The URL can be used to link to this page

2003-08-18 CC PacketALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA August 18, 2003 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER — ROLL CALL — ADOPT AGENDA 2. MINUTES (a) August 4, 2003, City Council Meeting (p. 1-5) 3. CITIZEN FORUM - (io Minute Limit) 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) Approve payment of claims (Check #'s 18419—18479) (p. 6-12) (b) Follow-up sheet from August 4`" meeting (p.13) (c) Resolution #2003-27 (A Resolution Approving Renewal of the Gambling License for the Albertville Lions at the 152 Club) (p.14) (d) Resolution #2003-28 (A Resolution Approving Renewal of the Gambling License for the Albertville Lions at Cedar Creek Bar & Grill) (p.15) (e) Resolution #2003-29 (A Resolution Approving Renewal of the Gambling License for the Albertville Lions at Geez' sports Bar & Grill) (p.16) 5. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS a. Fire Department • None b. Public Works • None c. Planning & Zoning l5 (1) Arhens Enterprise, LLC (p. 17-29) • Site and Building Plan Review 30 (2) Albertville Dental Land Use & Zoning Concept Plan (p. 30-38) (3) Phil Morris Property Concept Plan PUD (p. 39-56) (4) Fence Ordinance Amendment (p. 57-71) (5) Swimming Pool Ordinance Amendment (p. 72-77) City Council Agenda August 18, 2003 Page 2 of 2 d. Engineering (1) Alberlyille Public W rk Facility — Cost Estimat (p. 78) IF41,4, A e. Legal (3) (1) Ordinance #2003-1 — An Ordinance Requiring Construction Sites to be Free of Debris (p. 79-80) f. Administration (1) Directional signage for Albertville Crossing at CSAH 19/37 intersection (p. 81) (2) Consider $.50 per hour raise for Sean Vold effective immediately (6 month probationary period has been successfully completed) (3) Letters of interest regarding Council (p. 82-83) (4) Accept resigntion of ity administrator effective November 28, 2003 (p.84) �� 6. ADJOURNM NT ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL August 4, 2003 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor Don Peterson, Councilmembers LeRoy Berning, Tim Sweeney, Tom Fay, and Ron Klecker, City Engineer Pete Carlson, City Planner Al Brixius, City Attorney Mike Couri, and City Administrator Linda Goeb Mayor Peterson called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to order. The agenda was amended as follows: • Kolleville Estates 3`d Addition trail • Trees & street repairs • Add Albertville Primary School • Street Lights • Move Citizen Forum item to the Public Works Department Klecker made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Fay seconded the motion. All voted aye. Fay made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 17, 2003, Joint Albertville Otsego City Council Workshop, the minutes of the July 21, 2003, regular meeting, and the minutes of the July 23, 2003, Special Meeting as presented. Klecker seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mayor Peterson asked if anyone wished to address the Council under Citizen Forum. Judy Roden, 10941 57"' Street NE, questioned if the City had received the two benches that were gifted to the city from the Historical Society. Public Works Supervisor Tim Guimont reported that the benches had been received , but he has not located the benches as of yet. Mark Barthel, 11453 58`h Street NE, reported on problems he has observed at the Skateboard Park, especially after 9:00 PM. He has observed vandalism, foul language, underage drinking and smoking. Trash is being discarded on the ground. Park Supervisor Tim Guimont reported to the Council that the new fence around the Skateboard Park was damaged before it was even was completely installed. Tim called the Wright County Sheriff's Department and the suspect has been arrested. Staff was directed to contact the sheriff's department to enforce the park hour rules and to patrol the area more frequently. Check #'s 18356, 18371, 18375, and 18392 were removed from the Consent Agenda. Berning made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as follows: (a) Approve payment of claims (Check #'s 18349 — 18355, Check #'s 18357 — 18370, Check #'s 18372 — 18374, Check #'s 18376-18391, and Check #'s 18393 — 18397) (b) Resolution #2003-23 (A Resolution Recognizing Volunteers —Elaine Engstrom 1 il Albertville City Council Minutes August 4, 2003 Page 2 of 5 (c) Approve Non -intoxicating Malt Liquor License for Smackdown's Sports Bar & Grill, Inc. for a pig roast on September 6, 2003, from 2:00 PM to Midnight (d) Follow-up Sheet — July 7`}' Agenda Fay seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mayor Peterson presented Elaine Engstrom a plaque in recognition of her years as a volunteer on the Albertville Royalty Committee. Tate Mills, Chairman of the Albertville Fire Department Truck Committee, addressed the Council seeking approval to start looking for a new pumper truck. Mills reported that the Fire Department currently has three pumper trucks —the 2002 aerial ladder truck, a 1985 Chevy pumper and a 1979 pumper. The 1985 pumper truck has been removed from interior service. since July 19. That day the pumper truck was responding to a structure fire when the pumper quit and could not have been restarted. At the time several firefighters were inside the structure - The Fire Department's goal is to replace both the older pumper trucks. According to standards a pumper truck should be able to pump 2,200 gallons per minute. Neither of the older pumpers meet this requirement. The age of the vehicles needs to also be considered. Mills estimated that the cost to replace the pump on the existing rigs is in the $200,000 range. The Council agreed to set up a workshop meeting with the Fire Department on Thursday, August 141h at 6:00 PM to discuss the budget and the new truck. Under the Public Works Department agenda, Terry Felker. 5512 Lachman Avenue NE, responded to a neighbor's complaint regarding the board that he placed in front of a culvert to allow the pond area to get deeper. The neighbor, John Salen, believes the board inhibits water from properly draining his yard. Felker contends that the board does not prohibit storm water drainage, but rather the Salen's yard is graded too flat . The Council directed the engineer to have site elevations on Salen's yard taken o determine if the lot should be raised. City Engineer Pete Carlson also explained that the pond needs to be dredged out from the silt and debris that entered the pond during the Albertville Crossings development project. The City Attorney believes that the pond dredging should be done under the terms of the Developer's Agreement. The Salen's rear yard could be raised by the dredged materials. Councilmembers Fay and Sweeney believe that property owners should not be allowed to grade into detention ponds because it increases the liklihood of creating problems for other property owners. Fay questioned if the city would be liable for damages if someone is injured on the detention pond. City Attorney Couri responded that the City would likely be named in any lawsuit resulting from damages or injuries. Felker stated that he will remove the board blocking the culvert yet this evening. Zoning Administrator Jon Sutherland will inspect the property tomorrow. City Planner Al Brixius discussed the Kolleville Estates 3rd Addition trail. There is considerable opposition from residents to the extension of trail to the north through Kolleville 2 Albertville City Council Minutes August 4, 2003 Page 3 of 5 Estates 2"6 Addition. The developer is asking the City Council to reconsider the decision to require the trail between lots in Kollville Estates 3rd Berning made a motion to allow the trail to be remove d from the Kolleville Estates 3rd Addition plat with the stipulation that the existing driveway to Sylvester Kolles's farm be removed as soon as possible. Sweeney seconded the motion. All voted aye. Public Works Supervisor Tim Guimont has received a bid from Fehn Gravel & Excavating to gravel and improve Marlowe Avenue NE. Fehn's price to complete the upgrade is $20,976. City Engineer Pete Carlson estimated the cost of the Class 5 materials alone would be around $15,000. The Council requested that Pete contact Fehn's about the bid. Tim reported that installing a warning track on new softball field would cost around $1200. Mayor Peterson indicated that the Knights of Columbus may be willing to donate the funds for this project City Engineer Pete Carlson reported that Wright County will likely not be participating in a shared Public Works Facility building. He will revise the floor plan and present cost estimates at the next meeting. Council member Klecker reported that evergreens planted on two yards at the southwest corner of 57`h Street and Kalland Avenue create sight problem for drivers. Tim will measure to see if the trees are in the right-of-way and staff will work with the property owners to have the trees removed from the sight triangle. The street overlay project will be started next week and several areas of Kalland Drive will be patched at that time. A letter has been sent to RJ Marco regarding turf establishment on the Albertville Plaza site. The silt fencing should be removed after turf has been established Fay made a motion to approve the Public Works Report. Klecker seconded the motion. All voted aye. City Planner Al Brixius reviewed the request from Gold Key Development, Inc. for rezoning from R-IA to PUD and a preliminary plat to be known as Prairie Run, allowing the subdivision of a 33.5 acre site into 52 single family residential lots. The site is proposed to be developed under the R-1 district standards, with larger lots at the northern portion of the site and smaller single at the southern portion of the site, buffering County Road 18. The developer is opposed to Condition #2 of the Findings of Fact & Decision regarding the road extension to 53rd Street. The developer questions who will pay the costs for extending the 3 Albertville City Council Minutes August 4, 2003 Page 4 of 5 road into property that he does not intend to purchase. Some discussion occurred regarding assessing the cost of the road to benefited properties. No final decision was reached. The Council discussed the current agricultural operation at the proposed site and found that the proposed development will conflict and be inconsistent with the conduct of agricultural operations on or from any portion of the property. The Council added the following conditions of approval to the Findings of Fact and Decision: (1) Permanent demarcation of the wetland buffer must be installed. (2) All agricultural operations on for from any portion of the property ceases upon final plat approval. (3) The current farmstead shall be incorporated into the plat. (4) All street names within the development will be consistent with the Wright County grid. Berning made a motion to approve the Findings of Fact and Decision as amended. Klecker seconded the motion. Beming, Klecker, Fay and Peterson voted aye. Sweeney voted no. The motion carried. City Engineer Pete Carlson briefly reviewed the Storm Water Run -Off Review. He has found that an increase in the size of the storm sewer pipe to a 60" pipe would be required to control the drainage along Main Avenue. The other option is to add a detention pond in the area along Main Avenue. To consider this option, the City would need to acquire property. Additional catch basins could be also be added along Main Avenue. Pete will continue to explore other options and will report back to the Council at the next meeting. In the Albert Villas development, Pete modeled the effects of an 8" rainfall. Flood elevations were shown and the results were that the storm system worked as designed and is adequate for a 100 year rainfall (6" in 24 hours). Extra runoff comes from properties in St. Michael. Pete suggests creating a diversion channel to take excess water created from 8" rainfall along the rear property lines. The diversion channel would be a short term solution only until storm water detention ponds are built in the St. Michael area at the time development occurs in that area. Property owner next to County Ditch 9 at 4943 Kaiser Avenue told that Council that even small rainfalls create flooding of the street in front of her house. The water standing in the street is deep enough that she is unable to leave her home by car. Pete look into street flooding issues on Kaiser Avenue NE Pete was directed to begin discussions with the Primary School and the school board regarding establishing a joint park facility on the Primary School site. The Council asked Pete to research adding lights on the medians on CSAH 19 (between 67`h Street and 53rd Street). 9 Albertville City Council Minutes August 4, 2003 Page 5 of 5 City Attorney Mike Couri told the Council that the owners of Welcome Furniture have requested that the berm behind the west side of the mall be removed. The berm was not included in the original grading plan approved for the mall site. Ray Wiley, co-owner of Welcome Furniture, stated the berm erodes onto their parking lot and into their holding pond at the east side. The berm is also unsightly and has noxious weeds growing. The berm further cuts visibility to his site. Sally Thompson, representing the outlet mall, was present at the meeting and indicated she is willing to discuss options with the Welcome Furniture owners. Couri reviewed the technical amendment to the Developers Agreements of Albert Villas 3Td, 4`h and 6th Additions. The Developers Agreements reference a homeowners association which was never required in the developments. The amendment to the agreements eliminates all references to a homeowner's association. Sweeney made a motion to approve the amended Developer Agreements as described. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. Couri reviewed the Escrow Fee Ordinance with the revised escrow amount at $3,000 to be deposited at the time of building permit issuance. Berning made a motion to adopt the ordinance as presented. Klecker seconded the motion. Berning, Klecker, Peterson and Sweeney voted aye. Fay voted no. The motion carried. The council set the following workshop meeting to discuss the 2004 budget: • Tuesday, August 5 at 7:00 PM • Thursday, August 14 at 6:00 PM • Thursday, August 28 at 6:00 PM Fay made a motion to approve RESOLUTION #2003-26 titled A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING RESIGNATION OF COUNCIKLMEMBER TIM SWEENEY AND DECLARING A VACANCY. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. Sweeney made a motion to adjourn at 11:30. Fay seconded the motion. All voted aye. Don Peterson, Mayor Linda Goeb, City Administrator 5 A,bertville Smell Town ling. ag ON We. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE *Check Detail Register© August 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 Premier Bank Paid Chk# 018419 8/18/2003 ACTION RADIO & COMMUNICATIONS E 101-42000-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $511.20 9242 Batteries-motorola E 101-42000-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip $30.00 9242 Kenwood Radio -repair Total ACTION RADIO & COMMUNICATIONS $541.20 Paid Chk# 018420 8/18/2003 AFLAC G 101-21710 Other Deducations $54.60 728377 AFLAC Insurance Prem G 101-21710 Other Deducations $54.60 728377 AFLAC Insurance Prem Total AFLAC $109.20 Paid Chk# 018421 8/18/2003 ALEX AIR APPARATUS E 101-42000-560 Furniture and Fixtures $532.50 5283 Air Compresser Total ALEX AIR APPARATUS $532.50 Paid Chk# 018422 8h8/2003 ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES E 101-43100-417 Uniform Rentals $76.84 07/25/2003 Uniform Sery - PW Dept. E 601-49450-417 Uniform Rentals $51.22 07/25/2003 Uniform Sery - Sewage Dept. E 101-45100-417 Uniform Rentals $76.83 07/25/2003 Uniform Sery - Parks Dept E 602-49400-417 Uniform Rentals $51.23 07/25/2003 Uniform Sery - Water Dept Total ARAMARK UNIFORM SERVICES $256.12 Paid Chk# 018423 s 8/18/2003 BENCHMARK HOMES G 101-22800 Landscaping Escrow $3,000.00 420561 10254 - 53rd Street NE Total BENCHMARK HOMES $3,000.00 Paid Chk# 018424 8/18/2003 BEST WAY, INC. E 101-43100-582 C/O - Misc. Equipment $261.87 045015 A -frame barricades Total BEST WAY, INC. $261.87 Paid Chk# 018425 8/18/2003 CARQUEST E 602-49400-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip E101-45100-404 Repair/Maint- Machinery/Equip E101-45100-404 Repair/Maint- Machinery/Equip E 101-43100-404 Repair/Maint- Machinery/Equip E101-43100-404 Repair/Maint- Machinery/Equip E101-45100-404 Repair/Maint- Machinery/Equip E101-43100-404 Repair/Maint- Machinery/Equip E101-45100-404 Repair/Maint- Machinery/Equip E 101-45100-588 C/O - Park Mach/Equip E 601-49450-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) E101-43100-404 Repair/Maint- Machinery/Equip E 101-45100-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip Total CARQUEST $34.85 D237482 maintenance $3.82 D237670 maintenance $7.94 D237674 maintenance $13.00 D238240 maintenance $36.84 D238328 maintenance $19.48 D238337 maintenance $47.75 D238449 maintenance $7.01 D238450 Parks Maintenane $31.71 D238479 Parks Equipment $1.28 D238623 shop supplies $29.71 D238649 maintenance $4.85_ D239636 maintenance $238.24 08/15/03 12:49 PM Page 1 Paid Chk#,'018426 8%18,22003- -CENTER POINT ENERGY E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities $10.75 August 2003 Gas Utilities-PW Garage E 101-45100-383 Gas Utilities $5.33 August 2003 Gas Utilities -Park Shelter E 101-41940-383 Gas Utilities $15.91 August 2003 Gas Utilities -City Hall E 101-42000-383 Gas Utilities $20.71 August 2003 Gas Utilities -Fire Dept E 101-42400-383 Gas Utilities $10.76 August 2003 Gas Utilities - Bldg Dept Total CENTER POINT ENERGY $63.46 Paid Chk# '018427 8/18/2003 CHRISTIAN BUILDERS G 101-22800 Landscaping Escrow $2,750.00 420527 11436 - 53rd Court NE Total CHRISTIAN BUILDERS $2,750.00 �.-.,�.,_ �. ,,,._.- -1. 1 �__ - � r ._ .c,_ _l �..,,. ._�_,..- ..,.,.. h- 1.,_ Paid Chk# 018428 8/18/2003, COBORN'S E 101-41940-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL)_ _ $23.96 100764216 Misc.supplies-PW _ _ _ 6 /jA� 1bertvi j le Smo6 Towe Uving. Sly City Ufa. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE *Check Detail Register© August 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total COBORN'S $23.96 Paid Chk# 018429 8/18/2003 DEHN TREE COMPANY, INC E 101-41940-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $905.25 400 Tree removal Total DEHN TREE COMPANY, INC $905.25 Paid Chk# 018430 8/18/2003 DJ'S TOTAL HOME CARE CENTER E 101-42000-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $31.81 00702636 General Supplies E 601-49450-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $24.70 697673 Shop supplies E 101-41940-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $92.23 698668 General Supplies E 101-45100-588 C/O - Park Mach/Equip $41.30 699258 Weed Sprayer -Parks E 101-43100-215 Shop Supplies $20.25 699766 Supplies E 601-49450-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $55.81 700243 supplies E 101-43100-405 Repair/Maint - Buildings $8.88 701360 maintenance E 101-45100-588 C/O - Park Mach/Equip $23.24 702725 Weed sprayer\parks E 101-43100-215 Shop Supplies $4.02 702884 supplies E 101-43100-405 Repair/Maint - Buildings $6.37 704496 maintenance E 101-45100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $44.14 704637 Skate Park - fence E 101-41940-399 Miscellaneous $21.28 704644 misc. E 101-45100-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $27.97 705218 supplies E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials $30.29 705246 sign repair E 101-45100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $30.99 705284 Skate park - cleaners E 101-43100-400 Repair/Maint - Paved Rd $108.90 706269 crosswalk E 101-45100-588 C/O - Park Mach/Equip $42.58 706697 park - equip E 101-45100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $1.68 706718 skate park E 101-43100-403 Repair/Maint - Catch Basins $8.07 706891 catch basin materials E 101-43100-403 Repair/Maint - Catch Basins $11.43 706993 catch basin materials E 101-43100-400 Repair/Maint- Paved Rd $23.67 707244 crosswalks E 604-49660-406 R/M - Collection System $16.59 707424 Storm sewer general maintenanc E 101-45100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $6,602.85 R13201476 Fence @ City Park Total DJ'S TOTAL HOME CARE CENTER $7,279.05 08/15/03 12:49 PM Page 2 Paid Chk# 01845i_ ,�_i9r ��, , '40 � 1i �� ..�7_ .....ro 31 8/18/2003 OON'S AUTO 8 REPAIR E 602-49400-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip E 101-42000-404 Repair/Maint- Machinery/Equip E 601-49450-212 Motor Fuels E 101-42000-212 Motor Fuels E 101-42000-212 Motor Fuels E 101-42000-212 Motor Fuels E 101-42000-212 Motor Fuels E 101-42000-212 Motor Fuels E 101-42000-212 Motor Fuels Total DON'S AUTO & REPAIR Paid Chk# 018432 8/18/2003 DRAKE CONSTRUCTION $247.78 023096 Maintenance $130.27 023097 Repair -Truck #4 $10.12 18523 Fuel $16.89 18563 FD Fuel $10.20 18632 FD Fuel $27.82 18682 FD Fuel $29.79 18700 FD Fuel $94.49 18918 FD Fuel $28.31 18996 FD Fuel $595.67 G 101-22800 Landscaping Escrow $2,750.00 420434 10326 -61st Street Total DRAKE CONSTRUCTION $2,750.00 Paid Chk# 018433 8/18/2003 EGGEN'S DIRECT SERVICE, INC. E 602-49400-212 Motor Fuels $26.12 1-0725 fuel E 602-49400-212 Motor Fuels $4.84 1-1999 fuel E 601-49450-212 Motor Fuels $1.70 1-3246 fuel E 601-49450-212 Motor Fuels $30.00 1-3377 fuel E 601-49450-212 Motor Fuels $3.72 1-4839 Fuel E 602-49400-212 Motor Fuels $3.81 1-7761 fuel E 601-49450-212 Motor Fuels $3.78 1-9678 fuel E 601-49450-212 Motor Fuels $33.33 1-9943 fuel E 601-49450-212 Motor Fuels $38.00 77922 fuel 7 lb£rtvijje Smog Town Wing. big City Lft. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE *Check Detail Register© August 2003 08/15/03 12:49 PM Page 3 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 601-49450-212 Motor Fuels $4.05 77925 fuel E 601-49450-212 Motor Fuels $7.03 77926 fuel E 101-45100-212 Motor Fuels $26.12 77938 fuel E 602-49400-212 Motor Fuels $41.00 77939 fuel E 601-49450-212 Motor Fuels $36.00 77949 fuel E 601-49450-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip $39.00 77961 fuel E 602-49400-212 Motor Fuels $44.00 77966 fuel E 101-43100-405 Repair/Maint - Buildings $62.81 77978 supplies E 601-49450-212 Motor Fuels $35.00 78000 fuel Total EGGEN'S DIRECT SERVICE, INC. $440.31 Paid Chk# 018434 8/18/2003 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MNTC E 101-42000-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip $711.80 15257 FD Electric Fuel Pump E 101-42000-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip $341.18 15337 FD Trans.Fluid Ladder Truck Total EMERGENCY APPARATUS MNTC $1,052.98 Paid Chk# 018435 8/18/2003 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION E 101-49300-650 Working Capital Reserves $6,436.75 94017184 Battery back-up Defense Siren Total FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION $6,436.75 Paid Chk# 018436—8%18/2003 FEHN GRAVEL 8-EXCAVATING-,-.._— E 602-49400-407 RIM - Water Mains $517.18 10800 Repair water break E 602-49400-407 RIM - Water Mains $118.70 10812 Repair E 602-49400-407 RIM - Water Mains $258.48 10830 Repair - water main E 602-49400-407 RIM - Water Mains $152.89 10888 Repair Total FEHN GRAVEL & EXCAVATING $1,047.25 _md...H. V§ w , ..._._�.. �-.. ... -_" _ .....__ x... . a.,", �. -.............. ._._ .....- -m.....-._" Paid Chk# 018437 8/18/2003 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL E 602-49400-209 Locates $506.85 3070115 Locates- Water Dept Total GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL $506.85 Paid Chk# 018438 8/1812003 HOOVER, JUSTIN R 101-32210 Building Permits $38.96 B23-364 Refund overpayment Total HOOVER, JUSTIN $38.96 E 101-45000-596 Friendly City Days _$1,500.00 2002-2003 MA 2002-2003 M.Albt.Scholarship Total HUGHES, CASSIE $1,500.00 x. ,id o .7.. M...:....... ..' .., .r. ,�n1_ .,._.. q 1 .1r 1 PaChk# 018440 8/1812003 KERN, DEWENTER, 8 VIERE, LTD E 101-41400-301 Auditing and Acct'g Services $4,000.00 36766 Auditor Services Total KERN, DEWENTER, & VIERE, LTD $4,000.00 Paid Chk# 018441 8/18/2003 KNISLEY CONSTRUCTION G 101-22800 Landscaping Escrow $3,000.00 420533 10412 Kali Avenue Total KNISLEY CONSTRUCTION $3,000.00 Paid Chk# 018442 8/18/2003 KUECHLE UNDERGROUND, INC. E 101-41940-399 Miscellaneous $1,080.00 10098 Mowing of City Property-Barthe Total KUECHLE UNDERGROUND, INC. $1,080.00 Paid Chk# 018443 8/18/2003 LACAL EQUIPMENT, INC. _..a.n.. .. _� E 101-45100-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip $132.00 0009563-in Mower - blade - pin Total LACAL EQUIPMENT, INC. $132.00 Paid Chk# 018444 8/18/2003 LAKESIDE EQUIPMENT CORPORATION E 602-49400-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip $197.03 03-1489 Repair -maintenance Total LAKESIDE EQUIPMENT CORPORATION $197.03 lb�rtvijj� Smdl Town Uving. Slq City b. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE *Check Detail Register© August 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment Paid Chk# 018445 8/18/2003 LARSON PUBLICATIONS E 101-42000-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $106.65 06543743-001 PreventionTip Ad Total LARSON PUBLICATIONS $106.65 08/15/03 12:49 PM Page 4 Paid Chk# 018446 8/18/2003 M M HOMES G 101-22800 Landscaping Escrow G 101-22800 Landscaping Escrow G 101-22800 Landscaping Escrow Total M M HOMES Paid Chk# 018447 8/18/2003 MENARDS $3,000.00 420510 10298 Kali Avenue $3,000.00 420567 5417 Kahl Avenue $3,000.00 420597 5053 Kahl Avenue $9,000.00 E 101-45100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $70.55 88433 Treated lumber E 101-42000-560 Furniture and Fixtures $364.14 91539 FD 72" Steel Beam-misc. Total MENARDS $434.69 Paid Chk# 018448 8/18/20 33 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, E 101-45100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $565.06 68686 Parks Equipment Total METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY, II $565.06 Paid Chk# 01a449 8/18/2003 MIDWEST ANALYTICAL SERVICES E 601-49450-218 Testing Expenses $560.00 131240 Testing Expense (CBOD-5) E 601-49450-218 Testing Expenses $134.00 131290 Testing Expense (CBOD-5) Total MIDWEST ANALYTICAL SERVICES $694.00 Paid Chk# 018450 � 8/18/2003MONTICELLO, CITY OF E 101-42700-309 Animal Control Contract $464.00 7360 Animal Control Service Total MONTICELLO, CITY OF $464.00 'Paid Chk# 018451m�c 8/18%2003 �MOODY°S INVESTORS SERVICE E 463-49000-310 Other Professional Services $6,500.00 F1434818-000 2003A Series Bonds Total MOODY'S INVESTORS SERVICE $6,500.00 Paid Chk# 018452 8/18/2003 N. A. C. E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees E 456-49000-306 Planning Fees E 452-49000-306 Planning Fees E 463-49000-306 Planning Fees E 453-49000-306 Planning Fees E 101-41910-306 Planning Fees $42.80 12887 $948.40 12887 $699.75 12887 $9.90 12887 $277.94 12887 $34.00 12887 $3.00 12888 $20.00 12888 $40.00 12888 $169.50 12888 $193.59 12888 $339.55 12888 $418.00 12888 $681.00 12888 $362.25 12888 $493.45 12888 $168.00 12888 $301.86 12888 $875.00 12889 Total N. A. C. $6,077.99 Paid Chk# 018453 8/18/2003 NORTHERN DEWATERING INC. Swimming Pools Community Directional Signs Residential fences Garage Sale Signs General Planning Fees Commercial Zone Update Scherer Bros. Lot Brecke Zoning Concept Pope Daycare Prairie Run Preliminary Plat Heidi's Market Car Wash Parsons Mini Storage Ahren's Enterprises Phil Morris Concept Towne Lakes JMJ signage Plan Flooring America Kollville General Services E 602-49400-407 R/M - Water Mains $233.71 15018 Total NORTHERN DEWATERING, INC. $233.71 Paid Chk# 01"OIL Relocated press.relief valve y A\\lb�rtvijj� Smdl Town lMng. 09 City urs. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE *Check Detail Register© August 2003 08/15/03 12:49 PM Page 5 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 101-42000-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $66.43 08515529 FD blue tarps-misc Total NORTHERN TOOL 8 EQUIPMENT $66.43 -Paid Chk—# 018455-8/18/2003 OFFICE E 602-49400-210 Operating Supplies (GENERAL) $40.00 080903 Fax Cartridges E 101-41100-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $102.18 080903 4" Binders E 101-42400-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $98.88 080903 BD Supplies Total OFFICE MAX $241.06 Paid Chk# 018456 8/18/2003 OMANN SHINGLE RECYCLING E 101-43100-400 Repair/Maint - Paved Rd $43.13 139 Crushed Asphalt con -bit Total OMANN SHINGLE RECYCLING $43.13 .Paid Chk# 018457 8/18/2003— PATS 66 E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels ($0.26) Check 18304 E 101-42000-212 Motor Fuels $71.93 072903 FD Fuel E 101-45100-212 Motor Fuels $7.00 11297 Cub Cadet E 101-45100-212 Motor Fuels $7.00 11986 Cub Cadette E 101-45100-212 Motor Fuels $47.90 12146 Parks E 101-42400-212 Motor Fuels $43.00 16317 Building Dept. E 101-43100-212 Motor Fuels $8.65 18961 Public Works E 101-45100-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip $77.62 34543 Rear tires for toro Total PAT'S 66 $262.84 Paid Chk# 018458 8/18/2003 PINNACLE PRINTING, INC. E 602-49400-203 Printed Forms $1,719.98 2163 Printing -Turn-around Cards E 101-41100-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $367.43 2201 Newsletter paper Total PINNACLE PRINTING, INC. $2.087.41 Paid Chk# 018459 8/18/2003 POSTMASTER E 101-41100-300 Professional Srvs (GENERAL) $839.86 082003 Postage - Newsletter Total POSTMASTER $839.86 -., - ,. C—,H.. "E—P , - _.,. n Paid Chk# 0184ti0 � 8%18l2003 PUReCHASE POWER E 101-41400-413 Office Equipment Rental $1,060.79 080703 Postage Machine Rental Total PURCHASE POWER $1,060.79 PaidChk# a018461 8/18%2003 REED CONSTRUCTION DATA E 101-41100-351 Legal Notices Publishing $138.32 2376920 Legal Notices Total REED CONSTRUCTION DATA $138.32 Paid Chk# 018462 8/18/2003 SCHERER BROTHERS LUMBER CO E 101-45100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $68.10 227170 Green Treated Lumber Total SCHERER BROTHERS LUMBER CO $68.10 '_".rv,'_ Paid Chk#018463 E 101-41940-321 Telephone $107.53 072403 Phone - long distance Total SPRINT - IL $107.53 Paid Chk# 018464 8/18/2003 SPRINT- MO E 101-45100-321 Telephone $27.29 072103 Phone - Parks Dept E 101-43100-321 Telephone $30.61 072103 Phone - Sewer/Water fax Total SPRINT- MO $57.90 Paid Chk# 018465 8/18/2003 STATE OF MINNESOTA _n E 101-41400-433 Dues and Subscriptions $40.00 2003-2004 2003-2004 Membership MMD Total STATE OF MINNESOTA $40.00 Paid Chk#}018466 8/18/2003 SUNSHINE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS 10 Alb-crtville SmoH Town Uving. d9 City We. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE *Check Detail Register© August 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 101-45100-530 Improvements Other Than Bldgs $2,730.00 7592 Add on to existing sprinkler s Total SUNSHINE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS $2,730.00 Paid Chk# 018467 8/18/2003 T 8 S TRUCKING E 101-43100-227 Street Sweeping $125.00 89 sweep streets behind Coborn's Total T & S TRUCKING $125.00 Paid Chk# 018468 8/18/2003 TEAM LABORATORY CHEMICAL CORP E 101-41940-399 Miscellaneous $210.87 58325 Parks - cleaning supplies Total TEAM LABORATORY CHEMICAL CORP $210.87 08/15/03 12:49 PM Page 6 Paid Chk# 018469 8/18/2003 TOSHIBA AMERICA INFO —INFO INC E 101-41400-413 Office Equipment Rental $0.00 36465184 Copier Maintenance Agreement Total TOSHIBA AMERICA INFO SYS INC $0.00 E 318-47000-601 Debt Sry Bond Principal $10,000.00 090103 1989 GO Bond Principle E 318-47000-611 Bond Interest $387.50 090103 1989 GO Bond Interest E 341-47000-611 Bond Interest $500.00 09012003 1993C Bond Interest Total U. S. BANK $10,887.50 P, m.� —0184.,-.,�,. —8/18 R' �.....,,_ .......,< Paid Chk# 018471 8/18/2003 U.S. BANK TRUST NATIONAL ASSOC E 407-47000-640 Tax Increment Return Payment $20,237.94 2003 TIF#7 2003 TIF Payment Total U.S. BANK, TRUST NATIONAL ASSOC $20,237.94 ,. 2003 - �., AG.E--EN— _-' W�,a—.., M ..-h.,F Paid Chk# 018472 8/18/2003 WASTE MANAGEMENT E 101-41940-384 Refuse/Garbage Disposal $156.59 0608843-1593- Refuse Waste Hauler Total WASTE MANAGEMENT $156.59 47-3-�..<"�-18'/'.003 ER �6.M �...,_,A Paid Chk# 018473 8/18/2003 WEBER OIL COMPANY E 602-49400-212 Motor Fuels $300.25 47766A Balance on Invoice Total WEBER OIL COMPANY $300.25 PaidChk#018474--8/18/2003 WILLENBRINGCOMPANIES,INC. G 101-22800 Landscaping Escrow $2,500.00 420490 10352 - 52nd Street (sod only) Total WILLENBRING COMPANIES, INC. $2,500.00 Paid Chk# 018475 8/18/2003 WRIGHT COUNTY FIRE CHIEF ASSOC E 101-42000-433 Dues and Subscriptions $150.00 03-04 Dues 2003-2004 Fire Chief Dues Total WRIGHT COUNTY FIRE CHIEF ASSOC $150.00 E 101-41800-511 Taxes on City Property E 101-41800-511 Taxes on City Property E 101-41800-511 Taxes on City Property E 101-41800-511 Taxes on City Property E 101-41800-511 Taxes on City Property E 101-41800-511 Taxes on City Property E 101-41800-511 Taxes on City Property E 101-41800-511 Taxes on City Property E 101-41800-511 Taxes on City Property E 101-41800-511 Taxes on City Property E 101-41800-511 Taxes on City Property E 101-41800-511 Taxes on City Property Total WRIGHT CTY AUDITOR/TREASURER $704.00 2003 tax R101-022-010010 $726.00 2003 tax R101-022-002100 $462.00 2003 tax R101-022-010020 $384.00 2003 tax R101-022-002110 $19.20 2003 tax R101-022-002110 Penalty $23.10 2003 tax R101-022-010020 Penalty $36.30 2003 Tax R101-022-002100 Penalty $484.00 2003 Tax R101-022-002090 $50.70 2003 Tax R101-022-010040 Penalty $35.20 2003 tax R101-022-010010 Penalty $24.20 2003 tax R101-022-002090 Penalty $1,014.00 2003 tx R101-022-010040 $3,962.70 Paid Chk# 018477 8/18/2003 WRIGHT CTY SHERIFFS PATROL E 101-42110-307 Police Contract Fees $21,170.00 Patrol-03-8 Police Protection Sery A,lbertv�ill� fa. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE *Check Detail Register© August 2003 Check Amt Invoice Comment Total WRIGHT CTY SHERIFFS PATROL $21,170.00 Paid Chk# 018478 8J18J2003 WRIGHT RECYCLING E 101-43200-308 Recycling Contract Fee $3,297.00 073103 Recycling Contract Total WRIGHT RECYCLING $3,297.00 Paid Chk# 018479 8/18/2003 E 601-49450-381 Electric Utilities $180.17 090203 Electric-60th St -Lift Station E 601-49450-381 Electric Utilities $16.27 090203 Electric -Kaiser - Lift Station E 601-49450-381 Electric Utilities $91.45 090203 Electric-52nd St -Lift Station E 101-42400-381 Electric Utilities $80.70 090203 Electric-51st St-P. Shelter E 601-49450-381 Electric Utilities $2,366.74 090203 Electric -Sewage Plant -Mac E 601-49450-381 Electric Utilities $20.94 090203 Electric-Cty.Rd.18-Lift Statio E 101-43160-381 Electric Utilities $3,913.63 090203 Electric -Street Lighting E 101-45100-381 Electric Utilities $256.64 090203 Electric-58th -Skating/Rink E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities $80.69 090203 Electric-PW Garage E 101-41940-381 Electric Utilities $26.54 090203 Electric -City Hall E 101-43160-381 Electric Utilities $25.68 090203 Electric-CR 19 & 37 Traffic E 101-45100-381 Electric Utilities $23.20 090203 Electric-51st St-P.Shelter E 101-41940-381 Electric Utilities $20.88 090203 Electric-LaBeaux Park-n-Ride E 101-45100-381 Electric Utilities $7.92 090203 Electric -Main Ave -Parking Lot E 101-45100-381 Electric Utilities $7.49 090203 Electric-58th St-P.Shelter E 101-41940-381 Electric Utilities $3.77 090203 Electric-Oakside Siren E 101-41940-381 Electric Utilities $3.14 090203 Electric-CP-Siren E 101-42000-381 Electric Utilities $351.13 090203 Electric -Fire Dept Total XCEL ENERGY $7,476.98 10100 Premier Bank $141,032.95 Fund Summary 10100 Premier Bank 101 GENERAL FUND $93,822.35 318 1989 REF BOND $10,387.50 341 1993C REFUNDING $500.00 407 TIF #7 - SENIOR HOUSING $20,237.94 452 TRAFFIC LIGHT $493.45 453 KOLLEVILLE ESTATES $301.86 456 TOWNE LAKES $362.25 463 NW COMMERCIAL PARK $6,668.00 601 SEWER FUND $3,744.31 602 WATER FUND $4,498.70 604 STORM WATER $16.59 $141,032.95 08/15/03 12:49 PM Page 7 12 FOLLOW UP SHEET August 4tn Agenda Council Direction: • Cable access to Fire Hall (Linda) The cable and internet service has been installed at the Fire Hall. • Provide a copy of landscaping plan for Kolleville Estates (Linda) • Research the need for drain tile would be effective behind the townhouses in Kolleville Estates 2nd Addition (Pete) • Contact Fehn Excavating about the quote to repair Marlowe Avenue NE (Pete) • Evergreen trees located in the site triangle at 57`h Street NE and Kalland Avenue NE (Jon and Tim) > Jon contacted the property owners regarding the tree removal. Since he has been on vacation this week, I am not aware of the results of his contacts. 13 } CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #2003-27 A RESOLUTION APPROVING RENEWAL OF THE GAMBLING LICENSE FOR THE ALBERTVILLE LIONS AT THE 152 CLUB WHEREAS, the Albertville Lions have made application with the Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board for renewal of its gambling license at the 152 Club at 5794 Main Avenue NE, Albertville, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Albertville Lions submitted said application to the City Council of the City of Albertville, and the application was reviewed by the City Council at a public meeting conducted August 18, 2003. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Albertville hereby approves the application for renewal of the gambling license for the Albertville Lions at the 152 Club. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ABLERTVILLE THIS 18`h DAY OF AUGUST, 2003. Don Peterson, Mayor Bridget Miller, City Clerk 14 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #2003-28 A RESOLUTION APPROVING RENEWAL OF THE GAMBLING LICENSE FOR THE ALBERTVILLE LIONS AT CEDAR CREEK BAR & GRILL WHEREAS, the Albertville Lions have made application with the Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board for renewal of its gambling license at the Cedar Creek Bar & Grill, 5700 Jason Avenue NE, Albertville, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Albertville Lions submitted said application to the City Council of the City of Albertville, and the application was reviewed by the City Council at a public meeting conducted August 18, 2003. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Albertville hereby approves the application for renewal of the gambling license for the Albertville Lions at Cedar Creek Bar & Grill. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ABLERTVILLE THIS 18`h DAY OF AUGUST, 2003. Don Peterson, Mayor Bridget Miller, City Clerk 15 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #2003-29 A RESOLUTION APPROVING RENEWAL OF THE GAMBLING LICENSE FOR THE ALBERTVILLE LIONS AT GEEZ' SPORTS BAR & GRILL WHEREAS, the Albertville Lions have made application with the Minnesota Charitable Gambling Control Board for renewal of its gambling license at the Geez' Sports Bar & Grill, 5788 Main Avenue NE, Albertville, Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the Albertville Lions submitted said application to the City Council of the City of Albertville, and the application was reviewed by the City Council at a public meeting conducted August 18, 2003. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Albertville hereby approves the application for renewal of the gambling license for the Albertville Lions at Geez' Sports Bar & Grill. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ABLERTVILLE THIS 181' DAY OF AUGUST, 2003. Don Peterson, Mayor Bridget Miller, City Clerk 16 r NORTHWRS ASSOCIATto CEO"SukTANTS" INC, 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone:952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville Planning Commission Linda Goeb, City Administrator FROM: John Glomski / Alan Brixius DATE: July 28, 2003 RE: Albertville — Ahrens Enterprises FILE: 163.06 - 03.17 BACKGROUND Ahrens Enterprises, LLC, has submitted a request for site and building plan review of a 20,160 square foot office and warehouse building to be located at the southeast corner of 53rd street and Barthel Drive. The building is proposed to be constructed in two phases. The site is 3.2 acres in area and is zoned 1-1, Limited Industrial District. Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Location Map Exhibit B: Site Plan Exhibit C: Floor Plan Exhibit D: Building Elevation Exhibit E: Landscape Plan Exhibit F: Grading Plan ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan and Zoning The Zoning map classifies this site as 1-1, Limited Industrial District and the Comprehensive Plan designates this area for future Industrial development. As such, the proposed use is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and designated zoning. The Zoning Ordinance defines warehousing as the storage of materials or equipment within an enclosed building. Warehousing is allowed in the 1-1 district as a permitted use. Lot I Building Requirements The following table illustrates the applicable lot and building requirements of the 1-1 district: Lot Width Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Maximum Maximum Setback Setback Setback Hard Building Surface Height (including buildings) Reg uired 100 feet 35 feet 10 feet 20 feet 85% 35 feet Proposed 310 feet 70 feet 35 feet (off of 258 feet 53% 26 feet 53`d street) 10 feet (south eastern side The proposed project, both phases one and two, is compliant with the lot and building requirements of the 1-1 district. Access / Circulation The site is proposed to have two access points off of 53`d Street. Semi -trucks will utilize the northern most access at the rear of the site. There is sufficient room for semi -trailer circulation within the northern parking lot. Parking The following table illustrates the parking requirements as defined in Section 1200.9 of the Zoning Ordinance; Use Requirement Square footage Required Office Phase 1) 3 + 1 per 200 1,300 10 Warehouse (Phase 1) 1 space per 1,000 square feet + 1 space per each employee on maximum shift 6,400 6 Truck/Auto Service Area 2 per bay 4 ba s 8 Total: 24 stalls Phase I Provided: 24 stalls Phase II Provided 14 stalls The applicant has provided the amount of stalls required by code for the first phase of this project. All parking stalls meet the dimension requirements of the Zoning K 18 Ordinance. It should also be noted that ail bituminous area on the site is to have a continuous perimeter concrete curbing barrier. The plans illustrate the location for 14 future stalls at the time of phase 11 development. At this time, floor plans for phase II have not been provided. As such, our office is unable to designate the required amount of parking for the building. If phase II is a duplicate or relatively similar to that of the building being constructed in phase I, there appears to be a parking deficiency of approximately 10 spaces. The applicant should be aware of need to properly plan for the needed phase II parking during the layout of the site. As currently designed, the phase II building will need to be reduced in size so as to have a sufficient amount of parking as required by code. Outdoor Storage It appears that a large area of the northern most parking lot may be used for outdoor storage of semi trailers. No other outdoor storage use is allowed for this site without approval of a conditional use permit. Building Requirements The applicant has submitted building elevation and floor plans for the building being constructed in phase I of the project. The exterior building material will consist of raked precast wall paneling with pre -finished metal capping, consistent with the requirements of Section 1100.4 of the Zoning Ordinance. Landscaping The applicant has submitted a landscape plan which includes a mixture of berming along Barthel drive, some larger Colorado Blue Spruce trees along both the west and south lot lines, and some smaller potted Isanti Dogwood and Taunton Yew along the south fagade of the building. Staff would like to see four additional Colorado Blue Spruce added along the south lot line, giving additional screening between the parking lot and the residential development to the south. Fencing The applicant is proposing to install a chain link perimeter fence with inserts around the rear parking lot area. The proposed fence is six feet in height, meeting the eight foot maximum height allowed for fences within the industrial district. Lighting The applicant has submitted details showing the design, type and location of proposed lighting. The submitted details appear appropriate for the subject site and staff is comfortable with the lighting plan subject to it meeting the illumination requirements as illustrated in Section 1000.10 of the Zoning Ordinance which state that light emitted from the shoebox lights illuminating the parking area must not exceed one foot candle lighting beyond the center line of the abutting streets. 