1999-04-19 CC PacketALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
April 19, 1999
7:00 PM
7 Sib 1. CALL TO ORDER — ROLL CALL — ADOPT
AGENDA
2. MINUTES
• April 5, 1999, regular City Council Meeting
3. CITIZEN FORUM — (10 Minute Limit)
4. CONSENT AGENDA
(a) Approve payment of Check #'s 11651 -11673
(b) Revenue/Expenditure Report — March 1999
(c) March 1999 Financial Statement
(d) Approve Therapeutic Massage Therapist License — Deborah K. Kuntz
('a) X� /,,
5. DEPARTMENT BUSINESS
a. Public Works
• Report
b. Planning & Zoning
(1) Minor Variance Request — Don Anderson
,3 (2) Sign Variance — Savitski Commercial Building
r7g c. Engineering
(1) Feasibility Study for 62nd Street Improvements
RESOLUTION #1999-15 (Resolution Accepting Feasibility
Study and Calling for a Public Hearing on 62"d Street
Improvements)
� `Zo (2) Report on tree damages to Thomas Felker property (Greenhaven
Drainage Project)
�;as (3) f%�e�
f
d. Legal
3p (1) TIF # 11 Plan for Land of Lakes Tile Company (Review/Comment
only)
(2) Revolving Loan Fund — Proposed Standards
• Request from GEM Development Company to borrow from the
City's Revolving Loan Fund
(3) Albertville Crossings Developer's Agreement
(4) Amendment of Common Interest Community No. 20 Planned
Community Cottages of Albertville
e. Administration
(�) Pl;proval ' es outh of Affg--hay 11�—
(2) Request from Albertville Lions re: potential additional gambling site
(3) Reschedule joint meeting with St. Michael City Council — May 26`h?
Q� (4) Request from Church of St. Albert to purchase land from City
q( 30 (5) Proposed revisions to Sewage Disposal Standards for Wright County —
Council appr Val or disapproval
6. ADJOURNMENT
UPCOMING MEETINGS/IMPORTANT DATES
April 22 Public Hearing on 57�h Street Project 6:00 PM
April 26 Joint Powers Water Board Meeting 7:00 PM
May 3 Regular City Council Meeting 7:00 PM
May 10 Board of Review Meeting 7:00 PM
May 11 Regular Planning & Zoning Meeting 7:00 PM
May 17 Regular City Council Meeting 7:00 PM
May 31 Memorial Day — Legal Holiday
City Offices Closed
June 7 Regular City Council Meeting 7:00 PM
d
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
April 5, 1999
Albertville City Hall 7:00 PM
PRESENT: Mayor John Olson, Councilmembers Robert Gundersen,
Duane Berning, Patti Stalberger and John Vetsch, City Administrator -Clerk Linda
Goeb, City Attorney Mike Couri, City Planner Al Brixius and City Engineer Peter
Carlson
Mayor Olson called the regular meeting of the Albertville City Council to
order.
The agenda was amended as follows:
• Change Item 4a — Approve payment of Check #'s 11605 — 11641
• Change Item 4c — Schedule hearing for May 3 or May 17
• Add Item 5c(5) — Schedule public hearing on 57t' Street project for
April 22, 1999, at 7:00 PM
• Add under Public Works — Tree donation
Gundersen made a motion to approve the agenda as amended. Berning seconded
the motion. All voted aye.
Stalberger made a motion to approve the minutes of the March 15, 1999,
meeting as presented. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Mayor Olson asked if anyone present wished to address the Council under
the Community Forum section of the agenda. Don Jensen of Pilot Land
Development presented a letter to the city clerk regarding the proposed work on
lands south of County Road 118.
No one else present wished to address the Council.
Stalberger made a motion to approve payment of Check #'s 11605 — 11641
as presented. Berning seconded the motion.
Stalberger made a motion to approve the WWTF Monthly Operations
Report for February 1999 as presented. Berning seconded the motion. All voted
aye.
Stalberger made a motion to schedule a public hearing for TIF # 11 (Land of
Lakes Tile Co.) for either May 3 or May 17 at 7:15 PM. Berning seconded the
motion. All voted aye. `
AMW
I
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
April 5,1999
Page 2 of 8
Stalberger made a motion to approve the Revenue/Expenditure Report for
the month of January as presented. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Stalberger made a motion to approve the Revenue/Expenditure Report for
the month of February as presented. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Stalberger made a motion to approve the following liquor licenses:
Off Sale — Hack's
Off Sale, On Sale & Sunday —152 Club
Off Sale, On Sale & Sunday — Geez Sports Bar & Grill
On Sale and Sunday — KD's Family Restaurant
On Sale and Sunday — The Longshot Bar & Grill
Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Stalberger made a motion to approve the February 1999 Financial
Statement as presented. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Stalberger made a motion to approve the Therapeutic Massage Enterprise
License for the J. Nichols Salon. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council reviewed and accepted the Public Works Department Report.
Vetsch made a motion to approve a design/build construction for a salt shed
to be located at the rear of the old city hall site and to authorize the Public Works
Department to solicit quotes from several companies for the construction.
Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to authorize additional wiring in the maintenance
building portion of the old city hall at a cost not to exceed $1,000. Berning
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Councilmember Vetsch explained that a local Lions member has some trees
he would like to donate to the City if the City is willing to move those trees.
