The URL can be used to link to this page

2000-02-07 CC Agenda PacketALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA February 7, 2000 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER - ROLL CALL - ADOPT AGENDA 2. MINUTES ❑ January 18, 2000, regular City Council Meeting 3. CITIZEN FORUM - (10 Minute Limit) 4. CONSENT AGENDA a. Approve payment of Check #'s 12696 -12737 b. Resolution #2000-6 (A Resolution Approving a One Day, Off -Site Gambling License for the Albertville Lions) 5. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS a. Public Works ❑ (1) Susan Pearson, representing Safety Train, Inc. b. Planning & Zoning ❑ (1) Kollville Estates ■ Preliminary Plat Approval ■ CUP/PUD c. Engineering ❑ (1) Update on County Road 19 project d. Legal ❑ (1) Potential tax revenues from City owned industrial land e. Administration ❑ (1) Agreement to plow STMA Ice Arena parking lot ❑ (2) Change Orders for Fire Hall i. Extend water service as required for design change (+$2,873.15) ii. Extend completion date by 14 days due to delayed startup (+$1,741.02) iii. Addition of railing pipes on stairs for child safety (+$5,524.87) iv. Delete toilet partitions (-$1,380.00) V. Relocate main service transformer from front of building to side of building ($+734.20) ❑ (3) Reappoint members to sub -committee to meet with Otsego 6. ADJOURNMENT ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL January 18, 2000 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor John Olson, Councilmembers Robert Gundersen, Gary McCormack, Keith Franklin , and John Vetsch, City Engineer Pete Carlson, City Attorney Mike Couri, and City Administrator -Clerk Linda Goeb Mayor Olson called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to order. The agenda was amended as follows: • Pull Item 4a from Consent Agenda and place as Item 5e(7) • Pull Item 4c from Consent Agenda and place under Public Works • Add Item 5c(6) — Street Light options • Add Item 5d(2) — Consider appraisal of City property • Add Item 5c(5) — Driveway Widths Gundersen made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Franklin seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to approve the minutes of the January 3, 2000, meeting as presented. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mayor Olson asked if anyone present wished to address the Council. No one present asked to address the Council. Gundersen made a motion to approve payment of Check #'s 12604 — 12653 as presented. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to approve the WWTF Monthly Operations Report for December 1999 as presented. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council discussed the Public Works Department Report. McCormack made a motion to increase the rate of pay for locking the park shelter from $5 per time to $7 per time. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council reviewed the proposed "Right to Know" policy as drafted. Office products (i.e. copier toner) should also be included in the policy, along with inspection sheets. The policy will be amended and brought back to the Council for consideration. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL January 18, 2000 Page 2 of 6 Vetsch made a motion to accept the Public Works Department Report as presented. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council reviewed the revised park layout for the Albert Villas plat and the comments from the Planning Commission. The Council requested that the detention pond shown on a portion of Lot 6 be moved to the west and relocated behind Lot 11. The Council also heard comments and reviewed the letter from Don Jensen of Pilot Land Development Co. pertaining to issues associated with the development of the Albert Villas project. City Attorney Couri explained that some points raised by Jensen could be addressed at a later time. After further discussion of the park layout, the Council requested the trail shown behind Lots 1-5 be eliminated and replaced with a sidewalk along the park side of Kaiser Avenue. Developer Keith Harstad agreed to revise the plat according to the Council's requests. McCormack made the following motion relating to the Albert Villas project: (1) The Comprehensive Plan is amended to change the land use from agricultural/rural to low density residential for the entire parcel (subject property both north and south of County Ditch 9). (2) The property is rezoned from A-1 Agricultural to R-1 A Low Density Single Family for the entire parcel (subject property both north and south of County Ditch 9). Said rezoning shall not be placed into effect until such time as the final plat is approved by the City. (3) A Conditional Use Permit Planned Unit Development is approved to allow flexibility for lot width, area and setbacks only for the portion of the subject property located north of County Ditch 9. (4) A PUD Agreement is prepared which includes all development plans and specifications and sets forth specific land use and performance standards only for the portion of the subject property located north of County Ditch 9. (5) The preliminary plat for only the portion of the subject property located north of County Ditch 9 is approved for the development of 170 lots as amended by the Council relating to parks, sidewalks and ponds. Franklin seconded the motion. McCormack, Franklin, Gundersen and Olson voted aye. Vetsch voted no. The motion carried. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL January 18, 2000 Page 3 of 6 Gundersen made a motion to appoint Ron Klecker to the Planning & Zoning Commission to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Keith Franklin. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. City Engineer Carlson reviewed the draft Traffic Signal Agreement No. 99-02 with the Council. City Attorney Couri recommends minor changes in the indemnification language in Paragraph 2, Article 6. Gundersen made a motion to approve the Traffic Signal Agreement No.99-02 with the language change recommended by Attorney Couri. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Vetsch made a motion to adopt ORDINANCE #2000-1 titled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION A-900.8 (Definitions); and A-500.20 PLAT AND DATA REQUIREMENTS — PROPOSED DESIGN FEATURES; and A-600.13. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL; AND SECTION A- 800.1.(g) IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED — DRAINAGE FACILITIES; OF THE ALBERTVILLE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE BY ADDING REQUIREMENTS FOR STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANS. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to adopt RESOLUTION #2000-4 titled RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ESCROW DEPOSIT SCHEDULE FOR STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL PLANS EFFECTIVE AS OF JANUARY 18, 2000. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Carlson did not have an update on the CSAH 19 Improvement Project at this time. An update will be prepared for the next Council meeting. Carlson expressed concerns about Joint Powers Board policies associated with oversizing watermains. The Joint Powers Board representatives explained that a meeting to establish policies of the Board will be conducted in February. Carlson reported that a driveway on Karston Avenue NE exceeds the maximum allowable width of 24' at the curb. The ordinance gives the city engineer the authority to approve wider driveways. Carlson asked for input from the Council. Discussion was held regarding requiring notification of the driveway width on the building permit as a possible solution. The Council concurred that this driveway could remain as is based on Carlson's opinion that no negative impact has been created. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL January 18, 2000 Page 4 of 6 Gundersen made a motion to amend the subdivision ordinance to delete the phrase "engineer's approval" under the driveway widths section of the ordinance. McCormack seconded the motion. Gundersen, McCormack, Olson and Vetsch voted aye. Franklin voted no. The motion carried. City Attorney Couri reviewed the draft bill allowing the turnback of a portion of County Ditch 9 and 21 to the cities of St. Michael and Albertville. Couri explained that the bill is not legal unless Wright County, St. Michael and Albertville all approve. Therefore, the bill is harmless. Couri explained that a developer is interested in purchasing the City -owned property located north of the outlet mall. Couri has solicited a quote from appraiser Bill Waytus for an appraisal of the property at a cost of $900. The developer has indicated that if he does not purchase the parcel from the city, he will reimburse the City for the cost of the appraisal. The Council requested that staff prepare probable tax amounts that could be generated from this property if developed before a decision is made on the appraisal. Based on the fact that the City has not budgeted for participation in the Family Youth Community Collaborative, Gundersen made a motion to deny the request for $14,000 for the Collaborative this year. The Council will consider involvement in the program for the next year at the budget meetings. McCormack seconded the motion. Gundersen, McCormack and Olson voted aye. Franklin and Vetsch voted no. The motion carried. The Council considered the request for an amendment to the Developer's Agreement for the outlet mall to allow signage on the side and rear of several units. City Administrator Goeb recommended that the Council make a decision on the request but hold off on the actual amendment of the Developer's Agreement until later in case other minor amendments are necessary. The Council agreed. Gundersen made a motion to approve the request from JMJ Properties for additional signage and directed the city administrator and the zoning administrator to work out the sign details with JMJ. McCormack seconded the motion. Gundersen, McCormack, Olson, and Franklin voted aye. Vetsch voted no. The motion carried. The Council discussed whether the City should plow the STMA Ice Arena parking lot. Vetsch believes an agreement was made to plow the parking lot. The City administrator has been unable to find such an agreement in the Council minutes and ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL January 18, 2000 Page 5 of 6 the other Council members were unable to recall such an agreement having been made. Gundersen pointed out that the ice arena budget includes $2,500 for snow plowing. He is opposed to the City plowing the parking lot because he feels that the arena has budgeted for that expense on its own. Gundersen made a motion that the City not plow the ice arena parking lot. Olson seconded the motion. Gundersen and Olson voted aye. Vetsch, Franklin and McCormack voted no. The motion failed. Vetsch made a motion approving having the City plow the ice arena parking lot. Franklin seconded the motion. Vetsch, Franklin and McCormack voted aye. Olson and Gundersen voted no. The motion carried. Administrator Goeb reported on the Banyon Data software programs she previewed earlier today. In order to send meter reading cards out when the City begins to bill for its own water charges, new software will be required. The Banyon utility billing software is the program currently being used by Joint Powers for billing. Linda also previewed the Banyon accounting and payroll software. The total for all three software packages is approximately $11,000. There are sufficient funds in the capital outlay budget and previous carryovers to purchase the entire software package. Gundersen made a motion to purchase the Banyon Data Utility Billing, Payroll and Fund Accounting software and the annual support as proposed. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to have the Planning & Zoning Commission review a possible new contract for street lights as proposed through NSP and make a recommendation to the City Council. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council discussed the contract with Diversified Inspection Services for the year 2000. The percentage of the fees retained by the City has increased in this contract. Councilmember Gundersen feels that the City should retain a larger percentage of the fees. In 1999 the City retained $95,000+ of the total $309,000 generated through the issuance of building permits. Franklin made a motion to approve the 2000 contract for building inspection services with Diversified Inspection Services as presented. Vetsch seconded the ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL January 18, 2000 Page 6 of 6 motion . Franklin, Vetsch, Olson and McCormack voted aye. Gundersen voted no. The motion carried. Franklin made a motion to adjourn at 10:45 PM. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. John A. Olson, Mayor Linda Goeb, City Administrator CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT llnzoo February 7, 2000 Check No. Vendor Purpose Amount 12696 AirTouch Cellular Cell Phone & Charges $ 188.42 12697 Allina Medical Group FD Physical $ 360.00 12698 Banyon Data Systems Software & Support $ 10,867.93 12699 Chouinard Office Products Office Supplies $ 53.04 12700 Continental Research Corp. Lift Station Degreaser $ 816.91 12701 Davies Water Equipment Repair Clamps $ 1,071.46 12702 Diversifed Inspections Building Inspections $ 12,295.14 12703 Don's Auto Service Monthly Charges $ 320.82 12704 Fehn Excavting Class 5 - Watermain Break $ 86.70 12705 Fehn Excavting Greenhaven Project Final Payment $ 5,899.85 12706 Granite Electronics Reprogram WWTF Dialer $ 229.00 12707 Hawkins Water Treatment Water Dept. Supplies $ 157.05 12708 Henry & Associates Water Dept. Repair Parts $ 286.69 12709 Highland Bank Safe Deposit Box Rent $ 40.00 12710 Hoglund Bus Co. Repair Barkes on Unit 1203 $ 142.52 12711 Larson Publications January Legals $ 108.99 12712 Medica Group Insurance $ 4,374.66 12713 Menards Supplies $ 239.20 12714 Midwest Analytical Services WWT Testing $ 281.00 12715 Miller, Bridget Reimbursement for Supplies $ 24.63 12716 Minnegasco Monthy Service $ 698.31 12717 Minnesota Copy Systems Copy Use 11/25 - 1/24 $ 176.59 12718 Minnesota UC Fund Unemployment Claims $ 13.83 12719 MN DTED PFA Loan $ 49,965.26 12720 NCPERS Payroll Deduction $ 12.00 12721 North Central Laboratories Lab Equipment - WWTF $ 268.42 12722 North EMS Edcuation BLS Provider Refresher $ 48.00 12723 NAC, Inc. Planning Services $ 3,803.94 12724 Office Max Office Supplies $ 157.13 12725 Pat's 66 Wheel Alignment $ 53.20 12726 12727 12728 12729 12730 12731 12732 12733 12734 12735 12736 12737 CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT February 7, 2000 PitneyWorks Randy Kramer Excavating S.E.H. Sprint Sprint - UTS Superior Services Unlimited Electric USF - Rogers Wr. Co. Treasurer Wright Recycling Wright Hennepin ZEP Manufacturing Postage Pay Request #5 Engineering Services Long Distance Calls Local Service Monthly Garbage Service Temporary Wiring to Well Repair Parts January & February Police January Recycling Greenhaven Street Lights Cleaning Supplies Total Bills $ 500.00 $ 8,409.46 $ 5,454.48 $ 47.61 $ 329.00 $ 174.41 $ 179.00 $ 158.02 $ 18,666.00 $ 1,715.00 $ 22.16 $ 58.88 $ 128,754.71 E JY6 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESOLUTION #2000-5 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A ONE -DAY, OFF -SITE GAMBLING LICENSE FOR THE ALBERTVILLE LIONS WHEREAS, the Albertville Lions Club has made application with the Minnesota Charitable Gambling control Board to conduct a one -day, off -site gambling license for paddlewheels and pull -tabs on February 19, 2000, at the St. Albert's Parish Center; and WHEREAS, the Albertville Lions Club submitted said application to the City Council of the City of Albertville, and the application was reviewed by the City Council at a public meeting conducted February 7, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council of the City of Albertville hereby approves the application for a one -day, off -site gambling license for paddlewheels and pull -tabs for the Albertville Lions Club on February 19, 2000, at the St. Albert's Parish Center. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ABLERTVILLE THIS 7Tx DAY OF FEBRUARY 1999. John A. Olson, Mayor Linda Goeb, Administrator -Clerk Minnesota Lawful Gambling I For Board Use Only Application to Conduct One -Day Off -Site Gambling - LG230 Licensed Organization Information (please print all infonmation) Organization Name Albertville Lions Club Inc. License Number (5 digits) B-01535 License Expiration Date 10 / 31 / 01 Class of Organization License (A, B, C, or D) B Daytime Phone Name of Chief Executive Officer Anthony Listodeau Number ( 612 1 497-3912 (Do not list the gambling manager) Gambling Premises Information Name of establishment where gambling activity will be conducted St. Albert Parish Center Street Address and City 11458— 57th St. .,e. Alber-aville, NLn. 55301 (Do not use a post office box. If no street address, write in the road designations. Example: 3 miles east of Hwy. 63 on County Road 42) Does your organization own the gambling premises? Q If yes, no lease is required. ® If no, a lease agreement must be attached (you may use lease form LG224, available from the Board). However, no lease is required if the only gambling activity to be conducted is a raffle. Type of Gambling Activity. Check the box(es) which indicate(s) the type of gambling activity your organization will be conducting for this one -day off -site activity. Q Bingo Q Paddlewheels Q PulkTabs Q Tipboards Q Raffles NOTE - You may only conduct activity authorized by the class of your organization license. Date of one -day off -site activity: o_/ 19 / oo . If you are conducting a raffle, enter the date of the raffle drawing. The gambling activity conducted on this day may not exceed 12 hours. Local Unit of Government Acknowledgment If the gambling premises is within city limits, the city must sign this application. On behalf of the city, I acknowledge that this application will be forwarded to the appropriate city Print name of city officials, the city must pass a resolution specifically approving or denying this application, and a copy of the resolution will be (Signature of city personnel receiving application) forwarded to the applying organization. Title Date If the gambling premises is located in a township, both the county & township must sign this application. For the township: On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization is applying for Print name of township one -day, off -site gambling activity within the township limits. A township has no statutory authority to approve or (Signature of township official acknowledging application) deny an application (Minn. Stat. § 349.213, subd. 2). Title Date For the county: On behalf of the county, I acknowl- edge that this application will be forwarded to the Print name of county appropriate county officials, the county must pass a resolution specifically approving or denying this (Signature of county personnel receiving application) application, and a copy of the resolution will be forwarded to the applying organization. Title Date Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Oath I have read this application, and all information is true, accurate, and complete. CEO Signature Date Page 1 of 2 10199 Minnesota Lawful Gambling Lease for One -Day Off -Site Gambling Activity - LG224 Name of Legal Owner of Property Street Address City Zip Daytime Phone Albe a. rch 14C00— 57tn t.e. Abertville, PT. 55301(t 612 ) 497-2474 Name of Lessor Street Address City Zip Daytime Phone (If same as legal owner, write in "SAME") Same ( ) Name of Leased Premises Street Address, or road designations City Zip Daytime Phone St. Albert Parish Center Albertville Mn. 55301 ( 612 ) 497-3782 Name of Lessee (name of organization leasing the premises) Organization license number Daytime Phone Albertville Lions Club Inc. 8-01535 ( 612 ) 497-20 4 Activity Date Date of one -day off -site activity: 02 / 19/ 00 The gambling activity conducted on this day may not exceed 12 hours. Type of Gambling Activity Check the box(es) which indicate(s) the type of gambling activity that will be conducted for this one -day off -site activity. Bingo ❑ Raffles❑x Paddlewheels❑ Pull -Tabs® Tipboards❑ Rent Information Rent to be paid for the leased area: $ —0— (If none, write -0-) Rent may not be based on a percentage of receipts, profits from lawful gambling, or the number of participants attending a bingo occasion. An organization may not pay rent to itself or to any of its affiliates for space used for the conduct of lawful gambling. OTHER OBUGATIONS AND AGREEMENTS - Attachment All obligations and agreements between the organization and the lessor are listed below or attached to this lease. (Attach additional sheets if necessary. Any attachments to this lease must be dated and signed by both the lessor and lessee.) This lease is the total and only agreement between the lessor and the organization conducting lawful gambling activities. There is no other agreement and no other consideration required between the parties as to the lawful gambling and other matters related to this lease. /-/7--00 111Z,��ewe�el Signature of Lessor Date SWatur6 of Orga zation Official (Lessee) Date Pe, 7 L Print Name of Lessor Print Name and Organization Questions on this form should be directed to your licensing specialist at the Gambling Control Board at 651-639-4000. Hearing impaired individuals using a TTY may call the Minnesota Relay Service at 1-800-627-3529 and ask to place a call to 651-639-4000. This publication will be made available in alternative format (i.e. large print, Braille) upon request. -/7 of Person Signing on Behalf of The information requested on this form will become public information when received by the Board, and will be used to determine your compliance with Minnesota statutes and rules governing lawful gambling activities. 7/98 SAFETY TRAIN, INC9 Susan Pearson 612-428-2297 Ho:421-6702 13005 Main Street Fx: 428-2298 Rogers, MN 55374 January 21,2000 Tim Guimont Safety Director P.O.BOX 9 Albertville, MN 55301 Dear Tim: I am pleased to send you the information you requested about my company and the training I do for area cities. I have enclosed a list of fees usually charged the company's I work for. The cities I represent and I have agreed to a separate rate schedule. I have agreed to provide all the OSHA needed safety classes, a Safety Walkthrough and a written Manual for the total cost of $1223 each for the first two years. After that time, all safety classes required by OSHA will be provided at approximately $500 yearly for each city. If Manual updates or if additional classes are requested, they will be billed separately. If you only want part of this program, please call. The classes offered to the cities are, First Aid, CPR, Right to Know for Office personnel and Right to Know for Shop Workers, Confined Space, Trenching, Heavy Equipment, Bloodborne Pathogens and Respiratory safety and Fit Testing. I will also help you start an effective Safety Committee and help you with compliance problems without charge. If you have further questions, please call. Thank you for your interest in SAFETY TRAIN, INC. Sincerely, Susan Pearson Safety Train, Inc. SAFETY TRAIN, INC. 13005 Main Street Rogers, MN 55374 Susan Pearson 428-2297 FAX 428-2298 Safety Train, Inc. will be happy to conduct individual classes at your convenience. I will train in your facility or here in Rogers. All classes are conducted to fulfill OSHA regulations and all paperwork is given to you at the end of the class. PowerPoint is used for most classes. We offer the following OSHA regulatory classes: Right to Know, Right to Know Combo, Lockout/Tagout "A" or "B", Bloodborne Pathogens "A" or `B", Respiratory Safety, Laboratory Safety, Trenching and Shoring, Heavy Equipment Safety, Defensive Driving (4 and 8 Hour), Fork lift Training, Personal Protective Equipment, Hearing Conservation, Office and Production Ergonomics, Sexual Harassment, Fire Training, Hazardous Material Awareness, Confined Space, CPR (3 and 4 Hr certified), First Aid (3 and 4hr certified), Emergency Care, AED Training, Wilderness First Aid (8 to 36 hr). Setting up an Effective Safety Anhydrous Ammonia Committee . SAFETY TRAIN, INC. has a training option to help companies teach safety on a regular basis. With CONTRACT TRAINING, we will conduct any hour class for 6 consecutive months at a reduced rate of $150 per month. If your company wants more classes that day, we will charge only $100/hr for additional classes. PLEASE NOTE: If your company enters into a Training Contract with Safety Train, Inc., you agree to hold one class per month at a regular time. Your further understand that you will be billed monthly unless a class is canceled 48 hours in advance, or there will be a S25 cancellation fee. Classes not rescheduled in 30 days will be billed according to the contract schedule. SAFETY TRAIN, INC. SA VE HIGH WORK COMP FEES AND TIME OFF FOR INJURIES BY TRAINING YOUR EMPLOYEES TO WORK SAFELY!!! 13005 Main Street, Roger, MN 55374 SUSAN PEARSON 612-428-2297 FX-428-2298 Price Guidelines: 1. Right to Know .............................Up to 30 students* ............... (Ihr)...................... $175 Contract Right to Know ......................... 30........... *............... (lhr)....................... $150 2. Bloodborne Pathogens-A........................30.......... *................ (lhr)...................... $195 3. Bloodborne Pathogens-B........................ 30........... *............... (1/4hr)....................... $50 Lockout/Tagout-A................................. 30.......... *............... (1 hr)... .......$195 ............ ............. 4. Lockout/Tagout-B................................. 30.......... *............... (1/4hr)....................... $50 Confined Space ...................................... 12......... *... (lhr-classroom)...................... $225 5. Confined Space ..................................... 9........... *.... (Ihr. classroom and practical) .... $395 6. Trenching/Shoring................................. 30......... *............... (lhr)....................... $395 7. Respiratory Training with Fit Testing ............ 12*.......................(I 1/2hr)................... $295 8. Annual Respiratory Training ..................... 30*....................... (1 hr)........................ $175 9. Hazard Awareness .................................. 30*....................... (lhr)........................ $395 10. Fork Lift or Standie............................. 12.....(1hr class and individual road test) ..........$395 ($15 for each additional student) 11. Hearing Conservation .............................. 30*......................... (1hr)....................... $175 12. Personal Protection Equipment. ''***** .30* ......................... (Ihr) ....................... $175 13. Setting Up an Effective Safety Committee ...... 12........................... (lhr)...................... $175 14. Fire Training .......................................... 30*......................... (Ihr) ...... ....$175 ............ 15. Office Ergonomics .................................. 30*.................... ....(lhr)....................... $175 16. Industrial Back Safety ............................... 30*........................ (lhr)...................... $175 17. Sexual Harassment ................................... 30*........................ (1hr)...................... $175 18. Laboratory Safety ..................................... 30.......................... (lhr)..................... $325 19.Defensive Driving (4 and 8 hr.) 20. Heavy Equipment Safety ............................. 30........................... (lhr).................... $250 Pre OSHA Walkthrough.............. $150 first hour/$100 hr each additional hour Written walkthrough report.....................................................................................$100 CompanySafety Manual.........................................................................................$999 Annual Safety Manual Update..................................................................................$350 Safety Handbook for employees (Master Copy Only).......................................................$399 CPR....... 3 hr Certified .................................. 8*...................................................... $325 4 hr Certified .................................. 8*...................................................... $395 First Aid ....... 3 hr ... Certified ........................... 8*..................................................... $325 4 hr.... Certified ........................... 8*..................................................... $395 WILDERNESS FIRST AID ........................... 8*..(8,16,or 24 hr @ $750/da. BOOKS 24.95ea.) .................................... ................... AED......................8*................... ...............$395 Combo Classes: 6 hr First Aid and CPR .................................... 8*...................................................... $625 8hrFirst Aid and CPR ..................................... 8*..................................................... $695 4hr CPR and AED............... * .......$495 8hr First Aid, CPR and AED........................... 8*............. .......$795 ................................. (NOTE: there will be an additional $5.00 charge per person if only CPR is taught) *There will be an additional $5.00 for each student over the allowed number. NOTE: Multiple classes in one day are discounted. Effective Date: all prices are effective through September 1, 2000 A CURRICULA VITA St. Catherines-AAPS University of MN , BA Minnesota Safety Council 1997, Defense Driver Instructor 4 and 8 hr, American Red Cross 1994 First aide and CPR Instructor Training -Certified National Safety Council 1995 First aide and CPR Instructors Certified National Safety Council 1996 First Aide and CPR Trainer of Instructors Certified Life and Safety 8 hr. 501 Compliance Course -Certified Life and Safety 8 hr, 501, 1996-Certified OSHA 40 hr, Instructor Training 501, 1990- Certified Miscellaneous OSHA updates and procedural classes offered by Life and Safety Services and the Minnesota Safety Council. SAFETY TRAIN, INC. Susan Pearson FAX 612-428-2298 13801 Lawndale Lane, N 13005 Main Street Dayton, MN 55327 Rogers, MN 55374 612-421-6702 612-428-2297 January 11, 2000 Road Warriors City Hall Dear Warriors: I have set up the following schedule for the millennium training. As you see, I set no classes for the months of June, July and August (as you requested). I set the classes as close as possible to the one-year allowance. I appreciate if you will continue to call and reserve seats in the classes. Per your request, the classes will be in Corcoran on Thursday mornings at 8 and 9 when possible. 8:00 9:00 Jan 201h First Aid-3hr--for those who could not get into classes last year. Feb 17 CPR-3 hr—for those who could not get into classes last year. March 16 Right to Know Combo BLOODBORNE "A" For office workers for Shop workers April 13 Bloodborne "A" May 18 Respirator Sept 14 CPR-3 hr Oct 19 Trenching Nov 16 Heavy Equipment Dec 14 Lockout "A" Sincerely, Susan Pearson Pearson Lockout/Tagout "A" Right to Know —shop Confined Space Confined Space Right to Know -Makeup N WAA eo** NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED COI , INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARK MEMORANDUM TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council FROM: Deb Garross DATE: 5 January 2000 RE: Albertville - Kollville Estates • CUP/PUD • Site Plan • Preliminary Plat FILE: 163.06 — 99.17 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this item is to consider a proposal by Leuer-Munstertieger Properties to develop a townhome project to be known as Kollville Estates. The proposed project consists of a 131 Townhome unit development with private internal streets. The scope of the project is detailed in the attached Planning Report dated 5 January 2000. In order to develop the property as proposed, the applicant requests approval of the following: 1. Concept CUP/PUD Plan approval to allow for a mixed residential use development of the 64+- acre parcel located east of Karston Cove, west of Westwind PUD and north of Fairfield Estates. The Concept Plan CUP/PUD contemplates development of the north 22.44 acres of the subject site with 131 townhome units. The remaining 41.56 acres is proposed to be developed as single family residential. The easterly expansion of "Winter Park" a community park identified in the Albertville Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan is also contemplated. The applicant desires to plat the northerly 22.44 acres (zoned R-5) as Kollville Estates. The R-1A property (including the future expansion of Winter Park) are proposed to be platted as an outlot for development at some point in the future. 2. Development Stage CUP/PUD Plan approval for the north 22.44 acres of the subject site to develop Kollville Estates as proposed on the attached plan sheets. 3. Site Plan approval to allow development of the units and site as indicated on the attached plans. 4. Preliminary Plat approval for Kollville Estates, to plat the northerly 22.44 acres into 131 townhome units and the southerly 41.56 acres as an outlot. 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM The Planning Commission reviewed aspects of the Kollville Estates project at three separate meetings including a concept plan review, park plan review and the public hearing for the proposal, which was held on January 11, 2000. ISSUES The primary issues identified by the Planning Commission with respect to the proposal concerned unit design and architecture, restrictive covenants, park and recreation amenities and landscape design. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the project subject to several conditions that have been incorporated into the draft City Council Findings of Fact and Decision. The applicant agreed with the conditions set forth by the Planning Commission. A brief summary of the major issues is identified as follows: 1. The townhome portion of the PUD is the last parcel within the City with a medium density residential zoning classification. The subject site is flat and does not contain wooded areas or significant natural features. The proposal was considered to be quite dense by the Planning Commission and as such, recommendations were made to upgrade the exterior of the units with architectural treatments and to stagger the building front facades. The Planning Commission felt that the units should be located at staggered setbacks and modified with architectural accents in order to minimize the "alley" appearance of the development and to provide a more desirable living environment. The Planning Commission recommended allowing flexibility for the reduction of front yard building setbacks from 35 to 30 feet for units fronting on 64th Street (a public street) and 20 feet for units fronting the private roads within the development. 2. The Planning Commission recommended removal of the triplex (Units 71, 72 and 73) in order to provide additional building separation between the large 5 and 6-unit buildings. The Planning Commission felt that the triplex unit did not provide for a positive living environment as two of the units were located directly facing the side of a larger six-plex unit and due to the close proximity of the triplex to the easterly parking lot. The removal of the triplex would allow for additional open area inside of the circle formed by the private roads. The applicant concurred with the recommendation of the Planning Commission. 3. The Planning Commission recommended several modifications to the landscaping plan to relocate plant materials in a manner that provides for more visual interest throughout the development and screening of the over -flow parking areas. To ensure the survivability of plants and the long-term appearance of the medium density neighborhood, the Planning Commission recommended the installation of an irrigation system throughout the project. The applicant agreed with the modifications to the landscape plan as recommended by the Planning Commission. 4. The Planning Commission recommended that the applicant include restrictions within the homeowner association agreements addressing the following items: indoor storage, that proposed private streets within the development remain private in perpetuity, that the appropriate license/permits be obtained from the City prior to the leasing of any unit, and that the type of exterior additions (decks, porches, patio's etc.) that will be permitted on the lot underlying the townhome units are specified. 5. The Planning Commission recommended that the bulk of the park dedication for this project be taken as a cash dedication and .24 acres taken as land dedication to provide for the east half parking lot for Winter Park. The cash could then be utilized to purchase land in addition to the land dedication requirement for the southerly 41.56 acres (R-1A land to be platted as an outlot). The Albertville Comprehensive Park and Trails System Plan calls for an 18-acre community park (Winter Park) to be located directly south of the townhome units. In order to provide for a park consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, the City will need to acquire about 4 acres of land, (the park dedication for the southerly 41.56 acres of R-1A zoned land) and purchase an additional 5.5 acres. The townhome development is anticipated to house approximately 262 people and as the project will not be income -restricted, children will comprise a percentage of the population. The Planning Commission recommended that the developer provide private playground equipment within the development for use by children under age six. Additionally a trail system within the southern part of the project was also recommended to provide for a pedestrian connection between the townhomes and future Winter Park. The applicant agreed to the park and recreation recommendations of the Planning Commission. RECOMMENDATION 1. Concept Stage CUP/PUD: The recommendation of the Planning Commission is to approve the Concept Stage CUP/PUD to allow the northern (R-5) zoned part of the site to be developed with 128 townhome units. The southerly (R-1A) zoned part of the site is to be developed with single family residential lots and the easterly extension of Winter Park. The recommendation for approval is subject to the conditions outlined in the City Council Findings of Fact and Decision. 2. Development Stage CUP/PUD: The recommendation of the Planning Commission is to approve the Development Stage CUP/PUD for the northerly 22.44 acres (R-5 zoned part of the site) for the development of 128 townhome units and a .24 acre parking lot facility. The recommendation for approval is subject to the conditions outlined in the City Council Findings of Fact and Decision. 3. Site Plan(s): The recommendation of the Planning Commission is to approve the site plans for the northerly 22.44 acres (R-5 zoned part of the site) for the development of 128 townhome units and a .24 acre parking lot facility. The recommendation for approval is subject to the conditions outlined in the City Council Findings of Fact and Decision. 4. Preliminary Plat: The recommendation of the Planning Commission is to approve the preliminary plat of Kollville Estates for the development of 128 townhome units, a .24 acre parking lot facility and an outlot. The outlot will be subdivided at a later date into a combination of single family lots and community park, consistent with the Albertville Comprehensive Plan. The recommendation for approval is subject to the conditions outlined in the City Council Findings of Fact and Decision. ACTION REQUESTED A separate motion to approve, deny or conditionally approve the CUP/PUD — Site Plan(s) and preliminary plat of Kollville Estates is in order. ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Council draft Findings of Fact and Decision 2. Planning Commission Agenda Packet & Exhibits pc: Linda Goeb Mike Couri Pete Carlson Kevin Mealhouse Jim Brown Albertville Fire Chief Scott Dahlke Sharon Scheckel 2-7-00 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE City Council Findings of Fact & Decision CUP/PUD — Site Plan Preliminary Plat Applicant Name: Leuer-MunstertieQer Properties — Kollville Estates Request: Leuer-Munstertieger Properties has submitted plans for development of 131 townhome units as part of the Kollville Estates project. The subject site contains 64 acres of land which is bounded on the north by CSAH 37 (65th Street), the east by Parkside 2"d Addition, the south by Fairfield Addition and the west by Cedar Creek North. The PUD concept plan covers the entire land holdings of the applicant. The developer desires to preliminary plat the part of the site (approximately 22.44 acres located in the northerly part of the subject site) into 131 townhome units/lots. A Conditional Use Permit / Planned Unit Development (CUP/PUD) — Site Plan(s) will be necessary to allow flexibility from the strict provisions of the Zoning Ordinance related to setbacks and building separation. Preliminary plat approval will be necessary to divide the underlying parcel into a combination of 131 townhome units, public park and an outlot for future development of single family homes. Planning Commission Meeting Date(s): 11 January 2000. City Council Meeting Date(s): 7 February 2000. Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and decision: A. The legal description of the subject property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The Planning Report, dated 5 January 2000 is incorporated herein. C. The Planning Commission Findings of Fact and Recommendation is incorporated herein. D. The City Council finds the requested CUP/PUD to allow flexibility for front yard setbacks requirements acceptable and in conformance with the PUD criteria contained in the City's Zoning Ordinance. Page 1 E. The proposed lot area, setback, height and coverage requirements identified on Exhibit B are acceptable as part of the overall PUD. F. The proposed actions have been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and have been found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. G. The proposed development will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. H. The proposed use conforms with all applicable Zoning Ordinance performance standards. I. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. J. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. K. Traffic generated by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. L. The requirements of Sections 300, 400 and 2700 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance have been reviewed in relation to proposed plans. M. The preliminary plat is consistent with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. Decision: Based on the foregoing information, applicable ordinances and recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council APPROVES the CUP/PUD — Site Plan(s) and preliminary plat of Kollville Estates based on the most current plans and information received to date subject to the following conditions. 1. The PUD Concept Stage Plan is approved for the entire 64+- acre site (both the R-1A and R-5 zoned parcels), subject to the conditions outlined herein. 2. The PUD Concept Stage Plan shall be amended to show 9.5 acres of public park located east of the parkland in Karston Cove, consistent with the Albertville Comprehensive Park and Trail Plan. 3. The PUD Development Stage Plan, site plan(s) and preliminary plat are approved for the north 22.44 acres of the subject site (the R-5 zoned parcel), subject to the conditions outlined herein. 4. The PUD Development Stage Plan and preliminary plat shall be amended to show a ten (10) foot asphalt trail located south of CSAH 37 and west of proposed 64th Street N.E. Said Page 2 a44k 1 trail should connect to the 10' trail approved as part of the Karston Cove PUD and preliminary plat. 5. The PUD Development Stage Plan and preliminary plat shall be amended to show a ten- (10) foot asphalt trail in the southerly part of the townho, tevelop ttg provide a connection to future Winter Park. %� � '''4611 6. The PUD shall be amended to show two (2) private tot lots with play equipment. Said private tot lots are to be located east and west of the central parking lot. The tot lots shall be considered amenities for the project (to support flexibility to grant the CUP/PUD) and shall not be considered as part of the public park dedication requirement for this project. 7. The PUD shall be amended to show the location for a future office/maintenance building for the project. 8. The PUD and preliminary plat shall be amended to show conformance with the minimum building separation requirements of Zoning Ordinance 2700.2(n). 9. The townhome units within the PUD shall be owner occupied units. 10. The PUD and preliminary plat shall be amended to indicate the total area calculation proposed to be covered by buildings. (The maximum building coverage shall not exceed 50% of the project area). 11. Revised townhome unit plans incorporating varied architectural elements, alternative unit styles, and a variety of exterior materials shall be submitted. The corresponding revised unit floor plans and exterior building elevations (including front, side and rear) drawn to scale, shall be submitted. The building elevation drawings shall indicate the height of all proposed buildings. 12. The front of the townhome units shall be staggered in order to provide visual interest in the development and to allow for varied driveway lengths. The minimum front yard setback shall be 20 feet. 13. All townhome units shall include garage units with dimensions equal to or greater than 20' x 24' feet. 14. A sample and list of proposed building materials and colors shall be submitted. 15. The applicant shall submit building floor plans (to scale) indicating the dimensions and square foot calculations for each proposed unit type. Said plans shall be consistent with the "typical townhome" detail shown on Sheet 1 of 1 Development Stage PUD Plan. Page 3 16. The homeowner's association agreements should be amended to address the following. - indoor storage of garbage cans; repair and maintenance of the subdivision identification sign(s); that proposed 64th Lane and 64th Way shall be maintained as private roads in perpetuity; a license shall be obtained from the City of Albertville prior to the leasing of any unit; and the type of exterior additions (decks, porches etc... ) that will be permitted on the lot underlying the townhome units. 17. The landscape plan shall be amended to incorporate the following: a. The plant materials proposed along the northern and southern boundaries of the townhome PUD should be grouped in clusters of 3 to 5 trees/shrubs and/or staggered in a minimum of two rows. b. An irrigation system should be installed to ensure landscape materials survive and to enhance the project appearance. c. The private parking lot areas should be screened from the adjacent residential units by landscaping and/or vinyl fencing. d. Patio areas and first floor decks should be screened for privacy purposes by landscaping and/or vinyl fencing. e. Landscape materials including trees and a variety of shrubs should be added to the common area between the 5 and 6-plex townhomes in the central part of the development. f. All areas of the project that are not covered by buildings, hard surfaces or specifically called out on the landscape plan should be sodded. g. All landscape materials shall conform to the 30-foot clear view triangle standards of the Zoning Ordinance. h. The type of foundation plantings proposed for all buildings facing north, should be modified to shade tolerant species. i. The landscape plan should indicate the means to screen mechanical equipment air conditioning units etc., erected on the roof. The location of all roof/top equipment shall also be shown on the exterior plan elevations of the townhome units. j. The landscape plan should indicate the means to screen equipment such as air conditioning cooling structures or condensers. The location of such equipment shall also be shown on the exterior plan elevations and typical unit floor plans. 18.The PUD and preliminary plat should be amended to remove the triplex (Units 71, 72 and 73) 19. A property maintenance agreement and property owners association covenants are prepared by the applicant and submitted to the City Attorney for review and approval subject to the requirements of Sections 1100 and 2700 of the City Zoning Ordinance. The agreements, covenants, and restrictions are to be filed with the Wright County Recorder's office as a deed restriction against the title of each unit lot. Page 4 20. The applicant should submit information indicating how requirements of Zoning Ordinance Section 2200 concerning Model Homes will be addressed. 21. A Soil Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted acceptable to the City Engineer, Watershed District, DNR, and any other agency with review authority clearly illustrating erosion control measures to be used during construction and as permanent measures. 22. The applicant shall provide proof of title in the form of an abstract of title or registered property abstract currently certified and showing the petitioners have legal ownership of the property. 23. The preliminary plat map shall be amended to indicate the unit type proposed for all lots within the development. 24. If a subdivision identification sign is desired by the developer to identify Kollville Estates, a sign plan should be submitted for review and approval of the City Planner. The homeowner association agreements and/or covenants shall provide for maintenance and upkeep of subdivision identification sign(s). 25. A detailed lighting plan should be submitted specifying the style, height, strength/wattage and distribution of exterior lights proposed on the property and exterior of the buildings. Exterior lighting shall be provided for all overflow parking lot areas at a minimum. All exterior lighting on site must be arranged as to deflect light away from public streets. The source of lights shall be hooded. 26. The storm water management ponds shall be planned and constructed in a manner to be as aesthetically pleasing as possible (i.e. to hold water and contain natural wetland plant species along the perimeter of the ponds). 