2006-05-22 CC Workshop AgendaA�Ibcrtvillc
s, 'town tom,. ft aty ur..
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
WORKSHOP AGENDA
MONDAY, MAY 22, 2006
6:30 PM
6:30 p.m. Finance Update
Consultant Billings: Discussion on some recent permit application and the
cost to process.
7:15 p.m. City Hall Update and Discussion
a. Bonestroo (presentation on interior colors)
b. Telephone Systems
C. Furniture & Fixtures
d. Parking Landscape
• Other workshop topics
8:30 p.m. Adjournment
�J
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF MINNESOTA
SS.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
Bridget Miller, being first duly sworn, says that on the 181" day May 2006
Bridget posted the documents as shown on the reverse side a true copy of each
thereof at 1:30 p.m. at the Albertville City Offices in the window, at the City of
Albertville, County of Wright, State of Minnesota.
Subscribed and sworn to before me this ?h day of , 2006.
Notary Public
T(7 �-.;:J"r' Z'
NOT^-'!NNESOTA
My G arn. 31, 2009
•
M:\Public Data\City Council\Council Agendas\Affidavit of Agenda Posting format.doc
TO: City Council
FROM: Tina L. Lannes
DATE: Monday, May 22, 2006
RE: Consultant Billings
The City of Albertville collects an escrow with the planning and zoning application. Once the
escrow is depleted the City of Albertville invoices the owners for any additional consultant
charges over and above the escrow amount. Attached are the summary of two examples which
are Mobil's sign and Marine Service.
2
Mobil Sign
Application Base Fee $100.00
Sign Permit $1,500.00
Subtotal $1,600.00
Attorney
$108.75
Planning
$1,494.91
Planning Credit
-$500.00
Engineering
$0.00
Consultant Cost $1,103.66
Total cost for Mobil Sign $2,703.66
*"Escrow $100.00**
Marine Service
Application Base Fee
$300.00
Subtotal
$300.00
Attorney
$326.25
Planning
$2,031.23
Engineering
$60.00
Consultant Cost
$2,417.48
Total cost for Marine Services
$2,717.48
"Escrow $1,000.00**
3
■
A,Ibcrtvi
Small't n Wing. Big %'al p Life.
TO: City Council
FROM: Tina L. Lannes
DATE: May 19, 2006
RE: Billboard Fee
The City of Albertville collects an annual fee for billboards. Staff has done research on the
actual cost to do the annual inspection per billboard. That amount comes out to be $71.88.
11
Jon Sutherland One Hour of time
Wage $34.32
Social Securities 6.2% $2.13
Medicare 1.45% $0.50
PERA 6% $2.06
Insurance $5.37
Total Wages $44.38
Tori Time 1/2 hour
Wage
$8.53
Social Securities 6.2%
$0.53
Medicare 1.45%
$0.13
PERA 6%
$0.52
Insurance
$1.92
Total Wages $11.63
Other
Fuel $0.76
Workers Comp Insurance $0.73
Total $1.49
Total Direct Charges $57.50
25% charge for Overhead $14.38
(overhead is Administrative)
Total Indirect Charges $14.38
Total Charges $71.88
5
Date: May 22, 2006
To: City Council
From: Larry R. Kruse
RE: Parking lot South of City Hall
Enclosed is a map and parking lot layout showing the lot lines south of City Hall including a
triangular lot owned by Jamie Stevens and the railroad property. Also enclosed are the 2005
Wright County Market Values for the neighborhood. I would appreciate direction from the
Council how you want to proceed. The following are options to be considered.
1) The City purchase Jamie Stevens and the Railroad property and not develop a parking
lot at this time. Work with Jamie on other parking options on the east side of the
street. This option may include allowing a temporary unimproved parking lot for a
period to time.
2) The City purchase Jamie Stevens and the Railroad property and develop a public
parking lot. (Estimated land price around $10.00 per square foot plus $25,000 parking
lot)
3) The City trade land adjoining the railroad property for Jamie's land next to City Hall
and provide 4,000 square feet of land to jointly own and operate a parking lot with a
certain amount of parking spaces dedicated for each party.
4) The City trade land adjoining the railroad property for Jamie's land next to City Hall
and sell Jamie an additional 4,000 square feet with the condition that a private
parking lot be constructed to City standards. (Estimated land price around $10.00 per
square foot.
5) The City purchase the railroad property and do nothing at this time. To accommodate
this option, the City would need to modify our City hall grading plan slightly.
