2000-01-03 CC Agenda PacketALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
January 3, 2000
7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER — ROLL CALL — ADOPT
AGENDA
2. MINUTES
• December 20, 1999, regular City Council Meeting
3. CITIZEN FORUM — uo Minute Limit)
4. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) Claims Paid List—12/31/99
(b) Letter to City of Otsego
5. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS
a. Public Works
• Report
b. Planning & Zoning
• Albert Villas
- Comp Plan Amendment
- Rezoning from A-1 to R-1
- Preliminary Plat Approval (contingent upon approval of EAW)
c. Engineering
(a) Award bid for CSAH 19/37 Traffic Light
(b) Review Subdivision Ordinance Amendments — MPCA Standards
c. Legal
• None
d. Administration
(1) Sandy Greninger — Update on Family Services Collaborative
(2) Consider membership in the Economic Development Partnership of
Wright County ($500)
(3) Resolution #2000-1 (A Resolution Making Appointments to Certain
Offices and Positions within the City Of Albertville for the Year
2000)
(4) Establish Pay Rates — Resolution #2000-2
6. ADJOURNMENT
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
December 20, 1999
Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM
PRESENT: Mayor John Olson, Councilmembers Robert Gundersen, Patti
Stalberger (8:25 PM), Gary McCormack, and John Vetsch, City Engineer Pete
Carlson, and City Administrator -Clerk Linda Goeb
Mayor Olson called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to
order.
The agenda was amended by adding the following:
• Item 5b — Wastewater Treatment issues
• Item 5d(7) — Change Order #8 for the Fire Hall adding wood blocking for future
cabinets in the amount of $543.33
Gundersen made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. McCormack seconded
the motion. All voted aye.
The minutes of the December 6, 1999, meeting were amended as follows:
• Page 1, Paragraph 6 — Gundersen abstained.
• Page 2, Paragraph 7 — 45' X 82' building rather than 45' X 82" building
• Page 3, Paragraph 4 — Clarify to state the city attorney will research whether
shiatsu therapy should be considered massage or alternative medicine
Gundersen made a motion to approve the minutes of the December 6, 1999, meeting as
amended. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Mayor Olson asked if anyone present wished to address the Council. Judy
Roden introduced Ron Klecker, a resident who is interested in serving on the City
Council.
Councilmember Gundersen asked to remove Item 4(f) from the Consent
Agenda and place it as Item 5d(7) under Administration.
Gundersen made a motion to approve payment of Check #'s 12497 — 12544 as
presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to approve the Financial Statement for the month of
November 1999 as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
December 20, 1999
Page 2 of 4
Gundersen made a motion to approve a reduction in the Letter of Credit for
Karston Cove to $26,000. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to approve a reduction in the Letter of Credit for
Cedar Creek North to $41,000. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion authorizing payment of all just claims prior to
December 31, 1999. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to schedule the second January City Council meeting
on Tuesday, January 18th due to the Martin Luther King holiday. Vetsch seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to purchase Y2k expanded coverage from the
LMCIT in the amount of $469. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to approve the WWTF Monthly Operations Report
for November 1999 as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council discussed the Public Works Department Report. Michael
Sandstrom, the father of the young man who was involved in the accident with the
City's vehicle, addressed the Council. He stated he is certified in auto body work and
would appreciated the opportunity to repair the City's vehicle himself, rather than run
the claim through his son's insurance company. Councilmember Vetsch stated he
would prefer that the City go through the normal channels and have Albertville Auto
Body repair the vehicle, because the shop has paid taxes in Albertville for years.
Gundersen made a motion to allow Michael Sandstrom to make the repairs to
the City's truck provided he uses only genuine GM parts. McCormack seconded the
motion. Gundersen, Olson and McCormack voted aye. Vetsch voted no. The motion
carried.
Gundersen made a motion to approve the Public Works Department as
presented. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye.
City Engineer Peter Carlson reviewed the Highway 19 Interchange Study with
the Council. The study supports and justifies the traffic signal at County Road 19/37.
Wright County Engineer Wayne Fingalson has seen the study and will now support the
City's efforts to secure T-21 funds for a ramp at County Road 19.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
December 20, 1999
Page 3 of 4
Carlson reported that he has met with the MPCA. They are currently in the
process of writing the EAW for publication the third week of January. The PCA is
requiring minor changes to our storm water/wetland ordinances. He will present the
proposed changes at the first meeting in January.
Carlson explained that the existing well at the wastewater plant required an
upgrade to provide adequate service after the expansion of the plant. The other option
would be to extend the watermain to the plant. Carlson has a bid to upgrade the
existing well for $1680.50. Carlson feels this is far cheaper than the cost of extending
the watermain.
Gundersen made a motion to approve the upgrading of the wastewater plant's
existing well at a cost of $1,680.50. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Mayor Olson opened the sealed bids on the 1979 rescue van. The bids were as
follows:
Mike Czech $351
James Gundersen $275
Jeremy Collins $150
Joe Marx $501
Gundersen made a motion to accept the high bid from Joe Marx for the 1979 rescue
van. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
McCormack made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #1999-64 appointing
Keith Franklin to the City Council to fill the vacancy created by Councilmember
Stalberger's resignation effective December 31, 1999. Vetsch seconded the motion.
All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to adopt the Consent and Approval of Local
Franchising Authority to Transfer Control of CATV Franchise. McCormack seconded
the motion. All voted aye.
McCormack made a motion to appoint Councilmember Gundersen and City
Administrator Goeb to a committee to negotiate the franchise fee with the cable
television provider. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council revised the draft of the letter to the City of Otsego and will review
the final document at the next Council meeting.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
December 20,1999
Page 4 of 4
The Council directed the administrator to have each employee evaluated and
provide the results to the Council at a meeting to be conducted at 6:15 PM on Monday,
January 3, 2000, at which time the administrator's position will be evaluated by the
Council as well.
Gundersen made a motion to approve Change Order #7 for the Fire Hall to add
support to the wall to hang cabinets in the future. Vetsch seconded the motion.
Gundersen, Vetsch, Olson and Stalberger voted aye. McCormack voted no. The
motion carried.
Gundersen made a motion to approve the 2000/2001 contract for police
protection with Wright County. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Stalberger made a motion to adjourn at 8:55 PM. Gundersen seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
John A. Olson, Mayor
Linda Goeb, City Administrator
CLAIMS FOR PAVMF,NT
Check #
December
Vendor
30, 1999
Purpose
Amount
12551
Action Radio & Communication
FD Radio Repairs
$ 131.40
12552
Albertville Body & Fender
FD Repair Fire Truck
$ 710.50
12553
CarQuest
Monthly Charges
$ 64.13
12554
Construction Bulletin
Bids for Traffic Signal
$ 226.20
12555
Crow River Rental
Chain Saw Rental
$ 255.50
12556
Davies Water Equipment Co.
Meters & Supplies
$ 3,190.72
12557
DJ's Heating & AC
Settlement Payment
$ 24,925.00
12558
DJ's Total Home Care
Monthly Charges
$ 221.33
12559
Don's Auto Service & Repair
Monthly Charges
$ 54.35
12560
Driver -Vehicle Services Div.
License Plates
$ 54.00
12561
Earl F. Anderson, Inc.
Street Signs
$ 114.75
12562
Den Fehn Gravel & Excavating
Payment Request #7
$ 76,537.17
12563
Chris Gaulrapp
Milea e & Emt Test
$ 175.95
12564
Granite Electronics
Radio - New Pickup
$ 634.68
12565
HealthEast Med. Home
Pen Light Mabis/Gloves
$ 26.47
12566
Henry& Associates
Water Department Tools
$ 423.20
12567
J-Craft, Inc.
Tool Box/Bed Liner
$ 1,177.21
12568
Joint Powers Board
Hook -on through 12/31/99
$ 21,600.00
12569
Keys Well Drilling Co.
WWTF Pump
$ 1,680.50
12570
Larson Publications
December Legals
$ 380.02
12571
Medica
Group Insurance
$ 2,990.28
12572
Minnegasco
Monthly Charges
$ 464.84
12573
MN Women of Today Found.
Meat Raffle Donations
$ 1,525.00
12574
NCPERS Group Life Ins.
Payroll Deductions
$ 12.00
12575
Office Max
Office Supplies
$ 336.38
12576
Pitney Bowes, Inc.
Postage Meter
$ 20.25
12577
Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc.
Engineering Services
$ 3,050.94
12578
Sprint -United Telephone
Monthly Charges
1 $ 333.60
12579
Sunnyfield Construction
Yard H drant-Oakside Park
$ 700.00
12580
Richard S brant
Return Zoning Request Fee
I $ 650.00
B 12-30-99 Page 1
CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT
12581
December
Chad Wade
30, 1999
Mileage & EMT Test
$ 322.11
12582
Wright County Highway Dept.
2 yards of Cold Mix
$ 103.28
12583
Wright -Hennepin Cooperative
Greenhaven Street Lights
$ 22.06
TOTAL
$ 143,113.82
B12-30-99 Page 2
5975 Main Av a N.E.
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
(612) 497-3384
Fax: (612) 497-3210
January 3, 1999
City Administrator Michael Robertson
Otsego City Hall
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN 55330
Dear Mike,
This letter is in response to your letter dated November 8, 1999, regarding future
meetings between Albertville and Otsego. The Albertville City Council feels that
there is some misunderstanding regarding Albertville's position on the extension of
sanitary sewer into a portion of the City of Otsego.
It has always been the City of Albertville's position that sanitary sewer service could
be extended beyond its corporate limits to serve portions of the City of Otsego,
however, the City of Albertville insists on being instrumental in the planning of an
expanded service area. We feel that with joint planning and an equitable financial
arrangement, both cities will benefit.
The Albertville City Council is still interested in working on a sub -committee level to
attempt to resolve the sewer issue, as well as other issues of mutual interest. Perhaps
after the holidays, we can arrange a committee meeting that is convenient to everyone.
