2000-09-18 CC Agenda PacketALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
September 18, 2000
7:00 PM
1. CALL TO ORDER — ROLL CALL — ADOPT AGENDA
2. MINUTES
(a) September 5, 2000, City Council Meeting
3. CITIZEN FORUM - (lo Minute Limit)
4. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) Approve payment of claims
(b) Approve 3.2 Non -Intoxicating Malt Liquor License for the Albertville Lions on
September 23, 2000, from 4:00 PM — 8:00 PM at the Lions Shelter in City Park
(c) Resolution #2000-28 (Resolution Approving Increase in Levy Certification for Year
2001 Payable Taxes)
5. SPECIAL ORDER
• Presentation by Allison Becker, Wright County Public Health Department on Project
Northland
6. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS
a. Public Works
(1) Public Works Report
(2) Waste Water Treatment Plant Report
b. Planning & Zoning
(1) Concept Plan — Heuring Estates (Leuer-Munstertieger)
(2) Concept Plan - Albert Villas 41h Addition (Edina Development Company)
c. Engineering
(1) Resolution #2000-27 (Resolution Awarding Contract for the 2000 Barthel
Industrial Drive Improvement Project)
(2) Discuss stop sign placement on 50`h Street
(3) Kevin Mealhouse - Fire Department Review of Commercial Buildings
d. Legal
(1) Developers Agreement — Albert Villas 2"a Addition
(2) Ordinance #2000-13
City Council Agenda
September 18, 2000
Page 2 of 2
(3) Update on Albert Barthel property — First Right of Refusal
e. Administration
(1) Discuss hiring temporary office assistant October 30 — November 17
(2) Appoint Committee to meet with developer/staff re: commercial development
7. ADJOURNMENT
Aa/
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 5, 2000
Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM
PRESENT: Mayor John Olson, Councilmembers Keith Franklin, Gary McCormack,
and John Vetsch, City Engineer Pete Carlson, City Attorney Mike Couri, City Planner Deb
Garross, and City Administrator -Clerk Linda Goeb
Mayor Olson called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to order.
The agenda was amended by adding Item 5e(4) Schedule a public hearing to consider
an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance regarding house and garage size. McCormack made
a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Franklin seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Franklin made a motion to approve the minutes of the August 21, 2000, meeting as
presented. McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Mayor Olson asked if anyone present wished to address the Council under the Citizen
Forum portion of the agenda.
Benjamin Steiner, representing the STMA High School Environmental Club, reviewed
the funding possibilities toward the purchase of the Big Woods area and requested the City of
Albertville contribute $50,000 (approximately 7%) of the needed funds. Mayor Olson
explained that the Council had discussed the request at the budget meting and decided not to
budget for this expenditure in 2001.
Item 4e (Approve preliminary levy) was pulled from the Consent Agenda and placed
under the Administration Department.
Vetsch made a motion to approve payment of Check #'s 13519 — 13554 as presented.
Franklin seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Vetsch made a motion to approve RESOLUTION #2000-26 titled A RESOLUTION
ESTABLISHING THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE AS A PARTICIPANT OF THE
BUILDING QUALITY COMMUNITIES EFFORT. Franklin seconded the motion. All
voted aye.
Vetsch made a motion to adopt ORDINANCE #2000-12 titled AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING ORDINANCE 1989-9 — UNIFORM FIRE CODE. Franklin seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
Vetsch made a motion to schedule the Truth -in -Taxation Hearing for Wednesday,
December 13, 2000, at 7:00 PM and the continuation hearing, if necessary, on Monday,
December 18, 2000, at 7:00 PM. Franklin seconded the motion. All voted aye.
a •
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 5, 2000
Page 2 of 5
Franklin made a motion to approve the Public Works Department Report as presented.
McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council agreed to consider the Cedar Creek South 6`h Addition Final Stage Plan
later in the meeting to allow the developer to be present for the discussion.
Greg Klohn, representing Dolphin Real Estate, presented a concept plan for a Burger
King restaurant to be located on Outlot D on the Outlets of Albertville property. He explained
that in order to get footings, foundation and the parking lot in before freezing, he is requesting
that the Planning Commission schedule a special meeting to review the final plat and the site
plan. He asked for input from the Council regarding signage and the concept site plan.
Franklin suggested that the ground sign proposed be reduced in size. McCormack and Vetsch
both suggested that the garage door facing the mall itself be placed on the opposite side of the
building. There were no further comments from the Council.
City Engineer Peter Carlson reviewed the cost estimates for obtaining a wetland fill permit for
the Barthel Commercial Park area. Carlson estimates that securing a permit would require a
6-8 month time frame. Taskl (Delineation Review and Assessment) costs are estimated at
$1,180. Task 2 (Wetland Permit Application) costs are estimated at $1,240. Task 3 (Wetland
Replacement Plan) costs are estimated at $6,635. The final Task 4 (Mitigation Monitoring) is
estimated to cost $9,690, for a total project cost of $18,745. Completion of Tasks 1 through 3
dies not guarantee that the City will get the wetland fill permit, so the City may spend
approximately $9,000 and still not be able to fill the wetland. Task 4 is the monitoring phase
of the project and could extend over a five-year period.
Councilmember McCormack stated he is not in favor of risking $9,000 for the permit.
He feels the property owner should bear some of the risk, because, if the application is
approved, the owner will gain one or more commercial lots. Carlson explained that the
property owner could proceed on his own to acquire the wetland fill permit but has offered to
donate to the City property for a soccer field if the City acquires the permit.
McCormack made a motion to proceed with the wetland application only if an
agreement is reached with the property owner as follows:
(1) If the City is successful in securing the wetland fill permit, the costs associated
with the application and monitoring will be assessed against his marketable lot(s),
or
(2) If the City is unsuccessful in securing the wetland fill permit, the property owner
will repay one-half of the costs accrued by the City in the process.
If no agreement can be reached, the City will not proceed further. Vetsch seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 5, 2000
Page 3 of 5
McCormack made a motion to adopt the residential development requirements as
presented in the Council packet, including sod, silt fencing, certificate of survey showing final
grading, etc., as city standards. As a pat of the standards, the City will escrow one and one-
half times the cost of sod, trees, etc., if a certificate of occupancy is requested during the
winter. A $75 non-refundable administration fee will also be charged. Vetsch seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
Carlson presented a Stop Sign Policy for the Council to consider. Vetsch made a
motion to adopt the Stop Sign Policy as presented. There was no second to the motion. The
Council agreed to reconsider the stop sign policy at a later date.
Engineer Wayne Stark presented the breakdown of costs for the construction of a
softball field and a baseball field as directed at the last meeting. The softball field is
estimated to cost $56,990.80 and the baseball field is estimated to cost $107,940.
McCormack made a motion to proceed with the construction of the softball field
immediately. Franklin seconded the motion. McCormack, Franklin and Olson voted aye.
Vetsch voted no.
LeRoy Berning, representing the Albertville Jaycees, informed the Council that the Jaycees
have committed $5,000 toward the construction of the new softball field.
McCormack made a motion to proceed with the construction of a baseball field
immediately. Franklin seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council agreed that staff should meet with John Darkenwald to discuss a potential
commercial development before the Council will establish a committee to discuss the issue.
Carlson explained that the Fire Department would like to review commercial building
permits before they are issued. City Administrator Linda Goeb reported that Kevin
Mealhouse, the city's building official, already reviews the building's sprinkler system to
insure that it meets current fire codes. The Council took no action on the issue, but requested
that the City building Official attend the next Council meeting to discuss the request from the
Fire Department.
Vetsch made a motion to adopt ORDINANCE #2000-11 titled AN ORDINANCE
ALLOWING THE CITY COUNSIL TO SET MUNICIPAL WATER TRUNK
CHARGES AND DESIGNATING THE USE OF SUCH CHARGES. McCormack
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Mayor Olson appointed Councilmember Franklin and either Councilmember
Gundersen (if he wishes to participate) or himself to a sub -committee to meet with Otsego to
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 5, 2000
Page 4 of 5
discuss sanitary sewer service and agreed to meet with Otsego on September 28th at 7:00 PM
at the Albertville City Hall.
McCormack made a motion to approve ORDINANCE 2000-10 titled AN
ORDINANCE ESTABLSIHING GUIDELINES FOR CUTTING AND REMOVAL OF
GRASS AND WEEDS with Section 4, Part A amended to increase the fine to a maximum of
$500. Franklin seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Vetsch made a motion to direct the Planning Commission to conduct a public hearing
to consider increasing the maximum garage size and to increase the minimum square footage
requirements for house size. Franklin seconded the motion. All voted aye.
City Planner Garross explained that the Cedar Creek South 61h Addition plat includes
20 detached townhome lots on 5 acres and a 1.1 acre triangular parcel that is part of Cedar
Creek Golf Course. The plan differs from the development stage plan in the number and type
of units proposed and parking arrangement. The PUD development state plan included 22
attached townhome units in groups of 2 units each with a 15-stall angle parking area with the
central court development. The two units that have been deleted from the plat are proposed to
be moved to the future townhome plat to the east. The proposed plan included two fewer
units in a detached townhome style, removal of the 15 stall, central angle parking areas to be
replaced with a six stall parking area and 12 proposed parallel angle parking spaces along the
22-foot wide private road.
McCormack made a motion to approve the Findings of Fact & Decision granting Final
Stage PUD and Final Plat for Cedar Creek South 6th Addition amended as follows:
(1) Condition 18 is amended to state park dedication fees are paid pursuant to the Master
PUD Agreement.
(2) Condition 21 is added stating the developer will pay Water Trunk Access Charges as
determined by the City Engineer.
(3) Condition 22 is added stating the construction on the lots is limited to the plan
approved at this Council meeting unless an alteration is approved by the City
Council.
Franklin seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The meeting was recessed at 9:25 PM to allow the Council to continue with the closed
meeting on performance reviews.
Mayor Olson reconvened the regular meeting of the Council at 9:50 PM.
Vetsch made a motion to set the preliminary levy at $1,122,719, which includes
employee wages and a $15,000 line item for the installation of another civil defense siren.
McCormack seconded the motion. All voted aye.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
September 5, 2000
Page 5 of 5
Franklin made a motion to adjourn at 9:50 PM. McCormack seconded the motion.
All voted aye.
John A. Olson, Mayor
Linda Goeb, City Administrator
f
Am.1W
51751 YL
Albertville, MN 553U1
APPLICATION FOR NON -INTOXICATING
HALT LIQUOR LICENSE
(612) 497-3384
Fax: (612) 497-3210
The undersigned certifies that it complies with Minnesota
Statutes, Section 340.001, Subdivision 7, in that it qualifies
as a "Bona Fide Club" within that section, and that this appli-
cation makes petition for a limited license as a "Bona Fide
Club" for a limited, non -intoxicating malt liquor license. i
A license fee of $10.00 per day is required to accompany
this application.
