Loading...
2025-07-08 Planning Commission Agenda Packet- PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, July 8, 2025 7 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER – ROLL CALL – ADOPT AGENDA 2. MINUTES a. June 10, 2025, Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (Pages 2-4) 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Public Hearing for Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, PUD Rezoning, and Easement Vacation for Toybox Partners LLC at PID 101-500-011202 and 101-500-01126. (Pages 5-50) b. Public Hearing for Preliminary Plat and PUD Rezoning for Java Companies at PID 101-800-062200. (Pages 51-137) 4. OTHER BUSINESS a. None 5. ADJOURNMENT Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Regular Meeting on June 10, 2025 1 ALBERTVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 2025 DRAFT MINUTES ALBERTVILLE CITY HALL 7:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER – ROLL CALL – ADOPT AGENDA Chair Buhrmann called the meeting to order at 7 pm. Maeghan Becker conducted roll call. Present: Chair Buhrmann and Commissioners Anderson, and Smith. Absent: Huggins and Zagorski. Others Present: City Planner Jenni Faulkner and Andrew Dresdner with Bolten and Menk, Building Permit Tech Maeghan Becker, Rebecca Ford with Mold Tech. Motioned by Buhrmann, seconded by Anderson to approve the agenda as submitted. Ayes: Buhrmann, Anderson, and Smith. Nays: None. Absent: Huggins. MOTION DECLARED CARRIED. 2. MINUTES Motioned by Anderson, seconded by Smith to approve the May 13, 2025, Planning Commission meeting minutes as presented. Ayes: Buhrmann, Anderson, and Smith. Nays: None. Absent: Huggins. MOTION DECLARED CARRIED. 3. PUBLIC HEARINGS a. Public Hearing for Conditional Use Permit request for Mold Tech to reduce number of required parking spaces by demonstrating a reduced parking need for the site. Faulkner went over the conditional use permit request from Mold Tech to reduce the number of parking spaces. Faulkner went over the Mold Tech site plan and the parking plan. They will have a total of 89 stalls on site and 4 handicap stalls. They are adding 20 new spaces to accommodate 14 new employees. They do have future additional parking plans if they exceed 85 employees, or if parking becomes in adequate. Motioned by Smith, seconded by Buhrmann to open the Public Hearing. Ayes: Buhrmann, Anderson, and Smith. Nays: None. Absent: Huggins. MOTION DECLARED CARRIED. No one wished to speak. Agenda Page 2 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Regular Meeting on June 10, 2025 2 Motioned by Anderson, seconded by Buhrmann to close the Public Hearing. Ayes: Buhrmann, Anderson, and Smith. Nays: None. Absent: Huggins. MOTION DECLARED CARRIED. Motioned by Buhrmann, seconded by Smith to approve the Conditional Use Permit request for Mold Tech to reduce the number of required parking spaces by demonstrating a reduced parking need for the site with the conditions listed in the June 10, 2025, Planners Report. Ayes: Buhrmann, Anderson, and Smith. Nays: None. Absent: Huggins. MOTION DECLARED CARRIED. 4.VISION PLAN UPDATE a.Goals and Downtown DiscussionFaulkner went over the goal changes that were made at the previous May 13th planning commission meeting. Commissioners questioned if there was going to be a walkway over the I-94 bridge. Faulkner said they can follow up with staff on the plans for the bridge. Commissioners discussed the placement of the overhead arch “City of Albertville” – they would like it located closer to CR 37. Commissioners discussed the trail system goal; they are specifically wondering if there is a walking trail around Hunter or School lake. Faulkner is going to find the trail system plan and bring it to Commissioners as they have never seen it. Andrew Dresdner with Bolton and Menk approached to discuss downtown. Commissioners discussed how they would like downtown to flow. Dresdner says that most downtown is zoned B4 and public, mixed in with some small housing areas scattered in there. Dresdner stated that Commissioners should start thinking about architectural standards for the buildings we would like, along with what type of businesses and areas you would like to see downtown. Commissioners also need to look at what is existing and how to make them come together in uniform and to compliment each other. Dresdner went through the existing zoning and the current businesses in the downtown area. Commissioners discussed more of the older historic buildings in the downtown area and what the possibilities would be if they were purchased by the City. Commissioners discussed some ways to help the Main Avenue businesses improve their curb appeal and that they would like to open more attractive businesses. They discussed how the park events bring in so many people, but they don’t have much to offer. Discussed possibly having some rentals over businesses, a mixed zoning district. Commissioners discussed the train depot and they are wondering when that will be available for rent by the City. Commissioners discussed having a joint work session regarding this vision update. Faulkner said she can discuss with staff about getting together but we need to make sure it is done properly to not violate any open meeting laws. Commissioners discussed the compost site and what they would like to see there in the future. They responded with something that brings youth together, but no more baseball fields, more like a community center. They also do not want the eagle’s nest to be disturbed. Faulkner said they would look into more youth attractions to help come up with more ideas and discuss with staff. Agenda Page 3 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Regular Meeting on June 10, 2025 3 5. OTHER BUSINESS a. None. 4. ADJOURNMENT Motioned by Buhrmann, seconded by Smith to adjourn the meeting at 8:11pm. Ayes: Buhrmann, Anderson, and Smith. Nays: None. Absent: Huggins. MOTION DECLARED CARRIED. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________ Maeghan Becker, Building Permit Tech Agenda Page 4 Planning Commission Request for Recommendation July 8, 2025 ACTION REQUESTED The Planning Commission is asked to conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council on the Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Rezoning for the parcel with PIDs 101-500-011202 and 101-500-01126 located in the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 120, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota. The current request includes the Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, Planned Unit Development Rezoning (include site plan review), and an Easement Vacation for the site. The Final Plat and Easement Vacation are not reviewed by the Planning Commission and will be considered by the City Council at a future meeting. BACKGROUND Evan Keller, of Toybox Partners, LLC., along with Matt Boone and Tim Blinkhorn, the applicants, have made an application on behalf of the property owner, Schultz & Schupp LLC, represented by Duane Schultz, for a Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, PUD Rezoning, and Easement Vacation for the properties with PIDs 101-500- 011202 (Parcel A) and 101-500-01126 (Parcel B). The Planning Commission is responsible for reviewing, holding a public hearing, and making a recommendation to City Council on the Preliminary Plat and PUD Rezoning items. The property is located along Barthel Industrial Drive. The site is currently comprised of two parcels, Parcel A which is approximately TO: Chair Buhrmann and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jenni Faulkner, Consultant Planner T.J. Hofer, Consultant Planner AGENDA ITEM: Preliminary Plat, Final Plat, PUD Rezoning, and Easement Vacation for Toybox Partners LLC at PID 101-500-011202 and 101-500-01126 HEARINGS Preliminary Plat and PUD Rezoning to PID 101-500-011202 and 101-500-01126 Agenda Page 5 Planning Commission Request for Recommendation – July 8, 2025 Planning – Toy Box Albertville Page 2 of 6 1.51 acres and Parcel B which is approximately 0.63 acres. The proposal also includes a part of right-of-way that abuts both Parcel A and Parcel B that the applicant is requesting to vacate the easement and obtain the property and is approximately 0.17 acres. The parcel is currently zoned B-4 and is vacant. The applicant requests to combine the properties and proposed vacated easement area as well as create a planned unit development to allow for garage condominiums facility (passenger vehicles, trailers, boats, RV, and potentially small contractor vehicles or equipment). The current site has one access off Barthel Industrial Dr and proposes an access in approximately the same location. The property is zoned B-4 General Business District as is the parcels to the west. The parcel to the east is zoned I-1 Limited Industrial. Across the street to the north is zoned B-3 Highway commercial and railroad tacks are abutting the parcel on the south side. The PUD is to accommodate the use as its unique (owner occupied garage condominiums) and mini-storage type uses are not a permitted use within the B-4 zoning district. The applicant has submitted two options for the exterior materials of the building. An analysis of the two options is below. The applicant has previously discussed an additional common interest community plat for the garage condominiums facility. Staff anticipates this application would be submitted if the current applications are approved. REVIEW Preliminary Plat Review Dimensional Standards Standard Requirement Lot 1, Block 1 Meets Req. Lot area (acres) None 2.17 Meets Lot width (ft.) None 354.91 Meets Front yard setback (ft.) None 46 Meets Side yard setback if abutting R district(ft.) N/A 40 Meets Rear yard setback (ft.) 20 46 Meets Parking lot setback from street (ft.) 15 N/A Meets Curb barrier from lot line (ft.) 5 46 Meets Site coverage maximum (%) 85% 71.4% Meets Maximum Height (ft.) 35 25.7 Meets The proposed lot meets the dimensional standards for the B-4 zoning district. Staff notes that the impervious surface coverage stated on the submitted documents, 55%, is not consistent with the proposed conditions, 71.4%, but that the proposed conditions still meet the district standard. Dedication Requirements Commercial subdivision or developments require 10% land dedication. 10% of the resulting lots is 0.217 acres or 9,452,52 sq. ft. Cash in lieu of land dedication is determined by the City of Agenda Page 6 Planning Commission Request for Recommendation – July 8, 2025 Planning – Toy Box Albertville Page 3 of 6 Albertville fee schedule. Cash in lieu of land for industrial properties is $9,020.00 per acre subdivided. Cash in lieu of land for this site is $1,957.34. Dedication will be due with the final plat. Water and Sewer Systems The applicant is proposing to connect to water and sanitary sewer that are on Barthel Industrial Dr. and on site, respectively. Utility plans have been submitted for review. A condition requiring approval by City Engineer is added. Drainage System The applicant has submitted a grading and drainage plan. Stormwater management is proposed throughout the parking and directed towards a new stormwater facility on the southeast side of the site. Grading and drainage plans have been provided for City Engineer review. A condition requiring approval by City Engineer is added. Easements The proposed preliminary plat shows a 10 ft. drainage and utility easement along all sides of the parcel. There is also an existing 16.5 ft. easement on the southwest side of the parcel for AT&T. Erosion and Sediment Control A new stormwater management basin is proposed in southeast corner of the lot. The proposed erosion control and restoration plan includes a silt fence, with two layers of silt fence along portions of the eastern and southern lot line, as well as fiber logs around the proposed stormwater basin and new onsite catch basins. Preliminary erosion control plans have been provided for City Engineer review. Access Access is proposed off Barthel Industrial Dr in approximately the same location the existing access is located. The application has not provided a turning radius layout indicating the site can accommodate maneuvering of emergency vehicles on-site. A condition has been recommended that a site circulation exhibit be provided with additional details below regarding parking on the site. Preliminary curb cut and access plans have been provided for City Engineer review. Site Plan Review Proposed Use The proposed use for garage condominiums facilities is not allowed within he B-4 District. The proposal However, because of the unique nature of the storage in that it will be owner occupied, the use may be allowed with certain conditions. Several conditions relating to no commercial uses, repair, or sub-leasing have been included to mitigate potential impacts of the use in the neighborhood and site. Compliance with the said conditions will also provide for a more compatible use with adjacent parcels. Landscaping The proposed landscape plan shows 16 plantings for the property including one overstory tree and 16 ornamental trees. Areas that are not improved are shown as either seeded or sodded. The proposed landscaping plan conforms with the standards established in the zoning ordinance. Agenda Page 7 Planning Commission Request for Recommendation – July 8, 2025 Planning – Toy Box Albertville Page 4 of 6 Lighting A lighting plan has not been submitted. Before a building permit can be issued for the site, lighting and photometric plans will be required that are consistent with the standards established in the zoning ordinance. Parking The applicant is not proposing parking on the site and the proposed use does not have a defined parking requirement within the zoning ordinance. All uses typically require parking, however, due to the nature of the use and the expectation that vehicles on the site will be stored inside the proposed garage condominiums facility, parking is not required. Also, due to the nature of the use, it is likely that there will be vehicles and trailer on site as users come and go from the site. The site plan must be revised in one of two ways; revised to include no parking striping on the lot for the purposes of a fire lane, or, the site plan is revised to show designated parking areas for the site. Additionally, staff recommends outside overnight parking be prohibited so as not to create an outdoor storage use. Screening City Code requires all mechanical equipment to be screened (1000.7 J.) so as not to be visible . The submitted plans do not include information regarding mechanical equipment. Any mechanical equipment on the site will be required to be consistent with the standards established in the zoning ordinance. A trash enclosure is not proposed and given the use on-site collection is not needed or allowed. A condition has been added that trash receptacles shall be kept inside each garage unit. Additionally, outdoor storage is not permitted and a condition has been added to the PUD. Building Materials In the B-4 zoning district, fifty percent (50%) of all exterior wall finishes must be constructed of materials containing only brick, dimension stone, glass, stucco and its replicas, woods, rock faced block, or aggregate precast concrete panels. In the B-4 zoning district, any exposed metal or fiberglass finish on all buildings shall be limited to no more than fifty percent (50%) of the total solid surface of all walls. For building walls which face public rights of way or abut residential uses, an exposed metal or fiberglass finish shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the wall area. Any metal finish utilized in the building shall be a minimum of 26 -gauge steel. All sides of the principal and accessory structures are to have essentially the same or coordi nated, harmonious exterior finish materials and treatment. The applicant has submitted two options for the elevations and building materials for the proposed building. Option A includes a two-tone finish with lap siding, rock faced block. Option B includes an all grey finish with lap siding, pre-finished metal panels (26 gauge), and pre- finished metal trim. The proposed lap siding is not an approved exterior material for the B-4 zoning district. The proposed siding is a labeled as “James Hardie or its equivalent.” Hardie siding is a fiber cement siding commonly used in residential structures. Flexibility for building materials may be allowed within the PUD. Option A proposes that the building be 64.3% rock face brick and 35.7% lap siding. Option B proposes that the building be 89.4% lap siding and 10.6% pre-finished metal panels. The Planning Commission should make a recommendation regarding the option for the exterior building materials. Agenda Page 8 Planning Commission Request for Recommendation – July 8, 2025 Planning – Toy Box Albertville Page 5 of 6 Signs No details were provided regarding the sign. Any proposed signs shall meet the standards established within the Albertville City Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan The proposed preliminary plat and PUD must comply with the Albertville Comprehensive Plan. The property is shown on the Proposed Land Use Plan as Commercial. Commercial Goal 1 in the Albertville Vision/Comprehensive Plan is to promote commercial development by the City taking advantage of its access to Interstate 94 and the growing population of Albertville and its adjoining communities. The proposed uses are located near I-94 and creates a commercial use. RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully requested that Chair Buhrmann and Members of the Planning Commission consider the following: MOTION TO: Recommend approval of the planned unit development rezoning for the proposed Toybox Partners, LLC project, with the following terms: 5200.38 Toy Box A. USES: Uses allowed in the Toybox B-4/PUD district shall be the same as the B-4 base zoning district, as well as: 1. Garage condominiums facility as a permitted use, with the standards and conditions established in this section. B. Lot Requirements and Setbacks: Setbacks Front Side (Interior) Side (Corner) Rear Lot Area Lot Width - - - - - - - C. Special PUD Conditions: 1. Garage condominiums facilities shall be subject to the following standards and conditions: a. The garage condominiums facility building shall meet the architectural standards of section 4500.8 of this chapter. b. Parking shall either be provided and striped on the site or a emergency vehicles path shall be striped as no parking on the site. c. No overnight outdoor parking shall be allowed d. No outside storage is allowed. e. No detached trash enclosure or dumpsters or other trash receptacles are permitted. All trash receptacles shall be within the garage units. f. No sub-rental of the garage units are allowed. g. The units shall not be used for commercial warehousing or retail purposes. h. The units shall not be used for commercial manufacturing or repair of vehicles, equipment, or parts thereof. 2. The number of required parking spaces in the B-4/PUD shall be the same as the B-4 district. Agenda Page 9 Planning Commission Request for Recommendation – July 8, 2025 Planning – Toy Box Albertville Page 6 of 6 3. Any deviations from the approved site plans may require an amendment to Toybox PUD B-4/PUD zoning district or a conditional use permit, as established in the zoning ordinance. MOTION TO: Recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat for Toy Box Albertville for PID 101-800-062200 located in the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 120, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota. With the following conditions of approval: 1. Approval of the Toybox PUD B-4/PUD zoning district over the entire plat. 2. Approval is subject to the portion of Barthel Industrial Drive included in the plat being vacated. 3. Before a building permit may be issued: a. An exhibit showing emergency vehicle circulation and a fire lane that prohibits parking must be shown on the revised site plans. b. A lighting and photometric plan must be submitted and must be consistent with the standards established in the zoning ordinance. 4. The grading, drainage, and final site plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 5. The utility plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. The plat shall provide utility easements over all utilities, drainage ways, and stormwater ponds service the plat. The size and location shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Albertville for the required site improvements and the installation of the utilities. Attachments: A. Location Map B. Future Land Use Map C. Toybox Application D. Toybox Application Materials E. Draft Ordinance F. Draft Resolutions Agenda Page 10 1, 50 4.7© Bolton & Menk, Inc - Web GIS 0 Legend Location Map This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, information, and data located in various city, county, and state offices, and other sources affecting the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City of Albertville is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. Disclaimer: 6/30/2025 2:07 PM 1,053 Feet City Limits Centerlines Interstate Highway CSAH Local Road Parcels (07/02/2024) Protected Waters WRCO_2018 Red: Band_1 Green: Band_2 Blue: Band_3 Agenda Page 11 Subject Property Agenda Page 12 06/10/2025 2025-003PM 06/18/2025 07/08/2025 08/04/25 OR 08/18/25 $1,450.00 $9,500.00 CK # 1131 06/10/2025 X X VACATION Agenda Page 13 Agenda Page 14 Agenda Page 15 Agenda Page 16 Agenda Page 17 Agenda Page 18 Agenda Page 19 Agenda Page 20 Agenda Page 21 Project Toybox – 5836 Large Avenue Albertville, MN Detailed Project Narrative Project Overview Toy Box Partners LLC—founded by Evan Keller, Tim Blinkhorn, and Matt Boone—is proposing the development of a garage condominium facility at 5836 Large Avenue in Albertville, MN. With more than 60 years of combined experience in business, the team is committed to addressing a growing and underserved need in suburban communities: the demand for clean, secure, and ownership-based storage for personal and recreational items. What Are Garage Condos? Garage condominiums are privately owned storage units that function much like a traditional residential condo, but for storage and hobby use. Owners purchase a deeded unit, which they can customize and maintain independently. Unlike traditional storage rentals, garage condos offer permanent ownership, financial appreciation potential, and enhanced amenities. Units are typically used for storing boats, campers, classic cars, ATVs, tools, and other high-value items, often with climate control, power, security systems, and even optional mezzanines. Why Garage Condos Benefit the Community Garage condos represent an innovative solution to a widespread issue in modern suburban development: the lack of storage space. As new housing developments continue to feature smaller lot sizes and more restrictive homeowners' association (HOA) covenants, residents often find themselves unable to store RVs, trailers, boats, or recreational gear on their own properties. This creates frustration for outdoor enthusiasts, hobbyists, and working professionals who need reliable, accessible, and secure storage options. The proposed development will:  Alleviate Neighborhood Congestion: By removing trailers, RVs, and other large items from residential streets and driveways, the project helps maintain neighborhood aesthetics and reduces visual clutter.  Support Local Lifestyles: Albertville and the greater northwest metro area are home to a large community of outdoor enthusiasts. This project supports their passions by providing nearby, weather-protected storage for their gear.  Create Ownership Opportunities: Unlike storage rentals, garage condos give buyers a tangible asset they can own, improve, and sell. This creates a sense of investment and stewardship among users. Agenda Page 22 Project Toybox – 5836 Large Avenue Albertville, MN  Revitalize Vacant Property: This project will transform an underutilized parcel into a clean, well-designed facility that aligns with the surrounding land uses and contributes to the tax base. Project Details  Site Layout: One rectangular building comprising 18–20 units.  Unit Sizes: 2-3 unit configurations, optimized based on demand and architectural feasibility. The current plan includes the unit sizes from ~22x50 ft to ~30x50 ft.  Pricing: Unit pricing expected to range from the low to upper $200,000s.  Building Materials: Materials to comply with city’s existing requirements  Landscape & Civil Plan: Compliant with city’s existing requirements  Association Governance: Building governed by an association in compliance with MN regulations  Ensuring enduring management and stewardship. Included Amenities  Heated units with electrical service  Stubbed plumbing for optional half-baths  Concrete flooring with floor drains  Full fire suppression systems  Optional mezzanine storage Strategic Location Benefits  Regional Convenience: Located near I-94 and Hwy 10, ideal for residents commuting to/from recreational areas like Brainerd Lakes or Alexandria.  Growth Alignment: Albertville's growing population and limited competition in this storage niche make this project both timely and strategic.  Surrounding Uses: Proximity to gas stations, car washes, and similar service businesses enhances convenience for unit owners. Permitted And Limitations Of Use Agenda Page 23 Project Toybox – 5836 Large Avenue Albertville, MN Proposed Permitted Uses The garage condominiums are intended primarily for private storage, but limited and conditional commercial storage uses are proposed, subject to the following: Residential & Private Uses:  Storage of Personal Recreational Vehicles: Boats, UTVs, snowmobiles, motorcycles, trailers, etc.  Storage of Motorhomes and Camp Trailers.  Classic and Collector Car Storage.  Personal Workshop or Hobby Space: Activities such as woodworking, crafting, or equipment maintenance, provided they do not violate safety, noise, or occupancy standards.  Storage of Tools, Recreational Equipment, and Outdoor Gear. Commercial Storage Uses (Permitted with Conditions):  Storage of Commercial Materials or Equipment: Warehousing of tools, inventory, or materials – subject to, and compliant with, approved fire codes.  Storage of Commercial Vehicles: Includes company-branded vans, trucks, equipment or trailers used for business purposes. Conditions for Commercial Use: o No On-Site Employees or Daily Operations: The unit may not be used as a place of business operation with regular employee activity. o No Retail Traffic: No in-person customer sales, pickups, or client meetings may occur on-site. o Clean and Orderly Appearance: Units must be well-maintained, free from debris or hazardous materials, and consistent with the aesthetic and safety standards of the property. Prohibited Uses  Residential Living or Overnight Use: Units may not be used for sleeping, dwelling, or as living quarters under any circumstances.  Customer-Facing Commercial Operations: Any business model involving in- person sales, customer visits, or regular on-site employee staffing is prohibited.  Hazardous or Prohibited Materials: All material storage must comply with S1 occupancy.  Vehicle Repair or Maintenance Shops: While personal vehicle maintenance is acceptable, full-service commercial auto repair or body shops are not permitted.  