Loading...
2000-01-03 CC Agenda PacketALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA January 3, 2000 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER — ROLL CALL — ADOPT AGENDA 2. MINUTES • December 20, 1999, regular City Council Meeting 3. CITIZEN FORUM — uo Minute Limit) 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) Claims Paid List—12/31/99 (b) Letter to City of Otsego 5. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS a. Public Works • Report b. Planning & Zoning • Albert Villas - Comp Plan Amendment - Rezoning from A-1 to R-1 - Preliminary Plat Approval (contingent upon approval of EAW) c. Engineering (a) Award bid for CSAH 19/37 Traffic Light (b) Review Subdivision Ordinance Amendments — MPCA Standards c. Legal • None d. Administration (1) Sandy Greninger — Update on Family Services Collaborative (2) Consider membership in the Economic Development Partnership of Wright County ($500) (3) Resolution #2000-1 (A Resolution Making Appointments to Certain Offices and Positions within the City Of Albertville for the Year 2000) (4) Establish Pay Rates — Resolution #2000-2 6. ADJOURNMENT ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL December 20, 1999 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor John Olson, Councilmembers Robert Gundersen, Patti Stalberger (8:25 PM), Gary McCormack, and John Vetsch, City Engineer Pete Carlson, and City Administrator -Clerk Linda Goeb Mayor Olson called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to order. The agenda was amended by adding the following: • Item 5b — Wastewater Treatment issues • Item 5d(7) — Change Order #8 for the Fire Hall adding wood blocking for future cabinets in the amount of $543.33 Gundersen made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. The minutes of the December 6, 1999, meeting were amended as follows: • Page 1, Paragraph 6 — Gundersen abstained. • Page 2, Paragraph 7 — 45' X 82' building rather than 45' X 82" building • Page 3, Paragraph 4 — Clarify to state the city attorney will research whether shiatsu therapy should be considered massage or alternative medicine Gundersen made a motion to approve the minutes of the December 6, 1999, meeting as amended. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mayor Olson asked if anyone present wished to address the Council. Judy Roden introduced Ron Klecker, a resident who is interested in serving on the City Council. Councilmember Gundersen asked to remove Item 4(f) from the Consent Agenda and place it as Item 5d(7) under Administration. Gundersen made a motion to approve payment of Check #'s 12497 — 12544 as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to approve the Financial Statement for the month of November 1999 as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL December 20, 1999 Page 2 of 4 Gundersen made a motion to approve a reduction in the Letter of Credit for Karston Cove to $26,000. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to approve a reduction in the Letter of Credit for Cedar Creek North to $41,000. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion authorizing payment of all just claims prior to December 31, 1999. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to schedule the second January City Council meeting on Tuesday, January 18th due to the Martin Luther King holiday. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to purchase Y2k expanded coverage from the LMCIT in the amount of $469. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to approve the WWTF Monthly Operations Report for November 1999 as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council discussed the Public Works Department Report. Michael Sandstrom, the father of the young man who was involved in the accident with the City's vehicle, addressed the Council. He stated he is certified in auto body work and would appreciated the opportunity to repair the City's vehicle himself, rather than run the claim through his son's insurance company. Councilmember Vetsch stated he would prefer that the City go through the normal channels and have Albertville Auto Body repair the vehicle, because the shop has paid taxes in Albertville for years. Gundersen made a motion to allow Michael Sandstrom to make the repairs to the City's truck provided he uses only genuine GM parts. McCormack seconded the motion. Gundersen, Olson and McCormack voted aye. Vetsch voted no. The motion carried. Gundersen made a motion to approve the Public Works Department as presented. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. City Engineer Peter Carlson reviewed the Highway 19 Interchange Study with the Council. The study supports and justifies the traffic signal at County Road 19/37. Wright County Engineer Wayne Fingalson has seen the study and will now support the City's efforts to secure T-21 funds for a ramp at County Road 19. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL December 20, 1999 Page 3 of 4 Carlson reported that he has met with the MPCA. They are currently in the process of writing the EAW for publication the third week of January. The PCA is requiring minor changes to our storm water/wetland ordinances. He will present the proposed changes at the first meeting in January. Carlson explained that the existing well at the wastewater plant required an upgrade to provide adequate service after the expansion of the plant. The other option would be to extend the watermain to the plant. Carlson has a bid to upgrade the existing well for $1680.50. Carlson feels this is far cheaper than the cost of extending the watermain. Gundersen made a motion to approve the upgrading of the wastewater plant's existing well at a cost of $1,680.50. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mayor Olson opened the sealed bids on the 1979 rescue van. The bids were as follows: Mike Czech $351 James Gundersen $275 Jeremy Collins $150 Joe Marx $501 Gundersen made a motion to accept the high bid from Joe Marx for the 1979 rescue van. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. McCormack made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1999-64 appointing Keith Franklin to the City Council to fill the vacancy created by Councilmember Stalberger's resignation effective December 31, 1999. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to adopt the Consent and Approval of Local Franchising Authority to Transfer Control of CATV Franchise. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. McCormack made a motion to appoint Councilmember Gundersen and City Administrator Goeb to a committee to negotiate the franchise fee with the cable television provider. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council revised the draft of the letter to the City of Otsego and will review the final document at the next Council meeting. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL December 20,1999 Page 4 of 4 The Council directed the administrator to have each employee evaluated and provide the results to the Council at a meeting to be conducted at 6:15 PM on Monday, January 3, 2000, at which time the administrator's position will be evaluated by the Council as well. Gundersen made a motion to approve Change Order #7 for the Fire Hall to add support to the wall to hang cabinets in the future. Vetsch seconded the motion. Gundersen, Vetsch, Olson and Stalberger voted aye. McCormack voted no. The motion carried. Gundersen made a motion to approve the 2000/2001 contract for police protection with Wright County. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye. Stalberger made a motion to adjourn at 8:55 PM. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. John A. Olson, Mayor Linda Goeb, City Administrator CLAIMS FOR PAVMF,NT Check # December Vendor 30, 1999 Purpose Amount 12551 Action Radio & Communication FD Radio Repairs $ 131.40 12552 Albertville Body & Fender FD Repair Fire Truck $ 710.50 12553 CarQuest Monthly Charges $ 64.13 12554 Construction Bulletin Bids for Traffic Signal $ 226.20 12555 Crow River Rental Chain Saw Rental $ 255.50 12556 Davies Water Equipment Co. Meters & Supplies $ 3,190.72 12557 DJ's Heating & AC Settlement Payment $ 24,925.00 12558 DJ's Total Home Care Monthly Charges $ 221.33 12559 Don's Auto Service & Repair Monthly Charges $ 54.35 12560 Driver -Vehicle Services Div. License Plates $ 54.00 12561 Earl F. Anderson, Inc. Street Signs $ 114.75 12562 Den Fehn Gravel & Excavating Payment Request #7 $ 76,537.17 12563 Chris Gaulrapp Milea e & Emt Test $ 175.95 12564 Granite Electronics Radio - New Pickup $ 634.68 12565 HealthEast Med. Home Pen Light Mabis/Gloves $ 26.47 12566 Henry& Associates Water Department Tools $ 423.20 12567 J-Craft, Inc. Tool Box/Bed Liner $ 1,177.21 12568 Joint Powers Board Hook -on through 12/31/99 $ 21,600.00 12569 Keys Well Drilling Co. WWTF Pump $ 1,680.50 12570 Larson Publications December Legals $ 380.02 12571 Medica Group Insurance $ 2,990.28 12572 Minnegasco Monthly Charges $ 464.84 12573 MN Women of Today Found. Meat Raffle Donations $ 1,525.00 12574 NCPERS Group Life Ins. Payroll Deductions $ 12.00 12575 Office Max Office Supplies $ 336.38 12576 Pitney Bowes, Inc. Postage Meter $ 20.25 12577 Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc. Engineering Services $ 3,050.94 12578 Sprint -United Telephone Monthly Charges 1 $ 333.60 12579 Sunnyfield Construction Yard H drant-Oakside Park $ 700.00 12580 Richard S brant Return Zoning Request Fee I $ 650.00 B 12-30-99 Page 1 CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT 12581 December Chad Wade 30, 1999 Mileage & EMT Test $ 322.11 12582 Wright County Highway Dept. 2 yards of Cold Mix $ 103.28 12583 Wright -Hennepin Cooperative Greenhaven Street Lights $ 22.06 TOTAL $ 143,113.82 B12-30-99 Page 2 5975 Main Av a N.E. P.O. Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301 (612) 497-3384 Fax: (612) 497-3210 January 3, 1999 City Administrator Michael Robertson Otsego City Hall 8899 Nashua Avenue NE Elk River, MN 55330 Dear Mike, This letter is in response to your letter dated November 8, 1999, regarding future meetings between Albertville and Otsego. The Albertville City Council feels that there is some misunderstanding regarding Albertville's position on the extension of sanitary sewer into a portion of the City of Otsego. It has always been the City of Albertville's position that sanitary sewer service could be extended beyond its corporate limits to serve portions of the City of Otsego, however, the City of Albertville insists on being instrumental in the planning of an expanded service area. We feel that with joint planning and an equitable financial arrangement, both cities will benefit. The Albertville City Council is still interested in working on a sub -committee level to attempt to resolve the sewer issue, as well as other issues of mutual interest. Perhaps after the holidays, we can arrange a committee meeting that is convenient to everyone. Sincerely, Linda Goeb City Administrator cc: City Council TO: FROM: DATE: City of Albertville MEMORANDUM Mayor and City Council Tim Guimont, Public Works December 30, 1999 SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REPORT • Parks The skating rink was successfully opened for Christmas break. The Public Works Department opens it every morning because we need to be here for WW rounds on weekends. I hired James Morris to lock the warming house at night. (He is also snowplowing for us this season.) The current rate of pay is $5.00/time to lock the warming house. I would like to see a raise in the amount somewhat. Whatever the Mayor and Council members feel is appropriate. • Christmas Trees Two years ago the Public Works crew went around the City and picked up the trees. Last year we informed residents to bring them to the compost site. There has been some question about the situation for this year. I would like the Mayor and Council members to make a decision if we will continue the service of picking up the trees or have the residents bring them to the compost site? TG:bmm CAMy DocurnmtsTublic Works Report\memo-city council 12-3499.doc NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CO IN- COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARF 56 MEMORANDUM TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council Albertville Planning Commission FROM: Deb Garross DATE: 7 December 1999 RE: Albertville - Albert Villas Preliminary Plat FILE: 163.06 - 99.08 BACKGROUND The purpose of this item is to continue consideration of the preliminary plat of Albert Villas for K.C. Land Company. This item was scheduled for public hearing on September 14, 1999 however the applicant requested that the applications be removed from the agenda and considered on October 12, 1999. At the October meeting, the Planning Commission gave direction to the applicant to revise the PUD and preliminary plat drawings to address the items outlined in the Planning Report dated 8 September 1999. The Planning Commission continued the public hearing to November 9, 1999 wherein the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, and CUP/PUD for Albert Villas was approved. Consideration of the preliminary plat was continued to allow the developer to address the many conditions outlined in previous Planning Reports. The focus of this memo will be to outline for the Planning Commission the revisions that have been incorporated into the preliminary plat since the last meeting. ISSUES 1. This project required that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) be prepared and reviewed pursuant to the process established by the Environmental Quality Board. The EAW was published on August 25, 1999 and comments were submitted from the Department of Natural Resources and State Historical Society. The EAW process specifies that the City may not grant any project approvals until such a time as the City Council adopts a negative declaration (a finding that the project will not result in major environmental impacts). This being the case, a recommendation for approval of the preliminary plat should be contingent upon completion of the EAW process. 2. In the event that the Planning Commission finds the preliminary plat to be consistent with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and City Ordinances, a recommendation should be forwarded to the City Council to approve the preliminary plat subject to conditions 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 16 PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM specified by the Planning Commission. The attached findings of fact and decision documents are provided to assist the Planning Commission in this regard. The applicant has submitted revised preliminary plat plans which address the majority of conditions and issues identified in previous planning reports for the Albert Villas project. The number of conditions has been significantly reduced to the point that staff is comfortable in recommending approval of the preliminary plat. The majority of conditions outlined in the attached draft Findings of Fact and Recommendation reflect the various approvals for the EAW, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and CUP/PUD applications. Other conditions relate to the park dedication that is desired by the City for this project. The Planning Commission should discuss the park dedication and form a recommendation to the City Council concerning this issue. PRELIMINARY PLAT REVISIONS The preliminary plat has been amended to increase the width of 51st Court to the required 60' right-of-way width. All of the planned rights -of -way including those proposed for CSAH 18 are consistent with City and Wright County requirements. The developer did indicate to staff that he has negotiated an option for the triangular parcel located east of proposed Outlot E. This development is positive with regard to the preliminary plat and PUD circulation system because it will provide for a secondary street connection that was the subject of concern at the time of the original proposal. To date, the developer has not provided documentation that he has control of the triangular parcel. As such, the preliminary plat and PUD plan will likely need to be amended at some future date to incorporate the legal description of the triangular parcel into the project. (This action will require publication and public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council). In the interim, the preliminary plat identifies that a temporary cul-de-sac will be constructed at the eastern extent of 52"d Street, as had been recommended by Staff. The revised plan indicates some minor modifications to the wetland mitigation plan. However it should be noted that the amount of wetland impact in the proposed plan is relatively slight considering the size of the parcel and the number of wetlands (and County Ditch #9) that exist on site. With regard to the Shoreland Management Ordinance PUD requirements, the concept PUD plan indicates a schematic layout that appears to be consistent with Ordinance requirements. Additional land has been shown for a park area adjacent to Swamp Lake and the number of lots shown within each Shoreland PUD Tier are consistent with the Ordinance requirements. The revised plans indicate screening and berms along the rear of the lots which are located adjacent to CSAH 18. The proposed screening and berms are consistent with that suggested by staff during the review of the original proposal. With regard to the lot arrangement, layout, area and width requirements the applicant supplied the data which is incorporated into the following table: Lot Area, Setback, Height and Coverage Requirements. RI -A District Required Original Proposal Revised Proposal Density (Units per Acre) 2.9 1.34 1.30 Minimum Lot Area 15,000 sf 80 lots (44%) 12,524 sq. ft. Range of Lot Sizes 15,000 sf 12,505 — 35,647 sf 12,524 — 36,671 sq. ft. Required Minimum Useable 12,000 sf 30 lots (16% < 12,000 Upland lot area above O-H- 12,000) W (80% of required lot area must be above O-H-W) Lot Width 100 feet 80 —150 feet (143 or 85 feet minimum 79% of the lots are 95.04 feet average less than 100' wide) Lot Width Corner Lot 120 feet 90 —130 feet 100 feet minimum 2 Lots (10%) conform (except 2 lots are 95 feet" to requirement Average Lot Width Comer 101 feet 105.1 Lot Buffer Yard Lot Depth (lots 170 feet 165 feet* 170 feet except Block 9 which adjacent to arterial or major has 155 foot lots collector streets) Buffer Yard (lot width 25 feet feet 10 feet requirements for side yards) J16 Setback (PUD Periphery) 35 feet Unknown 35 feet Setbacks (front) 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet (side -interior) 15 feet 10 feet 10 feet (side -corner) 30 feet (side 20 feet 20 feet yard abutting a public street) (rear) 25 feet 30 feet 30 feet Wetland setback from O-H- 20 feet Unknown 20 feet W Building Height Maximum 35 feet Unknown 35 feet Maximum Lot Coverage for 25 percent of Unknown 25 percent of lot area Structures lot area Minimum Floor Area per 2 BR 960 sq. Unknown 2 BR 960 sq. ft. above ground Dwelling Unit ft. above 3 BR 1,040 sq. ft. above ground ground 3 BR 1,040 sq. ft. above ground The lot depth calculations are based upon the Wright County Highway Department requirement to dedicate 65' of R-O-W for CSAH 18. PRELIMINARY PLAT PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Lots with Easement Constraints: There are a number of lots within the proposed development that are encumbered by easements which severely restrict the building envelops, future home design and options for accessory structures such as decks, sheds, gazebos etc. The lots located along the western edge of the NSP easement are large in area however the existence of the easement results in a limited building envelope for these lots. The applicant has provided a number of house plans and foot prints that can fit within the resulting building envelopes (however it should be noted that these are general examples and are not necessarily representative of the type of homes that will be built within the development). The Planning Commission should be aware that future owners on these lots are going to have little if any yard area to construct accessory structures, which are typical in single family neighborhoods. Furthermore, the reduction of lot width flexibility requested on these lots also restricts the ability to construct oversize or three stall garages. To address this issue the following are suggested: The applicant file deed restrictions with the Wright County Recorder of Deeds for all lots adjacent to or containing NSP and/or Amoco pipeline easements indicating that no structures can be built within the easement areas. 2. The applicant provide information with lot sales literature identifying the NSP and Amoco easement restrictions. Lots with Wetland Constraints: The proposed project contains areas with relatively shallow lots which are encumbered by the large wetland area in the middle of the site (Outlot D). Similar issues will present themselves on these lots as that which was described above. To address this issue the following are suggested. 