3 19 Signage The applicant has not submitted signage plans at this time. A site plan showing the location of any proposed signage and detailed plans illustrating dimension and material, meeting the general standards of Section 9 of the Sign Ordinance must be submitted and reviewed by City Staff. Trash Enclosure / Snow Removal The submitted site plans show a trash enclosure located within the structure. In regards to snow storage, staff has concerns as to the ability to adequately remove snow from the site. The site currently shows a 12" swing gate at the northern section of the site. The applicant is aware that this is an error and needs to be shown as a 12 foot swing gate. The applicant must submit a detailed description explaining how snow will be adequately removed from the site. Grading / Drainage The applicant has submitted a grading plan for the subject site. It appears that the entire site will be drained to a pond located at the northeastern end of the site. The grading and drainage plans are subject to the review of the City Engineer. Utilities The plans show a number of floor drains within the shop area of the building. The City engineer should comment as to the acceptability of these floor drains. The utility plans, are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Recommendation The proposed use is an allowed use in the 1-1 district and the site layout and building design generally meet the requirements set forth in the Albertville Zoning Ordinance. As such, staff recommends approval of the site and building plans for Ahrens Enterprises, allowing the construction of an office/warehouse building on the subject site, subject to the following conditions; All bituminous areas within the site are to have a continuous perimeter concrete curbing barrier. 2. No outdoor storage, other than semi trailers, are allowed for this site without approval of a conditional use permit. 3. The landscape plan is to be revised to show four additional Colorado Blue Spruce along the south lot line, giving additional screening between the parking and lot and the residential development to the south. 4. The lighting plan must meet the illumination requirements of Section 1000.10 of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. A detailed site plan showing the location, dimensions and material of any signage is to be submitted and reviewed by City Staff. 4 6. The current site plan showing a twelve inch swing gate is to be revised to be a minimum of twelve feet. 7. The applicant must submit a detailed description explaining how snow will be adequately removed form the site. 8. Grading, drainage, and utility plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 9. Comments of other City Staff. pc: Mike Couri Pete Carlson Ahrens Enterprises, LLC 5 SITE LOCATION iii �'� n1�N: •�+�.�� mni� • � �� u/w � � �� Ifllllnll�l� SITE LOCATION EXHIBIT 8-13-03 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Fact & Decision Site Plan Review Applicant's Name: Ahrens Enterprises, LLC Request: The applicant is requesting site and building plan review of an office and warehouse building to be located on a 3.2 acre lot at the southeast corner of 53rd street and Barthel Drive. Planning Commission Public Hearing Date: August 12, 2003 City Council Meeting Date: August 18, 2003 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following finding of fact and decision: A. The Planning Report dated July 28, 2003 prepared by NAC is incorporated herein. B. The Planning Commission Recommendation for the application is incorporated herein. C.. The site and building plans are consistent with the applicable provisions of the Albertville Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance as well as policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the Site and Building Plan Review is approved based on the most current plans, dated July 14, 2003 and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: All bituminous areas within the site are to have a continuous perimeter concrete curbing barrier. 2. No outdoor storage, other than semi trailers, are allowed for this site without approval of a conditional use permit. 3. The landscape plan is to be revised to show four additional Colorado Blue Spruce along the south lot line, giving additional screening between the parking lot and the residential development to the south. Ahrens Enterprises, LLC Findings of Fact and Decision ", XtY4 XOVW/r,�7 1,4 4. The lighting plan must meet the illumination requirements of Se ion 1000.10 of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. A detailed site plan showing the location, dimensions, and material of any signage is to be submitted and reviewed by City Staff. 6. The current site plan showing a twelve inch swing gate is to be revised to be a minimum of twelve feet. 7. The applicant must submit a detailed description explaining how snow will be adequately removed from the site. 8. Grading, drainage, and utility plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 9. Comme s of other City Staff. ®- 44 �� ' ill Ci C it=Io f Au ust 2003. Adopted by the AI rtv a ty ounce this78ttg , City of Albertville Attest: In Linda Goeb, City Administrator Don Peterson, Mayor 2 Ahrens Enterprises, LLC Findings of Fact and Decision 24 ' m c�uCLci t=� (n 0 '34 'it Ftr ao C rn ^ t�y�y 0 n 12;2 z J O� Z m �— Z N Ed �Ie r e Q� V a 22 Zw =J� z V�� - �K mom"' a U' � a aW � zo so� l,- L h Q w m F- N a QQ u-, 2 r, J Z sSv• W u, o o z r. Z;E u \.v1 / a r---- ------------------------------ a° ti -------- Dz�— j 133b1S PIES "� + � ml 0 o 2 f 0 0 a LLm Z p �p p Lu o a s o� Z) ca C1 in � `Fm. m w�^- J 'ii 6( '6f �s a % (or .� p °f ^ J mZ 02 J N oD , s I ,11 4 4 �.% `L hm,� En U) Z� W W x�a W w0 W ¢ E E I N w r— Q�� ZU Dui NOVM? g f 4 is 'l w O ■ U a 6m mw O� ,n2m Q rn W q m 00 to �,� ��, z y a s Li'�¢ U rnLu Z _[•rppY; „ a , P� b aoo Y I a� a� 2 E-{ z Q a 00 o; �i LIN ,- ,- : IS !, k \ R ��}} ) k \o jipt L§ g\ (\§\ \j/ K \ §j> ? co m |. |., ■ 0 <Y yƒ Ln $ a § fly \ a� G Gk Gg mk ; . / � : P. ! \} IN Cp Q U O `g Ry m "r,, �; oz U �� - z0a00 Fit ELF Fib n EtT g o 2 s. �yOL y1 (� L S2 y 't y to W W W( uj .1 J v F v wfA ��o WO c7v Q aui 6 �a@ is �■ OL Q xLLJ �� (n W N�a1'f (v� J (� ` Q h H Z M m J �Q 0� co J~ Z Op tD O� NW 6 5+ c qyq. gc F� m z y p W (> m Z ai?� iva a p is aao ml I _ � o / � aaoaas YI \ as 00 o 6 r kgugu z i� ror.mnd a rnnvd? r t_}rr.� �" E� snon�nnnsa 7 �.ro-i9rv3 itnv ~ f NV7d ON1OVd`J AHVNIPV173dd '" '•"°• r JlV P J>l ,JN3 Yssvd 077 S3S1HdYMN3 SN3HHb . - •,_ •_ m. V t P ii p p t ion", da p f 1 y i �El� F 3 ��lgl,�El,eg� !, � IIlt ?!11 �f H um ;rlt ! I �� !!! ip RR41iRl"I P R v J _' \� / \ i LJLJ \ ;• a- L eee VV 3 oaa Y 2 o a� Y: At"i 2 0 YP \ •�\ fE�cRr P ." iz e t t t N0RTM;WE:ST. ASS;dC'tA.TE'Q_ C,Cf:N:S:t3LTAN.:TS,: 1.1VC 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, PAN 55416 Tele-phorie.: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 15lan3-)ers(c 3-Iacr)laniiing,coni PLANNING REPORT T0: Albertville Planning Commission Linda Goeb, City Administrator FROM: Alan Brixius DATE: August 7, 2003 RE: Albertville — Albertville Dental Land Use & Zoning Concept FILE: 163.06 — 03.20 BACKGROUND The purpose of this item is to consider a land use and zoning concept submitted by Jerry Brecke, Risk Control, Inc., to re -guide and rezone land located south of CSAH 18 for commercial as opposed to residential use. Mr. Brecke requests consideration by the Planning Commission and City Council of the land use/zoning concept to develop a commercial site for a dental clinic. In the event that the concept is determined to be favorable by the Planning Commission and City Council, Mr. Brecke will pursue a formal development application. It is important to note that this item is a concept only and the recommendations and decisions of the City are not binding. See attached Exhibits for further reference to the proposal and for background information regarding the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning District uses planned and contemplated for the site. Attached for reference. - Exhibit A — Albertville Dental Site Plan Exhibit B — Zoning Map Exhibit C — 8-1 & B-2 District Uses Chart ISSUE ANALYSIS Subject Site The subject site consists of three existing lots of record all fronting on CSAH 18. The site contains .84 acres (36, 612 square feet) of lot area and is about 328 feet long and 112 feet deep. When CSAH 18 was improved, the County required dedication of approximately 24 feet of additional right-of-way which reduced the depth of the lots from Albertville Dental Page 1 136 feet to the current 112 feet. The site is contains a single family home on one of the parcels and is surrounded by generally large tracts of open land and farming operations with the exception of Swamp Lake which is a Natural Environment Lake located to the southeast of the site. Adjacent lands are anticipated to develop with low -density single family uses. Comprehensive Plan and Zoning The Comprehensive Plan designates the subject site and adjacent properties as Low Density Residential land use. The corresponding zoning classification is R-1A, Low Density Single Family and the subject site is located within the S-1, Shoreland District of Swamp Lake. Lot / building Requirements The following table illustrates the applicable lot and building requirements of the current R1-A District as compared to the B-1 and B-2 Zoning Districts. Lot Lot Front Side Rear Max. Lot Max. Max. Area Width Setback Setback Setback Coverage Hard Building (buildings Surface Height structures) R-1A 15,000 100' (1) 30' 15' (1) 25' 25% N/A 35' sf 120' 30 (E) (C) B-1 8,000 75' 35' 15' (i) 25' 60% 80% 35' sf 20' (E) B-2 10,000 100, 35' 10' (1) 20' 50% 80% 35' sf 20' (E) (1) — Interior Lot (C) — Corner Lot (E) — Exterior (side yard on corner lot adjacent to a street) In addition to the requirements listed above, the following Shoreland District requirements apply and in a case where two standards conflict, the more restrictive standard applies: Setback from CSAH 18: 50 feet from right-of-way line Setback from O-H-W: 150 feet Maximum Impervious Surface: 25% or with CUP up to 80% Maximum Building Height: 25 feet The subject site is restricted by its shallow depth (112 feet), 150-foot lakeshore setback and 50 foot Shoreland setback standard from CSAH 18 right-of-way. About 1/3 of the site is located within the Shoreland setback however, a survey showing the ordinary - high -watermark of Swamp Lake will be needed to verify the actual area affected by the lakeshore setback. Assuming the ordinary -high -watermark is at approximately the Albertville Dental Page 2 southeast corner of the site or there about, the underling Lot 3. Heuring Addition may not be buildable without a variance under the existing R-1A or proposed B-1 or B-2 zoning classifications as the entire lot is located within the 150-foot lakeshore setback. The setbacks applicable to the lot result in a building envelope of about 35 feet deep by 115 feet long. In the event that the site were rezoned to B-1, the building would need to be moved to the southwest to meet the 50' County Road setback and reduced in depth to meet the 25' rear yard setback. In the event that the site is zoned B-2, the building depth as proposed could meet all setbacks provided the building is moved to the southwest to meet the County Road setback. Additional considerations for the site include screening that would be required to screen the commercial site from adjacent residential lands and additional Shoreland screening would be required between the building/parking lot and Lakeshore. DISCUSSION When Mr. Brecke first approached staff with the proposal to change the land use/zoning to commercial, the initial reaction was to advise him that the land use plan and Zoning Ordinance for the area established a consistent low density residential land use pattern and that recent amendments have resulted in an ample supply of commercial land within the City. Furthermore, the site is located about Y4 mile west of the intersection of CSAH 19 and CSAH 18 and separated by Swamp Lake. Mr. Brecke then prepared the site plan for the dental office (Exhibit A) and indicated that the site was no longer conducive to single-family residential development due to the expansion of the County Road right-of-way and resulting shallow depth of the lots of record. Individual development of each of the lots would result in the potential of 4 direct driveway accesses to CSAH 18 and the homes would all need to fit within a 35' deep building envelope, aligned along the County Road. Staff has re-evaluated the plan and concurs that there may be some merit to changing the land use/zoning designation of the site for a neighborhood commercial type use. Recommendation The request is for the Planning Commission to review the concept and provide guidance to Mr. Brecke as to whether or not the concept is acceptable and whether he should/should not pursue submittal of a formal development application. Staff has not conducted a formal review of the concept or site plan and as such, additional requirements of the Zoning Ordinance will apply. If the Planning Commission supports the concept of changing the land use/zoning the following suggestions are provided. - The subject site should be expanded to include the outlot, and vacant lot located west of Lot 1, Heuring Addition and the irregular parcel(s) located directly south of the subject site. See Zoning Map for reference. 2. Access to the site should be restricted to one driveway, meeting County Road spacing requirements. Albertville Dental Page 3 3. A development plan for all of the parcels should be submitted with a future Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning application. 4. Special attention should be given to screening, landscaping, lighting and architecture to ensure that the commercial property will be compatible with adjacent residential guided properties. 5. In the event that the City desires a trail adjacent to Swamp Lake the appropriate easements and/or trail should be acquired. 