Sincerely,
Linda Goeb
City Administrator
cc: City Council
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
City of Albertville
MEMORANDUM
Mayor and City Council
Tim Guimont, Public Works
December 30, 1999
SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REPORT
• Parks The skating rink was successfully opened for Christmas break. The
Public Works Department opens it every morning because we need to be here
for WW rounds on weekends. I hired James Morris to lock the warming
house at night. (He is also snowplowing for us this season.) The current rate
of pay is $5.00/time to lock the warming house. I would like to see a raise in
the amount somewhat. Whatever the Mayor and Council members feel is
appropriate.
• Christmas Trees Two years ago the Public Works crew went around the City
and picked up the trees. Last year we informed residents to bring them to the
compost site. There has been some question about the situation for this year.
I would like the Mayor and Council members to make a decision if we will
continue the service of picking up the trees or have the residents bring them
to the compost site?
TG:bmm
CAMy DocurnmtsTublic Works Report\memo-city council 12-3499.doc
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CO
IN- COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARF
56
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Albertville Mayor and City Council
Albertville Planning Commission
FROM:
Deb Garross
DATE:
7 December 1999
RE:
Albertville - Albert Villas Preliminary Plat
FILE:
163.06 - 99.08
BACKGROUND
The purpose of this item is to continue consideration of the preliminary plat of Albert Villas for
K.C. Land Company. This item was scheduled for public hearing on September 14, 1999
however the applicant requested that the applications be removed from the agenda and
considered on October 12, 1999. At the October meeting, the Planning Commission gave
direction to the applicant to revise the PUD and preliminary plat drawings to address the items
outlined in the Planning Report dated 8 September 1999. The Planning Commission
continued the public hearing to November 9, 1999 wherein the Comprehensive Plan
Amendment, Rezoning, and CUP/PUD for Albert Villas was approved. Consideration of the
preliminary plat was continued to allow the developer to address the many conditions outlined
in previous Planning Reports. The focus of this memo will be to outline for the Planning
Commission the revisions that have been incorporated into the preliminary plat since the last
meeting.
ISSUES
1. This project required that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) be prepared
and reviewed pursuant to the process established by the Environmental Quality Board.
The EAW was published on August 25, 1999 and comments were submitted from the
Department of Natural Resources and State Historical Society. The EAW process specifies
that the City may not grant any project approvals until such a time as the City Council
adopts a negative declaration (a finding that the project will not result in major
environmental impacts). This being the case, a recommendation for approval of the
preliminary plat should be contingent upon completion of the EAW process.
2. In the event that the Planning Commission finds the preliminary plat to be consistent with
the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan and City Ordinances, a recommendation should
be forwarded to the City Council to approve the preliminary plat subject to conditions
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 554 16
PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM
specified by the Planning Commission. The attached findings of fact and decision
documents are provided to assist the Planning Commission in this regard.
The applicant has submitted revised preliminary plat plans which address the majority of
conditions and issues identified in previous planning reports for the Albert Villas project. The
number of conditions has been significantly reduced to the point that staff is comfortable in
recommending approval of the preliminary plat. The majority of conditions outlined in the
attached draft Findings of Fact and Recommendation reflect the various approvals for the
EAW, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning and CUP/PUD applications. Other
conditions relate to the park dedication that is desired by the City for this project. The Planning
Commission should discuss the park dedication and form a recommendation to the City
Council concerning this issue.
PRELIMINARY PLAT REVISIONS
The preliminary plat has been amended to increase the width of 51st Court to the required 60'
right-of-way width. All of the planned rights -of -way including those proposed for CSAH 18 are
consistent with City and Wright County requirements.
The developer did indicate to staff that he has negotiated an option for the triangular parcel
located east of proposed Outlot E. This development is positive with regard to the preliminary
plat and PUD circulation system because it will provide for a secondary street connection that
was the subject of concern at the time of the original proposal. To date, the developer has not
provided documentation that he has control of the triangular parcel. As such, the preliminary
plat and PUD plan will likely need to be amended at some future date to incorporate the legal
description of the triangular parcel into the project. (This action will require publication and
public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council). In the interim, the
preliminary plat identifies that a temporary cul-de-sac will be constructed at the eastern extent
of 52"d Street, as had been recommended by Staff.
The revised plan indicates some minor modifications to the wetland mitigation plan. However
it should be noted that the amount of wetland impact in the proposed plan is relatively slight
considering the size of the parcel and the number of wetlands (and County Ditch #9) that exist
on site.
With regard to the Shoreland Management Ordinance PUD requirements, the concept PUD
plan indicates a schematic layout that appears to be consistent with Ordinance requirements.
Additional land has been shown for a park area adjacent to Swamp Lake and the number of
lots shown within each Shoreland PUD Tier are consistent with the Ordinance requirements.
The revised plans indicate screening and berms along the rear of the lots which are located
adjacent to CSAH 18. The proposed screening and berms are consistent with that suggested
by staff during the review of the original proposal.
With regard to the lot arrangement, layout, area and width requirements the applicant supplied
the data which is incorporated into the following table:
Lot Area, Setback, Height and Coverage Requirements.
RI -A District
Required
Original Proposal
Revised Proposal
Density (Units per Acre)
2.9
1.34
1.30
Minimum Lot Area
15,000 sf
80 lots (44%)
12,524 sq. ft.
Range of Lot Sizes
15,000 sf
12,505 — 35,647 sf
12,524 — 36,671 sq. ft.
Required Minimum Useable
12,000 sf
30 lots (16% <
12,000
Upland lot area above O-H-
12,000)
W (80% of required lot area
must be above O-H-W)
Lot Width
100 feet
80 —150 feet (143 or
85 feet minimum
79% of the lots are
95.04 feet average
less than 100' wide)
Lot Width Corner Lot
120 feet
90 —130 feet
100 feet minimum
2 Lots (10%) conform
(except 2 lots are 95 feet"
to requirement
Average Lot Width Comer
101 feet
105.1
Lot
Buffer Yard Lot Depth (lots
170 feet
165 feet*
170 feet except Block 9 which
adjacent to arterial or major
has 155 foot lots
collector streets)
Buffer Yard (lot width
25 feet
feet
10 feet
requirements for side yards)
J16
Setback (PUD Periphery)
35 feet
Unknown
35 feet
Setbacks (front)
30 feet
30 feet
30 feet
(side -interior)
15 feet
10 feet
10 feet
(side -corner)
30 feet (side
20 feet
20 feet
yard abutting
a public
street)
(rear)
25 feet
30 feet
30 feet
Wetland setback from O-H-
20 feet
Unknown
20 feet
W
Building Height Maximum
35 feet
Unknown
35 feet
Maximum Lot Coverage for
25 percent of
Unknown
25 percent of lot area
Structures
lot area
Minimum Floor Area per
2 BR 960 sq.
Unknown
2 BR 960 sq. ft. above ground
Dwelling Unit
ft. above
3 BR 1,040 sq. ft. above
ground
ground
3 BR 1,040
sq. ft. above
ground
The lot depth calculations are based upon the Wright County Highway Department
requirement to dedicate 65' of R-O-W for CSAH 18.
PRELIMINARY PLAT PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
Lots with Easement Constraints:
There are a number of lots within the proposed development that are encumbered by
easements which severely restrict the building envelops, future home design and options for
accessory structures such as decks, sheds, gazebos etc. The lots located along the western
edge of the NSP easement are large in area however the existence of the easement results in
a limited building envelope for these lots. The applicant has provided a number of house plans
and foot prints that can fit within the resulting building envelopes (however it should be noted
that these are general examples and are not necessarily representative of the type of homes
that will be built within the development). The Planning Commission should be aware that
future owners on these lots are going to have little if any yard area to construct accessory
structures, which are typical in single family neighborhoods. Furthermore, the reduction of lot
width flexibility requested on these lots also restricts the ability to construct oversize or three
stall garages. To address this issue the following are suggested:
The applicant file deed restrictions with the Wright County Recorder of Deeds for all lots
adjacent to or containing NSP and/or Amoco pipeline easements indicating that no
structures can be built within the easement areas.
2. The applicant provide information with lot sales literature identifying the NSP and Amoco
easement restrictions.
Lots with Wetland Constraints:
The proposed project contains areas with relatively shallow lots which are encumbered by the
large wetland area in the middle of the site (Outlot D). Similar issues will present themselves
on these lots as that which was described above. To address this issue the following are
suggested.
1. The applicant provide information with lot sales literature identifying the building envelope
and 20' required wetland setback area, where no structures can be constructed.
Parks & Trails:
Under the City's current Ordinance a 10% park land and/or cash dedication is required. A land
dedication of 23.5 acres for the entire project, cash or combination of land and cash will be
required for this development. The cash dedication for a single-family development is
$1,300.00 per lot, which in this case would result in $439,400 dollars for the entire PUD (338
lots multiplied by $1,300.00 per lot). The cash dedication for the preliminary plat would be
$230,000.00 (177 lots multiplied by $1,300.00 per lot). The park dedication fees, if any, will be
collected at the time of final plat approval, for each phase of the development. Trail dedication
standards require the developer/owner to construct trails with the cost for installation counted
as a credit toward the above mentioned park dedication requirement.
The preliminary plat proposes to dedicate two public parks wihtin the development area north
of County Ditch #9. The largest park within the preliminary plat consists of 5.8 acres however it
is a long, narrow configuration which is not very conducive to use for active recreational
purposes. The site is too narrow for a ball field however a minimum size soccer field and
basketball/volley ball courts could be constructed within the park. The second park area (1.9
acres located southwest of the intersection of Kahl Avenue and Kaler Avenue) is extremely
narrow and of little public recreation value due to the storm water pond and County Ditch
constraints.
The proposed trail system is an attractive amenity for the development and will provide for
pedestrian circulation throughout the project area. The Planning Commission should be aware
that the preliminary plat shows 20 foot access easements for some of the trail connections as
opposed to 30' outlots or platted "park" connections required by the Subdivision Ordinance.
1. The preliminary plat should be amended to include an asphalt trail along the south side of
CSAH 18 in place of the sidewalk that is shown on the plans.
