Loading...
1998-03-04 Planning Report Cedar Creek Golf CourseINC PLANNING REPORT NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council Albertville Planning Commission FROM: Elizabeth Stockman DATE: 4 March 1998 focopy RE: Albertville - Cedar Creek Golf Course Planned Unit Development Cedar Creek North Development Stage (Preliminary Plat) Cedar Creek South Development Stage (Preliminary Plat) FILE: 163.06 - 98.04 and 98.05 BACKGROUND Pilot Land Development has submitted development stage plans for a portion of the recently approved Cedar Creek Golf Course (CCGC) Planned Unit Development. As the second and third development stage (preliminary platted) portions of the project, together, Cedar Creek North (CCN) and Cedar Creek South (CCS) will provide another 184 single family lots and 50 town home lots in the City. CCN encompasses 78.33 acres and provides 90 single family lots, a +/-5.67 acre park and 4.44 acres of golf course land. CCS encompasses 193.08 acres and provides 94 single family lots, 50 town home lots, and 133.68 acres of golf course land. Following CCGC concept plan approval and in expectation of the current projects, the property was rezoned to Planned Unit Development on 17 November 1997. Attached for Reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Approved Golf Course Masterplan Exhibit C - CCN Development Stage Plan Exhibit D - CCN Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan Exhibit E - CCN Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan Exhibit F - CCS Development Stage Plan Exhibit G1-G3 - CCS Detailed Development Stage Plan/Golf Course Layout Exhibit H1-H3 - CCS Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Plan Exhibit I - Pilot Memo Re: Highway 118 Trail Construction 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9637 RECOMMENDATION Based on the review of submitted plans and established Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements, our office recommends approval of the Cedar Creek North and Cedar Creek South Development Stage Preliminary Plats subject to the following conditions: Cedar Creek North: 1. Temporary cul-de-sacs are constructed at the terminus of all roads that will serve more than two lots in the future at such time as lots are final platted along said streets. 2. All grading, drainage and utility issues are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 3. A cul-de-sac must be shown at the southern border of the plat thereby slightly altering the configuration of golf hole three and the emergency vehicle/trail easement connection between CCN and CCS in this vicinity. An easement should be shown for both the cul-de- sac itself as well as the emergency vehicle/trail easement connection. The City Engineer shall review and approve the street configuration (size proposed at 45 foot radius and material proposed as gravel) and location as discussed herein. 4. Park and trail dedication requirements are met as specified at the time of final plat approval. 5. One (1) deciduous or coniferous tree is provided per unit or lot in addition to any screening or other landscaping requirements which may be required by the City Council. Cedar Creek South: 6. Temporary cul-de-sacs are constructed at the terminus of all roads that will serve more than two lots in the future at such time as lots are final platted along said streets. 7. Site grading and drainage is completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, as shown on previously approved plans, who shall also review and approve utility layouts as proposed on plans included herewith. 8. At the time of final plat approval a landscape plan shall be submitted for all median areas or islands within the public street right-of-way. 9. Park and trail dedication requirements are met as specified at the time of final plat approval. 