1. Name of Applicant:
2. Nam and Address of President and Secretary of Applicant:
.�cy �,e t- /,v,/ 7 0 -' _5- A4 �r��2� �ic�� /vlw 9`c _30/
/ o ,5"03 -
�= s"F304f �Z_
3. Purpose for which funds derived will be used: .C/�kkZ, /C kAz i
4. Date of activity: 57,E!TPY
5. Premises from which non -intoxicating malt liquor will be
dispensed on said date: /ot)S .S Grp- 11e�_ 77//GLG" /�/t'
6. Hours of operation: y Sp i /-',7
7. Number of previous license obtained this calendar year:
8. Name, address, telephone number and position held with Club of
person signing this application: 7�3'�S7-�Z�� ���G ���- �sjlc&
11V -7 5��� Ss` N fl1� l//LGr /Y/J 3S3ai
Date: �JU� Sig nature of plicant(s) /
`fc
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
RESOLUTION #2000-28
RESOLUTION APPROVING INCREASE IN LEVY
CERTIFICATION TAX RATE FOR YEAR 2001 PAYABLE
TAXES
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota has enacted Chapter 243, Laws of
Minnesota 1999, Article 6, Section 2, requiring City Councils to adopt and file an
authorizing resolution if its tax rate turns out to be higher the following year than a
theoretical tax rate for the previous year under the law; and
WHEREAS, the City of Albertville has set its preliminary levy;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that if the tax rate of the City
of Albertville for the year 2001 is higher than the tax rate certified for the year
2000, the higher tax rate is hereby authorized by the City Council.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that an official copy of this adopted
resolution be filed with the Wright County Auditor/Treasurer.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ABLERTVILLE
THIS 18t" DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2000.
John A. Olson, Mayor
Linda Goeb, Administrator -Clerk
64Wop G)
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tim Guimont, Public Works Supervisor
DATE: September 15, 2000
SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS REPORT
FIRE HALL — The landscaping, seeding and sprinkler system has been completed.
■ SNOWPLOWING — It would be a good suggestion to hire the new person at least
by December. That way he would be on board to help with snowplowing. There
may be some money left from the temporary employee fund to pay for this.
■ PARKS — We will be purchasing some trees for the various parks at the end of
September. We will be purchasing them on sale at Midwest as we have in the past.
TG:bmm
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: John Middendorf, Water Department
DATE: September 15, 2000
SUBJECT: REPORT
WASTEWATER TREATMENT and WATER DEPARTMENT:
• Replaced Alum Feed pump
• Had Unlimited Electric fix outside light on the pole by the UV System.
• Replace dehumidifier in Industrial Park Lift station
• Had to have Granite Electronics reprogram dialer
• Replace motor on the spare aerator which is in the place of aerator #2 that is out for repair
• In the process of getting price estimates on removing the sludge left in Pond #3 verses
building a dike to contain the sludge. Then having to dispose of it at a later date.
• Continuing to mow and trim WWTF grounds
• Continuing to do daily, weekly and monthly duties
JM:bmm
Bridget's CAMy Documents\Public Works Reports\WWTPR-09-15-00.doc
3
w
0
0
Q O
W Ln
Q o Z U,) Q �
W V .0 W a rn
a ¢ U,)
F- O
za
W w
Qz
wFr
�O
wz
ui
Q�
W
U'^)
V/
Q
�U
N
Q
ui
cn
w
0 w o
a z M
CL z
m �
N
tL t0 Q
2
w
w
z
cis
rn0
CO
L
N C
O
a .= w
�U
Q' LL 2'
c
U. - u
Z 0
O $ c�
N U) U)
W
al
�ia
.r
a�
fty
o``�°
Ui
3
dZl
.W Q
�ix
x
X. .,
x
Ao—
x
x
k
LL.I
;N
'N
IN
N
'N
N
N
l
C
G Fw-
��
IE
ka w T
N
t 0 ,ter y� 6D o o
Z
II O
E a =
L
w
10 �WU.
: x,
— a� O! a m� r. wc.� U.
. . a
z�I LU
N >
r
Q"�o3o�
Cl
I
r
10
06
°°
00
i
rt
CN
�,
;
>
U.
cn o,
.
V
I
. ,
€
UJL
.w
Q.
•
�
A
C
� U
O >
of o
i
0
CD,rn
G m N
O m o
o
O E
O o
p
fn LO
E .-
m m o
O
o
m N p
co
coo p
U a m
F- fn o
C.
(n o
ao
x
a o
H
a
L
0 Y
O
La o
O
U:
W
X
w
J
w O
z
w
r
O
U.
O
E
mcmtai
ma
E
C
Ei t: 3 .O j
cm�Eo
c U
3 w
r O Q
0 J
o � m
z X
d O U c
2 °'
c9 OCL
CL C
310 D 0 11.1
O
O N o J�, 2
N m
.L+ .00 d r- W
z<w�tmo
OaJ
O— ImN U. 0
0 IV
'0— 0Zo
0.2 �~m
0 a
U)m )
E. 0
z °-
ww
Q z
w rx
�0
wz
PO
3w
w0
�- 0:
as
3N
0
ii
N
w
0
IL
02
1L 2
w
w
H
z
LO
0
0
0
z
2
W f
a
W a 2 a ja
z a e
Cc
w
O
t a-.sf
J
r
z10
Ile
IL
O w i6 w gym,
f s.
sec?# O
0
'V 1
t0 nb
'it O
w
It
im
o r —;
iz
o
LL
I O `O
` a
�-
i LU
ca
�U
f0 Z W
t
N_
00
F
Q= w
ti rn
O C L W 7 L d
Z y V) O` t
Z O
0 c� m CD
'� CD
0 0
ch
l0 O) tl1 O
0
r i V)i (0 _ O 0 La 5 r o
ul
d
z
w w
u;
w
`n.
Q
~
4'
41
k�
w
F-
I
z
w
w 0
H 0:
LU
aW
a
a
\ Na
a
�jo
p
C
`c
Fme
m
o
c
Inc
W
o
\
CO
14
W J
cc
V V
CD
d
O
O
OCO
WQI
I,C
`` °
x
x
x
x
ix
x
N
x
8
Z
ui
G
*
J
_J
w
010
00�0
0
0 o
Nt0
o�
po.
,
s
A
a g
�9
a. g
n.- g
ag .y
a g
w
uj,g
A
5Ix
,
s
10
I
Lu
{
ZU.
.'
,4,`
4
Q
�_
a
` `
a
a
w
z
04;0.
fa ,g
o
a g
�tj
(�
oo
to
�w
R
w�
R
�
F
O
t '
t
(
d S"
I
w
j
1,
CL
Z
a
O
W
r
f
r C
t
i rE
E
I I
'
L)
uj-
o;
N
0
t 3
_ :; I I :. I
m
Q2rn,�"� E _ ��+�,g� I S 5 mE
I�r uj,R, a
3 NLn
co 0
oI`' O Cj t1a �m o c m
Cop aZ�
y
m
! wicm
♦ �• : ♦� :
>
C z
Gi
Q..�0Ar
a
c W o
M O z a'
ci p UO
a
E u� E>. z oai`o
in �^ W m O r ..
ACL
w
0 in
aai NN GJ�b m
a 3 a rL�Oww rn
a y ,'� c c a fO 3 TraWgt•
g > O (ao is I- "o
T U)7 L C � >
z Z v 0 0 2 a oil wu0ia�a
O" w o rn a F° a:° 00�z az:
J a m N Fn C 0 V� ZOf �•
H$ a u rn ; p � coNN 0 (D °� 41 m a aS h M m
Qgl �a.. (n A m o O co o p to o 2 o t 0 C. L C O N A )
U- a t0 a H 3� ._-� a O U. 10 U aD H 0 O. O a H O a n
N
o a
ai
a
> b o
,
aj
ev
Ci.
-�
O O
b
.O
V] c
N
cq
° .—
c
U
U
¢3t
z
o
U
N
a
X
cz
C
to
U
as
C
Vf
C� y
°
. -o
o
V
c
>
N O
°
3 oCA
�.
uCA
cn
3
c
cn
3 � o
C
O
N N v
CO
bA
:3
ca
C
+� N ,
a.
cts
O d
'
3
t
cn
�
�r 4 �
• ; ��
V
p
Cc 0 C N -cd
°Cc:
a?
0
o
cd
N
vi Y-�
Q�
• i.r
U 3
U
0
7
J
a
F
s
°
z
o
°a
a
°
z
N
a
�
o
�'�
o
N
BSI
„
N
O
On
�
oo�
cc
�
0
c
In
�
�.
a
0
N
W
F•
N
Z
00,E
�
Z
4
U
?
0
R,
V
O
40
0
V
°°O
z
o
�
O
�?
o
�
N
oc
F
�
Z
U
tW7
W
0
y
U
u
F
z0
a
°
z
o
Gt
00
U
W
uoo
N
C
W
p
F,
O
e
to
e
F
cG
0�az�zp00
a�_-
p
z
o
°
F
0
S
o°
w
a<
F
oc
u
>
0
0
0
a
U.
N
w
O
O
a
Q Z uU'i
o Z
W a
.m c f
w a ~
IL Q Q
F-
�O
za
wW
t- 0
az
ui
�O
w Z
Q0
�w
w0
f-
U)a
a
3 c=i
N
0
� o
LL Q
w
Z N
d Lf)
¢z a�
i
co
w
w
z
0
0
0
z
2
a�
E
a)
a
Z H
O ,N >
Q � m'
cn Q
0,0 �o
LL C t
�a
z--b
p o
N N to
Lu
C9
II(�
0
to
io
I0
I Z �
I .r9
i �
� .tJ
• .r3 �
� .rJ
�� .ri. �
I � ..
,
OC
.�
p
OC
O
O
O
OQ
OZ.
i�' :
WQ
x
x
Ix LL•-
� o
I
I
.-
a
i
F- O
a
W
Q z
W
'
LL
US
'
O o_ I
01
N I
O
vi
1-0
w z
E... O
z
W
I
F (�
O
�Z
}
r;•
Q
U'
o
W��
"
CN 1
w
cy
a—
C)
a o &n
R Q Z
a
tL Q co Q
F
�
'
I
I
t
m m
r
�
co
W
J 0
v =
� 0
I
zz
W
O x
.�
E
�U ?
f
O 9
W a y
zo
o,
Fg �
o
Q t
Lc)
0) o
dam'
u
C
{
Eoa
N O C C
'3
If
� � •- CO
_,o o� m
i
'co
U COco 0 co Z
0 � y
c0 y m C
� i m JOR
Sc E cc
t
I
m z
_ �j,,� _ 3 w
W¢ W ¢] W ¢ W �r O o
to
0. 0. 0. 0. E I 4 4 p c o
m
w E _
o U
E>. z o�,o
m m O r.=
o� D W,0
0 N O J
c t m m"OWe CD
O m > •3 r G a z A
co «% E d °a ��:arQWWzt.
t taN C W C ca z a z Y
0
0 mLL
O y v U) .0 W 5m m m c o m
O m z0.