2. The preliminary plat should be revised to delete the asphalt trail shown along the north side
of 52"d Street and the rear lot lines of Block 4. (This trail is not necessary because there is
a proposed sidewalk in 52"d Street that will provide for pedestrian circulation).
In addition to the items outlined above, the following conditions identified for the original
application are still applicable to this application:
1. The EAW process shall be completed prior to City Council approval of the Comprehensive
Plan amendment, rezoning, CUP/PUD and preliminary plat.
2. A Planned Unit Development agreement is prepared which includes all development plans
and specifications, shall set forth specific land use and performance standards which must
be adhered to throughout the life of the PUD, and shall be approved by the City Attorney.
0
3. The number of building permits which will be issued to the project will be limited to 50 until
such a time as the entire length of Kahl Avenue/47th Street/Kallard Avenue is installed to
provide a secondary access to the development.
4. The City Engineer provide comments and recommendations on the following:
a. Status of the EAW
b. Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan
c. Water and Sanitary Sewer Plan
d. Wetland Mitigation Plan
e. Easement location and sizes on preliminary plat
5. The applicant submits documentation from NSP and Amoco identifying that each entity has
reviewed the preliminary plat and that the improvements proposed within the respective
easements are acceptable.
6. Deed restrictions are prepared subject to review and approval of the City Attorney
identifying the building pad locations for all lots adjacent to or containing the NSP and
Amoco pipeline easements. The deed restrictions should identify that said lots contain
restrictions precluding future building additions, decks, accessory buildings, and play
equipment behind the homes within said easement areas. Sales information will be
required as part of the PUD approval disclosing this development restriction to future
homebuyers.
7. The applicant provides the proposed means to disclose the location of all parks to future,
prospective lot owners.
8. The developer indicates the timing and method for removing and/or relocating the existing
buildings located on the subject site consistent with Sections 1400-1 and 900 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
9. The developer indicates the proposed use of model homes consistent with Section 2200 of
the Zoning Ordinance.
10. Any other conditions as set forth by the City Engineer, City Attorney, Planning Commission
or City Council.
CONCLUSION
The proposed preliminary plat has been amended to incorporate the majority of issues and
conditions identified by earlier reviews of the project. The decision to approve, deny or
conditionally approve the preliminary plat of Albert Villas is viewed as a policy decision to be
made by the City Council. This memorandum outlines recommended conditions of approval
should the decisions be made in favor of the developer. To assist the Planning Commission in
its formulation of a recommendation, the attached Findings of Fact and Recommendation are
provided.
ACTION REQUESTED
A motion to approve the preliminary plat of Albert Villas subject to the conditions identified
herein or as amended by the Planning Commission is in order.
Attachments:
1. Exhibit A Revised Preliminary Plat
2. Exhibit B Draft Findings of Fact for approval of Albert Villas
pc: Linda Goeb, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson, Kevin Mealhouse, Matt Davitch, Chuck Plowe,
Keith Harsted, Ron Rotelle
EXHIBIT B
Lot Area, Setback, Height and Coveraae Reauirements
RI -A District
Required
Original Proposal
Revised Proposal
Density (Units per Acre)
2.9
1.34
1.30
Minimum Lot Area
15,000 sf
80 lots (44%)
12,524 sq. ft.
Range of Lot Sizes
15,000 sf
12,505 — 35,647 sf
12,524 — 36,671 sq. ft.
Required Minimum Useable
12,000 sf
30 lots (16% <
12,000
Upland lot area above 0-H-
12,000)
W (80% of required lot area
must be above O-H-W)
Lot Width
100 feet
80 —150 feet (143 or
85 feet minimum
79% of the lots are
95.04 feet average
less than 100' wide)
Lot Width Comer Lot
120 feet
90 —130 feet
100 feet minimum
2 Lots (10%) conform
(except 2 lots are 95 feet"
to requirement
Average Lot Width Comer
101 feet
105.1
Lot
Buffer Yard Lot Depth (lots
170 feet
165 feet*
170 feet except Block 9 which
adjacent to arterial or major
has 155 foot lots
collector streets)
Buffer Yard (lot width
25 feet
10 feet
10 feet
requirements for side yards)
Setback (PUD Periphery)
35 feet
Unknown
35 feet
Setbacks (front)
30 feet
30 feet
30 feet
(side -interior)
15 feet
10 feet
10 feet
(side -comer)
30 feet (side
20 feet
20 feet
yard abutting
a public
street)
(rear)
25 feet
30 feet
30 feet
Wetland setback from 0-H-
20 feet
Unknown
20 feet
W
Building Height Maximum
35 feet
Unknown
35 feet
Maxdmum Lot Coverage for
25 percent of
Unknown
25 percent of lot area
Structures
lot area
Minimum Floor Area per
2 BR 960 sq.
Unknown
2 BR 960 sq. ft. above ground
Dwelling Unit
ft. above
3 BR 1,040 sq. ft. above
ground
ground
3 BR 1,040
sq. ft. above
ground
lts-1y7y 10:23 E.G.RUD & SUNS INC
612 786 6007 P.04i05
BPAmoco
November 18, 1999
Mr- Matt Davich
E. G. Rud & Sons, Inc.
9180 Lexington Avenue, NE
Circle Pines, NN 55014-6007
Dear Mr. Davich:
Pro ed Road trossin
BP Amoco Pipeline
28100Torch Parkway, Su;ta Boo
Warrenv(Ile Minois 60555-3939
630-836.5100
Thank you for the informadon you provided in your facsimile yesterday. Unfortunately, there is not enough detail
on the drawing. It is required that Amoco be supplied with a complete legal desctriprion of the property so that the
exact location of the crossing in relation to the pipeline can be determined. This Will also allow us to identify which
Right of Way Contracts or Conveyances are being affected.
In order to provide adequate protection to our pipeline, Amoco requires the following conditions are observed.
No utilities or roads shall run parallel to Arnoco's line within Amoco's right of way.
Amoco discourages any parking lot built on our right of way. If one does exist, it trust be asphalt and have
a minimum of four feet of cove, In addition, a pavement agreement must be executed between the owner
and Amoco. This agreement gives Amoco the right to excavate within the pavement area for any required
future maintenance on the pipeline without being responsible for any pavement replacement, Any
pavement replacement will be the owner's responsibility.
Pipe and road crossing Amoco's right of way should run at or as near as possible a 90° angle to our line.
In addition to the above items, the following are requirements which need to be considered when working within the
limits of the easement and/or around the pipeline.
There shall be a 2 foot clearance between Amoco's pipeline and any other utility line. Amoco prefers that
all utilities cross under our line.
A minimum of five and one half feet of cover is required for all road crossing and/or parking lot
throughways.
All concrete pavement is prohibited.
A minimum of four feet of cover is required for all drainage ditches.
Any structures such as manholes or catch basins shall not be located over the pipeline. A minimum
horizontal clearance of live feet is required between the structure and the pipeline.
i-18-1999
10:24 E.G.RUD & SONS INC
612 786 6007
P.05/05
No trees, shrubbery, above ground structures, etc. shall be planted, placed or built within Amoco's
easement.
Please contact Minnesota One -Call at (800) 252-1166 at least 48 hours prior to any construction so that we may
arrange to have a representative present to ensure that there are no conflicts with our pipeline. You may also use the
One -Call number to have the pipeline physically located, probed, and flagged across the property. If you have any
questions I may be reached at (630) 836-5192. Thank you for your cooperation.
Yours truly,
M. Groat
Right -of -Way
D. Neilan
M. Reh
D. Sommerfeld
TOTAL P.05
SIZE
85 - 89
90 -99
100 - 109
110 - 119
120 -129
130 larger
LOT WIDTHS
total
12/02/1999
12/02/1999
NO. OF LOTS
68
63
28
9
4
5
177
8 x
{ , ---------- ----i
S y it S�tt N N��•.�� ���� 1 �! •'yttJ. 1
• fl t7 R `c g � :
� o oho 0 0o aoe �
� b --- --- ---- - - - -
�'� � a � s q�q� � t•
{ { {
�.'... ...
.......
...... .
.........
..........
{ ...............
a {
A o'$
ti
{
{
o (
4 {
{
I
{
i
{
— — — — — — — — — — — —)
{
{
{
•` I Y •
• •••
tl`
{yrI Iy.� rye �yI
GGG
�
ttlit
it,
P
m
„
— �---
{
I
CITY
I
CITY oc SAINT
WOWL
' —
/
' I
I I I
I <I
III � a • c a a � • • J . .
•
a Ta-
91
•
rr
r
___ .__—__ ------
l .� �-� — �, � s�, �,« � � ,.�-� �. �. �,� V �� ray � � � � � • J
------------------------
I 1 �,
T 7t ,.T[[ 1 � �144 � ` (— 1tt��I � � r \ �% ,� y / / / r�• I
y
; Imo- T 1 — — i If i °a / `• n �J-/ / I
---- I
� � A I
I E
1 �Q 4 � I�
I
c
,
i
� Ia�Ei�ii�iliirMYWiiiirWiY>iiC':�i:�IIIM•fl�■ �Y�IWI���i�Y���ri��ll
y~ Ike II Ir O �ra}'w I 6fJll_II I ^I� u� _J _ L75m_W
'lr—-- —� —T — ry `I
A p ' k II a I II a II II a II 11
iII a
L-1L \IIN I�+JI_ _JL_ Jl _JL J r ItsG r
s _
I� {
g , � pf9,u KACiAM su AbL_'NiE ° k' I .., (i aq i3Q PL
1� /°, T�
s-no--lF-■ if 'j 1^\�r- .'1 !'_.. 1r
�1 rtlr I Q yyG_ 11 II I II
r—r o� II P I--¢--1 I I•� %/P\\\ 11 L } W 11
3 e I II II � II II N II � II ��I �_ J � // 8�p �\ � WI I J1, I 1 I
f
1 : -
�'
JL-
qqL A - J wag R- \ \ 1 �� '1 v 1LIL Is
1 ♦� ir
.pro noq♦ Ullllty Ea�°m�nt -� SI - 4 - I I Imo`` f al ,1 3QI'
d 1
? 1
L atP J I r 1
L wit
JPLj
oil is
I
O i
Fs
II------L I
------------F.