10. One (1) deciduous or coniferous tree is provided per unit or lot in addition to any screening or other landscaping requirements which may be required by the City Council. F .'1 `� a _ a � J I T ••k, ►W ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Conformance with Golf Course Master Plan. The proposed development stage plats for CCN and CCS are both in conformance with the approved conceptual master plan. The plats contain the same number of lots and are configured in the same arrangement with the minor exception of lots in the northern portion of CCN which had to be adjusted to lie outside of the Kadler Avenue right-of-way and subsequently shifted lots and roads in this area. Lot Size Requirements. All single family lots are a minimum of 15,000 square feet with the exception of Lot 1, Block 5 of CCS which is combined with a lot remnant in CCN. This 3,371 square foot remnant in CCN should be platted as an outlot and the 12,137 square foot portion in Cedar Creek South should replat both segments as a single lot (the reverse would also be acceptable). Lot widths approved with the CCGC master plan have to be a minimum of eighty (80) feet at the designated front yard setback line (varying for each lot). All lots within the proposed plats meet this requirement. Building Setbacks. Lots approved as part of the CCGC Planned Unit Development may have varying front yard setbacks provided they are no less than thirty (30) feet. The development stage plat indicates the minimum front yard setbacks (many greater than 30 feet) which must be adhered to throughout the life of the Planned Unit Development. It shall be the building inspectors job to see that minimum setbacks are met at the time of building permit application. Street Configuration. The proposed street locations and widths are in conformance with the approved CCGC master plan. Temporary cul-de-sacs must be provided at the terminus of all roads that will serve more than two lots in the future at such time as lots are final platted along said streets. One issue which needs to be resolved is the dead -ending of Kadler Avenue and the provision of a cul-de-sac in this location. The concept plan shows this occurring at the periphery of CCN single family lots, about +/-160 feet from the plat's southern border. In order to eliminate the issue of vacating (a portion or all of) Kadler Avenue at the present time and prolonging the plat approval process, a cul-de-sac must be shown at the southern border of the plat. The preliminary plat for CCN does not include any cul-de-sac in this location and should be revised as a condition of approval. This will slightly alter the configuration of golf hole three and the emergency vehicle/trail easement connection between CCN and CCS in this vicinity. This easement and hole realignment should be shown on both the CCN and CCS plats and should not rely upon Kadler Avenue being vacated in the near future. The portion of the cul-de-sac which lies outside the present Kadler Avenue right-of-way may be shown as an easement on the plat. The City Engineer shall review and approve the street configuration which was suggested by the developer as a 45 foot radius gravel cul-de-sac with dead-end signs. (Note: The dead -ending of Kadler Avenue is scheduled for public hearing in Otsego on 3-4-98 with a decision to be made on either 3-9-98 or 3-23-98. St. Michael has approved the vacation of their half of Kadler Avenue as it lies within the CCS plat.) 3 wr Grading, Drainage and Utilities. The grading, drainage and utility plans for CCN are attached as Exhibits D and E, however, please look at the plans available at City Hall. (They are barely legible as the project engineer used the previously proposed plat as the base and overlaid the changes, thereby losing the background when they were reduced.) The grading and drainage plans have been approved for CCS by the City Engineer and grading is near complete on site (so they have not been included as an exhibit). Exhibits H1 through H3 show the utility layouts for CCS. All grading, drainage and utility issues shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. The wetland mitigation plan for all of the Cedar Creek Golf Course Planned Unit Development have been approved by the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District. Wetland locations and approximate mitigation areas and retention ponds are shown on the overall concept attached as Exhibit B. High Water Elevation. No structure shall be placed at an elevation such that the lowest floor, including the basement floor, is less than two (2) feet above the highest known surface water level or ordinary high water level or less than one (1) foot above the 100-year flood level