Vetsch will provide additional information to the Public Works Department before
a decision is reached.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
April 5, 1999
Page 2 of 8
Stalberger made a motion to approve the Revenue/Expenditure Report for
the month of January as presented. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Stalberger made a motion to approve the Revenue/Expenditure Report for
the month of February as presented. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Stalberger made a motion to approve the following liquor licenses:
Off Sale — Hack's
Off Sale, On Sale & Sunday —152 Club
Off Sale, On Sale & Sunday — Geez Sports Bar & Grill
On Sale and Sunday — KD's Family Restaurant
On Sale and Sunday — The Longshot Bar & Grill
Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Stalberger made a motion to approve the February 1999 Financial
Statement as presented. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Stalberger made a motion to approve the Therapeutic Massage Enterprise
License for the J. Nichols Salon. Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council reviewed and accepted the Public Works Department Report.
Vetsch made a motion to approve a design/build construction for a salt shed
to be located at the rear of the old city hall site and to authorize the Public Works
Department to solicit quotes from several companies for the construction.
Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to authorize additional wiring in the maintenance
building portion of the old city hall at a cost not to exceed $1,000. Berning
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Councilmember Vetsch explained that a local Lions member has some trees
he would like to donate to the City if the City is willing to move those trees.
Vetsch will provide additional information to the Public Works Department before
a decision is reached.
M
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
April 5, 1999
Page 4 of 8
Stalberger made a motion to approve the Findings of Fact & Decision
preliminary plat approval for the Albertville Crossings subdivision and granting
variances from the minimum lot width requirement for Lots 8, 9, and 10, Block 9.
Berning seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Vetsch made a motion to table action on final plat approval for Albertville
Crossings to the April 22nd meeting to allow staff to prepare a recommendation on
the plat. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Ken Weber, 5626 Large Avenue NE, has applied for a minor variance to
allow him to construct a 10' X 14' wood shed on the site of an existing 8' X 10'
metal shed. The existing shed is located five feet from the property line and
Weber is requesting a variance from the 10' rear yard setback requirement.
Zoning Administrator Mealhouse has visited the site and makes the
recommendation that the minor variance be granted since it will not affect
adjoining property owners.
Stalberger made a motion to grant a minor variance to Ken Weber at 5626
Large Avenue NE to allow the existing shed to be removed and a wood shed to be
constructed on the same site. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
City Attorney Couri presented the Developer's Agreements for the Cedar
Creek South 3rd Addition and the Center Oaks 4t' Addition. Both agreements are
underlying to the PUD Agreement for the Cedar Creek Master Plan.
Berning made a motion to approve the Developer's Agreement for the
Cedar Creek South 3rd Addition. Gundersen seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to approve the Developer's Agreement for the
Center Oaks 4`h Addition. Vetsch seconded the motion. All voted aye.
City Attorney Couri reviewed the Planned Unit Development Agreement
for the Cottages of Albertville Two addition. The agreement defines the 24 units
as owner -occupied, senior citizen townhomes, similar to the original PUD
agreement for the first addition of the Cottages of Albertville -Owner Occupied
Units.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
April 5, 1999
Page 6 of 8
Stalberger made a motion to approve the revised City Park/Fire Hall layout
as prepared by City Engineer Pete Carlson. Berning seconded the motion. All
voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to authorize City Engineer Carlson to prepare a
Feasibility Study for the extension of sewer and water to serve the proposed GEM
Business Park, as petitioned by the developers and by Ed Hackenmueller. The
motion further authorizes Carlson to begin plans and specs for the project.
Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Carlson presented the Cooperative Agreement for Funding as proposed by
Wright County for the installation of traffic lights at the CSAH 19/37 intersection.
City Attorney Couri recommends amending Paragraph 5 by changing the time
frame from five years to three years, as the Developer's Agreement dictates.
Couri also recommended that paragraph 6 relating to a traffic light at the
intersection of CSAH 37 and the I-94 westbound exit ramp be deleted at this time
and cost -sharing of the traffic light be negotiated when the traffic light is
necessary.
The Council directed Carlson and Couri to revise the Cooperative
Agreement as discussed and send it back to Wright County.
Vetsch made a motion to reduce the letter of credit on the Fairfield
Addition to $15,000, as recommended by City Engineer Pete Carlson. Gundersen
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council discussed the request from Thomas and Dawn Felker for
reimbursement of $750 for the damage to trees and shrubbery damaged and/or
removed due to the Greenhaven Drainage Project. Carlson showed the Council
pictures of the trees prior to their removal, most of which were located in the
drainage easement. Carlson told the Council that some trees outside of the
drainage easement were damaged by dirt falling on them.
Vetsch made a motion to deny Felker's request for reimbursement in the
amount of $750 but to grant the Felker's $300 toward the damage caused to the
trees and shrubs that were located outside of the drainage easement. Stalberger
seconded the motion. Vetsch and Stalberger voted aye. Olson, Gundersen and
Berning voted no. The motion failed.
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
April 5, 1999
Page 7 of 8
The Council asked Carlson to provide additional information on the number
and types of trees and shrubs that were damaged.
The Council received the mechanic's lien on the STMA Ice Arena and the
representatives of the Joint Powers Hockey Board will discuss the matter at their
next meeting.
The Council agreed to meet jointly with the St. Michael City Council on
Wednesday, April 28 h at 7:00 PM at the Albertville City Hall to discuss
community projects.
Gundersen made a motion to renew the $626,616.61 certificate of deposit
maturing on April 7`h for one year at the State Bank of Rogers at an interest rate of
5.15%. Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye.
Gundersen made a motion to refund the $100 park rental fee to Allen
Lenneman since he cancelled the rental the day after the rental had been arranged.
Stalberger seconded the motion. All voted aye.
City Administrator Goeb reviewed the cost -analysis report on contracting
the maintenance and operation of the wastewater and water operations in the city
vs. hiring an operator. Based on the portion of the wastewater and water contracts
with PSG allocated to wages, the report shows that the City could hire one
additional employee to operate both the water and wastewater facilities at a cost
savings of approximately $20,000 per year.