Ocm Cl
O n m2�
o c.ZoOo o AAd U uu m z z O �QN0ZmU::
w
0
0
a
a
z
w
w
w
IL
0
w ,n
z
m
'e) N
0 a
a L
E. O
za
ww
H C9
az
LUR
�. O
W Z
Q �
3w
w0
Qa
�U
N
0
2
w
F-
z
l w
N
w
0
Q
� o
w Ln
Q o Z 'c)
m
Z
UJ
W
cc
Wa
IL Q Q
F- 0
za
wW
�o
az
��
wZ
3w
W CD
'- W
Q Q
3�
0
w
r
z
LO
O
O
Z
2
m
4,
W
- W,
¢
Q�.-
a
a
4
co i a-
v, "4
a`
cn
E U
O`
U)
Z m
w
o w o
Q
o J
a g y
I
10
Q Q z
z ��
w
�a
a
Zz
QZ
Y
Z_-
r
y
L O O
L O
N
Q o Q
N U U
Op
r C,a
r o
U u
cn
2 r 0
Z r 0 z !— C)ti
W
r
V
W
O
W
IL
d
O
z
W
x
U
�
w
W
w
f-
r
m �
y p C C
C',
` N
G 4
cooao
U
f V C Cc Z,
G m
CO
O m
O
Y E co
4
rn U
c_
w
0
Q .w
O
o
tg � a'
p c Q:
a
E z
ix
O 0
E dd
Z Oa
O
10
a O
= Q N
Z N 0 J f
L-OWw
i
m
cm
a.
cm Im (n U.
0 cw a
o m,�EzgIL
u
00
'o= 030
:
c h
0 W N
Q)
O
C.
m2
vi
cn
w
w
0
c
a
a
z
W
W
W
IL
0
W Ln
... z Ln
o m z
Q �
o •� ai
4) t
a ti
a Ln a
F-
F. O
za
ww
f- C9
Qz
I�
�O
LLJ �z
Q0
3w
w�
F-
Qa
3y
0
N
N
W
O
0
a
a
z
U
LLL a
it
w
F-
z
IT
LO
Co
Co
0
:�
4L /
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
IN�v COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council
FROM: Cindy Sherman
DATE: September 15, 2000
RE: Heuring Estates B-3/R-1A Concept Plan
FILE NO: 163.06 - 00.30
The Planning Commission reviewed the Concept Plan for Heuring Estates at
their meeting on September 13, 2000. The Commission consensus was that the
proposed subdivision was appropriate if all zoning regulations were met.
The Commission was not in favor of a rezoning at this time. The Commission
indicated that a zoning change could be considered in the future with a specific
application. If the use requiring a zoning change were compatible with adjacent
residential uses and if an appropriate buffer was provided it would be considered.
The Commission did not feel it was appropriate to amend the zoning without a
specific use in mind.
The Commission direction was to proceed with the preliminary plat on the
residential portion of the plan and for the zoning to remain as it exists.
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
INC COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albertville Planning Commission
Albertville City Council
FROM: Deb Garross
DATE: September 6, 2000
RE: Albertville - Heuring Estates B-3/R-1A Concept Plan
FILE NO: 163.06 - 00.30
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the Planning Commission and City Council
with general review comments from NAC regarding the concept rezoning and development
plan labeled "Concept Plan C for Heuring Estates", the map dated 8/21/2000.
The subject site is located west of CSAH 19, approximately one -quarter mile north of County
Road 18 and consists of approximately 37.33 acres of land. The applicant, Leuer-
Munsterteiger has submitted a concept plan calling for the rezoning of the existing B-2,
Limited Business District to B-3, Highway Commercial and to expand the B-3 area from a
depth of 500 feet to a depth of 567 feet. The entire area proposed to be rezoned to B-3
consists of approximately 15.48 acres. The site plan indicates that the remaining 21.86 acres
would be developed according to the R-1A standards of the Zoning Ordinance (15,000
square foot lots with 100' of frontage measured at the front yard setback line).
In considering the proposal to change the B-2 zoning classification to B-3, the Planning
Commission and City Council will need to consider the appropriateness of having B-3,
Highway Commercial land uses backing up directly to single family homes in the R-1A large
lot, single family zoning district. The access to the proposed B-3 parcel should also be
considered as higher intensity commercial uses generally require full access and generate
more traffic than the uses allowed in the B-2 Limited Business District. The following table
provides a comparison between the permitted and conditional uses for both the B-2 and B-3
zoning districts.
5775 WAYZATA BOULEVARD. SUITE 555 ST. LOUIS PARK. MINNESOTA 55416
PHONE 61 2-595-9636 FAX 61 2-595-9837 E-MAIL NAC@a WINTERNET.COM
Permitted Uses in B-2 District
Personal Services
Essential Services
Convenience Grocery Store (not supermarket type
and without motor fuel facilities)
Laundromat
Professional/Commercial Leased Offices
Government and Public Related Utility
Buildings and Structures
Funeral Homes and Mortuaries
Personal Wireless Service Towers
and Antennas
Art and School Supplies
Bakery Goods
Bank, Savings and Loan, Credit Unions,
Financial Institutions
Bicycle Sales and Repair
Candy, Ice Cream, Popcorn, Dessert Sales
Camera and Photographic Materials
Delicatessen
Dry Cleaning, Laundry Pick Up Stations
Drug Store
Florist Shop
Frozen Food Store
Gift or Novelty Store
Grocery, Fruit or Vegetable Store
Grocery, Supermarket
Hardware Store and Building
Supply Operations
Hobby Store
Ice Sales with Storage
Insurance Sales
Locksmiths
Meat Market
Medical and Dental Office/Clinic
Paint and Wallpaper Sales
Plumbing, TV, Radio, Electrical Sales
and Repair
Public Utility Collection Offices
Public Garage
Real Estate Sales
Shoe Repair
Permitted Uses in B-3 District
Personal Services
Essential Services
Convenience Grocery Store (not supermarket type
and without motor fuel facilities)
Laundromat
Professional/Commercial Leased Offices
Government and Public Related Utility
Buildings and Structures
Funeral Homes and Mortuaries
Personal Wireless Service Towers
and Antennas
Art and School Supplies
Bakery Goods
Bank, Savings and Loan, Credit Unions,
Financial Institutions
Bicycle Sales and Repair
Candy, Ice Cream, Popcorn, Dessert Sales
Camera and Photographic Materials
Delicatessen
Dry Cleaning, Laundry Pick Up Stations
Drug Store
Florist Shop
Frozen Food Store
Gift or Novelty Store
Grocery, Fruit or Vegetable Store
Grocery, Supermarket
Hardware Store and Building
Supply Operations
Hobby Store
Ice Sales with Storage
Insurance Sales
Locksmiths
Meat Market
Medical and Dental Office/Clinic
Paint and Wallpaper Sales
Plumbing, TV, Radio, Electrical Sales
and Repair
Public Utility Collection Offices
Public Garage
Real Estate Sales
Shoe Repair
Auto Accessory Store
Motor Vehicle, Farm Implement, Recreation
Equipment Sales, Uses, Structures
and Outdoor Sales
Commercial Recreation
Motels, Hotels
Restaurants (Not Drive -In, Convenience or Drive
Through Types)
Private Clubs or Lodges Serving Food
or Beverages
Animal Hospitals and Kennels
Adult Uses
2
Conditional Uses in B-2 District
Commercial Planned Unit Developments
Buildings Combining Residential and
Non -Residential Uses
Personal Wireless Service Towers and Antennas
Not Located on Public
Structures
Commercial and Public Radio and
TV Antennas
Commercial Private and Private Satellite
Dish Antennas
Conditional Uses in B-3 District
Drive In and Convenience
Food Establishments
Commercial Car Washes
Motor Vehicle Fuel Sales, Truck Stop,
Auto Repair -Minor and Tire and
Battery Stores and Services
The primary issues associated with the proposal from a planning perspective are the
compatibility of the B-3 uses with the City's large lot or most restrictive single family district.
The B-3 District in general allows higher intensity commercial uses that are, per the Zoning
Ordinance, intended to be located adjacent to Interstate 94.
The proposal would in effect create an isolated highway commercial zone or higher intensity
business district along County Road 19, that is separated from all of the other B-3 zoned
property within the City. In effect, an island of B-3 zoning would be created surrounded by R-
1A to the west, B-2 to the south and east, and PUD/high density residential to the north.
In our opinion, based on the preliminary information submitted, it is our recommendation that
the B-3 zoning request concept be denied until such a time as the developer provides the
City with a specific site plan and user for the site at which time the City could reconsider the
proposal to rezone to higher intensity B-3 zoning. It is extremely important that the site be
developed with a project that recognizes the inter -relationship between the single family and
commercial districts and also accounts for traffic movement/transportation improvements.
NAC would not recommend rezoning to a higher intensity use until such a time as a specific
site plan and user are identified to ensure that the access, transportation and land use
compatibility relationships are appropriately addressed for the subject site.
Attachments:
1. Albertville Zoning Map
2. Summary of Zoning District Classification and Requirements Chart
3. Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
4. Letter from Scott Dahlke dated August 22, 2000
5. Concept Plan C, Proposed Concept Site Plan Map
PC: Linda Goeb
Mike Couri
Pete Carlson
Ralph Munsterteiger
Mike Leuer
Scott Dahlke
REVISED2-1SOo OFFICIAL ZONING MAP
A-1, Agricultural Rural
❑ A-2, Agricultural Transitional
❑ R-1A, Low Density Single Family
❑ R-1, Single Family
Z R-2, Single & Two Family
® R-3, Single & Two -Family
❑ R-4, Low Density Multiple Family
R-6, Residential High Density
❑
B-W, Business Warehouse
❑
R-7, Special Purpose High Density
❑
1-1, Light Industrial
❑
R-8, Mixed Housing
Z
I-1A, Limited Industrial
Z
R-MH, Manufactured Housing Residential❑
1-2, General Industrial
B-1, Neighborhood Business
❑
PUD, Planned Unit Development
❑
B-2, Limited Business
❑
P/l, Public/Institutional
B-3, Highway Commercial
S, Shoreland Overlay
❑
B-4, C*neral Busin�e ram'
❑
W, Wetland�.Qverlay
� �
c
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE - WRIGHT COUNTY - MINNESOTA
s
'KA
t
4LRERTVILLE - WRIGHT COUNTY - MINNE5U 1F
Summary of Zoning District Classifications & Requirements
Zoning
District
District Classification
Min. Lot
Size
Min. Lot
Width
(interior)
Setbacks
Principal
Building
Height
Max.
Bldg.
