1998-10-05 CC PacketALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
October 5, 1998
7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER — ROLL CALL — ADOPT
AGENDA
2. MINUTES
September 21, 1998, Regular Meeting
3. CITIZEN FORUM — (io Minute Limit)
4. CONSENT AGENDA ;
(a) Revenue/Expenditure Report (August)
(b) Approval of Check #'s 10988 - 11023
(c) RESOLUTION #1998-18 (A RESOLUTION CHANGING STREET
NAME)
(d) RESOLUTION #1998-19 (A RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION
JUDGES FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION)
(e) Financial Statement (September 1 — September 30)
(f) Approve contract with KDV for the 1998 Audit Report - $7,000
5. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS
a. PLANNING & ZONING
(1) Development Stage (Preliminary Plat) - JMJ Properties (Outlet
Mall) /D„�
(2) Preliminary & Final Plat — Pysk's 7 h Addition !/ �-
(3) Site and Building Plan Review — Mold Tech, Inc.
b. ENGINEERING
• Request for reductions of Letters of Credit
Cedar Creek North
Center Oaks 2►,d Addition
Center Oaks 3rd Addition
Karston Cove
c. LEGAL��
• Project Updates
d. ADMINISTRATI%N
(a) LMCIT Insurance Proposal — Arlan Middleton
(b) Discuss continuation of lease of WWTF property to Zimmer
Brothers for 1999 season
6. ADJOURNMENT
UPCOMING MEETINGSA MPORTANT DATES
October 13
Regular Planning & Zoning Meeting
7:00 PM
(Consideration of land use south of CR 118)
October 19
Regular City Council Meeting
7:00 PM
(Public Hearing — Facilities Plan)
October 20
City Council Budget Meeting
7:00 PM
November 2
Regular City Council Meeting
7:00 PM
November 3
General Election — Polls open 7:00 AM — 8:00 PM
November 10
Regular Planning & Zoning Meeting
7:00 PM
November 11
Veteran's Day — Legal Holiday
(City Hall is closed)
November 16
Regular City Council Meeting
7:00 PM
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 21, 1998
Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM
PRESENT: Mayor Mark Olsen, Councilmembers Robert Gundersen,
Duane Berning, Patti Stalberger and John Vetsch, City Administrator David Lund,
City Clerk Linda Goeb, City Engineer Pete Carlson and City Attorney Michael
Couri
Mayor Olsen called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to
order.
The agenda was amended by adding the following:
• Item 6d(1) - Approval of 3.2 malt liquor license for the Albertville Lions on
Friday, September 25, 1998
• Item 6d(2) - Discussion of Public Works employee on medical leave
• Item 6b(3) - Soil Borings Update
• Item 6b(4) - Fire Hall Plan
• Item 6c(2) - Project Updates
• Item 6d(3) — Hockey arena update
• Item 6d(4) — Upcoming joint Council meeting with the Joint Powers Board
• Item 4(a) was removed from the Consent Agenda and added as Item 6d(5)
Stalberger made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Berning
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Vetsch made a motion to approve the minutes of the September 8, 1998,
meeting as presented. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Mayor Olsen asked if anyone present wished to address the Council under
the Citizen Forum portion of the agenda. No one addressed the Council.
Vetsch made a motion to approve payment of Check #'s 10944 — 10971 as
presented. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Vetsch made a motion to approve the WWTF Monthly Operations Report
for August 1998 as presented. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Mayor Olsen opened the public hearing to consider the modification of
Development District No. 1 and the tax increment financing plan for TIF District
#10.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 21,1998
Page 2 of 5
City Attorney Couri reviewed the proposal for the creation of TIF District
# 10 for Lot 3, Block 10, Barthel Industrial Park. Chuck Sand, owner of Mold
Tech, Inc., proposes to relocate his business from Brooklyn Park to Albertville if a
tax increment financing plan can be developed.
Couri explained that the proposed TIF district is a pay-as-you-go district,
i.e. the City returns the tax increment received from taxes paid by Mold Tech, Inc.
to the developer to reimburse expenses associated with land purchase and site
improvements. The proposed district has an eight -year life and will produce
$180,000 - $198,000 in tax increments. The City will be required to contribute
10% of the total package from its general fund as its local contribution. All
administrative fees, such as legal, planning and engineering, can be used as a
portion of the local contribution.
Mayor Olsen called for comments from the public. There were none.
Berning made a motion to close the public hearing. Olsen seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1998-16 titled
RESOLUTION APPROVING MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND A TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.
10. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Chuck Sand asked the Council to consider reducing the costs associated
with bringing the water and sanitary sewer to his lot. Although the as-builts show
that water and sewer stubs were extended into the property, Sand's engineer has
been unable to locate either service.
City Engineer Pete Carlson will review the area and report his findings
regarding the sewer and water services to the Council at the next meeting. The
Council will then consider whether to reimburse Sand for a portion of those
expenses.
City Administrator Lund reviewed the Planning Commission's
recommendation to approve a Conditional Use Permit as requested by Bernard and
Theolinda Richter. The Richter's propose to replace an existing 8' x 10' storage
shed with a 14' x 20' wood storage shed for personal use.
t
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 21,1998
Page 3 of 5
Berning made a motion to approve the Findings of Fact & Decision,
granting a Conditional Use Permit for Bernard and Theolinda Richter to construct
a 14' x 20' wood storage shed on the property located at 11577 56t' Street NE.
Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council discussed the rezoning of a 500' deep strip of property on the
east side of CSAH 19 south of 57h Street to 50t' Street.
Stalberger made a motion to adopt the Findings of Fact & Decision to
rezone the property B-1 (Neighborhood Business). Berning seconded the motion.
Stalberger, Berning and Vetsch voted aye. Gundersen and Olsen voted no.
Because a rezoning issue requires a four -fifths vote of the Council, the property
was not rezoned B-1.
Gundersen made a motion to adopt the Findings of Fact & Decision to
rezone the property B-2 (Limited Business), with the stipulation that a buffer be
constructed between the commercial property and the existing residential
properties at the time the property is developed. Stalberger seconded the motion.
All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to adopt ORDINANCE #1998-7 titled AN
ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE
MAP TO REZONE CERTAIN LANDS ALONG PORTIONS OF CSAH 19
AND 57TH STREET TO B-2, LIMITED BUSINESS, IN COMPLIANCE
WITH CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS OF FACT. Stalberger seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
Bob Sollentrop of Short Elliot and Hendrickson reviewed the final draft of
the Facilities Plan for the wastewater treatment plant expansion concerning
financing the expansion. Sollentrop explained that the current user rates and SAC
fees are adequate to finance the project. City Engineer Pete Carlson recommends
that the Council enlist Springsted, Inc. to perform more detailed analysis of the
financing options.
Stalberger made a motion to schedule a public hearing on the Facilities Plan
on October 19, 1998, at 7:15 PM. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 21,1998
Page 4 of 5
Vetsch made a motion authorizing Sollentrop to submit the Facilities Plan
to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for review. Gundersen seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
City Engineer Pete Carlson reported that the preliminary information on the
soil borings done on the Marx property show good clay soils and indicate no
abnormal soils corrections should be necessary. More detailed information
regarding the results of the soil borings will be available by the next meeting.
Carlson recommended the Council consider hiring an architect to work on
the new fire hall. He will contact several architectural firms to request information
regarding their experience in building fire halls and other background information.
City Attorney Couri reported that some provisions of the Parkside P
Addition Developer's Agreement could be released at this point, but other
provisions can not be released at this time. Couri recommended that no changes
be made to the Developer's Agreement until next summer when all provisions can
be released.
Couri reported that the park dedication fee issue for the Savitski
Commercial Building has not been resolved. Based on the $1.70 per square foot
that the City paid Savitski for the right-of-way for Country Road 37, the park
dedication fee is estimated at $10,500411,000. Negotiations are continuing with
Savitski's attorney.
Couri has received two quotes for title insurance for the Marx property.
Based on a purchase price of $217,000, Wright Title & Guarantee quotes the
premium at $813. Guarantee Title quotes the title insurance at $769.
Vetsch made a motion to purchase title insurance from Guarantee Title at a
cost of $769 and to have Guarantee Title do the closing on the land purchase.
Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The survey of the wetlands on the Marx property has not been completed at
this time. Bernard Marx requests that the City allow him to have the property
surveyed simultaneously with the survey of the rest of the Marx property.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 21,1998
Page 5 of 5
Vetsch made a motion to have $10,000 of the sale price of the property held
in escrow if the survey of the purchased land is not complete at the date of closing.
Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Olsen made a motion approving a 3.2 Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor
License for the Albertville Lions on September 25, 1998, at City Park. Stalberger
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Ken Lindsay's doctor reports that he will be able to return to work on
October 12, 1998. City Attorney Couri recommends that the Council get
Lindsay's doctor to review Lindsay's job description and report to the City if there
are specific duties that Lindsay will be unable to perform. City Administrator
Lund will contact Lindsay's doctor.
Mayor Olsen reported on the hockey arena. Construction is underway and
the projected opening date is November 1. The City of St. Michael has signed the
Mighty Ducks Grant Agreement and returned it to the state.
The Council discussed the upcoming meeting with the Councils of the three
member cities. Mayor Olsen reported that the mayors of each community would
be the spokesperson for each city.
Berning made a motion to table the Revenue/Expenditure Report at this
time. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to adjourn at 11:00 PM. Gundersen seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
Mark S. Olsen, Mayor
Linda Goeb, City Clerk
REVENUE/11PENBITURE REPORT 4,
4a
CITY OF ALBERTVIIIE
For the Period: 03/01/98 to 08/31/98 Original Budget Amended Budget YTO Actual Carr Nth Encumbered YTO Mae. Balance I Bid
Fund: 101 General Food
Revenues
Dept: 000.000 REVENUE
310.100 Current Taxes 496,500.00 496,S00.00 274,983.27 .00 .00 221,516.73 SS.4
310.200 Delinquent Taxes .00 .00 1,726.04 .00 .00-1,726.04 .0
310.400 Tax Incresents .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0
320.110 liquor Permits _ 8,100.00 8,100.00 4,300.00 .00 .00 3,800.40 S3.1
320.120 Beer Permits 200.00 200.00 110.00 .00 .00` 90.00 55.0
320.130 Amusements licenses 350.00 350.00 .00 .00 .00 350.00 .0
320.140 Cigarette licenses 250.00 250.00 10.00 .00 .00 240.00 4.0
320.1SO Sign Permits 3,37S.00 3,37S.00 150.00 150.00 .00 3,22S.00 4.4
320.160 Otherksiness licenses/Permits 5,000.00 5,000.00 6,327.16 50.00 .00 -1,327.16 126.S
320.210 Building Permits 39,000.00 31,000.00 163,807.67 S1,836.17 .00-124,807.67 420.0
320.220 Animal licenses 100.00 100.00 14S.00 .00 .40. -45.00 145.0
334.010 Local Government Aid 98,879.00 98,879.00 49,439.SO 00 , . .00 _49,439.S0 SO.O
334.020. HACA . 138,220.00 138,220.40 69,OS7.00 .00 .00 69,163.00 50.0._
334.030 local Performance Aid 3,136.00 3,136.00 1,568.00 _ .00 A'o 1,168.00 50.0
334.050 Police Aid 7,78S.00 7,78S.00. .00 .00 .00 7,785.00 .0
334.060 Fire Aid to,98S.00 10,985.00 .00 .00 .00 10,985.D0 .0
336.000 Other Gov. Units Grants A Aids 4,800.00 4,800.00 2,602.65 .00 .00 2,197.3S 54.2
341.070 Special Assessment Searches 300.60 _ 300.00 790.00 80.00 .00 490.00 263.3
341.090 Other Charges for Services 3,000.00 3,000.00 .00 .00 .00 3,000.00 .0
341.09S Developer €scroms -.00 .00 16,SOO.00 800.00 .00 16,S00.00 .0
342.020 fire Protection Services 36,49S.00 36,49S.00 18,247.65 7,560.79 .00 18,247.3S 50.0
342.030 Park Rental Fees 2,000.00 2,000.00 1,825.00 .00 .00 17S.00 91.3
350.000 Fines and Forfeits 100.00 100.00 266.00 .00 .00 166.00 266.0
362.000 Interest Earnings 2S,000.00 2S,000.00 39,67S.96 16,279.83 .00 14,6IS.96 158.7
364.000 Private Contributions/Donation .00 .00 1,176.85 20.09 .00-1,176.8S .0
372.080 Other Revenues 1,Soo.00 1,500.00 29S.00 12.00 .00 1,20S.60 19.7
391.010 Sales of General Fixed Assets .00 .00 2,037.50 .00 .00-2,037.50 .0
391.020 Insurance Recoveries .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 0
392.0SO Transfer Out .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .60 .0
39S.000 lease Payament 950.00 950.00 950.00 .00 .00 .00 100.0
REVENUE 886,02S.O0 886,02S.00 655,990.25 75,188.88 .00230,034.75 74.0
Revenues 886,02S.00 886,02S.00 655,990.25 7S,188.88 .00 230,034.7S 74.0
REVENUE/EXPENOITURE REPORT
Date: 09/30/92
Tire:
4:51pm
CITY OF ALBERTVIt1E
Pager
2
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 08/01/98 to 08/31/98 Original Budget
Amended Budget
YTO Actual
Carr Nth-
Encumbered YTO
Dow. Balance
I Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Food: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 000.000 REVENUE
511.000 Mages - Regular Employees
.00
.00
.00
.00
521.000 Group Insurance
.00
.00
366.36
-46.18
00
-366.36
.0
522.000 FICA Contributions
-T;.,00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
REVENUE
.00
.00
366.36
-46.18
.00 :..
.-366.36
.0
Dept: 410.100 General Goveroment - Council
511.000 Pages - Regular Employees
11,400.00
11,400.00
7,600.00
950.00
.00
3,800.00
66.7
522.000 FICA Contributions
872.00
872.00
742.20
72.69
.00
129.80
85.1
S23.000 PERA Contributions
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
526.000 Markers Coapeasatioo Insuraoce
18S.00
18S.00
.00
.00
.00
18S.00
.0
S33.900 Other Prof. Contract Services
S,000.00
5,000.00
4,S90.15
3,972.00
.00
409.85
91.8
SS2.000 Insurance Other than Esp. Bent
5,100.00
5,100.00
-251.40
.00
.00
.5,3SI.40
-4.9
S55.000 Printing i Publications
7,SOO.00
7,S00.00
2,614.67
101.27
.00
4,88S.33
34.9
S58.000 Travel
300.00
300.00
.00
.00
.00
300.00
.0
561.100 General Supplies
100.00
100.00
54.50
.00
.00
4S.50
54.5
S61.300 Training/Instructional Supplys
300.00
300.00
.00
.00
.00
380.00
.0
S91.000 Dues 6 Subscriptions
2,300.00
2,300.00
S75.00
30.00
.00
1,725.00
25.0
599.000 NiscelIaneous
1,100.00
1,100.00
2,986.00
.00"
.00
-1,B86.00
271.5
General Goverameat - Council
34,157.00
34,IS7.00
18,911.12
S,125.96
.00
IS,24S.88
55.4
Dept: 410.300 Gen. Govt.- City Administrator
511.000 Rages - Regular Employees
35,000.00
35,000.00
28,180.34 .
2,745.20
.00
6,819.66
80.5
521.000 Group Insurance
5,956.00
5,9S6.00
3,909.88
41.30
.00
2,046.12
65.6
S22.000 FICA Contributioos
2,730.00
2,730.00
2,177.49
210.00
.00
SS2.S1
79.8
523.000 PERA Contributions
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
S25.000 Deferred Comp - Employer Costs
1,849.00
1,849.00
1,208.70
142.20
.00
640.30
65.4
S26.000 Norkers Compensation Iosuraoce
147.00
147.00
-43.80
.00
.00
190.80
-29.8
552,000 Insurance Other than Esp. Beau
500.00
500.00
.00
.00
.00
SOO.00
.0
SS8.000 Travel
1,000.00
1,000.00
239.44
.00'
.00
760.36
24.0
S61.100 General Supplies-
200.00
200.00
13S.33
.00'
.00
64.67
67.7
561.300 Training/Instructional` Supplys
600.00
600.00
44S.00
.00
.00
ISS.00
74.2
S74.300 Capital Outlay-Furoituresax::
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
591.000 Dues 3 Subscriptions
200.00
200.00
.00
00
.00
200.00
0
744.000 C4pifal Outlay - Offieesu::::
3,100.00
-
3,J0D.00 _
<- .
355,18 .
00
00
-56.78
101.5
.................
Sen, Govt.- City Administrator"
-----
51,882.00
..---------- .................
51,882.00
----------
40,009.36
.................
3,132.70
.................
.00
11,872.64
----
77.1
Dept: 410.400 Sea. Govt.- City Clerk/Tress.
511J00. Pages - Regular Employees
31,701.00
31,701.00
23,508.38
2,640.00
- .00
8,192.62
74.2
512.000 Rages - Temporary Enloyees'
4,000.00
4,000.00
.00
.00
.00
4,000.00
.0
513.000 Rages - Overtime
500.00
SCUD
.00
.00:
.00
S00.00
.0
521.000 Group Tesuramce
5,271.00
5,271.00
4,248.70
41.30
.00
1,022.30
80.6
522.000 FICA Cootributioms
2,42S.00
2,425.00
1,798.40
201.96
.00
626.60
74.2
523.000 PERA Contributions
1,642.00
1,642.00
1,214.21
136.76
.00
437.79
73.3
526.000 Yorkers Compensation Insurance
21S.00
21S.00
-43.80
.00
.00
2S8.80
-20.4
S33.300 Accounting
.00
.00
2,270.00
S9S.00
.00
-2,270.40
.0
S33.400 Amditiog Services
6,S00.00
6,500.00
6,500.00
, .00
.00
.00
100.0
S33.700 Copy Nackine Naiteaance
1,200.00
1,200.00
448.78
128.8S
.00
7S1.22
37.4
S33.900 Other Prof. Contract Services
750.00
MOM
.00
.00
.00
750.00
.0
S43.100 Repairs78ainteance - Equipsm
S00.00
SO0.00
93.00
.00
.00
407.00
18.6
S44.200 Equipment Rental
1,000.00
1,000.00
467.28
.00
.00
S32.72
46.7
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE
REPORT
Dates 09/30/98
Time;
4:51pa
CITY Of ALBERTVILLE
Page:
3
For the Period: 08/01/98 to 08/31/18 Original Budget
Amended Budget
/TO Actual
Carr Nth
Encumbered YTO
Unenc. Balance
,I Bud
Food: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 410.400 Gen. Govt.- City Clerk/Tress.
SS2.000 Insurance Other than Emp. Bene
3,000.00
3,000.00
-2SI.40
.00
.00
3,2S1.40
-8.4
5S8.000 Travel
S00.00
SOO.00
346.91
25.81
.00
153.09
69.4
S61.100 General Supplies
3,300.00
3,300.00
1,450.41
50.32
.00
1,849.59
44.0
561.300 Training/lnstrvetional Supplys
I50.00
ISOM
284.00
.00 _
.00
-134.00
189.3
561.400 Postage
1,200.00
1,200.00
584.21
-26S.79
.00
615.79
48.7
574.300 Capital Outlay-Furniturersnst
200.00
200.00
SO.96
.00
.00
149.04
25.5
S91.000 Oats & Subscriptions -,
60.00
60.00
30.00
.00
.00
30.00
SO.O
592.000 Elections
3,200.00
3,200.00
.00
.00
.Do...-..
3,200.00
.0
744.000 CapitaL Outlay !. Offjceauxtss _.
5,000.00
S,OOO.00
7,130.20
1,330.00.
.00
-2,130.20
142.6
Gen..Govt.- City Clerk/Trees.
72,314.00
72,314.00.