501
May 22, 2006
11460 1---
W
Wright County Property Tax Values 2005
101500012125
jJamie
Stevens(City Hall Lot
4181
$36,500.00
$8.49
101500011203
Jamie Stevens(Body Shop)
4796
$52.600.00
$11.01
101500011216
Jamie Stevens(Body Shop)
7200
$72,000.00
$10.00
101500011217
Vaughn Fesenmaier Corner
7200
$72,000.00
$10.00
101500011210
Post Office
7200
$73,300.00
$10.18
101500011211
Past Office
7200
$72 ,500.00
$10.07
101500011212
Paul Schutte
8326
$84.300.00
$10.12
101500011222
David Vetsch
7200
$65,700.00
$9.13
101500011208
City Garage
7200
$67,800.00
$9.42
101500011209
City Garage
7200
$64,800.00
$9.00
101500012112
City Hall Lot
5776
$52.000.00
$9.00
101500012111
City Hall Lot
7264
$67,000.00
$9.22
101500012114
lCity Hall Lot
14646
$133.600.00
$9.12
101500012126
City Hall Lot
3485
$23,500.00
$6.74
101500012110
City Hall Lot
1448
$1,300.00
$0.90
1015ODD12113
City Hall Lot
7382
$66,400.00
$8.99
101500012109 City Hall Lot 74211 $66,800.00 $9.0D
115125 $1.071.300.00 $9.31 Average Value
i
MEMORANDUM
From: Larry R. Kruse
To: City Council
Date: May 22, 2006
Re: Liquor Compliance
The 152 Club, Majors, Geez, Full Moon Saloon and Rossetti's Pizza fail the liquor compliance
test. Letters have been mailed and this will be on the upcoming council agenda. The following is
a little history provided by Wright County.
Places that sold --
Jan 1-2002 through Jan 31-2002
SmackDowns
Geez
Jan 1-2004 through Jan 31-2004
Albertville Mobil
Coborn's Liquor
Hong Thai
Majors
Rosetti's Pizza
Jan 1-2005 through Jan 31-2005
Hack's Liquor
11011
Jan 1-2006 through May 15th 2006
152 Club
Majors
Rosetti's Pizza
Geez
Full Moon Saloon
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
COUNTY OF WRIGHT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.2005-15
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING GUIDELINES FOR THE IMPOSITION OF CIVIL
SANCTIONS AGAINST CITY LIQUOR LICENSEES FOR
VIOLATIONS OF THE CITY LIQUOR ORDINANCE OR ANY
OTHER APPLICABLE STATUTE, RULE OR ORDINANCE RELATING
TO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
WHEREAS, The City Council of the City of Albertville finds that the enforcement of its liquor
ordinance and other applicable liquor laws constitute a high priority policy for the City in
furtherance of health, safety and the public welfare; and
WHEREAS, in furtherance of that policy the City Council intends to establish non -binding
guidelines for the imposition of civil sanctions against City Liquor Licensees for violations of the
City Liquor Ordinance or any other applicable statute, rule or ordinance relating to alcoholic
beverages; and
WHEREAS, it is the City Council's intent that these guidelines be non -binding and are only
intended to suggest a schedule of civil sanctions pursuant to the City's Liquor Ordinance.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ALBERTVILLE:
Upon a finding that a licensee of any license granted pursuant to the City's Liquor
Ordinance has failed to comply with any provision of that Ordinance or any applicable
State law, or other regulation or ordinance relating to alcoholic beverages, the City
Council pursuant to the enforcement provisions of the City's Liquor Ordinance may
either suspend the license for a period of up to sixty (60) days, revoke any liquor license,
or impose a civil fine on the licensee not to exceed $2,000, for each violation.
2. The civil penalty and/or suspension and revocation imposed pursuant to the City's Liquor
Ordinance may in the City Council's discretion be based on the following guidelines
related to the licensees total number of violations at the specific location, at which the
violation occurred, within the proceeding 24-month period as follows:
First Violation: $ 500.00
Second Violation $1,000.00
Third Violation $1,500.00, plus two (2) day suspension of license
Fourth violation $2,000,00, plus a suspension of not less than five
(5) days but no more than sixty (60) days or revocation as determined by the City Council
The above referenced schedule is non -binding and is only intended as a guide to the City
Council for the imposition of appropriate sanctions pursuant to the City's Liquor
Ordinance. The City Council in its discretion may depart from this schedule for any
reason it deems appropriate.
4. Any suspension and/or revocation imposed by the City Council shall be pursuant to the
relevant provisions of the City's Liquor Ordinance including any hearing requirements.
5. Nothing in this resolution is intended to prohibit the City, County or other authorized
entity from seeking criminal prosecution for violations of the City's Liquor Ordinance or
other laws related to alcoholic beverages.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Albertville this 2nd day of May 2005.
9