of any adjacent water body or wetland. If sufficient data on high water levels is not available, the elevation of the line of permanent aquatic vegetation shall be used as the estimated high water elevation. When fill is required to meet this elevation, the fill shall be allowed to stabilize and construction shall not begin until the property has been inspected by the Building Inspector. Lot Coverage Requirement. All lots in the proposed plat must adhere to a maximum lot coverage requirement such that no structure or combination of structures occupies more than twenty-five (25) percent of the total lot area. Through analysis of the proposed building pad locations in relation to the lot sizes and configurations, it appears as though this requirement should not pose any problem for future land owners. This item will be subject to review and approval of the City Building Inspector at the time of building permit issuance. Park and Trail Dedication. The proposed CCN plat includes a gross park area of 7.97 acres and less the wetlands, provides a net area of +/-5.67 acres (to be verified at the time of final plat approval). Park dedication amounts for the proposed project have been estimated as follows and shall be definitively determined at the time of final plat approval. Required Residential Land Dedication: Total 13.32 acres ■ 73.89 gross acres in CCN X 10% = 7.38 acres ■ 59.40 gross acres in CCS X 10% = 5.94 acres Total Park Area Provided:= 42.57 percent of required residential land dedication ■ CCN: 5.67 acres (to be verified at time of final plat approval) ■ CCS: 0 acres Required Golf Course (commercial) Land Dedication: ■ CCN: 4.44 acres X 7.5% = cash equivalent to .33 acres ■ CCS: 133.68 acres X 7.5% = cash equivalent to 10.03 acres It should be noted that a park land credit of .35 acres currently exists for the CCGC Planned Unit Development as a result of first phase (2nd addition) final platting of Center Oaks. In addition, trails shall be provided as follows: CCN: 8 foot on Karston Avenue from CSAH 37 to the southern plat border; 8 foot between Lots 12 and 13 of Block 5 and through Outlot D; 10 foot along CSAH 37; 8 foot integrated with the future multiple family development (to be determined, shown as Outlots A, B, and C); and 8 foot stubbed to the west on 63rd Street. CCS: 8 foot on Karston Avenue through the plat; 10 foot grade -separated and/or improved shoulder along County Highway 118 (see Exhibit 1). The final plat plans must show these trails, some of which (location to be specifically identified at the time of final plat) are to be installed by the developer with credit from the City toward park dedication requirements. All proposed trails are to be in conformance with the overall intent of the City's Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan. Required Landscaping. At the time of final plat approval a landscape plan shall be submitted for all median areas or islands within the public street right-of-way. Additionally, developers of all new residential subdivisions are required to provide one (1) tree per single family lot. The tree may be evergreen (minimum 3 feet high) or deciduous (minimum 2 inch diameter trunk). Plantings shall not be located closer than three (3) feet to the property line. All yards must be sodded or seeded/mulched within thirty (30) days of building occupancy. Front and side yards as well as any other yard which abuts a public street must be sodded. Rear yards which do not abut a public street may be seeded and mulched. In cases where seeding/sodding has not been done within thirty (30) days of occupancy, the developer shall be required to provide an escrow deposit equal to one and one-half (1 1/2) times the estimated cost of the ground cover which will shall be returned to the developer upon completion of the work. If the weather or other uncontrollable factors prevent the sodding or seeding of bare ground within fourteen (14) days of final grading, the area shall be covered with straw or other temporary material to control erosion. CONCLUSION Analysis of the Cedar Creek North and South Development Stage Plats has shown that both are in conformance with the approved CCGC Masterplan. The subdivision of lots and construction of homes which follows are capable of