Michael. Vetsch made a motion to approve an advance of $1000 to the 4 Joint Powers Hockey Board. Olsen seconded the motion. Vetsch, Berning, Olsen and Stalberger voted aye. Gundersen voted no. The motion carried. Vetsch made a motion directing the Public Works Committee to secure Maintenance Workers to serve as part-time snowplowing assistants. If those selected are not on the current list, the Public Works Committee will present a revision to the resolution making those appointments effective to the start date at the next regular Council meeting. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to schedule interviews with the Maintenance Worker II candidates scoring 92.5 and up for December 3rd beginning at 6:30 PM (one hour interviews). Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to appoint Patti Stalberger as the Council representative on the Planning Commission, effective January 1, 1998, replacing Donatus Vetsch, whose term is expiring and who has resigned. Vetsch will continue to serve as an alternate to the Planning Commission. Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mayor Olsen requested that the Council consider appointing a city contact person for city developments until the new administrator is on board. City Clerk Houghton stated that the staff meetings are attended by the consultants who will not be changing at this time and she saw no need for an interim contact. Mayor Olsen requested that the clerk be considered the contact person. The Council agreed. Berning made a motion to adjourn at 10:45 PM. Olsen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mark Olsen, Mayor Linda Houghton, City Clerk �� ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL November 3, 1997 Albertville City Hall PRESENT: Mayor Stalberger, Duane Berning, Clerk Linda Houghton, City Peter Carlson em 7:00 PM Mark Olsen, Councilmembers Patricia Robert Gundersen✓ and John Vetsch, City Attorney Michael Couri and City Engineer Mayor Olsen called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to order. The agenda was amended by adding the following: Item 3 - Delete Check #11299 Item 5f - Approve Fire Service Contracts with the Cities of St. Michael and Otsego Item 7a(3) - Queen Committee Item 7c(2) - CSAH 19/37 Trails & Signage Item 7d(2) - Directive to Public Works Department personnel to make no alterations to equipment Berning made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. The minutes of the October 20, 1997, meeting were amended as follows: Page 3 - Insert Paragraph 4 - Councilmember Berning returned to the meeting at 8:05 PM. Corrected to state that the Otsego Page 4, Paragraph 2 - committee members were uncertain if there was interest in improving the shared roads. Page 4, Paragraph 8 - H63H is changed to 863H. Berning made a motion to approve the minutes of the October 20, 1997, meeting as amended. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. ndeen e a ove payment of Check an dr Checkd# I s 11300n-t11314r# as presented. Vetsch seconded 11298 98 an the motion. All voted aye. There was no one in the audience who wished to address the Council under Community Forum. Berning made a motion to approve the Financial Statement for the period October 1 - October 28, 1997, as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to cancel the Economic Development meeting scheduled for November 12, 1997, until after the first of the new year. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. 1 voted aye. Bert Bailey, representing the Wright County Human Services Agency, explained the River Rider and Volunteer Transportation System. In 1995 the County introduced a combined County -City subsidized and rider fare -paid public transit system named The River Rider. In 1998 the system is being expanded to include additional route areas, including a route from Albertville to Buffalo. Bailey is requesting a transit budgetary allocation from the City for the River Rider System in the amount of $1 per capita, or $24366. Stalberger made a motion to transit budgetary allocation to November 17th. Berning seconded Berning and Gundersen voted aye. carried. table further discussion on the the budget meeting scheduled for the motion. Stalberger, Olsen, Vetsch abstained. The motion The Council discussed the pending vacancy on the Planning & Zoning Commission due to the expiration of the term of Donatus Vetsch. Mr. Vetsch has relayed to City Administrator Hale that he is not willing to continue to serve on the Commission. Hale recommends that a Councilmember be appointed to fill the vacancy. Stalberger volunteered to serve on the Commission. The Council agreed to table the appointment of Councilmember Stalberger to the Planning & Zoning Commission until the December meeting and to request that Mr. Vetsch submit a formal resignation. Ken Tiernan, representing the Albertville Queen Committee, addressed the Council regarding the expenses associated with that committee. He stated that the Committee receives $2,000 from the Friendly City Days Committee for expenses and would like the City to authorize more funds, possibly for scholarships for the royalty. The Council asked the Committee to submit the anticipated annual Committee expenditures for consideration at the budget meeting on November 17th. City Attorney Couri reviewed the Grading Contract for the Cedar Creek Golf Course. Since it has not been determined exactly what areas can be graded, the amount of the letter of credit required has not been determined at this point. The letter of credit will be approximately $2,000 per acres that is graded. Berning made a motion to approve the Grading Contract for the Cedar Creek Golf Course Property, contingent upon the grading plans being approved by the city engineer and the letter of credit in the amount of $2,000 per acre of graded land being provided to the city. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to approve the Grading Contract for the Mike Potter property, contingent upon Potter complying with all applicable laws, the city engineer's approval of the grading plan, Q a letter of credit in the amount of $1,000, agreement to pay all city costs, and payment of a double grading fee, since operations were begun prior to a permit being issued. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to have the city engineer and administrator provide a recommendation on administratively approval of grading permits and the criteria necessary for administrative approval. Berning, Stalberger, and Gundersen voted aye. Vetsch and Olsen voted no. The motion carried. City Engineer Carlson reported that he! has visited the Robert Heuring property to check why water is standing on the field. Heuring believes the water is caused by the grading being done on the Center Oaks property. Carlson reported that it is not apparent why the water doesn't drain from the field. He is unable to determine that the grading on the Center Oaks property has caused the water to stand in Heuring's field.. The only method to determine exactly what is causing the problem is to have the ares surveyed. Vetsch made a motion authorizing Carlson to have the properties surveyed by a crew from SEH. Berning seconded the motion. Berning and Vetsch voted aye. Olsen and Gundersen voted no. Stalberger abstained. The motion failed. The Council directed the City Administrator to check if black dirt has been placed over the trail easement on the Savitski property along 61st Street. The Public Works Committee reported that a loaner Bobcat has been provided to the City free of charge until the new Bobcat can be delivered. The Council tabled discussion on Councilmember Vetsch's request regarding modifications on any Public Works equipment, since the direction has previously been made. The Public Works Committee will meet on November 15th at 8:00 to conduct preliminary interviews of the candidates for the position of Maintenance Worker II. The full Council will interview the final candidates at a later date. The Personnel Committee will meet on November 13th at 7:00 PM for the purpose of reviewing the Supplemental Questions submitted by the preliminary candidates for the position of City Administrator. The Committee will recommend candidates to be interviewed by the full Council, two members of the Planning Commission, the city clerk and the city attorney. Berning made a motion to adjourn at 10:20 PM. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. 4 Mark Olsen, Mayor L::`.nda, Houghton, City Clerk 3 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE BILLS TO BE PAID November 17, 1997 Check No. Vendor ^Reason Amount 10000 ABRA, Inc. Asir Bag Class 750.00 10001 AirTouch Cellular iPW Cell Phone 6.34 10002 CarQuest Monthly Charges 246.24 10003 Chicos, Chad F.D. Parts 78.00 10004 DJ's Total Home Care Monthly Charges 167.51 10005 First Trust 88 Sewer/Water 23,463.75 10006 Gopher State One Call Locates 17.50 10007 Granite Electronics F.D. Batteries 377.22 10008 Harvest Printing Printing/Off.Sup. 261.78 10009 Larson Publications Legals 101.68 10010 LMCIT Workers Comp 3,912.00 10011 Medica Group Insurance 930.79 10012 Minnegasco ,Service 95.79 10013 Monticello Animal Control October 54.00 10014 City of Monticello Animal Boarding 90.00 10015 Northern Hydraulics F.D. Generator 2,076.74 10016 NSP Service 2,530.07 10017 NAC, Inc. Planning Services 2,978.75 10018 Norwest Bank 90 GO & TIF 93,876.25 10019 City of Otesgo Road Maintenance 5,033.74 10020 PERA Life Insurance Payroll Deduction 12.00 10021 PERA 10/25 - 11/07 352.72 10022 Pat's 66 Gas/Oi1 164.23 10023 Superior Services 10024 Transport Graphics 10025 Unlimited Electric 10026 USCM Midwest 10027 Wright County Assessor 10028 Wright County Tresurer 10029 Wright County Treasurer 10030 Wright Recycling 10031 Wright -Hennepin Garbage Service 89.87 Names for helmets 49.20 Wiring -Lights 358.00 Payroll Deduction 92.00 Tax Capacity 12.00 Assessments Pd. 1,533.67 Police 5,246.88 October 1,028.50 Street Lights 20.90 Total $146,008.12 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT City of Albertville50'-� ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Amded Budget Annual Actual Curr hth Encumb Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------•----....--------------------------------------------------- •-------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Revenues 310.100 Current Taxes .00 412,400.00 215,745.��5 .00 .00 196,654.05 52.3 310.200 Delinquent Taxes .00 .00 12,007.(+0 .00 .00 -12,007.00 .0 310.400 Tax Increvents .00 .00 -13,210.i5 .00 .00 13,210.45 .0 320.110 liquor Pertits .00 8,100.00 8,150." 4,000.00 .00 -50.00 100.6 320.120 Beer Peraits .00 200.00 120.(10 .00 .00 80.00 60.0 320.130 husetents licenses .00 400.00 350.(0 .00 .00 50.00 87.5 320.140 Cigarette licenses .00 250.00 250.00 .00 .00 .00 100.0 320.150 Sign Periits .00 3,525.00 3,375.(0 .00 .00 150.00 95.7 320.160 OtherBusiness licenses/Periits .00 200.00 5,878.18 45.00 .00 -5,678.18 ttt.t 320.210 Building Peroits .00 13,940.00 119,350.18 23,780.49 .00 -105,410.78 856.2 320.220 Anital licenses .00 100.00 90.00 .00 .00 10.00 90.0 334.010 local Goverment Aid .00 82,672.00 41,569.3 .00 .00 41,102.50 50.3 334.020 NACA .00 136,182.00 69,070.10 .00 .00 67,111.50 50.7 334.030 local Performance Aid .00 2,384.00 1,192.(0 .00 .00 1,192.00 50.0 334.050 Police Aid .00 3,000.00 .(10 .00 .00 3,000.00 .0 334.060 Fire Aid .00 7,899.00 10,280.00 10,280.00 .00-2,381.00 130.1 336.000 Other Gov. Units Grants & Aids .00 4,800.00 2,812.10 .00 .00 1,987.30 58.6 341.070 Special Assessient Searches .00 100.00 500.00 70.00 .00-400.00 500.0 341.090 Other Charges for Services .00 3,000.00 1,970.3 .00 .00 1,029.80 6S.7 341.095 Developer Escrows .00 .00 JO .00 .00 .00 .0 342.020 Fire Protection Services .00 33,994.00 21,752.1 6,121.73 .00 12,241.64 64.0 342.030 Park Rental Fees .00 2,000.00 1,900.(0 -100.00 .00 100.00 95.0 343.000 Stori Sewer Fees .00 .00 .(O .00 .00 .00 .0 343.100 Penalites - Stort Water Bills .00 .00 .(0 .00 .00 .00 .0 350.000 Fines and Forfeits .00 100.00 189.(0 .00 .00 -89.00 189.0 362.000 Interest Earnings .00 2,200.00 73,247.18 178.08 .00-71,047.78 mJ 364.000 Private Contributions/Donation .00 .00 2,180.17 2,700.00 .00 -2,180.47 .0 372.080 Other Revenues .00 1,500.00 6,362.€1 125.80 .00 -4,862.61 424.2 391.010 Sales of General Fixed Assets .00 .00 2,988.`.1 .00 .00 -2,988.91 .0 392.030 Transfer -Capital Project Funds .00 .00 .(0 .00 .00 .00 .0 392.050 Transfer Out .00 .00 JO .00 .00 .00 .0 395.000 lease Payatent .00 950.00 950.(0 .00 .00 .00 100.0 REVENUE Revenues General Fund Grand Total: 00 719,896.00 589,072.49 47,201.10 .00 130,823.51 81.8 .00 719,896.00 589,072.19 47,201.10 .00 130,823.51 81.8 .00 719,896.00 589,072.49 47,201.10 .00 130,823.51 81.8 .00 719,896.00 589,072.49 47,201.10 .00 130,823.51 81.8 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Tiie: 3:16pi City of Albertville Page: 2 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Mended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud --------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Revenues .00 219,896.00 589,072.49 47,201.10 .00 130,823.S1 81.8 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Tile: 3:16pn City of Albertville I ---------•-------------------------------------- Page: 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------.-- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Aiended ------------------- Budget I---------------------- Annual Actual Curr Mth EnCUib ----------------------------------------------- Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------ Fund: 101 General Fund - -- ----------------------------------------- Expenditures Dept: 410.100 General Goverment - Council 511.000 Yages - Regular Eaployees .00 11,400.00 9,500.00 950.00 .00 1,900.00 83.3 522.000 FICA Contributions .00 872.00 738.76 72.69 .00 133.24 84.7 523.000 PERA Contributions .DO .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 526.000 Yorkers Coipensation Insurance .00 185.00 .00 .00 .00 185.00 .0 533.600 Planner: City Projects/Meeting .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 533.900 Other Prof. Contract Services .00 5,000.00 4,133.20 .00 .00 861.80 82.8 552.000 Insurance Other than Eap. Bene .00 4,900.00 4,419.00 .00 .00 481.00 90.2 555.000 Printing S Publications .00 2,800.00 6,861.98 2,276.93 .00 -4,061.98 245.1 558.000 Travel .00 309.00 .00 .00 DO 309.00 .0 561100 General Supplies .00 100.00 310.62 .00 .00 69.38 30.6 561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys .00 300.00 343.00 .00 .00 -43.00 114.3 591.000 Dues & Subscriptions .00 2,150.00 2,185.00 1,510.00 .00 -35.00 101.6 599,000 Miscellaneous .00 1,000.00 1,00D.00 .00 .00 .00 100.0 General Goverment - Council .00 29,016.00 21,216.56 4,809.62 .00 -200.56 100.7 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT ?ue` 113�ibpi City of Albertville ------- ..--------------------------------------------------------page------------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget hended ---------------------------------- Budget Annual Actual. ------------------------------------------------------------- Curr nth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud --------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 410.300 Gen. Govt.