1
/
y�Q
4� ,
4�0 '
91
�QW, j I49
r i
d
�N I /' //'
R �
A tit
ij / I I I
N
't D
z
s
I 1�1 1 11 t fy 0 A
{ g pR tgg
oil > m 9600
i
V
i9uae---
--�
MID 11 TO BEaPROYM
/
/ / a PRarorsm
a unun
I
I��
III
Ij///��� IIYJ
I P I
IIIPQ�
I Pr
N t
"—'� I " tD l/
,CP
�IIP III�� IIN
$ $ a $ W I
�
i a e a t° a T
? T P
L
B
_ •� y. �s
/ —
— � —
Syr
-!t ^I.
iO4
N I
I In
Il
�
_ > I-
(��
IL
1
�_ _
�
IL
I
___ -
I $Y I I N
II O l � N
����
���.D r
a I n a q•
a n d l)
t I I I t y
a s m
n tom` ;
`�.0 r c
I
__ ,
I yN N , �0►
ri
I I
LL m f�•'•
1 Arm
/
—
7
7_-I I
/
fi e
iJ�
80
If
i
C/
yy
III
� � �
\ /
/ ♦ ♦
l�o J t
/
`�� ��� \ � � \ \ �
�/
� / � \ � +
/
♦
+�
11
isail
/
♦ - L
\ I
I
i
v
A
pI ri I
z o
0 C) z
ZO K
>
A
M 2
m 00
rn1
-n
A) Z
4
To.
61 I>
A � r—
WMI I>
U—z
t—
I>
(P
'
.....
.....
Lon
III
YN <
z z z z z z z z
0 0 0 0 0 0
Oz
A
A A
D
Z
O z
z D
oM-0
Um
r-
a�NQ���A
rZ
P
c� x;
oD
a
C'�
y
tYti
afm•l tj
IN
��m
1-1
Z� v
x o rOi L
Un AZ n-.
Az;
❑r i
�i
a
m n
r
x
m
n
i
�A
D
I I ,
jo
/ t , yy sY wan a�an--OR
00 was "a
00
E ? r _ // / t vvYY� VV�►'f::, "� \ / ° $ B
It
/
r �v
;.
±
\\ II #III Mtii �tY
,�,.. mot\ ,r----�r--�_� /�- •,_�' ,;,�,I;;;;:• �_�. o
t 0o20 iijilln oil •fool
O
t I t M% r I i - e e I I • CA
E ' -� �' '-� .ii �� II �� 11 �Q II �„ II �t Bt .• � II cvt Il�t 11�4 /// /-�-t'�' � i ti 1 '' W
fQ2 t o 0
`ter_
•ij!i
II I' II II II 11 I II / /I I I I I I I ...
r tl i t I I I I I I r I • :j 'i
t� I, t I I I I r i l r I I r I I e / I e I� t 1 1 •� I I � iii ® �
t ril r d II t I t
e�_ 111 II_ t/ t �— --�— ---I --- i --- --- 1�
-- " -- zr g I q —I - 1i6 -i I �1- I Tr 1 C'�i r y-I i� � ;' I ----------
�$- 6t I
II — It II II II C it Z I
11 I. II II �11 II
3TNt.u'i" AD Alp / i ,/ �� a�nasua�
V9.�,
)TY Of SAINT MKMAEL
CITY OF ALDERMLLE
P40p s
.-.--t g II 1 I C 1W $i,_- aW- IN a--- - -i
�F__II_ III I 9— I �W pl-+
d►11�� II�"l t 7il �---I -k -- #--- � -- �--- V -- # # �--- a #--_-
k�" # I# # # # a I a II a a a A a a A a a a a }
Q r a a a a a
A
4 �. it 14 II 11 II II I ti I
7f • I - - J N -- - _ J - - - ` / KAOAGMAN AW91M ¢ N
■ lf_"lL II II � IIl+ Ilir' Ilrr I �"_yy YL W '
;b
aL
:w a a
N g 4.
J /
r s
� a /
- - - - - -
a qr
/
I0,
,
-.a \ --- W4M---
# JL a
I /
0Mir
4 dig — J I L a
p
n \` ` Now
>"
i
/
m
Egg
VV
IV 3
Pb 1Pp iPe-L�, aA^ a Qq PPP�
i, a 6
13
PILOT
LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
September 1, 1999
Mr. Mayor & Members of the City Council
C/o Ms. Linda Goeb
City Clerk\Administrator
5975 Main Avenue NE.
Albertville, MN 55301
RE: Plan approval issues south of Highway 118 for Albert Villas
Dear Mr. Mayor, Council Members and Staff:
This letter serves to confirm numerous telephone conversations with staff as it relates to
proposed work on lands south of 118. Please forward a full set of the plans which will be
shared with the Planning Commission. As an adjacent property owner we have the
following requests prior to preliminary plat approval, rezoning and quide plan amendment.
During our planning process we had to submit an EAW, receive its comments and
address a variety of issues such as ditch crossings and sewer flows prior to any
preliminary plat or guide plan amendment. We remind the City the EQB rules are the
same, which will require an EAW of the project as currently proposed due to the lack
of a various comprehensive plan elements such as a storm sewer master plan.
2. During the creation of sanitary sewer benefit areas, the City concluded there was little
likelihood of development in this area. So, a boundary was stopped at Highway 118,
which created a payback to Kenco for sewer under Highway 19 through Barthell's
land. This was a 12-year payback period of which 1.5 years are over. We again
request the City expand the benefited u1ca prior to any Filai guide plan change and
preliminary plats with a rebate to Kenco under the terms of the Parkside 3rd agreement.
We do believe that a sewer flow capacity question should be addressed as it relates to
flows from these new sites through Cedar Creek, Center Oaks, Parkside 1,2,3,4,
Summerfield and across Highway 19.
During 1998, the farmers along ditch 9 believed they could not afford a ditch cleaning,
so Pilot land offered to do so. It was discussed with the attorney, the City
Administrator at the time, and the Engineer, that Pilot be eligible for a fair share rebate
of costs from trunk storm sewer utility fees, since the ditch cleaning benefited the City
for the next 20 years and served more than just new development that Pilot was
undertaking. Our work cost $23000 in excavation and $12,000 in engineering. We
believe that work done in the area South of Highway 118 should be under a substantial
rebate if development proceeds, since it clearly benefits their property both for
1 avtrnkfe.doc
13736 Johnson Street NE • Ham Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094
agriculture in the short term and development in the long term. At a minimum,
engineering study work done on these sites should be generated without any financial
contribution from lands that Pilot owns.
4. There has been no discussion of a lift station study, which could impact our plans for
50 approved Townhomes. This must be completed prior to a preliminary plat
approval.
5. We have an engineering concern that without a guarantee that the first phases connect
to St. Michael for water looping, that additional water mains may be needed along
Highway 18. We would have zero use for any lines along 18 and could not participate
in any assessment, which would be proposed as part of that scenario.
6. Last, with development concepts pending, we wish to hear what the City has
discovered regarding joint trail construction with Wright County Highways and the
school district as they upgrade the road. They should be involved now if any new
intersections, accel or decel lanes are required, especially as they may affect a lift
station siting.
These are the most significant planning and financial issues, which we dealt with during
our approvals, and we would expect similar consideration and results from this project.
We will be at the Planning Commission meeting.
Sincerely,
' 41
Donald Jensen
Land Development Director
Cc: Kent Roessler
\\ServerO I\don\LANDDE V\LETTERS\PROJECTS\ALBRT VLE\OPERATIO\harstedques.doe
C environmental &*46.0
•605 Franklin Avenue NE, P.O. Box 51, St. Cloud, MN 56302-0051 320.25
A11099sef 11 '�� . engineering
EWA architecture
2000 CSAH 19/37 TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA
SEH-RCM No. A-ALBEV 9905.00
BIDS DUE: WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 29,1999 @10:00 A.M.
PAGE I
COLLISYS
MPLS MN
DESIGN ELECTRIC
ST CLOUD MN
ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION &
MAINTENANCE CO
"LE PLAIN MN
GRANITE CITY ELECTRIC
73
WAITE PARK MN
KILLMER ELECTRIC
4
MAPLE GROVE MN
RIDGEDALE ELECTRIC INC
LONG LAKE MN
TRAFFIC CONTROL CORP
AFTON MN
w.Wbev\9905\specs\SWmrAab
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Offices located throughout the upper Midwest Equal Opportunity Employer
We help you plan, desiyn, and achieve.
DEC-21-1999 15:25 NAC
6125--'"' v02
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CO
NtNC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MAR: (OAL)
MEMORANDUM
TO: Pete Carlson, City Engineer
FROM: Deb Garross, Senior Planner
DATE: 21 December 1999
RE: Subdivision Ordinance Amendment — MPCA Pollution Control Standards
FILE NO: 163.05-99.06
The purpose of this memo is to respond to the issues identified by the MPCA in their
letter dated December XX, 1999. The attached draft Subdivision Ordinance amendment
pages have incorporated the majority of changes suggested by the MPCA. Please note
that the proposed language is underlined and language proposed to be deleted from the
Subdivision Ordinance is shown with a line through the text. Some of the MPCA
suggested changes were not incorporated into the draft because other existing City
Codes and procedures provide for such protection measures, The foliowing comments
are provided based upon the order identified in the attached MPCA review letter:
1. The attached document represents the incorporation of pollution control standards
that are applicable to the City of Albertville and its ability to review and implement
such controls, The draft requires pollution control plans for subdivisions containing
five (5) or more acres of land and/or land disturbing activities involving the
excavation, filling or transport of fifty (50) or more cubic yards of material. The
MPCA model ordinance suggests that pollution control plans be required for all
building permits, To expect individual homeowners to develop pollution control
plans for single family homes, decks and additions as well as to provide financial
security ($3,000 as suggested by the MPCA) is considered to be an extraordinary
and extremely costly requirement both to the homeowner and the City. In the place
of requiring a pollution control plan for individual building permits/projects, the City
will continue to implement standard erosion control practices (i.e. silt fence and other
measures) at individual building/addition sites.