1. The applicant provide information with lot sales literature identifying the building envelope and 20' required wetland setback area, where no structures can be constructed. Parks & Trails: Under the City's current Ordinance a 10% park land and/or cash dedication is required. A land dedication of 23.5 acres for the entire project, cash or combination of land and cash will be required for this development. The cash dedication for a single-family development is $1,300.00 per lot, which in this case would result in $439,400 dollars for the entire PUD (338 lots multiplied by $1,300.00 per lot). The cash dedication for the preliminary plat would be $230,000.00 (177 lots multiplied by $1,300.00 per lot). The park dedication fees, if any, will be collected at the time of final plat approval, for each phase of the development. Trail dedication standards require the developer/owner to construct trails with the cost for installation counted as a credit toward the above mentioned park dedication requirement. The preliminary plat proposes to dedicate two public parks wihtin the development area north of County Ditch #9. The largest park within the preliminary plat consists of 5.8 acres however it is a long, narrow configuration which is not very conducive to use for active recreational purposes. The site is too narrow for a ball field however a minimum size soccer field and basketball/volley ball courts could be constructed within the park. The second park area (1.9 acres located southwest of the intersection of Kahl Avenue and Kaler Avenue) is extremely narrow and of little public recreation value due to the storm water pond and County Ditch constraints. The proposed trail system is an attractive amenity for the development and will provide for pedestrian circulation throughout the project area. The Planning Commission should be aware that the preliminary plat shows 20 foot access easements for some of the trail connections as opposed to 30' outlots or platted "park" connections required by the Subdivision Ordinance. 1. The preliminary plat should be amended to include an asphalt trail along the south side of CSAH 18 in place of the sidewalk that is shown on the plans. 2. The preliminary plat should be revised to delete the asphalt trail shown along the north side of 52"d Street and the rear lot lines of Block 4. (This trail is not necessary because there is a proposed sidewalk in 52"d Street that will provide for pedestrian circulation). In addition to the items outlined above, the following conditions identified for the original application are still applicable to this application: 1. The EAW process shall be completed prior to City Council approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezoning, CUP/PUD and preliminary plat. 2. A Planned Unit Development agreement is prepared which includes all development plans and specifications, shall set forth specific land use and performance standards which must be adhered to throughout the life of the PUD, and shall be approved by the City Attorney. 0 3. The number of building permits which will be issued to the project will be limited to 50 until such a time as the entire length of Kahl Avenue/47th Street/Kallard Avenue is installed to provide a secondary access to the development. 4. The City Engineer provide comments and recommendations on the following: a. Status of the EAW b. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan c. Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan d. Wetland Mitigation Plan e. Easement location and sizes on preliminary plat 5. The applicant submits documentation from NSP and Amoco identifying that each entity has reviewed the preliminary plat and that the improvements proposed within the respective easements are acceptable. 6. Deed restrictions are prepared subject to review and approval of the City Attorney identifying the building pad locations for all lots adjacent to or containing the NSP and Amoco pipeline easements. The deed restrictions should identify that said lots contain restrictions precluding future building additions, decks, accessory buildings, and play equipment behind the homes within said easement areas. Sales information will be required as part of the PUD approval disclosing this development restriction to future homebuyers. 7. The applicant provides the proposed means to disclose the location of all parks to future, prospective lot owners. 8. The developer indicates the timing and method for removing and/or relocating the existing buildings located on the subject site consistent with Sections 1400-1 and 900 of the Zoning Ordinance. 9. The developer indicates the proposed use of model homes consistent with Section 2200 of the Zoning Ordinance. 10. Any other conditions as set forth by the City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission or City Council. CONCLUSION The proposed preliminary plat has been amended to incorporate the majority of issues and conditions identified by earlier reviews of the project. The decision to approve, deny or conditionally approve the preliminary plat of Albert Villas is viewed as a policy decision to be made by the City Council. This memorandum outlines recommended conditions of approval should the decisions be made in favor of the developer. To assist the Planning Commission in its formulation of a recommendation, the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation are provided. ACTION REQUESTED A motion to approve the preliminary plat of Albert Villas subject to the conditions identified herein or as amended by the Planning Commission is in order. Attachments: 1. Exhibit A Revised Preliminary Plat 2. Exhibit B Draft Findings of Fact for approval of Albert Villas pc: Linda Goeb, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson, Kevin Mealhouse, Matt Davitch, Chuck Plowe, Keith Harsted, Ron Rotelle EXHIBIT B Lot Area, Setback, Height and Coveraae Reauirements RI -A District Required Original Proposal Revised Proposal Density (Units per Acre) 2.9 1.34 1.30 Minimum Lot Area 15,000 sf 80 lots (44%) 12,524 sq. ft. Range of Lot Sizes 15,000 sf 12,505 — 35,647 sf 12,524 — 36,671 sq. ft. Required Minimum Useable 12,000 sf 30 lots (16% < 12,000 Upland lot area above 0-H- 12,000) W (80% of required lot area must be above O-H-W) Lot Width 100 feet 80 —150 feet (143 or 85 feet minimum 79% of the lots are 95.04 feet average less than 100' wide) Lot Width Comer Lot 120 feet 90 —130 feet 100 feet minimum 2 Lots (10%) conform (except 2 lots are 95 feet" to requirement Average Lot Width Comer 101 feet 105.1 Lot Buffer Yard Lot Depth (lots 170 feet 165 feet* 170 feet except Block 9 which adjacent to arterial or major has 155 foot lots collector streets) Buffer Yard (lot width 25 feet 10 feet 10 feet requirements for side yards) Setback (PUD Periphery) 35 feet Unknown 35 feet Setbacks (front) 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet (side -interior) 15 feet 10 feet 10 feet (side -comer) 30 feet (side 20 feet 20 feet yard abutting a public street) (rear) 25 feet 30 feet 30 feet Wetland setback from 0-H- 20 feet Unknown 20 feet W Building Height Maximum 35 feet Unknown 35 feet Maxdmum Lot Coverage for 25 percent of Unknown 25 percent of lot area Structures lot area Minimum Floor Area per 2 BR 960 sq. Unknown 2 BR 960 sq. ft. above ground Dwelling Unit ft. above 3 BR 1,040 sq. ft. above ground ground 3 BR 1,040 sq. ft. above ground lts-1y7y 10:23 E.G.RUD & SUNS INC 612 786 6007 P.04i05 BPAmoco November 18, 1999 Mr- Matt Davich E. G. Rud & Sons, Inc. 9180 Lexington Avenue, NE Circle Pines, NN 55014-6007 Dear Mr. Davich: Pro ed Road trossin BP Amoco Pipeline 28100Torch Parkway, Su;ta Boo Warrenv(Ile Minois 60555-3939 630-836.5100 Thank you for the informadon you provided in your facsimile yesterday. Unfortunately, there is not enough detail on the drawing. It is required that Amoco be supplied with a complete legal desctriprion of the property so that the exact location of the crossing in relation to the pipeline can be determined. This Will also allow us to identify which Right of Way Contracts or Conveyances are being affected. In order to provide adequate protection to our pipeline, Amoco requires the following conditions are observed. No utilities or roads shall run parallel to Arnoco's line within Amoco's right of way. Amoco discourages any parking lot built on our right of way. If one does exist, it trust be asphalt and have a minimum of four feet of cove, In addition, a pavement agreement must be executed between the owner and Amoco. This agreement gives Amoco the right to excavate within the pavement area for any required future maintenance on the pipeline without being responsible for any pavement replacement, Any pavement replacement will be the owner's responsibility. Pipe and road crossing Amoco's right of way should run at or as near as possible a 90° angle to our line. In addition to the above items, the following are requirements which need to be considered when working within the limits of the easement and/or around the pipeline. There shall be a 2 foot clearance between Amoco's pipeline and any other utility line. Amoco prefers that all utilities cross under our line. A minimum of five and one half feet of cover is required for all road crossing and/or parking lot throughways. All concrete pavement is prohibited. A minimum of four feet of cover is required for all drainage ditches. Any structures such as manholes or catch basins shall not be located over the pipeline. A minimum horizontal clearance of live feet is required between the structure and the pipeline. i-18-1999 10:24 E.G.RUD & SONS INC 612 786 6007 P.05/05 No trees, shrubbery, above ground structures, etc. shall be planted, placed or built within Amoco's easement. Please contact Minnesota One -Call at (800) 252-1166 at least 48 hours prior to any construction so that we may arrange to have a representative present to ensure that there are no conflicts with our pipeline. You may also use the One -Call number to have the pipeline physically located, probed, and flagged across the property. If you have any questions I may be reached at (630) 836-5192. Thank you for your cooperation. Yours truly, M. Groat Right -of -Way D. Neilan M. Reh D. Sommerfeld TOTAL P.05 SIZE 85 - 89 90 -99 100 - 109 110 - 119 120 -129 130 larger LOT WIDTHS total 12/02/1999 12/02/1999 NO. OF LOTS 68 63 28 9 4 5 177 8 x { , ---------- ----i S y it S�tt N N��•.�� ���� 1 �! •'yttJ. 1 • fl t7 R `c g � : � o oho 0 0o aoe � � b --- --- ---- - - - - �'� � a � s q�q� � t• { { { �.'... ... ....... ...... . ......... .......... { ............... a { A o'$ ti { { o ( 4 { { I { i { — — — — — — — — — — — —) { { { •` I Y • • ••• tl` {yrI Iy.� rye �yI GGG � ttlit it, P m „ — �--- { I CITY I CITY oc SAINT WOWL ' — / ' I I I I I <I III � a • c a a � • • J . . • a Ta- 91 • rr r ___ .__—__ ------ l .� �-� — �, � s�, �,« � � ,.