The URL can be used to link to this page

2001-02-05 CC PacketALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA February 5, 2001 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL - ADOPT AGENDA 2. MINUTES (a) January 16, 2001, City Council Meeting 3. CITIZEN FORUM - (10 Minute Limit) 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) Approve payment of claims 5. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS a. Public Works (1) Public Works/Parks Report (2) Nextel Two-way Radio/Cell Phone Purchase (3) Wastewater/Water Department Report b. Planning & Zoning (1) Albertville Heritage — Concept Review (2) Casey's General Store (Parkside Commercial Center) • Site Plan Review • Conditional Use Permit for Gas Sales (3) Albertville Plaza • Amended PUD • Preliminary & Final Plat (4) Culver's Site Plan (Albertville Plaza) (5) Multi -Tenant Retail Building Site Plan (Albertville Plaza) C. Fire Department • Discuss purchase of new fire truck d. Engineering (1) Authorize Feasibility Study for sewer, water and street improvements to City property located north of the mall (2) Discuss regrading of swale located on the city property north of the mall City Council Agenda February 5, 2001 Page 2 of 2 e. Administration (1) Discuss conducting a joint meeting with the City of St. Michael (2) Amendment to Resolution #1999-31 (EDA Membership) (3) Discuss of the Relocation of the Wright County Garage f. Legal • Closed Session to discuss pending litigation 6. ADJOURNMENT ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL January 16, 2001 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor John Olson, Councilmembers LeRoy Berning, Scott Wallace, and John Vetsch, City Engineer Peter Carlson and City Administrator -Clerk Linda Goeb Mayor Olson called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to order. The agenda was amended as follows: • Add Item 6e(4) — Fencing along 57th Berning made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Vetsch made a motion to approve the minutes of the January 16, 2001, regular meeting as presented. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mayor Olsen asked if anyone present wished to address the Council under the Citizen Forum portion of the agenda. No one addressed the Council. Check #'s 14059, 14064, 10466, 10470, 14272, 14078, 14082, 14087, 14088, 14096, 10498 and 14103 were pulled from the Consent Agenda. Vetsch made a motion to approve payment of the checks with the above exceptions. Wallace seconded the motion. All voted aye. Vetsch made a motion to approve the 2001 contract for building inspection services with Diversified Inspection Services. Wallace seconded the motion. All voted aye. Vetsch made a motion to approve the 2001 contract for curbside recycling with Wright Recycling. Wallace seconded the motion. All voted aye. Scott Potter, representing Nextel, made a presentation on the Motorola two-way radio/cell phone that other businesses are using for quicker and easier communication between employees. The proposal that staff recommends includes ten phones —seven for employees, one for the building inspector, one for the engineering inspector, and one for the mayor. Potter explained that he will credit the City's service account for the cost of the phones. The calling plan the staff recommends allows for both two-way radio communication and cell phone service for $40 per month. The Council directed staff to determine if the two-way radios the City owns could be sold back to the company they were purchased from and to determine the cost difference between the Nextel phones and what the City is currently paying. Bob Thistle, representing Springsted, Inc., introduced Paul Steinman, Springsted's Economic Development and Housing specialist. Thistle is concerned that the Council has ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL January 16, 2001 Page 2 of 3 appointed two financial advisors and feels his firm has performed well for the City over the years and should be the only financial advisor the City needs. Vetsch made a motion to approve the Public Works/Parks report. Wallace seconded the motion. All voted aye. Berning made a motion to approve the Wastewater/Water Department Report. Wallace seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mooney Development Corporation has submitted ation store. amended site plan l for modifications to the exterior of their approved Mob g ns proposed only include changes in building design and materials. on was made lng Commission and seconded to reviewed this request at their January 9 meeting deny the requested changes. The vote on the motion s rovedin June 2000. Hlowever, present felt that the exterior materials should rem as app they did not agree that the entrance should remain as approved. Soathee_entrance only and endation to ho Commission was to recommend approval of the modifications require the exterior to be constructed of rockface block and scored glazed block with an EFIS accent band. the Vetsch made a motion to approve the Findingsonly, f with th no Ichanges to theecision vexe or modification to the entrance of the Mobil gas station y, materials. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. City Engineer Carlson explained the developers of the Towne Lakewitary seroject hsrvicto ave petitioned to have the City complete School1an1dtMud Lakes y Study to eXCanrdsonestimated that the cost their proposed development between to prepare the Feasibility Study to be $3,000, which the developer will be required to escrow with the City. Wallace made a motion authorizing the engineer to proceed with All votedaye.a Feasibility Study for the Towne Lakes project. Berning seconded the motion. of Vetsch made a motion to purchase insurance on theseconded the motion. Barthele in the All cunt d $95,000 from LMCIT at an annual cost of $1,135. Wallace aye. The Council discussed appointing someone to co wpi lte the serve until thernextof hmunicipal of former Councilmember Bob Gundersen. The appointee election. 0 ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL January 16, 2001 Page 3 of 3 Berning nominated Keith Franklin to fill the vacant Council seat. There were no other nominations. Olson and Berning voted to appoint Franklin. Wallace voted no, stating he would rather meet with each of the other interested candidates before making an appointment. Vetsch abstained. Berning again nominated Franklin to fill the vacant Council seat. There were no other nominations. Olson, Berning and Vetsch voted to adopt RESOLUTION #2001-3 titled A RESOLUTION APPOINTING KEITH FRANKLIN TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Wallace abstained. The motion carried. Wallace and Franklin were appointed to the Finance Committee. Vetsch and Franklin were appointed to the Public Works Committee. Franklin was appointed as alternate to the Planning Commission and Wallace was appointed as alternate to the Joint Powers Water Board. Olson and Franklin were appointed to the committee working with the owners of the properties adjacent to the City's property located north of the freeway. The fencing along 57`" Street by the Cottages of Albertville is still up. Linda was directed to contact the Townhouse Association to have the fence taken down. After reviewing the claims, Berning made a motion to approve payment of the checks pulled from the Consent Agenda. Franklin seconded the motion. All voted aye. Franklin made a motion to adjourn at 8:30 PM. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye. John A. Olson, Mayor Linda Goeb, City Administrator Ll Ll • CLAIMS LIST February 5, 2001 Check No. Vendor Amount 14138 AEROMIX 2,300.00 14139 BUILDERS CARPET, INC. 361.46 14140 CITY OF MONTICELLO 198.00 14141 DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO. 60.00 14142 DELTA DENTAL 313.50 14143 VOID 14144 ESCHELONTELECOM, INC. 22.61 14145 FRENCH LAKE CURB CO. 672.00 14146 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, INC. 38.40 14147 GRIDOR CONSTRUCTION 169,425.00 14148 HARVEST PRINTING 255.15 14149 HIGHLAND BANK 40.00 14150 L.M.C.I.T. 79.00 14151 LANO EQUIPMENT 10.26 14152 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 360.00 14153 LIDBERG, KATHERINE 250.00 14154 MEDICA 4,102.17 14155 MENARDS 2,211.68 14156 MFAPC 35.00 14157 MIDWEST ANALYTICAL SERVICES 252.00 14158 MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS 202.17 14159 MINNESOTA MAYORS ASSOCIATION 20.00 14160 MN MOTOR VEHICLE 13.50 14161 MORRIS, JAMES 230.00 14162 NCPER S GROUP LIFE INSURANCE 12.00 14163 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 241.26 14164 OFFICE MAX 2,430.41 14165 P.E.R.A 952.49 14166 PMX 333.66 • CLAIMS LIST February 5, 2001 14167 PREMIER 94 TRUCK SERVICES 526.54 14168 RELIANT ENERGY/MINNEGASCO 2,026.97 14169 RUSSELL'S LOCK AND KEY, INC. 39.07 14170 S.E.H./R.C.M. 41,962.57 14171 Void - 14172 SAFETY TRAIN 1,223.00 14173 SPRINT 963.74 14174 Void - 14175 UNLIMITED ELECTRIC 465.01 14176 VERIZON 60.80 14177 WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT. 1,780.16 14178 WRIGHT COUNTY TREASURER 19,466.67 14179 WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC 22.22 14180 XCEL ENERGY 2,867.66 Total Bills 306,791.39 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Thursday, February 01, 2001 Page 1 of 5 Check Detail Register Check Amt Invoice Comment 10100 Security State Bank Unpaid AEROMIX E 601-49450-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip $2,300.00 093144 Rebuilding Service Total AEROMIX $2,300.00 Unpaid BUILDERS CARPET, INC. E 101-41300-570 Office Equip and Furnishings $361.46 R4467 Fumishings/carpet Total BUILDERS CARPET, INC. $361.46 Unpaid CITY OF MONTICELLO E 101-42700-309 Animal Control Contract $198.00 6561 Total CITY OF MONTICELLO $198.00 Unpaid DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO. E 602-49400-208 Training and Instruction $60.00 Metrotech Locating Training Total DAVIES WATER EQUIPMENT CO. $60.00 Unpaid DELTA DENTAL E 601-49450-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) E 602-49400-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) E 101-41300-131 Employer Paid Health E 101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) E 101-45100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) E 101-41400-131 Employer Paid Health Total DELTA DENTAL $33.59 Dental - John/Mike $33.59 Dental - John/Mike $44.78 Dental - Linda $55.99 Dental - Ken/Mike $55.99 Dental - Tim/Mike $89.56 Dental - B/M $313.50 Unpa' EC XPN LOP EN PX RS 60 9450X1ondInter t8,45GO o sE 1-49450t Sry B P1,51GO eso ECDEVEL P, E 9 Unpaid ESCHELONTELEC M, INC. E 101-41400-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $22.61 Total ESCHELONTELECOM, INC. $22.61 Unpaid FRENCH LAKE CURB CO. E 101-43100-400 Repair/Maint - Paved Rd $672.00 2113 Repair 61st Street curb Total FRENCH LAKE CURB CO. $672.00 Unpaid GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, INC. E 601-49450-209 Locates $38.40 120085 Total GOPHER STATE ONE CALL, INC. $38.40 Unpaid GRIDOR CONSTRUCTION E 460-49480-310 Other Professional Services 169,425.00 Payment 5 WWTP Project Total GRIDOR CONSTRUCTION $169,425.00 Unpaid HARVEST PRINTING E 101-42000-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $255.15 7590 Medical Forms/Fire Forms Total HARVEST PRINTING $255.15 11 • • CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Thursday, February01, 2001 Check Detail Register Page 2 of 5 E 101-41400-413 Office Equipment Rental $40.00 Safe Deposit Box Rental Total HIGHLAND BANK $40.00 Unpaid L.M.C.I.T. E 101-41400-151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem $79.00 Balance Due LMC Total L.M.C.I.T. $79.00 Unpaid LANO EQUIPMENT E 101-43100-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip $10.26 16793 Total LANO EQUIPMENT $10.26 Unpaid LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES E 101-41100-433 Dues and Subscriptions $360.00 1-00005255 L.Beming/J.Olson Total LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES $360.00 Unpaid LIDBERG, KATHERINE E 101-45000-596 Friendly City Days $250.00 Scholarship Total LIDBERG, KATHERINE $250.00 Unpaid MEDICA E 601-49450-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) E 101-45100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) E 101-41300-131 Employer Paid Health E 101-43100-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) E 602-49400-130 Employer Paid Ins (GENERAL) E 101-41400-131 Employer Paid Health Total MEDICA Unpaid MENARDS $410.22 J.Middendorf $820.43 T.Guimont $820.43 L.Goeb $820.43 K.Lindsay $410.23 J.Middendorf $820.43 B.Miller $4,102.17 E 101-42000-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $136.81 77716 Fire Dept. E 101-43100-405 Repair/Maint - Buildings $1,128.54 78740 PW Bldg E 101-43100-405 Repair/Maint - Buildings $489.69 78875 PW Bldg E 101-43100-215 Shop Supplies $83.06 78876 E 101-43100-405 Repair/Maint - Buildings $97.94 78907 PW Bldg E 101-43100-405 Repair/Maint - Buildings $274.48 78940 PW Bldg E 101-43100-215 Shop Supplies $1.16 78942 Total MENARDS $2,211.68 Unpaid MFAPC E 101-42000-433 Dues and Subscriptions $35.00 2001 Annual Dues Total MFAPC $35.00 Unpaid MIDWEST ANALYTICAL SERVICES E 601-49450-218 Testing Expenses $104.00 117367 E 601-49450-218 Testing Expenses $148.00 117580 Total MIDWEST ANALYTICAL SERVICES $252.00 Unpaid MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS E 101-41400-202 Duplicating and copying supply $202.17 93750 Total MINNESOTA COPY SYSTEMS $202.17 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Thursday, February 01, 2001 Check Detail Register Page 3 of 5 Check Amt Invoice Comment Unpaid MINNESOTA MAYORS ASSOCIATION E 101-41100-433 Dues and Subscriptions $20.00 2001 Annual Dues Total MINNESOTA MAYORS ASSOCIATION $20.00 Unpaid MN MOTOR VEHICLE E 101-43100-215 Shop Supplies $13.50 Plate R 87253 Total MN MOTOR VEHICLE $13.50 Unpaid MORRIS, JAMES E 101-45100-104 Temporary Employees Regular $230.00 Park Shelter Total MORRIS, JAMES $230.00 Unpaid NCPER S GROUP LIFE INSURANCE G 101-21710 Other Deducations $12.00 February 2001 Total NCPER S GROUP LIFE INSURANCE $12.00 Unpaid NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS E 101-43100-226 Sign Repair Materials $241.26 TI-0062032 Total NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS $241.26 Unpaid OFFICE MAX E 101-41300-570 Office Equip and Furnishings $693.76 Office Furniture 1 E 101-42000-570 Office Equip and Furnishings $481,69 Fire Dept, E 101-41400-570 Office Equip and Furnishings $1,254.96 Office Fumiture/Equipment Total OFFICE MAX $2,430.41 Unpaid P.E.R.A G 101-21704 PERA $942.49 Pay Period 1/13 - 1/26 E 101-41300-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $10.00 Late Fee Total P.E.R.A $952.49 Unpaid PMX E 101-42000-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $333.66 1278353-01 Medical Supplies Total PMX $333.66 Unpaid PREMIER 94 TRUCK SERVICES E 101-43100-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip $526.54 41233-IN Total PREMIER 94 TRUCK SERVICES $526.54 Unpaid RELIANT ENERGY/MINNEGASCO E 101-41940-383 Gas Utilities $141.00 E 101-45100-383 Gas Utilities $126.00 E 101-42000-383 Gas Utilities $1,255.12 E 101-43100-383 Gas Utilities $345.00 E 101-41940-383 Gas Utilities $159.85 Total RELIANT ENERGY/MINNEGASCO $2,026.97 Unpaid RUSSELVS LOCK AND KEY, INC. E 101-41400-200 Office Supplies (GENERAL) $39.07 A1918 Total RUSSELL'S LOCK AND KEY, INC. $39.07 0 Unpaid S.E.H./R.C.M. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Thursday, February 01, 2001 Check Detail Register Page 4 of 5 Check Amt Invoice Comment E 460-49480-303 Engineering Fees $18,062.00 71335 WWTF Expansion E 101-41700-303 Engineering Fees $3,231.50 71628 Mall Traffic Signal E 450-49000-303 Engineering Fees $1,062.00 71632 AV E 450-49000-303 Engineering Fees $3,291.63 71633 AV2 E 101-41700-303 Engineering Fees $3,093.50 71634 Misc. Eng Serv. E 438-49000-303 Engineering Fees $399.00 71635 CCN3 E 201-45200-303 Engineering Fees $1,040.00 71636 City Park Improvement R 101-34000 Charges for Services $767.00 71637 Outlets Phase 2 E 438.49000-303 Engineering Fees $766.00 71638 CCS6 E 101-41700-303 Engineering Fees $5,108.48 71639 Northside Comp Plan E 450-49000-303 Engineering Fees $2,645.46 71640 AV3 E 101-41700-303 Engineering Fees $1,117.50 71641 . Heuring Meadows E 450-49000-303 Engineering Fees $297.00 71642 AV4 E 444-49000-303 Engineering Fees $263.50 71643 Psyk's 7 E 439-49000-303 Engineering Fees $440.50 71644 C04 E 438-49000-303 Engineering Fees $377.50 71645 CC3 Total S.E.HJR.C.M. $41,962.57 Unpaid SAFETY TRAIN E 101-43100-208 Training and Instruction $255.75 PW Training E 602-49400-208 Training and Instruction $255.75 Water Dept. Training E 101-45100-208 Training and Instruction $255.75 Parks Training E 101-41400-208 Training and Instruction $100.00 Training/Office E 101-41300-208 Training and Instruction $100.00 Training/Office E 601-49450-208 Training and Instruction $255.75 WWTF Training Total SAFETY TRAIN $1.223.00 Unpaid SPRINT E 101-41940-321 Telephone $124.48 E 101-42000-321 Telephone $34.28 E 101-41940-580 Other Equipment $295.16 Phone/Administration E 101-41940-321 Telephone $108.23 E 101-41940-321 Telephone $101.00 E 101-41940-321 Telephone $42.07 E 101-41940-321 Telephone $39.69 E 101-43100-321 Telephone $32.42 E 101-43100-321 Telephone $32.42 E 101-41940-321 Telephone $32.42 E 101-41940-321 Telephone $31.56 Long-distance Service E 601-49450-321 Telephone $29.44 E 101-45100-321 Telephone $26.29 E 101-42000-321 Telephone $34.28 Total SPRINT $963.74 Unpaid UNLIMITED ELECTRIC E 601-49450-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip $147.90 4930 Lift Station E 101-41940-404 Repair/Maint - Machinery/Equip $317.11 4952 Lights by Rink Total UNLIMITED ELECTRIC $465.01 Unpaid VERIZON 0 E 101-43100-321 Telephone $5.82 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Thursday, February 01, 2001 Page 5 of 5 Check Detail Register Check Amt Invoice Comment E 101-42000-321 Telephone $13.48 E 601-49450-321 Telephone $20.75 E 602-49400-321 Telephone $20.75 Total VERIZON $60.80 Unpaid WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT. E 448-49000-310 Other Professional Services $620.84 CR 19 Imp/MnDOT Study E 101-43100-222 Sand & Gravel $539.67 2821 E 101-43100-222 Sand & Gravel $619.65 2852 Total WRIGHT COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT. $1.780.16 Unpaid WRIGHT COUNTY TREASURER E 101-42110-307 Police Contract Fees $19,466.67 Police Protection Total WRIGHT COUNTY TREASURER $19,466.67 Unpaid WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC E 101-43160-381 Electric Utilities $7.11 E 101-43160-381 Electric Utilities $7.11 E 101-43160-381 Electric Utilities $8.00 Total WRIGHT HENNEPIN ELECTRIC $22.22 Unpaid XCEL ENERGY E 601-49450-381 Electric Utilities $1,886.28 Sewage Plant E 101-41940-381 Electric Utilities $6.52 6002 Main Ave E 101-45100-381 Electric Utilities $6.76 Park Shelter E 101-41940-381 Electric Utilities $50.85 60th Street E 601-49450-381 Electric Utilities $62.96 Lift Station E 101-43100-381 Electric Utilities $109.09 PW Bldg E 101-45100-381 Electric Utilities $199.47 Skating Rink/Balifield E 101-41940-381 Electric Utilities $241.51 City Hall E 101-42000-381 Electric Utilities $304.22 Fire Hall Total XCEL ENERGY $2,867.66 10100 Security State Bank $306,791.39 • CITY OF ALBERMLLE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tim Guimont, Public Works Supervisor DATE: February 2, 2001 SUBJECT: Public Works/Parks Maintenance Report Buiiding — The garage doors at the public Works Building have been installed. We blew 12' of insulation in the shop attic. Most of the building has been painted.. The roof and sofit has been repaired on the Barthel's garage. Streets — I have ordered and received the signage for 50* Street and 57`" Street. They should go up this week. Would like to purchase a 2001 Chev %z 2WD pickup at a cost of $13,255 plus tax. This would be from Hinckley Chev and the state bid contract. TG:bmm 0 The City now has three pagers and two cell phones for the maintenance • department. (We have not yet purchased a pager or a cell phone for the newest Public Works employee, pending the decision on the purchase of the Nextel system.) Monthly service cost for the cell phones and the pagers is $81, or $27 per employee. All the maintenance vehicles have a two way radios installed with the exception of the new loader. Tim has gotten a quote for $770 to install a radio in that unit. The disadvantage of those radios is they are usable only when someone is inside the vehicle. Tim contacted the company the two-way radios were purchased from and they will buy five radios back from the City for $150 each, for a total of $750. Both the building inspector and the engineering inspector will pay the City for the monthly service on their phones. Each employee's department has ample funds in the 2001 budget in the Furniture and Equipment line items to cover the costs of the monthly services. • Neztel's Proposal for the City of Albertville 51550 phones $49.95ea = $249.75 51700 phones $74.95ea $374.75 5 phone cases, 4 car charges = $149.75 value Free Total Equipment Charge $624.50 Monthly access charge per phone $39.99ea $50.00 free access charge per phone = $500.00 10 phones at $39.99ea = $399.90 per Month • � � era • a- a 1 , � y. e io pppp.... N I iri = z� a�LL z o c o1.