1999-05-03 CC PacketALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
May 3, 1999
7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL - ADOPT
AGENDA
2. MINUTES
(a) April 19, 1999, regular City Council Meeting
(b) April 22, 1999, special City Council Meeting
3. CITIZEN FORUM - (10 Minute Limit)
4. CONSENT AGEND*
(a) Approve payment of Check #'s 11691 -11741
(b) Resolution #1999-16 (A Resolution Approving Renewal of the Gambling
License for Voiture 1281 Minnetonka La Societe 40 Hommes Et 8)
(c) Rivers of Hope Day Proclamation
(d) Request from Friendly City Days Committee to close down streets June 10 —
June 14
7t tS. SPECIAL ORDER*
• Public Hearing on the creation of Tax Increment Financing District No. 11
and a Tax Increment Financing Plan for the TIF District and modification of
the Development Program for existing Development District No. 1
- Resolution #1999-19 (Resolution Approving Modified Development
Program for Development District No. 1 and a Tax Increment Financing
Plan for Tax Increment Financing District No. 11)
6. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS
glo a.
• Report
os b. Planning & Zoning
(1) GEM Business Park
• Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Rezoning from B-3 to I-2
Preliminary & Final Plat Approval
Conditional Use Permits
(a) Reduction of parking requirements
(b) Development of industrial use within the Shoreland Overlay
District
(c) Retail sales use in an industrial zone
• Site Plan Approval with minor 5' setback variance
(2) Ordinance #1999-3 (An Ordinance Amending the Albertville Land
Use Plan and Zoning Ordinance Map To Be In Compliance With
Plans For the Albertville Crossings and Land Of Lakes Projects In The
City)
C. . ag neering
$;1S (1) Update on costs for 62°d Street Improvements
$S3S (2) Feasibility Report for the CSAH 19 Improvement Project
RESOLUTION #1999-17 (Resolution Accepting Feasibility
;.4 Study and Calling for a Public Hearing on Wright County
Highway 19 Improvements)
3 jb (3) Fire Hall bids — Authorize staff to negotiate with apparent low bidder
d.
g, (1) GEM Business Park
(i) Developer's Agreement — Land of Lakes Tile Co.
(ii) Request from GEM Development Company to borrow from
the City's Revolving
(iii) RESOLUTION #1999-18 (Sponsoring Unit of Government
Resolution)
(2) Pilot Land Development Company Issues
(i) Plan approval issues south of Highway 118
(ii) Alternative surety agreement for Cedar Creek Master Plan
q,jo e. Administration,
(1) Outlet Mall update
(2) Oakside Park playground equipment
(3) R quest from Jones Intercable for refund of portion of franchise fee
(Y) OrA'n1
6. ADJOURNMENT
UPCOMING MEETINGSAMPORTANT DATES
May 10
Board of Review Meeting
May 12
Regular Planning & Zoning Meeting
May 17
Regular City Council Meeting
May 24
Regular Joint Powers Water Board
May 31
Memorial Day — Legal Holiday
City Offices Closed
June 7
Regular City Council Meeting
June 9
Regular Planning & Zoning Meeting
7:00 PM
7:00 PM
7:00 PM
7:00 PM
7:00 PM
7:00 PM
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
April 19, 1999
Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM
PRESENT: Mayor John Olson, Councilmembers Robert Gundersen,
Duane Berning, Patti Stalberger and John Vetsch, City Administrator -Clerk Linda
Goeb, City Attorney Mike Couri, and City Engineer Peter Carlson
Mayor Olson called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to
order.
The agenda was amended as follows:
• Add Item 4e — Approve 3.2 License for the Albertville Lions at the St.
Albert's Parish Center on April 25, 1999
• Delete Item 5e(1)
• Add Item 5c(3) — Discuss bidding process for the Fire Hall
Berning made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Gundersen seconded
the motion. All voted aye.
Vetsch made a motion to approve the minutes of the April 5, 1999, meeting
as presented. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Mayor Olson asked if anyone present wished to address the Council under
the Community Forum section of the agenda. No one present wished to address
the Council.
Gundersen made a motion to approve payment of Check #'s 11651 — 11673
as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion.
Gundersen made a motion to approve the Revenue/Expenditure Report for
the month of March as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to approve the Financial Statement for March
1999 as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to approve the Therapeutic Massage Therapist
License for Deborah Kay Kuntz. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to approve a 3.2 Malt Liquor License for the
Albertville Lions at the St. Albert's Parish Center on April 25, 1999. Vetsch
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
April 19, 1999
Page 2 of 5
Stalberger made a motion to accept the Public Works Department Report as
presented. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council reviewed Donald Anderson's five-foot minor variance request
from the side -yard setback in a R-1 zoning district to allow the construction of a
15' X 15' three season porch on the west side of his house. Zoning Administrator
Kevin Mealhouse reported that the Zoning Ordinance allows uncovered porches
only to encroach not more than five feet into the required side -yard setback.
Mealhouse found that neither the existing lot size nor the building location cause
undue hardship to the property, one of the findings necessary to grant a variance,
and he recommends that the minor variance request be denied.
Stalberger made a motion to deny the request for a minor variance for
Donald Anderson. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Mike Savitski has applied for a variance from the City's Sign Ordinance to
allow the placement of business signs on the west side of his commercial building
located at 11095 61s' Street NE. Zoning Administrator Kevin Mealhouse reports
that the Sign Ordinance allows each tenant in a multiple tenant building to display
a business sign on the front on the building, with the building front being defined
as the side of the building that fronts the public right-of-way. Mealhouse reports
that this building is unique in that there are tenant spaces with the only public
entrance on the west side of the building.
The Planning Commission has conducted a public hearing on the requested
Savitiski variance and recommended the Council approve the variance to allow a
maximum of three 4' X 8' signs on the west side of the building, all signs to be
located at the same height and that no other variances for signs be granted for this
building.
Mike Savitski told the Council he was opposed to the Planning
Commission's recommendation that no other variances be granted for the
building. City Attorney Couri is more comfortable with the Council stating "It is
the intent of this Council that further variances would not be granted".
Vetsch made a motion to approve the variance request to allow no more
than three 4' x 8' signs (one per business only) for those businesses that have their
entrance on the west side of the building, with the condition that those signs must
a
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
April 19,1999
Page 3 of 5
be located at same height and stating this Council's intent that no further variances
are granted for this building. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
City Engineer Pete Carlson reviewed the Feasibility Study for the 62nd
Street improvements, including sanitary sewer, water extensions and street
improvements. Carlson presented the estimated costs of the project.
The Council discussed whether the street improvements should include
curb and gutter along 62nd Street. Councilmember Vetsch stated he favors curb
and gutter along the entire 62nd Street, with the estimated $11,000 cost to be paid
through the TIF funds. The Council concurred that one half of the costs of the
curb and gutter along the already paved portion of 62nd Street would be assessed to
Heidi's Market.
The Council agreed that blacktop could be omitted on the portion of
MacIver Avenue NE bordering the Land of Lakes Tile property.
Stalberger made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1999-15 titled
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING FEASIBILITY STUDY AND CALLING FOR
HEARING ON 62ND STREET IMPROVEMENTS. Gundersen seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
Carlson reported that four trees on the Thomas Felker property in the
Greenhaven Addition had been damaged during the drainage construction project.
He feels that $300 is adequate to replace the four trees damaged. City Attorney
Couri reminded the Council that the property owner should sign a statement that
releases the City from further claims.
Stalberger made a motion to notify the Felkers that the City will reimburse
them up to a maximum of $300 for tree replacement. The Felkers will be required
to present the City with an invoice for the trees and sign a "hold harmless"
agreement prior to the reimbursement being issued. Vetsch seconded the motion.
All voted aye.
City Engineer Carlson reviewed the bidding process for the design/build of
the new fire hall. Carlson explained that a design/build is a negotiating process
and the final cost may not be exactly the bid price. Since the bidders have only
minimum specifications for the construction materials, there may be differences in
the quality of materials betwedn the bidders and the low bidder may have bid the
+ T
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
April 19,1999
Page 4 of 5
minimum standard materials. Should the City may want to upgrade items, such as
garage doors, windows, etc., terms can be negotiated with the bidder. The City
can increase the bid price up to, but not above, the second lowest bidder.
City Attorney Couri reviewed the proposed TIF Plan for the Land of Lakes
Tile Co. The proposed TIF is a pay-as-you-go TIF wherein the City reimburses
the developer from taxes paid on the property. The Council will conduct a public
hearing on the TIF Plan on May 3ra
Stalberger made a motion to approve the Revolving Loan Funds Policy.
Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Couri reviewed the Developer's Agreement for Albertville Crossings with
the Council. Couri recommends that the park dedication fees for the commercial
property be negotiated with the developer and the surety provided equal one third
of the costs of the project.
Stalberger made a motion to approve the Developer's Agreement for
Albertville Crossings as recommended by the city attorney. Berning seconded the
motion. Stalberger, Berning, Gundersen and Olson voted aye. Vetsch voted no.
The motion carried.
Gundersen made a motion to approve Amendment No. 1 to Declaration of
Common Interest Community No. 20 Planned Community Cottages of
Albertville. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council accepted the letter from the Albertville Lions Club requesting
consideration for a gambling license if or when another gambling site becomes
available. No action was taken.
The Council chose not to reschedule a joint meeting with the City of St.
Michael at this time.
The Council reviewed the request from the Church of St. Albert to purchase
one half to an acre of land contiguous with the church's western property line and
the continuation of 57t' Street for expansion of church parking space. The Council
has previously discussed meeting with church representatives to consider a cost -
sharing arrangement for the construction of a parking lot on the east side of the
fire hall property to accommodate both the fire hall and the church's parking
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
April 19,1999
Page 5 of 5
needs. The Council agreed that a meeting should be set with the church
representatives to discuss a mutually agreeable solution.
Gundersen made a motion to approve the proposed revisions to the Sewage
Disposal Standards for Wright County. Berning seconded the motion. All voted
aye.
Councilmember Gundersen explained that the Joint Powers Water Board is
requesting authorization from the City to allow the Board to condemn property if a
negotiated settlement cannot be reached with the property owner. The Cities of St.
Michael and Hanover have granted the Board that authority. Gundersen explained
that the Board needs to construct a well and water treatment facility and the best
location for the facility is on the property owned by Doug Psyk adjacent to the
Board's pumphouse. The Board has offered Mr. Psyk $100,000 for approximately
three acres. Psyk has made a counter-offer. The Board hired an appraiser whose
report values the property considerably under the Board's offer. Acquiring the
property in a timely manner is vital to the project.
Vetsch made a motion to table action on the issue until the next meeting.
There was no second to the motion.
Olson made a motion to grant authority to the Joint Powers Board to begin
condemnation proceedings on the Psyk property upon Psyk's rejection of the Joint
Powers Board's purchase offer or on April 26t'' whichever occurs first. Berning
seconded the motion. Olson, Berning, Stalberger and Gundersen voted aye.
Vetsch voted no. The motion carried.
Gundersen made a motion to adjourn at 10:00 PM. Vetsch seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
John A. Olson, Mayor
Linda Goeb, Administrator -Clerk
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
APRIL 22, 1999
Albertville City Hall
6:00 PM
Present: Mayor John Olson, Councilmembers Patricia Stalberger, Duane
Berning,and John Vetsch
Mayor Olson called the meeting to order.
Berning made a motion to approve the agenda. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted
aye.
Mayor Olson open the public hearing- 6:02 PM
Vetsch is worried about property owners, along the east border, losing trees. Gary Bartel
in particular.
Developer is willing to work with the property owners to ensure that doesn't happen.
Berning made a motion to close public hearing. Vetsch seconded the motion. 6:05 pm. All
voted aye.
Mike Couri explains resolutions-
Vetsch made a motion to approve RESOLUTION # 1999-12 titled A RESOLUTION
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT. Berning wants to add 2.) Sidewalks, curb and gutter.
Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Berning made a motion to approve RESOLUTION # 1999-13 titled A RESOLUTION
DECLARING THE OFFICIAL INTENT OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE TO
REIMBURSE CERTAIN EXPENDITURES FROM THE PROCEEDS OF BONDS TO
BE ISSUED BY THE CITY. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Vetsch made a motion to approve RESOLUTION 1999-14 titled RESOLUTION
AWARDING CONTRACT, for the amount of $780,144.75. Add sidewalks. Berning
seconded the motion. All voted aye
Berning made a motion to adjourn at 6:15 PM. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted
aye.
M. 1
Check No.
11691
11692
11693
11694
11695
11696
11697
11698
11699
11700
11701
11702
11703
11704
11705
11706
11707
11708
11709
11710
11711
11712
11713
11714
11715
11716
11717
11718
11719
11720
CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT
May 3, 1999
Vendor
Action Radio
Affordable Sanitation
AirTouch Cellular
Barthel, Albert
Berning, Duane
Berning, Gordon
Berning, Greg
Black, Scott
Campbell, Joe
Chicos, Chad
City of St. Michael
Construction Bulletin
CPR Emergency Training
Delta Dental
Diversified Inspection
Drewelow, Robert
Front Line Plus
Gaulrapp, Chris
Gergen, John
Gibson, Amy
Heinen, Paul
JME
Joint Powers Board
Lewis, Brian
Long, Steve
Marquette, Bob
Medica
Mills, Tate
Minnegasco
MN Dept. of Revenue
Purpose
Repair FD radios
Parks
FD Cell Phone
Fire Calls
Fire Calls
Fire Calls
Fire Calls
Fire Calls
Fire Calls/EMT
Fire Calls/EMT
Grading Marlowe Avenue
Fire Hall Bids
FD Classes
Group Dental Insurance
Building Inspections
Fire Calls/Firefighter I
Name Tags for FD
Fire Calls
Fire Calls
Fire Calls
Fire Calls
March Snowplowing
Contract Maintenance
Fire Calls/Firefighter 1
Fire Calls
Fire Calls/Firefighter I
May Group Insurance
Fire Calls/Firefighter I
Monthly Service
April Income Taxes
Amount
$ 78.20
$ 107.85
$ 5.68
$ 70.00
$ 98.00
$ 7.00
$ 7.00
$ 91.00
$ 528.48
$ 230.00
$ 200.00
$ 263.90
$ 950.00
$ 255.60
$ 5,253.08
$ 270.96
$ 118.00
$ 119.00
$ 119.00
$ 84.00
$ 14.00
$ 540.00
$ 2,793.43
$ 203.84
$ 84.00
$ 185.95
$ 2,104.16
$ 560.48
$ 189.06
$ 430.00
k I
CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT
May 3, 1999
11721
Minnesota UC Fund
Unemployment Costs
$
13.23
11722
NCPERS Group Life Inc.
Payroll Deduction
$
12.00
11723
PERA
Pay Period 4/10 - 4/23
$
509.47
11724
Premeir 94 Trucking
Mirror for Plow Truck
$
157.18
11725
Roden, Kenny
Fire Calls
$
154.00
11726
Roden, Kevin
Fire Calls
$
63.00
11727
Security State Bank
April Federal Taxes
$
2,662.98
11728
Simonson Lumber
Board for Park Bench
$
5.10
11729
Sprint
Long Distance
$
29.45
11730
Sprint-UTS
Monthly Service
$
329.70
11731
Sunnyfield Construction
Rent Air Compressor
$
300.00
11732
Unlimited Electric
Wiring PW Building
$
1,048.34
11733
Valerius, Bill
Fire Calls
$
119.00
11734
Vetsch. Dave
Fire Calls
$
28.00
11735
Wacker, Bob
Fire Calls
$
7.00
11736
Wade, Chad
Fire Calls/Firefighter 1
$
127.58
11737
Wr. Co. Highway Dept.
Cold Mix
$
120.25
11738
Wr. Co. Treasurer
1 st Half Taxes/Assessments
$
4,337.79
11739
Wulff, Brian
Fire Calls
$
42.00
11740
Zachman, Kevin
Fire Calls
$
42.00
11741
Joint Powers Board
WAC Fees Collected in April
$
7,200.00
Total Bills $ 33,269.74
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
RESOLUTION #1999-16
A RESOLUTION APPROVING RENEWAL OF THE
GAMBLING LICENSE FOR
VOITURE1281 MINNETONKA LA SOCIETE
40 HOMMES ET 8
WHEREAS, the Voiture 1281 Minnetonka La Societe 40 Hommes Et 8
has made application with the Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board' for
renewal of its gambling license at KD's Family Restaurant located at 5772 Main
Avenue NE, Albertville, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Voiture 1281 Minnetonka La Societe 40 Hommes Et 8
submitted said application to the City Council of the City of Albertville, and the
application was reviewed by the City Council at a public meeting conducted May
3, 1999.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City
of Albertville hereby approves the application for renewal of the gambling license
for the Voiture 1281 Minnetonka La Societe 40 Hommes Et 8 at KD's Family
Restaurant.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ABLERTVILLE
THIS 3rd DAY OF MAY 1999.
John A. Olson, Mayor
Linda Goeb, Administrator -Clerk
Central STATE OF MZ1V MSOTA I FOR BOARD IIS8 Orn.Y
GAMLXM CONTROL BOARD IMT PAID
PMWXSRS PBR=T RSIITBNAL APPLICATZON I CHECK NO. _ I
LG214PPR PRINTED: (DATE
LICENSE NUMBER: 8-04617-002 EFFECTIVE DATE: 07/01/97 EXPIRATION DATE: 06/30/99
NANO; OF ORGANIZATION: Voiture 1281 Minnetonka La Societe 40 Homes St 8
QAN8LING PREMISES IMORK&TION
NAME OF ESTABLISHMENT WHERE GAMBLING WILL BE CONDUCTED
KDs Family Restaurant
5772 Main Ave NS
Albertville 55301
COUNTY Wright IS THE PREMISES LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS?: Y
DOES YOUR ORGANIZATION OWN THIS SITE?: No
IF NO, LIST THE LESSOR:
Karen Corwin
5772 Main Ave NS
Albertville MH 55301
NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER (WHEN NOT LESSOR):
Karen Corwin
SQUARE FEET PER MONTH: 41 AMOUNT PAID FOR RENT PER MONTH: 225
SQUARE FEET PER OCCASION: 0 AMOUNT PAID PER OCCASION: 0
BINGO ACTIVITY
BINGO IS CONDUCTED ON THIS PREMISES: No IF YES, REFER TO INSTRUCTIONS FOR REQUIRED ATTACW49NT
STORAGE ADDRESS
-788;--They 66-M iGF,I#eL. A;-R/Gfrrii E.45761-4d S-r 114 S. NlfflAi
.17: A11490ek-9 HN 5-5374
BANK INFORMATION
Highland
5985 Large Ave
Albertville MN 55301
GAMBLING BANK ACCOUNT NUMBER: 23960200
ON THE LINES PROVIDW BELOW LIST THE NAME, ADDRESS AND TITLE OF AT LEAST TWO PERSONS
AUTHORIZED TO SIGN CHECKS AND MAKE DEPOSITS AND WITHDRAWALS FOR THE GAMBLING ACCOUNT.