Lot
Cover
Max. #
Units
Per
Acre
F S4 S-C R
A-1
Agricultural Rural
10 acres
300 feet
100 20 75 50
35 feet
10%
1/10
A-2
Agricultural Transitional
21/2 acres
300 feet
100 20 75 50
35 feet
10%
12.5
R-1A
Low Density Single Family
15,000 sf
100 feet
30 15 30 25
35 feet
25%
2.9
R-1
Single Family
12,500 sf
90 feet
30 10 20 25
35 feet
25%
3.5
R-2
Single & Two -Family
15,000 sf
100 feet
35 10 30 25
35 feet
30%
<5
R-3
Single & Two -Family
12,500 sf
90 feet
35 10 20 25
25 feet
30%
<5
R-4
Twin Home, Townhouse,
Quadraminium, & Low
Density Multiple Family-
15,000 sf
100 feet
35 10 20 30
35 feet
40%
<10
R-5
Medium Density Multiple
Family
15,000 sf
100 feet
35 15 30 30
35 feet
50%
<10
R-6
High Density Residential
15,000 sf
100 feet
35 15 20 30
35 feet
60%
10+
R-7
Special Purpose, High
Density
15,000 sf
100 feet
35 15 30 30
35 feet
60%
10+
R-8
Mixed Housing
12,500 sf
90 feet
35 10 20 25
35 feet
60%
10+
B-1
Neighborhood, Low Intensity
Business
8,000 sf
75 feet
35 15 20 25
35 feet
60%
-
B-2
Limited Business
10,000 sf
100 feet
35 10 20 20
35 feet
50%
-
B-3
Highway Commercial
(min. district size is 5 acres
& 200' frontage)
None
100 feet
35 20 35' 20
35 feet
30%
-
B-4
General Business
None
None
None 20' — 20
35 feet
85%
-
B-W
Business Warehouse
20,000 sf
100 feet
30 302 302 30
35 feet
None
-
1-1
Light Industrial
(min. district size is 5 acres
& 300' frontage)
None
100 feet
35 10 35 20
35 feet
30%
-
I-1A
Limited Industrial
(min. district size is 5 acres
& 300' frontage)
None
100 feet
35 10 35 20
35 feet
30%
-
1-2
Heavy Industrial
20,000 sf
100 feet
35 20 20 25
35 feet
50%
-
F = Front yard setback as measured from the property line
S-1= Side yard setback on interior lots
S-C = Side yard setback on corner lots
R = Rear yard setback
' Abutting a residential district
2 Maximum setback, refer to specific ordinance requirements
Prepared by Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
10--ID,96
Quality Site Design, LLC
Civil Engineering Land Development
August 22, 2000
City of Albertville
5975 Main Avenue NE
Albertville, MN 55301
Re: Concept Plan C
Heuring Estates -
R-1A Single Family Residential Project
Dear Linda,
Please find attached Concept Plan C for the proposed Heuring Estates project. The current property
owner is Leander and Monica Heuring, and the proposed developer is Leuer-Munsterteiger Properties.
The property is currently zoned R-1A and B-2. A modification of the commercial zoning is requested
from B-2 to B-3. The request is made such that the commercial property may be marketed to businesses
that are Permitted Uses in accordance with the B-3 zoning ordinance, mainly restaurants and motels.
We are requesting that this concept plan be reviewed at the September 13, 2000 Planning Commission
meeting and at the September 18, 2000 Council meeting such that comments received may be
incorporated into the project as appropriate.
If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me at 763-550-9056.
Sincerely,
Quality Site Design, LLC
Scott Dahlke
Professional Engineer
cc: Deb Garross - NAC
Pete Carlson — SEH
Mike Couri — C&M
Ralph Munsterteiger
Mike Leuer
File 00109
3600 Holly Lane N., Suite 100, Plymouth, MN 55447 • Phone (763) 550-9056 • Fax (763) 550-3913
w z Z n
$WAN....,
0 8 a
J N �
vtosw '3Tunlaasiv
S31d1S3 JNl8n3HAffiw
WO-4
0 Ndid ld3`JNOO
_ _�.. =,�
„�--
]TOS iKYltl]1
']1Y.lS IYINJZNPI
o5 A° QDO"
's
ri
w
_
m
�wnw wes w w �+.,
rear . vge.r +wr n� wr Nw /ate r
SAO6N3M
79f
a
S
c�
a
�n
Y,
w
OO
i�i a
------------------------------------------
----------
—�
-----------�-----
�—
?
OL
sa
��
oa
42
N ��
�J
b00
o
of �OF 1% 8:-L
Qi U a
o� l
mIQ
---------- --— — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
U
- N
anNanv ONV77l.4 o
m
�a
U
r
N o
o � I
� d
0
L
(and)
SWBO Jejueo A R
12
83 X 77 J
d b (i
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
NP T COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council
FROM: Cindy Sherman
DATE: September 14, 2000
RE: Albert Villas 4th Addition — Concept Plan
FILE NO: 163.06 - 00.23
The Planning Commission reviewed the Concept Plan for Albert Villas 4tn
Addition at their meeting on September 13, 2000. The Commission reviewed the
request based on the PUD criteria recently adopted by the City, which was
included in the NAC memo dated September 6, 2000. They concluded that the
plan as submitted was not eligible for a PUD but that if modified and enhanced it
could meet the criteria.
The Commission stated the following changes should be incorporated into any
future PUD submittals:
• Up to one half the lots may be designed with 100' widths.
• Up to one half the lots may be designed with a minimum 90' width.
• Standard side yard setbacks will apply.
• Park adjacent to the "lake " shall be eliminated and a 30'-40' trail
corridor be provided.
• Park dedication shall be cash fees in lieu of land.
• Sidewalks shall connect with sidewalks in St. Michael
• A Landscape Plan, shall be provided with the Development Stage
Plan.
Without the modifications outlined the Commission consensus was to apply the
R-1A regulations to the site without variance or flexibility.
NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS
=NC NftW0* COMMUNITY PLANNING - DESIGN - MARKET RESEARCH
MEMORANDUM
TO: Albertville Mayor and City Council
Albertville Planning Commission
FROM: Cindy Sherman/Deb Garross
DATE: September 6, 2000
RE: Albert Villas 4t' Addition
FILE NO: 163.06 - 00.23
Background
Edina Development Corporation has submitted an application for Albert Villas 4t"
Addition. The application includes five requests:
1. An amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to change the land use
from Agricultural/Rural to Low Density Residential.
2. Rezone from A-1, Agricultural Rural to R-1A, Low Density Residential.
3. Shoreland PUD to allow lots to be platted based upon the shoreland
tier standard.
4. A CUP to allow the site to be developed as a Planned Unit
Development in order to allow lot width and area standard flexibility.
5. Preliminary Plat to subdivide the 99.11-acre site for residential
development.
Under the provisions for processing a PUD the concept plan is the first stage of
review. The option exists to proceed with the development stage PUD at the
same time. However, in this case based on past Council discussions and
ordinance modifications staff believes it is prudent to review the concept plan and
identify issues to be addressed at the next stage of development.
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the development proceed as a standard plat under the R-
1A regulations and that direction for modifications be provided regarding the plan
as submitted and that the public hearing for the rezoning, preliminary plat, and
PUD/CUP be continued to the next Planning Commission meeting.
Concept Plan
The concept plan as submitted proposes development of 159 single-family
homes on 99.11 acres for a density of 1.6 units per acre.
Under the provision of a PUD the following flexibility from the zoning regulations
has been requested:
Regulation
R-1A zoning required
PUD request
Lot Width
100' interior/120' corner
85'
Setbacks:
Front
30'
30'
Side -
15'
10,
Corner side
30'
20'
Rear
25'
30'
In addition, the concept plan depicts the use of 60' street right-of-way widths with
32' wide streets and sidewalks provided in some locations. Direction should be
provided if more sidewalks are expected over what is shown.
The ordinance also requires that lots be a minimum of 15,000 Sq. ft. in area with
12,000 square feet of upland area. A graph has been provided on the plans that
lists each lot with total lot size and upland area of each lot. With the grading and
wetland fill proposed it appears that the lot area provision is satisfied. Without
wetland fill it appears approximately 6 lots will fall below the 12,000 upland
standard.
Parkland dedication 6.76 acres in size is identified adjacent to the lake. Based
on recent Park and Trail Comprehensive Plan discussions this additional land
may not be desirable for public park. Staff believes a trail corridor may be
adequate adjacent to the lake. The area currently shown as park could be
modified to include some lots, subject to shoreland regulation.
Usable lot areas on some parcels are very limited by setbacks, multiple
easements, wetlands or ponding. Specific lots of concern are lots 7-11, block 2;
lots 31-38, block 2; lots 16 and 18-21, block 2; lot 4, Block 9; The
Commission/Council should discuss if the usable yard area of parcels is a
concern. Staff recommends that block 7 be redesigned to eliminate lot 11 and to
modify lots 1, 21, and 20.
The plan depicts a 20' wetland buffer shown adjacent to all wetlands and ponds;
30' is required adjacent to wetlands by City regulation.
Albert Villas 4th Addition
Page 2 of 4
Issues Analysis
The City Council adopted an ordinance earlier this year that lists when PUD's will
be considered. In part, the ordinance states that:
The proposed PUD shall accomplish a majority of the purposes and the
design criteria outlined in the ordinance and shall not simply be for the enhanced
economic gain of the applicant. It shall be the applicant's responsibility to
demonstrate compliance with this requirement and provide specific
documentation addressing this matter as part of the zoning application. Based
on this documentation, the City shall determine that some benefit will be realized
by City if a PUD is permitted.
The purpose of the PUD, Planned Unit Development District is to provide
comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow flexibility in the
development of neighborhoods and/or non-residential areas by incorporating
design modifications and/or a mixture of uses. The PUD process, by allowing
deviation from the strict district and performance provisions of this Title, is
intended to encourage:
A. Innovations in development to the extent that the growing
demands for all styles of economic expansion may be met by greater
variety in type, design, and placement of structures and by the
conservation and more efficient use of land in such developments.
B. Higher standards of site and building design through the use
of trained and experienced land planners, architects, landscape architects
and engineers.
C. More convenience in location and design of development
and service facilities.
D. The preservation and enhancement of desirable site
characteristics such as natural topography, wetlands, woodlands, and
geologic features and the prevention of soil erosion which are over and
above minimum standards and expectations.
E. A creative use of land and related physical development
which allows for a phased and orderly development and land use pattern.
F. An efficient use of land resulting in smaller networks of
utilities and streets, thereby lowering development costs, long term
maintenance expenses, and public investments.
Albert Villas 4th Addition
Page 3 of 4
I
G. A development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the
Albertville Comprehensive Plan (PUD is not intended as a means to vary
applicable planning and zoning principles).
H. A more desirable and creative environment than might be
possible through the strict application of zoning and subdivision
regulations of the City.
The ordinance was drafted and adopted in order to provide a basis for the City to
use in determining when a PUD is an appropriate tool and the criteria under
which a PUD will be considered. The key provisions include the City's
determination that the project, under a PUD, will have benefit to the City, the
listing of specific desired outcomes of the PUD process (purpose), and specific
design criteria to be included with various types of projects.
Conclusion
Based on the information submitted staff does not believe this application meets
the test of providing benefit to the City. The subdivision design is not unique or
innovative. It appears that the reason for the PUD is to allow flexibility in the lot
width and setbacks. Staff believes the property should be processed as a
standard preliminary plat under the R-1A and shoreland regulations.
Albert Villas 41h Addition
Page 4 of 4
Utility Plan.dwg, 08/16/00 12:50:20 PM, AG
n D n
f � �
�D to
b
z
m
N m
z
z
�
v
Q
-m
O� S<
y
o
w
S"
°O
°
DDDDDDmm
�yfI+F�I1�
o
°m
c
° oap
R
(A cica�eSp
ZAA
��
°
wS A
m
p
1"' Oj O8
V
(7
N`-`
O'G.
04�
S
°'
O Q O
�l �� m
�
Q.
4 V
P O G .°.
N.•, *J'O AEG°
�3
G
O
'
w3Q^O
]
O Sao
A
its
t3
0
0
OOiG
m
��o
Kz
�_
,
)
0
1
1
f#�
f^
)
b
00
'jS
fP4�
s
.....I....y._.r."___........................-..............�� — .. i
Ave ---
T 7,/
1 iw P O P' S F URmpm
: ..�.._.. O
tPmm 10 DORM" k VIIIIY F' --r-_T_—T i__ �L -T"-T
Nv
W _ /'
T
3
if 19 .16 �3
1 7777? 77 a v PQ<-P / •r:i:•'/ / %i { )I I !