Any Illegal Activities: All unit uses must comply with local, state, and federal law. Agenda Page 24 Project Toybox – 5836 Large Avenue Albertville, MN Next Steps We are seeking collaboration and feedback from the City of Albertville to ensure the project aligns with community goals and standards. We are submitting our proposal on June 10th, 2025 with the goal of reaching approval by the August 4th council meeting. Site preparation and initial construction is targeted for fall of 2025 with completion in 2026. We look forward to partnering with the city to deliver a storage ownership solution that fills a real community need while enhancing the use of vacant property in a responsible and beneficial way. Agenda Page 25 PROJECT LOCATION SITE MINNESOTA TOY BOX ALBERTVILLE SITE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT CITY OF ALBERTVILLEWRIGHT COUNTY SITE SIT E SITE C0 BA R T H E L I N D U S T R I A L D R . N E R A I L R O A D INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN9412 Lakeside Trail Champlin, MN 55316 Evan Keller 612-655-7958 TOY BOXPARTNERS, LLC Agenda Page 26 ∆PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONLEGEND: SITE PLAN NOTESGENERAL NOTES KEY NOTES: SURVEY DATAPROJECT LOCATIONAPPROXIMATE GROSS AREAEXISTING ZONINGMINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTSBUILDING DATAEXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONSETBACK: IMPERVIOUS COVERAGEINDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN9412 Lakeside TrailChamplin, MN 55316Evan Keller612-655-7958Agenda Page 27 FILTRATION BASINPRE-TREATMENTBOTTOM=947.0OUTLET (WQV)=952.50HWL=954.23FILTRATION BASIN SHELFTOP OF MEDIA=951.0BOTTOM OF MEDIA=950.0HWL=954.23EOF=954.5BERM=955.0LEGEND:SURVEY DATAINDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN9412 Lakeside TrailChamplin, MN 55316Evan Keller612-655-7958Agenda Page 28 LEGEND: SURVEY DATAINDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN9412 Lakeside TrailChamplin, MN 55316Evan Keller612-655-7958Agenda Page 29 FILTRATION BASINOUTLET (NWL)=952.502-YR=953.1710-YR=953.45100-YR HWL=954.23EOF=954.5BERM=955.0LEGEND: SURVEY DATAINDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN9412 Lakeside TrailChamplin, MN 55316Evan Keller612-655-7958Agenda Page 30 EROSION CONTROL INSTALLATION SCHEDULEEROSION CONTROL NOTESEROSION CONTROL MAINTENANCE SCHEDULEVEGETATION GROUND COVER RESTORATIONSWPP NARRATIVEPOLLUTION PREVENTION NOTESDESIGN CALCULATIONSSWPPP Designer: EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIESLEGEND: INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN9412 Lakeside TrailChamplin, MN 55316Evan Keller612-655-7958PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONPROJECT LOCATIONEXISTING PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONSURVEY DATAIMPERVIOUS COVERAGELOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS IN PLANSAgenda Page 31 ∆LEGEND: DEMOLITION NOTES PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONINDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN9412 Lakeside TrailChamplin, MN 55316Evan Keller612-655-7958SURVEY DATAAgenda Page 32 CONCRETE PAVEMENT - LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT - HEAVY DUTYBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN9412 Lakeside TrailChamplin, MN 55316Evan Keller612-655-7958Agenda Page 33 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN9412 Lakeside TrailChamplin, MN 55316Evan Keller612-655-7958FILTRATION BASIN GENERAL NOTES:CLAY LINER CRITERIA (Per MPCA Gudelines)•••••••STORM WATER MANAGEMENTPOND OUTLET CONTROLSTRUCTURE OCS-1Agenda Page 34 INDEX OF CIVIL SITE DRAWINGS: CIVIL ENGINEERINGSITE DESIGN9412 Lakeside TrailChamplin, MN 55316Evan Keller612-655-7958Agenda Page 35 A1122BCDEFGHTYPICAL INTERIOR 2-HR PARTY WALL: - UL DESIGN #U411 - 6" METAL STUDS @ 16" o/c - (2) LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "C" GYP. BD.3JKL48" WIDE STORAGE RACKS (36 LF)CLASS "A" MOTORHOME(8'-6" x 45'-0")24" WIDE STORAGE RACKS (48 LF)NM1.2166 SFGARAGE21197 SFSPRINKLER221045 SFSTORAGE BAY #111161 SFSTORAGE BAY #221161 SFSTORAGE BAY #331161 SFSTORAGE BAY #441445 SFSTORAGE BAY #551445 SFSTORAGE BAY #661132 SFSTORAGE BAY #771132 SFSTORAGE BAY #881132 SFSTORAGE BAY #991132 SFSTORAGE BAY #10101132 SFSTORAGE BAY #11111132 SFSTORAGE BAY #12121132 SFSTORAGE BAY #13131132 SFSTORAGE BAY #14141445 SFSTORAGE BAY #15151445 SFSTORAGE BAY #16161161 SFSTORAGE BAY #17171161 SFSTORAGE BAY #18181161 SFSTORAGE BAY #19191045 SFSTORAGE BAY #2020OVERALL BUILDING: 100'-0"50'-0"50'-0"OVERALL BUILDING: 261'-4"22'-0"24'-4"24'-4"24'-4"30'-0"30'-0"23'-9"23'-9"23'-9"23'-9"8'-0"8'-0"16'-0"26'-0"3'-4"11'-4"250'-0"SDKarch #:Issue Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N S3030 County Road 101 NorthPlymouth, Minnesota 55447(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.comSHEET #:REVISIONProject Status: 2025 SDK Architects LLCALL RIGHTS RESERVEDcTHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.A1BUILDING CONCEPT "A"FLOOR PLAN / 3D VIEWS25-012NEW STORAGE FACILITYTOY BOX PARTNERS, LLCJUN 10, 2025SDKSDK- Albertville, MinnesotaISSUED forCITY APPROVAL# Description DateSCALE:1" = 10'-0"PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - CONCEPT "A"1PROJECT NORTHTRUE NORTHNO SCALEVIEW from NORTHEAST3NO SCALEVIEW from SOUTHWEST4NO SCALECHARACTER SKETCH APPROACHING FACILITY2Agenda Page 36 MASONRY SILL (DEEP GRAY COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU (LIGHT GRAY COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU (DEEP GRAY COLOR)TYP FASCIA: PRE-FINISHED METAL(OFF-WHITE COLOR)ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING (DEEP GRAY COLOR)TYPICAL OVERHEAD DOORw/ LITES (OFF-WHITE COLOR)TYPICAL SERVICE DOOR(PAINT OFF-WHITE COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU(DEEP GRAY COLOR)PRE-FINISHED METAL WRAPTO MATCH FASCIALAP SIDING (PAINT OFF-WHITE COLORJAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTTYPICAL SOFFIT RECESED DOWNLIGHTING EACH BAY (CENTER ON OVERHEAD DOOR)WALL FINISH CALCULATIONS:TOTAL WALL AREA (NORTH) TOTAL OVERHEAD DOOR AREA TOTAL SERVICE DOOR AREANET WALL AREA (MASONRY / SIDING)4746 SF1840 SF 210 SF2696 SF100.00%38.80%4.40%56.80%PRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM(OFF-WHITE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT OFF-WHITE COLORJAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTPRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM(OFF-WHITE COLOR)ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING (DEEP GRAY COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU (LIGHT GRAY COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU(DEEP GRAY COLOR)ROCK FACE SILL UNIT(DEEP GRAY COLOR)TYPICAL OVERHEAD DOORw/ LITES (OFF-WHITE COLOR)TYPICAL SERVICE DOOR(PAINT OFF-WHITE COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU(DEEP GRAY COLOR)PRE-FINISHED METAL WRAPTO MATCH FASCIALAP SIDING (PAINT OFF-WHITE COLORJAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTTYPICAL SOFFIT RECESED DOWNLIGHTING EACH BAY (CENTER ON OVERHEAD DOOR)WALL FINISH CALCULATIONS:TOTAL WALL AREA (SOUTH) TOTAL OVERHEAD DOOR AREA TOTAL SERVICE DOOR AREANET WALL AREA (MASONRY / SIDING)4746 SF1840 SF 210 SF2696 SF100.00%38.80%4.40%56.80%TYP FASCIA: PRE-FINISHED METAL(OFF-WHITE COLOR)PRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM(OFF-WHITE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT OFF-WHITE COLOR)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTPRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM(OFF-WHITE COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU (LIGHT GRAY COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU (DEEP GRAY COLOR)MASONRY SILL (DEEP GRAY COLOR)TYP FASCIA: PRE-FINISHED METAL(OFF-WHITE COLOR)TYP BOXED SOFFIT(MATCH FASCIA) ROCK FACE CMU (DEEP GRAY COLOR)OVERHEAD DOOR (MAINTENANCE)OFF-WHITE COLOR WALL FINISH CALCULATIONS:TOTAL WALL AREA (WEST) TOTAL OVERHEAD DOOR AREA TOTAL SERVICE DOOR AREANET WALL AREA (MASONRY / SIDING)2322 SF0 SF 0 SF2322 SF100.00%0%0%100.00%TYPICAL SERVICE DOOR(PAINT OFF-WHITE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT OFF-WHITE COLORJAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING - DEEP GRAY COLORPRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM(OFF-WHITE COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU (LIGHT GRAY COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU (DEEP GRAY COLOR)ROCK FACE CMU SILL (DEEP GRAY COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT OFF-WHITE COLORJAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTTYP FASCIA: PRE-FINISHED METAL(OFF-WHITE COLOR)TYP BOXED SOFFIT(MATCH FASCIA)ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING - DEEP GRAY COLORWALL FINISH CALCULATIONS:TOTAL WALL AREA (EAST) TOTAL OVERHEAD DOOR AREA TOTAL SERVICE DOOR AREANET WALL AREA (MASONRY / SIDING)2322 SF0 SF 0 SF2322 SF100.00%0%0%100.00%PRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM(OFF-WHITE COLOR)SDKarch #:Issue Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N S3030 County Road 101 NorthPlymouth, Minnesota 55447(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.comSHEET #:REVISIONProject Status: 2025 SDK Architects LLCALL RIGHTS RESERVEDcTHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.1A2BUILDING CONCEPT "A"EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS25-012NEW STORAGE FACILITYTOY BOX PARTNERS, LLCJUN 10, 2025SDKSDK- Albertville, MinnesotaISSUED forCITY APPROVAL# Description Date1 WALL FINISH CALC'S 6-11-25SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"BUILDING CONCEPT "A" - NORTH ELEVATION1SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"BUILDING CONCEPT "A" - SOUTH ELEVATION2SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"BUILDING CONCEPT "A" - WEST ELEVATION4SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"BUILDING CONCEPT "A" - EAST ELEVATION31111Agenda Page 37 A1122BCDEFGHTYPICAL INTERIOR 2-HR PARTY WALL: - UL DESIGN #U411 - 6" METAL STUDS @ 16" o/c - (2) LAYERS 5/8" TYPE "C" GYP. BD.3JKL48" WIDE STORAGE RACKS (36 LF)CLASS "A" MOTORHOME(8'-6" x 45'-0")24" WIDE STORAGE RACKS (48 LF)NM1.2168 SFGARAGE21198 SFSPRINKLER221046 SFSTORAGE BAY #111161 SFSTORAGE BAY #221161 SFSTORAGE BAY #331161 SFSTORAGE BAY #441445 SFSTORAGE BAY #551445 SFSTORAGE BAY #661132 SFSTORAGE BAY #771132 SFSTORAGE BAY #881132 SFSTORAGE BAY #991133 SFSTORAGE BAY #10101133 SFSTORAGE BAY #11111132 SFSTORAGE BAY #12121132 SFSTORAGE BAY #13131132 SFSTORAGE BAY #14141445 SFSTORAGE BAY #15151445 SFSTORAGE BAY #16161161 SFSTORAGE BAY #17171161 SFSTORAGE BAY #18181161 SFSTORAGE BAY #19191046 SFSTORAGE BAY #2020OVERALL BUILDING: 100'-0"50'-0"50'-0"OVERALL BUILDING: 261'-4"22'-0"24'-4"24'-4"24'-4"30'-0"30'-0"23'-9"23'-9"23'-9"23'-9"8'-0"16'-0"26'-0"3'-4"11'-4"250'-0"SDKarch #:Issue Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N S3030 County Road 101 NorthPlymouth, Minnesota 55447(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.comSHEET #:REVISIONProject Status: 2025 SDK Architects LLCALL RIGHTS RESERVEDcTHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.A1BUILDING CONCEPT "B"FLOOR PLAN / 3D VIEWS25-012NEW STORAGE FACILITYTOY BOX PARTNERS, LLCJUN 10, 2025SDKSDK- Albertville, MinnesotaISSUED forCITY APPROVALSCALE:1" = 10'-0"PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN - CONCEPT "B"1PROJECT NORTHTRUE NORTHNO SCALEVIEW from NORTHEAST3NO SCALEVIEW from SOUTHWEST4# Description DateNO SCALECHARACTER SKETCH APPROACHING FACILITY2Agenda Page 38 LAP SIDING (PAINT - LIGHT GRAY)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTPRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS(26 GA. MIN. - DEEP GRAY COLOR)TYP FASCIA: PRE-FINISHED METAL(OFF-WHITE COLOR)ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING - DEEP GRAY COLORTYPICAL OVERHEAD DOORw/ LITES (OFF-WHITE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT - LIGHT GRAY)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTPRE-FINISHED METAL WRAPTO MATCH FASCIALAP SIDING (PAINT - LIGHT GRAY)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTTYPICAL SOFFIT RECESED DOWNLIGHTING EACH BAY (CENTER ON OVERHEAD DOOR)PRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS(26 GA. MIN. - DEEP GRAY COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT - LIGHT GRAY)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTTYPICAL SERVICE DOOR(PAINT OFF-WHITE COLOR)WALL FINISH CALCULATIONS:TOTAL WALL AREA (NORTH) TOTAL OVERHEAD DOOR AREA TOTAL SERVICE DOOR AREA TOTAL METAL PANEL AREANET WALL AREA (LAP SIDING)4682 SF1840 SF210 SF210 SF2422 SF100.00%39.29%4.49%4.49%51.73%PRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM(OFF-WHITE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT - LIGHT GRAY)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTPRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM(OFF-WHITE COLOR)ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING (DEEP GRAY COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT - LIGHT GRAY)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTPRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS(26 GA. MIN. - DEEP GRAY COLOR)TYPICAL OVERHEAD DOORw/ LITES (OFF-WHITE)TYPICAL SERVICE DOOR(PAINT OFF-WHITE)LAP SIDING (PAINT - LIGHT GRAY)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTPRE-FINISHED METAL WRAPTO MATCH FASCIALAP SIDING (PAINT - LIGHT GRAY)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTLAP SIDING (PAINT)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTTYPICAL SOFFIT RECESED DOWNLIGHTING EACH BAY (CENTER ON OVERHEAD DOOR)PRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS(26 GA. MIN. - DEEP GRAY COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT - LIGHT GRAY)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTWALL FINISH CALCULATIONS:TOTAL WALL AREA (SOUTH) TOTAL OVERHEAD DOOR AREA TOTAL SERVICE DOOR AREA TOTAL METAL PANEL AREANET WALL AREA (LAP SIDING)4682 SF1840 SF210 SF210 SF2422 SF100.00%39.29%4.49%4.49%51.73%PRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM(OFF-WHITE COLOR)PRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM(OFF-WHITE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT - LIGHT GRAY COLOR)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTPRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS(26 GA. MIN. - DEEP GRAY COLOR)TYP FASCIA: PRE-FINISHED METAL(OFF-WHITE COLOR)TYP BOXED SOFFIT(MATCH FASCIA) LAP SIDING (PAINT - LIGHT GRAY COLOR)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTLAP SIDING (PAINT - LIGHT GRAY COLOR)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING - DEEP GRAY COLOROVERHEAD DOOR (MAINTENANCE)OFF-WHITE COLOR PRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS(26 GA. MIN. - DEEP GRAY COLOR COLOR) PRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM(OFF-WHITE COLOR)WALL FINISH CALCULATIONS:TOTAL WALL AREA (WEST) TOTAL OVERHEAD DOOR AREA TOTAL SERVICE DOOR AREA TOTAL METAL PANEL AREANET WALL AREA (LAP SIDING)2330 SF63 SF21 SF196 SF2050 SF100.00%2.70%0.90%8.40%88.00%TYPICAL SERVICE DOOR (OFF-WHITE COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT - LIGHT GRAY COLOR))JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTPRE-FINISHED METAL PANELS(26 GA. MIN. - DEEP GRAY COLOR)LAP SIDING (PAINT)JAMES HARDIE OR ITS EQUIVALENTTYP FASCIA: PRE-FINISHED METAL(OFF-WHITE COLOR)TYP BOXED SOFFIT(MATCH FASCIA)ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING - DEEP GRAY COLORPRE-FINISHED METAL TRIM(OFF-WHITE COLOR)WALL FINISH CALCULATIONS:TOTAL WALL AREA (EAST) TOTAL OVERHEAD DOOR AREA TOTAL SERVICE DOOR AREA TOTAL METAL PANEL AREANET WALL AREA (LAP SIDING)2330 SF0 SF0 SF352 SF1978 SF100.00%0.00%0.00%15.10%84.90%SDKarch #:Issue Date:Drawn By:Checked By:R E V I S I O N S3030 County Road 101 NorthPlymouth, Minnesota 55447(763) 331-5178info@sdk-architects.comSHEET #:REVISIONProject Status: 2025 SDK Architects LLCALL RIGHTS RESERVEDcTHIS DRAWING, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. FINAL DESIGN & DOCUMENTATION OF THIS PORTION OF THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED BY LICENSED DESIGN PROFESSIONALS REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.1A2BUILDING CONCEPT "B"EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS25-012NEW STORAGE FACILITYTOY BOX PARTNERS, LLCJUN 10, 2025SDKSDK- Albertville, MinnesotaISSUED forCITY APPROVALSCALE: 1" = 10'-0"BUILDING CONCEPT "B" - NORTH ELEVATION1SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"BUILDING CONCEPT "B" - SOUTH ELEVATION2SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"BUILDING CONCEPT "B" - WEST ELEVATION4SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"BUILDING CONCEPT "B" - EAST ELEVATION31111# Description Date1 WALL FINISH CALC'S 06-11-25Agenda Page 39 TOY BOX ALBERTVILLE Meyer-Rohlin SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS DRAFT COPY FOR CITY REVIEW - 06/09/2025 Agenda Page 40 TOY BOX ALBERTVILLE Meyer-Rohlin DRAFT COPY FOR CITY REVIEW - 06/09/2025 detail SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETSAgenda Page 41 Meyer-Rohlin DRAWN BY: AAN FILE NO. 24334 708 1st Avenue NE, #1 Ph. 763.682.1781 www.meyerrohlin.com Buffalo, MN 55313 Meyer-Rohlin PARCEL DESCRIPTION & R.O.W. VACATION EXHIBIT LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T. 120, R. 24 WRIGHT COUNTY, MN SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS Agenda Page 42 DRAWN BY: AAN FILE NO. 24334 708 1st Avenue NE, #1 Ph. 763.682.1781 www.meyerrohlin.com Buffalo, MN 55313 Meyer-Rohlin PARCEL DESCRIPTION & R.O.W. VACATION EXHIBIT LOCATED IN THE NW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 1, T. 120, R. 24 WRIGHT COUNTY, MN SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS Agenda Page 43 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 2025-XX ORDINANCE AMENDING ALBERTVILLE ZONING CHPATER 5200, PUD-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTIRCT, FOR TOY BOX PUD REZONING AND DEVELOPMENT SITE AND BUILDING PLANS FOR LOT 1, BLOCK 1, TOY BOX ALBERTVILLE ADDITION TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SELF- STORAGE FACILITY WITH THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE The City Council of the City of Albertville, Minnesota hereby ordains: Section 1. Chapter 5200 PUD Planned Unit Development District, Section of the Albertville City Code is hereby amended to add the underlined text and to repeal the strikeout text: 5200.38 Toy Box A. USES: Uses allowed in the Toybox B-4/PUD district shall be the same as the B-4 base zoning district, as well as: 1. Garage condominiums facility as a permitted use, with the standards and conditions established in this section. B. Lot Requirements and Setbacks: Setbacks Front Side (Interior) Side (Corner) Rear Lot Area Lot Width - - - - - - - C. Special PUD Conditions: 1. Garage condominiums facilities shall be subject to the following standards and conditions: a. The garage condominiums facility building shall meet the architectural standards of section 4500.8 of this chapter. b. Parking shall either be provided and striped on the site or a emergency vehicles path shall be striped as no parking on the site. c. No overnight outdoor parking shall be allowed d. No outside storage is allowed. e. No detached trash enclosure or dumpsters or other trash receptacles are permitted. All trash receptacles shall be within the garage units. f. No sub-rental of the garage units are allowed. g. The units shall not be used for commercial warehousing or retail purposes. h. The units shall not be used for commercial manufacturing or repair of vehicles, equipment, or parts thereof. Agenda Page 44 City of Albertville Ordinance No. 2025-XX Meeting of August XX, 2025 Page 2 2. The number of required parking spaces in the B-4/PUD shall be the same as the B-4 district. 3. Any deviations from the approved site plans may require an amendment to Toybox PUD B-4/PUD zoning district or a conditional use permit, as established in the zoning ordinance. Section 2. The remainder of the code. Numbering within sections of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance shall be adjusted in tandem to include the amendments within this ordinance. Section 3. This Amendment shall be in full force and effective immediately following its passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Albertville this XX day of August, 2025. ___________________________ Jillian Hendrickson, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk Agenda Page 45 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT ENTITLED TOY BOX ALBERTVILLE ADDITION, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, Toybox Partners, LLC, the applicant, has made an application on behalf of Schultz & Schupp LLC, the owner, to replat the property described in Attachment A, into the property described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, TOY BOX ALBERTVILLE ADDITION, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, Toy Box Albertville Addition consists of approximately 2.17 acres; and WHEREAS, the replatting of land within the City of Albertville requires the approval of the city; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat is located within the B-4 zoning district and meets lot requirements of the zoning district; and WHEREAS, the City of Albertville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 8, 2025, to consider the Preliminary Plat; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing on said Preliminary Plat was duly published and mailed in accordance with the applicable Albertville Ordinances; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard all persons interested in the Preliminary Plat at the public hearing, and the Commission recommended approval of the plat for Toy Box Albertville Addition to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed Preliminary Plat Toy Box Albertville Addition meets the requirements of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds the final plat for Toy Box Albertville Addition meets the requirements of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance and is consistent with the preliminary plat. Agenda Page 46 City of Albertville Resolution No. 2025-XX Meeting of August XX, 2025 Page 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, hereby approves the preliminary plat and final plat for Toy Box Albertville Addition subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Toy Box PUD B-4/PUD zoning district over the entire plat. 2. Approval is subject to the portion of Barthel Industrial Drive included in the plat being vacated. 3. Before a building permit may be issued: a. An exhibit showing emergency vehicle circulation and a fire lane that prohibits parking must be shown on the revised site plans. b. A lighting and photometric plan must be submitted and must be consistent with the standards established in the zoning ordinance. 4. The grading, drainage, and final site plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 5. The utility plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. The plat shall provide utility easements over all utilities, drainage ways, and stormwater ponds service the plat. The size and location shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Albertville for the required site improvements and the installation of the utilities. Agenda Page 47 City of Albertville Resolution No. 2025-XX Meeting of August XX, 2025 Page 1 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Albertville this XX day of August, 2025. ___________________________ Jillian Hendrickson, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk Agenda Page 48 City of Albertville Resolution No. 2025-XX Meeting of August XX, 2025 Page 1 ATTACHMENT A That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 120 Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 4, Block 2, Townsite of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, according to the recorded plat thereof; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 40 minutes 26 seconds West, along the South line of said Block 2, a distance of 148.83 feet; thence South 01 degrees 40 minutes 07 seconds West, a distance of 35.35 feet; thence return North 01 degrees 40 minutes 07 seconds East, a distance of 35.35 feet, to the South line of said Block 2; thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes 26 seconds East, along said South line and its Easterly extension, a distance of 208.91 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 01 degrees 12 minutes 37 seconds West, a distance of 34.16 feet; thence South 22 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 170.64 feet, to the Northerly right of way of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence South 60 degrees 59 minutes 18 seconds East, along said Northerly right of way line, a distance of 282.69 feet; thence North 22 degrees 08 minutes 32 seconds East, a distance of 232.47 feet; thence North 60 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds West, a distance of 307.23 feet to the Easterly right of way line of the Street adjacent to said Block 2 (a/k/a Large Avenue); thence South 01 degrees 05 minutes 28 seconds West, along said Easterly right of way line, a distance of 35.41 feet to said South line and its Easterly extension of Block 2; thence South 89 degrees 40 minutes 26 seconds West, along said South line and its Easterly extension of Block 2, a distance of 0.62 feet to the point of beginning. AND That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 120, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of Lot 4, Block 2, Townsite of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, accor ding to the recorded plat thereof; thence on an assumed bearing of South 89 degrees 40 minutes 26 seconds West along the South line of said Block 2, a distance of 148.83 feet; thence South 01 degrees 40 minutes 07 seconds West, a distance of 35.35 feet; thence return North 01 degrees 40 minutes 07 seconds East a distance of 35.35 feet, to the South line of said Block 2; thence North 89 degrees 40 minutes 26 seconds East along said South line and its Easterly extension a distance of 208.91 feet; thence South 01 degrees 12 minutes 37 seconds West a distance of 34.16 feet; thence South 22 degrees 09 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 170.64 feet to the Northerly right of way of the Burlington Northern Railroad; thence South 60 degrees 59 minutes 18 seconds E ast along Agenda Page 49 City of Albertville Resolution No. 2025-XX Meeting of August XX, 2025 Page 1 said Northerly right of way line a distance of 282.69 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 22 degrees 08 minutes 32 seconds East a distance of 232.47 feet; thence North 60 degrees 54 minutes 28 seconds West, a distance of 5.54 feet; thence North 01 degrees 06 minutes 32 seconds East a distance of 26.88 feet; thence North 80 degrees 15 minutes 34 seconds East a distance of 59.94 feet; thence South 01 degrees 06 minutes 32 seconds West a distance of 330.50 feet to the said Northerly right of way line of Burlington Northern Railroad; thence North 60 degrees 59 minutes 18 seconds West along said Northerly right of way line a distance of 155.49 feet to the point of beginning. AND That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 120, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the South Quarter Corner of Section 36, Township 121, Range 24; thence South 89 degrees 58 minutes 52 seconds West, assumed bearing, along the north line of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 1, a distance of 215.00 feet to the northwest corner of said Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence South 01 degrees 04 minutes 01 seconds West, a distance of 500.44 feet to the northerly right of way line of the BNSF Railway; thence South 61 degrees 02 minutes 17 seconds East, assumed bearing, along said northerly right of way line, a distance of 657.96 feet; thence North 21 degrees 59 minutes 44 seconds East, a distance of 232.79 feet; thence North 61 degrees 01 minutes 24 seconds West, a distance of 5.54 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence continue North 61 degrees 01 minutes 24 seconds West, a distance of 77.83 feet; thence easterly on a curve, tangent to the northwesterly extension of the last described course, concave to the north, having a radius of 100.00 feet and a central angle of 38 degrees 47 minutes 58 seconds East, a distance of 67.72 feet; thence North 80 degrees 10 minutes 38 seconds East, tangent to the last described curve, a distance of 3.11 feet to a line