2_ The City of Albertville addresses grubbing and clearing of land and other vegetation
removal/preservation practices through implementation of the following: Shoreland
Management Ordinance which outlines procedures associated with vegetation
removal within the most ecologically sensitive areas of the community (those areas
within 1,000 feet of the three Natural Environment Lakes within the City); Wetland
5775 WAYZATA. BOUt_EVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MI NNESOTA 554 1 6
PHONE 61 2 595-9636 FAX 51 2.595,-9637 E-MAIL NAC(-a-) WINT`ERNET.CON1
DEC-21-1999 15:26 NAC
612 595 9837 0.03
Systems Overlay District; required landscaping for new residential subdivisions,
semi public and all income producing properties including residential structures
containing 5 or more units; and by requiring landscape plans and drainage plans as
part of site plan and conditional use permit review/approval. Additionally, standard
erosion control practices are required as part of the individual building permit
process. The enactment of additional controls is viewed as duplicative and
unnecessary and therefore no further changes concerning this matter are
suggested,
3. This item has been incorporated into the draft.
4. This item has been incorporated into the draft.
5. This item has been incorporated into the draft.
6. This item has been incorporated into the draft.
7. The ordinance requires the pollution control plan to identify adjacent areas within
100' of the land disturbing activity as a submittal requirement for storm water
pollution control plans. The purpose of the ordinance is to require the control erosion
and sedimentation on the site, both during and after construction. Therefore, there
should be no down stream erosion problems associated with the project.
Furthermore, the requirements for permanent storm water pollution controls specify
that "accelerated channel erosion shall not occur as a result of the proposed land
disturbing or development activity." No further changes to the draft are suggested
regarding this item.
B. This item has been incorporated into the draft.
9. This item is in regard to required financial security for storm water and erosion
control facilities. Subdivision Ordinance Section 800 discusses required
improvements and financial arrangements for development projects. Item A-
800.1(g) has been amended to refer to storm water pollution control facilities to
address this matter. It is suggested that the City incorporate language concerning
the amount of financial security via Resolution and/or other means suggested by the
City Engineer and City Attorney, rather than incorporate the figure into the
Subdivision Ordinance. (The use of a Resolution, fee schedule, development
contract or other implementation device is suggested because those documents can
be modified accordingly based upon current market conditions. Specific security
amounts should not, as a matter cf practice, be incorporated into Ordinances, as the
amendment procedure is more difficult and time consumptive due to publication and
public hearing requirements).
NAC has reviewed the Albertville Subdivision Ordinance and found that there is not a
specific requirement for an amendment of the Ordinance to be processed through the
Planning Commission prior to consideration by the City Council. However, the
DEC-21-1999 15:26 NAC
amendments necessary to incorporate the MPCA pollution control standards are
extensive and Wil impose additional time and finandai burdens to individuals desiring to
develop their properties. This being the case, it is recommended that the City follow
similar notification and public hearing procedures for this Subdivision Ordinance
amendment as would be required for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. It may
also be advisable to have a joint meeting Wth Mike Couri to further discuss this matter,
prior to any further action.
Please review the attached information and the suggestions recommended herein and
advise our office accordingly of further changes and/or meetings which should occur
prior to preparation of the actual ordinance amendment documents for consideration by
the City.
Attachm nts.
1. Subdivision Ordinance Sections
2. Letter from Gary Rott (MPCA Review Letter)
PC Linda Goeb, City Administrator
Mike Couri, City Attorney
Kevin Mealhouse, Building Official
DEC-21-1999 15:27 NAC 612 595 9837 P.05
A-100.4. Conditions for Recordi g No plat or any subdivision shall be entitled to
record in the Wright County Recorder's office or have any validity until the plat or
subdivision has been prepared, approved and acknowledged in the manner prescribed by
this Chapter.
A-100.5_ Building Per s. No building permits shall be considered for issuance
by the City for the construction of any building, structure or improvement to the land or to
any lot in a subdivision as defined herein, until all requirements of this Chapter have been
fully complied with.
A-100.6. Conflict. Whenever there is a difference between minimum standards or
dimensions specified herein and those contained in other official regulations, resolutions
or City Code provisions, the most restrictive standards shall apply.
-100.7 MeasuLed Distanos, All measured distances expressed in feet shall be
the nearest tenth of a foot.
g,I00 B. DefinitioM Except for those words and phrases defined below, the words
and phrases used in this Chapter shall be interpreted to be given the meaning in common
usage, and as may be commonly defined in dictionaries so as to give this Chapter its most
reasonable application.
(a) Alley: A public or private right-of-way primarily designed to serve as
secondary access to the side or rear of those properties whose principal frontage
is on a street.
(b) Applicant: The owner, his agent or person having legal control and/or an
interest in the land proposed to be subdivided.
(c) Attorney: The attorney employed by the City, unless otherwise stated.
(d) 8ase Lot: A lot meeting all the specifications within its zoning district prior
to being divided into a subdivision of single family attached units.
Best Managgment
Practices (BMP's)
Erosion and sEdiment control and water
gualily management
12ractices that are
the most effecti a and practicable mens gj
controlling, 12reventing,
and minimizing
dearadation_Qf surface water includmca
cons ctu, ion p asings minimizin t
e length of time soil areas are exoosed�
prohibitions
and other managg}e_nt
practices ublis d b st a or des Hated
area -wide
annin encie Ex
les MP' can be nd in he current
versions of the
Minn sota Pollution control
Agency's "Protecting Water ualityj,
g rban Areas
"and the same gencv's
"Stor Water d Wpflnnds: PI nin d
Evaluatioa Guidelines
for Addres n Pot tia! IIs of Urban orm-W er an
Snow -Me Runo n lands The U ted tates vironme I Prote t'on
Agency's."Storm
Water Management
for (;o 1 .auction Activities: Developing
City of Albertville 100-2 Subdivision Ordinance
DEC-2-1-1999 15;27 NAC
612 595 9937 P . 06
r Ilution Prevention Plans and Best Man dement Practices "(as a referanco fnr
BMP's) the Minnesota Deoartriment of Transportation's "Erosion Contr_9 Desi
Manual."
(e) Block: An area of land within a subdivision that is entirely bounded by
streets, or by streets and the entire boundary or boundaries of the subdivision, or
a combination of the above with a river, lake, railroad, or unsubdivided acreage.
(f) Boulevard: The portion of the street right-of-way between the curb line and
the property line.
(g) Building: Any structure built for the support, shelter or enclosure of
persons, animals, chattel or movable property of any kind.
(h) Butt Lot: A lot at the end of a block, located between two corner lots.
(i) City: The City of Albertville.
6) Cluster Development: A subdivision development planned and constructed
so as to group housing units into relatively tight patterns, while providing a unified
network of open space and wooded areas, meeting the overall density regulation
of this Chapter and the Zoning Ordinance.
(k) Comprehensive Plan: A comprehensive plan prepared by the City,
including a compilation of policy statement goals, standards and maps indicating
the general locations recommended for the various functional classes of land use,
places and structures, and for the general physical development of the City,
including any unit or part of such plan separately adopted and any amendment to
such plan or parts thereof.
(1) Contour Map: A map on which irregularities of land surface are shown by
lines connecting points of equal elevations. "Contour interval" shall mean the
vertical height between contour lines.
(m) Copy: A print or reproduction made from a tracing.
(n) County: Wright County, Minnesota.
(o) Design Standards: The specifications to landowners or those proposing to
subdivide land for the preparation of plats, both preliminary and final, indicating
among other things, the optimum, minimum or maximum dimensions of such items
as rights -of -way, blocks, easements and lots.
City of Albertville 100-3 Subd►vlsion ordnance
EEC-21-1999 15;25 NAC 612 595 9537 P.07
(p) Development: The act of building structures and installing site
improvements.
Developer A hers firm corporation. sole pf_O_orietQLi�-& Her ip, s to
agency. or gglifical sub ' i ion thigreof erigaged in land disturbance ac ivi
ischar : The ve anc channglin gf styrm ater
including snow melt. from a construe ion site.
(q) Double Frontage Lot: A lot which has a property line abutting on one street
and an opposite property line abutting on another non -intersecting street.
(r) Drainage Course: A watercourse or indentation for the drainage of surface
water.
(s) Easement: A grant by a property owner for the use of a strip of land and for
the purpose of constructing and maintaining drives, utilities, including, but not
limited to, wetlands, ponding areas, sanitary sewers, water mains, electric lines,
telephone lines, storm sewer or storm drainageways and gas lines.
Energy Dissipation This refers to methods eloyedt pipe tlets to ere t
er ion. Ex les in de but arg not limited to: -aprons. rip ra2. j2Iasnq_49§,_a_M
gabions that are des'al3ed to prevent erosion.
(t) Engineer. The registered engineer employed by the City, unless otherwise
stated.
Erosion: An ss that Mars the s ce of eland the a on of ter,
wind, wge, or gravity.
Ero-sign ContraRefers
to methodemployed
to pr_p_M,t erosi
Exa
les i hide
soil st bilization practices
horizontal slope
aradi, na tem_p_orary
or permanent
c2ver,
and construction
phasina.
F_rasion
i t Pract e S12ecifications
or Pr ice: T
man emert
procedures, techniques
and methods to
co lm, soil erasion and
sedimen
ation a
officially adooted
by the cily or local Watershed ciroup.iche
er is m
e stri eot.
Exposed SoilAreas:
All eas of the
co ructio site
ere t
eve ation
('ncludinta trees.
shrubs, and brush) has
been removed
This irlpludes
ps011
sick iie areas,
borrow areas and dis psal
are s withi e
o struction site.
Filter trips A veaetated section of land esigned to treat runoff as 4verlaad sheet
City of Albertville Subdivision Ordinance
100-4
DEC-21-1999 15:29 PdAC— 612 5,35 9837 P.88
flaw. They m si ne in naturaletated orm fr m a eadow
to
a sm ' rest. T eense cover fac' ates iuta emov and
infiltration.