;. -_. ., , la. a. -�' � 4,.---`1- }�-U•_ Lam' �b
•
Y+ 49 7. �\ y„ , xj✓ 1. / I / bi '• r- T e�T T. �� ��
ai
19
��� •N S � •ti \ v � I I s t �'�• ��J��r'•�•
As tia7 1 I pv.f-
�` •>..,. >�''�� �'
it
I /
\
a: lu
lit
Go
rs
\.\ /. / \ l t •.
�y a �� •" ,� a •• � 3%� '` � ./' ��
� 1
A 1 eT w
i'
I X
,c F "'_,� / g!/ Pam'¢ �:., �,/X'•. �l. �� /' �.... � •
• (l _ N • / / ,Z r Lei
....
`ii '• Y
10
� � �' � ,fir/_,.:..` i �....•.... � '�''• .; -TI � �. � ;,, I� ,, \�\Y.
bi
l / 4.
s \ �! �.;,... I N , -` � �, �, ;I V sue. \ , � _•�
W /
�3g \� j.. �- it { �• �j'' •�O• U6. A \ (l�
—7r: c
Ail ta
`• n
91 ab
• � 1
,
1 _n
lei
............
\, c \
I� F •. :. I L - -------- .............................. ................ *11, ................................
- _' ^^" - _cVft�Tll'RA'f�.IM�14A___
4P
I
>•MLA6'--------------- --------� /
n
.. w�
�.�
OPOSED
POND
_
!
AI7RNIAOE ID
WI.
uitI7�.--__—/f—
w
1'
w
X
N
I
tv O. II
'll
:a II
°' II
II
__I-- i , •I / I I I I
I �� It
- —
�� I
�•�-
/
r
v
s
V
�a
o
full 1110
110 11
a og
_ i;
t�t�2tsf5 348t i�i4 � a
;3a.:a?a SPAPA of
r �
AA
O
n
jig
yP pP
Pp P
Ras
It
as
Q�:�•
o
n
i
MATCHUNE SEE SHEET 1
14
I
1. I I j� i i '�., � I •j ; I ' ill ,` � r; I;-i.._.. I C7 f �. " , .�.• I I I I , • %��I I EEO, I : cni I I .I "wF-
1
�.1
u ...
I —
gg
Zt+
R a -
pny7' Qsp, 7 4p e
I "...,
�y JAB 1N�,�
CO
Q _
fill
g12
S I M
10
is 30
0
' tieba
,
Ob
41,
m
HA 0 r ' 'minary Utility Plan.dwg, 08116/00 12:50:02 PM, AG
A n
Y--------------
U
A ` �
_-----------------
_
V1
V ({ O
1 r
0oCO�� t
1 w 1•,� -------
1
. 1
V -r�
Ffq
1, -v
310G k.�
tiFm
I ov
i �—
icc
1
't o cj)
r-
14
DD
co
n
OD
a o ` �. 14
��
y w_ 00 O
Y �
av NJ
v
'l
Ka
�- o
rn
I' A C O rt p G_ .(A°�
YI V� x
rTt40" oy�
i T�Z ti4
S
3ll
3�IINOO
O 0_0 ppp11=0 �
op1 q . N O n �O
Zy7�IOA � 217�p�' ,o o �a � �m a� �' o � � ��11 ,�-�•�
C O QJ A m O Y a
FU fitzI I. `�° o $ o O $ o pI ocm°a Z
i N�Qroo n gN^y'Rc3.
yCJ YO O^.���
A Rx
NZ>2
AZO °O w o ° a is Y= K3 v5
;V1 R j F
'o n o » K M mO i°
�p� z m 1 ° S20
pp Op> c
na a � °
N g ^1I
4:
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
RESOLUTION # 2000-27
RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT
FOR THE 2000 BARTHEL INDUSTRIAL DRIVE IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT
WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council has duly considered an improvement project
consisting of the 2000 Barthel Industrial Drive Improvement Project; and
WHEREAS, said improvements have been duly approved and ordered, and bids for said
project have been advertised in the official City newspaper and the Construction Bulletin for the
period required under state statute;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA, as follows:
(1) That all bids for said construction were duly opened at the City Hall at 10:00 AM
on the 14th of September, 2000.
(2) The bid of Dennis Fehn in the amount of $133,237.80 for the construction of said
improvements in accordance with the plans and specifications and advertisement for
bids is the lowest responsible bid and shall be and hereby is accepted.
(3) The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract
with said bidder for the construction of said improvements for and on behalf of the
City of Albertville.
(4) The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders
the deposits made with their bids, except the deposit of the successful bidder.
ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE THIS
18th DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2000.
ATTEST:
Linda Goeb, City Clerk
John Olson, Mayor
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
CONDITIONAL USE/PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
ALBERT VILLAS SECOND ADDITION
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of , 2000 by and
between EDINA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION referred to herein as "Developer";
and the CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, County of Wright, State of Minnesota, hereinafter
referred to as "City";
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer is the fee owner of the real property described in the
attached Exhibit A, which real property is proposed to be subdivided and platted for
development, and which subdivision, which is the subject of this Agreement, is intended to
bear the name "Albert Villas Second Addition" and shall hereinafter be referred to in its
entirety as "Said Plat" or "Subject Propert/, '; and
WHEREAS, Developer intends to subdivide 40.85 gross acres into 78 single-family
residential lots for purposes of constructing 78 single-family residential units; and
WHEREAS, approval of a Conditional Use Permit/Planned Unit Development is
required to allow for the aforementioned subdivision proposed by Developer; and
WHEREAS, the City has given preliminary approval of Developer's plat of Albert
Villas Second Addition contingent upon compliance with certain City requirements
including, but not limited to, matters set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the City requires that certain public improvements including, but not
limited to bituminous street, curb and gutter, grading, drainage, sanitary sewer, water and
storm sewer (hereafter "Municipal Improvements") be installed to serve the Subject
Property and be financed by Developer; and
WHEREAS, the City further requires that certain on- and off -site improvements be
installed by the Developer within Said Plat, which improvements consist of boulevards, top
soil and sod, grading control per lot, bituminous or concrete driveways, parking lot,
drainage swales, berming, street signs, street cleanup during project development, erosion
control, and other site -related items; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement is entered into for the purpose of setting forth and
memorializing for the parties and subsequent owners, the understandings and covenants of
the parties concerning the development of the Said Plat and the conditions imposed thereon;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AND HEREIN MUTUALLY
AGREED, in consideration of each party's promises and considerations herein set forth, as
follows:
Conditional Use Permit. Developer is hereby granted a Conditional Use Permit to
allow the development of Said Plat as a Planned Unit Development with flexibility
from the strict requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance in relation to minimum
lot sizes, lot widths and set -back requirements. Unless otherwise explicitly set forth
in this Agreement, however, Developer must conform to the requirements of the
Albertville Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance, as well as all other applicable land
use regulations. Developer agrees that the following conditions will be met on a
continuing basis:
A. A property owners' association is established in compliance with Sections 1100
and 2700 of the City Zoning Ordinance and a property maintenance agreement
and declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions are approved by the
City Attorney and recorded against the title to each lot within Said Plat and shall
remain in force throughout the life of Said Plat.
B. All grading, drainage, utility, wetland mitigation, and transportation issues that
arise during development of Said Plat shall be subject to review and approval by
the City Engineer.
C. Trees, shrubs, berms and screening are planted and installed as shown on the
landscape plan attached as Exhibit B. Developer shall promptly replace all
landscaping plants which die within two years of planting.
D. Developer shall, at its own expense, construct sidewalks and trails in the
2
locations shown in the attached Exhibit B.
E. The applicant shall file deed restrictions with the Wright County Recorder of
Deeds for all lots adjacent to or containing NSP and/or Amoco pipeline
easements indicating that no structures can be built within the easement areas.
The applicant shall also file deed restrictions with the Wright County Recorder of
Deeds for all lots adjacent to or containing wetlands, storm water ponds, or which
are adjacent to Wright County Ditch No. 9 indicating that no structures can be
built within 20 feet of wetlands, storm water ponds or Wright County Ditch No.
9. All such deed restrictions shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney.
F. Prior to the sale of any lot(s) within Said Plat, Developer shall provide the City
with a copy of the sales literature identifying NSP and Amoco easement building
restrictions, the required twenty (20) foot wetland setback building restrictions,
the location of all future parks within Said Plat, and the location of all sidewalks,
trails and easements. Developer agrees that the aforementioned sales literature
will be distributed to all potential lot buyers within Said Plat prior to the sale of
any of said lots by Developer.
G. It is the understanding of the Parties that Developer does not presently intend to
make use of model homes within Said Plat. The Parties acknowledge and agree
that should Developer decide to construct any model homes within Said Plat, use
of such Model Homes shall be consistent with Section 2200 of the Albertville
Zoning Ordinance. The Parties further agree that prior to construction of any
model homes, the Parties will enter a model home agreement and that said model
home agreement shall be subject to review and approval by the City Attorney.
H. The following requirements apply to the Subject Property:
Type
• Setback (PUD periphery)
• Setback (front)
• Setback (side -interior)
• Setback (side -corner)
• Setback (rear)
• Wetland Setback
3
Distance
35 feet
30 feet
10 feet
20 feet
30 feet
20 feet from ordinary high-
water mark.
2. Construction of Municipal Improvements.
A. The Developer shall construct those Municipal Improvements located on and
off Said Plat as detailed in the Plans and Specifications for Albertvillas, as
prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. dated August 7, 2000 and on file with the
City Clerk, said improvements to include installation of bituminous street,
curb and gutter, water mains, sanitary and storm sewers, storm water ponding
and site grading. All such improvements shall be constructed according to the
standards adopted by the City, along with all items required by the City
Engineer. Unless the City Engineer specifies a later date, said improvements
shall be installed by October 31, 2001, with the wear course of bituminous
pavement to be installed after May 15, 2002, but before June 30, 2002.
B. The Developer warrants to the City for a period of two years from the date the
City accepts the fmished Municipal Improvements that all such improvements
have been constructed to City standards and shall suffer no significant
impairments, either to the structure or to the surface or other usable areas due
to improper construction, said warranty to apply both to poor materials and
faulty workmanship.
C. Developer shall provide the City with lien waivers from all contractors and
subcontractors engaged to construct said improvements on Said Plat. Should
Developer fail to provide the City with all applicable lien waivers, the City
reserves the right to draw upon Developer's surety and pay any contractors
who performed work on any Municipal Improvements and whom Developer
has failed to fully pay for the performance of said work.
D. The City shall, at its option, have the City Engineer present on Said Plat for
inspection purposes at all times (or such times as the City may deem
necessary) during the construction and installation of said Municipal
Improvements. Developer agrees to pay for all costs incurred by the City
during said inspections.