- u, � �i cca5i5 Vi C� N CD U � CD r a2 ,j r 7 t F- F o U D W C1 � G � n W CL O !...11-ININI N O N 0 m IL FN - MZ W-41 gov, i UAW R �-R ww w FO Wa Q02 w Go 3� N G i W z ea J 1�111111111111 1�111111111111 01111�111111111111 911116111111111111 CIIII�111111111111 CIIII�111111111111 2 r G � oG on 0 z N 10 iirt w� C N �� In M O N y N `O► o�c � o�, o a cc N — N H N O W o. a N s 0 w 0 U 0 czl y a W. > 8 < Luz�$cM. O 9 vs 1 E E o to 3 •• ,4 A 4 v; Id e': 00 \A R 5b(1) 0 ALBERTVILLE HERITAGE Concept Plan • 40 NORTH IST ASSOCIATto CamsVILTAknTs" INC, 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile: 952.595.9837 nac@winternet.com PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville City Council FROM: Cindy Sherman DATE: January 31, 2001 RE: Albertville - Heritage - Concept Review FILE NO: 163.05 - 01.01 BACKGROUND Dynamic Designs Land Co. (Dynamics) has submitted a concept plan for property they rown at the southwest intersection of 57th Street and Lambert Street. The property is currently zoned R-1 and could accommodate approximately four single- family homes that meet all zoning regulations such as lot size and setbacks. Attachments: • Site location • Sketch plan • Floor plan • Memo and Attachments from Dynamics Dynamics is proposing to request a rezoning of the site to R-4, PUD to allow construction of 14 townhome units. They have submitted a sketch plan to determine the acceptability of such a rezoning. The development would include construction of single level townhomes for seniors 55 and older. A summary of the major points of the project prepared by Dynamics is attached. 0 A brief review of the site raised the following concerns: • Perimeter setbacks for structures shall be met and they are: 30' rear yard 35' front yard 20' side yard/corner As it is designed the setbacks are met and construction of porches on the units would meet setbacks if property located. No parking is permitted within the front yard area, which is 35 feet adjacent to 57th Street. Required parking is two enclosed spaces per unit with a minimum garage size of 480 square feet. The site currently depicts each unit with an attached garage, although they scale at less than 480 square feet, plus parking spaces behind the garages. In addition, 14 guest stalls are shown on the plan, although some would need to be removed to meet setbacks. Screening of the site would be required in the area behind Lots 5-8, which abut a single-family residence. In addition, parking areas containing more than five stalls require screening from a public road. These comments are based on very general information. More detailed plans may reveal other issues not addressed herein. RECOMMENDATION Rezoning of the site is a policy decision to be made by the City Council. As part of a rezoning action, a site plan should be submitted that addresses the ordinance, including comments contained herein. Staff believes the concept of senior housing would work well in this location. The Planning Commission discussed the concept plan and felt that it was too many units on a two acre site. They also discussed the unit size and the amount of pavement proposed. They generally favored the idea of some type of senior housing in this location. 0 PROPOSED SINGLE -LEVEL SENIOR HOUSING M.aior Points • The current Zoning of Rl would yield 4 homes at approximately $600,000 in tax value. • The proposed R-4 PUD Zoning with the condition of 55 and older senior housin could yield 14 units at $1.1 million tax base with less services (ie; schools) • Senior housing supports the Comprehensive Plan for "Life Cycle Housing': • Establish a hook-up rate based on unit consumption to keep housing affordable for seniors. • Deed restriction same as the Cottages of Albertville. • Attractive, yet affordable design, per senior input. • Attractive exteriors and landscaping per city input. • Units will be Owner -Occupied, with a Homeowner's Association that assures the building and grounds will be well maintained. • Need to further survey area waiting list. • Very compatible with adjacent uses, church, fire hall, commercial and single family. • Not converting valuable commercial property to residential. • Safe walking distance to future commercial. 0 • • I� sa—o- • rMA 1 1 t- 1 • v�xxpp � f 4 Lc • 0 L v X a to 0- -1 1= JAN-31-01 03,:04 PM DYNAMICS DESIGN and LAND 6124418604 P-02 P�kl� µ,,,^�L Ccac ,TIC LJT j!I, n � u Cc it zc cc = -- — — — — — — — — — — . . .. . .. . . . 7 --------- --------------- ------------------ - - — - — — — — — — — — — — — — — ---- — -H.Ug • DESIGN �' LAND CO3 DATE: January 16, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor & Council Members FROM: Dynamics Design & Land Company .144 RE: Concept Proposal for Owner Occupied Senior Homes. a� �f _-J i Outlot F of Parkview Place was not platted for single family homes to allow more time for researching possible uses for senior housing. The parcel is situated between several land uses such as, commercial, residential, and a church. The total acreage of the site is approximately 2 acres. Based on researching various senior use facilities, the most feasible senior use would be owner occupied single level town -homes. Other care facilities would require higher density and more land. Albertville's Comprehensive Land Use Plan discusses the need for senior housing in order to create opportunities for residents who want to continue to live in town during their golden years. After speaking with community members and staff, it sounds as if this is still a community priority. Enclosed please find a concept plan for single level senior town -homes that would be owner occupied by Seniors 55 & Older. The layout has a generous amount of green space and off street parking to accommodate the site that will help provide an excellent location for senior living. Furthermore, a Homeowner's Association will be created that will ensure the continued care of the grounds and building exteriors making it an attractive amenity to the central city. Upon favorable concept review by the city, Dynamics Design & Land Company would prepare the necessary subdivision application and legal documents for this project. Christian Builders would then construct the senior town -homes for sale. We have presented this concept to the Planning Commission on January 9th and made several changes per their input. We would appreciate the Council's input toward this proposal as well. • 555 - 3RD STREET NW ELK RIVER, MN 55330 PHONE (612)441-8591 FAX (612)441-8604 i COMMONS"TAEiE SENIOR TOWNHOMES 55 & OLDER I. NEED A. Comp Plan/ Life Cycle Housing B. Waiting List @ Cottages C.. Wright County Demographics II. IDEAL LOCATION/COMPATIBLE USE A. Close to Church, Commercial, Residential (fits) B. Good Neighbors to Single Family C. Will work with city on landscaping/screening III. EXCEEDS ZONING REQUIREMENTS A. See Handout IV. TAX BENEFIT A. Higher Market Value B. No Service Demands on Schools 0 • "HERJTAGE COMMONS" SENIOR T0WWjj0MF PURPOSE: To provide housing opportunities for area residents "55 and older to continue to live in the community. REQUIREMENT R4 ZONE R 5 ZONE PROPOSED MAXIMUM LOT COVETRAGE o FOR STRUCTURES 40% 501% 24.39% PARKING & RoAD SURFACE NA NA 21.5% OPEN SPACE/YARD 500 SQ FT NOT 500 SQ FT NOT 54% REQUIRED FOR REQUIRED FOR �3622 SQ FEET PER UNIT PER SEC 1100-01 SENIOR SENIOR HOUSING HOUSING PARKING STALLS MAY BE LESS 28 FOR SENIOR 39 STALLS HOUSING Building Calculation 1,590 X 14 UNITS = 22,330 / 91568 SQ FT = 24.39% Parldng & Drive Calculations • Front of garages (28 stalls x 200sq ft) 5600 • Drives 10728 • Off Street Parking (11 x 200) 2200 18528 / 91568 = 20% Remaining Yard and Open Space 55,61 a/a 91568 - 40858= 50710/14 units = 3622 sq. feet of open space per square unit. 0 Wright County: Total Population Age Group 1995 0-4 6.396 5-9 7,365 10-14 7,608 15-19 5,696 20-24 4,162 25-29 5,331 30-34 6,768 35-39 6,648 40-44 6,072 45-49 5,005 50-54 3,640 -1-- i --- 55-59 2,699 r 60 64 i 2,113 65-69 2,142 i70-74 1,884 t 75-79 I- - 1,625 i 80-84 1,158 85+ 920 Total 77,232 0 2020 7,170 7.240 7,210 6,480 5,810 6,860 7,800 7,510 6,150 5,760 6,530 7,530 6,850 5,670 4,260 2,920 . 1,730 2,090 105,570 1995 - 2020 % Change 12 10 -1 70 -5.23 13.76 39.60 I 28.68 15.25 12.97 i 1.28 15.08 79,40 i 178.99 224.18 164.71 126.11 79.69 49.40 127.17 36.69 Note: Due to rounding, the number of people in age groups by year may not add up to the total. The 1995 data is a U.S. Census Bureau estimate that was used to create the population projections through 2025. • • :21a sq - R DESIGN �' LAND CO. — oiy DATE: January 16, 2001 TO: Honorable Mayor & Council Members FROM: Dynamics Design & Land Company 0 6 RE: Concept Proposal for Owner Occupied Senior Homes. Outlot F of Parkview Place was not platted for single family homes to allow more time for researching possible uses for senior housing. The parcel is situated between several land uses such as, commercial, residential, and a church. The total acreage of the site is approximately 2 acres. Based on researching various senior use facilities, the most feasible senior use would be owner occupied single level town -homes. Other care facilities would require higher density and more land. Albertville's Comprehensive Land Use Plan discusses the need for senior housing in order to create opportunities for residents who want to continue to live in town during their golden years. After speaking with community members and staff, it sounds as if this is still a community priority. Enclosed please find a concept plan for single level senior town -homes that would be owner occupied by Seniors 55 & Older. The layout has a generous amount of green space and off street parking to accommodate the site that will help provide an excellent location for senior living. Furthermore, a Homeowner's Association will be