27. Separate public utility service shall be provided to each subdivided unit lot. All grading, drainage, street and utility issues shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 28.A complete set of revised PUD and preliminary plat plans (1" — 100' scale and one copy reduced to 11" x 17") shall be submitted to the City of Albertville, City Planner (NAC Inc,) City Attorney (Michael Couri), and the City Engineer (S. E. H.), within 30 days of City Council approval, incorporating all conditions of approval. The PUD will serve as the guide for all future final plat applications for this project. 29. The park dedication for the project should consist of the .24 acre parking lot and cash dedication of $1,300 dollars per unit. The trail, sidewalk and land dedication shall be credited pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance. Page 5 30.The preliminary plat is reviewed and found to be acceptable to the Albertville Fire Department. 31. The preliminary plat is reviewed by and found to be acceptable by Wright County. 32.A Storm Water Pollution Control Plan and escrow is submitted subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 33.Any other conditions as set forth by other City Staff, Sherburne County or City Council. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 7th day of February 2000. City of Albertville John A. Olson, Mayor Attest: Linda Goeb, City Administrator PC: Linda Goeb, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson, Kevin Mealhouse, Scott Dahlke Page 6 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF KOLLVILLE ESTATES That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, lying south of the Burlington Northern Railroad. Except therefrom that part platted as Fairfield according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office o the County Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota. Page 7 EXHIBIT B Lot Area, Setback, Height and Coverage Comparison Chart R-5 District Required Proposed Minimum lot area per unit 5,000 sf x 131 units = 655,000 sf 6,304.5 sq. ft./unit +- = 825,897 sf Setbacks (front) 35 feet 30 feet (units facing 64th Street) 20 feet (units facing private street) (side -interior) 15 feet 15 feet + (side -comer) 30 feet 30 feet + (rear) 30 feet 30 feet + Building Height Maximum 35 feet 35 feet Building Separation Minimum'/Z the sum of the building Minimum '/Z the sum of the heights of two adjacent buildings. building heights of two adjacent buildings. Minimum Open Space per Unit 500 sf 500 sf + Maximum Lot Coverage for 50 percent of lot area 50% (exact building coverage to Structures be verified by applicant) (Quad., Townhouses) 600 sf first floor plus 100 add'I sf for All plans shall be consistent with or exceed the minimum Zoning each bedroom Ordinance requirements. Minimum Floor Area per 650 sf first floor plus 100 add'I sf for All plans shall be consistent with Dwelling Unit (Double each bedroom or exceed the minimum Zoning Bungalow) Ordinance requirements. Minimum Garage Size 480 sf 480 sf Minimum unit lot frontage 20 feet 20.33 feet Page 8 1-11-00 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE Planning Commission Findings of Fact & Recommendation CUP/PUD — Site Plan Preliminary Plat Applicant Name: Leuer-Munstertieger Properties — Kollville Estates Request: Leuer-Munstertieger Properties has submitted plans for development of 131 townhome units as part of the Kollville Estates project. The subject site contains 64 acres of land which is bounded on the north by CSAH 37 (65th Street), the east by Parkside 2"d Addition, the south by Fairfield Addition and the west by Cedar Creek North. The PUD concept plan covers the entire land holdings of the applicant. The developer desires to preliminary plat the part of the site (approximately 22.44 acres located in the northerly part of the subject site) into 131 townhome units/lots. A Conditional Use Permit / Planned Unit Development (CUP/PUD) — Site Plan(s) will be necessary to allow flexibility from the strict provisions of the Zoning Ordinance related to setbacks and building separation. Preliminary plat approval will be necessary to divide the underlying parcel into a combination of 131 townhome units, public park and an outlot for future development of single family homes. Planning Commission Meeting Dates: 11 January 2000. Findings of Fact: Based upon review of the application and evidence received, the Planning Commission now makes the following findings of fact and recommendation: A. The legal description of the subject property is attached as Exhibit A. B. The Planning Report, dated 5 January 2000 is incorporated herein. C. The Planning Commission finds the requested CUP/PUD to allow flexibility for front yard setbacks requirements acceptable and in conformance with the PUD criteria contained in the City's Zoning Ordinance. D. The proposed lot area, setback, height and coverage requirements identified on Exhibit B are acceptable as part of the overall PUD. E. The proposed actions have been considered in relation to the specific policies and provisions of and have been found to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. F. The proposed development will be compatible with present and future land uses of the area. G. The proposed use conforms with all applicable Zoning Ordinance performance standards. H. The proposed use will not tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. I. The proposed use can be accommodated with existing public services and will not overburden the City's service capacity. J. Traffic generated by the proposed use is within capabilities of streets serving the property. Page 1 K. The requirements of Sections 300, 400 and 2700 of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance have been reviewed in relation to proposed plans. L. The preliminary plat is consistent with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan, and requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. Recommendation: Based on the foregoing information and applicable ordinances, the Planning Commission recommends APPROVAL of the CUP/PUD — Site Plan(s) and preliminary plat of Kollville Estates based on the most current plans and information received to date subject to the following conditions. 1. The PUD Concept Stage Plan shall be amended to show 9.5 acres of public park located east of the parkland in Karston Cove, consistent with the Albertville Comprehensive Park and Trail Plan. 2. The PUD Development Stage Plan and preliminary plat shall be amended to show a ten (10) foot asphalt trail located south of CSAH 37 and west of proposed 64th Street N.E. Said trail should connect to the 10' trail approved as part of the Karston Cove PUD and preliminary plat. 3. The PUD Development Stage Plan and preliminary plat shall be amended to show a ten- (10) foot asphalt trail in the southerly part of the townhome development to provide a connection to future Winter Park. 4. The PUD shall be amended to show two (2) private tot lots with play equipment. Said private tot lots are to be located east and west of the central parking lot. The tot lots shall be considered amenities for the project (to support flexibility to grant the CUP/PUD) and shall not be considered as part of the public park dedication requirement for this project. 5. The PUD shall be amended to show the location for a future office/maintenance building for the project. 6. The PUD and preliminary plat shall be amended to show conformance with the minimum building separation requirements of Zoning Ordinance 2700.2(n). 7. The townhome units within the PUD shall be owner occupied units. 8. The PUD and preliminary plat shall be amended to indicate the total area calculation proposed to be covered by buildings. (The maximum building coverage shall not exceed 50% of the project area). 9. Revised townhome unit plans incorporating varied architectural elements, alternative unit styles, and a variety of exterior materials shall be submitted. The corresponding revised unit floor plans and exterior building elevations (including front, side and rear) drawn to Page 2 scale, shall be submitted. The building elevation drawings shall indicate the height of all proposed buildings. 10.The front of the townhome units shall be staggered in order to provide visual interest in the development and to allow for varied driveway lengths. The minimum front yard setback shall be 20 feet. 11.All townhome units shall include garage units with dimensions equal to or greater than 20' x 24' feet. 12.A sample and list of proposed building materials and colors shall be submitted. 13.The applicant shall submit building floor plans (to scale) indicating the dimensions and square foot calculations for each proposed unit type. Said plans shall be consistent with the "typical townhome" detail shown on Sheet 1 of 1 Development Stage PUD Plan. 14.The homeowner's association agreements should be amended to address the following: indoor storage of garbage cans; repair and maintenance of the subdivision identification sign(s); that proposed 64th Lane and 64th Way shall be maintained as private roads in perpetuity; a license shall be obtained from the City of Albertville prior to the leasing of any unit; and the type of exterior additions (decks, porches etc...) that will be permitted on the lot underlying the townhome units. 15.The landscape plan shall be amended to incorporate the following: a. The plant materials proposed along the northern and southern boundaries of the townhome PUD should be grouped in clusters of 3 to 5 trees/shrubs and/or staggered in a minimum of two rows. b. An irrigation system should be installed to ensure landscape materials survive and to enhance the project appearance. c. The private parking lot areas should be screened from the adjacent residential units by landscaping and/or vinyl fencing. d. Patio areas and first floor decks should be screened for privacy purposes by landscaping and/or vinyl fencing. e. Landscape materials including trees and a variety of shrubs should be added to the common area between the 5 and 6-plex townhomes in the central part of the development. f. All areas of the project that are not covered by buildings, hard surfaces or specifically called out on the landscape plan should be sodded. g. All landscape materials shall conform to the 30-foot clear view triangle standards of the Zoning Ordinance. h. The type of foundation plantings proposed for all buildings facing north, should be modified to shade tolerant species. Page 3 i. The landscape plan should indicate the means to screen mechanical equipment air conditioning units etc., erected on the roof. The location of all roof/top equipment shall also be shown on the exterior plan elevations of the townhome units. j. The landscape plan should indicate the means to screen equipment such as air conditioning cooling structures or condensers. The location of such equipment shall also be shown on the exterior plan elevations and typical unit floor plans. 16.The PUD and preliminary plat should be amended to remove the triplex (Units 71, 72 and 73) 17.A property maintenance agreement and property owners association covenants are prepared by the applicant and submitted to the City Attorney for review and approval subject to the requirements of Sections 1100 and 2700 of the City Zoning Ordinance. The agreements, covenants, and restrictions are to be filed with the Wright County Recorder's office as a deed restriction against the title of each unit lot. 18.The applicant should submit information indicating how requirements of Zoning Ordinance Section 2200 concerning Model Homes will be addressed. 19.A Soil Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted acceptable to the City Engineer, Watershed District, DNR, and any other agency with review authority clearly illustrating erosion control measures to be used during construction and as permanent measures. 20.The applicant shall provide proof of title in the form of an abstract of title or registered property abstract currently certified and showing the petitioners have legal ownership of the property. 21. The preliminary plat map shall be amended to indicate the unit type proposed for all lots within the development. 22. If a subdivision identification sign is desired by the developer to identify Kollville Estates, a sign plan should be submitted for review and approval of the City Planner. The homeowner association agreements and/or covenants shall provide for maintenance and upkeep of subdivision identification sign(s). 23.A detailed lighting plan should be submitted specifying the style, height, strength/wattage and distribution of exterior lights proposed on the property and exterior of the buildings. Exterior lighting shall be provided for all overflow parking lot areas at a minimum. All exterior lighting on site must be arranged as to deflect light away from public streets. The source of lights shall be hooded. 24. The storm water management ponds shall be planned and constructed in a manner to be as aesthetically pleasing as possible (i.e. to hold water and contain natural wetland plant Page 4 species along the perimeter of the ponds). 25. Separate public utility service shall be provided to each subdivided unit lot. All grading, drainage, street and utility issues shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 26.A complete set of revised PUD and preliminary plat plans (1" — 100' scale and one copy reduced to 11" x 17") shall be submitted to the City of Albertville, City Planner (NAC Inc,) City Attorney (Michael Couri), and the City Engineer (S.E.H.), within 30 days of City Council approval, incorporating all conditions of approval. The PUD will serve as the guide for all future final plat applications for this project. 27.The park dedication for the project should consist of the .24 acre parking lot and cash dedication of $1,300 dollars per unit. The trail, sidewalk and land dedication shall be credited pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance. 28. The preliminary plat is reviewed and found to be acceptable to the Albertville Fire Department. 29. The preliminary plat is reviewed by and found to be acceptable by Wright County. 30.Any other conditions as set forth by other City Staff the Planning Commission or City Council. Adopted by the Albertville Planning Commission this 11th day of January 2000. Attest: Linda Goeb, City Administrator City of Albertville Jim Brown, Chair pc: Linda Goeb, Mike Couri, Pete Carlson, Kevin Mealhouse, Scott Dahlke Page 5 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF KOLLVILLE ESTATES That part of the East Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 121, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, lying south of the Burlington Northern Railroad. Except therefrom that part platted as Fairfield according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office o the County Recorder, Wright County, Minnesota. Page 6 EXHIBIT B Lot Area, Setback, Height and Coverage Comparison Chart R-5 District Required Proposed Minimum lot area per unit 5,000 sf x 131 units = 655,000 sf 6,304.5 sq. ft./unit +- = 825,897 sf Setbacks (front) 35 feet 30 feet (units facing 64`h Street) 20 feet (units facing private street) (side -interior) 15 feet 15 feet + (side -corner) 30 feet 30 feet + (rear) 30 feet 30 feet + Building Height Maximum 35 feet 35 feet Building Separation Minimum '/2 the sum of the building Minimum'/2 the sum of the heights of two adjacent buildings. building heights of two adjacent buildings. Minimum Open Space per Unit 500 sf 500 sf + Maximum Lot Coverage for 50 percent of lot area 50% (exact building coverage to Structures be verified by applicant) (Quad., Townhouses) 600 sf first floor plus 100 add'I sf for All plans shall be consistent with each bedroom or exceed the minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Minimum Floor Area per 650 sf first floor plus 100 add'I sf for All plans shall be consistent with Dwelling Unit (Double each bedroom or exceed the minimum Zoning Bungalow) Ordinance requirements. MINIMUM GARAGE SIZE 480 sf 480 sf Minimum unit lot frontage 20 feet 20.33 feet fhe elevation drawings are not to scale, and thus the building heights cannot be determined. Page 7 NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council Albertville Planning Commission FROM: Deb Garross DATE: 5 January 2000 RE: Albertville - Kollville Estates • CUP/PUD • Site Plan • Preliminary Plat FILE: 163.06 — 99.17 BACKGROUND Leuer-Munstertieger Properties has submitted plans for development of 131 townhomes as part of the Kollville Estates project. The 64+-acre subject site is located in the northwest quadrant of the City of Albertville. The site is bounded on the north by CSAH 37 (65th Street), the east by Parkside 2"d Addition, the south by Fairfield Addition and the west by Cedar Creek North. The property is one tax parcel (parcel of record) with two zoning classifications: R-5, Medium Density Multiple Family and R-1A Low Density Single Family. The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for the following land uses: Medium Density Residential, Low Density