The URL can be used to link to this page

1998-03-16 CC PacketALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA March 16, 1998 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER — ROLL CALL — ADOPT AGENDA Z. MINUTES March 2, 1998 3. AUDITING CLAIMS Check #'s 10312 - 10341 4. CITIZEN FORUM — (io Minute Limit) 5. CONSENT AGENDA a. Financial Statement (February 24 — March 13) b. Recommendation to deny rezoning request for the Marx Property as recommended by the Planning & Zoning Commission on March 10, 1998 RESOLUTION #1998-8 (A RESOLUTION DENYING THE REQUEST FOR A REZONING FROM P/I, PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL, TO B-3, HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL, AS REQUESTED BY MARX, DANIELS, KOPP, AND SCHERBER FOR A PORTIONOF THE MARX PROPERTY) C. WWTF Operations Report (February 1998) 6. SPECIAL ORDER — PUBLIC HEARING 7, 50, 41� - Outdoor Recreation Grant Application RESOLUTION #1998-7 (A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN OUTDOOR RECREATION GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION) 7. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS a. PLANNING & ZONING (1) Development Stage Plan 3� � - Cedar Creek North 2. - Cedar Creek South (2) Conditional Use Permit for outside storage, Building & Site Plan Approval — Scherer Brothers Lumber 3a (3) Concept Plan Review — Swanson Homes b. ARAGAL (1) Continuation of Public Hearing — Vacation of Kadler Avenue RESOLUTION # 1998-3 l#,,p S' (2) Developer's Agreement for Center Oaks 2nd Addition c. ENGINEERING (1) Consideration of Phase I for NE Trunk Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Extension (2) Wetland delineation of Marx property d. ADMINISTRATION (1) Annual Report on the OM&M of the WWTF (2) Uniforms for Public Works employees (3) Discuss one -ton truck purchase and financing options (4) Discuss financing Fire Department rescue vehicle/bobcat, as recommended by Angie Manuel, City Auditor (5) Discuss calling bond (Finance Committee) //,�d , 8. ADJOURNMENT UPCOMING MEETINGS/IMPORTANT DATES March 21 Strategic Planning Day 7:30 AM March 23 Joint Powers Water Board 7:00 PM March 25 Monthly Staff Meeting 9:00 AM April 6 Regular City Council Meeting 7:00 PM April 9 Board of Review Hearing 7:00 PM April 14 Regular Planning & Zoning Meeting 7:00 PM April 20 Regular City Council Meeting 7:00 PM Y _ ) PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION March 10,1998 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Chair Howard Larson, Commissioners Carolyn Bauer, Dan Robertus, Jim Brown and Patti Stalberger, Zoning Administrator David Lund, Deputy Zoning Administrator Linda Goeb, and City Planner Liz Stockman Chair Larson called the regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission to order. Robertus made a motion to approve the agenda. Bauer seconded the motion. All voted aye. Brown made a motion to approve the minutes of the February 10, 1998, meeting as presented. Robertus seconded the motion. All voted aye. Chair Larson reopened the public hearing on the rezoning request from P/I (Public/Institution) to B-3 (Highway Commercial) for a 13 acre parcel owned by Clem Marx. There were no revised concept plans presented. There was no public comment. Stalberger made a motion to close the public hearing and to approve the Findings of Fact & Recommendation denying the applicant's request. Bauer seconded the motion. All voted aye. Since no one was yet present to represent the Cedar Creek South and Cedar Creek North development stage and final plans, Chair Larson moved to the Scherer Brothers site and building plan review. City Planner Liz Stockman explained that Scherer Brothers Lumber proposes to build a 25,700 square foot building on an existing lot in Barthel Industrial Park. The property is zoned correctly and the proposed use as a lumberyard is permitted. The applicant does need a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for outside storage. The Commission reviewed the conditions listed for the CUP. Chair Larson stated he was not opposed to allowing outside storage within the rear and side yard setbacks. However, the developer stated he had no problems with the limitations outlined in Liz's recommendations. Stalberger made a motion to approve the Findings of Fact & Recommendation as presented, granting Scherer Brothers a Conditional Use Permit for outside storage and approving the building and site plan as presented. Bauer seconded the motion. All voted aye. Zoning Administrator Lund explained the Outdoor Recreation Grant Program. The City Council will be conducting a public hearing to consider authorization of a grant application for the Oakside Park. The Commission reviewed two concept plans for the development of Oakside Park and the features to be incorporated initially. The Commission favors a grass ballfield, two tennis court, a parking lot, playground equipment, water installation for sprinkling and horseshoe pits. Stalberger made a motion to recommend Oakside Park Concept Plan #2 for the Council's consideration. Bauer seconded the motion. All voted aye. Don Jensen, representing Pilot Land Development, who is donating the park land, explained that the grading costs for Concept Plan # 1 would be far cheaper because of the lay of the land. Stalberger and Bauer withdrew their previous motion and second. Robertus made a motion to recommend approval of Oakside Park Concept #1, revised by changing the parking lot design similar to that shown on Concept #2. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Chair Larson opened a joint public hearing on the Cedar Creek South and Cedar Creek North Development Stages at 8:05 PM. Planner Stockman reviewed the plans and stated all details conform to the Cedar Creek Golf Course PUD already approved. Stockman recommends Development Stage approvals for both plats. Chair Larson called for public comment. There was none. Chair Larson closed the public hearing at 8:15 PM. Robertus made a motion to approve the Findings of Fact & Recommendation to approve the Development Stage of Cedar Creek North and Cedar Creek South. Bauer seconded the motion. All voted aye. 2 1 Don Jensen presented a concept plan for the development of the R-5 zoned property along County Road 37. The Commission was presented with proposed townhouse designs and layouts. No decision was necessary. Harold Swanson, representing Swanson Homes, displayed two concept plans for the residential development of the properties located between Mud and School Lakes. Concept Plan 5B is a standard design that meets all criteria of the R-IA zone and the Shoreland Ordinance. Concept Plan 6A requires a PUD zoning but provides a public trail along both lakeshores. All lot sizes are in conformance with the R-lA requirements. Swanson requested input from the Commission regarding their preferences. Commissioner Brown stated that he feels that the trade-off of trail property for the PUD zoning district is a fair one for both the city and the developer. The other Commissioners agreed and stated to Swanson their preference for Concept 6A. Bauer made a motion to adjourn at 9:20 PM. Brown seconded the motion All voted aye. Howard Larson, Chair Linda Goeb, Deputy Zoning Admin. 3 i i� Ta City Council Fr = David Lund Date: March 12, 1998 Re: GeneralInformation 1. Don Jensen would like to schedule a photo session for the ground breaking of the golf course clubhouse. He would suggest the dates of March 26-30 or April 1-3 at 5:00 p.m. There should be enough daylight at that time. When would you be available? 2. At the last council meeting, the topic of ticketing vehicles parked over night was discussed with the Wright County Deputy. It was agreed to be lenient in ticketing because of the weather. On Friday (March 6) our public works employees arrived early in the morning to sand the roads and found 20+ cars parked in their path. They were not happy with a loosefinconsistent enforcement of this ban. Because of the unpredictability of winter weather, unexpected snowfalls and icy conditions make plowing/sanding an extra challenge. How should the enforcement of the parking ban be handled? 3. PSG — This is just an early reminder to be considering the wastewater treatment facility contract for next year. The current contract reads, "Thereafter, this Agreement shall be automatically renewed for an additional three (3) year term unless canceled in writing by either party no less than one hundred and twenty (120) days prior to expiration. Therefore, before September 1, the City needs to make a decision. 4. March 21— Reminder - Goal Setting Session — Brimeyer Group • Page 1 } 2 5. Uniforms — Public Works Employees A memo is included. Since this is either a three or five-year contract and totals more than $1,000, Council review is needed. 6. FYI - A copy of the Wright County Tobacco Ordinance meeting is included. 7. Recommended funding source for the one ton truck = There is a balance of $20,250 in the Public Works budget for a pick-up truck and $30,000 in the Snow Plow fund which may be used. 0 Page 2 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT WRIGHT COUNTY TOBACCO ORDINANCE NOTICE IS HERESY GIVEN that the Wright County Board of Commissioners will, on March 31, 1998 at 9:30 A.M., consider adopting a Wright County Tobacco Ordinance. This discussion will take place as a part of the regular County Board meeting for that date, held in the Commissioners' Board Room at the Wright County Government Center, Buffalo, Minnesota. The proposed Wright County Tobacco Ordinance would provide for the licensing of tobacco retailers in those cities and towns which choose not to do their own licensing. The Ordinance would also require an unannounced compliance check at least once per year at each licensed retailer. Both of these provisions are required by recent changes in state law. The Ordinance would also adopt the minimum administrative penalties contained in state law, to be assessed to retailers and others in violation of the Ordinance. Copies of the proposed Ordinance may be obtained by contacting the Office of the Wright County Coordinator at (612) 682-7378. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 2,1998 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor Mark Olsen, Councilmembers Duane Berning, Patti Stalberger, John Vetsch and Robert Gundersen, City Administrator David Lund, City Clerk Linda Goeb, City Engineer Peter Carlson, and City Attorney Michael Couri Mayor Olsen called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to order. The agenda was amended as follows: Check # 10273 was voided and replaced by Check # 10288 in the amount of $260.00, bids for the fire rescue truck was added as Item 6d(4) and the Vetsch CUP was removed from the Consent Agenda and placed as Item 6d(5). Berning made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to approve the minutes of the February 17, 1998, meeting. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Vetsch made a motion to pay Check #'s 10265 — 10272 and Check #'s 10274 — 10288 as presented. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Chad Wade addressed the Council under Citizen Forum regarding road restrictions. Wade explained he has purchased a new home in Albertville and the moving company is not able to get to his new home with the streets restricted to 4-ton. City Engineer Peter Carlson indicated that limited permits for overweight vehicles could be issued under certain situations. Mr. Wade will make a formal request for permission to exceed the 4-ton restriction. Don Jensen of Pilot Land Development Company requested that the City Council appoint a representative to work with the Wright County Highway Department to determine the appropriate side of the highway to widen the shoulder in order to create a bike path. Stalberger made a motion to appoint the Transportation Committee (Councilmembers Berning and Gundersen) to work with Wright County. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to approve the Financial Statement for January 1 — February 24 as presented. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 2, 1998 Page 2 of 5 Stalberger made a motion to approve the Wastewater Treatment Facility Operations Report for January 1998. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to approve RESOLUTION #1998-6 titled A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ORDINANCE #1998-1 ENTITLED BUILDING MAINTENANCE AND OCCUPANCY. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to approve the summary of ORDINANCE #1998-1 for publication purposes. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to approve RESOLUTION #1998-4 titled A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE RENTAL DWELLING ANNUAL FEE SCHEDULE. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to approve a 3.2 Non -Intoxicating Liquor License for the Albertville Jaycees at the St. Albert's Parish Center on March 21, 1998, from 5:00 PM to midnight. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to schedule a public hearing at 7:15 PM on Monday, March 16, 1998, to consider the Outdoor Recreation Grant Program. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. City Engineer Peter Carlson explained that Harold Swanson is prepared to begin development of his property located between School and Mud Lakes. In order for the property to be developed sanitary sewer and water must be extended, as proposed in the Northeast Sanitary Sewer and Water Main Project study. Carlson presented a Cash Flow Analysis that suggests ways the project can be financed for the Council to consider. Carlson discussed weight restrictions. He stated that 5-ton restrictions could be used on the newer streets due to their heavier construction. However, the City needs to know the number of trucks being driven. Carlson recommended the criteria to be used when considering issuance of over -weight permits in a memo April 8, 1997, as follows: (1) Maximum allowable load of 7-tons per axle. (2) Temperatures from the previous night were below 20 degrees. (3) Temperatures during the day do not exceed 35 degrees. (4) Deliveries are made prior to 10:00 AM. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 2, 1998 Page 3 of 5 Berning made a motion to approve Carlson's recommendation for exceptions from the weight limits as a guideline for the future, and to authorize Carlson to approve over- weight permits on a day-to-day basis. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Planner Liz Stockman presented the preliminary plat for the Parkside Commercial Center, the Conditional Use Permit to allow a gas station/convenience store to operate in a B-3 zone, and the building and site plan for the lot. Stockman explained that the Planning Commission had recommended approval but had debated the opening and closing hours for the CUP, as well as the need for fencing at the west side of the plat to prevent trash from blowing into the residential area. Another concern was screening from the Cottages of Albertville addition located directly to the south. Stalberger made a motion to approve the Findings of Fact & Decision with the following added conditions: (1) Fencing at the west edge of the plat may be required at a later date, if the situation warrants. (2) Additional parking will be required when or if a food franchise is added to the building. (3) Additional screening will be placed on the south side of 57t' Street as determined necessary by the developers of the Cottages of Albertville. (4) Hours of operation will be 5:30 AM to 11:00 PM Monday through Saturday and 7:30 AM to 11:00 PM Sunday. (5) Outdoor telephones will be placed on the building. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Beming made a motion to extend the city's cigarette licenses for two additional months to allow Wright County to complete their tobacco ordinance and licensing requirements. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Two Councilmembers, Administrator Lund and City Engineer Carlson met with Bernard and Clem Marx to discuss options for the City's acquisition of a portion of the Marx property for park expansion and a fire hall site. Since there is some conflicting opinions on what areas are wetland, Carlson recommended that an independent firm be contracted to delineate the wetlands. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 2, 1998 Page 4 of 5 Berning made a motion directing the engineer to secure bids for the delineation of the 13 acre Marx parcel for the next Council meeting. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council reviewed the two concept plans presented by the Joint Powers Board for watermain ownership/responsibility. The Council concurred that the operation and maintenance of each member's distribution system should be the responsibility of the member community. They also agreed that sprinkling bans, water quality, etc. should be the responsibility of the Joint Powers Board. The Council also recommends that Paragraph 7 stating that the Joint Powers Board is responsible for completing a Comprehensive Water Plan for the entire distribution system by January 1, 1999, is added to Concept Plan 2. Vetch made a motion directing the City's Joint Powers Board Members to relay the Council's recommendations to the Joint Powers Board. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council reviewed the two bids received for the rescue vehicle chassis and the one bid received for the additional apparatus. The bid from Hoglund Bus Company for the chassis was declared ineligible due to Hoglund's exceptions to the specifications. A representative of Marion Rescue and Fire Apparatus explained that financing the rescue vehicle could be accomplished through Baystone Financial Group through a finance/ownership lease. Baystone provided several options for the lease/purchase for the Council to consider. Gundersen made a motion to award Marion Rescue and Fire Apparatus the bid for one International Chassis in the amount of $48,814.00 and one Marion Body in the amount of $113,135.00, for a total price of the rescue truck of $161,949.00. Delivery of the completed vehicle will be 365 days from the date of award and financing will be through a Baystone Financial Group finance/ownership lease in the amount of $161,000 with $0 down over a five year period at an interest rate of 4.274%. First payment will be due on March 2, 1999. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to approve the Conditional Use Permit for Vetsch Custom Cabinets as presented. Gundersen seconded the motion. Stalberger, Vetsch, Gundersen and Olsen voted aye. Berning abstained. The motion carried. Mayor Olsen discussed the Strategic Planning Day set for March 21, 1998. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 2,1998 Page 5 of 5 Berning made a motion to adjourn at 10:05 PM. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor Linda Goeb, City Clerk CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT Check No. Vendor Purpose Amount 10312 Affordable Sanitation City Park Rental $ 71.90 10313 AirTouch Cellular Fire Dept. Cell Phone $ 11.43 10314 AirTouch Cellular Public Works Cell Phone $ 11.64 10315 Allina Medical Center Firemen Physical & Shots $ 150.25 10316 Burlington Northern Annual Park Rent $ 1,800.00 10317 CarQuest Parts & Supplies $ 21.48 10318 DJ's Total Home Care Monthly Charges $ 338.69 10319 Fehn Gravel Class 5 $ 85.50 10320 First Trust 1993E G.O. Improvement Bond $ 396.25 10321 First Trust 1996A Tax increment Bond $ 225.00 10322 First Trust 1993A G.O. Improvement Bond $ 429.25 10323 Front Line Plus Fire Department Supplies $ 33.33 10324 Hack's Monthly Supplies & Gas $ 91.96 10325 Larson Publications February Legals $ 847.91 10326 MinnComm Public Works Pagers $ 25.40 10327 Minnegasco Natural Gas $ 380.10 10328 Monticello Animal Control February Animal Calls $ 90.00 10329 NSP Street Lights $ 2,389.73 10330 NAC, Inc. Planning Services $ 3,795.89 10331 PERA Life Insurance Payroll Deduction $ 12.00 10332 Pat's 66 Diesel $ 5.61 10333 Short, Elliott & Hendrickson Engineering Service $ 4,989.17 10334 Simonson Lumber Park Shelter Materials $ 91.68 10335 Smoke Eaters Firemen Subsrciptions $ 94.50 10336 Superior Services February Garbage Service $ 93.02 10337 Wright County Journal Press Subscription $ 25.00 10338 Wright County Treasurer Special Assessment Listing $ 12.00 10339 Wright County Treasurer March Police Protection $ 8,650.50 10340 Wright Recycling February Recycling $ 1,215.00 10341 Wright Hennepin Electric Greenhaven Street Lights $ 22.44 TOTAL CLAIMS $ 26,406.63 .ray CITY OF ALBERTVILLE FINANCIAL STATEMENT February 23 — March 12, 1998 Beginning Cash Balance February 23, 1998 $ 909592.51 Income: Billings 759.85 Building Permits 21,137.98 Donations (Queen Cmtee) 1,687.00 Insurance Premiums 392.74 Interest (February) 170.54 Park Rent 100.00 Sewer Licenses 90.00 Title Search 40.00 Miscellaneous 43.30 Total Income 279421.41 Transfer in from Savings 1009000.00 Expenses: Check Ws 10265-10287 28,243.61 (Approved 3/2/98) PreApproved Checks: 8,943.10 (List Attached) Total Expenses 37,186.71 Ending Cash Balance March 12, 1998 $180,827.21 INVESTMENTS CD #9226 — Development Corporation — matures 3/29/98 7,623.06 CD #22202 — matures 4/7/98 @ 6.12% 554,777.10 CD #300116 — AFD — matures 6/26/98 @ 4.7% 25,183.60 Dain Bosworth Investments (2/28/98) 1,301,407.12 TOTAL INVESTMENTS $1,888,990.88 Money Market Savings Account (2/1/98) 463,196.28 PRE -APPROVED PAYMENTS Check No. Vendor Purpose Amount 10289-10300 PAYROLL PERIOD 2/1 - 2/28 $ 1,443.43 10301 VOID $ - 10302-10305 PAYROLL PERIOD 2/14-2/27 $ 3,307.97 10306 Aircraft Rescue & Fire Fighting Replaces Voided Check #10273 $ 260.00 10307 Minnesota Dept. of Revenue February State Income Taxes $ 380.95 10308 PERA Payroll Period 2/14 - 2/17 $ 352.94 10309 Security State Bank of ML Federal Taxes $ 2,821.71 10310 University of Minnesota Applicator's Tests $ 70.00 10311 USCM Midwest Payroll Deduction $ 306.10 TOTAL PREAPPROVED CHECKS $ 8,943.10 RESOLUTION NO.98- IF A RESOLUTION DENYING THE REQUEST FOR A REZONING FROM P/I, PUBLICANSTITUTIONAL TO B-3, HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL. AS REQUESTED BY MARX, DANIELS, KOPP, AND SCHERBER FOR A PORTION OF THE MARX PROPERTY. WHEREAS, the City of Albertville is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Albertville has adopted Ordinance 1988-12 to promote the orderly, economic and safe development and utilization of land within the city; and WHEREAS, Marx, Daniels, Kopp, and Scherber have made application for rezoning of a portion of the Marx property from PII, Public/Institutional to B-3, Highway Commercial; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as; (see attached) WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning requires the Planning Commission and City Council to consider the impacts of that adjustment; and WHEREAS, the Albertville Planning Commission reviewed the application and conducted a public hearing relative to the application on 10 February 1998 and 10 March 1998 and voted 5-0 to recommend denial of the application; and WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council reviewed the application information and Planning Commission recommendations at their meeting on 16 March 1998; and WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The property is currently zoned PA, Public/Institutional to be consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Park and Trail Plan to accommodate needed Lion's Park expansion. 2. The proposed rezoning and restaurant/bar would occupy area needed for park expansion and does not conform with either the policies and provisions of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan or Park and Trail Plan. 3. Development of commercial uses have been designated in other areas of the City, along the periphery of residential neighborhoods which are still available for development. 4. The addition of more commercial property would be in excess of what is needed city-wide and B-3 zoning is not appropriate to the site location. RESOLUTION NO. 96- _ _ MARX PROPERTY REZONING MARCH 1998 PAGE 2 5. The proposed project would increase the density of development in this vicinity and would increase traffic along the 57th Street residential collector. 6. The benefits of the side -by -side restaurant/bar and private athletic field development do not outweigh the negative aspects such as predominance of adult games, limitation of youth activities, availability of alcohol, site design/layout issues and vehicular safety/accessibility. 7. The project does not create a development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Albertville hereby denies the requested rezoning based upon the above listed findings of fact; This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Albertville on the 16th day of March 1998, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. Mayor Mark Olsen ATTEST: Linda Goeb, City Clerk pc: David Lund Linda Goeb Pete Carlson Mike Couri TOTAL F.09 3-11-98 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Planning Commission Findings of Fact & Recommendation Request: The applicants have submitted a concept plan for development on Marx land immediately west of Lion's Park. The concept plan shows a sports bar of +/-22,500 square feet, two softball/baseball fields, three volleyball courts, future playground and parking for 120 vehicles. In addition, the concept shows two acres of Marx land to be dedicated to the City as park for additional parking and an outdoor hockey rink (to be moved from its current location in Lion's Park). Shown on the Barthel property, the plan also proposes that the two acres of park land would provide needed parking and outdoor ice rink usage adjacent to the ice arena property thereby negating the need for future land purchaselexpansion. The concept would require amendment to the Comprehensive Plan from Park & Open Space to Commercial and proposes rezoning of +/-10-11 acres to 18-3, Highway Commercial. Although, not included in the current rezoning proposal, Mr. Marx wishes to rezone the +/-4 acres shown on the concept to be immediately south of the Barthel property and west of the southern most proposed ballfield to a business designation as well. Planning Commission Meeting Date: 10 March 1998 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received the Planning Commission now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1. The legal description of the subject property is as follows: (see attached) 2_ The requirements of Section 300 (Rezoning) of the City Zoning Ordinance have been considered. 3. The NAC memorandum dated 3 February 1998 is incorporated herein. Recommendation: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicants request for sl i.Wivisoon two variances and site plan review has been denied based on the most current plans and information received to date, for the following reasons: 1. The property is currently zoned P/l, Publiclinstitutional to be consistent with the Comprehensive land Use Plan and Park and Trail Plan to accommodate needed Lion's Park expansion. 2. The proposed rezoning and restaurant/bar would occupy area needed for park expansion and does not conform with either the policies and provisions of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan or Park and Trail Plan. 3. Development of commercial uses have been designated in other areas of the City, along the periphery of residential neighborhoods which are still available for development. 4. The addition of more commercial property would be in excess of what Is needed city-wide and B-3 zoning is not appropriate to the site location. 5. The proposed project would increase the density of development in this vicinity and would increase traffic along the 57th Street residential collector. 6. The benefits of the side -by -side restaurant/bar and private athletic field development do not outweigh the negative aspects such as predominance of adult games, limitation of youth activities, availability of alcohol, site design/layout issues and vehicular safety/accessibility. 7. The project does not create a development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Adopted by the Albertville Planning Commission this 10th day of March 1998. Attest: City of Albertville 0 Linda Goeb, City Clerk pc. David Lund Linda Goeb Pete Carlson Mike Couri Howard Larson, Chair E ca)Your water and wastewater partner ALBERTVILLE WASTEWATER TREAT.NIENT FACILITY February 1998 MONTHLY OPERATIONS REPORT Submitted by: .rL 414,47 Kepy Browning Date: March 12, 1998 Professional Services Group St. Michael Project 3320 Lander Avenue, NE St. Michael, Minnesota 55376 (612) 497-8309 Fax; (612) 497-8309 ALBERTVILLE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY Monthly Operations Report February 1998 Executive Summary Albertville met all of its NPDES permit requirements for the month of February. Average biochemical oxygen demand in the effluent was 2.0 mg/I. Total suspended solids averaged 6.6 mg/I in the effluent and total phosphorous was 0.26 mg/I. This will be the first winter the Albertville plant has met phosphorous limits since the plant upgrade. Operations The facility is still meeting phosphorous limits with no problems. Power was lost twice during the night on Feb. 25, 1998, due to high winds. The backup generator maintained plant operation during this time. As always, staff responded both times to assure that power transfers took place and that line power resumed. The industrial park lift station experienced an alarm condition. The cause was found to be foreign material (plastic wrapper) had plugged the seal water line, which caused to pump to heat up. The plug was removed and pump returned to service with no apparent adverse effects. The UV system was cleaned and prepared for return to seasonal service on March 1, 1998. The effluent channel was also thoroughly cleaned at this time. Maintenance Annual, in addition to monthly, preventative maintenance was performed on the lift stations. The impellers in the industrial park lift station are worn, but within O&M tolerances. The #7 aerator failed. It appears to be a bearing failure. The aerator was replaced with the recently repaired unit, and the bad one will now be repaired. A light fixture ballast was replaced in the control building. DJ's lift station continues to have excessive grease accumulation. The wetwell is pumped down frequently to minimize the problem. The UV bulbs, sleeves, and channel were cleaned. All connectors and wiring was checked for proper operation and corrosion. General monthly preventative maintenance took place throughout the plant, including backup generator maintenance, sampler cleaning and disinfection, clarifier servicing. Safetv Annual lockout / tagout training was received. Manual lifting instruction was also provided, with discussion of proper PPE available for employees performing heavy lifting. Re-gulatory Communications NPDES Discharge Monitoring Report Financial Financial report reflects all activity in the budget year. The financial data does not reflect February bills paid in March. Appendices NPDES Discharge Monitoring Report DMR Addendum's Loadings Summary Client Status ALBERTVILLE WWTF LOADINGS Con raet Vakiee 6 Triggers: Contract Values & Triggers Ave- 0.1580 MGD Ave- 307 ! 187 # Migtr 0.1896 MGD Hgh- 388 ! 224 0 Low- 0.1264 MGD Low- 246 / 150 4 Design: 0.3150 MGD 368 S 368 # FLOW 12 mo % of TSS 12 mo % of CBOD % of MGD ..................... Avg. Design ..................... mg4 ................. Lbs. Avg. ............................................... Design mgA lbs. Avg. .................... Design ............... 1995 Jan 0.151 384 483 240 302 Feb 0.143 285 339 184 219 Mar 0.164 288 394 191 261 Apr 0.177 99 145 92 136 May 0.172 274 392 148 212 Jun 0.163 232 315 133 181 Jul 0.152 222 281 154 195 Aug 0.174 288 418 136 197 Sep 0.165 234 322 100 138 Oct 0.161 294 395 122 184 Nov 0.163 78 106 88 92 Dec 0.156 405 527 234 304 1996 Jan 0.161 0.1626 51.01% 250 336 331 89.93% 175 235 195 52.87% Feb 0.158 0.1638 52.01% 433 571 350 95.18% 178 235 196 53.21% Mar 0.179 0.1651 52.41% 312 468 356 96.79% 221 330 202 54.78% Apr 0.188 0.1660 52.70% 338 527 388 105.43% 131 205 207 58.36% May 0.198 0.1882 53.39% 388 641 409 111.05% 189 279 213 57.87% Jun 0.203 0.1715 54.44% 354 599 432 117.48% 151 256 219 59.57% Jul 0.151 0.1723 54.68% 248 333 437 118.65% 129 173 217 59.07% Aug 0.141 0.1695 53.81% 558 656 456 124.04% 179 210 218 59.37% Sep 0.141 0.1675 5317% 825 735 491 133.40% 145 171 221 60.11% Oct 0.163 0.1677 53.23% 274 372 489 132.89% 144 196 224 60.83% Nov 0.250 0.1749 55 53% 244 W9 523 142.01% 141 294 241 65.40% Dec 0.171 0.1782 55.93% 309 441 515 140.06% 323 461 254 68.94% 1927 Jan 0.179 0.1777 56.409b 432 645 541 147.06% 180 269 256 69.70% Feb 0.183 0.1798 57.06% 225 343 522 141.92% 148 226 256 69.50% r OUTDOOR RECREATION GRANT PROGRAM What is it? It is a grant program sponsored by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The program assists local governments in acquiring parkland, and developing outdoor recreation facilities. The maximum grant amount is $50,000 with a local match required. This is a unique grant in that it allows for the development of a large variety of outdoor facilities including those in our Comprehensive Plan. Application Deadline = March 31, 1998 Why Oakside Park? 1. The City lists Oakside Park as number four on the priority list. 2. The City needs to develop parks in new areas to match development. 3. The location potentially accommodates all age groups. 4. If the application is successful, the city will show a visible commitment to park development. 5. The City "owns" or has a commitment on the acreage. Why were certain improvements chosen? The comprehensive plan lists 12 items for ultimate development. Fa ilihec selected.• a. grass ballfield for kids $12,000 The STMA Youth Baseball Association is in dire need of additional fields. This field would start to remedy the situation. According to the site development costs listed in the comprehensive plan, a baseball field (full sized), including grading and a backstop, costs between $238,100 and $270,400 to develop. The proposed field would be a simple open area for general play and could possibly be adapted for other field games and be flooded in the winter. b. playground, large $35,000 A playground area is needed in a developing neighborhood. c. 2 tennis courts $49,000 This is a facility which has potential use for youth and adults. The grant would help build a facility which is the second most costly on the list, difficult to fund later. d. horseshoe pits $2,500 Although this is not a costly item, it will add to the balanced approach to park development and provide a venue which would appeal to older adults as well as a feature families might enjoy. e. water faucet and drains $1,500 + f parking $6.000 $106,000 -2- This coffin provides facilities for children, youth, and adults as it is responsive to different age groom a. basketball court $14,500 b. picnic shelter or gazebo $31,000 c. six picnic tables or benches $2,000 d. restroom budding $75,000 e. shuffleboard sure $2,500 £ landscaping, waste receptacles, signage $20,000 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION # 1998-7 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN OUTDOOR RECREATION GRANT PROGRAM APPLICATION BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Albertville act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the Outdoor Recreation Grant Program Application to be submitted on March 24, 1998, and that David Lund is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Natural Resources for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Albertville. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Albertville has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for its design life. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Albertville has not incurred any costs and has not entered into any written agreements to purchase property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE City of Albertville has not violated any Federal, State or Local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, graft, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Albertville may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above -referenced project, and that the City of Albertville certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the contract agreement and described in the Compliances section of the Outdoor Recreation Grant Program Application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Administrator is hereby authorized to execute such agreement as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. I CERTIFY THAT the above resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Albertville, Minnesota, on March 16,1998. Linda Goeb, City Clerk Date: Mark S. Olsen, Mayor Date: NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC COMMUNITY PLANNING DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH MEMORANDUM TO: Albertville Planning Commission FROM: Elizabeth Stockman DATE: 4 March 1998 RE: Albertville DNR Outdoor Recreation Grant FILE: 163.05 - 98.01 In order to proceed with application for this DNR grant we will need to discuss and determine the following: ► Park layout - concept one or two or any other combination Priorities - only a portion of the elements will be installed with the grant money (see the attached application request form for a preliminary list of priorities) Playground Detail I will bring catalogs to review at the meeting and you should bring any other ideas you may have. It must be handicapped accessible. The meeting may get long with the five other agenda items, so please be patient and be prepared to move through everything as quickly as possible. This park stuff has to be decided that night or we will have to pass on the grant this time around. A public hearing is scheduled regarding the concept, etc. at the City Council meeting on the 16th. If possible, you should try to be there. PC: Dave Lund Linda Goeb Pete Carlson Mike Couri Kevin Mealhouse 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837 )posed Trail Ballfield/Open Play /40 Picnic Area � /e �ch j Backstop i , . . Play Equipment ' Horseshoes +c� m ater huffle Picnic Shelter board Restroom Buildi Tennis Pro o: 8 Tra 0 50' 100' , 8' Trail 00 rn c x w Parking 1(8 cars) Kantor Ct. roposed Trail Concept T , Oakside Park Albertville, Minnesota Proposed- 8, Trail Z7 T o Picn Area 0 0 o C T is Gbzebo play Proposed Equipmen 8' Trail — ` Shuffleboard Bench �.. BZrOksp 0 / , c w Ballfield/Open Play / IHorse— / shoes later N Restroom d / I Building Proposed p 8' Trail Y 0 `o° arking rt_ (10 cars) Kantor Ct. Proposed 8' Trail 0 50' 100' Concept 2 Uakside Park Albertville, Minnesota IMPLEMENTATION 4-Oakside Park Grass ballfield for kids, includes rough and fine grading, seed', backstop, and one bench 1,21000 11,000 Basketball court, including grading, surfacing, and goals X 14,500 Two tennis courts, includes grading, surfacing, fencing, and netstposts X 49,000 Playground, large -3c;v 000 45,000 Picnic shelter or gazebo 31,1000 15,500 Six picnic tables or benches 2 j 000 7,200 Parking for 10 cars k 6,000 Restroom building, foundation, grading, complete interior and exterior, 3 toilets and one sink qc7j d 62,000 Shuffleboard surface and equipment k 2,500 Horseshoe pits with wood backstops, sand and equipment Z SQQ 1,500 Landscaping, waste receptacles, signage X 20,000 Water faucet and drain (Subrf-0-0 1Zssjrn70 0 p 1,500 IA S -ftrGr l S * Z(p 000 `- $235,700 9-Winter Park Basketball court, including grading, colored surfacing, and goals to double as shuffleboard surface 21,000 Open skating including grading and seeding% warming house, lighting 9,000 Turf volleyball, including grading and seeding', equipment 2,000 Playground, large 45,000 Two picnic shelters or gazebos 35,000 Twelve picnic tables or benches 14,400 Parking for 20-25 cars and lighting 19,000 Restroom building, foundation, grading, complete interior and exterior, 3 toilets and one sink 62,000 Sliding hill (assuming 80% free fill), grading, top soil, erosion control/ seeding', and lighting 26,000 Frisbee park or golf, including grading, seeding*, and equipment 7,500 Open grass area, graded and seeded', comb. soccer/football goals 4,600 Landscaping, waste receptacles, signage 35,000 Water faucet and drain 1,500 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE 1997 COMPREHENSIVE PARK 8, TRAIL SYSTEM PLAN 44 a Page 1 of 2 From: Is it on7 <Isiton7@aol.com> To: NAC@WINTERNET.COM <NAC@WINTERNET.COM> Date: Wednesday, March 04, 1998 12:53 PM Subject: ATTN: Liz Stockman (from Anne Deuring) Hi Liz, I thought I would send you what I have figured on the cost estimates for Oakside Park. In general, I think they're workable. We might want to tweak a few of them. Ballfield - $12,000 Basketball court - $14,500 is fine if no soil amendments are necessary Tennis courts - again $49,000 is fine if no soil amendments are necessary Playground - $45,000 is generous. For this size park, $35,000 would probably do it. Picnic shelter - $15,500 is low unless it's absolutely barebones. For a nice six -sided shelter with a cupola or some special character the cost would be more like $31,000. 6 picnic tables - $7,200 is high. At $300 a piece, $2,000 would do it. Parking for 10 cars - $6,000 is good. Restroom building - $62,000 might be low. I'd say $75,000. Shuffleboard - $2,500 is good. Horseshoes - $1,500 is good. If handicapped accessible, add another $1,000 for paving. Landscaping, trash and signage - $20,000 is workable. Water faucet - $1,500 is low. Even keeping the service as close to the cul- de-sac as possible, I think the cost may be more like $6,000. * Trails (Not included in original estimate)- I assumed we would pave trails across the entire park to each entrance point (at least for handicapped accessibility). Trails would add $26,000 to the estimate. With these tweakings the total cost is around $400,000. I will call in a little while to see if you got this and have any questions. 3/4/98 f9L/Ld/1`jit! 11: Lb 4y/yLld HLDGKI V1l�LGGKI ,.�•�+"' ., _. ._ AppLICA'TION MQULST FORM Oaa ApPW"ou Aeq m Fam should be submitted per Project. Please make Capin of this form, � nsedcd City of Albertville AP'P David Lund Conbct I%c City Administrator 5975 Main Avenue NE P.O. Box-9 1 It I lit, phone Nuznber Daytime botw:s 6 Project N Pines cb a de Mnopwft prur. (if lovovvn) cad pmvi,ds on esti MMOd tool FcaJatt cost Public Boat Access Proplo Oumioot R,oaradioa Grant Program Fir W6 Pier Gant PMFun Noma sad Soak An& Onm Progla>as Clan Vessel Act Gnat PtoVam _ Cpopeted" limn Oro arm PLOP M N&d=d Ract6Wi °T=A Ptmd (Sys) 'fatal Bstimsted Cast s�t oA neo Lqosytive DisMct (IA-678): 19B C--' P siaual Distdet (I-S): _22 Proje# Darrlptlotts Oakside Park is a.planned neighborhood park in City of Albertville. The location is lacking in part of.the Comprehensive Park and Trail System The location is significant as it is near a new the middle of a rapidly growing neighborhood. Park development is projected in various stages funding. The amenities proposed are a reflection which had considerable community input. Phase 1 (� -i% ou 0 tennis court $49,000 I2 000 grass ballfield $11,000 ;34/)Up playground $45,000 7,t20o horseshoe pit $1,500 (,.00 _ water faucet/drain $1,500 1 (7��---��p p Total $ 108, 000 a new development area in the. park facilities. The site is Plan, adopted on September 8, 1997. senior housing project and in to correspond with available of the comprehensive plan frrirclpi)G'a(�91es Or �C iJes ? 2/000 Grant request - $50,000 City contribution - 468TOW S4)5l00 ( U3 d w/Dtt+ -� w Ocviw. 1. 1997 l o+,L:�00 i0, O v0-- (wG7 ��.17 ` 71 0f)0 -i- (rocs �-- Z, 000 T a.�l " tP� LI �)) 7 (y�p�000, CITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Decision tit.-,� 11 I �.='il- I'•,hII -;f I a W relill 9,1_71t •j•;IJ, TI Request: pilot Land Development has submitted development stage plans for a portion of the recently approved Cedar Creek Golf Course (CCGC) Planned Unit Development. As the seconddevelopment stage (preliminary plate portion of the project, Cedar Creek North (CCN} enc ornpasses 78.33 acres and prcvkles 90 single family lots, a +/-5.87 acre park and 4.44 acres of golf course land. Following CCGC concept plan approval and in expectation of the current projects, the properly was rezoned to Planned Unit Development on 17 November 1907. Cttty Council Ong Daft: 16 March 1998 Findings of Fed: Based on review of the application and evidence received the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and decision: 1. The legal description of the subject property Is as follows: (see attached) Z The NAC planning report dated 4 March 1998 is incorporated herein. 3. The requirements of Section 2700 (Planned Unit Development) of the City Zoning Ordinance have been met. 4. On 10 March 1998 the Albertville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the applicant's request, preceded by a mailed notice, Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that the City Council approve the project. Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for Cedar Creek North Development Stage (preliminary plat) approval has been spMved based on the most current plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. Temporary cul-de-sacs are constructed at the terminus of all roads that will serve more than two lots in the future at such time as lots are final platted along said streets. 2 All grading, drainage and utility issues are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 3. An easement is estalbished over Outlot 0 to allow for emergency vehiaWraii access between CON and COS (connection to the northern most cukle-sac in OCS). 4. An easement Is shown over a portion of Lot 17, Block 5 to accommodate the Kadler Avenue cut-dweao In this location. The City Engineer shall review and approve the street configuration (size proposed at 45 foot radius and material proposed as gravel) and location. 5. Park and trail dedication requirements are vet as specified at the time of final plat approval. B. One (1) deciduous or coniferous tree is provided per unit or lot in addition to any screening or other' landscaping requirements which may be required by the City Council. 91 Ado ffMd by the Af erbdile City Coundl # t 16th day of Mares 1"S. g. wwT/ +Cfiy of Albertvft Mayor Mark Olson Attest: Linda Goeb, City Clerk pc: don Jensen, David Lund, Linda Goeb, Mike Court, Pete Carlson CITY OF ALBERTVILLE 3-11-98 Pianning Commission Findings of Fact & Recommendation . . I �i• - _ ► • Ill �i_] _ • •,11 =�1 *T7 • ' _� •� .=:� = = :.._ C,• r: =., 1 -i• fill 01-1 - • =ill 71L • 10��1j: • Ilt=;l. Repunt: Pilot Land Development has submitted development stage plans for a portion of the rowntly approved Ceder Creek Golf Course (CCOC) Planned Unit Development. As the second development stage (preliminary platted) portion of the project, Cedar Creek North (CCN) encompasses 78.33 acres and provides 90 single family lots, a +J-5.67 we park and 4.44 acres of golf course land. Following CCGC concept plan approved and in expectation of the current projects, the property was rezoned to Planned Unit Development on 17 November 1997. Planning Conan"an Meeting Dom: 10 March 1998 MOW of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received the Planning Commission now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1. The legal description of the subject property is as follows: (see attached) 2. The NAC planning report dated 4 March 1998 is incorporated herein. 3. The requirements of Section 2700 (Planned Unit Development) of the City Zoning Ordinance have been met. Recommendation: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for Cedar Creek North Development Stage (preliminary plat) approval has been eyaPMVWbased on the most cement plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. Temporary cul-de-sacs are constructed at the terminus of all roads that will serve more than two lots in the future at such time as lots are final platted along said streets. 2. All grading, drainage and utility issues are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 3. An easement is estaibished over Outlot D to allow for emergency vehiclettrail access between CCN and CCS (connection to the northern most cul-de-sac in CCS). , . , 4. An easenwit is shown over a portion of Lot 17, $look 5 to accommodate the Kadier Avenue oul-de-sac in thb location. The City Engineer shall review and approve the street configuration (sin proposed at 45 foot radius and material proposed as gravel) and location. 5. Park and trail dedication requirements are met as specified at the time of final plat approval. 6. One (1) dedduous or coniferous tree is prokled per unit or lot in addition to any smening or other landscaping requirements which may be required by the City Council. �dcPsd by tore AlbwMNe Pla wing Commission this I Oth day of March INS. City of AlbwtvMo Howard Larson, Chalmian Attest: Unda Goeb, City Clerk Don Jenson, David Lund, Linda Goeb, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson 2 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE 3-11-98 City Council Findings of Face & Decision Request: Pilot Land Devellopment has submitted development stage plans for a portion of the recently approved Cedar Creek Goff Course (CCGC) Planned Unit Development. As the third develop stage (preliminary platted) portion of the project, Cedar Creek South (CC:S) encompasses 193.08 acres and provdies 94 single family lots, 50 townhome lots, and 133.68 acres of golf course land. City Council Matting : 18 March 1998 Fb4ngs of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and decision: 1. The leol description of the subject property is as follows: (see attached) 2. The NAC planning report dated 4 March 1998 is incorporated herein. 3. The requirements of Section 2700 (Planned Unit Development) of the City Zoning Ordinance have been met. 4. On 10 March 1998 the Albertville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the applicant's request, preceded by a mailed notice. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that the City Council approve the project. Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for Cedar Creek South Development Stage (preliminary plat) approval has been approved based on the most current plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. Temporary oui-de-sacs are constructed at the terminus of all roads that will serve more than two lots in the future at such time as lots are final platted along said streets. 2. Site Fading and drainage is completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, as shown on previously approved plans, who shall also review and approve utility layouts as proposed on plans included herewith. 1 ■ � * At ft *nv of fhtal pNu approval a landscape plan shall be submitted for all median areas . or islands within dte public street right-cf-wey. 4. Park and trail dedication requirements are met as specified at the time of final plat approval. 5. On® (1) dedduoue or ooniferous tree is provided per unit or lot in motion to any screening or oOwbl g requirements which may be required by the City Council. Adopled by the Aibo"le City Cowwil this 10th day of Wrch 190& City of Albertville Mayor Marken Attest: - Linda Goeb, City Clerk Po.- Don Jensen, David Lund, Linda Goeb, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson E TOTAL P.e 5. One (1) deoiduons or mWerous tree is provided per urdt or lot in addition to any screening or other lands requirements whirl, may to required by the City Council. A�dop�ed dy ft AN* tY t Pla"" Commleeion this I MN d" of Much 19N. City of Alberlvllle 2 3-11.98 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Planning Commission Findings of Fact & Rocommlendation Apoicant's Nun: Request: P1krt Land Development has submitted devebpment stage plans for a portion of the recently approved Cedar Creek Goff Course (CCGC) Planned Unit Development. As the third development stags (preliminary platted) portion of the proms, Cedar Creek South (CCS) a Kanpasses 193.00 acres and provdies 94 single family lots, 50 townhome lots, and 133.68 acres of golf course land. Planning CamrMssion Meeting Daie:10 March 1908 Rinatgs of Rant: Based on review of the application and evidence received the Planning Commission now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: 1. The legal description of the subject propertyIs as follows: (see attached) 2. The NAC planning report dated 4 March 1998 is Incorporated herein. 3. The requirements of Section 2700 (Planned Unit Development) of the City Zoning Ordinance have been met. Recominvndation: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for Cedar Creek South Development Stage (preliminary plat) approval has been epprovedbased on the most current plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. Temporary cul-de-sacs are constructed at the terminus of all roads that will serve more than two lots in the future at such time as lots are final platted along said streets. 2. Site grading and drainage is completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, as shown on previously approved plans, who shall also review and approve utility layouts as proposed on plans included herewith. 3. At the time of final plat approval a landscape plan shall be submitted for all median areas or islands within the public street right-of-way. 4. Park and trail dedication requirements are met as specified at the time of final plat approval. 