- City Adiinistrator 511.000 Wages - Regular Eeployees 00 42,000.00 35,538.36 4,846.14 .00 6,339.43 521.000 Group Insurance .00 3,780.00 3,44D.51 347.82 .00 339.43 91.0 91. 522.000 FICA Contributions .00 3,213.00 2,718.54 370.71 .00 494.46 84.6 523,000 PERA Contributions .00 1,882.00 1,5922.14 217.11 .00 289.86 84.6 526.000 Workers Coapensation Insurance DO 231.00 .00 .00 .00 231.00 500.00 .0 552.000 Insurance Other than Eip. Bene .00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 300.00 .0 558.000 Travel 561.100 General Supplies .00 .00 300.00 200.00 .00 335.52 .00 .00 .00 .00 -135.52 .0 167.8 561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys .00 300.00 245.0D .00 .DO 55.00 81.7 574.300 Capital Outlay-Furnituremm .00 200.00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 .0 591.000 Dues 8 Subscriptions .00 300.00 10'' O .00 .00 195.00 35.0 599.000 miscellaneous .00 .00 .00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 ------ .0 ----------------- Gen. Govt.- City Adtinistrator ----------------- .00 52,906.00 -------------I---- 43,975.13 5,781.78 .00 8,930.87 83.1 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 file: 3:16Pm City of Albertville Page: 5 -------------------------------------------------------------------•---------- -- - --- -------•--------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Amended Budget Annual Actual Curr Mth Encumb Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ----------------------------------------------------------------•.----------------------------••-----------------------..--------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 410.400 Gen. Govt.- City Clerk/Treas. 511.000 gages - Regular Employees 512.000 gages - Temporary Emloyees 513.000 gages - Overtime 521.000 Group Insurance 522.000 FICA Contributions 523,000 PERA Contributions 526,000 Workers Compensation Insurance 533.300 Accounting 533.400 Auditing Services 533.700 Copy Machine Maitenance 533.900 Other Prof. Contract Services 543.100 Repairs/Mainteance - Equiptitt 544.200 Equipment Rental 552.000 Insurance Other than Emp. Bene 558.000 Travel 561.100 General Supplies 561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys 561.400 Postage 574,300 Capital Outlay-Furnituressstzx 591.000 Dues & Subscriptions 592.000 Elections 744.000 Capital Outlay - Officetssszs: Gen. Govt.- City Clerk/Treas. .00 32,240.00 27,396.25 3,720.00 .00 41843.75 85.0 .00 5,600,00 2,489.85 .00 .00 3,110.15 44.5 .00 500.00 426.25 310.00 .00 73.75 85.3 .00 3,780.00 3,440.55 347.81 .00 339.45 91.0 .00 2,933.00 2,151.35 308.30 .00 781.61 73.4 .00 1,717.00 1,241.20 180.54 .00 475.80 72.3 .00 215.00 .00 .00 .00 215.00 .0 .00 .00 1,475.00 .00 .00 -11475.00 .0 .00 6,300.00 6,425.00 .00 .00 -125.00 102.0 .00 1,200.00 692.21 104.23 .00 507.79 57.7 .00 750.00 .00 .00 .00 750.00 .0 .00 500.00 195.16 .00 .00 304.84 39.0 .00 1,000.00 740.92 .00 .00 259.08 74.1 .00 3,000.00 3,919.00 .00 .00 -919.00 130.6 .00 500.00 34.80 .00 .00 465.20 7.0 .00 3,300.00 1,527.80 39.50 .00 1,772.20 46.3 .00 300.00 .00 .00 .00 300.00 .0 .00 1,200.00 912.20 250.00 .00 287.80 76.0 .00 200.00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 .0 .00 50.00 55.00 .00 .00 -5.00 110.0 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 .00 ---------- 2,500.00 .00 .00 .00 2,500.00 .0 ----------------- .00 ----------------- 67,785.00 ----------------- 53,122.58 ----------------- 5,260.38 ----------------- .00 14,662.42 ------ 78.4 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Tiee: 3:16pi City of Albertville page: 6 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ••---------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget hended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud -----------------------------------------------------------------••---------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 410.550 Gen. Govt.- Assessing 531.100 Assessing Contract Services .00 5,450.00 6,610.50 .00 .00-1,160.50 121.3 ----------------- ---- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Gen. Govt.- Assessing .00 5,450.00 6,610.50 .00 .00-1,160.50 121.3 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE: REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Tive: 3:16ps City of Albertville -----------------------------------------------------------------..------------------ I ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page: 7 For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget hended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud -------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund ---------•------------------. I ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Expenditures Dept: 410.600 Gen. Govt. - City Attorney 533.500 legal Service: General/Meeting .DO 29,000.00 15,439.00 636.00 .00 13,561.00 53.2 533.501 Developer Reitbursible .00 .00 2,200.00 .00 .00 -2,200.00 .0 533.502 Reiibursible - Capital Project .00 .00 2,264.82 .00 .00 -2,264.82 .0 ----------------- Gen. Govt. - City Attorney ----------------- .00 29,000.00 ---------------- I• ----------------- 19,903.82 ----------------- 636.00 .00 ----------------- ------ 9,096.18 68.6 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Tile: 3:16PI City of Albertville Page: 8 -------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget hended Budget Annual Actual ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Curr Nth Encumb Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 410,700 City Engineer 533.100 Engineer: Projects/Meetings .00 24,000.00 8,609.17 238.46 .00 15,390.83 35.9 533.101 Reiebursible - Developer .00 .00 7,230.01 .00 .00 -7,230.01 .0 533.102 Reisbursible -Capital Projects .00 .00 1,762.72 .00 .00 -1,762.72 .0 535.100 Contracted Services .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 535.102 delete this account .00 .00 .00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 .DO .0 ----------------- ------ City Engineer ---------------------------------- .00 24,000.00 ----------------- 17,601.90 238.46 .00 6,398.10 73.3 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/37 Time: 3:16Pi City of Albertville Page: 9 --------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Amended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encumb Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 410.800 Economic Development Authority 511.000 Rages - Regular Employees .00 500.00 360.00 .00 .00 140.00 72.0 522.000 FICA Contributions .00 39.00 30.60 3.06 .00 8.40 78.5 558.000 Travel .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 561.100 General Supplies .00 .00 .00 .DO .00 .00 .0 561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys .00 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 .0 599.000 Miscellaneous .00 1,885.00 1,844.26 .00 .00 40.74 97.8 ----------------- ------ Economic Development Authority ---------------------------------- .00 2,524.00 ---------------------------------- 2,234.86 ----------------- 3.06 .00 289.14 88.5 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Time: 3:16pi City of Albertville ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Page: 10 For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Amended Budget -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Annual Actual Curr Nth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General fund ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Expenditures Dept: 410.910 Gen. Govt. - Planning & toning 511,000 Wages - Regular Employees .00 1,000.00 1,140.00 100.00 .00 -140.00 114.0 522.000 FICA Contributions .00 77.00 88.74 7.65 .00 -11.74 115.2 533.600 Planner: City Projects/Meeting .00 15,000.00 23,712.65 2,345.29 .00 -8,712.65 158.1 533.601 Reiabursible - Developer .00 .00 8,134.41 451.88 .00 .8,134.41 .0 533.602 Reiibursible - Capital Project .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 558.000 Travel .00 500.00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .0 561.100 General Supplies .00 200.00 47.64 .00 .00 152.36 23.8 561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys .00 500.00 178.00 .00 ----------------- .00 322.00 ----------------- 35.6 ------ Gen. Govt. - Planning 8 toning ---------------------------------- .00 17,277.00 ---------------------------------- 33,301.44 2,904.82 .00 -16,024.44 192.8 REVENUE/EXPENOITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Tiie: 3:16pi City of Albertville Page: 11 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Aoended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Enculb Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 410.920 Gen. Govt. - Buildings & Plant 542.000 Refuse Disposal 543.100 Repairs/Mainteance - Equip Hs 543,200 Repairs/Mainteance - Building 552.000 Insurance Other than Esp. Bene 553,000 Telephone 561.100 General Supplies 562.100 Natural Gas 562.200 Electricity 572.000 Capital Outlay - Buildingsz:u 573.000 Capital Outlay/Hon-buildingsxs 574.100 Capital Outlay-Mach/Equipttt:: 574.300 Capital Outlay-Furniturexiuu 599.000 Miscellaneous Gen. Govt. - Buildings & Plant .00 600.00 450.05 .00 500.00 481.70 .00 12,000.00 238.71 .00 3,500.00 3,919.00 .00 2,500.00 2,429.13 .00 800.00 919.20 .00 2,000.00 712.26 .00 2,500.00 1,856.88 .00 2,500.00 432.39 .00 .00 .00 .00 500.00 .00 .00 200.00 .00 .00 41.00 210.00 ---------------------------------- .00 ----------------- 27,641.00 ----------- 11,649.32 44.93 .00 149.95 75.0 .00 .00 18.30 96.3 96.04 .00 11,761.29 2.0 .00 .00 -419.00 112.0 233.16 .00 70.87 97.2 155.02 .00 -119.20 114.9 14.18 .00 1,287.74 35.6 156.72 .00 643.12 74.3 .00 .00 2,067.61 17.3 .00 .00 .00 .0 .00 .DO 500.00 .0 .00 .00 200.00 .0 .00 .00 -169.00 512.2 ------ ----------------------- 700.05 ----------------- .00 15,991.68 42.1 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Tiie: 3:16pi City of Albertville Page: 12 ------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For the Period: 10/01197 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Aiended Budget Annual Actual Carr Nth Enculb Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund:.101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 421.000 Public Safety - Police 531.200 Police Contract Services .00 62,963.00 57,487.55 5,246.88 .00 5,475.45 51.3 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Public Safety - Police .00 62,963.00 57,487.55 5,246.88 .00 5,475.45 91.3 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Tioe: 3:16pi City of Albertville Page: 13 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Asended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Enculb Annual Unenc. Balance t Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 422.000 Public Safety - Fire 510.200 Wages - Fire Chief .00 600.00 .00 .00 .00 600.00 .0 510.300 Wages - Assistant Fire Chief .00 300.00 .00 .00 .00 300.00 .0 510.400 Fireoen's Training Reivbursett .00 8,250.00 52.50 .00 .00 8,197.50 .6 510.500 Fireien's Medical Training .00 2,250.00 .00 .00 .00 2,250.00 .0 512.000 Wages - Tewporary Ealoyees .00 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 .0 524.000 Pension Fund Contributions .00 12,111.00 16,916.00 10,280.00 .00 -4,745.00 139.0 526.000 Workers Cotpensation Insurance .00 2,850.00 .00 .00 .00 2,850.00 .0 529.001 Fireien Physicalsu::MUM: .00 500.00 2,177.81 629.00 .00 -1,677.81 435.6 529.100 Training/Instruction .00 3,600.00 1,501.50 595.00 .00 2,098.50 41.7 529.200 EMT TrainingHu:::::u::MM .00 750.00 805.35 .00 .00 -55.35 107.4 529.300 First Responders Training::::: .00 1,000.00 1,525.00 .00 .00 -525.00 152.5 533.410 Audit - Fireoen's Relief Assoc .00 1,200.00 675.00 .00 .00 525.00 56.3 543.100 Repairs/Mainteance - Equip:::: .00 1,000.00 2,429.92 636.90 .00 -1,429.92 243.0 552.000 Insurance Other than Eop. Bene .00 .00 100.00 .00 .00 -100.00 .0 553.000 Telephone .00 900.00 448.23 47.73 .00 451.77 49.8 558.000 Travel .00 1,500.00 792.28 189.08 00 707.72 52.8 561.100 General Supplies .00 2,500.00 _ 1,351.24 748.36 .00 1,148.76 54.0 . 562.100 Natural Gas .00 1,400.00 1,205.46 14.50 .00 194.54 86.1 562.200 Electricity .00 900.00 658.57 60.01 .00 241.43 73.2 562.600 Gasoline and Oil .00 800.00 565.36 62.55 .00 234.64 70.7 572.000 Capital Outlay - Buildings:::: .00 25,000.00 .00 .00 .00 25,000.00 .0 574.110 C/0 - Hose:::::::::uu:u:::: .00 1,500.00 .00 .00 .00 1,500.00 .0 574.120 C/O - Turnout Gear:::::::::u: .00 2,500.00 305.50 .00 .00 2,194.50 12.2 574.130 C/O - Air Packs::uu::::::::: .00 2,600.00 1,470.00 .00 .00 1,130.00 56.5 574.140 C/O - Pagersr::::::::::::::::: .00 1,000.00 2,012.12 .00 .00 -1,012.12 201.2 574.160 C/O - Tools::::::::::::::::::: .00 1,000.00 106.68 .00 .00 893.32 10.7 574.200 Capital Outlay - Vehicles::::: .00 30,000.00 .00 .00 .00 30,000.00 .0 591.000 Dues & Subscriptions .00 200.00 169.50 .00 .00 30.50 84.8 599.000 Miscellaneous .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 ----------------- .00 .0 ------ ----------------- Public Safety - Fire ----------------- .00 ----------------- 107,271.00 ----------------- 35,268.02 ----------------- 13,263.13 .00 72,002.98 32.9 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Tipe: 3:16pi City of Albertville Page: 14 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- Ear the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Aiended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- fund: 101 General fund Expenditures Dept: 424.000 Public Safety -Bldg. Inspection 533.200 Bldg. Inspection Contract Sery .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 535.100 Contracted Services .00 .00 9,446.67 .00 .00-9,446.67 .0 ----------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- ------ Public Safety -Bldg. Inspection .00 .00 9,446.67 .00 .00 -9,446.67 .0 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT City of Albertville Date: 11/13/97 Tiie: 3:16pi Page: is ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Atended Budget Annual Actual Curr Mth Encuab Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------• --------------------------------------------------------------- .0 .,. fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 427.000 Public Safety - Aniial Control 535.100 Contracted Services .00 1,750.00 1,944 00 36.00 .00-194.00 111.1 Public Safety - Anioal Control .00 1,750.00 1,944 00 36.00 .00 -194.00 111.1 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Time: 3:16pe City of Albertville Page: 16 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Amended Budget Annual Actual Curr Mth Encumb Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 431.000 Public Works -Highways,Streets 511.000 Wages - Regular Employees .00 31,055.00 27 577,64 3,583.21 .00 3,477.36 88.8 512.000 Wages - Temporary Emloyees .00 8,320.00 5,253.88 .00 .00 3,066.12 63.1 513.000 Wages - Overtime .00 500.00 1,175.75 .00 .00 -675.75 235.2 521.000 Group Insurance .00 3,780.00 3,440.63 347.81 .00 339.37 51.0 522.000 FICA Contributions .00 3,050.00 2,511.60 274.11 .00 538.40 82.3 523.000 PERA Contributions .00 1,787.00 1,229.89 160.53 .00 557.11 68.8 526.000 Workers Compensation Insurance .00 2,471.00 .00 .00 .00 2,471.00 .0 529.000 Other Employee Benefits .