Goeb recommended that the Council continue the operations contracts with
PSG through 1999 and to begin the search for a qualified person to operate the
water and wastewater operations later in the year.
Gundersen made a motion to continue the operations of the wastewater and
water systems through PSG until December 31, 1999, and to proceed at a later
date to begin the hiring process for a water and wastewater operator. Vetsch
seconded the motion. All voted aye.
The Council directed the administrator to contact John Kolles to explain
that the Council could not lease property it does not currently own. When the City
takes ownership of the property, the Council would be favorable to leasing the
land for agricultural purposes.'
ALBERTVILLE CITY COUNCIL
April 5,1999
Page 8 of 8
Gundersen made a motion to adjourn at 9:30 PM. Berning seconded the
motion. All voted aye.
John A. Olson, Mayor
Linda Goeb, Administrator -Clerk
CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT
ae
April 19, 1999
Check No.
Vendor
Purpose
Amount
11651
Aramark Uniform
Uniform Service
$
71.09
11652
CarQuest
Monthly Charges
$
158.45
11653
Couri & MacArthur
Legal Service
$
2,832.50
11654
Crow River Farm Equipment Welding Rods/Steel
$
165.13
11655
DJ's Hardware
Monthly Charges
$
206.30
11656
Earl F. Anderson, Inc.
Repair parts for park equipment
$
120.87
11657
Eggen's
Monthly Charges
$
153.15
11658
Front tine Plus
Bunker Boots
$
328.00
11659
Gopher State One Call
Locates
$
89.25
11660
Gov't Training Service
Lane Use Planning Workshop[
$
255.00
11661
Harvest Printing
Letterhead/Envelopes
$
126.20
11662
Kennedy &Graven
TIF Legal Counsel
$
571.73
11663
Larson Publications
March Legals
$
884.58
11664
Meiny's diggers
Repairs - Water System
$
1,955.00
11665
MTI Distributing
New lawn mower
$
17,152.89
11666
NSP
Monthly Service
$
3,102.32
11667
NAC, Inc.
Planning Services
$
4,195.60
11668
Pat's 66
Monthly Charges
$
149.73
11669
Sentry Systems
Park Shelter Alarm
$
69.49
11670
Short Elliott Hendrickson
Engineering Services
$
20,287.25
11671
Superior Service
Garbage Service
$
116.27
11672
Wr. Co. Highway Dept.
Cold Mix
$
167.86
11673
Wr. Co. Treasurer
April Police
$
8,942.50
Total Bills
$
62,101.16
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT I I
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE • `IUM"'
-- ------------------------------------------
For the Period: 03/01/11 to 03/31/19 Original Budget Amended Budget YTO Actual Curr Nth Encumbered YTO Unenc. Balance I Bud
Fund:
101 General fund
Revenues
Dept: 000.000 REVENUE
310.100
Current taxes
558,853.00
SS8,853.00
1,688.88
.00
.00
557,164.12
.3
310.200
Delinquent Taxes
.00
.00
927.23
.00
.00
-927.23
.0
310.400
Tax Increments
.00
.00
.00
.00
00
.00
.0
320.110
liquor Permits
10,700.00
10,700.00
100.00
100.00
.00
10,600.00
.9
320.120
Beer Permits
200.00
200.00
60.00
.00
.00
140.00
30.0
320.130
Amusements licenses
3SO.00
3SO.00
187.50
.00
.00
162.50
53.6
320.140
Cigarette licenses
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
320.150
Sign Permits
4,200.00
4,200.00
.00
.00
.00
4,200.00
.0
320.160
Otherksioess licenses/Permits
5,000.00
S,000.00
13,029.70
MOO
.00
-8,029.70
260.6
320.210
Building Permits
3S,000.00
3S,000.00
S3,489.17
21,048.52
.00
-18,489.17
1S2.8
320,220
Aoisal licenses
100.00
100.00
ISM
.00
.00
85.00
1S.0
334.010
local Government Aid
118,S33.00
118,S33.00
.00
.00
.00
118,533.00
.0
334.020
NACA
138,1SO.00
138,1SO.00
.00
.00
.00
138,1SO.00
.0
334.030
local Performance Aid
3,008.00
3,008.00
.00
.00
.00
3,008.00
.0
334.DSD
Police Aid
7,785.00
7,78S.00
.00
.00
.00
7,78S.00
.O
334.060
Fire Aid
10,280.00
10,280.00
.00
.00
.00
10,280.00
.0
336,000
Other Gov. Units Grants 3 Aids
4,800.00
4,800.00
.00
.00
.00
4,800.00
.0
341.060
PIO/legal Descriptioe Requests
1,000.00
1,000.00
290.00
120.00
.00
710.00
29.0
341.070
Special Assessment Searches
1,000.00
1,000.00
400.00
80.00
.00
600.00
40.0
341.090
Other 'Charges for Services
1,000.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
0
341.015
Developer [serous
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
342.020
Fire Protection Services
38,000.00
38,000.00
.00
.00_
.00
38,000.00
.0
342.030
Park Rental Fees
2,000.00
2,000.00
1,100.00
500.00
.00
900.00
55.0
350.000
Fines and Forfeits
100.00
100.00
.00
.00
.00
100.00
.0
362.000
Interest Earnings
25,000.00
2S,000.00
18,904.11
2,274.12
.00
6,095.89
7S.6
364.000
Private Contributions/Donation
.00
.00
4,100.00
800.00
.00
-4,100.00
.0
372.080
Other Revenues
.00
.00
114.50
30.00
.00
-114.50
.0
391.010
Sales of General Fixed Assets
.00
.00
.00
.DO
.00
.00
.0
391.020
Insurance Recoveries