bearing North 01 degree 01 minute 36 seconds East from the point of beginning; thence South 01 degree 01 minute 36 seconds West, a distance of 27.19 feet to the point of beginning. Agenda Page 50 Planning Commission Request for Recommendation July 8, 2025 ACTION REQUESTED The Planning Commission is asked to conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation to the City Council on the Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Rezoning for the parcel with PID 101-800-062200 located in the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 120, Range 23, Wright County, Minnesota. The current request includes only the Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development Rezoning for the site. Future submittals will be made for the development of the lots within the PUD and will include building details, landscaping, lighting, and all other necessary information to ensure conformity with the zoning ordinance. BACKGROUND Mark Krogh, of Java Albertville Retail, the applicant, has made an application on behalf of the property owner, Michael J and Heidi Potter, for a Preliminary Plat and PUD Rezoning for the property with PID 101-800-062200. The Planning Commission is responsible for reviewing and making a recommendation to City Council on the Preliminary Plat and PUD Rezoning items. The property is located along 60th Street Northeast (County Highway 137) between the Lymon Avenue and Mackenzie Avenue Northeast. The site is currently comprised of a single parcel that is 16.34 acres. The parcel is currently zoned B-3 and is vacant. The parcel is currently used for exterior storage which is only allowed with a conditional use permit. The applicant requests to subdivide the property and create a planned unit development to allow for shared access and private drive. The current site has one access off 60th Street Northeast and three accesses off of Mackenzie Ave. Access is proposed to be located off 60th Street Northeast and one access off Mackenzie Ave NE. Shared access is proposed for the lots. TO: Chair Buhrmann and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Jenni Faulkner, Consultant Planner T.J. Hofer, Consultant Planner AGENDA ITEM: Preliminary Plat and PUD Rezoning for Java Companies at PID 101-800-062200. HEARINGS Preliminary Plat and PUD Rezoning to PID 101-800-062200 Agenda Page 51 Planning Commission Request for Recommendation – July 8, 2025 Planning – Java Albertville Retail Page 2 of 7 The proposed subdivision would create two lots and one outlot. The proposed car wash would be located on proposed Lot 1, Block 1, and the proposed grocery store would be located on proposed Lot 2, Block 1. Outlot A would remain undeveloped. No changes are proposed to Outlot A. The plat is proposed as MUD LAKE ADDITION, and staff requested that the plat be renamed since Mud Lake was renamed. The applicant has indicated that they would prefer the name JAVA RETAIL ADDITION, so the plat is referred to as such in the report. The application includes a site plan that would be used to determine the shared improvements on the site. Future site plan review applications are expected for the car wash use and the grocery store use. REVIEW Preliminary Plat Review Dimensional Standards Standard Requirement Lot 1, Block 1 Lot 2, Block 2 Meets Req. Maximum Height (ft.) 35 Unknown Unknown Unknown Lot width (ft.) 100 182.07 313.92 Meets Front yard setback (ft.) 35 ~81 ~135 Meets Side yard setback(ft.) 20 ~25 ~58 Meets Rear yard setback (ft.) 20 ~206 ~74 Meets Parking lot setback from street (ft.) 15 22 – 45 22 – 59 Meets Curb barrier from lot line (ft.) 5 27 – 57 (0) 22 – 59 Does Not Meet (PUD) Site coverage maximum (%) 80% 53% 65% Meets The front of a lot shall be the boundary abutting a public right of way having the least width. The front of the lot for both proposed lots is 60th Street Northeast. The B-3 district has no required lot area minimum. Setbacks from curb barriers on parking lots is required from property lines. The proposed site plan meets the setback requirement for all exterior lot lines, however, the shared lot line between Lot 1 and Lot 2 has curb barriers located on the property line on Lot 2. The PUD can grant flexibility for this as the setback is internal to the site. Dedication Requirements Commercial subdivision or developments require 10% land dedication. 10% of the resulting lots is 0.483 acres or 21,039.48 sq. ft. Cash in lieu of land dedication is determined by the City of Albertville fee schedule. Cash in lieu of land for industrial properties is $9,020.00 per acre subdivided. Cash in lieu of land for this site is $4,356.66. Dedication will be due with the final plat. Agenda Page 52 Planning Commission Request for Recommendation – July 8, 2025 Planning – Java Albertville Retail Page 3 of 7 Water and Sewer Systems The applicant is proposing to extend sewer and water from the existing utilities located on Lymon Avenue. The applicant is proposing to bring utilities down Lymon Ave, along the southern border of the neighboring parcel that is used as a cemetery, and up to the developable area of the site. The applicant is proposing easements along the path of the utilities as well. The City Engineer has indicated that trunk utilities will need to be extended across Mackenzie Ave NE. Future site plan submittals for the structures on the proposed lots will be required to show connections to the utilities on site. A condition requiring approval by City Engineer is added. Drainage System The applicant has submitted a grading and drainage plan. Stormwater management is proposed throughout the parking lot and to the southeast of the site that will be directed towards a new stormwater facility on the south side of Lots 1 and 2 and on Outlot A, which will serve the site as a whole. The applicant has provided a draft Declaration of Easements that includes a stormwater system easement for the property. Preliminary grading and drainage plans have been provided for City Engineer review. A condition requiring approval by City Engineer is added. A condition requiring approval by City Engineer is added. Easements The proposed preliminary plat shows a 20 ft. drainage and utility easement along the south, east and west perimeters and a 35 ft. drainage and utility easement along the north perimeter of Lot 1, Block 1. 20 ft. drainage and utility easement are proposed along the south and west perimeters and a 35 ft. drainage and utility easement is shown along the north and east perimeter of Lot 2, Block 1. A condition requiring approval by City Engineer is added. Erosion and Sediment Control A new stormwater management basin is proposed to the south of Lot 1 and Lot 2. The proposed erosion control and restoration plan includes a silt fence around the construction site. The plan also shows inlet protection around the proposed storm sewer. Preliminary erosion control plans have been provided for City Engineer review. A condition requiring approval by City Engineer is added. Access Shared access is proposed for Lot 1 and Lot 2 through an access off 60th Street Northeast and an access on Mackenize Ave NE. The applicant has provided a draft Declaration of Easements that includes a roadway easement for the property. Access from 60th Street Northeast is proposed through a single access located approximately where the existing access is located. Access off of Mackenzie Ave NE is proposed to be reduced to one access, located approximately where the middle access currently exists, and the northern access is proposed to be closed. The existing access on the south side of the site is not addressed within the plans but changes may be necessary and will be addressed by the City Engineer. The application has not provided a turning radius layout indicating the site can accommodate maneuvering of semi-trucks on-site. A condition has been recommended that a site circulation exhibit be provided. Preliminary curb cut Agenda Page 53 Planning Commission Request for Recommendation – July 8, 2025 Planning – Java Albertville Retail Page 4 of 7 and access plans have been provided for City Engineer review. A condition requiring approval by City Engineer is added. Protected Areas There are two delineated wetlands located mostly on proposed Outlot A. Previously, a Wetlands Conservation Act (WCA) violation occurred on the site when wetlands were filled. The property owner has worked with the city as the local government unit (LGU) responsible for the enforcement of WCA, and efforts to address the violation are ongoing. 30 ft. wetland buffer strips and structure setbacks shall apply to all parcels of land whether or not the wetland is on the same parcel as a proposed development. The 30 ft. buffer width and setback shall apply to structures, roadways, and trails in all zoning districts. The proposed development appears to meet the setback requirement as the closest proposed impervious surface is located approximately 42.6 ft. from the edge of the delineated wetland. Site Plan Review Landscaping A landscaping plan has not been submitted for review. Conditions have been recommended to address the landscaping standards regarding ground cover. Additionally, landscaping plans are expected for Lots 1 and 2 when the sites develop and are required to be consistent with the standards established in the zoning ordinance. Lighting A lighting plan has not been submitted. As Lot 1 and 2 are developed lighting and photometric plans will be required that are consistent with the standards established in the zoning ordinance. Only the lighting on the building expansion is subject to review. A full lighting plan was not submitted as part of the application. Parking The applicant is proposing 116 parking stalls on the site with five of those being handicapped accessible spaces. 21 parking stalls and one accessible stall are proposed for the car wash use on Lot 1, Block 1. 90 parking stalls and four accessible stalls are proposed for the grocery store use on Lot 2, Block 1. 1200.9 of the zoning ordinance establishes the required number of parking spaces. Based on the proposed uses, the number of parking spaces required are: Use Requirement Square Footage Parking Required Car Wash A minimum of 10 spaces, or 1 space for each employee on the maximum shift, whichever is greater Number of employee unknown Unknown, minimum 10 Retail store and service establishment At least 1 space for each 200 square feet of floor area 20,716 sq. ft. 94 stalls Information regarding the number of employees has not been provided for the car wash use, but the 22 stalls are proposed where 10 are required as a minimum. 20 of the indicated stalls are Agenda Page 54 Planning Commission Request for Recommendation – July 8, 2025 Planning – Java Albertville Retail Page 5 of 7 shown as 13 ft. x13.5 ft. and appear to have additional features around them. These stalls appear to be bays for vehicles that are customers of the car wash and potentially should not be included as part of the parking count. 94 parking stalls are proposed for the grocery store use (retail store and service establishment), where the zoning ordinance requires 94 parking stalls. Staff understands that each lot is intended to have enough parking to accommodate the future uses. A condition has been included that if a future submittal shows an application is inconsistent with the approved conditions and standards of the zoning ordinance, that the future submittal must meet the standards and may require a PUD amendment or a conditional use permit. Most of the proposed parking spaces are 9 ft.x20 ft., which meets code requirements. Some parking spaces proposed on Lot 1 are shown as 9 ft.x18 ft. and 13 ft.x13.5 ft., while some parking spaces on Lot 2 are shown as 9 ft. x19 ft. The stalls proposed at 9 ft. x18 ft. and 9 ft. x19 ft. do not appear to have any accommodation to account for the reduced stall depth and shall be revised to meet the standards of the zoning ordinance. The stalls proposed as 13 ft. x13.5 ft. have an enlarged drive aisle of 39 ft., where 24 ft. is required. With this additional drive aisle, the full width from curb to curb is approximately 65 ft., which is one foot more than would be expected with a 24 ft. drive aisle and two 9 ft. x 20 ft. stalls. The 13 ft. x13.5 ft. stalls are shown with additional details that are not defined, but staff anticipates being part of the car wash use such as vacuum stations or other equipment associated with the use. A condition is included below that requires the stalls shown as 9 ft. x18 ft. and 9 ft. x19 ft. must be revised to conform with the ordinance. Loading A loading dock is shown on the south side of the building on Lot 2. Staff have recommended a condition that the loading dock shall be reviewed with the future submittal for the development of the structure on Lot 2. Screening City Code requires all mechanical equipment to be screened (1000.7 J.) so as not to be visible . The submitted plans do not include information regarding mechanical equipment. Staff have recommended a condition that screening shall be reviewed with the future submittals for the buildings on Lots 1 and 2. Building Materials In the B-3 zoning district, fifty percent (50%) of all exterior wall finishes must be constructed of materials containing only brick, dimension stone, glass, stucco and its replicas, woods, rock faced block, or aggregate precast concrete panels. In the B-3 zoning district, any exposed metal or fiberglass finish on all buildings shall be limited to no more than fifty percent (50%) of the total solid surface of all walls. For building walls which face public rights of way or abut residential uses, an exposed metal or fiberglass finish shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the wall area. Any metal finish utilized in the building shall be a minimum of 26 -gauge steel. All sides of the principal and accessory structures are to have essentially the same or coordi nated, harmonious exterior finish materials and treatment. Proposed building materials have not been submitted with the application. Staff have recommended a condition that building materials shall be reviewed with the future submittals for the buildings on Lots 1 and 2. Agenda Page 55 Planning Commission Request for Recommendation – July 8, 2025 Planning – Java Albertville Retail Page 6 of 7 Signs The proposed site plan shows what appears to be a sign on the north side of the site east of the proposed access. No details were provided regarding the sign. Any proposed signs shall meet the standards established within the Albertville City Code. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan The proposed preliminary plat and PUD must comply with the Albertville Comprehensive Plan. The property is shown on the Proposed Land Use Plan as Commercial. Commercial Goal 1 in the Albertville Vision/Comprehensive Plan is to promote commercial development by the City taking advantage of its access to Interstate 94 and the growing population of Albertville and its adjoining communities. The proposed uses are located near I-94 and creates a use that is not currently located in the city, a car wash, and creates a use that is critical for serving residential areas as the population increases, a grocery store. RECOMMENDATION: It is respectfully requested that Chair Buhrmann and Members of the Planning Commission consider the following: MOTION TO: Recommend approval of the planned unit development rezoning for the proposed Java Retail project, with the following terms: 5200.19 Java Retail A. USES: Uses allowed in the Java Retail B-3/PUD district shall be the same as the B-3 base zoning district, as well as: 1. Car washes as a permitted use, with the standards and conditions established in this section. B. Lot Requirements and Setbacks: Setbacks Front Side (Interior) Side (Corner) Rear Lot Area Lot Width - - - - - - - C. Special PUD Conditions: 1. Curb barriers must meet the setbacks established in 1200.4 (H) 16. of the zoning ordinance except for the shared lot line between Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, JAVA RETAIL ADDITION within the PUD 2. Car washes shall be subject to the following standards and conditions: a. The car wash structure shall meet the architectural standards of section 4400.8 of this chapter. b. Car wash stacking space shall be constructed to accommodate the number of vehicles that may be washed in a 30 minute period. 3. The number of required parking spaces in the B-3/PUD shall be the same as the B-3 district. Parking on the site is approved consistent with the Java Retail PUD B-3/PUD zoning district. Any proposed development that would result in an increase of parking must provide the additional required parking. Agenda Page 56 Planning Commission Request for Recommendation – July 8, 2025 Planning – Java Albertville Retail Page 7 of 7 4. Any deviations from the approved site plans may require an amendment to the Java Retail PUD B-3/PUD zoning district or a conditional use permit, as established in the zoning ordinance. 5. Prior to the development of Lot 1 or Lot 2, Block 1, JAVA RETAIL ADDITION, the following must be reviewed and approved through the site plan review process, including an application, all fees related to the application, and the submittal requirements established within the zoning ordinance: a. Any structures or facilities proposed to be constructed or developed within the Java Retail PUD B-3/PUD zoning district. b. All future development of the site must submit a landscaping plan to be reviewed as part of a site plan review. c. All future development of the site must submit a lighting plan to be reviewed as part of a site plan review. 6. Prior to development of Outlot A, the outlot must be platted as a lot and must be reviewed and approved through the site plan review process, including an application, all fees related to the application, and the submittal requirements established within the zoning ordinance. MOTION TO: Recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat for Java Retail Addition for PID 101-800-062200 located in the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 6, Township 120, Range 23, Wright County, Minnesota. With the following conditions of approval: 1. Approval of the Java Retail PUD B-3/PUD zoning district over the entire plat. 2. A private street easement over the lots must be prepared by the applicant that defines the location and configuration of the private street. The easement must allow shared access to all the lots in the plat. The street easement shall be recorded simultaneously with the final plat. 3. The applicant shall provide a copy of the recorded easements to the City before a building permit may be issued for any lot within the plat. 4. The grading, drainage, and final site plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 5. The utility plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. The plat shall provide utility easements over all utilities, drainage ways, and stormwater ponds service the plat. The size and location shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Albertville for the required site improvements and the installation of the public utilities and private street. Attachments: A. Location Map B. Future Land Use Map C. Java Properties Application D. Java Properties Application Materials E. Draft Ordinance F. Draft Resolution Agenda Page 57 1, 50 4.7© Bolton & Menk, Inc - Web GIS 0 Legend Location Map This drawing is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey and is not intended to be used as one. This drawing is a compilation of records, information, and data located in various city, county, and state offices, and other sources affecting the area shown, and is to be used for reference purposes only. The City of Albertville is not responsible for any inaccuracies herein contained. Disclaimer: 6/30/2025 2:05 PM 1,053 Feet City Limits Centerlines Interstate Highway CSAH Local Road Parcels (07/02/2024) Protected Waters WRCO_2018 Red: Band_1 Green: Band_2 Blue: Band_3 Agenda Page 58 Subject Property Agenda Page 59 Agenda Page 60 Agenda Page 61 Agenda Page 62 1 ALBERTVILLE RETAIL-NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION To: The City of Albertville From: Mark Krogh, Java Albertville Retail Date: 6/12/2025 Re: Albertville Retail Narrative Description Dear City of Albertville, The following is a narrative a description of the proposed project. Narrative Description: The Albertville Retail project will consist of a roughly 4,874 square foot carwash and a roughly 20,716 square foot grocery store. Our intent is to comply with the Albertville Comprehensive Plan, and we believe we have done so without requesting any amendments. Our plan would be to begin construction in the Spring of 2026 with a completion of the project in the Fall of 2026. This construction plan is subject to modification based on weather conditions. See Exhibit A: Site Plan See Exhibit B: Easement Declaration Agenda Page 63 Exhibit A: Site Plan Agenda Page 64 Exhibit B: Easement Declaration DECLARATION OF EASEMENTS THIS DECLARATION (this “Declaration”) is made as of this ___ day of__________, 2025, by Java Albertville Retail LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“Declarant”). Preliminary Statement of Facts Declarant is the owner of certain real property located in the City of Albertville (the “City”) Wright County, Minnesota (the “Property”) legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Property consists of three (3) parcels of real estate designated on Exhibit A as “Parcel One”, “Parcel Two and the “Pond Parcel”. Parcel One, Parcel Two and Parcel Three are singularly referred to herein as a “Parcel” and collectively as the “Parcels”. Parcels One and Two are sometimes collectively referred to as the “Developed Parcels”. For purposes of this Declaration, the owner of Parcel One is referred to as the “Parcel One Owner”, the owner of Parcel Two is referred to as the “Parcel Two Owner” and the owner of the Pond Parcel is referred to as the “Pond Parcel Owner”. The three Parcel Owners are singularly referred to herein as an “Owner” and collectively as the “Owners”. For purposes of this Declaration the tenants, guests, users and invitees of an Owner are referred to as “Permitted Users”. Declarant desires to provide for the construction of a roadway over, under and across the Developed Parcels to provide access from the Parcels to public roads and to create a stormwater drainage and retention pond system for the benefit of the Parcels. Declarant also desires to create (i) easements benefitting and burdening the Parcels for the roadway and (ii) easements for the stormwater drainage and retention pond system. NOW, THEREFORE, Declarant hereby declares as follows: Section 1. Roadway Easement. 1.1 Creation of Roadway Easement. Each Developed Parcel shall be subject to a permanent, nonexclusive easement (the “Roadway Easement”) over, under and across that portion of the roadway (the “Roadway”) now or hereafter constructed upon the Developed Parcel included within the easement area (the “Roadway Easement Area”) described and depicted on Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof. The Roadway Easement located on a Parcel shall run for the benefit all of the Parcels. The purpose of the Roadway Easement is to provide vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress to and from the Parcels to and from Mackenzie Avenue NE and 60th Street NE. Agenda Page 65 1.2. Use of Roadway. The Roadway shall be used solely for vehicular and pedestrian access and roadway purposes. No Owner nor its Permitted Users shall interfere with the use and operation of the Roadway. The Roadway Easement shall be used solely for the benefit of each Parcel and the Roadway Easement rights may not be assigned or sold separately from the ownership of a Parcel. 