created that will ensure the continued care of the grounds and building exteriors making it an attractive amenity to the central city. Upon favorable concept review by the city, Dynamics Design & Land Company would prepare the necessary subdivision application and legal documents for this project. Christian Builders would then construct the senior town -homes for sale. We have presented this concept to the Planning Commission on January 9th and made several changes per their input. We would appreciate the Council's input toward this proposal as well. 555 - 3RD STREET NW ELK RIVER, MN 55330 PHONE (612)441-8591 FAX (612)441-8604 0 "HERITAGE COMMONS" SENIOR. TOWNHOM S 55 & OLDER I. NEED A. Comp Plan/ Life Cycle Housing B. Waiting List @ Cottages C. Wright County Demographics • II. IDEAL LOCATION/COMPATIBLE USE A. Close to Church, Commercial, Residential (fits) B. Good Neighbors to Single Family C. Will work with city on landscaping/screening III. EXCEEDS ZONING REQUIREMENTS A. See Handout IV. TAX BENEFIT A. Higher Market Value B. No Service Demands on Schools 0 • • • "H AGE COMMONS"" SEN10ft TOWNHOMES 55 & OWWR PURPOSE: To provide housing opportunities for area residents "55 and older to continue to live in the community. RE UIItEMENT �,.1"ROFfi►SF�?, MA3GMUM LOT COVETRAGE FOR STRUCTURES 40% 50% 24.39% PARKING & ROAD SURFACE NA NA 21.5% OPEN SPACE/YARD 500 SQ FT NOT 500 SQ FT NOT 54% REQUIRED FOR REQUIRED FOR 3622 SQ FEET PER UNIT PER SEC 1100-01 SENIOR SENIOR HOUSING HOUSING PARKING STALLS MAY BE LESS 28 FOR SENIOR 39 STALLS HOUSING Building Calculation 1,590 X 14 UNITS = 22,330 / 91568 SQ FT = 24.39% Parldne & Drive Calculations • Front of garages (28 stalls x 200sq ft) 5600 • Drives 10728 • Off Street Parking (11 x 200) 2200 18528 / 91568 = 20% Remaining Yard and Open Space 55.61 % 91568 - 40858= 50710/14 units = 3622 sq. feet of open space per square unit. • • Wright County: Total Population Age Group 1995 2020 1996 - 2020 % Change 0-4 6,396 7,170 12.10 5-9 7,365 7,240 -1.70 i 10-14 7,608 7,210 -5.23 I 15-19 5,696 6,480 13.76 j 20-24 4,162 5,810 39.60 25-29 5,331 6,860 28.68 30-34 6,768 7,800 15.25 35-39 6,648 7,510 12.97 40-44 6,072 6,150 1.28 45-49 - 5,005 5,760 15.08 50-54 3,640 6,530 79.40 5555-59 2,699 7,530 178.99 i r60-64 2,113 6,850 224.18 1 65-69 2,142 5,670 164.71 r 1 70-74 1,884 4,260 126.11 75-79 I i 1,625 i 2,920 79.69 80-84 1,158 r 1,730-- --- --_-- 49.40 85+ 920 2,090 127.17 Total 77,232 105,570 36.69 Note: Due to rounding, the number of people in age groups by year may not add up to the total. The 1995 data is a U.S. Census Bureau estimate that was used to create the population projections through 2025. 9 • 0 za lT-0 sq. �Pv• 5b(2) • CASEY'S GENERAL STORE Site Plan Review Conditional Use Permit 0 • • ' NORTHWEST ASS0C.UATED CON SULTAi�TS, LiVC.. 5775 Wayzata i cufevard, suits 555, St: Louis Park, MN 55416 Telephone: 952.595.9636 Facsimile:; ,952,595.9837 nacCwinfiernatcorn PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville City Council FROM: Cindy Sherman DATE: January 29, 2001 RE: Albertville — Casey's Site Plan Review Conditional Use Permit for Gas Sales FILE NO: 163.06 — 00.08 BACKGROUND • Casey's General Store has submitted as application for Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan review to allow the construction of a convenience and gas facility to be located on the northwest corner of County Road 19 and 57"' Street NE. The site is zoned B-3, Highway Commercial and is approximately 1.2 acres in size. The proposed use is subject to a Conditional Use Permit in the B-3 zone. The Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Commercial Development. The Final Plat creating this site has previously been approved by the City and has been recorded. As part of the public hearing an adjacent neighbor asked if fencing was to be installed along the eastern property line. The files do not indicate that a fence was required. However, a condition of approval was attached to the plat that the existing trees and berming on the lot adjacent to the residential land would remain. This plan does not affect the berm. Attachments: ♦ Site Location Map ♦ Site Plan ♦ Exterior Elevations • ♦ Sign Plans ♦ Findings of Fact and Decision EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Issues Analysis Zoning. The property is zoned B-3, Highway Commercial which allows convenience stores as a permitted use. However, Motor vehicle fuel sales is a conditional use (CUP) with the B-3 District. A CUP for vehicle fuel sales maybe approved provided that: 1. The architectural appearance and functional plan of the building and site shall not be so dissimilar to the existing buildings or area as to cause impairment in property values or constitute a blighting influence within a reasonable distance of the lot. Staff is recommending that the building be finished on all four sides and revised plans have been submitted to address this. 2. The entire site other than that taken up by a building, structure or plantings shall be surfaced with blacktop or concrete to control dust and drainage, which is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. This provision is met. 3. A minimum lot area of 20,000 square feet and minimum lot width of 150 feet. The lot is 53,814 square feet in size with a width of 225.7 feet. 4. A drainage system subject to the approval of the City Engineer shall be installed. System is subject to the City Engineer review and comment. 5. The lighting shall be accomplished in such a way as to have no direct source of light visible from adjacent land in residential use or from the public right-of- way and shall be in compliance with Section 1000.10 of this chapter. The lighting plan indicates that this provision is met 6. Wherever fuel pumps are to be installed, pump islands shall be installed. Islands are proposed 7. At the boundaries of a residential district, a strip of not less than five feet shall be landscaped and screened in compliance with Section 1000.7 of this Chapter. Not Applicable. 8. Each light standard landscaped. Lighting is proposed within the yard areas and will be landscaped. 9. Parking or car stacking space shall be screened from view of abutting residential. Screening shall be required adjacent to 57' Street. In addition, the general criteria for CUP apply and include: 1. The proposed action has been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and has been found to be consistent with the official City Comprehensive Plan. 2. The proposed use is or will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. 3. The proposed use conforms with all Zoning Ordinance performance standards contained herein. 4. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. • 5. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and is will not overburden the City's service capacity. 6. Traffic generated by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. • • The proposed project is generally consistent with all of the criteria. The hours of operation are proposed to be from 6 am to 11 pm. And the Commission requested that the restrictions apply to all services. A condition to limit the hours as proposed is included in the findings of fact. The City Engineer will work to resolve any outstanding issues regarding access to the site prior to the issuance of a building permit. Lot Area, Setback, Height and Coverage Requirements B-3 District Required Proposed Lot Area 20,000 square feet 53,814 square feet Lot Width 150 feet 225.7+ feet Setbacks Front 35 feet (19 & 57"') 117 feet & 140 feet Side 20 feet 53 feet Rear 20 feet 45 feet Building Height Maximum 35 feet 14 feet, 9 inches Maximum Lot coverage for 30 % of lot area 19 % Structures The proposed improvements are in compliance with all lot area, width, setback height, and lot coverage requirements. Site Access: There are two accesses shown onto the property, both are off of 57t" Street. Because of the proximity to the intersection, the most easterly access is to be a right -in, right -out only. The design of the access shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. The most westerly access is designed to be shared with the adjacent parcel and was required through the platting process. Parking: The Zoning Ordinance requires the following parking gas/convenience facilities Ordinance Standard Required Spaces Proposed Spaces 1 space/ each 200 sq. ft. of gross floor area 14 14 4 additional parking spaces for motor fuel station 4 8 (at um s Total Parking Spaces 18 22 3 The parking as proposed should be adequate for the use proposed. All areas will be bounded with concrete curb and gutter and a combination of bituminous pavement and concrete will be used for surfacing. Building type and construction: The proposed building will have an exterior appearance consisting of predominately brick with corner stone accents on all four sides. The design also incorporates a sign band on the front and sides of the building that matches the canopy and is red. The building itself is proposed to be dark brown in color. Signage: A sign plan has been submitted for the property. The plan consists of wall signs, canopy signs and a ground sign as outlined below. Sin Permitted Proposed Ground sin 125 s . ft./30 feet tall 83.5 s . ft./21 -'/2 feet tall Wall/canopy Signs 80 square feet 72.76 square feet The sign plan is within the area allowed by ordinance for service stations. The sign areas do not include the red sign band area that is illuminated. Exterior Storage: No exterior storage is proposed as part of the application. The trash area shall be enclosed and is to be constructed of materials to match the building. Grading/Drainage/Utilities: The final plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Landscaping Plan: A landscaping plan has been submitted that concentrates plantings in one location on the site. The ordinance requires that a minimum of 16 ornamental trees or shrubs be provided per street frontage and that an emphasis be placed upon the perimeter of the site. Since Planning Commission review a revised landscaping plan has been submitted. However, it still does not meet the ordinance regarding the number of plantings required. A revised landscape plan that meets the ordinance shall be submitted subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. The applicant shall post the appropriate landscape guarantee as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Lighting: A lighting plan has been provided that shows two light poles with two fixtures each in the parking area and lighting under the canopy. The foot-candle measurements as provided meet the ordinance regulations. The freestanding fixtures are shoebox style and should have a recessed lens. Staff is concerned that the light under the canopy will cause a glare problem and therefore the fixtures should be recessed into the canopy or shielded from view. Additional information shall be required to address this concern prior to issuance of a building permit. • RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this request and voted 2-2 to approve the CUP for gas services. They voted 4-0 to approve the site plan with the following conditions: 1. The building shall be"finished" on all four sides with masonry materials. 