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
392,050
Transfer Out
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
39S.000
lease Payaoent
950.00
950.00
.00
.00
.00
9SO.00
.0
REVENUE
966,009.00
966,009.00
94,406.09
25,027.64
.00
871,602.91
9.8
Revenues
966,009.00
966,009.00
94,406.09
2S,027.64
.00
871,602.91
9.8
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE
REPORT
Date: 04/12/99
time;
1:07pmPage:
CITY OF
MERTYME
2
For the
Period: 03/01/99 to 03/31/99 Original
Budget
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Budget
YTO Actual
Corr Nth
Encumbered YTO
Unenc. Balance
x Bud
Fund:
101 General Food
---------------------------------------------------------------
Expenditures
Dept: 000.000 REVENUE
102.001
Nithdramal for FO Equipment
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
511.000
Nages - Regular Employees
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
S21.000
Group Insurance
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
522.000
FICA Contributions
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
S33.100
Engineer: Projects/Meetings
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
REVENUE
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
Dept: 410.100 General Government -Council
511.000
Nages - Regular Employees
11,400.00
11,400.00
2,BSO.00
9SO.00
.00
8,S50.00
2S.0
S22.000
FICA Contributions
872.00
872.00
218.07
72.69
.00
653.93
25.0
523.000
;PERA Contributions
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
526.000
Yorkers Compensation Insurance
200.00
200.00
.00
.00
.00
200.00
.0
533.900
Other Prof. Contract Services
S,000.00
5,000.00
.00
.00
.00
5,000.00
.0
S52.000
Insurance Other than Esp. gene
S,3SS.00
5,35S.00
.00
.00
.00
5,3SS.00
.0
SSS.000
Printing 3 Publications
S,500.00
5,500.00
2,977.26
1,177.87
.00
2,522.74
54.1
SS8.000
Travel
300.00
300.00
.00
.00
.00
300.00
.0
561.100
General Supplies
100.00
100.00
88.70
26.95
.00
11.30
88.7
561,300
Training/Instructional Supplys
300.00
300.00
.00
.00
.00
300.00
.0
S91.000
Dues & Subscriptions
3,000.00
3,000.00
520.00
.00
.00
2,480.00
17.3
599.000
Miscellaneous
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
599.300
Pledges/Contributions
1,000.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
General Government -Council
33,027.00
33,027.00 .
6,654.03
2,227.51
.00
26,372.97
20.1
Dept: 410.300 Gen. Govt.- City Administrator
S11.000
Nages - Regular Employees
45,OOO.00
45,000.00
12,649.38
S,192.31
.00
32,350.62
28.1
521.000
Group Insurance
S,800.00
5,800.00
1,096.56
S34.27
.00
4,703.44
18.9
S22.000
FICA Contributions
3,443.00
3,443.00
1,069.07
397.23
.00
2,373.93
31.1
S23.000
PERA Contributions
2,331.00
2,331.00
S37.90
268.95
.00
1,793.10
23.1
S2S.000
Deferred Coop- Employer Costs
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
S26.000
Yorkers Compensation insurance
200.00
200.00
-68.20
-68.20
.00
268.20
-34.1
SS2.000
Insurance Other than Esp. Rene
500.00
S00.00
.00
.00
.00
S00.00
.0
SS8.000
Travel
750.00
750.00
.00
.00
.00
750.00
.0
561.100
General Supplies
200.00
200.00
.00
.00
.00
200.00
.0
561.300
Training/Instructional Supplys
S00.00
500.00
.00
.00
.00
S00.00
.0
574.300
Capital Outlay-Fornituretttitt
.00
.00
.00
.DO
.00
.00
.0
591.000
Outs i Subscriptions
100.00
100.00
.00
.00
.00
100.00
.0
744.000
Capital Outlay - Officett;tstt
2,500.00
2,500.00
.00
.00
.00
2,S00.00
.0
Gen. Govt.-City Administrator
61,324.00
61,324.00
15,284.71
6,324.S6
.00
46039.29
24.9
Dept: 410.400 Gen. Govt.- City Clerk/Treas.
511.000
Nages - Regular Employees
22,890.00
22,880.00
2,686.04
.00
.00
20,193.96
11.7
S12.000
Nages - Temporary Emloyees
.00
.00
.00
.00
-.00
.00
.0
S13.000
Nages - Overtime
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
521.000
Group Insurance
5,650.00
5,6SO.00
.00
.00
.00
5,650.00
.0
S12.000
FICA Contributions
1,750.00
1,7SO.00
104.12
.00
.00
1,645.88
5.9
523.000
PERA Contributions
1,185.00
1,185.00
70.50
.00
.00
1,114.50
5.9
S26.000
Norkers Compensation Insurance
150.00
150.00
-68.20
-68.20
.00
219.20
-45.S
533.300
Accounting
2,500.00
2,500.00
625.00
.00
.00
1,875.00
2S.0
533.400
Auditing Services
7,000.00
7,000.00
.00
.00
.00
7,000.00
.0
S33.700
Copy Machine Maitenance
1,000.00
1,000.00
144.23
.00
.00
855.77
14.4
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE
REPORT
Date: 04/12/99
Tile:
1:07pm
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
Page:
3
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 03/01/99 to 03/31/99 Original Budget
Amended Budget
YTO Actual
Cum Nth
Encumbered YTO
Unenc. Balance
I Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 410.400 Gen. Govt.- City Clerk/Trees.