3. Construction of On- and Off -Site Improvements.
A. Developer shall construct all on- and off -site improvements including
installation of boulevards, street signs, traffic signs, yard top soil, sod and
seed in all yards, grading control per lot, bituminous or concrete driveways
and parking lots, drainage swales, berming, and like items as necessary, street
4
cleanup during project development, and erosion control, all as required by
City ordinance. Front, side and portions of the back yards shall be sodded in
accordance with the Residential Development Standards as on file with the
City Administrator's Office. Those portions of the backyards not required to
be sodded may be seeded with grass seed or sodded. In all cases permanent
turf or grass must be established over all areas of the lot not covered by a hard
or impervious surface. Said on- and off -site improvements shall be installed
no later than October 31, 2003, with the exception of erosion control,
drainage swales and berming, which shall be installed upon initial grading of
Said Plat.
B. Developer shall, at its own expense, cause the following items to be installed
within the development, all such items to be installed under ground, within
the street right of way or such other location as may be approved by the City
Engineer, accessible to all lots and in compliance with all applicable state and
local regulations:
i. Electrical power supply, to be provided by Northern States Power or
other such carrier;
ii. Natural gas supply, to be provided by Minnegasco or other such
carrier;
iii. Telephone service, to be provided by Sprint/United Telephone
Company or other such carrier;
iv. Cable TV service, to be provided by a local carrier;
In addition, the Developer shall, at its own expense, cause street lights and
street signs to be of such type and to be installed at such locations as required
by the City Engineer and in conformance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices.
C. Developer has submitted a utility plan for Said Plat showing all existing and
proposed utility lines and easements, attached hereto and incorporated herein
as Exhibit C. Developer agrees to have all utilities installed according to this
Exhibit C.
D. Developer shall install silt fencing in back of all curbing within 30 days after
said curbing is installed, or 7 days after the "small utilities" (gas, phone,
electrical and cable television) have been installed, whichever occurs sooner.
5
Developer shall be allowed to substitute hay bales for a 22-foot section of silt
fencing on each lot for the purpose of allowing construction vehicles to pass
from the street to each lot. No construction vehicles shall pass from the street
to the lots except through such designated 22-foot section of hay bales.
Developer shall remove all hay bales and silt fencing from each lot as sod is
installed upon said lot.
E. Notwithstanding the requirements of subparagraph 3A above, the Developer
shall install to the City's satisfaction improvements for each lot or parcel prior
to the date that a certificate of occupancy (temporary or permanent) is issued
by the City for a building located on the lot, unless the certificate of
occupancy is issued after October Ist and before March 30th in any given
year, in which case a certificate of occupancy shall be issued only if the
owner of the lot has entered into an escrow agreement with the City and
provided an escrow for 150% of the estimated cost of said improvements
pursuant to City Ordinance.
4. Intended Use of Subdivision Lots. The City and Developer agree that the lots in
Said Plat are intended only for single-family residential use in the number and the
configuration as are shown on the attached Exhibit D. Developer shall construct
only single family dwellings in the number and configuration shown on the attached
Exhibit D, unless Said Property is rezoned by the City in the future. Outlots A and B
shall remain unbuildable unless and until replatted into numbered lots and blocks.
Developer represents that it shall replat Outlot B in the future as part of a future
single-family residential plat.
5. Surety Requirements.
A. Developer will provide the City with an irrevocable letter of credit (or other
surety as approved by the City Attorney) as security that the obligations of the
Developer under this contract shall be performed. Said letter of credit or
surety shall be in the amount of $865,100 representing the sum of 100% of
the estimated cost of the Municipal Improvements ($800,000), 50% of the on
and off -site improvements ($47,400), and 150% of the estimated cost for
landscaping/screening materials ($17,700). Said letter of credit or surety must
meet the approval of the City attorney as to form and issuing bank.
B. The City may draw on said letter of credit or surety to complete work not
performed by Developer (including but not limited to on- and off -site
improvements, Municipal Improvements described above, erosion control,
T
and other such measures), to pay liens on property to be dedicated to the City,
to reimburse itself for costs incurred in the drafting, execution, administration
or enforcement of this Agreement, to repair or correct deficiencies or other
problems which occur to the Municipal Improvements during the warranty
period, or to otherwise fulfill the obligations of Developer under this
agreement.
C. In the event that any cash, irrevocable letter of credit, or other surety referred
to herein is ever utilized and found to be deficient in amount to pay or
reimburse the City in total as required herein, the Developer agrees that upon
being billed by the City, Developer will pay within thirty (30) days of the
mailing of said billing, the said deficient amount. If there should be an
overage in the amount of utilized security, the City will, upon making said
determination, refund to the Developer any monies which the City has in its
possession which are in excess of the actual costs of the project as paid by the
City.
D. Developer hereby agrees to allow the City to specially assess Developer's
property for any and all costs incurred by the City in enforcing any of the
terms of this agreement should Developer's letter of credit or surety prove
insufficient or should Developer fail to maintain said letter of credit or surety
in the amount required above within 30 days of mailing of written request by
the City. Should the City assess Developer's property for said costs,
Developer agrees not to contest or appeal such assessment and waives all
statutory rights of appeal under Minnesota Statutes, including Minnesota
Statute 429.081.
E. That portion of said cash, irrevocable letter of credit or other surety with
respect to the performance of Site Improvements shall be released upon
certification of the City Engineer and approval of the City Council that all
such items are satisfactorily completed pursuant to this Agreement.
F. In the event a surety referred to herein is in the form of an irrevocable letter of
credit, which by its terms may become null and void prior to the time at
which all monetary or other obligations of the Developer are paid or satisfied,
it is agreed that the Developer shall provide the City with a new letter of
credit or other surety, acceptable to the City, at least forty-five (45) days prior
to the expiration of the original letter of credit. If a new letter of credit is not
received as required above, the City may without notice to Developer declare
a default in the terms of this Agreement and thence draw in part or in total, at
7
the City's discretion, upon the expiring letter of credit to avoid the loss of
surety for the continued obligation. The form of any irrevocable letter of
credit or other surety must be approved by the City Attorney prior to its
issuance.
6. Surety Release.
A. Periodically, as payments are made by the Developer for the completion of
portions of the Municipal Improvements, On- and Off -site Improvements,
and/or Landscaping Improvements and when it is reasonably prudent, the
Developer may request of the City that the surety be proportionately reduced
for that portion of the Municipal Improvements which have been fully
completed and payment made therefor. All such decisions shall be at the
discretion of the City Council. The City's cost for processing reduction
request(s) shall be billed to the Developer. Such cost shall be paid to the City
within thirty (30) days of the date of mailing of the billing.
B. The Developer may request of the City a reduction or release of any surety as
follows:
i. When another acceptable letter of credit or surety is furnished to the
City to replace a prior letter of credit or surety.
ii. When all or a portion of the Municipal Improvements or the on- and
off -site improvements or the Landscaping Improvements have been
installed, the letter of credit or surety may be reduced by the dollar
amount attributable to that portion of improvements so installed,
except that the City shall retain the letter of credit or surety in the
amount of 10% of the estimated construction price of the Municipal
Improvements during the first year of the warranty period and 5% of
the estimated construction price of the Municipal Improvements
during the second year of the warranty period, and the City shall retain
the letter of credit or surety in the amount of 25% of the estimated
landscaping costs for two years from the time of the installation of said
landscaping materials.
iii. As to all requests brought under this paragraph B, the City Council
shall have complete discretion whether to reduce or not to reduce said
letter of credit or surety.
C. The costs incurred by the City in processing any reduction request shall be
billed to the Developer and paid to the City within thirty (30) days of billing.
7. Abandonment of Project - Costs and Expenses. In the event Developer should
abandon the proposed development of the Subject Property, the City's costs and
expenses related to attorney's fees, professional review, drafting of this Agreement,
preparation of the feasibility report, plans and specifications, and any other expenses
undertaken in reliance upon Developer's various representations shall be paid by said
Developer within thirty (30) days after receipt of a bill for such costs from the City.
In addition, in the event the Developer abandons the project, in whole or in part,
ceases substantial field work for more than nine (9) months, fails to provide
sufficient ground -cover to prevent continuing soil erosion from the Said Plat, or fails
to leave the abandoned property in a condition which can be mowed using
conventional lawn mowing equipment, Developer agrees to pay all costs the City
may incur in taking whatever action is reasonably necessary to provide ground -cover
and otherwise restore Said Plat to the point where undeveloped grounds are level and
covered with permanent vegetation sufficient to prevent continuing soil erosion from
Said Plat and to facilitate mowing of Said Plat. In the event that said costs are not
paid, the City may specially assess such costs against the lots within Said Plat and/or
take necessary legal action to recover such costs, including attorneys fees. Developer
knowingly and voluntarily waives all rights to appeal said special assessments under
Minnesota Statutes section 429.081.
8. Developer to Pay City's Costs and Expenses. It is understood and agreed that the
Developer will reimburse the City for all reasonable administrative, legal, planning,
engineering and other professional costs incurred in the creation, administration,
enforcement or execution of this Agreement and the approval of Said Plat, as well as
all reasonable engineering expenses incurred by the City in designing, approving,
installing, and inspecting said Improvements described above. Developer agrees to
pay all such costs within 30 days of billing by the City. If Developer fails to pay said
amounts, then the City may specially assess such costs against the lots within Said
Plat. Developer knowingly and voluntarily waives all rights to appeal said special
assessments under Minnesota Statutes section 429.081. Developer has the right to
request time sheets or work records to verify said billing prior to payment.
9. Erosion and Siltation Control. Before any grading is started on any site, all erosion
control measures as shown on the approved erosion control plan shall be strictly
complied with as set forth in the attached Exhibit D. Developer shall also install all
erosion control measures deemed necessary by the City Engineer should the erosion
control plan prove inadequate in any respect.
9
10. Drainage Requirements. Developer shall comply with all requirements set forth
for drainage into any county ditch or other ditch through which water from Subject
Property may drain, and shall make any necessary improvements or go through any
necessary procedures to ensure compliance with any federal, state, county or city
requirements, all at Developer's expense.
11. Maintain Public Property Damaged or Cluttered During Construction.
Developer agrees to assume full financial responsibility for any damage which may
occur to public property including but not limited to streets, street sub- base, base,
bituminous surface, curb, utility system including but not limited to watermain,
sanitary sewer or storm sewer when said damage occurs as a result of the activity
which takes place during the development of Said Plat. The Developer further
agrees to pay all costs required to repair the streets, utility systems and other public
property damaged or cluttered with debris when occurring as a direct or indirect
result of the construction that takes place in Said Plat.
Developer agrees to clean the streets on a daily basis if required by the City.
Developer further agrees that any damage to public property occurring as a result
of construction activity on Said Plat will be repaired immediately if deemed to be
an emergency by the City. Developer further agrees that any damage to public
property as a result of construction activity on Said Plat will be repaired within 14
days if not deemed to be an emergency by the City.
If Developer fails to so clean the streets or repair or maintain said public
property, the City may undertake making or causing it to be cleaned up, repaired or
maintained. When the City undertakes such activity, the Developer shall reimburse
the City for all of its expenses within thirty (30) days of its billing to the Developer.
If the Developer fails to pay said bill within thirty (30) days, then the City may
specially assess such costs against the lots within Said Plat and/or take necessary
legal action to recover such costs and the Developer agrees that the City shall be
entitled to attorneys fees incurred by the City as a result of such legal action.
Developer knowingly and voluntarily waives all rights to appeal said special
assessments under Minnesota Statutes section 429.081.
