Loading...
2000-09-05 CC Agenda PacketALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA September 5, 2000 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER — ROLL CALL — ADOPT AGENDA 2. MINUTES (a) August 21, 2000, City Council Meeting 3. CITIZEN FORUM - (io minute Limit) 4. CONSENT AGENDA (a) Approve payment of claims (b) Resolution #2000-26 (Resolution Establishing the City of Albertville as a Participant of the Building Quality Communities Effort) (c) Ordinance #2000-12 (An Ordinance Amending Ordinance #1989-9 — Uniform Fire Code) (d) Schedule Truth -in -Taxation Hearing on Wednesday, December 6, 2000, at 7:00 PM and the continuation hearing, if necessary, on Monday, December 11, 2000, at 7:00 PM (e) Approve preliminary levy 5. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS a. Public Works • Report b. Planning & Zoning (1) Final Stage Plan — Cedar Creek South 6ch Addition (2) Burger King Concept Plan — Signage/Site Plan c. Engineering (1) Wetland Fill Permit — Scope of Work & Cost Estimate (2) Review Process — Final Inspections (3) Consider Stop Sign Policy (4) Cost Estimates — Softball, Baseball Fields (5) Consider appointing sub -committee to begin discussion with John Darkenwald regarding commercial development (6) Discuss Fire Department review of commercial building permits City Council Agenda August 21, 2000 Page 2 of 2 d. _ egral (1) Ordinance #2000-11 (An Ordinance Allowing the City Council to Set Municipal Water Trunk Charges and Designating the Use of Such Charges) e. Administration (1) Consider appointing sub -committee to meet with Otsego's sub -committee (Mayor Fournier & Councilmember Heidner) (2) Schedule Sub -Committee Meeting (proposed dates September 14, 21, or 28) (3) Ordinance #2000-10 (An Ordinance Establishing Guidelines for Cutting and Removal of Grass and Weeds) i a 6. ADJOURNMENT 4 To: City Council From: Linda Goeb Date: September 1, 2000 Re: September 5th Agenda NOTE: Reminder that the Council is meeting at 6:30 Tuesday, September 5m, for employee reviews. CONSENT: • The bills list is not included in your packet. It will be available for review on Monday. • The League of Minnesota Cities is requesting all cities participate in the Building Quality Communities Program and has provided a sample resolution for the City to adopt. Resolution 2000-26 is enclosed for your consideration. • Ordinance 2000-12 amends the old Fire Code Ordinance by updating it to the 1997 Uniform Fire Code, as requested by the Fire Department. • The Council did not include the cost of an additional civil defense siren in the preliminary budget on August 30. If the Council wants to budget for another civil defense siren ($15,000), it should be included in the preliminary levy. PLANNING & ZONING: • Burger King is proposing to build on Outlot D of the Outlets of Albertville site. Gregg Klohn will attend the meeting to present a concept plan for both the site plan and the signage requests. ENGINEERING: • John Darkenwald has approached Pete regarding the Roden property (on which he has an option) to discuss commercial development vs. industrial development. Pete is suggesting that a sub -committee meet with Darkenwald to discuss his proposal. 0 Page 1 ADMINISTRATION: Otsego Administrator Mike Robertson contacted me after the Otsego Council meeting . Otsego has appointed Mayor Larry Fournier and Councilmember Vein Heidner to a committee to discuss extension of sewer service to Otsego from Albertville. The Council should appoint two members to the committee and choose one of the dates suggested by Otsego to meet. I have included in your packet an ordinance detailing the procedures the City can take to eliminate grass and weed problems. Ordinance #2000-10 sets the procedures the City can use to get grass and weeds mowed. The ordinance comes from the City of Prior Lake and has been revised for the City of Albertville. City Attorney Mike Couri has also reviewed this ordinance. Should the Council choose to adopt this ordinance, I believe we could eliminate the need for legal actions through the court system for problem yards. I did not put the garage and house size question on the agenda this time. If the Council wants to change the Zoning Ordinance in regards to garage and house sizes, a public hearing must be scheduled. The Council can amend the agenda to schedule the public hearing. FOR YOUR INFORMATION: • I contacted Marlin & Jan Fickle, owners of the property at 6213 Kahler Drive, regarding progress on complying with the City's ordinance regarding his yard. Grass seed was planted on Thursday, August 31 ". I drove by the property and took pictures of the Fickle's seeding their lawn. Jan Fickle also told me that they have ordered sod that will be laid on September 28t', but that they are complying with the City ordinance to plant grass seed at this time. Mrs. Fickle also advised me that her neighbors to the north (5629 Kahler Drive) have landscaped 6'-8' beyond their property border into the wetlands area abutting the lot . I looked at the area she referred to and, provided the post marking the property is accurate, it's apparent that the landscaping definitely is located beyond the lot line. City Attorney Mike Couri has advised me that two of the four lawsuits have been served on the property owners and will be filed with the court system. Mike has been unable to serve the other two lawsuits on the owners and will have the Sheriff s Department serve those property owners. As soon as the papers are served, they will be filed with the court as well. 0 Page 2 ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA September 5, 2000 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER — ROLL CALL — ADOPT AGENDA 2. MINUTES (a) August 21, 2000, City Council Meeting 3. CITIZEN FORUM- (10 Minute Limit) 4. (a) Approve payment of claims (b) Resolution #2000-26 (Resolution Establishing the City of Albertville as a Participant of the Building Quality Communities Effort) (c) Ordinance #2000-12 (An Ordinance Amending Ordinance #1989-9 — Uniform Fire Code) (d) Schedule Truth -in -Taxation Hearing on Wednesday, December 6, 2000, at 7:00 PM and the continuation hearing, if necessary, on Monday, December 11, 2000, at 7:00 PM (e) Approve preliminary levy 5. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS a. • Report b. (1) Final Stage Plan— Cedar Creek South 6`h Addition (2) Burger King Concept Plan — Signage/Site Plan C. Engineering (1) Wetland Fill Permit — Scope of Work & Cost Estimate (2) Review Process — Final Inspections (3) Consider Stop Sign Policy (4) Cost Estimates — Softball, Baseball Fields (5) Consider appointing sub -committee to begin discussion with John Darkenwald regarding commercial development (6) Discuss Fire Department review of commercial building permits City Council Agenda August 21, 2000 Page 2 of 2 d. a#,ndl (1) Ordinance #2000-11 (An Ordinance Allowing the City Council to Set Municipal Water Trunk Charges and Designating the Use of Such Charges) e. Administration (1) Consider appointing sub -committee to meet with Otsego's sub -committee (Mayor Fournier & Councilmember Heidner) (2) Schedule Sub -Committee Meeting (proposed dates September 14, 21, or 28) (3) Ordinance #2000-10 (An Ordinance Establishing Guidelines for Cutting and Removal of Grass and Weeds) 6. ADJOURNMENT 6F-rd-dL, a4p ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL August 21, 2000 Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM PRESENT: Mayor John Olson, Councilmembers Robert Gundersen, Keith Franklin, Gary McCormack, and John Vetsch, City Engineer Wayne Stark, City Attorney Mike Couri, City Planners Deb Garross & Cindy Sherman, and City Administrator -Clerk Linda Goeb Mayor Olson called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to order. Gundersen made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Franklin seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to approve the minutes of the July 17, 2000, meeting as presented. Franklin seconded the motion. All voted aye. Mayor Olson asked if anyone present wished to address the Council under the Citizen Forum portion of the agenda. Tiffany Nelson addressed the Council requesting that they allow a 48" chain link fence to be installed on her property at 10145 Karston Avenue NE, instead of a 42" high fence. Franklin made a motion to approve a variance from the fence ordinance to allow Tiffany Nelson to install a 48" high chain link fence at 10145 Karston Avenue. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Kim Molesky asked what progress has occurred regarding the lawn at 5612 Kahler Drive. Mayor Olson explained that the property owner has indicated he will plant grass seed by September 1. At the last Council meeting, the Council agreed to allow the property owner until September 1 to complete his seeding. Chris Olson questioned why nothing had been done with the other property owners who have not complied. City Attorney Mike Couri explained that lawsuits are being drawn up and must be served on the owners. After that time the suits will be filed in court and a court date will be set. He further explained there is a possibility of not getting a court date set until too late in the fall to plant grass seed. Gundersen made a motion to approve payment of Check #'s 11376 - 13426 as presented. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to approve payment of Check #'s 13402 - 13467 as presented. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion to approve payment of Check #'s 13476 — 13500 as presented. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. Gundersen made a motion ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL August 7, 2000 Page 2 of 5 to approve RESOLUTION #2000-25 titled A RESOLUTION TERMINATING AN INTERIM ORDINANCE IMPOSING A MORATORIUM ON THE PLATTING OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-5, R-6, R-7 AND R-8 ZONING DISTRICTS WITHIN THE CITY OF ALBERTVILL. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. Brian Bloch, CPA with Kern, DeWenter & Viere, presented the 1999 Audit Report and Management Letter to the Council. Ben Steiner, a student at STMA High School, gave a presentation on the Big Woods project and asked the City to consider financial support to purchase 35 square acres of Big Woods located in the City of St. Michael across from the Junior High School. Bridget Falbo, Patti Moses and Pat Stanglein were also present to request the City's support. The Council agreed to consider supporting the program at the budget meeting scheduled for August 30. Gundersen made a motion to approve the Water & Wastewater Treatment Department Report as presented. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye. Planner Sherman explained that Contractor Property Developer Company (CPDC) has submitted an application for rezoning from R-IA to PUD, CUP/PUD preliminary plat and variance under the Shoreland Regulations for the property located between School Lake and Mud Lake in the northeast quadrant of the city. The plat proposes 150 single family home sites designed in a "traditional neighborhood" fashion on 85 acres, for a density of 1.76 units per acre. An EAW has been prepared and submitted for review. The plat requires three variances from the Shoreland Regulations and the variances impact the ability to process the application as a PUD/CUP under the shoreland regulation. The variances must be granted in order for the project to be eligible for PUD Ordinances. Craig Rapp and Planner Mark Putnam, representing CPDC, made a presentation of the proposed development. They explained that a 20' minimum buffer area around the shores of the lakes would be dedicated as a shoreland conservation easement with the developer planting native trees and shrubs within the easement to encourage wildlife habitat and decrease the visual impact of the development on the natural environment Lakeshore. The developers proposed to install sidewalks on both sides of the streets and trails throughout the plat and green spaces. They are committed to constructing and maintaining a gazebo in the entrance park. They will also construct at their cost a practice ballfield and soccer field in accordance with the City's Comprehensive Park Plan. The Towne Lakes plat proposes 20+acres of park area in the high land areas, plus and additional 9 acres of parks located in the wetland areas, ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL August 7, 2000 Page 3 of 5 City Attorney Couri suggested that the Council require that a Master PUD Agreement be drafted that incorporates all the items the developer has indicated they will install, as well as all setback, lot size, etc. flexibility approved before the Council approved the preliminary plat. Franklin made a motion to approve the Findings of Fact & Decision amended to include all items that the developer has agreed upon, thereby approving the PUD/CUP, preliminary plat development plan, and variances under the Shoreland Regulations for the Towne Lake addition. Gundersen seconded the motion. Franklin, Gundersen, McCormack and Olson voted aye. Vetsch voted no. The motion carried. The Council reviewed the Albertville Park & Trail Plan Study presented by Planner Deb Garross. The park system costs has been increased to reflect the costs of the ballfields at City Park. The Planning Commission has reviewed the changes and has recommended that the Council establish the park dedication fee for commercial and industrial properties at $4,500 per acre. Olson made a motion to set park dedication fees as follows: $1,400 per residential unit $6,000 per acre for commercial properties 5% of market value for industrial properties Franklin seconded the motion. Olson and Franklin voted aye. McCormack, Gundersen, and Vetsch voted no. The motion failed. McCormack made a motion to set park dedication fees as follows: $1,500 per residential unit $7,000 per acre for commercial properties 5% of market value for industrial properties Vetsch seconded the motion. McCormack and Vetsch voted aye. Gundersen, Olson and Franklin voted no. The motion failed. Franklin made a motion to set park dedication fees as follows: $1,500 per residential unit $6,000 per acre for commercial properties 5% of market value for industrial properties Olson seconded the motion. Olson and Franklin voted aye. Gundersen, Vetsch, and McCormack voted no. The motion failed. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL August 7, 2000 Page 4 of 5 Gundersen made a motion to approve RESOLTUION #2000-21 titled RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FEE SCHEDULE FOR PARK DEDICATION EFFECTIVE AS OF AUGUST 21, 2000 setting fees as follows: $1,500 per residential unit $7,385 per acre for commercial/industrial properties The motion also requests that the Council and Planning Commission meet to consider discuss the park plan and make adjustments. This may lead to a decrease in park dedication fees for industrial properties. Vetsch seconded the motion. Gundersen, Vetsch and McCormack voted aye. Franklin and Olson voted no. The motion carried. Gundersen made a motion to adopt ORDINANCE #2000-9 titled AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION A-600.8. (PARK & TRAIL DESIGN) AND SECTION A- 600.15. (PARK AND TRAIL DEDICATION REQUIRMENTS) OF THE ALBERTVILLE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE TO INCORPORATE REVISED TRAIL, SIDEWALK AND PARK DEDICATION STANDARDS. McCormack seconded the motion. Gundersen, McCormack, Vetsch, and Olson voted aye. Franklin voted no. The motion carried. Vetsch made a motion to table discussion of an ordinance amendment regarding house and garage sizes. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye. Engineer Wayne Stark presented the cost estimates for a baseball and a softball field at City Park. Costs to complete both fields is estimated at $175,284. These costs do not include dugouts or bleachers. The Council requested that the costs for each field be broken down separately and brought back to the next Council meeting. The Council concurred that the joint meeting with Otsego would not cover specific issue or amounts, but rather be a general discussion. Gundersen made a motion to approve the Developer's Agreement for Psyk's 8th Addition. Franklin seconded the motion. All voted aye. Vetsch made a motion to approve the Contract for Private Development By and Between City of Albertville, Minnesota and Mold -Tech, Inc. as presented. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. Olson made a motion to table the request to participate in the River Rider Program to the August 30 budget meeting. Franklin seconded the motion. All voted aye. ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL August 7, 2000 Page 5 of 5 McCormack made a motion to table discussion of an additional civil defense siren to the August 30 budget meeting. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Council recessed at 10:45 PM and convened a closed session to discuss pending litigation. Mayor Olson reconvened the regular Council meeting at 11:14 PM. McCormack made a motion to adjourn at 11:15 PM. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye. John A. Olson, Mayor Linda Goeb, City Administrator CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION #2000-26 RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE AS A PARTICIPANT OF THE BUILDING QUALITY COMMUNITIES EFFORT WHEREAS, the top values and priorities of citizens include safety, family, job opportunities, health, the well-being of children, and recreational opportunities; and WHEREAS, many of the services cities provide directly enhance those citizen priorities; and WHEREAS, the connection between city services and how they benefit citizen priorities and concerns is not always understood by citizens; and WHEREAS, it is one of the responsibilities of city officials to ensure legislators, media and citizens understand their governments through open and frequent communication using various avenues and means; and WHEREAS, it is important to encourage citizens to actively participate in city government, to share their views, and to work in partnership with city officials to ensure that the needs of the community are met; and WHEREAS, partnerships developed between citizens and city officials can result in greater understanding of the connection between Minnesota's high quality of life and the services provided by Minnesota cities, as well as in greater trust by citizens in the efforts of their city government; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA HEREBY DECLARES ITS COMMITMENT TO JOIN IN THE "MINNESOTA CITIES: BUILDING QUALITY COMMUNITIES" STATEWIDE EDUCATIONAL EFFORT IN COOPERATION WITH OUR FELLOW MEMEBERS OF THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES. WE HEREBY DESIGNATE (need name & title of contact) AS THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE'S KEY CONTACT FOR THIS EFFORT, AND WILL INFORM THE LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES OF THIS DESIGNATION. ADOPTED this 51h day of September, 2000. CITY OF ALBERTVILLE John Olson, Mayor Linda Goeb, City Administrator 'c CITY OF ALBERTVILLE ORDINANCE # 2000-12 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1989-9 UNIFORM FIRE CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE ORDAINS: Section 1: ADOPTION OF UNIFORM FIRE CODE: It is hereby adopted by the City of Albertville for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions hazardous to life and property from fire and explosion, that certain Code and Standards known as the Uniform Fire Code, including all appendix chapters therein, and the Uniform Fire Cod Standards published by the Western Fire Chief s Association and the International Conference of Building Officials, being particularly the 1997 Uniform Fire Code thereof and the whole thereof, save and except such portions as are hereinafter deleted, modified, or amended, of which Code and Standards not less than one (1) copy has been and is now filed in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Albertville, and the same are hereby adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at length herein, and the provisions thereof shall be controlling within the limits of the City of Albertville. Section 2: PERMIT REQUIRED: A permit shall be obtained in advance form the Bureau of Fire Prevention for the activities described in Section 4.101 of the Uniform Fire Code as adopted by reference in Section 1 above. Section 3: ESTABLISHMENT AND DUTIES OF BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION: Said Uniform Fire Code shall be enforced by the Bureau of Fire Prevention which is hereby established in the Fire Department of the City of Albertville and which shall be operated under the supervision of the Chief of the Fire Department for the City of Albertville. Said Chief shall be in charge of the Bureau of Fire Prevention until such time as the City Council shall deem it advisable and shall appoint a separate chief in charge of the Bureau of Fire Prevention. The Chief of Albertville Fire Department may detail such members of the Fire Department, as inspectors as shall from time -to -time be necessary. Section 4: DEFINITIONS: The term "Jurisdiction", as used in said Uniform Fire Code, shall mean the City of Albertville. . Updated 09/05/00 - 1 - City of Albertville Ordinance 2000-12 Section 5: STORAGE OF DANGEROUS SUBSTANCES: The limits referred to in Section 82/105(a) and 77/106(b) of said Uniform Fire code restricting the storage of liquefied petroleum gases and the storage of explosives and blasting agents respectively, together with the limits for the storage of flammable or combustible liquids in outside above ground tanks are hereby established as being the entire area lying within the City of Albertville unless a special permit is issued by said City. Section 6: STATE REGULATIONS ADOPTED: In addition to the foregoing, the City of Albertville also adopts by reference as if fully set forth herein any and all amendments and changes to said Code and Standards and any other matters relative thereto set forth in Minnesota State Rules and Regulations of the Department of Public Safety, Fire Marshall Division, 11 MCAR §1.50101-1.5156. Section 7: APPEALS: Whenever the Chief of the Fire Department disapproves an application or refuses to grant a permit applied for, or when it is claimed that the provisions of the Uniform Fire code do not apply or that the true intent and meaning of said code have been misconstrued or wrongly interpreted, the applicant may appeal from the decision of said Chief to the City Council of the City of Albertville within thirty (30) days from the date of the decision appealed. Section 8: NEW MATERIALS, PROCESSES, OR OCCUPANCIES, WHICH MAY REQUIRE PERMITS: The City Administrator and the Chief of the Fire Department shall act as a committee to determine and specify, after giving affected persons an opportunity to be heard, any new materials, processes, or occupancies for which permits are required in addition to those now enumerated in said Uniform fire Code. The Chief of the Bureau of Fire Prevention shall post such list in a conspicuous place in his office, and distribute copies thereof to interested persons. Section 9: BARBECUES AND DECK FIRES: Part A: In any structure containing two (2) or more vertically stacked residential units or that contains two (2) or more residential units sharing as a means of ingress or egress a common hallway; no person shall kindle, maintain, cause or use any fire, open flame or electric heating element on any balcony -2- City of Albertville Ordinance 2000-12 or deck above the ground; nor shall such activity occur on any patio set in and level with the ground unless such activity occurs at least fifteen (15) feet from all portions of all such units in such a structure. Part B: No person shall keep or use any charcoal, nor any lighter fluid, natural gas, fuel, torch, barbecue grill or other similar heating or lighting chemical or device in any place where fire, open flame or electric heating element is prohibited in Part A above. Part C: Barbecue grills that burn natural gas are prohibited in any place where prohibited in Part A above unless such a grill is permanently mounted, plumbed to the structure's natural gas supply, and set at least six (6) feet at all points from all combustibles and all portions of all such residential units. Section 10: KEY BOX AND MYLARS: Part A: When access to or within a multi -housing building of three (3) or more units or other multi -housing, commercial or industrial structure or an area is unduly difficult because of secured openings or where immediate access is necessary for lifesaving or fire -fighting purposes, the Chief of the Fire Department may require a key box to be installed in an accessible location. The key box shall be a type approved by the Chief of the Fire Department and shall contain keys to gain necessary access as required by the Chief of the Fire Department. Part B: No owner of any building hereafter erected or remodeled shall use, maintain or keep the same for commercial, industrial or multi -housing (other than two -unit dwellings) purposes unless there is on file in the office of the City Clerk an 8'/2" x 11" reproducible mylar "as -built" print of each floor of the building. The City Clerk shall not issue a certificate of occupancy for any new or remodeled commercial, industrial or multi - housing building (other than two -unit dwellings) unless such mylars shall be on file. Section 11: PENALTIES: Part A: Any person who shall violate any of the provisions of said Code or Standards hereby adopted or fail to comply therewith, or who shall violate or fail to comply with any order made thereunder, or who shall build in violation of any detailed statement or specifications or plans submitted and -3- City of Albertville Ordinance 2000-12 approved from which no appeal has been taken, or who shall fail to comply with such an order as affirmed or modified by the City Council or by a court of competent jurisdiction, within the time fixed herein, shall severally for each and every such violation and non-compliance respectively by guilty of a misdemeanor. Part B: The imposition of one penalty for any violation shall not excuse the violation or permit it to continue; and all such persons shall be required to correct or remedy such violations or defects within a reasonable time; and when not otherwise specified, each ten (10) days that prohibited conditions are maintained shall constitute a separate offense. Part C: The application of the above penalties shall not be held to prevent the enforced removal of prohibited conditions. Section 12: EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 5th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2000. John A. Olson, Mayor Linda Goeb, Administrator -Clerk CITY OF ALBERTVILLE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and City Council FROM: Tim Guimont, Public Works Supervisor DATE: September 1, 2000 SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS REPORT Fire Hall: • We will be seeding the Fire Hall area in September 2000. Loader: • The loader should be here sometime in December 2000. Parks: • During the weekend of August 