S33.900'Other Prof. Contract Services
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
543.100 Repairs/Naiateance - Egmipm:
500.00
500.00
72.SO
.00
.00
427.50
14.5
544.200 Equipment Rental
_1,000.00
1,000.00
440.23
356.23
.00
559.77
44.0
S52.000 Insurance Other than Fop. 8ene
3,150.00
3,150.00
.00
.00
.00
3,150.00
.0
S58.000 Travel
500.00
500.00
.00
.00
.00
S00.00
.0
561.100 General Supplies
3,300.00
3,300.00
165.73
112.17
.00
3,134.27
5.0
561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys
300.00
300.00
.00
.00
.00
300.00
.0
561.400 Postage
1,200.00
1,200.00
257.50
.00
.00
942.50
21.5
574.300 Capital Outlay-Foraituremill
200.00
200.00
.00
.00
.00
200.00
.0
S91.000 Does I Subscriptions
SO.00
50.00
.00
.00
.00
SO.00
.0
S92.000 Elections
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
_00
.0
744.000 Capital Outlay - OfficeMIM
2,000.00
2,000.00
.00
.00
.00
2,000.00
.0
Gen. Govt.- City Clerk/Trees.
S4,315.00
S4,31S.00
4,497.65
400.20
.00
49,817.35
8.3
Dept: 410.550 Gen. Govt.- Assessing
S31.100 Assessing ContractServices8,500.00
8,500.00
.00
.00
.00
8,500.00
.0
Gen. Govt.- Assessing
8,500.00
8,500.00
.00
.00
.00
8,500.00
.0
Dept: 410.600 Gen. Govt. - City Attorney
533.500 legal Service: General/Neeting
1S,000.00
15,000.00
3,272.50
1,347.50
.00
11,727.50
21.8
S33.SO1 Developer Reimborsible
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
S33.502 Reimbursible - Capital Project
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
S53.500
.00
.00
2,464.50
.00
.00
-2,464.50
.0
Gen. Govt. - City Attorney
15,000.00
15,000.00
5,737.00
1,347.50
.00
9,263.00
38.2
Dept: 410.700 City Engineer
533.100 Engineer: Projects/Meetings
20,000.00
20,000.00
10,403.90
5,414.40
.00
9,596.10
52.0
533.101 Reimbmrsible - developer
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
S33.102 Reimbursible -Capital Projects
.00
.00
1S,33S.00
3,185.00
.00
-15,33S.00
.0
City Engineer
20,000.00
20,000.00
25,738.90
B,599.40
.00
-S,738.90
128.7
Dept: 410.800 Economic Development Authority
511.000 Nages - Regular Employees
480.00
480.00
.00
.00
.00
480.00
.0
522.000 FICA Contributions
37.00
37.00
.00
.00
.00
37.00
.0
S58.000 Travel
100.00
100.00
.00
.00
.00
100.00
.0
S61.100 General Supplies
100.00
100.00
.00
.00
.00
100.00
.0
561.300 Training/Instructional Supplys
100.00
100.00
.00
.00
.00
100.00
.0
599.000 Miscellaneous
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
599.100 TIF local Contributions
S,000.00
S,000.00
.00
.00
.00
5,000.00
.0
Economic Development Authority
5,817.00
5,817.00
.00
.00
.00
5,817.00
.0
Dept: 410.910 Gen. Govt. - Planning 3 Zoning
S11.000 Nages - Regular Employees
1,200.00
1,200.00
300.00
100.00
.00
900.00
25.0
Si5.000 Nages - Zoning Administrator
15,600.00
1S,600.00
.00
.00
.00
15,600.00
.0
S22.000 FICA Contributions
1,193.00
1,193.00
22.95
7.65
.00
1,170.05
1.9
S33.600 Planners City Projects/Neeting
6,000.00
6,000.00
4,631.OS
497.70
.00
1,368.95
77.2
533.601 Reimbursible - Developer
.00
.00
2,000.62
289.00
.00
-2,000.62
.0
SS8.000 Travel
SOO.00
500.00
.00
.00
.00
500.00
.0
REVENUE/EXPENOITURE REPORT
Date: 04/12/11
Tine: 1:07pm
CITY OF ALBERTVIIIE Page: 4
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 03/01/19 to 03/31/99 Original Budget Amended Budget YTO Actual Curr Nth Encumbered YTO Unenc. Balance I Bud
Fund: 101 General Food
Expenditures
Dept: 410.910 Gen. Govt. - Planning I Zoning
S61.100 General Supplies 200.00 200.00 .00 .00 .00 200.00 .0
561.300 Training/Tnstrmctional Supplys 500.00 S00.00 .00 .00 .00 SOO.00 .0
----------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ ------
Gen. Govt. - Planning i Zoning 2S,193.00 2S,193.00 6,954.62 894.35 .00 18,238.38 27.6
Dept: 410.920 Gen. Govt. - Buildings 3 Plant
S42.000
Refuse Disposal
600.00
600.00
163.48
S8.14
.00
436.52
27.2
543.100
Repairs/Nainteance - Equiptttt
SOO.00
500.00
iS.96
1S.96
.00
484.04
3.2
S43.200
Repairs/Naiateance - Building
4,004.00
4,000.00
1,02S.98
1,02S.98
.00
2,974.02
2S.6
5S2.000
Insurance Other than top. Sine
3,710.00
3,780.00
.00
.00
.00
3,780.00
.0
SS3.000
Telephone
2,SOO.DO
2,S00.00
SOS.41
259.32
.00
1,994.59
20.2
S61.000
.00
.00
49.03
.00
.00
-49.03
.0
S61.100
General Supplies
1,200.00
1,200.00
79.80
30.44
.00
1,120.20
6.7
562.100
Natural Gas
1,500.00
1,500.00
244.53
100.22
.00
1,2SS.47
16.3
S62.200
Electricity
2,500.00
2,500.00
S13.71
24.01
.00
1,986.29