12. Temporary Easement Rights. Developer shall provide access to the Subject
Property at all reasonable times to the City or its representatives for purposes of
inspection or to accomplish any necessary work pursuant to this Agreement.
10
13. Miscellaneous.
A. Developer agrees that all construction items required under this Agreement
are items for which Developer is responsible for completing and all work
shall be done at Developer's expense.
B. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph or phrase of
this Contract is for any reason held invalid by a Court of competent
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portion of this Contract.
C. If building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of public
improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and the costs resulting in
delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public
improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors,
materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties.
D. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment
to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers
shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of
the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce
this Contract shall not be a waiver or release.
E. This Contract shall run with the land and shall be recorded against the title to
the property. After the Developer has completed all work and obligations
required of it under this Contract, at the Developer's request, the City will
execute and deliver to the Developer a release of its obligations under this
Agreement. However, at no time shall the City release those provisions of
this Agreement which, in the City's sole judgment, contain continuing
obligations. Said continuing obligations include, but are not limited to,
paragraphs 1, 4, 8, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 25.
F. The Developer represents to the City that Said Plat complies with all City,
county, state and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to:
subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If
the City determines that Said Plat does not comply, the City may, at its
option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the
Developer so complies. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease
work until there is compliance.
11
A yy
G. Prior to the execution of this Agreement and prior to the start of any
construction on the Subject Property, Developer shall provide the City with
evidence of good and marketable title to all of Subject Property. Evidence of
good and marketable title shall consist of a Title Insurance Policy or
Commitment from a national title insurance company, or an abstract of title
updated by an abstract company registered under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
H. Developer shall comply with all water, ponding and wetland related
restrictions, if any, required by the City of Albertville and/or any applicable
provisions of State and Federal law.
I. The Albertville City Council reserves the right to allocate wastewater
treatment capacity in a manner it finds to be in the best interests of the public
health, safety and welfare. Developer acknowledges and agrees that the City
is currently in the process of expanding its wastewater treatment plant
capacity. Developer further acknowledges and agrees that delay in the
availability of wastewater treatment plant capacity may occur for some lots
located within Said Plat and that such delay in capacity availability may also
delay the issuance of building permits for some lots within Said Plat.
Developer shall not place any structure at an elevation such that the lowest
grade opening is less than two feet above the highest known surface water
level or ordinary high water level or less than one foot above the 100-year
flood level of any adjacent water body or wetland. If sufficient data on high
water levels is not available, the elevation of the line of permanent aquatic
vegetation shall be used as the estimated high water elevation. When fill is
required to meet this elevation, the fill shall be allowed to stabilize and
construction shall not begin until the property has been approved by the
Building Inspector or a professional soils engineer.
14. Violation of Agreement.
A. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, upon any default by
Developer, its successors or assigns, of any of the covenants and agreements
herein contained, the City shall give Developer thirty (30) days mailed notice
thereof (via certified mail), and if such default is not cured within said thirty
(30) day period, the City is hereby granted the right and the privilege to
declare any deficiencies governed by this Agreement due and payable to the
12
City in full. The thirty (30) day notice period shall be deemed to run from the
date of deposit in the United States Mail. Upon failure to cure by Developer,
the City may thence immediately and without notice or consent of the
Developer complete the Developer's obligations under this Agreement, and
specially assess the costs thereof against the lots within Said Plat and/or bring
legal action against the Developer to collect any sums due to the City
pursuant to this Agreement, plus all costs and attorney's fees incurred in
enforcing this agreement. Developer knowingly and voluntarily waives all
statutory rights to appeal said special assessment under Minnesota Statutes
section 429.081.
B. Breach of any of the terms of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds
for denial of building permits and/or revocation of the Conditional Use
Permit.
15. Dedications to the City.
A. Municipal Improvement Dedications: The Developer, upon presentation to the
City of evidence of good and marketable title to Subject Property, and upon
completion of all construction work and certification of completion by the City
Engineer, shall make the following dedications to the City:
Developer shall dedicate easements to the City over, under and across
all trails, and shall dedicate all parks within Said Plat, if any, to the
City, in a form and with legal descriptions acceptable to both the City
Engineer and City Attorney.
2. Developer shall dedicate to the City all streets within Said Plat.
B. Park and Trail Dedications: Developer acknowledges and agrees that in
order to satisfy the City's park dedication requirements for Said Plat,
Developer is required to pay $1,300 per platted lot. There are 78 lots being
platted in this phase. Prior to release of Said Plat, Developer shall pay City
a cash payment totaling $101,400, an amount representing the total park
dedication cash requirement (78 lots x $1,300) for this phase. In addition,
Developer shall receive credit toward park dedication requirements for the
actual cost of constructing and installing trails as shown on the attached
Exhibit B. No such credit shall be given for construction of sidewalks
within Said Plat. Developer shall provide documentation of the cost of trail
construction. Developer shall not receive credit for trails or portions of
13
trails constructed on the shoulder or in the right-of-way of a public street.
16. Phased Development. If the plat is a phase of a multi -phased preliminary plat, the
City may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases until public
improvements for all prior phases have been satisfactorily completed. Development
of subsequent phases may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases
are approved by the City. Approval of this phase of the Development shall not be
construed as approval of future phases nor shall approval of this phase bind the City
to approve future Development phases. All future Development phases shall be
governed by the City's Comprehensive Plan, Zoning ordinance, Subdivision
ordinance, and other ordinances in effect at the time such future Development phases
are approved by the City.
17. Indemnity. Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless
from claims made by Developer and third parties for damages sustained or costs
incurred resulting from Said Plat approval and development. The Developer shall
indemnify the City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages or expenses
which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorney's
fees. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this contract.
18. Assignment of Contract. The obligations of the Developer under this Contract
cannot be assigned without the express written consent of the City Council through
Council resolution.
19. Limited Approval. Approval of this Agreement by the City Council and issuance
of the Conditional Use Permit which is the subject of this agreement in no way
constitutes approval of anything other than that which is explicitly specified in this
Agreement.
20. Sanitary Sewer and Water Trunk Line Fees. Prior to the City releasing Said
Plat, Developer agrees to pay a trunk sewer charge in the amount of $57,190,
representing $1,400 per acre of Said Plat multiplied by 40.85 gross acres contained
in Said Plat. In addition, prior to release of Said Plat, Developer agrees to pay a
trunk water charge in the amount of $44,935 representing $1,100 per acre of Said
Plat multiplied by 40.85 gross acres contained in Said Plat. Developer agrees to
pay said amounts prior to the City's release of Said Plat.
21. Professional Fees. The Developer will pay all reasonable professional fees incurred
by the City as a result of City efforts to enforce the terms of this Agreement. Said
fees include attorney's fees, engineer's fees, planner's fees, and any other professional
14
fees incurred by the City in attempting to enforce the terms of this Agreement. The
Developer will also pay all reasonable attorney's and professional fees incurred by
the City in the event an action is brought upon a letter of credit or other surety
furnished by the Developer as provided herein.
22. Plans Attached as Exhibits. All plans attached to this Agreement as Exhibits are
incorporated into this Agreement by reference as they appear. Unless otherwise
specified in this Agreement, Developer is bound by said plans and responsible for
implementation of said plans as herein incorporated.
23. Integration Clause, Modification by Written Agreement Only. This Agreement
represents the full and complete understanding of the parties and neither party is
relying on any prior agreement or statement(s), whether oral or written.
Modification of this Agreement may occur only if in writing and signed by a duly
authorized agent of both parties.
24. Notification Information. Any notices to the parties herein shall be in writing,
delivered by hand (to the City Clerk for the City) or registered mail addressed as
follows to the following parties:
City of Albertville
c/o City Clerk
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
Telephone: (612) 497-3384
Edina Land Corporation
700 Industry Avenue
Anoka, MN 55303
Attention: Rick Lewondowski
Telephone: (612) 323-9086
25. Agreement Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the
representatives, heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE,
15
By
Its Mayor
By
Its Clerk
EDINA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
By Rick Lewondowski
Its President
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2000, by John A. Olson as Mayor of the City of Albertville, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the city and pursuant to the authority of the
City Council.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
, 2000, by Linda Goeb, as Clerk -Administrator of the City of
Albertville, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the city and pursuant to the
authority of the City Council.
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
Notary Public
16
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2000, by Rick Lewondowski, as President of Edina Development
Corporation.
Court and MacArthur Law Office
P.O. Box 369
705 Central Avenue East
St. Michael, MN 55376
(612)497-1930
Notary Public
17
EXHIBIT A TO DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT
The Real Property subject to the Developer's Agreement is legally described as follows
(after the filing of the Albert Villas Second Addition Plat):
Lots 1-8, Block l
Lots 1-7, Block 2
Lots 1-37, Block 3
Lots 1-7, Block 4
Lots 1-5, Block 5
Lots 1-14, Block 6
Outlots A and B
All said property in Albert Villas Second Addition plat, City of Albertville, County
of Wright, Minnesota.
18
it oil
[fill
�..
fit
mi
Na ��—r---T----i---i----i -------T---- r--- ----, ------- T---T-- �_
%
1 I ■
I I 1 1 I -- �.�..n ... ♦uw i i I
---^'^
( I I I I 1 � 1 I I • ,```•` U I I
♦ I�"Tr__._fT___'1T_-�,---,�-__i-31%._ � � __- �-_•' ----1 -__ I ----I --_ -�-1 �' w 7 i m 1 M �A
3" 111 III ili II+ III ra III 1 V I I P 1 1 Q 1 ►. i W 11 N i '+ 1 O I 11 III ,II III
� R +I+ oe III V II+ m I N III ^ Ilb pl 111 I I i t I I I I I I 1 1 111 Ijl III it
III III III II 111 III r 1 1 I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 II I I I I
-JIL___JIL___JIL___JIL�_�II III II (7v I 1 I I II III
J L__
J L_- I 111 III J�-.-
J!l__w!I;dv�=J----
__�Tr-__
1
Ir
III III III'�__�1j1
I IW 111 II Zia 111
11
�A
7
Y
^
Jw
r
01
Nu
41
0
00
N
59
La
A
�.t26
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA
ORDINANCE 2000-
AN ORDINANCE REQUIRING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN
ESCROW TO SECURE THE INSTALLATION OF REQUIRED
IMPROVEMENTS FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION
The City Council of the City of Albertville, Minnesota, hereby ordains as
follows:
Prior to the issuance of a final certificate of occupancy for any newly -
constructed residential dwelling, the owner of said dwelling shall have
installed all improvements to the property upon which the dwelling is located
as required by City of Albertville Zoning Ordinance Sections 1000.7(b) and
1200.4(h), the Residential Development Standards as on file with the City
Administrator's Office, and all individual lot requirements contained in any
applicable Developer's Agreement.
2. In the event the dwelling owner requests a certificate of occupancy after
October 31 of any particular year and before May 15t' of the following year,
the City may issue the certificate of occupancy, provided the dwelling owner:
A. Provides the City with a cash escrow in the amount of 150% of the
estimated cost of all improvements required of the property pursuant to
paragraph 1 of this ordinance; and
B. Enters into an escrow agreement with the City to install said improvements
by a date certain as specified by the City Engineer and which provides the
City with the authority to enter upon the property to install said
improvements using the money placed in escrow by the dwelling owner in
the event the improvements are not installed by the date certain determined
by the City Engineer.