S0,120.24
4,884.21
.00
22,193.76
69.3
Dept: 410.5SO Gen. Gout.- Assessing
S31.100 Assessing Contract Services
7,3SO.00
7,350.00
7,890.7S
.00
.00
-S40J5
107.4
Gen. Govt.- Assessing
7,3SO.00
7,350.00
7,890.75
.00
.00
-S40.7S
107.4
Dept: 410.600 Gen. Govt. - City Attorney
S33.500 legal Service: General/Neetiag
18,000.00
18,000.00
7,821.60
440.00_
.00
10,178.40
43.5
S33.SO1 Developer Reinbnrsible
.00
.00
S,610.00
2,14S.00
.00
-5,610.00
.0
S33.502 Reinbnrsible - Capital Project
.00
.00
247.50
..Do
.00
1 -247.50
_ ..D
Gen. Govt. - City Attorney
18,000.00
18,000.00
13,679.10
2,SBS.00
.00
4,320.90
76.0
Dept: 410.700 City Engineer
533.100 Engineer: Projects/Meetings
1S,000.00
1S,000.00
2S,434.40
7,SS9.04
.00
-10,434.40
169.6
S33.101 Reinbursible - Developer
.00
.00
3,814.90
1,024.40
.00
-3,814.90
.0
S33.102 Reinbnrsible -Capital Projects
.00
.00
2,008.DO
.00
.00
-2,000.00
- .0
City Engineer
1S,000.00
IS,000.00
31,249.30
8,S83.44
.00
-16,249.30
208.3
Dept: ,410.800 Economic Development Authority
S11.000 Yages - Regular Employees
480.00
480.00
-1.64
20.00
.00
481.64
-.3
522.000 FICA Contributions
37.00
37.00
16.83
1.53
.00
20.17
4S.S
5S8.000 Travel
100.00
100.00
.00
.00
.00
100.40
.0
561.100 General Supplies
100.00
100.00
.00
.00
.00
100.00
.0
S61.300 Training/Instructional Supplys
100.00
100.00
.00
.00
00
100.00
.0
S99.000 Niscellaneous
10,000.00
14,000.00
923.91
.00
.00
9,076.09
9.2
Economic Development Authority
10,817.00
10,817.00
939.10
21.S3"
.00
9,877.90
8.7
Dept: 410.910 Gen. Govt. - Planning I Zoning
S11.000 Mages - Regular Employees
1,200.00,
1,200.00
660.00
80.00
00
140.00
5S.0
S22.ODO FICA_Contrt� utions
92.00
92.00
SO.49
6.12
.00
41.51
S4.9
5 ACO Planner: City Projects/Neetiog �M
15,000.00
15,000.00
8,511.46
1,589.06
*00
W 16,41234
S6;.8
533.601 Reinbnrsible - Developer
.00
.00
10,202.24
1,594.30
p
.Do
-10,202.24
.0
SS8.000 Travel
SOO.00
SOO.00
.DO
.00
.DO, .
_.: Soo 0.cc
.0
S61.100 General Supplies
200.00
200.00
-30.00'
.00
.00
230.00
-15.0
561.300 Tralaing/Instructional Supplys
500.80
SOO.00
00
00
00
SOO.DO
.0
Gen. Govt. - Planning & Zoning
17,492.00
17,492.00
19,400.19
3,269.48
.00
-1,908.19
110.9
Dept: 410.920 Gen. Govt. - Buildings & Plant
.
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE
REPORT
Date: 09/30/98
Tise:
Mips
CITY OF ALB€RTVIt1E
Page:
4
For the Period: 08/01/90 to 08/31/98
Original Budget
headed Budget
YTO Actual
Carr Nth
lumbered YTO
Unenc. Balance
I Bud
Fund: 101 General Fund
-..-_
..._ ..........
Expenditures
Dept: 410.920 Ges. Govt. - Buildings 3
Plant
S42.000 Refuse Disposal
600.00
600.00
370.S1
46.51
.00
229.49
61.8
S43.100 Repairs/Raiateance - fquipmt
500.00
S00.00
.00
.00
.00
S00.00
.0
S43.200 Repairs/Nainteance - Building
1,000.00
4,000.00
101.11
.00
.00
3,898.89
2.5
SS2.000 Insurance Other than Esp. Bent
3,600.00
3,600.00
-2S1.40
.DO
.00-
3,851.40
-7.0
553,000 Telephone
2,S00.00
2,S00.00
1,710.60
239.61
.00
789.40
68.4
561.100 General Supplies
1,200.00
1,200.00
S78.S3
30.72
.00
621.47
48.2
S62.100 Natural Gas
1,500.00
1,500.00
349.86
12.80
.00
1,19:14
23.3
562.200 Electricity
2,500.00
2,S00.00
1,748.52
389.4S
.00
7S1.48
69.9
S72.000 Capital Outlay - Buildingsxstx
1,000.00
1,000.00
751.S7
.00
.00
248.43
75.2
573.000 Capital Outlay/Noa-buildingsxs
1,000.00
1,000.00
.Do
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
574.100 Capital Outlay-Nach/Equiptxtxs
500.00
S00.00
.00
.00
.00
500.00
.0
S74.300 Capital Outlay-Furniturexxxsts
1,100.00
1,100.00
.00
.00
.00
1,100.00
.0
S99.000 Miscellaneous
41.00
41.00
126.00
.00
.00
. -85.00
307.3
Gen. Govt. - Buildings 6, Plant
20,041.00
20,041.00
^S,48S.30
719.09
.00
-. 14,555 70
.`27.4
Dept: 421.000 Public Safety - Police
;IV 20D Police Contract Services
103,806.00
103,106.00
69,204.00
8,650.50
00
34,602,00
66.7 .
Public Safety - Police
103,806.00
104006.00
69,204.00
..................
, 8,6SO.SO
.................
00
34,602.00
......
66.7
Dept: 422.000 Public Safety - Fire
S10.200 Vages - fire Chief
600.00
600.00
.00
.00
.00
600.00
.0
510.300 Nages - Assistant Fire Chief
300.00
300.00
.00
.00
.00
300.00
.0
510.400 Firesea's Training Reishurseat
8,250.00
8,2SO.00
.00
.00
.00
8,2SO.00
.0
S10.S00 Firms's Nedical Training
2,2SO.00
2,2SO.00
'00
.00
.00
2,2SO.00
.0
512.000 Vages - Tesporary Esloyees
9,000.00
9,000.00
3,969.00
2,S27.00
.00
S,031.00
44.1
S24.000 Pension Fund Contributions
.17,846.00
17,846.00
3,430.SO
3,430.58
.00
14,41530
19.2
.526.000 Yorkers Cospensation Insurance
2,8S0.00
2,BS0.00
-43.80
.00
.00
2,893.80
-1.5
527.000 Unifors Service
.00
.00
189.10
189.10
.00
-189.10
.0
S29.001_Firms Physicalstxxxxutmst
S00.00
S00.00
2,143.2S
65.00
.00
-1,643.2S
428.7
S29.100 Training/Iostrsctioa
3,600.00
3,600.00
1,757.50
.00
.00
1,842:50
.48.8
529.200 ENT Trainisgxxmxxsxixxxum
7SO.00
150.00
290.00
.00
.00
460.00
38.7
529.300 First Responders Trainingtim
1,000.00
1,000.00
702.00
.00
.00
298.00
70.2
533.410 Audit- Firma's Relief Assoc
1,200.00
1,200.00
900,00
900.00
.00
300.00
75.0
S43.100 Repairs/Nainteaace - Equipsm
1,000.00
1,000.00
1,Som
.00
.00
-547.71
1S6.8
SS2.000 Insurance Other than Esp. Beat
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
SS3.000 Telephone
600.00
600.00
346.78
42.07
.00
2S3.22
S7.8
SS8.000 Travel
i,S00.00
1,S00.00
434.99
.00
.00
1,06S.01
29.0
S61.100 General Supplies
2,S00.00
2,S00.00
3,062.33
.00
.00
-S62.33
122.5 -
562.100 Natural Gas
1,400.00
- .1,400.00
403.19
_14.40
_ .00
996.81
28.8
562.200 Electricity
900.00
900.00
SOO.SS
62.8S
.00
399.4S
S5.6
S62.600 Gasoline and Oil
B00.00
880.00
S38.10
81.29
.00
261.90
67.3
S72.000 Capital Outlay - Buildingsssst
30,000.00
30,000.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
.00
20,000.00
33.3
S74.110 C/O - Nosesixtxtxxxxixxxuxtu
1,S00.00
1,SDO.00
697.00
.00
DO
803.00
46.5
-S74.120 C/O - Turnoot Geartxxxxmitst
2,500.00
2,S00.00
4,141.1S
950.00
.00
-1,641.15
165.6
S74.130 C/O - Air Packstxxxsxxxmms ;
2,600.00
2,600.00
WOO
00
.00
2,S1S.00
3.3
S74,,,1,f0_C/O - Pagerstmmsxmimsx
1,000.00
1,000.00
s81.36
484.3d
00
515.64
48.4
S74.160 C/O - Toolstimit xxxmstixx
f 1,000.00
;. I,OD0.00
._
.00
.00
100.
1,000,60
0
S76.200 Capital Outlay - Vehiclesxtxxx
30,000.00
30,000.00
.00
.00
.00
30,000.00
_ .0
S91.60, Dues 5 Subscriptions
200.00
200.00
94.50
.00
.00
105-SO
47.3
REVENUE/EXPENOITURE REPORT
Dater 09/30/98
list:
4:51pm
CITY OF ALBERTVIIIE
Page:
5
For the Period: 08/01/98 to 08/31/18 Original Budget
Amended Budget
YTO Actual
Corr Nth
Eocusbered YTO
Uneac. Balance
I Bud
Food: 101 General Fund
- -------------------------------•----•------------------..-------
Expenditures
Dept: 422.000 Public Safety • Fire
Public.Safety - Fire
12S,646.00
12S,646.00
3S,693.21
18,746.S7
.00
89,9S2.79
20.4
Dept: 424.000 Public Safety -Bldg. Inspectiop
S33.200 Bldg. Inspection Contract Sery
25,000.00
2S,000.00
39,771.17
8,772.83
.00
-14,779.17
159.1
-----------------
Public Safety -Bldg. Inspection
25,000.00
25,000.00
39,771.17
- --------------------------
8,772.83
---------
.00
------
-14,779.17
------
159.1
Dept: 427.000 Public Safety - Wall Control
S35.100 Contracted Services
3,000.00
3,000.00
1,S84.00
72.00
.00
1,416.00
52.8
Public Safety - Aninal.Cootrol
3,000.00
3,000.00
- ------------------
1,584.00
-----------------
72.00
----------l------
.00
1,416.00
------
52.8
Dept: 431.000 Public Yorks-Higbways,Streets
S11.000 Nages - Regular Employets
29,848.00
29,848.00
20,S45.S4
2,388.80
.00
9,302.46
68.8
S12.000 Nages - Temporary Enloyees
2,000.00
2,000.00
400.00
.00
.00
1,600.00
20.0
S13.000 Nages - Overtime
SOO.00
S00.00
240.74
.00 _
00..
259.26
48.1
S21.000 Group Insurance
5, woc
S,256.00
3,853.72
41.30
.00
1,402.28
73.3
S22.000 FICA Contributions
2,285.00
2,285.00
1,602.33
182.74
.00
682.67
70.1
523.000 PERA Contributions
1,S46.00
1,S46.00
1,107.24
123.74
.00
438.16
71.7
526.000 Norkers Compeasation Insurance
2,352.00
2,3S2.00
-43.80
.00
.00
2,395.80
-1.9
S27.000 Usiform Service
.00
.00
127.57
29.62
.00
=127.S7
.0
533 900 Other Prof. Contract Services
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
543.100 Repairs/Nainteance - Equiptttt
9,000.00
1,000.00
3,332.95
76.83
.,00
5,667.OS
37.0
543.340 RepairstNaateoace-Pavedgads
6,000.00 f
6,000.00
89.11
00.
va'. .
; 00
S,910,891
1.5
543.310 Ice Reeoval
3 000,00_
3,000.00
.00
.00
.00
3,000.00
:0
S43.320 Snow Plowing
3,500.DQ'-<.
3,500.00
.00
e_ 00_.,_
. .00
3,500.00
4
S43.330 Sand 6 Gravel
700.00
700.00
171.00
.00
Do.
S29.00
24.4
S43.340 Seal Cmatingtmtstttstttuttt
8,000.00
f8,000.00
1,037.42
.00
.00
6,96238
13.0
S43.360 Street Sweeping
2,800.00
2,800.00
2,341.03
.00
.00
4S8.97
83.6
54MOO Repairs/Aaistenace-Unpaved Rds
6,000.00
6,000.00
3,186.24
2S2.86
.00
2,813.76
SM
S43:S00 Reapir/Naistenance - Sidevalks
S,000.00
S,000.00
5,000.00
S,000.00
.00
.00
100.0
S43.600 Repairs/Naiotenance-CatchOasia
S,000.00
S,600.00
.00
.00
.00
S,000.00
0
SMOOO Telephone
ISO.00
7S0.00
06.76
S3.66
,00
293.24
60.1
5S8.000 Travel
100.00
100.00
16.13
.00
.00
83.87
16.1
S61.100 General Supplies
2,400.00
2,400.00
1,230.89
161.16
.00
1,169.11
51.3
561.300 Training/lastructional Supplys
S00.00
SOO.00
343.7S
.00
.00
1S6.2S
68.8
562,100 Natural Gas
898.00
898.00
281.41
4.79
.00
61631
31.3
562.200 Electricity
276.00
276.00
166.86
20.9S
.00
101.14
60.3
562.600 Gasoline and Oil
3,480.00
3,480.00
1,429.04
327.91
.00
2,050.96
41.1
S72.000 Capital Outlay - Buildingstm
9,005.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
,514:111 Tractor/loadertsmsmssst:is
2,000.00
2,000.00
32,935.12
.00
.00
f
-30,93S.12
sst.t
S74.170 Street OverlayetaM utttttts
50,000.00
55,008.00
3,277.00
3,04S.00
.00
46,723.00
6.6
514.180 Street Signsitmittuttutttt
300.00
300.00
.00
.00
.00
300.00
.0
S74.211 Nowerstummtttttttttnmt
1,000.00
1'"0.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
S74.311 Pickupsttttttstutttttitsttttt
3,000.00
3,"0.00
.00
_.00
.00
3,000.00
.0
S74.411 Soon Plootimi mmmst
4,000.00
4,000.00
.40
.00
.00
_4,.000.00
.0
574311 Nisc. C/o Egwipseottmttssts
2,S00.00
2,S00.00
832.49
300.00
.00
1,661.S1
33.3
591.000 Dues 6 Subscriptions
.. 2SO.00
MOM
21S.00
.00
.00
3S.00
86.0
Public Norks-Nighuays,Streets
173,241.00
-----------------------------
173,241.00
----------------•
84,176.22
.................
12,001.36
.................
.00
81,064.78
......
48.6
Dept: 431.600 Public Yorks - Street lighting
•
REVENUE/11PENBITURE REPORT
Date: 09/30/98
Tiae:
4:51ps
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
Page:
6
----------------.---------- ------
For the Period. 08/01/91 to 08/31/98
-------------------------------
Original Budget
Auaded Budget
-----------------------
- r YTO Actual
---------------------
Corr ith
------------------------
Encusbered YTO
Uwe. Balance
Y Bud
---%---------
Fund: 101-6eneral Fund
-------- ---
--------- -
----------------------
--
- .-.-
-----------
Expenditures
Dept: 431.600 Public Yorks - Street Lighting
542.200 Electricity
28,000.00
28,000.00
16,849.89
2,397.63
..DO
11,1SD.11
60.2
Public Norks - Street lighting
28,000.00
28,000.00
-------------------------------------------
16,849.89
2,397.63
-----------------
.00
11,1SO.11
------
60.2
Dept: 432.300 Public Norks - Recycling
535.100 Contracted Services
14,580.00
14,580.00
8,505.00
1,215.00
< .00
6,07S.00
58.3
Public Vorks Recycling
14,S80.00
14,580.00
--------
8,S05.04 __.-..___
-__-_
_1,215.00 ___---_00
6,07S.00
58.3
Dept: 4S].000 Parks and Recreation
S11.000 Nages - Regular Esployees
27,040.00
27,04040
16,802.00
2,216.00
.00
10,238.00
62.1
513.000 Rages - Overtise
.00
.00
198.00
.DO
.00
-198.00
.0
521.000 Group Insurance
5,450.00
5,4SO.00
3,898.08
41.30
.00
-1 SS1.92
71.5
522.040 FICA Contributions
2,069.00
2,069.00
1,28S.38
169.54
.00
783.62
62.1
523.404 PERA Contributions
1,401.00
1,401.00
807.50
114.78
.00
S93.50
57.6
S26.000 Yorkers Cospensatiou Insurance
2,352.00
2,3S2.00
-43.80
.00
.00
2,39S.80
-1.9
527.000 Uniforn Service
.00
.00
127.58
29.62
.00
-127.S8
.0
S42.000 Refuse Disposal
540.00 -
S40.00
370.SO
46.51
.00
169.50
68.6
543.100 Repairs/Maiateasce - Equiptttt
8,200.00
8,200.00
3,050.73
.00
.00
5,149.27
37.2
543.200 Repairs/Naiateaace - Building
.00
.00
99.98
.00
.00
-99.98
.0
544.200 Equipseat Rental
2,500.00
2,5DO.00
971.30
215.70
.00
1,528.70
38.9
SS2.000 Insurance Other than Up. Bene
3,300.00
3,300.00
-251.40
.00
.00
3,SSi.40
-7.6
553.000 Telephone
700.00
700.00_
429.06
37.77
.00
270.94
61.3
558.000 Travel
.00
.00
43.71
.00
.00
-43.71
.0
561.100 General Supplies
800.00
800.00
1,330.10
165.27
.DO
-530.10
166.3
561.300 Traising/Instructional Sapplys
.00
.00
35.00
.00
.00
-3S.00
.0
562.100 Natural Gas
1,43S.00
1,435.00
229.66
5.33
.00
1,20S.34
16.0
S62.200 Electricity
2,621.00
2,621.00
1,324.44
130.17
.00
1,296.56
SO.S
562.600 Gasoline and oil
100.00
100.00
69.55
00
.00
. 30.45
69.6
S72.000 Capital Betlay - enildag$uts
1,000,00
1,000.00
916.07
.00
.00
83.93
91.6
S73.000 Capital Qntlay/Non-boil ipgsu;.
7,134.0,E , __
7,134.04
12,131.95
3,181.28
.00-
-4,447,95
I70.1
574.100 Capital Outlay-Nach/Egaipttsu
1,000.00
1,000.00
400.00
00
00
104.00
90.0 -
599.000 Miscellaneous
3,800.04
3,800.D4
1,574-39
.00
.DO
2,225.21
41.4
Parks and Recreation,__;_
.................
71,442.00
-----------------
71,442.00
-----------------
46,300.26
-----------------
6,359.27
.................
.00
25 141.74
------
64.8
Dept: 4SS.000 Culture/Recreation
S91.000 Dues 6 Subscriptions
750.00
750.00
500.00
.00
.00
2SO.00
66.7
S9S.000 Friendly City Days Donation
4,2SO.00
4,2SO.00
5,500.00
.00
.00
-1,250.00
129.4
597.000 Ice Arena Funding
15,040.00
1S,000.00
133,333.33
133,333.33
.00
-118,333.33
888.9
Culture/Recreation
20,000.00
--------------------
20,000.00
-----------------
139,333.33
-----------------
133,333.33
---------------
.00
-
119 333.33
------
696.7
Dept: 490,000 Marking Capital
S90.000 Norking Capital Reserve
74,257.00
74,2S7.00
.00
.00
.00
74,257.00
.0
lurking Capital
74,257.00 1
74,2S7.00
.00
.00
.00
74,2S7.00
Expenditures
.................
886,025.00
-----------------
886,42S.00
----------------------------------
629,475.90
219,837.72
-----------------
.00
------
256 S49.10
71.0
CLAIMS
FOR PAYMENT
September 21,1998
Check No.
Vendor
Purpose
Amount
10988
AirTouch Cellular
PW & FD Cell Phones
$
8.38
10989
Albertville Fire Relief
State Fire Aid
$
12,257.00
10990
Allina Medical Group
Hepatitis Shots
$
65.00
10991
Anoka Technical College
Accountability Course
$
150.00
10992
B & B Sheet Metal & Roofing
Reroof City Hall
$
11,945.00
10993
Buffalo Bituminous
Street Overlay - Partial Payment
$
64,718.77
10994
Court & MacArthur
Legal Service
$
4,125.00
10995
Danko Emergency Equipment
Turn Out Gear
$
150.00
10996
Delta Dental
Group Insurance
$
206.50
10997
Don's Auto Service
Gas & Repairs
$
248.34
10998
Erickson Chevrolet
1998 Chevrolet Pickup
$
34,180.43
10999
Goeb, Linda
Mileage
$
17.40
11000
Harvest Printing
F.D. Brochures
$
51.23
11001
Lund, David
Mileage
$
85.76
11002
Medica
Group Insurance
$
1,816.31
11003
Midwest Landscaping
Trees - Women of Today
$
268.38
11004
Minnegasco
Monthly Service
$
36.98
11005
Minnesota Copy Systems
Copy Use 7/25 - 9/24
$
86.50
11006
MN Department of Revenue
September Taxes
$
590.04
11007
Minnesota PCA
Class C License Renewal
$
40.00
11008 '
NCPERS Group Life Ins.