26`h someone(s) drove a vehicle into Oakside Park and tore up the baseball infield and some of the outfield. We will be reseeding parts of Oakside Park in September 2000. Wastewater Treatment Plant: • I attended a school in Grand Rapids August 29`h and 30`h. I hope to complete the necessary courses to obtain my Class D Operators License. TG:bmm a NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CC INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MAF PLANNING REPORT TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council Albertville Planning Commission FROM: Cynthia Putz-Yang / Deb Garross DATE: August 25, 2000 RE: Albertville - Cedar Creek South Sixth Addition Final Stage PUD / Final Plat FILE NO: 163.06 - 00.27 BACKGROUND Pilot Land Development Company has submitted final stage PUD/final plat plans for Cedar Creek South Sixth Addition. The plat includes 20 detached townhome lots on 5 acres and a 1.1 acre triangular parcel that is part of Cedar Creek Golf Course. The plan differs from the development stage plan in the number and type of units proposed and parking arrangement. The PUD development stage plan included 22 attached townhome units in groups of 2 units each with a 15-stall angle parking area within the central court of the development. The 2 units that have been deleted from the 6th Addition are proposed to be moved to the future townhome plat to the east (Cedar Creek South 7th Addition). The proposed plan includes 2 fewer units in a detached townhome style, removal of the 15 stall, central angle parking areas to be replaced with a 6 stall parking area and 12 proposed parallel parking spaces along the 22-foot wide private road. The property is zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD). Attached for Reference: Exhibit A - Site Location Exhibit B - Draft City Council Findings of Fact and Decision Exhibit C - Cedar Creek South (CCS) Development Stage Plan Exhibit D - Revised Plan for CCS Sixth Addition Exhibit E - CCS 61h Ad. Utility Plan Exhibit F - CCS 6th Ad. Grading Plan Exhibit G - CCS 6th Ad. Final Plat Exhibit H - Building Elevations Exhibit I - Building Floor Plans 5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 5541 6 PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC�%a WINTERNET.COM RECOMMENDATION Based on the review of submitted plans and established Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements, our office recommends approval of the Cedar Creek South Sixth Addition Final Plat subject to the following conditions: 1. All grading, drainage, and utility issues are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 2. Parking and internal road circulation (with proposed parallel parking on the 22-foot wide private street) are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Fire Department. 3. The 27-foot-wide strip of land along CSAH 18, (proposed Outlot A), northwest of the proposed detached townhomes, must be dedicated as right-of-way, rather than platted as an outlot. 4. The applicant shall obtain all required driveway, utility and other permits required by the City Engineer and/or Wright County. 5. The private street shall be named Jason Court. 6. A street lighting plan is submitted specifying the style, height, strength/wattage and distribution of lights proposed within the development. Said lighting plan and the location of lights shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. City Council approval to allow PUD flexibility for building separation to be reduced from 17.5' to 12 feet to accommodate the detached townhome units. 8. A full size landscape plan (and 11 x 17" exhibit to attach to the development agreement), is submitted showing planting locations, species, planting instructions and addressing the following conditions: a. Proposed screening along CSAH 18. b. Foundation plantings conforming to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. c. The front and side yards (and/or any other yard which abuts a public street) of all lots shall be sodded. Rear yards that do not abut a public street may be seeded and mulched. d. A minimum of one shade tree or evergreen tree, conforming to the minimum 2 Cedar Creek So. 6th Addn. Final PUD/Final Plat C.C. Report size and species requirements of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance shall be planted prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for each lot within the final plat. e. A cost estimate for plant materials and installation of screening shall be provided for the purposes of calculating the required escrow. f. An escrow for the landscape/screening materials in the amount equal to 150% of the estimated cost for said materials, is provided to assure installation and survivability of all required plantings. (All new plants shall be guaranteed for two full years from the time the planting has been completed). 9. The common area within the project must be platted as an outlot rather than Lot 21, Block 2. 10. The developer shall establish a homeowners' association via a recorded covenant for this development. The association shall provide for maintenance of all common areas (including the area of the platted lots that are not covered with structures), and the exterior of all town home structures. Said association agreements/covenants shall be in a form and content acceptable to the City Attorney. 11.If a subdivision identification sign is desired by the developer to identify the Albert Villas development, a sign plan is submitted for review and approval of the City Planner. Deed restrictions or other appropriate documentation shall be provided to identify that the private homeowners association shall be responsible for the maintenance of the grounds as well as the subdivision sign in perpetuity. Said documents shall also provide a clause allowing the City to remove the sign in the event that it is not maintained. The written documentation shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney and filed with Wright County. 12. The City Council reserves the right to allocate wastewater treatment plant capacity in a manner it believes to be in the public's best interest. 13.A current title opinion or commitment of title insurance shall be submitted acceptable to the City Attorney. 14. The developer shall provide financial security for all applicable site improvements, acceptable to the City Engineer and City Attorney. 15. A developer's agreement is prepared by the City Attorney and signed by the applicant. 16. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible copy of the recorded final 3 Cedar Creek So. 6th Addn. Final PUD/Final Plat C.C. Report plat, either chronoflex or its equivalent, and two prints prior to issuance of building permits for the lots. 17. The final plat, developer's agreement and all pertinent documents must be filed with Wright County within 120 days from the date of City Council approval of the final plat. Failure to record the documents by January 3, 2001 will render the final plat null and void. 18. Park dedication fees in the amount of $15,879.00 dollars shall be paid as set forth in the PUD Development Agreement. 19. All fees associated with this project shall be paid prior to the release of the final plat mylars to the applicant. 20. Any other conditions as set forth by the City Council, City staff, City Consultants or other agency responsible for review of this application. ISSUES AND ANALYSIS Conformance with Development Stage Plan. The proposed final stage plan for Cedar Creek South Sixth Addition contains a similar lot configuration and street layout as is shown in the development stage plan. However, the unit type has changed from 2-unit townhomes to detached, single -unit townhomes. The number of units has been reduced from 22 units to 20 units in the final stage plan. Parking has been revised from 15 angled stalls to six 90-degree stalls and 12 parallel parking stalls on the private road. Lot Size and Density. The lots are all approximately 4,100 square feet in size. The minimum lot area per unit for townhomes is 5,000 square feet based on the total acreage of the parcel. The proposed project exceeds this minimum with 10,890 square feet of lot area per unit. The parcel is 5 acres in size and contains 20 units; therefore, the density is 4 units per acre. Building Setbacks. The buildings are set back a minimum of 35 feet from the front property line along CSAH 18, 22 feet from the internal private street, and 20 feet from other parcel boundary lines. The proposed plan is consistent with the setback requirements. Building Separation. Buildings within the development are separated by at least 12 feet. Zoning Ordinance Section 2700.2(n) states that no building within the project shall be nearer to another building less than one-half the sum of the building heights of the two buildings. Given the proposed building, the building should be separated at least 17.5 feet. Flexibility from this standard has been proposed to allow a minimum building 4 Cedar Creek So. 6th Addn. Final PUD/Final Plat C.C. Report separation of twelve feet. Streets and Parking. The street configuration is the same that shown in the Development Stage Plan; however, the parking has been revised from 15 angled stalls to six 90-degree stalls and 12 parallel parking stalls. The City Engineer should comment on the acceptability of this arrangement. Parallel parking on a 22-foot-wide, curving street may be difficult. Outlots and Right -of- Way. The common area within the project must be platted as an outlot rather than Lot 21, Block 2. The 27-foot-wide strip of land along CSAH 18, northwest of the proposed detached townhomes, must be dedicated as right-of-way, rather than platted as an outlot. Grading, Drainage and Utilities. The grading, drainage and utility plans are attached as Exhibits E and F. The plans are subject to City Engineer review and approval. High Water Elevation. No structure shall be place at an elevation such that the lowest floor, including the basement floor, is less than two feet above the highest known surface water level or ordinary high water level or less than one foot above the 100-year flood level of any adjacent water body or wetland. If sufficient data on high water levels in not available, the elevation of the line of permanent aquatic vegetation shall be used as the estimated high water elevation. When fill is required to meet this elevation, the fill shall be allowed to stabilize and construction shall not begin until the property has been inspected by the Building Inspector. Park and Trail Dedication. The park dedication is subject to the formula established in the PUD Development Agreement. Park dedication shall be satisfied via the payment of cash to the City on a per -unit basis representing 52.93% of the residential units in the development, at the per -unit requirement in effect at the time each Phase receives final plan approval. The park dedication fee for Cedar Creek South 6th Addition is $15,879 which is calculated as follows: 52.93% of 20 units = 10.586 units * $1,500 per unit = $15,879.00 dollars park dedication requirement. Required Landscaping. Developers of all new residential subdivisions are required to provide one tree per single family lot. The tree may be evergreen (minimum three feet high) or deciduous (minimum two inch diameter trunk). Plantings shall not be located closer than three feet from the property line. All lots must be sodded or seeded/mulched within 30 days of building occupancy. Front and side yards as well as any other yard abutting a public street must be sodded. Rear yards, not abutting a public street, may be seeded and mulched. In cases where seeding/sodding has not been done within 30 days of occupancy, the developer shall be required to provide an escrow deposit equal to one and one-half times the estimated cost of the ground cover which shall be returned to the developer upon completion of the work. If the weather or 5 Cedar Creek So. 6th Addn. Final PUD/Final Plat C.C. Report other uncontrollable factors prevent the sodding or seeding of bare ground within 14 days of final grading, the area shall be covered with straw or other temporary material to control erosion. Development Contract. The applicant must enter into a development agreement as a condition of approval. CONCLUSION Analysis of the Cedar Creek South Sixth Addition final stage plans has shown that it is generally in conformance with the development stage plans with the exceptions of revision to building type and parking. If the Planning Commission and City Council find the proposed detached townhomes to be an appropriate building type, we recommend approval of the Cedar Creek South Sixth Addition Final Plats subject to the conditions outlined in the recommendation section of this report. pc: Linda Goeb, Mike Couri, Peter Carlson, Wayne Stark, Kevin Mealhouse, Chad Cichos, Denise Johnson, Joint Powers Water Board, Wayne Fingleson and Don Jensen 6 Cedar Creek So. 6th Addn. Final PUD/Final Plat C.C. Report EXHIBIT A CITY OF ALBERTVILLE 8-25-00 City Council Findings of Fact & Decision -Final Plan PUD -Final Plat Applicant's Name: Pilot Land Development - Cedar Creek South Sixth Addition Final Plat/Final Stage PUD Plan (part of Cedar Creek Golf Course Planned Unit Development) Request: Pilot Land Development has submitted Final plat) for Cedar Creek South Sixth Addition. townhome lots on 5 acres and a 1.1 acre Cedar Creek Golf Course. City Council Meeting Date: 5 September 2000. Plan PUD plans and the (final The plat includes 20 detached triangular parcel that is part of Findings of Fact: Based on review of the application and evidence received, the City Council now makes the following findings of fact and decision: A. The legal descriptions of the subject properties are as follows: Outlot B, Cedar Creek and That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 2, Township 120, Range 24, Wright County Minnesota, lying northeasterly of the centerline of C.S.A.H. No. 18 (formerly known as County Road No. 18). B. The NAC Planning Report dated 25 August 2000 is incorporated herein. C. The requirements of Section 2700 (Planned Unit Development) of the City Zoning Ordinance have been met. D. The final plat and Final Stage PUD Plans are in substantial compliance with the Development Stage PUD and preliminary plat. Decision: Based on the foregoing considerations and applicable ordinances, the applicant's request for approval of Cedar Creek South Sixth Addition Final Plat and Final Stage PUD has been approved based on the most current plans and information received to date, subject to the following conditions: Cedar Creek South 6th Addition Final PUD/Final Plat 1 City Council Findings of Fact EXHIBIT B 1. All grading, drainage, and utility issues are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. 