The URL can be used to link to this page

1997-12-15 CC Agenda/Packetc x t AT_BERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA December 15, 1997 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL/ADOPT AGENDA (Mayor/Clerk/Council) 2. MINUTES (council) a. December 1, 1997, Regular Meeting b. December 3, 1997, Special Meeting C. December 8, 1997, Truth in Taxation Hearing 3. SPECIAL ORDER - PUBLIC HEARING - 1997 Northeast Sanitary Sewer and. Water Main Extension Project 4. AUDITING CLAIMS (council) - Check #'s 11060 - 10113 5. CITIZEN FORUM - 10 Minute Limit 6. CONSENT AGENDA C * ] (council) a. RESOLUTION #1997-57 (RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ANNUAL EVALUATION AND PLANNING SURVEY FOR THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY) b. RESOLUTION #1997-59 (ESTABLISHMENT OF SALARY ADMINISTRATION) C. RESOLUTION #1997-60 (RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL ALBERTVILLE 1997 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 1998 d. RESOLUTION #1997-61 (RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL ALBERTVILLE BUDGET FOR 1998) e. RESOLUTION #1997-64 (A RESOLUTION SETTING SAC CHARGES AND USER CHARGES IN THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE) f. RESOLUTION #1997-65 (DESIGNATION OF EMPLOYEE GROUP BENEFITS INSURANCE PROVIDERS AND ESTABLISHING THE PREMIUM DOLLAR AMOUNTS) g. Authorize the Building official to issue a permit for the foundation only for an addition to the International Country Antiques building, as recommended at the December 9th Planning Commission meeting h. Authorize the clerk to place a notice/ad seeking an interested citizen to serve on the Planning Commission to replace Commissioner Donatus Vetsch whose term expires 12/31/97 j. Accept financial report from Minnetonka Voiture 1281 for October, 1997 h. Authorize clerk, mayor or acting mayor to approve and issue year-end payments for 1997 invoices and prepaids for 1998 prior to year-end 7. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS a. ENGINEERING (1) Standard Street Section (2) Update on County Ditch 9 meeting (3) Report on Candidate Project Solicitation Notice for Federal Transportation Funding b . LEGAL �ZeTi[__ C. PLANNING & ZONING —RECOMMENDATIONS I2/9/97 (1) ORDINANCE #1997-19 (AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RELATING TO DRAINAGE COURSE ELEVATIONS, BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS, IRREGULAR SHAPED LOTS, ACCESSORY STRUCTURE PROVISION ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS, CUL-DE-SAC STREETS, PROTECTED AREAS. TREE PLANTING AND CERTIFICATION) (2) ORDINANCE #1997-'20 (AN ORDINANCE `MENDING SECTION R15,100-8 AND A600.13 OF THE ALBERTVILLE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE BY CHRNGTN!= THE PARK DIE -DI ` ATION FEE AND PuR_ENT LAND LEDICATION FEE, REOUTRING THE CONS`RUCTION OF TRAILS BY DEVELOPERS LAND SETTING FORTH GUIDELINES FOR PARK AND TRAIL DESIGN) d. GENERAL GOVERNMENT (1) RESOLUTION #1997-62 (A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SALARY/WAGE SCHEDULE) (2) RESOLUTION #1997-66 (A RESOLUTION APPOINTING TIMOTHY GUIMONT AS MAINTENANCE WORKER II) (3) RESOLUTION #1997-63 (A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE ASSIGNMENT OF PAY RANGE AND STEP) (4) RESOLUTION #1997-67 (A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE "PAY EQUITY FINAL REPORT") (5) Agreement for Sharing Road Expenses Between the Cities of Otsego and Albertville (6) Discuss request from Minnetonka Voiture 1281 to request a specific donation (7) Authorize purchase and implementation of time clock and reporting system 8. ADJOURNMENT ( Counci i ) 4 UPCOMING 1MEETINGSI IMPORTANT DATES December 16 Special Council Meeting - Interviews 6:00FM December 17 Special Council Meeting - Administrator 6:00 PM Negotiations (if necessary) December 22 Joint Powers Board - Water 7:00 PM December 25 Christmas Day - Legal Holiday January 5 Regular City Council Meeting 7:00EM January 13 Planning & Zoning Commission 7:00 R4 91 .` ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL December 15., 1997 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor Mark Olsen, Councilmembers Patricia Stalberger., Duane Berning, Robert Gundersen, and John Vetsch, City Clerk Linda Goeb, City Attorney Mike Couri and City Engineer Peter Carlson Mayor Olsen called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to order. The agenda was amended as follows: Move Item 6h from the Consent Agenda to General Government Item 7d(10) --- Add Item 6k - Schedule Public Hearing to consider vacation of old highway 152 on January 17, 198, at 7:30 PM Add Item 7d(81 - Consider adopting Maintenance/Repair Policy for Sanitary Sewer services Add Item 7d(9) - Follow-up on Public Works Department personnel complaint Olsen made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. The minutes of the December 1, 1997, meeting were amended on Page 3, Paragraph 6 to add the following: "The City of Otsego is not interested in acquiring sewer and/or water from the City of Albertville at this time". Gundersen made a motion to approve the minutes of the December 1, 1997, regular meeting as amended, and to approve the minutes of the December 3, 1997,.and the December 8, 1997, special meetings as presented. Olsen seconded the motion. All voted ave. Mayor Olsen called the public hearing to consider sanitary sewer and water main extension to the Northeast quadrant of the City to order. City Engineer Peter Carlson briefly reviewed the project with the Council with the projected cost of sanitary sewer at $440,000 and water mains at $665,000. The trunk fees per acre would be $1,300 for sanitary sewer and $1,250 for water. Mayor Olsen called for comments from the audience. Dick Mzolsik, representing OCI, questioned whether unbuildable property would be assessed. Carlson explained the property would be assessed only upon development. 1 Harold Swanson stated his firm would like the project to move ahead, as he is ready to develop the first phase of the Balfany properties. Mayor Olsen read aloud a letter indicating opposition to the project from Arnie Ergen and Wally Cox. City Clerk Goeb reported that Frank D'Aigle was unable to attend the meeting but requested that the clerk report that he is not in favor of the project proceeding at this time. There were no further oral or written comments. Stalberger made a motion to close the public hearing. Berning seconded the motion. All voted avP. Berning made a motion to authorize City Engineer Carlson to meet with Harold Swanson to discuss phasing of his development of the Balfany property and to report back to the City Council at the second meeting in January. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted ave. In order to allow the city engineer to review the construction bill from Wright County, Mayor Olsen delayed the payment of claims until later in the meeting. There was no one who wished to address the Council under Citizen Forum. Stalberger made a motion to approve RESOLUTION #1997-57 titled RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ANNUAL EVALUATION AND PLANNING SURVEY FOR THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1997-59 titled ESTABLISHMENT OF SALARY ADMINISTRATION. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to approve RESOLUTION #1997-60 titled RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL ALBERTVILLE 1997 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 1998. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1997-61 titled RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL ALBERTVILLE BUDGET FOR 1998. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted ave. Stalberger made a motion to approve RESOLUTION #1997-64 titled A RESOLUTION SETTING SAC CHARGES AND USER CHARGES IN THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. .-. Stalberger made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1997-65 titled DESIGNATION OF EMPLOYEE GROUP BENEFITS INSURANCE PROVIDERS AND ESTABLISHING THE PREMIUM DOLLAR AMOUNTS. Vetsch seconded the 2 motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion authorizing the building official to issue a permit for the foundation only for an addition to the International Country Antiques building, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to accept the October 1997 financial report of the Minnetonka Voiture 1281. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion authorizing the clerk, mayor and/or acting mayor to approve and issue year-end payments for 1997 invoices and prepaids for 1998 prior to year-end. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to schedule a public hearing on the vacation of old highway 152 on January 17, 1998, at 7:30 PM. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. City Engineer Peter Carlson discussed standard street section designs. Carlson presented a design for a heavier pavement section for areas where the soils have an R-value of less than 50. Some areas of the City would require this heavier street design, whereas other areas will be amenable to the City's standard street design. The current standard design will be acceptable for soils with an R- value of greater than 50. Berning made a motion to approve the two street sections as prepared by City Engineer Carlson for soils using R-value criteria for determining where each street section design is necessary. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Carlson briefly updated the Council on the meeting with Wright Soil and Water C =n ervation regarding County Ditch 9. Profiles of the ditch dating from 1923 will likely be used to determine the elevations for ditch cleaning. The Council directed Carlson to prepare an application for Federal Transportation Funds for a ramp at County Road 19. Stalberger made a motion to adopt ORDINANCE #1997-19 titled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RELATING TO DRAINAGE COURSE ELEVATIONS, BUFFER YARD REQTJIREMENTS, IRREGULAR SHAPED LOTS, ACCESSORY STRUCTURE PROVISION ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS, CUL-DE-SAC STREETS, PROTECTED AREAS, TREE PLANTING AND CERTIFICATION. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. Olsen made a motion to adopt ORDINANCE #1997-20 titled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS A-600.8 AND A-600.15 OF THE ALBERTVILLE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE PARK DEDICATION FEE AND PERCENT LAND DEDICATION, REQUIRING THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAILS BY 3 DEVELOPERS AND SETTING FORTH GUIDELINES FOR PARK AND TRAIL DESIGN with the following amendments: (1) Park dedication fees are set at $1300 per dwelling unit. (2) The cost of installation of trails plus an additional five percent (5%) of construction costs shall be counted as credit toward park dedication requirements. (3) Delete the following from Section 1(x)(1.) "When deemed necessary, such amount shall be levied at a maximum of once per year and shall be transferred to the park fund. The Planning Commission shall review and recommend to the City Council the levy amount for the current year based upon the park, trail and recreation priorities." Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to approve RESOLUTION #1997-2 (A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SALARY/WAGE SCHEDULE), RESOLUTION #1997-66 (A RESOLUTION APPOINTING TIMOTHY GUIMONT AS MAINTENANCE WORKER II), and RESOLUTION #1997-63 (A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE ASSIGNMENT OF PAY RANGE AND STEP). Gundersen seconded the motion. Stalberger, Gundersen, and Vetsch voted aye. Olsen and Berning voted no. The motion carried. Olsen made a motion to approve RESOLUTION #1.997-67 titled A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE "PAY EQUITY FINAL REPORT". Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted ave. Berning made a motion to approve the AGREEMENT FOR SHARING ROAD EXPENSES BETWEEN THE CITIES OF OTSEGO AND ALBERTVILLE. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council requested that Minnetonka Voiture 1281 consider a donation to the Albertville Queen Committee. Olsen made a motion authorizing the purchase and implementation of a time clock and reporting system for all city employees. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to approve the policy for sanitary sewer line repairs and maintenance as recommended by PSG and City Engineer Carlson. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger reported that the Personnel Committee has verified that the Public Works employee acted on the administrator's direction to raise the catch basin in the Fire Hall driveway and that no further action is warranted. Berning made a motion to deny the Planning Commission's request that. the clerk place an ad seeking an interested citizen for the position vacated by Commissioner Donatus Vetsch. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to send a letter of appreciation to 4 Donatus Vetsch in recognition of his many years of service to the City of Albertville. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberaer made a motion to approve payment of Check #'s 10060 - 10113 and Check #10041. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to adjourn at 10:35 PM. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mark Olsen, Mayor Linda Goeb, City Clerk 5 F- "-jl� -...j ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL December 1, 1997 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor Mark Olsen, Councilmembers Patricia Stalberger, Duane Berning, Robert Gundersen, and John Vetsch, City Clerk Linda Goeb, and City Engineer Peter Carlson Mayor Olsen called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to order. The agenda was amended as follows: Add to Item 3 - Check Vs 10034 - 10052 and Check #10019 Move Item 5c from the Consent Agenda to GeneralGovernment Delete Items 6a(1) and 6a(3) Add Item 7c(8) - Christmas Decorations - Disposal/Lighting Add Item 7d(9) - Pay Equity Report Add Item 7d(10) - Resolution #1997-58 Add Item 7d(11) - Supervision of Maintenance Worker II's Add Item 7d(12) - Consider temporarily closing City office to public Berning made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The minutes of the November 17, 1997, special meeting were amended on Page 1 by inserting Paragraph 4: "Vetsch arrived at the meeting at 6:20 PM." The minutes of the November 17, 1997, regular meeting were amended on Page 4, Paragraph 4, by deleting the administrator to sign "The Brimeyer Group Agreement for $1,150 but". Berning made a motion to approve the minutes of the November 17, 1997, special and regular meetings as amended. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Because City Engineer Carlson was prepared to discuss and make a recommendation on two of the bills considered for payment, Mayor Olsen delayed consideration of Audit Claims until later in the meeting. There was no one who wished to address the Council under Citizen Forum. Berning made a motion to approve the Wastewater Operations Report for October 1997 as presented. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council tabled approval of RESOLUTION #1997-57 (RESOLUTION 1 ADOPTING THE ANNUAL EVALUATION AND PLANNING SURVEY FOR THE MPCA) until the December 15th meeting to allow the Council to review the survey results. City Engineer reviewed his memo dated November 28, 1997, regarding the sewer repairs at the Steve Breingan residence. Carlson reported that he is unable to state absolutely how the pipe was broken and therefore recommends to the Council that the City reimburse the homeowner for one-half of the repair costs. Carlson further recommends that the Council consider a policy change stating the homeowner is responsible for maintenance of his service line from the house to the sewer main. Councilmember Berning questioned whether the repair to the sewer line had been inspected before being covered up. It is the engineer's and the clerk's understanding that Ken Lindsay was on site at the time. Berning made a motion to hold Check #10034 and direct Ken Lindsay to prepare a report for the Council on the incident. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. PSG representative Kelly Browning explained that she has a copy of the repair/maintenance policy from the City of St. Michael. The Council asked Browning to provide a copy of the policy to the Public Works Committee and the city engineer to review. The City Council approved the format of the response to the City of Otsego's engineer regarding Otsego's request that no new pipe systems or drainage improvements be made in the vicinity of Greenhaven Estates and the Albertville Cemetery until the full downstream impacts are known and mitigated. City Engineer Carlson has reviewed the pay request from Fehn Excavating for the site improvements to the parking lot at the L & D Trucking site in the amount of $25,018.25 and recommended payment. Carlson was directed to contact Wright County and.or MNDOT regarding the confusing signage at the I-94/CSAH 19 ramp area. Larry Lee, STMA Youth Hockey Association representative, requested permission for the association to use and maintain the ice rink facility again this year. Practices will be scheduled Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays, leaving Wednesdays and the weekends open for free skating. The Hockey Association will provide their own tractor/sweeper for cleaning the ice. Due to the large number of participants in the Initiation level, the Association would also like permission to use the large side of the park shelter exclusively for those participants. Berning made a motion granting STMA Youth Hockey Association's requests and directing the Public Works Department to remove the Toro mower from the shelter garage. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Public Works Committee will discuss who will be responsible for locking park shelter each night. The Arena Committee reported that the meeting originally scheduled has been postponed to December 6. Berning made a motion to adopt ORDINANCE #1997-16 titled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLE SIGN ORDINANCE (1987-3) RELATING TO BILLBOARDS as presented. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to schedule interviews for the four final candidates for the city administrator on Tuesday, December 16, and Wednesday, December 17, if necessary, beginning- at 6:00 PM. The Council and the clerk will rate each candidate on a point system basis. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Councilmember Berning reported that the Transportation Committee met on November 20 with the Otsego committee. Otsego does not want to make improvements, such as sewer, water or pavement, on the shared roads. They are not in favor of a realignment of MacIver Avenue. No further meetings have been scheduled at this time. City Engineer Carlson suggested that the Public Works Committee began consideration of a policy for shared roads. The Council agreed that a policy should be formulated. Councilmember Vetsch reported that the Joint Powers Board has contracted with PSG for operation and maintenance of the water system effective January 1, 1998 at a cost of $9,458 per month. He further reported that the Board secretary's wages were increased to $14.50 per hour beginning in 1998. Neither the Public Safety nor the Public Works Committee had a report. Vetsch made a motion to offer to return the old Christmas decorations to the Jaycees if they want them or to give them away to whoever would like them because the City no longer has room to store the decorations. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Olsen made a motion authorizing the City to pay for the additional wiring needed on three or four poles for the new Christmas lights. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. 3 Stalberger made a motion directing the city administrator to complete the Pay Equity Reporting Form for the Council to consider at the December 15, 1997, meeting. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1997-58 titled A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION #1997-12 TITLED RESOLUTION SETTING UNIFORM ATTENDANCE REQUIREMENTS AND APPOINTING ALTERNATES FOR ADVISORY BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED BY THE CITY COUNCIL as presented. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to appoint the city clerk as supervisor of the Public Works Department effective immediately. As supervisor the clerk will issue directives to be followed. Failure to cooperate with the clerk will result in disciplinary action. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. City Clerk Goeb explained that. Building Official Kevin Mealhouse volunteered to answer phones and keep City.Hall open as regularly as his duties allow during Christmas week when she is on vacation. The Council accepted Mealhouse's offer. Olsen made a motion to close the City Hall office to the public every Thursday until further notice to allow the clerk one day of uninterrupted work hours. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to hold issuance of Check #'s 10034, 10035, and 10041, and to issue Check # 10019, Check #'s 10036- 10040, and Check #'s 10042 - 10056 as presented. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Olsen made a motion to adjourn at 9:40 PM. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mark Olsen, Mayor Linda Goeb, City Clerk 4 ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL December 3, 1997 Albertville City Hall 6:35 PM PRESENT: Mayor Mark Olsen, Councilmembers Patricia Stalberger, Duane Berning, Robert Gundersen, and John Vetsch Mayor Olsen called the special meeting of the Albertville City Council to order for the purpose of interviewing candidates for the position of Maintenance Worker II. The Council interviewed John Dinkel, Thomas Kickhafer and Tim Guimont for the Maintenance Worker II position and rated each interviewee. After the interviews were completed, rating points were tabulated. The tabulations ranked the interviewees by points in the following order: First - Tim Guimont; Second - John Dinkel, and Third - Thomas Kickhafer. The Council agreed to offer Tim Guimont the position of Maintenance Worker II at a starting wage of $12.00 per hour. The Council further agreed to conduct monthly reviews of the new employee every month for the first six months of employment. The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 PM. Mark Olsen, Mayor Linda Goeb, City Clerk 01 ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING December 8, 1996 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor Mark Olsen, Councilmembers Patti Stalberger, Robert Gundersen and John Vetsch, City Clerk Linda Goeb Mayor Olsen convened the Truth in Taxation Hearing at 7:00 PM. There was no one in the audience. The Council reviewed the proposed budget. City Clerk Goeb asked the Council to adjust the 1998 wages for the City employees, including the new Maintenance Worker II before the Council approves the final budget at the December 15, 1997, regular meeting. Gundersen made a motion to increase the 1998 hourly rate for the city clerk to $16.50 per hour, and further to pay the city clerk for the additional -duties performed as interim administrator at amount to be determined later. Vetsch seconded the motion. Gundersen, Stalberger, and Vetsch voted aye. Olsen abstained. The motion carried. City Clerk Goeb was directed to adjust the proposed 1998 budget according to the new wages, employer insurance package and the new maintenance employee's wages averaged at $13 per hour. The Working Capital Reserve budget will be adjusted as necessary so that the total expense budget will not change. Stalberger made a motion to adjourn at 7:45 PM. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mark Olsen, Mayor Linda Goeb, City Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FOR NORTHEAST SANITARY SEWER AND WATER MAIN EXTENSION 1. Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Albertville, Minnesota will meet on December 15, 1997, at 7:00 PM at 5975 Main Avenue NE, Albertville, MN 55301 for the purpose of holding a public hearing on a proposed improvement as described hereinafter. 2. The general nature of the improvement is the construction of trunk sanitary sewer and water main and all other appurtenant works and services reasonably required therefore, to serve an area in the City of Albertville, County of Wright, State of Minnesota, east of County State Aid Highway 19 and north of I- 94. 3. The estimated cost of the sanitary sewer improvement is $440,000. The estimated cost for the trunk water main is $658,600. The total estimated cost of the entire project if $1,098,600. 4. The area proposed to be assessed for the making of said improvement shall include all the premises abutting the proposed sanitary sewer and water main. 5. All interested persons are invited to appear at said hearing for the purpose of being heard with respect to the making of said improvement. Written or oral objections will be considered. BY ORDER OF THE CITY COUNCIL Linda Houghton, City Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE BILLS TO BE PAID December 15, 1997 Check No. Vendor Reason Amount 10060 AirTouch Cellular PW/FD Cell Phones 18.89 10061 Allina Medical Group F. D. Physicals 279.00 10062 Barthel, Albert FD Training/Chief 710.00 10063 Berning, Duane FD Training 100.00 10064 Berning, Gordon FD Training 95.00 10065 Berning, Greg FD Training 85..00 10066 Black, Scott FD Training/A.C. 397.50 10067 Braun, Bob FD Training 12.50 10068 C.J.'s Linen Service FD Laundry 69.23 10069 Campbell, Joe FD Training 87.50 10070 CarQuest Supplies/Parts 436.81 10071 Chicos, Chad FD Training 140.00 10072 City of St. Michael Grading 200.00 10073 DJ's Total Home Care Supplies 105.44 10074 EDA/Dept. of Commerce JPB Bond 74,000.00 10075 Eull Concrete Adjusting Rings 14.22 10076 Fehn Excavating Hauling Sand 144.00 10077 Hack's City Hall Supplies 57.16 10078 Hackenmueller, Ed. FD Training 52.50 10079 Harvest Printing Office Supplies 45.50 10080 Heinen, Paul FD Training 12.50 10081 Kuechle Underground Railroad Culvert 45,000.00 10082 Larson Publications November Legals 98.78 10083 Lewis, Brian FD Training 72.50 10084 Long, Steve FD Training 310.00 10085 MainStreet Designs Xmas Decorations 5,027.24 10086 Maland, Marie FD Training 35.00 10087 Mealhouse, Kevin FD Training 12.50 10088 Miller Tree Removal Materials/Lights 354.00 10089 MinnComm Pager Service 25.40 10090 NSP Electric Service 2,835.46 10091 NAC, Inc. Planning Service 1,857.96 10092 Olsen, Mark Reimbursement 41.70 10093 PERA 11/22 - 12/5 378.09 10094 Pat's 66 Gas 206.76 10095 Plaisted Companies Sand 535.41 10096 Precision Auto Repair Front Axles 571.01 10097 R & W Welding Metal Tray 380.67 10098 Radzwill & Couri Legal Service 3,708.00 10099 Roden, Kenny FD Training 107.50 10100 Roden, Kevin FD Training 40.00 10101 SEH, Inc. Engineering 18,468.40 10102 Superior Services Garbage Service 89.87 10103 Valerius, Bill FD Training 160.00 10104 Vetsch, Dave FD Training 87.50 10105 Wacker, Bob FD Training 67.50 10106 Westley David FD Training 32.50 10107 Wr. Co. Highway Dept. Sand & Salt/Sand 1,482.62 10108 Wright County CSAH 19/37 122,345.13 10109 Wr. Co. Treasurer December Police 5,246.88 10110 Wright Recycling 10111 Wulff, Brian 10112 Zachman, Kevin 10113 Fire Relief Association November 1,028.50 FD Training 80.00 FD Training 97.50 2nd Half Payment 2,136.00 Total $289,983.13 /oar CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #1997-57 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE ANNUAL EVALUATION AND PLANNING SURVEY FOR THE MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature adopted a law that requires municipalities to annually complete an evaluation and planning survey of their wastewater facilities for MPCA review, and WHEREAS, the City of Albertville is required to participate in the annual evaluation and, planning survey has completed and submitted a copy of the survey report to the MPCA; and WHEREAS, the annual evaluation and planning survey report and the MPCA's response has been reviewed by the City Council of Albertville on December 15, :19971. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 7:T RESOLVED by the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, that the report has been presented and reviewed. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCII, OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 15th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Goeb, City Clerk City of Albertville Mayor Olsen and Council The following comments are provided to clarify some questions you may have concerning the Annual Evaluation and Planning System Survey report. I have also provided a copy of the original survey with the report for reference. 1. SECTION ONE. TREATMENT SYSTEM PHYSICAL CONDITION The response refers to the survey questions #2, 3, and 7 regarding the need for additional main lift station capacity. The City has already discussed this issue and will be incorporated into the engineer's Facility Plan. 2. SECTION TWO: SYSTEM LOADINGS AND PERFORMANCE (FROM DMR'S) As has been discussed in past meetings, the phosphorous issue was investigated and at least a temporary solution has been found. Phosphorous limits should not be exceeded this; winter. The cost of the alternate chemicals being used to meet phosphorous in the winter will also be addressed in the Facility Plan. Exceeding influent flow design capacity, refers to specifically the dates May 19, 1996, and June 9, 1996, during high rainfall events. This indicates that there may be significant inflow or infiltration into the collection system. The Facility Plan process also requires these issues to be addressed. 3. SECTION THREE: COLLECTION SYSTEM The response here refers to the bypass of the DJ's lift station this past summer. The bypass was a result of an extended power outage following severe storms. The system is not experiencing significant bypasses or overflows. 4. SECTION FOUR: BIOSOLIDS We have just now switched to the Pond #1 storage area for biosolids. Although there is no urgency for removal at this point, I would like to at least secure land to be permitted for disposal. 5. SECTION FIVE: SEPTAGE The comment does not apply to Albertville, since the City does not accept septage at it's facility. 6. SECTION SIX: TREATMENT SYSTEM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE The Agency found no areas of concern in this section. 7. SECTION SEVEN: FINANCIAL AND ORDINANCE STATUS Depreciation was discussed earlier in the year when we worked with City staff on the City's Wastewater and Collection System budget. I believe that $88,000 is the amount that should be used;, but it was reduced at some point prior to finalizing the budget. An industrial user rate should be developed in order to protect the life of the treatment facility. There are no significant industrial contributors at this point, but as the City grows, you will want to be prepared to have a rate structure in place. This is something that PSG can work with the City and its engineer to develop if you wish. Annual notification: self-explanatory. The information I used to answer this question was received from City staff. 8. SECTION EIGHT: FUTURE NEEDS I believe that the Agency leaves this open for discussion; although Albertville has already addressed the necessary issues and a Facility Plan is in progress by the engineers. If you should find anything in error on the survey or report or have any questions or comments, please call me at 497-8309 anytime. 00Minnesota Pollution Control Agency OW October 16, 1997 Ms. Kelly Browning Wastewater Superintendent City of Albertville City Hall Albertville, Minnesota 55301 RE: 1997 Annual Evaluation and Planning System Dear Ms. Browning: Thank you for participating in the 1997 Annual Evaluation and Planning System (AEPS) process. Your evaluation was reviewed and enclosed is a report based on your responses. We recommend the report be discussed at an upcoming municipal council/board meeting. In some cases, items identified in the report may require immediate attention. Comparing this year's data with that of past evaluations may help identify areas of concern for your wastewater system. After the meeting, the mayor/municipal chair should certify that the report has been discussed and submit this certification to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. If possible, this should be done within 30 days of your receipt of the report. The certification can be in the form of a letter signed by the mayor/chair. Many municipalities are using the AEPS as a planning tool for their wastewater system. Review of the report provides a great opportunity for municipal councils/boards to learn about their investment in pollution prevention. Take this opportunity to encourage them to visit your facility and see it in action. We hope the report information will prove useful in planning for the future of wastewater treatment in your municipality. If you need any assistance or have any questions regarding the AEPS process, would like assistance in implementing suggestions from the report, or would like a copy of the summary report, please feel free to contact me at (612) 296-8766 or 1-800-657-3864. Sincerely, r,, s &"'� Deb Lindlief Point Source Compliance Section Water Quality Division DL:mbo Enclosures cc: Municipal Official (without enclosures) 520 Lafayette Rd. N.; St. Paul, MN 55155-4194; (612) 296-6300 (Voice); (612) 282-5332 (TTY) Regional Offices: Duluth* Brainerd, Detroit Lakes -Marshall - Rochester Equal Opportunity Employer • Printed on recycled paper containing at least 2l)16 fibers from paper recycled by consumers. >>> MUNICIPALITY: ALBERTVILLE This report contains responses to questions you answered in the Annual Evaluation and Planning System form. Although you answered all the applicable questions in the form, not every answer received a response in this report. We provided a response only when an answer indicated that there is an issue which may need resolution. MPCA staff have assigned a point value to the various questions in this form, with the exception of questions in Section 8, Future Needs. Points are given to responses that indicate that there may be a problem to be addressed. Each section is worth 100 points. If your system received a score greater than 50 in any section, you should carefully review the report responses for this section to determine if your system is operating effectively and efficiently. We hope this report proves useful both in planning for future wastewater needs and in resolving current problems. If you need assistance in implementing any of the suggestions in this report or have questions concerning the report or survey process, please feel free to contact Deb Lindlief at 1-800-657-3864. >>> SECTION ONE: TREATNEVT SYSTEM PHYSICAL CONDITION Your responses to the questions 2, 4, 7, and/or 12 demonstrate your awareness that major repairs or replacement are needed in the next five years. As you are aware, this requires a great deal of planning, including funding, construction, permit modifications, and choosing of a consultant. Score for SECTION 1: 12, WHERE 0 IS BEST AND 100 IS•THE MAXIMUM. If your score is greater than 50, carefully review the survey you filled out and our report responses for this section to determine if your system is operating efficiently. >>> SECTION TWO: SYSTEM LOADINGS AMID PERFORMANCE (from your DMR's) Based on the monthly D.M.R. data you have submitted over the last calendar year, the following conclusions can be drawn: Last year, you exceeded your effluent phosphorus limits at least once. This is a permit violation. You should investigate the causes of the exceedence, create a plan to manage the problem and inform the Agency of your plan as soon as possible. Last year, You exceeded 90%- of your effluent phosphorus limits at least once. Although this is not a permit violation, it indicates your system is reaching the limits of its capacity to treat wastewater adequately. This may soon lead to noncarpliance. You should investigate your phosphorus loading and create a plan to manage it. Last year, you exceeded your influent design flow capacity at least once. While influent flow is not a permit condition, such exceedence may lead to non-ca pliance. You should investigate the causes of the exceedence and create a plan to manage the problem. Score for SECTION 2: 70 WHERE 0 IS BEST AMID 100'IS'THE MAxnIl M. If your score is greater than 50, examine your DMR's for the last calendar year and note if your system is operating efficiently. >>> SECTION THREE: COLLECTION SYSTEM Questions 25-26. If your system is experiencing significant bypasses or overflows, you should investigate the causes and take the steps necessary to correct them. Question 29. Unless lift stations receive proper maintenance, your system's removal efficiency is likely to suffer. Your lift stations should be inspected daily to ensure proper operation. Score for SECTION 3: 8, WHEF�E 0 IS BEST AMID 100 IS THE MAXIMLM. If your score is greater than 50, carefully review the survey you filled out and our report % responses for this section to determine if your system is operating efficiently. >>> SECTION FOUR: BIOSOLIDS Question 34.6. You indicated that you plan to obtain new landspreading sites. Be aware that the approval process takes one to three months. If you have not completed an application or need information on the application process, please contact Jorja Dufresne at 1-800-657-3864. Score for SECTION 4: 0, WHER3 0 IS BEST AND 100 IS -UM MAXM M. If your score is greater than 50, carefully :review the survey you filled out and our report responses for this section to determine if your system is operating efficiently. >>> SECTION FIVE: SEPTAGE Question 44. You should develop a septage disposal plan, which covers how your system will treat and dispose of septage. This is a significant but too often overlooked part of the process of wastewater treatment. Score for SECTION 5: 0, WHERE, 0 IS BEST AND 100 IS THE MAXIMLM. If your score is greater than 50, carefull,,► review the survey you filled out and our report responses for this section t() determine if your system is operating efficiently. >>> SECTION SIX: TREATMENT k;YSTEM OPERATION AMID MAINTENANCE Score for SECTION 6: 0, WHE ! 