1.3. Construction of Roadway and Retention Pond. The Parcel One Owner shall construct the Roadway and develop the Retention Pond according to the plans and specifications thereof (the “Roadway Plans" and "Retention Pond Plans," respectively) referenced on Exhibit C attached hereto and made a part hereof (the “Roadway Construction" and "Retention Pond Development"). The Parcel One Owner shall complete the Roadway Construction and Retention Pond Development no later than _____________________ (the "Construction Target Completion Date”). The Parcel One Owner shall have a construction easement over, under and across Parcel Two and the Pond Parcel as reasonably required in order to complete the Roadway Construction and Retention Pond Development. The Parcel One Owner shall comply with all applicable governmental laws, ordinances, and regulations (“Laws”) in completing the Roadway Construction and Retention Pond Development. The Parcel One Owner shall make no changes to the Plans without the prior written consent of the Parcel Two Owner. The anticipated cost of the Roadway Construction and Retention Pond Development (the “Budgeted Cost”) is set forth on Exhibit D attached hereto and made a part hereof. Upon completion of the Roadway Construction and Retention Pond Development, and within thirty (30) days after receipt of a detailed accounting of the cost of the Roadway Construction and Retention Pond Development from the Parcel One Owner, the Parcel Two Owner shall pay to the Parcel One Owner an amount (the “Shared Construction Cost”) equal to fifty percent (50%) of the actual construction and development costs but in no event more than fifty percent (50%) of the Budgeted Cost plus a variance of up to twenty percent (20%) unless the Parcel Two Owner has approved in writing an increase in the Budgeted Cost. If the Parcel One Owner fails to complete the Roadway Construction and Retention Pond Development by the Construction Target Completion Date and such failure continues for a period longer than thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice thereof from either of the other Parcel Owners, then either of the other Parcel Owners may, but without obligation to do so, complete the Roadway Construction and Retention Pond Development, and the Parcel Owner electing to perform such work shall have a temporary easement to enter upon Parcel One and the Pond Parcel for the purposes of performing some or all of the Roadway Maintenance Obligations and Retention Pond Maintenance Obligations as provided for herein. If one of the other Parcel Owners performs Roadway Construction and Retention Pond Development on behalf of the Parcel One Owner, the Parcel Owner performing the work shall be entitled to invoice fifty percent (50%) of the costs it incurs with respect to the Roadway Construction and Retention Pond Development to the Parcel One Owner, and the Parcel One Owner shall pay such amount, plus an administrative fee equal to ten percent (10%) of the cost of such work to the Parcel Owner performing the work, within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. No undertaking by a Parcel Owner to complete any Roadway Construction or Retention Pond Development shall relieve the Parcel One Owner of its obligation to fully and timely complete the Roadway Maintenance Obligations and Retention Pond Maintenance Obligations. Agenda Page 66 If either Parcel Owner fails to pay the Shared Construction Cost to the other Parcel Owner within thirty (30) days after receipt of the Parcel Owner’s written demand and detailed accounting of such costs, then the unpaid amount shall accrue interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum from the date payment was due until paid in full. In addition, Parcel One Owner shall have the right to file and record a lien against Parcel Two in the amount of the unpaid Shared Construction Cost, plus accrued interest and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in enforcing such payment, which lien shall be enforceable in accordance with applicable law. The Parcel Two Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees that this provision constitutes express authorization for such lien and waives any objection to the recording or enforcement of the same. The Parties agree that this reimbursement obligation and lien right shall run with the land and bind all successors and assigns of Parcel Two and Parcel One. 1.4. Maintenance of Roadway. The Parcel One Owner shall maintain the Roadway at all times in good repair and in safe operating condition and in compliance with all applicable governmental laws, ordinances and regulations (“Laws”) including making all necessary repairs, resurfacing and replacements thereto and promptly removing all accumulations snow and ice (the “Roadway Maintenance Obligations”). The costs and expenses of the Roadway Maintenance Obligations together with a management fee in an amount not to exceed seven percent (7%) of the sum of the aforementioned costs (the “Roadway Operating Costs”) shall be shared fifty percent (50%) by the Parcel One Owner and fifty percent (50%) by the Parcel Two Owner. The Parcel One Owner shall have a temporary easement to enter upon Parcel Two and the Pond Parcel for the purposes of performing the Roadway Maintenance Obligations. No later than April 1 of each year, the Parcel One Owner shall deliver to the Parcel Two Owner a detailed accounting of all the Roadway Operating Costs incurred during the previous calendar year. The Parcel Two Owner shall pay its share of the previous year’s Roadway Operating Costs to the Parcel One Owner within thirty (30) days after receiving notice of the Roadway Operating Costs. If the Parcel One Owner fails to properly and timely perform the Roadway Maintenance Obligations and such failure continues for a period longer than thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice thereof from either of the other Parcel Owners (or in cases of emergency with such written or telephonic notice as is practical), then either of the other Parcel Owners may, but without obligation to do so, complete some or all of the Roadway Maintenance Obligations for the portion of the Roadway in question, and the Parcel Owner electing to perform such work shall have a temporary easement to enter upon the defaulting Parcel Owner's property for the purposes of performing the necessary Roadway Maintenance Obligations. If a Parcel Owner performs Roadway Maintenance Obligations on behalf of the other Parcel Owner, the Parcel Owner performing the work shall be entitled to invoice the Roadway Maintenance Costs it incurs to the defaulting Parcel Owner, and the defaulting Parcel Owner shall pay the full amount of such Roadway Operating Costs, plus an administrative fee equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the cost of such work to the Parcel Owner performing the work within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. No undertaking by a Parcel Owner to complete any Roadway Maintenance Obligations shall relieve the Parcel One Owner of its obligation to fully and timely complete the Roadway Maintenance Obligations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Owner shall be liable for the full amount of the cost of the repair of any damage to the Roadway resulting from the acts or negligence of that Owner or its Permitted Users. No Parcel Owner shall allow any mechanic’s liens to be filed against the Parcel of another Owner as the result of its performance of the Roadway Maintenance Obligations, and if any such lien is filed as the result of such work, the Agenda Page 67 Parcel Owner performing the work shall cause such lien to be released within thirty (30) days after the date the Parcel Owner performing the work receives written notice from the affected Parcel Owner as to the existence of the filed lien. If either Parcel Owner fails to pay its share of any Roadway Maintenance Obligation to the other Parcel Owner within thirty (30) days after receipt of written demand and a detailed accounting of such costs, then the unpaid amount shall accrue interest at the rate of ten percent (10%) per annum from the date payment was due until paid in full. In addition, the Parcel Owner who advanced such costs shall have the right to file and record a lien against the non-paying Parcel Owner’s parcel in the amount of the unpaid costs, including Roadway Maintenance Obligations, plus accrued interest and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in enforcing such payment. Any such lien shall be enforceable in accordance with applicable law. Each Parcel Owner hereby acknowledges and agrees that this provision constitutes express authorization for such lien and waives any objection to the recording or enforcement of the same. The Parties agree that all such reimbursement obligations and lien rights shall run with the land and be binding upon and enforceable against all successors and assigns of both Parcel One and Parcel Two. 2. Stormwater System Easements. 2.1 Creation of Stormwater Retention Pond Easement. a. Pond Easement. The Pond Parcel shall be subject to a permanent, nonexclusive easement for stormwater retention pond purposes (the “Pond Easement”) over, under and across the stormwater retention pond and associated lines and drains (the “Retention Pond”) now or hereafter constructed on the Pond Parcel, which Pond Easement shall run for the benefit of the Developed Parcels. The area of the Pond Parcel encumbered by the Pond Easement is referred to herein as the “Pond Easement Area”. b. Stormwater System. Each Developed Parcel Owner may, at its expense, connect such lines, drains and associated facilities to allow stormwater to drain from the Developed Parcel Owner’s Parcel to the Retention Pond. Such lines, drains and associated facilities both on the Developed Parcels and on the Pond Parcel are referred to herein as the “Stormwater System”. 2.2 Use of Stormwater System. The Stormwater System shall be used solely for stormwater drainage, retention and management pursuant to the stormwater management plan for the for the Stormwater System for the Property approved by the City and any other governmental authority having jurisdiction over such system and in accordance with all applicable Laws (the “Approved Stormwater Management Plan”). No Owner shall interfere with the use and operation of the Stormwater System or the Stormwater System Easement. The Stormwater System Easement shall be used solely for the benefit of the Developed Parcels and the Pond Easement rights may not be assigned or sold separately from the ownership of a Developed Parcel. Agenda Page 68 2.3. Maintenance of Stormwater System. The Parcel One Owner shall maintain and keep the Stormwater System in good repair and operating condition and in compliance with the Approved Stormwater Management Plan, including making all necessary repairs, replacements and cleaning of the Stormwater System (the “Stormwater System Maintenance Obligations”). The Parcel One Owner shall have a perpetual easement to enter upon the other Parcels for the purpose of performing the Stormwater System Maintenance Obligations and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to minimize any interference with business operations on the Parcels in performing the Stormwater System Maintenance Obligations. The costs and expenses of the Stormwater System Maintenance Obligations, together with a management fee in an amount not to exceed seven percent (7%) of the sum of the aforementioned costs (the “Stormwater System Operating Costs”) shall be shared thirty-eight percent (38%) by the Parcel One Owner and sixty-two percent (62%) by the Parcel Two Owner. No later than April 1 of each year the Parcel One Owner shall deliver to the Parcel Two Owner a detailed accounting of all the Stormwater System Operating Costs incurred during the previous calendar year. The Parcel Two Owner shall pay its share of the previous year’s Stormwater System Operating Costs to the Parcel One Owner within thirty (30) days after receiving notice of the Stormwater System Operating Costs. If the Parcel One Owner fails to properly and timely perform the Stormwater System Maintenance Obligations and such failure continues for a period longer than thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice thereof from either of the other Parcel Owners (or in cases of emergency with such written or telephonic notice as is practical), then either of the Parcel Owners may, but without obligation to do so, enter upon Parcel One and the Pond Parcel and complete some or all of the Stormwater System Maintenance Obligations and the Parcel Owner electing to perform the work shall have a temporary easement to enter upon Parcel One and the Pond Parcel for the purposes of performing some or all of the Stormwater System Maintenance Obligations as provided for herein. If a Parcel Owner performs Stormwater System Maintenance Obligations on behalf of the Parcel One Owner, the Parcel Owner performing the work shall be entitled to invoice the Stormwater System Maintenance Costs it incurs to the Parcel One Owner and the Parcel One Owner shall pay its proportionate share of such Stormwater System Operating Costs to the Parcel Owner performing the work within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. In such instance the Parcel One Owner shall pay to the Parcel Owner performing the work an administrative fee equal to fifteen percent (15%) of the cost of such work. No undertaking by a Parcel Owner to complete any Stormwater System Maintenance Obligations shall relieve the Parcel One Owner of its obligation to fully and timely complete the Stormwater System Maintenance Obligations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an Owner shall be liable for the full amount of the cost of the repair of any damage to the Stormwater System resulting from the acts or negligence of that Owner or it Permitted Users. No Parcel Owner shall allow any mechanic’s liens to be filed against the Parcel of another Owner as the result of its performance of the Stormwater System Maintenance Obligations and if any such lien is filed as the result of such work, Declarant shall cause such lien to be released within thirty (30) days after the date the Parcel Owner performing the work receives written notice from the affected Parcel Owner as to the existence of the filed lien. 3. Taxes and Insurance Expenses for Pond Parcel. The real estate taxes and installments of special assessments payable therewith for the Pond Parcel and the costs of maintaining insurance for the Pond Parcel and the Stormwater System as reasonably determined Agenda Page 69 by the Pond Parcel Owner (the “Pond Parcel T/I Costs”) shall be shared thirty-eight percent (38%) by the Parcel One Owner and sixty-two percent (62%) by the Parcel Two Owner. The Pond Parcel Owner shall annually deliver to the Developed Parcel Owners a detailed accounting of all the Pond Parcel T/I Costs incurred during the previous calendar year. Each Developed Parcel Owner shall pay its share of the previous year’s Pond Parcel T/I Costs to the Pond Parcel Owner within thirty (30) days after receiving notice of the Pond Parcel T/I Costs. If the Declarant fails to pay any of the Pond Parcel T/I Costs or maintain the reasonable insurance coverage for the Pond Parcel and the Stormwater System and such failure continues for a period longer than thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice thereof from a Developed Parcel Owner (or in cases of emergency with such written or telephonic notice as is practical), then the Developed Parcel Owner delivering the notice may, but without obligation to do so, cure some or all of such default. If a Developed Parcel Owner pays any Pond Parcel T/I Costs on behalf of the Pond Parcel Owner, the Developed Parcel Owner performing such work shall be entitled to invoice the Pond Parcel T/I Costs it incurs to the other Developed Parcel Owner and the other Developed Parcel Owner shall pay its proportionate share of such Pond Parcel T/I Costs to the Developed Parcel Owner paying such costs within thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. No undertaking by a Developed Parcel Owner to pay any Pond Parcel T/I Costs shall relieve the Pond Parcel Owner of its obligation to pay the Pond Parcel T/I Costs and collect such amount from the Developed Parcel Owners. 5. Duration and Easement Areas;. The easements created by this Declaration (the “Easements”) shall be perpetual in nature and shall run with the title to the Property, benefitting and binding the Owners thereof and their Permitted Users. The Roadway Easement Area and the Pond Easement Area and the parking areas of each Developed Parcel burdened by the Cross Parking Easement are collectively referred to herein as the “Easement Areas”. 6. Indemnity. Each Owner shall indemnify and hold the other Owner and the Declarant harmless from any and all loss, damage, liability, mechanic’s liens, claims and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses and the cost of collection) arising or resulting from the use of the Roadway, the Pond, the Stormwater System and the Parking Areas by such Owner and its Permitted Users. 7. Insurance. Each Owner shall, at its expense, obtain and continuously maintain a comprehensive policy of liability insurance with respect to the Easement Areas located on the Owner’s Parcel, with the other Owner and Declarant named as an additional insured. The policy shall be with a company licensed to do business in the state of Minnesota and shall have coverage limits of at least $1,000,000.00 combined single limit and umbrella coverage in at least the amount of $3,000,000. The Owner providing such insurance will provide the other Owner and Declarant with thirty (30) days’ written notification prior to any modification or termination of the above described insurance coverage. Immediately upon taking title to a Parcel and then annually thereafter, each Owner shall provide the other Owners, upon written request, with a certificate of insurance showing the required coverage to be in force. Declarant shall provide liability coverage with respect to its obligations hereunder in the same amounts shown above, which coverage shall name the Owners as additional insureds. Agenda Page 70 8. No Dedication. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to constitute a gift, grant or dedication of any portion of the Easement Areas to the general public for any public purpose whatsoever, it being the intention of the parties hereto that this Declaration will be strictly limited to the private use of the Owners. 9. Interest. Any obligation of an Owner or the Declarant hereunder not paid within thirty (30) days of the date such obligation becomes due and payable shall bear interest from such date until paid in full at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum, or the highest mount allowed by law, whichever is less. 10. Estoppel Certificates. Any Parcel Owner, at any time and from time to time (but not more than once in any six (6) month period), or in connection with the sale or transfer of such Parcel Owner’s Parcel or any part thereof, or in connection with the leasing or financing or refinancing of such Parcel Owner’s Parcel or any part thereof, deliver written notice to the other Parcel Owners, requesting such other Parcel Owners certify in writing to the requesting Parcel Owner or the prospective or current mortgagee, or prospective lessee or purchaser of its Parcel or any part thereof, that to the actual knowledge of the certifying Parcel Owner: (i) the requesting Parcel Owner is not in default in the performance of any of its obligations owed to the certifying Parcel Owner hereunder, or, if in default, to describe therein the nature and amount of any and all defaults, (ii) whether this Declaration has been modified, amended, or assigned in any way by the certifying Parcel Owner (and if it has, then stating the nature thereof), (iii) this Declaration as of the date of the certification is in full force and effect, and (iv) such other information as the requesting Parcel Owner may reasonably request. Each Parcel Owner receiving such request shall execute and return such certificate within fifteen (15) days following the receipt thereof at such Parcel Owner’s sole cost and expense. 11. Amendment. This Declaration and the provisions contained herein may be terminated, extended, modified, or amended only with the express written consent of the Declarant, all Owners and all parties having an interest in the Properties. 12. Default; Remedies. This Declaration shall be enforced as follows: (a) Legal Action and Injunctive Relief. In the event of any breach by any Owner of any of the terms and conditions of this Declaration the other Owners shall have all rights and remedies allowed at law or equity, including injunctive relief. Except as specifically provided herein to the contrary, prior to the commencement of any such action alleging a default hereunder the Owners making the claims shall provide to the other Owner at least ten (10) days’ written notice of default and opportunity to cure to the other Owner. If an Owner commences and prevails in an action against another Owner to enforce its rights hereunder, such Owner shall be entitled to receive, in addition to all other relief, its reasonable costs and attorney’s fees expended with respect to such action. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Owner shall be entitled to receive any consequential, special or punitive damages as the result of any claim for relief. (b) Force Majeure. If performance of any action by any Owner under this Declaration is prevented or delayed due to any events outside the Owner’s Agenda Page 71 reasonable control including without limitation, any act of God, including but not limited to, tornado, hurricane, earthquake, high-wind storm damage, wildfires, flood, excessive snowfall, pandemic, epidemic, disease, illness, or other public health emergencies, along with the collateral effects and consequences thereof, strike, lockout, labor trouble, acts of war, terrorism, inability to secure materials, restrictive governmental laws, regulations, decrees, executive orders, public health orders, emergency orders, and ordinances, or any other cause (except financial inability) (“Delay Events”), the time for the performance of such action will be extended for the period that such action is delayed or prevented by such cause. (c) No Termination. No breach of this Declaration shall entitle the nondefaulting Owner to cancel, rescind or otherwise terminate this Declaration. The foregoing limitation will not affect, in any manner, any other right or remedy to which the nondefaulting Owner might have by reason of such breach of this Declaration. 13. Miscellaneous Provisions. (a) Notices. All notices, statements, demands, approvals, and other communications given pursuant to this Declaration shall be in writing and shall be delivered in person, by electronic mail or by certified or registered mail, postage prepaid to (i) the Declarant at the address set forth below and (ii) the Owner of each Parcel (if such Owner is not the Declarant) at the address shown on the official tax records of Wright County, Minnesota, which foregoing addresses may be changed from time to time by written notice properly given hereunder. (b) Waiver of Default. No waiver of any default by an Owner shall be implied from the failure by any other Owner to take any action with respect to such default. No express waiver of any default shall affect any default or extend any period of time for performance other than the specified in such express waiver. One or more waivers of any default and any performance of any provision of this Declaration shall not be deemed a waiver of any subsequent default in the performance of the same provision or any other provision. The consent to or approval of any act or request by an Owner shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary the consent to or approval of any subsequent similar act or request. The rights and remedies provided by this Declaration are cumulative and no right or remedy will be exclusive of any other, or of any other right or remedy at law or in equity which any Owner might otherwise have by virtue of a default under this Declaration and the exercise of any right or remedy by an Owner shall not impair the standing of such Owner to exercise any other right or remedy. (c) No Partnership. Nothing contained in this Declaration and no action by any Owner shall be deemed or construed to create the relationship of principal and agent, or a partnership, or a joint venture, or any association between or among the Owners. Agenda Page 72 (d) Severablity. If any provision of this Declaration is, to any extent, declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Declaration (or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those in respect of which the determination of invalidity or unenforceability was made) shall not be affected thereby and each provision of this Declaration shall be valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. (e) Governing Law. This Declaration shall be construed in accordance with the State of Minnesota. (f) Captions. The captions of the paragraphs of this Declaration are for convenience only and are not intended to affect the interpretation or construction of the provisions herein contained. (g) Time. Time is of the essence of this Declaration. (h) Binding Effect. The provisions of this Declaration shall be binding upon Declarant and shall run with the title to the Property and inure to the benefit of the Owners of the Parcels and their respective successors, assigns, and mortgagees and shall run with the title to the Property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Declarant, intending to be legally bound, has executed this Declaration as of the date first shown above. [Signatures appear on the following page] Agenda Page 73 [Signature Page of Java Albertville Retail LLC to Declaration of Easements] Java Albertville Retail LLC By: Mark Krogh Its: Chief Manager Address for Notices: 255 E Street Mendota, Minnesota 55150 Email: mark@javaprop.com STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ____________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ____ day of _______ 2025 by Mark Krogh, the Chief Manager of Java Albertville Retail LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. Notary Public Seal THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Java Albertville Retail LLC 255 E Street Mendota, Minnesota 55150 Agenda Page 74 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of the Property Parcel One: Parcel Two: Pond Parcel Agenda Page 75 EXHIBIT B Plans and Specifications for the Roadway Construction Agenda Page 76 EXHIBIT C Legal Description and Depiction of Roadway Easement Area Agenda Page 77 EXHIBIT D Budgeted Cost of the Roadway Constructio Agenda Page 78 Agenda Page 79 OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHElllllllllllN90°00'00"E 504.24 S89°42'15"E 275.00 N00°17'45"E 566.85S88°43'13"W 784.21 S00°01'51"E 1082.50N89°37'08"E 777.79 N89°37'08"E 282.00 182.07 313.92 S00°03'17"W 420.47314.54189.70 33.00422.56S01°05'54"W 498.38S00°17'45"W33.00(SOUTH)419.3479.04S00°17'45"W 495.00(SOUTH 30 RODS)0 60'120' MUD LAKE ADDITIONPRELIMINARY PLAT OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW1/4 of NW1/4) of Section 6, Township 120, Range 23, Wright County, Minnesota, except the following: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Section 6, Township 120, Range 23, and running South on the Section line 33 feet for a starting point; thence South on the Section line 30 rods; thence East at right angles 16 rods; thence North 30 rods; thence West parallel with Section line 16 rods to place of beginning. ALSO EXCEPT: The East 460 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 120, Range 23. ALSO EXCEPT: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Section 6, Township 120, Range 23 and running South on the Section line 33 feet; thence continue South on the Section line 30 rods; thence East at right angles 16 rods to the point of beginning; thence continue East on the same line 11 feet; thence Northerly to a point 16 rods and 18 feet East of a point, which is 33 feet south of the Northwest corner of said Section 6; thence West 18 feet to a point 16 rods East of a point 33 feet South from the Northwest corner of said Section 6; thence South 16 rods to the beginning of the land to be herein described. LAND SURVEYOR DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING JONATHAN D. SCHUETTE, LS MINNESOTA LICENSE NO. 45352 TELEPHONE: (320) 762-1290 ENGINEER: DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING MICHAEL J. GERBER, PE MINNESOTA LICENSE NO. 56653 TELEPHONE: (320) 762-1290 LOT AREAS: LOT 1 78,043 SQ. FT+/- OR 1.79 ACRES +/- LOT 2 132,450 SQ. FT+/- OR 3.04 ACRES +/- OUTLOT A 475,635 SQ. FT+/- OR 10.92 ACRES +/- ROAD RIGHT OF WAY 25,669 SQ. FT+/- OR 0.59 ACRES +/- OWNER: MICHAEL J. POTTER AND HEIDI B POTTER 11650 57TH ST NE ALBERTVILLE, MN 55301-9791 OHE OHE UGT UGT FO FO UGE UGE GAS GAS l l X X LEGEND HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE GATE VALVE POWER POLE LIGHT POLE CATCH BASIN SIGN DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE SHRUB COMMUNICATION PEDESTAL GUY WIRE BOLLARD POWER BOX ELECTRIC METER WELL SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT WOOD FENCE CHAINLINK FENCE WIRE FENCE STORM SEWER LINE SANITARY SEWER LINE WATERMAIN OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND FIBER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS LINE CONCRETE PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AGGREGATE SURFACING LANDSCAPING BUILDING PLATTED & EXISTING LOT LINES EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED EASEMENT LINE CENTERLINE BOUNDARY LINE EDGE OF TREE LINE OR WOODS EDGE OF WETLAND APRON GAS METER HAND HOLE SOIL BORING AIR CONDITIONER SB CO W BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN PRELIMINARY PLAT 1 of 1 THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2025 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTION DATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:P:\109-JAVA COMPANIES\10925002-MUD LAKE CONVENIENCE CENTER\SURVEY\CAD\10925002-PP.DWG #### 6/17/2025PREPARED FOR: 10925002 JAVA COMPANIES, LLC ALBERTVILLE, MN CWK JDS 45352 Jonathan D. Schuette 6/9/2025 Surveyor's Note: 1.The underground utilities shown hereon have been located from field survey information and existing record drawings. The surveyor makes no guarantees that the underground utilities shown comprise all such utilities in the area, either in service or abandoned. The surveyor further does not warrant that the underground utilities shown are in the exact location indicated, although he does certify that they are located as accurately as possible from information available. The contractor is responsible to ensure that any existing utilities (shown or not shown) are not damaged during construction. The surveyor has physically located the underground utilities per Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 241711008. 2. Subject property has 711,797 square feet (16.34 acres) more or less. 3. The survey does not constitute a title search by Design Tree Engineering and Land Surveying to determine ownership or easements of record. For all information regarding easements, right of way and title of record, Design Tree Engineering and Land Surveying relied upon title Commitment No.24-71382 prepared by Synthesis National Title & Escrow Group, LLC . 4. Topography is based upon field measurements taken by Design Tree Engineering on 2/14/2025. 1 INCH = 60 FEET VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 120, RANGE 23 50TH ST NE N DEVELOPER: JAVA COMPANIES, LLC MARK KROGH 255 E STREET MENDOTA, MN 55150 ZONING: A2 - AGRICULTURAL TRANSITION = DENOTES COUNTY MONUMENT = DENOTES FOUND IRON MONUMENT = DENOTES 1/2 INCH DIAMETER BY 18 INCH LONG IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET AND MARKED RLS# 45352, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE LOT 1 LOT 2 BLOCK ONE PROPOSED 40 FOOT DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 55TH ST NEMCALLISTER AVE NEMARLOWE AVE NEMACKENZIE AVE NECO. ROAD NO. 137 NABER AVE NEPROPERTY LOCATION INTERS T A T E N O . 