�-� �. �. �,� V �� ray � � � � � • J ------------------------ I 1 �, T 7t ,.T[[ 1 � �144 � ` (— 1tt��I � � r \ �% ,� y / / / r�• I y ; Imo- T 1 — — i If i °a / `• n �J-/ / I ---- I � � A I I E 1 �Q 4 � I� I c , i � Ia�Ei�ii�iliirMYWiiiirWiY>iiC':�i:�IIIM•fl�■ �Y�IWI���i�Y���ri��ll y~ Ike II Ir O �ra}'w I 6fJll_II I ^I� u� _J _ L75m_W 'lr—-- —� —T — ry `I A p ' k II a I II a II II a II 11 iII a L-1L \IIN I�+JI_ _JL_ Jl _JL J r ItsG r s _ I� { g , � pf9,u KACiAM su AbL_'NiE ° k' I .., (i aq i3Q PL 1� /°, T� s-no--lF-■ if 'j 1^\�r- .'1 !'_.. 1r �1 rtlr I Q yyG_ 11 II I II r—r o� II P I--¢--1 I I•� %/P\\\ 11 L } W 11 3 e I II II � II II N II � II ��I �_ J � // 8�p �\ � WI I J1, I 1 I f 1 : - �' JL- qqL A - J wag R- \ \ 1 �� '1 v 1LIL Is 1 ♦� ir .pro noq♦ Ullllty Ea�°m�nt -� SI - 4 - I I Imo`` f al ,1 3QI' d 1 ? 1 L atP J I r 1 L wit JPLj oil is I O i Fs II------L I ------------F. 1 / y�Q 4� , 4�0 ' 91 �QW, j I49 r i d �N I /' //' R � A tit ij / I I I N 't D z s I 1�1 1 11 t fy 0 A { g pR tgg oil > m 9600 i V i9uae--- --� MID 11 TO BEaPROYM / / / a PRarorsm a unun I I�� III Ij///��� IIYJ I P I IIIPQ� I Pr N t "—'� I " tD l/ ,CP �IIP III�� IIN $ $ a $ W I � i a e a t° a T ? T P L B _ •� y. �s / — — � — Syr -!t ^I. iO4 N I I In Il � _ > I- (�� IL 1 �_ _ � IL I ___ - I $Y I I N II O l � N ���� ���.D r a I n a q• a n d l) t I I I t y a s m n tom` ; `�.0 r c I __ , I yN N , �0► ri I I LL m f�•'• 1 Arm / — 7 7_-I I / fi e iJ� 80 If i C/ yy III � � � \ / / ♦ ♦ l�o J t / `�� ��� \ � � \ \ � �/ � / � \ � + / ♦ +� 11 isail / ♦ - L \ I I i v A pI ri I z o 0 C) z ZO K > A M 2 m 00 rn1 -n A) Z 4 To. 61 I> A � r— WMI I> U—z t— I> (P ' ..... ..... Lon III YN < z z z z z z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 Oz A A A D Z O z z D oM-0 Um r- a�NQ���A rZ P c� x; oD a C'� y tYti afm•l tj IN ��m 1-1 Z� v x o rOi L Un AZ n-. Az; ❑r i �i a m n r x m n i �A D I I , jo / t , yy sY wan a�an--OR 00 was "a 00 E ? r _ // / t vvYY� VV�►'f::, "� \ / ° $ B It / r �v ;. ± \\ II #III Mtii �tY ,�,.. mot\ ,r----�r--�_� /�- •,_�' ,;,�,I;;;;:• �_�. o t 0o20 iijilln oil •fool O t I t M% r I i - e e I I • CA E ' -� �' '-� .ii �� II �� 11 �Q II �„ II �t Bt .• � II cvt Il�t 11�4 /// /-�-t'�' � i ti 1 '' W fQ2 t o 0 `ter_ •ij!i II I' II II II 11 I II / /I I I I I I I ... r tl i t I I I I I I r I • :j 'i t� I, t I I I I r i l r I I r I I e / I e I� t 1 1 •� I I � iii ® � t ril r d II t I t e�_ 111 II_ t/ t �— --�— ---I --- i --- --- 1� -- " -- zr g I q —I - 1i6 -i I �1- I Tr 1 C'�i r y-I i� � ;' I ---------- �$- 6t I II — It II II II C it Z I 11 I. II II �11 II 3TNt.u'i" AD Alp / i ,/ �� a�nasua� V9.�, )TY Of SAINT MKMAEL CITY OF ALDERMLLE P40p s .-.--t g II 1 I C 1W $i,_- aW- IN a--- - -i �F__II_ III I 9— I �W pl-+ d►11�� II�"l t 7il �---I -k -- #--- � -- �--- V -- # # �--- a #--_- k�" # I# # # # a I a II a a a A a a A a a a a } Q r a a a a a A 4 �. it 14 II 11 II II I ti I 7f • I - - J N -- - _ J - - - ` / KAOAGMAN AW91M ¢ N ■ lf_"lL II II � IIl+ Ilir' Ilrr I �"_yy YL W ' ;b aL :w a a N g 4. J / r s � a / - - - - - - a qr / I0, , -.a \ --- W4M--- # JL a I / 0Mir 4 dig — J I L a p n \` ` Now >" i / m Egg VV IV 3 Pb 1Pp iPe-L�, aA^ a Qq PPP� i, a 6 13 PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY September 1, 1999 Mr. Mayor & Members of the City Council C/o Ms. Linda Goeb City Clerk\Administrator 5975 Main Avenue NE. Albertville, MN 55301 RE: Plan approval issues south of Highway 118 for Albert Villas Dear Mr. Mayor, Council Members and Staff: This letter serves to confirm numerous telephone conversations with staff as it relates to proposed work on lands south of 118. Please forward a full set of the plans which will be shared with the Planning Commission. As an adjacent property owner we have the following requests prior to preliminary plat approval, rezoning and quide plan amendment. During our planning process we had to submit an EAW, receive its comments and address a variety of issues such as ditch crossings and sewer flows prior to any preliminary plat or guide plan amendment. We remind the City the EQB rules are the same, which will require an EAW of the project as currently proposed due to the lack of a various comprehensive plan elements such as a storm sewer master plan. 2. During the creation of sanitary sewer benefit areas, the City concluded there was little likelihood of development in this area. So, a boundary was stopped at Highway 118, which created a payback to Kenco for sewer under Highway 19 through Barthell's land. This was a 12-year payback period of which 1.5 years are over. We again request the City expand the benefited u1ca prior to any Filai guide plan change and preliminary plats with a rebate to Kenco under the terms of the Parkside 3rd agreement. We do believe that a sewer flow capacity question should be addressed as it relates to flows from these new sites through Cedar Creek, Center Oaks, Parkside 1,2,3,4, Summerfield and across Highway 19. During 1998, the farmers along ditch 9 believed they could not afford a ditch cleaning, so Pilot land offered to do so. It was discussed with the attorney, the City Administrator at the time, and the Engineer, that Pilot be eligible for a fair share rebate of costs from trunk storm sewer utility fees, since the ditch cleaning benefited the City for the next 20 years and served more than just new development that Pilot was undertaking. Our work cost $23000 in excavation and $12,000 in engineering. We believe that work done in the area South of Highway 118 should be under a substantial rebate if development proceeds, since it clearly benefits their property both for 1 avtrnkfe.doc 13736 Johnson Street NE • Ham Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094 agriculture in the short term and development in the long term. At a minimum, engineering study work done on these sites should be generated without any financial contribution from lands that Pilot owns. 4. There has been no discussion of a lift station study, which could impact our plans for 50 approved Townhomes. This must be completed prior to a preliminary plat approval. 5. We have an engineering concern that without a guarantee that the first phases connect to St. Michael for water looping, that additional water mains may be needed along Highway 18. We would have zero use for any lines along 18 and could not participate in any assessment, which would be proposed as part of that scenario. 6. Last, with development concepts pending, we wish to hear what the City has discovered regarding joint trail construction with Wright County Highways and the school district as they upgrade the road. They should be involved now if any new intersections, accel or decel lanes are required, especially as they may affect a lift station siting. These are the most significant planning and financial issues, which we dealt with during our approvals, and we would expect similar consideration and results from this project. We will be at the Planning Commission meeting. Sincerely, ' 41 Donald Jensen Land Development Director Cc: Kent Roessler \\ServerO I\don\LANDDE V\LETTERS\PROJECTS\ALBRT VLE\OPERATIO\harstedques.doe C environmental &*46.0 •605 Franklin Avenue NE, P.O. Box 51, St. Cloud, MN 56302-0051 320.25 A11099sef 11 '�� . engineering EWA architecture 2000 CSAH 19/37 TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA SEH-RCM No. A-ALBEV 9905.00 BIDS DUE: WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 29,1999 @10:00 A.M. PAGE I COLLISYS MPLS MN DESIGN ELECTRIC ST CLOUD MN ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION & MAINTENANCE CO "LE PLAIN MN GRANITE CITY ELECTRIC 73 WAITE PARK MN KILLMER ELECTRIC 4 MAPLE GROVE MN RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC INC LONG LAKE MN TRAFFIC CONTROL CORP AFTON MN w.Wbev\9905\specs\SWmrAab Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Offices located throughout the upper Midwest Equal Opportunity Employer We help you plan, desiyn, and achieve. DEC-21-1999 15:25 NAC 6125--'"' v02 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CO NtNC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MAR: (OAL) MEMORANDUM TO: Pete Carlson, City Engineer FROM: Deb Garross, Senior Planner DATE: 21 December 1999 RE: Subdivision Ordinance Amendment — MPCA Pollution Control Standards FILE NO: 163.05-99.06 The purpose of this memo is to respond to the issues identified by the MPCA in their letter dated December XX, 1999. The attached draft Subdivision Ordinance amendment pages have incorporated the majority of changes suggested by the MPCA. Please note that the proposed language is underlined and language proposed to be deleted from the Subdivision Ordinance is shown with a line through the text. Some of the MPCA suggested changes were not incorporated into the draft because other existing City Codes and procedures provide for such protection measures, The foliowing comments are provided based upon the order identified in the attached MPCA review letter: 1. The attached document represents the incorporation of pollution control standards that are applicable to the City of Albertville and its ability to review and implement such controls, The draft requires pollution control plans for subdivisions containing five (5) or more acres of land and/or land disturbing activities involving the excavation, filling or transport of fifty (50) or more cubic yards of material. The MPCA model ordinance suggests that pollution control plans be required for all building permits, To expect individual homeowners to develop pollution control plans for single family homes, decks and additions as well as to provide financial security ($3,000 as suggested by the MPCA) is considered to be an extraordinary and extremely costly requirement both to the homeowner and the City. In the place of requiring a pollution control plan for individual building permits/projects, the City will continue to implement standard erosion control practices (i.e. silt fence and other measures) at individual building/addition sites. 2_ The City of Albertville addresses grubbing and clearing of land and other vegetation removal/preservation practices through implementation of the following: Shoreland Management Ordinance which outlines procedures associated with vegetation removal within the most ecologically sensitive areas of the community (those areas within 1,000 feet of the three Natural Environment Lakes within the City); Wetland 5775 WAYZATA. BOUt_EVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MI NNESOTA 554 1 6 PHONE 61 2 595-9636 FAX 51 2.595,-9637 E-MAIL NAC(-a-) WINT`ERNET.CON1 DEC-21-1999 15:26 NAC 612 595 9837 0.03 Systems Overlay District; required landscaping for new residential subdivisions, semi public and all income producing properties including residential structures containing 5 or more units; and by requiring landscape plans and drainage plans as part of site plan and conditional use permit review/approval. Additionally, standard erosion control practices are required as part of the individual building permit process. The enactment of additional controls is viewed as duplicative and unnecessary and therefore no further changes concerning this matter are suggested, 3. This item has been incorporated into the draft. 