20.S
S62.600
Gasoline and Oil
.00
.OD
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
S72.000
Capital Outlay - Buildimgstttt
1,000.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
S73.000
Capital Outlay/Non-buildfngstt
1,000.00
1,000.00
163.99
163.99
.00
836.01
16.4
S74.100
Capital Outlay-Mach/Eg6pttt1r
500.00
SOO.00
.00
.00
.00
S00.00
.0
S74.300
Capital Outlay-Furaiteretttttt
1,000.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
S99.000
Miscellaneous
S00.00
SOO.00
.00
.00
.00
500.00
.0
-----------------
Gen. Govt. - Buildings i Plant
-----------------
20,SBO.00
-----------------
20,SBO.00
-----------------
2,761.89
-----------------
1,678.06
-----------------
.00
17,818.11
------
13.4
Dept: 421.000 Public Safety - Police
S31.200
Police Contract Services
107,310.00
107,310.00
26,827.50
26,827.50
.00
80,482.SO
2S.0
-----------------
Public Safety - Police
-----------------
107,310.00
-----------------
107,310.00
-----------------
26,827.50
-----------------
26,827.50
-----------------
.00
80,482.50
------
2S.0
Dept: 422.000 Public Safety - Fire
SiD.200
gages - Fire Chief
1,000.00
1,000.00
.00
.DO
.00
1,000.00
.0
S10.300
gages - Assistant Fire Chief
S00.00
S00.00
.00
.00
.00
S00.00
.0
S10.400
Firemen's Training Reimburseet
9,000.00
9,000.00
.00
.00
.00
9,000.00
.0
510.500
firemen's Nedical Training
2,SOO.00
2,S00.00
.00
.00
.00
2,SOO.00
.0
512.000
gages - Temporary Emloyees
9,450.00
9,450.00
1,267.00
.00
.00
8,183.00
13.4
S24.000
Pension Fund Contributions
15,266.00
15,266.00
.00
.00
.00
IS,266.00
.0
526.000
Yorkers Compensation Insurance
3,000.00
3,000.00
-68.20
-68.20
.00
3,068.20
-2.3
S21.000
Uniform Service
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
529.001
Firemen Physicalstnummit
600.00
600.00
.00
.00
.00
600.00
.0
S29.100
Training/Instruction
4,000.00
4,000.00
1,805.00
.00
.00
2,195.00
45.1
529.200
ENT Trainingsttttttstt mml
800.00
800.00
175.00
.00
.00
625.00
- 21.9
S29.300
First Responders Traininguut
1,050.00
1,050.00
.00
.00
.00
1,050.00
.0
S33.410
Audit - Firemen's Relief Assoc
1,260.00
1,260.00
.00
.00
.00
1,260.00
.0
S43.100
Repairs/Nainteance - Equiptttt
1,SO0.00
1,500.00
676.34
126.40
.00
823.66
45.1
543.200
Repairs/Nainteance- Building
.DO
.DO
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
S52.000
Insurance Other than Fop. Rene
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
553.000
Telephone
600.00
600.00
101.80
47.80
.00
498.20
17.0
5S8.000
Travel
1,S00.00
1,S00.00
.00
.00
.00
1,S00.00
.0
S61.100
General Supplies
3,000.00
3,000.00
139.95
.00
.00
2,860.OS
4.7
S62.100
Natural Gas
1,400.00
1,400.00
439.85
180.21
.00
940.15
31.4
562.200
Electricity
900.00
900.00
1S7.78
.00
.00
742.22
17.5
562.600
Gasoline and Oil
800.00
800.00
97.17
49.25
.00
702.83
12.1
572.000
Capital Outlay - 8uildingsttst
30,000.06
30,000.00
.00
.00
.00
30,000.00
.0
i
k
REVENUE/EIPENOITURE
REPORT
Date: 04/12/91
Time:
1:07pm
CITY OF
ALBERTVILLE
Page:
S
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the
Period: 03/01/99 to 03/31/99 Original
Budget
Amended Budget
YTO Actual
Carr Nth
Encumbered YTO
Unenc. Balance
I Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 422.000 Public Safety - Fire
574.110
C/O - Nosetttttttttttttttttttt
1,500.00
1,500.00
.00
.00
.00
1,500.00
.0
S74.120
C/O - Turnout Gearttttsstttstt
2,S00.00
2,S00.00
.00
.00
.00
2,S00.00
.0
574.130
C/O - Air Packsttttttstttttttt
2,600.00
2,600.00
64.00
.00
.00
2,536.00
2.5
S74.140
C/O - PagerswISMtttt UM
1,000.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
574.150
C/0 - Tools
1,000.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
S74.160
C/O - Toolsttttttttttttttttttt
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
S74.200
Capital Outlay - Vehiclesttttt
30,000.00
30,000.00
.00
.00
.00
30,000.00
.0
S91.000
Ones l Subscriptions
200.00
200.00
.00
.00
.00
200.00
.0
Public Safety - Fire
126,926.00
126,926.00
4,S5S.69
335.46
.00
122,070.31
3.8
Dept: 424.000 Public Safety -Bldg. Inspection
S33.200
Bldg. Inspection Contract Sery
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
535.100
Contracted Services
.00
.00
18,279.S8
8,912.23
.00
-----------------
-18,274.58
.0
------
-----------------
Public Safety -Bldg. Inspection
-----------
.00
---------------------
.00
-----------------
18,279.58
-----------------
8,912.23
..00
-18,279.58
.0
Dept: 427.000 Public Safety - Animal Control