9 4 OUTLOT A ZONING: A2 - AGRICULTURAL TRANSITION ZONING: A2 - AGRICULTURAL TRANSITION ZONING: B3 - HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING: B3 - HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING: B3 - HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL ZONING: P/I - PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL NORTHWEST CORNER OF NW1/4-NW1/4 OF SEC. 6, T.120, R.23 WRIGHT COUNTY MONUMENT (EAST 16 RODS)(NORTH 30 RODS)(WEST 16 RODS) (EAST 11.00) (18.00) WEST LINE OF THE NW1/4-NW1/4 OF SEC. 6, T.120, R.23 NORTH LINE OF THE NW1/4-NW1/4 OF SEC. 6, T.120, R.23 WEST LINE OF THE EAST 460 FEET OF THE NW1/4-NW1/4 OF SEC. 6, T.120, R.23 40 40 40SOUTH LINE OF THE NW1/4-NW1/4 OF SEC. 6, T.120, R.23 SETBACK LINE Agenda Page 80 MUD LAKE CONVENIENCE CENTER JAVA COMPANIES, LLC ALBERTVILLE, MN INDEX OF SHEETS: C001 COVER SHEET C101 EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS PLAN C201 SITE PLAN C301 GRADING PLAN C401 UTILITY PLAN C402 UTILITY PLAN MAIN CONNECTION C501 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C601 CIVIL DETAILS C602 CIVIL DETAILS C603 CIVIL DETAILS C604 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C605 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C606 SWPPP NARRATIVE C607 CIVIL SPECIFICAITONS C608 CIVIL SPECIFICATIONS C609 CIVIL SPECIFICATIONS GENERAL NOTES: 1. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY, INCLUDING PROPERTY LINES, LEGAL DESCRIPTION, EXISTING UTILITIES, TOPOGRAPHY WITH SPOT ELEVATIONS AND PHYSICAL FEATURES WAS PROVIDED BY: DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING 120 17TH AVENUE WEST ALEXANDRIA, MN 56308 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT PROPERTY OWNER MICHAEL J. POTTER AND HEIDI B. POTTER 11650 57TH ST NE ALBERTVILLE, MN 55301-9791 60TH ST NE I- 9 4 PROPERTY LOCATION PROJECT CONTACTS CIVIL ENGINEER DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING AND LAND SURVEYING MICHAEL J. GERBER 120 17TH AVENUE WEST ALEXANDRIA, MN 56308 TEL:320-227-0203 EMAIL:mjg@dte-ls.com BENCHMARK 1: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT LOCATED AT END OF LYMON AVENUE NE NEAR LIFT STATION. ELEV:959.68 BENCHMARK INFO: THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:P:\109-JAVA COMPANIES\10925002-MUD LAKE CONVENIENCE CENTER\CIVIL\CAD\10925002-C-DETAILS.DWG #### 6/17/2025MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA COVER SHEET C001 OWNER JAVA COMPANIES MARK KROGH 255 E ST Mendota, MN 55150 Agenda Page 81 OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHE953952THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA OHE LEGEND HYDRANT SANITARY MANHOLE GATE VALVE POWER POLE LIGHT POLE CATCH BASIN SIGN DECIDUOUS TREE CONIFEROUS TREE CHAINLINK FENCE WIRE FENCE STORM SEWER LINE SANITARY SEWER LINE WATERMAIN OVERHEAD ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND FIBER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND GAS LINE CONCRETE PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AGGREGATE SURFACING UGT FO UGE GAS l X 0'30'60' NOTES: 1. EXISTING CONDITIONS & TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION PROVIDED BY: DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING & LAND SURVEYING 120 17TH AVENUE W ALEXANDRIA, MN 56308 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND REMOVAL LIMITS PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. 3. SAWCUT CURB AND GUTTER AND SIDEWALK, OR REMOVE AT NEAREST EXPANSION JOINTS. 4. SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT FULL DEPTH AT ALL TIE-IN LOCATIONS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SITE STABILITY PRIOR TO EXECUTING ANY SITE REMOVALS. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AFFECTED BY SITE DEVELOPMENT. ALL PERMITS, APPLICATIONS, AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 7. ALL EXCESS OR WASTE MATERIAL GENERATED AS PART OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 9. THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN HEREIN ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM AVAILABLE SURVEYS AND/ OR RECORDS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING LOCATION AND ELEVATION TO ENSURE THAT ANY EXISTING UTILITIES (SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN) ARE NOT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL DAMAGE PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR BURIED UTILITIES. 1-800-252-1166. CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATOR TO ASSIST WITH PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES. REMOVALS LEGEND = REMOVAL ITEM = TREE REMOVAL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS C101 60th STREET NE MACKENZIE AVE NE1 REMOVE CULVERT REMOVE TREES KEY NOTES: 1 1 2 2 2 2 Agenda Page 82 OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEBUILDING A 20,716 S.F. GROCERY STOREBUILDING B4,874 S.F.TUNNEL CAR WASHT FULL ACCESS 207 14 14 6 14 11 8 10 RIGHT TURN LANE RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT ACCESS 9 3 PARKING INFORMATION PARKING STALLS 111 STALLS ACCESSIBLE STALLS 5 STALLS TOTAL STALLS 116 STALLS PROPERTY INFORMATION TOTAL EXISTING PROPERTY AREA 16.05 AC PROPOSED EAST LOT PROPERTY AREA 2.81 AC PROPOSED WEST LOT PROPERTY AREA 1.78 AC DISTURBED AREA 5.6 ± AC EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.00 AC PROPOSED EAST LOT IMPERVIOUS AREA 1.99 AC PROPOSED WEST LOT IMPERVIOUS AREA 0.95 AC TOTAL PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 2.94 AC SITE LEGEND LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK CURB AND GUTTER TIPPED CURB AND GUTTER RETAINING WALL CHAINLINK FENCE WOOD/VINYL (PRIVACY) FENCE TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAINTED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL 0'30'60' NOTES: 1. ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FLOW LINE, CENTERLINE OF FENCE, EDGE OF PAVEMENT, OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLAN AND DETAIL DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. ALL CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR. 4. ALL INTERIOR PARKING STALL STRIPING SHALL BE 4" AND YELLOW IN COLOR. 5. ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL STRIPING, ACCESS AISLE, SYMBOL, AND SIGNAGE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL AUTHORITY REQUIREMENTS. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 7. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TEMPORARY PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE PLAN FOR ANY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR ANY WORK PERFORMED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. 10. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL DAMAGE PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR BURIED UTILITIES. 1-800-252-1166. CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATOR TO ASSIST WITH PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES. 1 2 B612 CURB AND GUTTER ADA PEDESTRIAN RAMP (SEE DETAILS) CONCRETE DRIVE APRON CROSSWALK STRIPING PARKING STRIPING MONUMENT SIGN (SEE ARCH) 3 4 5 KEY NOTES: SITE PLAN C201 THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA 9.00 (TYP) 1 1 1 1 60th STREET NE MACKENZIE AVE NEPROPOSED WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN R85.00 R25.00 30.00 28.50 28.50 33.5030.00R 2 5 . 0 0 R25.00R90.00R116.75R15.00R2 0 . 0 0 20.0024.0040.0024.0040.0024.0040.0025.0019.0030.0042.43 9.00 (TYP)20.0040.009.00 (TYP) 9.00 (TYP)24.0030.00 33.5218.009.00 24.0013.00(TYP)39 25.13 24.00 24.002 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 4 13.5 (TYP) 13.44 44.566 6 58.10 14.74Agenda Page 83 OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEPROPOSED BUILDING FFE=956.0 T FULL ACCESS9539549559549569 5 5 951 95 2 95 3956957958959955956957958955 956 957 955956 9 5 5 9 5 6 9 5 7 9 5 8 956956 957 958 9 5 4 955955955 951952953954 956 953952955 956 957 953954 954952 953 954958959960956956957957958959958957956955954953952 955952953954956957958 959959958 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE=958.5 945 946 945945 946 946 947 947 948950 950 948949 951 950 948949951952960958 959 958 957958956957 956954 955954953952RIGHT TURN LANE RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT ACCESS 9 5 6 950948949 951 952 952952GRADING LEGEND = EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR = EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR = EXISTING CONTOUR LABEL = PROPOSED MAJOR CONTOUR = PROPOSED MINOR CONTOUR = PROPOSED CONTOUR LABEL = EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION* = PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION* = PROPOSED SURFACE FLOW DIRECTION *SPOT ELEVATIONS ALONG CURB & GUTTER AND OTHER REVEALS ARE TO FLOWLINE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 100 0'30'60' NOTES: 1. THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN HEREIN ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM AVAILABLE SURVEYS AND/ OR RECORDS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING LOCATION AND ELEVATION TO ENSURE THAT ANY EXISTING UTILITIES (SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN) ARE NOT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. SIDEWALKS SHALL MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS, AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.00% CROSS SLOPE, OR 5.00% LONGITUDINAL SLOPE. 3. CONCRETE ENTRANCES AND APPROACHES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.00% CROSS SLOPE IN SIDEWALK AREAS. 4. ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS SHALL MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS, AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.00% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. 5. PEDESTRIAN RAMPS SHALL MEET ADA REQUIREMENTS. 6. ALL EXCESS OR WASTE MATERIAL GENERATED AS PART OF CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. 7. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 8. IN ADDITION TO THESE PLANS, A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY HAS BEEN PROVIDED. THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY INCLUDES ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE DESIGN OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMP(S). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE STORMWATER BOOK AND COMPLY WITH ALL STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. 9. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 10. INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL NOT BE EXCAVATED TO FINAL GRADE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND STABILIZED. ONLY LOW IMPACT TRACK EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED WITHIN INFILTRATION AREAS. 11. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED SURFACE GRADE. 12. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL DAMAGE PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR BURIED UTILITIES. 1-800-252-1166. CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATOR TO ASSIST WITH PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES. XXX.XX 1 2 MATCH INTO EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT MATCH INTO EXISTING CONCRETE MATCH INTO EXISTING CURB & GUTTER GRADE BREAK DRIVE APRON 3 4 5 KEY NOTES: GRADING PLAN C301 THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA 60th STREET NE MACKENZIE AVE NEWET SEDIMENTATION BASIN BOTTOM EL: 945.00 TOP EL: 952.00 NWL: 948.00 100-YR HWL: 951.12 5 3 3 2 2 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 10' WIDE EOF SWALE STABILIZED WITH RIPRAP INV:951.50 Agenda Page 84 OHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEOHEPROPOSED BUILDING FFE=956.0 T FULL ACCESS ST-6 CB 24" X 36" RIM: 954.49 INV W: 950.49 ST-5 CBMH 48" (DIA) RIM: 954.45 INV E: 949.83 INV S: 949.83 132 LF - 12" SCH 40 PVC @ 0.50% ST-4 CBMH 48" (DIA) RIM: 954.00 INV N: 949.16 INV S: 949.16134 LF - 15" SCH 40 PVC @ 0.50%ST-3 CBMH 48" (DIA) RIM: 954.15 INV N: 948.61 INV S: 948.61 111 LF - 18" SCH 40 PVC @ 0.50%48 LF - 18" SCH 40 PVC @ 0.50% ST-10 CB 24" X 36" RIM: 958.14 INV SE: 954.14 ST-9 CBMH 48" (DIA) RIM: 956.40 INV NW: 952.40 INV S: 952.40 14 4 L F - 1 2 " S C H 4 0 P V C @ 1 . 2 1 % ST-8 CBMH 48" (DIA) RIM: 954.96 INV N: 950.19 INV S: 950.19 INV W: 950.19 132 LF - 15" SCH 40 PVC @ 1.67%ST-11 CB 24" X 36" RIM: 955.69 INV E: 951.69 120 LF - 1 2 " S C H 4 0 P V C @ 1 . 2 5 %96 LF - 18" SCH 40 PVC @ 0.86%l l l lllll l l ST-104 SAN MH 48" (DIA) RIM: 954.05 INV W: 946.98 >>155 LF - 8" SDR 35 PVC @ 0.40%>>174 LF - 8" SDR 35 PVC @ 0.40%>>8" CAP 144 LF - 8" PVC C900 8"- 45° BEND PROPOSED BUILDING FFE=958.5 16 LF - 24" SCH 40 PVC @ 2.37% 85 LF - 12" SCH 4 0 P V C @ 0 . 5 0 % RIGHT TURN LANE RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT ACCESS ST-103 SAM MH 48" (DIA) RIM: 955.60 INV E: 946.36 INV S: 946.31 174 LF - 8" PVC C90078 LF - 12" SCH 40 PVC @ 0.50 % ST-13 CB 24" X 36" RIM: 952.70 INV NE: 948.70 INV W: 948.70 37 LF - 18" SCH 40 PVC @ 0.97% ST-2 CBMH 48" (DIA) RIM: 953.22 INV N: 948.37 INV S: 948.37 = HYDRANT = CURB STOP = GATE VALVE = SANITARY MANHOLE = CLEANOUT = STORM MANHOLE = CATCH BASIN = CULVERT APRON = WATER LINE = SANITARY LINE = STORM LINE UTILITY LEGEND l>0'30'60' NOTES: 1. THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN HEREIN ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM AVAILABLE SURVEYS AND/ OR RECORDS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING LOCATION AND ELEVATION TO ENSURE THAT ANY EXISTING UTILITIES (SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN) ARE NOT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND COORDINATE BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION SIZES, LOCATIONS, AND ELEVATIONS WITH PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 3. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 4. ALL WATER PIPING SHALL BE BURIED A MINIMUM OF 8'. 5. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER LINE CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER. THE WATER LINE SHALL NOT HAVE JOINTS OR CONNECTIONS WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE CROSSING. INSULATE CROSSINGS WITH STORM SEWER. 6. SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOR UNIT'S CONNECTION. 7. SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 90'. 8. SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 2.00% GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. 9. ALL NONCONDUCTIVE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCATE (TRACER) WIRE PER MINNESOTA RULES, PART 7560.0150 10. ALL CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND TESTING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINNESOTA STATE PLUMBING CODE. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE UTILITY INSPECTIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. 12. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL DAMAGE PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR BURIED UTILITIES. 1-800-252-1166. CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATOR TO ASSIST WITH PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES. UTILITY PLAN C401 THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA ST-12 18" FES INV : 948.27 ST-1 18" FES INV : 947.99 ST-7 18" FES INV : 949.36 60th STREET NE MACKENZIE AVE NEST-14 24" NYLOPLAST AREA DRAIN RIM: 952.00 INV : 949.09 ST-15 18" FES INV : 947.64 ST-16 18" FES INV : 948.00 10' WIDE EOF SWALE STABILIZED WITH RIPRAP INV:951.50 WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN BOTTOM EL: 945.00 TOP EL: 952.00 NWL: 948.00 100-YR HWL: 951.12 Agenda Page 85 llllllllllllllllllllllllll l l l l l l l lllll l l ST-104 SAN MH 48" (DIA) RIM: 954.05 INV W: 946.98 >>155 LF - 8" SDR 35 PVC @ 0.40% ST-102 SAN MH 48" (DIA) RIM: 952.37 INV N: 945.61 INV W: 945.56 >>174 LF - 8" SDR 35 PVC @ 0.40%ST 101 SAN MH 48" (DIA) RIM: 952.05 INV E: 944.31 INV N: 944.26 >>>>>313 LF - 8" SDR 35 PVC @ 0.40% ST 100 SAN MH 48" (DIA) RIM: 956.28 INV S: 943.66 INV W: 943.61 >>150 LF - 8" SDR 35 PVC @ 0.40%26 LF - 8" SDR 35 PVC @ 0.40% WET TAP EXISTING WATER MAIN INSTALL 8" GATE VALVE 5 L.F. 8" C900 8" 90° BEND 335 LF - 8" PVC C900 8" CAP MAINTAIN MINIMUM 10' SEPATATION73 LF - 8" PVC C900144 LF - 8" PVC C900 8"- 45° BEND 8"- 45° BEND 8"- 45° BEND CORE DRILL CONNECTION TO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE INV=943.51 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE=958.5 ST-103 SAM MH 48" (DIA) RIM: 955.60 INV E: 946.36 INV S: 946.31 174 LF - 8" PVC C900= HYDRANT = CURB STOP = GATE VALVE = SANITARY MANHOLE = CLEANOUT = STORM MANHOLE = CATCH BASIN = CULVERT APRON = WATER LINE = SANITARY LINE = STORM LINE UTILITY LEGEND l>0'30'60' NOTES: 1. THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN HEREIN ARE APPROXIMATE. THEY HAVE BEEN PLOTTED FROM AVAILABLE SURVEYS AND/ OR RECORDS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFYING LOCATION AND ELEVATION TO ENSURE THAT ANY EXISTING UTILITIES (SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN) ARE NOT DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY AND COORDINATE BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION SIZES, LOCATIONS, AND ELEVATIONS WITH PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS. 3. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 4. ALL WATER PIPING SHALL BE BURIED A MINIMUM OF 8'. 5. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER LINE CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER. THE WATER LINE SHALL NOT HAVE JOINTS OR CONNECTIONS WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE CROSSING. INSULATE CROSSINGS WITH STORM SEWER. 6. SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUTS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOR UNIT'S CONNECTION. 7. SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT SPACING SHALL NOT EXCEED 90'. 8. SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 2.00% GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE PLANS. 9. ALL NONCONDUCTIVE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LOCATE (TRACER) WIRE PER MINNESOTA RULES, PART 7560.0150 10. ALL CONSTRUCTION, MATERIALS, AND TESTING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINNESOTA STATE PLUMBING CODE. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE UTILITY INSPECTIONS WITH LOCAL AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION. 12. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL DAMAGE PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR BURIED UTILITIES. 1-800-252-1166. CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATOR TO ASSIST WITH PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES. UTILITY PLAN MAIN CONNECTION C402 THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA PROPOSED WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN RESTORE PAVEMENTS TO PRE CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS 2020 Agenda Page 86 BUILDING A 20,716 S.F. GROCERY STOREBUILDING B4,874 S.F.TUNNEL CAR WASHT FULL ACCESS 207 14 14 6 14 11 8 10 953954955954956 9 5 5 951 95 2 95 3956957958959955956957958955 956 957 955956 9 5 5 9 5 6 9 5 7 9 5 8 956956 957 958 9 5 4 955955955 951952953954 956 953952955 956 957 953954 954952 953 954958959960956956957957958959958957956955954953952 955952953954956957958 959959958 945 946 945945 946 946 947 947 948950 950 948949 951 950 948949951952960958 959 958 957958956957 956954 955954953952============ =============RIGHT TURN LANE RIGHT IN / RIGHT OUT ACCESS 9 3 9 5 6 950948949 951 952 952952NOTES: 1. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE FINAL GRADED AND PERMANENTLY STABILIZED WITH THE SEED MIX IDENTIFIED ON PLANS. 2. THE SITE MUST BE STABILIZED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA, NPDES PERMIT, MNDOT, AND THE CITY. 3. INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL CATCH BASINS AND INLETS DOWN GRADIENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. 4. PROVIDE SILT FENCE PERIMETER CONTROL DOWN GRADIENT OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND TEMPORARY STOCKPILES. 5. TEMPORARY STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITS SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 6. NO OFFSITE VEHICLE TRACKING IS PERMITTED. STREETS SHALL BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. 7. REFER TO THE SWPPP AND THE CITY OF ______________ EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS FOR FURTHER EROSION CONTROL SEQUENCING. 8. IN ADDITION TO THESE PLANS, A STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY HAS BEEN PROVIDED. THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT STUDY INCLUDES ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE DESIGN OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMP(S). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE STORMWATER BOOK AND COMPLY WITH ALL STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. 9. WHEN INSTALLING END-OF-LINE FLARED END SECTIONS, BRING THE SILT FENCE UP & OVER THE FLARED END SECTIONS & COVER DISTURBED AREAS WITH RIP RAP. THE UPSTREAM FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL HAVE WOOD FIBER BLANKET INSTALLED ON THE DISTURBED SOILS. 10. INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL NOT BE EXCAVATED TO FINAL GRADE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND STABILIZED. ONLY LOW IMPACT TRACK EQUIPMENT SHALL BE USED WITHIN INFILTRATION AREAS. 11. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL DAMAGE PREVENTION SYSTEM FOR BURIED UTILITIES. 1-800-252-1166. CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE A PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATOR TO ASSIST WITH PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATES. EROSION CONTROL LEGEND & QUANTITIES: STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT (2 EA) SILT FENCE (980 LF) SEDIMENT CONTROL ROLL/LOG (XX LF) MNDOT SEED MIX 25-151 (1.01 AC) RIPRAP (38 SY) CATEGORY 20 ROLLED EROSION PREVENTION PRODUCT (5,016 SY) INLET PROTECTION (9 EA) NOTE: QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE FOR SWPPP PLAN, AND ARE NOT FOR BIDDING PURPOSES. = 0'30'60' ***** EROSION CONTROL PLAN C501 THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA 60th STREET NE MACKENZIE AVE NEPROPOSED WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN INLET PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT SILT FENCE SILT FENCE RIPRAP RIPRAP RIPRAP RIPRAP Agenda Page 87 VARIABLE WIDTH 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE MAXIMUM SPACING 90' 5 1 4" (B) 2 1 1. 0-12" DEPTH TRENCH SLOPE DEPENDS ON SOIL TYPE. 2. 12-20' DEPTH TRENCH SLOPE DEPENDS ON SOIL TYPE. 3. 0-20' DEPTH TRENCH SUPPORT OR SHIELD SYSTEM CAN BE UTILIZED TO REDUCE TRENCH WIDTH. 4. 20' OR GREATER DEPTH TRENCH EXCAVATION MUST BE DESIGNED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE DESIGN COMPLETED AT HIS EXPENSE AND PROVIDE A COPY TO THE OWNER AND THE PROJECT ENGINEER. (A) MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL ALLOW FOR SIX INCHES OF CLEARANCE ON EACH SIDE OF PIPE JOINT HUB. (B) THE TRENCH MAY BE OVEREXCAVATED A MIN. OF 6" & BACKFILLED WITH COMPACTED GRANULAR MATERIALS WHEN ROCK, INCOMPRESSIBLE MATERIALS, OR UNSTABLE SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED. (C) COMPACTED GRANULAR ENCASEMENT MATERIAL SHALL COVER THE TOP OF PIPE BY AT LEAST 12" AND EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH OF THE TRENCH OR AT LEAST 2 1/2" TIMES THE PIPE DIAMETER ON EACH SIDE OF THE PIPE. (D) BEDDING AND HAUNCHING MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED AND COMPACTED TO PROVIDE FULL SUPPORT FOR THE LENGTH OF THE PIPE. NOTES: 1. THIS DETAIL APPLIES TO SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, WATERMAIN, AND ALL SERVICE PIPES. PIPE WIDTH (A) COMPACTED GRANULAR ENCASEMENT MATERIAL GRANULAR BEDDING MATERIAL 12" (C) 3.5' MAX. 1/2 PIPE DIA. (D) PIPE CASTING REQUIRED ON CLEANOUT IN PAVEMENT OR UNDEVELOPED AREA. CASTING SHALL BE NEENAH R-1970 SERIES PER TABLE BELOW, OR ACCEPTED EQUAL. PVC THREADED PLUG 3" BELOW CASTING RISER LONG SWEEP BEND COMBINATION WYE NOTES: 1. WHEN M.H.'S ARE PLACED IN HARD ROAD SURFACES, THE M.H. SHALL BE 1/2" BELOW ROAD SURFACE. 2. WHEN M.H.'S ARE PLACED IN GREEN SPACE, THE M.H. SHOULD BE FLUSH WITH THE TOP OF THE GROUND. 3. WHEN M.H.'S ARE PLACED IN WETLAND AREAS, THE M.H. SHOULD STICK OUT OF THE GROUND 2' AND SHOULD NOT HAVE ANY RINGS. 4. WHEN M.H.'S ARE PLACED IN GRAVEL SURFACES, THE M.H. SHALL BE 6" BELOW GRAVEL GRADE.GREEN 72" COMPOSITE UTILITY I.D. POST (OUTSIDE OF ROADWAY ONLY) 18" PRECAST CONCRETE ADJUSTING RINGS 2" x 27" SEAL BETWEEN RINGS W/ MASTIC SEALANT 3 RINGS MAXIMUM ECCENTRIC CONE MN/DOT STANDARD PLATE NO. 4005. 5" VARIABLE PRECAST MORTAR INVERT 1-1/2" NATURAL OR CRUSHED ROCK 6" MIN. 48" DIAMETER INTEGRAL CAST BASE SECTION MN/DOT STD. PLATE NO. 4007 MORTAR INVERT TO MATCH PRECAST BENCH PVC PIPE SEWER FLEXIBLE M.H. SLEEVE GASKETED JOINT INFI-SHIELD EXTERNAL JOINT SEAL OR EQUAL. M.H. STEPS MN/DOT STD. PLATE NO. 4180 16" O.C. INFI-SHIELD EXTERNAL SEALING SYSTEM OR EQUAL. 1/2" EXPANSION JOINTS AT ADJACENT WALK OR STRUCTURE MN/DOT 3702 CONCRETE SIDEWALK MN/DOT SPEC. 2521, MIX NO. 3F52 CONTRACTION JOINTS PER MN/DOT SPEC. 2521 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT COMPACTED GRANULAR MATERIAL6" 4" COMPACTED SUBGRADE -NOTIFY ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACING AGGREGATE BASE IF ORGANIC MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED IN SUBGRADE 12" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 2" NON-WEARING COURSE (SPNWB330B) TACK COAT 2" WEARING COURSE (SPWEB340B) 6" 13-1/2" 1 3 SLOPE34" PER FT 1/2" R 6"3" R 1/2" R 7" 8"VARIES SEE PLAN 1/2" R1/2" R VARIES SEE PLAN8" 9-1/2" 1-1/2" 7" END OF LINE CLEANOUT IN LINE CLEANOUT 4"3 1 SLOPE3/4" PER FT 1/2" R 1/2" R 7"VARIES SEE PLAN12" TIPPED GUTTER LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONTYPICAL SIDEWALK DETAIL NOTES: 1. ALL ORGANIC OR OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BENEATH THE ROADWAY. TYPICAL PIPE BEDDING DETAIL SEWER CLEANOUT CASTING DETAIL STANDARD PRECAST SANITARY MANHOLE TIPPED GUTTER COMPACTED SUBGRADE -NOTIFY ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACING AGGREGATE BASE IF ORGANIC MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED IN SUBGRADE 10" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 2" NON-WEARING COURSE (SPNWB330B) TACK COAT 2" WEARING COURSE (SPWEA340B) CURB & GUTTER DETAILS11 3/4"SLOPE3/4" PER FT TIPPED GUTTER NOTES: 1. ALL ORGANIC OR OTHER UNSUITABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM BENEATH THE ROADWAY. NOTES: 1 FOUNDATION MATERIAL - NATURAL OR CRUSHED 1 1/2" ROCK ON ALL WYES AND SERVICE RISER CLEANOUTS. 2 IN WET OR UNSUITABLE MATERIAL, BED ENTIRE SERVICE IN 1-1/2" NATURAL OR CRUSHED ROCK. 1 FOUNDATION MATERIAL (SEE NOTES) MN/DOT CASTING NO. 700-7 WITH SELF-SEALING COVER CASTING AS MANUFACTURED BY NEENAH OR APPROVED EQUAL CO Ø CASTING # 4" R-1970 6" R-1973-A 8" R-1976 SIGN POSTS 1. 1-3/4" SQUARE 2. 14 GAUGE WITH PUNCHED HOLES. 3. MINIMUM 8 FEET, MAXIMUM 12 FEET LONG. (LENGTH REQUIRED TO BE DETERMINED BY THE SIZE OF THE SIGN PANEL). 4. ATTACHED TO ANCHOR SYSTEM WITH 5/16" BY 2-1/2" GALVANIZED BOLT WITH WASHER AND NUT. 5. SIGN POSTS TO BE LOCATED WITHIN CONCRETE AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER. ANCHOR SYSTEM IF IN CONCRTE 1. 2" SQUARE 2. 12 GAUGE. 3. 3 FEET LONG. 4. ANCHOR SLEEVE a. 2-1/4" SQUARE. b. 12 GAUGE. c. 18 INCHES LONG. 5. ANCHOR POST AND ANCHOR SLEEVE TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO PLACING CONCRETE MEDIAN WITH TWO BOLT HOLES COMPLETELY EXPOSED AND ACCESSIBLE ABOVE MEDIAN GRADE. NOTES: 1. ALL POSTS, HARDWARE, AND ANCHOR SYSTEMS SHALL BE TELESPAR SQUARE TUBE SYSTEMS AS DISTRIBUTED BY UNISTRUT CORPORATION, OR EQUAL. 