2. The Landscaping Plan shall be enhanced to meet the zoning ordinance requirements for landscaping and buffering. 3. The Site Plan and related grading, utility and access issues are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 4. Details on the canopy lighting shall be submitted for staff review and subject to staff approval to address glare. 5. The business shall only be open from 6 am to 11 pm daily and all signage shall be turned off and lighting dimmed to security only levels when the business is not open. 6. The final plat shall be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. The site shall be monitored for odor, noise, traffic and lighting and that the owners will address these items if they should become an issue. The application as proposed requires that the City Council consider the application in relation to .established zoning ordinance review criteria and Comprehensive Plan policies. Should the Council find that the application meets the criteria established then a recommendation to approve would be in order subject to the conditions outlined in the findings of fact that are attached as Exhibit E. 0 PC Linda Goeb Mike Couri Pete Carlson Kristi Jennisch • 02-05-01 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Fact & Decision CUP/Site Plan Applicant's Name: Casey's General Store Request: Casey's General Store has submitted as application for Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan review to allow the construction of a convenience and gas facility to be located on the northwest corner of County Road 19 and 57th Street NE. Planning Commission Meeting Dates: January 9, 2001 City Council Meeting Date: February 5, 2001 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following finding of fact and decision: A. The legal description of the subject property is Lot 1, Block 1, Parkside Commercial Center, Wright County, Minnesota. B. The Planning Report dated January 29, 2001 from Northwest Associated Consultants is incorporated herein. C. The City Council finds the requested CUP/Site Plan in conformance with the criteria contained in the City's Zoning Ordinance. D. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. E. Traffic generated by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property with phasing as proposed and with an access to Highway 18. F. The requirements of Sections 400, 1200, 1500 and 4400 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance have been reviewed in relation to proposed plans. G. The proposed actions have been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and have been found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. H. The proposed development will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. I. The proposed use conforms to all applicable Zoning Ordinance performance standards. 1 Casey's General Store CC Findings of Fact & Decision J. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the City Council APPROVES the conditional use permit (CUP) and Site Plan based on the most current plans and information received to date subject to the following conditions: 1. The building shall be "finished" on all four sides with masonry materials. 2. The Landscaping Plan shall be enhanced to meet the zoning ordinance requirements for landscaping and buffering. 3. The Site Plan and related grading, utility and access issues are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 4. Details on the canopy lighting shall be submitted for staff review and subject to staff approval to address glare. 5. , The business shall only be open from 6 am to 11 pm daily and all signage shall be turned off and lighting dimmed to security only levels when the business is not open. 6. The final plat shall be recorded prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. The site shall be monitored for odor, noise, traffic and lighting and that the owners will address these items if they should become an issue. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 5th day of February 2001. City of Albertville John A. Olson, Mayor Attest: Linda Goeb, City Administrator 2 Casey's General Store 10 CC Findings of Fact & Decision V' RU 539 5315 1074 0 b ° °. @79" a� 6213 cl° @�9@ 6205 n O 6m nz^ � � � e 6155 615 x d ^'� pro° 8296 6141E 142 130 624 6232 627 6236 6; 6125 Clf612. 60 6215 - 6198 81g 6 '�� @�3 6111 114 ° 3993 609 ¢ mom, 3 6081 G NE 5821�11820 hy@ 5671 5671 5649 5649 5627 5627 WAI Future 01, CSAH 3; e 0 6000 5933 5940 f 5771 Case,y'to 57th Street NI NARRATIVE STATEMENT PROPOSED CASEY'S GENERAL STORE ALBERTVILLE, MNNESOTA Casey's General Stores, Inc. is requesting the City of Albertville grant a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan approval to allow construction of a new convenience store with gasoline pumps in a B-3 District zoning. The granting of a Conditional Use Permit would allow construction of a new commercial business which is compatible with the surrounding area and would not have a negative impact on the adjacent property owners in regards to aesthetics or property values. The proposed store is visually pleasing with a three -sided brick construction. There will also be extensive landscaping on the site to visually soften and tie in the commercial structure. The proposed use of this property is consistent with surrounding commercial properties and makes the highest and best use of the property. The proposed convenience store with gasoline service and prepared food items will provide a necessary service to the neighborhood and will be built in harmony with the character of the surrounding properties. In addition to the gasoline service and convenience items, the store will carry made -from - scratch food items just as pizza, sandwiches and baked goods. Casey's hours of operation will be from 6am to 1 1pm. Casey's does not operate on a 24-hour basis as one of its goals is to maintain more of a hometown family atmosphere to the business. The average number of full-time and part-time employees will be ten to twelve. Regarding store lighting, it is intentionally designed to focus illumination on the gasoline pump area. This ensures the safety and security of our patrons, without creating a nuisance for homeowners or other businesses located near our stores. Moreover, all exterior lights are set to the minimum security level each evening at 1 1pm when our stores close. 9 0 v m Z �coQ cn a ,t 80 Z as o O ?7 O j3 w' zi u V] � O I N ` 1 GI c x z cn C tJ. r�+ G A o I v+ chi o 0 1 _ _ �11171l �1111lI�*2. 11'1!!l111�II111 11 hhh {jI1Irl�l�l�li� hhh4�l4h1�■ ' rta!1!,!1!1M1!1� 1!IL!!1!1 J��l,l,�,�►1,11I� 111,11,`.I . ��i'i�rr'i�i BIII111111 � i�i!'i��ili�i� I-1111 ■ i' �iyl�lh44�d1 yl,�--ril�lh■., ■ �1 1 1a) �?? O Noon o _ n r no;vo vmlz O^OX�AK''oO p m�tO�rrnO�vl gocmNm�'� 'n OymQ o� o O A C'1 � N • ^ is •c5 m m x I(I I^, 14'-9" TOP OF PAD I� I I I 1 1 O IO � M \ = A � �z �o o N N C � a O I a O nm 14'-9' TrP M Pin pig m §RR� z 3.-0' m n o Q = T oa T ' 8'-5 3/4' 4'-0' Ri� '�� q � `-0 U tag I'k L � 1 —1 1 i I � � E b 1 Y n I o I N. 1 d � r-.• s� r-� r-�,�r s� ar sue• xa3 IM • • INFORMATION ON SIGNAGE FOR CASEY'S GENERAL STORE Sign #1 (Pylon sign -vertical) Sign #2 (Facade sign -"Pizza") Sign #3 (Fagade sign-"Casey's") Sign #4 (Fagade sign -"General Store") Sign #5 (Facade sign -"Donuts") Sign #6 (Fagade sign-Casey's logo - right elevation) Sign #7 (Fagade sign — Casey's logo - left elevation) Sign #8 (Casey's logo -East end of canopy) Sign #9 (Casey's logo -West end of canopy) Bottom of sign Top of sign Total SF 71699 21' 1/2" 83.5 9' 6" 117 6" 7 9' 4" 11' 8" 23.88 9' 4" 11' 9" 12.48 9' 6" 11' 6" 7 9' 6" 111611 5.6 9' 6" 11 ' 6" 5.6 177 19, 5.6 17' 19, 5.6 Please Note: I do not have a detail which actually shows the Casey's logo on the canopy, however the canopy logo is exactly the same in dimensions and square footage as the logo on the building fagade. �l PYLON SIGN STANDARD VERTICAL PRICE SIGN 11'-1n t7 WEATHER VANE 8-2 ROOF 14.30 0 B-3 SIGN AREA 47.57 V1 B-4 --1 PRICE SIGN 21.730 I I I 00 T in C] M GFI OUTLET DUPLEX W/ WEATHER 4'-0" PROOF COVER B- 9 r I i I CONCRETE BASE CONCRETE BASE 6' A80VE FINISHED GRADE I 16" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE -------� L------� J J Q 41 O T CV g cn Of PAD T(p (T pin B�-it 3/4' � 3'-0• FI I O rm X4 o Si T 8'-5 3/4' 4-0 o' z ��' Cii 3'-0• 0 0 vg 15 r A �s ImI 14'-9' TOP OF PAD 13'-T TOP OF PAO INN 8-1t 3/4- 3'-0, 12 I�� m�o z � � r m o�m i 5b(3) • ALBERTVILLE PLAZA Amended PUD Preliminary & Final Plat 0 • PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville City Council FROM: Cindy Sherman DATE: February 1, 2001 RE: Albertville — Albertville Plaza Amended PUD / Preliminary and Final Plat FILE NO: 163.06 — 00.36 0 REQUEST Albertville Plaza LLC has acquired the property located at the south and west intersection of County Roads 37 and 19. The site is zoned PUD and was approved for unrestricted commercial development as part of the Westwind PUD. The existing PUD also allowed pylon signs consistent with the Sign Ordinance allowance for lots abutting the freeway. The current application is to amend the PUD and implement a development plan with specific uses with an internal system of shared access. The application also includes platting the property. ATTACHMENTS • Site location • Development plan • Preliminary Plat PRELIMINARY PLAT/DEVELOPMENT PLAN The preliminary plat consists of three lots and one large outlot: Lots 1 and 3 currently have development proposed that are subject