THE ORGANIZATION'S TREASURER MAY NOT HANDLE GAMBLING FUNDS'.
by c/b kL i e k A#.7 l MAY /'1*?j7e
4FN) L- 6. Sur..l V bL--9 Sao / wi c.1, IJ72.1 R-a*Z IVJ- 1 Jk--,,)Akj- 6*M0LJ 1dr M4R .
(BE SURE TO COMPLETE THE RB'VBRSB SIDE OF THIS APPLICATION)
THIS FORM WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN ALTERNATIVE FORMAT (I.E. LARGE PRINT, BRAILLE) UPON REQUEST
ACKNOWLEDGl0WT
GAMBLING PREMISES AUTHORIZATION
I HEREBY GIVE CONSENT TO LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD, OR AGENTS
OF THE BOARD, OR THE COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OR PUBLIC SAFETY, OR AGENTS OF THE COMMISSIONERS,
TO ENTER THE PREMISES TO ENFORCE THE LAW.
BANK RECORDS INFORMATION
THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD IS AUTHORIZED TO INSPECT THE BANK RECORDS OF THE GAMBLING ACCOUNT
WHENEVER NECESSARY TO FULFILL REQUIREMENTS OF CURRENT GAMBLING RULES AND STATUTES.
I DECLARE THAT:
• I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION AND ALL INFORMATION SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD;
ALL INFORMATION IS TRUE, ACCURATE AND COMPLETE;;
ALL OTHER REQUIRED INFORMATION HAS BEEN FULLY DISCLOSED;
I AM THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF THE ORGANIZATION;
I ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FAIR AND LAWFUL OPERATION OF ALL GAMBLING
ACTIVITIES TO BE CONDUCTED;
• I WILL FAMILIARIZE MYSELF WITH THE LAWS OF MINNESOTA GOVERNING LAWFUL GAMBLING AND RULES
OF THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD AND AGREE, IF ISSUED A PREMISES PERMIT, TO ABIDE THOSE LAWS
AND RULES, INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO THEM;
• ANY CHANGES IN APPLICATION INFORMATION WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD AND
LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT WITHIN TEN DAYS OF THE CHANGE;
• I UNDERSTAND THAT FAILURE TO PROVIDE REQUIRED INFORMATION OR PROVIDING FALSE OR MISLEADING
INFORMATION MAY RESULT IN THE DENIAL OR REVOCATION OF THE PREMISES PERMIT.
SIGNATURE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER DATE
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT
1.• THE CITY* MUST SIGN THIS APPLICATION IF THE GAMBLING PREMISES IS LOCATED WITHIN CITY
ram'
LIMITS.
2. THE COUNTY** AND TOWNSHIP** MUST SIGN THIS APPLICATION IF THE GAMBLING PREMISES IS
LOCATED WITHIN A TOWNSHIP.
3. FOR TOWNSHIPS THAT ARE UNORGANIZED OR UNINCORPORATED, THE COUNTY** IS REQUIRED TO ATTACH
A LETTER TO THIS APPLICATION INDICATING THE TOWNSHIPS STATUS.
4. THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT (CITY OR COUNTY) MUST PASS A RESOLUTION SPECIFICALLY
APPROVING OR DENYING THIS APPLICATION.
5 . A_COPY OF THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT'S RESOLUTION APPROVING THIS APPLICATION MUST BE
ATTACHED TO THISAPPLICATION.
6. IF THIS APPLICATION IS DENIED BY THE LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT, IT SHOULD NOT BE SUBMITTED
TO THE GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD
TOWNSHIP:
BY SIGNATURE BELOW, THE TOWNSHIP ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE ORGANIZATION IS APPLYING FOR A
PREMISES PERMIT WITHIN TOWNSHIP LIMITS.
CITY* OR COUNTY** TOWNSHIP**
CITY OR COUNTY NAME I TOWNSHIP NAME
hi- 01V-9?-VI L-L IF -
SIGNATURE OF PERSON RECEIVING APPLICATION I SIGNATURE OF PERSON RECEIVING APPLICATION
TITLE DATE RECEIVED I TITLE DATE RECEIVED
REFER TO THE CHECKLIST FOR REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS
MAIL TO: GAMBLING CONTROL BOARD
1711 W COUNTY RD B - SUITE 300 S
ROSEVILLE, mN 55113
k
RIVERS OF HOPE DAY
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS Ten years ago, the founders of Rivers of Hope recognized the need in this
area for organized advocacy and support for the victims and survivors of
domestic abuse; and
WHEREAS Rivers of Hope was founded with the goal of building a community free of
domestic violence through advocacy and education; and
WHEREAS Domestic violence is the number one cause of emergency room visits by
women: and
WHEREAS Rivers of Hope is now serving over 1,500 individuals each year; and
WHEREAS Rivers of Hope provides such necessary services as:
• a 24-hour crisis telephone line
• advocacy services regarding court, housing, etc.
• transportation services
• support groups
• community education; and
WHEREAS These important services are recognized by many other groups who
provide funding;
NOW, AFORE, the ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
(name of council or board)
hereby resolves to designate May 15,19" as Rivers of Hope Day in honor of their
Tenth Anniversary.
Date: MAY 3. 1999
Al
f1ll/Gll•u.rat{a• JJJV l
May 1,1999
City of Albertville
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
City Council,
The Albertville Friendly City Days committee is requesting permission
to close down the following list of
streets on the days listed. during Friendly City Days.
Street Day
Time
Activity
58th Street (Main to Lander Avenues) June 10-14
All Day
Carnival
Lander Avenue (58th Street to Barthel's Driveway) June l l-13
All Day
Carnival
Main Avenue (57th to 59th Streets) June 11-12
6:00 - 1:00
Dance
Main Avenue (56th to 57th Streets) June 12
10:00- 11:00
Kids Parade
56th Street (Main to Lander Avenues) June 12
10:00-11:00
Kids Parade
Lander Avenue (56th to 57th Streets) June 12
10:00- 11:00
Kids Parade
57th Street (Main to Lander Avenues) June 12
10:00- 11:00
Kids Parade
Lansing Avenue (50th to 51 st Streets) June 12
1:00- 4:00
Soapbox Derby
Lander Avenue (57th to 58th Streets) June 12
1:00- 4:00
Pedal Pull
Main Avenue (50th to 60th, Streets) June 13
1:00- 4:00
Grand Parade
59th Street (Barthel Industrial Drive to Main) June 13
1:00- 4:00
Grand Parade
Barthel Industrial Drive (51 st to 59th Streets) June 13
1:00- 4:00
Grand Parade
51 st Street (Barthel Industrial Drive to Main) June 13
1:00- 4:00
Grand Parade
60th Street (CASH 37 to Main Avenue) June 13
1:00- 4:00
Grand Parade
For your information we have submitted applications to Wright County
Highway Department
for the closing of
CASH 35 (Main Avenue) for dune l 1th,12th, and 13th. The applications are attached.
The committee is also requesting permission to extend the city park hours on Friday, June
11 and 12th to 1:00
a.m. for the Firemans Dance, the Jaycees Softball Tournament, and the Lions Dance.
Sincerely,
Albertville Friendly City Days Committee
4
� 2
= a A
J�
lose
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
EVENT DESCRIPTION:
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
WS/u COURV P011C Nbrks MUMS
I"I HISbAw 2S NOF A
b ak Afl+ea M ssin
*L rm. 2S "d GR. In
7i VUW 012) =-71d1 &K (612) 61 43li
v *. --Araar ar ♦ us-% t �'Gsilltli
PERMIT NO.
i
HOME PHONE: _ G/ a. V 9 7- 30/ 9
WORK PHONIC: 6/1- '4-97-y2-,,/
k,
t
ESTIMATED NtN KA OF PARTICIPANTS: 2G�4
STARTING LOCATION: �s un /Pi 3.S` �+✓. v` �v �Z ,
ENDING LOCATION: 00
EVENT DATE: 111 / .
r �—
EVENT TIME: r1 '00 AjV 0 J to •'4 t�
fie- HIGHWAY ROUTES USED: c�i'
c4 /�
SAFETY PROCEDURES/TRAFFIC CONTROL {27XT PBR3ONN):
NUMBER OF SHERIFF'S UNITS �RSQUIRSD: X $27. 50/HR. $ /HR,j
SHERIFV DRZ?T. C0)4MZNTS/RRQUIRBMHNTS:
APPRQVBD 8rs
Authorised SheriS' • Dept. SiQsiature -- `%ipr-oval D1►
HIGHWAY DEPT. COMMENTS/RHQUIRSMENTS:
"PAOVND BYE
Authorised Signatu - Bighway Department pA
I
The undersigned applicant hereby agrees to the above requirements and holds
harmless Wright County for any acts resulting from the negligence of his organizers,!
participants or any spectator.
Applicant's Sibnature bA
"
4
71 � jy
logo
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS: _=
EVENT DESCRIPTION:
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS PERMIT NO.__
*Ight Coanq Pabfic Abrkt Bn(ldins
1901 Hishwy Jf Hoak
hok MhMad" 1J31J
Jh T.X. u &W C.R. JJd
rdepUm (612) 6U-?MJ = (612) 6U-731J
^dam HOME PHONE: 61 4 4?_�i�_
►► . Alte WORK PHONE: /.Oyj ji9T 3 0%
A
ESTIMATED WJMBER OF PARTICIPANT!: 1&4-40
STARTING LOCATION: do eAlv f- -:57Ah 9/
BIDING LOCATION: eaVAly
EVENT DATE • �ih.t // ���/9
EVENT TIME: 4 • Qa�'- •n�• to /• Dt9 p ram... HIGHWAY ROUTES USED: �.JP. luau r / /6,,W/-Adj )A dv s ly,
(supply sap)
SAFETY PROCEDURES/TRAFFIC CONTROL (SV,�rW PERSONNEL):
�s
NUMBER OF SHERIFF'S UNITS REQUIRED: X $27.50/1-M _ $ /HR.
SHERIFF DUT.i COMMENT$/RBQUIREMENjrS: -
"P1tom Er:
HIGHWAY DEPT. COMMENTS/REQUIREMENTS:
- #pprawaL
APPROVED 8Y:
Authorised 39gnMrs Highway Department Dh
I
The undersigned applicant hereby agrees to the above requirements and holds
harmless Wright County for any acts resulting f om the n ligence of his prganizeri,
participants or any spectator.
Applicant's Signature DA
I
Development Program approved by
City Council , 1999
TIF Plan, TIF District No. 11 approved by
City Council , 1999
MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1
and
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 11
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA
May _,1999
This Instrument Drafted by:
KENNEDY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED (SJB)
470 Pillsbury Center
200 South Sixth Street
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
Telephone: (612) 337-9300
SJB-160674
AL141-29
SECTION L
Subsection 1.1.
Subsection 1.2.
Subsection 1.3.
Subsection 1.4.
Subsection is
Subsection 1.6.
Subsection 1.7.
Subsection 1.8
Subsection 1.9.
Subsection 1.10.
Subsection 1.11.
Subsection 1.12.
Subsection 1.13.
Subsection 1.14.
`wok 1
MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICTNO.11 HNIlNNflNNNNNNlfliNNNifIiNNNNNN1fNllliNilN!lYINNN 1
Defwitions...........................................................................................................1
Statement and Finding of Public Purpose........................................................... 2
StatutoryAuthority .................................................................................... R N 2
Statement of Objectives .... .................................................................... 3
Estimated Public Costs and Supportive Data ...................................................... 4
Environmental Controls...................................................... ........w..,,,,.......... . 4
Proposed Reuse of Property................................................................................ 4
Public improvements and Facilities to be Constructed Within
DevelopmentDistrict No. 1................................................................................ 4
Administration and Maintenance of the Development District ........................... 4
Rehabilitation............................................................................. ..................... 5
Relocation....... ...... ...................... ................. ............................... . 5
Open Space to be Created ......................................................................... 5
Boundaries of the Development District... ............................................ 5
Parcels to be Acquired or May be Acquired.
Whole or in Part
Within the Development District........................................................................ 5
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 11,,,,i,.,,NN..............NNNNN...... 6
Subsection 2.1.
Statutory Authodty.............................................................................................. 6
Subsection 2.2.
Statement of Objectives.....................................................................................
6
Subsection 2.3.
Stmement of Public Purpose...............................................................................
6
Subsection 2.4.
Development District Program............................................................................
7
Subsection 2.5.
Description of TIF District..................................................................................
7
Subsection 2.6.
Development Contracts ..................................................................................
7
Subsection 2.7.
Classification: of IF District..............................w........,................,...
8
Subsection 2.8.
.............
Modification of TIF Plan............................................................... 8
Subsection 2.9.
Use of Tax Increment...................................................w...............................8
.................
Subsection 2.10.
Limitation on Collection of increment ........................w....,.............,...,.......
..... 9
Subsection 2.11.
Limitation on Administrative
Subsection 2.12.
Limitation on Boundary Changes ........................................ ...................
.....10
Subsection 2.13.
Relocation ....................................................................w.....................................10
Subsection 2.14.
Parcels to be Acquired Within the TIF District...................................................10
Subsection 2.15.
TIF Account
Subsection 2.16.
....,
Estimate of PrgJect Costs .......................................... ........................ ..10
Subsection 2.17.
to of Indebteess
Subsection 2.18.
. ,10
Original Tax Capacity and Original Tax Capacity Rate...................................... ....11
Subsection 2.19.
Estimate of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment ..............
........... ..11
Subsection 2.20.
Duration of the TiF District.. .......................................
.. .....121
Subsection 2.21.
Estimate of hapact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions fictions ............................
.............12
Subsection 2.22.
Annual Financial Report , .......
.... .12
Subsection 2.23.
Notification of Prior Planned Improvements......................................................12
Subsection 2.24.
Assessment Agreements.
12
ys18-160614
AL141-29
i
Subsection 2.25. Local Go rAid omesuad and
AgrkWM*t 6"t Aid (Lt3AMACA).................................... ...12
Subsection 2.26. TIF Account ............................................................................. ... ..........12
EXHIBIT A MAP OFIDEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. I AND
TAX I?KtP MENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1
EXHIBITB DESCRH►'1 M OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 11
EXHMBITC TAX WREMENT SCHEDULE
FAIT D RVACTTABLE
S1&i4Ad"li 4
AIA41-29
e
Subsection Q.fi im thepurposes of the DevelopmentProgram,
#to m the
following 1.,I 4ishall have t meamags specified below, :ti h,. context.:.1 li. e
means the City 4 Albertville, municipalcorporationunder the1 12-. State
4 Minnesota.
"Comprehensive .Plant" means the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the objectives,
policies, standards and programs to guide public and private land use, development,
re+de rve4opment and preservation for all lands and water within the City.
"!City Council" or Tbuncir' means the Albertville City Council;
� ° : ► � s � - � i� _ + � k t � � � LE_.1 s .:.� s r i dam' � � ► a s � � �
"County" mews Wright County, Minnesota.
'Development District" means Development District No. 1 which was initially approved
by the Council in April, 1981 pursuant to and in accordance with the City Development District
Act, and as it has been or may be modified.
"Development District Program" or "Program" means the program for development of
the District adopted by the City,pursuant to the Development District Act.
"Project, Anew' or "Project' means the property within Development District No. 1, as
described in the Development -Program.
"State!'means the State of Minnesota.
"Tax Increment Financing Act' or `TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections
469.174 through 469179, inclusive, as amended.
`Tax bxmmmt BonW mews any general obligation or revenue tax increment bonds or
notes issued by the City to fimme the public costs associated with Development District No.1 as
stated in the Program and in the Tax increment Financing Plan for the Tax Increment Financing
Districts within Development Distinct No. 1, or any obligations issued to refund the Tax
Increment Bonds.
`Tax Increment Financing District" or `TIF District' means any Tax. Increment Financing
District created and ettabUshe d pursuant to the TIF Act within Development District No. 1.
WID-1004
AU41-20
a
"Tax Incremm Financing Plan" or "Plan' means the TIF Plan adopted by the Council for
any TIF District within Development ent District No. 1.
Subsection 1.2. St19ment and Ending of Public. The Council of the City
determines that dtexe is a need for development and redevelopment within the corporate limits of
the City and within the Development District to provide employment and housing opportumues,
to improve the tax We, sod to improve the general economy of the State. It is found that the
area within the Daim is potentially more useful and valuable than is being realized under
existing is ees productive than is possible under this program, and, therefore, is not
contributing to the tax tease to its full potential.
TMnefose, the City has determined to exercise its authority to develop a program for
Improving the Development Dot= of the City to provide an impetus for private development,
to mainta r► and increase employment, to utilize existing potential and to provide other facilities
as are outlined in the Development Program adopted by the City.
The Council finds that the welfare of the City as well as the State of Minnesota requires
active Promotion, MWOOD, encouragement and development of economically sound industry,
housing, and commerce to carry out its stated public purpose objectives:
Subsection 1.3. &U= Authority. The Council reaffirms its determination that it is
desirable and in the public interest to establish, develop and administer a Development Program
for the Development District in the City, pursuant to the provisions of the Act.
Funding of the necessary activities and improvements in the Development District may be
accomplished in whole or in part through tax increment financing in accordance with the TIF
Act.
The City has designated a specific area within the corporate limits of the City as
Development District No. 1 as authorized by Section 469.126 of the Act, as outlined in this
document. VNtth a the Development District the City has previously created TIF District Nos. 1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10
The original Devd . t Program for Development District No. 1 was approved in
April, 1981 and has been modified subsequently. On July 17, 1989, the Development Program
was,modiftei to expand the area of the Development District. On July 15, 1996 and May 20,
1997, the Development Program was again modified to expand the area of the Development
District.
The City has now deftrmined that, in order to address changing development needs
throughout the City, tt is in doe public interest to provide for additional expenditures and
development within Development District No. 1. This modified Development Program is
intended to restate and expand on the original program and all prior amendments hereto, which
are incorporatedhereinby r+efcrertce. Nothing in this modification is intended, to supersede or
alter the activities described in the driginal Development Program.
3iB-14p674
ALJ41-zs
s
Subsection 1.4, SNOW gL Qhigo=.-The Council determines that the Development
District will provide the City with the ability to achieve certain public purpose goals not
otherwise obtainable in the foreseeable future without City intervention in the normal
development process. Mw public purpose goals include: restore and improve the tax base and
tart revere genenting capacity of the Development District; increase employment and housing
Opportunities; realize e9omprea FaI a planning goals; remove blighted conditions; revitalize the
property within the Development District to curate an attractive, comfortable, convenient, and
efficient aria for industrial, commercial and related use.
The City and Council seek to achieve the following Development District program
objectives:
1. Promote and secure the prompt development of certain property in the
Development District, which property is not now in productive use or in its highest and best use,
in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and with the minimum adverse
impact on the envirownent, and thereby promote and secure the development of other land in the
City.
2. Promote -and secure, additional employment and housing opportunities within the
Development District and the City for residents of the City and the surrounding area, thereby
improving living standards, reducing unemployment and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor
and other human resources in the City.