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 533.900 Other Prof. Contract Services .00 9,100.00 2,539.84 466.47 .00 6,560.16 27.9 543.100 Repairs/Mainteance - Equiptt:: .00 7,000.00 2,712.47 187.01 .00 4,286.53 38.8 543.300 Repairs/Maintenace-Paved Roads .00 6,000.00 5,317.73 .00 .00 682.27 88.6 543.310 Ice Removal .00 3,000.00 1,964.72 .00 .00 1,035.28 65.5 543.320 Snow Plowing .00 5,750.00 3,672.88 .00 .00 2,077.12 63.9 543.330 Sand & Gravel .00 500.00 544.15 .00 .00 -44.15 108.8 543.340 Seal Coatinguutiuut:tout .00 8,000.00 .00 .00 .00 8,000.00 .0 543.360 Street Sweeping .00 2,500.00 2,682.83 .00 .00 -182.83 107.3 543.400 Repairs/Mainteoace-Unpaved Rds .00 6,000.00 262.50 .00 .00 5,737.50 4.4 543.500 Reapir/Maintenance - Sidewalks .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 543.600 Repairs/Maintenance-CatchBasin .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 553.000 Telephone .00 600.00 661.05 49.73 .00 -61.05 110.2 558.000 Travel .00 100.00 .00 .00 .00 100.00 .0 561.100 General Supplies .00 1,500.00 1,750.66 15.30 .00 -250.66 116.7 561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 562.100 Natural Gas .00 575.00 401.80 4.83 .00 173.20 69.9 562.200 Electricity .00 300.00 219.52 20.00 .00 80.48 73.2 562.600 Gasoline and Oil .00 1,500.00 2,1n.11 164.90 .00 -615.71 141.0 572.000 Capital Outlay - Buildingstttt .00 7,500.00 .00 .00 .00 7,500.00 .0 574.111 Tractor/loadertututuuuut .00 2,000.00 .00 .00 .00 2,000.00 .0 574.170 Street Overlaymentuuututtt .00 50,000.00 44,519.05 42,629.35 .00 5,480.95 89.0 574.180 Street Signsuuu:utuutu: .00 300.00 249.48 .00 .00 50.52 83.2 574.211 howertutuutututuutuut .00 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 .0 574.311 PickOptttttu:ttttttttz::stttt .00 3,000.00 .00 .00 .00 3,000.00 .0 574.411 Snow Plowutuutuutuuuu .00 4,000.00 .00 .00 .00 4,000.00 .0 574.511 Misc. C/O Equipmentutuuuu .00 2,500.00 686.51 .00 .00 1,813.49 27.5 551.000 Dues & Subscriptions .00 250.00 215.00 ----------------- .00 ----------------- .00 35.00 ----------------- 86.0 ------ ----------------- Public Works-Highways,Streets ----------------- .00 ----------------- 173,938.00 111,706.29 47,903.25 .00 62,231.71 64.2 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Tire: 3:16pi City of Albertville Page: 17 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Asended Budget Annual Actual Curr Nth Encuab Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 431.600 Public Works - Street lighting 562,200 Electricity .00 27,000.00 22,412.30 2,309.32 .00 4,587.70 83.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ Public Works - Street lighting .00 27,000.00 22,412.30 2,309.32 .00 4,587.70 83.0 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Tile: 3:16PI City of Albertville Page: 18 ---------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget hended Budget Annual Actual Curr Mth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 432.300 Public Yorks - Recycling 535.100 Contracted Services .00 12,345.00 9,206.48 .00 .00 3,138.S2 74.6 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Public Yorks - Recycling .00 12,345.00 5,206.48 .00 .00 3,138.52 74.6 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/77 Tile: 3:16pa City of Albertville Page: 19 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Mended Budget Annual Actual Curr Mth ERcuab Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 451.000 Parks and Recreation 511.000 Wages - Regular Elployees .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 521.000 Group Insurance .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 522.000 FICA Contributions .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 523.000 PERA Contributions .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 526.000 Workers Coipensation Insurance .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0 542.000 Refuse Disposal .00 600.00 450.00 44.94 .00 150.00 75.0 543.100 Repairs/Mainteance - Equiptttt .00 1,500.00 4,160.36 75.00 .00 -2,660.36 277.4 544.200 Equiprent Rental .00 2,500.00 1,197.58 .00 .00 1,302.42 47.9 552.000 Insurance Other than Eip. Bent .00 3,300.00 3,919.00 .00 .00 -619.00 118.8 553.0001elephone .00 700.00 463.81 82.61 .00 236.19 66.3 561.100 General Supplies .00 800.00 870.22 63.94 .00 -70.22 108.8 562.100 Natural Gas .00 1,200.00 626.98 5.50 .00 573.02 52.2 562.200 Electricity .00 2,800.00 2,149.41 196.47 .00 650.59 76.8 562.600 Gasoline and Oil .00 100.00 8.09 .00 .00 91.91 8.1 572.000 Capital Outlay - Buildingstttt .00 1,000.00 .00 .00 .00 1,000.00 .O 573.000 Capital Outlay/Non-buildingstt .00 2,000.00 2,218.43 .00 .00 -218.43 110.9 574.100 Capital Outlay-Mach/Equipttttt .00 1,000.00 274.93 .00 .00 725.07 27.5 599.000 Miscellaneous .00 3,800.00 3,854.53 1,683.69 .00 -54.53 ----------------- 101.4 ------ Parks and Recreation ---------------------------------- .00 21,300.00 ---------------------------------- 20,193.34 ----------------- 2,152.15 .00 1,106.66 94.8 REVENUE/EXPENOITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 Tice: 3:16pi City of Albertville Page: 20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget hended Budget Annual Actual Curr Mth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 455.000 Culture/Recreation 591.000 Dues & Subscriptions .00 750.00 .00 .00 .00 750.00 .0 595.000 Friendly City Days Donation .00 2,600.00 2,600.00 ----------------- .00 .00 .00 100.0 ---------------------------------- ------ Culture/Recreation ----------------- .00 ---------------------------------- 3,350.00 2,600.00 .00 .00 750.00 77.6 REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT Date: 11/13/97 lite: 3:16pi City of Albertville Page: 21 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- For the Period: 10/01/97 to 10/31/97 Original Budget Asended Budget Annual Actual. Curr Mth Encuib Annual Unenc. Balance % Bud ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fund: 101 General Fund Expenditures Dept: 490.000 Working Capital S90.000 Working Capital Reserve .00 54,380.00 .00 .DO .00 54,380.00 .0 ----------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------ ------ Working Capital .00 54,380.00 .00 .00 .00 54,380.00 .0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ----------------- ------ Expenditures _. .00 719,896.00 487,880.76 91,244.90 .00 232,015.24 67.8 CITY Or ALBERTVILLL SA FOLLOW-UP SHEET As of November 17, 1997 DATE ACTION TO BE TAKEN PERSON 05/96 WWTF Planning Eng. In process 08/96 Water Tower Lot Atty 04/97 Frankfort Drainage - Greenhaven Eng./ In process CM-1cil 07/97 Strategic Planning/Grant min/ cwmii 07/97 City Hall Roof/Siding Replacement Staff/ On Hold CbMACil 08/ 97 Employment Process Caxril In process 09/97 Transportation - Joint Road 70t:h Street CM-1di In process Improvement (Otsego) 09/97 Gravel Roads Couxii In process 09/97 Fire Hall ES Cbm• In process 09/97 Street Construction Standards Eng. In process 11/97 Computer Equipment Update/Purchase Staff/ cmx:ii 11/97 CSAH 19/37 Intersection Realignment Project Atty. In process 30 MEMORANDUM DATE: November 13, 1997 TO: City Council FROM: Council Committees & Staff SUSJ: City Department Report - October 6th to November 13 The following represents work assignments status/update: City Clerk -Treasurer Personnel Applications/Screening and Employment Process - Preliminary computer equipment review Beginning year-end processing City Administrator/Zoning Officer - CSAH 37/19 Intersection Realignment Project Final Employment Process Training Housing Maintenance Ordinance for PS Committee Public Works & Parks - Prepare Ice Rink - Park Bench Engraving - Buildings - Winter prep - Equipment setup for winter City Attorney - CSAH 19/37 Intersection Project Right -of -Way - Water tower lot title - Vetsch CUP Agreement - Developer's Agreement for Center Oaks City Engineer - WWTF Planning - CSAH 37/19 Intersection Realignment Project Final - Greenhaven Drainage Project - Developer Projects - Grading Permits - Marx/Potter/Darkenwald City Planner Developer Projects Subdivision and Sign Ordinance Amendments Center Oaks City Council CSAH 19/37 Project - final - Joint Services & Transportation Committee - Otsego & St. Michael joint issues Public Safety Committee - Work on budget 1998 for Police, Fire and Animal Control. Work on joint opportunities with neighboring communities with preparation of "futures" cost estimates that may be included in 1998 budget. Work on City ordinances that may be required. - Fire Hall & Site - Joint Shared Road Agreement - Joint Powers Ice Arena Board - set up - Personnel Employment Process - Maintenance Worker II & Administrator .sd CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #1997-54 A RESOLUTION MAKING A NEGATIVE DECLARATION ON THE NEED FOR AN ENVIR0109 NTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE CEDAR CREEK GOLF COURSE MASTER PLAN WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Albertville has approved a Response to Comments and Findings of Fact on the Cedar Creek Golf Course Master Plan Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW); and WHEREAS, the City Council has found the following: (1) The proposed development conforms to current comprehensive plans. (2) Environmental impacts are consistent with developments of this type. (3) Mitigation measures will be incorporated into the construction process. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council, of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, finds that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required for the Cedar Creek Golf Course Master Plan. FURTHER, BE IT RESOLVED, the City of Albertville makes a Negative Declaration. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 17th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Houghton, City Clerk MEYER-ROHLIN, INC. O ENGINEERS -LAND SURVEYORS 1111 Hwy. 25 N., Buffalo, Minn. 55313 Fax 612-682-9492 Phone 612-682-1781 1-800-563-1781 November 6, 1997 Mr. Garrison Hale City Administrator City of Albertville 5975 Main Avenue Northeast Albertville, MN 55301 Dear Mr. Hale: The following are the responses to the comment letters received after review of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Cedar Creek project published in the EQB Monitor September 22, 1997. Letters were received from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR), Minnesota Department of Health (MDH), and Minnesota Historical Society. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Comment: The County Ditch Authority should be listed in the "Permits and Approvals Required" section because use of County Ditch #9 as a stormwater outlet may require an outlet fee and permit. Response: The city has proposed to take over jurisdiction of the ditch within the city limits of Albertville. It is anticipated that approvals relating to the ditch would be obtained as part of the city's approval process. Comment: The assertion that the site contains no fishery resources is incorrect. Project -generated runoff must be properly pretreated and managed before it enters County Ditch #9. Response: The proposed grading and drainage plan for this project ensures that all project -generated runoff is routed into a water quality/detention pond before it is outlet into either County Ditch 99 or existing or mitigated wetland area. The fishery resources comment should be changed to read "There may be the presence of several minnow species located in County Ditch #9, however these species should not be disturbed by project -generated runoff because all runoff will be properly pretreated before it enters County Ditch #9". Comment: There is concern that relocating County Ditch #9 will reduce or eliminate existing natural resources. Development should conform as much as possible to the existing landform and natural drainages should not be altered. Response: The "relocating" of County Ditch #9 does not include altering existing runoff patterns or reducing existing drainages. While the developed condition includes routing runoff through storm sewer and water quality/detention ponds before entering County Ditch #9, there are no changes in drainage patterns of surface water runoff. Comment: A DNR Water Appropriation Permit will be required for any activity that appropriates 10,000 gal/day or 1,000,000 gal/yr. The permit numbers given in the EAW are incorrect. The correct number is 79-3116. Response: A DNR Water Appropriation Permit is in the process of being submitted. The permit will be for a golf course irrigation well. As was stated in the EAW, the well will be a backup irrigation water source as the main source will be an onsite pond associated with the drainage system. F] Thore P. Meyer, Professional Engineer Robert Rohlin, Licensed Land Surveyor Page 2 November 6, 1997 City of Albertville Comment: Detention ponds should be heavily vegetated, and maintenance and retention of natural buffer between the golf course, ponds, and residential area is recommended. It is also recommended that runoff quantity -based measures be incorporated to those areas that drain to the School Lake watershed. Response: All ponds are designed using standard, accepted shaping techniques including a bench or "buffer" which separates the ponds from surrounding land uses. The project contract will also include an item for seeding, much of which will go toward the water quality/detention ponds and mitigated wetlands. Comment: Fluctuation in discharge and runoff rates to the stormwater storage areas in the project shall be limited to lessen the negative effect on fish and invertebrates. Response: The proposed storm water drainage system acts as a regulating device for storm runoff. Discharge from water quality ponds to detention ponds occurs at a designed rate which keeps the runoff at a constant level during rainfall events. The developed condition of storm runoff, therefore, has less fluctuation than the unregulated pre -developed condition. Minnesota Department of Health Comment: Any new well proposed for the project must be installed by a licensed well contractor. The well must also be equipped with an approved backflow prevention device. Response: The proposed well, to be used as a secondary irrigation source for the golf course, will be installed by a licensed well contractor and shall include the appropriate approved backflow prevention device. Comment: There is a minimum setback distance of 50 feet between a well and any buried municipal sanitary sewer line, and 20 feet between a well and any buried storm sewer line greater than one foot in diameter. Response: The proposed utility plan for the Cedar Creek project locates the new irrigation well 55 feet from a buried sanitary sewer line and 350 feet from a buried 12" storm sewer line. Comment: All buried sewer lines must maintain a distance of ten feet from any buried watermain lines. Response: It is standard practice to maintain a separation of at least ten feet between water and sanitary sewer lines and this practice is proposed for the Cedar Creek project as well. Comment: A field well inventory is recommended to identify any existing wells and to ensure that all isolation distances from existing wells are met. Response: Existing wells are not known to exist on the project site. A survey of past land owners of the project site, as well as a visual inspection confirmed that there are no existing active, unused, or unsealed wells on the project site. Minnesota Historical Society No relevant comments were made by this agency. Page 3 November 6, 1997 City of Albertville Response to the agencies making relevant comments, the MnDNR and MDH, is made by copy of this letter. The 30-day comment period after EQB publication of the EAW expired on October 22, 1997. The next step is for the City (acting as Regulatory Government Unit) to determine if an Environmental Impact Study (EIS) is required. Please proceed with this and if you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, MEYER-ROHLIN, INC. Scott Dahlke Professional Engineer cc: Don Jensen — Pilot Land MnDNR MDH File 97139 EAW OCT-27 5�?