1 I NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS Nw^ em** tNC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council Albertville Planning Commission FROM: Elizabeth Stockman DATE: 4 March 1998 RE: Albertville - Cedar Creek Golf Course Planned Unit Development Cedar Creek North Development Stage (Preliminary Plat) Cedar Creek South Development Stage (Preliminary Plat) FILE: 163.06 - 98.04 and 98.05 BACKGROUND Pilot Land Development has submitted. development stage plans for a portion of the recently approved Cedar Creek Golf Course (CCGC) Planned Unit Development. As the second and third development stage (preliminary platted) portions of the project, together, Cedar Creek North (CCN) and Cedar Creek South (CCS) will provide another 184 single family lots and 50 town home lots in the City. CCN encompasses 78.33 acres and provides 90 single family lots, a +/-5.67 acre park and 4.44 acres of golf course land. CCS encompasses 193.08 acres and provides 94 single family lots, 50 town home lots, and 133.68 acres of golf course land. Following CCGC concept plan approval and in expectation of the current projects, the property was rezoned to Planned Unit Development on 17 November 1997. Attached for Reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B Approved Golf Course Masterplan Exhibit C - CCN Development Stage Plan Exhibit D - CCN Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Exhibit E - CCN Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan Exhibit F - CCS Development Stage Plan Exhibit G1-G3 - CCS Detailed Development Stage Plan/Golf Course Layout Exhibit H1-H3 - CCS Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Plan Exhibit I - Pilot Memo Re: Highway 118 Trail Construction 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 RECOMMENDATION Based on the review of submitted plans and established Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements, our office recommends approval of the Cyr Creek North and Cedar Creek South Development Stage Preliminary Plats subject to the following conditions: Cedar Creek North: 1. Temporary cul-de-sacs are constructed at the terminus of all roads that will serve more than two lots in the future at such time as lots are final platted along said streets. 2. All grading, drainage and utility issues are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 3. A cul-de-sac must be shown at the southern border of the plat thereby slightly altering the configuration of golf hole three and the emergency vehicle/trail easement connection between CCN and CCS in this vicinity. An easement should be shown for both the cul-de- sac itself as well as the emergency vehicle/trail easement connection. The City.Engineer shall review and approve the street configuration (size proposed at 45 foot radius and material proposed as gravel) and location as discussed herein. 4. Park and trail dedication requirements are met as specified at the time of final plat approval. 5. One (1) deciduous or coniferous tree is provided per unit or lot in addition to any screening or other landscaping requirements which may be required by the City Council. Cedar Creek South: 6. Temporary cul-de-sacs are constructed at the terminus of all roads that will serve more than two lots in the future at such time as lots are final platted along said streets. 7. Site grading and drainage is completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, as shown on previously approved plans, who shall also review and approve utility layouts as proposed on plans included herewith. 8. At the time of final plat approval a landscape plan shall be submitted for all median areas or islands within the public street right-of-way. 9. Park and trail dedication requirements are met as specified at the time of final plat approval. 10. One (1) deciduous or coniferous tree is provided per unit or lot in addition to any screening or other landscaping requirements which may be required by the City Council 2 ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Conformance with Goff Course Master Plan. The proposed development stage plats for CCN and CCS are both in conformance with the approved conceptual master plan. The plats contain the same number of lots and are configured in the same arrangement with the minor exception of lots in the norther portion of CCN which had to be adjusted to lie outside of the Kadler Avenue right-of-way and subsequently shifted lots and roads in this area. Lot Size Requirements. All single family lots are a minimum of 15,000 square feet with the exception of Lot 1, Block 5 of CCS which is combined with a lot remnant in CCN. This 3,371 square foot remnant in CCN should be platted as an outlot and the 12,137 square foot portion in Cedar Creek South should replat both segments as a single lot (the reverse would also be acceptable). Lot widths approved with the CCGC master plan have to be a minimum of eighty (80) feet at the designated front yard setback line (varying for each lot). All lots within the proposed plats meet this requirement. Building Setbacks. Lots approved as part of the CCGC Planned Unit Development may have varying front yard setbacks provided they are no less than thirty (30) feet. The development stage plat indicates the minimum front yard setbacks (many greater than 30 feet) which must be adhered to throughout the life of the Planned Unit Development. It shall be the building inspectors job to see that minimum setbacks are met at the time of building permit application. Street Configuration. The proposed street locations and widths are in conformance with the approved CCGC master plan. Temporary cul-de-sacs must be provided at the terminus of all roads that will serve more than two lots in the future at such time as lots are final platted along said streets. One issue which needs to be resolved is the dead -ending of Kadler Avenue and the provision of a cul-de-sac in this location. The concept plan shows this occurring at the periphery of CCN single family lots, about +/-160 feet from the plat's southern border. In order to eliminate the issue of vacating (a portion or all of) Kadler Avenue at the present time and prolonging the plat approval process, a cul-de-sac must be shown at the southern border of the plat. The preliminary plat for CCN does not include any cul-de-sac in this location and should be revised as a condition of approval. This will slightly alter the configuration of golf hole three and the emergency vehicle/trail easement connection between CCN and CCS in this vicinity. This easement and hole realignment should be shown on both the CCN and CCS plats and should not rely upon Kadler Avenue being vacated in the near future. The portion of the cul-de-sac which lies outside the present Kadler Avenue right-of-way may be shown as an easement on the plat. The City Engineer shall review and approve the street configuration which was suggested by the developer as a 45 foot radius gravel cul-de-sac with dead-end signs. (Note: The dead -ending of Kadler Avenue is scheduled for public hearing in Otsego on 3-4-98 with a decision to be made on either 3-9-98 or 3-23-98. St. Michael has approved the vacation of their half of Kadler Avenue as it lies within the CCS plat.) 3 Grading, Drainage and Utilities. The grading, drainage and utility plans for CCN are attached as Exhibits D and E, however, please look at the plans available at City Hail. (They are barely legible as the project engineer used the previously proposed plat as the base and overlaid the changes, thereby losing the background when they were reduced.) The grading and drainage plans have been approved for CCS by the City Engineer and grading is near complete on site (so they have not been included as an exhibit). Exhibits H1 through H3 show the utility layouts for CCS. All grading, drainage and utility issues shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. The wetland mitigation plan for all of the Cedar Creek Golf Course Planned Unit Development have been approved by the Wright.County Soil and Water Conservation District. Wetland locations and approximate mitigation areas and retention ponds are shown on the overall concept attached as Exhibit B. High Water Elevation. No structure shall be placed at an elevation such that the lowest floor, including the basement floor, is less than two (2) feet above the highest known surface water level or ordinary high water level or less than one (1) foot above.the 100-year flood level of any. adjacent water body or wetland. If sufficient data on high water levels is not available, the elevation of the line of permanent aquatic vegetation shall be used as the estimated high water elevation. When fill is required to meet this elevation, the fill shall be allowed to stabilize and construction shall not begin until the property has been inspected by the Building Inspector. Lot Coverage Requirement. All lots in the proposed plat must adhere to a maximum lot coverage requirement such that no structure or combination of structures occupies more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total lot area. Through analysis of the proposed building pad locations in relation to the lot sizes and configurations, it appears as though this requirement should not pose any problem for future land owners. This item will be subject to review and approval of the City Building Inspector at the time of building permit issuance. Park and Trail Dedication. The proposed CCN plat includes a gross park area of 7.97 acres and less the wetlands, provides a net area of +/-5.67 acres (to be verified at the time of final plat approval). Park dedication amounts for the proposed project have been estimated as follows and shall be definitively determined at the time of final plat approval. Required Residential Land Dedication: Total 13.32 acres ■ 73.89 gross acres in CCN X 10% = 7.38 acres ■ 59.40 gross acres in CCS X 10% = 5.94 acres Total Park Area Provided:= 42.57 percent of required residential land dedication ■ CCN: 5.67 acres (to be verified at time of final plat approval) ■ CCS: 0 acres Required Golf Course (commercial) Land Dedication: ■ CCN: 4.44 acres X 7.5% = cash equivalent to .33 acres ■ CCS: 133.68 acres X 7.5% = cash equivalent to 10.03 acres 4 It should be noted that a park land credit of .35 acres currently exists for the CCGC Planned Unit Development as a result of first phase (2nd addition) final platting of Center Oaks. In addition, trails shall be provided as follows: CCN: 8 foot on Karston Avenue from CSAH 37 to the southern plat border; 8 foot between Lots 12 and 13 of Block 5 and through Outlot D; 10 foot along CSAH 37; 8 foot integrated with the future multiple family development (to be determined, shown as Outlots A, B, and C); and 8 foot stubbed to the west on 63rd Street. CCS: 8 foot on Karston Avenue through the plat; 10 foot grade -separated and/or improved shoulder along County Highway 118 (see Exhibit I). The final plat plans must show these trails, some of which (location to be specifically identified at the'time of final plat) are to be installed by the developer with credit from the City toward park dedication requirements. All proposed trails are to be in conformance with the overall intent of the City's Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan. Required Landscaping. At the time of final plat approval a landscape plan shall be submitted for all median areas or islands within the public street right-of-way. Additionally, developers of all new residential subdivisions are required to provide one (1) tree. per single family lot. The tree may be evergreen (minimum 3 feet high) or deciduous (minimum 2 inch diameter trunk). Plantings shall not be located closer than three (3) feet to the property line. All yards must be sodded or seeded/mulched within thirty (30) days of building occupancy. Front and side yards as well as any other yard which abuts a public street must be sodded. Rear yards which do not abut a public street may be seeded and mulched. In cases where seeding/sodding has not been done within thirty (30) days of occupancy, the developer shall be required to provide an escrow deposit equal to one and one-half (1 1/2) times the estimated cost of the ground cover which will shall be returned to the developer upon completion of the work. If the weather or other uncontrollable factors prevent the sodding or seeding of bare ground within fourteen (14) days of final grading, the area shall be covered with straw or other temporary material to control erosion. CONCLUSION Analysis of the Cedar Creek North and South Development Stage Plats has shown that both are in conformance with the approved CCGC Masterplan. The subdivision of lots and construction of homes which follows are capable of meeting all Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements. Based on the review of plans attached hereto, we recommend approval of the Cedar Creek North and South Development Stage Plats subject to the conditions as outlined in the executive summary of this report. pc: David Lund, Linda Goeb, Pete Carlson, Mike Couri, Kevin Mealhouse, Don Jenson, Scott Dahlke of Meyer-Rohlin, City of Otsego V 0 � Ow W rk Lu 4 ct ca OL M Lu lilt IT owl In MA!, Rag s •ac it -oil] nil 71 l a ' IM, t l a ..' . - •� � fall, Cc i l i iIim I 1 � eeeiiiieae CC art t� � • • w lUitli}�iii (, �yE i • Q � 7113Ui3U31 Q i� I a � ��• t 331 i �.... `• ;i ' ................. ftffttffttfffttfff V Jr � '�.. �i,,,,, ' • ! iiiiiiiiiliiiiiiii • yi � ` + + '� aaNRHlil.114w..w pia i . � , •, ' :` l ! iiiiiiiiiii3i"i33a _ Q � ftfffttffttttfffff i ,� a ; � •� \ � #iiiiiiiiiiiiiii} aUIl77]]]!lI3ir—••••••ataafb 3]]33 t♦ aIl1111U111UtU11 1 4 � t12 Y' k \ .............. 44 tttrtfHtttftteeft 8 i t� a a� ssnnn»n�ssaFs la \ � •• !. $ I111U313111UlUl .................. • tfenufrurrreetf 5 j g` t ' l113111111I33313133 � tffff tftltftttfN �3 •,� �,� Q � ` . "�. � --- � ili3i�i}iiiliiiiii a '� t,r";llliiUllllEX �.....,. and � a BIT C .• n ( 0 it r N:: • ..�I CG 25 Yl !v !, r. `✓ ati ..� •� t.f =G 'it Lu • ♦ O • y♦ , W I i3 at �i•/� �wfi'A- tom_,(_ mow• A' - i .� •��\ ..`` ,ice •, �, p. ^. / fy — � ` .tf.f� lw't~Y. 4i , sue.. _'� � • �_ \ /,r Nt "_•<1.y,. -,,.' v� ' . �� • ,. , "•-�� J .i ' .aI �Nl n� ./\It q• �i: ,=!ii�ii �.re-f+a�.a_..—ti �. `'3" ; 7 �. ♦, a•''j f :•�\�• •.1��:��1•V . a ;f;.�l�ii l \\ � i��.�. ��-•�� =M J�: .1'' mac,;;. :� EXHIBIT D _ .I -Mari- -- - — 44 r: Cq uj % N I/ fft 16 Lies ~ Cf) wo 11 EXHIBIT E �z t ! lll ! II IsI Isl Ii#< ral III if lR 11 } 31 �� IsF Ise Ise Ise ii1� 1#� Isi Isi �-- xs x:a+•+w tre�gne.terertrtiteeeeeee 1 y f � nNw•�n.«tr a �f;t �� ] 3i� ]�� ]�� ]�� 3#� ]�! L ■�ttHtttttttttttttttttttttt •et � _ � • � � � � „ � III Isis Id 1.0 IsI +•+��aaaasar_aaRaRRiRi.CR-R�AAj �7 xta33333a33I3]]]IIII3]]333Sa � p I1111111A11111111I111111III�II . it # it 3� ii 111f3f11a 66ttttt��ttttqttmttgtttt;;ttttttttttt��teetqttpttttpttgttjt 33I3333333]33133333]IIII]II3I3III73 '"tl •Y� M...... M.. M...... .................... 111I11UA111I111111111UI111II111I # 13# 11 11 ttee............e.�.....e..�...e....�. �++•��'•�•atY.t2a�aaR;Ip1iRRRRRRRRRRM . I3IJ33333UM333333ISIaIII] U333I3 EXHIBIT F UU111i1111i11U11I111I1111I11111I1 I x AL EXHIBIT Gl j W V XHIBIT G2 1�- ti x ti Wi Ali i _I q IOU EXHIBIT G3 EXHIBIT H2 PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY February 10, 1998 Mayor & City Council Members Planning Commissioners c/o City Administrator Lund 5975 Main Avenue NE. Albertville, MN 55301 RE: Highway 118 Trail Impacts to approved Cedar Creek Golf Course plans Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council, City Staff and Planning Commissioners: This letter serves to confirm our request that Albertville designate a representative to work with Wright County Highway Department to determine the appropriate side of the Highway to widen a shoulder for a bike path. All discussion we have had with Virgil at the DOH is that the City has not participated. Currently, there are no agreements by the DOH to allow a trail in any ti portion of the Right of Way (ROW). This position is unacceptable since it does not acknowledge the need to be in the ROW to avoid environmental and safety aspects around wetlands etc. A secondary, but important reason is that it will be cheaper for Albertville to create a community of trails if you can use a right of way that has been taken from municipal residents for multiple public purposes. It will be cheaper because you will not need to acquire gap easements to assure the trails built, tie together and go some where. There are several Counties which have created bike trails as part of the shoulder of roadways, most notably Washington County. On busier roads they have used off road beyond the ROW �Wite paved trails, but, when posed with environmental or easement purchase obstacles,.theyhave used the ROW. • Since there is sufficient time, until July 1998, the City could be sure that the trail work on 118 is incorporated into the proposed bid plans. With all of the talk about trails over the last 1 1-2 years, no one was responsible to add the appropriate design into the Highway 119 upgrade. We would be disappointed if a second opportunity was missed. We have begun our final plans on the golf course and phase one development plans. The County DOH has reviewed our plans and requested some minor changes to the access points which would meet the terms of their October 3 letter to Albertville. In addition, they intend to work with Pilot on the design of the road, drainage sharing, and appropriate shoulder widths so that our rough grading can be accomplished in 1998 for a road project which may not happen until 2001 or 2002. However, trails or extra wide shoulders are still absent. The City and their residents would be in a substantially better financial position by creating a maintenance agreement with Wright County to widen the shoulder on 118 to allow improved pedestrian or bike access to the clubhouse as part of the trails master plan. Washington County is forwarding copies of their agreements and design standards. Without this agreement, you will 1 EXHIBIT Hwyl l8tr.dodlanddev 13736 Johnson Street NE - Ham Lake, MN 55304 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094 spend at least 13.00 +.08% or 14.04 a lineal foot and waste opportunities for tax and park fee dollars to go further. My preliminary estimates are as follows: • Off road out of ROW trail; 2850 LF (on golf and TH. lands) $14.04 LF $40.014 • Extra wide 9' shoulder (use Cedar Creek bids) $8.60 LF + 20% Cnty admin. _ $10.31 $29.410 • Beming Exception 430 LF $6.037 $4,433 Subtotals $46,D51 $33,843 Using County ROW could yield $12,208 savings under this example. In closing, we believe that this series of requested actions allows for a safer long term traffic; drainage and pedestrian system, enables current planning and grading to continue, and allows the conceptual trail plan to be implemented as presented by NAC. Thank you for your understanding. Sincerely, Donald Jensen Land Development Director cc: NAC, SEH, Meyer-Rohlin, Virgil Hawkins, WCHD attachment: Master plan for trail access points, Cedar Creek Bid Tab 2 Hwyl28tr.doc/landdev / - —41 e CL {{ � . r .a.. I , I ik CITY OF ALBERNE.LE City Council Finding of Fact dr Decision AWIunrs Nam: �e h�r,�r 9rnEhAre 1 umher��Wj Le�.ihh Ra*wu Scherer Brothers Lumber has submitted Plans for development of Lot 6, Block 2 Barthel kxkw rlai Park. The compwW plans to manufacture, store and distribute lumber products. The principal bu llft encompasses 25,700 square feet of the 6.61 acre site. A thres-slded aweeMbuilding ad)Ilrsnt th the railroad tracks provides an additional 10,200 square feet of covered storage sptwe. Plans include the construction of a spur to allow railroad access to the property. The site is zoned 1-1, Light Industrial under which the lumber operation Is a permitted use, but the proposed outdoor storage requires a Conditional Use Permit. City Council WoU ng DaW 18 March 1998 MKOW of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received the City Council now makes lhe following findings of fact and decision: 1. The legal description of the subject property is as follows: Lot 6. Block 2 Barthels Industrial Park 2. The NAC pWvft report dated 4 March I and the SEH memorandum dated 9 March 1998 are incorporated herein. 