3. Secure the in of commerciallindus vial property subject to taxation by the
City, Independent School District No. 885, Wright County, and other taking jurisdictions in order
to better enable such enticeto pay for governmental services and programs required to be
provided by them.
4. Provide for the financing and construction of public improvements in the
Development District necessary for the orderly and beneficial development of the Development
District and adjacent areas of the City.
5. Promote the cowentration of commercial, office, and other appropriate
development in the Development District so as to maintain the area in a manner compatible with
its accessibility and paninence in.the City.
6. Encourage local expansion, improvement, nt, and development, whenever
possible.
t
?. Create a desirabie and unique character within the Development District thorough
quality land use alternatives and design quality in new and remodeled buildings.
8. Encourage anal pmvide maximum opportunity for private redevelopment of
existing areas and structures that an compatible with the Development Program
9. Encourage redevele pmeat of substandard buildings, to improve employment
SM16W4
AU4I-29 '
opportunities in the Development District and the City, where compatible with other planning
and development goats.
Subsection tn ARi ' W { ,r Costs Ed figQd Uy Thepublic t and
development plansfor die Development District have been described in detaila F Plan,
whichweP.ri R t ..t t-.;.d.6 byreference.
l,. City now anddqases� public !.` M be financed 1 part with
tax
incremetitsfrom { - DistrictofEstimatedcosts andrelated data for dforts we set
forth *in the T[F Plan for TIF District No. 11. The TEF Plan for TIF District No. I I is attached to
this modified Det tm.+.R Program.
Subsection r _.-{ Mt(f!Sfi,F Y,Q=1j. The proposed development activities in the
i! sprf ;n District r,t not Y-rt significant ef tn!1 nconcerns All municipal act rr
public improvements and privatedevelopmentbe carried out F a manner !" t f :1 f f1
existing enVmnmental standards.
Subsection 1.7. E4g=d.Reuse of Property. The proposals for reuse of property within
the Development District are -described in the documents referenced in Section 1.5 herein. The
City may acquire additional parcels for development, as identified in Subsection 1.14 herein.
Unless otherwise specified, the Development Program does not contemplate the
-acquisition of private property until such time as a private developer presents an economically
feasible program for the rouse of that property. Proposals, in order to be considered, must be
within the framework of the above cited goals and objectives, and must clearly demonstrate
feasibility as a public progmzL Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property,
the City Council will require a binding contract, performance bond and/or other evidence or
guarantees that a supporting tax increment or other funds will be available to repaythe public
cost associated with the proposed acquisition. It is the intent of the City to negotiate the
acquisition of property whenever necessary. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse and
redevelopment,of property shall be incorporated into any land sale contract to which the City is a
per•
#wMt.< QUlt .,j W:"S No. I Tu public improvementsand .s to be constructed within
Development District 1includestreets, -sanitary sewerand stormsewer, utilities,soils
correction, parking i t landscapW& public 11 1 i e91! ,faremore ' particularly described R
the documents referenced to Subsection 1.5 herein.
Subsection ' ; R dwomd2n ad _' f '_.},. t'>!: of ft '' sQR tMi'. ! .aR:.
Maintenance '.e anM' f t operation of the public ifi r i r5e' ! " will be the responssibilhityof
of the r t shall serve!R r; -ot of r t ft ft District-
Adminisuator will administerthe Development District pursuaiito the provisions ot 4 R
469.131 of the ! i tf'r.R 6 t ' .t thatsuch t 1 _.'1... mayonly t`.exercised ... the t.: _4 R
1 the t nNo isAi'i taken by the Administrator pursuant !above -mentioned
shall be effective, without by the Council.
AL141--29
Subsection 1.10. &bAbWWiW Owners of pnVaties within the Development District
will be, encouraged to rehabilitate their property to com form with the applicable state and local
codes and ordinances, as well as any design standards. ' Owners of the properties who purchase
provaty within the Development District from the C ty may be required to rehabilitate their
properties as a coadidm of ask of land. The City will provide such rehabilitation assistance as
may be available from federaL state or local sources.
Subwztion. 1.11. Rdgafn The City does not anticipate the need to relocate any
residents or businesses, but if such need arises, provisions for relocation will be matte in
accordance with Minnesota Stawtes, Section 117.50 through 117.56 and any rules adopted by the .
City Council.
Subaction 1.12. QM SR" to be Mw City, in carrying out the objectives of
fr. Development gr d5 proposes po .*: to encouragethe beautification oopen a through
development of criterm which shall be incorporated into any land sale or developmem
agreements entered into by the City of Albertville.
Subsection 1. 13. :aiMd dM if the QWJ== R _`jeI'i Boundaries of Development
District No. I am unchanged by thismodification. m:! of the Development District
attached at Exhibit
Subsection 1. 14. ftMdg IQ BeAa!l iM' or May ba &!! In Whqk 21 In ba Within
+. i � Ri:z IUCityMay acquire ! parcels r any TfFDistrict or
Development District whole necessary t! carry out R : and objectives of
Development < ! ♦ g- n
Sr846M4
Ari141-29
Ip
MIT= NO.
SubseWon 2. 1. Pursuant t the TEF► i
create TIP District Nt 11 and adopt a TF Plan for that1 District.
District forth in Subsection oftheDevelopment Program meincorporated herein by
reftrence.
Mtrict No.the }- r. make the followingfindings:
Anticipated ,
solely through privaft mw�-
increased market value, of the
Use 1.taxincrement tk 1.
estimated to teak from the,,--
}r projected a' ems# snk
TIF Plan;
FactaW Bads:
d f /
lopment would not reasonably be expend to occur
at within the reasonably foreseeable future and the
that could reasonably be expected to occur without the
would be less than the increase in the market value
aced development after subtracting the present value of
the maximum duration of the district permitted by the
would not reasonably be expected to occur solely
within the reasonably foreseeable future
he proposed - development is a large manufacturing facility, located at a site 1#.a
requires street, curb and water improvements. ne project financing requires an
t t .r.R h d= .. #� t # 1submitted letter}t primary t} 1rtgage
t }.',.�. }`N t t !#-: t ! t t # t i 1 i t' thr.Yl ! .."1 tt # 1.` provided
by thet. underc#i'.;. #, :.t. Tax mcrementnecessary to M defray land costs
and t the costof 4' .t D' improvementsbeassessedagainst the property.
77w Increased market va
widmut the use of Au in
market value esdmatted t
the present VWW of ice I
district pernari W by tom.
This site has failed to d
chariged ownership se"
fruition. Any significarm
improve metcis. The site
that such use is unW
rezoned for industrial us
e of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur
ement f inancing would be less than tics increase in die
result from the proposed development after subnw ing
ejected tax increments for the maximum duration of dw
F Plan
;ve3lop ate a good location near Intestate 94. It has
ral times, and no development proposals have come to
development would require extension of water and strea
has been zoned commercial, but the City has determined
V given historical patterns. The site is therefore being
as proposed by Land of Lakes Stone Company.
SJB 1004
At,141-V
s
i
I
As noted in the tax in ent cash flow in Exhibit C, the pro development
ase will create an hmn market value of $1,25O,000. The present value of the
tax inmements for the maximum duration of the plan is $264,677. For the
reasons cited above, the City does not anticipate any increase in market value on
this site that would exceed $985,323 (the proposed increases less the present value
of the tax 'increment). 16 fact, the proposed development is the largest industrial
facility built in the City! in over ten years. Any other development under current
commercial zoning would create far less market value. The City believes that any
other industrial development would also require assistance, and would almost
certainly create lei value than the substantial project proposed by Land of Lake
Stone Company.
2. The T1F Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the wind
needs of the Authority as a whole, for development of the District by private enterprise;
and
Factual Bads:
The tax inmement, provided in the TIF Plan will permit development of
a long underutilr.ed si in the City and will substantially increase jobs and tax
base in the City.
i
3. The 7T Plan conforms to general plans for development of the City as a
whole.
i
Factual
The City Planning commission at its meeting on April 13, 1999 found that the
developaxa proposed in the plan is consistent with the general plans for the City
as a whole. i
I
Subsection 2.4 DWACOM DkUigActions taken with regards to T1F
District No. 11 will be fully consistent with the Plan for Development District No. 1, as
approximate 3-7=711ries
in Exhibit
Subsection 17h1,. Authority not yet entered any
developmentcon"M regarding Plopotywithin the 11FDistrict.e to enter
a development contract with Land of takes Stone Company or a related entity providing for the
development described in more de4il bi Section 2.17 of this TIF Plan.
3MIdW4
Subsection :' :. 1 v �ia;i 1
an economic development dbU*l pw
because the proposed tax, increnmw
from moving their T-
within the State, and will result in the;,
Further, revenue derived fmm tax hm*-
• ,+Kt3i" in any form to developments
15 percent of the buildings and faciliti
purpose other than:
1. the
including processing rwulft in the ck,
2. ,.Q ,
n-
excluding retailsales;3. :.. nde
TIF District The City finds that TIF District No. l 1 is
ant to Section 469.174, subdivision 12 of the TIF Act
assistance will discourage commerce, industry, and
ions from the City, will result in increased employment
,nervation and eiihanaemen►ent of the tax base of the State.
lent from the TIF District will not be used for to provide
onsisting of buildings or ancillary facilities if more than
i (detemmined on a square footage basis) are used for a
storage and distribution of tangible personal property,
;e in condition of the property;
and distribution of tangible personal property,
related to the activities listed in clause 1 or 2;
4. teleadriariretng, if T""' activity is the exclusive use of the property;
5. tourism facilities (if the conditions specified in Section 469.174, subd. 22
are met); and
6. space necessary f�r and related to the activities listed in clauses 1 to 5.
I :.i la. i,..I ►! t M..y it J' T.. 1 I i� 1' iITAV,:_
P .:_� 1" R i:M .±;5., t` t.�rr r..'� i. ��{ I 1 { 1 Gi � f i I�+ i+' ! i t'" f I° ;.•, {�
I�' !M 11! I {. 1<t6Yi t::ed r, s, .-.iti;.�t ! 1': .i; I�I t {r` � E $ - i :•i
�-�" 5Y ,i (I..�a{1! f .e:'. 1 I �- '1i.=;4-1�1 1 ', !•i A t 17 !� I #':� K i'" i ;�i # !t� l
Wf'OAKII�. I I,l't' vl eat I I lwx#{ 1,�+ t uI 1 I I I } y l ! �.. ' :.Y i ►
{ c
t �S nlEI �Fi
2. Pursuant to .
of the revenue derived fhm tax
be expended on activities ("Act
sra.l6W4
AL141-29
n 469.176, Subd. 4 of the TiF Act, all revenues derived_
District No. 11 sha11 be used in accordance with the "13F
used to finance or otherwise pay the capital and
orient activities within the Development District as
469.1763, Subd. 2 of the TIF Apt, at least 80 percent
mnents paid by properties in TIF District No. 11 will
iee) in the TIF District or to pay bonds, to the extent
that the pmceeds of the bonds used to finance Activities in the TIF District or to
pay, or secure —payment of, debt ice, on credit enhanced bonds (as defined in the TIF
Act). No more than 20 parcent of the revenue derived from tax increments paid by
pmpetties, in TIF Dist No. 111 will be expended, through a development fund or
oth on Activities outside of the TIF District but within Development District No. 1
exams to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds.
3. Revemmdefive4
the five-year rues as set forth in ;
Subsection 2.11.
1. No increment r7E
years from the daft of art f ca
in the TIF District by the cou--t
have bow issued in aid of Dev6
TIF Act or any other law ex�i.—,
Sections 469.152 to 469.165, or
TIF District #
from tax increment will be expended in accordance with
wtion 469.1763 of the Tax Increment Act.
Pursuant to Sections 469.176, Sums, 2 of the TIF
c the amount necessary to pay the costs authorized
amount to do any of the following, in the order
increment therefor,
dedicated to the payment of bonds;
lure development purposes; or
to the Wright County auditor, who shall distribute the
and Independent School District No. 885 in dimes
rates.
ations set forth in Subsections 2.7 and 2.9 herein, the
in order to provide for other economic development
I be paid to the City from TIF District No. 11 after three
a of the original tax capacity of the taxable real property
r auditor unless within the three year period (a) bonds
pment District No. 1 pursuant to Section 469.178 of the
revenue bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
5) the City has acquired property within TIF District No.
or caused to be constructed public improvements within
SJWISW4
AL441.29
i
i
2. If, attleer four yeas from the. date of certification of the original tax capacity
of T F District No. 11, no demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation of property or other
site preparation, including 9uoified improvement of a street or right-of-way adjacent to a
parcel but not installation of underground utility service, including sewer or water
systems, have been commenced on a parcel located within TIF District No. 11 by the
City, or by the owner of the! parcel in accordance with the T1F Plan, no additional
utcrenunt may be tabw km that parcel, and the original tax capacity of that parcel shall
be excluded h mt the original tax capacity of the TIF District. if these activities
subsequently commences. thel City will so certify to the county auditor, and the tax
capacity of die property as recently certified by the commissioner of revenue will be
added to the 7T Districts or g al tax capacity.
3. No tax increment will in any event be paid to the City from T1F District
No. 11 after 9 years from the date of receipt of the first increment, or 11 years from the
date of approval of this TIF Plan, whichever occurs first.
Subsection 2.12. ve Expon Pursuant to Section 469.176,
Subd. 3 of the IT Act, adminimove expenses are limited to 10 percent of the total tax
increment for Developmont District No. 1. Each time the City increases the budget
of TIE District No. 11, the amount of tax increment money allocated to administrative costs may
be increased as long as the total of administrative expenditures does not exceed 10 percent of the
total budget of the TIF District
Subsection 2.13. station on RQVUdM Changes The geographic area of TIF District
No. 11 may be reduced, but it may not be enlarged after five years following the date of
certification of the original tax capacity by the Wright County auditor. Thus, the TIF District
may not be enlarged after approximately September 2003.
Subsection 2.14. Adaggio While no relocation is currently anticipated, the City
as binding its obligations um ler state law for relocation and will adminisw relocation
services for families, individuals and t usinesses displaced by public action.
t two
-ISJ
Subsection 2.-16. 32
No. 11 shall be segregated by the
held by a trustee for the -benefit of l
Subsection 2.17. F&IMP
the Land of Lakes Stone Company,
financed in part with tax. incrernent, ex
S79-tM04
AL141-29
'* i
iiii, il
1 i ii II :. k' �► A 4.+ , i � �' i
I I Y :. _.. `• i i t '73 1
The City mu nds to facilitate development of
during facility. The total estimated costs to be
of interest, are as follows.
Street, curb, NO
Adt�tin%t�tiOn
T(Y rAL
Zs
6
$300,000° '
water improvements 350q,000 / 11 f�,r�syZ�
-000
�$' xizool
ra
may shift among categories without m �{ of this
will not exceed the total listed, and that the City will
2. Costs within each category are deemed to include
ending on when or if bonds are issued, but in any event
y Minn. Stat. Ch.475.
l `... ! t'i .°as,.{,"•,-, ! : 1 l h 7l1757# ! €,.':,. 1,' €f 71.0 €'►" ! !' # -..: rr+
1 t; } 1 :�.f al € {� :iF ft 1't 'af #-•- !,.f t # t cn; ! 9 `"! i !. 'Y. f ! #-; i
f t`. €i f .+1 .+ $:I '-1 'r-1 f i't 1 ;. f f € ! €€ ! l f # 1 ice:.! € ! 1 ! ! 0—k
! f t. . f
I tax capacity of TW District No. 11 is expected to be
m payable in 1999. The original tax capacity rate of
tAN%. This rate is an estimate of the aggregate tax
the TIF District for taxes payable in 1999, though the
ai'; wnue 01 property Q;wr —TIV4n- WIN
M Mau wrilun Me
the five yem prior to 0 e TIP District.
17he County auditor will also increase or decrease the original tax capacity of TW District
ias a resultof.
1. Change in the
Lbis"I+ 1+ i i;".19,28
+ : f
4. Change in, the clasd
that has a different class, rate.
status of property within the TIFDistrict;
by means of a court -ordered abatement, siipuation
y the assessor or auditor or by order of the Minnesota
of property within the TIF District to a classification
OEM!S .a+� ! € f :rili, ''_ �, �..#t4 _t-f +C `f +i il �. - +rt f € .
` lr.M €. #3 1 !.'wilt"..:5 / ! � �'ud'f t ! f`Il ! :� "r! ! ■ 'c.i +€ i:- i..ii _ ! +
PEA
_f SS- 'All f'.
StW ldWA
AIJ4129
well. A complete schedule of estimated tax increment from the TIF District is shown in Exhibit
C.
Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subd. 2 of the TIF Act, it is found and declared that all of
the captured tax capacity gated within TIP District No. 11 is necessary to finance or
otherwise make permissiW expenditures authorized by Sanction 469.176, Subd. 4 of the TTP Act.
Subsection 2.21. i#$ of theme Z In accordance with Section 469.176, Subd.
1(b) of the TIF Act,, the City may continue to receive TIF payments until the earlier of 9 years
after the date of receipt of the first increment, or 11 years after the date of approval of this TIF
Plan. The City expects the first receipt in 2001 and the last receipt in 2009, but may collect
increments through May, 2010 at the latest.
Subsection 2.22, FAhM, L ImQact on Qft Taxing Jurisdictions The City believes
that, because the development would not have occurred without tax increment assistance, the M F
Ditsuict has no impact on othertaxing jurisdictions. However, assuming the development would
have occurred without tax increment assistance, making the anticipated cape tax capacity
available to other Jurisdictions, the hypothetical impacts on other jurisdictions are presented in
Exhibit D.
Subsection 2.23. The City will file the annual reports with the
State Auditor regarding all TIF Districts in the City, as required in Sections 469.175, subds. 5, 6,
and 6a of the 11F Act.
1s° ee + 1 1 0.l.1 � I e ' i1 i! +. i 1i t t i a
Subsection 2.25. ABOMM Asmm= Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 8 of
the TV Act, the City may execute an assessment agreement in recordable form with the
developer which establishes a minimum Market value of land and improvements for the duration
of TIP District No. 11. The Assessment agreement, if any, shall be presented to the Wright
County assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be
constructed, review the matket value previously assigned to the land upon which the
improvements are to be constructed and so long as the minimum market value contained in the
assessment agreement appem in the judgment of the assessor to be a reasonable estimate, the
asseAsor may certify the minimuzn mule et value agreement The assessment agreement shall be:
filled of record in the office of the county recorder or the registrar of titles of Wright County.
Recording or fi mg of an assersstrreaht agreement complying with the trams of Section 469.177,
Subd. 8 of the TIF Act, shall constitute notice of the agreement to any subsequent purchaser or
encumbrance of the land or any part thereof, whether voluntary or involuntary, and shall be
binding upon diem.
s-:,�k + r ► tea:. +l(..�!_J4 _ ; E: +IEs_ 7-77 + f.4i : 4 K_.. k. r, t`R+r i.