Payroll Deduction
$
12.00
11009
Newman Traffic Signs
Speed Limit Signs
$
16.99
11010
Northwest Carpet
Cleaning City Hall carpets
$
219.39
11011
PERA
9/12 - 9/25
$
425.18'
11012
Pats 66
F. D. Gas
$
13.00
11013
Pitney Bowes
Balance of Lease Payment
$
12.00
11014
PSG
October WWTF Operations
$
8,059.50
11015
Security State Bank of ML
September Federal Taxes
$
4,424.20
1,1016
Sprint
long Distance Calls
$
24.07
11017
Sprint-UTS
Local Service
$
327.60
CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT
September 21,1998
11018
Uniforms Unlimited F.D. Shirts
$
152.20
11019
USCM Midwest Deferred Comp
$
306.10
11020
Weber Oil Company Reissue of Check #8986
$
25.00
11021
Wright County Treasurer 2nd Half Tax Payments
$
2,768.70
11022
Wright County Treasurer October Police
$
8,650.50
11023
Wright Hennepin Electric Greenhaven Street Lights
$
22.24
TOTAL
$
166,606.68
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
RESOLUTION # 1998-18
A RESOLUTION CHANGING STREET NAME
WHEREAS, the City Council of Albertville has identified an error in the
n
naming of a street in the Center Oaks 2d Addition plat; and
WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of having the Center Oaks-2nd
Addition plat amended in order that the street names comply with adjoining plats.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City
of Albertville hereby renames "Karston Street" as shown on the Center Oaks 2'
Addition plat "Karston Avenue NE".
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
THIS 5th DAY OF OCTOBER� 1998.
Mark S. Olsen, Mayor
Linda Goeb, City Clerk
4(d)
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
RESOLUTION # 1998-19
A RESOLUTION APPOINTING ELECTION JUDGES FOR
GENERAL ELECTION
FOR THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council is desirous of appointing election
judges to serve in the General Election scheduled in 1998; and
WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council is appointing election judges to
serve the General Election to be held on November 3, 1998.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City
of Albertville hereby appoints the following persons to serve in the capacity of
election judges at an hourly rate of $8.00.
Denise Beaudry
Charlene Zachman
Elaine Engstrom
Donatus Vetsch
Janet Berning
Sharon Anderson
David Lund
Linda Goeb
Carolyn Bauer
Patricia Stalberger
Michael Potter
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
THIS 56 DAY OF OCTOBER.1998.
Mark_S. Olsen, Mayor
Linda Goeb, City Clerk
f
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
September 1- September 30,1998
Beginning Cash Balance August 31, 1998 $201,148.09
Income:
Building Permits 47,018.02
Business Licenses 3,125.00
Disaster Payment 6,062.00
Donations 3,300.00
Fire Aid 12,257.00
Insurance Recovery 6,898.94
Interest (For August) 452.78
Loan Repayment 689.06
Park Dedication Fees 8,878.00
Piper Jaffrey Settlement 1,557.55
Planning Fees 550.00
TAC Fees 10,505.00
Title Search 80.00
Utility Bills 2,598.87
Miscellaneous 47.25
Total Income 104,019.47
Voided Check #10969 10.59
Expenses:
Check Ws 10904 - 10929 24,139.40
(Approved 9/8/98)
Check #s 10944-10971 49,975.94
(Approved 9/21 /98
Preapproved Checks) 19,983.66
Total Expenses 94,099.00
Ending Cash Balance September 30,1998 $211,079.15
INVESTMENTS
CD #9226 - Development Corporation matures 10/25/98 7,807.27
CD #300116 AFD — matures 12/26/98 @ 4.7% 25,773.79
CD #22202 - matures 4/6/99 @ 6.12% 589,516.62
Dain Bosworth Investments (8/31/98) 1,327,094.05
TOTAL INVESTMENTS $1,950,191.73
Money Market Savings Account (8/31/98) 678,366.79
Kern, DeWenter, Were., Ltd. D;mm,;.DodCexbrf
David H. Nina *amp
Certified Public Accountants ChrisW*rP a
August 28,1998
Mr. David Lund, Administrator
Ms Linda Goeb, Clerk -Treasurer
City of Albertville
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
We are pleased to confirm our understanding of the services we are to provide to the City of
Albertville for the year ending December 31, 1998. We will audit the general purpose financial
statements of the City of Albertvilleas of and for the year ending December 31, 1998. Also, the
document we submit to you will include the following additional information that will be
subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the general purpose financial
statements
1. Combining and Individual Fund Financial Statements
The document will also include the following additional information that will not be subjected to
F M the auditing procedures applied in our audit of the general purpose financial statements, and for
which our accountants report will disclaim an opinion:
I. General Fixed Assets Account Group
2. Supplementary Information
Throughout the remainder of this letter, references to Government Auditing Standards apply only
if the City has received any federal funding; whereas references to the Single Audit Act of 1996,
'`OMB Circular A-133, OMB Compliance Supplement, major programs and grant agreements
apply only if the City has received $300,000 or more of federal financial assistance.
.The objective of our audit is the expression of an opinion as to whether the general purpose
financial statements are fairly presented, in all material respects, in with generally
accepted accounting principles and to report on the fairness of the additional information referred
to in the first paragraph when considered in relation to the general purpose financial statements
taken as a whole. The objective also includes reporting .on the City of Albertville's compliance
with laws and regulations and the provisions of contracts and grant agreements and its internal
controls as required by the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular A-133,
Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non -Profit Organizations. Our audit will be
conducted in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards; the standards for financial
audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the
United States; the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996; and the provisions of OMB Circular
;A-133. and will include tests of the accounting records ofthe City of Albertville and other
procedures we consider necessary to enable us to express such an opinion and to render the
s # required Single Audit reports. If our opinion on the general purpose financial statements or the
Single Audit compliance opinion is other than unqualified, we will fully discuss the reasons with
you in advance. If, for any reason, we are unable to complete the audit or are unable to express
A
220 Park Avenue South P.O. Box im St. Cloud, MN 56302
320-251-7010 FAX 320-251-1784
2
an opinion, we may decline to express an opinion or may not issue a report as a result of this
engagement.
The management of the City of Albertville is responsible for establishing and maintaining
internal control. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are
required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of the controls. The objectives of
internal control are to provide management with reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that
assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition, that transactions are
executed in accordance with management's authorizations and recorded properly to permit the
preparation of general purpose financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that federal award programs are managed in compliance with
applicable laws and regulations and the provisions of contracts and grant agreements.
In planning and performing our audits, we will consider the internal control sufficient to plan the
audit in order to determine the nature, timing, and extent of our auditing procedures for the
the 's general se financial statements and on its
expressing our opinions on City's se of x
P� P g P tY g P�
compliance with requirements applicable to major programs.
We will obtain an understanding of the design of the relevant controls and whether they have
been placed in operation, and we will assess control risk. Tests of controls may be performed to
test the effectiveness of certain controls that we consider relevant to preventing and detecting
errors and fraud that are material to the general purpose financial statements and to preventing
and detecting misstatements resulting from illegal acts and other noncompliance matters that
have a direct and material effect on the general purpose financial statements. (Tests of controls
are required only if control risk is assessed below the maximum level.) Our tests, if performed,
will be less in. scope than would be necessary to render an opinion on internal control and,
accordingly, no opinion will be expressed.
We will perform tests of controls, as required by OMB Circular A-133, to evaluate the
effectiveness of the design and operation of controls that we consider relevant to preventing or
detecting material noncompliance with compliance requirements, applicable to each of the City's
major federal award programs. Our tests will be less in scope that would be necessary to render
an opinion on these controls and, accordingly, no opinion will be expressed.
An audit is not designed to provide assurance on internal control or to identify reportable
conditions. However, we will inform the governing body or audit committee of any matters
involving internal control and its operation that we consider to be reportable conditions under
standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Reportable
conditions involve matters coming to our attention relating to significant deficiencies in the
design or operation of the internal control that, in our judgment, could adversely affect the
entity's ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial data consistent with the
assertions of management in the general purpose financial statements. We will also inform you
of any nonreportable conditions or other matters involving internal control, if any, as required by
OMB Circular A-133.
Identifying and ensuring that the City of Albertville complies with laws, regulations, contracts,
and agreements, including grant agreements, is the responsibility. of management. As part of
obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the general purpose financial statements are free
of material misstatement, we will perform tests of the City's compliance with applicable laws
and regulations and the provisions of contracts and agreements, including grant agreements.
However, the objective of our audit will not be to provide an opinion on overall compliance and
we will not express such an opinion.
k
Our audit will be conducted in accordance with the standards referred to in the second paragraph.
OMB Circular A-133 requires that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
t C • 3
about whether the auditee has complied with applicable laws and regulations and the provisions
of contracts and grant agreements applicable to major programs. Our procedures will consist of
the applicable procedures described in the OMB's compliance supplement. The purpose of these
procedures will be to express an opinion on the City's compliance with requirements applicable
to major programs.
-({ ur procedures will include tests of documentary evidence supporting the transactions recorded
_r in the accounts, and may include tests of the physical existence of inventories, and direct
confirmation of receivables and certain other assets and liabilities by correspondence with
selected individuals, creditors, and financial institutions. We will request written representations
from your attorneys as part of the engagement, and they may bill you for responding to this
inquiry. At the conclusion of our audit, we will also require certain written representations from
you about the financial statements and related matters.
An audit includes examining, ona. test basis, evidence supporting the amount and disclosures in
the financial statements; therefore, our audit will involve judgment about the number of
transactions to be examined and the areas to be tested. We will plan and perform the audit to
'obtain reasonable rather than absolute assurance about whether the financial statements are free
of material misstatement, whether caused by error or fraud. As required by the Single Audit Act
Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular A-133, our audit will include tests of transactions
related to federal award programs for compliance with applicable laws and regulations and the
provisions of contracts and grant agreements. Because of the concept of reasonable assurance
and because we will not perform a detailed examination of all transactions, there is a risk that a
material misstatement may exist and not be detected by us. In addition, an audit is not designed
detect errors, fraud, or other illegal acts that are immaterial to the general purpose financial
t _ AV- statements or to major programs. However, we will inform you of an material errors and an
j P l�s• Y Y y
=' fraud that comes to our attention. We will also inform you of any other illegal acts that come to
our attention, unless clearly inconsequential. We will include such matters in the reports
required for a Single Audit. Our responsibility as auditors is limited to the period covered by our
audit and does not extend to matters that might arise during any later periods for which we are
not engaged as auditors.
An audit of the general purpose financial statements performed in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards is not designed to determine whether the computer systems of the
City of Albertville are Year 2000 compliant, or to provide any assurance on whether the City of
Albertville has addressed all of the affected systems on a timely basis. Further, we have no
responsibility with regard to the systems of vendors, service providers, or any other third parties.
These are responsibilities of the City's management. However, we may choose to communicate
matters that come to our attention relating to the Year 2000 issue.
Management is responsible for making all financial records and related information available to
us. We understand that you will provide us with such information required for our audit and that
you are responsible for the accuracy and completeness of that information. We will advise you
about appropriate accounting principles and their application and will assist in the preparation of
your financial statements,' but the responsibility for the financial statements remains with you.
That responsibility includes the establishment and maintenance of adequate records and effective
internal control over financial reporting, the selection and application of accounting principles,
and the safeguarding of assets. Additionally, as required by OMB Circular A-133, you will
prepare the summary of prior audit findings. This schedule should be available for our review.
We understand that your employees will prepare all cash or other confirmations we request and
will locate any invoices selected by us for testing.
w*The workpapers for this engagement are the property of Kern, DeWenter, Viere, Ltd. and
,k constitute confidential information. However, we may be requested to make certain workpapers
m,
4
r
.available to Cognizant or Grantor Agencies pursuant. to authority. given to it by law o regulation.
If requested, access to such workpapers will be provided under the supervision of Kern,
DeWenter, Viere, Ltd. personnel. Furthermore, upon request, we may provide photocopies of
selected workpapers to the Cognizant or Grantor Agency. The Cognizant or Grantor Agency
may intend, or decide; to distribute the photocopies or information contained therein to others,
including other governmental agencies.
Our fee for these services will be at our standard hourly rates except that we agree that our gross
fee, including expenses, will not exceed $ 7,000. Our standard hourly rates vary according to the
degree of responsibility involved and the experience level of the personnel assigned to your
audit. Our invoices for these fees will be rendered each month as work progresses and are
payable on presentation. The above fee is based on anticipated cooperation from your personnel
and the assumption that unexpected circumstances will not be encountered during the audit. If
significant additional time is necessary, we will discuss it with you and arrive at a new fee
estimatebefore we incur the additional costs. if the City of Albertville receives $300,000 or
more of federal financial assistance, which would subject it to the Single Audit Act of 1996, we
will negotiate a fee with you. Fees for these engagements typically vary between $500 and
$ 1,500, depending on the type of program.
Government Auditing Standards require that we provide you with a copy of our most recent
quality control review report. Our 1996 peer review report accompanies this letter if
Government Auditing Standards are applicable and if you have not received a copy of our peer
review report in a previous year.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to the City of Albertville and believe this letter
accurately summarizes the significant terms of our engagement. If you have any questions,
please let us know. If you agree with the terms of our engagement as described in this letter,
please sign the enclosed copy and return it to us.
Sincerely,
KERN, DEWENTER, WERE LTD.
David ffinnenkamp
Certified Public Accountant
RESPONSE:
This letter correctly sets forth the understanding of the City of Albertville.
By:
Title:
Date:
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
September 9, 1998
Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM
PRESENT: Chair Howard Larson, Commission Members Carolyn Bauer, Dan
Robertus, Jim Brown, and Patti Stalberger, Zoning Administrator David Lund, Deputy
Zoning Administrator Linda Goeb, City Attorney Michael Couri, City Engineer Pete
Carlson, and City Planner Liz Stockman
Chair Larson called the regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission to
order.
Stalberger made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Bauer seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
Approval of the minutes of the August 11, 1998, was tabled until the next
Planning & Zoning Commission meeting.
Chair Larson opened the public hearing to consider the Conditional use Permit
request to allow Bernard and Theolinda Richter to construct a 14' X 20' shed on their
property located at 11577 56d' Street NE.
An existing 8' x 12' storage shed will be removed and they plan to use the new
shed for personal storage only.
Chair Larson called for comments from the public. There was none.
Chair Larson closed the public hearing.
Brown made a motion to approve the Findings of Fact & Recommendation,
recommending approval of the Conditional Use Permit for Bernard and Theolinda
Richter to allow them to construct a 14' x 20' storage shed on their property at 11577 56 h
Street NE. Bauer seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Chair Larson opened the public hearing to consider the preliminary and final plat
of Psyk's 7t' Addition.
The plat consists of 29 single family lots and extends the existing portion of 53'd
Street NE to Main Avenue. City Planner Liz Stockman stated that a variance for the
street intersection offset will be necessary.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMUSSION
September 9,1998
Page 2 of 4
If the variance were not granted for the street offset, several lots would become non-
conforming and would require variances. City Engineer Pete Carlson indicates that the
street jog is the best option to pursue.
A grade -separated trail will be required on the north side of 53rd Street as a portion
of the park dedication fees.
Chair Larson called for comments from the public.
Terry Harrington asked if existing homes in the area would be assessed for any
costs. The answer is no.
Several residents requested that a stop sign be installed at the intersection of
Lambert Avenue and 53rd Street.
There were no further comments from the public, and Chair Larson closed the
public hearing at 7:05 PM.
Stalberger made a motion to approve the Findings of Fact & Recommendation,
recommending preliminary and fmal plat approval for Psyk's 7`h Addition,
recommending a variance be granted for the street intersection offset, and recommending
the Council require a stop sign be installed at the intersection of Lambert Avenue and
53rd Street. Bauer seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Chair Larson opened the public hearing for JMJ Outlet Center Development Stage.
JMJ Properties, Inc. is requesting preliminary plat approval and PUD
Development Stage Plan approval for the JMJ Minneapolis Outlet Center located on the
parcel of land zoned PUD at the northwest quadrant of I-94 and CSAH 19. The plat
contains five lots, one outlot, and one remnant parcel of land. Lot 1 encompasses the
outlet center, proposed to be 250,000 square feet in area with 45-50 stores and 57,000
square feet reserved for future expansion on 41.17 acres. The outlet center is expected to
produce 400 full/part time jobs.
Lot 2 is zoned I-1, Limited Industry, and B-3, Highway Commercial, and is not
planned for development. Lots 3, 4, and 5 are intended for use by restaurants or other
complimentary commercial uses. Outlot A is a large wetland and drainage area.
A 4
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
September 9,1998
Page 3 of 4
Mike Knowlton, Steve Smallbone, John Bertelson and Robert Morse were present
representing JMJ Properties. Knowlton explained that construction of the mall would
require a 6-9 month time frame. The front of the building will be treated with both
stucco.and rust colored steel. The side and rear of the building will be constructed of tip -
up concrete.
Planner Stockman stated that several issues relating to surrounding land use must
be resolved. The plat does not encompass all the land previously zoned PUD. This land
remains under the ownership of Bernard and Judy Roden and is not part of the
development. To be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, the land
should be rezoned. Changes in land use should be considered at this time, because
vehicular access necessary for retail development will differ from that required for
industrial development.
Commissioner Brown requested that the Planning Commission consider rezoning
the excess PUD lands to I- l at the next meeting.
Stockman explained that the ponds shown on Lot 2 (north of the mall) will be
relocated to the corners of the mall property, therefore Lot 2 should be replatted as an
outlot. The remnant parcel west of the building should also be replatted as an outlot.
Stockman reviewed the landscape and screening plan. There is the opportunity to
expand green areas on the site, since the plan shows an excess number of parking spaces.
Knowlton explained that the number of parking spaces shown represent what the
developer has found to be needed, even though it is in excess of the number of spaces
required by the Zoning Ordinance.
The Planning Commission indicated it is satisfied with the landscape plan as
shown.
City Engineer Peter Carlson discussed his August 4, 1998, report with the
Commission. Carlson stated that raised concrete medians and bollards should be
installed around all fire hydrants. The Fire Chief should also review and approve the
location of all hydrants.
Carlson also feels that curb and gutter should be required around all storm water
detention ponds.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
September 9,1998
Page 4 of 4
Carlson stated improvements to CSAH 19 will be necessitated by the mall
development. Turn lanes will be need to be constructed on County Road 19 and the
center median will need to be extended. Two traffic lights, one at the intersection of
CSAH 19/37 and one at the entrance into the mall, will be required. The traffic signal at
CSAH 19/37 will likely be a 50150 cost share with the County. The cost to install the
traffic signal at the entrance will be a local cost.
Chair Larson called for comments from the public. There was none. Chair Larson
closed the public hearing at 8:45 PM.
Stalberger made a motion to recommend the City Council approve the PUD
Development Stage and Preliminary Plat for JMJ Properties. Bauer seconded the motion.
Stalberger, Brown, Bauer, and Larson voted aye. Robertus voted no. The motion
carried.
City Attorney Couri reviewed the proposed TIF District # 10 with the Commission.
The TIF is a pay-as-you-go economic development district proposed to reimburse Mold
Tech, Inc. for land cost and site improvements on Lot 3, Block 10, Barthel Industrial
Park.
Stalberger made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION 98-1 titled RESOLUTION
FINDING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 10 AND THE MODIFICATION TO THE
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANS FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE. Bauer seconded the motion.
All voted aye.
The Commission agreed to schedule a special meeting for the purpose of
reviewing the site and building plans for Mold -Tech, Inc. on Tuesday, September 29,
1998, at 7:00 PM.
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 PM.