6. Particular attention should be given to allowing access to the parcel from the south and west both for vehicle and pedestrian traffic. pc: Mike Couri Pete Carlson Jerry Brecke, Risk Control Inc. Albertville Dental Page 4 City of Albertville Zoning Map 0 A-1, Agricultural Rural ,- A-2, Agricultural Transitional RI -A, Low Density Single Family 0 R-1, Single Family R-4, Low Density Multiple Family R-5, Medium Density Multiple Family R-8, Mixed Housing 37;" B-1, Neighborhood Business B-2, Limited Business B-2A, Limited Business B-3, Highway Commercial ® B-4, General Business 1-1, Light Industrial 1-2, General Industrial `® PUD, Planned Unit Development �P/I, Public/Institutional Water S-1, Shoreland District ' S-2, Shoreland District N Ciij Limits 1 ' Railroad Interstate Highway 0 County Road ❑ State Highway 1200 0 1200 Feet EXHIBIT A +,G'�., NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. s]>�s ev ae,e 7e..e -e.e ho 9S".59 9fi36 F smie. 52�595.98J] plannersSnac p�enn ng.co f l `\ Source Wrighl County, MnDoT, & Northwest Associated Consultants. August 2003 Eost Gne of N of the SE t14 t i o° z i 3 A .. n `R�\ 3 ... Nti Noo N - a - aR �,z��o� NMS�ONS a o 1 OwrN e+ 50 �' OCLCN(D B1' SO WOND 1-5 If eoox _ P�cc IN rurrxr0 a+ SD Nae�roNru scar vrrncu scut ALBERTVILLE DENTAL 5067 Jansen Avenue Albertville, Minnesota A � A rPliNKD ar: � v U p Z OUALITv SITE DESIGN, LLC � � � Q w� CONCEPT PLAN A EXHIBIT C B-1 AND B-2 DISTRICT PURPOSE & USES CHART B-1 PURPOSE: The purpose of the B-1 Neighborhood Low Intensity Business District is to provide for the establishment of integrated neighborhood centers for convenient, limited office, retail or service outlets which deal directly with the customer for whom the goods or services are furnished. The B-1 District is to provide for a transition between residential and commercial development. B-2 PURPOSE: The purpose of the B-2, Limited Business District is to provide for low intensity, retail or service outlets which deal directly with the customer for whom the goods or services are furnished. The uses allowed in this district are to provide goods and services on a limited community market scale and located in areas which are well served by collector or arterial street facilities at the edge of residential districts. Description B-1 District B-2 District Personal Services P P Essential Services P P Convenience Grocery Stores (not supermarket type and without motor fuel facilities) P P Laundromat, self-service washing and drying P P Professional and commercial leased offices P P Governmental and public utili buildings and structures P P Funeral homes and mortuaries p p Personal wireless service towers and antennas if located upon a public structure P P Art and school supplies p Bakery goods and baking of goods for retail sales on site P Bank, savings and loan, credit unions and financial institutions P -Bicycle sales and repair p Candy, ice cream, popcorn, nuts, frozen desserts and soft drinks P Camera and photographic materials p Delicatessen p Dry cleaning pick up and laundry pick up stations including incidental repair and assembly but not including processing P Drug store p Florist shop p Frozen food store, but not including a locker plant P Gift or novelty store p Grocery, fruit or vegetable store, but not including sales from moveable, motorized vehicles. P — r ci nnucu vaa, M — t1GGC55UIy use, t, - uonamonai use Description B-1 District B-2 District Hardware store and building supply operations P Hobby store P Ice sales with storage not to exceed five tons P Insurance sales P Locksmiths P Meat market, but not including processing or locker plant P Medical and dental offices and clinics P Paint and wallpaper sales P Plumbing, television, radio, electrical sales and such repair as are necessary use to the retail establishment permitted in the district P Public utility collection offices P Public garage P Real estate sales P Shoe repair P Commercial or business building sand structures for a use accessory to the principal use but such use shall not exceed 30% of the gross floors ace of the principal use A A Off street parking A A Off street loading A A Adult uses A A Radio and television receiving antennas...... A A Commercial PUD C C Buildings combining residential and non-residential uses C C Personal wireless service towers and antennas not located on a public structure C C Commercial, private and public satellite dish or receiving antennas in excess of 2 meters C C P - Permitted Use; A - Accessory Use; C - Conditional Use rd NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suits -555, St, Louis Park; MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9836 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 plan ners(abnacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville Planning Commission Linda Goeb, City Administrator FROM: Alan Brixius DATE: August 7, 2003 RE: Albertville — Phil Morris Property — Concept Plan PUD FILE N0: 163.06 — 03.18 BACKGROUND Boulder Properties, in conjunction with Weber Architects and Planners, have submitted an application for concept plan planned unit development for the Phil Morris property located at the corner of 1-94 and County Road 37. This site is currently vacant and zoned B-3, Highway Commercial. The applicant is seeking general concept plan planned , unit development conditional use approval to allow for a commercial development that would include a family restaurant, a convenience store with gas sales, and a hotel or retail development. While the hotel concept is expressed as being desirable, the applicant indicates that if the market dictates, the hotel will not work and he would change the hotel to a retail use. The concept plan shows the proposed uses situated on the site with a three lot subdivision. In examining the concept, the Planning Commission and City Council are asked to provide opinions as to land use and overall site design. In formulating your opinions and recommendations, we offer the following comments. Attached for reference: Exhibit A: Project Narrative Exhibit B: Existing Survey 1 Wetlands Exhibit C: Existing Survey with Concept Overlay Exhibit D: Site Plan Exhibit E: Retail Site Plan Exhibit F: Site Plan with Parking Dimensions Exhibit G: Retail Site with Parking Dimensions ISSUES ANALYSIS Comprehensive Plan According to the Comprehensive Plan, the proposed site is guided for commercial uses. Recommendations for this area of the City include "commercial development which is highway oriented and portrays high quality in design and construction." The proposed concept plan for business and commercial is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan recommendations. Zoning B-3 District. The purpose of the B-3, Highway Commercial District is to provide for and limit the establishment of motor vehicles oriented or dependent high intensity commercial and service activities. The proposed uses (restaurant, hotel, or retail) are permitted uses in the B-3 District. Gas sales and the car wash are a conditional use within this district. The City Council, in recent discussions, has raised concern regarding the number of motor vehicle fuel stations that have been established within the community and question the need for additional development of a similar type. The applicant has proposed a convenience store with gas sales and car wash, recognizing that the site's location falls in close proximity of County Road 37 and 1-94. In this regard, it appears that this auto oriented use would be well sited. However, the City would not want to see the convenience store with gas sales as the exclusive use of this site. In this regard, the City should condition any PUD approval with the requirement that the gas sales would not be established unless the convenience store is built in conjunction with one of the other uses (restaurant, hotel or retail). This would assure the City that it would not end up with just a gas station at another location in the community. PUD. The PUD process allows a deviation from the strict provisions of the Zoning Ordinance related to setbacks, height, lot area, lot width, and lot depth. Through the conditional use permit, PUD is intended to encourage innovations in development, higher standards in design, more convenience in location, and a more desirable and creative environments through the flexibility that would not be accomplished through the strict application of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The applicant is requesting a planned unit development to establish an integrated commercial site that is reliant on a single access off of County Road 37. Cross access easements would be necessary as well as shared parking. In exchange for the flexibility to create the three lot subdivision, the City's expectations will be that we establish high performance standards in building architecture, site landscaping, and effective site circulation. 2 Performance Standards. The applicant's total site area is 11.89 acres. Wetland and ponding consume approximately 5.81 acres and the applicant is proposing approximately .65 acres for dedication for the new off -ramp from 1-94. The balance of the property will be used in three lots for commercial development. Use Total Site Square Footage Acre Restaurant 85,095 1..95 Convenience Store 52,668 1.21 Hotel / Retail 85,560 1.96 New Off Ramp Area 28,425 .65 Common Circulation Area 13,440 .31 Total Use Area 265,188 6.08 Wetland and Ponding 252,870 5.81 Total Site Area 518,212 11.89 The following are the lot requirements for a B-3 District as compared to the lots proposed in the applicant's site plan: B-3 District Required Restaurant Convenience Store Hotel/Retail Lot Area None 1.95 acres 1.21 acres 1.96 acres Lot Width 100 feet None 226 feet 250 feet Front Yard 35 feet 55 feet 70 feet Side Yard 20 feet 25 feet 35/40 feet Rear Yard 20 feet 15 feet 10 feet Hard Surface Coverage (Including Buildings) 80% 85% + Meets requirement Roughly 70% Hard Cover Meets Requirement Roughly 70% Hard Cover According to Code, the lot front is defined as that boundary abutting a public right-of-way having the least width. Because there is no proposed direct access to the restaurant, flexibility in this standard is being sought. The applicant's proposed subdivision illustrates lots with irregular lot lines. These irregular lot lines may produce issues related to boundary line disputes in the future with multiple owners within this subdivision. In examination of the B-3 performance standards, it appears that all lots exceed the area requirements. The restaurant lot does not have access to a public local street and thus needs flexibility through the PUD. The buildings appear to comply with setbacks with the exception of the proposed hotel, which has a 10 foot rear yard setback on the south property line. This can be corrected 3 with a lot line adjustment to provide the necessary 20 foot rear yard setback. If the retail center replaces the hotel, it appears that all building setbacks have been complied with. Lot Coverage. Within the B-3 District, a maximum of 80 percent of total lot coverage is permitted. It appears that both the convenience store and the hotel meet this requirement, however, lot coverage calculations should be provided for the restaurant in that it appears to be in excess of the 85 percent standard. If this is the case, the City may consider averaging the total impervious surface of the development site against the entire lot. With the available green space and ponding areas and wetlands that would be included in the outlot to the south, the impervious surface is well below the B-3 District standard. Outlots. The subdivision has the potential for three outlots. The first outlot is the area west of the property which would be dedicated for a future off ramp from 1-94. This additional right-of-way dedication would provide the City, State and County the opportunity to plan the most appropriate location for the new off ramp with any future redesign of the County Road 37/1-94 interchange. The City Engineer should provide a more detailed review as to whether the dedication is sufficient to accommodate the City, State, or County needs in any future redesign. This may occur at the time of development stage. The second outlot lies south of the proposed development area and contains approximately 5.81 acres of land used for wetland and ponding. The site plan clusters the development on the buildable area in the north, retaining the wetland area and providing ponding in close proximity to the wetland as a storm water measure related to the overall development. It should be noted that the City has adopted regulations of a 30 foot buffer zone to be maintained with natural ply the ordinary high water mark of the wetland. In examinat that the proposed parking for the restaurant would be wit[ illustrated on the existing survey with wetlands. Some required. ,iat require the establishment nt vegetation extending from on of the site plan, it appears in that 30''foot buffer area, as djustment to the plan will be The third outlot appears to be the shared entrance off of County Road 37. It is anticipated that this will be a private street that will be under common ownership between the three lots. PUD agreements must be established for a property owners association that would be responsible for the long term maintenance and upkeep of that shared driveway access. Access. The proposed subdivision would include the dedication of additional right-of- way for a new off ramp from 1-94. It appears that with this dedication there is flexibility in the siting of where the ramp will intersect with County Road 37. Any future design of that area will be subject to review and approval by City Engineer, MnDOT, and Wright County. C! The proposed access to the commercial area would be' applicant has located this access point approximately 320I, off ramp from 1-94. Spacing and sight line configure approved by the County, however, in examination of the 5 of the proposed plan, it appears that it is well conceivj location and lot configuration. off of County Road 37. The feet east of the proposed new tion must be reviewed and to accesspoint in the context :d in relationship to building Internal circulation appears to work with regard to automobile traffic. However, we would raise concerns with the circulation of large trucks serving the convenience store, restaurant, and potentially the retail center. The applicant should show truck turning radii and truck circulation patterns through the site. Parking. The applicant has identified parking spaces or the site plan. The following illustrates what is proposed versus what is required by Section '1200.9 of the City Zoning Ordinance. We do not have a definitive building floor plans. As such; the required parking calculations are just estimates at this point. These will need to be worked through in greater detail as we move to development stage. Proposed equired Restaurant 125 137 (based on 1000 square foot kitchen area) Hotel 88 88 Convenience Store --+-235 1 22 30 stalls (based on,' proposed square footage plus carwash Total 255 An issue does arise as to the parking lot dimensions. It appears that the double loaded parking areas have a 60 foot dimension. By City regulation, these must be 64 feet. The adjustment to City standards will be required as part of development stage approval. This could have an influence on overall site design in that there is already issue with the restaurant parking falling within the wetland buffer zone. As we proceed to development and final stage PUD, documents must be provided that illustrate cross access easements between the lots so that the shared driveways can be identified. In conjunction with that, we would also like to see the long term maintenance agreements for the private streets that will be owned in corjnmon by the three lots. Landscaping. The site plan illustrates a generalized ''landscape plan that is fairly attractive. Greater detail will be given as we move to development stage based on anticipated sight lines into the site and areas that require) additional screening. At the time of development stage, we will require a more detailed landscape plan that identifies plants by species, size, and number. 