� MID, � Minnesota Department (if Natural Rey ol-l[•cc s 500 Lafa)-c-te Rond 10 S( Paul N11i)rn_.,pt:Z 551 33--4rI Ocr0ber 21, 1997 Garrison Hale, Administrator City of Albertville 5975 Main Avenue NE Albertville, NIN 55301 RE, Cedar Creek Residential ].development and Golf Course Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Dear Mr, Hale, The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has reviewed the EAW for the Cedar Creep Residential Development and Golf Coarse project. We offer the following comments for your consideration. ] tem 8, Perni is and Approvals Required, should list the County Ditch Authority if there will be outlets into the county ditch identified in Item IS, Use. of the county ditch for storm sewer outlets may require an outlet fee and permit. In the fish and wildlife habitat discussion offered in Item Ila, assertions are offered that the site contains no fishery resources. This is incorrect. County Ditch #9 likely provides some seasonal fish habitat, especially for potential use by northertr }like during spring spawning runs and subsequent fingerling rearing. County Ditch #9 flows into County Ditch #21 and ultimately into Pelican Lake, Beebe bake, Mud Lake, Uhl Lake, and the Mississippi River; each of these basins exhibits a substantial fish community. In addition, ditches are often inhabited year-round by mudminnows, sticklebacks, various dace, minnow and shiner species. County Ditches #9 & #21 support such species and are an important comporient of the ecosystem. Ensuring that project -generated runoff is properly pretreated and managed can allow for post-proJeet habitat retend i-i in the c-ounty ditch. Given the previous discussion, we note that Item 12, physical Impaets on water Resources, states, "Minor relocation of portions of existing drainage ways within the Project area will be performed to conform with overall platting and stormwater and water quality controls." The modification or "relocation" of natural waterways implied in this statement causes concern because such activity reduces, or even eliminates, the existing natural resource functions and values (e.g., fish Habitat) that are present. Development should conform as rn�ch as possible to the existing landform to minimize the overall impacts to the ecosystem. Regarding the text in the EAW, does this mean that runoff patterns will be changed or altered, or that additional drainages will be created'? In general, natural drainages should riot be altered. Item 13, Water Appropriation, indicates that water appropriation will be required, either for ongoing course watering needs or temporarily during project construction. A DNR water appropriation permit DNR (nformation: 612-296-6157, TTY, 612.396.54•;, 1-800-657-Y).19 Garrison Hale, City Administrator October 21, 1997 will be required for any activity that results in the appropriation of 10,000 gallons of water per day, or 1,000,000 gallons per year. It should also noted that the permit numbers identified in Item 13c are incorrect and are most likely the MDH unique well ntimb:rs; the correct DNR permit number is 79- 3116. We recommend contacting Larry Kramka, Area i4ydrologist, at (320) 255-2984 for information regarding potential permit requirements. Regarding stormwater runoff management issues addressed in Iterit 18, we commend the proposer for considcring stormwater management beyond a "standard" water duality treatment perspective, The proposed detention ieasures will also address water runoff quantity issues as well, which we enthusiastically support for not only the County Ditch sysizi-i but also from the floodplain management perspective. To further limit the project's consequences, we recommend incorporating ntnoff quantity - based measures to those areas that drain to the School Labe watershed. Also regarding stormwater management, the retention ponds should be heavily vegetated to improve their ability to take up excess nutrients, particularly phosphorus, which would ttonnally be taken up by craps and fringe wetland vegetation stands.. Additional measures include maintenance of vegetated buffers between the golf course and ponds and County Ditch #9, R,=ntion of enough natural buffer along County Ditch #9 within the golf course and residential development will also retain sore residual upland habitat far wildlife species such as shore birds, songbirds, and saint waterfowl, forbearers, amphibians, and insects beneficial to the local ecosystem. In regulating stormwater quantities, attention should be paid to discharge rates because as the amounE of runoff increases, there are implications on fish and invertebrate natural history. Severe fluctuations in flows, regardless of local watershed size, will cause weak year classes of fish and invertebrates. This can have a "rippling"effect throughout the food chain and. ecosystem. Assessment of adequate storage for the project should include consideration of this factor, We offer the following comments to clarify or enhance information contained in the EAW and require no response. Golf course turf management often involves the use of various chemical agents, including fertilizers, herbicides, and pesticides. Spills or other situations, often unintentional, can result in delivery of these agents to natural watercourses or wastewater treatment facilities. We rccomtnend development of a contingency plan for these types of events so that golf course personnel have a clearly identified path of action available to limit potential human health and natuftLl resource impacts. Regarding proaeet-relate d habitat losses, we recommend incorporation of landscape design features considered "friendly" to wildlife, which is best achieved by retaining and protecting natural features found at the site. Thank you for the opportunity to review this project, We duo not recommend preparation of an environmental impact statement (EIS) based upon natural rE:source considerations. We look forward to receiving your record of decision and responses to coaunerrts. 14iinnesota'Rules part 4410.1700, subparts 4 & 5, require you to send us your Record of Decision within five days of deciding this 2 Garrison Hale, City Administrator October 21, 1997 action. Please contact Bill Johnson of my staff at (612) 2.96-9229 if you have questions regarding this letter, sincerely, Thomas W. Balcorn, Supervisor Nawral Resources ;environmental Review Section Office of Plaaning c, Bob )fiance Cori Christianson Bret Anderson Larry Krarnka, Area Hydrologist Lynn M. Lewis, USF" WS Gregg Downing, EQB Donald Jensen, Pilot band Development #98(70484-Q i C EDAR.Wp6 3 .. .. �A i l ,ti.s 1- 1-1 1 v UFF W-BERTH ILLE .21a - x Minnesota Department of Health 121 East Seventh dace P.O. Box 64975 St. Paul, MN 55164-0975 October 21, 1997 Mr. Oarrison hale City Administrator 5975 Main Avenue Northeast Albertville, Minnesota 55301 I7ear Mr. Bale: Mituiesota Department of Health (MDH) staff have rcvicyved the revised Environinental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Ccdar Creek golf course and residential development, Wright County, Minnesota. We understand that the proposed project is a golf course, clubhouse, and a residential development with towrlhorne units and single-family residential lots. Regttired concomitant development includes streets, stormwater and erosion controls. and utilities including water and sewage disposal. 1, 2. Any new well must be installed by a licensed well contractor and meet all other requirements of Minnesota Rules, Chapter 4725 (rules regulating Wells and Borings, also terfned the Well Code). The Well Code requires that all ,Avlls be protected from possible backflow or back - siphoning of a contaminant into the well. To prevent this, irrigation wells must have an approved- backflow prevention device if the well Nvill be used for application of agrictltural chemicals (chemigation). No cross -connection is allowed between an irrigation well and it water supply well unless an approved backflow prevention device is maintained on the system. If any well, including an irrigation well, will be used to fill a tattle for txti, ing of an agricultural chemical (e.g. a pesticide), the well must either be protected with a backflow prevention device or maintain as air gap or wparation of at least twice the pipe diameter. For further information.. please contact Ronald 'Thompson at 612/215-0831, Mr. Garrison Halc October 21, 1997 Paige 2 3. Minnesota Statutes, section 103I,205 prohibits the placement of buried sewers, or ally other regulated source of contamination. an I closer to an existing water supply `yell (active or tuiu;ed, unsealed) than the distances prescribed by the Well Code. 'File Well Code specifies the following setback distances between water supply v4ells and buried sewers, including building drains cotulected to the building sewer: 50 feet: A minirnt►,.m setback distance of at least 50 feet must be maintained between a well and a buried sewer if the sewer: a. is a collector or municipal sewer; b. is pressurized and serves more than a single-family residence; c, is open -jointed; or d, is constructed of materials that do not ineet the material, installation) and testing requirements in the Minnesota. plumbing Code. 20 feet: The 50-foot separation distance may be reduced to 20 feet if the sower meets the material, installation and testing requirements in the Minnesota Phunbing Codc, AND it is: a. it buried, gravity sewer that serves a single -fancily residence or a single facility Stich as a business, church, school, or single commercial property. (This does not include collectors or municipal sewers); or b. a buried, pressurized sewer that serves a single-falnily residence. 4. The Well Code specifies that the setback distaiwe betwccn water supply wells and stormwater pipes or conduits must be 20 feet if the pipe is 12 inches in diameter 4r greater; there is no setback distance requirernefrt if the pipe is less than 12 inches in diameter. if the pipe carries sewage or sewage can back up hi the pipe, the piping is considered a sewer, not a stormwater drain. 5. please mote that the ivlinnesota Phunbing Code requires that a buried sewer or drain be located at least 10 feet from a buried water service line, or if this distance cannot be maintained, the installation and materials must comply ,vitll Minnesota Rules Chapter 4715.1710, subp. 2 (Minnesota Plumbing Code). Questions should be directed to the local plumbing administrative authority or the state plumbing regulation program at 6121215-0336. Z6t,d `Ni-1H0N-NaA3W si,= ei nHl L6-£S-^ON ... Mr. Garrison Hale October 21, 1997 Page 3 6. To ensure that the isolation distances will be inet, we recommend that a field well inventory be performed to actively determine in advance the locations of all existing water supply WC11s (active or Unused, unsealed), especially any wells along the romcs of the new sewer lines or any sewer lines to be replaced, as well as along the routes of any large diameter stonnwater pipes. PaiiicuIar attention should be made in the arcas Shown on air photos, old Wraps, etc. where any farinsteads hax.re been located on this property, as well as along property boondaxies where wells on adjacent properties inay still exist. Once a well is sealed by a licensed well contractor in accordance with requirements of the Well Code, the isolation distance is no Ionger an issue. Thank you for the opportttrtity to review this EAW. If you have questions or need further hifonnation, please contact Betty Wheeler at 612/215-080 7. Division of Environmental Health UWW:BJW:sig cc: James Nye Ronald Thompson Betty Wheeler Cutrtis Wunderlich MINNE4.O'. A IIISTOiiIC,.Af, SOCIETY STATE HISTORIC 1IRLSERVATIOV OFFICE October 15, 1997 City of Albertville Attn: Garrison Hale City Administrator 5975 Maim Avenue NE Albertville, MN 55301 Re: Cedar Creek GoifcoUrse & Clubhouse Albertville, Wright County SHPO Number: 97-4133 Dear Mr. Hale: Thank you for providing this office with a copy of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the above -referenced project. It has been reviewed pursuant to responsibilities given to the Minnesota Histo6call Society by the Minnesota Historic Sitar Act and tho Minnesota Field Archaeology Act and through the process outlined in Minnesota Mules 4410.1600. There are no properties listed on the In tareathatrviilbe affect dythis project tional he rState Registers btodc Places, and no known . Therefore, nn our suspected archaeological properties opinion, the "no" response to question 26a is appropriate. rurther, pursuant to the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and 36CFR800, Procedures of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, we conclude that there are no properties 1tSted on or eligible for Ilsting on the National Register of Historic Places within the area of potential effect for the project. Please contact Dennis Gimtnestad at 612-296-5462 if you have any questions regarding our review of this project. Si cerely, Britta L. Bloomberg Deputy State tdistoho Preservation Officer 8e •d z6y6 Ze9 ZT9 'ONI 'NIIH0N-N3AaW eS: eT nHl L6-2T-^0N IqL, September 17, 1997 Garrison Hale City Administrator 5975 Main Ave SE iUbertville MN 55301 RE: Environmeritat Assessment Worksheet (EA,W) for Cedar Creek Residential Golf Course Development Dear Mr. ,Hale. This letter acknowledges that we have received the EAW for the above -named project. We would also like to remind you that according to the Environmental Review Program rules (at Minnesota Rules, part 4410.1500, item B), your agency is required to notify the public that the EANY is available by submitting a press release to at least one newspaper of general circulation within the project's area, and that you send copies of the E,AW to all points on the.EQB distribution list. We presume that these requirements have been met. Notice of the EAW availability will be published in the EQBMO?titor on September 22, 1997. The 30-day corhment period will begin on that day and will expire on October 22, 1997. Pursuant to Minnesota Rules, part 4410,3100, subpart 1, no final governmental decision to grant a permit, approve the project, or begin the project may be made until a negative declaration or EIS adequacy determination has been made. Please contact me if any questions arise about the Environmental Review process. My phone number is (612) 296-8253, or you may :all toll -free by dialing 1-800-657-3794. Sincerely, �4 Gregg Downing Environmental Review Coordinator � y'- • — � i y vi o� > • OU � 5�. � � � � fC RS ca � -' 0-0-0 0 U blO73 O O • Oy O U O .c O a-' U • � Y d O b4 {� E .