(u) Final Plat: A drawing or map of a subdivision, meeting all of the
requirements of the City and in such form as required by Wright County for the
purpose of recording.
Final Slabilizati eans that all soil disturbi activities at thf, siteh e bee
completed, and that a uniform perennial vege cover with den�ity of_
percent of the co for un a d areas nd area n t covere anent
st lure has been established orequivalent perr panent st biiizati n m sures
have been employed.
(v) Goveming Body: The Albertville City Council.
HyOric Soils, Soils that are
sa ated flooded. or 2o
ng the
growing season to develop
anaerobic conditions in -the
upp&r.part.
Hydrophytic Vegetation-
cro hplant life rowin in ter
it or a
substrate that is gI least
periQdicallyeficient - ox
a as a r uit of
ce s' e
Mpter content.
ervio urface
n t r r artific I hard s
ace at ei er
re nts or
in
retar a ent of water i o the soil. andcausesorate to run off the
surface
greater quantities and
at n incre ed rate of
flow tr,an exists..
rior to
development- Examples
includg rooftopg. sidewal
s at os dr ewavq
narkina
lots.storm Q greas,and
concrete. as hal r ray
pads_.
(w) Key Map: A map drawn to comparatively small scale which definitively
shows the area proposed to be platted in relation to known geographical features
(e.g., town centers, lakes and roads).
Land Disturbance Activity: Any land c pge invo vino the cav tion ter ps_port a
nd
fillin�gof fftK(50� or more cubic yards aterial at ma esult i sool ero pan fr
water or , 'nd and the movement of sediments intoSr u o wate s or la ds wit
the jurisdiction of Alb ville. he follo 'n are of co sjd re tab Land
Dis urbance Activities:
1. Activities such as home Bard s and in jvidual home I_ndscacajnQ•
repairs -and maintenance work.
Co struction installati and ntenanc f el ctric t e ho and
television�utili li es or indvidual s rvice onnec n to ese
uti{itie except ere over u e fee of ex sed s it area wjil
City of Albertville 100-5 Subdivision ordinance
GEC-21-1999 15:29 NAC 612 595 °e37 ~.09
result.
Tilling, la n or harvesting gf agricultural, hPrti-C tural.
silvicultural cr
A. Installation
of fence
sign telephone and
electric pokes and other
Inds of
posts or
poles exQept. whe
over fi thousa 5 000
square -let
of exposed
soil area will re
ut.
S. mergencywork to protect life limb or pmpesi and a er e
re irs unless the land disturbingactivitywould . required an
apr)rnvgd erosion and sediment control pIan except or the
emergency, then the land sirea,di urbed all be ha ed and
stabilized in accordance \Mth the ity's Egguirements
(x) Lot: A parcel or portion of land in a subdivision or plat of land separated
from other parcels or portions by description, as on a subdivision or record of
survey map, for the purpose of sale or lease or separate use thereof and having its
principal frontage on a public street-
(y) Lot, Comer. A lot situated at the intersection of two (2) streets, the interior
angle of such intersection not exceeding one hundred thirty-five (135) degrees.
(z) Lot Improvements: Any building, structure, place, work of art, or other
object, or improvement of the land on which they are situated constituting a physical
betterment of real property, or any part of such betterment. Certain proposed lot
improvements shall be properly bonded for as provided in these regulations.
(aa) Metes and Bounds Description: A description of real property which is not
described by reference to a lot or block shown on a map, but is described by
starting at a known point and describing the bearings and distances of the lines
forming the boundaries of the property or delineating a fractional portion of a
section, lot or area by described lines or portions thereof.
(bb) Natural Water Way: A natural passageway in the surface of the earth, so
situated and having such a topographical nature that surface water flows through
it from other areas before reaching a final ponding area. The term also shall
include all drainage structures that have been constructed or placed for the purpose
of conducting water from one place to another.
(cc) Outlot; A. lot remnant or parcel of land left over after platting, which is
intended as open space or other future use, for which no building permit shall be
issued.
City of AtberhriUe 100-6 Subdivision ordinance
DEC-21-1999 15:30 NPC 512 595 983,' P.10
(dd) Owner: An individual, association, syndicate, partnership, corporation, trust
or any other legal entity holding an equitable or legal ownership interest in the land
sought to be subdivided.
(ee) Parks: Playgrounds, trails, parks or open spaces within the City, owned,
leased or used, wholly or in part, by the City for park and recreational purposes or
of which is designated by the City Council as a park.
paved 5urface:-Aconstructed hard, smooth su fggg Made o as alt ret r
other pavement material, Examples in 1 tare of li ' ed to road
,$jdewal s driveways and parking lots.
(ff) Pedestrian Way: A public right-of-way or private easement across a block
or within a block to provide access for pedestrians and which may be used for the
installation of paths or trails.
(gg) Percentage of Grade: Along a center line of a street, the change in vertical
elevation in feet and tenths of a foot for each one hundred (100) feet of horizontal
distance, expressed as a percentage.
Permane ove Bans nal stab ti n. am s incl de rass avel
aphalt and concrete.
(hh) Planning Commission: The Planning Commission of the City.
(ii) Preliminary Plat: A drawing or map of a proposed subdivision meeting the
requirements herein enumerated submitted to the Planning Commission and
governing body for their consideration, in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan,
along with required supporting data.
(jj} Private Street: A street serving as vehicular access to two (2) or more
parcels of land which is not dedicated to the public and is owned by one or more
private parties.
(kk) Protective Covenants: Contracts entered into between all owners and
holders of mortgage constituting a restriction on the use of all private property
within a subdivision for the benefit of the property owners, and providing mutual
protection against undesirable aspects of development which would tend to impair
the stability of property value and economic integrity of any given area_
(II) Public Improvement: Any drainage ditch, roadway, parkway, street,
sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water system, sidewalk, pedestrian way, tree, lawn;
off-street parking area, lot improvement or other facility for which the City may
ultimately assume ownership, responsibility for maintenance and operation, or
which may affect an improvement for which local government responsibility is
subdivision Ordinance
City of Albertville 100-7
DEC-21-1999 15:30 NAC 612 595 %37 P.11
established.
(mm) Quadraminiums: Single structures which contain four (4) subdivided
dwelling units all of which have individually separate entrances from the exterior of
the structure.
(nn) Reserve Strips: A narrow strip of land placed between lot lines and streets
to control access.
(co) Right -of -Way: The land covered by a public road, otherwise dedicated for
public use, or land for certain private uses, such as land over which a power line
passes.
Runoff Coefficient The average annual fraction of total precipitation that is not
infiltrated into or otherwise retained by the soil, concrete. asphalt or otb L u�rface
upon which it fal,ls that will aooear at the conveys ce as runoff
Sediment The produd of an eros' rocess id material oth mi al and
organic —that is in sus e is beingr rted or s been oved bVater,
or ice and hag come to rest on the earth'earth'a surface e— r ve below Mter
i9ye I.
Sedimentation: Sedimentation means the process os action of depositing sediment
caused by erosio_rl
Sediment Control: The methods empigyad to prevent sediment from leavina.the
siteSediment control lractices include silt fences, sedi ent trans earth dikes.
drainage,swales chegk dams, subsurface drains pile slope drains, sty drat
inlet protection and temporary or perman sedimen ion bas' s
(pp) Setback: The distance between a building and the property line nearest
thereto.
Sail„ The unco lidated mineral and organic material on the immediate surface pf
t earth.
Stabilized: The expQsed grounds ace after it gg been covered by sod.erosio
contrpl blanket dP Eap. or other material that prevents a ion fro ccurr
Grass seed is not staLili to ion.
t rm Wgter The 12regipitation runoff orm water ruaOff. snoytLielt runo an an
other surface runoff and drainage (defned in 40 C H 122 26 [W 1131"
St Water Poll on ontrol P190, A joint storm water and erosion nd sed' ent
City of Albertville 100-8 Subdivision Ordinance
DEC-21-1999 15:31 NAC
512 59S 9837 P.12
contr9l aLijn that is a document containing the it ents of A-60 3 t t whe
im emente Il ere soil a ion on parcel of land and o -site n nint
g9liUlion and se0iment
(qq) Street: A public right-of-way for vehicular traffic, whether designated as
highway, thoroughfare, parkway, through- way, road, avenue, boulevard, Jane,
place, drive, court or otherwise designated.
(rr) Streets, Arterial: Those streets carrying larger volumes of traffic and
serving as links betvreen various sub -areas of the City. Arterial streets are intended
to provide for collection and distribution of traffic between highways and collector
streets; hence regulation of direct access to property is critical.
(ss) Streets, Collector. Those streets which carry traffic from local streets to the
major system of arterials and highways. Collector streets primarily provide principal
access to residential neighborhoods, including, to a lesser degree direct land
access.
(tt) Streets, Local: Those streets which are used primarily for access to
abutting properties and for local traffic movement.
(uu) Streets, Marginal Access (Service Road): Those local streets which are
parallel and adjacent to high volume arterial streets and highways; and which
provide access to abutting properties and protection from through traffic.
(vv) Streets, Cul-De-Sacs: A local street Wth only one outlet and having an
appropriate terminal for the safe and convenient reversal of traffic movement.
(ww) Street Width: The shortest distance between the fines delineating the right-
of-way of a street.
(xx) Subdivision: The division of a parcel of land into two (2) or more lots or
parcels for the purpose of transfer or ownership or building development. This
includes resubdivision and, where appropriate to the context, shall relate to the
process of subdividing or to the land subdivided.
(yy) Surveyor: A land surveyor registered under Minne3ota State laws.
(zz) Tracing: A plat or map drawn on transparent paper, film, or cloth which can
be reproduced by using regular reproduction procedure.
T M ora otectio N The methods ern ed to preve eros'on. E am 1 of
such protectio s include straw ulch erosion control b! kets ood c i s nd
erosion netting.
City of Albertville 100-9 Subdivision Ordinance
DEC-21-1999 15:32 NFC 612 595 9837 P.13
(13) Provisions for surface water ponding, drainage and flood control.