0 IS BEST AND 100 IS THE MAXDMXM. If your score is greater than 50, carefully review the survey you filled out and our report responses for this section tc determine if your system is operating efficiently. >>> SECTION SEVEN: FINANCIAL AND ORDINANCE STATUS The area of sewer service charge systems and sewer use ordinances is complex and confusing. Municipalities which received funding from the federal or state construction grants program or the State Revolving Fund (loan program) face certain requirements in the area of ordinances. We have sample ordinances and charge systems which you can use to create your own documents. If you have questions concerning ordinances, charge systems, rate setting, or whether you must meet the requirements of specific funding programs, please contact Deb Lindlief.at 1-800-657-3864. Question 69. An egupipment replacement account contains funds set aside for replacement of equipment that will wear out during the life of the system. Such an account should be part of your operation and maintenance budget. Depreciation information will provide the dollar amounts to be set aside each year for this account. This both ensures adequate funding for equipment replacement and helps your municipality avoid emergency funding problems. Question 75. An industrial user rate schedule may exist in the form of surcharges to users contributing high -strength waste to the system. If you are not applying such surcharges, your system is probably not proportional. Even if there are no industries contributing waste to your system at this time, it is a good idea to be prepared and establish a schedule for future use. Question 76.5. Your sewer use ordinance should require annual notification of cost to all users. Users should be notified annually regarding what is enccnpassed in the user charge. Score for SECTION 7: 19, WHERE 0 IS BEST AMID 100 IS THE MAXIMUM. If your score is greater than 50, carefully review the survey you filled out and our report responses for this section to determine if your system is operating efficiently. >>> SECTION EIGHT: FVIURE NEEDS MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY WATER QUALITY DIVISION ANNUAL EVALUATION AND PLANNING SYSTEM Municipality Name Today's Date Avl&--2�� • t1)(4)( )(A)ls)(I)(1:.)(a)(f �0)t.2)(4)(4)tS)(4)(1)(8)(9 01(1) 13) t,3.) (4)40 0) (? `(4) ($ 00)( )W(4)l4.)(4)(#:)(0))4 6)(1)(2+(3.)(4)t.3)t}�Ci)(ii)� (3)(4) i lf](. )lell9 (3)db (S)t#)0)(A)0 MARKING INSTRUCTIONS 6 Use No. 2 pencil. • Do not use red ink or felt tip pens. • Make solid marks that fill the response completely.- • Make no stray marks on this form. • Do not tear or mutilate this form. • KEEP A COPY OF THE COMPLETED FORM FOR YOUR RECORDS Incorrect Marks (SA (X) jw (:.) Correct Mark • 0(..:)C?t_..)r: 1l(-)(")(')(._)f-',0gn(')o o 4189 PLEASE DO NOT MARK IN THIS AREA w r wo M All Systems 1. Age of the • + " 2 a"� "• 3 i a' + r "+ a +. s (This is defined as the number of years since the last construction facility: u �+ �'' 3"!'' S' a ci ce s: to increase the organic or hydraulic capacity of the facility.) �2. Are there any valves, piping, pumps, etc. that will require major repair or .replacement within the next five• • . • • �H;> years? ............................... .. . 3. Identify items needing repair or replacement:_ NA, ................................. Mechanical Unit Processes .................................................. If not applicable, go to question S. listed below, indicate whether equipment, structures, etc., will require major repair or replacement 4, For the processes five within the next years: 4.1 Activated Sludge ............ .... ... ......... .... .. ..........I........ removal, pH adjustment, • etc.) ' ' V'' • "A' , Y: NA 4.2 Chemical Feed Equipment (including phosphorus 4.3 Clarifiers (including primaryry, secon a►y, Imhoff tanks, etc.) .......................... :....... (I) NA 4.4 Disinfection (including dechlorination) ...................... , ........ • ... • ....... ,y) rN 140 • • • • .. . 4.5 Effluent Filters..................................................................... �q)!N' • 4.6 Incineration ......................................... ...................•'•v,(it) 4.7 Intermittent Sand Filters ... ............ ...... • • • • • • .. • .......... , , • • „ • Treatment (including grit removal,�comminutors, screening, etc.). • .' (N+• rY;+N) • 4.8 Preliminary • • . • . • . , . , , ..... Biological Contactors ..................... 4.9 Rotating , . , ..... , , ....... , ..... , (y„ N) • • • • . • .. • • . . . 4.10 Sequencing Batch Reactors ......................... +Y) cHl ............................ 4.11 Sludge Composting................................................................. Sludge Dewatering.................................. ri+N?sr '�'"N"r 4.12 .............................. 4.13 Sludge Dipsters................................................................... Y}(W ars 4.14 Sludge Thickening ...................... ........... ......................... • • ' " v, u> • 4.15 Trickling Filters/Biofilters ..................... • • • • • • • • . • Unit Processes (such as Stabilization, Aerated, Polishing, Sludge Storage, etc.) ...... NA` Pond If not applicable, go to question 8. S. is there any deep rooted vegetation (e.g., cattails, etc.) in ponds or dikes? ....................... 6. Are there any burrowing rodents living in the ponds or dikes? ...................... • . 7. Will any of the following need major repair or replacement within the next five years? 7.1 Liner or seal....................................................................... �• 7.2 Lift stations ................................................ ....................... 7.3 Riprap............................................ ....... .......................... 7:4 Dikes • .......................................................::::.................(Y) 7.5 Control structures .................................... ..........................'.v�1 7.6 All-weather road .......................................... Systems (such as Spray Irrigation, Rapid Infiltration, Drainfields, etc.) ... • • Soil Treatment If not applicable, go to question 12. or of water on the ground surfaces .... (V) t N 8. During dry weather conditions, are there soft spots, seepage pooling 9. Is there any unusual growth of vegetation in or near the soil treatment system area (e.g., cattails: plush green• • areas, etc.)? .......................... .......... 10. Is there established vegetative cover on the soil treatment system? .................................. 11. If are the ground water monitoring wells up to Minnesota Department of Health codes? .......... cti� rN) present, in Section One require major repair or replacement within. the. next five (y) a 12. Will any other equipment identified • • years? .............................. .......... ,y} 13. Identify items in Section One needing repair replacement: 14. Additional comments on wastewater treatment system physical if necessary: 0 0 ■■ Soil Treatment Systems (Spray Irrigation, Rapid Infiltration, Drainfields) ...............• If not applicable, go to question 25. 15. The influent design flow for your soil treatment system is: i e. The influent design biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) for your treatment system is: 17. In the last year, how many months did the following exceed 90 percent of the design values listed above: 17.1 0 ,: 2 J e s a •7::a.-a] 17.2 � o�rl.,2. s! 4, 18. In the last year, how many months did the following exceed the design values: 18.1 0' t 0 `1 2 3' 4 5 6 , A,.9 18.2 0 1 19. Were the design hydraulic application rates exceeded on any sites? ................................... r N 20. Were there any discharges to surface waters In the past year? ...................................... * r.. N, 21. Does the system have enough site acreage to accept all of the water received? .......................... r N: 22. Do leasees ever refuse to accept water per their lease agreements? .................................. v 23. Did any monitoring well sample results exceed: ............... ... ....... , , , , , . , , .. , , , . , , . NA 23.1 250 mg/L chlorides? ............... N 23.2 10 mg/L nitrate-nitrogen?............................................................. r" N 24. Additional comments on wastewater treatment system loadings and performance, if necessary: PLEASE 00 NOT MARK IN THIS AREA ■■ ■ . M M SECTION THREE: COLLECTION SYSTEM (All Systems) 25. How many days in the last year did emergency bypasses or overflows occur? (Regional systems answer to the extent of available information.) i 25.1 In any part of the sewer collection system? —--------------- 11- 1 2 3 4 5 6-7 1 2• 3 4 5 6 7 8 90 41.2 3 4 5 �6 t7y !8- 25.2 At the treatment system? �C? -,7'! 2_._33 4_5_67'8,19' 26. Of the number listed in 25.1 and 25.2, how many were due to: 26.1 Rain or Snow Melt (infiltration/Inflow) �{ ,1'�2+13 4 5 6' 2 3 4�5 6i7_8 `9 J 26.2 Equipment Failure_ 1_2 3 4 _5 _6 _7 8 9 27. Does a plan exist to remove any infiltration or inflow? ............................................ !v+(W 28. How many rainfalls in the last year caused basement backups? (Regional Systems answer to the extent of available information.)_ _ �' __ 1 2 31 4 5 6 7 8 9 0'1 21t3+ 4'•,5',6)'7'!8',9. dW'1 21!3 A 5` 6 7 8 9. 29. Are lift stations adequately maintained and operated? ............................................ • f k ) 30. Does a scheduled preventive maintenance program exist for the collection system? ...................... 0 (N) 31. Does a routine inspection program exist for the collection system? ........... 0 t Ni 32. Describe any major repairs or equipment replacement that were made to the collection system in the last year. Do not include if the system is less than one year old (as indicated in question 1). 33. Additional comments on collection system, if necessary: IN ■ 0 ■ If not applicable, go to question 42. NA• � 34. For biosolids that are land applied: ... 34.1 Does the system employ a certified Type IV waste system (sludge) operators ...................... • N .. i 34.2 Does the system contract with a certified Type IV waste system (sludge) operator? ........ .�. Y � a� 34.3 Does the system have at least six months of storage? .................... . . • . • .. • 34.4 What storage components exist? ;:: Digester ) Dryin g s � t? Storage Tanks sta Other 8 sc2et�r Dt_n�c .r2 -rea c>f 34.5 Are an adequate number of MPCA approved acres available to apply the system's biosolids pp o�luction for the next year? ....................................... the sys .. 's bins ..N, (T. . 34.ti Will any new lands r d' p ea Ing sites be applied for in the next 12 months? ,, , , , , , , , , , , , 34.7 Have any site complaints been received regarding biosolids?........... • N 41111 34.8 Are biosolids spread on frozen or snow covered ground? ................ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... Y 35.1 in general are the EPA/503 regulations understood? 3ti. 37. 35.2 Are pathogen reduction to Class 8standards met? ..•.,.••.•,•......,•••••••...LL.�••�•�•._••••••.• 35.3 Are vector attraction reduction requirements met? Are monitoring wells in place at an lands readin locations? If the biosolids are not land applied, are the transferred to another facility? 37.1 If yes, list the name of the receiving facility: N Y N 38. 39. List total annual biosolids generated (not landspread) in dry tons: o , , 1 , 's , 3 N/A 0 1! 2. 3; 4,,5` 6, 7 8' 9 'T 0' 1''2"J' 4 '5"6• 7 �5: 9 Will any other equipment identified in Section Four require major repair or replacement within the next five years? ................. 40. Identify items in Section Four needing repair or replacement: • • .. • • • • . • • . • • • , . • . • • • . • • • Y • 41. Additional comments op biosolids, if necessary: r- T E DO NOT MARK IN THIS eaFe 4189 ■■ Nh st• f not applicable, go to question 49. 42. How many exist within the service area? O I x 3 :4 s 6 7 6 g Individual sewage treatment systems LO 1 2 5 4 S 6 7' 6-9 43. Have the individual systems' septic tanks been pumped in the last three years? ......................... . Y .N 44. Is septage accepted in the treatment system? .............................................. Y�& 4S. Does the municipality have a septage disposal plan? .............................................. 45.1 Is the septage disposal plan in accordance with the permit? .................................. Y WO 46. Will any other equipment identified in Section Five require major repair or replacement within the nexAve .. Y N years? ............................................... 17. Identify items in Section Five needing repair or replacement: --- ----- 48. Additional comments on septage, if necessary: 0 0 0 no SECTION SIX: TREATMENT SYSTEM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE System Operation 49. How many days per week is the wastewater treatment system staffed? 3 e d 6 J 50. How many hours per day is the wastewater treatment system staffed? ti ( i I •.2 • LIST THIS AS A TOTAL PER DAY (I.E., HOURS), OT A TOTAL PER PERSON o) i):.:a;c4,r!e; s):9 PER DAY. f)Ou On wdkkt- eS 51. Total daily flow measurement: C�� c { Y 51.1 Has the influent (or effluent) flow meter that measures total daily flow been calibrated within the last year?............................................................................. (W NA 51.2 If total daily flow is determined by running time meters on lift station pumps, were the pumps calibrated within the last year?......................................................... v), N I. dk 51.3 If flow is not measured using a flow meter or running time meters, how are total daily flows measured? 52. Have any significant mechanical or process -related operational problems been experienced within the last year? • ( N AA 53. Please describe: t��.�,,�/ Ltod 54. if item 52 is yes, were any of the problems attr�ttVribu able to ommercraT or Industrial discharges? ............ 1 Y' NA 55. is your laboratory work conducted at a certified laboratory (excluding dissolved oxygen, pH and chlorine residual)?..............................................................................(N`. System Maintenance 56. Does a scheduled preventive maintenance program exist for the treatment system? ...................... • N` 57. Is the preventive maintenance schedule being adhered to and are accurate records being maintained? ...... 1 �" NA 58. Were any major repairs or equipment replacement made in the last year? Do not include if the system is less than one year old (as indicated in question 1)................................................... •'N) 58.1 Please describe: QLAWAVIN 4 L• i Operator Certification and Training 59. What is the treatment system's classification (mark one) ........................................ +A: e) 0 � 6) 60. Is the operator in responsible charge of the system certified at a class equal to or greater than the system's classification?............................................................................ 0 IN,, 61. Has the above operator attended any training within the last year? .................................. • (NJ 62. How many operators does the system employ? �(j)t2)t�lt�)(6)(Bl(7)�elt9 63. How many of those operators are certified? (1_)(u(.4)(4)(s)A)i7)(11(91 a(- )0.)(5)(1)(3)(d)tt)f01t9, 64. Does an ongoing safety training program exist? .................................................. • (N)� 65. Additional comments on treatment system operation and maintenance, if necessary: 0■ 0 N M I SECTION SEVEM FINANCIAL AND ORDINANct STATUS 66. Please complete the following for the entire wastewater system using Information from the last fiscal year. REVENUES -j 0. , 2 3 4- - 5- '6-*--7--'-0 1 9 User 0 t 2 3 A 5 6 0 8 9 a 2 3 05 6 7 -S!,O Charges 1) 1 2 3 4. 6 V 8 9 $ n 1 2 3 0 5 6' 7 19, 9 0 1 2--3-4 34 5 6 7 9 7 8 9 Taxes (9_ of ;-' .1 4 5 6 7 8 9 01 2 1 .1 56 7 8 9 +$ Of 2 1 4 5 6 1 a 9 0 16-7 7 8-9 7 0 '0 3 4' 5 17,'S '' 9 Other 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 A 9 +$ 0. 1: 2 31 4 5 JA .O_db 1 2 3 4 5 6, 7 8:'9 1 2 3 4-_ 5 6- 7% 8 9. Please list: SAC 70-7-17-6-3- 47-5 1 5 - 7 f 8', 9 0 1 , 2 3 4 5 F 7' 8. 4P Total 0 1 2 1 4 5 4P 7 8-9 =$ 0 1 2 0 4 5 6 7 8 9 01 1 2 3 40 5 6 7 R i 1 _2 -3-4 4 -5-6 6 7 4P19 EXPENDITURES Operation 2 & 0-l 2 3 4 5 0 7-6-9 Maintenance 0 42 3 4' 5 6 17 '91 9 ._I_ 0; 1 2' 3 A 5 6 4PI 8 9 4 5 6 1 -2 3 4 5 6 Oitl) 2-3.'4'fS�-6 7 8 9 Al -9' Depreciation 0t-1 2 3 4 5 6 8 7 & 9 +$ 0' & 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0' V 2 3 4 5 6 7 8, 0. 2 3 0 5 6 �7 81 9 0 4p,1-2 3 4 5 6 7 8, 9 Capital _0 0( - -11f2r13-4 ;51 61f7-8),9'1 Replacement _W 0` A. 4' 5 6 7"81,9' 670 1) ( 2 1: 3:, 4: +$ 1' 2. 3 14' 5 6 7 0 -C) 4P !�J,- 1 2 (3 4 s, r, .7„8! 91 Debt (.0) f I „2 .3 " 4 5) 6 7! 18 '4p Service 1, 2 3 4 5 6 7 A-40 ,0)11,''2; 1 4' 51' 6!'7,1V4* +$ '0 '1' 2 dP 4 5 �6 7 8 .9 60 .1,1:2' 3i 4 ,5 6 7 6' 9. 1 '2 3 4 5 6` 7 t8,! 9 Other 0't2 i3 14:'5* +$ 1. 2 3 4 5 6 Please list: 0 1 0 3: 4 '5, 0 1 (1 1'2 1 i 3 114 1 ',5) i 6 (7) db j) Total 0-1-21 3! & 5't6'ft),+$)(0) 0 1 to 3,,4 15 =$ 01-1-1 .1121 3)�45 16-7)ITO t—.o 0_1 2 3'a 56 7, 9 IN NNO E. - , ." -'a -, 1 - - - 4189 PLEASE DO NOT MARK IN THIS AREA III m E 0 0 m 67. Did expenditures for operation and maintenance significantly exceed user charges? ...................... (Y:) ttp 68. Did user charges significantly exceed expenditures for operation and maintenance? ...................... (.Y)4P .69. Does the municipality have an equipment replacement account? .................................... (.Y)• i 70. Are revenues and expenditures for the wastewater treatment systems kept in accounts separate from non -sewer accounts (e.g., water utilities, public works, etc.)? ................................................ i1! (N) 71. What was the year of JtheAlast rate adjustment? CtI/ YEAR 9 02 3 4 - 6 .8 !71t�O!dO 02 3 4- Sr 6;4111 (8;(V 72. Monthly Residential User Rate 72.1 Base Rate $ _,ri_0p _ w, t, r 1 72.2 If you use a per unit charge: 9 Per 1,000 allons _ -AlS x ,� _ $ 22 , 9S ov4 r �- c'tx, Or Per 100 cubic feet $ x 10.67 = $ 72.3 Total Residential User Rate (based on an average 8,000 gallons per household per month) (72.1 + 72.2) = $ b) a) (2, l0]O)(2)(3)C4.