SiA46004
AU41-24
make a local contribution to pay costs of the project financed under this TlF Plan, in the amount
equal to 10 percent of the annual tax increment. therefore, the City anticipates that the TIF
District will be exempt from Lt3AMACA loss.
The local contribution will be made from unrestricted funds of the City, and not from tax
inert or developer paw. The local contribution will not be used for general
go purposes or for ireprovements or costs that the City or the City planned absent the
projem
The City cuffently anticipates that the contribution will be made through City payment of
consultant fens in connection with the development (to the extent paid with funds other than tax
increment or developer payumb). along with additional payments to the Developer for
development costs similar to those financed by tax 'increments under this plan. However, the
City teserves do right to saddy its local match requirement through any means permitted under
Section 273.1399 subd b(d).
WD-i+W4
A A41-29
EXHIBIT A
MAP OF D .MOPMENT DISTRICT NO.1
and
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.11
Vvt*t Nita' TreabvwM
r 1,.
Ttf to4i � (pt �� {•
Y Aer
6450
sm lie"
city
i' �•. Tom.' .p
:i t 'tit �:•'.. Y' Sf
s.
I
13011's :.
!• A a. �y�t"'fi'
972 Sol
- SMt � f61 582f! �6]7 5611' t"' A"` x,* • � •'•
903/
$018 S82 nil
1 3584 $659.
r 3082
SS+t Sul lithbt rt ..
it" lift
rt
5474 SM 44T4 e
w rt r�i w .rtrt r ,
� a04N
�... �, ._ .. s• . i� gar^ ,� x - ,,, _ .
El
.. yam. .
it M -1 1: +► e
W p "1
Mot
• Wiz. "' ..
DESCR ON OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.11
Pit) No.101-500-361401
PID No.101-500-364304
PBD No. 101-500 1
Legsd Description
(See attached)
AL141-n
B-1
EXHIBIT C
TAX INCREMUM SCHEDULE
TAX V4CREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.11
i
Assum dons Rovort
City of AftWMIK Ukammoto
Tax humamd F (Etamnnic OerwbpnaDistrict
Land of Low St m Project
Scenario A
Type of Tax kwornent Financing DisMct
EcorrornicDOVGW~t
Mmxknurn Duration of TIF District
Loom of 11 ym *am TIF plan approval
-cu 9 years fiom let kwmn ent
Certification Rat Dabs
0*00rokow DOW
12101/09 (9 Years of W"wnent)
1996/1999
Sore fs*nand Me" value
$114,100
Tlmos; First $150.000
2.45% 2,795
Excess
3.50% 0
Orww Net Tax Copeft
SZ795
AssessmentlCollecdon Year
1999/2000 200=200i 2001=2 2002=03
So" Estimated Ma"Volue
$1%.100 S1i4,100 $114,100 $114,100
Immosso M Eafteled Market Value
0 1 000 1 250 000 1 250 000
Total Estimated Market Value
$114,100 $1,364,400 $1,364,100 $1,364,100
Times. First $150.000
2.45% 2.795
3,675
3,676
3,675
Exams
3.50% 0
42,494
42,494
42,494
Total Not Tax C.opulty
$2,795
$46,189
$46,169
$46,189
Base irMotion Factor
27.34%
Local Tax Capacity Rate
136.404% (Pay 1999)
RKW Disparities Conte Fran TIP OkMd
0.0000%
Administrative ft ( a 10%)
0.00%
Pooling Percent
0.00%
City Tax Raba (Only N " TIF)
NA
Bonds Dated 06MONO
Nobs Dated 06/30199
First Inlonmet Oat* 02101J00
Note Rate 7.50%
UnderwrOws Discount 1.50%
LtiAl► Leas:
Will Annual i. t Coakftdm Se Mad* (Yes or No)?
Yes
1.S.0 OM Equalized Tax Capacity Rage
NA
I.S.D 07U Soles Rath
NA
+CitySeles Ratio S Tax" Not Tax Copmelly
NA NA
Present Value S Rabe
Oermm 5.00%
Prepared by: S~tod ttmotporatad tprinted on 4/W99 at 8:02 AM)
Tlfo.xis
O O 0 4 NO N A 1 A 4 PA cc O o O Q o a d a d a Q O 0 Q a 0 tlN
In
O b O a O. a O a a. 0 0 a a Q to a O a
eYtlao
00 io w• r M! N N
r
O O O O O O O O Q O d O Q Q O 0 a Q C4
{ p
O O 44 X 2 tl' O A^ pY d Q O a O O O O O• a Q Q a O d a a a
-fir �v�Ppp A. tpp� Ppp� l� 4�pD qpV �Ny �j
iR7R�iR*aR����aRi$iRiRiR����+c��aRaR71R8R3��iRit
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
r r r w w P w P r r r r r r r r r Y Y r w P w r r w r-
x O pp 1Q /0 N OW p
M^ b Yfxxx2 NNI
al
a„
OO �AN M! Ap�r YDp AO�r AO . AR tl-OM gVA rAtl1P ArOV AfYr0 Atlr vAtl A A6w
lY 4 tl0 h A rtlpO mf OqAr A4rR r
4 V Otl Vtl' '
Z O
i t11 OP - ib O O O 00
A0 +YO O iAD AP O O O O m-
Z IU
i
A O w N W O tl! O A tl O r M' W n
P P r r P r P (Y�j {4 */P�� ^(�f Yjy
P r r r w r Y r r r w M P r Y P r
I MINN 4 Yw4m t
City of AlbertvUls, Iffinnesols
Tax kusremont.Ithuncing (Economic DawlopmenO District
Land of takes Stone Prsj W
Scenario A
NOMM DOMr:
Oerim
Nola RMs:
7 5Olt►
Aennt:
i3d6,Td0
semkArdwal
Loan
Not
Dels
PeMK"
P 8 I
R+rwrn S
interestOumardno
1
4
5
8
286.700.00
02/01100
am
0.00
0.00
0.00
12AMS5
299.302.85
Oamm
0A0
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.223.80
310AM71
02(01101
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11,644.75
322.171.48
0810/181
19.0".57
i2.MA3
31.l59.00
31.159.00
0.00
303,093AO
02101102
19; M106
11,386 02
31,159.00
31.159.00
0.00
283.3D0.91
O"Im
1O.W.72
10 U&78
30,231.50
30,231.50
0.00
283,893A9
02Nl103
20".01
11,8WAO
30,231.50
30,231.50
0.00
243,350.18
0601103
i9.925.37
%12&0
29.051.00
29.051.00
0.00
223.424.81
0201/04
20.872A'
SAM43
29.051.00
29,051.00
0.00
202,75224
06001104
19.942.79
7.003.21
27,546.00
27,546.00
0.00
ISZS09.45
02(01105
20.
6.855.35
27,546.00
27.548.00
0.00
162,118.80
O810f105
19.WZ04
6.07448
25,631.50
25,631.50
0.00
142,5K78
02 01M
20.2WM
8,346.25
25,631.50
25,631.50
0.00
122.281.51
08101106
18,606.94
4.SMA6
23.192.50
23.192.50
0.00
103.674.57
02001/07
19,104.70
3.887.80
23.192.50
23,192.50
0.00
$4.300.87
OeM 07
16.923.13
3,163.87
20.087.00
20,087.00
0.00
67,446.74
0201108
17.557.75
2.529.25
20.087.00
20,097.00
0.00
49, MOO
O810i108
14.281.16
i,870M
16.132.00
16,137-00
0.00
35,627.83
14,795.95
1.336.04
16,132.00
16,132.00
0.00
20,831.87
06m/09
10.314M
78120
11,095.50
11,095.50
0.00
10,517.57
02f01H0
10,517.57
394AI
10,911.95
10,911.95
0.00
0.00
06MAO
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
WWII
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
O"Wi1
000
2m
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
SM.171
$105.897.02
$428,068.48
$426.065.48
$35.471.46
Exosse Tax kxxwr M 183.52
Tote) Not Rwwm $428,252.00
Prepared b1" SptkvMd kworporaW tvkmdan 4W" at 8:03 AM)
Tifa.xkr
No it- Saltm Anab-sis Report
City of AtbertVINO, Ukamots
Tax ink Fkmmft (Econongc DevebpreenQ District
Land of Lakes Stone Project
8csnarlo A
AUtitlriyiM
Prnot Value 130110
P.V. Rab - Gores T.I.
06/30/99
7.50%
Incresse in EMV Wild TiF District
$1,250,000
Lees: P.Y of Gross Tat IrKwwenient
264,677
Subiotal
$985,323
Low. is EMd W*wd TIF
0
DKIWence
'$985,323
Annual
Present
Gross Tax
value a
Year
irrcxement
7.50%
1
2000
0
0
2
2001
56,795
48,256
3
2002
55,104
43,563
4
2003
52,952
38,932
5
2004
50,210
34,341
6 -
2005
46,720
29,724
7
2006
42,274
25,019
8
2007
36,614
20,158
9
2008
29,405
15,059
10
2009
20,225
9,635
11
2010
0
0
12
2011
0
0
13
2012
0
0
14
2013
0
0
15
2014
0
0
16
2015
0
0
17
2016
0
0
16
2017
0
0
19
2018
0
0
20
2019
0
0
21
2020
0
0
22
2021
0
0
23
2022
0
0
24
2023
0
0
25
2024
0
0
$390,299
$264,677
Prepared by: Springsted lincorlmrawl 141 9)
EXHIBIT D
IMPACT TABLE
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.11
D-1
AL141.2T
r
EXMIT h
IMPACT TABLE
TAX MCRE NT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.11
NOTICE OF PUBLIC EWARING
NOTIM is
hereby eiy givien to the Council of of { meet ,# the
Albertville4 5975 Main Avem NE, AlbatMeMinnesft 55301 at 7:15 {m e 1
Monday, 1999, # conduct w publichearing on diecresition E.Taxi, Mi :sl#, -. !District.
1 �7i, Ar? 1
M. District [i♦ No. f:4 a Tax F#M ...Y( rl # : �' 1 a'# W Plan")
..1 1` r R si c. and
f,. #1. Program, 1' existing DevdopmentDistrict No.
t.. I i it #'., w.: i the Development District we
1.,. (1e -City as a wholmThe
boundaria ii. theF District ,F shown 1 inthemap below. proposed ,F District an
economic t'elc1i ##=«+I district,pup{is to development1 manufacaning
facility in the Cit3k Deaft an the proposal we containeid in the Devekpumt Program and the TF
Plan,
i 1 iicopy of which will be =a i for public inspectionatthe Albertvillell during
regular business hour&
7 person wishing g toexpress an opinion {,Pthemattersto be considered at the public
hearing willbe beard w orally or inwriting
ORDERBY OF Cn`Y COUNCIL
Dated: e+ of bi«s i {n#
(,2tx=
city
City
of { r Minnesota
SM441M
AL 41-29
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION NO. 1
RESOLUTION FINDING THE TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. I I
AND THE MODIFICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT : DISTRICT NO. 1
CONSISTENT WITH THE PLANS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
WHE MAS, the City of Albertville has authorized preparations of a Tax Wtemeht
Financing Plan (T IF Plan) for Tax Incmment Financing District No. 1 I (an economic development Fi
district) within Development District No. 1, and a modification to the Development Program for
Development District No. 1, and the TIF Plan and the modified Development Program have been
submitted to the Planning Commission for comment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the TIF Plan and the modified
Development Program and has compared them with the plans for development of the City as a
whole.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED By the Planning Commission of the City of
Albertville, Minnesota as follows:
1. Thar modhW TIF Plan for TiF District No. 11. and modified Development Program
for Development District No. 1 are found to be consistent with the plan for
development of the City of Albertville as a whole.
2. It is recorrinumded #hat the City Council of the City of Albertville hold the public.
hearing required by law and adopt the modified TIF Plan and Development
.. Program. ,
Approved this 13th< day of April, 1999 by the Planning Commission of the City of
Albertville, Min
ATTEST:
f' i
secretary
SM161043
AL141-29
a
CITY OF ALBERTVEL LE
RESOLUTION NO. 19
RESOLLMON APPROVM MODWED
DEVELOPMEW PROGRAM ..l. DEVELOPMENT DISTRXT NO.
AND ATAX WREMEN'r FINANCING PLAN FOR
TAX DICREI(ENT FINANCM DBIRJCT NO.
BE 1T RESOLVED by the City Council ("Count ) of the City of Albertville, Min
W) as f
i 1, '
1.01. The City has previously established its Development District No. 1 pursuant to MjM
21g, Section, 469.124 through 469.134 ("Development District Act").
0/ The City has determined need to modify the Development Program forthe
Development District and 1 creae TIF i v t M No.t, f Distw t purmw to
MiM is Section .6...174 through 469.179 I 1./ M thatend has caused to be
prepared 1 1 «,ixun titled mModified Development Pr1 .r: it Development District Nt I and
Tax
bxament Financing
.- '.i.TaxIncrement1 1 District No.Cityr: Albertville,
Minnesota:' € .-. i May 3,1999.
03 TheDevelopment / gr. tl andTaxhicrementFmancing PlanforI District 0
f' , 1were,in accordance with the Development District r 11TIF Act,W:1 1 the
Albertville Honing whichfound that theyconform #t 1=". general ► ! for the
developmentofthe City as awhole.
1.04. Estimms 1 theAter. and economic1 theTIF Planwereprovided 1
+l11l District N# 11WrightCounty, r._Y1 of whichwaived the
requirement before the CouncV& P.`1bhearing on the TIF._a.t
Ell.
' i .. _J 1 ►'t Ili T U:, r1F t .+.. ...s ► a 11• 1.' +� t 1. Ki fd�. • 1 1 : .-�: �1
.•+) i't � Iliiia^, =. `1A"' .t�tl F�.,<�.1. ���:.4[i�
F. b+ .b found and 1 eit athat there is aneed 1 modifythei ♦:rrlF ;dl
Program 1r the Development District, in order to improve the tax base and 1 employment
o Ile
f: 1'1 4 Uil Mr=ti -.rt •1 provide .,!. impetusfor related housing development.
2.02. It is further specifically found
1,1 i:. i.. Ir :/ that
a) the land within the Development District would not be made available for
development without the public intervention and financial assistance described in
the Development Program and TIF Plan;
b) the modified Development Program will afford maximum opportunity, consistent
with the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development of tine
Development District by private enterprise; and
C) the Development District and modified 1 Yd Development conform.to the
general plan for development of the City as set forth in the comprehensive
municipal plan.
Section 3. Emdm 32 District Nm
3.,01. It is found and deumnined that it is necessary and desirable for the sound and ordedy
development of the Development District and the City as a whole, and for the protection and
preservation of the public health, safety, and general welfare, that the authority of the TIF Act be
exercised by the City to provide public financial assistance to the TIF and Development districts.
�( 3.02. It is further found and determined, and it is the reasoned opinion of the City, that
(� anticipated development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private
investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and the increased market value of the site that
could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less
than the int:r = in the madmt value estimated to result from the proposed development after
subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the
district permitted by the TIF Plan;
3.03. The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of
the City as a whole, for development of the District by private enterprise, and
3.04. The 11 F Plan conforms to general plans for development of the City as a whole.
#..- proposed public improvements1 be ! 7 t=cei 1 part through tax increment
financing at tiecessary to permit the City to realize the hill potential of the TIF and Development
Districts # termsof development intensity, opportunities andtaxbase.
3.06. 11F DistrictNo. =.1 economicdevelopmentdistrict under Section 469-174. sM r
t, in Ph:J. which aref- ►- o , t;.N herein by
�( 3.07. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 273.1399, subd. 6(d), the City elects to make
j a local contribution to pay costs of the project financed under this TTF Plan, in the amount equal to
10 percent of the annual tax increment" Therefore„ the City anticipates that the TIF district will be
exempt from LOAMACA loss.
911-161136
AL141-29
i
08Reasons andfacts supporting the findings 1 t g. t.r' dus Section are stated in tt11-Ir
1
Plan.The Cityhas Wrelied upon the reportsand nendations of +ar
e j 1 1.. knowledge 1 members : 1 the Council in reaching
its conclusions regarding
t F
District 1
Section D- 1.a f '.1 t 11 f Plan t! i r1 i f 1 t
4.01. TU modifiled Developinwt Program and the TIFhereby approved ! ►
adopted.
4.02. Ihepop-spbw boundaries 1 the ) ., fptnet District and of t1 - TIF D`it d we
desmibed 9 theDevelopteent Program and i Plan t therefor,I and am I.te.1 I t, : +i
4.03. The City in-M-M is authorized and r directed to tivanit a certified +►of r 1 f Ft
resolution uW&w with #.: r@1.-t copy of he Development Program ;n1theF Auditor of Wright
"� t f the
r is it -r` t i .. !' � t.' v; i :. / ! "4 #' It 1 TIF
District No. I I be certified to *e City pursuant to Section 469.177, subd. I of the TJF Act, and to
file a >4f'1 R theDevi6lopment
Program
.of 'I it and the
F Planwith theMmmtaf tl ti sf�t e.+ of
Revenue as required by ft TF Act.
Adoptedthis -t dayof tt/
ti mayor
ayor
SM161136
AU41-29
1 10
4
City of Albertville
MEM
ORA DUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tun Guiniont, Public Works
DATE:April 29,1999
SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REPORT
• Streets The crack sealing has been completed.
• Parks Tennis and volleyball nets and posts have been repaired and
installed for the season. The fertilizing for spring is done.
• Barthel nd Drive The ditch on the south side of the road needs
to be re-Vadedand dirt added. The slope is too steep to mow. We could
elect not to mow it in any event it has to be re -seeded because the seed did
not take.
• Suit Shed As it turns out, we cannot put the salt shed next to the building
because of fire Codes. We would like to get a variance and put the shed
where the salt pile sits now. We could put a lean to off of the existing
building with a roof and no -walls.
• Lions Park We removed brush and stumps from the area between the
railroad tracks, north of Lions Park. This will be easier for maintenance and
help beautify the area.
TG:bmm
C:\My Ducuments\mmemo,-city council 4-29-99.doc
4k(l)
PLANNING &ZONING COMNIISSIGn
April 13, 1999
Albertville City Hall
7:00 PM
PRESENT: Chair Jim Brown, Commission Members Carolyn Bauer, Ed Budde,
Keith Franklin, Ray Meyer and Council Liaison Patti Stalberger, City Administrator
Linda Goeb, City Attorney Mike Couri and Planner Al Brixius
Chair Brown called the regular meeting of the Planning & Zoning Commission to
order.
The agenda was amended by adding the following under Other Business:
• Training for new Planning Commission members
• Discuss rescheduling Planning Commission meetings to Wednesdays
Bauer made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Franklin seconded the motion.
All voted aye.
Bauer made a motion to approve the minutes of the March 9, 1999, regular
meeting as presented. Budde seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Chair Brown opened the public hearing to consider the variance request for Mike
Savitski's commercial building. The variance requested would allow Savitski, to install
three (3) 4'X8' wall signs on the west side of the building. The city's Sign Ordinance
allows each tenant in a multiple building to display a business sign on the front of the
building.