Howard Larson, Chair
Linda Goeb, City Clerk
5EP-16-19% 11:01 iAC
CITY 4F AL,BERTVILLE
Appiicarrit`s fpme. RNLI Mirinmin I� Ql t Center
612 595 9837
City
Findings of Fact
& Decision
fit: JMJ Properties, Inc. Is requesting preliminary plat approval and PUD Development Stage
Plan approved for the JMJ Minneapolis Outlet Center located on the parcel of land zoned PUD. Planned Unit
Development at the northwest quadrant of 1-94 and CSAH 19. The plat contains 5 lots, one outiot and one
remnant parcel of land. Lot 1 encompasses the outlet enter, proposed to be 250.000 square feet in area
with 50 stores, and future expansion area (57,000 so on 41.17 acres. The outlet center is expected to
produce 400 fuNlpart-time employees.
Lot 2 is zoned 1-1, Limited industry, and B-3, Highway Commercial, and is not planned for development.
Lots 3, 4, and 5 (within the Planned Unit Development District) are intended for use by restaurants or other
complimentary commercial uses. Outlet A is a large wetland and drainage area.
City Council (Meeting Dote: 5 October 19M
Fktdirige of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received the City Council now makes
the following findings of fact and decision:
1. The legal description of the subject property is attached.
2. The Planning Report dated 6 August 1998. prepared by NAC, Inc. is incorporated herein.
S. The Memorandums dated 4 August and 25 August 1998, prepared by SEH are incorporated herein.
4. The Letter dated 8 September 1998, prepared by Michael Couri is incorporated herein.
S. The Letter dated 19 August 1998, prepared by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is
incorporated herein.
6. The Letter dated 7 August 1998, prepared by Virgin Hawkins of the Wright County Highway
Department is incorporated herein.
7. The requirements of Section 2700 (planned unit developments) of the City Zoning Ordinance and
the platting provisions of the City Subdivision Ordinance have been met.
S. On 9 September 1998 the Albertville Planning Cortmtission conducted a public hearing to consider
Me appii Ws request, preceded by a published and mailed notice. Upon review of the application
and evidence received, the Pie Kft Commission closed the public hearing and recommended that
the City Council approve the project.
Dech*m: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicants request for
approvci have been appfflWd used on the most current
drawings and information received to date, subject to the following conditions:
1. Issues related to land use, street access, and conceptual subdivision of land to the north and west
of the mail are discussed and resolved by the City Council.
2. The City rezones land to the west of the project back to 1-1, Limited Industrial, and future public
street access is obtained from the north, NOT through the outlet center property.
SEP-16-1998 11:01 NAC
612 595 9837 P-15
3. The City Council finds that the proposed development encompasses high standards of site and
bulkiing design, creativity and efficiency in land tom cons tent with the Planned Unit Development
regulations. The City Council may mandate specific requirements related to platting, site design
and/or development as may be deemed necessary.
4. The preliminary plat Is revised as discumd herein.
5. Elevation drawings are submitted for the buildings which show detailed design and materials.
6. All grading, drainage, and utility Issues are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
7. All issues related to on -site wetlands, including delineation and mitigation, are reviewed and
approved by the Wright County Soil and water Conservation District.
S. Parking stalls and aisle wkiths are acceptable to Me City Council at the sizes shown on plans.
9. The location. amount and type of landscaping and screening is acceptable to the City Council as
shown on plans.
10. All traffic, access and circulation issues are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, Wright
County Highway Engineer and the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
11. The requirements for open space, park dedication, and trail dedication are determined by the City
Council based on discussions herein.
12. It the outdoor storage of refuse containers is desired, revised plans must be submitted showing their
location and method of screening.
13. A comprehensive signage plan is submitted as discussed herein which conforms with all Sign
Ordinance requirements.
14. A Planned Unit Development agreement and other agreements deemed necessary by the City
Attorney (eg: prop" owners associaton, shared roadway ON utility easement agreements) are
signed by the property owners.
15. Prior to project consideration at the 04 Council level, City staff and JMJ staff negotiate a cost/fee
structure to recommend to the City Council.
16. Other conditions as required by the City Council.
Adopted by the AlbefMlle City Councill this 5th day of October I M.
City of Albertville
Day:
Mayor Mark Olsen
Attest:
Linda Goeb, City Clerk
PC: David Lund, Linda Goob, Mike Couri. Pete Carlson, Jim Morse. Steve Smallbone. Mb'nael
Knowlton
2
TOTAL P.15
SEP-16-1998 10:59 NAC 612 595 9837 P.12
9-16-98
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
Planning Commission
Findings of Fact
& Recommendation
Applicant's Name: JMJ Minneapolis Outlet Canter
Request: JM.I Properties, Inc. Is requesting preliminary plat approval and PUD Development Stage
Plan approval for the JW Minneapolis Outlet Center located on the parcel of land zoned PUD, Planned Unit
Development at the northwest quadrant of 1-94 and CSAH 19. The plat contains 5 lots, one outiot and one
remnant parcel of land. Lot 1 encompasses the outlet center, proposed to be 250,000 square feet in area
with 50 stores, and future expansion area (57,000 so on 41.17 acres. The outlet center is expected to
produce 400 fuNipart-time employees.
Lot 2 is zoned 1-1, Limited Industry, and B-3, Highway Commercial, and is not planned for development.
Lots 3, 4, and 5 (within the Planned Unit Development District) are Intended for use by restaurants or other
complimentary commercial uses. Outlot A Is a large wetland and drainage area.
Planning Commission Meeting mite: 9 September 1998
Findings of FecU Based on review of the application and evidence received the Planning Commission now
makes the following findings of fact and recommendation:
1. The legal description of the subject property is attached.
2. The Planning Report dated 6 August 1998, prepared by NAC, Inc. is incorporated herein.
3. The Memorandums dated 4 August and 25 August 1998, prepared by SEH are incorporated herein.
4. The letter dated 8 September 1988, prepared by Michael Court is incorporated herein.
S. The Letter dated 19 August 1998, prepared by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency is
incorporated herein.
6. The Letter dated 7 August 1998, prepared by Virgin Hawkins of the Wright County Highway
Department is incorporated heroin.
7. The requirements of Section 2700 (planned unit developments) of the City Zoning Ordinance and
the platting provisions of the City Subdivision Ordinance have been met.
Reoommetdations Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's
request for approval of Dg1[eMomen_ t afar Pjans and Preliminary( Plat have been moved based on the
most current drawings and Information received to date, suW to the following conditions-
1. Issues related to land use, street access. and conceptual subdivision of land to the north and west
of the mail are discussed and resolved by the City Council.
2. The City rezones land to the west of the project back to 1-1, Limited Industrial, and future public
street access Is obtained from the north. NOT through the outlet center property.
3. The Planning Comm and City Council find that the proposed development encompasses high
standards of site and building design, creativity and efficiency In land uses consistent with the
Planned Unit Developrrwnt regulations. The City Council may mandate specific requirements related
to platting. site design and/or development as may be deemed necessary.
SEP-16-199e 11:e NAC 612 595 9837 P.13
4. The preaminwy plat is revised as discussed herein.
5. Elevation drawings are submitted for the buildings wh h show detailed design and materials.
6. An grading, drainage, and utility issues are reviewed approved by the City Engineer.
7_ All issues related to on -site wetlands. including delineation and mitigation, are reviewed and
approved by the Wrest County Soil and Water Conservation District.
8. All traffic, access and circulation issues are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, Wright
County Highway Engineer and the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
g, The requirements for open space, park dedication, and trail dedication are determined by the City
Council based on discussions herein.
10. If that outdoor storage of refuse containers is desired, revised plans must be submitted showing their
location and method of screening.
11. A comprehensive signage plan is submitted as discussed herein which conforms with all Sign
Ordinance requirements.
12. A Planned Unit Development agreement and other agreements deemed necessary by the City
Attorney (eg: property owners association, shared roadway and utility easement agreements) are
signed by the property owners.
13. Prior to project consideration at the City Council level, City staff and JMJ staff negotiate a CosVfee
structure to remwnend to the City Council,
14. Other conditions as required by the City Council.
Adopted by the Albertville PWmtng Commission this 9th dot of SepUmbW 199&
City of Allbertvi!!e
ey:
Howard Larson, Chair
Attest.
Linda Goeb, City Clerk
PC: David Lund, Linda Goeb, Mike Couri. Pete Carlson, Jim Morse, Steve Smailbone, Michael
Knowlton
2
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
INC
COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
PLANNING REPORT
TO: Albertville Major and City Council
Albertville Planning Commission
FROM: Jeffrey Schaumann / Elizabeth Stockman
DATE: 6 August 1998
RE: Albertville - JMJ Outlet Center Development Stage (Preliminary Plat)
FILE NO: 163.06 - 98.13
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BACKGROUND,
JMJ Properties, Inc. Is requesting preliminary plat approval and PUD Development Stage Plan
approval for the JMJ Minneapolis Outlet Center located on the parcel of land zoned PUD,
Planned Unit Development at the northwest quadrant of 1-94 and CSAH 19. The plat contains 5
lots,, one outlot and one remnant parcel of land. Lot 1 encompasses the outlet center, proposed
to be 250,000 square feet in area with 50 stores, and future expansion area (57,000 sf) on 41.17
acres. The outlet center is expected to produce 400 full/part-time employees.
Lot 2 is zoned 1-1, Limited Industry, and B-3, Highway Commercial, and is not planned for
development. Lots 3, 4, and 5 (within the Planned Unit Development District) are intended for use
by restaurants or other complimentary commercial uses. Outlot A is.a large wetland and drainage
area.
Attached for Reference:
Exhibit A Site Location/Zoning
Exhibit B - Comprehensive District Seven Land Use Plan
Exhibit C - Preliminary Plat
Exhibit D Site Plan
Exhibit E - Grading Plan
Exhibit F - Utility Plan
Exhibit G - Landscaping Plan
Exhibit H - Lighting Plan
Exhibit I - Schematic Drawings of Mall Facade and Aerial View
Exhibit J - City Engineer's Comments
Exhibit K - City Attorney's Comments
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6
PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837
e
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon our review of the submitted plans and established Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance
requirements; our office recommends approval of the JMJ PUD Development Stage Plans and
Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions:
Y
1. Issues related to land use, street access, and conceptual subdivision of land to the north
and west of the mall are discussed and resolved.
2. The Planning Commission and City Council find that the proposed development
encompasses high standards of site and building design, creativity and efficiency in land
uses consistent with the Planned Unit Development regulations. The City Council may
mandate specific requirements related to platting, site design and/or development as may
be deemed necessary.
3. The preliminary plat is revised as discussed herein.
4. Elevation drawings are submitted for the buildings which show detailed design and
materials.
5. All grading, drainage, and utility issues are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
6. All issues related to on -site wetlands, including delineation and mitigation, are reviewed
and approved by the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District.
7. All traffic; access and circulation issues are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer,
Wright County Highway Engineer and the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
8. Parking stalls are lengthened to 20 feet and parking aisles are reduced to 24 feet to
comply with the City Zoning Ordinance.
9. Consideration is given to eliminating some excess parking and instead increasing green
space and landscaping on site as discussed herein.
10. The requirements for open space, park dedication, and trail dedication are determined by
the City Council based on discussions herein.
11. The landscape plan is revised to provide additional screening of side and rear building
areas and at the City's discretion, to address other concerns identified herein.
12. If the outdoor storage of refuse containers is desired, revised plans must be submitted
showing their location and method of screening.
13. A comprehensive signage plan is submitted as discussed herein which conforms with all
Sign Ordinance requirements.
Page 2 - Minneapolis Outlet Center
3s
14. A Planned Unit Development agreement and other agreements deemed necessary by the
City Attorney (eg: property owners association, shared roadway and utility easement
agreements) are signed by the property owners.
15. Other conditions as required by the City Council.
ANALYSIS AND ISSUES
Comprehensive Plan Consistency The proposed development is compatible with adjacent
existing and planned land uses, identified as follows:
Existing Land Uses Planned Land Uses
North: Farmland; Light Industrial Commercial and Light Industrial
South: Interstate 94 Interstate 94
West: Farmland Light Industrial
East: Light Industrial; Large Lot Commercial "
Residential across CSAH 19
The Comprehensive Land Use Plan for District Seven has been attached as Exhibit B. While
the proposed development conforms with established Comprehensive Plan policies, there are
several outstanding issues to be resolved relating to the development of surrounding area land.
Specifically, the future development of commercial and industrial areas surrounding the proposed
outlet mall, the provision of street access and subdivision potential. The following issues should
be discussed and resolved prior to formal decision on the project:
Land Use and Zoning. The green lines depict the border of JMJ land and proposed
subdivision of parcels. Note that the land to the west of the mall was zoned Planned Unit
Development as preliminary concepts for the development encompassed this area.
Currently, this land remains under the ownership of Roden's and is not part of the
development. To be consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, the land should
be rezoned back to 1-1 to be compatible with the planned industrial park development in
surrounding areas. However, pending construction and operation of the outlet mall, other
commercial uses will be attracted to the City. It would not be surprising for land owners
and/or developers to want to continue commercial uses to the west of the mall along
Interstate 94. The Planning Commission and City Council must be comfortable with the
current designation of commercial uses along the CSAH 19 and 37 corridors. Any
changes in land use must be considered now, prior to approval of the outlet mall, as
vehicular access necessary for retail development will differ from that required for
industrial development.
Vehicular Access. Private streets provide access to the outlet mall and are best self
contained within the Planned Unit Development as is proposed under strict control for
usage and maintenance in the required PUD agreement. Private streets are prohibited by
Ordinance except within Planned Unit Development's and thus cannot be extended to
serve industrial and/or retail development outside of the proposed project. It is thereby
critical that public street access be planned for areas surrounding the mall. With the large
Page 3 - Minneapolis Oudel Center
parcel of land controlled by JMJ immediately north of the mall, existing businesses which
front along CSAH 19, and the location of large wetlands, vehicular access to planned
commercial and industrial areas is a physical challenge. It is important for the City to be
able to promote and encourage development beyond the mall site.
Streetand Lot Layout. JMJ does not wish to develop the large parcel of land immediately..
north of the mall, but needs to use it for wetland mitigation and drainage control. It
appears that the provision of a street across this property is not only critical in serving land
to the west, but providing a second outlet for employees and truck traffic from the mall.
The City may require this road to be platted and/or constructed if deemed necessary.
Furthermore, it is crucial that JMJ work with the City to provide wetland mitigation and
ponding areas which make the most sense for shared use by future adjacent industrial and
commercial development and allow for the optimum arrangement of lots to be subdivided.
Zoning, The site was zoned Planned Unit Development in previous years in expectation of the
outlet mall. The designation allows for a mixture of use types and deviation from the strict
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance performance standards when high standards of site and
building design are demonstrated and innovations in development can provide creativity and
efficiency inland uses. The City Council may mandate specific requirements related to platting,
site design and/or development as may be deemed necessary.
Preliminary Plat. The preliminary plat must be'revised because of the manner in which lots have
been designated. Lot 1 contains the mall itself and is acceptable as shown. Lot 2 as shown on
plans provides for wetland mitigation/ponding from Lot 1, but does not provide road access for
the future subdivision of commercial and industrial lots. Lot 2 must either be platted as Outlot B
to allow for future platting or the City may require a street to be platted in association with multiple
outlots or lots to promote adjacent development and provide a second outlet from the mall. The
remnant piece of land to the west of the outlet center cannot be platted as a lot because it lacks
street access and also contains ponding for Lot 1. This remnant should therefore be platted as
part of Lot 1.
Building Materials. The front of the buildings will be treated with both stucco and rust colored
steel. The side and rear of the building will be constructed of tilt -up concrete. Building design
and materials will be subject to review and approval once building elevations have been
submitted and shall be made a condition of approval.
Building Height. The proposed building heights vary among heights of 19, 24, 27 and 30 feet,
all of which meet the standards set forth within the Zoning Ordinance.
Wicks. Setbacks within a PUD must be 35 feet at the front yard, 10 foot side yards and 15 foot
setbacks from all non-public internal roadways. Additionally, the two proposed buildings must be
setback from one another a distance equal to one-half the sum of the building heights of the two
buildings. The proposed development meets all these setback requirements.
Grading and Drainage. A grading and drainage plan has been attached as Exhibit E and will be
subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. The City Engineer's preliminary comments
have been attached for your review. All issues related to on -site wetlands, including delineation
Page 4 - Minneapolis Outlet Center
and mitigation, will be subject to approval by the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation
District.
Utilities. A utility plan has been attached as Exhibit F. The location and configuration of sewer,
water and storm facilities shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer.
Road=s., All private streets and main parking lot drives are shown at a minimum 30 foot width.
A 25 foot loading drive has been provided at the sides and rear of the building. A property
owners association agreement will be required to accommodate the private road system and
access to it by other adjoining platted lots. Additionally, curbing will be required throughout the
development.
Review and approval by the City Engineer will be necessary for all roadways and internal
circulation patterns. Additionally, review and approval by the Wright County Highway Engineer
will be required as the proposed development relates to future signalization, turn lanes and
functioning of traffic flows on CSAH 19.
Site Circulation and Parkina. For retail store and service establishments the Zoning Ordinance
requires one parking stall for every 200 square feet of floor area, making the required parking
1,250, of which 50 must be handicapped accessible. The applicant is proposing the provision of
1,375 parking stalls, of which 52 are handicapped accessible. The development is over parked
by 125 stalls, and that is prior to any consideration of how much of the building floor area would
be used for storage and warehouse space, thus further decreasing the need for parking. A
reduction in parking would expand the green area and lessen the impact of hard surfacing across
the overall site. The majority of parking aisles contain curbing only on the ends, thus it is
suggested that an expansion of enclosed curb areas be provided where additional vegetation
could be incorporated.
Parking stall width for both handicapped and standard stalls is acceptable as shown, however,
the stall lengths are only 18 feet where 20 feet is required by the City. Aisle widths are 28 feet
where only 24 feet is required by the City, so the stalls can be striped accordingly without
changing the layout of the parking bays.
Common Open Space and Park Dedication Requirements. Park and trail dedication
requirements must be satisfied under the terms of the City's Subdivision Ordinance unless
otherwise approved by the City Council. A park dedication fee in lieu of land dedication can be
made which would be 10 percent of the. City's calculated fair market value for the commercial
property, as set forth within the Zoning Ordinance. Total acreage of land controlled by JW is
102.43 acres x .10% =10.24 acres. JMJ has estimated park dedication fees to be $90,000. On
a preliminary basis, the City Council has discussed cutting this fee in half, provided that an
outdoor picnictrest area is provided to the public during business hours.
Common open space is required within Planned Unit Developments as deemed necessary by the
City Council to provide for the benefit and enjoyment of users. The site plan indicates that there
will be three ponds accessible by pedestrians and one open gazebo in a centralized area of the
Parking lot. These open space areas will have to be managed and maintained by a property
owners association agreement. The open spaces require pedestrians to cross parking areas, and
Page 5 - Minneapolis Outlet Center
potentially traffic flows. A determination should be made as to what amenities will be provided
(eg: picnic tables, benches, etc.) and as to the overall acceptability of the common open space
area.
The installation of trails as shown in the City's Park and Trail Plan is required of all developers
and is deducted from the amount of cash owed for park dedication. An eight foot, grade -
separated trail is shown on both sides of CSAH to provide connection between the retail uses on
both sides of 1-94. This trail segment has not been shown on submitted plans, nor has a trail
connection from CSAH 19 to the shop areas been included.
IBndscapiM. A landscape plan has been attached for your review. Mainly deciduous species
have been proposed along the front (main/private) street, center north -south parking lot drive and
around the proposed open space/ponding/gazebo area. The landscape plan shows less
plantings in the parking lot areas than does the schematic aerial view of the site. As discussed
under the circulation/parking section of this report, opportunity exists to expand green areas on
site given the excess number of parking spaces. Consideration may be given to the following:
A. Elimination of the center drive aisles, both those between the proposed ponds and
the north -south center aisle within the parking lot to provide a more usable open
space area which is not bisected by traffic flows. This will still leave four access
points into parking areas from the private east -west road. Further options might be
to:
1. Consolidate the three ponds into one integrated pond.
2. Relocate the open gazebo to the north area of the common open space to
be closer to walk to from shops.
B. Provide direct, unobstructed pedestrian connection to the ponding/open space area
via replacement of the north -south center drive aisle of the parking lot with a raised,
curbed green area, which will include landscaping and a sidewalk for pedestrian
access to the common open space.
C. Replacement of the first row of parking stalls adjacent to the private roadway with
more extensive green area/landscaping.