(l )(81(Ti( Ma 8)(9 ?roil/ �f i UO(D(2)0)(4)(S,)(6)( )(§)(9- 73. Is there a fee for a new connection to the sewer system? .......................................... 73.1 If yes, please list the fee in whole dollars: $ �:o) (S) (1) • (a) ($) O(1_) (6) (s) 1-4) U) (A) (i) (e) (0, 0 (J) (2) (3) (4) (9) (4) CV (4) 0 ) Q 1)(1)(3)(4)(0)(0)(i)(e)(4) 74. Are all users charged proportionately to their use? ................................................ • (N) 75. Does an industrial user rate schedule or surcharge rate exist? ...................... (Y 76. Has the municipality adopted a sewer use ordinance? ............................................ I►(u) If yes, does the ordinance: 76.1 Control new connections 76.2 Prohibit clear water connections 76.3 Prohibit toxics. ....... ................................... (N) 76.4 Allow the municipality to require pretreatment ............................................ •,q) 76.5 Require annual notification of cost to all users ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' . dP 76.6 Provide for enforcement of the ordinance ................................................ (N> 77. Does the municipality have pretreatment agreements/permits with significant industrial users? ............ (V (N) • 77.1 If yes, do the agreements have limitst.. 77.2 Have there been any violations limits in of the last�year?.................................... (Y) tN) 78. For individual soil treatment systems: • 78.1 If a sewer use ordinance exists does it address routine maintenance for individual sewage treatment systems and proper disposal oFthe se taget .............................................. 78.2 Does the municipality require individual systems be inspected and brought up to code at the time of building permit application, point of sale or complaints? .................................... 78.3 Does the municipality (Y.) CH) 04 restrict the discharge of non -domestic waste to individual sewage treatment systems? . , 78.4 Does the municipality allow newly constructed homes to be served by individual sewage treatment (Y) (t0 NA systems? . . 78.5 If yes, does the municipality have ordinances and an inspection program to ensure that the new system is (Y) (N) f1b i properly located, designed and built? .................................................. Cp) (Nl 79. Additional comments on financial and ordinance status, if necessary: NN N s 80. What is the expected increase in the average wet weather (maximum monthly) flow over the next five years? p 0 , U 3 0 (million gallons per day) 81. What is the expected increase in the maximum monthly loadings for the following five years? 81.1 Biochemical Oxygen Demand % qQ 2 (pounds/month) 81.2 Total Suspended Solids (pounds/month) C c �iIrX CCy,) S /yam 81.3 Ammonia /',`// A (pounds/month) 81.4 Phosphorus '74o (poun month) 82. Will the five-year projected average wet weather flow rate exceed the system capacity? .................. 83. Will the five-year projected average maximum monthly loadings exceed the system design capacity? .......... r) r N ) 84. Are any major treatment facility or collection system improvements or expansions planned in the next five years?.................................................................................. I :N, 84.1 if yes, please complete the following: Treatment System Additional Capacity O Rehabilitation of Present System O Rehabilitation to Meet New Standards (Not for additional capacity) Estimated Year of Construction Start 0)(1."2) Or) (1)12_1(3+(4):.$it.6.)(1)(4)l6! 6)A)!V3! 4� 5 6.117)($�)(4) AI(J)'_21(3`l4(t5i(6_i(1)(6-)0) Estimated Year of Construction Start 0)r,1)(2` co)(i)(2)ryO4,r5)(6)f>(9)(i 0?t1`r2113''4 :5"6)(.7)l 0,10)(.2't3)'_4: i5't6)(7)CS)($) Estimated Year of Construction Start 0)(1)(2)1.3)14' O'(1)tI)(31(4)($)(8) CV (A)($) :Ot(1)(2;(3)t4)l )(61),(7)&(P) Estimated Year of Construction Start q)0);.2)0)(4)($)(3)Q)()(f) ? 01f,4)(5)(U(T)(j)(i) CO)Ci)12)(J)(4)('$)(f)C7)(f)(9) Put,, wiliar } S c.lSSi��7S i71� 'Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars $ (0)(1)(2)13)+4)(51'6 „71(8'19� '0111,'21A :'4 ,S T 7,'6)(_9) 01 �2 '3':4)' S g' 7) 6:10) Or•t)12.t3.,41 S..b.' Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars 01(1)(2;(3J1A)(5: 6;(7`'8)(8) 0)tt)+21C31t4)f5_)8!�3)(8)f91 _ .0'r,t !2r;3r 4 4.)(0) Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars S :0)tt)t21(1)'4'[S!t6'(7'16,t9; 0) !.J.) (2 i 0) A) (6) t6.) (Z) (4) (9 ) Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars $(_o.)(i)(:z)(3)(4)(1)(4)(1)CC(0) '.0)(i.)(;2)0)(4)(s)(6)(7)(A)(9) (0)(1)(�)(3)(4)(9)(6)rl)(6)(9) +0!(i)f2�r3+r1)(5i'6)r7ir6(g, c0)(1>r,2)t31t.4)($i(6i;7)(,6)l0) ©0NNnoN00000N00?7-)n0(-)o0c)c)(w) 4189 PLEASE DO NOT MARK IN THIS AREA �� MM Collection System 1i) Sewer Extension O Rehabilitation due to Inflow/infiltration O Rehabilitation due to all others O Other: Sludge O Additional Capacity O Rehabilitation of Present System O Rehabilitation to Meet New Standards (Not for additional capacity) O Other: Estimated Year of Construction Start 61(1' 2 13l"4i"5)(6)C7)t8)it 0)0.12 13.'4,+5,(6)(7)0(9) Estimated Year of Construction Start _. 0 .1 ""2' 0!'12'13)(4)rV(d)Q)(8)CO) 0)"1);21(.3)..4)(s)(8)(7)($)Ct) 0 ;1)'2)(3)(4)t5�)(6)(D(1)(.$) Estimated Year of Construction Start 011 i!, 2) :0)(1)12)(3)(4)(6)(4j(3)CS) W (3)(4)0)0)C)C6)C#) o)(t)(2)(3)(k)QSj( )(D(U(1) Estimated Year of Construction Start 0 1)12) 0!!1 )(2)(3)C4)Cf)(1)(DQI)(1) 0)11)i2)(3)(4)($j(3)O(1)($) 0) (1.111) (8) (4)(4) (0) (t) (1)(it) Estimated Year of Construction Start (01(t)(2) a)(i)(2)W(4:)(t)(1)Q)(VW 0) t:'"2.1(3)(4)(5)(0)CI) (f) 0 1, 2J(3)1.4)(5)1,4)C,}(a)C%� Estimated Year of Construction Start rojli)-.2+ 0) (1) (2) (j) (4) (6) (6) (1) (1) Ct) i)(1)(4))0(6)(1)(e)(0) 0)it 4"15)16)(,7)(6)(0) Estimated Year of Construction Start ,0))i)!2' 10)(1)i211.3)141r5)r6.)(_7)(d)i0) b)4.)(2'r1 41r51(81(7)(8)(0) O;o, 21i3)`,4 (5i(6)(7)0)3) Estimated Year of Construction Start '0`"1 :2) 10)t1 i2)(3"t4115)16)(a)(d)(0) 1,01) i112)13.'.4).5'(6)(f')(6)(4.) Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars +O)t111"2:r3)(41(5'";61(7)(e)C9,1 '0)11r12,t31141f6)l6117)(6) U) 0.11)•21 3,41 51 Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars $ '0)ti.:) 1,2,(3)(4)(5)r6)(1)ta)C0` 0t41)t2)(3)t4)1S.)16)(11(A)(.6) (0.)(tj(,2)r3it,4)t511.61(7)r.6j!.9; C0)(. 112)1,3?(4.1t5)t6)t.711,6)(6) ".0)(1)t2'13)(4)(5)t6)(T)(01)499 0,1(1; (2;(1)(4)(5)QB)(7)(6)(9) Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars $ 0)11_i:2),11(4r(3) d?(7)4 6)(il) (0)(.1)(2)(3)t,4.)1.t1(6,)(7)(u(0) O)(,t)(2i(3.)(4rt6)'6)(71(6)(0) i0)(i,,(2)(3)(1)(5)(5)(r)cj6)C0) (0)(t)(2)(3)(4)(5) -0)(f)(0)(0) 0)(11t2)0, "4)(5,:(6)t7.)(6)1Q) Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars $ 01;1+'2,(2)!41t5.16)iJ)t11)(0) 61It) 12)+3rr,41,6)(6)(Tj(8)(f)) 6)(1)12":31t4.11V(61(T)(e)(0) 10)(1)'.,2)(3)14�It5)(6)t2)(e)(6) 'O)111'_2 13.1(4;"..6,t.8.)(7)(6)(!d) 0)(1)t2'1.3)+;4'(5)t6`•(7)(6)(0.) Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars $(0f(i-)Q);3,(4:,j16?16)'9.,(b!r�) (OI(i)(2)(8)tof95 (8)(7)(8)(-t) (6)CT)C-)0) A)(3)(s)QD(4)(0) (0)(.i..0)(3)(41,$)(a.,(7)t8)(9) Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars $ (0)00( )(5)(4)(3)t6)i7jCd)(£) ('00Ctj(v00(A.,(.$ t6)t.)0)(01 (o)(i)(2)(j)(4)(6,(6)(1)(ti)(ii) (0)(f0r2)(3)(4.'(6t(6)(7)1.6>(0) (0.)CiJ(.2)(3)(4)10)(6.1(2,)(,6)(j) Estimated Cost in Millions of Dollars $ lo)(i)r2)(2;;.4)(51f6)(1')(d)(0) i ti) ct) (2, 7t2) (4) 0! (6 ) (f) (d) (0) (6)01)0)0-1(4)(6)(e)0.)(V0) (0) (i)(1)(5.)14)(5)(,6)(7)(1)(4) (0)( )(2)(3)(.41(51(6)(7)A..)(0) CO) 0)(2)(3)(_4)(b)Or) (.7j(4)(e) Estimated Cost in Millions of Dolla ' $ o)(.i)(2)13)(41(0)t0)(1)(e)iA) (0)t.1j(2)(3)(4)1,t)(d)tT)(8)(0) (t)) (i.) (2.) (2) (4) (5) (6) (T.) (4) C4) (o)O)( .)(1)4)(6:)4)(V(4)CU 0■ N N 0 84.2 ,: QNI ?4", author and date of document that listed the cost estimate on previous 2 pages (e.g., facilities plan, engineering report, engineer study, etc.) Write "None" if estimate was not documented. t /V F Do any plans exist to connect any of the unsewered homes in the service area to the municipal treatment system within the next five years?..................................................................: v , , N ' w 85.1 If yes, how many? P0 � 1 '2' 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 '0,11"2-3'�4 i5•�8 7;'8)�9 O) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 85.2 Total estimated cost of sewer extension in millions: $ ; 01 r- )' 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (01(1-)(21t3 �4, 5 6 7 8 9 (0)(V, 2113 '4 5 6 7 8 9 !011)(21'34 .5 ri 17 8 9 01C�?i21'3' 4 5 6 7 8 9 O)i1?(21(3 4 5 6 7 8 9 86. If future construction project(s) were identified in 84, are you interested in receiving information regarding financial assistance through the State Revolving loan Program? ...................................... v • 87. Additional comments, if necessary: 88. Completed by: r' �;ndci J,fp,� C; � GttrL Ku) c,I-ds /Jub/ y Works 61-�-L J 0r r'h •� Sl c�-{�sr If you have questions concerning this document, please contact: Deb Lindlief Water Quality Division 1-800-65 7-3864 (612) 296-8766 Copyright O 1994 Natlonel Computer Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed In U.S.A. Mark nellex0 by NCS MM104681:321 AGS05 ©, NNw-,E,-.)(_4189 PLEASE DO NOT MARK IN THIS AREA N M N ■N CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #1997-59 ESTABLISHMENT OF SALARY ADMINISTRATION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Albertville is desirous of amending their present policy for "salaries" and is by this resolution rescinding RESOLUTION #1995-43; and WHEREAS, the City Council is interested in determining additional parameters for the "Salary" policy to be renamed "Salary Administration" policy for the City. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, orders the amendment to their Personnel Policy of the City as amended May 2, 1994, with the following additions: SALARY ADMINISTRATION Policy: It is the policy of the City of Albertville to pay wages and salaries which are based upon the nature of the job performed and which are competitive with rates being paid for similar work by other employers and cities in the community/state and commensurate with pay equity. Comment: (1) The city administrator and City Council Personnel Committee have been appointed to review all wages and salaries on an annual basis. It is their responsibility to determine whether existing pay ranges are competitive and whether compensation of individual employees accurately reflect their job performance and responsibilities. Increases for individual employees and adjustments to the pay ranges will be presented to the City Council by committee in keeping with the Minnesota Law on "Pay Equity". The City Council will formally act on any recommendations by resolution of the Council. (2) New employees generally are hired at the minimum pay rate of the pay range in relation to the nature of the job. Department heads may recommend higher starting rates based on the employee's prior experience and/or education. These recommendations will be reviewed by the city administrator and the Personnel Committee before recommendation for formal action by resolution of the City Council. (3) Wage and salary surveys are conducted among ares cities and the League of Minnesota Cities. The data obtained from these surveys form the basis for the city administrator and Personnel Committee's recommendations for pay adjustments to the City Council for formal action. (4) There will be no automatic cost -of -living adjustment. (5) Employees are paid every two weeks (bi-weekly) on Wednesday following the close of the pay period. (6) On each payday employees will receive a statement showing gross pay, deductions and net pay. City, federal, social security (FICA), state taxes, Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) and employee contributions to the City's benefit plans will be deducted automatically. Deductions for the 457K Plan and other City Council authorized deductions will be made if the employee submits a written request totthe city. (7) Every full-time or permanent part-time employee shall be considered for an increase in compensation based on a salary compensation plan adopted annually bo resolution of the Council. Compensation increases will' not be given on an automatic basis but shall be contingent upon favorable service/performance reports and recommendation of the department head and city administrator, as well as the availability of funds. (8) Pay schedules for compensation will be established by formal resolution of the City Council with all pay ranges and steps being determined in hourly pay amounts. The resolition will establish pay ranges based on "Pay Equity" Job Value Points with steps for future movement based on performance. (9) At the time of initial employment, promotion or demotion, the City Council will appoint the employee by resolution and will specify in the resolution the criteria, such as education and/or experience used for initial placement on a step within a pay range. Movement between steps will be based on the initial criteria for credit and other verifiable criteria credit as deemed appropriate by the City Council to determine the move to the next step on the pay schedule. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Goeb, City Clerk 4G CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #1997-60 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL ALBERTVILLE 1997 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 1998 WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council has adopted a proposed budget; and WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council has determined that a tax levy upon the taxable property in the City of Albertville is necessary to provide sufficient funds for the operation of the City from January 1, 1998, through December 31, 1998; and WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council has posted notice according to Minnesota Statutes of a public hearing to discuss the proposed tax levy and the proposed budget for 1998; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held and the proposed 1997 budget and tax levy collectible in 1998 have been discussed, including the proposed percentage increase in taxes and the proposed uses of the funds generated from such proposed tax increases. NOW, THEREFORE, BE I91 RESOLVED by the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, that: 1. The following sum: of money be levied for the current year, collectible in 1998, upon the taxable property in the City of Albertville, for the following purposes: GENERAL FUND $496,500 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS: 1988 Refunding Bond $2,600 1989 Refunding Bond $10,000 1990 G.O. Bond $22,500 1992 Sewer Trunk Bonds $8,500 1992 Refunding Bonds $14,000 1993C Refunding Bond $25,000 1996A G.O. Bond $10,900 2. The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of such levy to the County Auditor of Wright County, Minnesota, to be placed upon the tax rolls of the property within the City of Albertville. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF, THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 15th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Goeb, City Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #1997-61 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL ALBERTVILLE BUDGET FOR 1998 WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council has adopted a proposed budget; and WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council has adopted a final tax levy to be placed upon the taxable property in the City of Albertville; and WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council has posted notice according to Minnesota Statutes of a public hearing to discuss the proposed tax levy and the proposed budget for 1998; and WHEREAS, such public hearing has been held and the proposed 1998 budget and tax levy collectible in 1998 have been discussed, including the proposed percentage increase in taxes and the proposed uses of the funds generated from such proposed tax increases. WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council desires to reserve within the General Fund those monies designated as capital outlays within the various budget classifications, such that those monies can be disbursed only for those capital outlays so specified within the budget. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, that: 1. The attached budget. is hereby adopted as the final budget for the City of Albertville for the period January 1, 1998, through December 31, 1998. 2. All monies designated within the budget as capital outlays shall be reserved within the General Fund, such that those monies can be disbursed only for those capital outlays so specified within the budget. 3. The Albertville City Council has hereby complied with Minnesota Statutes. 4. The City Clerk is hereby authorized to transmit certification of compliance with Minnesota Statutes to the Commissioner of Revenue as required. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 15th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Goeb, City Clerk 1 4 '" 1998 FINAL BUDGET 000.000 REVENUE 1998 BUDGET 310.100 Current -Taxes -- - $496,500 -----------------------------_______-_-_-______-_----------------__ 310.200 Delinquent Taxes $0 ______________________________________________________________ 310.400 Tax Increments $0 _________________________________________________________ 319.100 Penalties/Interest _ _______________________________________________________________________________ 320.110 Liquor Permits $8,100 _________________________________________________________ 320.120 Beer Permits $200 ______________________________________________ 320.130 Amusements Licenses $350 ____________________________________________ 320.140 Cigarette Licenses $250 ________________________________________________ 320.150 Sign Permits $3,375 _________________________________________________________ 320.160 Other Business Lic./Permits $5,000 __________________________________._______________--_-_____ 320.210 Building Permits $39,000 __________________________________.____________ 320.220 Animal Licenses $100 _________________________ 334.010 ______-__-_____________ Local Government Aid $98,879 __________________________________._-------_____ $138,220 334.020 HACA -- _______________________________________-.___-____ 334.030 Local Performance Aid $3,136 _________________________________-._-_________-_______-_____ 334.050 Police Aid $7,785 _________________________________--____________________________ 334.060 Fire Aid $10,985 _________________________________-.