meeting all Subdivision and Zoning Ordinance requirements. Based on the review of plans attached hereto, we recommend approval of the Cedar Creek North and South Development Stage Plats subject to the conditions as outlined in the executive summary of this report. PC: David Lund, Linda Goeb, Pete Carlson, Mike Couri, Kevin Mealhouse, Don Jenson, Scott Dahlke of Meyer-Rohlin, City of Otsego *,. r 1 iIBIT C 12-11-1997 5:43PM -1771 e)a• 1 I FROM CITY OF WAYZATA 404 5318 14K. 612 595 9937 P.05/ie R uired Proposed W. Lot Size 10,60D sq. IT. 66.947 sq. ft, Max. Lot Coverage' (guMing* only) 30% 23% Floor Area Ratio 0,7 02 Wn_ Lot Area per Unit 5,300 sq. ft. SM5 aq. fL Perimeter gays From 20 fL 20 ft. Side 10 ft. 12 tt Rear 20 ft. +50 ft. Intemal Setbacks/Building Height. The maximum bolding height allowed in the FI5 District is 35 feet The applicant has net submitted detailed elevations suitable to evaluate compliance with this requirement These elevations will be required for General Plan of Development consideration_ These plans are critical in that the internal setback between structures of the PUD is dependent on the height of the structures. Consideration of a variance may be necessary as a part of General Plan of Development review due to the height of the proposed strur—lures and their separation distance. LZ' Parking. Section 801.20.15_U of the Zoning Ordinance requires two off-street parking stalls per unit, one of which must be enclosed, for townhouse developments. The submitted site plan indicates that each unit is provided with a two stall garage. Additionally, ail of the units except Unit 3 of Building B and Unit 1 of Building C have sufficient depth in front of the garage stalls to accommodate vehicle parking. Six vrsitor parking spaces, including one disability accessible design stall, have also been provided. The design of the driveway areas appear functional from a concept plan perspective. -GW is c oncwned about the function of the driveways of Unit 3 of Building B and Unit 1 of Building Ca-ttt�urewer� Grading, Drainage and Utiliity Ptarm The applirar t nos submitted a preliminary grading, drainage and utility plans for review. These plans are subject to review and approval of the City Engineering Department and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District as may be applicable. The following issues relate to these preliminary plans. - Wetland Alteration. There is a large wetland area in the southern area of the subject site. The applicant is proposing to fill a portion of the wetland to provide a setback from the structures of approximately 16.5 feet. The applicant has had preliminary discussions with the Minnehahe Watershed District regarding their proposed wetland alterations. The applicant has indicated that the Watershed favors expanding the wetland to the west and south versus the installation of a 4 I � N DEVELOPMENT STAGE to 7"M 5 7i i _7 16 t.-I Ulu r i iL2 Pxor —oig 24 737J5 " 3 20 at'-- " 5 imc. K 17 4t 3 1 _.!4 4 3 it ?m 13 4 C c 4j 07, r '3r4-,, IHOUSE Da T• m "Eil x 7.,; 1 -.1- - 1, 11 X a) GRADI G. !LRAINAGE, EROSION CONTROL PLAN Sheet 2 of 5 Sheets 9110S 'aouegdwoo s,alls loafgns a43 se IIaM se 'Wepuels ese4l samAsnllc algel Buwollo; eqj -juawailnbai )pMos pue ( luoi; a of pafgns aje sa6eluou; anuanV Ajjelj pue pJenelnoe ewzAeM a4l 43oq 'lol lawoo a si A4jadoid pefgns aul se 'osiy -pafowd rind lellusplsw a lo; gluewejmbai a5eluo,4laaiis wruuluiw ou si aJOL4 leU1 salels eoueulpJp BuluoZ eyl ;o Z-£'££- �08 uolpaS •/fliadoid pefgns ayl of Aidde loins±(, 5-b ayl ;o spiEpuels pioA pus lol a4l 'spmptMS a*ueuuopad sa (smit supuod) ladolAawjn Lanos i-� IRPoutw03 4=3 SNI POOS OH jolunf LWON 4-N I0PePIOLI WrAg=puoo OH iseN► :aouejapi jo} molaq papinold ale /4jedad loefgns a4l of luenefpe sash puel 'eaie a43 w sesn puel Bu,islxe Liam walslsuoo AllejauaB aq Ipm luewdolenep pasodOld 0411 '88sn pue ivaoetpd -sgdebejed luanbasgns w pessnosip pue pelenlEna aq Il!