14Storm Water Pollution Cgotrol
Pla
A storm w
r olluti ntrol
plan shall be submitted for reviefand
a2proval
by the QjtyEn
ear in the
followin cases: Subdivision a
icationprojectcontaining
five (5) or
more s of land, Said plan sh
confor
o the re uire
ments o ti gn
A-600.13 of this Ordinance.
(d) The items listed in this section shall be in conformance with all other
applicable sections of this Chapter.
5 (e) Platting Adjoining Lands. A preliminary plat shall contain the entire tax
parcel to be platted plus all of the owner's contiguous lands unless such lands are
subject to a Planned Unit Development or the City Planner and City Engineer agree
to waive such requirement. The final plat may cover only a portion of the
preliminary plat, provided it is in conformance with the approved preliminary plat,
development contract and other requirements herein.
5 (f) Supplementary Information. Any or all of the supplementary information
requirements set forth in this section shall be submitted when deemed necessary
by the City staff, consultants, advisory bodies and/or City Council.
(1) Proposed protective covenants or private restrictions-
(2) A survey prepared by a qualified person identifying tree coverage in
the proposed subdivision in terms of type, weakness, maturity, potential
hazard, infestation, vigor, density and spacing. A vegetation preservation
and protection plan that shows those trees proposed to be removed, those
to remain, the types and locations of trees and other vegetation that are to
be planted may also be required.
(3) Statement of the proposed use of lots stating type of buildings with
number of proposed dwelling units or type of business or industry, so as to
reveal the effect of the development on traffic, fire hazards, and congestion
of population. The City may require the applicant or developer to have
formal traffic or other studies performed to the City's satisfaction which show
the effect of the proposed development on traffic, fire hazards and
congestion.
Amended Ord. 1997-3, 3 June 1997
City of Albertville 500-4 subdivision Ordinance
` DEC-21-1999 15:32 NP
612 595 9837 P.14
(aaa) Two -Family Dwelling: A dwelling designed exclusively for occupancy by two
(2) families living independently of each other.
lY attached
(bbb) Unit Lots: Lots created from the subdivision thanethe famconvent onal
dwellings having different minimum lot size requirements
base lot within the zoning district.
n: f r atin to ch r t istic of stitutin c't .
both gtrat g d infiltra
of "wetiands,"1
onsu u�.•,
st Wetlands must have the follcw09 AttribpME
1. A predominance of hymc soils;.
2.
cond��: and
3. uNJ -
YPnetation_
t,ccc)
Zoning
Ordinance: The Zoning Ordinance or resolution controlling the use
of land as adopted by the City.
Subdivision Ordinance
city of Albertville 100-10
CEC-21-1999 15:33 Nk-- 612 595 9837 P.15
A-600.1 . Street -Names. Names of new streets shall not duplicate existing or
platted street names, unless a new street is a continuation of or in alignment with the
existing or platted street. In that event, it shall bear the same name of the existing or
platted street. Street names shall conform to the City's Street Naming and Property
Numbering System as applicable.
A-6,00_13 Erosion and Sediment Cyntml-
14 L-1 a zv_l aim- _
- - : - - . • - - - -
•
w Ston Water ollution Qgrtrol PIgn A sto water llution ntrol pian
shall be su mitted for review an a rov l by t,. he City Enginpgr fors d it
appliggtions foc proiects containing iv es or more of land.
W The gtorm water pollutim, control lan shall include,
a. Project description- inclu fin- the naturg andPurpose of the
land disturbinga vit and a amou of radi utilifigg and
building construction involved.
b. Project phasing plan includi ,g the time frames and sched es
for theTjec's varioug aspect§,
c. A map of the ex st ting site condi)ns existL2g toaos9r_aph-Y4
City of Alberty ile 600-13 Subdivision Ordinance
MC-21-1999 15:33 NAC 612 595 9837 71.16
property information steep slopes existing drainage
systems/patterns. type of soils waterways AWIand
vegetative cover, and 100year flood plains.
d. 6 site construction flan that includes the proposed _land
disturbing activities stockpiles, erosion sediment control
plan construction schedule and the maintenance
inspection of the storm water. pollution control measures._
g, Adiacent areas neighboring streams lakes residential areas
roads_ etc within one hWndred (100) feet of the subiect site.
whichmay be affected by the land disturbing activity.
f. The methods that WU bg used to contmi erosion a d
sedimentation on the site both during and a. construction
including
the followingitems-
4.
Schedule and meth o s to stabilize all
exposed soils.
soil stockpiles and steep s1.o,Res.
5
Schedule and methods to establish perManent
vegetation.
6_
Meth ds to prevent sedimentation damage
to ad, a
properties and natural fe ures.
7.
Measures to control the quality and quantity
of stg
water leaving the sites
8.
Melbodg to protect gtgrm sewers from
he entran f
sediment.
9
Methods to protect ads from sediment
and mini
brought in from access _routes.
10.
Methods to maintain both teMpora
and-RffManent
pggsion and sediment control de ices.
11.
Methods to restabglize bAility construction
areas as soon~
as possible.
Calculations ung designpar eters for sediment b sins. wet
detention basin diversions waterways and other aoa,iigable_
practices.
LM Minimum Storm Water Pollution Qontrol Requirements' These minimum
control measures are required y ere bare soil i$ exposed. Due to the diDe—r-uX of
individual construction sites each site will b�individuall���luated. Where
additional control meass a needed hey will be s e ified at the di lion of
the City Engineer
,Qsvqrion of channeled runoff around disturbed areas if pract'scal. ar
the erotection of the.cllennel.
City of Albertville Subdivision Ordinance
600-14
DEC-21-1999 15:34 NW 612 595 7-937 P.17
2. The scheduling of the site's activities to lessen their impact on
ernGinn and sediment control measures.
3. Minimize the amount of exposed sojl
I ,Control runoff as follows:_
a,Stabilize inactive disturbed ar as with sod or seed with mulch;
and
b, Construct temporary or permanent sediment fioion basins.
Sedimentation basins must have a minimum surface area
ggual to at - east 1 % or area draining to basin. 3 foot mi_❑.imam
depth, and constructed in accordance with design
goAcifications. Sedimentation basins must be maintained
re,gularlX includingseiment removal to maintaiagl three (3)
foot del2l�i Basin discharge rates must also be control a to
prevent erosion in the discharge channel The applicant is
required to obtain a Nation it Pgl] tant Discharge Elimination
System/State Disposal S s e NPDE ISDS construction
,storm water permit from the Minnesota Poll ign Control
Agency
5. F, grsoil stockpiles area er than ten (10) cubic yards, the toe of_ tb
pile must be more than twenty-five (25) feet from a road. drainaue
channel or storm water inlet If ft #or more than seven M d�ys� they
must be sgtabilized with mulch v tion to or other ans. If left
for less than seven 7 da lion from stogkpilgs olust be
controlled wit i silt fences or rock check dams.
a. If for aray reason a soil stockpile i§IQcated closer than_tyyen4t -,
five (25) feet from a road, drainage Channel or storm mmter
inlet and left for more than seven (7) days, it must be covered
with tarps or controlled in some other_manner.
6. Temporary stockpiling of 50 or more cubic yards of excess o� on any
lot cr other vacBrit area will not be allowed without issuance gf a
grading permit for th earth moving activity in s tion.
7. Where a proiect's ultim o development replacglaUfface vegetation
with one or more acres of cumulative impervious surface, and all
runoff has not accounted forjo the City's existing st r ter
management plan or Plactice the run= shall be dischar
A&aja a wet
Sedimentation basin P-Eig[ to entering waters of the state.
Work shall conform with the current version of the Minnesota
Pollution con of Agency's "Protecting Water Quality in Urb�1n
City ofAlbertvlW 600-1 5 Subdivislor, Ordinance
DEC-21-1999 15:45 Nw-
612 595 9837 P.01•'05
art f the normal
maintenance
rwntirnmfor
ggblic
works fa�iliti s. I
shall be the
respon ibility
of the applicant
t
obt an ace
t
r then
ert int
ests o allo
s to the orm
asern
v` -tear managemen
faci{iti
s for i
pectioaan
maintenan rose.
JI6 Easements If a storm water m _ement Flan inv Ives tree n
some or all runoff fr_ m the sit_e._the applicant sh II obtain _from
adiacent pr_QWrty o ers gny neces a nt or o her ro art
interests con mi no a of ter.
U Permanent Storm W ter Pv ition Controls�
1. The agol i cant all i stall truct nr n2Ve C t fe fo all
storm water management f cilities necessary to ma a e i a eas
rt�,off, so that the two year tenear and .. 0 _ e r storm _uegik_
discarge rates existin-1 before the flropos d de ant U n t
be increased Also acceleCate d chap el erosion shah n t occur as
result of the l2rona ed land dimming or devalcFment act�vsty. An
{ic nt ma�iso ke an in -kind or a monetary co trio ion to the
¢evelooment and main enan of com unity storm vv�er
management facilities designed to serve multiple land dis-t� rb1na-L1d
evelogment activities uncle ate k b.Y on�ar more persons includes
the applicant.
All calculations and hXolocc models/in ormation used in
determining peak flo shall a su mitte along with the sto er
20 ution control flan.
The applira t sha I consider r duci g_the need for storm vY' tamer
ana ent f cilitie in or t use nat ral t o ra
and Ian cover uch as natur I swa'es and depressioas they e�
afore dove! 12ment to the ere hat they aMQmr—n2da-t-eLtW
dition { flow of water without co Qromi ina the inte it�ali
ty
of the wetland or pond,
q. Thy, storm water_ poll tian ontrol ,plan shoul inc ore the
llwn:
a. Me sure to otect an esery as muc pat 1 0
vage_tated area on the s'Le as ossib a m' � izin m e ions
surfaces, and directing runoff to ve9.etated yeas ratbgL than
to adjoi ng streets, storm ewer�tches,
.
b, Flaw att uation by usg of o on ve9etat d swales and natu
rpi
de ressi s.
c storm water wet de ention facilities.