4. This item has been incorporated into the draft. 5. This item has been incorporated into the draft. 6. This item has been incorporated into the draft. 7. The ordinance requires the pollution control plan to identify adjacent areas within 100' of the land disturbing activity as a submittal requirement for storm water pollution control plans. The purpose of the ordinance is to require the control erosion and sedimentation on the site, both during and after construction. Therefore, there should be no down stream erosion problems associated with the project. Furthermore, the requirements for permanent storm water pollution controls specify that "accelerated channel erosion shall not occur as a result of the proposed land disturbing or development activity." No further changes to the draft are suggested regarding this item. B. This item has been incorporated into the draft. 9. This item is in regard to required financial security for storm water and erosion control facilities. Subdivision Ordinance Section 800 discusses required improvements and financial arrangements for development projects. Item A- 800.1(g) has been amended to refer to storm water pollution control facilities to address this matter. It is suggested that the City incorporate language concerning the amount of financial security via Resolution and/or other means suggested by the City Engineer and City Attorney, rather than incorporate the figure into the Subdivision Ordinance. (The use of a Resolution, fee schedule, development contract or other implementation device is suggested because those documents can be modified accordingly based upon current market conditions. Specific security amounts should not, as a matter cf practice, be incorporated into Ordinances, as the amendment procedure is more difficult and time consumptive due to publication and public hearing requirements). NAC has reviewed the Albertville Subdivision Ordinance and found that there is not a specific requirement for an amendment of the Ordinance to be processed through the Planning Commission prior to consideration by the City Council. However, the DEC-21-1999 15:26 NAC amendments necessary to incorporate the MPCA pollution control standards are extensive and Wil impose additional time and finandai burdens to individuals desiring to develop their properties. This being the case, it is recommended that the City follow similar notification and public hearing procedures for this Subdivision Ordinance amendment as would be required for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. It may also be advisable to have a joint meeting Wth Mike Couri to further discuss this matter, prior to any further action. Please review the attached information and the suggestions recommended herein and advise our office accordingly of further changes and/or meetings which should occur prior to preparation of the actual ordinance amendment documents for consideration by the City. Attachm nts. 1. Subdivision Ordinance Sections 2. Letter from Gary Rott (MPCA Review Letter) PC Linda Goeb, City Administrator Mike Couri, City Attorney Kevin Mealhouse, Building Official DEC-21-1999 15:27 NAC 612 595 9837 P.05 A-100.4. Conditions for Recordi g No plat or any subdivision shall be entitled to record in the Wright County Recorder's office or have any validity until the plat or subdivision has been prepared, approved and acknowledged in the manner prescribed by this Chapter. A-100.5_ Building Per s. No building permits shall be considered for issuance by the City for the construction of any building, structure or improvement to the land or to any lot in a subdivision as defined herein, until all requirements of this Chapter have been fully complied with. A-100.6. Conflict. Whenever there is a difference between minimum standards or dimensions specified herein and those contained in other official regulations, resolutions or City Code provisions, the most restrictive standards shall apply. -100.7 MeasuLed Distanos, All measured distances expressed in feet shall be the nearest tenth of a foot. g,I00 B. DefinitioM Except for those words and phrases defined below, the words and phrases used in this Chapter shall be interpreted to be given the meaning in common usage, and as may be commonly defined in dictionaries so as to give this Chapter its most reasonable application. (a) Alley: A public or private right-of-way primarily designed to serve as secondary access to the side or rear of those properties whose principal frontage is on a street. (b) Applicant: The owner, his agent or person having legal control and/or an interest in the land proposed to be subdivided. (c) Attorney: The attorney employed by the City, unless otherwise stated. (d) 8ase Lot: A lot meeting all the specifications within its zoning district prior to being divided into a subdivision of single family attached units. Best Managgment Practices (BMP's) Erosion and sEdiment control and water gualily management 12ractices that are the most effecti a and practicable mens gj controlling, 12reventing, and minimizing dearadation_Qf surface water includmca cons ctu, ion p asings minimizin t e length of time soil areas are exoosed� prohibitions and other managg}e_nt practices ublis d b st a or des Hated area -wide annin encie Ex les MP' can be nd in he current versions of the Minn sota Pollution control Agency's "Protecting Water ualityj, g rban Areas "and the same gencv's "Stor Water d Wpflnnds: PI nin d Evaluatioa Guidelines for Addres n Pot tia! IIs of Urban orm-W er an Snow -Me Runo n lands The U ted tates vironme I Prote t'on Agency's."Storm Water Management for (;o 1 .auction Activities: Developing City of Albertville 100-2 Subdivision Ordinance DEC-2-1-1999 15;27 NAC 612 595 9937 P . 06 r Ilution Prevention Plans and Best Man dement Practices "(as a referanco fnr BMP's) the Minnesota Deoartriment of Transportation's "Erosion Contr_9 Desi Manual." (e) Block: An area of land within a subdivision that is entirely bounded by streets, or by streets and the entire boundary or boundaries of the subdivision, or a combination of the above with a river, lake, railroad, or unsubdivided acreage. (f) Boulevard: The portion of the street right-of-way between the curb line and the property line. (g) Building: Any structure built for the support, shelter or enclosure of persons, animals, chattel or movable property of any kind. (h) Butt Lot: A lot at the end of a block, located between two corner lots. (i) City: The City of Albertville. 6) Cluster Development: A subdivision development planned and constructed so as to group housing units into relatively tight patterns, while providing a unified network of open space and wooded areas, meeting the overall density regulation of this Chapter and the Zoning Ordinance. (k) Comprehensive Plan: A comprehensive plan prepared by the City, including a compilation of policy statement goals, standards and maps indicating the general locations recommended for the various functional classes of land use, places and structures, and for the general physical development of the City, including any unit or part of such plan separately adopted and any amendment to such plan or parts thereof. (1) Contour Map: A map on which irregularities of land surface are shown by lines connecting points of equal elevations. "Contour interval" shall mean the vertical height between contour lines. (m) Copy: A print or reproduction made from a tracing. (n) County: Wright County, Minnesota. (o) Design Standards: The specifications to landowners or those proposing to subdivide land for the preparation of plats, both preliminary and final, indicating among other things, the optimum, minimum or maximum dimensions of such items as rights -of -way, blocks, easements and lots. City of Albertville 100-3 Subd►vlsion ordnance EEC-21-1999 15;25 NAC 612 595 9537 P.07 (p) Development: The act of building structures and installing site improvements. Developer A hers firm corporation. sole pf_O_orietQLi�-& Her ip, s to agency. or gglifical sub ' i ion thigreof erigaged in land disturbance ac ivi ischar : The ve anc channglin gf styrm ater including snow melt. from a construe ion site. (q) Double Frontage Lot: A lot which has a property line abutting on one street and an opposite property line abutting on another non -intersecting street. (r) Drainage Course: A watercourse or indentation for the drainage of surface water. (s) Easement: A grant by a property owner for the use of a strip of land and for the purpose of constructing and maintaining drives, utilities, including, but not limited to, wetlands, ponding areas, sanitary sewers, water mains, electric lines, telephone lines, storm sewer or storm drainageways and gas lines. Energy Dissipation This refers to methods eloyedt pipe tlets to ere t er ion. Ex les in de but arg not limited to: -aprons. rip ra2. j2Iasnq_49§,_a_M gabions that are des'al3ed to prevent erosion. (t) Engineer. The registered engineer employed by the City, unless otherwise stated. Erosion: An ss that Mars the s ce of eland the a on of ter, wind, wge, or gravity. Ero-sign ContraRefers to methodemployed to pr_p_M,t erosi Exa les i hide soil st bilization practices horizontal slope aradi, na tem_p_orary or permanent c2ver, and construction phasina. F_rasion i t Pract e S12ecifications or Pr ice: T man emert procedures, techniques and methods to co lm, soil erasion and sedimen ation a officially adooted by the cily or local Watershed ciroup.iche er is m e stri eot. Exposed SoilAreas: All eas of the co ructio site ere t eve ation ('ncludinta trees. shrubs, and brush) has been removed This irlpludes ps011 sick iie areas, borrow areas and dis psal are s withi e o struction site. Filter trips A veaetated section of land esigned to treat runoff as 4verlaad sheet City of Albertville Subdivision Ordinance 100-4 DEC-21-1999 15:29 PdAC— 612 5,35 9837 P.88 flaw. They m si ne in naturaletated orm fr m a eadow to a sm ' rest. T eense cover fac' ates iuta emov and infiltration. (u) Final Plat: A drawing or map of a subdivision, meeting all of the requirements of the City and in such form as required by Wright County for the purpose of recording. Final Slabilizati eans that all soil disturbi activities at thf, siteh e bee completed, and that a