3.The requirements of Section 400 (Conditional Use Perm) and 1500 (Site and Building Plan Review) of the City Zoning Ordinance have been met. 4. On 10 March I M to Abe* Ale Planning Commission coruiucted a meeting to consider the oWicanirs requ", preceded by a mailed rioboe. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission closed the mewing and recommended that to City Council approve the project. Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for Site Plan approval and Conditional Use Pwffl has been appmved based on the most current plans and Information received to date, subjW to the following conditions: 1.. The general and outdoor storage Conditional USe POrMit provisions of the City Zoning Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. 2. OuW= storage Is prohibited within thirty-five (35) feet of the west (front) property fine and within ten (10) feet of the southern (side) property fine. 3. The accessory structure Is moved further wesUshortened in length to meet the 20 foot setback requirement from the east lot line. 4. Of the 62 required parking stalls, 29 are shown in front of the building and will be paved upon bLWM occupancy. The remaining 22 sWI9 may be reserved/used within the outside storage area on the gravel =facing into the Indefinite future. If the number of paved staffs becomes inadequate to meet the parking demand arKVor it the gravel surfacing or location of parking stalls behind the fence Is problematic for any reason, the City Council may require additional stalls to be paved. At such time, the City Council may rsquke the additional spaces to be located outside of the designated outdoes storage area (possibly requiring a shift In fencing) and paved in a manner such that the new paved stalls adjoin those wft*V to form one contiguous parking lot. I & The City Engineer revisw8 and approves al grading, drainage, and utility issues. S. The City Engineer approves the two curb cuts at a width of thirty (30) feet. 7. The Welland on sit SM be delineated and shown on revnd plans which must include appropriate ff*Oftn menures, all subject to review and approval of the City Era teer and Wright County Sol and Water Cortservatlon District. 8. A dstaled sign plan shy be a"lled for review and approval by the City Planner and City Binding Inspector prior to tsuam of a binding permit. 9. Detaled lgft OM shall be submitted which specify the style, heft, streng rattage and Of ftkM proposed on the property. A photometric plan shell be submitted for review and approval by due City PWM and City Engineer which Indicates the toot candt power of to Gram that they an In conVilance with ordinance requWemertts. Detailed landscape and screening plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planter as discussed herein prior to Issuance of a kAftg permit. The proposed chain Nnkferroe must be seven (T) feet high, with to barbed wdre angled to the Interior up to a tots height of eight (6) feet. v, The store and hams of gasoline complies with re irenwft of the Minnesota ire` Fire R Marshall's office, Pollution Control Agency, and /or other appiicaft authorities and any regWr6d permits must be IaO on site and properly displayed i rwo are MWON to ren= the changes required herein and are submitted for review and ap of the City Planner, City Engineer and City Building Inspector. Adopted by the Albertvige City Council this iftlh day of Wrch 'tl, & City of AtbOUNIG W. Mayor Mark Ott Attest: Linda Goeb, City Clerk Pry PC: Larry Leftchuh, Bob Olson, Mark Hanson, David Lund, Linda Goeb, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson 2 3-11-98 CITY OF ALBERTVIL.LE Planning Co nmbslrn Findings of Fact & Ro mrrondation Appifcorift Netnr Mgr Bm:.r.r ::S=." : Icy met: Scherer Brothers Lumber has submitted plans for development of Lot 6, Block 2 Barthel Industrial mark. The company plans to manufacture, store and distribute lumber products. The principal building encompasses 25.700 square feet of the 5.51 acre site. A three -sided a�oceesoty building a4acent to the railroad tracks provides an additional 10,200 square feet of covered storage space. Plans include the construction of a spur to allow railroad access to the properly. The site is Zoned 1-1. Light industrial under which the dumber operation Is a permitted use, but the proposed outdoor storage requires a Conditional Use Permit Pluming Canter Meeting DOW:10 Mamh 19M Mulings cl ftet Based on review of the appication and evidence received the Planning Commission now makes the following findings of fact and rsconunendation: 1. The legal description of the subject properly is as follows: (see attached) 2. The NAC planning report dated 4 March 1998 and the SEH memorandum dated 9 Mauch t 998 are incorporated herein. 3. The requirements of Section 400 (Conditional Use Perna) and 15W (Site and Building Plan Review) of the City Zoning Ordinance have been met. Recomrtnrndet1w: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the appiicarws request for Ste► Plan approval and Comdktkmal Use Permit has been *Wvvred based on the most current plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: 1. The genial and outdoor storage Conditional Use Permit provisions of the City Zoning Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. 2. OUWW storage is prvfdbited within thirty-five (35) feet of the west (front) property line and within ten (10) feet of the southern (side) property line. 3. The accessory structure is moved further westlshorhwed in length to meet the 20 foot setback requirement from the east lot line. 4. Of the 52 required parking stalls, 29 are shown in front of the building and will be paved upon bWWg occupancy. The remalning 22 stalls may be reservedfused within the outside storage area on the gravel surfacing into the Indefinite future. if the number of paved stalls becomes inadequate to meet the panting demand andlor 8 the gravel surfacing or location of parking stalls behind the fence is problematic for any reason, the City Council may require additional star to be paved. At such tirne, the City Council may require the additional spaces to be located outside of the designated outdoes stomp area (possibly requiting a shift in fencing) and paved in a manner such that the new paved stab adjoin t1me cluing to form one contiguous parking lot. S. The City Engineer reviews and approves all grading, drainage, and utility issues. 8. The City Engineer approves the two curb cuts at a width of thirty (30) feat. 7. The vAMM on ske Shoal be delineated and shown on revised plans which mast include appropriate mft@ftt MOMMUfft sit 4u*0t to review and approval of the City Engineer and Wright County Soil and Water Corftrvetfon Matt. a. A detelled slit plan ohd be stomped for review and approval by the City Planner and City BWMft Irtspea tw prW to issuance of a balding permit. 9. t oMW 10ft piaans shall be submitted whlah specify the style~ height. strength1watte and d1*bA t of fi hm proposed on the property. A photometric flan shag be submitted for review and approval by the City Planter and City Engineer which Indicates the foot candle power of lghts to ensure that toy are In comphan a with ordinance requirements. 10. Detaailed latMa:ape and screening plats Shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Phknner as dbct=W heroin prior to issuance of a buldirtg permit. 11. The proposed dirt lilt fence mast be seven M feet high, with Ste barbed wire angled to the Interior UP to a total how of eight (a) feet. 1z The storage and hand tit of gasoline complies with requirerrterfs of the Minnesota State Fire Marshaiahs OMN. Potion Control A0mtclr, and /or other appl cl Me autttt dties and any r+equued pvrnft must be kept on see and property displayed. 13. Plaits we revised to reflect the Changes required herein and are submitted for review and samova i ; of the City Planner, City Engineer and City Building Irwpector. , Aa'bPM by the AlbwMNle Planning Conwnh lon this loth day of Lbmh IM. City of Agortvllie Attest: -03 Linda Goeb. City Clark Howard Larson, Chairman PC: tarry Lekschuh, Bob Olson. Malark Hanson, David Lund, Linda Qoeb, Mike Court, Pets Carlson 2 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS NINC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council Albertville Planning Commission FROM: Elizabeth Stockman DATE: 4 March 1998 RE: Albertville - Scherer Brothers Lumber Site Plan Review and Outdoor Storage Conditional Use Permit FILE: 163.06 - 97.04 BACKGROUND Scherer Brothers Lumber has submitted plans for development of Lot 6, Block 2 Barthel Industrial Park. The company plans to manufacture, store and distribute lumber products. The principal building encompasses 25,700 square feet of the 6.51 acre site. A three -sided accessory building adjacent to the railroad tracks provides an additional 10,200 square feet of covered storage space. Plans include the construction of a spur Wallow railroad access to the property. The site is zoned 1-1, Light Industrial under which the lumber operation is a permitted use, but the proposed outdoor storage requires a Conditional Use Permit. Attachments: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Barthel Industrial Park Location Exhibit C - Site Plan Exhibit D - Grading and Drainage Plan Exhibit E - Building Floor Plan Exhibit F - Building Elevations EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation The requested approval of a Conditional Use Permit to accommodate the outdoor storage as accessory to the principal lumber manufacturing/warehousing use requires that the Planning Commission and City Council consider the application in relation to established zoning ordinance review criteria and Comprehensive Plan policies. The decision to approve or deny the requested Conditional Use Permit is viewed as a policy decision to be made by the City Council. Should they find the submitted plans acceptable, it is recommended that the following conditions be imposed: 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837 1. The general and outdoor storage Conditional Use Permit provisions of the City Zoning Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. 2. Outdoor storage is prohibited within thirty-five (35) feet of the west (front) property line and within ten (10) feet of the southern (side) property line. 3. The location of the accessory structure is found to be acceptable to the City Council under the terms of the Conditional Use Permit at a distance of 15 feet from the rear (east) property line or the structure is moved further west/shortened in length to meet the 20 foot setback requirement. 4. The provision of 29 parking stalls is deemed acceptable by the City in the interim or the plan is changed to add the remainder of required stalls (22) [the Planning Commission should make recommendation as to whether the additional 22 stalls should be within or outside of the fenced area and whether they should be paved or not]. Should the (29) stalls become inadequate at any time in the future to meet the parking demand, the City Council shall require additional stalls to be established. 5. The City Engineer reviews and approves all grading, drainage, and utility issues. 6. The City Engineer approves the two curb cuts at a width of thirty (30) feet. 7. The low, wet spot on the subject property is delineated by a wetland specialist and included on the site plan if it is determined to be a wetland. If necessary, appropriate mitigation measures are addressed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. A detailed sign plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner and City Building Inspector prior to issuance of a building permit. 9. Detailed lighting plans shall be submitted which specify the style, height, strength/wattage and distribution of fixtures proposed on the property. A photometric plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner and City Engineer which indicates the foot candle power of lights to ensure that they are in compliance with ordinance requirements. 10. Detailed landscape and screening plans shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner as discussed herein prior to issuance of a building permit. 11. The proposed chain link fence must be seven (7) feet high, with the barbed wire angled to the interior up to a total height of eight (8) feet. 12. Park dedication requirements shall be satisfied with a cash payment equal to ten (10) percent of the City's calculated fair market value of the property. 13. The storage and handling of gasoline complies with requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Marshall's office, Pollution Control Agency, and /or other applicable authorities and any required permits must be kept on site and properly displayed. 2 14. Plans are revised to reflect the changes required herein and are submitted for review and approval of the City Planner, City Engineer and City Building Inspector. Issues Analysis Zoning. The property is zoned 1-1, Light Industrial which allows manufacturing and warehousing as a permitted use. However, outdoor storage is a conditional use within the 1-1 District. A Conditional Use Permit for outdoor storage may be approved provided that: 1. The Conditional Use Permit provisions of the City Zoning Ordinance are considered and satisfactorily met. a. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan which designates the subject property as industrial. b. The proposed use is or -will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. The lumber operation is compadb/e with aft surrounding land uses, as the abutting properties are designated for industrial development and zoned P 1. C. The proposed use conforms with all Zoning Ordinance performance standards contained herein. The use wN conform with all requirements provided the conditions of approval are met as outlined in the Executive Summary of this report. d. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. The lumber operation is viewed as an asset to the community and a welcome addition to the industrial park. G. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. Water and sewer services are readily available and can be provided to the site without negative impacts to the overall system. f. Traffic generated by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Vehicular traffic to and from the site will not overburden the City's street system, as access will be attained via Barthel Industrial ©rive which was designed for this purpose. Furthermore, the railroad spur will serve to minimize the need for shipments by truck. 