Subdivision ordinance
City ofAlbertvr7le 1 600-17
DEC-21-1999 15;46 NAC 612 595 987? 0.02,05
(e) Water Mains. In the case where water mains from a public water system are
available, the applicant shall be required to install water mains in the plat and
connect the same to the public water system. The water house service (ended with
curb box) shall be installed into the lot a distance of eight (8) feet, measured at a
right angle, from the right-of-way line of the abutting public street.
(f) Public Sanitary Sewer. In all cases where trunk line sanitary sewer facilities
are available, the applicant shall be required to install sanitary sewers in the plat
and connect the same to the trunk line sewers. The sanitary sewer house service
(ended with plug) shall be installed into the plat a distance of eight (8) feet,
measured at a right angle, from the right-of-way line of the abutting public street.
(g) Drainage Facilities. Such facilities and easements shall be installed as will
adequately provide for the drainage of surface waters, storm water ilu i
control, and a storm sewer system may be required Drainage way easements or
land dedication may be required when such easements or land is needed in the
public interest for purposes of floodplain management, proper drainage, prevention
of erosion, pedestrian access to water bodies, or other public purpose. All surface
water drainage must be approved by the Wright County Watershed District.
(h) Miscellaneous Facilities. Tree planting; street name signs, traffic control
signs, oversized trunk lines, pedestrian ways and other improvements may be
required to be furnished and installed by the applicant. The applicant shall install
four (4) inches of black dirt and a good quality sod in the boulevard at the time of
occupancy of the adjacent lot. During the construction phase, if the utility lines
(electric power, telephone, gas, and cable TV) are placed prior to placing the curb,
the applicant shall place four (4) inches of black dirt and adequate seed in the
boulevard within thirty (30) days after curb placement. If the curb is placed prior to
placing the utility lines, the applicant shall place four (4) inches of black dirt and
adequate grass seed in the boulevard within thirty (30) days after the utility lines
are placed, or within one year after the curb is placed, whichever occurs sooner.
Placing of black dirt and grass seed in the boulevard shall not relieve the applicant
from placing black dirt and sod in the boulevard at the time of occupancy of the
adjacent lot.
10 (i) Sidewalks. Concrete sidewalks or bituminous trails shall be installed in the
approximate locations shown on the City of Albertville Comprehensive Trail Plan.
Exact locations of the sidewalks or trails shall be shown on the preliminary plat and
shall be subject to review by the City Engineer.
' Amended Ord. 1989-10
10 Amended Ord_ No. 1999-10, 15 November 1999
City of Alberiville aoo Subdivision Ordinance
1 1) � sd(odl)
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A NON-PROFIT PRIVATE/PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP
December 28, 2000
Linda Houghton -Loeb
City of Albertville
5975 Main Ave. N.E., PO Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
Dear Linda,
I would like to take this opportunity to thank you and City of Albertville for your membership
with the Economic Development Partnership of Wright County in 1999. Because of your support
the Partnership has been able to advance itself as an organization as well as impact Wright
County's economy and business environment.
1999 was again a busy and successful year for the Partnership. Major accomplishments were:
• Received 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status.
• Coordinated funding for the start-up of David & David Productions in Delano.
• Completed and initiated of the Partnership's Two-year Plan
• Recruited seven new members to add strength to our organization.
• Established a satellite office of the Small Business Development Center in Wright County.
• Enhanced and expanded our web page to promote the County, the Partnership, and its
members.
• Assisted the cities of Clearwater and Rockford in exploring the Initiative Foundation's
Healthy Communities Partnership Program.
• Completed business retention and expansion visits with 64 of the county's businesses.
The Partnership's Board of Directors have developed action plans for 2000 that include:
• Increasing marketing efforts for Wright County and its communities.
• Addressing the labor shortage by promoting and coordinating resources that enhance the
productivity of businesses.
• Seeking expanded financial resources that enhance the economic environment of the county.
• Growing the membership base of the Partnership.
I would be happy to answer any questions you may have. I can be reached at (612) 477-3086.
Thank you for your continued support.
Sincer ly,
Heidi Peper
Executive Director
Enclosure: Invoice
PO Box 525, 6800 ELEc me DwE, Rocmw, MN 55373 (612) 477-3086; FAx (612) 477-3054
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PARTNERSHIP OF WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A NON-PROFIT PRIVATE/PUBLIC PARTNERSHIP
Invoice for 2000 Membership Investment
Company Name city of Albertville
Work Address
Member Dues
5975 Main Ave. N. E., PO Box 9
Albertville MN 55301-
$500.00 Amount Due By 1131100
Please return bottom portion with membership payment.
Company Name City of Albertville
Work Address
Member Dues
5975 Main Ave. N,E., flO Box 9
Albertville MN 55301-
$500:00 Amount Due By 1131100
Remit to: Cathy Thisius, Security State Bank - Maple Lake
PO Box 449
Maple Lake. MN 5
Tuesday, December 28, 1999
PO Box 525, 6800 ELEcrRcc DRIVE, RocxroRD, MN 55373 (612) 477-3086; FAx (612) 477-3054
163)
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
RESOLUTION # 2000-1
A RESOLUTION MAKING APPOINTMENTS TO
CERTAIN OFFICE AND POSITIONS
WITHIN THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE FOR THE YEAR
WHEREAS, it has been the policy of the Albertville City Council to make annual
appointments to fill certain offices and positions with the city government at the
beginning of each year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Albertville,
Minnesota, establishes the following:
1. That the following persons are appointed by the City Council to the following
offices and positions for the year 2000:
ACTING MAYOR: Robert Gundersen
PLANNING COMMISSION: Gary McCormack
Alternate: John Vetsch
ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR: John Vetsch
CITY ATTORNEY: Couri & MacArthur
CITY ENGINEER: Short Elliott & Hendrickson
FINANCIAL ADVISOR: Springsted, Inc.
PLANNING CONSULTANT: Northwest Associated
Consultants
TAX INCREMENT CONSULTANTS: Briggs & Morgan
Kennedy & Graven
BOND COUNSEL: Briggs & Morgan
Kennedy & Graven
y . 0 t
ANIMAL CONTROL: Monticello Animal Control
CIVIL DEFENSE DRECTOR: Fire Chief
FIRE RELIEF ASSOCIATION Assistant Fire Chief
REPRESENTATIVES: Mayor
Clerk/Administrator
FIRE DEPT. REPRESENTATIVE: Mayor
OTSEGO CREEK AUTHORITY: John Vetsch
Planning Commission Chair
Alternate: Keith Franklin
JOINT POWERS WATER BOARD: John Olson
Robert Gundersen
Alternate: Keith Franklin
JOINT POWERS ICE ARENA BOARD: John Olson
John Vetsch
OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER: Crow River News
OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES: Highland Bank
Dain Rausher
LMC 4M Fund
Security State Bank of Maple
Lake
State Bank of Rogers
PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE: Robert Gundersen
Keith Franklin
Scott Nadeau
Fire Dept. Representative
PERSONNEL COMMITTEE: Mayor
Robert Gundersen
Gary McCormack
RULES OF PROCEDURE: Robert's Rules of Order
CABLE TV BOARD: Acting Mayor
2. City Staff and/or Consultants will attend the boards, commissions and committee
meetings as directed by the City Council. Staff who are directed to attend
meetings will be compensated based on the City's personnel policies or
contractual agreements. Staff who are not directed to attend will not be
compensated for their attendance.
3. Change City Council regular meeting dated conflicting with legal holidays as
follows:
Martin Luther King Day — Monday, January 17, 2000, to Tuesday, January 18,
2000, at 7:00 PM.
President's Day — Monday, February 21, 2000, to Tuesday, February 22, 2000, at
7:00 PM.
Independence Day — Postpone from Monday, July 3, 2000, to Wednesday, July 5,
2000, at 7:00 PM.
Labor Day — Monday, September 4, 2000, to Tuesday, September 5, 2000, at 7:00
PM.
4. That such appointment shall take effect on the date thereof and shall continue for
the remainder of the year or until such time as a successor is appointed by the City
Council.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS
3rd DAY OF JANUARY, 2000.
John A. Olson, Mayor
Linda Goeb, City Administrator
,+ . A rr
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
RESOLUTION # 2000-2
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING 2000 WAGES FOR CITY
EMPLOYEES
WHEREAS, the City Council is desirous of establishing the assignment of
pay rates for the City of Albertville effective to December 31, 1999; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, hereby establishes the following as its
official pay rate to be used for the City's officers and employees based on
employee classification.
Classification Rate/Hour
Administrator -Clerk -Treasurer
Secretary/Deputy Clerk
Zoning Administrator
Lead Maintenance Worker
Maintenance Worker II
Water/Wastewater Operator
$17.50
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon adoption, this resolution
rescinds Resolution # 1998-28.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
THIS 3RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2000.
John A. Olson, Mayor
Linda Goeb, City Administrator
January 3, 2000
City of Albertville
5975 Main Ave NE
Albertville MN 55301
Dear City of Albertville:
Subject: Family Youth Coordinator
Per your request for more information in the collaborative hiring of a Family Youth Coordinator I have
put together the following information:
City of Albertville
City of St. Michael
STMA Family Youth
Community Collaborative
Coordinator Cost
$12,000.00
$12,000.00
$12,000.00
Youth Programming
$ 2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
$ 2,000.00
Total Cost
$14,000.00
$14,000.00
$14,000.00
• Coordinator costs include salary, benefits and travel expenses.
• Programming is to include youth summer activities, after and or before school programs, parenting
classes, family community activities.
• Total costs supply the availability of a Family Youth Coordinator for a period of one year.
I would like to thank you for your consideration in joining in this collaborative venture to supply our
communities with this much needed position. As we know our communities are growing by leaps and
bounds and it will be reassuring to know that we are working to keep our youth focused in a positive
direction and the family as a unit one of our main focuses. I'm sure that you believe as I do that
investing in our youth is the best possible investment that we can make in our future.
Respectfully,
Sandra Greninger
Family Youth Coordinator
cc: STMA Family Youth Community Collaborative