^A sanssi iaylo a41 'luelslsum aq of puno; pue ueld enlsuagajduco a41 jo saloliod a4l of UOIMOJ ui paJaplsuoo uaaq seq luawdoisnap pasodoid ayl -Apoodco eowes s1U±o au1 Pue 'sall!I!in pue slaaqs 'slows `shed 6urpnpu! saippoe; pue seoinies oggnd Buip!xa uodn piedwi s,esn pasodoid a41 •L -Awadwd a41 Bul/UeS sleejls;o seiililgedeo of uollepi ul si asn pesodad e4l Aq parnaua6 ogpjl g 'padolanap si li tpiW ut eale e 4 ui senla/, Apadwd uodn pedw s,esn posodoid a41 -S posodoid sl it LpWv► ui ease e4l uo papa s,asn pasodoid a41 y -aoueulpjp BwuoZ a41 ua pauleluoo spiepuels aouew,wped Ile qpm Alluuo;uoo .sash pasodoid e41 I -sale agi;n sasn ainIN pue lueseid L4Vm,4!I!q!ledLum s,asn pasodoid e41 Z E • d 8 l FS VOV VIV2 lvm �O J,I I O WdZV ' S L66 l - l l -Z l DEVELOPMENT STAGE —a _- / — �• � ,\ .,I�� c�sie� 5 �" /,T --� _.� is ��y 1 � � Jz•z 73 4 s,� �' i• - — - ------------ i.— '� 2{` _ 1J7_d JCnNSCH Swrr tf.=u�� a „ -�.� i_. V.; 55'o- Is '� l s . b.s...a 21. { �'w..•.Fww -I AI.2 Y!•'A1-R OMLlM, )1'IC, / lo 17 is 13 25 13 L7. I '♦ 12 !! I ° 7 I •'ir ° 14 � �•a' ; ' II lit w..wi. ' r.u.►wNI f� r�o \f .� i �d/•s" /• \ , 0.2e: �• — _ i '� — _ !• Mittpj I p 12' � � �• 3• f ,I� `_ 7 ' 4 WATE_P. AND SANITARY SEWER PLAN m I - T_2 W m z ayl;o suo!slnad Ue1d anlsuayaldwoo �(I!O le!ocyjo pue se!o!lod o toeds ayi 01 uoria1w u, ualpe pasodaid et{L lau inq) uodn 's�oloe4 Buunollo; ayl (01 Pa3!w!I paseq aq Ileys lumwabpnf 1!ayl 6sn leuc!1rPuoo pasodoA ayI }o sloe.4e asleApe elq,ssod Japlsuoo 1la4s llounO3 �4!0 pue uo!sslwwoO buiuueld atll 6u!u a MOIeq WIAOid eoueulpl0 oZ yl "Z'dt3' LtJB uo!paS u! Peu!Il'� suolIejep!suoo 6utmolIN ayl W Inafgns e1e pua esn leuoll!puOO a ce pW!O 911 ayI U14W Penes a a,e sivawdolanap pun psuueId 'uolleloosse i A smumo uS q uowwoo u � . Pie Ile PUeI ayl ln4 `6u!ll�+Q lenioe ayl umc sluop!se1 aJaw luewa6ueue u�n!u!wopuoo a ul palepowwome aq of pepualu, Si d!yssac mo 'jawed al6uls a uo pelepowLuO=e Isaq sl PjawdoleAep pasodoid ayl 'sZ!un jo xrw ayI eo asnaq `a10 eleyl -pays!igegsa aq Puueo lol pun a 'd 6u!pllne to Z uu(1;o uo!l,od a sdepaAo b 6u!pl!n:e X L llun asneoag •uogelnBl oo lol eseq/1!un a uc pageld eq of sluawdolanap asnetl< AOI sa urn lord �,�i 6ui a0 UOZ aw m L'O'6'6 L' LOB uolpeS U04 Al!1!q!xe9 Bu!we161ap!suoo oI spaau esle /q!o eyl 'dno-and aLa 3o Pad w aoueuipjO 6wuoZ eyl 10 ££ L08 uo!3�S U! Pau!Ilno $e afld a se passaOOA aq of Amadaid a uo alnpnA$ Ied►ou!ad auc ueyl alow 411M sluawdolanep le!wap!SW sa1Ir-6a1 aoueu!plO Eu!uaZ eyl to £"O66 L' L08 uOQ=S 'sampnlls pun-ealyi ov4 PUB alr43n4s pun ino; a jo sls!suoo haled 315uls 94=11dde aul in 3uewdolenep Pasodn, 1 'dn"nd de�6e�ed luanbasgns ui passnos!p luaweumbei Bu!lletd a of sple6al ylwi a'JUBaJAeq swop 1! �3!leo!uyoel a Alle!luesse s1 enss! sitj al!4M b' 6u!AI!N JO Z 3!un jo uolvell od a sdaAC 11 se awoy louew a Alle3!u4W4 s! yo!tlnn y 6ulplm9 jo L Vufl X uo!l oa a41 !M 'sasnoyu+u►oI e1e pedolenep aq of shun jo ad�(1 ayl 'aoueu!p1O 6uruoZ elezAeM ayl 1apun -alrgoruls leo!sA4d;o adAj ayl of jou `digsraumo 10 Blois a of �Iuo siap1 rtwntuiwopuoo. wlel eyl 'aaueu!p10 Bu!uoZ elezdeM ay3 P suoll!ugep ayl urtilM Juawdolanap wn!u!wopuoo a;a lenoldde 6ugsanbal a1B Aetii leyl pelMIPU! sey lueogdde aLg 'uogEn4 _rela;O Je33ew a sd io WO 9-8 ayl ui sasn pali!uuad ale sasnoy jouew pue sasnoyumol 'sale;y6ncjoy4 to sasn puel laylo t(1!nn eig!ledwoo sl 3uawdoleAsp s!L4 alaynn luawdolanap ilun eldlllnw Apsuap a6ejane 10; ap!Aoid of si pl.gs,oyl jo Iualu! OLU 'p!sls!O le!luaplsas eld►IInW Aj!sua() e6eleny S-U Pa= s! Apado1d 3oa(gns aul '6u,uoZ SISA 7VNV S3nSS/ '6u!1eSH o!ignd ey3 P P1ooa1 lela►UIo aril jo lied spew aq II!M 6uyeW Pue uoll3!Ignd �O 31AePWt' Pue BuueaH oragnd to ao!3oN ayl 'awewpUp 6uluo2 aril O'Z'b0' LOS uo!peS 10 sluewaimbel eyI BuiApges 166 L 'v lagwao9a 'Aeps1ns13 uo ueilel alarm suope 01/Zo d LE66 S6S ZT9 ObN 9T;FM iAF,T-TT-)qrr Z ' d 8 l FS V0V vlvz�lvm SO ill I O "CaA WdZV ' S LEE[ -II -EL LL N ! ! w W lit Z�' L= 9 s . GP �V EN LLN E Q �� wIA!111its 13 ow --1 ,� , � � 4, `.�/•��1 � � i��=J l_� � b,� � � �' Abe - � .. •.. ' • �� y^. y�'!._„� � �.... ��~_J"� � Imo" ' i •iA M Is ( �\ • ��� t er- nI � 0 �lit 171� r �Al16 au r /t N-1 _ rtrrrrrr=rrtrrrrrrrrrrrrr;r� C ' y � � � / 7lilllllil]]]llll73lll]7�lil"o ,� � 1'1J l/ , /' 0,1 1I11U1111uIlullllllullll�l wl a !: ' �, I,' i'••... � � i / , / / / e.eeee.eeeeee.eee.eee..e.e.eee<+eeee..e �i ��?� ��� �✓i:� �!� rrrrrrrtrrrprgrrrrrrrrrrr!rm�irrrrrr*rr �� 1 u /� `�.'�' ! III11I1]AliII1I1I11I1I11]111II1111 I�j3 i��s �� i� i� i�.