to site plan review later in the agenda. Lot 2 will be subject to site plan review in the future. Outlot A may • become more than one lot and will be subject to platting and site plan review in the future. The uses on the parcels under the amended PUD are proposed to be restricted to restaurant, automobile service, professional office, bank, motel, daycare and retail sales. The uses proposed are subject to the ability to provide a site plan with reasonable setbacks, lot coverage and parking ratios. All perimeter setbacks shall be consistent with the ordinance for B-3 zoning and parking. Following the public hearing the Planning Commission recommended that no restaurants or auto service be permitted on lots 1, 2 or on Outlot A. Stormwater Management/Utilities. An overall design has been submitted regarding stormwater management and utilities on the site. The City Engineer is reviewing the information and will provide comments prior to the Commission meeting. Access. The entire development will be served via two accesses, one to County Road 37 and one to County Road 19. The access points, designs and any additional improvements are subject to the review and approval of Wright County. The internal system will be a private road through the site with individual accesses and parking for each use. Cross easements for access and parking will be recorded for the entire PUD. Landscaping. Some berming and landscaping was installed with the residential portion of the PUD. Additional plantings will be required on the commercial side but this will be addressed with the individual site plans. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission held a public hearing on this matter and they recommend approval of the amended PUD to be known as Albertville Plaza with the following conditions: 1. The PUD shall be limited to two multi -tenant ground signs at 75 feet in height and 125 feet in area. 2. Each lot may have one ground sign not to exceed 10 feet in height and 40 square feet in area. 3. No wall signs shall be allowed on the rear of buildings facing residentially zoned areas. 4. Wall signs shall be consistent with the City sign regulations. 5. Uses on the site shall be restricted as follows: • 6. Lot 1: Multi tenant retail, office, and coffee shop. Albertville Plaza Amended PUD Page 2 of 3 7. Lot 2 and Outlot A: professional office, bank, hotel/motel, daycare and retail • sales. U • 8. Lot 3: Restaurant 9. Any other uses will require an amendment to the PUD and all uses are subject to site plan review. 10. All restaurant uses may . be required to include odor reduction equipment as determined by the City. 11. Utility/storm water management plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 12. Access and related improvements are subject to the review and approval of the County Engineer. 13. A PUD agreement incorporating all conditions of approval shall be drafted by the City Attorney and shall be executed by all parties prior to recording the plat. Albertville Plaza Amended PUD Page 3 of 3 02-05-01 • CITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Fact & Decision PUD Applicant's Name: Albertville Plaza LLC Preliminary/Final Plat Request: Albertville Plaza LLC has acquired the property located at the south and west intersection of County Roads 37 and 19. The site is zoned PUD and was approved for unrestricted commercial development as part of the Westwind PUD. The current application is to amend the PUD and implement a development plan with specific uses with an internal system of shared access. The application also includes platting the property. Planning Commission Public Hearing Date: January 9, 2001 City Council Meeting Date: February 5, 2001 • Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following finding of fact and decision: A. The legal description of the subject property will include Lots 1-3, Block 1 and Outlot A, Albertville Plaza, Wright County, Minnesota. B. The Planning Report dated January 31, 2001 from Northwest Associated Consultants is incorporated herein. C. The City Council finds the requested Development Plan in conformance with City's Zoning Ordinance and provisions of the PUD ordinance. D. The proposed uses can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. E. The requirements of Section 2700 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance the Subdivision Regulations have been reviewed in relation to proposed plans. F. The proposed actions have been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and have been found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. • 1 Albertville Plaza PUD and plat CC Findings of Fact & Decision G. The proposed development will be compatible with present and future land uses of the . area. H. The proposed use conforms to all applicable Zoning Ordinance performance standards. Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the City Council APPROVES the Amended PUD, preliminary and final plat based on the most current plans and information received to date subject to the following conditions: 1. The PUD shall be limited to two multi -tenant ground signs at 75 feet in height and 125 feet in area. 2. Each lot may have one ground sign not to exceed 10 feet in height and 40 square feet in area. 3. No wall signs shall be allowed on the rear of buildings facing residentially zoned areas. 4. Wall signs shall be consistent with the City sign regulations. 5. Uses on the site shall be restricted as follows: • 6. Lot 1: Multi tenant retail, office, and coffee shop. 7. Lot 2 and Outlot A: professional office, bank, hotel/motel, daycare and retail sales. 8. Lot 3: Restaurant 9. Any other uses will require an amendment to the PUD and all uses are subject to site plan review. 10. All restaurant uses may be required to include odor reduction equipment as determined by the City. 11. Utility/storm water management plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 12. Access and related improvements are subject to the review and approval of the County Engineer. 13.A PUD agreement incorporating all conditions of approval shall be drafted by the City Attorney and shall be executed by all parties prior to recording the plat. . 2 Albertville Plaza PUD and plat CC Findings of Fact & Decision • Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 5th day of February 2001. Attest: 0 • Linda Goeb, City Administrator City of Albertville 0 John A. Olson, Mayor is Albertville Plaza PUD and plat CC Findings of Fact & Decision OFFICIAL ZONING MAP REVISEDIO1&00 ❑ A-1, Agricultural Rural ❑ R-6, Residential High Density ❑ A-2, Agricultural Transitional ❑ R-7, Special Purpose High Density ❑ • R-1A, Low Density Single Family ❑ ❑ R-8, Mixed Housing Housing Residential ❑ R-1, Single Family R-MH, Manufactured `' R-2, Single & Two Family ❑ B-1, Neighborhood Business z R-3, Single & Two -Family ❑ B-2, Limited Business ® RA Low Density Multiple Family ❑ 8-3, Highway Commercial d 04 w FO -C — 4m z' C i++!•��Il+ I I ! 1 F V1 W i t0 U a w z life i 1` S ,1� ;{•;;+�I(oi� i p �� ® Mh a \ i � Oy J16 SON 4b \ \ '�• e �E LU Jill : Ng((;i _► tim M M lvr .9 " N.., lilt lilt tu ok U .. w g tl s € � � B �! �� I .. I - to milt w 088388 s �l1,!!!I!it f !En Jig 1 LUV z3�? fit 'soil gg !'!�'' :wec �l •SS '-S ...-S i ttuif Mill III i t Y11U1�tK 1. ---- � - u� ---- ----__ �=--------------------- - - ---- ==_------ --------,--------------------'r J W a-S�lll ' Cb 'dHk a � -� %�'- �• s/1 s •a N ew aex l' 0 IIJ.110N m u o v. I J� t I Al 1 1 I � I T p, 1 �V3Q /•+SS1 c? 1 N W V O H Q 5b(4) • CULVER'S Site Plan Review 0 TO: Albertville City Council FROM: Cindy Sherman DATE: January 31, 2001 RE: Albertville — Culver's Site Plan Review FILE NO: 163.06 — 00.34 BACKGROUND • RJ Marco Construction Inc. has submitted as application for Site Plan review to allow the construction of a restaurant with drive -through facilities to be located on the southwest corner of County Roads 19 and 37. The site is zoned PUD and a restaurant use is permitted under the PUD. The site is approximately 1.5 acres in size and the Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Commercial Development. Attachments: ♦ Site Location Map ♦ Site Plan ♦ Landscape plan ♦ Floor Plan ♦ Exterior Elevations 0 • Issues Analysis Zoning. The property is zoned PUD and the use is consistent with the development plan for the area. Lot Area, Setback, Height and Coverage Proposed PUD District Proposed Lot Area 1.5 acres Lot Width 284 feet Setbacks Front 45 feet Side 124 feet Rear 90 feet Building Height Maximum 25 feet Maximum Lot coverage for 14 % Structures The proposed improvements are in compliance with the PUD. Site Access/Circulation: Access into the site will be from the internal private road. Circulation will be provided around the building for drive -up service with a by-pass lane . to provide access to the parking area. Stacking space has also been provided on both sides of the drive -up window since the orders at this type of facility take longer then a typical fast food restaurant. Parking: The Zoning Ordinance requires the following parking based on a blended use of a sit down and fast food restaurant. This is how this oarticular restaurant o erates Ordinance Standard Required Spaces Proposed Spaces 1 space/ each 40 sq. ft. of gross floor area for dining 26 1 space/each 35 sq. ft. of service area 28 1 space/each 80 sq. ft. of kitchen/storage area 22 Total Parking Spaces 76 76 12 of the parking spaces are provided as stacking before and after the drive -up window, 64 spaces are standard design. The parking as proposed should be adequate for the use proposed. Shared parking will be available under the PUD agreement. All areas will be bounded with concrete curb and gutter with bituminous surfacing. All spaces shall be at least 8 Y2' x 20' with 24' drive aisle. Parking shall also be provided to meet ADA regulations. . Culver's Site Plan Page 2' • Building type and construction: The proposed building will have an exterior consisting of blue and cream colored brick with brick soldier course accenting. The roof will be blue standing seam metal. Signage: There are two small signs shown on the building. There is a menu board proposed for drive -through service, no detail has been provided. No detail has been provided for a ground sign. If a ground sign is proposed it shall meet the requirements of the PUD agreement and is subject to a sign permit. Exterior Storage/Screening: No exterior storage is proposed as part of the application. The trash area shall be enclosed and is to be constructed of materials to match the building. Any roof top equipment shall be screened. Grading/Drainage/Utilities: The final plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Landscaping Plan: A landscaping plan has been submitted that is marked preliminary. The planting key does not match what is depicted on the plan. A revised plan shall be submitted subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. The applicant shall post the appropriate landscape guarantee as required by the Zoning Ordinance. • Lighting: A lighting plan has not been submitted. This shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit and is subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission reviewed this request and they recommend approval subject to the following conditions: 1. A sign plan shall be submitted to identify all signage proposed on the site. The plan is subject to the PUD provisions and the two wall signs shown on the elevation plan. Any additional signage shall meet the ordinance. - 2. A Landscaping Plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the building permit subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. Security guaranteeing the installation of the landscaping shall be provided as required by ordinance. 