uniform perennial vege cover with den�ity of_ percent of the co for un a d areas nd area n t covere anent st lure has been established orequivalent perr panent st biiizati n m sures have been employed. (v) Goveming Body: The Albertville City Council. HyOric Soils, Soils that are sa ated flooded. or 2o ng the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in -the upp&r.part. Hydrophytic Vegetation- cro hplant life rowin in ter it or a substrate that is gI least periQdicallyeficient - ox a as a r uit of ce s' e Mpter content. ervio urface n t r r artific I hard s ace at ei er re nts or in retar a ent of water i o the soil. andcausesorate to run off the surface greater quantities and at n incre ed rate of flow tr,an exists.. rior to development- Examples includg rooftopg. sidewal s at os dr ewavq narkina lots.storm Q greas,and concrete. as hal r ray pads_. (w) Key Map: A map drawn to comparatively small scale which definitively shows the area proposed to be platted in relation to known geographical features (e.g., town centers, lakes and roads). Land Disturbance Activity: Any land c pge invo vino the cav tion ter ps_port a nd fillin�gof fftK(50� or more cubic yards aterial at ma esult i sool ero pan fr water or , 'nd and the movement of sediments intoSr u o wate s or la ds wit the jurisdiction of Alb ville. he follo 'n are of co sjd re tab Land Dis urbance Activities: 1. Activities such as home Bard s and in jvidual home I_ndscacajnQ• repairs -and maintenance work. Co struction installati and ntenanc f el ctric t e ho and television�utili li es or indvidual s rvice onnec n to ese uti{itie except ere over u e fee of ex sed s it area wjil City of Albertville 100-5 Subdivision ordinance GEC-21-1999 15:29 NAC 612 595 °e37 ~.09 result. Tilling, la n or harvesting gf agricultural, hPrti-C tural. silvicultural cr A. Installation of fence sign telephone and electric pokes and other Inds of posts or poles exQept. whe over fi thousa 5 000 square -let of exposed soil area will re ut. S. mergencywork to protect life limb or pmpesi and a er e re irs unless the land disturbingactivitywould . required an apr)rnvgd erosion and sediment control pIan except or the emergency, then the land sirea,di urbed all be ha ed and stabilized in accordance \Mth the ity's Egguirements (x) Lot: A parcel or portion of land in a subdivision or plat of land separated from other parcels or portions by description, as on a subdivision or record of survey map, for the purpose of sale or lease or separate use thereof and having its principal frontage on a public street- (y) Lot, Comer. A lot situated at the intersection of two (2) streets, the interior angle of such intersection not exceeding one hundred thirty-five (135) degrees. (z) Lot Improvements: Any building, structure, place, work of art, or other object, or improvement of the land on which they are situated constituting a physical betterment of real property, or any part of such betterment. Certain proposed lot improvements shall be properly bonded for as provided in these regulations. (aa) Metes and Bounds Description: A description of real property which is not described by reference to a lot or block shown on a map, but is described by starting at a known point and describing the bearings and distances of the lines forming the boundaries of the property or delineating a fractional portion of a section, lot or area by described lines or portions thereof. (bb) Natural Water Way: A natural passageway in the surface of the earth, so situated and having such a topographical nature that surface water flows through it from other areas before reaching a final ponding area. The term also shall include all drainage structures that have been constructed or placed for the purpose of conducting water from one place to another. (cc) Outlot; A. lot remnant or parcel of land left over after platting, which is intended as open space or other future use, for which no building permit shall be issued. City of AtberhriUe 100-6 Subdivision ordinance DEC-21-1999 15:30 NPC 512 595 983,' P.10 (dd) Owner: An individual, association, syndicate, partnership, corporation, trust or any other legal entity holding an equitable or legal ownership interest in the land sought to be subdivided. (ee) Parks: Playgrounds, trails, parks or open spaces within the City, owned, leased or used, wholly or in part, by the City for park and recreational purposes or of which is designated by the City Council as a park. paved 5urface:-Aconstructed hard, smooth su fggg Made o as alt ret r other pavement material, Examples in 1 tare of li ' ed to road ,$jdewal s driveways and parking lots. (ff) Pedestrian Way: A public right-of-way or private easement across a block or within a block to provide access for pedestrians and which may be used for the installation of paths or trails. (gg) Percentage of Grade: Along a center line of a street, the change in vertical elevation in feet and tenths of a foot for each one hundred (100) feet of horizontal distance, expressed as a percentage. Permane ove Bans nal stab ti n. am s incl de rass avel aphalt and concrete. (hh) Planning Commission: The Planning Commission of the City. (ii) Preliminary Plat: A drawing or map of a proposed subdivision meeting the requirements herein enumerated submitted to the Planning Commission and governing body for their consideration, in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, along with required supporting data. (jj} Private Street: A street serving as vehicular access to two (2) or more parcels of land which is not dedicated to the public and is owned by one or more private parties. (kk) Protective Covenants: Contracts entered into between all owners and holders of mortgage constituting a restriction on the use of all private property within a subdivision for the benefit of the property owners, and providing mutual protection against undesirable aspects of development which would tend to impair the stability of property value and economic integrity of any given area_ (II) Public Improvement: Any drainage ditch, roadway, parkway, street, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water system, sidewalk, pedestrian way, tree, lawn; off-street parking area, lot improvement or other facility for which the City may ultimately assume ownership, responsibility for maintenance and operation, or which may affect an improvement for which local government responsibility is subdivision Ordinance City of Albertville 100-7 DEC-21-1999 15:30 NAC 612 595 %37 P.11 established. (mm) Quadraminiums: Single structures which contain four (4) subdivided dwelling units all of which have individually separate entrances from the exterior of the structure. (nn) Reserve Strips: A narrow strip of land placed between lot lines and streets to control access. (co) Right -of -Way: The land covered by a public road, otherwise dedicated for public use, or land for certain private uses, such as land over which a power line passes. Runoff Coefficient The average annual fraction of total precipitation that is not infiltrated into or otherwise retained by the soil, concrete. asphalt or otb L u�rface upon which it fal,ls that will aooear at the conveys ce as runoff Sediment The produd of an eros' rocess id material oth mi al and organic —that is in sus e is beingr rted or s been oved bVater, or ice and hag come to rest on the earth'earth'a surface e— r ve below Mter i9ye I. Sedimentation: Sedimentation means the process os action of depositing sediment caused by erosio_rl Sediment Control: The methods empigyad to prevent sediment from leavina.the siteSediment control lractices include silt fences, sedi ent trans earth dikes. drainage,swales chegk dams, subsurface drains pile slope drains, sty drat inlet protection and temporary or perman sedimen ion bas' s (pp) Setback: The distance between a building and the property line nearest thereto. Sail„ The unco lidated mineral and organic material on the immediate surface pf t earth. Stabilized: The expQsed grounds ace after it gg been covered by sod.erosio contrpl blanket dP Eap. or other material that prevents a ion fro ccurr Grass seed is not staLili to ion. t rm Wgter The 12regipitation runoff orm water ruaOff. snoytLielt runo an an other surface runoff and drainage (defned in 40 C H 122 26 [W 1131" St Water Poll on ontrol P190, A joint storm water and erosion nd sed' ent City of Albertville 100-8 Subdivision Ordinance DEC-21-1999 15:31 NAC 512 59S 9837 P.12 contr9l aLijn that is a document containing the it ents of A-60 3 t t whe im emente Il ere soil a ion on parcel of land and o -site n nint g9liUlion and se0iment (qq) Street: A public right-of-way for vehicular traffic, whether designated as highway, thoroughfare, parkway, through- way, road, avenue, boulevard, Jane, place, drive, court or otherwise designated. (rr) Streets, Arterial: Those streets carrying larger volumes of traffic and serving as links betvreen various sub -areas of the City. Arterial streets are intended to provide for collection and distribution of traffic between highways and collector streets; hence regulation of direct access to property is critical. (ss) Streets, Collector. Those streets which carry traffic from local streets to the major system of arterials and highways. Collector streets primarily provide principal access to residential neighborhoods, including, to a lesser degree direct land access. (tt) Streets, Local: Those streets which are used primarily for access to abutting properties and for local traffic movement. (uu) Streets, Marginal Access (Service Road): Those local streets which are parallel and adjacent to high volume arterial streets and highways; and which provide access to abutting properties and protection from through traffic. (vv) Streets, Cul-De-Sacs: A local street Wth only one outlet and having an appropriate terminal for the safe and convenient reversal of traffic movement. (ww) Street Width: The shortest distance between the fines delineating the right- of-way of a street. (xx) Subdivision: The division of a parcel of land into two (2) or more lots or parcels for the purpose of transfer or ownership or building development. This includes resubdivision and, where appropriate to the context, shall relate to the process of subdividing or to the land subdivided. (yy) Surveyor: A land surveyor registered under Minne3ota State laws. (zz) Tracing: A plat or map drawn on transparent paper, film, or cloth which can be reproduced by using regular reproduction procedure. T M ora otectio N The methods ern ed to preve eros'on. E am 1 of such protectio s include straw ulch erosion control b! kets ood c i s nd erosion netting. City of Albertville 100-9 Subdivision Ordinance DEC-21-1999 15:32 NFC 612 595 9837 P.13 (13) Provisions for surface water ponding, drainage and flood control. 