— f0 O d W U =_ N :3 tz O cV .� (W z Q- E o Cl- bO > _ � ao >, s W � �s-1>�w� °� Q E -n W rl c¢ S � = G. O W Q O � 4-1 LL QG d cs vs W ca,E E4-0 ., p 3 o y La., E w i o 0 s o 4, �i U U � U .s � '� sue•' i N .� '� :s E WLLU W V� w X co OC CL CL L. O L. cc co U 0 W W W = 2= O w E d p CG �- CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COUNTY OF WR I OU STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #1997-55 RESOLUTION ORDERING IMPROVEMENT AND ORDERING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council held a public hearing on November 17, 1997, to consider the following proposed improvement: The extension_of..sanitary sewer and municipal water service to the northeast quadrant of the City (known as the Northeast Sanitary Sewer & Water Main Extension Project); NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is hereby approved and ordered. 2. The City Engineer is hereby requested to prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Houghton, City Clerk e 597 a in us .E P.O. Box! Albertville, MN 5530. (612) 497-338, Fax: (612) 497-32l( FAX TRANSMISSION COVER SHEET TO (NAME) : A- f� ORGANIZATION: FROM: DATE: _ ��— / L� — Gj 7 SUBJECT: p4t� ' 9 �6'C AJC) GL�� Pages to follow including cover sheet COMMENTS: 0 If you do not receive all of the pages, please call us. PLAMING & ZONING COMISSION November 10, 1997 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM Commissioners PRESENT: ChairHoward and Larson, Carolyn Robertus, Zoning Brown, Donatus Administrator Garrison Hale and City Planner Liz Stockman Chair Larson convened the regular meeting at 7:10 PM. Moved by Robertus, supported by Brown, to adopt the agenda with an amendment adding under New Business Item 5e - Franklin Sing - Right of Way and Item 5f - Country Antique CUP. All voted aye. Moved by Vetsch, supported by Brown, to approve the minutes of the October 14, 1997, minutes as amended. All voted aye. Chair Larson opened the continued public hearing on the Albertville Sign Ordinance at 7:12 PM. Planner Stockman opened discussion on billboards with .(1) spacing, damage/reconstruction; and billboards of record will be considered after ten years (2008) as principal uses. Today they are not principal use. City Attorney Couri reviewed federal/state laws as it relates billboard signage. Keith Franklin of Albertville addressed the issue. Concern focuses on the concept of "eliminate" billboards. ut Franklin pal not aware of complaints and is not happy Further he stated the employees and businesses using the signs are spending money in the community. The issue._ of billboards came up as a subject in 1994. Interpretation of ordinance equaled "accessory use" or "adjacent areas" as confirmed by former Mayor Potter. Franklin supports billboards on freeway corridor in commercial/industrial use zoning areas. Supports spacing change from 500 to 1,000 feet. Commissioner Robertus questioned of Franklin why "Acts of God" are discriminatory. City Attorney Couri said it would not be discriminatory. Mr. Franklin explained CUP not easy to get nor are there any guarantees on PUD zoning. Ask to eliminate principal uses. Further dishe leavesnMr thFiranklinr. rlquestioningg enforcement the yof t due to ordinance concept of "mandatory removal". Chair Larson asked for expenses of signs. Attorney Couri stated we had legal costs. Commissioner Brown feels "fees" belong to the City Council. Further he wants to know what the public thinks. Larson asked the audience for input. By a show of hands, most people lived in Albertville, most worked for Franklin Sign. Mr. Franklin Sr. asked why the City is trying to choke out billboards. Judy Roden was concerned about property owners rights to change vendors with final year established. Mike Couri stated landowners need clauses in leases to permit the vendor to work with them (options) when development may occur. Keith Franklin followed up on spacing and said it is not good business to put $15 , 000 to $30 , 000 in a sign with a short time line to recoup investment. Bonnie Hiedelberger from Highland Bank stated. it enhances business. Mr. Franklin stated Pat's 66 supported signage. Pete Merges stated principal use would stop him from building a garage. He presently has a house and barn. Mike Couri discussed ordinance on non-conformance. Commissioner Vetsch inquired of Franklin Outdoor what is a standard spacing. 500 feet majority, some at 750 feet and a few at 1,000 feet. Rogers is 1,000 (Zoning Administrator Hale disagrees). Question to Mike Couri as .who determines 50% damage --Building Inspection/City Council. Chair Larson asked why we are spending time on the sign ordinance. Commissioner Brown feels time and money premature when complaints and concerns not present. Jim Brown feels why address a question that has no support. Councilmember Vetsch discussed raising rates on billboards. Commissioner Brown rediscussed 1,000 foot spacing. Chair Larson inquired of former Mayor Potter what he remembers from 1994. Councilmember Berning inquired of restricted area south of CSAH #37. Chair Larson requested why the sign ordinance became an expensive, large issue. What is the outcome. Why? Councilmembers, City Attorney offered up reasons for the billboard issue and by holding a public hearing clarify the issues. Councilmember Gundersen explained the Council wanted to review the ordinance. Chair Larson closed the public hearing at 8:28 PM. Commissioner Robertus wants less signs and a principal use. Brown supports 1000 feet delete agricultural. Larson concurs if sign is destroyed. Vetsch supports one principal use on property. Bauer supports 1000 foot and principal. use. Moved by Robertus, (no second) to accept draft ordinance as stated. Moved by Brown, supported by Bauer, to recommend Ordinance #1997-16 with 1,000 feet existing and future, strike all other changes and strike agricultural. Ayes 3 Bauer, Brown and Larson; Nays Vetsch and Robertus. Motion carried. Chair Larson opened discussion on Franklin Sign Right of Way. Zoning Administrator Hale and Planner Stockman discussed the City Council request for the Planning Commission to determine snowmobile trail easement requirements of Keith Franklin. Stockman discuses snowmobile trails widths. Moved by Brown, supported by Bauer, to recommend no action on the snowmobile width and to authorize that no snowmobile trail easement be included in Keith Franklin's land purchase from the City. All voted aye. Moved by Robertus, supported by Vetsch, to order public hearing to consider Ordinance Amending Section A-600.8 and A- 600.15 of the Albertville Subdivision Ordinance by Changing the Park Dedication Fee and Percent Land Dedication Fee, Requiring the Construction of Trails by Developers and Setting Forth Guidelines for Park and Trail Design" on December 9, 1997. Chair Larson opened the public hearing on rezone the Cedar Creek Golf Course Master Plan from R-lA to PUD at 8:55 PM. Don heen omastert Land was plan and present ne d tdiscuss approval of o of tcontinue with the rezoning process. Commissioners inquired of Jensen and Planner Stockman on sureties for building the course. Chair Larson closed the public hearing at 8:59 PM. Moved by Robertus, supported by Brown, to approve the Findings of Fact and Recommendation dated November 10, 1997, as prepared by ing NAC, Inc. andto UD for theend CedareCity Council approve hCreek Golf Course Master Plan. All from R-lA to P voted aye. Chair Larson opened the continued public hearing on Zoning Ordinance (1988-12) at 9:06 PM. Planner Stockman continued the reviewal line by line. Discussion was held on how to enforce ordinances. Commissioner Vetsch concerned about over -regulating. Commissioner Brown told the Commission set the ordinances how you want it. City Council assist staff and staff must perform. Moved by Brown, supported by Robertus, to recommend City Council approval of the amendment of the Zoning Ordinance (1988-12) Relating to Minimum Garage Sizes, Screening, Landscaping, able Open Yards, Structure Placement Above High Water Elevations, Space, Building Construction Standards, Parking Standards and PUD Regulations as amended. All voted aye. Chair Larson continued the public hearing on "An Ordinance Amending the Albertville Subdivision Ordinance Relating to Drainage Course Elevations, Buffer Yard Requirements, Tree Irregular Planting Lots, Cul-de-Sac Streets, Protected Ares, and Certification" to December 9, 1997, at 7:00 PM. Chair Larson continued the public hearing on the CUP request for outside storage for International Country Antiques to December 9, 1997, at 7:00 PM. Commissioner Brown informed the Commission that either this matter gets acted upon or denied. Zoning Administrator Hale refreshed everyone that this item was being held up due to the processing of a site/building plan addition to the International Country Antique facility and with a resolution at the December meeting. Zoning Administrator Hale reviewed all "General Information". Moved by Bauer, supported by Brown, to adjourn at 10:46 PM. All voted aye. Howard Larson, Chair Garrison Hale, Zoning Admin. Planning Commission recommended re 9 con(1--l/-)97 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Fact & Decision Applicant's Name: Request: Rezoning of the property from R-1 A, Low Density Single Family Residential to Planned Unit Development . City Council Meeting Date: 17 November 1997 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and decision: ------ - ___ 1. The legal description of the subject property is as follows: (see attached) 2. The masterplan for the planned unit development was approved on 6 October 1997 and the applicant has applied for development stage (preliminary plat) and final stage (final plat) approval for the first phase. 3. The requirements of Section 2700 (Planned Unit Development) of the City Zoning Ordinance have been met. 4. On 10 November 1997 the Albertville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the applicant's request, preceded by a published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that the City Council approve the project. Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for r has been approved based on the most current plans and information received to date. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 17th day of November 1997. City of Albertville By: Mark Olsen, Mayor Attest: Linda Houghton, City Clerk PC: Don Jensen, Gary Hale, Linda Houghton, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson a A CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS TO THE ALBERTVILLE SIGN ORDINANCE (1987-3) RELATING TO BILLBOARDS AND APPROVED AS ORDINANCE NUMBER 1997- SECTION 8 (1)(a): A clarification was made to definitively state that billboards shall only be allowed within 100 feet (adjacent area as defined in this Chapter) on either side of 1-94 except that no billboards shall be allowed south of CSAH 37 and west of the 1-94/CSAH 37 interchange. SECTION 8 (1)(b): The distance required between billboard structures erected in the City has been changed from 500 feet to 1000 feet. Such distance shall be measured on the same side of the highway facing traffic proceeding in the same direction. - SECTION 8 (2)(a): A billboard can no longer be constructed on agriculturally zoned land. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING ITS PASSAGE AND PUBLICATION. Approved by the Albertville City Council this 17th day of November 1997. In ATTEST: CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Mayor Mark Olsen Linda Houghton, City Clerk pc: Gary Hale Linda Houghton Mike Couri Pete Carlson Recommended by Planning Commission on 11-10-97 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 1997 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLE SIGN ORDINANCE (1987-3) RELATING TO BILLBOARDS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. SECTION 8 OF THE SIGN ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: Section 8 Permitted Advertisina Devices: Conformance With Regulations Area Number and Height Restrictions. Subd. 1. General Standards. Advertising devices shall comply with the standards in this section. a (1 } The maximum area of an advertising device face, whether a single advertising device face or each face of two back-to-back or V-type advertising devices, shall not exceed seven hundred twenty (720) square feet, including border and trim, but excluding base and apron supports and other structural members, and provided further that the maximum allowable extensions shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the total advertising device area. The maximum size limitation station in this subdivision shall apply to each side of an advertising device structure and advertising devices may be placed back-to-back, or in a V-type construction (provided the angle shall not exceed ninety (90) degrees), but not more than two displays to each facing and such advertising device shall be considered as one advertising device. (2) Advertising devices shall not be erected or maintained which are not effectively shielded so as to prevent beams or rays of light from being directed at any portion of the traveled way of an interstate highway, of such intensity or brilliance as to cause glare or impair the vision of the operator of any motor vehicle; or which otherwise interferes with any driver's operation of a motor vehicle are prohibited. (3) Outdoor advertising devices shall not be erected or maintained which shall be so illuminated that they interfere with the effectiveness of or obscure any official traffic sign, device or signal. (b) No advertising device shall be erected closer to any other such advertising device on the same side of the same interstate. highway facing traffic proceeding in the same direction than five -i tindred (5e6} one thousand,(1-000) feet on any interstate highway. (c) All advertising devices shall comply with the minimum setback requirements provided in the Zoning Ordinance. (d) The maximum height of any advertising device shall be thirty (30) feet from the ground. (e) The maximum length of any advertising device shall be sixty (60) feet in length. Subd. 2. Other Requirements. No advertising device shall be erected or maintained in the City in any area other than an adjacent area-( i0obfeet} o Internstafe Highway 94, and except in compliance with the applicable requirements of this Ordinance. (a) No advertising device shall be erected or maintained on any lot or parcel of land unless the lot or parcel of land is within the area zoned as agrietiltural; commercial or industrial districts under the City of Albertville Zoning Ordinance. (b) No advertising device shall be erected or maintained in that part of the City which lies south of County State Aid Highway No. 37 and west of the bridge over Interstate Highway No. 94 (202 Bridge). (c) The provisions of this section relating to permits and fees shall apply to advertising devices legally existing on the effective date of this Ordinance as well as devices that may be erected and maintained thereafter. (d) There