5 Building Design Criteria. No building design features have been submitted with this concept stage review. As we move to development stage, the City will have expectations that as part of the PUD, architectural guidelines will be established for the overall site plan and will be used to control the architectural appearance of the restaurant, convenience store, hotel or retail center. The site's location at the entryway of Albertville will mandate that the buildings be build of premium materials and design. As such, as a condition of moving to development stage, we will ask that the architectural guidelines and colored building elevations be submitted for City approval of the overall PUD process. Trash Enclosures. With the exception of the convenience store, the other sites do not illustrate location for trash equipment. The City will mandate that these be identified on the development stage plans in conjunction with any building development and that the trash enclosures be designed in a manner that is consistent with the architectural exterior finishes. of the buildings. Signage. Within the concept plan, the applicant has identified sign locations near the off ramp of 1-94 and at the entrance off of County Road 37. The applicant should demonstrate their expectations for signage and how it will be used or shared amongst the three parcels. Any signage shall be reviewed against !the City's Sign Regulations, Lighting. As noted in the Architectural Design Guidelines, this is a dominant gateway area for Albertville. All lighting that is located within this', site will be required to be 90 degree cut off lighting, directs all lighting downward. ,Gasoline canopy must have lighting that is recessed into the canopy. The exterior fascia of the canopy will not be allowed to be illuminated except for approved signage. An overall photometric plan will be required for the site that demonstrates that the site will not exceed the City standards for glare at the property lines. CONCLUSION The proposed concept plan is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The City must make a determination as to the appropriateness of the uses and site design that are being offered by the applicant. In general, we believe th',at the overall concept is well designed as each of the uses are well related to one another. If it is determined that the concept plan is appropriate, the Planning Commission and City Council may direct the applicant to proceed to development stage conditional use planned unit development provided the following items areaddressed: The applicant provide information that illustrates the percent impervious surface requirement or the flexibility, the existing impervious surface based on south. restaurant site meets the 85 City approves, as a PUD the site and the outlot to the O 2. The City Engineer determines that the outlot for dedication as part of the 1-94 freeway is of sufficient size and configuration to accommodate future off ramp planning. 3. The second outlot is properly sized to provide a'30 foot buffer area from the ordinary high water mark of the wetland in accordance with City ordinance. 4. As part of the development stage PUD, the applicant must provide association documents that outline how access easements will be established, how the shared access will be maintained, along with other maintenance of common areas. 5. Access from County Road 37 is approved by Wright County. 6. The applicant's submission of floor plans and parking calculations that are consistent with the City's Zoning Ordinance. 7. The applicant's site plan provides parking dimensions that are consistent with City requirements. 8. The applicant provide architectural guidelines and colored building elevations that illustrate the architectural stylings of each of the proposed uses. 9. The site plan be revised to identify service areas and trash enclosures for each of the uses. All trash enclosures shall be -constructed in a manner that is consistent with the architectural exterior finishes of the buildin6s. 10. The applicant provide a signage plan that illustrates what is intended for the overall site signage. 11. The applicant provide a detailed lighting plan in conjunction with development stage drawings that illustrate both the type of lighting that is being proposed as well as a photometric plan to illustrate foot candle locations on the property. PC.. Mike Couri Pete Carlson Neil Weber, Weber Architects George Daniels, Boulder Properties 7 12 July 2003 Submittal for; GENERAL CONCEPT STAGE PHIL MORRIS PROPERTY ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA 1. GENERAL INTRODUCTION The vacant site is located adjacent to the freeway exit as it joins CR 37. It is currently zoned B3. We are requesting approval for a general concept for a PUD. We are attempting to gain recognition,' for the uses to be provided to the City of Albertville. Our plan asks approval for a family restaurant, a',convenience store, and a hotel or retail development. The first two uses are to be approved as ones that will be provided. The Hotel would be our number one choice for the third site. If the market dictates that a hotel will not work, we would like to develop that site for retail. We are asking for approval of the concept plan for a PUD which requires a conditional use approval. Therefore this submittajl is for; 1. A site plan review 2. A conditional use approval 2. PROPERTY OWNER The property owner is; Phil Morris 612-812-9061 603 Lake Street, #302 Excelsior, Minnesota 55331 3. APPLICANT This submittal is being presented by Weber Architects & Planners (Neil Weber) and Boulder Properties) George Daniels', as a representatives of the owner. The applicants are; Neil Weber, AIA 952-476-4434 Weber Architects & Planners 2280 Watertown Road, Suite 100 Long Lake, Minnesota 55356 EXHIBIT A George Daniels 952-476-4036 Boulder Properties 641 Lake Street Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 4. PRESENT STATUS OF PROPERTY The property is currently vacant and is zoned B3. The property is vacant The legal description of the property is; That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 120, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota that lies North and East of the right of way of Interstate Highway Number 94 5. AREA MAP Attached is a map that locates the site within the community. 6. WRITTEN STATEMENT OF PRPOSED PUD We are proposing three uses for this site. 1. Convenience Store A moderate size store with gas will work well with the restaurant and hotel/retail use on the site. The building will be screened from the street with landscaping to reduce the impact while allowing visibility to a degree required for marketing purposes. 2. Restaurant A 6,000 sf restaurant will be a welcome addition to the City of Albertville. It will be a family restaurant that will serve the communities. 3. a. Hotel An 88 unit hotel will provide the development to the east side of the site. The hotel will compliment the convenience store and restaurant development on the west side of the site. A pool will be located towards the south side of the building. b. Retail Should the market not be able to support the hotel concept on the site, we would propose to develop this lot for retail uses. Appropriate parking and screening is provided on this site. In all cases we will be bringing back each use for individual approval once specific users can be found for the sites. 7. SITE CONDITIONS Sheet number 6 of our drawings shows the delineated wetlands and the topography at one foot increments. The site is highest along the road and tapers toward the highway with a large wetland next the exit ramp from the freeway. 8. SITE CALCULATIONS See attached table for the area calculations of each of the sites. 9. UTILITIES The utilities are located in the street and connections will be shown when we bring forward final plans for each of the sites. a aaa a a LO r CD 00 O N C) LO r ' c- r�- LL LL LL LL LL LI) U ` to U) fn V) N to 00 O LO O r- O CD <D N qt N LO N LO 00 M r 00 t1) 00 N s' cn a Z w O a a cnW wF- F-� n Qua U 7)°J CLLI J H U) a a a Q V LU U F- L) =z� U-Z- W H > W Q F— cn Z t— E-- w 0 0 w 0 0 U� =U= ZUF— SITE LOCATION MAP 50 ....... .. .. �WL96&S PROPERTY ALBERT-Vil I F NAINNFqr)TA Puoco.cEll s".1- - PHIL MORRIS PROPERTY ALBERTN/li i F AA-I.C-. r - ucti +�. — oo f IIZr I m o 0 t o r / m I m _ �i j v ,.,�•- T PHIL MORRIS PROPERTY •• e Al RFRT\/II I F MINNFC(1TA m x 00 m WDk6 PRRIS PROPERTY 154 m x a �E PHIL MORRIS PROPERTY NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 pfanners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville City Council Linda Goeb, City Administrator FROM: John Glomski DATE: August 13, 2003 RE: Albertville Zoning Ordinance Amendments - Fences FILE NO: 163.05 03.09 The Planning Commission held discussion on August 12, 2003 in regards to various options for revising the City's Zoning Ordinance as to the placement and height of residential fences. At the meeting, it was realized that the exhibits illustrating the different options for fence placement were not included within the Planning Commission member's packets. Furthermore, it was realized the following day that the Planning Commission members may have been looking at a memorandum dated July 2"d, 2003 rather than the most up to date memo. Regardless, staff was able to handout copies of the diagrams and report on the two options described in the August 5, 2003 memorandum. The Planning Commission recommended approval of option 1 with minor revisions. Staff has made the required revisions to option 1 to adequately reflect the Planning Commissions recommendation and have included it as option 3 within this packet. The August 5, 2003 report is included herein, as well as both Options 1 and 2 as presented and discussed at the Planning Commission. pc: Mike Couri, City Attorney W NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis park, MN 55416 Telephone-: 952.595.9833 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Linda Goeb FROM: Alan Brixius DATE: August 5, 2003 RE: Albertville Zoning Ordinance Amendments — Fences FILE NO: 163.05 — 03.09 BACKGROUND As requested by the Planning Commission, City Staff has re-evaluated the language addressing residential fences. Concern was expressed over both the height and placement of fences. In our review of the fence regulations, we believe that the current language is confusing and hard to understand with regard to fence location. Additionally, pursuant to the Planning Commission recommendation, we have reduced the residential fence height from 8 feet to 6 feet. Attached please find two options for addressing residential fences. Option 1 Within Option 1, we have removed language that we felt to be confusing pertaining to the location of boundary line fences on residential lots and replaced it with new language. The new language is illustrated in Provisions 1 and 2 underlined. In provision 1 we attempt to clarify where a 6 foot high boundary line fence maybe located. In this case we allow for 6 foot high boundary line fences along all side and rear line, provided it will not extend forward of the principal structure. However, in the case of a corner lot abutting a street, we require a minimum fence setback of 20 feet. Comment: Provision 1 is intended to provide greater clarity for the placement of the fences, and is intended to reduce the fence height from 8 feet to 6 feet in residential areas and is intended to maintain a side yard setback where the fence abuts up a side yard abutting a street. Provision 2. This language is intended to provide greater clarity where a rear lot abuts a side lot line of an adjoining lot. In this case, the fence may follow the rear lot line to a point equal to the required front yard setback of the abutting lot. At that point no fence greater than 42 inches may be allowed. Option 1 is illustrated in the attached exhibits. Option 2 Replicates Option 1 with one exception. In Option 2, provision 1 states that fences no more than 6 feet in height may be erected along the side or rear property lines provided such fences do not extend forward of the principal structure. In this provision, we did not include the 20 foot setback for side yard abutting a public right-of-way. Basically, the intent of this is to provide more yard within the fenced area by allowing the boundary line fence to extend to the property line. The Planning Commission must make a determination as to whether a minimum setback should be established for the 6 foot fence or whether this option would be more preferred. The amendments have associated diagrams that display corner lots within residential neighborhoods. We would intend to include the diagrams in the Zoning Ordinance to provide a clear description of fence location requirements. RECOMMENDATION The revised zoning amendments regarding residential fences have been directed by the Planning Commission. The amendments have been reviewed based on requirements of the Zoning Ordnance with the intent of providing greater clarity and understanding on how the fence location requirements are applied. Two options are offered for Planning Commission review and recommendation to Council. We ask that the Planning Commission review and discuss both options and make a determination as to which ordinance amendment is the most appropriate for the City of Albertville. PC: Mike Couri, City Attorney 2 OPTION 1 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2003- AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AMENDMENTS TO THE ALBERTVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE The City Council of the City of Albertville ordains - Section 1. Section 1000.7 (g) (Residential District Fences) is hereby amended by adding the language identified with underlined text and deleting language shown with a line through the text then renumbering the subsequent sections- `k-_ the Gase efGGrner let whiGh abuts a stFeet,- RGes aIG'0 side-pfopeky lines shall notbe - eight - -t i"eight fGFthe x - e e a -s a -Ge-along--SUGh--&ide-propert-y--fine--t-o-a-pGint ffinGiple StFUGture on the let-. all _ _ -- .. a[Gng-a--r-ear-Pr-opert-y-tine-w-hich--line--constitutes-t#e--side-tot--I+ne-of-are-abutting let shall not eXGeed eight (8) feet iR height. 