�i!s rreeee.etreee.eeee�eeee....ere..eeeee .. stta=�ita aataiaatwRi°rittatifstt ,EXHIBIT F ]llll]373l1111377S111777I71]773773377 "-" � lltlllllltlllllllllllllllllllUllllll � h I D79E24EF07BBE6B87 a 12-11-1997 5c41PM FROM CITY OF WAYZATA 404 5318 P.1 11�1 -11-1' 7 08! 15 IC 612 595 9837 P.01/10 DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT /U PLANNING REPORT- Vb Fax Transmission TO: Sarah Smith FROM: Daniel Licht J Scott Richards I Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. ©ATE. 11 December 1987 RE: Wayzata - Grace Pointe PUD: Concept Plan Review ;!J FILE NO.: 103.09 - 97.04 �6 1 G (j,�oa G , �� �► l ExECUTlYE SUMMARY yy-) � 1 Background Pillar Homes Inc. is requesting Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept, Plan approval for a 10 unit townhouseknanor home condominium development to be constructed on their property at the southwest quadrant of Barry Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard. The proposed development requires approval of a PUD-CUP to allow for multiple principal structures on a single lot and to allow the property not to be platted in a unit/base lot configuration. The 66,94T square foot site is zoned R-5 Average Density Multiple Residential District. Legal Description The subject property is legaily described as follows; That part of Lot 4, Auditor's Subdivision No. 184, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 184, Hennepin County, Minnesota and Tract B, Registered Land Survey No 1201. Public Herring Notice Section W1.04.2.0 of the Wayzata Zoning Ordinance requires a Notice of Public Hearing to be published in the Lit= are Weekly and that Notices of Public Hearing also be all owners of property within three Nmdred fifty (350) feet of the subject property. N -ft Py -IN --. DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT PLANNING REPORT - Via Fax Transmission TO: Sarah Smith FROM: Daniel Licht / Scott Richards Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. DATE: 11 December 1997 RE: Wayzata - Grace Pointe PUD: Concept Plan Review FILE NO.: 103.09 - 97.04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Pillar Homes Inc. is requesting Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Plan approval for a 10 unit townhouse/manor home condominium development to be constructed on their property at the southwest quadrant of Barry Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard. The proposed development requires approval of a PUD-CUP to allow for multiple principal structures on a single lot and to allow the property not to be platted in a unit/base lot configuration. The 66,947 square foot site is zoned R-5 Average Density Multiple Residential District. Legal Description The subject property is legally described as follows: That part of Lot 4 , Auditor's Subdivision No. 184, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Lot 10, Auditor's Subdivision No. 184, Hennepin County, Minnesota and Tract B, Registered Land Survey No 1201. Public Hearing Notice Section 801.04.2.0 of the Wayzata Zoning Ordinance requires a Notice of Public Hearing was published in the Lakeshore Weekly and that Notices of Public Hearing also be mailed to all owners of property within three hundred fifty (350) feet of the subject property. These MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: RE: FILE NO.: Brian Wessel Daniel Licht / Alan Brixius 27 January 1998 Lino Lakes - Comprehensive Plan: Economic Development 194.07 The attached materials are intended to provide City Officials with a range of information regarding the development of commercial and industrial land uses. It must be emphasized that this information is highly generalized and does not address specific locational factors that will influence demand for commercial or industrial development in Lino Lakes. As such, this information may be used as a reference, but should not be taken as a substitute for a comprehensive market analysis. In order to provide City Officials with a reference for the anticipated amount of commercial and industrial development based upon population growth, we contacted Metropolitan Council for regional data on population, households and land use. Using these regional statistics, we calculated the development/population ratios on the following page. Again, this information should be used as a general reference and not necessarily steadfast benchmarks in that a number of factor serve to influence development of commercial and industrial land use in the region as well as in Lino Lakes. li DEVELOPMENT STAGE LEGEND \ WATER, SANITARY SEWER CEDAR CREEK SOUTH k ""' AND STORM SEWER PLAN PILOT —A slier OPMEN7 CO. - ,$)v:oa�sa sl(r ion: su. w.1 ] Xor In rdZ=itb'•e •rerrwa •-ei•rd =)/ /�_\ /: 1/ METE ROHLIN. INC. (((jjj ��— /�+.dV �,�` .