D. Accent the diagonal drives with trees/landscaping within a wider, raised, curbed
green area. This will both channel traffic from the two entranceways along either
side of the open space and provide for improved site appearance.
E. Added planting medians in center bays of parking where only pavement striping is
currently shown.
With regard to screening on site, no plantings are shown on the sides of the buildings and only
eleven (11) evergreen trees have been provided along the entire rear of the property. The Zoning
Ordinance requires that landscape plans for income -producing uses provide emphasis at the
perimeter of sites and at points adjoining other property. Screening at the sides and rear of the
building is important not only to buffer loading and employee parking areas, but to minimize the
Page 6 - Minneapolis Outlet Center
effect of the large building masses and hard surfaces. All plantings must meet the minimum size
requirements specified in the Zoning Ordinance.
1lghtina. A photometric plan for lighting has been attached for your review which indicates light
fixture locations and light levels at the perimeter of the project. Because the development is
setback so far from any public roads and is not adjacent to residentially zoned land, glare or.,
residual shine from lights proposed is not a problem. The lighting plan is in conformance with all
relevant city standards and regulations.
Refuse/Outdoor Storages, If there is to be any outdoor refuse storage, it shall be totally screened
from eye- level view and located at the rear or sides of the buildings. No outdoor storage will be
allowed anywhere on site.
Sionage. A comprehensive signage plan for the two buildings has not been submitted and will
be required as a condition of approval. The maximum size of permitted wall signs for individual
tenants shall be shown on elevation drawings. Additionally details shall be submitted for pylon
or pole signs which provide overall structure identification. Written sign criteria have been
attached for your review and further encompasses under -canopy and back door signs. Sign plans
shall be subject to review and approval by the City Planner.
Agreements. A Planned Unit Development agreement shall be prepared by the City Attorney and
signed by the property owners as a condition of project approval. Other items to be addressed
include the property owners association, shared roadway and utility easement agreements.
CONCLUSION
Based upon our review of the preliminary plat and the PUD Development Stage Plans, we find
that there are numerous outstanding issues which need to be discussed in depth and resolved
prior to project approval. Many relate to the overall context of the outlet mall in its regional setting
and others are site specific.
We anticipate that upon detailed consideration, the proposed outlet center is capable of meeting
all Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements, but this will most likely require more than a
single Planning Commission and City Council meeting. The need to resolve all land use and
regional issues that affect the long-term development and proper functioning of the community
cannot be stressed enough. Our office recommends approval of the project subject to the
conditions set forth under the Recommendations section of this report.
pc: Dave Lund, Linda Goeb, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson, Jim Morse, Steve Smallbone, Terry
Herman, Virgil Hawkins, Jim Povich
Page 7 - Minneapolis Outlet Center
1
PROPOSED LAND USE PLANNING DISTRICT SEVEN
NW
No St
Industrial • • • Primary Street
Commercial Alignments
® Lakes & Wetlands
El Proposed JMJ Minneapolis Outlet Mall Shown in Relation to
Planned Land Uses and Conceptual Roadway Configurations
1996 City of Albertville Comprehensive Plan
EXHIBIT B
LAND USE PLANNING DISTRICTS
DISTRICT SEVEN
District Seven is located in the northwest portion of the City. It is bounded by CSAH 19 to the
east, Interstate 94 to the south, and the northern and western City limits. The district is currently
rural in nature, with portions that are still being farmed, with the exception of three industrial
operations that front on CSAH 19: Otsego Tool and Engineering, Omann Brothers Excavating,
and Denny's Small Engine and Chain Saw Repair.
All existing urban (industrial) uses should be maintained in their respective locations, as the
remainder of this district is planned as an industrial and commercial expansion area. A large area
of approximately 80 acres has been designated for commercial land uses, in the southeast corner
of this district. Conceptual plans have been submitted showing a large shopping center and
several restaurants in this location. In this regard, there are many development issues to be
resolved both related to the site as well as the surrounding area. These include site design
details such as architecture, parking, signage, landscaping, and screening and surrounding area
issues such as public vs. private street access, coordination with abutting industrial property,
wetland mitigation, the cost of public utility expansion, and future completion of the existing half -
diamond interchange at CSAH 19/Interstate 94.
The County Highway 19/1-94 interchange forms the southeast corner of the District. The
interchange is a half -diamond design which allows access only to and from the west. The 1994
Wright County Transportation Plan cites this interchange as an area needing improvement. With
the scheduled CSAH 37/19 upgrade, more land area is available to allow expansion of the 19/1-94
interchange. While it is not known when the two remaining ramps may be completed, City and
County officials agree that as population and development continue to be experienced in
Albertville, access to and from the .east will become increasingly necessary. The intersection
access will also be vital to the success of the commercial and industrial businesses in.this
location.
That portion of District Seven not designated for commercial uses, as indicated above, is shown
as a +/-200 acre industrial expansion area. The location of primary roadways has been indicated
on the Land Use Plan conceptually, as they will be critical in providing access to adjacent major
roadways, while at the same time avoiding wetlands to result in the largest number of usable
parcels. The exact means of access as well as wetland mitigation issues need to be worked out
when a preliminary plat is submitted. Access will be necessary to the north to intersect with 70th
Street and potentially into Otsego's planned industrial park.
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
EXHIBIT B
LAND USE PLANNING DISTRICTS
High quality in building and site design is critical to the functional and aesthetic success of a
business park environment. The City Zoning Ordinance shall be evaluated with regard to building
material requirements. Currently, all commercial and industrial buildings can be constructed of
up to 75 percent metal exteriors. Consideration should be given to upgrading commercial district
regulations to exclude metal or further restrict them.
SUMMARY OF DISTRICT SEVEN RECOMMENDATIONS
1) Promote the District as a joint commercial -industrial business park with a full range of
opportunities and amenities.
2) Existing industrial.uses should be maintained and improved as necessary to complement
the business park image being promoted in the District.
3) Public roads should provide through access in and around the proposed business park to
accommodate planned development in Albertville and tie into Otsego's adjoining industrial
area.
4) Proposed plans for development in this District coordinate with one another and take into
account the area -wide issues such as street access and wetland mitigation.
5) All business park development should portray high quality in building and site design.
6) The City should continue to pursue completion of the 1-94/CSAH 19 interchange as a
means of promoting the desired Commercial and industrial development in the region and
relieving congestion at the 1-94/CSAH 37 interchange as the community continues to grow.
Detailed studies are necessary to determine which locations for access ramps will cause
the least disruption to natural resources and existing/planned development.
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
DECEMBER 1996 REVISED DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
RECOMMENDATION
Based upon our review of the submitted plans and established Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance
requirements, our office recommends approval of the JMJ PUD Development Stage Plans and
Preliminary Plat subject to the following conditions:
1. Issues related to land use, street access, and conceptual subdivision of land to the north
and west of the mall are discussed and resolved.
2. The Planning Commission and City Council find that the proposed development
encompasses high standards of site and building design, creativity and efficiency in land
uses consistent with the Planned Unit Development regulations. The City Council may
mandate specific requirements related to platting, site design and/or development as may
be deemed necessary.
3. The preliminary plat is revised as discussed herein.
4. Elevation drawings are submitted for the buildings which show detailed design and
materials.
5. All grading, drainage, and utility issues are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer.
6. All issues related to on -site wetlands, including delineation and mitigation, are reviewed
and approved by the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District.
7. All traffic, access and circulation issues are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer,
Wright County Highway Engineer and the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
8. Parking stalls are lengthened to 20 feet and parking aisles are reduced to 24 feet to
comply with the City Zoning Ordinance.
9. Consideration is given to eliminating some excess parking and instead increasing green
space and landscaping on site as discussed herein.
10. The requirements for open space, park dedication, and trail dedication are determined by
the City Council based on discussions herein.
11. The landscape plan is revised to provide additional screening of side and rear building
areas and at the City's discretion, to address other concerns identified herein.
12. If the outdoor storage of refuse containers is desired, revised plans must be submitted
showing their location and method of screening.
13. A comprehensive signage plan is submitted as discussed herein which conforms with all
Sign Ordinance requirements.
Page 2 - Minnew As Outlet Center
ft
r
yy�'"alo++r�llnn
o
1 � i
------------ --- ------------r'- ------ _t-..--- -J-- / ••
rrrrl rrrrtnttttt+ --
'rlellelunirit' iiillllm I�itil�iiJi�
_ r '
' — — — — Tit pl Ililllllillll
1 I � �FF�FIi+tFH�Hiii� ; � i
Y �; I I� Y/IIIIt111111111V �� p
t 1
1 I l i A111111111111111p i
1 ; ; Ulf
Niiii 6i+li i t 1
}lllillllll lllA 1 1
i � � 1 1 I i � # i i•
ffH+
A11�11t1'+4111i1'1��1�111A
i 6 $ ; 1 ; Y11.11t111i0 s ■
ppg1t111L1`1111 11111'11lso rQ<if
cm
1 raj
1 rs i � pall ll 111 11111 f� 1
I }i H#F�4iii F�ittj
i 1 V11 111111111111111
� 1 I � tlf;; 111111I II� Y �
i 1 1 � I�ff 11 11 11 i 1 1'iltT I � ' • • • • •
1 I i Vella 1a11111111V '
� 1,— — — — !_J tlllllllllllll111 11{ i
Ui lLL111 Ilit
JJJJ 1
t
r! 1
R
/
1
Im
M
snaif nam
't
0
Ir 00
iq54
r4AMMI
Dui
I
Tyr A
..a G
1.. �—r «�.Si:'..�'L.�4 •w °•/ wr.. •w+wrr w Y1110J 1iU110
wadam
i
��.��— N SON AYNigfl NN���, qu T�.�..��.� ✓'�..
gD llbN� tom_
;111 /1111 t1i11111 �.._�II rrrvTii
r111i1111 11/111% _
alllll ilnt 111 I
1 1 ea�
I 1 1 ; rlll 11111111 �1Y 1
E�= f
• ; 1 .1 1 a11��111-.1111 Ilnin��1lJ�rl11�l
III�Y
1 t
ti all Illllllll41411
ru nnulluur ali
II ; 1 _ 1 ; 1L11r.11r�111, 1 11 1 I 11•.pp.... }
I iii = ' 1�• 1 ; h4 I 1 1111 i`
oilui nl nl
Iilllltll 1111/ � E . • • • •
i 1
1 1 1 a111 1 1 null{�{I� '
1 j i 'r�lu 11 Inlniu e
1 rg
ary1=II n Ilulll
U i rinunnnnl nlf�.% I
ar 1 IIIltlllllll 1.=Iill LLLLL JJJ
1
zs
Tu�ll��
H
-HHHH"
4!LiLD
9mnm
0
/
t.■ t t{ f too i•{ i i i` a: s.
i �' IIIIIIII►►►►►�►►►►►►►►IIIIII►,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIIIIIIIIIII�►►►►►►►►►�►
e e t t{ t f{ a s t
e i c t e! t t t! s i t i R t{■ t t i f■
} i • t
a t i
{ e •! t e! i� f! 1 t
t{ i• t t i S 7 • t i i! t{/� � !! ! c� i!! f
.t t { t } ■ � t • { f : . : : ! i i i : • i i s � ! s i i !
i i C • { • i ' � { {• } {
I t! i i i t ! • ! !
f{.[ R i • / t i • t f
f I i /_•• i• f R� 1{
21
so Is
SIMI
s {•
s s i
t{ t { t a s t t t t �■ t i {
i / } j r/ i i i i■{ c 1 {
s R
i y
i i i i R ! / ! � { ■ ! ! i ! ! i r
i i � � •
L a i � t t R f 1■ C t t! t i y
1 ! i
s r a Q
i f t f i f t■ w! R j!•!!•�•� i t{
J A i R / t t• t f i i • 9 +
■ {` i � f{ i t s 1■
■� :{! i i i!� i i i i i i�
i � : • : : i i i
!
t
i t ! ! ! f ! ! { i • f ! ! ! ! ! i i i ! ! ! ji � ! ! ! ! 1
• L { • 7 R ' ! !i i i � i f s � f i i { � � ! ! ! R
e i
i i t
■ v! i■ t t t t t R t t t i t■ t!!�•!!!�,!� i i• i s i•
II
W
WU
a:
r
^
N Y
y g
all
s a
IbV;:
q
� f
b
OV7
r .91 . ,
Z-9
4Z
1!
tog
ti
j+
mw*l
Ow
i ml
rm
dip
z
ar.
4'1-
A4
uaiu4i
•r401
0
MEMORANDUM
O Sr PAUL, ANV O ~MAPOU^A ARV ■ Sr CLOUD, AW O CFNPPPWA FALLS, W/ O A4400 iV. W! O LAKE COUNTY, JN
TO: Dave Lund
City Administrator
Albertville, Minnesota
FROM: Peter J. Carlson, P.E.
City Engineer
DATE: August 4,1998
RE: Site Plan Review
Minneapolis Outlet Center
Albertville,. Minnesota
SEH No. A-ALBEV9811.00
T have reviewed the above referenced site and have the following comments:
Sheet C 2
1. All the pedestrian ramp locations shall be shown.
2. Concrete dumpster pad is shown along the north lot line. With all the parallel parking north
of the proposed building, it is unclear how the dumpster site will be accessed. The plan shall
be clarified.
3. "Do not entee'signs shall be installed along the one-way driveways adjacent to the proposed
ponds.
Sheet C-4
1. Raised concrete medians and bollards shall be installed around all fire hydrants.
2. No fire hydrants are shown on the back side of the buildings. This shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Fire Marshall.
Sheet C-5
l . Open excavation within CSAH 19 will not be allowed. The water main shall be jacked -in -
place across CSAH 19.
.4• �(@�i�Nw AcNsp,
�Oppatwlry6nFloys�
EXHIBIT J
0
Dave Lund
August 4,1998
Page 2
2. Open excavation within CSAH 19 will not be allowed. The force main shall be installed by
directional boring.
Sheet C-6
1. Concrete curb and gutter will be required around all storm water detention ponds.
2. It is unclear how storm water will be directed to the catch basins. Drainage direction arrows
and spot elevations shall be shown on the plan.
3. All grade breaks shall be shown on the plan.
4. All drainage from the site shall be directed to the storm water detention ponds. Concrete
curb and gutter and catch basins shall be added to the south driveway.
5. It is unclear how the storm water ponds north of the development will be incorporated into
any future development. This shall be clarified.
Additional issues which shall be addressed by the developer are the following:
1. A long dead-end water main is proposed. A hydraulic analysis shall be provided to show
that a minimum of 2000gpm at 20 psi can be provided at all hydrants within the
development.
2. There does not appear to be any room for snow storage on the site. The wetland to the south
should not be used for storage. The developer shall provide clarification.
3. The plan indicates the parking lot pavement will be constructed with approximately a 1%
grade. Considering the poor soils that are typical for Albertville, the large parking lot, and
the locations of the catch basins, "bird baths will develop throughout the parking lot. I
would suggest to the developer a reconfiguration of the storm sewer that will allow an
increase in the grade of the parking lot and minimize the distance storm water will have to
travel to a catch basin.
4. The plan shall be submitted to Wright Soil and Water Conservation District for approval.
c:
GiOnVUMCAM3MJW.WM
i
1
1
1
MEMORANDUM
TO: DAVE UND, LIZ STOCK, PETE CARLSON, ALBERTVILLE
CITXUNCIL MEMBERS
FROM: MIKE dOURI, CITY ATTORNEY
SUBJECT: JMJ OUTLET MALL ISSUES
DATE: AUGUST 4, 1998
Below are the issu s I could have identified related to the proposed outlet mall which I
believe should be discussed at some level, either sta$ P&Z, or City Council:
A. Application-- jodens need to sign the application as the underlying owners of the
property (JMJ has only an option, not fee ownership).
B. Roads
1. Private Road
a. Access to property immediately west of outlet mall? How provided?
Should we require access to facilitate retail development of this
PtoPerty?
b. Do we need recorded easements of access to private road for all lots
,4ithin the outlet mall plat?
C. Does Highway 19 entrance location line up with future service road
location on the east side of Highway 19?
2. Improvements made necessary by outlet mall
a. Ijighway 19 north of I-94 (joint project with County)
b. Shop lights at Highways 19 & 37?
C. Stop lights at entrance to outlet mall?
d. Stop lights at east -bound exit of I-94 & Highway 37?
e. Is a future east -bound Highway 19 exit ramp possible on this
property? If so, we should try to get an easement now.
1
C.•1�ni1ce1A413ER71t3F,NERAL1Men�lulsdni+iniantor memol9.doe
EXHIBIT K
W V
+
i
t
f. Additional Highway 19 easement dedication for future improvement
turning & acceleration lanes? Do we need additional easement now
fwr a future center turn lane?
g. Trail dedication on Highway 19 on JMJ property?
h. H developer willing to help pay for east -bound ramps at Highway 19 '
in future, if ever built?
i. How to fund road improvements (stop lights, etc.) prior to 2002
(when first large City tax revenue will come in)?
C. Developer's Agreement
1. Status of outlots
a. Who maintains drainage ponds?
2. Lot 2 should be an oudot.
3. What is the small north/south lot immediately west of outlet mall? Is this
an outlol? If so, how will it eventually be used and accessed?
4. Clarify A tore SAC & WAC fees for lots 3, 4, 5 and outlots.
5. Status of billboards in future? Do they come down when leases are up?
D. Utilities
1. Water
a. Need easement for looping of water main, service easement for
emergency repair all along building where line is run.
b. Ownership — who will own the water line adjacent to the building?
If private, we need agreement that water line will not be shut off for
repairs, etc. without approval of Joint Powers or City.
C. Do we need a larger than 8" line on west side for eventual looping,
aAd if so, who pays for larger line?
d. Do we need hydrants at the back side of the building for fire
ptuposes?
e. Who flushes hydrants if lines are privately owned?
2. Sewer (s�nitary)
2
C.WAOVJbERT%OENERAL%Mamo: craw memol7.aoc
i
1
a. Who pays for running the sewer line north up Hwy 19 on JMJ's east
side? Who constructs it?
b. How big is JMJ's proposed lift station? Will it be sufficient to
blandle sewer from other properties? Who maintains it? Proper
e6sements shown on plat?
C. Can property to the west of JMJ hook into this sewer system? How?
*ill a lift station be needed for property to west?
d. Savitski lift station upgrade — timing?
E. Miscellaneous issues
1. Additional police contract time?. How expensive for the City?
2. Is current fire fighting equipment sufficient? If not, what cost?
3. Increased demand on Albertville's rescue capabilities? Any new equipment
needed?'.
4. 1-94 sig*age — does the city need to apply to MNDot for directional signs
on I-94 & ramps?
5. Directional signs on Highway 37?
6. Will Wight County Highway Department allow access to Highway 19 at
industrial property to the north if JMJ's retail access is as shown?
3
TOTAL. P. 04
REQUIRED SIGN CRITERIA
Phase
Minneapolis Outlet Center - Albertville, Minnesota
December 19,1997
1. GENERAL
A. All proposed signage must be approved in writing by Landlord prior to fabrication
and/or installation.
B. Submitted applications will include scaled drawings detailing the following:
1. Materials and colors.
2. Dimensions.
3. Illumination detail.
4. Mounting detail.
C. All portions of sign construction and/or installation detail will meet requirements set
forth by Owner, subject to local, state or other municipal approval.
D. Sign installation crews are to report to the Owner's Field Representative or mall
manager upon arrival at job site. Failure to do so may result in removal and
relocation of signs, fascia repair, etc. at sign contractor's expense.
E. A I cutting and patching shall be subject to the direction and approval of the General
Contractor. The Subcontractor shall not endanger the stability of the structure by
cutting, digging, etc., and shall not cut or alter the work of any other Contractor.
F. Proof of sign permit will be required before installation of any signs, and will be
subject to approval by Owner's Field Representative. Any cutting, drilling, etc.
of the building fascia will be sealed to prohibit moisture entering the building.
G. Sign installation contractor to field verify fascia height to determine if lift truck, etc.
will be required.
H. Landlord's responsibility relative to Tenant's signs is limited to approval solely of
Landlord's purpose, and Tenant bears the full and final responsibility, financial and
otherwise, for the following, relative to Tenant's signs:
1. Meeting all applicable regulatory, approval, code and permit requirements.
2. Proper installation, operation, maintenance and repair of Tenant's signage.
3. If Tenant changes artwork and/or design of sign or vacates space, Tenant
bears the full responsibility and expense to remove signage and restore or
replace fascia fo its original condition. If signage has not been removed
and/or does not meet Landlord's approval, Landlord shall complete and back
charge Tenant all cost to complete said work.