1 Fences not more than six 6 feet in height may be erected along side and rear..property lines provided such fences do not extend forward of the principal structure. In the case of a side yard on a corner lot that abuts a street a minimum fence setback of twenty 20 feet shall be maintained see Diagram 2 Should the rear lot line of a lot be common with the side lot line of an abutting lot that portion of the rear or side lot equal to the required front yard setback of the abutting lot shall not be fenced to a height of more than forty-two 42 inches. For the ur ose of this section the front and sideyards of the abutting lot shall be as defined in this Ordinance rather than as related to the orientation of the house see Diagram 7.b . L4-)(3) The required screening provisions for residential districts shall supersede, where applicable, the provisions of this Subsection. J&)(4)-All posts or similar supporting instruments used in the construction of fences shall be faced inward toward the property being fenced. All fences shall not obstruct natural drainage. f 4(6) Fences extending across required front yards OF a reqUiFed side yard which --- abuts --a --- &treat on a corner- tot --shall not exceed forty-two (42) inches in height, and shall be at least seventy-five (75) percent open space for passage of air and light, shall not be constructed of chain link and shall maintain the traffic visibility requirements of Section 1000.8 of this Chapter. 18)(7) Interior yard fences are permitted provided they do not exceed forty-two (42) inches in height and conform to subsection (c) through (g) of this Section. Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and publication. APPROVED by the Albertville City Council this day of CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Donald Peterson, Mayor ATTEST- Bridget Miller, Deputy Clerk 2003. TRAFFIC VISIBILITY TRIANGLE 11111t111111'1' FENCE UP TO 4 FEET IN HEIGHT FENCE -UP TO 6 FEET IN HEIGHT DIAGRAM 7.A I TRAFFIC VISIBILITY TRIANGLE nuwuuuu FENCE UP TO 4 FEET IN HEIGHT FENCE UP TO 6 FEET IN HEIGHT DIAGRAM 7.6 OPTION 2 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2003- AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AMENDMENTS TO THE ALBERTVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE The City Council of the City of Albertville ordains: Section 1. Section 1000.7 (g) (Residential District Fences) is hereby amended by adding the language identified with underlined text and deleting language shown with a line through the text then renumbering the subsequent sections: -- aIGRg side PFC)peFty lines shall nGt be mGre than eight (8) feet in height fe"he the--rear--let-firie--and--pr,GGeeding--t-henGe-along--SUGh--side-prGper-t-y--tine--to-,a-point thereen whiGh woulddbe - -d by the frGRt wall "Re of - existing aluftiRg4et--s,hu,�_I.1_nnt evneed eight (8) foot in height, s along-a--rear--propert-y-tiee-w-hieh--line--consstitutes-the--side-tot--line-ef-are-abl+tt+ng let shah not eXGeed eight (8) feet irni-rhieight. 1 Fences not more than six 6 feet in height may be erected alonq side and rear property lines provided such fences do not extend forward of the principal structure (see Diagram 7.a). 2 Should the rear lot line of a lot be common with the side lot line of an abuttin,q lot that portion of the rear or side lot a ual to the required front yard setback of the abutting lot shall not be fenced to a height of more than forty-two (42) inches. For the purpose of this section the front and side yards of the abutting lot shall be as defined in this Ordinance rather than as related to the orientation of the house (see Diagram 7.b). f4)(3) _The required screening provisions for residential districts shall supersede, where applicable, the provisions of this Subsection. 64 �W4) All posts or similar supporting instruments used in the construction of fences shall be faced inward toward the property being fenced. (64(5) All fences shall not obstruct natural drainage. (7-4(6) Fences extending across required front yards per a equ+Fed-stile-yard t-shall not exceed forty-two (42) inches in height, --and--shall be at least seventy-five (75) percent open space for passage of air and light, shall not be constructed of chain link and shall maintain the traffic visibility requirements of Section 1000.8 of this Chapter. W7) Interior yard fences are permitted provided they do not exceed forty-two (42) inches in height and conform to subsection (c) through (g) of this Section. Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and publication. APPROVED by the Albertville City Council this day of ATTEST: IN Bridget Miller, Deputy Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Donald Peterson, Mayor 2003. TRAFFIC VISIBILITY TRIANGLE I' H w w F- cn .............iQ �11 11tO11111111 FENCE UP TO 4 FEET IN HEIGHT 'AKMM FENCE UP TO 6 FEET IN HEIGHT DIAGRAM TA •r r TRAFFIC VISIBILITY TRIANGLE I� O w w cn fr■1� uwuwuw FENCE UP TO 4 FEET IN HEIGHT FENCE UP TO 6 FEET IN HEIGHT DIAGRAM 7.13 OPTION 3 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2003- AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AMENDMENTS TO THE ALBERTVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE The City Council of the City of Albertville ordains: Section 1. Section 1000.7 (g) (Residential District Fences) is hereby amended by adding the language identified with underlined text and deleting language shown with a line through the text then renumbering the subsequent sections: al-Gn i - -e3Fty lines shall Rot be -might1Q) feet in heig4#-fGr4he t-he-reaF--lot-line--and--pr-oc-,eeding--thenGe-along--SUGfl--side-prGper-ty-tir--+e--t,o--a--point existing lot. (2) e Ges along e whi GTh is also the rve c'ar-��irlTf'iV-ef aR abutting--lot--shall--not--exceed--eight-(}-feed^ hT, hergh - along-a--r-ear---praper-ty--line-which--tir-+e--constitutes-the--s+de--lot--I+ne--of--ao--abutting } in height-. 1 Fences not more than six 6 feet in height may be erected along side and rear ro ert lines provided such fences do not extend forward of the principal structure. In the case of a side yard on a corner lot that abuts a street a minimum fence setback of twenty. (20) feet shall be maintained for all fences --'.................................................................................................................................................................................-........-- .._....----.......... s exceedin fort -two 42 inches in hei ht. see Dia ram 7.a . f2) Should the rear lot line of a corner lot be common with the side lot line of an abutting lot; a minimum (20) foot side yard setback must be maintained on the corner lot for all fences _exceeding forty-two 42 inches in hei ht, see Diagram (4)(3) The required screening provisions for residential districts shall supersede, where applicable, the provisions of this Subsection. F5 W All posts or similar supporting instruments used in the construction of fences shall be faced inward toward the property being fenced. Tj-)(5) All fences shall not obstruct natural drainage. {7-)(6) Fences extending across required front yards or ---a ---- required ---side --- yard whiGh- ab is a Street ^^ a GGFReF lot shall not exceed forty-two (42) inches in height., and shall be at least seventy-five (75) percent open space for passage of air and light, shall not be constructed of chain link and shall maintain the traffic visibility requirements of Section 1000.8 of this Chapter. f84(7) Interior yard fences are permitted provided they do not exceed forty-two (42) inches in height and conform to subsection (c) through (g) of this Section. Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and publication. APPROVED by the Albertville City Council this day of ATTEST. - IN Bridget Miller, Deputy Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Donald Peterson, Mayor 2003. TRAFFIC VISIBILITY TRIANGLE -1� mmmwtm��ll O I. -ICE w w �I 1100111111 FENCE UP TO 4 FEET IN HEIGHT FENCE UP TO 6 FEET IN HEIGHT DIAGRAM TA 70 I TRAFFIC VISIBILITY TRIANGLE "I'lu"I'llu FENCE UP TO 4 FEET IN HEIGHT =�ml FENCE UP TO 6, FEET IN HEIGHT DIAGRAM 7.B 71 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 planners@nacplanning.com MEMORANDUM TO: Linda Goeb FROM: John Glomski / Alan Brixius DATE: July 9, 2003 RE: Albertville — Swimming Pools NAC FILE: 163.05 — 03.03 At the request of the -Mayor and in conjunction with a recent swimming pool application, we have been asked to investigate the swimming pool regulations within the Albertville Zoning Code. Specific concern was the type and height of fences that secure private swimming pools. After investigating the specific application with Jon Sutherland, other issues arose related to deck extension, as well as location of pool filtering and heating systems in close proximity to adjoining property lines. This being the case, we have re-evaluated Section 1000.5 of the Albertville City Code and offer the attached ordinance change. Specifically, the ordinance change is consistent with the current language in that it requires a permit for all swimming pools, but spells out the requirements for site plan and construction drawings so that the Building Inspector will have an opportunity to review all elements of the pool prior to permit approval. Secondly, we have established a more specific list of setbacks for the swimming pool and fences. The next part of the ordinance relates to securing of the pool with appropriate fences or security enclosures. Specifically, we have increased the required fence height to five feet. We have prohibited the use of chain link fences, security fences for swimming pools. We have still maintained a requirement for latch gates and we have spelled out the requirements for the proper setbacks of these fences. The new ordinance also provides some standards for commercial or public swimming pools that may be associated with a hotel or an apartment building. The City can make a determination as to the appropriateness of these, but we felt since we are already looking at the issue, they should be included. 79 We believe that the changes that have been made are reflective of the issues that were raised by the City Building Inspector, as well as the Planning Commission's at their July 8th, 2003 meeting. pc: Mike Couri Jon Sutherland Pete Carlson 73 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2003- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1000.5, SWIMMING POOLS OF THE ALBERTVILLE ZONING ORDINANCE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE ORDAINS. - Section 1. Section 1000.5, Swimming Pools, of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance is repealed in its entirety. Section 2. Section 1000.5, Swimming Pools, of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance is hereby replaced as follows: 1000.5 Swimming Pools. (a) A building permit shall be required for any swimming pool that is over twenty-four (24) inches in height or depth, measured from ground level. This includes in -ground swimming pools, above ground pools, on -ground swimming pools and fixed -in -place wading pools. (b) An application for the construction of swimming pools shall be on a City application form and accompanied by a fee established by City Council ordinance. The permit application shall include: (1) Site plan illustrating: a. Type and size of pool. b. Location of the pool on the lot. C. Location of other buildings and structures on the lot. d. Location of structures on adjoining lots. e. Location of filter and heating units. f. Location of pumps and wiring. g. Location of back flush and drain outlets. h. Location of any overhead or underground utilities or utility easements. Fence locations. 