Zoning Administrator Mealhouse reports that the Savitski building is unique in
that there are tenant spaces with separate entrances on the side of the building.
Mealhouse recommends that variance be granted with the following restrictions:
1. No more than three (3) 4'X8' signs are permitted on the west side of the building.
2. All signs must be located at the same height.
3. No other variance for signs are granted for this building.
Chair Brown called for comments from the public. There were none, and the
public hearing was closed.
Meyer made a motion to approve Zoning Administrator's Mealhouse's findings
and to recommend the City Council grant a variance to allow three 4'X8' signs on the
west side of the Savitski Commercial Building. Bauer seconded the motion. All voted
aye.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
April 13,1999
Page 2 of 4
Chair Brown opened the public hearings on the GEM Business Park.
Planner Al Brixius reviewed the project and his report with the Commission.
GEM Development LLC has submitted a number of applications to allow a new business
to come to the community. The proposed Land of Lakes Granite Company will consist
of a granite fabrication company with office space, wholesale and retail sales, and
showroom area. The development will be located at the corner of 62°d Street NE and
proposed MacIver Avenue NE.
The property totals 6.9 acres and is currently zoned B-3. 'A Comprehensive Plan
amendment is necessary to rezone the property I-2, as requested. Brixius stated that the
proposed I-2 used is compatible with the adjoining properties. Subject to approval of the
Comprehensive Plan amendment and the rezoning to I-2, the applicant is seeking
preliminary and final plat approval to combine the existing three parcels into one lot.
Three Conditional Use Permits are also being requested by the applicant for the
following:
(1) Retail Sales in an Industrial District
(2) Reduced parking
(3) Industrial Use in the Shoreland Overlay District
Brixius recommends approval of all requested items.
Commissioner Franklin inquired about the hours of operations and the noise
generated. Eric Dudley, one of the developers, explained that the fabrication portion of
the business would probably operates from 5:00 AM to 5:00 PM weekdays with the retail
portion probably open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM. There will be minimal noise
emanating outside of the building from the fabrication area.
Dudley further explained that there are currently six employees in the fabrication
end and four employees in the tile warehouse. He hopes to add 8-10 additional
employees over the next few years.
The Commission also reviewed the letter dated March 29, 1999, from City
Engineer Peter Carlson in which he recommended that concrete curb and gutter be
installed around all paved surfaces to help facilitate drainage. In an update, dated April
13, 1999, Carlson indicates that at a minimum, concrete curb and gutter is required along
the westerly driveway. Though not required by ordinance, curbing the remainder of the
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
April 13,1999
Page 3 of 4
paved surfaces would improve drainage, however, Carlson states, it is not essential
drainage and could be deleted.
Dudley told the Commission that the building project is $250,000 over preliminary
budget and the developer would prefer not to be required to add non -essential curbing.
Chair Brown called for comments from the public. There was none.
Meyer made a motion to approve the Findings of Fact & Recommendation
amending the land use plan from commercial to industrial and to recommend approval of
rezoning the parcel from B-3 to I-2. Bauer seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Franklin made a motion to approve the Findings of Fact & Recommendation
granting preliminary and final plat for the GEM Business Park, granting approval of the
site plan, and the approval of Conditional Use Permits for (1) reduction of parking
requirements, (2) development of industrial use with the Shoreline Overlay District, and
(3) retail sales in an industrial zone. Budde seconded the motion. All voted aye.
City Attorney Couri reviewed the TIF District proposed for Land of Lakes Title
Co. The TIF District is a pay-as-you-go district with a budget of approximately
$428,000. The City is obligated to pay 10% of the total captured tax increment out of
General Fund monies as its Local Contribution to the TIF District. The City Council also
has the option of spending up to 20% of the entire increment off -site.
Meyer made a motion to approve CITY OF ALBERTVILLE PLANNING
COMMISSION RESOLUTION #1 titled RESOLUTION FINDING THE TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT NO. 11 AND THE MODIFICATION TO THE DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 CONSISTENT WITH THE
PLANS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE. Bauer
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The three newest members of the Planning Commission will attend the Land Use
Planning Workshop in St. Cloud on April 29, 1999.
Due to conflicting summer schedules, Franklin made a motion to move the regular
Planning Commission meeting dates from the second Tuesday of the month to the second
Wednesday of the month for the months of May, June, July and August. Bauer seconded
the motion. All voted aye.
r
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
April 13,1999
Page 4 of 4
Bauer made a motion to adjourn at 8:30 PM. Budde seconded the motion. All
voted aye.
Jim Brown, Chair
Linda Goeb, City Administrator
NINC
PLANNING REPORT
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council
Albertville Planning Commission
FROM: Troy D. Hagen / Alan Brixius
DATE: 8 April 1999
RE: Albertville - Land of Lakes Granite Company - Comprehensive Plan
Amendment / Subdivision / Rezoning / Conditional Use Permit/ Site
Plan Review
FILE NO.: 136.06 - 98.33
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
BACKGROUND
GEM Development LLC has submitted a number of applications to be considered by the
Albertville Planning Commission and City Council to allow a new business to come to the
community. The proposed Land of Lakes Granite Company will consist of a ,granite
fabrication company with office space, wholesale and retail sales, and showroom area.
The development would occur, if approved, at the corner of 62nd Street NE and proposed
Maciver Avenue NE. To accomplish development of this land use, the project is reviewed
according to the following applications:
Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning. Currently, the site is zoned B-3,
Highway Commercial. The requested zoning would be 1-2, General Industrial. In
conjunction with the rezoning, the applicant will need to amend the Comprehensive
Land Use Plan to match the zoning being proposed.
► Preliminary/Final Plat. Subject to the City's approval of the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment and rezoning, the applicant is pursuing preliminary and final plat
approval to combine the existing three parcels into one lot for the specific zoning
district noted above.
5775- WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416
PHONE 6 1 2-595-9536 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837
Conditional Use Permit - Retail Sales in Industrial District. To incorporate the
use of wholesale and retail sales in an industrial district, the applicant is requesting
the CUP, per Section 4600.4 (b).
Conditional Use Permit - Reduced Parking. In addition to the aforementioned
CUP, a second CUP would be necessary to allow the applicant to develop the site
with less than the required number of parking spaces. The applicant would have
to demonstrate a need less than that required (Section 1200.9 (bb) of the Zoning
Ordinance).
Conditional Use Permit - Industrial Use in Shoreland Overlay District. As
indicated on the Official Zoning Map, the subject site is looked within the Shoreland
Overlay District, and as such, industrial development requires a CUP.
Attached for Reference:
Exhibit A:
Site Location
Exhibit B:
Existing Zoning Map
Exhibit C:
Proposed Zoning Map
Exhibit D:
Comprehensive Land Use Plan
Exhibit E:
Comprehensive Land Use Plan Amendment
Exhibit F:
Preliminary Plat
Exhibit G:
Final Plat
Exhibit H:
Site Plan
Exhibit l;
Site Grading Plan
Exhibit J:
Building Elevation Plan
Exhibit K:
Future Site Plan
Exhibit L:
City Engineer comments, dated March 29, 1999
RECOMMENDATION
The proposed use would be consistent with the economic development objective of the
City of Albertville. Based upon our review of the development application, our office would
recommend the following:
1. Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning as submitted by
the applicant provided the Planning Commission and City Council agree with the
findings outlined in the report pertaining to the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
and Rezoning.
2. Approval of the Preliminary Plat and Final Plat subject to the following conditions:
a. Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning
applications.
b. The applicant provides a revised final plat, which indicates utility easements
along all property lines of a minimum of 10 feet.
C. The comments of the City Engineer, dated March 29, 1999, be referenced.
d. The applicant make a cash contribution towards the City's park fund. The
amount will be five percent of the fair market value based upon a current
appraisal or market value of the property as determined by selling price of
the parcel(s) in question.
e. The developer enters into a development with the City and post all
necessary securities required by it.
3. Approval of the Site Plan and three conditional use permits subject to the following
conditions:
a. Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning
applications.
b. The applicant submit plans specifying type of material to be used on exterior
wall surfaces. Exposure of metal or fiberglass walls shall not exceed 50
percent of the wall area along 62nd Street NE and Maclver Avenue NE.
C. The applicant submit a Landscape Plan illustrating additional screening of
the parking area, loading areas with compliance to the standards outlined in
Section 1000.7 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance.
d. Approval of the CUPs are subject to the approval of the site plan.
e. Approval of the CUP for the reduction of parking requirements subject to the
the City finding that the reduced number of parking spaces adequately
supplies the site until such time the City determines that additional parking
are warranted (i.e. parking occurs in the public right-of-way or on -site in
areas other than those designated as parking).
f. Approval of the CUP for development of industrial use within the Shoreland
Overlay District subject to the review and approval by the City Engineer.
3
ISSUES AND ANALYSIS
Site Location. The site consists of 6.95 acres of land located on the north side of 62nd
Street NE and west of the proposed Maclver Avenue NE.
Comprehensive Plan Amendment/Rezoning. Any change of land use or zoning is,a
policy decision to be made by the City. According to Albertville Zoning Ordinance Section
300.1, the Planning Commission and City Council shall consider the possible adverse
effects of the proposed amendment. Its judgement shall be based upon (but not limited
to) the following factors:
The proposed land use plan designates the site for commercial land uses. The applicant
is requesting a land use and zoning change to industrial land use. This is necessary to
accommodate the manufacturing component of the business. However, it is also important
to note that the business will include the commercial uses including office, retailing and
wholesale, and a showroom that are consistent with city commercial intentions for the area.
These uses are also allowed within the proposed 1-2 Zoning District. The proposed land
use change is also consistent with the following Comprehensive Plan Policy Statements.
Comprehensive Plan Consistency. The Comprehensive Plan encourages the development
of industrial uses within the Interstate 94 corridor. For instance, page 16 of the Policy Plan
states, "Continue to maintain and expand the City's industrial and commercial tax base to
assist in paying for needed services and in reducing tax impact on housing costs."
The proposed use would also be supported by the policy found on page 13, which reads
"Encourage development of commercial uses which will take advantage of the visibility and
access along the interstate." With the nature of the subject business containing a retail
element, the applicant would prefer a site of high profile over other industrial sites in the
City.
Land Use Compatibility. The land uses surrounding the subject site are as follows:
East: Gas Station/Convenience Store
South: Interstate 94
West: Undeveloped/Public Works Building (northwest)
North: Metropolitan Underground Services (industrial use)/
Sewer Treatment Facility
The gas station/convenience store ,to the east, would benefit from the traffic that would be
created by the subject site. The proposed industrial use will be compatible with the
adjoining freeway and the existing industrial use to the north.
4
Depreciation of Area. The applicant is proposing a building valued at $1,000,000. This
in combination with an attractively landscaped site plan should not depreciate the value
from the surrounding area
Performance Standards. The proposed use and its conformance with all performance
standards will be outlined later in this report. However, an important factor that should be
noted is that the minimum size land area for an "1-2" Industrial Zoning District shall be five
acres, with a minimum frontage of 300 feet. The subject site is 6.95 acres with a lot
frontage of 306.85 at the centerline of Maclver Avenue NE or approximately 333 feet at the
setback line, therefore, satisfying these City requirements.
Public Services. There is no water service immediately available to the site, however, the
City plans to extend water services to the site, as well as, undertake street improvements
on 62nd Street NE utilizing TIF financing generated from this new development.
Traffic Generation. As stated above, the City plans to make street improvements through
a TIF. We feel the use will not contribute negative traffic conditions to the site.
SUBDIVISION
The applicant is requesting both preliminary and final plat approval, which would
consolidate the three existing lots into a single lot.
Block LengthMidth. The Albertville Subdivision Ordinance indicates a maximum block
length of 1,200 feet and block width of 600 feet. The subject site is 971 feet, thus
complying with the City requirements.
Lot Size. The proposed lot size is 6.95 acres, or 302,742 square feet. The minimum lot
area in the 12 District is20,000 square feet, therefore, is compliant with City requirements.
Grading and Drainage. The applicant has submitted a grading plan, which shall be
subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer.
Utilities. The applicant has not submitted a Utility Plan indicating the connection to city
sewer and water. The Utility Plan is subject to the review and approval of the City
Engineer. The final plat does not indicate utility easement along all property lines of a
minimum of ten feet. A revised final plat shall be submitted to indicated such easements.
Park Dedication. Based upon the location of the proposed development, the City should
request a cash contribution towards the City's park fund. The amount shall be five percent
of the calculated fair market value. Fair market value shall be determined as of the time
of final plat approval in accordance with the following:
5
1. The City and the applicant may agree as to the fair market value based upon
a current appraisal.
2. The market value of the property as determined by selling price of the
parcel(s) in question.
SITE PLAN REVIEW
Lot Area/Width/Depth. Minimum lot area in the 1-2 District is-20,000 square feet. The
proposed development is 6.95 acres, or 302, 742 square feet, therefore, satisfying this
minimum requirement. Lot width shall be no less than 100 feet. The proposed width is
approximately 333 feet, which complies with the Zoning Ordinance. There is no lot depth
requirement in the 1-2 District.
Building Height. The maximum building height allowed in the 1-2 District is 35 feet. The
submitted building elevation plans indicate the proposed building height is 29 feet, thus
complying with City requirements.
Setbacks. The following table illustrates the required setbacks in the 1-2 District, as well
as, the proposed setbacks for the site.
Setbacks
Required
Proposed
Front Yard
35 feet
Q 124 feet
Side Yard*
20 feet
20 feet
Rear Yard
20 feet
80 feet
' Side yard setbacks in the Shoreland Overlay District are the same
as the 1-2 District.
As seen on page 6, the development would meet the required setbacks for the district.
Building Materials. The plans submitted do not accurately indicate the type of building
materials to be used for the development. There is indication that insulated panel and
block are proposed building materials. It is undetermined exactly what type of material
"insulated panel" is made of. The applicant shall specify what type of construction this will
be. The following is stated in Section 1100.4 (f) of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance
regarding wall exposure:
Industrial Districts. In industrial districts, all buildings constructed of curtain
wall panels or finished steel, aluminum or fiberglass shall be required to be
faced with brick, wood, stone, architectural concrete cast in place or pre -cast
concrete panels on all wall surfaces. The required wall surface treatment
6
may allow a maximum of seventy-five (75) percent of the metal of fiberglass
wall to remain exposed if it is coordinated into the architectural design. For
building walls which face public rights -of -way or abut residential uses, the
building material requirements of subsection (e) shall apply.
With 62nd Street NE and Maciver Avenue NE running along the south and west property
lines, respectively, the Section 1100.4 (e) of the Zoning Ordinance as follows shall apply:
Business Districts. In business districts, any exposed metal or fiberglass
finish on all buildings shall be limited to no more than fifty (50) percent of the
total solid surface area of all walls. For building walls which face public
rights -of -way or abut residential uses, an exposed metal or fiberglass finish
shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the wall area. Any metal finish utilized
in the building shall be a minimum of twenty-six (26) gauge steel. All sides
of the principal and accessory structures are to have essentially the same of
coordinated, harmonious exterior finish materials and treatment.
Without specification of material type, it is inconclusive whether the amount of wall
exposure exceeds maximum allowance. The applicant shall submit plans specifying type
of material to be used, which shall meet the requirements of the above mentioned
provisions. Based upon the established provisions stated above, the applicant would need
to decrease the amount of exposed "insulted panel" (if metal or fiberglass) along 62nd
Street NE and Maciver Avenue NE.
Parking. The parking requirements are outlined in the section for the CUP request for a
reduction of parking.
Parking Stall, Aisle, and Driveway Design. A review of the proposed stalls, aisles, and
driveway design indicate that they are consistent with the provisions established in Section
1200.4 (h) of the Zoning Ordinance. The applicant will be required to comply with all
guidelines related to striping, curb barrier, and curb cuts.
Loading. The applicant has proposed two loading areas for the site. The main loading
area is located on the east side of the building facing east. This loading may be visible
from 62nd Street NE, therefore the applicant has provided some screening from the right-
of-way. In addition, this loading area contains the dumpster of the site. It is located on the
south side the loading area and has been provided with screening.
There is a second loading area located on the west side of the building along Maciver
Avenue NE As mentioned earlier, the driveway access meets the minimum distance from
the intersection.
7
f
Landscape Plan. The applicant has not submitted a Landscape Plan, however, he has
included proposed landscaping on Exhibit L: Future Site Plan. The proposed plantings are
listed, but exact location and size of the plantings are not indicated. The applicant shall
submit a Landscape Plan that illustrates type, location, size, and quantity of proposed
plantings, as well as, comply with other performance requirements outlined in Section
1000.7 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance.
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) - Retail Sales in Industrial District. The proposed
development would require three CUP's. The first CUP is necessary because of the
inclusion of the wholesaletretail on -site in the industrial district. Section 4600.4 (b) of the
Zoning Ordinance provides the following criteria that needs to be satisfied before Planning
Commission can approve the CUP.
1. Such use is allowed as a permitted use in a business district.
Under B-2, Limited Business District, hardware store and building supply store is allowed
as a permitted use. Also, wholesale showroomsANarehousing is a permitted use within the
B-W, Business -Warehousing District.
2. Such use does not constitute more than 50 percent of the gross floor area of the
principal use.
The total building area of the proposed development is 31,728 square feet. The display
area would occupy 2,200 square feet, or only seven percent of the total area, thus
complying with the City requirement.
3. Adequate off-street parking and off-street loading in compliance with the
requirements of Sections 1200 and 1300 of this Chapter is provided.
The applicant is proposing 42 parking spaces and the required minimum is 83 spaces.
However, the applicant is requesting a CUP (outlines above) for a reduction in the
minimum number of parking spaces. The applicant indicates on Exhibit K future parking,
or proof -of -parking, that would adequately meet the minimum number of parking spaces
for the site. Provided the Planning Commission finds in favor of the CUP, the -applicant
would satisfy the parking requirement.
The applicant meets the requirements for loading area, therefore, satisfying this element
of the criteria.
4. All signing and informational or visual communication devices shall be in compliance
with the provisions of the City Code relating to signs.
The applicant shall comply with all provisions regulating signage in the Sign Ordinance.
U
5. The provisions of Section 400.2 (0 of this Chapter are considered and satisfactorily
met.
The criteria in Section 400.2 (f) is reflective of that for the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment and Rezoning. If the City finds that criteria to be satisfactorily met, it would
similarly agree with the CUP criteria sufficiency.
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) - Reduced Parking. The second CUP is requested
because the applicant wishes to development the property with less than the minimum
number of required parking spaces. The criteria for this CUP is reflective of the
aforementioned criteria fore the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning, therefore
can be reiterated here.
Based on the Albertville Zoning Ordinance, the following table indicates the minimum
requirements for parking per type of use associated with the site.
Standards
s.f. Provided
Required
Proposed
Office
3 + 1200 s.f.
3,672 s.f.
21
18
Showroom
1200 s.f.
1,980 s.f.
10
9
Warehouse
111,000 s.f. + 1/ co. owned truck
7,200 s.f.