2. PROVIDE "NO PARKING" SIGNAGE AT ACCESS AISLE. 3. SLEEVE NOT REQUIRED IN GREEN SPACE LOCATIONS 4. INSTALL ON POST WITHIN 2' MIN AND 8' MAX FROM HEAD OF PARKING STALL.60" MIN. - 66" MAX.BLUE BACKGROUND, FRONT, BACK, AND POST 12" x 18" - 16 GAUGE GALV. STEEL SIGN 1" WHITE HELVETICA MEDIUM LETTERS 1/2" WHITE BORDER ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN & POST DETAIL CONCRETE OR EXISTING GROUND B6 CURB B6 CURB AT DRIVEWAY D4 CURB USE "NO PARKING" SIGN FOR ACCESS AISLES NOPARKINGACCESSAISLE NOTES: 1. SEE TYPICAL BITUMINOUS SECTION FOR AGGREGATE BASE SECTION INFORMATION.CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE6" 6"CONCRETE HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE5" 6"CONCRETE LIGHT DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:P:\109-JAVA COMPANIES\10925002-MUD LAKE CONVENIENCE CENTER\CIVIL\CAD\10925002-C-DETAILS.DWG #### 6/17/2025MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA CIVIL DETAILS C601 Agenda Page 88 SECTION NOTE: 1. USE METAL SHIMS ONLY AT ADJUSTING RINGS WHEN LEVELING. 2. ALL PIPE CONNECTIONS SHALL HAVE MANHOLE SLEEVES OR WATERSTOP FOR WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS. STANDARD MNDOT STORM MANHOLE/CATCH BASIN 4020 6" PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB ALL JOINTS IN MANHOLE TO HAVE "O" RING RUBBER GASKETS MANHOLE STEPS, 12" ON CENTER, COPOLYMER POLY PLASTIC PRECAST CONCRETE SECTION GROUT BOTTOM MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS, 6" FOR 14' DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS TO 1" FOR EACH 4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14', AND REINFORCE WITH 6"X6" 10/10 MESH PIPE DIAMETER VARIES SEE PLANVARIES 6" 1'-4"5" 6" USE CASTING SHOWN ON CASTING ASSEMBLY TABLE STRUCTURE TYPE LOCATION FRAME COVER/GRATE STMH PAVEMENT R-1642 R-2501 STMH GREENSPACE R-1733 R-2573 CB/CBMH PAVEMENT R-2501 R-2501-F CB/CBMH PEDESTRIAN R-2501 R-2501-G CB/CBMH GREENSPACE R-2501 R-2501-B CB/CBMH DITCHES, BASINS R-2561 R-1733 CB/CBMH MID GUTTERLINE B6/D4 CURB R-3067-V R-3067-V CB/CBMH LOW POINT B6/D4 CURB R-3067-VB R-3067-V CB/CBMH VALLEY GUTTER R-3360 R-3360-C OR R-3360-D REFER TO CITY STANDARD DETAILS FOR FRAMES AND GATES. CITY STANDARD DETAILS SUPERSEDE THIS TABLE WATER GRADE NOTE: 1. BITUMASTIC ANTI-CORROSIVE COATING REQUIRED ON ALL BARE METALS (AEROSOL SPRAY IS NOT ACCEPTABLE) 2. ALL MECHANICAL JOINT BOLTS SHALL BE COR-BLUE OR STAINLESS STEEL 3. 8' MINIMUM COVER REQUIRED OVER TOP OF WATER MAIN 4. "MEGALUG" JOINT RESTRAINTS OR ACCEPTED EQUAL REQUIRED FROM VALVE TO TEE WATERMAINWATERMAIN 3' 8" CONCRETE BLOCK VALVE BOX ADAPTER GATE VALVES RESILIANT WEDGE VALVE CONFORMING TO AWWA C509 STANDARDS W/ S.S. BOLTS. VALVE BOX STEM EXTENSION ADJUST TOP TO 1/2" BELOW GRADE. BOX TO BE SET TO PROVIDE 12" OF ADJUSTMENT. AA NOTE: 1. BITUMASTIC ANTI-CORROSIVE COATING REQUIRED ON BARE METALS. (AEROSOL SPRAY IS NOT ACCEPTABLE) 2. ALL BOLTS MUST BE COR-BLUE OR STAINLESS STEEL. 3. 8' MINIMUM COVER REQUIRED OVER TOP OF WATER MAIN. GATE VALVES RESILIANT WEDGE VALVE CONFORMING TO AWWA C509 STANDARDS W/ S.S. BOLTS. STAINLESS STEEL TAPPING SLEEVE 8" CONCRETE BLOCK UNDISTURBED EARTH COMPACTED GRANULAR BACKFILL BEARING AREA (SQ. FEET) 6" 8" 12" 11 1/4° BEND 0 0.6 1.7 22 1/2° BEND 1.0 1.8 3.1 45° BEND 1.6 3.3 6.6 90° BEND 3.0 6.0 12.0 TEE 2.1 4.2 8.5 PLUG 2.1 4.2 8.5 UNDISTURBED EARTH FITTING RESTRAINER GLAND ALL JOINTS (TYP) PRECAST CONCRETE BLOCK SEE SCHEDULE FOR BEARING AREA CONUCTIVITY STRAP, WELD TO EXISTING WATER MAIN OR CONNECT TO EXISTING TRACER WIRE SECTION A-A PLAN GATE VALVE & BOX INSTALLATION WATERMAIN WET TAPWATERMAIN THRUST BLOCKING DETAIL NORMAL WATER LEVEL: SEE PLANS BOTTOM OF POND ELEVATION: SEE PLANS 100-YEAR HIGH WATER LEVEL: SEE PLANS 3:1 SIDE SLOPES3: 1 S I D E S L O P E S 3: 1 S I D E S L O P E S 10:1 BEN C H 10:1 BENCH POND SECTION 2' 4 1 41 B B A A SLOPE VARIES RIPRAP FILTER BLANKET FILTER BLANKET RIPRAP D 2' 2' RIPRAP 5 X DIAMETER OR SPAN GEOTEXTILE FILTER BLANKET SHALL EXTEND UNDER APRON 1' 1.5'1' SEC. B-B PLAN SEC. A-A NOTES: 1. FILTER BLANKET REQUIRED UNDER RIPRAP OR 2 LAYERS OF 500X "MIRAFI" FABRIC OR EQUAL *CLASS III RIPRAP, D50= 9 IN. (MNDOT SPEC 3601) CLASS III RIPRAP AT OUTLETS CLASS III RIPRAP REQUIREMENTS 12" 4.4 CUBIC YARDS 15" 4.8 CUBIC YARDS 18" 6.4 CUBIC YARDS 21" 7.1 CUBIC YARDS 24" 9.2 CUBIC YARDS 27" 9.9 CUBIC YARDS 30" 12.3 CUBIC YARDS 36" 15.8 CUBIC YARDS 42" 18.7 CUBIC YARDS 48" 22.2 CUBIC YARDS (ONE CUBIC YARD IS APPROX. 2,800 LBS) THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:P:\109-JAVA COMPANIES\10925002-MUD LAKE CONVENIENCE CENTER\CIVIL\CAD\10925002-C-DETAILS.DWG #### 6/17/2025MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA CIVIL DETAILS C602 Agenda Page 89 4' 0'' MIN. REQUIRED LANDING VAR. RAMP 1/4" R. 0.02 FT./FT. MAX. 1/4" R. 4' 0'' MIN. REQUIRED LANDING 0.05 FT./FT. AND 0.083 FT./FT PREFERRED 4' 0'' MIN. REQUIRED LANDING VAR. RAMP 0.02 FT./FT. MAX. 1/4" R. 0.02 FT./FT. AND 0.05 FT./FT PREFERRED AAS F X" LANDING AREA - 4' X 4' MIN. (5' X 5' MIN. PREFERRED) DIMENSIONS AND MAX 2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. LANDING SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF INCOMING PARS. A A C C A A 6" CONCRETE WALK 6" CONCRETE WALK CURB OR CURB AND GUTTER 6" CONCRETE WALK CURB OR CURB AND GUTTER CURB OR CURB AND GUTTER 0.02 FT./FT. MAX. SECTION A-A SECTION C-C PARALLEL/DEPRESSED CORNER SECTION B-B FAN PERPENDICULAR/TIERED/DIAGONAL BBBBCCLEGEND 8 8 10 10 3 7 WALK WALK S 4 INITIAL CURB RAMP LANDINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 15' FROM THE BACKOF CURB, WITH 6' FROM THE BACK OF CURB BEING THE PREFERRED DISTANCE, ONLYAPPLICABLE WHEN THE INITIAL RAMP RUNNING SLOPE IS OVER 5.0%. SECONDARY CURB RAMP LANDINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR EVERY 30" OF VERTICAL RISEWHEN THE LONGITUDINAL RUNNING SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 5.0%. 6 RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SETBACK 3" FROM THE BACK OF CURB. RADIALDETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SETBACK 3" MINIMUM TO 6" MAXIMUM FROM THE BACK OF CURB. 5 DETECTABLE WARNINGS MAY BE PART OF THE 4' X 4' MIN. LANDING AREA IF IT IS NOTFEASIBLE TO CONSTRUCT THE LANDING OUTSIDE OF THE DETECTABLE WARNING AREA. 0" 0" 1 MATCH FULL HEIGHT CURB. 2 4' MINIMUM DEPTH LANDING REQUIRED ACROSS TOP OF RAMP. 8 ALL RAMP TYPES SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM 3' LONG RAMP LENGTH. 3" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 3' LONG RAMP, 4" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 4' LONG RAMP. 9 NON-WALKABLE OR WALKABLE SURFACE PAVE FULL WALK WIDTH. 9 9 NON-WALKABLE OR WALKABLE SURFACE LANDINGS SHALL BE LOCATED ANYWHERE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE (PAR) CHANGESDIRECTION, AT THE TOP OF RAMPS THAT HAVE RUNNING SLOPES GREATER THAN 5.0%,AND IF THE APPROACHING WALK IS INVERSE GRADE GREATER THAN 2%. THE GRADE BREAK SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE BACK OF WALK. THIS WILL ENSURETHAT THE GRADE BREAK IS PERPENDICULAR TO THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL. (TYPICAL FOR ALL) 2% MAX. 2% MAX. 10 "S" SLOPES ON FANS SHALL ONLY BE USED WHEN ALL OTHER FEASIBLE OPTIONS HAVE BEENEVALUATED AND DEEMED IMPRACTICAL. THESE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE RANGES SHALL BE THE STARTING POINT. IF SITE CONDITIONS WARRANT, LONGITUDINAL SLOPES UP TO 8.3% OR FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL BE GREATER THAN 2.0% AND LESS THAN 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL BE BETWEEN 5.0% MINIMUM AND 8.3% MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%. CURB HEIGHT A 7' MIN TOP RADIUS GRADE BREAK IS REQUIRED TO BE CONSTRUCTIBLE. TO ENSURE RAMPS AND LANDINGS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED, ALL INITIAL LANDINGS AT A TOP OF A RAMPED SURFACE (RUNNINGSLOPE GREATER THAN 2%) SHALL BE FORMED AND PLACED SEPARATELY IN AN INDEPENDENT CONCRETE POUR. FOLLOW SIDEWALKREINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR ALL SEPARATELY POURED INITIAL LANDINGS. WHEN ADJACENT TO GRASS, GRADING SHALL ALWAYS BE USED WHEN FEASIBLE. V CURB,IF USED, SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDEWALK LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS.WHEN ADJACENT TO PARKING LOTS, CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS TAPERS LESS THAN 5% RUNNINGSLOPE SHOULD BE USED OVER V CURB TO REDUCE TRIPPING HAZARDS AND FACILITATESNOW & ICE REMOVAL. WHEN SIDEWALK IS AT BACK OF CURB, TOP OF CURB SHALL MATCH PROPOSED ADJACENT WALK GRADE. SEE SHEET 4 OF 6, TYPICAL SIDE TREATMENT OPTIONS, FOR DETAILS ON FLARESAND RETURNED CURBS. MAINTAIN POSITIVE BOULEVARD DRAINAGE TO TOP OF CURB. 11 INTERMEDIATE CURB HEIGHTS TAPER SHALL RISE AT 8-10% TO A MINIMUM 3" CURB HEIGHT.REDUCE INTERMEDIATE CURB HEIGHT TO 2+ INCHES IF NECESSARY TO MATCH ADJACENTBOULEVARD OR SIDEWALK GRADES. 11 11 11 11 S 5 7 BACK OF CURB FRONT OF GUTTER FLOW LINE FLAREFLARE 4 4 FLARE 3 4 FLARE 4 S S F S F NON-WALKABLE OR WALKABLE SURFACE 3 NON-WALKABLE OR WALKABLE SURFACE 1 1 1 1 0"0" 0"0" 0"0" 1 1 4 4 6 6 7 7 MODIFIED FAN 5 6 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 F F F F F F F F F F S DEPRESSED CORNER S 2 2 STRAIGHT FORMS MAY BE USED 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 2 USED WHEN RIGHT-OF-WAY IS CONSTRAINED FAN DIAGONAL SHALL ONLY BE USED AFTER ALL OTHER CURB RAMP TYPES HAVE BEEN EVALUATED AND DEEMED IMPRACTICAL 6 ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE PATH OF TRAVEL. THUS BOTHSIDES OF A SLOPED WALKING SURFACE MUST BE EQUAL LENGTH. (EXCEPT AS STATED IN BELOW. PARALLEL TIERED PERPENDICULAR PERPENDICULAR NOTES: 4' MINIMUM WIDTH OF DETECTABLE WARNING IS REQUIRED FOR ALL RAMPS. DETECTABLE WARNINGSSHALL CONTINUOUSLY EXTEND FOR A MIN. OF 24" IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL. DETECTABLE WARNINGTO COVER THE ENTIRE PAR WIDTH OF SHARED-USE PATHS AND THE ENTIRE PAR WIDTH OF THE WALKWITH THE EXCEPTION OF 3" MAXIMUM ON EACH OUTSIDE EDGE WHICH ENSURES THE DETECTABLEWARNINGS ARE ENCASED IN CONCRETE WHEN ADJACENT TO TURF. WHEN ADJACENT TO CONCRETE FLARES0" - 3" OFFSET IS ALLOWED. WHEN DESIGNING OR ORDERING RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHOULD BE 6" LESSTHAN THE INCOMING PAR. ARC LENGTH OF THE RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHOULD NOT BEGREATER THAN 20 FEET. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR. 1/4" DEEPVISUAL JOINTS SHALL BE USED AT THE TOPS OF CONCRETE FLARES ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACES. PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAILS THIS IS FOR GUIDELINE ONLY. REFER TO MNDOT STANDARD PLANS 5-297.250 THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:P:\109-JAVA COMPANIES\10925002-MUD LAKE CONVENIENCE CENTER\CIVIL\CAD\10925002-C-DETAILS.DWG #### 6/17/2025MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA CIVIL DETAILS C603 Agenda Page 90 PUBLIC ROAD PUBLIC ROAD TRAFFIC FLOW 2 SURFACE FLOW RADIUS AS REQUIRED SLASH MULCH, CRUSHED ROCK, SHEET PAD, OR OTHER PER SPECIFICATION 34 5 7 SLASH MULCH, CRUSHED ROCK, OR SHEET PAD CONSTRUCTION EXIT SEDIMENT TRAP SURFACE FLOW MIN. LENGTH = 1ENTRANCE WIDTH AS REQUIRED 10 FT.MIN.MIN LENGTH = 610 FT.MIN.ENTRANCE WIDTH AS REQUIRED SEDIMENT TRAP 34 2 SLASH MULCH, CRUSHED ROCK, SHEET PAD, OR OTHER PER SPECIFICATION RADIUS AS REQUIRED RUMBLE PAD 75 TAPER EDGES AT 1:1 CORRUGATED STEEL PANELS GEOTEXTILE FABRIC CROSS SLOPE 3% OR FLATTER 6" MIN. DEPTH OF 1" TO 2" CRUSHED ROCK OR SLASH MULCH HIGH STRENGTH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (TWO LAYERS SEWN TOGETHER TO FORM POCKETS) MIN. 2" DIA. HIGH TENSIL REINFORCED RIBS RUMBLE PAD CONSTRUCTION EXIT RUMBLE PAD SHEET PAD SLASH MULCH OR CRUSHED ROCK 6" MIN. DEPTH OF 1" TO 2" CRUSHED ROCK OR SLASH MULCH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC INPLACE GROUND TAPER EDGES AT 1:1 6" MIN. MAINTENANCE OF CONSTRUCTION EXITS SHALL OCCUR WHEN THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SEDIMENT REMOVAL HAS BEEN REDUCED. MAINTENANCE SHALL CONSIST OF REMOVING SEDIMENT AND CLEANING THE MATERIALS OR PLACING ADDITIONAL MATERIAL (SLASH MULCH OR CRUSHED ROCK) OVER SEDIMENT FILLED MATERIAL TO RESTORE EFFECTIVENESS. MINIMUM LENGTH OF RUMBLE PAD SHALL BE 20 FEET, OR AS REQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM TIRES. IF SIGNIFICANT SEDIMENT IS TRACKED FROM THE SITE, THE RUMBLE PAD SHALL BE LENGTHENED OR THE DESIGN MODIFIED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL VIBRATION. WASH-OFF LENGTH SHALL BE AS REQUIRED TO EFFECTIVELY REMOVE CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT FROM VEHICLE TIRES. IF A TIRE WASH OFF IS REQUIRED THE CONSTRUCTION EXITS SHALL BE GRADED TO DRAIN THE WASH WATER TO A SEDIMENT TRAP. IF RUNOFF FROM CONSTRUCTION EXITS WILL DRAIN OFF OF PROJECT SITE, PROVIDE SEDIMENT TRAP WITH STABILIZED OVERFLOW. IF RUNOFF FROM DISTURBED AREAS FLOWS TOWARD CONSTRUCTION EXITS, PREVENT RUNOFF FROM DRAINING DIRECTLY TO PUBLIC ROAD OVER CONSTRUCTION EXIT BY CROWNING THE EXIT OR SLOPING TO ONE SIDE. IF SURFACE GRADING IS INSUFFICIENT, PROVIDE OTHER MEANS OF INTERCEPTING RUNOFF. PROVIDE RADIUS OR WIDEN PAD SUFFICIENTLY TO PREVENT VEHICLE TIRES FROM TRACKING OFF OF PAD WHEN LEAVING SITE. MINIMUM LENGTH SHALL BE THE GREATER OF 50 FEET OR A LENGTH SUFFICIENT TO ALLOW A MINIMUM OF 5 TIRE ROTATIONS ON THE PROVIDED PAD. MINIMUM LENGTH SHALL BE CALCULATED USING THE LARGEST TIRE WHICH WILL BE USED IN TYPICAL OPERATIONS. 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 SEE SPECS. 2573 & 3882. NOTES: STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT DETAILS AA PLAN SECTION A-A EXCAVATED WASHOUT STRUCTURE PLAN SECTION B-B BB STAPLE DETAIL WASHOUT STRUCTURE WITH STRAW BALES NOTE: CAN BE TWO STACKED BALES OR PARTIALLY EXCAVATED TO REACH 3 FT DEPTH BB PLAN SECTION B-B WASHOUT STRUCTURE WITH WOOD PLANKS CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS 1. LOCATE WASHOUT STRUCTURE A MINIMUM OF 50 FEET AWAY FROM OPEN CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, SENSITIVE AREAS, WETLANDS, BUFFERS AND WATER COURSES AND AWAY FROM CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. 2. SIZE WASHOUT STRUCTURE FOR VOLUME NECESSARY TO CONTAIN WASH WATER AND SOLIDS AND MAINTAIN AT LEAST 4 INCHES OF FREEBOARD. TYPICAL DIMENSIONS ARE 10 FEET X 10 FEET X 3 FEET DEEP. 3. PREPARE SOIL BASE FREE OF ROCKS OR OTHER DEBRIS THAT MAY CAUSE TEARS OR HOLES IN THE LINER. FOR LINER, USE 10 MIL OR THICKER UV RESISTANT, IMPERMEABLE SHEETING, FREE OF HOLES AND TEARS OR OTHER DEFECTS THAT COMPROMISE IMPERMEABILITY OF THE MATERIAL. 4. PROVIDE A SIGN FOR THE WASHOUT IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE FACILITY. 5. KEEP CONCRETE WASHOUT STRUCTURE WATER TIGHT. REPLACE IMPERMEABLE LINER IF DAMAGED (E.G., RIPPED OR PUNCTURED). EMPTY OR REPLACE WASHOUT STRUCTURE THAT IS 75 PERCENT FULL, AND DISPOSE OF ACCUMULATED MATERIAL PROPERLY. DO NOT REUSE PLASTIC LINER. WET-VACUUM STORED LIQUIDS THAT HAVE NOT EVAPORATED AND DISPOSE OF IN AN APPROVED MANNER. PRIOR TO FORECASTED RAINSTORMS, REMOVE LIQUIDS OR COVER STRUCTURE TO PREVENT OVERFLOWS. REMOVE HARDENED SOLIDS, WHOLE OR BROKEN UP, FOR DISPOSAL OR RECYCLING. MAINTAIN RUNOFF DIVERSION AROUND EXCAVATED WASHOUT STRUCTURE UNTIL STRUCTURE IS REMOVED. WOOD FRAME IMPERMEABLE SHEETING IMPERMEABLE SHEETING WOOD FRAME SECURELY FASTENED AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER WITH TWO STAKES STAKE (TYP.) STAKE (TYP.) IMPERMEABLE SHEETING STRAW BALE (TYP.) STAPLES (2 PER BALE) BINDING WIRE STRAW BALE (TYP.) IMPERMEABLE SHEETING 1/8" DIA. STEEL WIRE WOOD OR METAL STAKES (2 PER BALE) SANDBAG IMPERMEABLE SHEETING IMPERMEABLE SHEETING 1:1 OR FLATTER SIDE SLOPE SANDBAG OR EQUIVALENT 10' TYP. 10' TYP.3' TYP. 10' TYP. 2" 4" 3' TYP. 10' TYP. 10' TYP. 3' TYP. 10' TYP. 10' TYP. CONCRETE WASHOUT DETAILS DIRECTION OF RUNOFF FLOW POST (METAL OR WOOD) (2" x 2") WIRE MESH (14-1/2 MIN. GA.)12" MIN.FILTER FABRIC (36" MAX. HT.) NOTES: 1. TYPE OF FENCING TO BE USED SHALL COMPLY WITH MNDOT 3886.1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON PLANS. 2. DIG A 6" x 6" TRENCH ALONG THE INTENDED FENCE LINE. 3. DRIVE ALL POSTS INTO THE GROUND AT THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF TRENCH. 4. WIRE FENCING PER MNDOT SPEC. 3886. WIRE MESH MUST BE A MINIMUM OF 2" INTO THE GROUND AND NO MORE THAN 36" ABOVE THE ORIGINAL GROUND SURFACE. 5. FILTER FABRIC PER MNDOT SPEC. 3886. FABRIC APPARENT OPENING SIZE (AOS) SHALL BE 30 TO 80 IN AREAS OF COARSE GRAINED SOILS, AND 50 TO 80 IN AREAS OF FINE GRAINED SOILS. 6. LAY OUT SILT FENCE ON THE UPHILL SIDE ALONG THE FENCE LINE, AND BACK FILL. 7. WOOD POSTS MAY BE SPACED UP TO 4 FEET APART IF WIRE MESH IS NOT USED TO SUPPORT THE FABRIC. IF WIRE MESH IS USED TO SUPPORT THE FABRIC STEEL POSTS MAY BE SPACED UP TO 8 FEET APART. SILT FENCE DETAIL THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:P:\109-JAVA COMPANIES\10925002-MUD LAKE CONVENIENCE CENTER\CIVIL\CAD\10925002-C-DETAILS.DWG #### 6/17/2025MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C604 Agenda Page 91 NOTES: 1 1 3 1:21:2 14.75" R8" 12" 4" 2 5 4 USE WHERE INLET DRAINS IN AN AREA WITH SLOPES AT 1:3 or LESS 2 6 5 4 3 6 PERSPECTIVE VIEW FILTER BAG INSERT SEDIMENT CONTROL INLET HAT SILT FENCE RING AND ROCK FILTER BERM POP-UP HEAD 1 TUBE RISER SEE SPECS. 2573, 3137, 3886. ROCK LOG/COMPOST LOG1/2 W D W 1/2 D INLET SPECIFICATIONS AS PER THE PLAN DIMENSION LENGTH AND WIDTH TO MATCH FLAP POCKET USE REBAR OR STEEL ROD FOR REMOVAL ( FOR INLETS WITH CAST CURB BOX REPLACE ROD WITH WOOD 2" X 4") . EXTEND 10" BEYOND GRATE WIDTH ON BOTH SIDES, LENGTH SECURE TO GRATE WITH WIRE OR PLASTIC TIES MINIMUM DOUBLE STITCHED SEAMS ALL AROUND SIDE PIECES AND ON FLAP POCKETS FRONT, BACK, AND BOTTOM TO BE MADE FROM SINGLE PIECE OF FABRIC. OVERFLOW HOLES (2" X 4" HOLE SHALL BE HEAT CUT INTO ALL FOUR SIDE PANELS) 2" (CAN BE INSTALLED IN ANY INLET TYPE WITH OR WITHOUT A CURB BOX) ENDS SECURELY CLOSED TO PREVENT LOSS OF OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE FILL. SECURED WITH 50 PSI. ZIP TIE. BUTT JOINTS 3/16" THICK (MIN.) STEEL COVER 6" DIAMETER POLYETHYLENE D=2" ADJUST LEVEL OF FILTER SOCK TO BE BELOW ROAD SURFACE ELEV. SECTION (UP POSITION) 3/16" THICK (MIN.) STEEL PLATE 3/16" THICK (MIN.) STEEL PLATE TUBE RISER 8" DIA. TYPE 9 MULCH GROUND LINE FLANGES CATCH BASIN/ MANHOLE NOTE: THE SEDIMENT CONTROL BARRIER SHALL BE A METAL OR PLASTIC/POLYETHYLENE RISER SIZED TO FIT INSIDE THE CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE; HAVE PERFORATIONS TO ALLOW FOR WATER INFILTRATION; HAVE AN OVERFLOW OPENING, FLANGES AND A LID/COVER. 5' MIN. LENGTH POST 36" GEOTEXTILE REINFORCED WITH WIRE PLASTIC ZIP TIES (50 LB TENSILE) HOLDS GEOTEXTILE IN PLACE ON ALL POSTS TYPE 9 MULCH GEOTEXTILE ANCHORAGE LAY GEOTEXTILE UNDER TYPE 9 MULCH 12" OUT DROP INLET WITH GRATE DEVICES MUST BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY AS TO NOT CAUSE FLOODING ON ROADWAY THAT WOULD IMPEDE TRAFFIC FLOW. ALL GEOTEXTILE USED FOR INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MONOFILAMENT IN BOTH DIRECTIONS, MEETING SPEC. 3886. FINISHED SIZE, INCLUDING POCKETS WHERE REQUIRED SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10 INCHES AROUND THE PERIMETER TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE OR REMOVAL.INSTALLATION NOTES: DO NOT INSTALL FILTER BAG INSERT IN INLETS SHALLOWER THAN 30 INCHES, MEASURED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE INLET TO THE TOP OF THE GRATE. THE PLACED BAG SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SIDE CLEARANCE OF 3 INCHES BETWEEN THE INLET WALLS AND THE BAG, MEASURED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OVERFLOW HOLES. WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE BAG, USING PLASTIC ZIP TIES, TO ACHIEVE THE 3 INCH SIDE CLEARANCE. FLAP POCKETS SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT WOOD 2 INCH X 4 INCH OR USE A ROCK SOCK OR SAND BAGS IN PLACE OF THE FLAP POCKETS. SOCK HEIGHT MUST NOT BE SO HIGH AS TO SLOW DOWN WATER FILTRATION TO CAUSE FLOODING OF THE ROADWAY. GEOTEXTILE SOCK BETWEEN 4-10 FEET LONG AND 4-6 INCH DIAMETER. SEAM TO BE JOINED BY TWO ROWS OF STITCHING WITH A PLASTIC MESH BACKING OR PROVIDE A HEAT BONDED SEAM (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT). FILL ROCK LOG WITH OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE CONSISTING OF SOUND DURABLE PARTICLES OF COARSE AGGREGATE CONFORMING TO SPEC. 3137 TABLE 3137-1; CA-3 GRADATION. STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION DETAILS 8"2" 2' - 0" 6" 2 1/2" 2" TUBE RISER FILTER SOCK SECTION (DOWN POSITION) 2.5' MAX SPACING 12" 24" 18" MIN. POST EMBEDMENT 12" 10" - 12" THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:P:\109-JAVA COMPANIES\10925002-MUD LAKE CONVENIENCE CENTER\CIVIL\CAD\10925002-C-DETAILS.DWG #### 6/17/2025MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA EROSION CONTROL DETAILS C605 Agenda Page 92 Project Description: The work on the project includes construction of a retail development including new retail buildings, bituminous pavement, concrete curb & gutter, concrete sidewalks, sanitary sewer piping, water service piping, and the installation of storm sewer piping and structures that discharge to a newly constructed stormwater pond BMPs. The majority of the underlying soils on the property are in Hydrologic Soil Group "D" and have low infiltration rates when thoroughly wet. Receiving Waters: All existing stormwater runoff sheet flows to to the wetland located on the property. All stormwater runoff from proposed impervious surfaces will discharge to a proposed pond that will maintain the exisitng drainage pattern by discharging to the wetland on the property. Responsible Parties: The Owner and the Contractor are responsible co-permittees for the implementation of the SWPPP. The Contractor and Owner shall apply for the NPDES/SDS Construction Permit within 24 hours of award of Contract. The complete application must be submitted prior to start of construction activity. The Contractor is responsible for installation, inspection, maintenance, and repair of all erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs before, during, and after active construction. The Contractor shall amend the SWPPP before beginning construction to include the chain of responsibility of all operators on the site, or if not known, the title or position of the responsible party. The Contractor is responsible for identifying a trained person (as specified in the NPDES/SDS Contruction Permit) knowledgeable and experienced in the application of erosion prevention and sediment control BMPs who will oversee the implementation of the SWPPP before and during construction until the construction project is complete, the entire site has undergone final stabilization, and a Notice of Termination(NOT)/Permit Modification form has been submitted to the MPCA. The Owner must identify who will be responsible for the long-term operation and maintenance of all permanent stormwater management systems. The Contractor is liable until final stabilization of all disturbed areas is achieved and the Notice of Termination (NOT)/Permit Modification form is submitted to the MPCA (as specified in the NPDES/SDS Construction Permit). Once the identity of Responsible Parties is known, the SWPPP must be amended to include this information in the area below. Project Contacts: Project Engineer Owner Contractor Michael J. Gerber Java Companies TBD Design Tree Engineering & Land Surveying Mark Krogh 120 17th Ave W.255 E St Alexandria, MN 56308 Mendota, MN 55150 (320) 227-0203 mjg@dte-ls.com SWPPP Amendments: The Owner or Contractor must amend the SWPPP as necessary to include additional requirements, such as additional or modified BMPs that are designed to correct problems identified or address situations whenever: 1. There is a change in design, construction, operation, maintenance, weather or seasonal conditions that has a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to surface water or underground waters. 2. Inspections or investigations by site owner or operators, USEPA or MPCA officials indicate the SWPPP is not effective in eliminating or significantly minimizing the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or underground waters or that the discharges are causing water quality standard exceedances. 3. The SWPPP is not achieving the general objectives of minimizing pollutants in stormwater discharges associated with construction activity, or the SWPPP is not consistent with the terms and conditions of this permit. 4. At any time after the permit coverage is effective, the MPCA deems necessary. Construction Notes: Construction shall be governed by the MnDOT Standard Specifications for Construction, latest edition, City of Albertville's Specifications, special provisions, amendments, and the project specifications and details. Permits and maps relating to this project's SWPPP can be found in the Project Documents. The Contractor shall keep inspection and maintenance logs and NPDES/SDS Construction Permit on-site at all times during active construction. Please refer to the plans and specifications for additional SWPPP information. Soil Compaction should be minimized and topsoil should be preserved whenever and wherever possible during construction All soil stockpiling shall include sediment control devices and shall be placed in areas away from surface waters or natural buffers. Special Waters, Impaired Waters, & TMDL Implementation Plans: The site is located within 1 mile of a special water or an impaired water as identified by the MPCA. The site is located within 1 mile of Hunters Lake. This lake has an EPA-approved impairment for: Nutrients. These impairment(s) are considered to be construction related parameters and require the additional best management practices (BMPs) found in items 23.9 and 23.10 of the permit if the project has a discharge point on the project within 1 mile (aerial radius measurement) of, and flows to the impaired water. The site is also located within 1 mile of School Lake. This lake has an EPA-approved impairment for: Nutrients. These impairment(s) are considered to be construction related parameters and require the additional best management practices (BMPs) found in items 23.9 and 23.10 of the permit if the project has a discharge point on the project within 1 mile (aerial radius measurement) of, and flows to the impaired water. All disturbed areas not actively being worked must be stabilized within 7 days. The Owner is responsible for the long term maintenance of all stormwater treatment facilities and private storm sewer systems. Inlet protection, silt fence, final stabilization, and other BMPs must be implemented prior to allowing any water runoff from being discharged off-site. Calculations: Disturbed Area XX AC Pre-Construction Impervious Area 0.00 AC Post-Construction Impervious Area 2.94 AC Net Increase in Impervious Area 2.94 AC Sequence of Construction: The Contractor shall verify that all applicable permits have been obtained and the NPDES/SDS Construction Permit has been submitted to the MPCA prior to the start of construction. 1. The Contractor must plan for and implement appropriate construction phasing, vegetated buffer strips, horizontal slope grading, and other construction practices that minimize erosion. The location of areas not to be disturbed are shown on the plans. 