Landlord reserves the right, at its discretion, to install other tenant's signage on
Tenant's exterior walls. EXHIBIT L
,x
REQUIRED SIGN CRITERIA
Minneapolis Outlet Center - Albertville, Minnesota
Rvs.12119197
II. ILLUMINATED STORE IDENTITY SIGNS (by Tenant)
A.
Sign Description:
1.
internally illuminated, individual channel letters, mounted directly to a
raceway to be attached to the building facade.
OR
2.
Intemally illuminated, individual channel letters, mounted directly to building
facade.
B.
Materials:
1.
Letters must be made of noncorrosive aluminum, .063 minimum on sides
and .080 minimum on backs and will be welded, no exposed fasteners or
wooden backs allowed.
2.
Letter faces shall be 1/8" Rhom-Haas, translucent plexiglass (7328 White).
3.
Retainer shall be 3/4" Jewelite.
4.
60 MA transformers.
5.
Lexan face (no PK housing).
6.
Must be UL approved.
C.
Color Specifications:
1.
Letter faces: 7328 white
2.
Letter sides and backs: 313 Dark Bronze (example: Duradonic 313E)
3.
Trimcap: 313 Dark Bronze (example: Duradonic 313E)
4.
Signage Raceway (if required): Contact Landlord to verify color.
D:
Size:
1.
Maximum overall sign height not to exceed 48". However, the overall sign
N
height of the anchor tenants may be greater than 48 . Maximum length not
to exceed dimensions shown on elevation drawing. Signage to be centered
within these dimensions. Landlord will establish maximum sign sizes for
each tenant to ensure the architectural integrity of the building elevation as
a whole.
-2-
r're a
REQUIRED SIGN CRITERIA
Minneapolis Outlet Center Albertville, Minnesota
Rvs.12119197
E. Illumination:
1. All portions of Tenant's sign are required to be illuminated with White neon.
Minimum requirement is 13 mm. All parts of sign must bum continuously
when lit.
F.
G.
10
All sign components and installation procedures shall carry a UL label.
Sign Location:
1. Positioning of lit signs may vary. Sign location drawing to be provided by
Owner.
Owner/Landlord will furnish electrical junction box centered behind sign band from
Tenant's panel. Sign contractor to contract final electrical connection.
Specifically not permitted; but not limited to:
1. Any flashing action, moving action, or audible action sign parts.
2. Listing of products, unless part of name of logotype.
3. -Plastic molded letters, illuminated or otherwise.
4. Cabinet or box signs.
5. Visible ballasts or transformers.
Ill.. UNDERCANOPY SIGNS
Landlord to provide with Tenant reimbursing the cost to Landlord.
1'-V' high x X-O" long.
IV. BACK DOOR LETTERING (by Landlord)
A. Each store will have one set of V vinyl cut letters with store name. List of products
will not be permitted unless part of name.
&15
ti
. .. .... i -- `,iJ i�.. -�
�w saua�rw
z
VUN3* iavta saaavaNM
��111111...........
11111111111111111
1
J
1
IILLLLLiJJJJJJJ.
ILILLIILLLWJJJJJ
i
fb
y
r
�f
J
M
L
a
P
rib
a Na�u
t
c us ao
31
„gb-ATZ_;'ON nJ uiu 'N «a ce/a/e :"'a spot-►ec(m) s►oc-seo(ae) _., �p ixa —,. :p•uels cecor-r--""m • 9=
oaa oar nr«s 1r-u -+IMw3 s 1or
ai-33NJ voar-r»(ZvW ceor-swrie)
010.• ro nols w1 ro —Iocen-io••aurA *,"Ill GIs
— ae NMvuo wl ,•w� _s vooi P �10.a �*ti v Om off
NaK3a RIMp o wo 1 1w1 pun •�/A.V--W /-7 'SUA- K M7 lut—O-Z IIU
.. NaaN1�S3a 3/q 04--:31'N ��ww umd �t�NJ P41 3PU•i .10•»Y� �"I '60JRla066Y P JOAMO UqOP
---- ---T— -------------------- ----« in NNW
— —=---------------- - Rrt �1
3 � �
� 1
HH uull(��uJ JJ
ITl ”
Ir
1 � �
I,
(i
1w aes «p N •u11 1«- - I _ I I I I I
•1«1 OW Ys3 -m M wl P-m
� � du llU uu- u
b
I
I
I
L
lYld kklYNlVtt3Hd
ONI S31IMdObd
1
i
U
43JN33 13UM SnOdY3NNIV4
cy
A
Q
_j
a
W
U
H
m
I
ALI.
ti s�
Ij $ A
IN'S rl
fit
1 1 all 1
- - -- - —: 3u 09•r/ '.N •a.y 96/05/9 :-M a0c-pefUr1) D.Ic-»I(ul)
:wuMs AMO �►«•U• .I19 '•ttw •�•�a
M •IM 'Dwl -•i••�W[ 'A 10r
I — :OMO
:As 03.03N3 9DD9-IgOa1) ROr-1w rlI)
Ing
101—�:As NMWO .Vl yun N.Mu3 P-1-05-M MW.r •AP•Q 0I9
l f :AB N01530 AM . w. 1 1.41 W u.M..dn. Od"dy�/Aghw%/ ry.�9JV-PA"l-S I—? 16-W- w�r�/1/M�A/ .
31W —9S% —:L1'0 1,o , umdAom ro.1 N.. AWl.V �`./ IG��/�.rGQI �A#0 �7vD __
I
S3LL83dOHd PVT
NP o:
MIN30 1311M SIIOdV3NNIY4
•�i�►�•�
i•Q;vI
��������
•ii"00
•O! •i'.
cn
iOi :4'•
OD
/�.
r�
s.. I
NY Id ALlb
■oo�rx3a
"i i4;ZL—•'oa 3U
---7RON'�>x�
M01 'ON 'BOB OO/Ot/O ,-wO
o►oY-rooarw v►oc-►oo(m)
- oor inn
i s
`P--o'5
J- WIlS w1 M .1
.O a,. —, -3 ..wo-w
H^P /etH Wo-d-.
"o: qe'w 1 V1i-:°, o:°:ww'
'ONTO
UTW—:AS O7MO3N0
NMMaa
Tf —:AB N9153O
SSSS-AWYM) YLOY-1w91S)
Oren nlu.uuyR ""If 711Y
.—.v .4-0 O0S
N)w-L ►-7 'a+9A-^�S /r7 'YMA-•�WS 1W.)
OIII '>QOjQ/aOQQV '� /oAO WDi
u u
AM
— O17R74 — — 3<ro
a •ON ).V#J*M
A11M 1FpRJN►
I
-.7 au.af
3j '.Zojm
avis
rrrrrrrm1111111�
Iritllllliritilllr rrrrrrrrrm111111-iC
`__JIII111111111111111�
1 ,
'-----T-1 n I IL t I I I l l l l l l l l l n 1
11 III 1 1 111'� � 1'll 1
Y } < j l I ; UIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIU
I n l l t t l l l l l l l l l l l n 1
bl i I 1 I Lr�LI 1 L1_1 IJJJ
' I 1 U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I u I
1 i 1 1
' 1 I
o ( I 1 nilllllllllllllln
` I I , L11 I I L LI I IJJJ I I I ,
L t� , I I 1 UIIIItIIIII1lI11U ,
I � � nllllllllllllllllllr
, _ I , 11 LLLLLLI LI_LLI_iJJJ 1 11J
I , IrT�rl I rl , 1 I, I 11 11�
, UI11111111111111L___.
I I '
�`♦ 1 I ~O I n l l l l l I I l l l l, l r---
♦`♦ J I I II ,LLLI , LLLLI I I I I I,,
" ♦ 1 a 1rr' v rrri�l rl I I n1-11�
- • �`. I ( I � U I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i
I nllillllllIIIIIIn 1
I 1II��LLLLLLI I_I 1 1 1 1 JJ I I I
I I If Trl I rl 1 1 111� 1 11�1 1
ulllllllllllllllu
1 I
1
nII111i,lllllllln I
� I I , , IIIIJ1111Jn I
n L J J
I L----__1 U I I 1111.1111 t l l l l u
u •-
--111111111111111111ri
]OM , ,Illllllllltllllll LLLLLLL'LiII JJJJJJJ
_! LLLLLLLLLUJJJJJlj
/
-5
I
'd'
0
J
N
LONIN" In ter
a31N30 131M SnOdV3NNIM1
a
Z
Q
J
a
W
1--
N
0
H
m
X
W
�a
e 1
I
1
I
1
I
1I
1
1
I
1
o!
CT
!
1
® ■
-wo-orc �—:ON rlu ooerl .N •e.a re/a/D %.Po spot-rov(xrd) Dior-roa(9Aa NVId 30VNIVHG UNV ONIOVa'J
oor * bWt: •••t•+�1 for
-'" °M° DDDD-In(m) reor-nr(rls) •ONI s3LL23doad rrr Z
tl7'�—:,.8 O7>t�3N� oCCDD W�.•�N► 'ANY i17 Nm 'ITLU i M Q
NMYtlO 'olopw,n 10 •lo``S W7 to •�q .Nwn► .MQ got
,v, wp,n ,..u,e 9 w,.u,b•a J
N•JIi3U A^D — , ,�� p.. uo,NN.&. ..-, .,,,,,,,,,,,� srr ••,»•aw ».� a31N3� 13I1l10 s(i0dV3NNlw
,.,� A. ,.- .� .a �,.a.,a 'aajQ/ao6>sy f JNO WW a
NQa�tlx3t] Lro � �%�—:LMO .or uote .rv, ,oVi N!uoa Aa.,.y 1 '11
11
U tI111y11111111U i Z
j ` .—..._.. _•—• _ I .--� 111 1 11 I 1 1111111 f
IJJ) Q
LLLJJJJJ ;
LLL JJIJJJI� �.
`i ; w
i ` m
LLJ
1 as �a �_.-•---�• - �_
/ 1 I - / ..] • . •,pia. :1 • . , _....._ ga 0 I
I be
o14'' y b
a R' e f
,ii I I mikiinti
xa
I VIl I III I� I I
ahe
I /I I I I I I I I loll
JI
S
1; ! ��••
b•
ti •l \f !' � I �" ' .1 Sty / r/
A ow / $
' I
Fir
•T`
NOBAIOS]0
�v
-�St—;•� 096" as BB/Bt/B awa Bror-roNsri) rror-nB(r�B)
:IXIL ° oor stmsiw� n c��ior
soap-1wrrr) rcor-j»(rn)
�B '6ir:A0 IM33H3 OR999 Wwwr/R =,V vs
-N1 W., p W S wq M W4 mu.nr �r Opp
V—:Aa M%ao AVV — 1 4 Puo WMNWna Mild /w7 'wM�'�AS tr7 'M+� l i1M.7
,auy. Aul ..p.. ,. AQ p.,.e.,a OW 'So #100 9V f JSAJO U110f
71M0 .iu --31V0 ..r uqa .wi I.V1_AIM.a AO.I.V 1
NVId 30VNIVSU UNV UNIUVW
I
ONI� u��rvr
a
QI
4
2131N3O 1311M SnOdV3NNIMI
z
a
J
a
cs
z
0
a
c)
W
m
x
x
W
NVId AlMn
Nouwwz3a
11
11
—Ko-olf—: ON 3>v 094►1 '•N 'atl Da/af/9 •wa var-saKsrf) D►or-ioKill
--7mw-- :rxn :w.as oor M-S IpAt -n
DaaD-rrr(rr.0 reor-rrHrra)
yF" t�:Ae 03MO ND ortDD •io•• M •+•^1r itr
' IOL AB MYN 'oloNuv!M M *Ins W1 to ••ol .nwnY •oaoD ODD
.l wpun ...u3 0••.i-&'
N�S3a p o ".1 1 W4 o"• Aq.. ^a Npw.q/ ►w7 ' •n�^S D�'7 •M-^'Iti'7 7MM3
dt nw rapA..." .o ow AQ p...a..d '$O O6$ !OAu,0—as>�s—� ro..01� .w1 wN, AN,»o w.,..1 ��/ ,f� Y p Lf0 �W�1'
0
b
ONI�
Z
STUJMMPvp`
8311N33 13M SnOdV3NNln
a
1 I 1111111111111111111 j
}
U I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I i l U
�..
J
; M
`,..
Iiilllllllllill--'11I11111111111111
LLLLLLIJJJJJJJJ� ILLLLLLLLIJJJJJJJIr
77
st
uj
0
1
Y
O
J
m
k o
X
:•� 311
Mitt '.N 6-0 96/009 ;.IDO
OIOt-IID(SLI) rl0t-10D0/r)
•
DDDD-IH(rYJ) iL0r-1►►(r/D)
w:AB 03X3343
OCCDD oM-11 '+wMY �fll
•
dt—yt7a
---1 u :As kwova
'olowuuY� M �10 5 W1 M awl
w0 rq.n .wylw.3 Wyri1�tl
.wv.nr "p-C 00D
—�—:AO ,MiS30
NM . wo � >W1 P.. �I,,�.b,.
.W—,, ..., Yy..n.K .—, M,...N..r 014.1
--:M�
':o; : "wn WN '00161meov 9 AOANO u►!W
u.a
Ain.,pwod—A
IVV lu A.Ll 1uA 1
ONI S3LLH3dOSd W
NM 3TIA11am
a31.N33 13UM SnOdV3NN1►1
wrw0.r. .n
61 'ON kV#JM ALNno0 MOM aws
— — — — — — — — — — — —
— — — —
— — — -- — — — — — — — — — — — .._ - —
rrrrrrrl-I
rrrrrrrr-m- T-n -rrI T1
,Iltlllltllllllll--Jltllllllllltllllll4
'
1
I
nllltllllllllllin I
I
I I
ILI LLI � � IJ I I 11 I
Il rf ��lnllnl�ll��11 I
I
uIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIU
I I
nllllllllllllllln��l
.I
, I
I I
IL L LLL� I iJJJJ J JI I
I I I I
8
i i
I
IIItII11111I 1I u
u I
' I
n l l l l l l l l l I min
� I I i
p
i I I IJ I IJ 1 1 I
u I I I I I I i i I I iiiii a b�
' I I
I I
� I I �
nllllllflllllllll
I I
I
1 Ulitllllllllll IL____.
I I
i
nL lL IL.IL l l l, l l l l IJ 1 1 --r
Jr i
f i�l���i'IZI�
I
Ullilllllllllllllll�
I I I
nllllllllllllllln �
uIIIIIIII
I IiiIIIu
I
� I I I
1
nIIIIIIIIIII llln
ILI I I I I I IJ I IJ11 11 I
II ri-ri-rrrn n-1 I I 111 I
, I
I I 1
UIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIU I
I I j
n I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I n I
L—_—_--J
U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U
I
,
1 I1111111111111 /^-111111111111111111rJ
II 1
p
t
�LLLLLLU_UJJJJJI�
LLLLLLLLUJJJJJJIIJ /
I
1
4��
5a
I
Liet I B tl $
I
0
a .
11,
i
N
O w
f%''
.iaitia�
---------------------------------------------------------------------
N LM AVM ON ALMM 111W%
- ------------------------------------------- -----------------------
i 111 ?i I i I iTi !I 11_Ii 11-T? IiTii I tTi i'
J � i , , � uit�liiulslst�l�
� w � i � i i a1111?11ii?lili?
LU
Q Q y CL 11 I .1.T.. iii.i..
LU
Q� �4 i i"!il»luillil111'
0 Q W i i ;M.r .....
I I 1 I 111111IIIT 1111111
ilj� t1111"
1111111M. 1MN
�a g •
oo�a
r
47
f;
Nd limp .o O m ,orA wAr 'uo C./
b�atros-urti �wlou 6w
Z
w.cn..0 au mr
ne.ew..
a`.M nti.ow
fZ
'sm'.mm"wy
-------'-------------
�
b�6
I
►J
3
srry ;av-�cc
a
Q
U
ICZ
Q
J
Q
X
f�
X
a
W
=
o
f
1,
NLu
�
a�
Q�r<
� �bb
a
e
fill
■ w S R f R S R S S A
ci
0 o w i R a• 9� :«: i:: e« e: n
e w ci
w • - -
4
fi i n a s fi R R S, S S « s» «
� - R 9 A 2 C R 1C ry S. C •-,
■ A� S f � S« R� S a a g R R fi � F
a a R R■ • fi R R" A S S X x X«
S a p S $ S
ci
R R n
3 S
■ A x R f T 3 R R S S f
R i r fi R f R x s:
o R o
R R A R k f i X S 4 S B■� ? X � --
R t i n
R a R ! a R R x A A R T x
. o. a •• - " -
x i ! it a = ■! ,..>! A 7 R X R R a R S 4 S a S f
� 6 R A■ 8 t �I R R ! C
R x R p y S a R 6 R R
t S 2 R
R R R R i F
f ®_• { R 9 A 6 x 6 f N R i t; A fi A
Y o i $ R
x « « » « « »
e 66
0
-
R
4.1
s a x s a s z
e
lq
s fi s a w s x n«
o 0'
14
R f! X S S R� i R yl fi S fi f" R X
10
ci
w n = i• a S A t R S#« »
ri
ci
�. R >• a x s S s >• �' R a e
x s x a a c u f c
X - x
I
1111111111911imil
......
......
Up
S 3 g X S X 8 a
a X E x - _ o
z
~
O
s a
G
O
00 i
a
WZV
V
¢
OC a
m00
>z
V
a
ir
¢ z
O
OL
r
ti
O
V
N
W 0'
W
UNa
O
lu
m W
OEl
W W ut
Vq W
H
O
t9ZZ F
10
z
LL
_
w
=
1 L
• m LD V
r L
O
l7
+
JJj laL
4
r V
O W
qZ
U
W
z
tnju
iav a
u
>
~ 00 10
m
v < L
O W
Z r W L.
O
•'
0 LL
W
a:) O
ZWO
W
J
VI
1 12w, z
MO0a
m
ZG
W
J
0
.u�.r
art.
z W
m
,~•N
aV
QO
-N m
J00 ZJ
W>
I--w
m 'm 'O
JaW OJ
aU'
OL
1Q�0 T
NWT VN
W
a
�j
m.• PN
WI
a
aEa
NW
4r
.. •.•
V
Z¢r. Wq
W
a
Q
W££ZZ
E00
o
Z>
197 Jra,-a
Q£LL£
.-a.. a.,
LLV
O
QS
�L-j
VJ JI-
l~n2
Jr
rin
WXZl9X
>Q,+>Q
LW ¢V
I-
VMw
Z
QiLQ£
J
D_ m
0
r
r O
P
w £ O
W O U
= a r V
L H > r Q
1 vt r O L
N J W N in r
v r O j
m ¢ o r O 3
VI La = QO H LL
O V O O 4 U
O Q vt
O K O 4 W VI
J O 4 K J A
V L. V O O ¢
LL H LL 4 d o
t< J V J O J
0-1r YJ 'S J
F- Q. W a' ¢ VI O VI W O.
Z tt Z In a
..0 m =0 L O O F
W I
v O £ R
r =
3m N Z 3W OmN W Q W O
O-� N O -� OVN r d O
1!l O W O H
N .. .. £ N .. Z
r W r - r W •+ ^
A l 2 J J = r
til i .Z Q £i £ "''t7 „ - Z W
o
I Z W
E
J J.
i NS Q 3 C4 OBIS Q Q Q!
VI
r l P r P P. r N P W
Z I ml9 N v: mL91 J 1 1
W I L�r £ -L,r O r m O 0
£ I V£ r i Q. £ V£ r CL Q. P LL
1 ^ N
o i m m , to m w
W I ■
1
r
3
N ~• Z Z j
s
LL
w 5
- V
r
` s
L—t-
til
FLO
cm
m
.. -=JIM 0 - O'I'a
IN 1= my
sm
far;:— 1:: 1 11 1-.Yl
1f
jo, as ake
F
01I
7 1
46
(=:amtl
id
Doi ft on
= 11101.410
nab
AM@
:El
aw
--JAM,
AL
�,, �;
QUO 9m
da
so
WAVE
"I" fit %I,
jj
JL4U.