53S.100
Contracted Services
3,000.00
3,000.00
405.00
54.00
.00
2,S95.00
13.5
------
-----------------
Public Safety - Animal Control
-----------------
3,000.00
-----------------
3,000.00
-----------------
405.00
-------
S4.00
--------------------------
.00
2,59S.00
13.5
Dept: 431.000 Public Narks-Nighmays,Streets
S11.000
gages - Regular Employees
33,135,00
33,135.00
8,906.34
3,720.00
.00
24,228.66
26.9
S12.000
gages - Temporary Emloyees
2,000.00
2,000.00
.00
.00
.00
2,000.00
.0
513.000
gages - Overtime
500.00
500.00
.00
.00
.00
S00.00
.0
S21.000
Group Insurance
S,640.00
5,650.00
1,083.96
534.27
.00
4,S96.04
18.7
S22.000
FICA Contributions
2,726.00
2,726.00
681.34
284.58
.00
2,044.66
2S.0
S23.000
PERA Contributions
1,846.00
1,846.00
461.34
192.69
.00
1,384.66
2S.0
S26.000
Norkers Compensation Insurance
2,470.00
2,470.00
-68.20
-68.20
.00
2,538.20
-2.8
S27.000
Uniform Service
750.00
750.00
95.04
28.66
.00
654.96
12.7
533.900
Other Prof. Contract Services
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
S43.100
Repairs/Mainteance - Equiptttt
9,000.00
9,000.00
903.02
366.69
.00
8,096.98
10.0
543.200
Repairs/Mainteaace - Building
3,000.00
3,000.00
.00
.00
.00
3,000.00
.0
S43.300
Repairs/Maintenace-Paved Roads
.DO
.00
111.70
.00
.00
-111.70
.0
S43.310
Ice Removal
3,000.00
3,000.00
.00
.00
.00
3,000.00
.0
543.320
Snor Ploving
6,500.00
6,500.00
2,640.00
.00
.00
3,860.00
40.6
543.330
Sand 3 Gravel
700.00
700.00
.00
.00
.00
700.00
.O
543.340
Seal Coatingtttxxtttuusttttt
8,000.00
8,000.00
.00
.00
.00
8,000.00
.0
543.340
Street Sreeping
3,500.00
3,S00.00
.00
.00
.00
3,500.00
.0
S43.400
Repairs/Mainteeace-Unpaved Rds
6,000.00
6,000.00
111.70
.00
.00
5,888.30
1.9
543.S00
Reapir/Maintenance - Sidevalks
5,000.00
S,000.00
.00
.00
.00
S,000.00
.0
543.600
Repairs/Maintenance-Catch8asin
3,000.00
3,000.00
.00
.00
.00
3,000.00
.0
544.200
Equipment Rental
.00
.00
300.00
300.00
.00
-300.00
.0
SS3.000
Telephone
750.00
750.00
133.55
73.83
.00
616.45
17.8
5S8.000
Travel
100.00
100.00
.00
.00
.00
100.00
.0
561.100
General Supplies
2,800.00
2,800.00
903.33
120.73
.00
1,896.67
32.3
561.300
Training/Instructional Supplys
7SO.00
150.00
20.00
20.00
.00
730.00
2.7
S62.100
Natural Gas
900.00
100.00
147.02
60.47
.00
752.98
16.3
S61.200
Electricity
275.00
17S.00
S2.59
.00
.00
222.41
19.1
S62.600
Gasoline and Oil
3,S00.00
3,SOO.00
640.51
166.53
.00
2,859.49
18.3
572.000
Capital Outlay - Buildingmtt
15,000.00
15,000.00
.00
.00
.00
15,000.00
.0
574.111
Tractor/loadertuttuttttuttt
5,000.00
5,000.00
.00
.00
.00
5,000.00
.0
REVENUE/EMPENOIIURE REPORT
Date: 04/17/99
Tiae:
1:07pe
CITY OF
ALBERTVIIIE
Page:
6
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the
Period: 03/01/99 to 03/31/99
Original Budget
Aaended Budget
YTO Actual
Curr Nth
Enceabered YTO
Unenc. Balance
I Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FuAd:
101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept:
431.000 Public Yorks-Nigkvays,Streets
574.170
Street Overlayeeotststssustss
50,000.00
50,000.00
15,592.80
.00
.00
34,407.20
31.2
S74.180
Street SigAstssssssusssssssss
SOO.00
SOO.00
.00
.00
.00
500.00
.0
574.211
Noverstsxtmmstlsstsssuus
3,000.00
3,000.00
.00
.00
.00
3,000.00
.0
S74.311
PickUpttsuutstttummstts
7,000.00
7,000.00
.00
.00
.00
7,000.00
.O
574.411
SOON Plowls;litttttit mm
IS,000.00
15,000.00
.00
.00
.00
15,000.00
.0
574.S11
Rise. C/O Equipseotstussssstt
2,S00.00
2,S00.00
129.70
929.70
.00
1,570.30
37.2
591.000
Dues I Subscriptions
2S0.00
250.00
230.00
.00
.00
20.00
92.0
------
Public Voris -Nighuays,Streets
----------------------------------
204,102.00
-----------------
204,102.00
-----------------
33,845.74
-----------------
6,729.95
-----------------
.00
170,256.26
16.6
Dept: 431.400 Public Voris - Street lighting
562.200 Electricity 30,000.00 30,000.00 8,100.96 2,816.86 .00 21,899.04 27.0
Public Voris - Street lighting 30,000.00 30,000.00 8,100.96 2,816.86 .00 21,899.04 27.0
Dept: 432.300 Public Voris - Recycling
535.100 Contracted Services 17,500.00
561.100 General Supplies .00
-----------------
Public Voris - Recycling
Dept: 451.000 Parks and Recreation
511.000 gages - Regular Esployees
513.000 gages - Overtiae
521.000 Group Insurance
522.000 FICA Contributions
523.000 PIRA Contributions
S26.000 Norkers Cospeasatioa Insurance
527.000 Uoifora Service
542,000 Refuse Disposal