\ • .. .� ru c .a,r C,'C S—Lt•.J SURVlYp,.$ RBRW / _ •RY•11. 19y OIL Pond #11 �_' �, - a - — ','•,_ _ \ ' V. w►Na• Y I J — — r ...\ \ Li Pond #9 �\ y • /� O Pam' ,' 1 _ o _ _ ' �' � i / f , f •. - _ s. oo / d i / 9t6 �. - � 11 ' 1. F. .h !«.rfu.f JIS / , i O , �\ ,1 C � ..� � 1� y�rr ' 1 � O i� ♦ �.! (tiraau s, S 8< Oel _ [ / fw9 PPi1d Pond x7 1 i ��// •• j� ✓. v \ p (wFr 1f \ Pond 7 10 t MEMORANDUM TO: Brian Wessel FROM: Daniel Licht / Alan Brixius DATE: 27 January 1998 RE: Lino Lakes - Comprehensive Plan: Economic Development FILE NO.: 194.07 The attached materials are intended to provide City Officials with a range of information regarding the development of commercial and industrial land uses. It must be emphasized that this information is highly generalized and does not address specific locational factors that will influence demand for commercial or industrial development in Lino Lakes. As such, this information may be used as a reference, but should not be taken as a substitute for a comprehensive market analysis. In order to provide City Officials with a reference for the anticipated amount of commercial and industrial development based upon population growth, we contacted Metropolitan Council for regional data on population, households and landuse. Using these regional statistics, we calculated the development/population ratios on the following page. Again, this information should be used as a general reference and not nececarily steadfast benchmarks in that a number of factor serve to influence development of commercial and industrial land use in the region as well as in Lino Lakes. 1I �' � -� .t' •�• ray P } ..i 1 ✓, �, / l`'+ `� 3- - Pond f9 5 . 8one 2 Pond *io Pond .M72 9 •' \` Pond t8 1 G Pond 08: OrMV R" e \/�/�j 1 , 11 ��—�� / • ;, ; , O % o,ees / J ondiB Pond t1 DEVELOPMENT STAGE \ CEDAR CREEK SOUTH �\ LEGEND bat !•r"rl s— PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT CO. Isne 101-40r smm } 1 W+M aNY WE avI !!JW Avm lnwr ROSl1MY 11, lYle Aoim Se..e fw+4a. WATER, SANITARY SEWER -• -- MCYEER-R`OH SIN, INC. OiL s[. +.r1 2 Iv [Ilnn .,.« :! w., Ivrrer•, un 55313 Lf l%lll%l AND STORM SEWER PLAN P I(612) 882 walr and ba.a�r ea..na1 Ratio of C/I Develo ment for 7-Coun Metro Area 1980 1990 Population Household Acres of Commercial/ 1( z i 4-AP7 % of Total Land Use Acres of Industrial / I Z7 I % of Total Land Use Commercial Acres/ Z /b 1000 Population Commercial Acres/ 1000 Households Industrial Acres/ 70 1000 Population Industrial Acres/ 1000 Households Source: Metropolitan Council Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. Pon d DEVELOPMENT STAGE _ CEDAR CREEK SOUTH mz P[OT LAND DEVELOPMENT CO. 13736 lo-so r sonar —— wire rn. !i2) 751-alive MEYER-RONL/N, INC. (riGrr[[RS-t ui0 SVRV[1pRS L'CjVjJ/LiZY(I,II 75 !.r_-.�, !!lr! R >> NOS. la corm r)) !!?- I if � uhl Kd di.JRf ei. _ ''ram•-9 RI "" 'a it o. ~ _ ' .ram _ `\ �.,•-- neRuncr n. i.ve WATER, SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER PLAN $beat 7 of 7 Sheets i '-' MEMORANDUM TO: Brian Wessel FROM: Daniel Licht / Alan Brixius DATE: 27 January 1998 RE: Lino Lakes - Comprehensive Plan: Economic Development FILE NO.: 194.07 The attached materials are intended to provide City Officials with a range of information regarding the development of commercial and industrial land uses. It must be emphasized that this information is highly generalized and does not address specific locational factors that will influence demand for commercial or industrial development in Lino Lakes. As such, this information may be used as a reference, but should not be taken as a substitute for a comprehensive market analysis. In order to provide City Officials with a reference for the anticipated amount of commercial and industrial development based upon population growth, we contacted Metropolitan Council for regional data on population, households and landuse. Using these regional statistics, we calculated the development/population ratios on the following page. Again, this information should be used as a general reference and not nececarily steadfast benchmarks in that a number of factor serve to influence development of commercial and industrial land use in the region as well as in Lino Lakes. PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY February 10. 