7
3
Mfg./Fabr.
1/350 s.f. + 1/co. owned truck
15,696 s.f.
45
12
Total
I
1
83
42
The applicant has indicated on the "Future" Site Plan a total of 130 parking spaces may
be provided. It is our feeling that the proposed parking is sufficient until future needs
warrant the additional parking. At such time, parking occurs in areas other than the
designated parking areas the City will require the applicant to surface and curb the area
intended as future parking to meet parking demands.
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) - Industrial Use in Shoreland Overlay District. The
proposed site is located within the Shoreland Overlay District associated with it proximity
to Mud Lake. As such, the applicant requires a CUP to development an industrial use
within the Shoreland Overlay District. The Shoreland Overlay District contains more
restrictive provisions than the 1-2 District, specifically industrial uses shall not exceed 25
percent of impervious surface. Based on the figures found on Exhibit K, the impervious
surface at the site equals 23.3 percent, therefore, complying with the City requirement.
The type of industrial use will not negatively impact the shoreland area.
The criteria for this CUP is reflective of the criteria for the previous CUP's, and therefore,
can again be reiterated here.
9
5. The provisions of Section 400.2 (0 of this Chapter are considered and satisfactorily
met.
The criteria in Section 400.2 (f) is reflective of that for the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment and Rezoning. If the City finds that criteria to be satisfactorily met, it would
similarly agree with the CUP criteria sufficiency.
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) - Reduced Parking. The second CUP is requested
because the applicant wishes to development the property with less than the minimum
number of required parking spaces. The criteria for this CUP is reflective of the
aforementioned criteria fore the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning, therefore
can be reiterated here.
Based on the Albertville Zoning Ordinance, the following table indicates the minimum
requirements for parking per type of use associated with the site.
Standards
s.f. Provided
Required
Proposed
Office
3 + 1200 s.f.
3,672 s.f.
21
18
Showroom
1200 s.f.
1,980 s.f.
10
9
Warehouse
1/1,000 s.f. + 1/co. owned truck
7,200 s.f.
7
3
MfgJFabr.
1/350 s.f. + 1/co. owned truck
15,696 s.f.
45
12
Total
I
1
83
42
The applicant has indicated on the "Future" Site Plan a total of 130 parking spaces may
be provided. It is our feeling that the proposed parking is sufficient until future needs
warrant the additional parking. At such time, parking occurs in areas other than the
designated parking areas the City will require the applicant to surface and curb the area
intended as future parking to meet parking demands.
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) - Industrial Use in Shoreland Overlay District. The
proposed site is located within the Shoreland Overlay District associated with it proximity
to Mud Lake. As such, the applicant requires a CUP to development an industrial use
within the Shoreland Overlay District. The Shoreland Overlay District contains more
restrictive provisions than the 1-2 District, specifically industrial uses shall not exceed 25
percent of impervious surface. Based on the figures found on Exhibit K, the impervious
surface at the site equals 23.3 percent, therefore, complying with the City requirement.
The type of industrial use will not negatively impact the shoreland area.
The criteria for this CUP is reflective of the criteria for the previous CUP's, and therefore,
can again be reiterated here.
r
CONCLUSION
The introduction of the Land of Lakes Tile & Stone Company would be a welcomed
addition to the City of Albertville. The layout and design of the development is generally
positive, outside of a few minor issues (parking requirement). As set forth in this report,
the development is generally compliant with the Zoning Ordinance and consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
pc: Linda Goeb
Pete Carlson
Lary McCall
10
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The part of the South 60 rods of the Southeast Quarter of the South 60 rods of
Government Lot 9, all in Section 36, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County Minnesota,
Described as follows:
Commencing at a point on the south line of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter,
distant $80.00 feet west from the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter, said point being the southwest corner of the East 20 acres of South 60 rods of said
Southeast Quarter, thence on an assumed bearing of North 1 degree 18 minutes 47 seconds
West along the west line of said East 20 acres of the South 60 rods of the Southeast Quarter
of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 700.03 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence
continue North 1 degree 18 minutes 47 seconds West along said west line, a distance of
140.00 feet to the south line of the North 150.00 feet of said South 60 rods of the Southeast
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 10 minutes 10 seconds West
along the South line of the North 150.00 feet of said South 60 rods of the Southeast Quarter
of the Southeast Quarter; thence South 89 degrees 10 minutes 10 seconds West along the
South line of the North 150.00 feet of said South 60 rods of the said Southeast Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter and said Government Lot 9, a distance of 760.55 feet to the centerline of
a township road; thence South 40 degrees 57 minutes 10 seconds West along said centerline,
a distance of 306.85 feet to the northerly right-of-way line of land acquired by the State of
Minnesota for highway purposes; thence South 73 degrees 13 minutes 36 seconds East along
said northerly right-of-way line, a distance of 685.50 feet; thence continue along said northerly
right-of-way line along a tangential curve concave to the southwest, having a radius of 527.57
feet and a central angle of 0 degrees 02 minutes 04 seconds, a distance of 0.32 feet; thence
North 1 degree 18 minutes 47 seconds West not tangent to said curve, a distance of 296.23
feet; thence North 89 degrees 10 minutes 10 seconds East a distance of 315.01 feet to the
point of beginning. Containing 5.45 acres and subject to the right-of-way of said township
road.
Also, that part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 36, Township
121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at a point of the south line of said southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter,
distant 880.00 feet west from the southeast comer of said Southeast Quarter of the Southeast
Quarter, said point being the southwest corner of the East 20 acres of South 60 rods of said
Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter; thence of an assumed bearing of North 1 degree
18 minutes 47 seconds West along the west line of said East 20 acres of the South 60 rods
of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter, a distance of 171.11 feet to a point on the
northerly right-of-way line of land acquired by the State of Minnesota for highway purposes;
thence continuing North 1 degree 18 minutes 47 seconds West along said west line, a
distance of 345.00 feet to the actual point of beginning; thence South 88 degrees 41 minutes
13 seconds West, a distance of 255.00 feet; thence South 1 degree 18 minutes 47 seconds
East, a distance of 133.45 feet to said northerly right-of-way line; thence northwesterly along
said northerly right-of-way line along a non -tangential curve, concave to the southwest having
a radius of 527.57 feet and a central angle of 7 degrees 00 minutes 51 seconds, a distance
of 6458 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 69 degrees 41 minutes 07 seconds West;
thence North 1 degree 18 minutes 47 seconds West, a distance of296.23 feet; thence North
89 degrees 10 minutes 10 seconds East, a distance of 315.01 feet to the west line of the said
East 20 acres; thence South 1 degree 18 minutes 47 seconds East along the said west line
a distance of 183.92 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 1.51 acres.
EXHIBIT A
i,12ll
MEANI:
a
MM°11 oil
M'��� �j
r
REVISED 12-3-96 PROPOSED LAND USE PLAN
Agricultural / Rural
Industrial ••••• Primary Street
Law DensityResidential
Public & Semi -Public Alignments
Medium Density Residential
E
Shared
Park & Open Space Private Drives
High Density Residential
Future Park & Open Space
Commercial
J
Lakes & Wetlands
AL U
-
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
DECEMBER 1996 REVISED DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
19
EXHIBIT Dt COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN
REVISED 12-3-96
PROPOSED LAND
USE PLAN
1
Agricultural 1 Rural
Industrial .....
Primary Street
Low Density Residential
Public & Semi -Public
Alignments
Medium Density Residential
Park & Open Space
Shared
Private Drives
®
High Density Residential
Future Park & Open Space
Commercial
J
Lakes & Wetlands
70TH STREET_
_
70TH 3TR ET -.
L US
I L=.
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
DECEMBER 1996 REVISED DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
19
EXHIBIT E: COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN AMENDMENT
I► J
v r
i g
H ?►
1bi1 41i
s i '
Md
ts;
IYR Md
ijR
ail
I
/-
1 ,
i,. I
�, it .:�N•� i L
l�
r.
lily
an
"•` ! tY,. Y >t 'djit�its lfdtit
ilt
Hatl{��
it'llIt
pill. 14
) j � t a , t�a�l�8t
\ t
tli .• .� � � t,a�t� al;; � tRat�;r,.ti
\ ♦ e ! ID
bill !� ` Iit d titala
.}t ,
�ti jt
fiat I CD I ,Y
Q
EXHIBIT F: PRELIMINARY PLAT
its
7 jjs! a
i i I c
Ij a�t;
�1
qoi
i • ,� d�slls�Fltii7�: ! ,� ��it�fE,;IxE� tt 1 t� ;,� 4 ;,I j �� � �1�t ,�
°
rix
fit
1
�
tR4i
S" I
V �2�
-• i
—I •-
� jyatr I
I
R�
i
(
I
carer•. 'f4
of
�a
AQ
I
�
t
_l
F
I
a)
a�
}
�I
-
a
EXHIBIT G: FINAL PLAT
1
us
O
I
w
x
U
Q
i
+ t +
a
°'
v
t�1 n r N
4
N
cQ
r
to
Q
W
Q
Blu
OC
JU
W
JU
< W
IK
Q
Llu
O
Z
Y
N
a
NN
O
a
-'
aN°0°o
Q
N
O O O p
' coCOI�y
00
r
OpiOLn
I
u
F
LLNON't
jW
94w, 1
_
I—TbR 9
btoak
I iy
e 06-0
5 7ArXr
00
LU
iz
rxLL�
iCLLNN
to u,Npp
cc
I
Wno-
i a
On
'r w
M
QwQ&
rQ-
wocpcO
p
QQOV f
W <".,
U-iWX
uwiQ
0
EXHIBIT H: SITE PLAN
r
to
•
GRADING PLAT
EXHIBIT J: BUILDING ELEVATION PLAN
323.92'
m
w
ly
U
Ln
+ + + e-
V
d Q u w LL a
w LD a ui vJ of a
ra cri d i m �
m r cV n
O r ci r
m
in coto
ci
Q
co
133.45' Q W
Q a W q W
ul w
�« (AY O O Q Q
umi ti , O Q X toz H
O $ > W a g 0
c-
�_ + c- a
L U 6\' U co',"',
y mcr,rr — cim p
—
a m
OOc'-M w
>000 o n ao 0
C)u. !L WQ1 F
N r oc
zIL
F Loom-k r CDH�
�4Y w lL 0 w acmLnr I to)ci
LLI
a n ao
z —i m rc I OW-O °' ae
V Z W o° xX o X
Q> Q W rXd)N < N X
—I W r a LL.00 < a
O W O
Q- U W z MO O._: m �
OC Or
111 r Z 0C4 co T w
a r wY J z
IL N l7 awQ� ac w
= aaoto O ac
} <-,LL Qcrw p
z-
ty LLN=Q ,--
<Oy- M
pOgE tL"
EXHIBIT K: FUTURE SITE PLAN
AAr
Amriarm• MEMORANDUM
I VWF ICM
605 FRANKLIN AVENUE NE, PO BOX51, ST. CLOUD, MN 56302-0051 320 253-1000 800 346-8138 320 253-1002 FAX
TO: Linda Goeb
City Administrator
Albertville, Minnesota MaR 3
FROM: Peter J. Carlson, P.E. ��C1
City Engineer
DATE: March 29, 1999
RE: Site Plan Review
Gem Business Park
Albertville, Minnesota
SEH No. A-ALBEV9901.00
I reviewed the above referenced site plan and have the following comments:
1. To facilitate drainage and define the edge of the paved surfaces, concrete curb and gutter is
required around all paved surfaces.
2. To minimize the potential for freezing, all driveway culverts shall be 15 inches in diameter.
3. Submit drainage calculations for review.
4. Make provisions for vehicles to back up at the westerly driveway. Traffic will not be allowed
to back up on Maciver Avenue.
5. Maciver Avenue is considered an industrial road. The required right-of-way is 80 feet --revise
plat accordingly.
6. When construction is complete and the turf has been established the detention pond shall be
cleaned out.
Please call me if you have any questions.
djg
c: Mike Couri, City Attorney
Liz Stockman, City Planner
Scott Dahlke, Meyer Rohlin, Inc.
c: W bevleort�nrz9a•99. wpe
An Aj/irwdive Action,
Eq-1opporrmdryEmployer EXHIBIT L: CITY ENGINEER COMMENTS
4-20-99
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
City Council
Findings of Fact
& Decision
Applicant's Name:
Request: Land of Lakes Tile & Stone Company has requested approval of a preliminary plat, final plat,
site plan, and three conditional use permits associated with developing a 6.95 acre parcel as a granite
fabrication facility.
City Council Meeting Date: 3 May 1999
Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes
the following findings of fact and decision:
1. The legal description of the subject property is attached herewith.
2. The Planning Report, dated 8 April 1999, prepared by NAC, Inc., is incorporated herein.
3. The requirements of Section 300 and 4600.4 (b) of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance have been
satisfactorily met.
4. The "future" site plan indicates plans for future parking that would adequately supply the site
additional parking, if necessary.
5. The nature of the business requires the applicant to have retail sales and showroom area on -site.
6. The impervious surface associated with the development does not exceed the 25 percent maximum
allowance.
7. The industrial use will not negatively impact the site and surrounding area.
8. On 13 April 1999 the Albertville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the
applicant's request, preceded by a published newspaper notice and mailed notice to adjacent
property owners. Upon review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission
closed the public hearing and recommended that the City Council approve the project.
Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the City Council hereby approves
the preliminary and final plat, site plan, and three conditional use permits based on the most current plan and
information received to date, subject to the following conditions:
1. City approval of the requested rezoning and Comprehensive Plan Amendment associated with the
Land of Lakes preliminary and final plat.
2. Preliminary & Final Plat:
a. Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning applications.
b. The applicant provides a revised final plat, which indicates utility easements along all property
linen of a minimum of 10 feet.
C. The comments of the City Engineer, dated March 29, 1999, be referenced.
■
d. The applicant make a cash contribution towards the City's park fund. The amount will be five
percent of the fair market value based upon a current appraisal or market value of the
property as determined by selling price of the parcel(s) in question.
e. The developer enters into a development with the City and post all necessary securities
required by it.
3. Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit's:
a. Approval of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning applications.
b. For Site Plan:
i. The applicant submit plans specifying type of material to be used on exterior wall
surfaces. Exposure of metal or fiberglass walls shall not exceed 50 percent of the
wall area along 62nd Street NE and Maciver Avenue NE.
ii. The applicant submit a Landscape Plan illustrating additional screening of the parking
area, loading areas with compliance to the standards outlined in Section 1000.7 of the
Albertville Zoning Ordinance.
iii. Approval for the CUPs are subject to approval of the site plan.
iv. Approval of the CUP for the reduction of parking requirements subject to the City
finding that the reduced number of parking spaces adequately supplies the site until
such time the City determined that additional parking is warranted (i.e. parking occurs
in the public right-of-way of on -site in areas other than those designated for parking).
V. Approval of the CUP for development of industrial use within the Shoreland Overlay
District subject to review and approval of the site grading plan by the City Engineer.
vi. Curb and gutter be required around the parking area, along the westerly driveway on
62nd Street NE, and along the driveway connecting the passenger vehicle parking lot
and the truck parking and driveway area.
Attest:
Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 3rd day of May 1999.
Linda Goeb, City Clerk
City of Albertville
By:
John Olson, Mayor
2
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
ORDINANCE # 1999-3
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ALBERTVILLE
LAND USE PLAN AND ZONING ORDINANCE MAP
TO BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH PLANS FOR THE
ALBERTVILLE CROSSINGS AND LAND OF
LAKES PROJECTS IN THE CITY
The City Council of the City of Albertville ordains:
Section 1. The Albertville Land Use Plan is hereby amended to the
following:
(see attached Exhibit A)
Section 2. The Albertville Zoning Ordinance District Map is hereby
amended to the following:
(see attached Exhibit B)
Section 3. This ordinance shall be in full force and effective immediately
following its passage and publication.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
THIS 3rd DAY OF MAY,1999.
John A. Olson, Mayor
Linda Goeb, Administrator -Clerk
•.,,.
1
_.lal 12.
irN, `� r �_� :l{R�a' mow. ! .eA •h..
ruones
Ea- C.
♦ was no j
y `� moo{•{ ■ .a /
4
UV AR.BERTVILLE - WRIGHT COUNTY _ MtNwr�cn`r�
R-IA
1;
att
a
ARE
X
WO
,*Vk
041b
- _-.�.
' �■fil
;IL
� I_z R 7' ff-aiWar-M
dalk
I
CITY OF AL33ERTVHIE
COUNTYOF Ge
SrATE OF hHNNESOTA
RESOLUTION# 1999-
RESOLUT10N' iFEASWELM STUDY AND Me�
FOR, REARM ON
M r t COUNTYHIGHWAY NO. t #, (PY I � _R
iM dw AHxwtvil1et. Councilhas received &sibiEW studyprepwed by
6t Fagmer rdwed 41 h cost toreconsbw porhm of Ult County W*kway!
19 and tt" ''(!p'iS't. t€' bftucdm 1 lli County K*way Nos. 19 and 37, all
`ii,i tt:1i' 1 '.,?li;.*i; i; ii e. tt«# FSii§9 he City 1 %m and
14 fivtr nt of 4BE ff RESOLVED BY THE ClTY f i OF ME
CITY OF t'' i ' r !"Tff COUNTYt NMWWSMA.-
4 iItA
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE TH[S
DAY OF MAY,1
Jobn U1su4 Major
ATTEST:
i
4
�14 p
.4
O
C
Gi
o
VJ
z
q
69
69
4,%j
604
e4
z
`
69
64)
60
60}
6R
64
iR
40).
6+23
6R
�
Q+p
W
6l4
6f!
6l4
644
6R
GA
Z
C�
�i
L•
O a
C U
A_
t :Le..�
n
80
W V.. C/i, C/i � y
c 0,
09
o C14
v p,
iz d a.
wM
OC
Z
a
4
x�
ii
J
4
'4
Oq
C
U'
u u
E E
O' °?
a
a � a
O O a
A
3333
[ S
o
Z
6
.° ESEE
c et %,c d co
o a
c> or 41
C It •E .'t
vo4�aa
a S.5 S
3
6 Ey .E F c
cdaoSS0
'C u '� u
... 4- 4-
=S S�-
4 o A oG c
4 N rn
p
tt» mo Z oo Z
ts
lot Q
C FV OF ALBERTV] LLE DEVELOPERN AGREEMENT
Gem Business Park
tr al1N Off �i)/a �1
t
A
!
Wf , ' ` J)eIreI(qW
is la; ft!