14Storm Water Pollution Cgotrol Pla A storm w r olluti ntrol plan shall be submitted for reviefand a2proval by the QjtyEn ear in the followin cases: Subdivision a icationprojectcontaining five (5) or more s of land, Said plan sh confor o the re uire ments o ti gn A-600.13 of this Ordinance. (d) The items listed in this section shall be in conformance with all other applicable sections of this Chapter. 5 (e) Platting Adjoining Lands. A preliminary plat shall contain the entire tax parcel to be platted plus all of the owner's contiguous lands unless such lands are subject to a Planned Unit Development or the City Planner and City Engineer agree to waive such requirement. The final plat may cover only a portion of the preliminary plat, provided it is in conformance with the approved preliminary plat, development contract and other requirements herein. 5 (f) Supplementary Information. Any or all of the supplementary information requirements set forth in this section shall be submitted when deemed necessary by the City staff, consultants, advisory bodies and/or City Council. (1) Proposed protective covenants or private restrictions- (2) A survey prepared by a qualified person identifying tree coverage in the proposed subdivision in terms of type, weakness, maturity, potential hazard, infestation, vigor, density and spacing. A vegetation preservation and protection plan that shows those trees proposed to be removed, those to remain, the types and locations of trees and other vegetation that are to be planted may also be required. (3) Statement of the proposed use of lots stating type of buildings with number of proposed dwelling units or type of business or industry, so as to reveal the effect of the development on traffic, fire hazards, and congestion of population. The City may require the applicant or developer to have formal traffic or other studies performed to the City's satisfaction which show the effect of the proposed development on traffic, fire hazards and congestion. Amended Ord. 1997-3, 3 June 1997 City of Albertville 500-4 subdivision Ordinance ` DEC-21-1999 15:32 NP 612 595 9837 P.14 (aaa) Two -Family Dwelling: A dwelling designed exclusively for occupancy by two (2) families living independently of each other. lY attached (bbb) Unit Lots: Lots created from the subdivision thanethe famconvent onal dwellings having different minimum lot size requirements base lot within the zoning district. n: f r atin to ch r t istic of stitutin c't . both gtrat g d infiltra of "wetiands,"1 onsu u�.•, st Wetlands must have the follcw09 AttribpME 1. A predominance of hymc soils;. 2. cond��: and 3. uNJ - YPnetation_ t,ccc) Zoning Ordinance: The Zoning Ordinance or resolution controlling the use of land as adopted by the City. Subdivision Ordinance city of Albertville 100-10 CEC-21-1999 15:33 Nk-- 612 595 9837 P.15 A-600.1 . Street -Names. Names of new streets shall not duplicate existing or platted street names, unless a new street is a continuation of or in alignment with the existing or platted street. In that event, it shall bear the same name of the existing or platted street. Street names shall conform to the City's Street Naming and Property Numbering System as applicable. A-6,00_13 Erosion and Sediment Cyntml- 14 L-1 a zv_l aim- _ - - : - - . • - - - - • w Ston Water ollution Qgrtrol PIgn A sto water llution ntrol pian shall be su mitted for review an a rov l by t,. he City Enginpgr fors d it appliggtions foc proiects containing iv es or more of land. W The gtorm water pollutim, control lan shall include, a. Project description- inclu fin- the naturg andPurpose of the land disturbinga vit and a amou of radi utilifigg and building construction involved. b. Project phasing plan includi ,g the time frames and sched es for theTjec's varioug aspect§, c. A map of the ex st ting site condi)ns existL2g toaos9r_aph-Y4 City of Alberty ile 600-13 Subdivision Ordinance MC-21-1999 15:33 NAC 612 595 9837 71.16 property information steep slopes existing drainage systems/patterns. type of soils waterways AWIand vegetative cover, and 100year flood plains. d. 6 site construction flan that includes the proposed _land disturbing activities stockpiles, erosion sediment control plan construction schedule and the maintenance inspection of the storm water. pollution control measures._ g, Adiacent areas neighboring streams lakes residential areas roads_ etc within one hWndred (100) feet of the subiect site. whichmay be affected by the land disturbing activity. f. The methods that WU bg used to contmi erosion a d sedimentation on the site both during and a. construction including the followingitems- 4. Schedule and meth o s to stabilize all exposed soils. soil stockpiles and steep s1.o,Res. 5 Schedule and methods to establish perManent vegetation. 6_ Meth ds to prevent sedimentation damage to ad, a properties and natural fe ures. 7. Measures to control the quality and quantity of stg water leaving the sites 8. Melbodg to protect gtgrm sewers from he entran f sediment. 9 Methods to protect ads from sediment and mini brought in from access _routes. 10. Methods to maintain both teMpora and-RffManent pggsion and sediment control de ices. 11. Methods to restabglize bAility construction areas as soon~ as possible. Calculations ung designpar eters for sediment b sins. wet detention basin diversions waterways and other aoa,iigable_ practices. LM Minimum Storm Water Pollution Qontrol Requirements' These minimum control measures are required y ere bare soil i$ exposed. Due to the diDe—r-uX of individual construction sites each site will b�individuall���luated. Where additional control meass a needed hey will be s e ified at the di lion of the City Engineer ,Qsvqrion of channeled runoff around disturbed areas if pract'scal. ar the erotection of the.cllennel. City of Albertville Subdivision Ordinance 600-14 DEC-21-1999 15:34 NW 612 595 7-937 P.17 2. The scheduling of the site's activities to lessen their impact on ernGinn and sediment control measures. 3. Minimize the amount of exposed sojl I ,Control runoff as follows:_ a,Stabilize inactive disturbed ar as with sod or seed with mulch; and b, Construct temporary or permanent sediment fioion basins. Sedimentation basins must have a minimum surface area ggual to at - east 1 % or area draining to basin. 3 foot mi_❑.imam depth, and constructed in accordance with design goAcifications. Sedimentation basins must be maintained re,gularlX includingseiment removal to maintaiagl three (3) foot del2l�i Basin discharge rates must also be control a to prevent erosion in the discharge channel The applicant is required to obtain a Nation it Pgl] tant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal S s e NPDE ISDS construction ,storm water permit from the Minnesota Poll ign Control Agency 5. F, grsoil stockpiles area er than ten (10) cubic yards, the toe of_ tb pile must be more than twenty-five (25) feet from a road. drainaue channel or storm water inlet If ft #or more than seven M d�ys� they must be sgtabilized with mulch v tion to or other ans. If left for less than seven 7 da lion from stogkpilgs olust be controlled wit i silt fences or rock check dams. a. If for aray reason a soil stockpile i§IQcated closer than_tyyen4t -, five (25) feet from a road, drainage Channel or storm mmter inlet and left for more than seven (7) days, it must be covered with tarps or controlled in some other_manner. 6. Temporary stockpiling of 50 or more cubic yards of excess o� on any lot cr other vacBrit area will not be allowed without issuance gf a grading permit for th earth moving activity in s tion. 7. Where a proiect's ultim o development replacglaUfface vegetation with one or more acres of cumulative impervious surface, and all runoff has not accounted forjo the City's existing st r ter management plan or Plactice the run= shall be dischar A&aja a wet Sedimentation basin P-Eig[ to entering waters of the state. Work shall conform with the current version of the Minnesota Pollution con of Agency's "Protecting Water Quality in Urb�1n City ofAlbertvlW 600-1 5 Subdivislor, Ordinance DEC-21-1999 15:45 Nw- 612 595 9837 P.01•'05 art f the normal maintenance rwntirnmfor ggblic works fa�iliti s. I shall be the respon ibility of the applicant t obt an ace t r then ert int ests o allo s to the orm asern v` -tear managemen faci{iti s for i pectioaan maintenan rose. JI6 Easements If a storm water m _ement Flan inv Ives tree n some or all runoff fr_ m the sit_e._the applicant sh II obtain _from adiacent pr_QWrty o ers gny neces a nt or o her ro art interests con mi no a of ter. U Permanent Storm W ter Pv ition Controls� 1. The agol i cant all i stall truct nr n2Ve C t fe fo all storm water management f cilities necessary to ma a e i a eas rt�,off, so that the two year tenear and .. 0 _ e r storm _uegik_ discarge rates existin-1 before the flropos d de ant U n t be increased Also acceleCate d chap el erosion shah n t occur as result of the l2rona ed land dimming or devalcFment act�vsty. An {ic nt ma�iso ke an in -kind or a monetary co trio ion to the ¢evelooment and main enan of com unity storm vv�er management facilities designed to serve multiple land dis-t� rb1na-L1d evelogment activities uncle ate k b.Y on�ar more persons includes the applicant. All calculations and hXolocc models/in ormation used in determining peak flo shall a su mitte along with the sto er 20 ution control flan. The applira t sha I consider r duci g_the need for storm vY' tamer ana ent f cilitie in or t use nat ral t o ra and Ian cover uch as natur I swa'es and depressioas they e� afore dove! 12ment to the ere hat they aMQmr—n2da-t-eLtW dition { flow of water without co Qromi ina the inte it�ali ty of the wetland or pond, q. Thy, storm water_ poll tian ontrol ,plan shoul inc ore the llwn: a. Me sure to otect an esery as muc pat 1 0 vage_tated area on the s'Le as ossib a m' � izin m e ions surfaces, and directing runoff to ve9.etated yeas ratbgL than to adjoi ng streets, storm ewer�tches, . b, Flaw att uation by usg of o on ve9etat d swales and natu rpi de ressi s. c storm water wet de ention facilities. Subdivision ordinance City ofAlbertvr7le 1 600-17 DEC-21-1999 15;46 NAC 612 595 987? 