LIM cm
ur
WAS
X.M an
LLD 113.1 MCI -60 wo
IM, Airtbcs h MI
S. 1X33 U.0 Lo"I
b I sm cm ul
r
10:1 : A
we
wo
v
Iro pap
gig, 101 WN I
Nolif
0
0
11
.dIV
'd MEMORANDUM
0 ST. PAUL. A&V O ANNNEAPOUS, ANM ■ ST. CLOUD, MN O MPPEWA FALLS, M O MADISON, WI O LAKE COUNTY, Nd
TO: Dave Lund, City Administrator
Albertville, Minnesota
FROM: Peter J. Carlson, P.E., City EngineerG
DATE: August 25, 1998
RE: Site Plan Review
1998 Minneapolis Outlet Mall
Albertville, Minnesota
SEH No. A-ALBEV 9811.00
I have reviewed the above referenced site and have the following comments:
SHEET C-2
1. All the pedestrian ramp locations shall be shown.
2. The concrete dumpster pad is shown along the north lot line. With all the parallel parking north
of the proposed building, it is unclear how the dumpster site will be accessed. The plan shall be
clarified.
3. "Do Not Enter" signs shall be installed along the one-way driveways, adjacent to the proposed
ponds.
SHEET C-4
1. Raised concrete medians and bollards shall be installed around all fire hydrants.
2. No fire hydrants are shown on, the back side of the buildings. This shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Fire Marshall.
SHEET C-S
1. Open excavation within CSAH 9 will not be allowed. The water main shall be jacked -in -place
across CSAH 19.
2. Open excavation within CSA11 19 will not be allowed. The force main shall be installed by
directional boring.
An A,QinraHvs Auiom
Dave Lund
August 25, 1998
Page 2
SHEET C-6
1. Concrete curb and gutter will be required around all storm water detention ponds.
2. It is unclear how storm water will be directed to the catch basins. Drainage direction arrows and
spot elevations shall be shown on the plan.
3. All grade breaks shall be shown on the plan.
4. All drainage from the site shall be directed to the storm water detention ponds. Concrete curb
and gutter and catch basins shall be added to the south driveway.
5. It is unclear how the storm water ponds north of the development will be incorporated into any
future development. This shall be clarified.
ADDITIONAL ISSUES WHICH SHOULD BE ADDRESSED ARE AS FOLLOWING:
1 A long dead-end water main is proposed. A hydraulic analysis shall be provided to show that
a minimum of 2,000 gpm at 20 psi can be provided at all hydrants within the development.
2. There does not appear to be any room for snow storage on the site. The wetland to the south
should not be used for storage. The developer shall provide clarification.
3. The plan indicates the parking lot pavement will be constructed with approximately a 1 percent
grade. Considering the poor soils that are typical for Albertville, the large parking lot, and the
locations of the catch basins, "bird baths will develop throughout the parking lot". I would
suggest to the developer a reconfiguration of the storm sewer that will allow an increase in the
grade of the parking lot and minimize the distance storm water will have to travel to a catch
basin.
4. The plan shall be submitted to Wright Soil and Water Conservation District for approval.
5. The site requires a lift station to provide sanitary sewer service. This lift station could also
provide service to other property north and west of the outlet mall site.
Please call me if you have any questions.
c: Linda Goeb, City Clerk
Mike Couri City AttogLe
ToFn BertelsenThRlivWera2nd Associates
Jim Morse, JMJ Properties
IdtbevW11XcwAw25&4&wpa
An Affirn ive Attu%
Equal Opporamily Employer
SEP-16-1998 10:59 NAC
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
612 595
CI wvv.......
Findings of Fact
& Decision
Request: Doug Psyk has submitted a preliminary plat for the subdivision of 29 single family
lots. The subject area encompasses 13.42 acres and is located west of Main Street and south
of PsWs earlier additions. The plat will cite a missing segment of 531dStreet between Main
Avenue and Lambert Avenue, but will require approval of a variance for the street Intersection
offset. The preliminary plat is consistent with the concept plan for the Psyk Additions that was
submitted and approved earlier. The final plat encompasses 13 lots and two outlots. The subject
property is zoned R-1, Low Density Single Family Residential and the proposed development is
In conformance with the approved Land Use Plan of the City.
City Council Meeting Date: 5 October 1998
FlIndings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received the City Council
now makes the following findings of fact and decision:
1. The legal description of the subject property is attached.
2. The Planning Report date 2 September 1998, prepared by NAC, Inc. is incorporated
herein.
3. The requirements of Section 500 (variances) of the City Zoning Ordinance have been met.
4. On 9 SepUmber 19M the Albertville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to
consider the applicant's request, preceded by a public W and mailed notice. Upon review
of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission closed the public
hearing and recommended that the City Council approve the project.
Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's
request for approval of a Preliminary and Final Plat and interseWon offset variance have been
approved based on the most current plans and information received to date, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The street jog variance is granted by the City Council according to the review criteria
outlined herein.
2. The increased lot width and screening requirements along Main Avenue as discussed
herein are waived.
3. The preliminary Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control and Utility Plans are reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer.
4. A stop sign is installed by the developer on Lambert Avenue where it meets 53rd Street.
SEP-16-1998 10:59 MAC
612 595 9837 P.11
5. A minimum of one shade tree or evergreen tree is provided for each lot according to the
minimum size requirements outlined herein.
6. The park and trail dedication requirement is satisfied in accordance with the approved final
plat as discussed herein.
7. A development agreement is prepared by the City Attorney and signed by the applicant.
Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 5th day of Octet er 1998.
City of Albertville
By:
Mayor Mark Olsen
Attest:
Linda Goeb, City Clerk
-pc: David Lund, Linda Loeb, Mike Coun, Pete Carlson, Doug Psyk, Thor Meyer
2
r
SEP-16-1998 10:58 NAC
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
612 595 9837 P.08
9-16-98
Planning Commission
Findings of Fact
& Recommendation
Request: Doug Psyk has submitted a preliminary plat for the subdivision of 29 single family
lots. The subject area encompasses 13.42 acres and is located west of Main Street and south
of Psyk's earlier additions. The plat will complete a missing segment of 53'd Street between Main
Avenue and Lambert Avenue, but will require approval of a variance for the street intersection
offset. The preliminary plea is consistent with the concept plan for the Psyk Additions that was
submitted and approved earlier. The final plat encompasses 13 lots and two outlots. The subject
property is zoned R-1, Low Density Single Family Reskiential and the proposed development is
in conformance with the approved Land Use Plan of the City.
Planning Convnission Meeting Date: 9 September 19M
Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received the Planning
Commission now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation:
1. The legal description of the subject property is attached.
2. The Planning Report dated 2 September 1998, prepared by NAC, Inc. is incorporated
herein.
3. The requirements of Section 500 (variances) of the City Zoning Ordinance have best met.
Recornnwdation: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the
applicant's request for approval of a Preliminary and Final Plat and intersection offset variance
have been appr+vvod based on the most current plans and information received to date, subject
to the following conditions:
1. The street jog variance is granted by the City Council according to the review criteria
outlined herein.
2. The increased lot width and screening requirements along Main Avenue as discussed
herein are waived.
3. The preliminary Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control and Utility Plans are reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer.
4. A stop sign is installed by the developer on Lambert Avenue where it meets 53rd Street.
S. A minimum of one shade tree or evergreen tree is provided for each lot according to the
minimum size requirements outlined herein.
SEP-16-1998 10:58 NAC 612 595 9837 P.09
6. The park and trail dedication requirement is satisfied in acoordanoe with the approved final
plat as discussed herein.
7. A development agreement is prepared by the City Attomey and signed by the applicant.
Adopted by the Albertville Planrdng Commission this 9th day of September 19W
City of Albertville
By:
Howard Larson, Chair
Attest:
Linda Goeb, City Cleric
pg: David Lund, Linda Goeb,. Mike Courl, Pete Carlson, Doug Psyk, Thor Meyer
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
INC
PLANNING REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
FILE NO:
COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN ` MARKET RESEARCH
Albertville Mayor and City Council
Albertville Planning Commission
Cynthia Putz-Yang / Elizabeth Stockman
2 September 1998
Albertville - Psyks Seventh Addition Preliminary Plat
Psyks Seventh. Addition Final Plat
163.06 - 98.21
BACKGROUND
Doug Psyk has submitted a preliminary plat for the subdivision of 29 single family lots. The
subject area encompasses 13.42 acres and is located west of Main Street and south of Psyk's
earlier additions. The plat will complete a missing segment of 53ro Street between Main Avenue
and Lambert Avenue, but will require approval of a variance for the street intersection offset. The
preliminary plat is consistent with the concept plan for the Psyk Additions that was submitted and
approved earlier. The final plat encompasses 13 lots and two outlots. The subject property is
zoned R-1, Low Density Single Family Residential and the proposed development is in
conformance with the approved Land Use Plan of the City.
Attached for Reference:
Exhibit A - Site Location
Exhibit B Approved Concept Plan
Exhibit C - Preliminary Plat
Exhibit D - Utility Plan
Exhibit E - Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan
Exhibit F - Final Plat
RECOMMENDATION
The requested approval of a street jog variance for Psyks Addition requires that the Planning
Commission and City Council consider the application in relation to established zoning ordinance
review criteria and Comprehensive Plan policies. The decision to approve or deny the requested
Variance is viewed as a policy decision to be made by the City Council. Should they find -the
submitted plans acceptable, it is recommended that the following conditions be imposed.
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416
PHONE 61 2-595-9635 FAX 61 2-595-9837
1. The street jog variance is granted by the City Council according to the review criteria
outlined herein.
2. The City Council makes a determination regarding the increased lot widths and screening
requirements along Main Avenue as discussed herein.
3. The preliminary Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control and Utility Plans are reviewed and
approved by the City Engineer.
4. A minimum of one shade tree or evergreen tree is provided for each lot according to the
minimum size requirements outlined herein.
5. The park and trail dedication requirement is satisfied in accordance with the approved final
plat as discussed herein.
6. Any other comments of City Staff or Council.
ISSUES ANALYSIS
Lot Size Requirements. All lots meet or exceed the minimum lot size requirement of 12,500
square feet and the minimum lot width requirements for interior (90 feet) and corner (100 feet)
lots. All lots contain usablelbuildable upland equal to at least 80 percent of the required minimum
lot area, in this case 10,000 square feet, as required. All lots are capable of meeting the following
required structure setbacks: 30 feet front, 10 feet side interior, 20 feet side corner, 25 feet rear.
In November of 1997 a Zoning Ordinance amendment was approved which requires that all lots
abutting major collector or arterial streets (Main Avenue) provide an increased lot width of ten (10)
Y m ;feet for the purpose of establishing buffers along the lot line bordering such streets. Accordingly,
A screening plan is required which shows the screening trees/shrubs by type, size and location.
Given the long-term standing of the Psyk concept plan in the community, it shall be a policy
decision by the City Council as to whether this provision should be enforced. The Zoning
Ordinance specifically states that the City Council may make exceptions to the rule, thus 'a
variance is not required.
Lot Coverage Requirement. In the R-1 District, a maximum lot coverage requirement is applicable
which states that no structure or combination of structures shall occupy more than twenty-five (25)
percent of the lot area. Through analysis of the proposed building pad locations in relation to the
lot sizes and configurations, it appears as though this requirement should not pose any problem
for future land owners.
Street Configuration. The proposed main east -west street of the development is shown at the
required 70 foot right-of-way width for minor collector roads and represents a logical extension
of 53rd Street from both directions. Fifty-third Circle NE extending south from the proposed
extension of 53'd Street and ending in a cul-de-sac is shown at the required 60foot right-of-way
width. This road design has changed since the original concept plan approval due to wetland
2
constraints. In the concept plan a road connects 53'd Street via a loop back to Main Street. The
preliminary plat shows thisroadending in a cul-de-sac rather than connecting to Main Street to
avoid a wetland area.
Street Access Limitation, The Zoning Ordinance stipulates that no more than 25 lots may be
platted on a local street which does not have two outlets. While only 13 lots will be final platted
in Psyks Addition, the 53rd Street connection is planned to be constructed with the first phase to
complete the connection between Main and Lambert Avenues. This will improve traffic flow from
the neighborhood already dead -ended at 53rd Street to the west of the proposed plat.
,met Jog The preliminary plat shows a slight street jog of approximately 11 feet in 53rd Street
NE as it intersects with Main Street. A variance has been requested to allow this jog. The
Subdivision Ordinance prohibits street jogs with centerline offsets of less than 150 feet.
.Eliminating this street jog would cause one proposed lot to be lost because corner lots are
required to be at least 100 feet wide. The developer has limited road design options because
53rd Street NE already exists east of Main Street. The design submitted shows the Feast amount
of offset possible without eliminating a lot. The City Engineer has approved the proposed street
location and stated that it will not likely be realized by drivers and should not cause traffic
problems.
In considering all requests for a variance and in taking subsequent action, the City staff, the
Planning Commission and the Council shall make a finding that the proposed action will not:
1. Impair and adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property.
2. Unreasonably increase the congestion in the public street.
3. Increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety.
4. Unreasonably diminish or impair established property values within the neighborhood, or in any way
be contrary to the intent of the City Zoning Ordinance.
5 Violate the intent and purpose of the Comprehensive Plan.
6. Violate any of the terms or conditions of the following:
A variance from the terms of the Zoning Ordinance shall not be granted unless it can be demonstrated
that:
a. Undue hardship will result I the variance is denied due to the existence of special conditions
and circumstances which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building involved.
1) Special conditions may include exceptional topographic or water conditions or, in the
case of an existing lot or parcel of record, narrowness, shallowness, insufficient area
or shape of the property.
2) Undue hardship caused by the special conditions and circumstances may not be
solely economic in nature, I a reasonable use of the property exists under the terms
of the Zoning Ordinance.
3) Special conditions and circumstances causing undue hardship shall not be a result
of lot size or building location when the lot qualifies as a buildable parcel.
3
r .
b. Literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance would deprive the applicant of
rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district, or deny the applicant the
ability to put the property in question to a reasonable use.
C. The special condkions and circumstances causing the undue hardship do not result from the
actions of the applicant.
d. Granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is
denied by the Zoning Ordinance to other lands, structures, or buildings in the same district.
e. The request is not a use variance.
f. The variance requested is the minimum variance necessary to accomplish the intended
purpose of the applicant.
Application for a variance shall set forth reasons that the variance is justified in order to make
reasonable use of the land, structure or building. Should the Council find that the conditions
outlined heretofore apply to the proposed lot or parcel, the Council may grant a variance from the
strict application of the Zoning Ordinance so as to relieve such difficulties or hardships to the
degree considered reasonable, provided such relief may be granted without impairing the intent
of the Zoning Ordinance. The Planning Commission shalt have the power the advise and
recommend such conditions related to the variance regarding the location, character and other
features of the proposed building, structure, or use as it may deem advisable of the intent and
purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.
Grading,. Drainage. & Utilities. A preliminary Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan and
a preliminary Utility Plan have been submitted which will be subject to review and approval by the
City Engineer. The Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan shows the delineated wetland.
Park & Trail Dedication. The site plan illustrates an eight -foot -wide bituminous trail running along
the north side of 53'd Street. The trail is consistent with the City's Park and Trail Plan. The trail
is approximately 1,600 feet long. Estimating a cost of $13 per linear foot, the trail will cost
`approximately $20,800. This cost is subtracted from the cash contribution of $1,300 per lot that
is required to satisfy the park dedication requirement. Subtracting $20,800 from the park
dedication fee of $37,700 leaves the remaining amount owed to be $16,900 for the entire plat.
Only a`portion of this will need to be paid at the time of final plat approval in proportion to the 13
lots and linear frontage of the trail which runs adjacent to the lots being final platted.
Landscaping In addition to required ground cover after completion of grading to prevent soil
erosion and sodding of all front and side yards following home construction, the Zoning
Ordinance requires that the developer plant a minimum of one (1) shade tree or large evergreen
tree per lot which conforms to the following size requirements:
shade trees 2 inch diameter trunk
evergreen trees: 3 feet high
4
1
Analysis of the Pysks Seventh Addition Plat has shown that it is generally well configured in
relation to the surrounding existing development. The subdivision and construction of homes
which follows is capable of meeting all Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements with the
exception of a slight street log for which a variance is requested. Our office has found the request
for a street jog variance to be the result of a unique situation in which the developer has limited
frontage on Main Street and limited street design options because 53rd Street NE east of Main
Street already exists. Because of these findings and the fact that the proposed street alignment
will not cause negative effects to the area, sufficient hardship has been demonstrated. Based on
the review of submitted plans and established City Ordinances, our office recommends approval
of the Psyks Seventh Addition Preliminary and Final Plats subject to the conditions as outlined
in the Executive Summary of this report.
pc: Dave Lund
Linda Goeb
Pete Carlson
Mike Couri
Doug Psyk
Thor Meyer
5
OFAs
�ISVKS 7th Additic
:ilw±
- Q
i 1
•tf •x ,• s ,r, •. •t0 r
.•-- 1 z 3 '' S o1a00 � � - �
tj or
• j :� ; •(fir � 1 ••� �� ' s .. � _ __
' _ r
�� V� S � 4 t � ? a 1 i L ,t.• Z
9 2 , 3 �3
s 1 4
' "vl i s. s• .. i
/[• 2
2 r Q�
1 ri• , , T
� • 1
,4 I ,. t 3 k\• PS Y' s 2
rt •� "s `., IN �, /`� �:F Y •e
IV
Mr-
04
14
ilk
w
11 jig 'is* ST
t :• _` --a . �♦,, _.. •_. ---- •-- `` , �.\ I �,..i"' /ter..+, r. R��Y...„
Aw
t-•�"_,.—•�M , � , t° J • AS w�0 .».NO .- »...o..� . ,RO � . I y. — . �•" . �...n+ri' /.`' •) 1 •, • I
`'a,, -�: �• �. \ '� .- � /may,' � j�j�p.(p
; t 4 ;r 3 ,EXHIBIT B
0 x
Q '
F
z �;-
�W_� �
W aR�ih
W
Wa
a
a
- - -- - -
i n
�
w
1
__Vt.
'• 14'
asaaaaaaa�aaaaa
�335333333333333 ,
aa}}aaaaaxaaa>Fa
�4q.gOw..2r-2-
3333333}333333
EXHIBIT C
a
fs
6 '`j `g - _1� I � " ' _ �+'� � � � sit � I • t� �� _ ._ _ `_
1 ,7 far � oo•4ai i �� � „ �. _
1 rt _ _ 3 sv = to r °s e
06
,%;\ ���I�'�
12,
42
34
5--- r�i� tit g 1=p �• oe t..l= �'
AD Ana
r.TiT.iiTSiiiiiiZ'i'i`i�STi ... ... __ _. ! : .. .. �,�c�r4 �Sn•��ir� � �-�� �
Z
E� E�
MYI
x'�ILL-
a �
a
a
-i v' L
— — — — — — — —
—^----
m
�.— — — —
• ! 1 , f•'tj i 1
1
'I,
f • JYl1 Y' �n �•� 1 ':' -.
�. .o
�`,`/
, 1
fit' �4 �• \ \ --'i4
" \ 4
..\ �
e- F
•.-
1-
1 1
I
M �
__; ___-` 1 r'-'�a�--1. � •
it T�� w.+
y'
EXHIBIT D
Z
Q , x MID
a
z
3€e
F p ag,8
z
Q 0 p ."- x. ;€ a%-
pr QZ z
;�jsigSsa�8 x :
yQ Q��jj eg�a aaa i +�i; II
H iL /Li
yLL,
c ✓� agky i' as i :
zz
a ai
� y
W C� a
�a ar, J
aA
v
gF
e..
iPr ii j; if s I s i ji
£�� � ii ii� e� 1 p� � ra► =d
� / s
r
t ,i ! b
EXHIBIT E
e
rm
a����■ TW+J wire .rm wn 'r '+'t
?] Y. r Mr �`•I/fY r Y A P BMW WM«'} & ft F s
_ lYfYie ' M#vn
— — mist
{i , t
fnl— '
I! j _�—
._ L C' _ K ^• �S',a�"`' \(''a"' ->r i ' ,.lam ~ �C33�1�
c+•:.K:.. :arYYY+ n S� n ' -s z'lt3• t � -
r
Is
till
It
I �till
EXHIBIT F 4
t t
INC
PLANNING REPORT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
Albertville Mayor and City Council
Albertville Planning Commission
Elizabeth Stockman
21 September 1998
Albertville - Mold Tech Site Plan Review
FILE: 163.06 98.22
BACKGROUND
Mold Tech has submitted plans for development of Lot 3, Block 10 Barthel's industrial Park. The
company, which is relocating from Minneapolis, plans to design and build plastic and die cast
molds.' The principal building encompasses 12,132 square feet of the 2.95,acre site. Noputside
storage is proposed on site. The property is zoned 1-1, Light Industrial under which the.
manufacturing operation is a permitted use.