Residential and Future Park and Open Space. The proposal is to subdivide the underlying parcel of record to allow for the development of 131 townhome units on the northern 22.44 acres (area zoned R-5) of the subject site. The applicant proposes to dedicate 2.24 acres of land for public park and to plat the remaining 40.24 acres (area zoned R-1A) as an outlot for future development of single family homes. In order to develop the property as proposed, approval of a Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development (CUP/PUD) and preliminary plat will be required. The CUP/PUD is necessary to allow the subdivision of base lots into unit lots for individual private ownership and to provide setback and building separation flexibility. Attachments: Exhibit A Site Location Map Exhibit B Kollville Estates PUD Concept Stage Plan Exhibit C Kollville Estates PUD Development Stage Plan Exhibit D Kollville Estates Preliminary Plat Exhibit E Building Elevations/Floor Plans Page 1 of 13 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 PHONE 6 1 2-595-9636 FAX 6 1 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@ WINTERNET.COM Exhibit F Sample Restrictive Covenants Exhibit G NAC memo (9 November 1999) Concept Plan Review Exhibit H NAC memo (6 December 1999) Park Issues Exhibit I Draft Findings of Fact and Recommendation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation The requested approval of the CUP/PUD, site plan(s) and preliminary plat, requires that the Planning Commission and City Council consider the applications in relation to established Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance review criteria and Comprehensive Plan policies. The decision to approve or deny the project is viewed as a policy decision to be made by the City Council. Should they find the submitted plans acceptable, it is recommended that the following conditions be imposed. CUP/PUD — Site Plan(s) Recommendations: 1. The PUD Concept Stage Plan shall be amended to show 9.5 acres of public park located east of the parkland in Karston Cove, consistent with the Albertville Comprehensive Park and Trail Plan. 2. The PUD Development Stage Plan and preliminary plat shall be amended to show a ten (10) foot asphalt trail located south of CSAH 37 and west of proposed 64th Street N.E. Said trail should connect to the 10' trail approved as part of the Karston Cove PUD and preliminary plat. 3. The PUD and preliminary plat shall be amended to show conformance with the minimum building separation requirements of Zoning Ordinance 2700.2(n). 4. The PUD and preliminary plat shall be amended to indicate the total area calculation proposed to be covered by buildings. (The maximum building coverage shall not exceed 50% of the project area). 5. Revised townhome unit plans incorporating varied architectural elements, alternative unit styles, staggered building fronts and a variety of exterior materials shall be submitted. The corresponding revised unit floor plans and exterior building elevations (including front, side and rear) drawn to scale, shall be submitted. The building elevation drawings shall indicate the height of all proposed buildings. 6. A sample and list of proposed building materials and colors shall be submitted. 7. The applicant shall submit building floor plans (to scale) indicating the dimensions and square foot calculations for each proposed unit type. Said plans shall be consistent with the "typical townhome" detail shown on Sheet 1 of 1 Development Stage PUD Plan. Page 2 8. The homeowner's association agreements should be amended to address the following: indoor storage of garbage cans; repair and maintenance of the subdivision identification sign(s); that proposed 64th Lane and 64th Way shall be maintained as private roads in perpetuity; and the type of exterior additions (decks, porches etc... ) that will be permitted on the lot underlying the townhome units. 9. The landscape plan shall be amended to incorporate the following: a. The plant materials proposed along the northern and southern boundaries of the townhome PUD should be grouped in clusters of 3 to 5 trees/shrubs and/or staggered in a minimum of two rows. b. An irrigation system should be installed to ensure landscape materials survive and to enhance the project appearance. c. The private parking lot areas should be screened from the adjacent residential units by landscaping and/or vinyl fencing. d. Patio areas and first floor decks should be screened for privacy purposes by landscaping and/or vinyl fencing. e. Landscape materials including trees and a variety of shrubs should be added to the common area between the 5 and 6-plex townhomes in the central part of the development. f. All areas of the project that are not covered by buildings, hard surfaces or specifically called out on the landscape plan should be sodded. g. All landscape materials shall conform to the 30-foot clear view triangle standards of the Zoning Ordinance. h. The type of foundation plantings proposed for all buildings facing north, should be modified to shade tolerant species. i. The landscape plan should indicate the means to screen mechanical equipment air conditioning units etc., erected on the roof. The location of all roof/top equipment shall also be shown on the exterior plan elevations of the townhome units. j. The landscape plan should indicate the means to screen equipment such as air conditioning cooling structures or condensers. The location of such equipment shall also be shown on the exterior plan elevations and typical unit floor plans. 10. The PUD and preliminary plat should be amended to remove the triplex (Units 71, 72 and 73) 11. A property maintenance agreement and property owners association covenants are prepared by the applicant and submitted to the City Attorney for review and approval subject to the requirements of Sections 1100 and 2700 of the City Zoning Ordinance. The agreements, covenants, and restrictions are to be filed with the Wright County Recorder's office as a deed restriction against the title of each unit lot. Preliminary Plat Recommendations: 1. The applicant should submit information indicating how requirements of Zoning Ordinance Section 2200 concerning Model Homes will be addressed. Page 3 2. A Soil Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted acceptable to the City Engineer, Watershed District, DNR, and any other agency with review authority clearly illustrating erosion control measures to be used during construction and as permanent measures. 3. The applicant shall provide proof of title in the form of an abstract of title or registered property abstract currently certified and showing the petitioners have legal ownership of the property. 4. The preliminary plat map shall be amended to indicate the unit type proposed for all lots within the development. 5. The preliminary plat should be amended to increase the front yard setbacks for all units along the private drive to a minimum of 22 feet. 6. If a subdivision identification sign is desired by the developer to identify Kollville Estates, a sign plan should be submitted for review and approval of the City Planner. 7. A lighting plan should be submitted for all of the guest parking areas. Said plan shall specify the style, height, strength/wattage and distribution of exterior lights proposed on the property and/or exterior of the buildings. All exterior lighting on site must be arranged as to deflect light away from public streets. The source of lights shall be hooded. 8. The storm water management ponds shall be planned and constructed in a manner to be as aesthetically pleasing as possible (i.e. to hold water and contain natural wetland plant species along the perimeter of the ponds). 9. Separate public utility service shall be provided to each subdivided unit lot. All grading, drainage, street and utility issues shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 10.A complete set of revised PUD and preliminary plat plans (1" — 100' scale and one copy reduced to 11" x 17") shall be submitted to the City of Albertville, City Planner (NAC Inc,) and the City Engineer (S.E.H.), within 30 days of City Council approval, incorporating all conditions of approval. The PUD will serve as the guide for all future final plat applications for this project. 11. The park dedication for the project should consist of the .24 acre parking lot and cash dedication of $1,300 dollars per unit. The trail, sidewalk and land dedication shall be credited pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance. 12. The preliminary plat is reviewed and found to be acceptable to the Albertville Fire Department. 13. The preliminary plat is reviewed by and found to be acceptable by Wright County. Page 4 14. Any other conditions as set forth by other City Staff the Planning Commission or City Council. Issues Analysis Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates the subject property as a combination of low/medium density residential and future park and open space at the present time. The application is consistent with the land use designations of the Comprehensive Plan with the exception that the proposed park area is significantly smaller than that identified in the Comprehensive Plan. It is suggested that the PUD Development Stage Plan be amended to show 9.75 acres of park in a configuration that is consistent with the Albertville Comprehensive Plan. (The PUD Development Stage Plan should also note that the City will acquire any land in excess of the 10% dedication at some future date). The Comprehensive Plan calls for a north/south primary street to provide a link between 61 St Street and CSAH 37 (65th Street). The objectives with respect to providing a through street include providing for neighborhood interconnection, diffusion of traffic and links to existing platted roadways within adjacent developments. The PUD Concept Stage Plan shows a layout that will provide for connections to existing streets within adjacent developments. The proposed PUD Development Stage Plan also calls for the provision of a sidewalk along the southerly side of proposed 64th Street NE and asphalt trail adjacent to CSAH 37 (located east of the proposed intersection with 64th Street). During the initial Staff review meetings with the developer, the City Engineer indicated that a north/south connection between CSAH 37 and 61 st Street may not be necessary. This opinion was premised upon the developer submitting a concept plan showing street interconnections between the low -density land and adjacent platted and/or existing streets. The alternative to allow for an alternate street circulation system was also premised upon the southern 42.24 acres of land (located south of the townhome portion of the project) being developed with single family homes at the R-1A density standard. The alternative street system maintains the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan by assuring interconnections between neighborhoods and allowing for the diffusion of traffic throughout this area of the City. The majority of traffic associated with the subject site will be generated from the townhome development. The proposal will direct traffic to the north and still allow for neighborhood circulation utilizing 64tn Street NE, Karston Avenue, 61st and 62"d Streets. Neighborhood access to the park will be provided via the sidewalk and trail system links to the parking lot of future Winter Park. It is suggested that the PUD Development Stage Plan and preliminary plat be amended to show a ten (10) foot trail located south of CSAH 37 and west of proposed 64th Street N.E. Said trail should connect to the 10' trail approved as part of the Karston Cove PUD and Preliminary Plat. This trail connection would bring the proposed trail plan into compliance with the Albertville Comprehensive Park & Trail System Plan. CUP/PUD — Site Plan(s). The property is zoned a combination of R-5, Medium Density Multiple Family and R-1A, Low Density Single Family. The proposal is to develop the north Page 5 22.44 acres (R-5 zoned property) with 131 townhome units as indicated on attached Exhibit C. A CUP/PUD is necessary to allow the subdivision of base lots into unit lots for individual private ownership and to allow flexibility to setback and building separation requirements. The Zoning Ordinance establishes PUD objectives whereby flexibility from the strict provisions of the Ordinance may be allowed. It is the responsibility of the applicant to demonstrate to the City how the individual proposal is consistent with the following objectives: a. Innovations in development to the end that the growing demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater variety in type, design, and siting of structures and by the conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments. b. Higher standards of site and building design through the use of trained and experienced land planners, architects and landscape architects. c. More convenience in location and design of development and service facilities. d. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site characteristics such as natural topography and geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion. e. A creative use of land and related physical development which allows a phased and orderly transition of land from rural to urban uses. f. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets thereby lowering development costs and public investments. g. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. (PUD is not intended as a means to vary applicable planning and zoning principles.) h. A more desirable and creative environment than might be possible through the strict application of zoning and subdivision regulations of the City. The applicant has not submitted information supporting the request for PUD flexibility for the subject site. The proposed CUP/PUD plans address items c, a and f of the aforementioned objectives, which refer to the provision of efficient utility/street networks and phased development. The proposal clearly maximizes the number of townhome style units that can fit on site. However, in the opinion of staff, it fails to utilize innovative design, variety in design and type of units and the creation of a desirable and creative living environment. The proposal includes two townhome styles (one-story and two story) for 131 proposed units. The architecture of the proposed units is simple offering little in terms of architectural interest, variety of design or use of quality exterior materials. All of the units are shown with setbacks of approximately 20 feet to the private street (64th Way/Lane) resulting in a monotonous neighborhood design where garage doors/units serve as the main architectural focal point. Furthermore, the overall PUD is not consistent with the Comprehensive Park and Trails Plan in that it does not show Winter Park, (the planned Community Park for this area of the City). This site is one of the last remaining medium density areas within the City. There are a number of developments existing within the community that provide for the type of townhome living opportunities proposed in this project. The application is for a CUP/PUD and flexibility is Page 6 being requested for front yard setbacks and building separation. (See Table 1 for a comparison of the required zoning provisions and the CUP/PUD proposal). It is incumbent upon the applicant to demonstrate that the project is innovative, unique and provides for a variety of design and type of units. At a minimum, it is suggested that the applicant utilize townhome unit designs that incorporate a number of varied architectural elements along both the front and rear of the units. The units should also be arranged to provide some fluctuation in the front setback either by relocating some of the units, intermingling different types/numbers of units and/or by utilizing a townhome design whereby the front of the units are offset from one another. Due to the proposed density of the project and narrow width associated with the private road, it is suggested that the minimum front yard setback be 22 feet as opposed to 20 feet. The townhome floor plans should also be consistent with the "Typical Townhouse" detail identified on the Development Stage PUD Plan map. The applicant has identified that this development concept is based upon a similar project within the City (the Cottages). However, that project was specifically developed for senior living with occupancy limitations, which do not allow children within the development. There are no occupancy limitations proposed for this project and therefore it can be assumed that children will live in the Kollville Estates neighborhood. If the project is constructed as proposed, a population of approximately 262 (2.0 people per household) will live in the townhome portion of this neighborhood. The project does not contain any usable play areas or site amenities other than the