0.02,05 (e) Water Mains. In the case where water mains from a public water system are available, the applicant shall be required to install water mains in the plat and connect the same to the public water system. The water house service (ended with curb box) shall be installed into the lot a distance of eight (8) feet, measured at a right angle, from the right-of-way line of the abutting public street. (f) Public Sanitary Sewer. In all cases where trunk line sanitary sewer facilities are available, the applicant shall be required to install sanitary sewers in the plat and connect the same to the trunk line sewers. The sanitary sewer house service (ended with plug) shall be installed into the plat a distance of eight (8) feet, measured at a right angle, from the right-of-way line of the abutting public street. (g) Drainage Facilities. Such facilities and easements shall be installed as will adequately provide for the drainage of surface waters, storm water ilu i control, and a storm sewer system may be required Drainage way easements or land dedication may be required when such easements or land is needed in the public interest for purposes of floodplain management, proper drainage, prevention of erosion, pedestrian access to water bodies, or other public purpose. All surface water drainage must be approved by the Wright County Watershed District. (h) Miscellaneous Facilities. Tree planting; street name signs, traffic control signs, oversized trunk lines, pedestrian ways and other improvements may be required to be furnished and installed by the applicant. The applicant shall install four (4) inches of black dirt and a good quality sod in the boulevard at the time of occupancy of the adjacent lot. During the construction phase, if the utility lines (electric power, telephone, gas, and cable TV) are placed prior to placing the curb, the applicant shall place four (4) inches of black dirt and adequate seed in the boulevard within thirty (30) days after curb placement. If the curb is placed prior to placing the utility lines, the applicant shall place four (4) inches of black dirt and adequate grass seed in the boulevard within thirty (30) days after the utility lines are placed, or within one year after the curb is placed, whichever occurs sooner. Placing of black dirt and grass seed in the boulevard shall not relieve the applicant from placing black dirt and sod in the boulevard at the time of occupancy of the adjacent lot. 10 (i) Sidewalks. Concrete sidewalks or bituminous trails shall be installed in the approximate locations shown on the City of Albertville Comprehensive Trail Plan. Exact locations of the sidewalks or trails shall be shown on the preliminary plat and shall be subject to review by the City Engineer. ' Amended Ord. 1989-10 10 Amended Ord_ No. 1999-10, 15 November 1999 City of Alberiville aoo Subdivision Ordinance 1 1) � sd(odl) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A NON-PROFIT PRIVATE/PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP December 28, 2000 Linda Houghton -Loeb City of Albertville 5975 Main Ave. N.E., PO Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301 Dear Linda, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you and City of Albertville for your membership with the Economic Development Partnership of Wright County in 1999. Because of your support the Partnership has been able to advance itself as an organization as well as impact Wright County's economy and business environment. 1999 was again a busy and successful year for the Partnership. Major accomplishments were: • Received 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status. • Coordinated funding for the start-up of David & David Productions in Delano. • Completed and initiated of the Partnership's Two-year Plan • Recruited seven new members to add strength to our organization. • Established a satellite office of the Small Business Development Center in Wright County. • Enhanced and expanded our web page to promote the County, the Partnership, and its members. • Assisted the cities of Clearwater and Rockford in exploring the Initiative Foundation's Healthy Communities Partnership Program. • Completed business retention and expansion visits with 64 of the county's businesses. The Partnership's Board of Directors have developed action plans for 2000 that include: • Increasing marketing efforts for Wright County and its communities. • Addressing the labor shortage by promoting and coordinating resources that enhance the productivity of businesses. • Seeking expanded financial resources that enhance the economic environment of the county. • Growing the membership base of the Partnership. I would be happy to answer any questions you may have. I can be reached at (612) 477-3086. Thank you for your continued support. Sincer ly, Heidi Peper Executive Director Enclosure: Invoice PO Box 525, 6800 ELEc me DwE, Rocmw, MN 55373 (612) 477-3086; FAx (612) 477-3054 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA A NON-PROFIT PRIVATE/PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP Invoice for 2000 Membership Investment Company Name city of Albertville Work Address Member Dues 5975 Main Ave. N. E., PO Box 9 Albertville MN 55301- $500.00 Amount Due By 1131100 Please return bottom portion with membership payment. Company Name City of Albertville Work Address Member Dues 5975 Main Ave. N,E., flO Box 9 Albertville MN 55301- $500:00 Amount Due By 1131100 Remit to: Cathy Thisius, Security State Bank - Maple Lake PO Box 449 Maple Lake. MN 5 Tuesday, December 28, 1999 PO Box 525, 6800 ELEcrRcc DRIVE, RocxroRD, MN 55373 (612) 477-3086; FAx (612) 477-3054 163) CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION # 2000-1 A RESOLUTION MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO CERTAIN OFFICE AND POSITIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE FOR THE YEAR WHEREAS, it has been the policy of the Albertville City Council to make annual appointments to fill certain offices and positions with the city government at the beginning of each year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Albertville, Minnesota, establishes the following: 1. That the following persons are appointed by the City Council to the following offices and positions for the year 2000: ACTING MAYOR: Robert Gundersen PLANNING COMMISSION: Gary McCormack Alternate: John Vetsch ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR: John Vetsch CITY ATTORNEY: Couri & MacArthur CITY ENGINEER: Short Elliott & Hendrickson FINANCIAL ADVISOR: Springsted, Inc. PLANNING CONSULTANT: Northwest Associated Consultants TAX INCREMENT CONSULTANTS: Briggs & Morgan Kennedy & Graven BOND COUNSEL: Briggs & Morgan Kennedy & Graven y . 0 t ANIMAL CONTROL: Monticello Animal Control CIVIL DEFENSE DRECTOR: Fire Chief FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION Assistant Fire Chief REPRESENTATIVES: Mayor Clerk/Administrator FIRE DEPT. REPRESENTATIVE: Mayor OTSEGO CREEK AUTHORITY: John Vetsch Planning Commission Chair Alternate: Keith Franklin JOINT POWERS WATER BOARD: John Olson Robert Gundersen Alternate: Keith Franklin JOINT POWERS ICE ARENA BOARD: John Olson John Vetsch OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER: Crow River News OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES: Highland Bank Dain Rausher LMC 4M Fund Security State Bank of Maple Lake State Bank of Rogers PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE: Robert Gundersen Keith Franklin Scott Nadeau Fire Dept. Representative PERSONNEL COMMITTEE: Mayor Robert Gundersen Gary McCormack RULES OF PROCEDURE: Robert's Rules of Order CABLE TV BOARD: Acting Mayor 2. City Staff and/or Consultants will attend the boards, commissions and committee meetings as directed by the City Council. Staff who are directed to attend meetings will be compensated based on the City's personnel policies or contractual agreements. Staff who are not directed to attend will not be compensated for their attendance. 3. Change City Council regular meeting dated conflicting with legal holidays as follows: Martin Luther King Day — Monday, January 17, 2000, to Tuesday, January 18, 2000, at 7:00 PM. President's Day — Monday, February 21, 2000, to Tuesday, February 22, 2000, at 7:00 PM. Independence Day — Postpone from Monday, July 3, 2000, to Wednesday, July 5, 2000, at 7:00 PM. Labor Day — Monday, September 4, 2000, to Tuesday, September 5, 2000, at 7:00 PM. 4. That such appointment shall take effect on the date thereof and shall continue for the remainder of the year or until such time as a successor is appointed by the City Council. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 3rd DAY OF JANUARY, 2000. John A. Olson, Mayor Linda Goeb, City Administrator ,+ . A rr CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION # 2000-2 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2000 WAGES FOR CITY EMPLOYEES WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of establishing the assignment of pay rates for the City of Albertville effective to December 31, 1999; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, hereby establishes the following as its official pay rate to be used for the City's officers and employees based on employee classification. Classification Rate/Hour Administrator -Clerk -Treasurer Secretary/Deputy Clerk Zoning Administrator Lead Maintenance Worker Maintenance Worker II Water/Wastewater Operator $17.50 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon adoption, this resolution rescinds Resolution # 1998-28. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2000. John A. Olson, Mayor Linda Goeb, City Administrator January 3, 2000 City of Albertville 5975 Main Ave NE Albertville MN 55301 Dear City of Albertville: Subject: Family Youth Coordinator Per your request for more information in the collaborative hiring of a Family Youth Coordinator I have put together the following information: City of Albertville City of St. Michael STMA Family Youth Community Collaborative Coordinator Cost $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 Youth Programming $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 Total Cost $14,000.00 $14,000.00 $14,000.00 • Coordinator costs include salary, benefits and travel expenses. • Programming is to include youth summer activities, after and or before school programs, parenting classes, family community activities. • Total costs supply the availability of a Family Youth Coordinator for a period of one year. I would like to thank you for your consideration in joining in this collaborative venture to supply our communities with this much needed position. As we know our communities are growing by leaps and bounds and it will be reassuring to know that we are working to keep our youth focused in a positive direction and the family as a unit one of our main focuses. I'm sure that you believe as I do that investing in our youth is the best possible investment that we can make in our future. Respectfully, Sandra Greninger Family Youth Coordinator cc: STMA Family Youth Community Collaborative