2. The Contractor shall be responsible for full implementation and maintenance required by the SWPPP untill the Notice of Termination (NOT) is approved by the MPCA. 3. The Contractor shall construct erosion and sediment control BMPs in the following construction sequence: a. Install rock construction entrances where indicated in the plans. b. Install silt fence and inlet protection where indicated in the plans. c. Install silt fence around proposed infiltration and bioretention BMPs to protect soils from compaction. d. Locate portable toilets on flat surfaces away from drainage paths. Position portable toilets so they are secure and will not tip or be knocked over. e. Construct concrete washout area and provide signage. f. Establish waste control areas. g. Construct temporary sediment basins where 5 acres or more drain to a common location. h. Construct diversions to sediment basins. i. Rough grade site. j. Leave disturbed area of site in a roughened condition to limit erosion. Temporarily stabilize areas that will be inactive for a period of 7 days. k. Install storm drainage system and place inlet protection as each inlet is installed. Energy dissipation devices shall be installed and functional within 24 hours of connecting pip outlets to surface waters. l. Protect and repair BMPs, as necessary. m. Perform street sweeping as needed. n. Temporarily stabilize areas not actively being worked. o. Site construction (Utilities, paving, buildings, etc...) p. Final grading. q. Final stabilization (seeding, planting). Stabilized soil with the seed mix indicated on the plans. r. Remove temporary sediment basins when permanent cover has reduced the acreage of disturbed soil to less than five (5) acres draining to a common location. s. Construct stormwater infiltration basins and bioretention basins only when contributing drainage area has been constructed and fully stabilized. t. Remove erosion control devices upon site establishment in accordance with the NPDES/SDS Notice of Termination (NOT) requirements. Final Stabilization: Final stabilization is not met until all of the following are completed: 1. Stabilization by uniform perennial vegetative cover (70% density of it's expected final growth). The seed mix indicated on the plan or sod shall be used for final stabilization. 2. Permanent stormwater management system is constructed, meets all requirements, and is operational. 3. Drainage ditches are fully stabilized. 4. All temporary synthetic and structural BMPs are removed. 5. Sediment from conveyance systems and sedimentation basins are cleaned out (returned to design capacity). 6. Notice of Termination (NOT) is submitted to the MPCA. Erosion Control Maintenance and Inspection: BMP inspection and maintenance Responsible Party: 1. Inspect erosion control devices and provide routine maintenance as follows: a. Inspect erosion control a minimum of once per week and within 24 hours of a rainfall event greater than 0.5" in 24 hours. b. Records of each inspection and maintenance activity shall include: ·Date and time of inspections. ·Name of person(s) conducting inspection. ·Accurate findings of inspection, including the specific location where corrective actions are needed. ·Corrective actions taken (including dates, times, and party completing maintenance activities). ·Date and amount of all rainfall events greater than 0.5" in 24 hours, and the amount of rainfall for each event. Rainfall amounts must be obtained by either a properly maintained rain gauge installed onsite, a weather station that is within 1 mile of the site, or a weather reporting system that provides site specific rainfall data from radar summaries. ·If discharge is observed during the inspection, the inspector must record and should photograph and describe the location of the discharge (i.e. color, odor, settled or suspended solids, oil sheen, and other obvious indicators of pollutants). ·Documentation of amendments to the SWPPP proposed as a result of the inspection as required by the NPDES/SDS Construction Permit. c. Inspections may be suspended where construction activity has been suspended due to frozen ground conditions. Inspections must resume within 24 hours of runoff occurring, or upon resuming construction, whichever comes first. 2. Provide maintenance for all devices as follows: a. Silt fences and erosion control devices at storm sewer inlets shall be inspected for depth of sediment, tears, to see if fabric is securely attached to support posts or structure, and to see that posts and devices are securely in place. b. Silt fence, inlet protection at storm sewer inlets, and other erosion control devices shall be cleaned when sediment reaches 1/3 of the height of the erosion control device. c. Rock construction entrances shall be inspected for clogging of rock. Rock that has become clogged with sediment shall be removed and replaced with clean rock. d. Repairs or replacement of all erosion control devices shall occur within 24 hours of discovery. e. Temporary sediment basins shall be cleaned when sediment reaches 1/2 of the outlet's height or 1/2 of the basins storage volume. The basin shall be drained and sediment removed within 72 hours. f. Temporary diversion berms shall be inspected and any breaches shall be promptly repaired. g. Tracked sediment from construction vehicles onto public streets and paved areas (including paved areas on the construction site) shall be removed within 24 hours of discovery. h. The bottom and side slopes of the proposed stormwater treatment basins shall be stabilized within 200 feet of the property lines or point of discharge to any surface water, including curb and gutter, pavement, storm sewer, swales, or other similar stormwater conveyance devices. i. Removal of all deltas and sediment deposited in surface waters and re-stabilization of exposed soils shall be accomplished within 7 days of discovery. Pollution Prevention Management Measures: 1. Storage, handling, and disposal of construction products, materials and wastes: a. The Contractor shall comply with the following to minimize the exposure to stormwater (any of the products, materials, or wastes/products which are either not a source of contamination to strormwater or are designed to be exposed to stormwater are not held to this requirement): ·Building products that have the potential to leach pollutants must be under cover (e.g. plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or be protected by a similarly effective means designed to prevent contact with stormwater. ·Pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemicals, and landscape materials must be under cover (e.g. plastic sheeting or temporary roofs) to prevent the discharge of pollutants or protected by similarly effective means designed to prevent contact with stormwater. ·Hazardous materials, toxic wastes (including oil, diesel fuel, gasoline., hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservatives, additives, curing compounds, and acids), must be properly stored in sealed containers to prevent spills, leaks, or other discharge. ·Restricted access storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste or hazardous materials must be in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7045 including secondary containment as applicable. ·Solid wastes must be stored, collected, and disposed of properly in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035. ·Portable toilets must be positioned so that they are secure and will not be tipped or knocked over. Sanitary waste must be disposed of properly in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7041. 2. Fueling and maintenance of equipment or vehicles; spill prevention and response: a. The Contractor shall take reasonable steps to prevent the discharge of spilled or leaked chemicals, including fuel, from any areas where chemicals or fuel will be loaded or unloaded including the use of drip pans or absorbents unless infeasible. b. The Contractor must conduct fueling in a contained area unless infeasible. c. The Contractor must ensure adequate supplies are available at all times to clean up discharged materials and that an appropriate disposal method is available for recovered spilled materials. d. The Contractor must report and clean up spills immediately as required by Minn. Stat. 115.061, using dry clean up measures where possible. 3. Vehicle and equipment washing: a. If the Contractor washes the exterior of vehicles or equipment on the project site, washing must be limited to a defined area of the site. b. Runoff from the washing area must be contained in a sediment basin or other similarly effective controls and waste from the washing activity must be properly disposed of. 4. The Contractor must properly use and store soaps, detergents, and solvents. 5. No engine degreasing is allowed on site. 6. Concrete and other washout waste: a. The Contractor must provide effective containment for all liquid and solid wastes generated by washout operations (concrete, stucco, paint, form release oils, curing compounds, and other construction materials) related to the construction activity. b. The liquid and solid waste must not contact the ground, and the containments must be designed so that it does not result in runoff from the washout operations or areas. c. Liquid and solid wastes must be disposed of properly and in compliance with MPCA rules. d. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility that requires site personnel to utilize the proper facilities for disposal of concrete and other washout wastes. Dewatering and Basin Draining: Dewatering or basin draining that may have turbid or sediment laden discharge water must be discharged to a temporary or permanent sedimentation basin on the project site whenever possible. Discharge from the temporary or permanent sedimentation basin must be visually checked to ensure adequate treatment is obtained in the basin and nuisance conditions, impacts to wetlands, and erosion in receiving channels or on down gradient properties will not result from the discharge. Adequate sedimentation control measures are required for discharge water that contains suspended solids. If using using filters with backwash water, either haul the backwash water away for disposal and return the backwash water to the beginning of the treatment process, or incorporate the backwash water into the site in a manner that does not cause erosion. Timing of BMP Installation: The erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be installed as necessary to minimize erosion from disturbed surfaces and capture sediment on site and shall meet the NPDES/SDS Construction Permit part VII requirements. Perimeter controls shall be placed prior to the start of any construction. All disturbed areas not actively being worked must be stabilized within 7 days. Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan: The Permitees must implement the entire SWPPP and the requirement of the NPDES/SDS Construction Permit. The BMPs identified in the SWPPP and in the permit must be selected, installed, and maintained in an appropriate and functional manner that is in accordance with manufacturer specifications and accepted engineering practices. Temporary Sediment Basins: Project is not required to provide temporary sediment basins for construction. Future Operation and Maintenance (O&M): The Owner shall be responsible for performing future operations and maintenance of the permanent stormwater management systems on the property. CONTACTS AGENCY NAME PHONE NUMBER Write County Write County Soil and Water Conservation District (763) 682-1970 DNR Waters Janell Miersch (218) 739-7576 ext. 232 ACOE St. Paul Office (651) 290-5375 State Duty Officer MPCA (800) 422-0798 SWPPP Designer Michael Gerber, PE (320) 227-0203 Erosion Control Review Michael Gerber, PE (320) 227-0203 Erosion Control Supervisor TBD LOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTS DESCRIPTION TITLE SHEET # OR SPECIFICATION SECTION Receiving Surface Water RECEIVING WATER CXXX Final Stabilization Erosion Control Plan CXXX Drainage Plans Site Grading & Utility Plan CXXX Drainage Details Details CXXX Erosion Control Sheets Erosion Control Plan CXXX Erosion Control Details Details CXXX Erosion & Sediment Control Quantities Erosion Control Plan CXXX Existing & Proposed Drainage Maps Final Stormwater Management Plan Project Manual THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:P:\109-JAVA COMPANIES\10925002-MUD LAKE CONVENIENCE CENTER\CIVIL\CAD\10925002-C-DETAILS.DWG #### 6/17/2025MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA SWPPP NARRATIVE C606 Agenda Page 93 THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:P:\109-JAVA COMPANIES\10925002-MUD LAKE CONVENIENCE CENTER\CIVIL\CAD\10925002-C-DETAILS.DWG #### 6/17/2025MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA CIVIL SPECIFICATIONS C607 Agenda Page 94 THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:P:\109-JAVA COMPANIES\10925002-MUD LAKE CONVENIENCE CENTER\CIVIL\CAD\10925002-C-DETAILS.DWG #### 6/17/2025MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA CIVIL SPECIFICATIONS C608 Agenda Page 95 THIS DRAWING AND THE INFORMATION THEREIN IS THE PROPERTY OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. USE BY THE HOLDER OR DISCLOSURE TO OTHERS WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. IS PROHIBITED. IT CONTAINS PROPRIETARY AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. REPRODUCTION OF THE MATERIAL HEREIN WITHOUT WRITTEN ERMISSION OF DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING INC. VIOLATES THE COPYRIGHT LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WILL SUBJECT THE VIOLATORS TO LEGAL PROSECUTION. COPYRIGHT @ 2024 BY DESIGN TREE ENGINEERING I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DRAWING NO. DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: PROJECT NO.: NO.DATE DESCRIPTIONPRELIMINARY:NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDATE:LICENSE #: PRINTED NAME:P:\109-JAVA COMPANIES\10925002-MUD LAKE CONVENIENCE CENTER\CIVIL\CAD\10925002-C-DETAILS.DWG #### 6/17/2025MICHAEL J. GERBER 5665309/04/2024 10925002 MUD LAKE ADDITION ALBERTVILLE, MN NPK JEA CIVIL SPECIFICATIONS C609 Agenda Page 96 Potter – 60th Street Northeast City of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Michael Potter by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2024-055) July 1, 2024 Agenda Page 97 1 Potter – 60th Street Northeast City of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY .......................................................................... 2 2. OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................ 3 3. METHODS .............................................................................................................................. 3 4. RESULTS ................................................................................................................................ 4 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters, and NHD Information .......................................... 4 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations......................................................................... 5 4.3 Other Areas ........................................................................................................................ 6 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination .................................... 6 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION .............................................................................. 7 FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Public Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset APPENDICES A. Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota B. Wetland Delineation Data Forms C. Precipitation Data Agenda Page 98 Potter – 60th Street NE, City of Albertville Wetland Delineation Report 2 Potter – 60th Street Northeast City of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY • The 16.05-acre site at 60th Street NE (no address) was inspected on May 15th, 2024 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) map showed one PEM1C/PEM1A wetland in the southwest portion of the site and continuing offsite. • The soil survey showed Klossner, Okoboji, and Glencoe complex as Hydric/Predominantly Hydric soil in the majority of the site and Cordova loam as Hydric/Predominantly Hydric soil along a small portion of the east central site boundary. Other soils mapped within the boundaries were Non-Hydric/Predominantly Non-Hydric. • The DNR Public Waters Inventory showed an unnamed Public Water Wetland (86-415 W) approximately 700 ft southwest of the site. No Public Watercourses were mapped within 1000 ft of the site boundary. • The National Hydrography Dataset did not show any surface waters on or near the site. • Two (2) wetlands were delineated onsite as summarized in Table 1 below. Table 1. Wetlands delineated on the 60th Street Northeast site. Wetland ID Wetland Type Dominant Vegetation Area (ac) Circular 39 Cowardin Eggers and Reed 1 Type 1 PEM1A Fresh (wet) meadow Reed canary grass 2.37 ac 2 Type 3/1 PEM1C/A Shallow marsh/fresh (wet) meadow Reed canary grass, cattail, European common reed 4.37 ac onsite Agenda Page 99 Potter – 60th Street NE, City of Albertville Wetland Delineation Report 3 2. OVERVIEW The 16.05-acre site at 60th Street NE (no address) was inspected on May 15th, 2024 for the presence and extent of wetland. The property was located in Section 6, Township 120 North, Range 23 West, City of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota. The site was located approximately 80 ft north of Interstate 94, adjacent to and south of 60th St NE, and adjacent to and west of Mackenzie Ave NE (Figure 1). The property corresponded to Wright County PID 101800062200 (No address; 16.05 deed acres). The site consisted of gravel pads, wetlands, planted trees and turf, and a field road between the two wetlands. Dominant species present within the wetlands consisted of reed canary grass with lesser amounts of narrowleaf cattail and European common reed (Phragmites australis). Dominant species in the planted and turf areas included boxelder and ash trees, honeysuckle, and Kentucky bluegrass. The site had mostly gentle sloping topography, with elevations peaking at 958-ft MSL in the northern portion of the property and falling to 948-ft MSL in Wetland 1 and Wetland 2. Surrounding land use consisted of commercial and medium-density residential. Two (2) wetlands were delineated within the site boundaries. The delineated wetland boundaries and existing conditions are shown in Figure 2. Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for a wetland boundary and type determination from the City of Albertville under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). 3. METHODS Wetlands were identified using the Routine Determination method described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0) as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper-most extent of wetland that met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland-upland boundaries were marked with pin flags that were located with a sub-meter accuracy GPS unit. Figure 2 does not constitute an official survey product. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at a representative location along the wetland- upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30-foot radius for trees and vines, a 15-foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5-foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 24 inches (unless otherwise noted) using a Munsell Soil Color Book and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used Agenda Page 100 Potter – 60th Street NE, City of Albertville Wetland Delineation Report 4 are from Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Version 8.1, 2017). Mapped soils are separated into five classes based on the composition of hydric components and the Hydric Rating by Map Unit color classes utilized on Web Soil Survey. The five classes include Hydric (100 percent hydric components), Predominantly Hydric (66 to 99 percent hydric components), Partially Hydric (33 to 65 percent hydric components), Predominantly Non-Hydric (1 to 32 percent hydric components), and Non-Hydric (less than one percent hydric components). Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2018 National Wetland Plant List (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2018. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.3, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, NH). 4. RESULTS 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters, and NHD Information The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) (Minnesota Geospatial Commons 2009-2014 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) showed one PEM1C/PEM1A wetland in the southwest portion of the site and continuing offsite (Figure 3). The Soil Survey (USDA NRCS 2015) showed Klossner, Okoboji, and Glencoe complex as Hydric/Predominantly Hydric soil in the majority of the site and Cordova loam as Hydric/Predominantly Hydric soil along a small portion of the east central site boundary. Other soils mapped within the boundaries were Non-Hydric/Predominantly Non-Hydric. Soil types mapped on the property are listed in Table 2 below and a map showing soil types is included in Figure 4. Table 2: Soil types mapped on the 60th Street Northeast site. Symbol Soil Name Acres % of Area % Hydric Hydric Category 1080 Klossner, Okoboji and Glencoe soils, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes 12.8 79.5% 100 Hydric 1094B Angus-Cordova complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes 3.2 20.1% 35 Partially Hydric 1156 Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes 0.1 0.4% 95 Predominantly Hydric Agenda Page 101 Potter – 60th Street NE, City of Albertville Wetland Delineation Report 5 The Minnesota DNR Public Waters Inventory (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 2015) showed an unnamed Public Water Wetland (86-415 W) approximately 700 ft southwest of the site. No Public Watercourses were mapped within 1000 ft of the site boundary (Figure 5). The National Hydrography Dataset (U.S. Geological Survey 2015) did not show any surface waters on or near the site (Figure 6). 4.2 Wetland Determinations and Delineations Potential wetlands were evaluated during field observations on May 15, 2024. Two wetlands were identified and delineated on the property. Corresponding data forms are included in Appendix B. The following descriptions of the wetlands and adjacent upland reflects conditions observed at the time of the field visit. Precipitation conditions were atypical (wet) using the three-month antecedent precipitation data method. The 30-day rolling precipitation total was above the normal range (wet) (Appendix C). In the week leading up to the observation date, there was a 0.03 inch precipitation event on May 8th. Wetland 1 was a Type 1 (PEM1A) fresh (wet) meadow that was dominated by reed canary grass. Approximately 2 inches of ponded water was present in the lowest point in the wetland. Two secondary indicators of geomorphic position and the FAC neutral test were also present. The upland was dominated by Kentucky bluegrass, planted green ash trees and honeysuckle bushes. No primary or secondary indicators of hydrology were observed in the upland. The wetland boundary corresponded to the base of the field road fill and changes from hydrophytic vegetation to upland vegetation on the west and southwest sides. On the north side, the boundary corresponded with the edge of gravel fill. On the southeast side, the boundary corresponded to a slight change in topography and a change from dominant hydrophytic vegetation to dominant upland vegetation. Wetland 1 was mapped within hydric soils (Klossner, Okoboji, and Glencoe soils) according to the soil survey. Wetland 2 was a Type 3/1 (PEM1C/A) shallow marsh/fresh (wet) meadow that was dominated by reed canary grass and narrowleaf cattail with lesser amounts of European common reed. There was approximately 6 inches of ponded water in the middle of the wetland. The secondary indicator of geomorphic position was also present. The adjacent upland at the sample point had disturbed soils (mixed road fill) and weedy vegetation with a few planted boxelder trees. No primary or secondary indicators of hydrology were observed in the upland. The wetland boundary corresponded with the base of the field road and gravel pad fill on its north and east edges, and a change from dominant hydrophytic vegetation to dominant upland vegetation. Wetland 2 corresponded to an NWI PEM1C/A wetland and was mapped within hydric soils (Klossner, Okoboji, and Glencoe soils) according to the soil survey. Agenda Page 102 Potter – 60th Street NE, City of Albertville Wetland Delineation Report 6 4.3 Other Areas A large area north of Wetland 1 was mapped in hydric soils (Klossner, Okoboji, and Glencoe soils). This area was determined to be non-wetland as it contained approximately 4 feet of fill. The field road between Wetlands 1 and 2 and the southeast gravel pad were also located within the same hydric soil mapunit. An area east of Wetland 1 mapped in the same hydric soil mapunit was also reviewed. The soils observed were non-hydric. The vegetation was dominated by Kentucky bluegrass. All vegetation was FAC or drier except for a few planted green ash trees. This area was determined as non- wetland. There were no other depressional areas with hydrophytic vegetation on the site. No other areas were shown as hydric soil on the soil survey or as wetland on the NWI map. 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for a wetland boundary and type determination from the City of Albertville under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). Agenda Page 103 Potter – 60th Street NE, City of Albertville Wetland Delineation Report 7 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. This wetland delineation and report were prepared in compliance with the regulatory standards in place at the time the work was performed. Site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation completed by: Faith Holaday, Wetland/Soil Specialist Minnesota Certified Wetland Professional In-Training No. 5526 Kat Dickerson, Wetland/Ecologist Minnesota Certified Wetland Professional In-Training No. 5439 Report prepared by: Faith Holaday, Wetland/Soil Specialist Report reviewed by: ____________________________________ Date: July 1, 2024 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 Agenda Page 104 Potter – 60th Street Northeast Wetland Delineation Report FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Protected Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset Agenda Page 105 © OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA Figure 1 - Site Location Map Potter - 60th Street NE (KES 2024-055) Albertville, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 1,000 Feet Legend Site Boundary Source: Open Street Map I-94 I-94 60th Street Northeast/CR 37 Mackenzie Avenue NortheastPID: 101800062200 (No Address) Agenda Page 106 !( !( !( !( !( # # ## # # # # # # 954 948954948956 956 946 9 5 2956 95 2 948950956 96095 0 948954 954 948 94895 2 958 952950 954950948954952958 950960 95296095 0 948958954 950 95 6 952 948Figure 2 - Existing Conditions (2021 FSA Photo) Potter - 60th Street NE (KES 2024-055) Albertville, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 200 Feet Legend #Culvert !