landscape treatments that are proposed. The landscape plan does meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. However, again, the application for consideration is a CUP/PUD, which calls for innovative design above and beyond what is required under the typical zoning controls. As much as unit design and building architecture create the impression of a neighborhood, so too does the landscape treatment. Because no other site amenities are offered for the project, it is suggested that the landscape plan be enhanced. The following modifications to the landscape/screening plan are suggested for consideration by the Planning Commission to enhance the visual impression of the development and provide some degree of privacy between and among the units. • The plant materials proposed along the northern and southern boundaries of the townhome PUD should be grouped in clusters of 3 to 5 trees/shrubs and/or staggered in a minimum of two rows. This change is recommended to enhance the appearance of the buffer area and to produce a more dense planting mass between the townhomes and the R-1A property to the south, and CSAH 37 to the north. • To assure the survivability of the screening and landscape materials, it is suggested that the landscape plan be amended to add an irrigation system to the project. • The private parking lot areas should be screened from the adjacent residential units. Screening consisting of shrubs/trees that will provide a minimum 4' screen are suggested. • Landscape materials including trees and a variety of shrubs should be added to the common area between the 5 and 6-plex townhomes in the central part of the development. Page 7 These structures are approximately 70 feet apart and aligned in a manner where units directly face each other. The addition of trees and tall shrub varieties will add visual interest, some degree of privacy, and help to break the monotonous appearance and "alley" feeling that results from placing units with the exact same exterior directly across from each other. • The Zoning Ordinance requires that landscape plans show some form of designed site amenities (i.e., composition of plant materials, and/or creative grading, decorative lighting, exterior sculpture, etc., which are largely intended for aesthetic purposes. The landscape plan should be amended accordingly. • The landscape plan should be amended to show sod for all front/side and other yards fronting public streets. • The shade trees proposed near the intersections of the park parking lot/private roads and proposed 64th Street should be moved away from the intersection in order to ensure a 30 foot clear view triangle to enhance the traffic sight distance at these intersection locations. • The landscape plan should be amended to change the type of foundation plantings proposed for all buildings facing north, to shade tolerant plants. (The foundation plantings proposed are all varieties needing full to moderate sunlight. These varieties will not grow well in shaded areas along the north side of buildings). • All mechanical equipment air conditioning units etc., erected on the roof shall be screened so as not to be visible. The applicant should address how this will be accomplished as part of the landscape plan and the location of such units should be shown on the exterior plan elevations of the townhome units. • No accessory uses or equipment such as air conditioning cooling structures or condensers, which generate noise, may be located in a side yard except for side yards abutting streets where equipment is fully screened from view. The landscape plan should address screening of such equipment and the location shown on the typical unit floor plans. Preliminary Plat. The preliminary plat proposes to divide the northern part of the subject site into 131, owner occupied, townhome lots with the southern 40.24 acres to be platted as an outlot for future development of single family homes. The applicant proposes to dedicate 2.24 acres of land for the development of a parking lot and community park. The majority of issues associated with the project have been identified in the CUP/PUD section of this report. The remaining section of the report will focus on the specific preliminary plat issues. The subject site is a relatively flat piece of property that has been used for agricultural production in the past. As such, there are few unique topographic features associated with the site with the exception of a small wetland located in the northeast part of the project. The preliminary plat indicates that two storm water management ponds are proposed for the northeast and northwest parts of the project area. It is suggested that the storm water ponds Page 8 be constructed to be a aesthetically pleasing as possible (i.e. to hold water and contain natural wetland plant species along the perimeter of the ponds). The preliminary plat includes a proposal to link 64th Street NE from the eastern edge of the Cedar Creek North subdivision to CSAH 37. A 20-foot private drive (64th Way/Lane) is proposed to serve the bulk of the townhome units proposed within the preliminary plat. The plans indicate that surmountable curb is proposed along 64th Street, the private drive (64th Way/Lane) and around the three private parking lots within the development. The proposal provides for the required number of parking spaces for each unit within each associated double car garage. An additional 44 parking stalls have been added to accommodate guest parking for the units within the development. Landscaping/Screening: The Zoning Ordinance specifies the minimum landscape requirements for the townhome project as: For all residential properties (containing 4 units or less) 1 shade or evergreen tree is required. For residential projects (containing 5+ units) 1 shade or evergreen tree is required per unit. Utilizing the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, a minimum of 72 shade and/or evergreen trees are required for the townhome PUD. In addition, all front and side yards and other yards facing streets are required to be sodded. The proposed PUD and preliminary plat indicate that a total of 136 trees (60 shade; 76 evergreen) plus an additional 44 ornamental trees/shrubs are planned within the development. Additional foundation plantings are also proposed pursuant to the typical foundation -planting plan. The number and type of landscape materials is consistent with the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance both respect to required landscaping and screening. Staff would however suggest that the modifications to the landscape plan identified earlier in this report be made, to produce a more aesthetically pleasing neighborhood and to assure species survival. Building Type and Construction. The applicant provided front, rear and side elevation plans as well as floor plan for the proposed two-story units (all units within the central part of the project area and inside of the private road). A front elevation and floor plan was also submitted for the Single -Story units (all units located north of 64th Street, and outside of the private drive (along the periphery of the project area). A materials list including type of construction, colors, type of roofing materials and exterior siding were not provided with the application. It should also be noted that the floor plans provided by the applicant do not correspond to the "Typical Townhouse" detail shown on the PUD Development Stage Plan (map 1 of 1). The applicant was advised to bring examples of proposed exterior materials for review by the Planning Commission at the meeting. It is suggested that the preliminary plat be amended to incorporate the changes suggested earlier in this report for the CUP/PUD concerning plan submittal and unit design. Signage. If a sign is desired by the developer to identify the Kollville Estates development, a sign plan should be submitted for review and approval of the City Planner and the sign location(s) shown on the PUD Development Stage Plan map. Reference to proposed sign(s) Page 9 and responsibility for maintenance and upkeep should also be included in the homeowner association agreements. Lighting. Detailed plans have not been submitted which specify the style, height, strength/wattage and distribution of exterior lights proposed on the property and exterior of the buildings. Any exterior lighting on site must be arranged as to deflect light away from public streets. The source of lights shall be hooded. It is suggested that lighting should be provided at a minimum, for all of the clustered guest parking lots within the project. A lighting plan should be submitted for review and approval of the City Planner. Lot Area, Setback, Height and Coverage Requirements. The proposal indicates that flexibility is requested to allow lesser front yard setbacks than typically required for the R-5 Zoning District. As indicated in Table 1, the required front yard setback is 35 feet. Flexibility is requested to allow units fronting on 64th Street to maintain 30- foot setbacks and units along the private drive (64th Way/Lane) to maintain 20-foot setbacks. Table 1. Lot Area, Setback, Height and Coverage Com arison Chart R-5 District Required Proposed Minimum lot area per unit 5,000 sf x 131 units = 655,000 sf 6,304.5 sq. ft./unit +- = 825,897 sf Setbacks (front) 35 feet 30 feet (units facing 64th Street) 20 feet (units facing private street) (side -interior) 15 feet 15 feet + (side -corner) 30 feet 30 feet + (rear) 30 feet 30 feet + Building Height Maximum 35 feet *To be provided by applicant Building Separation Minimum 'h the sum of the building heights of two adjacent buildings. *15 feet proposed (1 story units) *18 feet proposed (2 story units) Minimum Open Space per Unit 500 sf 500 sf + Maximum Lot Coverage for Structures 50 percent of lot area 50% (exact building coverage to be verified by applicant) (Quad., Townhouses) 600 sf first floor plus 100 add'I sf for each bedroom Plans vary, but all are in excess of this requirement Minimum Floor Area per Dwelling Unit (Double Bungalow) 650 sf first floor plus 100 add'I sf for each bedroom The floor plans for single story units did not contain sq. ft. information. Minimum garage size 480 sf 480 sf Minimum unit lot frontage 20 feet 20.33 feet Page 10 The elevation drawings are not to scale, and thus the building heights cannot be determined. Due to the density of development and the fact that the private drive (64th Way/Lane) is 20 feet with a 30-foot drainage and utility easement, (as opposed to a public, local road of 36 feet with 60 feet of right-of-way), there is concern about adequate snow storage. It is suggested that the minimum front yard setback along the private drive be increased to 22 feet and that the front of the units either be staggered and/or the unit locations adjusted to provide increased areas for snow storage. The suggestion for the front of the units to be off set/staggered also addresses aesthetic concerns that result from the continuous sight line of the same architectural unit style directly aligned with one another along the long, straight streets proposed in the development. The Zoning Ordinance requires buildings within a PUD to be separated from each other based upon the following formula (minimum '/2 the sum of the building heights of two adjacent buildings). The plans submitted for the units did not contain height information for the single story units, therefore it was not possible to determine whether the preliminary plat is consistent with this requirement. (Building height is determined based upon the vertical distance from the average of the highest and lowest point of grade for that portion of the lot covered by the building to the point mid -way between the eave and ridge). It appears that there is insufficient distance between the structures located inside of the private drive (however revised building elevations indicating the height of the proposed structures will be needed to verify the distance). It is suggested that the preliminary plat and PUD Development Stage Plan map be amended to increase the building separation pursuant to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. It is further suggested that the triplex (Units 71, 72 and 73) be deleted from the PUD and preliminary plat. Units 71 and 72 will directly face the side of Unit 70 with a proposed separation of only 30 feet. Proposed unit 73 is located directly south of a parking lot. This triplex will have an extremely undesirable living environment and removing the unit will allow for the area to be utilized to re -adjust and increase the building separation between the units located east of the 34-stall parking lot. Park and Trail Dedication. Under the City's current ordinance park dedication requirements must be satisfied with a cash payment of $1,300.00 per dwelling unit. The applicant proposes to dedicate 2.24 acres of land as park dedication and to construct a sidewalk along the southern side of 64th Street and asphalt trail adjacent to CSAH 37 (east of the 64th Street intersection). The northerly .24 acres of proposed parkland is intended to provide the second half of a 60-stall parking lot. The westerly side of the parking lot area was dedicated at the time that Karston Cove was platted. The memorandum prepared by NAC dated 12-6-99 discusses the park and recreation objectives for this part of the City in detail. (Please refer to the attached memo for reference to this matter). The Albertville Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan calls for approximately 18 acres of land in this area of the City for the development of a "community park" (identified as Winter Park) within the Comprehensive Plan. About 8.25 acres of the 18 acres has been dedicated within the developments of Karston Cove (.281 acres for '/2 of the Page 11 parking lot) and Cedar Creek North (7.97 acres of natural open space area) plats. The subject site consists of 64.92 acres of land, which could provide 6.4 acres of additional parkland if the 10% park dedication were applied. In order to develop Winter Park as identified in the Comprehensive Plan, the City would need to acquire about 4 additional acres of land (for a total of 18 acres). The Subdivision Ordinance gives the City the power to determine whether the required park dedication shall be land, cash or a combination thereof. It is suggested that the park dedication for the preliminary plat be taken as a combination of land and cash. The .24 acres of land proposed for the park parking lot should be dedicated with the preliminary plat. The remaining dedication should be in the form of cash consisting of $1,300 per unit within the townhome development. The cash dedication can then be utilized by the City to purchase the remaining land area needed for Winter Park, Community Park. It is important to note that park dedication will also be required at the time the R-1A part of the subject site is final platted. Based upon this park dedication scenario, the City will need to acquire about 9.5 acres of land through a combination of land dedication from the R-1 A area of the plat and/or purchase of the land. The preliminary plat also shows a trail adjacent to CSAH 37 (located east of 64th Street) and a sidewalk along the southeasterly side of 64th Street. It is suggested that an asphalt trail also be shown along CSAH 37, west of 64th Street, which connects to the trail planned for the Karston Cove subdivision. The trail dedication standards require the developer/owner to construct trails as shown on the Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan. The cost for installation of trails shall be counted as credit toward the above mentioned park dedication requirement. Trails and/or sidewalks, if required, may be located within the public right-of-way and shall be constructed to city standards as is required by the City Engineer. Grading. Drainage and Utilities. Map sheets 5 and 6 of Exhibit D, show plans for grading, drainage and utilities. All grading, drainage and utility issues shall be subject to review and approval by the City Engineer. CONCLUSION The proposed development is in conformance with many of the minimum requirements of the R-5 zoning district and Subdivision Ordinance criteria, however, the project falls short of the PUD objectives identified by the Zoning Ordinance. The fundamental planning issues associated with the project, concern the proposed building architecture, site amenities (landscaping) and park dedication. These matters were identified for the applicant early in the process pursuant to the memorandum by NAC (dated 9 November 1999) and attached as Exhibit G. The Park and Trails Comprehensive Plan chapters associated with the community park (Winter Park), for this area of the community were provided to the applicant and the issue was further addressed by memorandum and discussion of the Planning Commission. Page 12 RECOMMENDATION At this point further direction from the Planning Commission is needed to result in a PUD and preliminary plat that will result in the type of neighborhood desired by the City. The issues, as viewed by our office, are identified herein. It is recommended that the Planning Commission consider the proposal with respect to the suggestions provided herein and provide feedback to the developer. The suggestions have been incorporated into a draft Findings of Fact (Exhibit 1) to assist the Planning Commission in making its decision. The decision to approve or deny the requested CUP/PUD and preliminary plat is viewed as a policy decision to be made by the City Council. The Executive Summary of this report outlines recommended conditions of approval should the decisions be made in favor of the developer. ACTION REQUESTED A separate motion to approve, deny or conditionally approve the CUP/PUD — Site Plan(s) and preliminary plat of Kollville Estates is in order. pc: Linda Goeb Mike Couri Pete Carlson Kevin Mealhouse Albertville Fire Chief Scott Dahlke Leuer-Munsterteiger Properties Sharon Scheckel Page 13 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP ❑ A-1, Agricultural Rural ❑ R-6, Residential High Density ❑ B-W, Business warehouse ❑ A-2, Agricultural Transitional R-7, Special Purpose High Density ❑ 1-1, Light Industrial ❑ R-1A, Low Density Single Family ❑ R-8, Mixed Housing L I-1A, Limited Industrial ❑ R-1, Single Family ❑ R-MH, Manufactured Housing Residential❑ 1-2, General Industrial Z R-2, Single & Two Family ❑ B-1, Neighborhood Business ❑ PUD, Planned Unit Development Z R-3, Single & Two -Family ❑ B-2, Limited Business ❑ P/l, Public/institutional R-4, Low Density Multiple Family ❑ B-3, Highway Commercial _ S, Shoreland Overlay ❑ R-5, Medium Density Multiple Family ❑ B-4, General Business ❑ W, Wetland Overlay 0 1000 2000 SCALE IN FEET CITY OF ALBERTVILLE - WRIGHT COUNTY - MINNESOTA 8-17-99 .s �F/ 0 I Ei I EXHIBIT E >Lc3q Vgt,:OT 66-ZZ-aaCl i i O i 10 : 46A 1 ' o� .S 1 � 1 C -o t- - - - -- - - - ................... fr�f J .............. ... ..... .. ......... .... . .... /1 ,... _ %( ' / i .... ........................