2. All non-residential outside storage of equipment, materials and inventory shall conform to the following: a. The area occupied is not within a required front or side yard. The proposed outdoor storage is shown in the front yard and side yards of the property. To be in compliance with this requirement, there shall be no outside storage within thirty -rive (35) feet of the west lot line and ten (10) feet of the south lot line. The proposed fence surrounding the outdoor storage area is shown along the property line which physically indicates the storage area boundaries 3 and may tend to attract storage cbser to Me property Ins than allowed. However, steeper slopes and a dn*We area exist along the south property Ahe which have also been designated for snow storage. This precludes the need to store materiels in this location. The west side entrance drive accesses the fenced area fatrly close to the western property line, thus if the area adjacent to the fence line can be left clear as a chivskm through the yard, there should not be any problem in meeting this requirement b. The storage area is totally fenced, fully screened and landscaped according to a plan approved by the Zoning Administrator and a landscape guarantee as determined by the Zoning Administrator is provided. The storage area will be totally fenced and a landscape plan will be required to show the materials whkh wN provide screenOg from the street, in the front yard. The fence line along the wester let line will be shared with Truss Manufacturing. C. H abutting a Residential District or use, screening and landscaping is provided according to a plan approved by the Zoning Administrator. The site does not abut a residential district. d. The storage area is grassed or surfaced with asphalt, concrete, or crushed rock (concrete or granite) to control dust. Should an area surfaced with anything other than hard surfacing prove to be unmaintainable, the City shall require that a hard surface be installed within three (3) months of formal written notice to the property owner. The proposed storage area Is to be gravel. G. All lighting shall be hooded and so directed that the light source shall not be visible from the public right-of-way or from neighboring residences and shall be in compliance with Subdivision 1000.10 of this Section. A lighting plan has not been submitted and will be required prior to issuance of a building permit. f. The storage area does not encroach upon required public or employee parking space(s), required loading space, or snow storage area as required by this Chapter. As indicated previously, the snow storage area has been designated along the south property line. The fenced area is large enough to allow for loading and parking (If needed in addition to that which will be paved at the front of the building). g. A site plan documenting the location and grading of the storage operation shall be submitted and shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. A grading plan has been submitted and the City Engineer's recommendation/documentation of his review of the plans will be provided separately. Lot and Building Requirements. The proposed development is in conformance with all lot size and building requirements, outlined as follows: 1-1 District Required Proposed Lot Size None 6.51 acres Lot Width 100 feet 250+ feet Front Yard Setback (west lot line and cul-de-sac) 35 feet 65 feet off cul-de-sac and 150 from west lot line (abutting Truss Mfg.) 4 1-1 District Required Proposed Side Yard Setback (north) 10 feet 265 feet Side Yard Setback (south) 10 feet 170 feet Rear Yard Setback (east) 20 feet 100 feet Building Height Maximum 35 feet 27.5 feet Lot Coverage by Structures 30% maximum 14.88% Lot Coverage by all Hard Surfaces 85% maximum 21.96% The proposed development is in conformance with all lot and building requirements outlined above. Except as expressly allowed by Conditional Use Permit, accessory buildings must conform to the setback and height requirements of the zoning district in which they are located. The storage building near the railroad is setback fifteen (15) feet from the eastern (rear) property line rather than the required twenty, (20) feet. The City Council must determine whether the deviation is acceptable under the terms of the Conditional Use Permit or whether the building must be moved five feet to the west. Outside Storage. The outside storage of materials, equipment and inventory as a principal or accessory use is only permitted by Conditional Use Permit and is not allowed within required front or side yard areas. The proposed outdoor storage is shown in the front yard and side yards of the property. To be in compliance with this requirement, there shall be no outside storage within thirty-five (35) feet of the west lot line and ten (10) feet of the south lot line. The proposed fence surrounding the outdoor storage area is shown along the property line which physically indicates the storage area boundaries and may tend to attract storage closer to the property line than allowed. However, steeper slopes and a drainage area exist along the south property line which have also been designated for snow storage. This precludes the need to store materials in this location. The west side entrance drive accesses the fenced area fairly close to the western property line, thus if the area adjacent to the fence line can be left clear as a drivelane through the yard, there should not be any problem in meeting this requirement. Parking and Circulation. The Zoning Ordinance requires that no curb cut exceed twenty-four (24) feet in width unless approved by the City Engineer. Both curb cuts are thirty (30) feet in width and should be reviewed by the City Engineer. Each is appropriately located five (5) feet or more from all property lines. The following parking requirements apply to the proposed development: Office Area (3,200 sf) 1 space/200 sf Warehouse (22,500 sf) 1 space/1000 sf Employees (1 for each on maximum shift) TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: 16 spaces 23 spaces 12 spaces (long term) 51 5 The submitted site plan shows twenty-nine (29) parking stalls to be paved in front of the building. The applicants wish to begin operations with these stalls, knowing that they may be required to provide additional parking in the future. There will only be 3-4 employees at the onset, hopefully growing to 12 in future years. Our office recommends that they revise the site plan to show and reserve space for all required stalls. If use of the first phase (29) stalls becomes inadequate to meet the demand, the City Council shall require additional stalls to be established. The Planning Commission should make recommendation as to whether the additional 22 stalls should be within or outside of the fenced area and whether they should be paved or not. The fence could be moved further away from the front of the lot, thereby creating more parking space contiguous to that proposed. Building Type and Construction. The proposed office portion of the project is to be constructed of decorative concrete block with a flat roof. The remainder of the building is a combination of poured -in -place concrete and metal with a metal roof and metal overhead doors. The percentage of metal exteriors in industrial districts is limited to 75 percent of the total wall area. At 69.71 percent, the Scherer Brothers building is in conformance with this requirement as indicated below: BUILDING WALL CALCULATIONS West Elev., South Elev. North Elev. East Elev. Total Percent Metal 2,764 sf 2,313 sf 2,918 sf 1,811 sf 9,806 sf 69.71% Concrete 440 sf 1,036 sf 490 sf 130 sf 2,096 sf 14.90% Decorative Block 0 505 sf 540 sf 1,120 sf 2,165 sf 15.39% Total 3,204 sf 3,854 sf 3,948 sf 3,061 sf 14,067 sf 100.0% The accessory building is constructed of concrete panels on three sides and is open to the south. Grading and Drainage. A grading plan has been submitted as required and is shown as Exhibit D. The plan shall be subject to formal review and written approval by the City Engineer, although his preliminary look at the project has shown no major issues. The majority of stormwater runoff flows into the street, the catch basin and finally into the storm sewer that exists between the subject property and Fraser Steel. The remainder flows into the ditch on the south side of the Scherer Brothers property and toward the wetland on the adjacent Lot 12. Wetland Delineation. The City Engineer has identified a low, wet spot near the center of the subject property which needs to be further analyzed to determine whether it is a wetland or not. Scherer Brothers should have their project engineer look into delineation of this area. Signage. While a wall sign is shown on the south building elevation, a detailed sign plan has not been submitted as required. Wall signs on industrial properties are limited to 200 square feet. The submission of a sign plan prior to issuance of a building permit shall be made a condition of approval L Lighting. Detailed lighting plans have not been submitted which specify the style, height, strength/wattage and distribution of fixtures proposed on the property. A photometric plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner and City Engineer which indicates the foot candle power of lights to ensure that they are in compliance with ordinance requirements. Any light or combination of lights which cast light on a public street shall not exceed one foot candle. Bare incandescent light bulbs shall not be permitted in view of adjacent property or the public street. Screening and Landscaping. The Zoning Ordinance requires submission of a landscaping plan as well as requiring screening of the outdoor storage area. While no plans have been submitted, Scherer Brothers Lumber plans on landscaping between the parking lot and fencing with dense screening trees. Additionally, the west side of the office portion of the building will contain shrubs and grass. A water spigot should be installed in this vicinity to allow maintenance of the vegetation. Detailed landscape plans will be required as a condition of approval which shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner. Above and beyond the plants provided for screening, required plantings include one(1) shade tree or evergreen tree and sixteen (16) ornamental trees or shrubs. Fencing. The applicants wish to install barbed wire as part of their chain link fencing for security reasons. In order to do so, the chain link must be seven (7) feet high, with the barbed wire angled to the interior up to a total height of eight (8) feet. Park and Trail Dedication. Park dedication requirements shall be satisfied with a cash payment equal to ten (10) percent of the City's calculated fair market value of the property. State Permit(s) Required. The storage and handling of gasoline must comply with requirements of the Minnesota State Fire Marshall's office, Pollution Control Agency, and /or other applicable authorities. Any required permits must be kept on site and properly displayed. CONCLUSION The proposed lumber operation is in conformance with the majority of Zoning Ordinance criteria, however, there are several outstanding issues to resolve. The decision to approve or deny the requested Conditional Use Permit is viewed as a policy decision to be made by the City Council. The Executive Summary of this report outlines recommended conditions of approval should the decision be made in favor of the Conditional Use Permit. pc: David Lund Linda Goeb Mike Couri Pete Carlson Kevin Mealhouse Larry Leitschuh Bob Olson Mark Hanson 7 RER BRQTHEP 1MRER SITE c to z_--- 73 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER Co. 9.n..lro. "r"'"• • Ky"�� r AMRr4LU YARO RN.n. MW[ ONE Andwft A •w •1 PLAM A..od.IN .t ra • wrw•N • .rw rswa .e nr , , r ti s V.. �rrnp 5, i t ' a •• vyyarsp 4 i s• �S.••.. • P R t• t.. f j _...._.._ .. t N U j � t `�,y \ i�• sap I ox di ij l 'trst�o f l=S'' ro+u+. *l.3-. ,;,i,:.y;sa•,,,n .. -.�.., --a="`-' I^N'... O l V j Ic r;l/s MAID _ { ' :":. g c��l�l�•e+i�'=�how .06> F Fr -- It co m O x� SUN n a iv SCHERER BROS. LUMBER Co. w w wr• w n•wr+ ALSERMLLE YARD ft"" W PK4M OW Andwft A AnocWl" _ STEARLm PL/JI •aIN. W.wI•. •wra•►r•r .r•n•wewa .c nM t • 1 i r ..... :. �....alp befoo br• ,t �� —�3 ;i i f ? h [71 t 1 1 I_-1AFT ITTIT Jw •'} E 1 R3 IT �•, l i� Ar w ' At A. !• t 7/i" ij � � c } ! � i ry1:i ri .er, �';, i.l� •\ '•, �! !r .A. �?' !' t H r,rr t• � : f(• •.,♦,�y.•..:•r,•.i..,wa.:.....-..._.......•.7....�'RpP '•, . < � i ! 'rr', r; J/ % %Jt}iF� i • e� P%. 1M• ..........� \•,tea...... . A^� • . !.•...M... ,• oy• x z� Wilt i '6 It I III ; � is SCHERER BROS. LUMBER Co. ewa•Hee •,• » �� •r � rtwt... • a.wl•.1. w� "wio w •1.'1 •tnt,.r.» .rs At9ERT UE YARDma Rosa�s aiai tii u.i'a • .�w1�a n:.wi. ,• AndWilk 8 .. W amm"6 UNDSQAPE Pl}1N ANOeltfp arw•t1•u•b• 'u•n or .M • rrr.. •emu. rm•. r nw mw �.•.•I..rw•'+n.•: , sl r Sol O I I oai —J L__J 1 I ( I a� aa I ' f i :, 7, I , Ilk I I I ux� I' ox K'xa' j c2 - I q I I I i I 1 i I I I 1 I I 1 I I l I I� X i im-----_----_---_----_- --=-------------- - ,.1 m y. = SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO, 0 LS 0 N ALBERTVILLE YARD it •�' •••• mLEK am 02-24-W &A 16 . I �Z fmyl x w "n art SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. ALBERTVILLE YARD LEK sm 02.24-W 23'-21 231-21 i yam' LL LSON commum — NOUN" colaffmcm i 4 t N'ORTHWEST A386CiATRO CON S:ULTA NTS INC COMMUNITY PLANN)NQ - -DESIGN.-- MARKET RCJEARCH 11 March 1998 Mr. Laq 'Lsitschuh Scherer Brothers Lumber Company 91.10 83rd Avamue North Brooklyn Park; MN 55445 Re: Albertdlie - Serer Brothers Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit File: 16&0G 98.02 Dear tarry; Attaadwd is the final Planning Commiulon Findings of Fadt as revised qtfter. last night's meeting. Also included is.the City 0oun6il Findings of Fact for the CouncilWs use at Monday's meeting. You will note that the oondition relating to parking has been phanged slightly to ensure that additional parking spaces may be prodded if and*Mwn they we needed. The condition requiring park dedication money vas deleted at the request of the'City Attorney bcause the property was platted before the park dedicattort ordinance Was adopted by the City and therefore does not apply. If you have any questions or concerns, please.feel free to' call .me. Thank you for your cooperation throghout the -'approval process. Sincerely, Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. etbibUettdjaan."�/ Senlor PlannerA andcaps Arc h.itect pc: David Lund, Undo Goeb, Mike Cow, Pete Carlson,13bb Olson, Mark Hanson 5775 WAYZATA NOUI.E•VARD. SUITE 555. 9T. LOUIS •PARK,• MINNE50TA 55410 PHONE 61 2-595-0636 'FAX 61 2.505-9837 M a i.L£i-M (ZM) 'XVd OW -MOM MOW �r � � -x • OU I ' 4 USO o I Gwd 400444�O IS- 1 sZKs N S3a Je d ISt - loov N�JIS34 4NV �JNINNVId 311S � 31 I S 3 1 l i A 1 a 38 �d w'EIl7�aW �S 1'1�1SN0:NOSt�F10P f .w ;� A,..4, 89 31 VN 21311 V - N V I d 1 d K) oavaia '1 13 'OS 000'OZ '13 'OS 00C 13 'OS C S3NJV zZ"S S38:)V t8' Z F S: ('AbVd 4l NOSNVMS aIOadH ;Jo:J 311S 3111Ala39ld i 89 llb - Ndld 1d3ON0O J iL£t-995 (ZI9) 7(Yd 95t�-995 I7191 :may • a u I • l u• m o I o e Od i s*& y 4 J oN yy_ szns N SM nog ,� 1S[ - 1� �. 311 S 3111 A 1 H 38 �� NJIS34 (NV �JNINNVId 311S oN -Sl 1'rm:) NDow � f »i ., - :'' (afid) d9 31dNd31�b - Nt/�d 1d30N0Z) l� 'OS 009'0 lj 001 8/S a lj 'OS 000'0 S3d0d S3d0b ;b S3dDV (MHO S38DV NOSNvmS u ivavM •au:f 311S 3111Ala381d b9 llb - Nbld 1d33N0O : : : : 7�6 1- CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COURTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MICA RESOLUTION #1998-3 A RESOLUTION VACATING KAMER AVENUE WHEREAS, the City of Albertville has duly published and mailed notice of a public hearing to consider the vacation of Kadler Avenue described as: To Be Vacated KADUR AVENUE (Section 2 & 3) A 66.00 foot easenmt for public right of Wqr purposes, the side lines of said easement are to be krolcnvo or shortened to temunate on other public right of way easement lines. That p of Sect -on s 2 and 3, Township 120, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, the centerline being de n'bed as followc Commencing at the northwest corner of Section 2; thence South 880 39' 57° Fast, assumed bearin& along the north line of the Nordwest Quarter of Section 2, a distance of 143.00 feet to the point of beginning of the centerline to be des • thence South 53° 01' W West, a distance of 117.14 feet; thence southerly along a tangential curve, concave to the east, wing a central angle of SW 48' 098, radius of 118.86 feet, and are length of 105.39 feet; thence South r 13' Or Was; a distance of 1349.19 feet to the centerline of County Road No.118 and terminating thereat. WHEREAS, the City believes that Kadler Avenue is no longer needed for road purposes; and WHEREAS, the City believes that Kadler Avenue would best serve the public if it were returned to the tax rolls; and WHEREAS, the City believes that it is in the best interest of the public to vacate Kadler Avenue; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE: 1. The City finds that Kadler Avenue described above is no longer needed for street purposes; and 2. The City finds that Kadler Avenue would best serve the public if it were a tax -generating property; and 3. The City finds that it is in the interest of the public to vacate Kadler Avenue; 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to execute the necessary paperwork to complete the vacation of Kadler Avenue. PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 1998. Mark S. Olsen, Mayor ATTEST: Linda Goeb, City Clerk Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. M E M O R A N D U M TO: Mike Robertson, City Administrator FROM: John Harwood, City Engineer DATE: February 18, 1998 RE: Closure of Kadler Avenue, Pilot Land Development City Application 98-1-14 3601 Thurston Avenue Anoka, Minnesota 55303 612/427-5860 Fax 612/427-3404 0520 Kadler Avenue is currently a gravel surface road, between County Highways 37 and 118. The road provides only local property access and is not a part of or intrinsic to any overall transportation or traffic circulation plan for the City of Otsego. I do not see any problems in revising, closing or ultimately vacating of all or portions of Kadler Avenue so long as local property access and appurtenant property use such as fire and other public or safety issues are sufficiently addressed. Approval of the closure is recommended, with conditions. Any consideration to vacate the joint road between Otsego and Albertville is recommended to be postponed. Part I Current Proposal, Creation of Long Cul-de-sac via Closure South of Otsego The current proposal involves vacation by the Cities of St. Michael and Albertville of the south 1500 ± ft. of Kadler Avenue that is located on the border between these. cities. This road is south of the City of Otsego. While this action does not impact right of way in Otsego, it eliminates