Attachments:
Exhibit A -Site Location
Exhibit B Lot Survey
Exhibit C -Site Plan
Exhibit D Grading, Drainage, Utility, and Erosion Control Plan
Exhibit E Landscape Plan
Exhibit F -Building Floor Plan
Exhibit G Building Elevations
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation
Based on the review of submitted plans in comparison to Zoning Ordinance requirements, our
office recommends approval of the Site and Building Plans for Mold Tech, provided the following
conditions are met:
1. The provision of 50 parking stalls is deemed acceptable by the City Council in the interim.
The site plan is revised to show. a) the remaining 14 required parking stalls as future
development and b) parking consistency with the grading plan. Should they become
needed to satisfy demand, the City Council may require that they be constructed.
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA .5541 6
PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9637
2. The City Engineer reviews and approves all grading, drainage, utility, and erosion control`
issues.
3. A detailed sign plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner and
City Building Inspector prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
4. Detailed lighting plans shall be submitted which specify the style, height, strength/wattage
and distribution of fixtures proposed on the property as discussed herein. Lighting plans
must be approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
5. Park dedication requirements shall be satisfied with a cash payment equal to ten (10)
percent of the City's calculated fair market value of the property.
6.
A TIF agreement is signed by the applicant as approved by the City Attorney and City
Council.
Issues Analysis
Zoning. The property is zoned 1-1, Light Industrial which allows manufacturing and warehousing
as a permitted use. The plans show space for future building expansion of 17,000 square feet.
Lot and Building Requirements. The. proposed development is in conformance with all lot size
and building requirements, outlined as follows:
1-1 District
Required
Proposed
Lot Size
None
2.95 acres
Lot Width
100 feet
225.37 feet
Front Yard Setback (west)
35 feet
89 feet
Side Yard Setback (north)
35 feet (street)
39 feet
Side Yard Setback (south)
10 feet
145 feet
..Rear Yard Setback (east)
20 feet
185 feet
Budding Height Maximum
35 feet
22 feet
Lot Coverage by Structures
30% maximum
9.45%
Lot Coverage by all Hard
Surfaces
85% maximum
32.37%
The proposed development is in conformance with all lot and building requirements outlined
above.
Parking and Circulation. The Zoning Ordinance requires that no curb cut exceed twenty-four
(24) feet in width unless approved by the City Engineer. The one curb cut measures 24 feet and
is appropriately located five (5) feet or more from all property lines.
2
ro
The following parking requirements apply to the proposed development:
Office Area (3,545 sf): 3 plus 1 space/200 sf
Manufacturing (4,300 sf): 1 space/350 sf
Warehouse (4,287 sf): 1 space/1000 sf
Company owned trucks not stored in bldg: 1 space each
Employees (1 for each on maximum shift)
21 spaces
13 spaces
5 spaces
0
25 spaces
TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: 64
The submitted site plan shows fifty (50) parking stalls to be paved at the front of the building/site.
The applicants wish to begin operations with these stalls, knowing that they may be required to
provide additional parking in the future. The business has very little customer traffic. The 50
stalls will allow the business to grow in employees. The site plan must be revised to show and
reserve space for the remaining fourteen (14) required stalls. If use of the first phase (50) stalls
becomes inadequate to meet the demand, the City Council shall require additional stalls to be
established.
Loading. Two loading areas have been provided on site. The main loading area is located on
the south side of the building, while a secondary overhead door has been provided on the
building's east end. A large paved area has been provided to accommodate truck maneuvering.
Building Type and Construction. The proposed building is to be constructed of precast
'concrete panels with painted accent stripes. Aluminum trim is to be used for windows and at the
roof line. These materials are in conformance with the City Zoning Ordinance.
Grading, Drainage, Utilities and Erosion Control. A grading, drainage, utility, and erosion
control plan has been submitted as required. The plan shall be subject to formal review and
written approval by the City Engineer. The majority of storm water runoff flows into the on -site
pond and eventually into the adjacent wetland.
Signage. No plans for signage have been submitted at this time. Prior to issuance of a
certificate of occupancy, signage plans shall be submitted to the City Planner for review and
approval.
Lighting. Detailed lighting plans have not been submitted which specify the style, height,
strength/wattage and distribution of exterior fixtures proposed on the property. A photometric
plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner which indicates the foot
candle power of lights to ensure that they are in compliance with ordinance requirements. Any
light or combination of lights which cast light on a public street shall not exceed one foot candle.
Bare incandescent light bulbs shall not be permitted in view of adjacent property or the public
street. Prior to electrical work being completed for the project, plans must be submitted for
approval of the City Planner. A certificate of occupancy will not be issued until lighting has been
R?
approved by the City.
Screening and Landscaping. The Zoning Ordinance requires submission of a landscaping and
screening plan for all new development for which Mold Tech has complied. The plan shows
seven (7) deciduous shade trees (Maple and Linden), six (6) ornamental trees (Crabapple), nine
(9) large Spruce, and thirty-four (34) ornamental shrubs (Juniper and Spires). The plantings are
appropriately located along the two streets and at the front of the building. The Spruce serve to
screen the parking area.
Park and Trail Dedication. Park dedication requirements shall be satisfied with a cash payment
equal to ten (10) percent of the City's calculated fair market value of the property. No trails are
proposed in the area of the site, thus there are no trail dedication requirements to be met.
Refuse. A concrete block trash enclosure has been located on the south side of the building.
It will be painted to match the building and has cedar gates.
CONCLUSION
The Mold Tech plans are in conformance with the majority of Zoning Ordinance criteria, however,
there are a few minor issues to resolve prior Ao issuance of building and occupancy permits.
Provided the conditions as listed in the Executive Summary of this report are met, our office
recommends approval of the project.
pc: David Lund
Linda Goeb
Mike Couri
Pete Carlson
Kevin Mealhouse
Chuck Sand
Dennis Sharp.
w u
III
l
® -
Uts
l
0$-131l98 ICON 15:18 FAX 612 546 0885 R.A. ANDERSON & ASSOC. L� � bo lY • VV rrti .vas Q002
TEL No.
g5o8
S.awish.a in lot
LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC- s "°. -
LAND SURVEYORS s�' 1" w-
It oWu n %WNbUt tOr LAWS or SCAU or Ni>.xnOTA I. %mu. Ile Ywn"rd
• ,.oa rDrt ana.. weu
IllttseyNM. Mta""de �L17M
.01110 Oa�M ftme v [fib"
a,,,w n.r...} pwetNn
bururVers (Strtifiratt t> n �«. a~
' tgr6s R�lneO O� w MkA
N reMw* N t� IeNa
� Ktwee+etien
T` . ..1 a+�kMelw►
i)ELINEATED' WETLAW LOCATION FOR: �+hAp44 lop et Pea
GeV" rbw
PFEFFER COMPANY, INC. s L..«l rt er
�I
-----------------
lot S. Sock 10. OMTME S t�USTAIAI. PARK Wright County. ieRrmesota
/wu�Aone/da�lBP3-tOS10
�e elrw� .. Rem Nets e1 r.evd . WAM,rttm � � aC)'W. Wa INS M Mue". •'
,e MnM l�.Na N =1. ere+e baNNM M \ 1r+
:iIEFe1 bw*W n+ how 16m IMr Ifll
tvwra •r d. a+P_91g..
EXHIBIT B
SEP-30-1998 16:18 NAC 612 595 983
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE i
Gi
Findings of Fact
& Decision
Applicant's Name: Mold Tech_ Chuck Aand
Request: Mold Tech has submitted plans for development of Lot 3, Bk)dc 10 Barthel's
Industrial Park. The company, which is relocating from Minneapolis, plans to design and build
plastic and the cast molds. The principal building encompasses 12,132 square feet of the 2.95
acre site. No outside storage is proposed on site. The property is zoned 1.1, Light Industrial
under which the manufacturing operation is a permitted use.
City Council Mooing Date: 5 October 1998
Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received the City Council
now makes the following findings of fact and decision:
1. The legal description of the subject property is Lot 3, Block 10, Barthel's Industrial Park.
2. The Planning Report dated 21 September 1998, prepared by NAC, Inc. is incorporated
herein.
3. The requirements of Section 15W (site and building plan review) of the City Zoning
Ordinance have been met.
4. - On 29 September 19M the Albertville Planning Commission conducted a special meeting
to consider the applicant's request. Upon review of the application and evidence received,
the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the project.
Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's
request for approval of site and building plans has been approved based on the most current
plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions:
1. The provision of 50 parking stalls is deemed acceptable by the City Council in the interim.
The site plan is revised to show: a) the remaining 14 required parking stalls as future
development and b) parking consistency with the grading plan. Should they become
needed to satisfy demand, the City Council may require that they be constructed.
The City Engineer reviews and approves all grading, drainage, utility, and erosion control
issues.
A detailed sign plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner and
City Building Inspector prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
SEP-30-1998 16:19 NAC 612 595 9837 P.04/04
4. Detailed lighting plans shall be submitted which specify the style, height, strongthANattage
and distribution of fixtures proposed on the property as discussed herein. Lighting plans
must be approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
5. A TIF agreement is signed by the applicant as approved by the City Attorney and City
Council.
Adopted by the Albertville City Council this Sth day of October 1996.
City of Albertville
By:
Mayor Mark Olsen
Attest:
Linda Goeb, City Clerk
pc: David Lund, Unda Goeb, Mike Courl, Pete Carlson, Chuck Sand, Dennis Sharp
2
TOTAL P.04
SEP-30-19% 16*-17 NPC
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
Applicant's Name:
612 595 9837 P.01/0+4
Planning Commission
Findings of Fact
& Recommendation
ROq: Mold Tech has submitted plans for development of Lot 3, Block 10 Barthei's
Industrial Park. The company, which is relocating from Minneapolis, plans to design and build
plastic and die cast molds. The principal building encompasses 12,132 square feet of the 2.95
acre site. No outside storage is proposed on site. The property is zoned 1-1, Light Industrial
under which the manufacturing operation is a permitted use.
Pining Commission Meding Date: 29 September 1998 (special meeting)
Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received the Planning
Commission now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation:
1. The legal description of the subject property is Lot 3, Block 10, Barthel's Industrial Park.
2. The Planning Report dated 21 September 1998, prepared by NAC, Inc. is incorporated
herein.
3. The requirements of Section 1500 (site and building plan review) of the City Zooing
Ordinance have been met_
Recamrrondation: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the
applicant's request for approval of site and building plans has been approved based on the most
current plans and Information received to date, subject to the following conditions:
1. The provision of 50 parking stalls is deemed acceptable by the City Council in the interim.
The site plan is revised to show: a) the remaining 14 required parking stalls as future
development and b) parking consistency with the grading plan. Should they become
needed to satisfy demand, the City Council may require that they be construoW.
2. The City Engineer rsyiwus am approves all grading, drainage, utility. and erosion control
issues.
3. A detailed sign plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Planner and
City Building Inspector prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy.
4. Detailed lighting plans shall be submitted VA** specify the style, height, strengthlwattage
and distribution of lbdures proposed on the property as discussed herein. Lighting plans
must be approved by the City Planner prior to issuance of a .certificate of occupancy.
` SEP-30-1998 16:18 NAC 612 595 9837 P.02iO4
S. A TIF agreement is signed by the applicant as approved by the City Attorney and City
Council.
Adopted by the Albertville Planning Commission this 29th day of September I M.
City of Albertville
By:
Howard Larson, Chair
Attest:
Linda Goeb, City Clerk
pc: David Lund, Ling Gioeb, !Mike Couri, Pets Carlson, Chuck Sand. Dennis Sharp
2
I
ry �• a oil: ,C I a C
V
W ga e�osauu!W a11!^1a qld �•— z ��
ter= Fh ° 'OD 'H:)31 C]lOW a 00 y a
n E t ao j SuippS pasodoJdi 0-illw1b
X
— W
q< (lii(Ili
W
OX
all
IdI sin
Jti a d r i -' • M �1 I .. � 11121 fit
LLA
"'list� , as flits�� ��.►� ! _ _;- l
� � Oe� �'�NH W. � �.e«Hfddr:dd < � .! 4 •, N H f A d n d O f N H / A fNHfd 0. NHf A d -
O O O 47
C)W 1 m d c Li 4.: ti i _ i �[ J 3 = a
06
\ III
\ Ilt
f 1•` .Z t7 N 4 C - - - - \`\\ - N ,y it �. C 10•-0. I. I. L z
2iBl1 l
a,
1L U N \ �. d
co
in t,4
�...:j 59
Q S
z zM
41
Cff3tb`
b �1
m ,
W.
m
N .. J b . ` . - Zvi \\ `y
CA
�. r -
in
I
O to
a, I15 I 1
v oa,a
• �� i I
i 1 �
� i I
f, r
t 1
Clip
i I 9 I I
7r
Ail
is
jig
jai �i I I
ryd
KIM
4
- `d �.�
.- 0
Tilsix
l
q , q y Y
ii n x !R ! I; : >, 9 l a r G z ggr �p �Y y n gg qq
it II ! yy za " %9 ` a$a g� i:l mi 416 0g
Y� �C YF 6
� � ��;� ��� i Y�3 A"p•e Ap���g ��# �;� g � �.. si g�n � 3Q ��r n in a � lilt
��
_DRI
d
Y
5�
\ 1
1I}
<ay
1 \
SY zz
fi t I m
a� Ogg.
U
m
W N
y�W
Z m
W f.p
vim
of
O
ao
�za
le J
III w
1
\
m
m
m
a
O.
N
N
r
00
a
LC)
N
�-
d
N
co
w
G
Q
Z
o
<
c^
�
Z
6
�
U
Q
?
r
6
W
IAW
W�Z<
vi F
W
0
i�4S Oz
<z
Wz
JW
Z4
O2
wU
Q]
Q a..
Fcci
as
20
�m
0
W
W
2
a
U
Z
w
0
U'
o
_
Z
z
O
3�
�z
��z3
0<
LL
az
<
osas
F—
U
ZI
7M
ciLLJ
Q
m
U
TOLLJ
W
0-
F-
1
LL
lejosaU W ''OIUAIJagld
OD HD31 GIOW
ao� �uip�ins pasodoad _
a x
W
W
a
e b
1
Q
I �xSolIS
f- xl I tl xdg
a � m
ON
z�
_ b
T �
t" ;f . • �
�. :jz
b I
.0 .9im
-
N
rh b
i
A -At .Ot-.f A'^A .0-A ' ,0-S I .9•'.ff .o`pt � �
« b b b
js
ID
,... ...� F
}+
A-.f �-A A -A .0-.9. A`A A�AI A Al .0-A ,0-A o L O-A o b
.o-.f .0-.f A-Z n
.0-49
.0'
'71T,
i mtx 1 b a$ r
br4�lRwn --"
r a#
ejosauww ''ajl!n3a9gid �--
D
i� . S
,s 'ow'HD31 aIOW E
i I _ss� ! r �1
E = I ao j Suippil pasodoad = L
i
K S c`5 rc �' X N
W
V. 61
1�
I I
I!
II
ii
I!
I I
I{
II
I
1!
II
Ii
it
II
If
II
�
�1.
<
�;
II
I.t
l
10
LI
,
I
if
I I
1i
it
II
i!
I!
fV4**1PPM »Iwl»1i
• 99/30/98 17:56 FAX 13302818789 SMI ST. CLOUD +++`ALBERTVILLE CI'.`I
QOr PAM AN O WNSOPOM MN ■Si p OM MU A 0OPSNM PALLA W a 1+4 of O LAKBoCJEAY7" 's
TO: Vkoolb
ljn im-
t NY
city ckxk
;y
" AlbfttviIle, Iu nnesolal -
FROM: Pdw I C*40n„'P.E.
K
DATE. SgKamba 30, 1999,cwu
�
t
,a r.
����yy,yy}}��(�y}yyy��� y`yry�.�■/��
rzllw
■A�l�■�
1Jii/iii;�s iI13.VM
AU ofMiM pip work is *Jf jed and dw cowwW has WIding the
I have mvbwed,aU dke wodc to do* and mommmd the b of be r d i�d io no.
less thin :.. ,MVY
art 7, 09/30/98 17:50 FAX 13202318160 SBH ST. 'CLotm
;+► ALSEMILLB CITY Q002/003
:,.
AM Lw
MEMO R�i�I�tl
M PA UL AW 0 Nwmvpom AW *Or #XOM AW 0 OWV9MPUM W1
0 VAMW W CLAW OPUNTY, &V .
Lime C�aab TO:
}
ty
1llbtvllla, �
mom: pew J: P.#. ..
city
DATE.- , r 30,19 .z
w r
{' •
yy{dry" �� '}�q� {y�yl� i , , y
�.Ap��A/��aA/,,�■' ■��[(�
be MbX*d
JiiVY {�/ no!1�MMVti/V
c: M&e Comi, City AUomay
{
a
PILOT
LAND D"ELOPMMT COMPANY
>ber ati_1998
W. DIM Lml
CIWA&Wnistrator
SW5 Main Avmw W.
Albertville, W 55MI
of Qyfit hrl^.MW Oaks 2" mad $4 Addit�ns
Mar W.
Carwm-
On 3uiy W. we requestedamdu a ftom $335,437 to $317,273. To date this has not occ uffed.
CurventlymehavecORDIACtaladditional. work and request a further reduction from $317, 273 to $193,�9
which is the renimining str&x and tail work lento do for all roads planed and dedicated. w h to neact
wc* name of the and will have been: placed and we eacpect that. the curb add l and ,
street will be complete by October e. 'Upon the completion of the street we are requesting in advance an
additional reduction of $75,000. SfaU Wilkies will start shordy.after.that tim.: --
Please issue confirmation to our leader and us regarding the lowering of letter of credit #9-98 to cover the
°and pedesubm trail. Asa your inspectors can verify, all the wotk to date has met or ... .
wweeded City
Please schedule this item for the Council mfttmg and notify Northeast State Bank accordingly upon
your concun=ce with my meth My►ou have any questions, please contact me.
i
Sincerely,
D6
Land Development Dina"
r
1 iwSwVW011dontLaMUDEVtE.ETT RBIPROJECi�'tALBRi"VLEtc Ckac. as
13736 Johnsm Street N£ • Hain lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 Fax: 757-4094
","PILOT
Sq,tanbut 24,1998
ifr. Pete C - C4 ft&W @`Sm
Mr" Dane LOW
City Actin'
5W5 Main Avenue NB.
Albertville, MN $5301
L Cedar Cyr dgU
Dear Air. Carlson:
1U week thelast 4 SOfholes vmo secdod. It Wm about 10 days for tine seed to clearly a'{
s WewMbcwvm*&etmminor&rtortgww&asUftfio
octohor as possible : ft"ousiy, aft ft dew lots were seeded with oats fxr a
u-nifi-M-1 look dim the MOO seed nixes. All the rch areas of the golf
sec&dwi&a&mwmm]Fumlly,aHpwdboaftbavebmwo&dmdcmmdwi*an. .
our *o NPDES penWL All work in ditch 9 is" late peer
our apeornent vvith Wriglit County wid a our pie boundary.
plegse mm cmfimsfim to our knder and us the relom of letter of chit #21-96 fan; .
$50,000 to Zno. This letter ofauk was spmfically for grading and ermm control.
As you may recall, we still have surety over the mbdrvWm lots thermselves, which can provide any
additional surdy coverage for raw Vmhug issues. Clearly, the golf course will compmue to wed
and rowed anyareas wWon its boundaxiies in oeder to establiah a playable surer without the stiff
ofa letter of
Please schedule this item ft the nod Council meeft andnotify Northeast State Bank a ccm.
upon your concurrence vvA vay.mpM above. If you have my questions, please contact me.
Sincerely,
JensenDonald
Lariat i
1 A
13736 Johmon Sbvd NF. Hamm Laim MN 55304 • 757 6 • Fax: 757-4094
09/30/98 17:35 FAX 13202318760
K ..
wt
SEH ST. 'CLOUD ALBERTYILIZ CITY l0011003
AJL"iA^MAAlf%i )AI