3. A lighting plan shall be submitted that meets the ordinance and is subject to the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of the building permit. 4. Final plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. • Culver's Site Plan Page 3' 02-05-01 • CITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Fact & Decision Site Plan Applicant's Name: RJ Marco Construction Inc. Request: RJ Marco Construction has submitted an application for Site Plan review to allow the construction of a restaurant to be located in the Albertville Plaza PUD which is located just south of County Road 37 and west of County Road 19. Planning Commission Meeting Dates: January 9, 2001 City Council Meeting Date: February 5, 2001 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following finding of fact and decision: A. The legal description of the subject property will be Lot 3, Block 1 Albertville Plaza, Wright County, Minnesota. • B. The Planning Report dated January 31, 2001 from Northwest Associated Consultants is incorporated herein. C. The City Council finds the requested Site Plan in conformance with City's Zoning Ordinance and provisions of the PUD. D. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. E. The requirements of Section 1500 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance have been reviewed in relation to proposed plans. F. The proposed actions have been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and have been found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. G. The proposed development will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. H. The proposed use conforms to all applicable Zoning Ordinance performance standards. • 1 Albertville Plaza Site Plan CC Findings of Fact & Decision Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the City Council • APPROVES the Site Plan based on the most current plans and information received to date subject to the following conditions: • 1. A sign plan shall be submitted to identify all signage proposed on the site. The plan is subject to the PUD provisions and the two wall signs shown on the elevation plan. Any additional signage shall meet the ordinance. 2. A Landscaping Plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the building permit subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. Security guaranteeing the installation of the landscaping shall be provided as required by ordinance. 3. A lighting plan shall be submitted that meets the ordinance and is subject to the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of the building permit. 4. Final plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 5th day of February 2001. Attest: In Linda Goeb, City Administrator City of Albertville John A. Olson, Mayor • 2 Albertville Plaza Site Plan CC Findings of Fact & Decision OFFICIAL ZONING MAP REVISEDI0-18-00 ❑ A-1, Agricultural Rural ❑ R-6, Residential High Density ❑ A-2, Agricultural Transitional ❑ R-7, Special Purpose High Density ❑ R-1A, Low Density Single Family ❑ R-8, Mixed Housing • ❑ R-1, Single Family ❑ R-MH, Manufactured Housing Residential R-2, Single & Two Family ❑ B-1, Neighborhood Business R-3, Single & Two -Family ❑ B-2, Limited Business ❑ R-4, Low Density Multiple Family ❑ B-3, Highway Commercial 0 p 6 % d� Rom+ a i{I;•Iji}t{ t; t uj �j a Jill p pagg s n L- — 1 5 i'tifF h i SNiii; r ]MUM I A to • V I N / ASSI — h 41ai •' c / // � ® O tT cY. O 3 ------ — QY °' Ld S (, 1 / ZI b Z l -& ° 0/1 3N OM 1 0 �rV� CNN O • U J u C p �\ Lij � rrriii � U // N 0 - Q LO \ CO l O \ 4 dd �. `O,. `$. W V, O� Z f 00 \o� 00 ODOR l Fb. • FIW 3313 �\ aJ • 9�' \OC of • O \ � \ \ 9`t S O OJ O t�. I \ V- a F-6 z a :g lt lilt {!I �,I �� .�� {F�t90 a�f��t,�tli 4' W O ( IY ! a 2 N2 w C1a z bilg ti § �ctidabe I { 3 pill,&. i a6a 'p7 t d• / 10 b/t 3N a4l lc �.1% � \ _,.. � rram�,• � � � � 11) `°� / Q w Q N' // / ✓ + L O 10 (31 \ co (,A O,110 \ \ / + 1 \ 51 / R �21a O 'o \ / \ � O 11 g .�� SNdld 3dA101Oad Dli CM j CI all 'ONIeW31SAS ONISIHONVU=e�e� Q "o uaewu eaa '�9'Wnsl3&"4mey mnln'J w uolenuued VIOR eDemDomnm vnvogdnv eq NW lanaomhM egeep NO xo eue{d"1413F Ind off'quo wno4 en4ml pmpgne pw wj,meH13 CuMWw Fuynp Lo em mwrnn anmt ne w9ld NOU aonmxvM I * �{ eweyp uumrop a0-lt-s0 h1 ungnnl lelme9 -00 !n �nuna -9t•It 10 dTN+0 A93YN3 }79 db3� I/ ,'r 1 III n�� At . LU CID cl I•GldvIN31[D17 10 ry r ,OI y _ 102 53dA '.T&1Y3K O _ '� I�I STdldd'N�d1:13 � E`4e u I°^��7� WC/dd ih.hlkYa ki ®r, 113Ito aW'H �,9i5 " Y3Htl d3tld — a0M 3Z IiM 3 — I �� pis �t� r,• -----r tl 7v3�ate„o01W14140ea�rnr.,d.9.y �M suln (FGlfdd Ol lKild)�:3,7.AI-,GL aL'11 ° `kp I BNOIIY1.N,R3JC!i w 1AW 9 wl;-c" w Lll 3H�11N — I °� F .?7L;kM :y,Jix, Lt' a1"FJ. 9'4 301Atl33 tl3W�13Li0 `' � \�\I -1 � t,' Htt 33Mt13$ tl3tlV tl34l10 tl3e70A3f1� � 1 J ¢ k s I F y b ^ W Z �; ZQQpZ r, a 0 ,w Z v CL n tN3.fd1) 0 _ o I d;3r,�,alanl _j LJ. ai S W ry�8 Ndld 3dA101Oad OZ LNW ,a A I'll 'DNI `W31SAS JNISIHONVEW H3Alno W,i Q Z W ! ! N '■1'we1sR8 WpplounM Jonpp W uoiequuee No41W pexpoN■ m pgglUnp p few IuerMel /alp uONep eW jo fueN N to VW ON 'Auo """ M4*ml p■II■Br pr'au1 "WOWS a4N4-k1 JGWO M er ■Nnpxe e4l lol ue SUM rryl 9NINum • err I� ii, al: ' wii �ggg nor . nor o''llll. vo�rr +ram1 � e No s �J� x'3 s 4 _ O g O o � CT 1 1 11 11 i W W g W Z U Z UQ V rn i ±; z - g all e J W -- - 1 ?N UNWZLAAO3lf� � z p N MRB '3NIeW31SASJNISIH3NVH'� y J C! 'al4'IuWft &RMPULYMV0 PouoP%wOd VMW pempoAm io p Modnp p Au lu-Aw An unimp e4I jo amp amp W VW oN.NwS)oMo4 eaMm-4 OuMm Om'oul'nmrftUM4=M JWD to em egmraaa MIDI m eMd GMj:10NINWM o m 3 x 10 To � ,L is A " a k o 7 a 3 � LLI N t wb CS � 4� z 0 _ F- LU W N 4 N 0 O', U� G J in C7 5b(5) MULTI -TENANT RETAIL BUILDING Site Plan Review 0 PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville City Council FROM: Cindy Sherman DATE: January 31, 2001 RE: Albertville — Multi tenant @ Albertville Plaza Site Plan Review FILE NO: 163.06 — 00.37 BACKGROUND RJ Marco Construction Inc. has submitted as application for Site Plan review to allow the construction of an 11,800 sq. ft. Multi -tenant building to include, among other uses, retail sales and a liquor store to be located on the west side of County Road 37. The site is zoned PUD and the uses are permitted under the PUD. The site is approximately 2.41 acres in size and the Comprehensive Plan guides this area for Commercial Development. Attachments: ♦ Site Location Map ♦ Site Plan ♦ Landscape plan ♦ Floor Plan ♦ Exterior Elevations 0 0 Issues Analysis Zoning. The property is zoned PUD and the use is consistent with the development plan for the area. Lot Area, Setback, Height and Coverage Proposed PUD District Proposed Lot Area 2.41 acres Lot Width Approx. 450 feet Setbacks Front 105 feet Side 150 feet Rear 60 feet Building Height Maximum 20 feet Maximum Lot coverage of 8.9 % Structures The proposed improvements are in compliance with the PUD. Site Access/Circulation: Access into the site will be from the internal private road. Circulation will be provided around the entire building. The proposed fast food site • includes a drive -through lane separate from the rest of the on -site circulation. The drive aisle areas and parking on the west side of the site is adjacent to residential uses. Staff would like to see the maximum separation that can be accommodated in order to provide a meaningful buffer. Parking: The ratio for shopping center was used to calculate parking space. This requires 5.5 spaces per 1000 square feet- of space which works out to be 65 spaces required, 69 spaces are provided. The parking as proposed .should. be adequate for the uses proposed. Shared parking will be available under the PUD agreement. All areas will be bounded with concrete curb and gutter with bituminous surfacing. All spaces shall be at least 8 Y2' x 20' with 24' drive aisles. Parking shall also be provided to meet ADA regulations. Building type and construction: The proposed building will have an exterior consisting of rockface block and burnished block with an accent band. The front of the building utilizes glass storefronts with colored awnings proposed over the individual tenant spaces. The south elevation is very plain and some additional banding or mix of materials should be provided to create a nicer view from the public road and the main entrance into the site. The roof is flat with a parapet wall along the front. Albertville Plaza Multi -Tenant bldg. Site Plan Page 2' Signage: A monument sign is shown on the site plan but no detail has been provided. There is a sign band shown on the front of the building that will allow wall signs up to 5% of the total wall area, the sign ordinance allows up to 15%. Wall signage shall be limited to the areas identified on the exterior elevation plan submitted and a date of approval will be provided following City action. Exterior Storage/Screening: No exterior storage is proposed as part of the application. The trash area shall be enclosed and is to be constructed of materials to match the building. Because of the proximity to the residential use west of the site staff recommends that the trash enclosure be moved to a different location on the site. Any roof top equipment shall be screened as appropriate. Grading/Drainage/Utilities: The final plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Landscaping Plan: A landscaping plan has been submitted that shows a number of plantings but there are no labels on the plan. A buffer a minimum of 6 feet in height as required by the ordinance shall be included in the revised landscape plan. Special attention should be given to screening headlights since the circulation pattern directs traffic so that it may create headlight issues. A revised plan shall be submitted subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. The applicant shall post the appropriate landscape guarantee as required by the Zoning . Ordinance. Lighting: A lighting plan has not been submitted. This shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit and is subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. RECOMMENDATION The application is proposed under a Planned Unit Development. The Planning Commission reviewed this request and they recommend approval with the conditions outlined below. 