2. Building Plans. a. Swimming pool design b. Fencing and gate details. C. Deck or surfacing details. (c) Single Family or Two Family Dwelling Pools. (1) Setbacks and Location Standards. a. Pools shall not be located in front of the principal building. b. Pools shall not be located in the required side yard of any zoning district. C. Pools shall not be located closer than (10) feet from the rear property line. d. The filter unit, pump, heating unit, and any noise making mechanical equipment shall be located not closer than twenty (20) feet to any lot line or ten (10) feet from any lot line if located within an insulated building to buffer noise. e. Pools shall not be located beneath overhead utility lines nor over underground utility lines of any type. f. Pools shall not be located within any private or public utility, walkway, drainage or other easement, PrXL-Sn appoygfty!j�"j& g. Pools shall be set back at least six (6) feet from the principal building or frost footing. (2) Lighting for the pool shall be designed with (90) degree cut off and hooded to direct lighting toward the pool and not toward adjacent property. (3) All swimming pools for which a building permit is required shall be provided with safeguards to prevent children from gaining uncontrolled E access. This can be accomplished with fencing, or other enclosure, or any combination thereof, of sufficient density as to be impenetrable. a. If fences are employed, they shall be at least five (5) feet in height. The bottoms of the fences shall not be more than four (4) inches from the ground. Fences shall be of a non -corrosive material and shall be constructed as to be not easily climbable (chain link fences must be vinyl coated with slats for screening) All fence openings or points of entry into the pool enclosure shall be equipped with gates or doors. All gates or doors to swimming pools shall be equipped with self -closing and self -latching devices placed at a height not lower than (48) inches so as to be inaccessible to all small children. Prior to filling the pool, the approved fence or enclosure must be completely in place and inspected and approved by the City Building Inspector. b. Swimming pool fences shall comply with fence setback standards of Section 1000.6 of this Chapter. C. Required structure or safety fencing shall be completely installed within three (3) weeks following the installation of the pool, before any water is allowed in the pool, and prior to final inspection. (4) Water Quality/Drainage. a. Water in the pool shall be maintained in a suitable manner to avoid health hazard of any type. b. Back flush or pool drainage water shall be directed onto the property on which the swimming pool is located and ultimately to public storm sewer, if available. C. Drainage of pools directly into public streets or other public drainageways shall require written permission of the Zoning Administrator and/or Public Works Director. Draining pool into the sanitary sewer is prohibited. (d) For private swimming pools which are intended for and used by the occupants of a multiple family dwelling and the guests of the occupants, or for private and public clubs and organizations, the following regulations shall be met in addition to those listed for single and two family dwellings provided in Section 1000.5(c) above. (1) No part of the water surface of the swimming pool shall be less than fifty (50) feet from any lot line. 3 (2) No pumps, filter or other apparatus used in connection with or to service a swimming pool shall be located less than fifty (50) feet from any lot line and must be contained within an insulated building. (3) The pool area shall be adequately fenced to prevent uncontrolled access from the street or adjacent property. Fences shall be at least five f5) feet in height. The bottoms of the fences shall not be more than four (4) inches from the ground. Fences shall be of a non -corrosive material and shall be constructed as to be not easily climbable (chain link fences must be vinyl coated with slats for screening) All fence openings or points of entry into the pool enclosure shall be equipped with gates or doors All gates or doors to swimming pools shall be equipped with self -closing and self -latching devices placed at a height not lower than (48) inches so as to be inaccessible to all small children. Prior to filling the pool the approved fence or enclosure must be completely in place and inspected and approved by the City Building Inspector. Adequate screening including but not limited to landscaping shall be placed between the pool area and adjacent lot lines. (4) All deck areas, adjacent patios, or other similar areas used in conjunction with the swimming pool shall be located at least thirty (30) feet from any lot line. (5) To the extent possible, back flush water or water from pool drainage shall be directed onto the owner's property and -to the nearest public storm sewer or drainage easement. Draining pools into the sanitary sewer is prohibited. Section 3. Effective Date. This amendment shall be in full force and effect immediately following its passage and publication. APPROVED by the Albertville City Council this day of 2003. ATTEST. - A: Bridget Miller, Deputy Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Donald Peterson, Mayor 4 A i 08/13/03 16:34 FAX 320 229 4301 SEH Albertville Public Works Facility Base Pian Means Cost Inflation 2003 Cost per Foot Factor per Foot Vehicle / Equipment Storage Operations Warm Vehicte/Equipment Storage including Sign Storage and Tools and Supplies $00.00 0.05 250.00 Wash bay equipment $25,000.00 D.05 $26,250.00 Vehicle/ Equipment Maintenance Operations (SHOP) Note: This could be future Vehicle Maintenance Tools and Supplies (included with maintenance/welding bays) Maintenance/welding Bays Parts Storage Wood/Paint Shop (Not Booth) Hazardous Materials Storage Safety Hygene (included in maintenance/welding bay) Air Compressor Room MechanciaVelectrlcai Walls and Circulation (15%) $85.55 Shop Subtotal $12.000.00 Trolley Hoist $13,700.00 Hydraulic Vehicle Lift 7 HP Air Compressor $,.00 Lube Equipment $8,72525.00 Facility Support Open Office for Workstation, GIS Workstation Superintendents Office Conference Room (included in training room) Central Files and Office Equipment (included in open office) Flat File Storage Room Included in open office) Training Room/ Break/ Maintenance Manual Library :ustodial Space „Aechanical room (included in veh.nle maintenance) Circulation and Walls Office Subtotal $105.65 Locker Rooms / Restrooms $250.00 Lockers $250.00 Cold Storage (60' wide x 80' long Pole Barn Type; (Future', Building Subtotal Site Requirements Litilities, Pavement / Surfacing, Gi ading 1 Landscaping Salt,Shad Note: This could be future Project Soft Costs Professional Fees Legal/ Fiscal Fees Testing / Permitting / Survey Fixtures, Furnishings and Equipment Commurications and Misc. Systems Opinion of Total Project Costs 005 $89.83 0,05 $12,600.00 0.05 $14.385.00 0.05 $3,360.00 0.05 $9,161.25 0.05 $110.93 0.05 $262,50 0.05 $262.50 0.05 $52.50 ALBERTVILLE Z 002/002 Square Footage Cost 15% of Cuilding Construction Costs $35.00 005 $36.75 Site Subtotal Project Subtotal Estimate/Construction Contingency Project W/ Contingency 12600 0 2500 200 0 200 0 200 300 465 3865 1 0 150 150 0 0 0 262 64 0 370 996 300 12 0 3000 10% 15% $869,872.50 $26,250.00 $347,183.29 $12,600.00 $0.00 $3,360.00 $9,161.25 $110,533.14 $76,750.00 $3,150.00 $0.00 $1,460,860.18 $2 t 9,129,03 $110,250.00 $329,379.03 $1,7g0,239.21 $179,023.92 $1,969,263.13 $295,389.47 , $2264, 052 68 Bl13/2003 081303B3s9est.xls r f � CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE 2003-16 AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING CONSTRUCTION SITES TO BE FREE OF DEBRIS The City Council of the City of Albertville, Minnesota, hereby ordains as follows: Section 1. Definitions. The following terms shall have the following meanings: A. Debris shall mean all excess construction materials, construction material shipping cartons, construction material packaging, and used construction materials which are present at a construction site and which are not secured in a Construction Debris Container as defined herein. B. Construction Materials shall mean all materials of any type which are used in the construction of a house, building, or other structure, including, but not limited to, lumber, plastics, metal, asphalt and fiberglass shingles, fiberglass, vinyl, glass, ceramic, and other composite building materials. C. Construction Site shall mean a property in the City of Albertville on which a structure is being constructed upon which a temporary or final occupancy permit has not yet been issued. D. City shall mean the City of Albertville. E. Construction Debris Container shall mean a rigid, free-standing enclosure consisting of a solid metal bottom and solid metal sides constructed in such a manner that no gaps, holes or other spaces exist between the sides or between the bottom and sides, and which has a cover made of netting or a solid, rigid material which covers the entire top of the enclosure and does not allow materials from inside the enclosure to exit the enclosure when the cover is closed. Section 2. Prohibition. All construction sites shall be free of debris at all times. Section 3. Use of Construction Debris Containers. All construction sites shall have a Construction Debris Container located on site, and all construction debris shall be contained within such container at all times. All Construction Debris Containers shall be securely covered at all times (the cover may be removed only for such time as is necessary to deposit or remove construction debris from the container) such that no debris is able to leave the enclosure by force of wind, gravity or other event. Section 4. Inspection. The City's Building Inspector may refuse to inspect any property and may issue a stop work order on any property which: A. Contains debris that is not in a fully enclosed Construction Debris Container; B. Does not have a Construction Debris Container located on site; or C. Has a Construction Debris Container which does not meet the requirements of this ordinance or which is not securely covered. Upon compliance with this ordinance, any stop work order so issued may be rescinded and inspections may resume. Section 5. Violation. Any person or entity in violation of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to 51,000.00, plus the City's costs of prosecution. Section 6. Repealer: Albertville City Ordinance 2003-01 is hereby repealed. This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication in the official newspaper of the City. Passed this 18th day of August, 2003. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor 2 COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE • MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT August 12, 2003 Linda Goeb, City Adminstrator 5975 Main Avenue NE P.O. Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301 Re: Signage for Albertville Crossing Dear Linda: Per our phone conversation on Tuesday, August 12, I would appreciate it if you would notify the council that my partnership would be very interested in a directional sign at 37 and County Road 19. We would commit to leasing space immediately and would be willing to look into participation of the construction of the sign. Our tenants have expressed extreme interest on having signage near the outlet mall. One restaurant actually put a sign on a truck, which we do not approve of, but his business increased that day by 50%. We have also been in contact with Hoey Outdoor Advertising about the billboard sign they have on 19 near the bridge. The Lion's Tap restaurant is presently on that sign. They said they could expand it by 14 x 48 feet but would need a variance by the council. We could also live with this signage if the council so permitted. I am faxing this letter to you now, but will also mail it to you. 15600 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 201 • Wayzata, Minnesota 55391 Office (952) 476-9400 • Fax (952) 476-9401 81 .! # August 14, 2003 6120 Kalland Circle Albertville,MN 55301 Albertville City Council Albertville City Hall 5975 Main Avenue NE Albertville, MN 55301 Dear Mayor Peterson and City Council Members: I understand that there has been an unexpected vacancy on Albertville's City Council. Please accept this letter of intent as my interest in becoming a member of this Council. In the four years I have lived in Albertville I have seen many exciting changes to the city and would love to be a part of its future. I believe that I have experience that would be helpful to a growing community. I am a consumer affairs examiner for the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. One of the most exciting parts of my job is meeting with community officials and organizations in an attempt to evaluate a bank's performance under the Community Reinvestment Act. The Community Reinvestment Act ensures that bank's meet the credit needs of the entire community of which it serves including low and moderate -income people and small businesses. I have had the opportunity to speak with planning committee members, housing officials, and small business development organizations for a variety of small communities throughout the Midwest. I find it very interesting to see how different communities address similar issues. Further, I think this will be helpful knowledge as a member of Albertville's City Council. Prior to my employment with the Federal Reserve Bank, I have worked for various local community banks in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area in a similar capacity. My educational background includes a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Minnesota in Sociology of Law, Criminology, and Deviance. I also have a paralegal certificate from the Minnesota Paralegal Institute. Please know that a full resume is available upon request. I can be reached at 763-497- 0639. I am looking forward to discussing my application for membership on the City Council further. cerely4.h � c� Dorothy 1 � M August 13, 2003 To Whom It May Concern: I am writing in regards to an opening on the Albertville City Counsel. I am very interested in being a candidate for consideration. My name is Brian Lewis. I have been a resident of Albertville_ for 12 years. I live at 5660 Lambert Avenue, with my wife and two daughters. We have been members of St. Albert's Catholic Church for many years. I am an active member of the Albertville Fire Department, and have beery for 7 years. Currently, I hold an officers position, and have also served as President, and served on the ladder truck committee and also the current truck committee. I am employed, full time at Rock- Tenn Company in Maple Grove in sales. I have always been interested in the affairs and events of the City of Albertville, and I believe my involvement and loyalty with the fire department reflect that. I hope that you will give me the opportunity to serve the City c f Albertville with the same dedication and loyalty. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 40�- A-4'� Brian Lewis a Ib£rtvi l le 5975 Main Avenue N.E. • PO. Box 9 • Albertville, MN 55301 • (763) 497-3384 • Fax: (763) 497-3210 Small Town UNng. 819 City We. � w August 15, 2003 Mayor Don Peterson, and Albertville City Council Members Albertville City Hall Albertville, MN 55301 d Dear Mayor and Council, Please accept this letter as official notification that I will retire_ from my position with the City of Albertville effective November 30, 2003. 1 hope that by giving you advanced notice of my pending retirement, you will have ample time to find a replacement. I view my retirement with some mixed emotions. My position with the City of Albertville has been both a challenging and�a rewarding experience. I have enjoyed working with both the current, as well as previous, City CounciFs and staff. As,City Administrator, I have met many genuinely nice people in all professions. I am very proud of the progress the City has seen over the past several years, and 1 will miss the excitement of participating in its continuing growth and development. I > do believe we have a dedicated and capable staff, who will continue to provide excellent service to the City. I will miss working with them. However, I also welcome the opportunities to travel and to have time to devote to my hobbies. I am confident that I can count on your continuing support during the remainder of my employment. b Sincerel Linda Goeb City Administrator 0*