--..../.-. ------------------ L F r FROM : FAX NO 1dJ • ./Wrl% I I%J Il. �. w•.a &nv A4 1,4 rAA 1 014 ZVJ L87U 9492 Dec. 30 1999 11:00PM P3 L LBR. MONTICELLO 444 xOLC lZ0 1 g D \o Y G Y a / l ! L I .I � I \ • / / '/ � � do m � mt�S:r':119e'1(J:� - - U 0 83.00 , v"zai 2eo Jzo o 1 g ~o 1 60.0 K S$ m Q •a, 320 12.0 g$ ' o J9.0 g a 1 ny i„ 4 00 yC�y O m a• o � o /1.0 � °• 44.� o2G1) r A Y" o 60.0 28.0 o 0� 12.0 J2.0� 63. 00 4 Tn it 'Z\i a � �i4 i5 Yq C R i q_N p4 $ a z a eu OA 7£ 11123/99 REWSIONS 12-22-99 1 hereby codify fhot fhiu plon, .tpec(Rmlbn, w rq°af — prgoered by me or under my Fr -I .,v orvlrM and thot l duty Repfelered Prolmlo D O Ca 1'Y7 7 2 ono d Enpnter under the lo•r atfhe Slufe N.hn,eolm �- nl C y of DRAWN 8Y DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN � s :o � , AAN O �m Dots Rep.Nw FOR � r � -Q C �7 1 o m z ' UCSlGNCD BY JKw RECORD P(.ANS UAI£: PREPARED RY: 10 k � Cn —4 =V Nqik L300K ,___ PACE: MEYER-ROHLIN, INC. LAND 6URVEYOFi6 ENCiRey KOLLVILLE ESTATES z m CI ICCKCD BY JKW 110R1ZCW7A1 SCA(£ b£RRCAL SCAL£ 1111 Nrp TSN., Rulldo UN SSJIJ 2 f (l N m 1 Inch R ._jQQ reef I hch N/,A feet Ph. 617 682-1781 !o, ( ) (617) 682-9�9T O O m i .y f .. f.. .... .... ..... ..... .... .... .. - .-.- -- •- We1 8,..1 rM r 1/7 .1------. U. SW 114 of s--m x1.>u PARK (A) � saw r-•�= • 8 NW WW'f N N uw Eja b Q 00 A # \ N .l. \ to S 00WY1'W I t0�1` •\ I I .p 4> C / o / .p •n /0 ti� / 8 0 �� 8 / + cn 8 � 9 •44, / k 8 O GI tS ,p 8 4! �► tp , i - saao N 0174U* W : _ p Ida O 8 IEg I =1.Ict1 s : to a g to b 8 L � � v � --Faoo - � � � ♦ � � I T T In! OOSY�0 - Eal1 �;%,— I I t lol I JS 00 Jaw Ja00 J100 Ul # Ca tV JAW jaw 8+///�%0 I / O 81'L_,7 b •�. / ,b , / c., k / , 8 4r4, � .a, � I I �, OD b to 1, ' / 8 J bum O 41 /k IN - `i'�P g � A Z'2 �$ 8 a' �sSs 8 Z yy�•0� y �p33¢ y� 2 v ~ ti 'J 2 O b N GATE 11/23/99 R£NS1CN5 11-22-99 / na.ay eallly tAel fhb a+n raod6eollo\ er np.rf .m r+.am !y f. m wdW my *w( Rio+ aW that / an ! aWy Rpblow P1 k"; Wd f"hw W W fM ba o/ Mr SI.b of YJ.~& Oalc PRELIMINARY PLAT SHEET 1 FOR KOLLVILLE ESTATES p -p r m< ? li7 ITl m :o . m N m o I z o y co L, ( � a 1� ORAW 8Y AAN Df9CN£0 8Y JKW RCCORO MANS DATE; HOOK PACE. PNCPARED 8r MEYER•ROHUN, INC. ENGWEtB - LAND 81+11VEYCM � � Ip l(611) 1iB2-17>ll/d4 fm (65531 6n1-9r91 ■ CHECKED 8Y JKW HOMrOYTAL SCALE it 1•ERRCAL SCALE 1 nU_ __. fAAVI /11 L-- L \ / s 8 �w d` 1 �il��• v o 8 �� •a J M6s �ao� IP // ` h a y / ��/ / �'� •. 2 �� ,Iq �% a ti 8 t Yt # 3 -jxz .. JJrs JIM) limo Zp:pI IW 8v @ v I q 8 g � 8I 8 v8 y v vQ v k9ldt I V .d y cn 8# g 8 t /4 / 1.4 00 ~ JS 0.500 a a� �•r� •Li ql .11 i 'Q'at+op, ono UfIIry f.+.n�rr Q7 N IX176'iJ' f Jp,pp S C1o76 �. I do 1746.43 tea sra se / � j N: o•rr�r s 1 ----lr..r r,..r nlr r rn a r j j /j I / / — I i 'm, sw 114 orsm 31 7 IN t L. ilia S S6 PNN'• Py / � w 1 ; i fif s fill III g $ A / 3 = b gg w w I8�� P s till w`; s PH IR�s $his $��s I -All $W 11.1 IP I t'- 14 IN s z p x L/ L / L x x z f■ R •■ Y �tY a ntips • o fvj •mi uja t i ids i�v i�js1 110 _2 8 _ ts` 9pL3 ppf i. (Ii. gry�s iztj8` i_ym tits tit I g I tit 1 • > '+ � 4 � �;i ■ V ■ p ■ '�' t■ f■ �5� � ■�■ It Y `y� � {■ y P `■ /- 41s {��t V � 14S f■� � 'Q$ � � l Cl* {l} -. 14s ■}tit? 4aill? ■� w 1f ps1 t[■ N a14 i■ w s14 ■■ Y � 4a1 •■ 14s ■■ $ O T1 1 hl X I • Y 1. 4 l y ♦ All / n1 I Ty •" I ♦h 11 /; 1 •j*i !w.1 )wr'P I rI !j�1 I; I •t"1 )p 1 if-? +�pI J�q�� jr?♦�pI j�h1 $ Ira Ida a �I�g Ina �# $ $#+$ $�Ia �I¢a R 4� �� tw lug , �# �N vrwMx• Z a 0 0 0 o e oo 0 0 0 0 gy 1 1q y 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 $ 1 �� G� #KR �[+��LY#�Y°7 Vo€Q-tqI�� t f��a #Rag >igas f � o �M Nyll I fro IT a gr 4 11 Y Y a � ill ii 41�a 11 R R R,�wi�,^x�:�� Art A, a An N o V V V V V V V y V V V 9V �V V�oo V y _ .• „ � � _ # Ol 3 v � a �^' FI 1 a if YR R+�RReL R 4S4+! ! R�L ! i�Y ! l4 2 fk Q* £R }t. )r.♦ 4 V " V w u . 4 V " �N �+♦ �.. t. ,l. m4 1V V V .IV V P � � yy4RyyRRR`RRR°RRpRRpp°.4Y��RRRRR°R4RRRR22X££kyyRyy4g4�4y�£yyRvvYyy4yykky4R♦k��RgRRg44�pR4q4qRyR�RkRklRQRk4}RR4R.°�,/R�.RYk£kRkR££24�RXR£RRYRk�kRk4RRR2£RRR£RRRXR4 R4kRk44kRYk �I�p'�oOVot lnit•N`O�DY�O41l.Y�abO yMU lt•�bptli VOitAI.t•N��. a1Vw4 a4 Y�pbw VYCY�Cw-8�Ck8kkY�l�'= Na1��4 NCO �•{{.� {{.� ((.. {{�� yyyyyyyry,�yyyyy y O V ��Vw. tl�i�V �bV VO.tra4 V�pW0 VAti `a t.4�Obwyw O.V V`�'O bwywO.Vy_� � p.NNNNNe�NNeNNNNeN;vNNNNN!+;..tiNNNN�NNNN{�NNNNNNNNNNNN3.NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNI+ FNNNNNNNNNN Ab�ObYY''}}!! }}�^'�{ yy{y(4,��±. {(,,�� {yy{,,�� yyW 44UU (yy(��,, .VVYb{y{�.{{{��,, Vb V4 yyy. pb�yqy.. {yyn�. b(y{�.,y� ypp Ny}q �yyp�O..y0` y0y Y0Y0YY A. y0VVyyy0y..y0y y0 y0♦�.4 y00y Y0..0V y0]O�. �Y0 y00y ]O�. 8 �Oy VO yO. YppOy0°Y..00O°.b �VY.yC yy Syr ybbyy�{{��V.Vp yy {y��V V{y. 1{��b �p br yy bq �Vp yy VVb § y�yYr YtiYi riUO��Y YYO YIO NYOONYtSOY7rS 3K2S IS%i2�S7&y Y�YUC(pppY.�ppp NU 0llp il�p00 iUppO iY06pp .Y aaa IwO 0tipalalti NMOONN004{iV 04NO0YMOO OMOOb YO YMi L � at LLLLLLLLLaLLLLLLaLLLLLLLLLLLaLtLLLLtLLLaLLLLLLtLaLLtLLLLLLtYt4taatLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLtLCLLLLttLLtLLLtLtttLLLLtttttttttL �tttLLLLLLt L RCNS70N5 DATE 11/23/99 17-22-99 1 A.r.by a Illy D1.1 NJ. Pbpti o, u t .d&V1A r ow1 (" m •ar P•47~ sr m- w dw my &Wt w,.wvwo old D 0 2 Mot / " o ddy R IvW ftAusbnd EVhw wWwFn jv n o mo Am or 00 Vol. o/ mp m"ra I DRAW By AAN PRELIMINARY PLAT SHEET 2 D.N. r •�', rs'- co -0 FOR 17, ox ym to RCCORO PLANS OA7[' tv ocgr EO BY Aw PREPARED 8Y: (NJ i u eon PACE., — MEYER-ROHLIN, INC. KOLL VILLE ESTA TES 1 2 m S"o ^� V �1� - LAND SLRVEYOFIS -� � co o c CHCC(EO BY JKW HO141ZQY7AL SCALE VER77CAL SCALE IIII Hwlt ISN., aulldo, MN W13 -�°„ ul 7 non - p 7..r 1 ern - h�LA/W PR (612) W-M I'm (612) 6a7-949I M o W.,f Ike of the f .. ..... .... .... .... .. r the 51 1112.66 49J. 10 ----- .... .. .... .... .... .. — PARK (6) 2.00 Acres 5 a0volill w ............. . .... .... ..... .... ..... ..... ... ... . .... ..... .... -------- ... .... ... .... .... ... �b.... .... .... F ti a any ti .. ..... ..... .. .... .... .... ... Ii .. ..... .... .... I .... .... .... .... ... 41 Y ... ..... ..... .... ... 966.22 im rid,44 9 r-f 414 f th.! E 12 f W, 114 of/S. w I'm rn X a. zN r n R � p DA7E 12122199RENSICWS 1 Araby mtlty that this pA^ Wed&-*tAk V .pWt .oxplp—d by -, W -d., y *act V"sb� wd r-- th t f " a duly Roght—d � C�ox- dw Co m th: kew of the POO ./ Afkmlm a m DRAW BY AAN PRELIMINARY PLAT SHEET 3 iz; 0 �— r— CD "mV FOR rn C) Z- 10 RECORD PLANS OAT: N , >, m Cn 10 VC9CNED BY JKW PREPARED Sr BOOK — PACE: MEYER-ROHLIN, INC. KOLLVILLE ESTATES 0XV13ma - LAND Co N 0 -2 -1 Im CHECKED BY JKW HORIZ(NIAL SCALE WRnCAL SCALE 1111 H*y. 25N., Owffolo, MN 55ili L4 " I 1—h feet I ich PtL (612� 682-1781 Fox (612) 682-9492 0) 0 m O p Vl � N ti V 8 ~ 2 p �o N DATE 12/22/99 RENSlONS 1 Aseby _Ufy that (h4 plan, W_l fant/M arro r art papoad Oy ma s ands my directsupsilabn and tho( 1 am a ably RW 1-W Profeuknd &941— ands the lcn of the Sto(e of Alk—sota —EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR KOLLVILLE ESTATES -_ D Q � � r.. nl ]. m A m r -+ o � m X � Z rn � C' 1 z w•11 00 o N 91 CA m m m DRAW BY AAN PoM Rp.Na D£SICN£D BY JKW RECORD PLANS DATE: BOOK PA GE: PREPARED BY.• MEYiER:RO�LIN, trvC. -1 .1 SURVEYORS t 111 Hr} 25;. Buffoio, MH 55313 Ph• (612) 682-1781 fo+ (612) 682-9492 - CHECKED BY JKW HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 kch - 700 feel VER71CAL SCALf 11,h N/A /eet mo s �r 0 ti Q I • � • -f N ry \' ti V ^t O (NV.r DATE 11123199 R£NSIONS I2-22-99 1 hw by a 111y that IN, pbn, xp-wwtt L w r,P,f rot pr-Oarad oy — or undr my asr-1 AV-W. tan and that I — o duly R.V.I.W Aehxslond £npinwr undr the brx of fhr Stole d YMexofa PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN FOR KOLLVILLE ESTATES f� C ITl o : ` m o m z L.I z C.1 f'7.1 o � x ((A m 0, O T DRAWN BY AAN Dal. RepNa 0MCN£0 BY JKW RECCIRO PLANS DA f£: BOOK 1=^C£: PRCPARCD BY: MpEYERGREERS .R4�LINC.-,SLRVEYO 1111 Nay. 23N•. Butfolo, RN 55311 Ph (612) 682-1751 Pox (612) 682-9492 CIIECKCO BY JKW HORIZGW/AL SCAL£ 1 Ghch �.Q� het 6£RRCAL SCALE T I hch —VA AQW. Wf N y k m� m m 9 Anrr Wf r D � 998 iA 1 O M _ � + GOJIFA(.►.F .. . iT @u I {F l� 2 p v '-1 rn 2 O 10 N DATE „/z,/99 REWSIONS 12-22-99 1 hweby cwtl7y that this Plop, ,paNffcollca, or report — P'Apwrd by ma ar wdw my d�.et and that I am a duly Rrybtwrd Pro/r..knot £nyhrw ,rtdw thr Aa- of thr Slob o/ 4(brnrota GRADING DRAINAGE AND ! ! EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR KOLLVILLE ESTATES D --- p r r m S m f l C o A m C) m z ' N • X � I z o N M L m L„l Ul 0 m DRAWN BY AAN Data Rp.Na DESIGNED BY JKW RECORD PLANS DATE: BOOK PACE: - PREPARED BY. MEYER-ROHLIN, INC. ENOO�AS • lAfO SUIVEYO"a 1111 Hwy, 23N., Buffalo, UN 3331J Ph• (612) 682-1781 fo. (w) 682-9492 CHECKED BY JKW HDRIILW fAL SCALE ! hch - 100 /eel l'ER7tCAL SCALE l hch . _J1[i7ee1 m ^ �• ayc�m't c$2°� Ana xm_° c 22;a� �°n°3° � ° =°g n U IT tn�Qn c yr Q a O c o 3 cp e � N ^ N a rn D A � 2 a a a y ti 2 P 0 a Q (/1 V p V o N C. DATE 11123199 REVISIONS 12-22-99 I hr.6y Mllfy that lh4 Ph+y wodffcol/at n nporl oaf p apa•.d by m. or uMr my d -1 v-p rv4W- and that I am o duly Rooforod Ihvlvflanot Enghow under th. bra of Ih. Slot. of Nhn.00la LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR KOLLVILLE ESTATES p y- t► f*1 ? LU m nl C m t— o Z7 ^' m o) M z m X ]7 (N) —r o m (, W Li o m DRAWN BY AAN Dvla R.p,Na DESIGNED BY JKW RECORD PLANS OA(E: QooK PACE: _ PREPARED BY; MEYER-ROHLIN, INC. � � ENO9�A8 • LAND SMVEYORB 1111 NrK 1SN., Buffalo, UN 553IJ Pk (612) 682-17E1 (o+ 612 667-949i ( ) CHECKED BY JKW IfOWIZON (AL SCALE I hch - _LS29 la.r VERACAL SCALE f hCn - l«r MEMORANDUM TO: ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS; LINDA GOEB, CITY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: MIKE COURI, CITY ATTORNEY SUBJECT: ESTIMATED PROPERTY TAX REVENUES FROM COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ON CITY - OWNED LAND NORTH OF ALBERTVILLE OUTLETS. DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 2000. At the last City Council meeting, the City Administrator and myself asked the Council whether they were interested in having the City -owned property north of the Outlet Mall (it was deeded to the City by the Outlet Mall developer in exchange for a waiver of fees in the $400,000 to $500,000 range) appraised for purposes of a potential sale to an interested party. The City Council asked for more information related to the amount of taxes this property could be expected to generate if developed for industrial purposes. Attached are estimated City tax revenues (excluding County and School tax revenues) from commercial/industrial properties of various valuations if they were located in the City. I have calculated these amounts for three different tax rates: the City's pay 2000 rate of 47.577, a rate approximately 10 points below that at 38, and a rate 10 points below that at 28. I have also included a summary/comparison page comparing the effect of different tax rates. All of these figures are calculated using pay 2000's tax capacity formula. The state legislature has reduced the commercial/industrial tax capacity formula over the past few years, which has had the effect of reducing the amount of taxes commercial/industrial property must pay. If the legislature continues to reduce the commercial/industrial tax capacity formula, the tax revenues the City will collect from commercial/industrial property will also decrease. I have shown three different tax rates in anticipation that the City's tax rate will begin to decline over the next several years as the Outlet Mall and other commercial development on Highway 19 comes on line and increases the City's total tax capacity. The actual tax rate may or may not decline, and I have no idea how much it may decline —I have simply used the 38 and 28 point figures to illustrate the effect of tax rate declines on City revenues from a given commercial/industrial property. 1 I have chosen a range of values to illustrate how much incremental tax revenue is received from each $100,000 of value and each $1,000,000 of value added from the development of the land. It is hard to estimate the value of developments which may locate in Albertville. Generally, manufacturing facilities have a higher value than warehouse facilities of equal size, but there are many other factors which may affect the valuation of a particular building. I expect that any industrial development would have a valuation of at least $1,000,000 but would likely be under the $5,000,000 mark. Pete Carlson estimates that the City's industrial land north of the Outlet Mall will likely be developed into two usable industrial sites. It may be possible to also develop a small -acreage commercial site on the portion of the land abutting County Highway 19. Because this property needs to be serviced with sanitary sewer (sewer is presently located at the southern end of the Outlet Mall property, several hundred feet from the City's property), and water laterals and an industrial street, any potential developers will likely seek TIF financing to help pay for the utility and street costs. If the City were to establish a TIF for this property, it would capture up to nine years of taxes (less if the City desires) which would be unavailable to the City general fund until the TIF expired. The City retains sole discretion as to whether or not a TIF should be established. 