1. The site shall be modified to provide the maximum setback possible to the west property line adjacent to residential uses. 2. The south wall of the building shall include additional decorative banding or architectural features to enhance the appearance. The change shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. 3. A sign plan shall be submitted for the monument sign. Wall signage shall be limited to the sign band as identified on the building elevations presented to the Planning Commission January 9, 2001. 4. A Landscaping Plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the building permit subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. Security guaranteeing the installation of the landscaping shall be provided as required by ordinance. Albertville Plaza Multi -Tenant bldg. • Site Plan Page 3' 5. A lighting plan shall be submitted that meets the ordinance and is subject to the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of the building permit. 6. Final plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. The trash enclosure shall be relocated on the site subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. Should the Council find the application consistent with the PUD then a recommendation for approval should be subject to the conditions as outlined in the findings of fact. • Albertville Plaza Multi -Tenant bldg. • Site Plan Page 4' 02-05-01 • CITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Fact & Decision Site Plan Applicant's Name: RJ Marco Construction Inc. Request: RJ Marco Construction has submitted as application for Site Plan review to allow the construction of a multi — tenant building to be located in the Albertville Plaza PUD which is located just south of County Road 37 and west of County Road 19. Planning Commission Meeting Dates: January 9, 2001 City Council Meeting Date: February 5, 2001 Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following finding of fact and decision: A. The legal description of the subject property will be Lot 1, Block 1 Albertville Plaza, Wright County, Minnesota. • B. The Planning Report dated January 31, 2001 from Northwest Associated Consultants is incorporated herein. C. The City Council finds the requested Site Plan in conformance with City's Zoning Ordinance and provisions of the PUD. D. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. E. The requirements of Section 1500 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance have been reviewed in relation to proposed plans. F. The proposed actions have been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and have been found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. G. The proposed development will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. H. The proposed use conforms to all applicable Zoning Ordinance performance standards. • 1 Albertville Plaza Site Plan CC Findings of Fact & Decision Decision: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the City Council • APPROVES the Site Plan based on the most current plans and information received to date subject to the following conditions: 1. The site shall be modified to provide the maximum setback possible to the west property line adjacent to residential uses. 2. The south wall of the building shall include additional decorative banding or architectural features to enhance the appearance. The change shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. 3. A sign plan shall be submitted for the monument sign. Wall signage shall be limited to the sign band as identified on the building elevations presented to the Planning Commission January 9, 2001. 4. A Landscaping Plan shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the building permit subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. Security guaranteeing the installation of the landscaping shall be provided as required by ordinance. 5. A lighting plan shall be submitted that meets the ordinance and is subject to the review and approval of the City Planner prior to issuance of the building permit. 6. Final plans are subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. The trash enclosure shall be relocated on the site subject to the review and approval of the City Planner. • Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 5th day of February 2001. City of Albertville 0 Attest: Linda Goeb, City Administrator John A. Olson, Mayor • 2 Albertville Plaza Site Plan CC Findings of Fact & Decision P (a z_a, P[AV1 &V(A 0 0 I_I A-1, Agricultural Rural ❑ A-2, Agricultural Transitional ❑ R-1A, Low Density Single Family ❑ R-1, Single Family R-2, Single & Two Family R-3, Single & Two -Family R-4, Low Density Multiple Family n— - - . -- -_` I R-6, Residential High Densit% R-7, Special Purpose High D ❑ R-8, Mixed Housing R-MH, Manufactured Housin, ❑ 9-1, Neighborhood Business ❑ B-2, Limited Business ❑ B-3, Highway Commercial d ° e � � �"�� r!� a � I 1{ 11 !' -T, ��'i;�li p1p N acnotn WMEA U. o0t2 Ir o 1 CL - '•• ��6j �\ Si � I 3 Li ul ��'• �• \ 1 i M.s A sn oao a 1' , M s ssa ui F°s o = \uawsg03 ss� 3 ,(• •x N m mo . 1 N W •' „I I f�Tc 24. sy�s - \ T3 I 1 ♦Ito to A •� ��. 4�. 'rye �. `---.\\ �--,,:,�•„� N : EON cow^V oO4.�, �'\g � ':c o •F., \ 1 \ � .-�.0";+i of � -Yo IN ry \ ;'b �0• ; Inh°o \ NINON o k \ $ "'PAI a I .k, .r� 'sue" 1 , tr8 I e, P3�% , I � � 1 I I a I Iley4os , z 1 I Q„ is uz 8 sa I ti r fs - �g n3 'eg j I. I i ( 1 i. zi s� I I • �mm 81" � Z oe�� • r NVId U h-0 M- —-----°=°= 80013 Use w Boa 3Y,e .,e1H •VI w •.,Pi •vI ,•wee V1053NNI% '3111A18391tl r k Pei9al°u AI un P ° i Ievl Pee uoeMiu.ene 1-41 A) d a 4, o ugloglio•e.-wore n41 1e41 QIV•e Ago•y g > a. , VZVld 31llA1838lV 0—,01 a M a ..� e5'9E :f ;E -�+ Lei °+P':9-i e�i.39M1\tJ)LlrtltNlSL)A'IIN°\nPl Mse�\SPf!Uil°\.'. O w V i o . � i n � �� _. 19, Ja 4 — _ wny a V.yslbetl __._._._.__._ _ pr,slelB. Alnp . we I l.yl PV. J., u ol^In,edns IrouVr Aw ,spun ,e rw Ay pu.El,A + y.dr, uoll.11ard+ •uold +pll I.VI Alp., Aqr»4 I SNOI1VA313 NOR131X3 V10S3NNIN '31lIA18381V T^ 31IIA18381V i 3 uVZdld W N u ' I a � C a Z N I ` \ a O p O O Q ~ W W W yam-, • 5e (a) CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION # 2001-4 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO THE ALBERTVILLE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Albertville is desirous of appointing members to the Albertville Economic Development Authority, effective January 1, 2001; and WHEREAS, the City Council is interested in determining that the positions are in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City of Albertville's Economic Development Policies with membership established in Resolution #1999-31 (five members, two of whom are members of the City Council). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, appoints the following five individuals to the position of Economic Development Commission Member: ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 5 h DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2001. ATTEST: Linda Goeb, City Clerk John Olson, Mayor r CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION # 1999-31 RESOLUTION RATIFYING APPOINTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MEMBERS WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council on April 1, 1997, appointed the sitting City Council members to the Albertville Economic Development Authority ("AEDA") as commissioners via Resolution No. 1997-2 1; and WHEREAS, since the April 1, 1997 appointments, a new Mayor has been elected and duly sworn into office; and WHEREAS, the AEDA terms of some of the commissioners have expired January 1, 1999; and WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council now desires to renew the AEDA terms of the sitting City Council members and appoint the current mayor to the AEDA; and • WHEREAS the Albertville CityCouncil intends in the near future to modify the AEDA Enabling resolution to reduce the AEDA to five members, all of whom will consist of the sitting Albertville City Council members, and whose AEDA terms will expire at such time as such member no longer hold office as a City Council member. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA: 1. Resolution No. 1997-21 is hereby rescinded and superceded by this resolution. 2. The Albertville City Council Hereby appoints the following individuals to the position of Economic Development Commission Member, said individuals to serve in accordance with the terms contained in this resolution and until a qualified replacement is appointed: NAME TERM EXPIRES John Olson January 1, 2005 Duane Berning January 1, 2005 Robert Gundersen January 1, 2005 s f, Patricia Stalberger January 1, 2001 John Vetsch January 1, 2001 3. The City Administrator is hjby directed to cause to be prepared the documents necessary to amend the AEDA enling resolution such that the AEDA consists of the five sitting City Council members whAEDA terms will expire at such time as such member no longer hold office as a City Cocil member.. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 19`h DAY OF JULY,1999. x s. 4 7a