the south outlet for Kadler Avenue and turns a through street into a 2600 ft long cul-de-sac road. The Developer has submitted a plan sheet prepared by Meyer-Rohlin showing construction of a 45 foot radius gravel surfaced cul-de-sac bulb, Located approximately 2000 ft. south of County Road 37. The plan proposes signs for special public notification at Kadler and CR 37 and additional notification or warning signs along Kadler Avenue to the proposed cul-de- sac. The proposal as submitted seems appropriate. There is no significant change in the method of access to Otsego properties other than the road being a cul-de-sac. 1 don't see any significant local problems or any overall City issues. Approval of the construction as shown is recommended with the added requirements that a public road easement be described and recorded for the cul-de-sac bulb, and that a permanent "Phase 3" sign be added identifying the road as a dead end. The proposed signage plan is quite good and may be somewhat more extensive than the City of Otsego, the general public, or the property owners who use Kadler actually need. The signing however, is perfectly acceptable. The Phase I closure notification sign is a welcome courtesy. The Phase 2 barricades, flashers and closure signs should be placed Engineers Landscape Architects Surveyors Mike Robertson, City Administrator Page 2 February 18, 1998 concurrent with the start of grading on the portion of the road that will be vacated in St. Michael/Albertville which placement will also be concurrent with construction of the Otsego/Albertville cul-de-sac bulb. These signs and barricades are intended to be temporary only and should be replaced after construction is completed by a more. normal "dead end" or "no outlet" notification sign which is requested as a permanent Phase 3 addition. See the attached mark up sheet for details of the cul-de-sac and signage. Part II Long Range Planning for Kadler Avenue The current action that makes Kadler Avenue into a cul-de-sac does not release any City of Otsego public right of way nor the joint responsibility of Otsego and Albertville for road maintenance. Public maintenance responsibility for Kadler could continue indefinitely with Kadler jointly maintained as a public road within 66 ft. of right of way or easement along the joint City border. It is clearly the intent of the Developer/Applicant to request vacation of the east half of Kadler that is within the City of Albertville. The property Developer's Plan shows vacated Kadler as being incorporated into developed lots. The questions related to how property access will be continued after Kadler vacation do not need to be addressed until the City of Albertville considers vacation of the east half. The City of Otsego would oppose any Albertville road vacation that would leave Kadler as a public road with only 33 ft of right of way. In a July 9, 1997 letter from Pilot Land Development, Donald Jensen identifies the 4 existing properties that use Kadler or would be impacted by Kadler and suggested some "remedies", which primarily suggest that Kadler be vacated as a public road and turned into joint private use driveways. Excerpts from that letter are attached. The suggested remedies do not seem sufficient. I don't believe that there is any current action by the City of Albertville on vacation. I think in a few years, after the golf course is completed and as the grading and development of the residential subdivision in Albertville proceeds, the ultimate land use for Otsego properties on Kadler Avenue will become more clear and ultimate planning for full or partial Kadler Avenue vacation or relocation can occur. Consideration of road vacation should be postponed. ot2188.mr1 1911'r?cloco"cM' % -f/cC rcM o/ C4Vr".,La: / Crlrr a wv r ed rrdti Hakanson Anderson Assoc., Inc. l_.,'1y p1l Clow C '.�_ I naA,O' ,� PHASE 1 SIGNS >1 r • r a, a7S.e FU re. 1.5 Y� o 971: ' _ ' '. o7na PHASE 2 SIGNS •t• �,', - t :T+f p • a773 LJ •� ' i ( &OM OUM 7YR'f01M DIE . � � ��• ' J �� - ' ._ - - • _ .J rum-Arand DetaO - .y'sr ei • r i t •� "' Tempo aty euldesae to,ba.. . � 'gc�ds� vlth clay matat4al•!t F,• -' ,•'' — the ptoyeet and au;laeed' M1t8 • of -class S giivel. B F See ?um-Arand Detw . _ 1 ?TAi ac£a : .= 4:4::313, Zj • I l lk. L } - .t is M /D T Sign CITY. ~,� t B F -'PHASE aREG. A SPEC, ROAD E BE 60-x30- CLOSED 2 PHASE B TYPE Ill BARRICADE w/FLASHERS 5_ !1 ( CJ `. I ROAD CLOSED R11-4 TD Twu TitAM 1 i O ROAD W20-3 ttoslo D 1 O W20-100P soa iEET 1 O R11-2 RDAD 0.03E0 4 !>wa.rd O w iV-z „;,� /t'o0 o.V� l�E1t rt��lN�Nr op T)ON Al /t'o0 o.V� l�E1t rt��lN�Nr op T)ON Al BONE NO. : bl� 441 4414 FROM : CITY OF OTSEGO l� fexcCttP rs F�toM 4,6 Tr,& tL �! PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY I have attached a small and large copy of our master plan and a sketch plan of the David Becker site for your information. The residents and uses You will need to consider are as follows: `< I . Comer residential use at Kadler and Hwy. 37. Solution: Can use Kadler vacated as a 75' driveway extension. This would not need to be plowed by the City. 4 2. A second. residential use, suspected home machine shop: Solution: would use same joint driveway for about 200 feet. 0 f 3. The David Becker farm is 120 acres with access to both Kadler and Hwy. 37. We propose vacation of Kadler when proposed 63rd Avenue is complete. This will contain sewer and water if Albertville and Otsego can solve revenue issues. Regardless, access -is publicly 0 provided. Solution: After 63rd Street is complete, vacated road provides additional LF for Becker to plow until farm subdivided. 4. The cellular tower lessors of Sprint, US West are currently accommodated by the combined i plowing of David Becker and the City. We believe that vacation does not pose any threat tq, operations for access or snow plowing. Solution: Kadler to remain intact as an expanded gravel road until the Becker farm develops, at which time Otsego will create permanent direct access to the cell to --n. via the subdivision process, Wt: are requesting the following from Otsego: • Otsego acknowledge the vacation request and conceptually approve the orderly abandonment of the Kadler alignment when roadway facilities are in place from Albertville to serve the RAr VR Becker farm from the east. vticaro�K. • Support the project as an incentive to development of housing within Otsego which should p bG benefit from a market amenity such as a golf course in Albertville. • Identify any issues formally which impact Otsego. To dace, no item is reasonably identifiable: within the EAW process. Since land holdings are over minimum thresholds, an F..AW will be routed to Otsego for comment when completed later this month. • Identify any procedures required by Otsego if Becker were to sell or lease land adjacent to golf course for layout expansion. 14,AJ 11 ---TWJL'WW- 7rVW""'0' - Donald Jensen Land Development Director Cc7 Kcnt Rneulcf. President Pilot Lvtd Garrison Hale Albertville Administrator Nor 'r'IIFd LoNg 7'Eni' lc+«rlaA) �u b PIL01 LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY February S, 1998 Mayor and Council Members c/o Mr. Michael Robertson City Administrator 8899 NE Nashua Avenue. Otsego, MN 55330 RE: Kadler Avenue closing Dear Mr. Robertson: This letter augments previous letters regarding Kadler on Jan. 29, 1998 & July 9, 1997. We are'executing the development forms with the understanding that review by Otsego consultants is specific to Kadler and not hypothetical subdivision actions. Our primary request is to have Otsego issue permits for road closed signage. The road is only being closed outside of the Otsego limits south of the David Becker farm. We do not own any land that is in Otsego, but do own land that abuts Kadler from Hwy. 37 to Highway It 8. To update you on approvals to date, we have been through public hearings for our PUD master plan and rezoning. The Albertville Planning Commission and Council has held these hearings which notified all our neighbors and your residents in Otsego along Kadler. We have concluded an EAW which held public hearings and a mandatory 30 day public comment period which Otsego was notified about. During all of these hearings we received no written or verbal objections to Kadler closure from your residents. We are therefore comfortable paying the $200 road closure application fee but will want to watch the open ended consultant escrow fee. The consultants which have stamped our plans are registered engineers by the State of Minnesota. licensed to perform work which meets public design and -safety standards. These plans have in turn been reviewed by SEH consulting engineers with the same standards of review and conduct. Permits to post signs on Highway 37 and 118 have been reviewed by the County highway department. and St. Michael received a report frttm their Consulting Engineers MFRA regarding no negative impact to closing the 1 18 connection. NAC has reviewed all the preliminary and final plans and informs us that Bob Kirmis was made aware of the plans through inter office communication. David Licht as Principal Planner for Albertville and Otsego was aware of joint road plans and has always been very diligent in protecting municipal interests regardless of political jurisdiction during the creation of the final plans for Cedar Creek. Please accept the plans submitted as thorough. needing minimal further review, and recommend approval to install signs as shown in the Otsego portion of the right of way for Kadler Avenue. You now possess the approved plans and have had briefings from all parties. We have also talked personally with the Beckers to inform them of the pending construction. That you for your attention to the Kadler closure request. Sincerely. 6: Donald Jensen Land Development Director Cc: Kent Roessler. President Pilnt Land Pete Carlson - SEH Jeff Roos - MFRA Dave Lund. Albertville Administrator Robert Dents. St. Michael Scott Dahlke - Meyer - Rohlin 13736 Johnson Street NE • Ham Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094 OTSSCO — ;—ALBZRrr1ZLr G0t1j,P vp*4-Tj0 6rTYeAI vfbN 0 11llb/NG mF �'6Yo rJ Tfl +lw `137 / \ 14 1 I \ \ / • �,g \\ALIERNARVE LAYOUT,e Au Gb�I�R�ryrrgp aid 63 c , rjW441 W. Al- 'rOMr. "91 w/ 12�VW ` 1:7dI?4{f,,/ iD Mbe4i (.le 6Pr't l9Rf� N� O 26 DU. COWMWTS Aeafl�.w 100' R1A STANDARDS N rw G' /w 1 1600 Sr MIN BRICK OX 6:12 Rope PIRN p • � ►wr No �• U an w.3 1 owr LM Lawua \ \ Mefifi 4vw"104 Gvy.,. IJI.J ACRES �.lr a sAuy 16 MOLE GOLF . VCC FACrLITY Jab oeres in St. michoel 90.6 ones in Cedar Creek 9.7 acres in Center Oaks CEDAR CREEK SOUTH Single Fomay. 91 lots Ce.e Plan. 00' - 170' 1.1 widths 62 lets larger than MOOD st 11 lets smaller than flow st . lots smader than 15.000 st (12.516 $/ smollest . sire) 16.059 sI average lot size 52 golf fron/oge lots J. Pork frontage tots 41.5oeres smg/e /amity area multi FelnAy Phase 1 2e townhomc unity 2J golf fronloge nits 5.1 acres n lornhelne area 9.2IJ st osroge to.nhome tot sire Phase e 26 torllhome units 26 golf frontage units 4.0 ants in to.Marne area 6.0/0 st overage tewnhome )of size Phase 1 21 DU 1990-1999 Phase 2 JI DU 1999-2000 Phase J 19 DU 2000-2001 Phase a 2J DU 2000-2002 m Ilo 5(h C• �� trw 1 l U'pa arse ey W ��'�• IenM ST.. YVICh'ASL ——ALBE'R7' L6 ' I TOtwHouC DENSITY TRANSFER AR* ♦•\ LM' / 24 DU TOaNNDmES 2 STORY MARKET TUD F / 1 CAR GARAGE - 1050 SI�t+IN_ i� Ora W ( TOI/NNOUE DENSITY ( TRANSFER AREA PRO / UPLAND FOR.NOLCS / IJ. Ic h 15 SIX LOAD J GAR GARAGE (7 POS.96LE OUT LY 24 vo LNO) ROAD EXIENDED AS NEEDED 1990-T999 r RS zONMO - ND M/PACT 21.0 acres -PARK CREATES ALL REOfRRED LAND DCOICAWN C04 GCS RJ 7.9 acres tJ eves wetland wlthn perk CEDAR CREEK NORTH Single Fomsy. 90 lots Cave Plan. 60 - 120' Lot INdfhs 15.000 sf mi knum lot sire 17400ovcrogs lot sirs 12 9oll Ronlops lets 19 Pork 4anlope lots 44.6 ocres it sinpla famsy area Phase / JO DU 1996 Phase 2 20 DU 1990 Phase J IJ DU 1999-20W Phase s 27 DU 2000-2007 ts+q M.s ACRES OPEN SPAS/ O�'' M S'!Z7 �w w •FED-02-98 MON 14:46 "EVER—ROHLIN. INC. 6682 9492 P.01 west Corner of Section 35, T.121, Oight County Monument. M PC9t 1t' Fax Note 7671 Z 9 b Dages— To From col000t V"c CO. *'e'fL— (4.hR.J Phone 4 phone M C 10, Fax # Fa�c Y 11WOO-3444L Dovid � Lynd! Albertw7le City Limits TEMr V� 81'5 lC'/CL, A AlbertM/� A!N L�I�►J I It vk7 vai. v.c. / 6./"% L/t.Lr1 in v r._. 25 A W . N - 7// N � W CITY OF ALBERTVILLE DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT Center Oaks Second Addition THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of , 1998 by and between Center Oaks, LLP and Pilot Land Development Company, Inc., collectively referred to herein as "Developer"; and the CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, County of Wright, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "City"; WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the fee owner and developer of a parcel or parcels of land described in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, a portion of which parcels of land are proposed to be subdivided and platted for development, and which subdivision, which is the subject of this agreement, is intended to bear the name "Center Oaks Second Addition" and may sometimes hereinafter be referred to as the "Subject Property" or "Said Plat"; and WHEREAS, the City has given preliminary approval of Developer's Development Stage plan of Center Oaks Second Addition contingent upon compliance with certain City requirements including, but not limited to, matters set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the City requires that certain public improvements including, but not limited to, grading, sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer and streets (hereafter "Municipal Improvements) be installed to serve the Subject Property and other properties affected by the development of Developer's land, to be installed and financed by Developer; WHEREAS, the City further requires that certain on- and off -site improvements be installed by the Developer within the Subject Property, which improvements consist of boulevards, top soil and sod, grading control per lot, bituminous or concrete driveways, parking lot, drainage swales, berming, street signs, street cleanup during project development, erosion control, and other site -related items; and WHEREAS, this Agreement is entered into for the purpose of setting forth and memorializing for the parties and subsequent owners, the understandings and agreements of the parties concerning the development of the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the City and Developer have previously entered into a Developer's Agreement titled "City of Albertville Developer's Agreement Cedar Creek Golf Course Planned Unit Development Concept Plan Master Agreement" ("Master Agreement") under which the City granted concept plan approval to the plan for the area covered by said Master Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City and Developer desire to supplement the Master Agreement with the site specific details applicable to Center Oaks Second Addition via the execution of this agreement; and WHEREAS, the City and Developer desire to have this agreement and the Master Agreement read together as if the entire Master Agreement were recited herein; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AND HEREIN MUTUALLY AGREED, in consideration of each party's promises and considerations herein set forth, as follows: 1. Concept Plan Master Agreement. A. That Developer's Agreement titled "City of Albertville Developer's Agreement Cedar Creek Golf Course Planned Unit Development Concept Plan Master Agreement" ("Master Agreement") between Pilot Land Development Company, Inc. and the City of Albertville, dated , 1998 is hereby incorporated herein the same as if the text of said agreement were contained within this document. B. It is the intent of the parties that this Developer's Agreement ("Developer's Agreement") supplement the Master Agreement as to the specific development issues related to Center Oaks Second Addition, and that these two documents be read together to determine the rights and obligations of the parties with respect to the property contained within the Center Oaks Second Addition. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Master Agreement and this Developer's Agreement, the terms of this Developer's Agreement shall control with respect to any conflicting issues within Center Oaks Second Addition, but any such conflicts shall not alter the terms of the Master Agreement as they apply to other plats, now existing or to be platted in the future, within the remaining land area subject to the Master Agreement. 2. Construction of Municipal Improvements. The Developer shall construct those Municipal Improvements located on and off Said Plat as detailed in the Plans and Specifications for Center Oaks Second Addition, as prepared by Meyer-Rohlin, Inc. dated August 19, 1997 and revised September 29, 1997, as on file with the City Clerk, said improvements to include installation of water mains, sanitary and storm sewers, storm water ponding, site grading, curb and gutter, and paved streets. All such 2 improvements shall be constructed according to the standards adopted by the City, along with all items required by the City Engineer. Unless the City Engineer specifies a later date, said improvements shall be installed by September 1, 1998, with the wear course of bituminous pavement to be installed after May 15, 1999 but before June 30, 1999. 3. Construction of On- and Off -Site Improvements. Developer shall construct all on - and off -site improvements including installation of boulevards, street signs, traffic signs, yard top soil, sod in all front and side yards, at least one tree in the front yard, grass seeding in back yards, grading control per lot, bituminous or concrete driveways, drainage swales, berming, and like items as necessary, street cleanup during project development, and erosion control, all as required by City ordinance. Said on- and off - site improvements shall be installed no later than September 15, 2003, with the exception of erosion control, drainage swales and berming, which shall be installed upon initial grading of Subject Property. 