2. Parking and internal road circulation (with proposed parallel parking on the 22-foot wide private street) are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and Fire Department. 3. The 27-foot-wide strip of land along CSAH 18, (proposed Outlot A), northwest of the proposed detached townhomes, must be dedicated as right-of-way, rather than platted as an outlot. 4. The applicant shall obtain all required driveway, utility and other permits required by the City Engineer and/or Wright County. 5. The private street shall be named Jason Court. 6. A street lighting plan is submitted specifying the style, height, strength/wattage and distribution of lights proposed within the development. Said lighting plan and the location of lights shall be subject to review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. City Council approval to allow PUD flexibility for building separation to be reduced from 17.5' to 12 feet to accommodate the detached townhome units. 8. A full size landscape plan (and 11 x 17" exhibit to attach to the development agreement), is submitted showing planting locations, species, planting instructions and addressing the following conditions: a. Proposed screening along CSAH 18. b. Foundation plantings conforming to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. c. The front and side yards (and/or any other yard which abuts a public street) of all lots shall be sodded. Rear yards that do not abut a public street may be seeded and mulched. d. A minimum of one shade tree or evergreen tree, conforming to the minimum size and species requirements of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance shall be planted prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for each lot within the final plat. e. A cost estimate for plant materials and installation of screening shall be provided for the purposes of calculating the required escrow. Cedar Creek South 6th Addition Final PUD/Final Plat 2 City Council Findings of Fact An escrow for the landscape/screening materials in the amount equal to 150% of the estimated cost for said materials, is provided to assure installation and survivability of all required plantings. (All new plants shall be guaranteed for two full years from the time the planting has been completed). 9. The common area within the project must be platted as an outlot rather than Lot 21, Block 2. 10. The developer shall establish a homeowners' association via a recorded covenant for this development. The association shall provide for maintenance of all common areas (including the area of the platted lots that are not covered with structures), and the exterior of all town home structures. Said association agreements/covenants shall be in a form and content acceptable to the City Attorney. 11.If a subdivision identification sign is desired by the developer to identify the Albert Villas development, a sign plan is submitted for review and approval of the City Planner. Deed restrictions or other appropriate documentation shall be provided to identify that the private homeowners association shall be responsible for the maintenance of the grounds as well as the subdivision sign in perpetuity. Said documents shall also provide a clause allowing the City to remove the sign in the event that it is not maintained. The written documentation shall be subject to review and approval of the City Attorney and filed with Wright County. 12. The City Council reserves the right to allocate wastewater treatment plant capacity in a manner it believes to be in the public's best interest. 13. A current title opinion or commitment of title insurance shall be submitted acceptable to the City Attorney. 14. The developer shall provide financial security for all applicable site improvements, acceptable to the City Engineer and City Attorney. 15. A developer's agreement is prepared by the City Attorney and signed by the applicant. 16. The developer shall provide the City with a reproducible copy of the recorded final plat, either chronoflex or its equivalent, and two prints prior to issuance of building permits for the lots. 17. The final plat, developer's agreement and all pertinent documents must be filed with Wright County within 120 days from the date of City Council approval of the final plat. Failure to record the documents by January 3, 2001 will render the final plat null and void. Cedar Creek South 6th Addition Final PUD/Final Plat 3 City Council Findings of Fact 18. Park dedication fees in the amount of $15,879.00 dollars shall be paid as set forth in the PUD Development Agreement. 19. All fees associated with this project shall be paid prior to the release of the final plat mylars to the applicant. 20. Any other conditions as set forth by the City Council, City staff, City Consultants or other agency responsible for review of this application. Adopted by the Albertville City Council this 5th day of September 2000. Attest: City of Albertville Linda Goeb, City Administrator John A. Olson, Mayor PC: Linda Goeb, Mike Couri, Peter Carlson, Wayne Stark, Kevin Mealhouse, Chad Cichos, Denise Johnson, Joint Powers Water Board, Wayne Fingleson and Don Jensen Cedar Creek South 6th Addition Final PUD/Final Plat 4 City Council Findings of Fact A h 111F *# # fi R 4 4A# fi1F,F fi1F1k 41F#IF l I F4500'-OJN 00 S.T .4155 rtWl., .701 � hN4h4hN44h4hhNNhhhNh4NNN4h4NM44hNNh-.-. yy y yyyyyy W..t k» a U. e 1 w te. i` '� i�k4Y ��Y�V1�Y(.�iN�Qi1i�V;.�4M+0YUV04a4N.N�. W 1/4 0/ S-V— 1 T. 11q N.24. bgqry�ry yYyY ��}'}�jj `�'yayaZ' yeyeyY [�[���(( yYYy�' 88QaQaYggYyyyy�A�n'�niiRyyg'A�Psgy'qy���yp�� / _. It 46V6�oRtiIRRi6V�04Rh.C3N.6iG _ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa## / i'-•tt .' �.� �� 3SL last ........I. a a a a a a a aa...... h4444Mf.4N4 a N�..a 44vvb�00.V.4a4N•+Yw4N+ � � / ` �/ If ffhINIH14li1111 HUiHill iIii R � 4 gq�....VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV / / .`"'q �''; t i {H�y r c crCrc•CCrrrt rrrrCrrrCrr r _.-, ;�' r-�� ::,.._� � t. A ► 4 ♦ .7g yy $11�71�llllll1l11717y11[7111i71717C71%11111C117t11�X /./.. (...� - J ! j ' � ! , � C1�F R�9�iiNi�$�iE'i�iv6��V`u'a1.4i..'iO.OV.4a4 ;•� i/ �% J +� 36 $1 k t3 r1.1dM- rwEr/zwn. ,� 1/4 w S.m� S TIM.z1� u ~ N ' Y a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa SO. --W. y T. 24 R24. / I fill f I ICI ICI I I t V o ilE4 ♦ 4 4 !S !SV 3 I ccoiF \ !■�BAR I 2 // / %� l 7• t.♦1 / /� i ` �` 1 ,'i b t, wi4� "P Jig It'. I4 ��•' �• xy G � + i s l ,• J/I !,� 1 I I �,� 1 j �� I: �, i.,, 1..: l y � �A� l 40 J FF tt f a.. sw 1/�AAw s. rbn z / � � �) �'.,1 �\ \ ., y Y _ r • � -.� _ • �y�io // • I �.�� ,:-.-'-A' `,i -�) +''t, ... Y � tom- 7. ,� Aayy�•�_ t s±��� _ may- ' f:. , 1 � J i � t�i _ y1 i�. 4 -• e- l I i! +N i Y _ k Y / ;ftSW 114 p' r,. a U. Nw 1g •_], r�`,J�l ,• t ; _ .._ _✓ o^may ' b t '— I /.. ` �.\� Sxtkn T T. 120, R24. 1A / all mo �WL ,fit a SC m z m U 8 �;1 CENlFAL.WE 6 � �gI,NE I �) o —`=' ;I r^; .O I -.a � r,•, Dct .Y / . ----------------- r \ vw \ IC • ..! Ada I } r- J mtz PO ND ?2' ti Jim 10.67 in. 21.67 I60 i Iq 4 4 .n M p N O —_ 10 a (y� 12.57 757 12.00 ` Iry a la 89.JJ I 10J � 'd R S Xo v �t — O V D,TE oa�os�oo REVISIONS I h"by certify that lhie p-, rpecificolion, a mpod .a, prepared 6y Ine or u� y oiwl :apenision and that I om a duly Rep..—d Profess — Engineer under the I." of the Slate of Minn —to. DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN FOR " CEDAR CREEK SOUTH SIXTH ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA V < rn O Zj � m = m �° T Z is Z z ~ Q n cn .-I v cCn � � y CD O Z m 1v {a DI?AWN BY AAN DESIGNED BY JKW RECORD PLANS [A1TE: aoox PACE: _ PREPARED BY: MMOMBIS -Ai n Lsu VEOO INC. " � "� 1111 NKY• 25N., Bultolo, UN 553I3 Ph. (612) 682-1781 Far (612) 682-9492 CHECKED BY JKW HORIZONTAL SCALE 1 inch - � feet VERTICAL SCALE I inch - NIA feet 0 m m y Wm �A n' 11 r 20 o o DATE 08�09�00 RE14SIONS I h"by cmlity that this PA-, spdvhwtW. a report "s Prvond 6y me or undo my di—1 supmris;on a. d that I a o duly Rsyitt.W Prates 91 En9lneo undo the Mrs of the State of lhhnesoto. CEDAR CREEK SOUTH SIXTH ADDI'`fION ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA a 'S L4 v r ° oCD �' � Z < r A Ln Z 0 r O i' z z O -i 0 C4 iTl ry o m DRAWN BY ," tbfe Ra9.No DESIGNED BY JKw RECORD PUNS (34TE: BOOK PAGE: _ PREPMEO BY. MEYER-ROHLIN, INC. ENGWEERS - LAND SLHVEYORS fill Hry. 25N., ButIola, MN 55313 Ph. (612) 682-1781 Fox (612) 682-9492 CHECKED BY JKW HORIZONTAL SCREE I inch - 5_ teet VERTICAL. SCALE 1 inch - NIA feel UTILITY PLAN i o i �g � gz g 0 a o000 o00 J / i / y a— O - - V O 0 Oho r � -n mtJB��9�0� M1 a4Tf REVISIONS l Mreby cerfi/y that fh pbn, �psc:fncaf:on, or -port "°' �Am O that ! "`�°"° � R. " "W ' °"'V f-qi - °� o ReyirfaW Ro/ssriond £nyinear v�Mer the CEDAR CREEK SOUTH '' 'Z` f� �1 DRAWN s he brs of fM Sfote o/ L:nnawta. T � V b BY AAN ... i'' C4 ZZ Q Dole R� SIXTH ADDITION o tar.. O O o DESIGNED BY JKW RECORD PLANS DATE. PREPARED BY.. ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA R7 Z o o m r Q ..-� eooK PAGE, _ MEYER-ROHLIN, INC. CHECKED BY JKW HORIZONTAL SCALEFv inch.4L� 7 inch . _�5� teal inch r N laet ems - urn st mN 55s Ih. 12) 82- 8u11a1o, IfN (612) Ph. {617) 661-17B1 Tot 611) 681-9491 GRADING PLAN k. " iTl _ _ At .To.Of,.Z S S 6'S341--BS'BIT-- ---188.05 � - - 46.p0 5 j5562 a 56 E515'56261E 0 5'56 1�6 2` vy O 1, 5 g6p0 w rn �.o N 3 I\ 9M1. '•>}, �\ 9r 12�F 01 3q `ti0�,y j,�A 5y552 }9 .-, �� �00 N}2 M12� sP �, �'�q �•z�a 15'56 26 W°�'ifi N µ 46 ho 15'p6�Q r5.56, W sn h 791\ 4q �'• ,J oNysy6 tom,.+?y} •p.y m' �a' . w m. N 4600 < / II it ,A9' g706.,. �. , ti �S S 'am z`\ \rye 9 'am A6 e523993 f� •r4`g \ 7 ,.'m 'J"`s AgAOq,•y'/ ``` \ •�• '1'� / $ ti N yyg93} j •},`rfry \ F 7 ,J `� �A g�i s rt / 0,Li C - .� \ a 5 6y. •11 s ; o ; \! r,r ` a 5 �q0o. J y'sd, A �'GC �Ayg?gq�y3 j`,1, 10 o9aJ, 3ry 3 \ \ IN 6 ,g •o �,T G y' Li s 56_ °ra a� ��,, _ `y �A • o A5 0q ye / // v0 `o/ c� ti j �YJ / �-ae•tiBe-- 15'bo£ •olosa.MIN ',()—j 146uM I`-------- •OZ11 •Z /o b/1 MS ��� 441 /e b/1 MN aV! /o awry 1so3 < I\ / � o o �I A5 ti 6 f�. \ m I y Aq0 0� S6 Lv `. � J � Poo AS / 0-1,Cv zta c- � 'iJ✓ 1` �1 � W O r C U z y wok o • CI o o� � � � k (12R� )/}2 o / ` o \/\/ \ { rg u ® » ; )7# / / \ US / / / § \ / / U }\ ] } / / / \ / / / }2 / \ \ g £ 2 < < ®/ R !#§/§/ g R \ / 2 / d g of©/» )\) } \ G \ \ / < / \ \ \ \ \ / \ / \ \ \ /u-/vor //\U/\/ m 3 \ % / / j q a § \ } B A / � � <1 # t,l 1 m [ 0 (Y |I| y m \ \ \ \e k \( \\ ; ■ \� - IL , m @ \ $ Q z (p n i■ q § m o ^ � t � � � O_ ii■ ote� )��� - m \A° & m •- )? §\} / ( ±\W§ ! 03 \ \Q6o °n70G ) \6 m 70 ° E 0 8' 12' 8'-m' y-m• M.O. 9648 11DR- (2) 2x 105 _ r--------------------------------- - 1 — I y I I N to z 4l x 1 5'-0• SLIDER 1, I1DR- (2) 2x 105 - -_1 F Z 1 I n I I I 1 I i i ,4-- 1 N N L W— n N 1 I •_ I I ... ......... f O II 1 I 1 1 \ I 1 1 I I 1 \ I I 1 1 I 1 \ I I I I I T I 1 I\ Z Q N I I I N I I 1\ I ILE D fl �' I 1 \ I I I I I TUBi5110WEK o I _ 12'-8' 5'_4' 4'-0' M.O. t I I M \ I 0 iO I 0 Ip \I I r o� mD000� _ 7p t�1 I • 1 � � � r � C = x rn I I � \ 1 \\ r ir 0 6; N � I 1 U \ � \ n \ \I I \ 1 I I \ 1 I I I 1 ,ri x 1 I \ I 1 0@ 1\ I z I I I \ I \ ----------------------------' 1 O C z I Z: 0�� ------------------------------, I I JC z \ 1 n D 1\ I 0 -� I I z i\' z x O� QCP x A p \ I C) \ I Z @ 101-31 NO 1 1 1 I \ I 1 I I I \ I n N A 1 I I 0 0 Cl 1\ 1 Z 1 01 1 1 n x Q I\ 1 \ L -- \ I 1 \ 1 22'-0' n s , n +1 I v,- �m 11100WUF(1AVE ++ mE 1(n + + c O � lU ! I u G Sn Y -_ U W O v _ ll ' N _CP =00Z�(yD �1nr 11sIII nb-DCAf- 3(1 ++ OAO,-1-!"_'(POr-1rI-1 bA AO Zn-Gl yOr Ain -- llOml)�( UG�OE 'm r z O y W S AO+-. O- Eu1(P(nrm n nuc Ci + �n01iN� z(pm (jZOF'�(�ppcA]FMA)f(1n00 +WmWtnWO► ZZ�'OC��ip- �OU�E ZalnlOOmp t AA Y b AA00�!� tit 11 O r z 1ZR m , Uvm7(, r Oi 7CmO m(( LY r r ZCl 0 m1 rt1mt�AmAYObZOmm (P AO O- mmp +'-O_ p p U 1 -+1n mr �O O Sum-EG�Z n- ml_1_EY 3 (ltntn U 1 b z S x00. 3mn < 1 AAZOZrrtnmYLmYW(U 1n(nYL < ,c-UAL 11a07c'-ctP 7b ,-IOrUmO pTE-+ ' Xlg i ,A�r tDm<U-4U-,A C) (l ^ �0, U Up O c lPtnN.- n, (P Emro x S.. (, rx r0"' E}p A-, t nn aq m m- \/ m m rn b ( U-0 -Z_ rtl -m.=m ,' - 100 Z UZAU 00 O n1 aA 1n A_ 00 �_1 nl- -(P 6mE W OG U- , b0 mtP!-017i 0�0- nt O(li- UU(' , to rtt , Cl An UrU U -1 0 (10AtZ�r. U-+nt 0(p, �� EY Ur_ Ann Z_ t7Y2 r-Z_ Z -n r , r , pZOm• ,n +- T-Ir O�i m + Y1 bAYU O L n m c A III 'i �A' DEroX 00OrtnLOW_+ ON_IOniOW1°ntrtt(T)� - LY(i(U r Inc =�� tnm U Y (� A(niAi-N E OA _ (P UU =0- r_ (P z-- Z--Z' mZ0 r + (P0 (v_O in -0 AZN fV(1- rn0 A(� t� O ()r(P m0EA r-t_r OUI S- U(PUDbm UQ 7 cQ + O , A A .,.