shall be submitted, together with the fee for the annual renewal, a statement by the applicant that the owner or occupant of the property has consented to the continued use of his property for such advertising device, and adequate proof of such consent'?shall be submitted to the City at the time application is made for a permit or renewal. (e) Advertising device permits may be assigned. The City Clerk shall be notified in writing by the assignor of any assignment of an advertising device permit. (f) The City Council may revoke any permit granted herein after a hearing for violation of the provisions of this Ordinance, or applicable laws and regulations of the United States or the State of Minnesota, upon thirty (30) days written notice of such hearing to the permittee. The City Council, within ten (10) days after conclusion of the hearing, shall notify the permittee of its decision, and may, where appropriate, notify the permittee what he can do to retain the permit and the permittee shall in those instances have thirty (30) days therefrom in which to comply with the requirements of the City Council, if compliance would bring the advertising device Sign Ordinance Amendment - 2 into lawful conformity with this Ordinance. (g) Advertising devices erected or maintained after the effective date of this Ordinance not complying with the regulations hereof may be removed by the City upon sixty (60) days prior written notice by certified or registered mail to the owner thereof and to the owner of the real property on which such advertising device is located, provided that no notice shall be required to be given to the owner of an advertising device whose name is not stated upon the advertising device or the structure on which it is displayed, unless the name of such owner is otherwise reasonably known to the City Clerk. The period of such notice shall be computed from the date of mailing. Subd. 3. Permit Identification Number. Every permit issued by the City shall be assigned an identification number. The City shall also issue with each permit an identifying number which shall be attached to the advertising device in a conspicuous place by the permittee. The permittee shall also have his name plainly marked on each advertising device. Subd. 4. Prohibited Devices. The following advertising devices are specifically prohibited by this Ordinance: (a) Which purports to be or resembles an official traffic control device, sign or signal, or railroad sign or signal; or which hides from view or interferes in any material degree with the effectiveness of any traffic control device, sign or signal, or railroad sign or signal, or which obstructs or interferes with the driver's view of approaching, merging, or intersecting traffic for a distance not to exceed five hundred (500) feet. (b) Which predominantly displays the word "stop" or "danger". (c) On private land without the consent of the owner or occupant thereof. (d) On trees, shrubs, or which are painted or drawn upon rocks or natural features, or on public utility poles. (e) Which has distracting flashing or moving lights so designed or lighted as to be a traffic hazard. (f) Which are structurally unsafe, in disrepair, or are abandoned. (g) Painted directly on building walls. (h) Located or maintained on land outside of adjacent area. Subd. 5. Non -Conforming Advertising Devices (a) The following are non -conforming advertising devices: Sign Ordinance Amendment - 3 (1) Devices prohibited by Section 8, Subd. 4. (2) All other devices not prohibited that do not conform to the provisions of this Ordinance. (b) A non -conforming advertising device may not be: (1) Structurally altered except to bring into compliance with the provisions of this Ordinance. (2) Expanded. (3) Re-established after its removal for thirty (30) days. (4) Re-established after damage of more than fifty percent (50%) of advertising device replacement cost except to bring into compliance. (c) All non -conforming and prohibited advertising devices shall be removed or brought into conformity with this Ordinance after notification in writing within the following time periods: (1). Advertising device prohibited by Section 8, Subd. 4 of this Ordinance: Thirty (30) days (2) For all other non -conforming advertising devices: Ten (10) years SECTION 2. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING ITS PASSAGE AND PUBLICATION. Approved by the Albertville City Council this 17th day of November 1997. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Mayor Mark Olsen ATTEST: Linda Houghton, City Clerk pc: Gary Hale, Linda Houghton, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson Sign Ordinance Amendment - 4 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA SUMMARY OF AMENDMENTS TO THE ALBERTVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE (1988-12) APPROVED AS ORDINANCE NUMBER 1997- SECTION 1000.4(b) ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, USES AND EQUIPMENT: 1. No accessory use, building, structure or equipment shall be allowed within a required front yard, except by Conditional Use Permit. 2. Minimum garage size of 480 square feet, maximum size of 900 square feet. 3. No building permit shall be issued for more than one (1) detached or attached private garage for each single family dwelling or for one or more lots under common ownership, except by conditional use permit. SECTION 1000.7 REQUIRED FENCING, SCREENING, AND LANDSCAPING: 4. For business or industrial uses, required screening fence shall be constructed of masonry (eg: brick, stone, decorative concrete block, interlocking or mortarless concrete wall systems) wood or metal. Chain link fences with privacy slats shall not be permitted within residential or commercial zoning districts to meet the requirements for screening. 5. All lots in the City must be seeded or sodded within 30 days following building occupancy. The front and side yards (and/or any other yard which abuts a public street) of all residential lots shall be sodded. Rear yards which do not abut a street may be seeded and mulched. Escrow money is required for seeding or sodding not done within 30 days to be returned upon completion of the work. 6. Tree planting requirements have been established In addition to required ground cover specified above and exclusive of required buffering or screening. Residential properties containing four (4) dwelling units or less: All new residential subdivisions, semi- public and all income producing property uses (excluding property containing four (4) dwelling units or less): One (1) shade tree or evergreen tree per lot One (1) shade tree or evergreen tree per residential unit and per non-residential lot and Sixteen (16) ornamental trees or shrubs shall be provided per street side of non- residential lots Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 1 7. The following plants have been added to the list of recommended landscaping species: Ground Juniper, Periwinkle (myrtle), Dwarf -winged Euonymus, Winged Euonymus, Privet, Mock Orange, Sumac, Common Lilac, Japanese yew, American arborvitae, Amur Maple, Red Maple, White Ash, Crabapple, Mountain Ash, Black Hills Spruce, Colorado Blue and Green Spruce, Austrian Pine, White Pine, Fir 8. Double frontage residential lots shall have an additional depth of at least twenty (20) feet in order to allow space for buffering/screen planting along the back lot line. Except as may be approved by the City Council and except for lots of record, preliminary platted lots, and residential Planned Unit Development concepts having legal standing on November 1, 1997, for those lots which abut arterial or major collector streets, the following minimum lot depths shall be required. R-1 A, R-2, R-4, R-5, R-6, R-7 170 feet R-1, R-3, R-8 159 feet 9. Lot Width Requirements. Except as may be approved by the City Council and except for lots of record, preliminary platted lots, and residential Planned Unit Development concepts having legal standing on November 1, 1997, lots which border major collector or arterial streets on a side yard shall be increased at least ten (10) feet in required minimum lot width for the purpose of establishing buffers along the lot line bordering such streets. 10. Maintenance of the buffer strip planting and/or fence shall be the responsibility of the individual property owners or, if applicable, the homeowners association. All repairs to the fence or wall and all replacement of landscape materials or plantings shall be consistent with the original approved screening design. 11. Design Standards. All plantings within designated buffer yards shall adhere to the following: (a) Plant material centers shall not be located closer than three (3) feet from the fence line or property line, (b) Landscape screening shall be planted in two (2) or more rows unless otherwise approved by the City Council, (c) Where massing of plants or screening is intended plant spacing shall be specific to the species chosen to provide screening to a height of six (6) feet in compliance with Section 1000.7 of this Chapter. The American Standard for Nursery Stock published by the American Association of Nurserymen shall be used as the reference for spacing guidelines as needed. SECTION 1000.9 DRAINAGE PLANS: 12. High Water Elevation. No structure, except docks and retaining walls shall be placed at an elevation such that the lowest floor, including basement floor, is less than two (2) feet above the highest known surface water level or ordinary high water level, or less than one Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 2 (1) foot above the 100-year flood level, if determined, of any adjacent lake, pond, stream, watercourse or wetland. If sufficient data on known high water levels is not available, the elevation of the line of permanent aquatic vegetation shall be used as the estimated high water elevation. When fill is required to meet this elevation, the fill shall be allowed to stabilize and construction shall not begin until the property has been inspected by the Building Inspector. SECTION 1100.2 USABLE OPEN SPACE 13. Except as may be approved by the City Council and except for lots of record, preliminary platted lots, and residential Planned Unit Development concepts having legal standing on November 1, 1997, lots in all zoning districts of the City must contain usable/buildable upland equal to at least eighty (80) percent of the required minimum lot areas. The required upland area shall not contain wetlands, streams, ponds, or any other non - buildable terrain. Lots which involve wetland mitigation practices shall be evaluated for conformance with this requirement based on wetland mitigation plans indicating areas of wetland filling or dredging.:' 14. In addition to the setbacks required for principle and/or accessory structures under individual zoning districts of the City or in other sections of this Chapter, all structures must be setback a minimum of twenty (20) feet from the ordinary high water level or elevation of the line of permanent aquatic vegetation (whichever is greater) of wetlands, ponds, or drainageways. SECTION 1100.4 BUILDING TYPE AND CONSTRUCTION 15. A wall area calculation has been established: For purposes of calculating exterior building material requirements, the total wall area of structures shall be calculated by taking the total solid surface area. The solid surface area shall encompass all exterior surfaces including any portion of overhead garage doors without windows but excluding all other windows and doors. 16. Business Districts. In business districts, any exposed metal or fiberglass finish on all buildings shall be limited to no more than fifty (50) percent of the total solid surface area of all walls. For building walls which face public rights -of -way or abut residential uses, an exposed metal or fiberglass finish shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the wall area. Any metal finish utilized in the building shall be a minimum of twenty-six (2.6) gauge steel. All sides of the principal and accessory structures are to have essentially the same or coordinated, harmonious exterior finish materials and treatment. 17. Industrial Districts. In industrial districts, all buildings constructed of curtain wall panels or finished steel, aluminum or fiberglass shall be required to be faced with brick, wood, stone, architectural concrete cast in place or pre -cast concrete panels on all wall surfaces. The required wall surface treatment may allow a maximum of seventy-five (75) percent of Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 3 the metal or fiberglass wall to remain exposed if it is coordinated into the architectural design. For building walls which face public rights -of -way or abut residential uses, the building material requirements of subsection (e) shall apply. SECTION 1200.4(h)(17) REQUIRED SCREENING AND LANDSCAPING: 18. Non -Residential Uses. All open, non-residential off-street parking areas of five (5) or more spaces shall be screened and landscaped from abutting or surrounding residential districts and from adjacent public streets in compliance with Section 1000.7 of this Chapter except that the height of the screening or landscaping shall be four (4) feet. Grass plantings or landscaping shall be provided in all areas bordering the parking area not occupied by screening materials or other landscape amenities. 19. Residential Uses. All open, off-street parking areas of five (5) or more spaces shall be screened and landscaped from adjacent public streets in compliance with Section 1000.7 of this Chapter except that the height of the screening or landscaping shall be four (4) feet. Grass plantings or landscaping shall be provided in all areas bordering the parking area not occupied by screening materials or other landscape amenities. SECTION 1200.9 NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 20. The following parking requirements have been added: Banquet, Reception, Conference or Meeting Facilities. One (1) space per three (3) persons [based on the maximum capacity] when associated with and housed within hotels, motels, golf or country clubs, and restaurants. Golf Course. Six (6) spaces for each golf hole, plus one (1) space for each golf related employee (golf/assistant pro, pro shop cashier, club storage attendants, locker room attendants, caddies, maintenance crews, etc) on maximum shift, plus seventy-five (75) percent of the spaces otherwise required for restaurant/bar areas, office areas, banquet facilities and other accessory uses. Golf Driving Range. One and one-half (1'h) spaces for each tee area (if individual tees are not marked, the maximum number of persons which may swing at the driving range at full capacity). SECTION 2700.2 General Requirements and Standards for Planned Unit Development's 21. Clauses were added which allow the City Council to modify density and setback requirements within Planned Unit Development's as are appropriate to individual or site circumstances. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 4 THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECTIVE ON APRIL 1, 1998 FOLLOWING ITS PASSAGE AND PUBLICATION. Approved by the Albertville City Council this 17th day of November 1997. ATTEST: M CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Mayor Mark Olsen Linda Houghton, City Clerk pc: Gary Hale Linda Houghton Mike Couri Pete Carlson Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 5 Recommended by Planning Commission on 11-10-97 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 1997 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE (1988-12) RELATING TO MINIMUM GARAGE SIZE, SCREENING, LANDSCAPING, BUFFER YARDS, STRUCTURE PLACEMENT ABOVE HIGH WATER ELEVATIONS, USABLE OPEN SPACE, BUILDING CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, PARKING STANDARDS, AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. SECTION 1000.4(b) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (b) Single family detached uses: (1) No accessory use, building, structure or equipment shall be allowed within a required front yard, except by Conditional Use'' -Permit. With the exeepti ri of et garage, me (2) No accessory building, structure, and/or detached garage for a single family dwelling shall occupy more than twenty-five (25) percent of the area of the side ar_rear yard. (3) The total floor area of either an attached garage or a detached garage for a single family detached dwelling shall not be Tess than fpr_hunirec# eighty, (480) square #eet shall not exceed nixie ftuncired `(9Q0) square feet of floor area and shall not exceed the ground coverage of the dwelling, except by conditional use permit. (4) No building permit shall be issued for more than one (1) detached or attached private garage for each single family dwelling, nor will building permit ,Wu be issued fo[ more than one (1) detached garage or accessory buiid'irig on ane or more lets Under cgmmor ownership, except by conditional use permit. (5) No accessory detached building for a single family dwelling shall occupy more than one hundred fifty (150) square feet when accompanied by an attached garage on the same lot nor shall the combined total floor area of an accessory detached building and/or attached garage exceed nine hundred(900) square feet except as each standard may be modified by conditional use permit. A further exception to the r� Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 1 (6) No building permit shall be issued for the construction of an accessory building for a single family dwelling when an existing detached garage is located on the same lot, except by conditional use permit. (7) No permit shall be issued for the construction of more than one accessory building and/or structure, except by conditional use permit. (8) Accessory buildings may encroach into the required side and rear yard setbacks within the rear yard of a lot, except, however, that no such encroachment may occur on required easement, or in a required side yard setback abutting a street in the case of a corner lot. In no case shall the setback be less than ten (10) feet. SECTION 2. SECTION 1000.7 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (a) Fencing and Screening_ (1) Businesa.orindustriai Uses:' Where any business or industrial use (i.e., structure, parking or storage) abuts property zoned for residential use, that business or industry shall provide screening along the boundary of the residential property. Screening shall also be provided where a business or industry is across the street from a residential zone, but not on that side of a business or industry considered to be the front (as defined by this Chapter). (2) All fencing and screening specifically required by this Chapter shall be subject to Subsection 1000.8 of this Section and shall consist of either a fence or a green belt planting strip as provided for below: a. A green belt planting strip shall consist of evergreen trees and/or deciduous trees and plants and shall be of sufficient width and density to provide an effective visual screen. This planting strip shall be designed to provide complete visual screening to a minimum height of six (6) feet. Earth mounding or berms may be used but shall not be used to achieve more than three (3) feet of the required screen. The planting plan and type of plantings shall require the approval of the Council. b. A required screening fence shall be constructed of masonry (eg: buck; stone; decorative concrete block, interlocking or mortarless concrete waif systems) ice, wood or meta(. Chain link fences with privacy slats shad. not be permitted within residential or commercial zoning districts to meet the requirements for screening:` Such fence shall provide a solid screening effect six (6) feet in height. The design and materials used in constructing a required screening fence shall be subject to the approval of the City Council. Fences in excess of six (6) feet in height shall Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 2 require approval of the Zoning Administrator and the Building Official. (1) Required Ground Cover. The lot area remaining after providing for driveways, sidewalks, patios, building site and/or other requirements shall be sodded or;seeded and mulched within thirty (3Q) days following building occupancy... a Thefront and side yards (and/or any other yard which abuts a public street) of all residential lots shall be sodded. Rear yards which do not abut a street may be seeded and mulched. in'special cases, :deviation from this'standard maybe approved bythe,City, Planner orCity Building Inspector. C. if the weatEer or other uncontro##able factors -prevent the sodding or seeding of bar%e ground within fourteen (14) days of finai grading, "the area shall be covered with straw or other temporary material to control erosion. trees or other eteeeptable vegetettieft or treatffl GLJIY eel in contain a minimum of one () shade tree of evergreen tree which --shall,conform to . the minimum size requirements-°I#sfed in subsection (d)of this section. (3) Limitations. Fences and trees shall not be located within the street or other :public right-of-way Anv. landscape structures and plantings placed upon utility easements or within publicright-of-way are subject to removal if required for the maintenance or improvement of the utility. Trees on utility easements containing overhead wires shall not exceed twenty (20) feet in height. (The planting of large trees is not recommended under overhead wires.) The amount of hard surfacing provided on a lot shall be limited to the size and area necessary to accommodate ordinance requirements and allowances. (c) Landscaping: New Residential Subdivisions Semi Public and All Income Producing Property Uses. (Excluding residential structures containing Tess four (4) dwelling units or less.) Prior to approval of a building permit, all above referenced uses shall be subject to a mandatory landscape plan and specification requirements. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 3 (1) The landscape plan should be developed with an emphasis upon the following areas. the boundary or perimeter of the proposed site at points adjoining other property and the immediate perimeter of the structure. (2)Required Ground Cover. The lot area remaining after providing for off-street parking, off-street loading, sidewalks, driveways, building site and/or other requirements shall be sodded or seeded and mulched within thirty,(30) days of building occupancy:, a The front and side yards (and/or any other yard which abuts a public street) of all lots shall be sodded. Rear yards which do not abut;a public street maybe seeded and mulched. '`in special cases, deviation from this standard may be approved by the City Planner or, City Building' Inspector. c If the weather or other uncontrollable.factors prevent the sodding or seeding of bare ground within fourteen ;(1 4) days offinal grading, the area shad .be - of with straw or other temporary material to control erosion. ping within one (1) year following the date of building occupancy. a A minimum of one W shade tree'or evergreen tree shall be provided.per residential unit and per non-residential lot which shall conform to the minimum size requirements listed in subsection'(d)of this section. b A minimum of sixteen (16) ornamental trees or shrubs shall be provided per street side of non-residential lots which shall conform to the minimum 'size requirements listed in subsection (d)of this section. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 4 (d) Minimum Size Requirements. All plants must at least equal the following minimum size: (1) Shade Trees (2) Ornamental Trees (Flowering Crab, Russian Olive, Hawthorn, etc.) (3) Evergreen Trees (4) Tall Shrubs & Hedge Material (Evergreen or Deciduous) (5) Low Shrubs - Deciduous - Evergreen - Spreading Evergreens Potted/Bare Root or Balled & Burlapped 2 inch diameter 1-1/2 inch diameter 3 - 4 feet 3-4feet 24 - 30 inches 24 - 30 inches 18 - 24 inches The type and mode of planting for all trees and shrubs is dependent upon time of planting season, availability, and site conditions (soils, climate, ground water, man-made irrigation, grading, etc.) (e) Spacing.-&. Plant material centers shall not be located closer than three (3) feet from the fence line or property line and shall not be planted to conflict with public plantings based on the judgement of the City staff. W.WA; ;-; (f) Types of fidew-gees—Plantings Ttie following species are suable.#or spenrrtg and Jan scaptrig purposes:; COMMON NAME Ground Covers Ground Juniper Periwinkle, rrtyrtfe Shrubs Dwarf -winged Euonymus Winged Euonymus Privet Mock Orange Sumac Common' Lilac Japanese yew American arborvitae SCIENTIFIC NAME Juniperus spp. Vinca minor Euonymus alatus "compactus" Euonymus alatus Ligustrum spp. Philadelphus spp. Rhus spp. Syringa vulgaris Taxus cuspidata Thuja occidentalis Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 5 Shade Trees Amur Maple Norway Maple Red Maple Sugar Maple River Birch Hackberry White Ash Green Ash Ginkgo Tree Honey locust Kentucky Coffee Tree Crabapple Oak Mount an Ash American Linden Little Leaf Linden Acer ginnala Acer platanoides (and varieties) Acer rubrum Acer saccharum Betula nigra Celtis occidentalis Fra)onus americana Fra)dnus pennsylvanica lanceolata (and varieties) Ginkgo biloba (male tree only) Gleditsia triacanthos Gymnocladus dioicus Malus spp. Quercus spp. Sorbus spp. Tilia ameriicana Tilia cordata (and varieties) Con`rferous Trees Black Htlls Spruce Picea abies CalOra dc Blue and Green Spruce Picea pungens Austrian Pine Pinus nigra White pme Pinus strobus Fir Abies (all varieties) (g) Design. (1) The landscape plan must show some form of designed site amenities (i.e., composition of plant materials, and/or creative grading, decorative lighting, exterior sculpture, etc., which are largely intended for aesthetic purposes). (2) All areas within the property lines (or beyond, if site grading extends beyond) shall receive landscape treatment or surfacing. All exterior areas not paved or designated as roads, parking or storage, must be planted into ornamental vegetation (lawns, ground covers or shrubs) unless otherwise approved by the Zoning Administrator. (3) Turf slopes in excess of 2.1 are prohibited. (4) All buildings must have an exterior water spigot to ensure that landscape maintenance can be accomplished. (h) Landscape Guarantee. All new plants shall be guaranteed for two (2) full years from the time planting has been completed. All plants shall be alive and in satisfactory growth at the end of the guarantee period or be replaced. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 6 (i) Existing Trees. With respect to existing trees in new developments, all trees on the site are to be saved which do not have to be removed for street, buildings, utilities, drainage or active recreational purposes. Trees over six (6) inches in diameter that are to remain, are to be marked with a red band, and to be protected with snow fences or other suitable enclosure, prior to any site grading or excavation. The City may further require that the Applicant retain a professional forester to prepare a forest inventory and management plan for the development, in order to control and abate any existing or potential shade tree disease. (dIj) Mechanical Equipment. All mechanical equipment such as air-conditioning units, etc. erected on the roof of any structure, shall be screened so as not to be visible. (k) Buffer Yards. (1) Lot Depth Requirements.` Double frontage residential Io depth of at least twenty (20) feet in order, to ailow space for buffe the back lot line.. Except as may be approved by the City Col record, preliminary platted lots, and residential Planned Unit De >`shall have an a ng{screen planti RegUired Lot Depth 170 feet R-11 R-34 R-6 159feet ;oncei r majo V tE (3) For applicable subdivisions, a screening plan shall be submitted. The plan, All identify all proposed buffer screening by;type, size and location. (4) Timing/Responsibility of Installation. Weather permitting, all buffer yards, ber pings and/or plantings shall be constructed or planted within thirty (30)`days of issuance_of an occupancy permit. In cases where buffer yards, bermings, and/or plantings have not been installed within thirty (30)'days of building occupancy, the property owner/developer si?ali be required to provide an escrow deposit, equal to one and one-half times the estimated cost of the ground cover, which will be returned to the property owner/developer upon completion of the work. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 7 (5) Maintenance. a. Maintenance of the ` buffer strip planting and/or fence shall be the I esponsibility of the individual property owners or, if applicable, the homeowners association. b. All repairs to the fence or wall and all replacement of landscape materials or plantings shall be consistent with the original approved screening design.; (6) Design Standards. All plantings within designated buffer yards shall adhere to the following: a. Fencing and screening shall be consistent with Subsection (a) of this"Section: b. Plant`materiai centers shall not be located closer than three (3) feetfrom the fence line or property line. C. Landscape screening shall be planted in two more rows PIantirigs shall be staggered in rows unless otherwise approved by the City Council; e Landscape materials, sizes, and spacing `shall be consistent with "sub sect ion (d :through (f� of this Section. SECTION 3. SECTION 1000.9 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO ADD THE FOLLOWING: (c!} High Water Elevation. No structure, except docks acid retaining'walls"shall be placed at an elevation such that the lowest floor, including basement floor, is less than.two (2� "feet above the,highest known surface water level'or ordinary high water level, or less than one (1 )foot'above the 100-year, flood level, if determined, of any adjacent lake, pond, stream, watercourse or wetland. If sufficient data on known high water levels is not available, the elevation of the line of permanent aquatic vegetation shall be used as the estimated high water, elevation. When fill is required to meet this elevation, the fill shall be allowed to `stabilize and construction shall not s in, until the property has been inspected by the Building Inspector. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 8 SECTION 4. SECTION 1100.2 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: I . - •.- .. - cord, preltmiriary id )a re )n (c) Except for elderly (senior citizen) housing, each multiple family dwelling site shall contain at least five hundred (500) square feet of usable open space as defined in Section 200 of this Chapter for each dwelling unit contained thereof. SECTION 5. SECTION 1100.4 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 1100.4. Building Type and Construction (a) No galvanized or unfinished steel or unfinished aluminum buildings (walls or roofs), except those specifically intended to have a corrosive designed finish such as corten steel shall be permitted in any zoning district, except in association with farming operations or as allowed by Section 1000.4 of this Chapter. (b) Buildings in all zoning districts shall maintain a high standard of architectural and aesthetic compatibility with surrounding properties to insure that they will not adversely impact the property values of the abutting properties or adversely impact the public health, safety, and general welfare. 60 ; :- - -- Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 9 - (etc) Exterior building finishes shall consist of materials comparable in grade and quality to the following: (1) Brick. (2) Natural stone. (3) Integral colored split face (rock face) concrete block. (4) Cast in place concrete or pre -cast concrete panels. (5) Wood, provided the surfaces are finished for exterior use and wood of proven exterior durability is used, such as cedar, redwood, cypress. (6) Curtain wall panels of steel, fiberglass and aluminum (non-structural, non -load bearing), provided such panels are factory fabricated and finished with a durable non -fade surface and their fasteners are of a corrosion resistant design. (7) Glass curtain wall panels. (8) Stucco. (9) Vinyl. (10) Other materials determined to be acceptable by the City Council. its Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 10 SECTION 6. SECTION 1200.4(h)(17) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (17) Required Screening and Landscaping. a. Non -Residential Uses. All open, non-residential off-street parking areas of five (5) or more spaces shall be screened and landscaped from abutting or surrounding residential districts and from adjacent public streets in compliance with Section 1000.7 of this Chapter except -#hat the height of the screening` or landscaping shall be four (4) feet. Grass plantings or sereenjmg landscaping`shall be provided in all areas bordering the parking area not occupied by trees er Shrubs screening materials or other ia,nd.scape amenities. b Residential Uses. All open, off-street parking areas of five (5} or more spaces ahall be` screened. and landscaped from adjacent ,public streets rn compliance with Section 1000.7 of this Chapter except that the height ..©f the materials or'otherlandscape amenities. - SECTION 7. SECTION 1200.9 (Number of Parking Spaces Required) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO INCORPORATE THE FOLLOWING: (a) Single Family (including Manufactured Housing), Two Family, Townhouse and Quadraminium Units. Two (2) enclosed spaces per unit (minimum garage size of #eat 48Q square feet). Upon application, the City Council may allow the construction of the garage for a single family dwelling to be delayed for a period not to exceed three (3) years from date of occupancy. Banquet, _Reception, Conference or Meeting Facilities. One (1) space per three (3) persons €based on the maximum capacity] when associated with and housed within hotels, rriotels, golf or country clubs, and restaurants. (y) Golf Course: Six (6) spaces for each golf hole, plusone (1) space for each golf related employee (golf/assistant pro, pro shop cashier, club storage.`attendants, 'locker room attendants, caddies, maintenance crews, etc) on maximum shift, plus seventy-five (75) percent of the spaces otherwise required for restaurant/bar areas, office areas, banquet facilities and other accessory uses. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 11 (z} Golf Driving Range. One and ;one-half (1412) spaces for each tee: area'(if individual tees are not marked, the maximum number of persons which may swing at the, driving ranget full capacity}. SECTION 8. SECTION 2700.2 (General Requirements and Standards for Planned Unit Development's) OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO CHANGE THE FOLLOWING SUBSECTIONS: (g) aging of Public and Common Open Space When a PUD provides for common or public open space, and is planned as a staged development over a period of time, the total area of common or public open space or land escrow security in any stage of development shall, at a minimum, bear the same relationship to the total open space to be provided in the entire PUD as the stages or units completed or under development bear to the entire PUD. (h) Density. The maximum allowable density in a PUD zoning district shall be determined by standards negotiated and agreed upon between the applicant and the City. In all cases the negotiated standards shall be consistent with the development policies as contained in the Comprehensive Plan. Whenever a PUD is to be developed in stages, no such stage shall, when averaged with all previously completed stages, have a residential density that exceeds one hundred (100) percent of the proposed residential density of the entire Planned Unit Development 77 7- {1. _ A PUD b conditional use permit y p mit must comply with the applicable base zoning district. (n) Setbacks. (1) The front and side yard restrictions of the periphery of the Planned Unit Development conditional use permit site at a minimum shall be the same as imposed in the base zoning districts. A PUD zoning district shall at minimum have a thirty-five (35) foot front yard setback and ten (10) foot side yard setback. As appropriate, the City Council may imerease modify these standards. (2) No building shall be located less than fifteen (15) feet from the back of the curb line along those roadways which are part of the internal street pattern. (3) No building within the project shall be nearer to another building less than one-half (1/2) the sum of the building heights of the two buildings. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 12 SECTION 9. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECTIVE ON APRIL 11998 FOLLOWING ITS PASSAGE AND PUBLICATION. Approved by the Albertville City Council this day of ATTEST: On 13 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Mayor Mark Olsen Linda Houghton, City Clerk pc: Gary Hale Linda Houghton Mike Couri Pete Carlson 1997. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - 13 . c , Date. November 12,1997 7d Ca To: The Albertville City Council From: The Albertville Royalty Committee Regarding: Income and Expense Report and Funding Request On the following page is an income and expense report. The income listed on the report, is what the Royalty Committee receives in an average year. The Albertville Friendly City Days Committee receives start-up funds of: $2600 from the City $2000 from the Lions 2000 from the Jaycee's Total $6600 from which the Royalty Committee receives $2000. Fortunately the committee had a positive reserve to begin the year. The expenses are the expenses incurred for 1997. The 1997 expenses are not outrageous and there is very little roan for cutting expenses. With the difference in income verses expenses we will in the future need to find or request additional funds from community organizations, businesses or A.F.C.D. funds. The Royalty Committee has in the past received prize money for the float in various parades but this has not happened in the last few years. One reason may be that Albertville has had the present float for approximately 10 years. Funding Request Our intent for coming to the Albertville City Council is to request Scholarship money. The amount we are requesting is $1250 to be divided between the newly crowned royalty starting with the 1998-1999 royalty. We are proposing that the money be divided as such: $500 to the Queen $250 to each Princess and Miss Congeniality. If Miss Congeniality happens to be either the Queen or a Princess, then the $250 would be divided between the Queen and Princesses. Our request for scholarship money is to be a goodwill gesture and thank you to those who are part of the Royalty and also hopefully increase participation in the program from eligible candidates. We as a committee do not know of any other area community offering a scholarship to their Royalty but that should not deter Albertville from doing so. Why not show our area residents we are supportive of the candidates and willing to help further their education. What a feather in Albertville's cap!! Our 2nd request is for funds for a new float. As mentioned previously the present float has been used for about 10 years. A request of $2,000. would get the process going in designing and building a new float. Our 3rd request is that the savings bonds that the City gives to the Junior Royalty be increased from a $50 savings bond to a $100 savings bond. Any requests previously mentioned to the Albertville council for clothing allowance were not coming from the Royalty Committee. We hope this clarifies any misconceptions of what the Royalty Committee is requesting and we are looking forward to the council agreeing to our fund requests. Income and Expense Report Income Deposits Albert. F. C. D. 2000 Raffle 417 Sponsor Fees 290 Brunch tickets sold 40 Brunch food bought by committee 43 Total deposits 2790 Expense Deductions Float Storage 240 Float upkeep and repair 228 Winter Carnival & Aquatennial 850 Sashes 241 Float and parade name signs 330 Crowns 261 Flowers 130 Brunch (food, janitor, cook) 503 Judges 125 Style show tickets 110 Buttons 150 Raffle costs 518 Brunch tickets for our Royalty 60 Office products 50 Misc. 100 Total expenses 3896 Deficit Balance <-1106> Explanation of some categories Style show tickets - Office products includes dinner tickets for junior royalty candidates, judges, present royalty, jr. royalty sponsor and fashion store representatives. includes such things as paper, envelops, copies stamps, tag board, etc. Brunch tickets for our Royalty - includes price of tickets for when our Royalty go to a inviting communities brunch. Misc. - includes such things as juice and rolls for judging day, cash prizes at the dinner/style show, bracelet for Miss Congeniality, drum roll during coronation, etc. PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY November 6, 1997 Mayor & Members of the City Council c\o Ms. Linda Houghton City Clerk PO Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301 70/(43) RE: Trail construction within Parkside Third addition on Kalenda, Kalland, 57th Street and Kahler. Dear Ms. Houghton: Kenco/Pilot Land Development has offered the City a construction bid and rebate against other projects for the above development. The City attorney advised against this option in early October. On behalf of the residents who have not sodded to the curb in anticipation of the trails, we are requesting the City to authorize plans and specifications to implement the trails throughout the project immediately during the 1998 construction season. Many residents have been extremely patient with us and the City process to formally adopt and define trail design and locations. However, several have been in limbo regarding the look of their property for all of 1997. We do not believe that it would be fair to them and us in the marketing of the development to continue into the new year without action. Please schedule the project and notify those residents along the phase one build area of your jptentions. The above request is rntf-mded in the spirit of cooperation, and with the performance of our company in delivering facilities and plans for the City over the last year. Sincerely, Donald Jensen and Development Director cc: John Olson - 5751 Kalland Ave.. Donny Anderson - Kenco Mike Couri, Pete Carlson - Albertville consultants land dev: trailbld.doc 13736 Johnson Street NE • Ham Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094 1 A CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #1997-56 A RESOLUTION CERTIFYING UNCOLLECTED SEWER AND STORM WATER BILLS TO WRI(W COUNTY FOR COLLECTION WITH REAL ESTATE TAXES WHEREAS, the- City Council is desirous of collecting all charges for the use of the wastewater treatment facility and the storm water system;.and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that some sewer and storm water accounts remain uncollected and delinquent. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, hereby directs the city clerk to certify the attached list of uncollected sewer and storm water accounts to the County Auditor for collection with real estate taxes. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City council hereby orders that delinquent accounts certified to the tax rolls will be assessed an eight percent (8%) interest charge upon certification and the total assessment will be collectible along with the 1998 taxes. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1997. ATTEST: Linda Houghton, City Clerk Mark S. Olsen, Mayor LA November 12, 1997 Gary Hale City of Albertville 5975 Main Ave NE PO Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301 c�f;,, t 1,r . ,'� A,, �7 RE: 9800005 -- - --. --- — - � Dear Mr. Hale: C gratulat-tohsl_`This is to info= you that your a lication for the project entitled lmmtng as een approved in the amount of $1,150, Two original copies of -the Grant Agreement are enclose his -a--- ement explains the conditions of the award as well as the reporting requirements. In order for your organization to receive funds, we require the following: V 1. Return of one of the enclosed Grant Agreements signed by the authorized person. . 2. Submission of the Request for Payment form and Financial Progress Reports pursuant to Grant Agreement. 3. Completion of initial Evaluation I�orrn immediately. (Please fill out and return one copy of the evaluation Prm;,listing your primary project goal and one to three outcome objectives. In some cases we may hake already negotiated the objectives with you or filled them in.) - 4.. Submission of completed Evaluation Form pursuant to dates in the Grant Agreement. Please indicate progress on goal; .(using progress codes) and actual achievement of objectives. It is important to remember that any written or video materials resulting from this grant shall contain the following: `This project was funded in part by the Central Minnesota Initiative Fund, a regional foundation."' Thank you - this helps all of us in future fund raising efforts..: We are looking forward to working with you on this project. Please feel free to contact us at any time if you have questions. l Since Carol Spearman Director of Community Initiatives Enclosures: Two Grant Agreements , Sample Evaluation Form Regtiest For Payment Forms Blank Evaluation Form Financial Progress Report 70-SE First Avenue • Little Falls, MN 56345 (320) 6 3 2 - 9 2 5 5 Fax (320) 632.9258