! ► tf i / ! 1.,y
ilt; ,wl i
1� 1 l.y Proposed i ..1! ! or
C!' ;.l.;l 1..iwi ! by
m*mce, which zeal
which sub(�
! -! the subject
1 ! sM ! Il�:l 1' develop
l` menand
1 +1
and! I.Gl .i f �i 1 4 ( IntendedIs bear the name .i1 Business t
1 in its entirety 'Said Plat"
� M � ref ° and
/ 1
!+e City has ,i
- _ ��MI tt eit U_:t :ilil � Business
i ` 71 s ' of _
Iopes Plat of .dir
limited 1 as : ttMset
- ►# � K rl «1
11 as ,N! ►, including 1 i not
l; 11 herein, and
1t
as f:n! tl ) A t#� a:# ! ` 1 certain1 ►
lic !1 1' 1 ra iMi. ti
! and i t r t a 1! 1! but i t
11 MI►... !f ► } "eta ^'� 1 r_! 1 a,l H 11 !
►water -+
"Mi
affected by the 1'► as 11 1 [ 1 1 a,/ Subject 1 l :{ty and / other
/ 1 ! :, !
instafled by the City and paidfor by
i tI w
installed
} F; ;_1 ! �. It �.. requiresthatcertain J 1 r :la,! off -site
1 ►,► I+a11t ! f t al u 1 i! : 1 a� tr r: be
il and so4 -WiM 1}r 1. 1. i w ►, at ..
a " tll fl 1�11 t! r
!r l 11 1-!! at
1 i !
t ii�1` !t t �.i11 .111 !1� ► it t► ! it 1` i►Ati ► 1► ! " 4i��i :rl ►
ti,wefi is i :AI(' ► it i'• 1 ri 1.1 is ► �[ ► ` 1.a Ir. It:1:s1 `+t�i� ►I!{ ' ilk ► h► .YC.%.41K i'
i 1'. i ► +r: MY1.- i Ii ' ! ►• ►`iifl .rl 1 fR. `IM UP
. 7i'1 ii 1 ►"L: N i i«:: w.i li .+ ='► 1
i� M i ia ' ii'd'
i ►i t i .N i 3ii ► :�; ) ii I; •'Ii .+: Sr1,i Wi4! `t i.' Gli i 1 4�+� ii ►d i1.
1. Construction of Municipal Improvement&
A. The Developer has petitioned the City to install a municipal water line and
pave 6e Streek As a condition of its approval of Said Plat, the City requires
the installation of the Municipal Improvements as detailed in the Plans and
Specifications for 62nd Street, dated as prepared by SEH
RCM, Inc. and on file with the City Cleric, said improvements to include
installation of bituminous street, curb and gutter, and water maims. The City
shall install said Municipal Improvements specially assess the cost of said
Municipal Impts to Developer. Developer has agreed to be assessed
for the cost of said Municipal Improvements (except for the cost of
which shall not be assessed to Developer), and has agreed to
waive the right to appeal said assessment to the Wright County District Court
pursaant to Mines. Stat. § 429.081.
B. The City shall have the City Engineer present on Said Plat for inspection
purposes at all times (or such times as the City may deem necessary) during
the cottstruction and installation of said Municipal Improvements.
2. Construction of On- and Off -Site Improvements.
r���r�r.wrrrr •�rrr.
AL Developer shall►°!stall on- andoff-siteincluding
installation of boukvards, streetpa%111 signs,yard ► ► ".i "hi orseed
inall yards,grading control per ► Intummousor i 1' driveways -:}Y..!
parking lots, ponding, drainageandlike itemsnecessary, stred
ckwup during project development, erosion control, ►all as requhvd by City
ordinance. .1 on -and off -site 11 ►; i ` I! 141,'shall1' installed :,► 1oi later than
October 31, 000 !1 the exception of erosion iSf ! of and pondizl& which
shall be insWled upon initial grading of Said Plat
K
B. Developer shall, its own n a1t Mt ' "camthe following t' ll to t.. insulted
Xi
thtt tt t » t t tt «tall such Lann to be t. r, .# under ground, itt it
&e street • 'att ofway or such odwr locations may be approved by the t
Enginew,accessible toall lots and of compliance tlall applicablestateand
local regulations:
Electrical,power supply, o be provided by t' t4 l StatesPower or
& Nat and gas supply, to be provided by Minnegasco or other such
HL Telephone service, to be provided by SprintUnited Telephone
Company or other such carrier;
C. Developer has submitted a utilityplan for Said Plat shoW:ing all existin :n
proposed t .' 1.utility linesandcasements, attachedand incorporatedherein as
t t't B. Developeragreesto have utilities installed according to this
1t i ! B.
D. Notwithstanding the scants of subparagraph 2A above, the Developer
shall install to the City's satisfaction said m and off -site * 11 Dvenents pr.
to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy (temporary orpermanent) by the
City for a building located on the lot In the event the certificate of occupancy
is issued after October 1st and before Much 301h in any given year, said on -
and off- site improvements shall be so completed by the following June 15th.
F. Developer shall iEst it towater retentiontwaterVdIty t t tit S and basins
upon t Plat as
shown 1 t'1 the Gradmg, DramageandErosionControl i
attachedas Exhibit Said ponds l-` and basins '1 l.' shall be
it : t Y.. n e+i U good
working order by Developer !retention i t'1=t ' and basins shall be
insulted prior to the installation of utilities.
3. Sureq Requirements. The City shall not w"i re the Developer to post a surety with
the development of Said plat. In lieu of posting a surety, Developer hereby agrees that
the, City may withhold any Tax Increment proceeds from Developer until said default is
cured. Developer agrees to allow the City to offset against any Tax increment due to
3
Developer any t,i all carat: incurred by the City I enforcing any of the bans of this
agreetnent should Devek)per fWl to pay i costs fi li ! days 4 mailin ' 1written,
requestfor payment ytt. by it..
4. Abandonmentof i ;q Costs I iExpenses. I the eventDeveloper should
abandontheproposed development of the 1 Property, Itcostsand
eqxnses related £4 attorneysprofessional 11 :tft11 " of thisge+fkl...t
pieparition. of the&asibilityrepoMplans and 1' 1•. >It 1 t ;.I i anyothera. I' t'..
sl.,i ti t; et inrelianceupon Developees various
,+s i 1 t.'.shall be paid 1 by said
DeveloperI!t t thirty i days r.r rece4)t 1 bill 1' such costs from the City In
addition, it &e event theDeveloperh project, Ia t wholeor in part,ceases
substantial field Ii for morethan nine i monft 1+. f1 provide ground -
cover t1 prevent 4•t iif i+ softerosion from the Said PIA or fails toleavethe
abandoned propertyII condition which W,tI be mowed ei usingconventionallawn
mowing equipment Developeragrees 1 pay all costs the may incurin taking
whateveractionis reasonably necessary to provideground-coverand otherwise restate
1. Plat f1 the pointwhere tf 1-. 4 t.et groundsam levelandcoveredwith r:f-1I.i7i�api
vegetation sufficient to prevatcontinuingsoil erosion '4 4`f from 1 Plat
and to t:. ftll
mowing 1Said 't. In the =+1 that said costs are notpaid, the may Atli '
:fimdsfrom the above -mentioned suretyfor ft purpose of payingthe costsrefwed 1 .t
1! paragraph.
i t 11.1 4 4 4-1 It,:
- 4'1 - tl 1'L 1 :.Ult f '+1 1 - +fi 1 .Fit fi 11.
1 171,73t' "i ".+, +.' to, If. T avo,"'I&,s it N, I I I t.;l It li M — t 1 1
�# 4f :itt+al 17 .► 1;1 1:1 1 It '1 +. 11 �I ':tI f ft:- i'1 i 4 1 �
.,[ "1 t.:.1 :�t. 'Att +"*1 1-t�It..-1 :.+." tl 11 �i t tt.� 1 II 1; y +11.11 + 11' 4 I.•
tr.Ii i> 1 `. LI o tt-ie':M1if '. r II 1 A '-1ii .41 1Q 1 Gi: .77. :. PRvil
I Ititl; ft I it l+. 1I till,
11 i f li... 4 1 4 i f
tf�4 tI K 1 11,0 :.'1 a [1 1 11, ! II t 1111 &:.: MoToM M I I
1 1f. +
iErosionandffiltationControL Before anygradingis started 11 11f site, ti Iti 4 {
control measures e.»;asshown I;f ff,,. approvedGrading, Drainage:n Erosion 1 lil i t Off
shallbestrictlycomplied with asset• tI II fl: attached Exhibit C. Developeral
also install all erosioncontrol measures r a;, deemed necessaryby the Engineer should
.i
the erosion 1"Icontrol plan prove1'.i. i t- in I respect
4
Maintain7. t RMrrq Damaged or :t During Construction. Developer
it ' to assufWI me,finaung reVonsibihtyfor .rtdamaged I may occur to ► f:.,
propertyincluding butnot limited t I streets, street Y 1.. base, ! ! t!1 rt! ► : 'r i ac
curb,utility system. including g but nothunted 1 I waternim sanitary w:r or storm,
sewer when
! damageoccurs 'as a result of It. activity which takesplace during h
developmentof tr Plat t,.- Developer r it.:, agrees to pay All costs required r r er
repair the streets,and/orutilitysystemsdamaged orcluttered it debrisoccurring
as a director indirectsI of the l;► ''1 i t on It takes :s place inSaid Plat Y theevent
the Developerto clean 1! maintain or repair r thedamaged public property
l a
mentioned :'fabove,t1'.City shallprovide #., the Developer with NoticeIits intent to
dean fl!repm, or maintain suck publicproperty Developershall have tat days
t trrt thedateof ff.. 1 1f such noticeit effectsuchclean tM repair or li :tOf
said public property to the ristl:ct ! t of theCity Council. In 11."event Ir ;t Developer
fials to soclean up, repair 1r maintain said I public property,the City may n ta
11 ki !'-causing 1 to be „+: to ►repaired or maintained. When the City
undertakies+r such activity,the Developer shall reiur i r the !r all of expenses
within thirty f days of ts billing to the Developer. dw Developer ! pay said
bill trit► tt i t i days, finds 1 ' suffictent to pay the bill may betaken from he. Tax
Incrementtt due the Developer and/or pecially assessed against ai or allrw
within Said
8. Temp2rary FAsement y ' i 4- Developer shallprovide access Wilie Subject Property
at all reasonable times i .+: to the City or itsrepresentativesforpurpose . s / inspection or 1
accomplish anynemssaty !' pursuant to it Agreement
� ti♦ t.:r
R !'f 1 -.< $lei 10 .1t r : i ► r,l :? If �! ati * Et
11 l l i' St► 1 !Y
B. If anyportion, sectimsubsectimsentence,t paragraph 4° phrase
1
rt Contract ,« 11 +- 1 held invalid!' Court competent
/ ;l
Jurisdiction, t decisionshall i:1 affect ll�.validityI the
!Contract.
!' t !tr I Il ! t]t
building permitsamissued prior to ►1ecompletion andacceptanceof public
ftl! 1 ti .it ti the Developerassumes ;h:all liability and thecostsresulting ! it
l,. t►completion of publicl► ! ! a lre t: and damageto public
*----vcmcntscaused by theDeveloper, itscimilractors,
5
materialmenemployees,agents, or third r parties ' dwingconstruction of
Irtr' 41i �+# !'t 1 Plat
D. 11ke action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment
to the provisims of this Contract. To be binding, eats or waivers
shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of
the City Council. The City's failure to promptly tape legal action to enf =
this Contract shall not be a waiver or release.
173. Thisnr .« ,": run with the had and shall be , o; r, a against theto
the"cityAftertheDeveloperhas completed all work
and obligations
:.a t -tea ofa tuxlerthisContractra # r to dw vqxration of the warranty
e t r at IheDeveloper's. r a ,k the t and deliver to h
Developer :.: t; obligations n :, this t! "e asexcept for f1.1s.'
obligations which at o'1 A tl ng in nature.
1 r
F. The Developer represents to the City that Said Plat complies with all City,
county, oft and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to.
subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and 1 1 ' tal regulations. If
the City determines that Said Plat does not comply, the City may, at its
option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the
Developer so complies. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease
work until tyre is compliance.
R Prior to the execution of this Agreement and prior to the start of any
construction on the. Subject Property, Developer shall provide the City with
evidence of good and marketable tide to all of Subject Pry. Evidence of
good and marketable tifle shall consist of a Tide Insurance Policy or
CoI m111, nit fiom a national title insurance company, or an abstract of title
updated by an abstract company registered under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
I. Developer shall comply with all water, ponding and wetland related
restrictions, if any, required by the City of Albertville and/or any applicable
provisions of State and Federal law.
J. The Albertville City Council reserves the right to allocate wastewater
treatment capacity in a manner it finds to be in the best interests of the public
health, sir and welfare.
6
t# h ►�I.al tl ' .», : Y! :ft ► I it !t
i ►,} � ► ##}1 : .�! #a }-rl 1 �} :r#} � #li�4 .�t }.���_ }n tt �,r�
!_a 1.1 i7Mtt :tl I;t } 117t. } ►' d I# :1# a#t ! Y a#t
}Clf }.i i.� � t # •# ti "71 tL' f.�l tt 'Yt .:a =t# }�.# Y;:al ►
!�#. :�1 #: -i t;t #-= 1:1 ! '� I !it 1 It," !1 } !� t.: } Ki �tl'! -► �t t 1!
10. Violation of Anent,
A. In the case of defank by the Developa, its successors or assigns, th
covenants `nagreenwaa ham attcontained, the Cityshadil give
thirtydaysmailed e# noticeItra ki. certified ti :!t_i `# # },=fi
Wt
is " cured ttt itsaid ## t ( day period, the hereby granted Y1e
A& and the privilege to decIm any d6dencies governed by dus Agreemalt
due and payable to the City in fidl. The ddrty (30) day notice period " be
deemed to tt from the daftof deposit 1 }#..' United StatesM► ►;i
I:t E to cumby Developer, theI mayit ak immedhftly andv h !# }-' t
notice or consent complete some or all of the Developer's obligations under
tt E► - ltat and 1 II 'legalaction. against w h Developer tocollectany
sumsdueto the City pursuant A thisAgreemaitplus all costs and 1 awxneys
incurred in Ott i} tl ' dus agreement.The may alsospecially
all } costsincurredupondefinilt against11." properties 1!Said Plat ►' t ` :..tt
1 tit tamof tbis agreementand/or t"reimburseitselffrom a Increment
proceeds o6ervdsedueto Developer.
B. Breach of anyof the terms ' of diis Contractby ##..Developershallbe rr -}'!#t }.for denial of bw1ding pamits.
11. Dedications to the City.
A. Developer acknowledges and agrees that in order to satisfy the City's park
dedication regwrtments for Said Plat, Developer shall pay the City a cash
payment totaling $16,750, consisting of 5% of the value of the land as
platted, which both parties agree is valued at $335,000`00 at the time of
platting. All such park dedication fees shall be paid prior to release of Said
Plat by the City.
7
B. Developer aci mowledges that the City will charge Developer S1,000 per
acme as a trunk water line charge (in addition to the lateral water lime special
assessment being proposed). Said Plat consists of 616' ass.
Developer agrees to pay S_�f� , in satisfaction of said trunk water
line charge.
12. Phased ft-+ t l tl at Ndke platphase1 multi -phased preliminaryp 11:" t
may t to Mxvn1lt A 4t►; 1subsequentphases until public11 1 -M .itt +fi M: for
all
•! phases havebeen completed. Developtnodof subsequentphases
' tiff
may1o4 proceed ..e1until Development Contracts o:' such phasesweapproved by the
City
Approval of thisphase of Y1; Development shall not be construedasapprovaltf future
`
phases nor shallapprovalof thisphase bind 1 theCityt1 approveDevelopment
phases. All future Development phases 1" governed by it Comprehensive
Plan, Zoning t` 1 ri r Subdivision oWinance, and other *I ordinances IIeffecta M4;'
tune uF?tfiihut Developmentphases `..,, areapproved by theCity
13. Indemnity. Developer r : hold f the City and t; officers andemployees harmless fium
clams made by Developer and third parties .: •r damages tt tt -► or costs incurred
resulting lro•rr Said Plat:approvalttl development TheDeveloper shall indemnify h
City and t.: officers and employeesfor all costs, damages or expenseswhich the
maypayii. incurnconsequence ofsuchclaims,including attorneys Third parties
shall have no recourse against the City under this contrw%
14. Ae&ment of Contract. The obligations of the Developer under this Contract cannot
be assigned without the vgnss written consent of the City Council t nu*h Council
resolution.
15. Limited, &Vrovai. Approval of this Agreement by the City Couoii in no way
.r.. constitutes approval of anything other than that which is explicitly specified in this
Agreement.
16. Professional Fees. The Developer will pay all reasonable professional fees incurred by
the City as a result of City efforts to enforce the terms of this Agreement. Said fees
include attorney's fees, engineer's fees, planner's fees, and any other professional fees
incurred by the City in attempting to enforce the terms of this Agreement.
Plans17. AttachedExhibits. All plans .. attachedto It Agreement 7. _ t ! 6: .t
incorporated into thisAgreement 1referencetheyappear.Unless otherwise
Vmfied in do ApumenkDeveloper bound Ft 1 by ":t,t plans andresponsible!
ttt. wrt at l at of r plans _ herein
.:Is1 aE t I r;
riw
1 •f 1. ): (!, t ,il t Ir �'IIII ;�I Ii.t,.f 77 1 1 ' 1 II, 1-1 i - S I
CI -!!" I Ili It
'I 'r: .31 i�-{Il 11 7 i� It 1! i III ' 'U I :1 '11.-�t ►' I11 ;lltMf:!` i:.i *.ii f' 1111
19. Notifidadon Information. Any notices to the parties herein shall be in writing,
delivered by hand (to the City Clerk for the City) or registered mail addressed as follows
to the following patties:
City of Albertville
c/o City Clerk
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
Telephone: (612) 497-3394
r
Gem Development Company, LLC.
20. Agreement :a I. Agreement shallbe 11L.i it ! upon andextend I4 h
representatives, heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
� MR
By
Its Mayor
B
Its Clerk
n •i tD 1,211• a'.
f :: .�� y (i,• arsr �� 71
!si ,iF Y: 4, '.� .•aU�.i 11 i. e7,77, 77 1 il-i • i i As 4A t fill
'a «.1lt�y fi; Nl,: t I1 ♦;1 tt IAIt ` :��J 'II .1 1 if. i1 fl1,i A«i :-i !f 11 14
19. Notiftation Informatloo. Any notices to the parties herein shall be m
delivered by band (to tie City Clerk for the City) or registered mail addressed as follows
to the following parties:
City of Albertville
c/o City Clerk
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
Telephone: (612) 497-3394
Gem Development Company, LLC.
2OAvftmmt Effect.,Agreement l : be binding upon and ft nthe
sumessm and assigns of the parties hereto.
By
Its Clerk
GEM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC
By
Its
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing insttlm2erit was acknowledged before nee this day of
1999, by John Olson as Mayor of tine City of Albea hAt, a
Kinnesota munici l corpouration, on behalf of the city and pursuant to the =&o&y of the
City Coma
Notary Public
STATE OF r O
COUNTYOF
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I day of
1999, by Linda Goeb, as Clerk of the City of Albertville, a
Minnesota municipal cmpoaradon, on behalf of the city and pursuant to the authority of the
City Council.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
�.." i ' t 1I ' �! ' s Isi.•+it ,�1.1 ' 1 ' .�1 1�# 11 Ai � I1. 1.: 1
•'�t 1 1 .isl
}m 1 1,1MacAilbwIawffiV
P.O.