1998 Mayor & City Council Members Planning Commissioners c/o City Administrator Lund 5975 Main Avenue NE. Albertville, MN 55301 RE: Highway 118 "Frail Impacts to approved Cedar Creek Golf Course plans Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council, City Staff and Planning Commissioners: This letter serves to confirm our request that Albertville designate a representative to work with Wright County Highway Department to determine the appropriate side of the Highway to widen a shoulder for a bike path. All discussion we have had with Virgil at the DOH is that the City has not participated. Currently, there are no agreements by the DOH to allow a trail in any portion of the Right of Way (ROW). This position is unacceptable since it does not acknowledge the need to be in the ROW to avoid environmental and safety aspects around wetlands etc. A secondary, but important reason is that it will be cheaper for Albertville to create a community of trails if you can use a right of way that has been taken from municipal residents for multiple public purposes. It will be cheaper because you will not need to acquire gap easements to assure the trails built, tie together and go some where. Th6re are several Counties which have created bike trails as part of the shoulder of roadways, most notably Washington County. On busier roads they have used off road beyond r the ROW �e�rate paved trails, but, when posed with environmental or easement purchase obstacles,,the.ihave used the ROW. • Since there is sufficient time, until July 1998, the City could be sure that the trail work on 118 is incorporated into the proposed bid plans. With all of the talk about trails over the last l 1-2 years, no one was responsible to add the appropriate design into the Highway 119 upgrade. We would be disappointed if a second opportunity was missed. We have begun our final plans on the golf course and phase one development plans. The County DOH has reviewed our plans and requested some minor changes to the access points which would meet the terms of their October 3 letter to Albertville. In addition, they intend to work with Pilot on the design of the road, drainage sharing, and appropriate shoulder widths so that our rough grading can be accomplished in 1998 for a road project which may not happen until 2001 or 2002. However, trails or extra wide shoulders are still absent. The City and their residents would be in a substantially better financial position by creating a maintenance agreement with Wright County to widen the shoulder on 118 to allow improved pedestrian or bike access to the clubhouse as part of the trails master plan. Washington County is forwarding copies of their agreements and design standards. Without this agreement, you will EXHIBIT I Hwy 118tr.doc/landdev 13736 Johnson Street NE • Ham Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094 spend at least 13.00 +.08% or 14.04 a lineal foot and waste opportunities for tax and park fee dollars to go further. My preliminary estimates are as follows: • Off road out of ROW trail; 2850 LF (on golf and TH. lands) @ $14.04 LF $40.014 • Extra wide 9' shoulder (use Cedar Creek bids) $8.60 LF + 20% Cnty admin. = $10.3 ( $29,410 • Berning Exception 430 LF $6.037 $4,433 Subtotals $46,051 $33,843 Using County ROW could yield $12,208 savings under this example. In closing, we believe that this series of requested actions allows for a safer long term traffic. drainage and pedestrian system, enables current planning and grading to continue, and allows the conceptual trail plan to be implemented as presented by NAC. Thank you for your understanding. Sincerely, 4"Oeve^ Donald Jensen Land Development Director cc: NAC, SEH, Meyer-Rohlin, Virgil Hawkins, WCHD attachment: Master plan for trail access points, Cedar Creek Bid Tab 2 Hwy118tr.doc/landdev :H !tee ^S y i yl i � Y FA oil V