(v A m ( + 71 bN b-1 EZ UO t> XOZZm Y Z- E Wrm{lr NmC1�W +Zmci ({ t� b X E _O ( 0� OAI 0 U_ 1 00 O31(MAImIDAOU.. -,N O U OZ- 1- �An,.,WOE U�o- tP iE0 O (7mm007c h Atn Tt 0 t r f u1 0 , OmA IAnt t11-t n urm rtl �s T- U TW OiWOi A O b _� Zr rf SU' Y _ !n - m Y +.TA l7 to (Ap +_.- -1 (Pm�U CActo Z U P n II c in blU ! U nt < (P-10 (7WT OA YcA- nIUUYNrWzWmY AA U J(U �Am rF_ in 01 mZ bNm-4L U LUm A,. YO �' UrSSS • Ar O U -1 1S in Al c (PY-1tPPA ( OcA L I (P�)C1 AO r m- ln(P ZYmpZ III In' c0 Y O Al I- p U Y rUU AU W m,l m Y-1 Alin % AO AC)� , iACJE 1>- �Tm ,(l m 'I - Z m E nAm0CJ A AA , WZ�m m bJ YO f 0 i(P-_ c� to < Om Yr r0 A m Z L b bU b , D U Z= Anm Uii 6S A )O III IN L U (JL�O►'- <11A-100In(P U (n O An 0 rYmn 0 0 ?'-,1nc-10 1>- CJ' c0 , Z Lbm-.r ,` ZZ pYOZ USA (P A r b I�IU AZI00 1 0_ 0!n A. m Y 3 W 0 1,0 Zn �F- in l7 CwpA LI(P p r r.,7n 0 r Or(P� 1'q y 1-UZc n011 10n0 nA f A30 �� 1N L-+nN�tn+M 11 (Oj m T i r c < G� �_hi WZ mp O ? O i(Pl - tri'L YO(t -�A OZ OL c O Z U 0. 19 O Al _ i- �O 1 0,11 IV c ElY A A In L Oi W SDI (7 S m G� nl 0 O. Nr W +ZApt CI O t> m DZ U Om NU Ze(P UO 3 (nS Y r. c vtnA b<t7 (1 O� 0 O m n1 1 Al(nA rG� W U A m O-mA- Zw O O S r. AY O I� 0 m W O ► 1i12 c +A 'n U N W0 jYYr (P b A O m 00z , 1I>* CI mUm UmUcu(" �O Zi-u �Z 3 Zn(p (PA (ny m ZX(Pm Z + U_ m A ]c 0 Am Z Gr O , cA Z-n m �> Y N Y O-(-( Z01 XS r (-' tnS n Eh 0 ( 1 Z O SA +in rA 0in =0 �, rZ011 A fm OAO c 10m 3zTt� �n0 Y Up Z 7 OYyiA W +_ Z WO r' 1--+ I>0 -1 r_iOZA UO U(PAAS i O�U c_<6m AO ZOZ Zci (z ( m T D Z Dm < 0 Z 10 A rql X G',nt O cA0 Ern Z—Y 3cit1(- c00 C1mZU " GAL Z 0 Z dt m 0 W mU rCla'�c Z-+Y _ ,% c 1nZ- Y tnSU Pt0 0 it(7WA Z G < (d0.Wm < w Y. *1q ==A(n -+ E + NS 1_ S-Im A O mm(s A rn O(n Cl YO m AlA !n m mz: 0 1 Yr m c r °' Im Y cn� Z m Y ! A m0 r U' UU= In AO l7 m x mOw r0.-+L r• b(n,= A" (v =U m I. .. 0-1 1) tl 71 to m, Z Y U, O. to c Z O I-(P0 n 0 W { Y 03(n A " AA i A t> n U © tit �O Z U U a„_+_ oO Az 1 cb m ,((PP mb <�` I- 1'Z!Pi;im In In,Y Otn Y + Z m r O 1� 1n Zm AUm CI X O (U 6q, 1 t>r- 11L _+ III -+ < O Y 1 A O 1z Z -I CI m nt = m In - {- 0 T .-' A W -+ t .. U -( at U O A ( N n (i m -1 < m 1pU-AmTt'mpmAA00A �mppKnml�AmA�UDyi0pm IOIn � T OCT in— lDze�� i orT aA(;A Dg A puo- O Z mr1 NN-EOU 00Omzzmll FYI N �IZwmDAAUJUp nl>DOphj U z I D1z Ap O j LO,ryr�Zmw pnmU minAA��jzmApaNU (DOZO0V (iP ni Z 1 000°'tPU NOA r-IUApN OIn ,'[Min O p Z Lz 0 t Z zOr y �A < m in O f pppz�11 U ,�,(z j v(Z1PP1 A A�mN6_ l (P <�z fo(Yon 1> A lD 1 L 1 I I t I I 1 1 1 1 i 1 -1 1,@(P3 N A A pr n-+ EI,INN DAOOI> PW A�OU c_ uA111O znp�Amzzb�?Ur"UmOmn arnz3r!�G�rzl( n I IE r. or oAA1, y ElYADmU1nZOUO pmxmZlzm �mZU(po 1>mII Z ZU hwwOE u-1 0inIn 1 A.,Ditpr1Z"O M_ N P,tppL ID 2m3 A(rP Zym0ZN 0 oO- - pUp mmpE Z ZDmDatm� ��zzW .DppCu � Op D0OM''AW ZN' 1E 10(D S1> Ozp cm A AOsZXNm -. Z X3Nr1 O ovo :' � 10m rm m D 1 pZiU 3y<m 3 �Em�Wp m r!ti[I E �Z-Di N� (_ c AU N z c� r u O. pO.eNi T in (I r��1U z ZZ ccpp AUmpU X O�w -pm int11 . = 1> z U -1 -1 U in zYDin)a (plTAj30imti0A0 c+DAp�mA��mOm(1 mtD1OlD m�(pmuln�NXIM]Im 111110 Nm DmEU-(IUL� -z_ AiZ(P X0-1mm0Nrc-D m0(p_,O(1()Dz�,IrI111NpU� �tliipmooDOpEt� Ain OU UUmZ�m A�,o. �pyA�z(APA ND-INDA -( OA;u 1 z impUAp- WzZmymU- 1-Imc 10 m U' c0-IZ rlou. CI nA 3 AAO c0 Z U NU ZED Up 3 ONiA o° °zF= zz z�"(AP(n A , A in ;� y z 0 D@U o Al tou I ��0�� _(D �m < W D in Z_ m0 me in Oin zp In np c X@1"tD111 u'1LAIII U� 1 mnOo(z_Pz(�yppm2-. XOOAQin O ,mn AAA i �A� O A �(PA Uaum 01AjV :,i1 1 YONX OOOr p Xm((P mAOL-�( 0'Nm E U (P O D Fn rE3 t2< ul An � MA EU t- oin Z l�pp N n O r (P pin r O Zi0D,1M O A in01Tup mN U E-1r Z Z0 3 zj Z ym m in Om O Z1O1,, Z 1 in70 �t A m A A In F in Iq m V U U to N n n 3 l> to y Z A •� i � Z U „ Q D _ ^ � N Ip T_w1C i m F_Imo nit O I' z L N N = w X i d'_OJ• August 29, 2000 City of Albertville 5975 Main Ave North Albertville, MN 55301 Dear City Staff, Planners, Commission and Council, Enclosed is a copy of the Elevations and Signage for the proposed Burger King at Albertville Outlot D. The following signs are requested on this site: (See attached for copies and details) TYPE SIZE 1 ground sign 12 foot round sign 35 ft. high 108 sq.ft. 1 entrance sign 4 foot round & 4X8 readerboard 44 sq.ft 2 wall signs 5 foot round 38 sq.ft 2 awning signs Raceway 17ft long 2 ft high 60 sq.ft. Total Signage requested 250 sq.ft. The above signage meets the Burger King Specifications for their standard Image 99 building. If you have any questions please call me at 612-338-7581. Sincerely, Gregg Klohn DOLPHIN FAST FOOD, INC. 258 Hennepin Avenue • Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 • (612) 338-4220 A Franchise of Burger King Corporation Dopm Law Fes, Wilbur F. Dorn, Jr., Attorney at Law Jody L. Erickson, Certified Paralegal August 30, 2000 Ms. Linda Goeb, City Administrator City of Albertville Albertville, MN RE: Burger King Signage Dear Ms. Goeb: LTD. 9380 Central Avenue NE, Suite 200 Blaine, MN 55434 Office: (763) 783-7000 Fax: (763) 783-5715 In reviewing the Development Agreement between the City and the Albertville mall developer, it appears that the City used its PUD ordinance language in signage approval. This is also apparent from observing the actual signage in place at the mall. It appears that the City correctly and wisely reasoned that the mall signage should be evaluated on an individualized basis. I can therefore understand the need to amend the Development Agreement to now incorporate the signage for Outlot D. I have enclosed a draft of such an amendment, complete with exhibits and language depicting the signage proposed for the Burger King. I have submitted this draft to Mr. Michael Knowlton, the attorney for the developer, for his review. However, subject to final language approval by the attorney for the City and the attorney for the developer, I would ask that this matter now be considered by the Planning Commission. Sincerely, 4�ibur F. Dorn, Jr. AU6. 30.2000 12:57FM CULVER SHERIDAr+ !,0. 7,» 1 P. 1'7 CULVER SHERIDAN KNOWLTON EYEN & FRANKS A PIRCIFRSSIONAL. COMP01tATION ATTORNZY5 AT LAW 230 TERRACE PLAZA, T.O. BOX 629 MIICKJGON, MIGNIGAN 41AA3 FAx:231.72444330 PNom 231•724.4320 FRBD G. CULVtR, JR. JANES M. SMERIDAN MICNAEL M. KNOWLTON KLY114 A. EVEN EUGENE A. FRANKS August 30, 2000 VIA FACSIMILE (763-497-3210) Ms. Linda Goeb, City Administrator City of Albertville 5975 Main Avenue, N.E. Albertville, MN 55301 Dear Ms. Goeb: OAVID 6 WATYRSTRADT Joss►N S. BusK SCOTT M. KNOWLTON THOMAS H. ANBREWS, JR. OP 091usL._. On behalf of Albertville Factory Outlets, L.L,C., I request that the City consider an amendment to the Developer's Planned Unit Development Agreement dated May 4, 1999, as follows: Add the following subparagraph 3(1)(4): 4. Dolphin Real Estate Management, L.L.C., in conjunction with the development of a Burger King Restaurant on Oullot D, may erect the following sigaage, which is also graphically depicted on the hereto attached exhibit entitled "Burger King Signage", consisting of: a. Two mansard signs, one at the front elevation and one at the Drive-Tluu elevation, to be placed on the upper canopy facing. The location of the mansard signs on the building shall be as depicted on Sheet 1. The dimension of the Burger King circular logo shall be 2 feet, eight inches in diameter. The lettering "Burger King" shall be in letters 1 foot seven inches in height, and rsave a length of 15 feet two inches, with an eight inch space between the Burger King Logo and the "Burger King•• lettering, as depicted on Sheet 2. b. One entrance sign to be placed at the middle entrance to the Burger King site, consisting of a brick monument supporting a Readerboard of 32 square feet, topped by a circular two-sided Burger King Logo of 12 square feet per side, as depicted on Sheet 3. C. One pylon sign 35 feet in height, consisting of a two sided circular Burger King Logo having 108 square feet on each side, atop a monopole. Total sign height to be 35 feet, as depicted on Sheet 4. AUG."c0.?000 12:57PM aJLV=R SHERIDAN N0.741 P.2'7 GIs. Linda Goeb, City Administrator August 30, 2000 Page 2 d. Two circular wall signs of 19 square feet each, to be located on either side of a decorative wing wall on the opposite side of the drive -through side, as depicted on Sheet 1. Summly yours, I'k aal NC owhon M.kwrt Enclosures cc: Shane Bullough Michael, C. Couri Kw hon11001-11jeuralGoebOS3000 CULVER SHERIDAN KNOWLTON EVEN & FRANKS EXHIBIT: BURGER KING SIGNAGE I 3O FASCIA f' M GA GAL V. MTL eaPPER (TT}•) E1Q•pEED SLIIFACEb TO BE PNTD, NJMS SOLDEFED. DEAL ALL EDGES TRDp' lETOND METAL RhLA1 SG O FED PARAPET LkSW- CA/V. SEE T/A3 /7 FFIeO PARAPET Lr ff W. _ roP of LwNtmra � ELL. E'•S' TOP DF rleHeARD IeecP MTL eoEG - e EL T a Sa 'TT EM L __-FA9GW O FOR TWOaM D EFIS CONTRACTOR To MATCH FASCIA LK EXrEWOR uUB. TCP OF FWl%4 SLAG E4 O'-O• Tro LiGNib>ld! OL _ MMlEARD SKN �W OFASCIA AL o T/O SToREFRONf O ' �E µ•-3' — EFM 4 OCIA L , Tro TRASH ETICLOSIIffh IFL TRAS47 ENCLOSIff1E_.� . EL, Y-6' .'SEE PLAN 1 " - . .. DEIITAN.S' . OSCFFR L 8 j��'Sff�E LJGARAGE F�j E - -. DOOR V EL 3•-� Iul T7 � Tro SLAB FL d-0' CLEAR ANCDIMD 44 STL PIPE BOLIN+D BRENC METAL BT SEE CML CWfA FOR DETAILS I STOR@ICNT SIP'!'LMt PANT OSHA TEL.LOW / _ \ HAM el CveTlr J BIE1K PETAL BT STOWM4T SUPPLIER L-1 �_ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J �i� DRIVE THRU ELEVATION rI S I! `—• I P e V Z Zo rr w0 �0 m0 2�ss _ z cz w 3i TYIl mmQ A-2 RACEWAY SIGNS / AWNING SIGNS 2 BURGER KING RACEWAY SIGNS TOTAL 60 SQ. FT. rogros I 3 i ENTRANCE SIGN 4 FOOT ROUND SIGN 12 SQ. FT. 4 X 8 READERBOARD 32 SQ. FT. OVERALL HEIGHT OF SIGN 11 FEET BIN OF As %. so : as GROUND SIGN 12 FOOT ROUND SIGN 108 SQ. FT. OVERALL HEIGHT OF SIGN 35 FEET WALL SIGNS / BUILDING ENTRANCE SIGN -- REQUIRED BY BURGER KING 2 - 5 FOOT ROUND SIGNS TOTAL 38 SQ.FT. ------------------------------------------------------------------- S1� 1817E PLAN sta r . 2a-v Amendment to Developer's Planned Unit Development Agreement Outlets at Albertville dated May 4, 1999 The undersigned, as signatories to the above described instrument, hereby agree that the above described agreement shall be amended by adding thereto a sub -paragraph 3(I)(4), to read as follows: 4. Dolphin Real Estate Management, LLC., in conjunction with the development of a Burger King Restaurant on Outlot D, may erect the following signage, which is also graphically depicted on the hereto attached exhibit entitled "Burger King Signage", consisting of.- a. Two mansard signs, one at the front elevation and one at the Drive-Thru elevation, to be placed on the upper canopy facing. The location of the mansard signs on the building shall be as depicted on Sheet 1. The dimension of the Burger King circular logo shall be 2 feet, eight inches in diameter. The lettering "Burger King" shall be in letters I foot seven inches in height, and have a length of 15 feet two inches, with an eight inch space between the Burger King Logo and the "Burger King" lettering, as depicted on Sheet 2. b. One entrance sign to be placed at the middle entrance to the Burger King site, consisting of a brick monument supporting a Readerboard of 32 square feet, topped by a circular two-sided Burger King Logo of 12 square feet per side, as depicted on Sheet 3. c. One pylon sign 35 feet in height, consisting of a two sided circularl Burger King Logo having 108 square feet on each side, atop a monopole. Total sign height to be 35 feet, as depicted on Sheet 4. d. Two circular wall signs of 19 square feet each, to be located on either side of a decorative wing wall on the opposite side of the drive -through side, as depicted on Sheet 1. Executed this _ day of , 2000. City of Albertville Albertville Factory Outlets, LLC by: its: by: its: by: its: De/u/Do aDr pm Alb-,n.ady I I r D Z — ■u 50I3.011.00�® CD BURGER KING RESTAURANT BK 94 w/Playlancl YM�Juw M1 Ndr� —` Albertville, MN « WE PLAN AX el-= 01Md FAN 2�19iQ00 � �r ®nsn rw,r rtr tiut rscsr.Anow wraerat i+o mar i Au � w.rewnem rxarircr u� ns uw� of rc rrwre or va�wrw Wu 00000000000000000OooOOO®000000000000000000omeoz000mmoommooemomo O P °o�P�N�AwuN N�AAAAAAwA WWWWWWW WWWuuuu uuv uuu �d�F���R� Jd�PwwWu- P EE our�m F-- N 77J9216 -y2Z2pp42V L0AWW igi mDm�20 V�43N rbOgg r°��ngu�$ r�r7i 1Qj �1 Arne r @°p mm4'�' a �m£mD°D3rug"33Rf�mcymmym°3ISEop mAA N �mM� 3��3Arm �j Drmimti'c77�c��jO Q ,'p •mOm T 3 G ° A O-A 'i mY Tr a Xm Oma_ a Sfi4�i R01r�D-�D t' AAIO tdltl _ D DPDp m m 3 001 � $N y T D Bo 6. (01 F �•i r �� r ��(y�� m�� rpuo� Z (gyp A 7 A rn "'LYZZ �O D A� wur S1 r� p4 li'®®®OOOo®®®❑�4�®®�000®®®O17�OO®®®®®O❑®®O® ®®❑®®❑®DODO®®® ��� � ova vi.'irN°'�'�Oro'�+Pw �v��B���6�FG R�gJ o�evwW•+- ❑ Lt,�m mmmmmm0(lOD O 'Dto �p1 AA z z E m ZZZz D aEE (��Sdj w,.W..-Z (��D Zmm OmO, OOr y' o +1mD�_X �00O0 °E_E_E_E_ Z�ryiDp'S O Fa�2°jil =OAm p a0w Z'D� y �W ���-. y �t� -1 zz mnz<9"�;" Pi nW DD Nm pZz-33VfDm ��ch Op0ODDAai AA p3rS°EA7�°m z yZ8 r a Z n 0�u �04�PDIn V mmmm i� ��i ° m An .�'-' AAll �2 Z § oymon �33o oa�oe P mAA $_ (P A gZ ><°a N LLZti 0 am mm �D �0z0imOy�yQ ADD�n7 A<AZ m5 p�6 1 Afhdm� A 3 j5 tmn SffA�A" Am O �rf O O '0 < ' A ° an IO° � Lmm (1�r a c, y `Q�' O Ilnn D O mu, n A �rSi "_' pro°Pn �iNonmA§3k� X '�Op�m OPm ° r= DpdWq pom°A Oym�� use m�jpmmm E Xu O tm�mmnn A QXaO m p °I w 7� P � m CIS O• � " • " • �� -- 1 DATE 2/9 e a I I I I I 1J P D I I m i i m D m L I D Il gY e u r �� onu wu 5 D 19 .011. 0 0 1�T �� rw�r Tw r�Ar{ ars<uTc"m� OBAWN BY. mJR DATE Cfl IElGff MA! f1EfAR9 9Y YE M tMxA MT Ol�6Cf _ �Ll9f1�.Yj A!D TMT I AY A DIIT IFfYI@I® AKH1BCf BURGER KING RESTAURANT "� ""'�"""" �""°� KING _ r eK 944 w/Playlancl ' 0 @BUR(.:3iER CORPORATION Albertville, MN AYn.