1705 CentralDili. Ent
Michael,St
(612)497-1930
10
I UV
Iouy!• r
TO: ALBERTVILLE CITY" COUNCIL MEMBERS
I ' !m: LINDA GOEB, CITY ADMWSTRATOR, MIKE COURI;
REVOLVINGATTORNEY
SUBJECT: GEM DEVELOPMENT COWANY, LLC REQUEST FOR
!FUNDS.
Mr. Eric Dudley, Vice President of Gem Development Company, LLC ("Gem")
has requested that the City loan Gem $75,000 from the City's revolving loan fund for 20
years at 20A hiterest. Gem is developing the land and building a building which Land of
Lakes Stone Company Cum of Lakes") will lease from. Gera for the won of a
granite countertop business. Land of Lakes is a new company and will create six jobs in
Albertville within the first two years of operation. These jobs will pay at least $ 13.00 per
hour, well above the minimum required by state standards for a revolving loan fund. The
company also will offer a benefit program to its employees. The City has approannately
$77,000 in its revolving loan fitmd at this time. Gem is the first company to request
revolving loan fiords since the es ablishment of the fund in 1991-92.
We have considered the request and make the following recommendation to the
City Council:
Amount of loan: $75,000, with annual payments of $7,500 in principal plus accrued
interest
Term of loan: 10 years.
Interest rate: 0% for the first two years, 3% for the next three years, 5% for the
last five years.
Security: Secured by a subordinated mortgage in the land and a subordinated
UCC statement in the equipment Also, guaranteed by the same
person or persons who guarantee the Small Business Administration.
Loam which Gem has applied for.
We believe that a ten year loan is a sufficiently long period to be a real benefit to Gem,
but short enough that the money will be retuned to the City while the City will still: have
vacant industrial land left and can assist one or more other businesses m locating to the
City. The staggered interest rate is Set up so that Gem does not .have a heavy interest
payment in the startup years when cash is generally scarce. The low interest rate is sat up
not to provide the City the highest return, but to assist a business locating in Albertville
while at the some time providing some return to build additional revolving loan funds for
the next rmpent. The equipment lien and mortgage would be submAinate to bask, SBA
and CMiF financing and any other institutional lender involved in the transaction. This
rrconmmuendation is similar to the structure of the Fraser Steel Loan from DYED, which
provided the finds for ow revolving loan fund.
a
era sac, amewMAw
To: The City of Albertville
Attention: Linda Goer City Clerk
From: GEM Development Company LLC.
Regarding application for a loan from. the City of Albertville Revolving Loan Fund.
At the fast staff meeting with GEM Development, City Attorney Michael Court
mentioned that The City of Albertville has about seventy six thousand dollars in a
revolving loan fund that was generated through fimdmg from the Department of Trade
and Economic Development (DTED). Mr. Coun also mentioned that this money was
available at a low 'interest rate to assist qualifying businesses with financing and that our
Proposed fabrication. facility should qualify for assistance.
At this time, GEM Development Company LLC. would lice to formally apply for a loan
from the city's revolting loan fund. We propose to borrow seventy five thousand dollars
at No simple interest for a twenty-year term.
# .I rr �� r • i �ru ..r t ' : ar s ' er E M�
' « It R_ rtFr ri r r
r� r - � i, , 1i r ,,; � r �� �t a� • .� �r :+: t•r r r .:� :ar . � ' r x ..
�1-• ri r
We would like to thank the City of Albertville for the opportunity to bring our new
`business to the area and the staff for their help and hard work on this project. We look
forward to being responsible members of your corporate community.
Respectfully Submitted April 13,1999
Eric E. Dudley
Vice President, GEM Development Company LLC.
oa- 29 99 11:47 FAx 6120834003 iST NATL BANK CS 0001
To: The City of Albrrttw&
AUMUUM Linda Gock city Clark
From: GEM Developnmeat Campasy LLC.
Regatdws addenduaen to app&xtion for a ban From tie City of Albertville Rcvolvimg
Lou Fend dated Apt 13,1999.
Dear Linda,
In ACCOtdance with tie Piddines sat forth by the Miauesota Dgwtmeitt of Trade w d
Eooaondc DevelopwAS regafts the establisinsaat of wage levels and job creation
goals. Land of Laical Scone company intends to create at Brest six new jobs witiszin our
first two ye m in opambos. TIM wage level for these new jobs will be at lost $13.00 per
hour exchlsive of baaefts. We also komd on offering mmedieg dental seed rdirement
beneft to our anptoym.
In resud to need forthe funding q a Ow project .. L,r: ♦ ♦t!!t. 11 1# 00
overour originalprojected t t A i'. createdseveral gap in #11 f M Mon a
low1lf l.+ loon of 1iiiS f' N= o♦ ♦ help If '{1 the succemful ♦ I/fI ♦.Ft of 1:.
ProjecL We would use 1: m'm 0 0'0 from the v i 5 s t n4 to I i♦ u i
.:i iit'f/.* it needed !7 pwdtcuon1{ 1.-stone,company b .• `{ lienwet7' :n on
hml'.:htii ' is t i'! modan available L J mftstryand a u..*m,=^♦ operam to
t! it. tis flict help tort 1.l i.. job security with 11 am Y{ {{ a ;:i! and I.' i i::t our
war levels will remain well abovei IHU { lI tx..:i .. estsbUslied by YD
Timak you for your considustion in this matter. If there are any limber questions, please
fuel free to WnW me at any time.
Respectfully Submitted April 29, 1999
Eric E. Dudley
Vice President, GEM mint Corveny LLC.
44(0 00
l) fit
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
RESOLUTION #1999-18
SPONSORING UNIT OF GOVERNMENT RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions and requirement of the 1 `987 Rural
Economic Development Act, the local governing unit is required to issue a
Sponsoring Resolution on behalf of businesses requesting financing through the
Central Minnesota Initiative Fund's partnership with the State of Minnesota's
Challenge Grant Program and;
WHEREAS, this body has received a request to issue a resolution on
behalf of Land of Lakes Tile Company; and
WHEREAS, it is consistent with the purpose of this local governing unit to
encourage employment, enhance the tax base, and create more opportunity for its
residents.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED., that this local governing unit
supports the project submitted by Land of Lakes Tile Company to the Central
Minnesota Initiative Fund's partnership with the State of Minnesota's Challenge
Grant Program.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ABLERTVILLE
THIS 3rd DAY OF MAY 1999.
John A. Olson, Mayor
Linda Goeb, Administrator -Clerk
*Minutes of the Meeting of this local Governing Unit adopting this resolution are
attached hereto and made a part thereof.
MEMORANDUM
REQUESTS.SUBJECT: PILOT LAND DEvEL opmENT cowmrs APRIL 5, 1999
DATE: APRIL 28, 1999
By letter dated April S, 1999, Mr. Don Jensen requested that the City consider
sieveral requests related to the development of lands adjacent to or near Pilot's meat
developments. Pilot's letter is attached to this memo. I have addressed these issues from
a legal perspective below, and have the following recommendations:
• Request: Expand the existing sewer district west of Highway 19 to include
additional land, and rebate a portion of the money collected from this land to Pilot
,-- under the same terms as set out in the Pa timide III Developer's Agreement.
l Recommendation: I do not think we can legally do this. In the Parkside III
Developer's Agreement, we agreed that if Pilot built the trunk line, we would
establish a sewer district covering a certain area and would rebate to Pilot a portion of
the per -acre trunk line fee we collected That agreement was a contract where each
side promised to do something (Pilot builds the trunk line, we rebate money to Pilot).
Were we to expand the district area as Pilot requests, we would be giving Pilot more
money than we agreed to, and we would be getting nothing back in return. I believe
that this would constitute an unauthorized expenditure of City .fimids, as there is no
"public p urpos e7 which would be furthered by this transaction. I recommend that this
request be denied
Request: Pilot paid NSP $35,000 to extend 3-phase power to the golf course
property. If we use this 3-phase power for a li#istadon which will need to be installed
in that area, Pilot is requesting that we rebate to Pilot a portion of the $35,000 Pilot
paid for the power extension. Recommendation: Like the issue discussed above, a
rebate in this fashion appears to be an unauthorized expenditure that is not related to a
public purpose. The 3-phase power is now an existing condition which the City is not
now obligated to pay for, and thus the rebate does not appear to be a necessary
expenditure for the construction of the lifistation. I recommend that this wVx-A be
denied.
• Re quest: Pilot cleared out County Ditch 9 as part of the Cedar CredUCenter Oak
development The Developer's Agreement contains a clause which states: "The City
may elect to (bit shall not be required to) refund to the Developer uses incurred
by Deveeloper for machine operator time spent cleaning the ditch beyond the
Plboundaries of Said Plat." This language creates no obligation on behalf of the City to
make any payments to Pilot. As I recall, the cleaning of this ditch was rem by the
County before they would approve the Cedar CreeklCenter Oak developments. As
with the prior request, this was an activity which Pilot chose to volunh ly undertake
in order to facilitate its development I do not believe that a City expenditure at this
point for this purpose would constitute a public purpose expenditure, and thus
recommend that this request be denied
Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you.
Cc: Mr. Pets Carlson
Ms. Liz Stockman
Mr. Don Jensen
2
C unwUdw
0
PILOT
LAND DHVBLOPMfiNT COMPANY
Apt 5, 1999
Mr. Mayor & Members of the City council
C/o Ms. Linda Loeb
City Clerk\Administrator
5975 Main Avenue NE.
Albertville, MN 55301
i. -i,_ I 1 1 i ;a, 7 !L_ �.Vr i
Dear Mr. Mayor, Council Meyers and Staff:
This letter serves to confirm sous telephone conversations with the City Attorney and
City Engineer as it relates to proposed work on lands south of 118. As an adjacent
property owner we have the following requests prior to anything more than concept
endorsement.
1. During our planning process we had to submit an EAW, receive its comments and
address a variety of issues such as ditch crossings and sewer flows prior to any
preliminary plat or guide plan amendment. We remind the City the EQB rules are the
same, which will require an EAW of the project as currently proposed.
2. During the creation of sewer benefit areas, the City concluded there was little
likelihood of development in this area. So, a boundary was stopped at Hiighway 118,
which crested a payback to Kenco for sewer under Highway 19 through B 's
land. This was a 12-year payback period of which 1.5 years are over. We request st the
City expand the benefited area prior to any final plats with a rebate.to Kenco under the
terms of the Parkside 3'4 agreement. We do believe that a sewer capacity question
should be addressed as it relates to flows from these new sites through Cedar Creek,
Center Oaks, Parkside 1,2,3,4, Summerfiedd and across Highway 19.
3. During 1998, Pilot spent $35,000 to NSP in order to extend three-phase poser from
Highway 19 up the right of way to serve golf course pumps. Should the city use this
power source for a lift station (which will create lower maintenance costs) we would
expect a rebate to be part of the feasibility study since a pro rate benefit can be
determined.
4. During 1998, the f inners along ditch 9 believed they could not afford a ditch cleaning,
so Pilot land offered to do so. It was discussed with the attorney, the City
Administrator at the time, and the Engineer, that Not be eligible for a fair share rebate
of costs from trunk utility fces,�since the ditch cleaning benefited the City for the next
aVif 41M.!�_�
13736 Johnson Stred NE • Ham Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094
20 years and servedmore than just new development that Pilot was undertaking. We
will be presenting Engineer supported billing in May for consideration. We believe
that work done is the area South of Highway 118 should be under a substantial rebate
if development p mcaeeds, since it clearly benefits their property both for agriculture in
the short tern and development in the long term.
5. Last, with development concepts pending, we wish to hear what the City has
discovered regarding joint trail construction with Wright County lfghways as they
upgrade the road. They should be involved now if any new intersections, accel or
decel lanes are required, especially as they may affect a lift station siting.
These are the most significant planning and financial issues, which we dealt with during
our approvals, and we would expect similar results from the new project.
Sincerely,
r 7„ 1 ► 7, mf
Cc: xmt Roesda
March 24, 1999
Mr. Mike Court, Attorney
Mr. Pete Carlson. Enginw
/16. Linda Goeb, City Clerk
5975 Main Aveam NE.
Albertville, MN 55301
This letter confirms my conversation with you rounding the possible amendnent of surety to
Albertville for upcoming projects. We are currently authorized to provide 75% of the road
construction cats in a letter of credit and 25% in a bond in order to reuse a plat for recording.
So long as we .furnish the letter of credit, the City will provide inspection and we can proceed to
build the streets and utility pipes.
We are asking the City to allow a change to our required surety based on previous testimony at
earlier Council meetings. At those mectings it was suggested to us that if performance; was
satisfactory, alternative; ratios could be explored and approved. We are requestmg that the
following occur. -
I. Lower the bond percentage of construction costs f ern 150°l® to 1101%;
2. Allow a ratio of 50% letter of credit and 50% bonds;
3. Allow the use of an agreement to restrict the plat of Cedar Creels South 5'- project as an
afternativic with an equivalent LOC value. Through the develot agreement we would
authorize the City to withhold final plat on 23 lots, which have a retail value of $50,000 each
or S 1,150,000. Widdiolding valuable land from recording would be great leverage to pa*rm
and further reduce LOC and bond requirements. Should the City agree to use this alternative,
just as we did to build the golf course, we would agree to require 50°lo LOC and the
withholding. In order to rdease the land for plat, the work world need to be completed or a
replacement band or LOC would be furnished.
The reality of municipal surety disputes is fewer than 5 per year in the entn metro. I doubt
whedier any City could provide an eacarnple of a full amount surety breach in the Last 10 years. I
furtla~ar' believe that one days research of 30 City's would yield fewer than 10 actual surety calls in
the last 5 years. I have had developmeant experience in over 30 different communities and have
never heard of a full surety breach, and believe my claims to be supportable. Tbere have been
many times that the final release of the last 10% has been used as leverage for final billings.
However, final billings and the last 10% are a large difference from the amount necessary to
furnish to a City to release a plat and to commence construction. So, why is it required? It is a
13736 Johnson Street NE - Ham Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094
i v+ �.♦ ,.� itf t: Ali :.k lit'r I..rl ! ! .{ 1' t /\ 1, � Y, 1'..4': t II it f M {':
f :41 t: Vi ♦?I fEt _ '.M ti Yil{1 :.« •_ F.t lt' 1.
,.+M fl ti.; t vH.lf f,�( '.•♦ 1 tJ. r._ : ! /..:. ♦ r/ ca Pt 1 t-. r; 1;- 4_F '' _♦
Today, developersmustbewallW_ r Ili =1 must usethe for backup or prirnary
inspection services whkhcan redtog a•.tforpoor i +r / t e sign i 4eitt-•Y
objection `.ht for .:rr, work on the same
site. We have higher knder control over project
ee I t c: ium Last, the 1.,.1. caused a firadarnentalchangeto i ts.'. budding i - u to 1
residential projects. 1•'can not I I Y_ I building pernutuntil cuzb and gutter in, #h:+4 all
residentialt ijrett_' Wit an - id/ to 'Y_...trevenueIII that t ' smr' mosttransactions t t'. I
developer to : 1' t::nareiInfin"+n ♦ t being 'ableto pull partnit. Thevefboe,,
1,,:. risk of total
default1.;.+.t r.. riskof : 1 it f:'. tl.i'.. than of dieproject costs is lessthan isince
road thatiscapableof having a i! pulledwillhave1.' first of pavingcompleted.
We apprecufo Albertville's willingness to work with us in the past We have delivered our
promised goals of
• subdiviskm with homes from a mix of builders with a variety of types and values,
t.:t,l. '.ii. ",{,. ♦:.
3.4 t'. � f; }.tt 11" tp+► II f �♦1�t t' f'1 • iR..a � 11 ( I:� •' ! :+L. 4
- Y� �. t'i :.-tJl�' 1` '.• v•' .. `l i • f..i :i 1,♦-. 1.! • 4 'ti- 4 ♦.. tJ II `
i ! i • iri i. ! i'.♦4�'. t 1 It .rl tr". t:- R,♦,i / t.' t:1
a♦ rLt tt" t' vt"frI ,.M I vtf14, • L :. t... I.I '.:...1 #1. 1.:. 1.. ,�.:1t t . ".t:' ,.1 i _.ii.,.
1 •:..! t' 9t :.t : I t•:' / t". 4: •.: I M/f. i t
4 .1
to r.:.'If. � .1~ •
Cc: Kest Roessler — Pilot Jon Olson — Mayor
Attachment: CCS preliminary plat surety area
�1
vs
.s
A m C
Z
F
A e o 0
-�A� 4 z
go
L
B N z In
--------------------- -------------------- A Q $ Z
P q §
'Q a Q
' i I_ (n n
��.F F
flUs a� N
I I
I I �
I I �
I I N
I I
1 I
i I
I I
I I
I c I
1 t
1 I
i I
I i
r------- --CIS
1
I � 1 a•: rl
' L-------------i
' 1
I I im Z
I I Ir)
g Ln
i
1 I
I �
I I
I �
I I
I � I
1 I
I '
I
1
I '
I I
I I
I i
' L
I " I
I
1 . I
t t
t t
I f
r-----1 J 1
W _
' N
------------------------------- \ — ------------------
1 8x I
I I
I < U O I
1 L47 -•+ I
I 00 =Ile I
i I
I 1
I 1 0I I
. .... .... ..
I I
jJ M a
1 c
1
1
I O
1 �
1
I
1
1
('•— m in
i
1 �J
I
1
1
1
1
1 U
1
1
1 C40
I �
1
1
1
1 m
AA C%l ®V�
1 d N
1 �
z
a
O 0
0. g
Zz Ln
0 R
z
Gj 3
U cr-
83
w
WLi
Ni-4 3 � "
w
x ° i C
E Z)
th
e ee Z 3
NEI!
�3
Ln
�Ln
in
YM
.se mm L
eea o°o
e o e o e
'e ee
ee e° e
•aaia e
ee
i
0
e
O
a
w
O �p
J
0
I F
JONES
I N I E R C A E3 1L. E
April 16, 1999
City of Albertville
POBOX 9
Albertville, MN 55031
Attn: Linda Houghton
Re: System 1403-999-100 Buffalo
Vendor#F00438
Account # 22503
FTA # 17
Following is our franchise fee owing status as of the sale of the system on
March 29, 1999. Since we will no longer owe a franchise fee, we request
a refund of our credit balance.
Total Gross
Revenues
January 1999 $20,214.83
February 22,717.29
March 20,870.26
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Total $63,802.38
@ 3%
Total Due $1,914.07
Overpmt in 1998 (4,363.48)
(Pd @ 5%) ---- ---
Total Due ($2,448.41)
Sincerely,
Jones Intercable, Inc.
Ka a Gerard
Fund Accountant
Enclosure
JONES INTERCABLE, INC.
9697 EAST MINERAL AVENUE, P.O. BOX 3309, ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO BO1 55-3309
TEL 303.792.31 11