(Sample_Point Site Boundary Wetland Wright County Lidar Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons SP1-1W Wetland 1 Type 1 2.37 ac total Wetland 2 Type 3/1 4.36 ac onsite SP1-1UPL SP2-1W SP2-1UPL SP1-2UPL Agenda Page 107 PEM1C PEM1A PEM1A PEM1C PEM1C Figure 3 - National Wetlands Inventory Potter - 60th Street NE (KES 2024-055) Albertville, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 200 Feet Legend Site Boundary PEM1A PEM1C Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USFWS Agenda Page 108 Klossner, Okoboji and Glencoe soils, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes Angus-Cordova complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes Angus-Cordova complex, 0 to 5 percent slopes Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes Figure 4 - Soil Survey Potter - 60th Street NE (KES 2024-055) Albertville, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 200 Feet Legend Site Boundary Hydric/Predominantly Hydric Partially Hydric Predominantly Non-Hydric/Non-Hydric Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USDA, NRCSAgenda Page 109 Unnamed (86-415 W) Hunters (86-26 P) Figure 5 - DNR Public Waters Inventory Potter - 60th Street NE (KES 2024-055) Albertville, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 1,000 Feet Legend Site Boundary Public Ditch/Altered Natural Watercourse Public Watercourse Public Waters Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, MN DNRAgenda Page 110 Figure 6 - National Hydrography Dataset Potter - 60th Street NE (KES 2024-055) Albertville, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 1,000 Feet Legend Site Boundary Lake/Pond Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, USGS Agenda Page 111 Potter – 60th Street Northeast Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX A Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota Agenda Page 112 Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form – Revised May 2021 Page 3 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: KES:2024- PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the agent’s contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Michael Potter Mailing Address: 11650 57th St. NE Albertville, MN 55301 Phone: 763-242-2038 E-mail Address: Ckouttimes18@hotmail.com Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Kjolhaug Environmental Services; c/o Faith Holaday Mailing Address: 2500 Shadywood Road Excelsior, MN 55331 Phone: 608-852-2337 E-mail Address: faith@kjolhaugenv.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Wright City/Township: Albertville Parcel ID and/or Address: 101800062200 Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): 6, 120N, 23W Lat/Long (decimal degrees): 45.236763, -93.641794 Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): ~16 ac If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. Wetland Delineation concurrence/approval Agenda Page 113 Agenda Page 114 Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form – Revised May 2021 Page 5 of 12 Project Name and/or Number: KES:2024- Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District (Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply): Wetland Type Confirmation Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.). Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx Agenda Page 115 Potter – 60th Street Northeast Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX B Wetland Delineation Data Forms Agenda Page 116 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Albertville/Wright Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/15/2024 Sampling Point: SP1-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave 6, 120N, 23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Potter - 60th Street Northeast Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 110 (Plot size: 15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 110 220 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 1 1 0 0 100.00% Y 0 Phalaris arundinacea 110 Y FACW (Plot size: 5 0 2.00 110 220 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 1If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions atypical (wet) per gridded database Y Dominan t Species Indicator Status Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes N Klossner, Okoboji, and Glencoe soils, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes NWI Classification: 0-1 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s): Faith H. and Kat D. Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner: Micheal Potter State: depression Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Agenda Page 117 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X X Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X X 6-20 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C PL/M loamy sand 10YR 5/1 30 D M *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):7 7 Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 10YR 2/1 20 24-28 10YR 5/1 80 loamy sand 20-24 10YR 2/1 65 10YR 4/6 5 C PL/M loamy sand 2-6 10YR 2/1 100 loam 0-2 10YR 2/1 100 mucky loam Sampling Point:SP1-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Agenda Page 118 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 50 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Albertville/Wright Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/15/2024 Sampling Point: SP1-1UPMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):linear 6, 120N, 23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Potter - 60th Street Northeast Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 112 (Plot size: 15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FACU 50 100 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 2 2 12 48 100.00% Y 0 Lonicera morrowii 5 N Parthenocissus quinquefolia 2 N FACU Poa pratensis 100 Y FAC (Plot size: 5 Taraxacum officinale 5 N FACU 0 2.77 162 448 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 0 0 100 300 Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions atypical (wet) per gridded database. Vegetation was mowed and trees were planted. N Fraxinus pennsylvanica 50 Y FACW Dominan t Species Indicator Status X Y N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes N Klossner, Okoboji, and Glencoe soils, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes NWI Classification: 0-1 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s): Faith H. and Kat D. Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner: Micheal Potter State: hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Agenda Page 119 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) 23-26 10YR 2/1 87 10YR 5/2 10 D M sandy loam *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) NHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 10YR 5/8 3 C PL 8-23 10YR 2/1 98 10YR 5/2 2 D M sandy loam 0-8 10YR 2/1 100 sandy loam Sampling Point:SP1-1UP Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Agenda Page 120 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) No vegetation. Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Albertville/Wright Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/15/2024 Sampling Point: SP1-2UPLMN Local relief (concave, convex, none): linear to flat 6, 120N, 23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology X Potter - 60th Street Northeast Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 0 (Plot size: 15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: 0 0 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 0 0 0 0 0.00% N 0 (Plot size: 5 0 0 0 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions atypical (wet) per gridded database N Dominan t Species Indicator Status X X N N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? No N Klossner, Okoboji and Glencoe soils, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes NWI Classification: 0-1 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s): Faith H. and Kat D. Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner: Micheal Potter State: flat gravel Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Agenda Page 121 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Approximately 4 feet of gravel fill. Assumed underlain by mapped hydric soil (Klossner, Okoboji and Glencoe soils). Did not take sample. Depth (inches): 0 Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Coarse gravel Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) NHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) Coarse gravel See below. Sampling Point:SP1-2UPL Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Agenda Page 122 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is >50% 6 X Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 10 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Albertville/Wright Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/15/2024 Sampling Point: SP2-1WMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):concave 6, 120N, 23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) PEM1C/PEM1A , or hydrology , or hydrology Potter - 60th Street Northeast Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 168 (Plot size: 15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FAC 90 180 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) Y 2 2 42 168 100.00% Y 0 Poa pratensis 25 N Plantago major 3 N FAC Stellaria media 10 N FACU Potentilla norvegica Trifolium pratense 2 N FACU Rumex crispus 2 N FAC Phalaris arundinacea 90 Y FACW (Plot size: 5 Taraxacum officinale 30 N FACU 0 2.73 178 486 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 6 N FAC 0 0 46 138 Absolute % Cover30 Wetland 2If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions atypical (wet) per gridded database. Vegetation is mowed regularly. Y Acer negundo 10 Y FAC Dominan t Species Indicator Status X Y Y VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes N Klossner, Okoboji, and Glencoe soils, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes NWI Classification: 0-1 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s): Faith H. and Kat D. Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner: Micheal Potter State: toeslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Agenda Page 123 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) X Aquatic Fauna (B13) X True Aquatic Plants (B14) X Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) X 17-23 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M sandy clay loam *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes X NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) Y Water table present?Yes X No Depth (inches):6 6 Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) YHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) 23-26 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M loamy sand 8-17 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M sandy loam 0-8 10YR 2/1 100 sandy loam Sampling Point:SP2-1W Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Agenda Page 124 Project/Site: Slope (%): Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year?(If no, explain in remarks) Are vegetation , soil significantly disturbed? Are vegetation , soil naturally problematic? SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Hydrophytic vegetation present? Hydric soil present?Is the sampled area within a wetland? Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Remarks: (Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Dominance Test Worksheet ) 1 (A) 2 3 (B) 4 5 (A/B) =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum )Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total % Cover of: 2 OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 4 FAC species x 3 = 5 FACU species x 4 = =Total Cover UPL species x 5 = Herb stratum )Column totals (A)(B) 1 Prevalence Index = B/A = 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is >50% 6 Prevalence index is ≤3.0* 7 8 9 10 =Total Cover Woody vine stratum ) 1 2 =Total Cover Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Number of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: Total Number of Dominant Species Across all Strata: Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Midwest Region City/County: Albertville/Wright Sampling Date: *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic 5/15/2024 Sampling Point: SP2-1UPLMN Local relief (concave, convex, none):linear 6, 120N, 23W (If needed, explain any answers in remarks.) None , or hydrology , or hydrology Potter - 60th Street Northeast Hydrophytic vegetation present? (Plot size: 30 115 (Plot size: 15 Tree Stratum (Plot size: FAC 0 0 Morphological adaptations* (provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) N 3 1 88 352 33.33% N 0 Poa pratensis 20 Y Digitaria sanguinalis 8 N FACU Taraxacum officinale 15 N FACU Ambrosia artemisiifolia Rumex crispus 7 N FAC Trifolium pratense 30 Y FACU (Plot size: 5 Matricaria discoidea 25 Y FACU 0 3.77 115 433 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* (explain) 0 0 10 N FACU 0 0 27 81 Absolute % Cover30 If yes, optional wetland site ID: Climatic conditions atypical (wet) per gridded database N Dominan t Species Indicator Status X X N N VEGETATION -- Use scientific names of plants. Are "normal circumstances" present? Yes N Klossner, Okoboji and Glencoe soils, ponded, 0 to 1 percent slopes NWI Classification: 5-10 Lat:Long:Datum: Investigator(s): Faith H. and Kat D. Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): Applicant/Owner: Micheal Potter State: hillslope Section, Township, Range: Soil Map Unit Name: US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Agenda Page 125 Iron-Manganese Masses (F12) (LRR K, L, R) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Aquatic Fauna (B13) True Aquatic Plants (B14) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) *Type: C = Concentration, D = Depletion, RM = Reduced Matrix, MS = Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL = Pore Lining, M = Matrix Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR K, L, R) Dark Surface (S7) (LRR K, L) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Sandy Redox (S5) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Other (explain in remarks) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) Geomorphic Position (D2) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Yes FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Iron Deposits (B5) Drift Deposits (B3) (includes capillary fringe) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Surface water present? Yes NoSaturation present? Field Observations: Depth (inches): Thin Muck Surface (C7) N Water table present?Yes No X Depth (inches): X Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Primary Indicators (minimum of one is required; check all that apply) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) No X Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Depth (inches): Crayfish Burrows (C8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Historic gravel road fill. Assumed underlain by mapped hydric soil (Klossenr, Okoboji and Glencoe soils). Did not take sample. Depth (inches): Sediment Deposits (B2) SOIL Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Saturation (A3) HYDROLOGY Surface Water (A1)Surface Soil Cracks (B6) High Water Table (A2) 2 cm Muck (A10) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) Restrictive Layer (if observed): Histosol (A1) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) Depleted Below Dark Surface (A11) Thick Dark Surface (A12) Remarks: Water-Stained Leaves (B9) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (C3) Drainage Patterns (B10) Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depleted Matrix (F3) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Gauge or Well Data (D9) Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric Soil Indicators: Describe recorded data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic Remarks: Type: Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) NHydric soil present? Dry-Season Water Table (C2) Water Marks (B1) coarse gravel See below. Sampling Point:SP2-1UPL Depth (Inches) Matrix Redox Features Texture RemarksColor (moist) % Color (moist) % Type* Loc** US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Agenda Page 126 Potter – 60th Street Northeast Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX C Precipitation Data Agenda Page 127 6/25/24, 1:37 PM Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Using Gridded Database https://climateapps.dnr.state.mn.us/gridded_data/precip/wetland/worksheet.asp?passXutm83=450247&passYutm83=5008881&passcounty=Wright&p…1/1 Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources home | current conditions | journal | past data | summaries | agriculture | other sites | about us Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Wright township number: 120N township name: unnamed range number: 23W nearest community: Albertville section number: 6 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Wednesday, May 1, 2024 Score using 1991-2020 normal period values are in inches A 'R' following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from radar-based estimates. first prior month:April 2024 second prior month:March 2024 third prior month:February 2024 estimated precipitation total for this location:4.40R 2.13R 0.71 there is a 30% chance this location will have less than:1.96 1.19 0.50 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than:3.11 1.68 1.04 type of month: dry normal wet wet wet normal monthly score 3 * 3 = 9 2 * 3 = 6 1 * 2 = 2 multi-month score: 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet)17 (Wet) Other Resources: retrieve daily precipitation data view radar-based precipitation estimates view weekly precipitation maps Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) Agenda Page 128 Agenda Page 129 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1/31 2/14 2/28 3/13 3/27 4/10 4/24 5/8 5/22Daily and monthly total precipitation (inches) daily precip 30d rolling total monthly precip 30 - day rolling total Climate Conditions 2024 Albertville, MN normal precip range Site Visit: May 15th, 2024 Agenda Page 130 Albertville, Minnesota: Precipitation Summary Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group Site Visit: May 15th, 2024 Monthly Totals: 2024 Target: T 120N R 23W S 6, Lat: 45.23166 Lon: -93.63382 mon year cc tttN rrW ss nnnn oooooooo pre Jan 2024 27 119N 22W 1 SWCD .19 Feb 2024 27 119N 22W 1 SWCD .71 Mar 2024 27 119N 22W 1 SWCD 2.32 Apr 2024 86 120N 25W 29 SWCD 5.18 May 2024 86 120N 25W 29 SWCD 5.12 February/March/April/May Daily Records Date Precip. Feb 1, 2024 0 Feb 2, 2024 0 Feb 3, 2024 0 Feb 4, 2024 0 Feb 5, 2024 0 Feb 6, 2024 0 Feb 7, 2024 0 Feb 8, 2024 .32 Feb 9, 2024 0 Feb 10, 2024 0 Feb 11, 2024 0 Feb 12, 2024 0 Feb 13, 2024 0 Feb 14, 2024 .37 Feb 15, 2024 0 Feb 16, 2024 0 Feb 17, 2024 0 Feb 18, 2024 0 Feb 19, 2024 0 Feb 20, 2024 0 Feb 21, 2024 0 Feb 22, 2024 0 Feb 23, 2024 0 Feb 24, 2024 0 Feb 25, 2024 0 Feb 26, 2024 0 Feb 27, 2024 .02 Feb 28, 2024 0 Feb 29, 2024 0 1991-2020 Summary Statistics Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec WARM ANN WAT 30% 0.43 0.50 1.19 1.96 2.87 3.27 2.87 3.15 1.60 1.23 0.89 0.58 16.45 27.80 28.11 70% 0.88 1.04 1.68 3.11 4.74 4.77 4.56 4.64 4.68 3.63 1.83 1.36 23.37 33.56 33.18 mean 0.71 0.82 1.47 2.73 4.01 4.49 4.02 3.99 3.33 2.66 1.52 1.07 19.85 30.84 30.81 Date Precip. Mar 1, 2024 0 Mar 2, 2024 0 Mar 3, 2024 0 Mar 4, 2024 0 Mar 5, 2024 0 Mar 6, 2024 0 Mar 7, 2024 0 Mar 8, 2024 0 Mar 9, 2024 0 Mar 10, 2024 0 Mar 11, 2024 0 Mar 12, 2024 0 Mar 13, 2024 0 Mar 14, 2024 0 Mar 15, 2024 0 Mar 16, 2024 0 Mar 17, 2024 0 Mar 18, 2024 0 Mar 19, 2024 0 Mar 20, 2024 0 Mar 21, 2024 .30 Mar 22, 2024 0 Mar 23, 2024 0 Mar 24, 2024 0 Mar 25, 2024 .81 Mar 26, 2024 .95 Mar 27, 2024 .26 Mar 28, 2024 0 Mar 29, 2024 0 Mar 30, 2024 0 Mar 31, 2024 0 Date Precip. Apr 1, 2024 0 Apr 2, 2024 0 Apr 3, 2024 0 Apr 4, 2024 0 Apr 5, 2024 0 Apr 6, 2024 0 Apr 7, 2024 0 Apr 8, 2024 1.03 Apr 9, 2024 .21 Apr 10, 2024 .02 Apr 11, 2024 0 Apr 12, 2024 0 Apr 13, 2024 0 Apr 14, 2024 0 Apr 15, 2024 .03 Apr 16, 2024 .02 Apr 17, 2024 2.25 Apr 18, 2024 0 Apr 19, 2024 .01 Apr 20, 2024 0 Apr 21, 2024 0 Apr 22, 2024 0 Apr 23, 2024 0 Apr 24, 2024 0 Apr 25, 2024 .03 Apr 26, 2024 0 Apr 27, 2024 0 Apr 28, 2024 0 Apr 29, 2024 1.55 Apr 30, 2024 .03 Date Precip. May 1, 2024 .47 May 2, 2024 .18 May 3, 2024 .09 May 4, 2024 0 May 5, 2024 0 May 6, 2024 .21 May 7, 2024 .18 May 8, 2024 0 May 9, 2024 .02 May 10, 2024 0 May 11, 2024 0 May 12, 2024 0 May 13, 2024 0 May 14, 2024 0 May 15, 2024 0 Site Visit: May 15th, 2024 Agenda Page 131 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE AMENDING ALBERTVILLE ZONING CHPATER 5200, PUD-PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTIRCT, FOR JAVA RETAIL PUD REZONING AND DEVELOPMENT SITE AND BUILDING PLANS FOR LOT 1 AND LOT 2, BLOCK 1, JAVA RETAIL ADDITION WITHIN THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE The City Council of the City of Albertville, Minnesota hereby ordains: Section 1. Chapter 5200 PUD Planned Unit Development District, Section of the Albertville City Code is hereby amended to add the underlined text and to repeal the strikeout text: 5200.19 Java Retail A. USES: Uses allowed in the Java Retail B-3/PUD district shall be the same as the B-3 base zoning district, as well as: 1. Car washes as a permitted use, with the standards and conditions established in this section. B. Lot Requirements and Setbacks: Setbacks Front Side (Interior) Side (Corner) Rear Lot Area Lot Width - - - - - - - C. Special PUD Conditions: 1. Curb barriers must meet the setbacks established in 1200.4 (H) 16. of the zoning ordinance except for the shared lot line between Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 1, JAVA RETAIL ADDITION within the PUD 2. Car washes shall be subject to the following standards and conditions: a. The car wash structure shall meet the architectural standards of section 4400.8 of this chapter. b. Car wash stacking space shall be constructed to accommodate the number of vehicles that may be washed in a 30 minute period. 3. The number of required parking spaces in the B-3/PUD shall be the same as the B-3 district. Parking on the site is approved consistent with the Java Retail PUD B-3/PUD zoning district. Any proposed development that would result in an increase of parking must provide the additional required parking. 4. Any deviations from the approved site plans may require an amendment to the Java Retail PUD B-3/PUD zoning district or a conditional use permit, as established in the zoning ordinance. Agenda Page 132 City of Albertville Ordinance No. 2025-XX Meeting of August XX, 2025 Page 1 5. Prior to the development of Lot 1 or Lot 2, Block 1, JAVA RETAIL ADDITION, the following must be reviewed and approved through the site plan review process, including an application, all fees related to the application, and the submittal requirements established within the zoning ordinance: a. Any structures or facilities proposed to be constructed or developed within the Java Retail PUD B-3/PUD zoning district. b. All future development of the site must submit a landscaping plan to be reviewed as part of a site plan review. c. All future development of the site must submit a lighting plan to be reviewed as part of a site plan review. 6. Prior to development of Outlot A, the outlot must be platted as a lot and must be reviewed and approved through the site plan review process, including an application, all fees related to the application, and the submittal requirements established within the zoning ordinance. Section 2. The remainder of the code. Numbering within sections of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance shall be adjusted in tandem to include the amendments within this ordinance. Section 3. This Amendment shall be in full force and effective immediately following its passage and publication. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Albertville this XX day of August, 2025. ___________________________ Jillian Hendrickson, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk Agenda Page 133 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XX RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT ENTITLED JAVA RETAIL ALBERTVILLE ADDITION, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA. WHEREAS, Java Albertville Retail, the applicant, has made an application on behalf of Michael J and Heidi Potter, the owner, to replat the property described in Attachment A, into the property described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, JAVA RETAIL ADDITION, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA.; and Lot 2, Block 1, JAVA RETAIL ADDITION, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA; and Outlot A, JAVA RETAIL ADDITION, WRIGHT COUNTY, MINNESOTA; and WHEREAS, Java Retail Addition consists of approximately 16.34 acres; and WHEREAS, the platting of land within the City of Albertville requires the approval of the city; and WHEREAS, the proposed plat is located within the B-3 zoning district and meets lot requirements of the zoning district; and WHEREAS, the City of Albertville Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 8, 2025, to consider the Preliminary Plat; and WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing on said Preliminary Plat was duly published and mailed in accordance with the applicable Albertville Ordinances; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission heard all persons interested in the Preliminary Plat at the public hearing, and the Commission recommended approval of the plat for Java Retail Addition to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the proposed Preliminary Plat Java Retail Addition meets the requirements of the Albertville Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance; and Agenda Page 134 City of Albertville Resolution No. 2025-XX Meeting of August XX, 2025 Page 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota, hereby approves the preliminary plat for Java Retail Addition subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of the Java Retail PUD B-3/PUD zoning district over the entire plat. 2. A private street easement over the lots must be prepared by the applicant that defines the location and configuration of the private street. The easement must allow shared access to all the lots in the plat. The street easement shall be recorded simultaneously with the final plat. 3. The applicant shall provide a copy of the recorded easements to the City before a building permit may be issued for any lot within the plat. 4. The grading, drainage, and final site plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 5. The utility plan shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 6. The plat shall provide utility easements over all utilities, drainage ways, and stormwater ponds service the plat. The size and location shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. 7. The applicant shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Albertville for the required site improvements and the installation of the public utilities and private street. Agenda Page 135 City of Albertville Resolution No. 2025-XX Meeting of August XX, 2025 Page 1 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Albertville this XX day of August, 2025. ___________________________ Jillian Hendrickson, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Kristine A. Luedke, City Clerk Agenda Page 136 City of Albertville Resolution No. 2025-XX Meeting of August XX, 2025 Page 1 ATTACHMENT A The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Wright, State of Minnesota and is described as follows: The Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of NW 1/4) of Section 6, Township 120, Range 23, Wright County, Minnesota, Except the following: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Section 6, Township 120, Range 23, and running South on the section line 33 feet for a starting point; thence continuing South on the section line 30 rods; thence East at right angles 16 rods; thence North 30 rods; thence West parallel with the Section line 16 rods to place of beginning. Also Except: the East 460 feet of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (NW 1/4 of NW 1/4) of Section 6, Township 120, Range 23, Wright County, Minnesota; Also Except: Beginning at the Northwest corner of Section 6, Township 120, Range 23 and running South on the section line 33 feet; thence continuing South on the section line 30 rods; thence East at right angles 16 rods to the point of beginning; thence continue East on the same line 11 feet; thence Northerly to a point 16 rods and 18 feet East of a point, which is 33 feet South from the Northwest corner of said Section 6; thence South 16 rods to the point of beginning of the land to be herein described. Wright County, Minnesota Abstract Property Agenda Page 137