�.Ml --gym Sr E PLAN Fwc maTo-aw H 1 9 41'•4• FACE OF BL O FACE OF BLOCK = ^ Z •' '-B 1'•II' 1'-II• 4' O N' y'-4' ]'- 3'-4' 6'-O' I UY I O �— I + lY • � I 5 s Z v i I I u I < P b �I S s � I I 0 I e; D u i 7'-O' ]'•o• 3'-4• S E¢ SPACES . 6'•D• !'-,• Y-D• ' v s r-o• an I CL 4 I ti IF d$ I I • "F I s s I � I CC a r I o• 1 i I F Z I ov pS7ppp • E O I ii g x 1� � o i g• F �� ��� � po dip Y QQ •Q ti D I — }PR� All L` • n I �•r ]-iN 3 DaN• �N• y•r € U !� + a T �J I•a 2 i �� .n �+; 1,.. B'-0• g'-]. 6 (S' B'-10 N• ip � 011 lOy� S'-, 3'-11' 3��$ ��?<y? EZO Z v >i x � uX s m• D '— ��� q� r c� y P • •+ B FA c ! — Y§� 6• O O o v_ 7m W g 5 r I I I I 1 I O ` Q -• v 6 4• 0 WI s S m a a a 29V-4• n•-m• VERFY W/ WJD. rMV&F. 3T-4• FACE OF BLOCK TO FACE OF BLOCK !�^•�TATTw ti'� .'.'w CM"1 DA75 I] JArWARI', 7000 cryt Xu S • 13.011.0 0 • a1 leTowr wAa r�A�o n an uoal wr wecr .. .I19\WGl At0 TIMT 1 AY A D1t'f IFGI/IB1®MYJRBCf D BURGER KING RESTAURANT �'�``"""°�'`�`"��""°°'" ° BURGER KING I BK 94 w/PlaLylancl W- ° o CORPORATION Albertville, MN wB'60 .rw. A.onscx un R.DOR PLAN AND DETALS PAX elxasia]ao _ €r. F1 ch D I \ ro r r 3 • I a =. ( P Ir Pf s N I I � P �• \ � 00 p I p I 1 LF ' nn m ym' a W •. - �3C � p m I —XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX o� O �'x`• i g V. R• (pfp11 z A o z A ((j�yy..� �J till9f m Iu - goo yr A G bcb D I— r Zs Us L-L R I $ d�3A �cl i I D I . I In I ONE a I n — I F LF P n n n 0 I � I RIO ,� L.T � LF a5 all Me 1 °EI�I Rartwr rw,r r,•e rt.W wECIYCArnM WAWN BY, CM OATS 10 J LY• 7000 tarLw 5019.011.00 an waanr w.,e rTr•—AMY onuwnvr = «ea+,wwt wo nur 1,w � a�Lr�arre,co Mcmm� u� nw uwe or rya �r+re or va�emw D BURGER KING RESTAURANT ° I BK 94 w/P1ay11ar,a ° CORPORATION N Albertville, MN 1,�� fY• T Al1ORKTl LR EXTEi40R ELEVATKNJS ea-�cmo r�x eu•m►sra wg m O�l WW l q � Z pn O A �A S} m O a'I her by certify that this plan, REV DATE: 8/16/00 DATE DOLPHIN REAL ESTATE ADDITION John O/lvei &Associates, Mc. spec on, or report was prepared N0. LOTI BLOCK I Civil Engineering, Land E—ymg. L—d Planning by e der my direct supervision DESIGN BY: TGL z r 580 Dodge Avenue and th t a Licensed Professional 8 Engineer tl laws of the State DRAWN BY: TOIL _ O ALBERTVILLE, MN Elk River, 072 (rota 41-6 of Minnesota. //�,J CHECKED BY: TLH " F� (612)941-2072 (FAX)441-5665 -✓/ \ WG: 7837SITE.DWG D DOLPHIN REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP zol IF. Travelers Trait, suite zoo ��(} l Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 Signed: _jam TEXT: NONE _ LJV SITE DIMENSION PLAN 1 (612J894-3045 (FA:r�894-3049 Date: 8/16/00 Reg. No. If61/9 FILE NO.:_7837.10-03 DES, ,PTi3r obi � n N x s n \ N Y �A p `ti D m - NN-N iA > mN 2 9 NO o m�ba r, m A m i n Q t � o i m � \N DOLPHIN REAL ESTATE ADDITION LOT I, BLOCK I Z ALBERTVILLE, MN DOLPHIN REAL ESTATE FOR PARTNERSHIP w \ GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL PLAN D Q yyz u 1(2 O mp A< O 1 p� m S OZD 00Z A" rnA �0 1 1 �o Z zZ oN c7 DOp O 'o vOi v m to m �L •' '- y fA'l n fN A A A O n m F N o o �+ C 17 O ry 3 O I hereby certify that this plan, REV {, Associates, ATE: 8/14/00 DATE JohnOliverlS ASSo�iia{e8, Inc.�spec i on, or report was prepared N0. Civic Snginaering, Land .Surveying. Land Planning by n der my direct supervision DESIGN BY: TGL 580 Dodge Avenue and th t a Licensed Professional 9 Engineer tl- laws of the State DRAWN 8Y: TGL (61Elk River, Minnesota 55330 of Minnesota.` / j� CHECKED BY: TLH (612)491-2072 (FAA)441-5665 201 II, Travelers Trail, Suite 200 DWG: 7837GRAD.DWG Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 Signed: ._.__�.!7?1y TEXT:_ NONE (612)894-304.5 (FA1)894-3049 Dote: 8/16/00 Reg. No. ,12 9 FILE NO.: 7837.10-03 DESCRIPTION I o = Zy ( = V D Z O rr D I T N A m O T m m m M av1 0 o O Z Z o � O o 0 0 > >' m n m f 07� a a a U) N o 3 3 3 O 3 N > g E a \ y DOLPHIN REAL ESTATE ADDITION I her by certify that this plan, DATE: 8/16/00 REV DATE Cr! 1 John Oliver & Associates, Inc. 5Pe or report was Prepared No. LOT I, BLOCK I Civil Engineering, Lwnd Surveying, Lwnd PEwnning by B ������yyyyyy,,, Cr y direct SUpe IS10n DESIGN BY: TGL z 580 Dodge Avenue and th t /C�4 Licensed Professional DRAWN BY: TGL ALBERTVILLE, MN Engineer ye Tows of the state — O Elk River, Mi>aneso t¢ 55330 / FOR of Minnesota. CHECKED BY: TLH (612)441-2072 (FAX)441-5665 DOLPHIN REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP �/DWG: 7837uTL.DWG 201 1F. Travelers Trait, Suite 200 TEXT: NONE Burnsville, Minnesota 55337 Signed: C!� UTILITY PLAN (6l2)894-3045 (FAX)894-3049 Dote: 8/16/00 Reg. No. 126 9 FILE NO.: 7837.10-03 DESCR-IPi�Ord ANIV MEMORANDU 1200 25th Avenue South, P.O. Box 1717, St. Cloud, MN 56302-1717 320.229.4300 800.572.0617 320.229.4301 FAX TO: Linda Goeb City Administrator Albertville, Minnesota FROM: Peter J. Carlson, P.E. tc' City Engineer DATE: August 30, 2000 RE: Wetland Fill Permit Sunrise Industrial Park SEH No. A-ALBEV 0101.00 14 Attached is a detail scope of work and cost estimate for our office to prepare a wetland fill and mitigation plan for the Sunrise Industrial Park. The cost for Task 4 would be spread over a 5-year period. Please add this information to the next council agenda. cb Attachment w:\albev\O 101 \corr\ag3Oaoo-m. doc Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Offices located throughout the Upper Midwest Equal Opportunity Employer We help you plan, design, and achieve Task 1. Delineation Review Labor Scientist 12 hrs $1020 $118( and Assessment Technician 2 hrs $120 Expenses Mileage $40 Task 2. Wetland Permit Labor Scientist 10 hrs $850 $124( Application Technician 5 hrs $300 Expenses Word Processor 1 hr $45 Mileage $40 Task 3. Wetland Replacement Labor Scientist 65 hrs $5525 $663_ Plan Technician 15 hrs $900 Expenses Word Processor 2 hrs $90 Mileage $120 Task 4. Mitigation Monitoring Labor Scientist 110 hrs $9350 $969( Word Processor 6 hrs $120 Expenses Mileage (5 Trips) $220 Total Cost $18,74` Scope of Work and Cost Estimate for City of Albertville Project Task 1 Delineation Review and Assessment Existing wetland delineation reports will be reviewed to determine the identified wetland area(s). An historical site review will be conducted and will include a review of existing site topographic and wetland maps, soil survey and air photos, and other pertinent information to evaluate historical wetland existence and land use. A visit to the site will be made to visually estimate the location and extent of any wetland habitat on the site. Task 2 Wetland Permit Application Based upon previous wetland delineations, historical wetland assessment, and field review the extent of jurisdictional wetland for regulatory purposes will be determined. A wetlands functions and values assessment will be conducted using the MNRAM assessment methodology to determine lost wetland functions and values. Applicable wetland permit requirements will be identified. The proposed project will likely require an individual permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers unless wetland impacts can be kept under two acres. Agency staff will be contacted to review the project and proposed mitigation. The appropriate wetland permits will be completed and submitted to the agencies. Task 3 Wetland Replacement Plan As part of the wetland permit application, SEH will develop a replacement plan in conjunction with the City to replace wetlands impacted by the proposed site development. Under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (MWCA) replacement for wetlands impacted must be at a 2:1 ratio. Wetland functions and values lost from impacted wetlands must be replaced. This task will include identifying one to two potential wetland mitigation sites. Task 4 Mitigation Monitoring SEH will monitor the success of the wetland mitigation in accordance with standard requirements in all wetland permits. Standard monitoring is for five years. SEH wetland scientists may request final approval from permitting agencies before that time if the criteria used to measure success appear to have been met. =SEN MEM��ia� 1200 25th Avenue South, P.O. Box 1717, St. Cloud, MN 56302-1717 TO: Linda Goeb City Administrator Albertville, Minnesota FROM: Peter J. Carlson, P.E.D1'� City Engineer DATE: August 30, 2000 RE: Residential Development Requirements SEH No. A-ALBEV 0101.00 14 320.229.4300 800.572.0617 320.229.4301 FAX Attached are several land development requirements that have been established for the city of Rogers that I thought the Albertville City Council might want to consider. Please include these attachments on the next Council Agenda for discussion and consideration. tjw Attachment c: Mike Couri, City Attorney Deb Garross, City Planner w Aalbev\0101 kmr\eg30c00-m. doc Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. • Offices located throughout the Upper Midwest • Equal Opportunity Employer We help you plan, design, and achieve Inspections: Inspections: Footing (Including Elevation) Sewer and Water Foundation Walls Meter Framing Drain Tile Mechanical (Rough -in and final) Sump Pump Plumbing (Rough -in and final) Driveway Gas Line Final Grade/As-Built Survey Fireplace Water Shut-off Insulation Sidewalk Sheet Rock Meter— Final Read Deck Address Final Sod and Trees No I No Approval Approval Yes Yes Issue Certificate of Occupancy (CO) Project Complete Z (p U Q) 1 p \ 00 m N I O Z r L'ip \ W J Ln Q > H W W� p \ N p r N L'i U O U INTERIOR LOT SILT FENCE W W W W W W W W L K W W W W W W W W Vt W W W W W W W W W W W W 1 W W W DR I VEW4Y W W W HOUSEW W W Jr W W W Jr W W � W W SOD OR SEED 3 0 W W W W W W y (J W W Ji Z W W W W W W W W W W lL ~ W W W W W W W W W W 1 W W W W W W SOD W W W W W W y! 4-W W W � W W �L W W W W W W W `Y W W W W W W W Jt W W W W W IV : W W SILT FENC W W W W W W W W W + W W CORNER LOT i SILT FENCE IV W W W 1 W W W W W W W W W W DR I VEW4Y I W W W HOUSE W W W W Jf W W SOD OR SEED W W W i W W W W W W W It W w U W W i V 30' W W W Z I w W W W W W W W W W W y W d' W W W W W W W W `✓ W W SODW W W W W 1 W W W W W I W W W W W W W W W W �V W W W W `L W W W W W W W W 15 �Y W WY W W W .L �✓ W J� W W �✓ `/ `L W `L`L CURB *NOTES:1. INSTALL 6 OF BLACK DIRT UNDER ALL TURF AREAS. 2. SOD REQUIRED ON SLOPES OF 4:1 OR STEEPER. 3. PERMANENT, UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION REQUIRED TO SEED. 4. PERIMETER SILT FENCE REQUIRED :FOR SEED. RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION TURF ESTABLISHMENT REQUIREMENT`- ROGERS. MINNESOTA pT7 OF ROGERS G E N- 1 8 0 SIL SEE U T FENCE PLATE GEN-10 HOUSE UNDER CONSTRUCTION 24' MAXIMUM WIDTH ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SEE PLATE GEN-13, SIDEWALK OR TRAIL CURB RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION EROSION CONTROL STANDARDS ROGERS, MINNESOTA GEN-17 SECTION 07 B. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY 1. Certificates of Survey may be submitted after the Developer has completed all grading, underground work, and has an approved Development Plan. 2. The Certificates of Survey must be consistent with one of the City's Standard Detail Plates (SURVEY-1, SURVEY-2, or SURVEY-3). 3. Deviations in elevations of over 0.2 feet between the Certificate of Survey and the approved Development Plan will require that the Certificate of Survey be revised, or the Grading Plan and Development Plan revised to guarantee consistency. If the Plans are revised, the development design engineer must submit the revised plans to the City with a letter stating that the revised lot elevations will drain properly. If there are elevation changes to the rear lot area, the City Engineer will also review and accept the lot survey. A $100 surcharge will be added to all building permits when the City Engineer is required to review the lot survey. 4. After final grading of the lot, but prior to sodding or seeding, the builder's surveyor must submit an as -built Certificate of Survey which will include the following information: A. Final corner elevations. B. Top of block elevation. C. Elevation of garage floor at the driveway. D. Elevation of grade at the back of house. E. Elevations of swale(s) at property lines. F. Elevation(s) of drainage break point(s). G. Stamped "Record Drawing" with date. 5. Deviations in elevations of over 0.2 feet between the Record Drawing Certificate of Survey and the approved Development Plan will require that the grading be corrected and a new Record Drawing Certificate of Survey be submitted. Land Development Requirements and Procedures Certificate of Survey 01/00 Section 07-B - 1 e SURVEY COMPANY ,mm XXX.X XX. .i 0 XX. w Z J } tr w CL 0 cr a ----- 50' - - -- XX. 50'---- .._.. _.. _..-------•-----.-- PROPERTY LINE ------------------- I •. I I ' � Y I ' l �Z � XXX. X • I 1 'I XX. i •I WALKOUT 01 �I i PROPOSED .I SETBACK HOUSE of XXX.X' XX. i I I I XXX.X I I � I c m WATER SHUT-OFF w L-------- ----- N PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED HOUSE ELEVATIONS TOP OF FOOTING ELEVATION: XXXXX LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION: XXX.X TOP OF BLOCK ELEVATION: XXX.X GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION: XXX.X TOB @ REAR ELEVATION: XXX.X ki LOT, BLOCK, PLAT NAME SCALE: 1 INCH = XX FEET BENCH: TNH LOT X & LOT Y BENCH ELEV: XXXXX OTY OF ROGERS wl 0 J N a ! XXX.X I 0 !Ln i Q i i m w I ! NLLJ • Z I i J Ii I0i ~ ILni I ! a - I 0 I •, I � I • ; a - I •� SETT t XX. BA K:', I �o MAXIMUM -WIDTH= THRU ROW 4r + ++ +++ LEGEND XXX.X DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION XX. DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION ---- DENOTES EASEMENT �- DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION --�— DENOTES MONUMENT + DENOTES SPOT ELEVATION J�h N C. OOE. L.S. Reg No. XXXXX SAMPLE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY BUILDING AS HIGH POINT ROGERS. MIN'NESOTA SURVEY - 3 *NOTE: THIS IS A SAMPLE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY AND SHOWS THE MINUMUM INFUHMAIIUN HtUUtntU. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT. 0 SURVEY COMPANY NAME XX.X XXXXX ------ 50 ------ 50'._..__• XXX.X iO�X ',PROPERTY LINE • - - �'- ------ - - - -- ----------- i QI I + �,. In ! I +� •• 50. _ . ! uri 50'co '� Y ++ 50 I . I• I Z � w I • �. I XXX. X I o; \ XX. � � • ! i LOOKOUT i I ; LOLn I 0 ! I PROPOSED I I j SETBACK HOUSE I . • j i I i EX. + I SEIT t XX. I XXX.X BA K a j 0 i Ln ! i o Ln WATER SHUT-OFF co r I i N J i XXX. X ' MAXIMUM i XXX.X �----•-••-•--•--.._.._.._..-•-----••-----•-----•--- -.._..1--• XX. WIDTHPROPERTY LINE THRU XX. ROW PROPOSED HOUSE ELEVATIONS LEGEND TOP OF FOOTING ELEVATION: XX 4X XXX.X DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION: XXX.X XX.X DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION TOP OF BLOCK ELEVATION: XXX.X - - - -' DENOTES EASEMENT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION: XXX.X E DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION TOB @ REAR ELEVATION: XXX.X —'— DENOTES MONUMENT + DENOTES SPOT ELEVATION LOT, BLOCK, PLAT NAME SCALE: 1 INCH = XX FEET BENCH: TNH LOT X & LOT Y BENCH ELEV: XXX.X J N C. DOE. L.S. Reg No. XXXXX SAMPLE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY REAR TO FRONT DRAINAGE ROGERS, MINNESOT�­ CITY OF ROGERS SURVEY — 2 *NOTE: THIS IS A SAMPLE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY AND SHOWS THE MINUMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT. z V O ). r w N 1 w 0 cr- w c� 0 w Mw A SURVEY COMPANY NAME XX.X XXX.Xl. --------- 50,-----.-------- 50-----•--..!• XXX.X i............ I-.._.._•--•-_._.._..�--•-•t--.._.._.._..----.._.._ ._.._-._.._.._..--••+•-- PROPERTY LINE , XXX. o An ! ! u, i 125' �; - 25' - 25'• • . . -25 - . I i i 2 m i I ;a �cL XXX.X w I I + XX. w;, WALKOUT iI i01 Ii lOi m iLnI ILn o PROPOSED a cr ; SETBACK HOUSE i ' ! m ia_ I XX. I I • SETT '! I BAIK;' XXX.X i I XXX. a 1 1' Ln !. I I a of N I ! o I 1 i IWATER m SHUT-OFF w I , -------- ----- N ---- --� i XXX. X :i MAXIMUM X - - - - - XX. -.._.._..� - - - --._.._.._ PROPERTY LINE WIDTH _.._..!XXX. XX. THRU ROW PROPOSED HOUSE ELEVATIONS LEGEND TOP OF FOOTING ELEVATION: XXX.X XXX.X DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION: XXX.X XX. DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION TOP OF BLOCK ELEVATION: XXX.X - - - -- DENOTES EASEMENT GARAGE SLAB ELEVATION: XXX.X DENOTES DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION TOB 0 REAR ELEVATION: XXX.X DENOTES MONUMENT + DENOTES SPOT ELEVATION LOT, BLOCK, PLAT NAME SCALE: t INCH = XX FEET BENCH: TNH LOT X & LOT Y Dl-))C> BENCH ELEV: XXX.X J N C. DOE, L.S. Reg No. XXXXX SAMPLE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY CROSS DRAINAGE IN REAR YARD ROGERS, MINNESOTA CITY 0F ROGERS SURVEY - 1 *NOTE: THIS IS A SAMPLE CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY AND SHOWS THE MINUMUM INFORMATION REQUIRED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE REQUIRED TO OBTAIN A BUILDING PERMIT. s6mcmoo 10 (3 MEMORANQU 1200 25th Avenue South, P.O. Box 1717, St. Cloud, MN 56302-1717 320.229.4300 800.572.0617 320.229.4301 FAX TO: Linda Goeb City Administrator Albertville, Minnesota FROM: Peter J. Carlson, P.E. k LCity Engineer DATE: August 30, 2000 RE: Stop Sign Requests SEH No. A-ALBEV 0101.00 14 Attached is a policy for stop sign placement that our office prepared for another community that I modified for Albertville. I think this is a good policy, and one that the City Council might want to consider. Please put this on the council agenda for their consideration. cb Attachment c: Deb Garross, City Planner Mike Couri, City Attorney wAalbev\O101kour ag3000-m.dm Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Offices located throughout the Upper Midwest Equal Opportunity Employer We help you plan, design, and achieve City of Albertville, Minnesota Traffic Study Request Form Date: Requested by (Name, Address and Phone Number) Description of the Problem: Time of Day Problem Occurs: Requested Action of the City: Sketch of intersection or roadway segment showing where problem occurs: Return form to: Albertville City Hall 5975 Main Avenue NE Albertville, MN 55301-0009 August 1, 2000 City of Albertville Policy for Placement of Stop Signs Purpose: To provide for the safety of the public in the city of Albertville, and provide for the efficient free flow of traffic by establishing a uniform policy for stop sign placement. Policy: It is the policy of the city of Albertville to review streets in all new development proposals to determine the need for stop signs at intersections. Further, it is the policy of the city of Albertville to handle citizen's request for stop signs by conducting an objective study of the intersection. The city council has final authority to approve or deny requests for stop sign placement within the city. The placement of stop signs will not be used as a method of vehicular speed control. Procedures: To enhance the city council's ability to use rational criteria in evaluating stop sign requests, and minimize the proliferation of stop signs, except where required, the following guidelines are to be used: 1) A completed Traffic Study Request Form must accompany all stop sign requests. 2) Direct requests to city engineer for evaluation. 3) The city engineer will evaluate each request using the criteria identified in the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. A stop sign may be warranted at an intersection where one or more of the following conditions exist: a) The intersection of a less important road with a main road where the application of the normal right-of-way rules is unduly hazardous. b) A street enters a through street or highway. c) Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. d) Other intersections where combination of high speed, restricted view, and serious accident record indicates a need for control by a stop sign. 4) The city engineer will evaluate a request for a Multiway Stop Sign by the criteria identified in the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, and by the Residential Street Multiway Stop Control Justifications Worksheet. One of the following conditions may warrant a Multiway Stop Sign installation: a) Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multiway stop is an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for the signal installation. b) Accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents of a type susceptible of correction by a multiway stop installation in a 12-month period. Such accidents include right- and left -turn collisions, as well as right-angle collisions. ! I ' N c) Minimum Traffic. Volumes: i) the total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours of an average day, and or ii) the combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but iii) when the 85-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements. d) Other factors may be considered as applicable. 5) Upon completion of the review, a report will be forwarded to the city administrator outlining the study and recommendation. 6) City administrator will forward results of the report to the city council for their consideration. 7) City engineer will respond to the requesting party with results of the report and the decision by the city council on the stop sign request. W Aalbev\stds\S topSignPJcy2.do August 1, 2000 City of Albertville Stop Sign Requests — Things to Consider. One of the most common street -related requests received by city officials is for the installation of stop signs. This sheet offers a few items to consider when making such a request. What does a stop sign cost? When you consider the average cost to install a stop sign is about $200, it seems difficult to believe that any stop sign request is ever turned down. The cost of installation, however, is rarely a major factor in considering such a request. The true cost of a stop sign includes not only installation, but also street user costs such as excess vehicle operation cost, lost time, and increased pollution. Individually, street user costs for each stop sign are minimal; however, when the costs are added together for all users over a one-year period, they are substantial. Annual Highway User Costs: (per 1,000 vehicles stopping at stop sign on a 35 mile per hour street — from Federal Highway Administration statistics) $18,000 in excess vehicle operation costs 1,400 hours of lost time 3,800 gallons of extra fuel 8,400 pounds of carbon monoxide emissions 600 pounds of hydrocarbon emissions 600 pounds of nitrogen oxide emissions What is our primary consideration? More than the cost, the primary consideration in approving a stop sign request is to make sure a stop sign is the most appropriate and effective solution to the problem. Stop signs do not necessarily make an intersection safer. Studies of low volume intersections with less than one accident per year have shown that adding stop signs do not reduce the accident rate. This is especially true in cases where unnecessary multi - way stops are created. The city's goal is to provide for public safety and efficient free flow of traffic. City of Albertville Stop Sign Information Rev 8-00 Page 1 What is actually the problem? When a stop sign request is made, the reason for the request must be clear. The main purpose of a stop sign is to assign right-of-way at an intersection. If the problem to be addressed is not related to right-of-way, then a stop sign is not the answer. In many cases, stop signs are requested to curb speeding on a street. Numerous studies have been conducted examining the effect of stop signs on speeding. These studies consistently show stop signs are poor speed control devices. Stop signs do reduce speeds at the point of the installation, but the effect of this speed reduction is gone in a very short distance (less than 200 feet). How will the city process the stop sign request? The city established a policy to process stop sign requests. The process is as follows: 1. The requestor completes the Traffic Study Request form and turns it into City Hall. 2. The city engineer will evaluate each request using State Traffic Control Procedures, which are based on • Traffic Volumes • Sight Distance • Accident Reports 3. The city engineer will report the study findings to the city administrator. 4. The administrator will forward the results of the study to the city council. 5. The city council will make the final determination as to the need for the stop sign. 6. The city engineer will respond to the requestor with results of the report and council action. City of Albertville Stop Sign Information Rev 8-00 Page 2 I I # Where is a stop sign warranted? • Intersections with a demonstrated accident problem involving right-angle turn and left - turn accidents. 0 Intersections with sight obstructions on approaches that restrict sight lines of opposing traffic. 0 Uncontrolled intersections with much heavier traffic on one street than on the other. • Intersections with heavy traffic on conflicting approaches Where does a stop sign not help? • Vehicular speed reduction Elimination of cut -through traffic on residential streets • Providing a safer environment for pedestrians WAa)bev\stds\Things to Consider- stop signs.doc City of Albertville Stop Sign Information Rev 8-00 Page 3 GRANITE RE, INC. GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY Know all Men by these Presents: That GRANITE RE, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of OKLAHOMA and having its principal office at the City of OKLAHOMA CITY in the State of OKLAHOMA does hereby constitute and appoint: RODMAN A. FRATES, JONATHAN PATE, KENNETH D. WHITTINGTON, ERICK SCHMIDT, RICHARD MOONEY, TOM LAHL its true and lawful Attorney-in-Fact(s) for the following purposes, to wit: To sign its name as surety to, and to execute, seal and acknowledge any and all bonds, and to respectively do and perform any and all acts and things set forth in the resolution of the Board of Directors of the said GRANITE RE, INC. a certified copy of which is hereto annexed and made a part of this Power of Attorney; and the said GRANITE RE, INC. through us, its Board of Directors, hereby ratifies and confirms all and whatsoever the said: RODMAN A. FRATES, JONATHAN PATE, KENNETH D. WHITTINGTON, ERICK SCHMIDT, RICHARD MOONEY, TOM LAHL may lawfully do in the premises by virtue of these presents. In Witness Whereof, the said GRANITE RE, INC. has caused this instrument to be sealed with its corporate seal, duly attested by the signatures of its Vice President and Secretary/Treasurer, this 14'h day of May, 1998. .OTf q,r SEAL p„ R. Darryl Fishe , ice President STATE OF OKLAHOMA ) SS: � COUNTY OF OKLAHOMA ) Rodman A. Frates, Secretary/Treasurer On this 14th day of May 1998, before me personally came R. Darryl Fisher, Vice President of the GRANITE RE, INC. Company and Rodman A. Frates, Secretary/Treasurer of said Company, with both of whom I am personally acquainted, who being by me severally duly sworn, said, that they, the said R. Darryl Fisher and Rodman A. Frates were respectively the Vice President and the Secretary/Treasurer of the GRANITE RE, INC., the corporation described in and which executed the foregoing Power of Attorney; that they each knew the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to said Power of attorney was such corporate seal, that it was so fixed by order of the Board of Directors of said corporation, and that they signed their name thereto by like order as Vice President and Secretary/Treasurer, respectively, of the Company. d A .pr�R H My Commission Expires: May 9, 2004 � a GRANITE RE, INC. Certificate THE UNDERSIGNED, being the duly elected and acting Secretary/Treasurer of Granite Re, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, HEREBY CERTIFIES that the following resolution is a true and correct excerpt from the July 15, 1987, minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors of Granite Re, Inc. "RESOLVED, that the President, any Vice President, the Secretary, and any Assistant Vice President shall each have authority to appoint individuals as attorneys -in -fact or under other appropriate titles with authority to execute on behalf of the company fidelity and surety bonds and other documents of similar character issued by the Company in the course of its business. On any instrument making or evidencing such appointment, the signatures may be affixed by facsimile. On any instrument conferring such authority or on any bond or undertaking of the Company, the seal, or a facsimile thereof, may be impressed or affixed or in any other manner reproduced; provided, however, that the seal shall not be necessary to the validity of any such instrument or undertaking." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has subscribed this Certificate and affixed the corporate seal of the Corporation this 17 th day of August , 2000 ,WTE SEAL " ., �.. Rodman A. Frates, Secretary/Treasurer 0 O M m J IL Cl) O -j m m O m a LL O Z O Z a O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O N O O O O O O O -ITO 0 O O O J O O LO O M l't O o o O (D O (D O W V O (O O (D O Q O O (() (n I V O 69 (D r n (h M N 69 69 u') N U') 69 NC (A D) C7) o (D O '7 n r 0 N 69 W N 69 N O F. vi N 6A 69 69 69 v 69 fA N N 69 69 69 69 h ri 44 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O -� U) 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 to (n O 0 0 O O O CO CO 40 o to 69 EA m 6R O 60 O O N N (O N O O� O O O (O (D OD V O N N n c0 CO N C� O o (D M to69 O N 69 n N w 69 EA 69 69 fA 69 � I- 69 6A r- Vk O W N U. F' O p O p O O p O O O O O p O O O O 0 O p O O O O O 0 J J N 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 0 (A w 0 0 0 0 0 O cD O 40 O to LO 0 69 cr 69 to O O N (O N O co O N O N (D O v (7 n a7 O) W U W p (D �'d (D � r M to� Cl) N r V CV 69� 4& 6 O � w 69 i9 i9 vi w � Q W 6R m LL pp pp pp O O O O p O p O O O O O O O O O O O cl O W O O O O Ch S N a0 0 0 0 0 0 (D N N o � O N O O O j-- 6A V O 69 69 69 N o io O 0 FA. N 69 n 69 O O 69 0 � 69 tD n 69 U a C dN9 6N9 0 H - N FA N Z Z O U 0 0 0 o O o 0 0 O o O o O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N o 0 O --:1; o N o O } O O o 0 O O O � r O n O n O OLOO (n ( CO N N `7 ( ( NN M Co co O Z (1 co N N O 0 0 0 0 O o 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 O 0 V 0 O 0 cq 0 V 0 O J a O 0 O 0 O 0 O O 7 O O O O '.Zt O O 0 N 00 � N J O LO v O n O r o r r co rn Q o r LL ? N O O O O O O O o O o O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O O CO O O o (D O CO 0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O n O 0 O O m ITN J t � N O r N N N Q) m Q T CI W W Z co U) m F- 0��� ����c=i� z���z Qzzcrz a� z Z z QQ ¢ z z 2 UO U p� U ¢ p 2 U U m D: W W W U J J a ¢ d d (A W J J 2 Z W Er O D ¢ CL w w U d N U)_ N U) U) W Z 0 Q U w O U w Z W Z U oo C w¢ O� O� 0 0 0 Z LL} U❑ W W¢ W ~ O X W it u) U¢¢ d d Z g LL' Y J ❑ O¢ N 0 CO U a a a Q p U a ❑ O O Z ~Q X C7 X U CC W J F- w LL M = u) U) Y = C7 ❑ z_ ❑ ❑ = Q W F = _ _ = W a U¢ Z O J D U U O U (j) - - - Cr S Q p U m Z. Q u) uWi U) ❑ U (A Q Z W r cc C W. N co a to cD n CO O) •o N W W 0 Ncr m 2000 City Park Improvements Albertville, MN SEH NO. A-ALBEV 0103.00 OPINION OF PROBABLE COST - SOFTBALL ONLY 8/30/00 UNIT OF MEASUREMEN APPROXIMATE ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION T QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL GENERAL 1 MOBILIZATION 2 COMMON EXCAVATION STORM 3 15" HDPE STORM SEWER 4 15" HDPE APRON 5 HDPE DRAINAGE STRUCTURE 6 RIP RAP, CLASS 11 BALLFIELD 7 CRUSHED LIMESTONE 8 BACKSTOP FENCE 9 6' CHAINLINK FENCE 10 IRRIGATION SYSTEM 11 SEED MIXTURE 500 RESTORATION 12 SEEDING 13 SEED MIXTURE 800 14 MULCH MATERIAL TYPE 1 15 DISC ANCHORING 16 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER LUMP SUM 1.00 $0.00 $0.00 CU YD 420.00 $1.00 $420.00 LIN FT 424.00 $18.00 $7,632.00 EACH 1.00 $300.00 $300.00 EACH 4.00 $500.00 $2,000.00 CU YD 4.00 $50.00 $200.00 TON 705.00 $25.00 $17,625.00 LIN FT 107.00 $75.00 $8,025.00 LIN FT 1,008.00 $12.00 $12,096.00 LUMP SUM 1.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 POUND 0.40 $4.00 $1.60 ACRE 1.00 $200.00 $200.00 POUND 0.60 $2.00 $1.20 TON 2.00 $150.00 $300.00 ACRE 1.00 $70.00 $70.00 POUND 400.00 $0.30 $120.00 CONSTRUCTION $56,990.80 - - - - - - - - - - - - 77- ------------ -------- ti 146 Ho Jj m m0< (-) m zz� m Cl) i ;r\ Cl) 0 I z z .sdG) CITY OF ALBERTVILLE WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO.2000-11 AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING THE CITY COUNCIL TO SET MUNICIPAL WATER TRUNK ACCESS CHARGES AND DESIGNATING THE USE OF SUCH CHARGES The City Council of the City of Albertville, Minnesota, ordains: SECTION 1: DEFINITIONS For the purpose of this ordinance, the following words and terms shall have the meanings set forth below. Subd. 1. "CITY" means the City of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota. Subd. 2. "OWNER" means an individual or entity holding legal or equitable title to property within the City of Albertville. Subd.3. "MUNICIPAL WATER SYSTEM" means any part of the network of municipal water connections and pipes located within the City of Albertville, including water trunk lines and lateral water lines. Subd. 4. "MUNICIPAL WATER TRUNK ACCESS CHARGE" means a charge imposed by the city for connection to the city's trunk water line within a given municipal water district. Subd. 5. "MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT" means a geographical division of property within the City providing the basis for the municipal water trunk access charge. Subd. 6. "MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION" means the act of connecting any property or structure to City municipal water system such that said property or structure is able to draw water from the municipal water system. SECTION 2. MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICTS The City may by resolution establish one or more municipal water districts. I r I r SECTION 3. MUNICIPAL WATER TRUNK ACCESS CHARGE Municipal water trunk access charges shall be imposed on all land within each municipal water district so as to reimburse the costs associated with the installation of trunk water lines, water mains and other necessary water distribution facilities. The City Council may by resolution exempt from the municipal water trunk access charge those lands within each municipal water district which are already connected to the City's municipal water or which have been previously assessed for the costs of the installation of municipal water trunk facilities. No connection shall be made to the City municipal water system serving the property of any person or occupants of the land, parcel or premises upon which municipal water trunk access charges remain unpaid. SECTION 4. METHOD OF CALCULATING CHARGE The City may by resolution set the per -acre rates to be charged for the municipal water trunk access charge in each district, and may set different rates for different districts. The charge shall be based on the gross area of land on the plat or other property, including all outlots and wetlands. SECTION 4. TIME OF PAYMENT All trunk access charges shall be paid to the City at the earlier of: 1) final plat approval for any plat in which a new municipal water connection is required for any property in such plat which is located within a municipal water district, or 2) issuance of a building permit by the City for which a new municipal water connection is required within a municipal water district. No final plat approval or building permits shall be issued prior to payment of the trunk access charges unless other arrangements for the payment of the municipal water trunk access charge are made and approved by the City. Payment shall be in cash or by check acceptable to the City Clerk and/or Administrator. SECTION 5. USE OF TRUNK ACCESS CHARGES The City may establish one or more Trunk Water Funds, and may credit all trunk access charges to such fund. Such funds may, as determined by Council resolution, be used to offset costs incurred in the installation or maintenance of existing or future water lines, general water maintenance costs, or any debt service incurred in the past or to be incurred in the future to finance the municipal water expansions, improvements, operations or maintenance, or any combination of the above. SECTION 6. RESERVATION This ordinance in no way precludes the City Council from adopting additional ordinances imposing other water -related charges in lieu of assessments, or other such ordinances relating to area or service charges with regard to the municipal water system, nor does this ordinance preclude the City from assessing to property owners the costs related to the installation of water lines, trunk mains, laterals and other water related facilities installed by the City. Nothing contained in this ordinance shall act to revoke any existing water access charges. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall be effective upon passage by the City Council and publication in the official city newspaper. Passed this 51h day of September, 2000. Mayor City Clerk Se�3� CITY OF ALBERTVILLE ORDINANCE # 2000-10 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING GUIDELINES FOR CUTTING AND REMOVAL OF GRASS AND WEEDS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE ORDAINS: Section 1: CUTTING AND REMOVAL OF GRASS AND WEEDS: Part A: It shall be unlawful for any owner, lessee or occupant or any agent, servant, representative or employee of any such owner, lessee or occupant having control of any occupied or unoccupied lot or land or any part thereof in the City to permit or maintain on any such lot or property or along the sidewalk, street or alley adjacent to the same, any growth of plants, grass, brush, or other weeds or vegetation which is horticulturally out of place to a height greater than twelve inches (12"). This requirement does not apply to the following: ♦ A wetland or flood plain designated on the official Zoning Map; ♦ A drainage pond or ditch which stores or conveys storm water; ♦ Maintained and weeded gardens, trees and shrub plantings; ♦ Property being used for agricultural purposes; and ♦ An area designated as a "natural preserve" by the City Council. Part B: The determination of what constitutes a "natural preserve" shall be made by the City Council in its sole discretion. The City Council shall consider the following factors in making its determination: ♦ Whether there are compelling reasons to preserve the property in its natural state; ♦ The zoning district of the City within which the property is located; and ♦ Whether any public safety or health problems may result if the area is designated a "natural preserve". Section 2: DUTY OF OWNER, LESSEE, OR OCCUPANT TO REMOVE: Part A: It shall be the duty of any owner, lessee, or occupant of any lot or land to cut and remove or cause to be but and removed all such weeds, grass, brush or other poisonous or harmful vegetation as often as may be necessary to comply with the provisions of Section 1; provided, however, that cutting and removing such weeds, grass and vegetation at least once in every three (3) weeks, between May 15 and September 15, shall be deemed to be in compliance with this Section. City of Albertville Ordinance 2000-10 Section 3: WORK DONE BY CITY: Part A: If the provisions of the foregoing sections are not complied with, the City shall serve written notice upon the owner, lessee, or occupant or any person having control of such lot or land, to comply with the provision of this Section. If the person upon whom the notice is served fails or brush or other vegetation within five (5) days from the date such notice is post -marked or delivered, then the City shall cause the weeds, grass, brush and other vegetation of such lot or land to be cut and removed. The actual cost of cutting and the removal, plus such sums as determined by the City Council to reimburse the City for its costs of inspection, shall be certified by the City Administrator and shall thereupon become a lien upon the lot or land on which such weeds, grass, brush, and other vegetation were located and shall be added to and become and form a part of the taxes next to be assessed and levied upon such lot or land and shall bear interest at the same ate as taxes and shall be collected and enforced in the same manner as real estate taxes; provided, however, the owner, lessee or occupant or any person having control of the lot or land, may pay to the City in full the actual costs incurred for cutting and removal plus the inspection fee by September 150' or the same calendar year in which the cutting and removal occurred in order to avoid having such costs levied upon the lot or land. Section 4: PENALTY: Part A: Any person violating any provision of this Section shall be guilty of a petty misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine of not more than two hundred dollars ($200.00). This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS 5th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2000. John A. Olson, Mayor Linda Goeb, Administrator -Clerk