3. The estimated cost of all improvements required of the lot shall be as
determined by the City Engineer. Said escrow amount shall be refunded
without interest to the dwelling owner within thirty days of certification by the
City that all required improvements have been satisfactorily installed.
4. All dwelling owners requesting a certificate of occupancy pursuant to
paragraph 2 of this ordinance shall pay the City a non-refundable
administration fee of $75 for the processing of the escrow and escrow
agreement. Said fee may be modified from time to time by resolution of the
City Council.
5. This ordinance shall apply to all residential dwelling units within the City
which have not received a final certificate of occupancy at the time this
ordinance becomes effective.
This ordinance shall be effective upon its passage and publication in the official
newspaper of the City.
Passed this 18th day of September, 2000.
ATTEST:
City Administrator
Mayor
0
09-15-2003 01:29PM PROM Couri & MacArsh�,r
4973 0 P
3r
RIGHT OF FIRST REFUSAL
j Ixt cotsidtion of S250,00
hereby received of the City ofEAibewMe Piam j
and Albert 8a el (`Bwtheis") hereby grant the City of Aibej tv4le ("City,,) a
!. xight'+f fastefosal to purchase Barthels' property located' at at 1.5I Sq 3� ram.
j { ( , � � A►lhertvlle, Mumesom, inciudmg tbe;hause�' nd garage j
G ' dY located an it ("Property") 'lye terms of tIu righf of furiefusal are as i
f 1 fn {the t4ent Barthels desire to accept any offers to purchase t o Property from j
tidedate ;o)f'execution of this document through September 30, 2000, Barthels
i
} ( shall acceot any such offers conditional upon the City of A llbe tville exercising
di`e ri& bf first refusal grouted in this document. '
In idle event Barthels accept an off
er to chase the Pr
� �P Y P� �, Barthels shall
provide tbt City rxrith a copy of the purchase Offer. The 'City all then have ;14
da s from the' date the City receives the copy of the purchase 6ffer to .notify,
i B4rthels e's to`whether the City will purchase the property fro. Barthels; at the
pr ce;aa l4erins of payment contained mi the accepted offer:
$ .3 1 in the event the City notifies Batthels within the 14 day period that it will
purcliaseheproperty at the price and. terms of payment stated, in the purchase
agceee, the City and Bardi
mels shall proceed tti close; on the `pzoperty under f
same .ems of the purchase ggreemem accepted by Barthel, ;umess
ell and,�the, City agree to modify one or more of the terms.
4 if,,}heC4 fiWs to notify the Barthels within said 14 day period that it will
( ( p rchase tl�e'Proi arty or if it dediues to purchase: the piope the Barthels
triay freely convey the property to the offerer: In the events offer is voided
i f or ether wise is not effective, the City's right of firs# refusal shall remain; intact
f for any fi�tUre offers received mrough Sept mber 30, 2000.
S ' If tba city does not purchase the Property from the Bartlicls, thc $250 paid to
the BartheLs under this agreement shall become; the property of the Barthels Zf
' City&es purchase the Property from the Barthels, the S2paid.to the
tartthel's' nder this age eat shall .be applied. to the parcha�'price to be paid
b ithe City.
5 W e City purchases the Property from the Barthels,. the City all draft all
dooume is necessary for the closing, (but not incclbding any dgcw' nentation
necessary" to ensure that the Barthels have Clear title to the property prior to
th�ir conNieyance to the City).
a
i
TO
i
r 09-15-2003 01:29PM
FROM Couri & MacArthur TO
49^,3210 P.03
i i '•
a 'ALB�RT & PAS BARTHEL
CITY OF ALBEkTVILLE
i
' I
t $aI$l t !
16bn Olst7lY, Maypr.•
;I
Linda.Gdeb, Ci
Administrator' !
sm arti a
I
i
f
�
t
9.�
Z
1
TOTAL P.03
Memo
To: City Council
From: Linda Goeb
Date: September 15, 2000
Re: September 18th Agenda
CONSENT:
• The bills list is not included in your packet. It will be available for review on Monday.
• Resolution #2000-28 is a resolution the City needs to adopt approving an increase in the levy
certification. The resohrtion needs to be forwarded to the County Auditor.
PLANNING & ZONING:
• Two concept plans are included for your consideration. Both concept plans were addressed at
the September 13'h Planning Commission meeting and the comments from the Commission are
included in your packet.
ENGINEERING:
• Pete will have the bid tabulations for the Barthel Industrial Drive improvement at the meeting.
Resolution 2000-27 awards the bid for the project.
• Building Official Kevin Mealhouse will be at the meeting to give input on the need for Fire
Department review of commercial building plans.
LEGAL:
• Mke has drafted an ordinance relating to the residential development standard criteria that we
approved at the last Council meeting. This ordinance requires a cash escrow for improvements
not completed at the time a certificate of occupancy is requested, phis a $75 ran -refundable
administration fee.
• Mke will update the Council on the progress of negotiations with Albert & Pam Barthel.
0 Page 1
ADMINISTRATION:
• As I indicated earlier in a prior agenda memo, my husband and I have been invited to
participate in an agribusiness tour of China in November. I will taking vacation from
November To to November 20" . I am requesting permission to hire a temporary office worker
to assist Bridget for three weeks, starting October 3e. In the past, we have used Temporary
Assets in Rogers for temporary help. (We have $5,000 in the budget for temporary office
employees that we have not spent.)
• Pete, Mike and I met with John Darkenwald to discuss his proposal to develop some currently
zoned 'industrial property commercially. We feel the proposed project is valid and request that
two Councilmembers be appointed to meet to review this proposal.
0 Page 2
�I jJ r
i,.�6a �7fC •/. : r, fr�
Addendum No. 3
September 13, 2000
2000 Barthel Drive Improvement
Albertville, Minnesota
SEH No. A-ALBEV 0008.00
From: SEH
1200 25th Avenue South
P.O. Box 1717
St. Cloud, Minnesota 56302-1717
(320) 229-4300
To: Document Holders
DOCUMENT HOLDERS on the above -named project are hereby notified that this document shall be
appended to, take precedence over and become part of the original bidding documents dated August 17, 2000
and previous addenda dated August 30 and September 6, 2000 for this work for this work. Bids submitted
for the construction of this work shall conform to this document.
This addendum consists of 1 page.
Changes to Bidding Requirements:
1. Section No. 00410 - Bid Form, Page 3, Item No. 10, Common Excavation, Unit of Measure: Delete
"TON" and replace with "CY" (use the same bid form, just cross out and replace).
Changes to Specifications:
2. Section No. 02510, Article 1.01, Paragraph E.2., Page No. 1: Delete "Select Granular Borrow CV CY",
in lieu thereof, substitute "Select Granular Borrow CV TON'.
Note: Receipt of this Addendum No. 3 shall be acknowledged on Page 00410-1 of the submitted Bid
Form. Failure to do so may subject BIDDER to disqualification.
END OF ADDENDUM
2000 Barthel Drive Improvement Addenda No. 3
A-ALBEV 0008.00 1
N E W S
Wright County
L E T T E R
Construction Update
Vol. I No. I
August 2000
BIDS
TO
BE OPENED
ON
AUGUST
29TH
FOR
CSAH
18
Oason
Ave.)
RECONSTRUCTION PROD.
Work on CSAH 18 (Jason
Avenue) from Giffort
Avenue near Monticello to just
east of CSAH 37, northwest of
Albertville, will begin in early
September with the clearing of
trees from the highway right-
of-way. Other work that may
be accomplished this year,
depending on weather,
includes common excavation
work southeast of CSAH 37 so
that NSP can construct a new
large transmission structure.
The majority of the
reconstruction work will be
accomplished in 2001. A
preconstruction meeting will
be held between the County
and the Prime Contractor,
(following award of contract)
to discuss the project schedule
and other aspects of the
proposed construction, which
you will be informed of in a
future newsletter.
Tree Removal and CSAH
18/37 Intersection
Construction to Begin
First'
The Contractor will start at the CSAH 18/37
intersection first since excess dirt from
this area will be needed to the west. Also, a
large transmission stricture and power poles
will be relocated through this area by NSP as
the road alignment will be shifted in this area.
Tree removal along the entire length of the
project will also be completed this fall so that
utility companies can relocate their lines prior
to the reconstruction project beginning in
force next year. The tree removal operations
will be conducted under traffic with
appropriate temporary traffic control devices
(no detour will be in place when they are
working off of the highway removing trees).
Jason Avenue to be detoured
This project will be detoured when the
existing roadbed is reconstructed. It is
likely that the detour will not be needed
until work begins next year. Tree removal
and topsoil stripping will begin this year,
prior to the detour. Signing will be set up to
warn the public of construction. It is
anticipated a majority of the reconstruction
work, requiring a detour, will be completed
in 2001. The remainder of CSAH 18 to
Albertville is slated to be reconstructed in
2001 under a separate project, that will be
started later in 2001, following the
completion of this project.
Right -of -Way Acquisition
to Continue on CSAH 18
The County will continue to acquire right-
of-way on CSAH 18 this year, to CSAH
19 in Albertville, for the project that will be
constructed in late 2001. The next CSAH 18
project will be constructed next year & will
begin from the easterly endpoint of this year's
project & continue to CSAH 19.
Proiect Contacts:
Nick Carlson
Project Inspector
Nicks' Vehicle:
White County pickup with a topper.
To contact Nick, call 763-682-7383
and leave a message that will be
relayed to him immediately.
Virgil Hawkins
Assistant County Engineer
763-682-7387
Richard Marquette
Engineering Assistant
763-682-7386
Kevin Johnson
Senior Construction Technician
763-682-7707
Any questions or concerns? Please call one
of the contacts listed above.
Page 2
August 2000
New Mailbox Supports
Coming
This project also includes the
placement of a new mailbox
support at no cost to residents. This
mailbox support meets current safety
standards and will swing away if hit by
a moving vehicle. Later next year,
near the end of the project, the
contractor will install your mailbox on
the new support at the correct height
and location. If you wish to have a new
mailbox installed, please have it
available at the time of installation of
the new support and please call the
Highway Department at 763-682-7383
and let us know your address.
The mailbox support replacement shall
only be completed for existing
mailboxes that are directly located on
CSAH 18. If your mailbox is on a
township road, you will not receive a
new mailbox support.
Please call County with
questions
Nick Carlson will be Wright County's
inspector for this project. He will be
accessible to all residents who have
questions or concerns.
Once the project
w
begins you can
reach Nick by,2,�k
calling 763-682-7383
and leaving a message for him. Your
message will be relayed in a matter of
minutes to Nick by digital pager to his
location on the project. Nick will
return your call or come see you as
soon as he is able.
Nick will be your fastest link to
problem solving because he will be in
contact with everyone on the
construction team. Be sure to notify
him if you have a special event
planned in the coming months. We'll
make every effort to make sure access
to your home will not be a problem.
Wright County Construction Update
If you can't reach Nick for some
reason, you can reach Virgil Hawkins,
Project Engineer at 763-682-7387;
Richard Marquette, Engineering
Assistant at 763-682-7386 or Kevin
Johnson, Senior Engineering
Technician at 763-682-7707. If you
have any questions or comments on the
project as a whole, please let us know.