4. Intended Use of Subdivision Lots. It is the Developer's and City's intent that single- family detached dwelling units be constructed on the lots in Said Plat (one unit on each lot). Developer agrees that it shall not construct any units other than said single-family detached dwelling units on the land in Said Plat. 5. Surety Requirements.. Developer will provide the City with an irrevocable letter of credit (or other surety as approved by the City Attorney) as security that the obligations of the Developer under this contract shall be performed. Said letter of credit or surety shall be in the amount of $335,437.00 representing 100% of the estimated remaining cost of the installation of the Municipal Improvements ($315,437.00) and $20,000.00 as the amount deemed necessary to ensure that on- and off -site improvements will be installed. Said letter of credit or surety must meet the approval of the City attorney as to form and issuing bank. If a bond is used for up to 25% of the surety amount, said bond shall be in an amount at least 1.25 times the percentage of the required surety which the bond represents. 6. Sanitary Sewer Trunk Line Fees. Developer agrees that the City's Sanitary Sewer Trunk Line Fee Ordinance requires the Developer to pay $1,400.00 per acre in sanitary sewer trunk line fees. There are 21.44 acres in said plat. However, per the agreement outlined in Parkside 3'd Addition Developer's Agreement, paragraph 2, pages 2-5, the developer will be credited $900.00 per acre prior to the installation of a sanitary sewer trunk line. Therefore, the Developer shall be required to pay $10,720 ($500.00 x 21.44 acres). Developer will pay said fee prior to the release of the final plat by the City. 7. Erosion and Siltation Control. Before any grading is started on any site, all erosion K control measures as shown on the approved erosion control plan shall be strictly complied with as set forth in the attached Exhibit B. Developer shall also install all erosion control measures deemed necessary by the City Engineer should the erosion control plan prove inadequate in any respect. 8. Ditch Cleaning. Developer shall comply with all requirements set forth for drainage into any county ditch or other ditch through which water from Subject Property may drain, and shall make any necessary improvements or go through any necessary procedures to ensure compliance with any legally enforceable federal, state, county or city requirements, all at Developer's expense. The City may elect to (but shall not be required to) refund to the Developer expenses incurred by Developer for machine operator time spent cleaning the ditch beyond the boundaries of Said Plat. 9. Miscellaneous. A. This Contract shall run with the land and shall be recorded against the title to the property (or shall be recorded via a short form companion document referencing this agreement). After the Developer has completed all work and obligations required of it under this Contract (including the expiration of the warranty period), at the Developer's request, the City will execute and deliver to the Developer a release of its obligations under this agreement. B. The Developer represents to the City that the Plat complies with all City, county, state and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the plat does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the Developer so complies. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. C. Prior to the execution of this agreement and prior to the start of any construction on the Subject Property, Developer shall provide the City with evidence of good and marketable title to all of Subject Property. Evidence of good and marketable title shall consist of a Title Insurance Policy or Commitment from a national title insurance company, or an abstract of title updated by an abstract company registered under the laws of the State of Minnesota. D. Developer shall comply with all legally enforceable water, ponding and wetland related restrictions as contained in the 8--4 -17 letter from the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District (said letter is on file with 4 f the City Clerk). / E. Developer shall not place any structure at an elevation such that th owest floor including the basement floor, is less than two feet above the highest kno surface water level or ordinary high water level or less than one foot above the 100-year flood level of any adjacent water body or wetland. If sufficient data on high water levels is not available, the elevation of the line of permanent aquatic vegetation shall be used as the estimated high water elevation. When fill is required to meet this elevation, the fill shall be allowed to stabilize and construction shall not be ' until the property has been mspeeted by the Building Inspector] 10. Dedications to the City. A. The Developer, upon presentation to the City of evidence of good and marketable title to Subject Property, and upon completion of all construction work and certification of completion by the City Engineer, shall dedicate all roads, road right of ways, sewers and water mains to the City. Upon acceptance of dedication, Developer shall provide to the City "As-Builts" of all sewers, water mains, and roads. Acceptance by City of any dedication shall occur upon passage of a resolution to such effect by the City Council. B. Developer acknowledges that a total of 21.44 acres of land are being platted in this plat. Developer also acknowledges that 10% of this land area must be dedicated as park land under the City's current park dedication ordinance, amounting to 2.14 acres of parkland (21.44 x 10%). The Developer is dedicating 2.49 acres of park land with this plat, which represents 116.36% of the land required for dedication. Developer and City have agreed that the excess 16.36% shall remain as a credit to the Developer to be applied to future plats within Center Oaks future phases. C. As part of the development of Said Plat, Developer shall install eight foot wide paved bituminous trails, designed in accordance with the trail requirements as set out in the Community Greenway Trail section, City of Albertville Standard Detail Plates, dated September, 1996 (or as amended), and constructed in a manner acceptable to the City Engineer, in the locations shown on the attached Exhibit C. Developer shall receive a park dedication credit for the construction of said trails in the amount of the cost of the trails plus 5% for engineering and administration, all to be applied to future plats within the Cedar Creek PUD. Prior to the installation of said trails, Developer shall supply the City engineer 5 with Developer's best estimate of the cost of installing said trails based upon the bid price received from the construction contractor. Developer shall supply the City with copies of paid invoices from the construction contractor itemizing the materials and labor incurred in constructing the trails. 11. Indemnity. Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from claims made by Developer and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Said Plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's fees. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this contract. 12. Assignment of Contract. The obligations of the Developer under this Contract cannot be assigned without the express written consent of the City Council through Council resolution. 13. Agreement Effect. This agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the representatives, heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, By Its Mayor By Its Clerk PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. By Kent Roessler Its President r,, CENTER OAKS, LLP. By Kent Roessler Its STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1998, by Mark Olson, as Mayor of the City of Alberwille, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the city and pursuant to the authority of the City Council. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1998, by Linda Houghton, as Clerk of the City of Albertville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the city and pursuant to the authority of the City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF WRIGHT Notary Public 7 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1998, by Kent Roessler, as President of Pilot Land Development Company, Inc., and as of Center Oaks, LLP. Radmill & Couri Law Office P.O. Box 369 705 Central Avenue East St. Michael, MN 55376 (612)497-1930 Notary Public s EXHIBIT A TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT The Real Property subject to the Developer's Agreement is legally described as follows (prior to platting): The Real Property subject to the Developer's Agreement is legally described as follows (after the filing of the Center Oaks Second Addition Plat): All said lots in Center Oaks Second Addition, City of Albertville, County of Wright, Minnesota. . 11 Erosion Control Plan 4:11 Trail Plan j4 ... �. Jr Y � r v ter. v w. y,1 �N137 T— At r►w arh l � _ � 1 ` p 0 s a 1 t k i 1 1 I I 1 I 1 1 ! 1 1 etunHNftftlM MtWltinttmtseauenrtettM. mmu 33MINUUMN I ; a _fill� �-.. �i alias tw►tt tattettttntata.retnm.tt..ttatnn I •1� ytiilZ i$atalaail�nt A L� , 1. - I !"a ! • Hot— a�i�� Q, 1ZL 1. ■ 03/12/98 12:13 FAX 1320251117fO SE8 ST. CLOM +-►i ALBERTVILLE CITY ;1003t004 i rav3m wAp dew Ob MR^ Wr t Coady Soil Svrvoy, .) a site visit and ' nerd properu in 60 foul of a Mort WObond eftes wits be by a mm of two people Oft vqmdw• in bydcic sops -n d hydrop - Mw edge will be mubd with ' ly 4-i*t'lxdL and bkw maw• "W for andhadaby lend sins. W bq' xuW to dw pcqMW ibw if the bay!oad dw liwAts•of do Upon ammpledm of** Mbismim via yott vamp for a pmfeamvml surveyor to kc+te the nwW and car ampispairm mum a possbb to efimbude the potmW p cf iatli oar ` We wM a *dch of ` loth* surMw- WenqWndwaawy of** boar &dw be nu too a for review. This can pmvw pwwims in 1wr sups cif tie ' o d o site said wW6NWf' a d ATM' "$ids sp w Mb . _ ss by &* U.S. AtW Cow `: • of salt 'lam aF�V'a� S� � : • .'rise acceracy of am &Ikwdm is mad late been by zumKm tsconiW ors ' a vociety dlae* oft aid hdm* ogencies. AS do. 4an ius of a ` S will mot aiodae . bombms wWwa pto&wm a ..may .. � TOW %e tmloM" *&omdm m npwt is-aftawd to be a of 52323 . &Vw arc, wiU be hourly cwt xusfsat rupm c}i�t A .proposal `wili be ., 9e�lak - SyoUft B04*0atR• ` is 'p.mpuW to edwide to wak upon mmipt of f at6whed-Auffiorixotim to ktutis tie° • Dis4�os�ur4: art v , Mg"' is coaftwel and =ivi)*d sad 9hwW nit bet=mdmd to saym a tbett , • au from &atl We 10& ftwuidjo *&4pmWnkydwoddug with you. - plan va i if ym hm any quesd= or VAM14 like to dismiss this pqmd imam ds eal• ='uk you for mpsWug w usistmm off► this 1 Sie44c4srselq, , sVODQVA ECOLOGIC41, JUMOURMS F J. S 9,CWD s 93/12/199e 15:10 612.472-190 KJOLHAUG EWIRONMEW PAGE $2 - r ttN. KJOLHAUGENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPA14Y Pt�d� 9ow�, Cmr�+rte .'�atro+t! Rsroafrr �uteos: Much h I t,1998 City ,of Abertvlle Attir 5975 , Avaue NE Bax 4 ANOMY* Wq 55301 Rye: Pr serwic�ea 17 ,aeiPapand% park ud &e nation Dw M ..fic At of - F ncr& o mxh we -am of be POvkw as part of*k Propow: A # win WcomplaW. We wM widk tM am Fv'pwty &val~ QQ tO +enure 49 WMknft we • 'fnd, IM- A . 11M WWMMdos will betoWtompportthe mog � det�rmina e. + Wedw4s wjU be dekowed in the fidd umv andad madadologm a3 dem in the 1987 Cams a(ZO&M Wedow Uelivawm MuMaL This m tw involves Wwtirft are" vft wk vW49ion and kdmbgy M +wiive bOuOdad"of Avm OdOOM wethmd Condkkm will be suked =&o Bagged with ate dOCu�rler------ -n MI. be completed. ♦. A ► O'x Qf d b*=dM 5 will be PrNPwv4 0" tO Yaw vmvtyws W at ftfinefted wetaallEle. 4P57'"ChMOM4 itwi, irt*U" 5504 • , 611-474-4475 • Fux: $12-472-I00,0 7c(�a) To: City Council From. David Lund Date: March 9, 1998 Subject: Uniforms - Public Works Employees We have started our search for unifom*shirt, pants, jacket) plus shop towels and have contacted the following companies. G&K - shirt & pants $8.00/week jacket $2.00/week $10.00/week x 2 = $20.00/week x 52 weeks = $1040 Requires a five year contract, might consider three Cintas - shirt,pantsjacket $7.10/week x 2 = $14.20/week x 52 weeks = $738.40 Requires a five year service agreement AmeriPride -shirt & pants $7.25/week jacket $.64/week $7.89/week x 2 = $15.78/week x 52 weeks = $820.56 (Plus an additional $1.50 each time the jacket is laundered) Requires a three year contract Aramark - shirt & pants $5.23/week jacket $1.10/week $6.33/week x 2 = $12.66/week x 52 weeks = $658.32 Requires a three year contract Conclusions: 1. Our employees would prefer 100% cotton and blue jeans. The G & K contact is for 100% cotton. The other three are using a 65/35 blend. The Aramark bid with 100% cotton would be $7.75/week. 2. A three year agreement is the minimum 3. Aramark is the low bidder on shop towels at $.06 per unit. 4. There is the question of short vs. long sleeve shirts. Most users select a mixture of short and long sleeves. An extra set of shirts from G & K is $1.30/week. Aramark would charge a rate of $8.00 per seasonal change. I 1V City Clerk Linda Goeb Date: March 12, 1998 To: City Council Subject: Financing Options - Fire Department Rescue Truck At the March 2nd Council meeting, we awarded the bid for purchasing a fire rescue vehicle. Financing the vehicle was discussed and the Council decided to use a lease/purchase option available through Baystone Financial Group. It was determined that the City would put no cash down and finance the entire $161, 000 purchase over five years at 4.274 % interest. While Angie Manuel was doing the field work for the 1997 audit report, she and I discussed projected purchases and capital outlays for 1998. 1 advised her of the plan to finance the fire rescue vehicle through a tease/purchase option. She believes it is more fiscally responsible to use the funds reserved in the Fire Department Vehicle Capital Outlay account and to borrow the remaining amount from another fund through an inter -fund loan. The inter: fund loan could be interest -free or Interest could be paid to the lending fund from the general fund at whatever rate the Council sets. She indicated she would be able to set up the inter -fund loan for the city. The same type inter -fund loan should be used to fund the balance of the Bobcat as well. The advantage of using inter -fund loans is that the City does not pay out interest to another source. There are several funds which have sufficient fund balances from which monies could be borrowed. If the Council chooses to establish inter -fund loans rather than lease/purchase agreements, a motion rescinding the March 2 motion is necessary. If the Council chooses to proceed with the lease/purchase, a credit application will be completed and returned to Baystone this week. W120 CONFIDENTIAL Page 1 7d(5) City Clerk Linda Goeb Date: March 12, 1998 To: City Council Subject: Early Call of Bonds At the last Finance Committee meeting, the Committee discussed early call of several of our bonds to decrease out debt load. The bonds considered for early call are: 1990 $435, 000 Improvement Bond. There is a $130, 000 outstanding principal balance on this bond, plus $4, 388.75 in interest that would be payable as an early call on June 1st. The current interest rate over the ten-n of the bond varies annually between 6. 6-6.8%. The fund balance on this bond is approximately $68, 000. The bond document require a 30-day notice of early call. An inter -fund loan would be necessary t call this bond early. 1988 $210, 000 Sewer & Water Revenue Bond. There is an outstan ' g principal balance on this bond of $75, 000, plus interest accrued to June 1st of $2, 743. 75. The interest rate fluctuates between 7.2-7. 4%. The bond could be called early on June 1. As a reminder, this is the bon used to finance the County Road 37 sewer and water extension, an the $200 WAC charge and a portion of the SAC charges are pledged to this bond, as well as the deferred assessment on the John -George property. Although the fund balance as of 12131197 shows a negative $39, 000, a portion of the funds in the SAC Fund are pledged toward this bond. If this bond is called early, the deferred assessment payment (when it is collected) can be placed in the General Fund and used however the Council chooses. Another item for consideration is thal the WAC fee is pledged to this debt service. If the Council chooses to continue to collect the WAC fee after the bond is retired, the ordinance establishing the WAC fee should be amended to specify the new use of the WAC fees, such as a watermain replacement fund. • 1968 $505 000 Advanced Refunding & Improvement Bond. This bo d has an outstanding principal of $30, 000, interest of $1, 087.50, and an interest rate of 7. 2-7. 25%. The bond can be called early on August 1st. 3112/98 CONFIDENTIAL Page 1 The fund balance on this account is approximately -$45, 000. There re still special assessments due to this debt service, in addition to the annual city levy. In order to call this bond early, funds would need t be borrowed through an inter -fund loan. 7 1989 $215, 00 Refunding Bond. There is an outstanding $105, 000 principal amount and a $4,002.50 interest payment due on this bond on its early call date of September 1. The fund balance on this bond is approximately $70, 000. An inter -fund loan is necessary to call this one early. The Council needs to make a decision regarding the proposed early calls. The bond's paying agent must be notifed 30-60 days prior to each earl call. 3/12198 CONFIDENTIAL Page 2