____-_______________________ 336.000 Other Gov Units Grnts&Aid=.s $4,800 _________________________________-___-___-_---------_____________ 341.070 Special Assessment Searches $300 _________________________________--___--___-__-_____-___________-__ 341.090 Other Charges for Services $3,000 ---------------------------------_-___--___-____--______________-____ 342.020 Fire Protection Services $36,495 __________________________________----____________------------_________ 342.030 Park Rental Fees $2,000 _____________________________________________________________________ 350.000 Fines & Forfeits $100 _____________________________________________________________________ 362.000 _________________________________.-_______--______-______________--__ Interest Earnings $25,000 I _________________------_ 364.000 Private Contrib./Donations $0 __________________________________--___--____ 372.080 Other Revenues $1,500 _________________________--_________ 395.000 Lease Payment $950 ------------------------------------------------------- ____________________________-__-___-__---_____ BUDGET TOTALS $886,025 __________________________________.------___---------- 4 1 410.100 GEN. GOVT. - COUNCIL 1998 BUDGET 510_100WAGES---Elected-Officials 11,400 - 522.000 ---------------------------------------$- FICA Contributions _$872 523.000 _________________________________ PERA Contributions ________________________________________________________________________________ $185 526.000 Workers Comp Insurance ___________________________________________ $5,000 533.600 Other Prof. Contracts ___________________ 552.000 _______________________________ Ins. Other Than Emp. Ben. $5,100 _________________________________ 555.000 ------------------ Printing & Publications $7,500 _______________________________ $300 558.000 Travel -------------------------------------------------------- $100 561.100 General Supplies 561.300 --_.___________________ Training & Instruction $300 _______________________________ 591.000 ______________________ Dues & Subscriptions $2,300 599.000 __________________________________.__-______-_- __________________________ Miscelleaous - CMIF Donatio -$1,100 _____-_____________________ $34,157 BUDGET TOTALS 410.300 GEN. GOVT. - CITY ADMINISTRATOR 1998 BUDGET 511.100 WAGES - Administrator ------------------------ ------------------------------ 521.000 Group Insurance ------------------------------- _________ ------------------------------------ 522.000 FICA Contributions ----------------------- -------- ----------------------------------------------- 523.000 PERA Contributions --------------- _-------- ----------------------------------------------- 526.000 Workers Comp. Ins. ----------------------- _-------- ----- _ 552.000 Ins. Other Than. Emp. Ben. _______________ ------------------------------------------------- 558.000 Travel ________________ _____ 561.100 General Supplies --------------- _________ ______________________________________ 561.300 Training/Instructional Sup. ---------------- ----- --------------------------------------------------------- 574.300 Capital Outlay-Furn/Fix *** ___-_--_---_ --------------------------------------- 591.000 Dues & Subscriptions _________________ _____________________________________ ------------------ ------------- ____________________________________ City Administrator - Budget Included in Working Capital -_ ------------- _------- _-------------------------------------------------------- 410.400 GEN. GOVT. - CITY CLERK -TREASURER 1998 BUDGET 511.200 WAGES - Clerk/Treasurer $31,701 512.000 -------------------------------------------- WAGES -. Temp. Employees_ $4,000 --------------------------------------------------- 513.000 WAGES - Overtime $500 ______________ __________________________________ $5,271 521.000 Group Insurance 522.000 __________________ FICA Contributions $2,425 523.000 _______________________________________ PERA Contributions $1,642 _______________________________________________ 526.000 Workers Comp. Ins. $215 ________________________________________________ 533.300 Accounting Services -------- ----$0- ______________________________________-_-________-___-____-_-_ 533.400 Auditing Services .- _ $6,500 _ _ _ _ 533.700Maintenance/CopyvMachine--_-_____yY---------- _ ___ _ _ _ _--___--__ ------------_____--$1,200 - _ 533.900 Other Prof. Contracts $750 543.100 __________________________________________ Rep/Maint-Eq. *** ($865.30) $500 _________________________________________________ 544.200 Equipment Rental $1,000- _.»_..._-_...__-_.... _.,_.__....... -----------.-----......�___...__....___-"---•-- 552.000 Ins. Other Than Emp. Ben. $3,000 _______________________________________________ 558.000 Travel $500 561.100- GeneralSupplies_________________________-_____________- _____---- 300 - 561.300 - Training/Instructional Sup. $150 ----------------------------_--__________-________ $1,200 561.400 Postage ________________________________________________ 574.300 C/0-Furn/Fix ***($1,138.81) $200 591_000Dues&Subscriptions -60 592_000Elections - - - ------------------------------------------------- _ 3,200 744.000 ------------------_--___--_-_----___--__-_-_-____--_____ - ______________________________________________________________ C/O - Office *** $5,000 ___-_-------"- ____________________________________________________ ___________ BUDGETTOTALS _________ $72,314 410.550 GEN. GOUT. - ASSESSING 1998 BUDGET 531.100 Assessing Contract Services $7,350 ________________________________________________ _ 410.600 GEN. GOV. - CITY ATTORNEY 1998 BUDGET 533.500 Legal Services $18,000 ______________________________________________ 410.700 GEN. GOV. - CITY ENGINEER 1998 BUDGET 533.100 ENGINEERING ^SERVICES $15,000 --------------------------------------------------------- 410.800 GEN. GOVT. - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1998 BUDGET 510.100 WAGES - Elected Officials $480 ------------------------------------- 522.000 FICA Contributions _$37 ____________________ _____________ 558.000 Travel $100 ________________________ 561.100 General Supplies $100 ---------------------------- 561.300 Training/Instruction $100 --------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- 599.000 Miscelleaneous/Local Contribution $10,000 ____________________________.-___________-___ BUDGET TOTALS $10,817 ------------------------------------------------------ 410.910 GEN. GOVT. - PLANNING & ZONING 1998 BUDGET 510.100 WAGES - Elected Officials $1,200 _____________________________________________ 522.000 FICA Contributions ____________________________________________________________________________$_2_ 533.600 Planning Contract Services $15,000 _____________________ ---------------------------- 558.000 Travel $500 -------------------- 561.100 General Supplies $200 ___________________________________________ 500 561.300 Training/Instruction ---- ------------------------------------------------ BUDGET TOTALS $17,492 ------------------------------------------------- 410.920 GEN. GOVT. - CITY HALL 1998 BUDGET 542.000 Refuse Disposal $600 ------------------------------------------------------------ 543.100 Repairs/Maint.-Equipment $500 ____________________________________________________________ 543.200 Repairs/Maint.-Building $4,000 ---------------------------------------------------------- 552.000 Ins. Other than Emp. Ben. $3,600 ----------------------------------------------------------- 553.000 Telephone $2,500 ___________________________________________________________ 561.000 General Supplies $1,200 ______________________________________________________________ 562.100 Natural Gas $1,500 ______________________________________________________________ 562.200 Electricity $2,500 _______________________________________________________ 572.000 Capital Outlay - Buildings $1,000 ______________________________________________________________ 573.000 Capital Outlay - Non -Bldg. $1,000 ______________________________________________________________ 574.100 Capital Outlay-Mach/Equip $500 ---------------------------------------------_____________-___--_ 547.300 Capital Outlay-Furn/Fixt- $1,100 _______________________________________________________________ 599.000 _________________________________________________________________ Miscellaneous - -- - $41 ____________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________ BUDGET TOTALS $20,041 421.000 PUBLIC SAFETY - POLICE 1998 BUDGET ��_200 Police Contract Services $103,806 422.000 PUBIC SAFETY - FIRE DEPARTMENT 1998 BUDGET 510.200 WAGES - Fire Chief $600 -------------------------------------------------- 510.300 WAGES - Assistant Chief $300 ----------------------------------------------------------- 510.400 Fireman's Training Reimb. $8,250 _-___-_-------------------------------------------------------- 510.500 WAGES - Medical Training $2,250 --------------------------------------------------------------- 512.000 WAGES - Temp. Employees $9,000 ----------------------------------------------------------------- 524.000 Pension Fund Contr/Fire Aid $17,846 _________________________________________________________________ 526.000 Workers Comp. Insurance $2,850 _________________________________________________________________ 529.001 Physicals/Shots *** $500 ______________________________________________________________ 529.100 Training/Instruction $3,600 --------------------------------------------------------___-_-_ 529.200 EMT Training *** $750 _______________________________________________________ 529.300 First Resp. *** $1,000 ______________________________________________________________ 533.410 Audit Service - Relief. Asso $1,200 ------------------------------------------------------------ 543.100 Rep/Mtn - Eq. *** $1,000 ------------------------------------------------------------ 553.000 Telephone $600 ----------------------------------------------------------- 558.000 Travel $1,500 ------------------------------------------------------------- 561.100 General Supplies $2,500 ----------------------------------------------------------- 562.100 Natural Gas ( 75 % of total) $1 ,400 _____________________________________________________________ 562.200 Electricity (75% of total) $9-00 ________________________________________________________________ 562.600 Gasoline & Oil $800 ________________________________________________________________ 572.000 C/O -- Bldg. *** $30,000 ---------------------------------------------------------------- $1,500 574.110 Hose *** ------------------------------------------------ $2,500 574.120 Turnout Gear *** --------------------------------------------------- 574.130 Air Packs *** -$2,600 M -------------------------------------------------------__--_-__- -- $1,000 574.140 Pagers *** __________________________________________________ $1,000 574.160 Tools *** _ _____________________________________________________ $30,000 574.200 ____________________________________________________________ C/O -Vehicles *** 591.000 Dues-& Subscriptions_________________rV-_--V-__-----__-___________----- ---------------------- $125,646 ----- -------- ------------------------ 424.000 PUBLIC SAFETY - BUILDING INSPECTION 1998 BUDGET r -.200-Building Inspection 5rvcs=^-__----$25,000 533 __________________ ______________________________________ P. 427.000 PUBLIC SAFETY - ANIMAL CONTROL ----------------------------------------------= 1998 BUDGET 1 Control Contr Srvcs 535.100 Anima -__-------- ________________________________________ 431.000 PUBLIC WORKS - HIGHWAYS, STREETS 1998 BUDGET 511.000 WAGES - Regular Employees $29,848 _______________________________________________ 512.000 WAGES - Temporary Employees $2,000 513.000 ________________________________________ WAGES - Overtime $500 ____________________________ _____________________ $5,256 521.000 Group Insurance ______________________________________________ 522.000 FICA Contributions $2,285 _____________________________________________ 523.000 PERA Contributions $1,546 -------------- 526.000_Workers ---------------------------------------------------------- Comp. Insurance $2,352 _________.-_________________________________________________ 5431.100-Repairs/Maint. - Equipment $9,000 _____________________________________________ 543.300 Repairs/Maint.-Paved Roads -- $6,000 _____________________________________________________________ 543-310IceRemoval_____________________________________________________________ - 543.320 - Snow Plowing $3,500 ____________________________________________________________ 543.330 Sand and Gravel _____________ 700 ---- _______________________________________________ 543.340 Seal Coating *. $8,000 ____________________________________________----___-_-__-_____ 543-360StreetSweeping 2,800 543.400 - - _________________________w________--_-__--_--_____$- Repairs/Maint.-Unpaved Rds. $6,000 ____________________________________________________________ 500 5------_-----rs/Mai 543_600VReapirs/MaintY_Catch-Basins--__Y______________-___________-______$5,000_ -----------s_______________.�______________-_________------0_ 553.000 Telephone -- $750 .________________________________________________________________ 558.000 Travel _$100 .______________________________________________________________ 561.100 General Supplies $2,400 _____________________________________________________________ 561.300 Training/Instructional Supplies $500 ____________________________________________________________________ 562.100 Natural Gas $898 ________________ ------------------------------------------------------- 562.200 Electricity $276 ____________________--___-_____-_-_-___-_---_____-___-____-_-_-_-__ 562.600 Gasoline & Oil 480 572_000CapitalOutlay--Buildings*** ----------------------------------- w_r -VMM-______________----V-_____-_$9_000 - - ------------- 574.111 ____________________________________ C.O. - Tractor/Loader*** $2,000 ___________________________________________________ 574.170 Street Overlayment*** $50,000 --____..____________________________________-. 574.180 Street Signs $300 574.211 C.O. - __________________ Mower.*** 11 $1,000 574.311 __________________________________ C.O. - Pick-up*** $3,000 574.411 ___________________________________ C.O. - Snow Plow*** $4,000 574.511 C.O. - ---- _--__---__--________________ Misc. C/O Equipment*** $2,500 591.000 __________________________________________ Dues & Subscriptions $250 __________________-_____-----_______-__-___-_______ ____________________________________________________ _ $173,241 431.600 PUBLIC WORKS - STREET LIGHTING 1998 BUDGET 5$28,000 62^200 Electricity 432.300 PUBLIC WORKS - RECYCLING 1998 BUDGET ted services 535.100 COntrac __________________ _______________________________________ 451.000 PARKS AND RECREATION 1998 BUDGET 511.000- WAGES --- Regular -Employees - -- $27,040 ___________________________________________________________ 521.000 Group Insurance $5,450 ___________________________________________________________ 522.000 FICA Contributions $2,069 ___________________________________________________________ 523.000 PERA Contributions $1,401 ___________________________________________--_________-__ 526.000 Workers Comp.Insurance $2,352 _________________________________________________________ 542.000 Refuse Disposal $540 543.100 ______________________________________ Repairs/Maint. - Equip *** - __ _,_ $8,200 - ------------------------------------------------------- 544.200 Equipment Rental $2,500 ______________________________________________ 522.000 Insurance Other than Emp Be $3,300 ------------------------------------------------------------ 561.100 General Supplies $800 _________________________________________________________ 562.100 Natural Gas _ $1,435 _________________________________________________________ 562.200 Electricity $2,621 ________________________________________________________ - -0Gasoline&Oil_________________________________________________$100 ----- 572.000 - - - C/O - Bldg * $1,000 _________________________________________________________ 573.000 C/0-Non-bldgs* $7,134 ___________________________________________________________ 574.100 C/0-Equip * $1,000 ____________________________________________________________ 599.000 _____________________________________________________________ Misc.- Assessments/Solid Waste $3,800 _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________ BUDGET TOTALS ------------------------------------- $71,442 455.000 CULTURE/RECREATION _ 1998 BUDGET 591.000 Dues & Subscriptions $750 ___________________________________________---------------------------- 595.000 Friendly City Days Donation $4,250 _____________________________________________ 597.000 Ice Arena Bond $15,000 ______________________________________________________ ____________________________________________ BUDGET TOTALS $20,000 --------------------------------------------------------------- 0 490.000 GENERAL FUND - WORKING CAPITAL RESERVE -- 1998 BUDGET 590.000 Working Capital Reserve $126,138 0 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #1997-64 A RESOLUTION SETTING SAC CHARGES AND USER CHARGES IN THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WHEREAS, the City Council has issued a $505,000 General Obligation Advance Refunding and Improvement Bond of 1988 and a $210,000 General Obligation Sewer and Water Revenue Bond of 1988; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Albertville did approve a connection Charges Table on which the debt service repayment schedule is based at the time of issuance of the bonds; and WHEREAS, the City of Albertville has issued a $1,454,514.26 General Obligation Sewer Revenue Note, Series 1993, to pay for improvements to the sewer infrastructure and the wastewater treatment facility; and WHEREAS, the City Council is interested in setting aside additional monies to pay for future wastewater plant expansion; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Public Facilities Authority requires the City to impose and collect such rates and charges so that there are sufficlient gross revenues available for the payment of the operation and maintenance of the system. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, as follows: (1) The SAC (Sewer Access Charge) for the remainder of the calendar year 1996 and beyond is $3, 200 per single family residence. (2) Effective January 1, 1998, sewer rates for billing purposes are $36.05 minimum per quarter, which provides for up to 15,000 gallons of use, and $2.63 per 1,000 gallons of use over 15,000. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon adoption, this resolution rescinds and replaces RESOLUTION 1996-76. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Goeb, City Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #1997-65 DESIGNATION OF EMPLOYEE GROUP BENEFITS INSURANCE PROVIDERS AND ESTABLISHING THE PREMIUM DOLLAR AMOUNTS WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Albertville is desirous of de-ignat ing the employee group benefits insurance providers; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Albertville is establishing the premium dollar amounts for the year 1998. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, designates the following insurance providers and premium amounts. Nbnthl y Type of -Coverage ProviderPremium Health, Life, & Accidental Death & Disability Policies Dental Insurance Medica MCS5 & Met Life $1,772.47 Delta Dental $165.20 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that beginning with the first pay check in the calendar year 1998 and continuing with each pay check throughout the year, $14.58 will be deducted as the employee contribution to the Health, Life & Accidental Death & Disability premium. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon adoption, this resolution rescinds and replaces RESOLUTION 1995-61. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Goeb, City Clerk PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION December 10, 1997 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Chair Howard Larson, Commissioners Carolyn Bauer, Jim Brown, and Donatus Vetsch, Deputy Zoning Administrator Linda Goeb and City Planner Liz Stockman Chair Larson convened the regular meeting at 7:00 PM. Vetsch made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Bauer seconded the motion. All voted aye. Bauer made a motion to approve the minutes of -the November 10, 1997, meeting as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Chair Larson opened the public hearing to consider amendments to the Subdivision Ordinance. City Planner Stockman reviewed the amendments relating to drainage course elevations, buffer yard requirements, irregular shaped lots, accessory structures, cul-de-sacs, protected areas, tree planting and certification. Commissioner Brown suggested Section A-600.4, Subsection-(g) of the Subdivision Ordinance be revised to state that the lowest floor elevation is required to be above the water table. City Planner Stockman will contact the city engineer to get his opinion regarding the change. The consensus of the Commission was to revise Section 500.4, Subsection (c) to state "City Administrator or City Clerk". Chair Larson called for comments from the audience. Don Jensen of Pilot Land Development asked City Planner Stockman to clarify the section on irregular shaped lots. Stockman explained that irregular shaped lots are allowable under the amendment but that the plat would be required to show a footprint of how the house would sit on the lot. Since there were no further comments or questions from the audience, Chair Larson closed the public hearing. Brown made a motion to recommend the City Council adopt ORDINANCE #1997-19 titled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RELATING TO DRAINAGE COURSE ELEVATIONS, BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS, IRREGULAR SHAPED LOTS, ACCESSORY STRUCTURE PROVISION ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS, CUL-DE-SAC STREETS, PROTECTED AREAS, TREE PLANTING AND CERTIFICATION with the above revisions to Sections A-500.4 (c) and A-600.4 (g). Bauer seconded the motion. All voted aye. Chair Larson opened the public hearing to discuss park dedication fees, trails, and park and trail design. Planner Stockman reviewed the minor revisions to the proposed ordinance as recommended by the city engineer. She further explained that there has been discussion at the City Council level of phasing the increase in park dedication fees per residential lot over a three or four year period. She feels that a $200 per year increase is insufficient to meet the City's needs. Don Jensen of Pilot Land Development told the Commission that both his firm and the Builders Association is opposed to the large jump in the per residential lot dedication fee. He feels it is not equitable between the new homes and the existing homes. Jensen also expressed concerns that the City Council has not_. made a budgetary commitment for the capital improvements outlined in the Comprehensive Parks and Trails Plan that are proposed to be funded through the park dedication fees. Commissioner Vetsch suggested that the. City could assess every existing lot a one-time additional park fee of $700. Planner. Stockman pointed out that the ordinance recommends that each house is assessed approximately $50 per year for parks. The Commission discussed phasing the park dedication fee increase over a period of three years and agreed to recommend a phasing plan to the City Council. Since there were no further comments from the audience, Chair Larson closed the public hearing. Brown made a motion to recommend the City Council adopt ORDINANCE #1997-20 titled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION A600-8 AND A600.15 OF THE ALBERTVILLE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE BY CHANGING ADTHE PARR DEDICATION FEE AND PERCENT LAND DEDICATION FEE, REQUIRING CONSTRUCTION OF TRAILS BY DEVELOPERS AND SETTING FORTH GUIDELINES FOR PARR AND TRAIL DESIGN setting the per lot park dedication fee for 1998 at $900, for 1999 at $1,100 and for 2000 at $1,300. Further, to tie the per lot fee increase after year 2000 to the engineering index percentage. The motion also clarifies the recommendation that the Council levies an annual amount for capital improvements in the parks area. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Planner Stockman explained that the public hearing on the CUP for International Country Antiques should be postponed until the January meeting when complete plans are available for landscaping and outdoor displays. Stockman also explained that the owner of the building is proposing an addition to the antique building and is requesting permission to put the foundation of the building in as soon as possible. She sees no problem with allowing the foundation to be done now because the size and materials proposed for the new addition are consistent with what currently exists. Vetsch made a motion to recommend that the City Council authorize the building issue the proposed ddition to apermit the International foundation y Country Antiques building. Bauer seconded the motion. All voted aye. Commissioner Vetsch submitted his resignation effective December 31, 1997, to the Commission. He indicated he would be willing to serve as the alternate to the Commission. Commissioner Brown is not in favor of a Councilmember appointment to the Commission, but rather favors filling the position with an interested citizen. Bauer made a motion to recommend that the City Council place an ad seeking an interested citizen to serve on the Planning Commission with a City Council member serving as the alternate. Brown seconded the motion. All voted aye. The meeting adjourned at 8:20 PM. Howard Larson, Chair Linda Goeb Deputy Zoning Admin. �h November 10, 1997 City Council Planning Commission City of Albertville PO BOX 9 Albertville, MN 55301 Dear City Council & Planning Commission Members: My term of office as a planning commissioner ends on December 31, 1997. I am not requesting consideration for reappointment. It is now time for me to pursue other things in my life and with this in mind, thank you for allowing me the chance to serve my community. Very Sincerely, Iw-&�e Donatus Vetsch Planning Commissioner • G-1 Schedule Receipts and Expenses Per Premise -------------------------------------------------------------i----------------------------------------------- orgganization License Number Premise Permit Number Premise Name Month and yea t o this form 04617 B-04617-002 KD S BAR & RESTAURANT 10/1991 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (Lines 1 - 10 and 18 - 36 correspond to form 6-1) gross rreeceipts prizes netreceipts 1 Bingo 1 0.00 -L44_ 2 Raffles 2 0.00 0.00 _ _ 0,& 3 Paddletickets 3 M 01,00 _ 0.00 0.00 4 Income from interest and dividends (fill in same amount in both columns A and C) 4 7.77 7.77 5 Add lines 1 through 4 . 5 7.77_ 0.00 7.77 6 If negative, amount from line 7c of last month's form 6-1, or portion of amount distributed to this premise - 6 0.04 0.00 7 Subtract line 6 from 5. If you did not fill in amounts on line 6, fill in amounts from line 5. 7 7.77_ LU- 7.77 8 Tipboards . 8 0.00 0.00 0.00 9 Pulltabs 9 40,118.00 33,374.00 6,744.00 10 Add lines 7 through 9. The amount you list in Column C is your gross profit for the month 10 40.125.77 33,374.00 6.751.71 18 Beginning inventory of gambling equipment (from line 21 of last month's schedule A) 18 275,09 19 Cost of gambling equipment obtained during the month. (Include sales tax, but do not include the 2 percent tax listed on distributors' invoices) 19 _ 950.60 20 Add lines 18 and 19 20 1,225.69 21 ending inventory of gambling equipment (dollar value on the last day of month) 21 542.29 22 Subtract line 21 from line 20. The result is the total dollar value of the gambling equipment you sold during the month 22 683,40 23 Amount paid for compensation and payroll taxes. 23 3.268.66 24 Penalty and interest you paid during the month on any taxes, including payroll taxes, that you listed on any form 6-1 and on any schedule C since beginning gambling activities 24 0.00 25 Amount paid for advertising 25 0.00 26 Amount paid for accounting services for preparation of monthly lawful gambling tax forms and for your annual financial audit review, and for qualifying legal Mork 26 50.00 27 Amount paid for bank service charges; office supplies; lodging, meals and transportation for lawful gambling classes conducted by state agencies; and miscellaneous expenses 27 6.0 28 Amount paid to purchase and/or repair office furnishings and office equipment used for gambling, and to purchase and/or repair devices used for gambling 28 0.00 29 Amount paid for rent for conducting lawful gambling . 29 225.00 30 Amount paid for utilities used for conducting lawful gambling 30 0.00 31 Amount paid during the month for theft insurance and the amount you are permitted to list for liability insurance paid during the month 31 0.00 32 Amount paid during the month for local government investigation fee, and new or renewed: gambling managers bond, gambling managers license and premise permits 32 0.00 33 Cash short or long. (If long, put parentheses around the amount) 33 39.0L 34 Amount of reimbursement for excess cash short. (This is a negative amount). 34 0.00 ) 35 Amount of reimbursement for negative expense calculation. (This is a negative amount) 35 ( 0.00 } 36 Add lines 22 through 35. This is your TOTAL ALLOWABLE EXPENSES for the month 36 ____ 41272 07 Bruce D. Anderson State Representative District 19B Wright and Sherburne Counties 7 ,sue Minnesotan (13) .� House of Representatives. COMMITTEES: GENERAL LEGISLATION, VETERANS AFFAIRS, AND ELECTIONS; ELECTIONS DIVISION; GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS; STATE GOVERNMENT FINANCE DIVISION December 5, 1997 RE: Candidate Project Solicitation Notice for Federal Transportation Funding Dear Local Officials: The Central Minnesota Area Transportation Partnership is presently soliciting candidate projects for developing its draft 1999-2001 Area Transportation Improvement Program (ATIP). The draft ATIP is a prioritized list of transportation projects that the Partnership recommends for inclusion in the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP). Once in the STIP, projects become eligible for federal transportation funding. The Partnership will be accepting new project nominations for State Fiscal Year 2001 (July 1, 2000 to June 30, 2001). The categories of projects being considered for this solicitation include Urban and Rural Road, Urban and Rural Bridge, Hazard Elimination Safety (HES), and Transportation Enhancement Activities. Local governments wishing to nominate a project for any of the above categories should contact Steven Voss at the Minnesota Department of Transportation (218/828-2460) to obtain a copy of the eligibility requirements and project nomination forms. Application deadlines vary between categories. The deadline for submitting road, bridge and Transportation Enhancement Activities applications is Friday, January 16, 1998. The deadline for submitting HES applications is Friday, January 9, 1998. Applications received after theses deadlines cannot be considered for funding. Sincerely, 6w&-- Bruce Anderson State Representative BA/wh 3222 Aadland Ave NE Buffalo Minnesota 55313 (612) 682-1480 State Office Building, 100 Constitution Ave, St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1298 (612) 296-5063 FAX (612) 296-3949 TDD (612) 296-9896 tJ* s d / NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSUL T'j COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM TO: Albertville City Council FROM: Elizabeth Stockman DATE: 10 December 1997 RE: Albertville - Subdivision Ordinance Amendment FILE: 163.05 - gen During review of proposed _Subdivision Ordinance amendments, the Planning Commission requested that the City look into establishing a minimum structure (basement floor) elevation above the water table or mottled soils, similar to that which exists under Section A-600.4 (g) titled Drainage Courses. As I could not appropriately respond to that question myself, I contacted Pete Carlson for his input. He is comfortable with the current system which requires sump pumps with direction connection to drain tile along the rear lot lines. If minimum structure elevations had to be above the water table or mottled soils, most would have at best only partial basements or no basement as a slab on grade. Alternatively, fill could be brought in but such action would result in homes sitting atop man-made hills. pc: Linda Houghton Mike Couri Pete Carlson Planning Commission 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 5 1 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837 Planning Commission Recommended Approval 12-9-97 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 1997 - 19 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE RELATING TO DRAINAGE COURSE ELEVATIONS, BUFFER YARD REQUIREMENTS, IRREGULAR SHAPED LOTS, ACCESSORY STRUCTURE PROVISION ON RESIDENTIAL LOTS, CUL-DE- SAC STREETS, PROTECTED AREAS, TREE PLANTING AND CERTIFICATION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. SECTION A-500.4 Subsection (c) OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (c) Space for certificates of approval and review to be filled in by the signatures of the Mayor and City Administrator in the form: - For Approval of the City: y This plat of (name of plat) was approved and accepted by the City Council of Albertville, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of 19 CITY COUNCIL OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA Mayor City Administrator-,, City Clerk SECTION 2. SECTION A-600.4 Subsection (g) OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (g) Drainage Courses. Lots abutting a drainage course, wetland, ponding area, drainageway, channel, or stream shall have additional depth and width, as required under the provisions of the City Zoning Ordinance to assure building sites that are not subject to flooding Lots ab.uttng a ve the highest known .water)el vel or nb less than one Iet' ecmlri the htgh water:levels; on-1.000.9 Subdivision Ordinance Amendment -1 SECTION 3. SECTION A-600.4 Subsection (1) OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (1) Frontage on Two Streets. Double -frontage, or lots with frontage on two (2) parallel or non - intersecting streets shall not be permitted except: where lots back on arterial streets or highways, or where topographic or other conditions render subdividing otherwise unreasonable. Such double -frontage lots shall have an additiomal for Sereen r lot line. comply with. b,uffer.yard requkremenfs as established ;in Section '1000 7 (e) cif theonrrtg ordinance: SECTION 4. SECTION A-600.4 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO ADD THE FOLLOWING: SECTION 5. SECTION A-600.6 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (b) or (1) Physical site conditions warrant a cul-de-sac. (2} A through sfreet' is not physically:feasible or ciesrr'abie due toJpr.vironmer�tal considerations. (c) Requirements'. �} Cul-de-sac streets, permanently designed as such, shall not exceed six hundred (600) feet in length, including a terminal turn around which shall be provided at the closed end, with a right-of-way radius of not less than sixty (60) feet. The length shall be measured along the centerline from the nearest intersection to the center point of the cul-de-sac. Subdivision Ordinance Amendment - 2 (isd) Where a temporary cul-de-sac is required, the turn around right-of-way shall be placed adjacent to a plat boundary line and a right-of-way of the same width as the street shall be carried to said property line in such a way as to permit future extension of the street into the adjoining tract. At such time a such a street is extended, the acreage coverage by the turnaround outside the boundaries of the extended street shall revert in ownership to the property owner fronting on the temporary turn around. SECTION 6. SECTION A-600.14 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: A-600 14 Protected Areas. Where land proposed for subdivision is deemed environmentally sensitive by the City due to the existence of wetlands, drainageways, watercourses, floodable areas, steep slopes ar wooded areas, the design of said subdivision shall clearly reflect all necessary measures of protection to ensure against adverse environmental impacts. Based upon the necessity to control and maintain certain sensitive areas, the City shall determine whether said protection will be accomplished through lot enlargement and redesign or dedication of those sensitive areas in the form of outlots. In general, measures of protection shall include design solutions which allow for construction and grading involving a minimum of alteration to sensitive areas. Where these areas are to be tted into jets within the proposed stibelivil 'Liu TW %1V1 uv�tien on -slopes ever -eighteen (ti} i he �mpiemerttationf #load control rr�easures (e) Te enlargement ct lots''obdivs�oreod (dj` The submission of a tree'preser .at16ri plansubject to the review of`the:P arinirig GommEssior antl approval;of the'City Council. (e) The utilization OVA erosion control measures subject to .approval b the Ci y Engineer. (f) Soil testing ;to determine the ability of the proposed subdivision to support devetopment< ... ...,:,:., (g) The limitation of development on natural or man-made slopes,over eighteen (18j percent. (h) Struettare conformance to the natural imitations presented by the topographyand soil so'as. to create the least potential of. soil erosion. Subdivision Ordinance Amendment - 3 SECTION 7. SECTION A-700.2 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE IS HEREBY REPLACED WITH THE FOLLOWING: SECTION 8. SECTION A-700.6 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: A-700.6, Drainage. All surface and underground drainage systems shall be installed to adequately remove a* natural drainage that accumulates on the developed property. All such systems shall provide a permanent solution for the removal of drainage water. AiE_prapet'tV crest oSAFI that clrafn.a C€�tir�tyttcf� # saH nvr�trdrh't`ce SECTION 9. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING ITS PASSAGE AND PUBLICATION. Approved by the Albertville City Council this 15th day of December 1997. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE LZA Mayor Mark Olsen ATTEST: Linda Houghton, City Clerk pc: Linda Houghton, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson Subdivision Ordinance Amendment - 4 Planning Commission Recommended Approva f� CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 1997 - _2o AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS A-600.8 AND A-600.15 OF THE ALBERTVILLE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE BY CHANGING THE PARK DEDICATION FEE AND PERCENT LAND DEDICATION, REQUIRING THE CONSTRUCTION OF TRAILS BY DEVELOPERS, AND SETTING FORTH GUIDELINES FOR PARK AND TRAIL DESIGN. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. SECTION A-600.15 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: (a) Applicants for the subdivision of land and developers of land within the City of Albertville shall be required to dedicate to the City of Albertville for park, playground, trail and public open space purposes the following minimum amounts of land or cash, or both, whichever the City, at its option, shall require. The required dedication shall be made prior to the City's release of the final plat for filing. The amount of any required cash contribution shall be calculated based upon, rates established by the City and in effect as of the date of the release of the final plat for filing. (b) Land to be dedicated for public use shall be reasonably suitable for its intended use as determined by the City and shall be at a location convenient to the public to be served. Factors used in evaluating the adequacy of proposed park and recreation areas shall include size, shape, topography, geology, hydrology, tree -cover vegetattorl, access and location. (c) The applicant shall consult with the Planning Commission, at the time his preliminary plat is under consideration, to secure their recommendation as to the location of any property that should be dedicated to the public, such as parks, playgrounds or other public property. The preliminary plat shall show the location and dimensions of all areas to be dedicated in this manner. Such contribution requirement recommendations) will be sent to the City Council for their approval. (d) When a proposed park, tra 1, playground, recreational area, or other public ground has been indicated in the City's official map, Comprehensive Land Use Plan or Comprehensive Park and T_rak Pta the appropriate ' City. If the applicant and is located in whole or in part within a proposed plat, it shall be dedicated to .,.._ elects not to dedicate an area in excess ; of the land required hereunder for a proposed public site that the City feels is in the public interest to acquire, the City may consider acquiring the excess land through purchase or condemnation. (e) Land area conveyed or dedicated to the City shall not be used in calculating density requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance and shall be in addition to and not in lieu of open space requirements for planned unit developments. (f) Where private open space for park, trail, playground, open space or other recreation purposes is provided in a proposed subdivision and such space is to be privately owned and maintained by the future residents of the subdivision, such areas may be used for credit at the discretion of the City Council against the requirement of dedication for purposes described in this Chapter provided the City Council finds it is in the public interest to do so and that the following standards are met: (1) That yards, court areas, setbacks and other open space required to be maintained by the zoning and building regulations shall not be included in the computation of such private open space; and (2) That the private ownership and maintenance of the open space is adequately provided for by written agreement; and (3) That the private open space is restricted for park, playground, trail, open space or recreational purposes by recorded covenants which run with the land in favor of the future owners of property within the tract and which cannot be eliminated without the consent of the City Council; and (4) That the proposed private open space is reasonably adaptable for use for such purposes, taking into consideration such factors as size, shape, topography, NEW, geology, access and location of the private open space land; and (5) That facilities proposed for such purposes are in substantial accordance with the provisions of the recreational element of the Comprehensive Plan ar Coiprehertsf�r and Trait €'fan, and are approved by the City Council; and (6) That where such credit is granted, the amount of credit shall not exceed twenty-five (25) percent of the amount of dedication as calculated herein. (g) The City, upon consideration of the particular type of development, may require larger or lesser parcels of land to be dedicated if the City determines that present or future residents would require greater or lesser land for park and playground purposes. In addition, the City Council may also require lots within the subdivision be held in escrow for future sale or development. The monies derived from the sale of escrowed lots will be used to develop facilities or to purchase park land in the future. (h) Residential Dedications. (1) Land shall be dedicated pursuant to the following schedule wherein density is calculated by considering the total grass acreage of the entire plat, subdivision or development being considered: Dwelling Units Per Gross Acre Dedication Requirement Less than nine (9) 510% of subdivision area Park Dedication Ordinance - Page 2 Dwelling Units Per Gross Acre Nine (9) and More 5-+/R % of subdivision area plus an additional 1/2% for each additional dwelling unit per acre over nine (9) (2) A cash contribution in lieu of land dedication may be required pursuant to a standard formula established by the City, which formula takes into consideration such things as, but not necessarily limited to, the fair market value of the property in the plat, subdivision or development. The City Council shall establish from time to time by Resolution the amount of required cash contribution, and until changed by Resolution hereafter adopted,=sh Par�C��ta�a�tt�n Fee �� Per t�y�ret�ih� brit lanua�r. �s { 998,#o f3ecember �#_f 199$ $90a January ,fi 999 to D cembe�1 $'f, Q , ar narAlr►tr! ct ar%ged fad tty Gfl nc�t = 3�7(} t.esniu�t�?�,here�fitei` �tivpted (3) Combination Land and Cash Dedication. The City may require the applicant or developer to make a combination cash and land dedication pursuant to the following formula: (a) The amount of land which could be required in accordance with this Ordinance shall be calculated. (b) From the total calculated in sub -paragraph (3)(a) above, the actual amount of land the City determines to be needed to fulfill the purposes of this Chapter shall be subtracted. (c) The balance arrived at in sub -paragraph (3)(b) above shall be converted into a cash contribution in lieu of land dedicated pursuant to a standard formula established by the City, which formula takes into consideration such things as, but not necessarily limited to, the fair market value of the property in the plat, subdivision or development and the percentage of the total park dedication obligation represented by the said balance. Commercial and Industrial Dedication Requirements. (1) Land dedication, if required, shall be ten(10) percent of:a commercial subdry►ior or development.and five (5) percent of an in subdivision or development. Park Dedication Ordinance - Page 3 (2-3) If the City requires payment of fees in lieu of land dedication, that the fee shall equal five (5) percent of the City's calculated fair market value for industrial property as if zoned in the classification requested by the applicant or developer. (34) Where a combination land and cash dedication is made, the lands dedicated will be deducted from the total park dedication land requirement and the balance of acreage will be multiplied by the current per acre dedication rate. 0) The City may elect to receive a combination of cash, land and development of the land for park use. The fair market value of the land the City wants and the value of the development of land shall be calculated. That amount shall be subtracted from the cash contribution required by applicable sub -section above. (k) "Fair market value" shall be determined as of the time of the final plat approval in accordance with the following: (1) The City and the applicant may agree as to the fair market value based upon a current appraisal. (2) The market value of the property as determined by a recent selling price of the parcel(s) in question. (1) Planned unit developments with mixed land uses shall make cash and/or land contributions in accordance with this Section based upon the percentage of land devoted to the various uses. (m) The City Council shall establish a separate fund into which all cash contributions received from owners and developers in lieu of conveyance or dedication of land for park, playground, trail and open space purposes shall be deposited. The City Council shall establish separate budgeting and accounting procedures for such fund and shall make from time to time appropriations for such purposes, for developing existing parks, or the development of new park facilities. (n) If an applicant is unable to make a commitment to the City as to the type of building that will be constructed on lots in the proposed plat, then the land and cash contribution requirement will be a reasonable amount as determined by the City Council. (o) Wetlands, ponding areas and drainageways accepted by the City may not be considered in the park land and/or cash contribution to the City. (p) Property being divided with the same number of lots shall be exempt from all park land dedication requirements. If the number of lots is increased or if land outside the previously recorded plat is added, then the park land dedication and/or park cash contributions shall be based on the additional lots and on the additional land being added to the plat. If the additional Park Dedication Ordinance - Page 4 land does not create additional lots, then each one-third (1/3) acre added shall be considered a new lot for purposes of calculating the dedication requirements. (q) Cash Payment. A cash contribution required by the City shall be made at the time of final plat approval by the City Council or as specified by the applicable development contract. Trait Dedicatiion Requirements (fs) The following requirements apply to all dedications or conveyances for park, playground, trail or public open space purposes: (1) Land conveyed or dedicated pursuant to the provisions of this Section must be located outside of drainageways, flood plains and ponding areas after the site has been developed. (2) As part of their development contract or site plan approval responsibilities, applicants and developers shall be responsible for making certain improvements to the developments for park, playground, trail and public open space purposes including, but not limited to, finished grading and ground cover for all park, playground, trail and public open spaces within their developments. Park Dedication Ordinance - Page 5 (3) Dedication credit shall not be granted for the construction of recreational facilities unless a specific agreement granting credit is approved by the City Council. This paragraph does not affect the requirements of sub -paragraph (2) above. trails, or, hn roper Y s: such elernenis (st) Areas to be dedicated for public park, trail, or pending dp` n pace shall be brought to a suitable condition by the subdivider prior to acceptance by the City. This shall include the following: All dead trees, trash, junk, unwanted structures or similar undesirable elements shall be removed by the owner at his expense; On grades or exposed areas which are not sodded, lawn grass seed shall be sown at not less than four (4) pounds to each one thousand (1,000) square feet of land area; Seeding and germination testing shall take place on a schedule set forth by the City at the time of the conveyance; Seeding shall consist of a maximum of ten (10) percent rye grass by weight and a minimum of ninety (90) percent of permanent bluegrass and/or fescue grass by weight. The applicant shall submit an agreement in writing signed by the developer that re -spreading of soil and seeding of lawn will be done during the immediately following planting season as set forth in this Section and provide a performance bond to guarantee said seeding. Said condition shall also be in accordance with the City's resolution on condition of acceptance of public parks and f" in Albertville. _ (t) Title and Survey Requirements. (1) Lands dedicated for public park, trail or peftg ripen;pace shall be accompanied by a certificate of survey or shall be designated as a park, trail or pondiflg pu%it en` space area on the plat as determined by the City. Lands dedicated for public parks shall be dedicated as a legal lot of record and not as an outlot. Pording areas`�not #Qcaed (2) Further, such lands shall be free and clear of all liens and encumbrances including special assessments as evidenced by an up-to-date abstract of title or registered property abstract to be submitted at the applicant's cost to the City for its examination. (3) Such dedication shall be in the form and manner as prescribed by the City. (ttv) Where fees are not specifically stated in this Ordinance, said fees shall be established by resolution of the City Council which may be revised from time to time. (VW) In the event the City waives the requirement that an applicant or developer proposing to subdivide land plat the same, the City Council may require the applicant or developer, as a condition of granting such waiver, to dedicate parks (or pay cash in lieu thereof) and pondiftg areas trails, and open.space in a manner consistent with the provisions of this Ordinance. Park Dedication Ordinance - Page 6 (X} Park,_ Tail, and. ReCreatronal Airea Mamtenancq/;__ .Peep SECTION 2. SECTION A-600.8 OF THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS: raj Traii D.Opign. (1) Trail Types Trails constructed in the City shall be one of_the fvflowirg (a) Qn=Street Trails/Paved Shoulders: These _trails ;share the lamer paved surface as the .roadway that they #ollow. They are designed for multiple ups and may be, located on one or bath sides of -the. street. Park Dedication Ordinance - Page 7 StreeE MOW �aiar Cotfector maaffector 10 foot trail on hotft 10 t trail on Otte or bo#h stcies $toot #rail ah one side rtsr 6 boa# tra[I 8 food#r fi n ofte kt'"p tr e one or steles scree# as of street as att bo#h stiles of street bar! of required;_ required fhe t3treet_ requrac GS�1H � CSAH,35 ��►rest of Main) x Gouniy HgFtway� t$ X Nla'>n; Avenue_ � CSAt� 35 (east of Maui) �3rdl57tfx Streets Katiand avenue x Barthst t7rive x 70th Street x x Ail oti ier streets Lesser- widths may be necessary in established residen#al areas, and where space, is limited. In no case, shall a trail be installed at less than a four (4) foot width. Park Dedication Ordinance - Page 8 SECTION 3. THIS AMENDMENT SHALL BE IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING ITS PASSAGE AND PUBLICATION. Approved by the Albertville City Council this 15th day of December 1997. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Mayor Mark Olsen ATTEST: Linda Houghton, City Clerk pc: Linda Houghton, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson Park Dedication Ordinance - Page 9 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE FX50LUTION NO. 1997-62 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SALARY/WAGE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council is desirous of establishing salary and wages for the City of Albertville effective December 20, 1997, and thereafter until amended by resolution; and WHEREAS, the City Council is determining all salary and wage ranges in accordance with Minnesota Law and City Personnel Policies; and WHEREAS, the City Council is determining an official salary/wage schedule to be used for all the City`s officers and employees. The pay schedule is based on pay ranges and steps and moves within the schedule are by formal action of the Council and/or at the time of an appointment to a position. In that event that the Council utilizes contracted agreements for employees, their pay will comply with the established pay ranges of the City of Albertville. The average work week year is defined as 2,080 hours. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PAY RANGE STEP STEP STEP STEP STEP STEP STEP STEP STEP STEP STEP STEP STEP RANGE FLOOR A 8 C 0 E F G H I J K L M --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 423 16.00 16.50 17.00 17.50 18.00 18,50 19.00 19.50 20.00 20.50 21.00 21.50 22.00 6 353 14.50 15.00 15. SO 16.00 16.50 17.00 17.50 18.00 18.50 19.00 19.50 24.04 20.50 S 283 13.00 13.50 14.00 14.50 15.00 15.50 16.00 16.50 17.00 17.50 18.00 18.50 19.00 4 213 11.50 12.00 12.50 13.00 13. SO 14.00 14.50 15.00 15.50 16.00 16.50 11.00 17.50 3 143 10.00 10.50 11.00 11.50 12.00 IL 50 13.00 13. S0 14.00 14.50 15.00 15.50 16.00 2 73 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10. SO 11.00 11.50 12.00 12.50 13.00 13.50 14.00 14.50 1 0 7.00 7.50 8.00 8.50 9.00 9.50 10.00 10.54 11.00 11.50 12.00 12.50 13.00 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, does hereby authorize the afore -mentioned action. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council rescinds Resolution #1995-4 titled A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SALARY/WAGE SCHEDULE effective upon adoption of this resolution. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THIS 15th DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor Attest: Linda Goeb, City Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #1997-66 A RESOLUTION HIRING TIMOTHY G(JIMONT FOR THE POSITION OF MAINTENANCE WORKER II WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Albertville is desirous of hiring a qualified individual for the position of Maintenance Worker II; and WHEREAS, the City Council placed advertisements for applicants for the position of Maintenance Worker II, the Public Works Committee screened all applications and selected the most qualified individuals for a preliminary interview, and the City Council conducted final interviews and rated each of the recommended candidates; WHEREAS, references checks and criminal investigations are required and are deemed to be acceptable on the highest scoring interviewee, Timothy Guimont. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, hires Timothy Guimont for the position of Maintenance Worker II effective January 5, 1998, at a starting wage of $12.00 per hour. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Council will conduct monthly reviews of the Guimont's performance every month for the first six months of employment and may adjust wages accordingly. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Goeb, City Clerk 7d�) CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #1997-63 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE ASSIGM1ENT OF PAY RANGE AND STEP WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of establishing the assignment of pay ranges and steps for the City of Albertville effective to December 21, 1997, or as contracted; and WHEREAS, the City Council is determining that the following assignment of pay ranges and steps to be used for the purposes of pay based on RESOLUTION ##1997-60 (A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SALARY/WAGE SCHEDULE) and to assign rating points for pay ranges as set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, hereby establishes the following as its official pay range and step assignment to be used for the City's officers and employees based on employee classification: PAY RANGE & STEP ASSIGNMENT Classification Ratings Pay Range Step City Administrator 483 7 - City Clerk -Treasurer 275 4 K Maintenance Worker II (KL) 149 3 $14.9:3 Maintenance Worker Ii (TG) 149 3 E BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon adoption, th.is resolution rescinds RESOLUTION 1995-3. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Goeb, City Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #1997-67 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE "PAY EQUITY IMPL NTATION REPORT" WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Albertville is desirous of adopting a "Pay Equity Implementation Report" dated December 15, 1997; and WHEREAS, the City Council is determining that the positions (jobs) included in the report will comply with the State of Minnesota Pay Equity Law and the report is all inclusive as written; and WHEREAS, the City Council is ordering that the "Pay Equity Implementation Report" dated December 31, 1997, is the final source for pay equity value points and, in the event positions (jobs) change or new positions are created or eliminated, the report will be modified by resolution of the City Council for the purposes of updating the report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, does hereby adopt this resolution and authorize the actions stated herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon adoption, this resolution rescinds and replaces RESOLUTION 1995-2. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1997. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Goeb, City Clerk Pay Equity impitmontation Report Send completed report to: Pry EQuitY Coordinator bepartrrwnt of Employee ANatlons 200 Centennial Quiiding 868 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 6616&16M (612) 2W2633 (Voice) (612) 297-2003 (TDD) lame of Jurisdiction M city PO Box 9 Contact CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Q County 13 School d Other: L.M. Goeb 0 The Job evaluation system used messurard al ll, effort, responiblity and working conditions and the same "tam Was used for so cdo$$" of errtpoya". Check the system used: State Job Match d Designed Own (spacifyl Q Con$uttartt'a System (OPWAY) ❑ Other (apeoifo HOM inauranee bwoffta for mete and fernale classes Of oomperable value have been ovakwta l and: There is no difference and fernale dusea are not at a dlsadventage. Q Theme is a difference and the maximum aaieries rapo W include the monthly amount paid by the wrlpoyer for health insurance. Infomu tion in this report is oompiets and ac+currw O The report irfciuciee all classes of employees over which ttm jurledetiort has final budgetary aWml Au ttority, For 0"nment Use Only Postmark Data of Rom Jurisdiction ID Number Albertville ( 612 ) 497-3384 0 No salary rsnQtMperfort'Anco differences. 55301 :hack here If both of the fotk;-Mng apply; ottterwriae, never Nenk. Juriadction does not have a salary range for arty jab salsas. b. Upon ragtrest, lairiadbtfon w+ia Guppy docxatnertatbn showing that In"uttles between main and female deasee are due to owformance df *woe& Note; Do not inakxM arty dwmtantation mprdittg p urfonwance with this four►. 0 An official notice has bear~ posed at i,--v Hall Eul l ptI&I Board 0VMk9 ertbpali w) infom eq employeea OW the Pay Equity Impiernontetkm Repot; has been filed and Is available to am*yees upon request. A copy of the notice has been sent to each exclusive I epresentative, If any, end afao to the public library. The report was approve l by: C:i rg of 4T hartv_i l l e potrwrb**) Mark S. Olsen ~ 0 6 w o ad al>`Nalai pt" GdairlwMoMdorllt+la�t afpnattrW — Mayor Result from Salary Rirype worbtreer N/A _ % is the result of average years to salary range maximum for male classes divided by the even** years to salary range maximum for female classes. Results from Exceptional service Fay wwksheer C� 20% or leas of male classes receive ESP. -- % is the result of the percentage of female c�iesaes receiving ESP divided by the percentage of maia classes receiving ESP, t;v t 105,294 is the annual payroll forth* calendar year fast ended December 31. t- (Part F on Back) e r• rt r• rt w r• J� t't C iC {� f7 G lr rt C r� as rS (D rt O S lc)l- o A � N p i w w co o 41 PQ � � uLLLL w �n � � y� M N N N N N N M M M N N M N M M �•i '" ��••ii Zi W W W N N N N N M N N M M N M N N W Co N W O N N V w W W W II!IIIIIIUIIIIIw.9- IIIIIIIIIII�IIIP�°9_ Illlilllllllllhle�[- i 0 0 V 5 ALBERTVILLE's ORIGINAL AGREEMENT FOR SHARING ROAD EXPENSES BETWEEN THE CITIES OF OTSEGO AND ALBERTVILLE WHEREAS, the City of Otsego and the City of Albertville have certain shared streets located along the boundaries of the respective jurisdictions; and, WHEREAS, the two cities desire to set forth in writing their agreement as to responsibilities for maintenance and sharing of expenses for said shared streets; and, WHEREAS, the shared streets which are the subject of this Agreement are as follows: 1. 70th Street (CSAH 19 to Kadler Avenue)- bituminous paved, designed to 10 ton capacity with 12 foot lanes and 4 foot paved shoulders. 2.70th Street (CSAH 19 to MacIver Avenue)- gravel surfaced with approximately 22 feet of driving surface. 3. MacIver Avenue (70th Street to 62nd Street)- gravel surfaced with approximately 22 feet of driving surface. 4. Kadler Avenue (70th Street to dead end)- gravel surfaced with approximately 20 feet of driving surface with limited turn around. 5. Kadler Avenue (CSAH 37 North to I-94)- gravel surfaced with approximately 16 feet of driving surface. 6. Kadler Avenue (CSAH 37 to 60th Street)- gravel surfaced with approximately 20 feet of driving surface. NOW THEREFORE, the City of Otsego and the City of Albertville agree as follows: 1. The maintenance to be completed by the municipalities as assigned in this Agreement is defined as follows; the care and upkeep of the existing roadway so as to provide a durable all weather transportation route, including the following, motor patrol blading, dust control, gravel overlay, crack sealing, seal coating, periodic replacement of culverts, mowing, signage and replacement of signage. a. On gravel roads, regular maintenance includes grading the road periodically with a motor patrol grader, during the frost free season. Grading will occur once a week during the summer unless it is determined by the party responsible for maintenance, and at their sole discretion, that less frequent grading is necessary. b. Gravel road maintenance also includes adding new gravel to the surface approximately every four years. Depending upon traffic volumes and weather and soil conditions, additional spot gravel may be needed from time to time. The frequency of adding gravel to the surface shall be at the sole judgment and discretion of the City responsible for maintenance, and upon notification to the City of Albertville. c. During the snow season regular maintenance shall include plowing the designated streets after each two inch or more snow event, or more frequently depending upon drifting conditions. d. Bituminous surfaced streets will be maintained by crack sealing and seal coating periodically. Crack sealing shall be performed on average every two to three years. Seal coating will be done on average every five to seven years. Streets that are striped for traffic lanes will be re -striped after seal coating and when markings cannot be clearly distinguished by motorists. 2. The City of Otsego agrees to provide the regular street maintenance as set forth above upon the roads listed above with equipment and operators sufficiently skilled to perform the necessary maintenance. 3. The City of Albertville agrees to compensate the City of Otsego for said services at a rate which equally divides the costs of such maintenance, including one half the cost of all materials and one half of all reasonable charges for time and equipment (including fuel costs and costs for depreciation of equipment) provided by the City of Otsego, at those rates contained within this Agreement, subject to yearly adjustment by resolution of the Otsego City Council and notification of any changes provided to the Albertville City Council. 4. Maintenance concerns on these shared roads will be directed to the City of Otsego which shall respond to concerns raised using the normal criteria for priority of response used throughout the City. 5. Otsego shall provide two years in advance its proposed maintenance program for such items as seal coating, crack sealing, culvert replacement, and graveling. 6. The City of Otsego will maintain and install street and traffic signs along the shared roads designated for maintenance in this Agreement. New signs, if needed, will be installed at cost plus the reasonable hourly cost for time and equipment as set forth above, these costs will be shared equally. 7. Grass and weeds will be cut at least once per year on the inslopes of the designated roads. Additional mowing will be done as needed, at the discretion of the Otsego Maintenance department. 8. All costs related to administration of this Agreement and drafting of the Agreement and any addendum to the same shall be shared equally. 9. In the event that there is a dispute regarding the terms and conditions of this Agreement the following process shall be followed: the dispute shall be first submitted to the standing Public Works Subcommittees of each City at a joint meeting. If no resolution is reached at such a meeting, the matter may be referred to the City Councils of both Cities which can either resolve the matter or agree upon a neutral third party to arbitrate the dispute. All costs related to resolution of the dispute shall be shared equally between the Cities. 10. This Agreement may be dissolved by either party hereto with six months notice to the other party in the form of a resolution passed by a majority of the City Council delivered to the other party. Dissolution of this Agreement shall not relieve either party from any financial obligation incurred because of the Agreement. 11. If any portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid by a Court of competent jurisdiction the invalidity of that portion or portions shall not effect the validity of the other terms and conditions of this Agreement. ADOPTED by the Otsego City Council on this �day of LZ:4�97. IN FAVOR: Larry Fournier, Mayor Council Members Vern Heidner, Suzanne Ackerman OPPOSED: Virginia Wendel and Mark Berning No one Was opposed ADOPTED by the Albertville City Council on this day of 91997. IN FAVOR: OPPOSED: CITY OF OTSEGO: CITY OF ALBERTVILLE: MAYOR/' �6Z-t� MAYOR • - = `41 CITY CLERK &--L BEATrY Exhibit A Maintenance Needs List for Shared Streets Between Otsego and Albertville COST SPLIT Olseao Albertville Kadler Avenue (60th Street to 1-94) .......... $1,134.46 ... $1,134.46 -2" Gravel Overlay. Cost is based upon Otsego forces hauling and placing material Material - 598 Ton @ $1.79/Ton - 12 Tandem Hours @ $42/Hour - 7.5 Tandem & Trailer Hours @ $52/Hour - 3.5 Motor Grader Hours @ $75/Hour 70th Street (CSAH19 to Kadler Avenue) ....... $3,465.00 ... $3,465.00 - Crack Sealing (10,500 lbs. @ $0.66/lb) Kadler Avenue (CSAH39 to 60th Street) ......... $434.28 .... $434.28 - Dust Control (Magnesium Chloride) TOTAL 1997 COSTS .................... $5,033.74 ... $5,033.74 1998 (Estimate 70th Street (CSAH19 to Kadler Avenue) ......... $4,263 ..... $4,263 - Seal Coating Maciver Avenue (70th Street to 67th Street) ........ $273 ...... $273 - Dust Control (Magnesium Chloride) Maciver Avenue (67th Street to South end) ........ $597 ...... $597 - Dust Control (Magnesium Chloride) TOTAL ESTIMATED 1998 COSTS .............. $5133 ..... $5133 1999_- Eatim Maciver Avenue (70th Street to 67th Street) ....... $1,260 ..... $1,260 - Gravel (2" lift, 420 tons @ $6/ton) Maciver Avenue (67th Street to South end) ....... $2,757 ..... $2,757 - Gravel (2" lift, 919 tons @ $6/ton) 1 r 70th Street (CSAH19 to Maclver Avenue) ......... $917 ...... $917 - Dust Control (Magnesium Chloride) . . TOTAL ESTIMATED 1999 COSTS .:............. $4939 ..... $4934 COST SPLIT Otseao Albertville 70th Street (CSAH19 to Maclver Avenue) ........ $4,238 ..... $4,238 - Gravel (2" lift, 1,212 tons @$6/ton) Maclver Avenue (70th Street to 67th Street) ........ $273 ...... $273 - Dust Control (Magnesium Chloride) . Maclver Avenue (67th Street to South- end) ........ $597 ...... $597 - Dust Control (Magnesium Chloride) TOTAL ESTIMATED 2000 COSTS .., : ............ $5108 ..... $5108 2001(Estimated Costs) 70th Street (CSAH19 to Maclver Avenue) ......... $917 ...... $917 - Dust Control (Magnesium Chloride) TOTAL ESTIMATED 2001 COSTS ................. $917 ...... $917 2002 (Estimated Costs) Kadler Avenue (CSAH37 to 60th Street) .......... $2,127 ..... $2,127 - Gravel (2" lift, 709 tons @ $6/ton) Kadler Avenue (70th Street to 1-94) .......... $893 ...... $893 - Gravel (2" lift, 298 tons @ $6/ton) Maclver Avenue (70th Street to 67th Street) ........ $273 ...... $273 - Dust Control (Magnesium Chloride) Maclver Avenue (67th Street to South. end) ........ $597 ...... $597 - Dust Control (Magnesium Chloride) TOTAL ESTIMATED 2002 COSTS $3890 ..... $3890 ot910.exa 2 PRINT STORAGE & TIME RECOR SAF1W STACKABLE STEEL FLAT FILES / This classic file is practical for both working organization and archival storage. Heavy gauge steel frame and front supports add stacking strength and prevent drawers from buckling. Heavy steel side roller assembly with case- hardenec ball -bearing rollers for smooth, quiet drawer operation. Extra sturdy drawer rails ensure jam -,free drawer alignment. Safety stops prevent drawers from pulling out too far, courtesy stop keeps drawers from rolling while in open position. Hinged front depressor and rear hood in each drawer protects sheets and prevents curling. Anti -slip pads allow units to stack securely without bolting. Each file is finished in furniture -grade baked enamel and includes chrome label holders and drawer handles. Available in black or tropic sand. FOB FACTORY —We. of Drawer Overall Base Weight Order Number Net Price Drawers W x D x H (In.) W xD x H (in.) Sze (Lbs.) Black Sand Each 5 37 x 26 x 21A 403A x 29% x 161h S 177 89857544 89857551 $567.72 5 43 x 32 x 21A 463A x 353A x 161h M 222 89857569 89857577 :-,- 658.12 5 50 x 38 x 21A 533/e x 413A x 161h L 267 89857585 89857593 - ``-784.68 10 43 x 32 x 11A 463A x 353A x 161h M 307 89857858 89857866 1135.45 SOW BASES TRUCK Freight Class 85 ( _ - 161q' _ 16�2- t � i Stackabie Steel Flat File Shown wtv, (Must be ordered separately.) Closed Base ® Open Storage Base TRUCK Raises up, to 5 files 6" off the floor to protect u(�S Raises up to 2 files 20" off the floor and them from dirt, scuffs and moisture. Available in II'' provides handy storage space. Available in Truck Freight black or tropic sand. black or tropic sand. Class 85 Base Weight Order Number Net Price Size (Lbs.) Black Sand Each S 24 1 89857601 89857619 _ $100.53 M 28 89857627 89857635 '-'. 109.92 L 32 89857643 89857650 133.79 All items :ship FOB Factory Base Weight I Order Number Net Price Size (Lbs-) Black Sand_ Each S _ 40 89857668 89857676 $220.57 M 41 89857684 89857692 235.04 L 47 89857700 1 89857718 245.17 �[s S-A-PW DRAWER STACKABLE CORRUGATED FLAT FILES Heavy, mul J-ply corrugated fiberboard construction with rigid steel frame in front for added strength. Black plastic handles allow easy access to steel reinforced drawers. Label holders included. Stack up to 3 high for high volume storage. Shipped se?: -up. Color. Tropic Sand with Black accents. All items ship FOB Factory Drawer Overall Overall Overall W x D x H Width Depth Height Weight Order Net Price (In.; ..._ _.- (In.) (in.) (in.) (Lbs.) Number Each 223/4 x 27 x 2 25/h 29 16 45 1 898577261 $245.17 363/4 x 241h x 2 393/i 263/4 16 62 89857734 45 x 35 x 2 473/4 37 16 83 1 '89857742 ''`:'433.20 'Ships via Truck; Freight Class 125 Stackable Steel Flat Ft4 4 .", with Open Base (Must tk ordered separately.) cROPRiNT TIME RECORDERS nr[ .[CORD[. cD 1 Year Manufacturer's Warranty Lifetime Manufacturer's Warranty on Typewheels Provides accurate and indisputable time records which meet the Fese,= i =.k requirements governing wages and hours. Heavy-duty electric -drive :y motor assures years of dependable service. Automatic forward revc/1-=E *e4 for extended ribbon life. Easy -view clock dial is directly geared to mte" `_ typewheels for utmost accuracy. Uniform and legible printing regtstraroe -e : 4 paper stock. Heavy -gage metal casing with rust and corrosion-res:sta'%! C.- finish. Mounts quickly and easily;o�k or platform. 115VAC 60 M.' Available in 2 m1 Manual: Fingertip pressure on activates printing me' Overall dimensions: 6/h"D x 10Y4"H (inclu i bar). Shipping weight 13 lb . Automatic: Insertion of time card ' trips" printing mechani Overall dimensions: 83 61h"D x 91h"H. Shipping weight 14 lbs. Registration Outp i_12.hr 0-59min Month, date, l-12 hr., 0.59 n Accessories: s: ® m Sturm t„xutit NX push- x Manual Order N_eiPrce Number' Each 89851125 2.5 �2 cket Time Card Rack - Green I 8 Automs� Nu'-rX ata 89851133 8�851155 3S8 pO w c a-_ �r Nurr"N' Bi-Weekly" Time cards - Manila, 1000/bx. 898511w 1E Repl Ribbon - Red /Blue 89851174 �n Custom Registration Output Available - Contact Nationwide 5 le3t 3L 800-645.7270. 2 2902 7,e l