2 Summary of City property taxes generated under various City tax rates for commercial industrial property. Tax Rate Tax Rate Tax Rate Valuation 0.28 0.38 0.47577 $500,000 $4,340 $5,890 $7,374 $1,000,000 $9,100 $12,350 $15,463 $5,000,000 $47,180 $64,030 $80,167 $10,000,000 $94,780 $128,630 $161,048 Projected City tax revenues for commercial/industrial property for various property valuations. Assuming a City tax rate of .38 Tax City Tax Valuation Capacity Tax Rate Revenues $500, 000 $15, 500 0.38 $5, 890 $600,000 $18, 900 0.38 $7,182 $700,000 $22, 300 0.38 $8,474 $800,000 $25,700 0.38 $9,766 $900,000 $29,100 0.38 $11,058 $1,000,000 $32,500 0.38 $12,350 $1,500,000 $49,500 0.38 $18,810 $2,000,000 $66, 500 0.38 $25,270 $3, 000,000 $100, 500 0.38 $38,190 $4,000,000 $134, 500 0.38 $51,110 $5,000,000 $168,500 0.38 $64,030 $6,000,000 $202, 500 0.38 $76, 950 $7, 000,000 $236, 500 0.38 $89,870 $8,000,000 $270,500 0.38 $102,790 $9,000,000 $304,500 0.38 $115,710 $10,000,000 $338,500 0.38 $128,630 Projected City tax revenues for commercial/industrial property for various property valuations. Assuming a City tax rate of .47577 Tax City Tax Valuation Capacity Tax Rate Revenues $500,000 $15, 500 0.47577 $7,374 $600,000 $18,900 0.47577 $8,992 $700,000 $22,300 0.47577 $10,610 $800,000 $25,700 0.47577 $12,227 $900,000 $29,100 0.47577 $13,845 $1,000,000 $32,500 0.47577 $15,463 $1, 500,000 $49, 500 0.47577 $23,551 $2,000, 000 $66, 500 0.47577 $31,639 $3,000,000 $100,500 0.47577 $47,815 $4,000,000 $134, 500 0.47577 $63, 991 $5,000,000 $168,500 0.47577 $80,167 $6, 000, 000 $202, 500 0.47577 $96, 343 $7,000,000 $236,500 0.47577 $112,520 $8,000,000 $270,500 0.47577 $128,696 $9,000,000 $304,500 0.47577 $144,872 $10,000,000 $338, 500 0.47577 $161, 048 10 Projected City tax revenues for commercial/industrial property for various property valuations. Assuming a City tax rate of .28 Tax City Tax Valuation Capacity Tax Rate Revenues $500,000 $15,500 0.28 $4,340 $600,000 $18, 900 0.28 $5,292 $700,000 $22,300 0.28 $6,244 $800,000 $25, 700 0.28 $7,196 $900,000 $29,100 0.28 $8,148 $1,000, 000 $32, 500 0.28 $9,100 $1, 500, 000 $49, 500 0.28 $13, 860 $2,000,000 $66,500 0.28 $18,620 $3, 000, 000 $100, 500 0.28 $28,140 $4,000,000 $134,500 0.28 $37,660 $5,000,000 $168,500 0.28 $47,180 $6,000,000 $202,500 0.28 $56,700 $7,000,000 $236,500 0.28 $66,220 $8,000,000 $270,500 0.28 $75,740 $9,000,000 $304,500 0.28 $85,260 $10,000,000 $338,500 0.28 $94,780 x 02%03i00 ` 09:52 FAX 13202518760 SEH-RCH 444 ALBERT Change Order AIA Document G701 - Electronic Format OWNER ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR FIELD OTHER Duane Da [ City of Albertvillel ( Remely Architects ( Shingobee Buildersf I THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS ENCOURAGED WrTH RESPECT TO ITS COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION, AUTHENTICATION OF THIS ELECTRONICALLY DRAFTED AIA DOCUMENT MAY BE MADE BY USING AIA DOCUMENT D401. PROJECT: (name, address) / 999Fire Station Alt Saville. MN TO CONTRACTOR: (name, address) Shingobee Builders Inc. 669 North Medina Atre41 Loretto. MN 55357-0008 The Contract is changed as follows: 1. Extend water service as required for design change. CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: Ten DATE: January 13, 2C00, ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO.A-AWEV9906.01 CONTRACT DATE: June 2,1999 CONTRACT FOR: Desinn/Build Construction Not valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor. The original (Contract Sum)EGuaFanteed Ma*imufa PFie ) was $ 696.900.00 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ +786.39 The (Contract Sum)( ) prior to this Change Order was $ 697,666.39 The (Contract Sum)(Guammead Maximum PFiee will be (increased)(desreased) (uas4attged) by this Change Order in the amount of $ +2.873.15 The new (Contract Sum}( ) including this Change Order will be $ 700,559.54 The Contract Time will be (unchanged) by zero ( 0) days. T ,e date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is January 1C, 2000 NOTE: This summary does not reflect changes in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or Guaranteed Maximum Price which have been authorized by Construction Change Directive. ARCHITECT GO ' OINNER Address SEH R 113 et ve St, ClougJMN 56302 BY DATE 1 -! S Address Address Shingobee Builders City of Albertville PO Box 6. Loretto. MN 55337-0006 PQ Box 9 Albertville. MN 55301-0009 BY J BY DATE 1 _9b 0 AIA DOCUMENT 0701 - CHANGEORDER - 1987 EDITION- AIA- COPYRIGHT 1987 -THE AMERICAN INSTITUTEOFARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENUE, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C., 20006-529Z. WARNING; Unlicensed photocopying violates U.S. copyright laws and is subject to legal prosecution. This document was electronically produced with permission of the AIA and can be reproduced without violation until the date or expiration as noted below, Electronic Format G701-1987 User Document: G701-10.DOC—1113/2000. AIA License Number 100121, which expires on 10/6/2000 -- Page #1 T 02/03/00 09:53 FAX 13202518760 r SEE -RCM 4-4 ALBERTVILLE CITY 9 003/011 Shingobee Builders, Inc. 1999 Fire Station, Albertvitle, MN Change Order Worksheet Description: Date: 1=0199 InslaM 30' of 6' DIP water line info bullong with flange f errnlnatlon at lbor Am Requested Days Extension: 4 #15 Subcontract costs: at subcontractors Amount 1 Latour Construction i 2,925.100 2 3 4 5 6 7 Subtotal Subcontracted cost S 292500 8 OH&P on Subs (%) 5% 1 $ 146.2 9 Total Subcontracted costs $ 3,071.25 ShkVobee Costs Labor Costs Hours Rate SMr Total cqoen Hours S Laborer Hours $ Flak! Superintendent Hors 2 i 55,00 $ 110.00 Project Manager Hours 1 $ 55.00 S 55.00 Other Hours $ Subtotal Or Labor S 165.00 Labor burden 38% $ 62.70 Subtotal $81 Labor S 227.70 OH&P an labor 10% $ 22.77 Total SBt Labor $ 250.47 Material Costs S S s a Subtotal Material Costs S - State Sales tax 6.5D% S City Tax 0 f Subtotal Material cosb f OH&P on Material Total Material costs is General Conditions Days Ratelda EquipffientRental 0 0 $ Jobsite office rental 0 0.00 $ Temporary Facility Rental 0 D f Total General Conditions fi'b i 199,30 Summa Total Subcontracted oosts S 3,071.25 Tofailabor costs i 250.47 Total Material Costs $ Total Field Overhead costs $ 199,30 Subtotal $ 3,521.C2 Band costs 2.00% $ 70.42 Total 13 3,591.44 Shingobee Share - W30 City of Albertville Share - 24130 $718.29 $2,873.15 r owksht#15-GClitaiN 02%03;00 : 09:54 FAX 13202518760 SEH-RCM -:- 4 ALBERT' I FEE. 2.2eOO 1 4:5�MAX 1SHU<0BEE BUILDERS SEl-RCM i Change Order OWNER ARCHITECT { �� {{ AIA Document G701 - CONTRACTpR Electronic Formal FIELD OTHER 10Mwe Dev1 TICS LICCUMENT HAS IM?ORTANT LEGAL CONSBQUENCFS: CONSULTATION wrM AN ArrORNSY 1S ENCOURAGUM WITH RESPECT TO r rs COMPLETION OR MODIFICATION, AUTHEN7ICATIONOF THIS ffiBC VONICALLY DRAFT= AIA DOCUMENT MAY IS MADE I3Y USING AIA DOCUMENT t)401, PROJECT: (name, address) J2&Fire Sration AlbertvIDo. MN CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: MyeE.._ DATE: Eebrum 2,2000 TO CONTRACTOR: ARCHITECT'S PROJECT N0;L-ALMVB19b6.01 (flame. addAea)CONTRACT DATM e a �+ Qgbve � dera lid. 6 N�o inn Sirget CONTRACT FOR: Desian/Bui)d Cendrixtion + t-MN 5535?-0008 The Contract is chanted as follows: L10- exttsnd completjQpdate by t4 days due1� A. )..,-A stortt� Not valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Contractor. The original (Contract Sum) N WA No*) was 6 §� OD t�0 Net change by previously authorized Change Orders $ ,3.659 54 The (Contract Sum)( ) prior to !his Change Order was g 700 5 The (Contract Sum) will be (increased)(eleefeesed) ("BoWned) by this Change Order in the amount of $ tf 741.0� The new (Contras Sum)(6 anteed Matirflum PFiee) including this Chnpge Order will be $ 7C2,900,53 Tho Contract Time will be (increased)(d@@r@s }( g }by tQutteen (14) days. The date of Substantial Cotnplvtian as of the date Of this Change Order therefore is jji r 2Aj& NOTE; This summary does not reflect changes in the Contract Sum, Contract Time or Guaranteed Maximurn Price which have been awhorited by Construction Change Directive, AR HITECT CONTRACTOR OWNSF1 ..�itYZ�� .�• uI Address Shinszabee 8uildsrt _ 8Y 7 .0 Ca Addreee t, City of A,lbar-wile ��•"T W— 'SS Lai vil MN_S�.iOi•QQ 19 BY UN AIA 00CUMENT0701 - CHANCE ORDER • 19s7 EDITION- AIA- COPYRIGHT 1597 • THE AMP.RICAN :NM UTEOFARCHITBCTS,17?5 XBW YORK AV9NM NSW.. WASHRVGTON.D.C., 20006_S= . WARNING; Unlicensed ppoweopylpg violatep L•,5 copytight ]two and it subject to lagitt Psyswu9Cn. This doeutneet wac eltxuvnicidly Produced with pesmisslun of the AIA and ten be mprodured widtoyrvWetion until the data cf aspimdan ae noted below, Electronio'F-emtat G701-1987 User Document: G701.11,DCC -- 2/212000. AIA License Number 100121, which expires on .10/5/2000 -- Page #1 02%'03/00 • 09:35 FAX 13202518760 SEH-RCM ALBERTVILi_E CITY 2 005/011 I FEE. 2.2000 1, 4:54PMAX 1SHINGOEEE EJILDERS SM-hC}1 NO,@44 P,2/9003/010 JAN.31.20M 11: -OFin SHI!' tXE BUILDERS NO.961 P.520 • Slzt,�Cobrr Cylldnr•, inc. , ', Iaeo pip.SUden, Atborwltl•, MN change orderVl%tk4hoat Oossdpflanl Data: 111311109 bteridd Ouwal rlonQltl m Ov 14 Qstsysa M,�%up 41 #*#G t and WNWO. E,rsa►,trai sa WAW h, 41t ort "As, 0a(at+Hnto4m asliysd tN� yp l 14 O"(Wor deft lNWtta-w Iraall V "smn 14 Q*yx I Raquerlad pays tstenjfon: q „ r mil:�! f. l- 1.1',' ■IMfiO Will tea' 1 COWkahA�4•ACO�nCortC 02/03/00 '09:56 FAX 13202513760 SEH-RCH aLBERTI FEE.-2..20ee 1_4:54FMAx 1SHINGCEEE-BUILDERS SEX -RCM Change Order OWNM ARCHITECT L ROW/ Arch- a- e l AIA Document G701 - CONTRACTOR I Shimoob a Builders) Electronic Format FIELD OTFIP,R (Duane Dayj THIS DOCUMV`NT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; COWLTATICNY WITH AN ATrORNOY IS SNCOURAQVID1 WITH RESPECT TO (TS COMPLETION OR AfODngCAT:ON, AUTHENTJCATJON OF TMS ELECTRONICALLY DRAFTED AAA DOCUMENT MAY.i P MADE BY USING AIA DOCUMENT D401. n PROJECT: (name, orddrers) logo Firs SraalrM, Albertville. I TO CONTRACTOR. (nerve, addmvs) Shinrohes Builders Inc. 09 North Medina Sleet Leared.rn, MAT 55357-0008 The Contract is changed as follows: 1. AddiLj2g.of railing,piM on stain for cWjg,-safCtV, CHANCE ORDER NTUMBBR; Twelve DATE: i"tbwy 2. 20D0 ARCHJTECT"S PROJECT NO-A-ALBEVS806.01 CONTRACTDATE: June2.1989 CONTRACT FOR; DecignlM_COnsiructlon Not valid until Wined by the Owner, Architect and Contractor. The original (Contract Sum)(&iiarart ) was $ Net change by previously authorized Cjtango Orders $ The (Contract Sum)C ) prior to rhis Chapgo, Order was C. $ The (Contract Sum)(Quw4*mveW?6a*ifnWH P000 will be (incroased)(deSreese (unobaanged) by this Change Order in the amount of y The new (Contract Sum)( ) including this Change Order will be $ The Contract Time will be ' a (unehanga;d) by ZQ (2) days. The date of Substantial Completion as of the data of this Change Order thcTefore is January 24, 2000 696,904.00 4,400,66 702,3QQ,56 4624.87 707,825,43 NOTE: This summary does not reflect changes in the Conuact Sum, Contract Time or Gualantoed Maximum Price which have been authorized by Construction Change Directive. A ITEC CWC; TOR OWN6R Address 56302 HY DA w� F..-e. r Addloos City of Albertville _ PO_13.ox 2. AibrrtAlle, MN 55301=�{1i19 By_ j AIA DOCUMENT 0-7DI - CKANGA ORDIM -1967 EDITION - AIA- COPYRIGHT 1987 - THE AMEWCAN JNSTITL7SOF ARC:"j719CTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVENL73, N.W.. WA$HJNGTON,D.C., 20006-SM.. WARNING; tlnikenoW phcrcoopying vlotafo; U.S. eapy"tlght taws and in subjeei to lognl prosecudon. This document wan cleetronically produced withpam-Jssion of the AIA and can be mprochiced withoutvio!ntion u+0 the dom of expirpdon As noted blow. Electronic Format G701-1987 User Document: G701.12,DOC -- 2/2f2000. AIA License Number 100121, which expires on 1016reoOo -- Page #1 0V03i00 1 09:57 FAX 13202518760 SEH-RC11 ALBERTVILLE CITY 9007/011 FEE. 2.EeOO, 1 4:SSPMA% 1SHI14GOBEE ELILDERS SEB-RCM h0.644 P,5/51005/O10 t .:rNM SFi1ti�OFrE FI.I TL nERs 0 �.961 P.4�28 3h1Rl+bw lWom, im 1� FJn e0!(+�� ,�Ib+11vlA�, May aKripiren; ON"lls Order Worksdwer in.tiu �a,.rn�dnr�louwr+ ++.rimers► Ove; ustlao + �r'Wd+'f*0'PwKowa l��u+srw D+ri hsnsla� .. PaQ� 1 GO�VkihtYQa�OCtbTir 02,'03/00 1 09:58 FAX 13202518760 SEH-RCM F=E. 2.22200 1 4:55PMAX 1SHINGOBEE EUILDERS SEH-RC) I Change Order AIA Document G701 - Electronic Format yaa ALBERTVIIIR ('ITv GhnnQini. OWNER a y. ARCHITECT _ CONTRACTOR [ S Inaobse Builds FIELD i ) OTHER 1 THIS DOCUMENT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSBQUENCBS; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY JS ENCOURAGBD W r1j Wpr--CT TO ITS COMPLBT70N OR MODMICATION. AUTHIINTICATION OP THts ELECTRONICALLY DRAFTEO AIA DOCUMENT MAY BE MADE BY USING AJA DOCUMENT D401. PROTECT: (name, address) 199R Fii 'rye Marion Albcnville. MN CHANGE ORDER NUMBER; IMM DM'R: February 2. 2000 TO CONTRACTOR; ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: A-ALBEV9906.01 Irwrue, address) CONTRACT DATI~; June 2. 1999 r �Cn�JTe u!!Oe►S, rf� � 669 North Medina Seeet CONTRACT FOR; DeSiarf%id Construc!(on Lefo.MN 55357-0009 The Contract is changed as follows: 1. 22I8M t�LoarUlions. I Add kLto resMoq-mL Ned valid until signed by the Owner, Architect and Csantram9r. , The original (Contract Surn)(Qtara )was --' — $ §9 ,9o0.od Not change by previously authorized Change Orders $ +10.925.43 The (Contract Stun)( ) Ixior to this Change Order waaa $ 907.&25;43 The (Contract Surax- will be Snoreased)(decreamd) Eanehangad) by this Change Order in the amount of S - t 38d•00 The new (Contract Sum)( ) including this Change Order will be S 7M446.43 The Contract Time Will be Eincreased)(-deo*ttr.cl-)(unahaFiledj by 2M (1) days. The date of Substantial Completion as of tho date of this Change Ordor therefore is >fry 25. 2000 ;ia; NOTE. This summary does not rei1ect changes in the Contract Sum, Cennriet Time or Guaranteed Maximum Price which have been authorized by Construction Change Directive, ARCHARCHrMCr CONTRACTOR OWNER Address -T v N Q BY DATE oot, OCR .• a �` ,�,�� t��.. Addreos -- M a, Ni N 55301_-aQ09 BY AIA DOCUMENT 0701 -CHANGE ORnRR - 1997 EDITION- .sIA - COPYRTGKT 1987 -'rH0 AMERICAN JKST1TtJ7'E Olt AjtCKrraCTS,1735 , W YCRK AVENUE. N,W„ W %SRLNGTON, D,C., 2W06-5292- WARNING: Ualicm" phplocopyinS vldoa s li,2 Copyright favq� and 10 euAjeet to IeQat prosecution. This daeumonr woe electronically producred with geernitrion of the AIA and can be r¢prednead without vlolapon until Oc data of axpindon w now belgw, Electronic Format G701-1987 User Doeumem., G701.13.DOC -- 2/212000. AIA Ucenoe Number 100121. which expires on 10/6/2000 -- Pape 01 02iO3/00 ` 09:59 F'AC 13202518760 SEH-RC:II .4 ALBERTVILLE CITY it 009/011 FEB. 2.2000 1 —':S6PM&X I. HIh'GOEE__EUILDERS SFH-RCN NO.E44 P. /ad0 /O oo SAN.�1.2000 1� 1 M E;6N EEE BUILDERS N0.161 P.2/28 SN"m iij4dw, Ino. Iwo F110 Sloan Nb*Rww,. MN Chinos amu waftfism M � Dae�ptlon. Dow, iMlfoo Cl l* W M pMMau of* loW pOn W fmMa ai Ram "O"dMyo lsetnoiop 1 1-7 nM.r",LjTm�ftl —A �■r� -s,�r:ri� Pose I CCWWhlS2240ft 4k*om 0?i2i3/00 , 10:00 FAX 132025IS760 SEH-R01 FEE. z.Ee(2e 2 4:56PMAa 1SHINGOSEE BUILDERS SEX-)tcx R Change Order AIA Document G701 Electronic Format ALBERTVILI NO. V. owrrER I ARCHITECT' CONTRACTOR PMD OTHER QULO Da I WMJV Art INCls i f bnaobee BLilde�tl� t� THIS DOCtJMtWT HAS IMPORTANT LEGAL CONSEQUENCES; CONSULTATION WITH AN ATTORNEY IS RNCOURAt3El Ic— , t RESPECT D ITS COMPLETION OR MODMCATION. AUTHENTICATION OF THIS ELEMONICALLY DRAFTED AIA DOCUMENT MAY AP. ,NADB BY !CT T AIA DOCUMENT D401. PROJECT: (uwsr, eddrssai IM Fire Sr sinf Albarty1le, MN TO CONTRACTOR: f► mn, addtexel Shinsobee Builders Inc, 669 Noah Medina Strut l.erette. MN�S3S7.000(t Tho Contract is changed as follows; CHANOB ORDER NUMBER: ,,, DATE: February 2 20w ARCEii=,s Pit01'I:CTNO;A-AL 808,G1 CONTRACT DATE: June 2.1*9 CONTRACT FOR: DaiantBuikl Construction DaIM IA main satvicc RMB fOr'R Mfrf2n, fr0a &Jwi1dine R side of building. Not valid until signed by ft Owner, Architect and Contractor, The original (Contract Sum)(£ t ?was $ g5,504.OQ Not change by Previously authorized Change Orders $ This (Contract Surnx ) prior to this Change Order was 7 ,43 The (Contract Sutra will be (increasad)(dowvasW aged) by this Change Order in the amount of $ ; rJ34.2g 11e new ;Contract Sum)( ) including this Change Order will be $ 707,179.63 The Contract Time will be (4fmleae6d)EI amsesed)(unchanged) by &2 ( Q) days. The date of Substantial Completion as of this dote of this Change Order therefore is J8rulaty 25, 2000 NOTE: This summary does not MrIect chnngos in the Contract gQuM, Contract Time or Guaianteed Maximum Prim which have been authorized by Construction Change Direcrivs, ARCMTECT CONTRACTOR OWNS Address �IiSiJst youd,3� BY DATE • Address Q v or A ltwity I'e �15YT11�MN SSi G! AA — BY --- AfA L:OCt'JMWr 0 701 -CHANCE ORDER -1917 SOMON - AIA - COPYRIGHT 1997 -THE AMMICAN iNSTITUTEOF ARCHITECTS,1735 NEW YORK AVUNLI4 N,W.. WASi{1NGTON, D.C., 2D006-5292- WARNING; Unlicensed PhRtoovpyltzg violores US, copyright IMWe and is subVO:o Icgal prosecution. This docurnant was clecuonieaily Produced wtth pennissian a(the AIA and can be reproduced wittwutviolpdon unlit the date of vnpiratior, as no•ad bslgw. EleCtronicIzormat User Document G701-14.DOC -- 2/2/2000. AIA License Number 100121, which expires on 10/6/2000 . Paged#7 02/e3/00 • 10:01 F.i 1320251S760 SEH-RC)t 44- ALBERTVILLE CITY Z 011/011 # FEB. 2.20E0 1; 4:57Fni 1;SHINGCEEE EUILDERS SEH-•RCM NO.844 P.?/� 008/010 JPN.31. 2EM I1: 12AM SHINGOi1^E SUIOERS NC. 96i p. a^20 v4ra Mka amen. ub OM4% rN Champ Ordw Workarmt 021 boocjp*ml Oah: 1151100 :AMR mom down hrurnnwA Mee►aloe at eeW40 H 4-ofbW*W a.nrapAwOwne OSK r Reowe*d0aya8arenal.n: ,a aLT�: �>l�F�Eis rfii"s:1=7'fZI2t'.17."_-9"J �E_'.'� �lY[icr.� .• . ti1�7'.=7,T,'T.TrT17 _ i�E>E.-1!•'•0[ 1t [ i�: •� MH RR(=ly'11t�•�lffl•I- �C7:rR�_.J r +wig-r. ILSO a�r■e� M[ac, v■�• ®� T saw 60eSO Peps, C04Vbht/21•&CicfaA 5e Meeting: Sub committee member What portions would Albertville be able to service? How much capacity would Albertville be able supply? How soon would sewer be available to Otsego? What would the cost be? How would this be financed? What does Albertville require from Otsego to service any portion of the city? What does Albertville consider equitable financial arrangement? Would you sell sewer direct to the customer or would Otsego have to collect and forward the cost of sewer to Albertville? Who would be paying for the trunk lines? Who would be paying for the lateral lines? What about maintenance or repairs?