543.100 Repairs/Naioteance - Equipttst
543.200 Repairs/Nainteance - Building
544.200 Equipment Rental
SS2.000 Insurance Other than Esp. Beat
553.000 Telephone
SS8.000 Travel
561.100 General Supplies
561,300 Training/Instructional Supplys
562.100 Natural Gas
562.200 Electricity
562.600 Gasoline and Oil
S72.000 Capital Outlay - Buildiagstslt
573.000 Capital Outlay/Non-buildiogsst
574.100 Capital Outlay-Nach/Equipsuts
S99.000 Miscellaneous
599.200 Assessments on City Property
Parks and Recreation
17,S00.00
17,500.00
4,310.50
1,547.75
.00 13,189.50 24.6
.00
1,994.21
.00
.00-1,994.21 .0
--------------------------
17,500.00
-----------------
6,304.71
-----------------
1,547.75
----------------- ------
.00 11,19S.29 36.0
33, 280.00
33, 280.00
8,805.02
3,840.00
.00
24, 474.98
26.5
S00.00
500.00
.00
.00
.00
500.00
.0
5,800.00
5,800.00
1,053.98
S34.28
.00
41746.02
18.2
2,546.00
2,546.00
673.58
293.76
.00
1,872.42
26.S
1,724.00
1,724.00
456.08
198.90
.00
1,267.92
26.5
2,600.00
2,600.00
-68.20
-68.20
.00
2,668.20
-2.6
MOM
750.00
9S.OS
28.66
.00
654.95
12.7
600.00
600.00
163.48
58.13
.00
436.52
27.2
3,000.00
3,000.00
209.80
18.72
.00
2,790.20
7.0
1,000.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
2,S00.00
2,500.00
1S4.46
.00
.00
2,345.54
6.2
3,46S.00
3,465.00
.00
.00
.00
3,46S.00
.0
700.00
700.00
148.32
S3.53
.00
551.68
21.2
200.00
200.00
.00
.00
.00
200.00
.0
2,000.00
2,000.00
209.26
20.00
.00
1,790.74
10.5
200.00
200.00
115.00
115.00
.00
85.00
S7. S
1,500.00
1,500.00
30S.57
113.83
.00
1,194.43
20.4
2,700.00
2,700.00
514.68
23.25
.00
2,18S.32
19.1
MOM
250.00
.00
.00
.00
250.00
.0
1,000.00
1,000.00
.00
.00
.00
1,000.00
.0
9,500.00
9,500.00
.00
.00
.00
9,500.00
.0
20,000.00
20,000.00
.00
.00
.00
20,000.00
.0
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.0
3,800.00
3,800.00
.00
-----------------
.00
-----------------
.00
-----------------
3,800.00
.0
------
----------------------
99,615.00
----------- -----------------
99,615.00
12,836.08
5,229.86
.00
86,778.92
12.9
Dept: 455.000 Culture/Recreation
591.000 Dues 5 Subscriptions .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .0
595.000 Friendly City Days Donation 4,250.00 4,250.00 .00 .00 .00 4,250.00 .0
597.000 Ice Arena Funding 15,000.00 15,000.00 .00 .00 .00 15,000.00 .0
REVENUE/EXPENDITURE REPORT
Date: 04/12/19
Time: 1:07pn
CITY OF ALBERTVIt1E
Page:
7
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Period: 03/01/91 to 03/31/91
Original Budget
Amended Budget
YTO Actual
Curr Nth
Encumbered YTO
Unenc. Balance
I Bud
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fund: 101 General Fund
Expenditures
Dept: 455.000 Culture/Recreation
591.300 Pledges/Contributions
ISOM
1S0.00
.00
.00
.00
750.00
.0
Culture/Recreation
----------------------------------
20,000.00
----------------------------------
20,000.00
.00
-----------------
.00
-----------------
.00
20,000.00
------
.0
Dept: 410.000 lurking Capital
590.000 Norkiog Capital Reserve
73,900.00
73,800.00
.00
.00
.00
73,900.00
.0
S90.t00 Capital Projects
40,000.04
40,000.00
.00
.DO
.00
40,000.00
.0
lurking Capital
----------------------------------
113,800.00
-----------------
113,840.00
-----------------
.00
-----------------
.00
-----------------
.00
113,800.00
------
.0
Expenditures
----------------------------------
966,009.00
-----------------
966,001.00
-----------------
171,084.06
-----------------
73,925.19
-----------------
.00
786,924.94
------
18.5
Net Effect for General Fund
----------------------------------
.00
-----------------
.00
-----------------
-84,677.17
-----------------
-48,817.55
-----------------
.00
84,677.97
------
.0
Change is Fund Balance:
.00
Grand Total Net Effect:
.00
.00
-84,677.17
-48,897.55
.00
84,677.97
.0
YC
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
March 1— March 31,1999
Beginning Cash Balance February 28,1999 $378,403.88
Income:
Building Permits
77,079.29
Business Licenses
75.00
Donations
2,300.00
Insurance Rebate
341.00
Interest
422.22
Liquor Licenses
100.00
Loan Repayment
689.06
Meter Sale
850.00
Park Rent
500.00
Planning Fees
4,050.00
PID/Legal
120.00
Special Assessment PayOff
250.00
Title Search
80.00
Utility Bills
1,114.06
WAC Fees
9,100.00
Water Sales
58.66
Miscellaneous
45.00
Total Income
979174.29
Voided Check # 11545
918.27
Expenses:
Check #'s 11525 - 11536
31,816.13
(Approved 2/l/99)
Check #'s 11543-11584
75,540.87
(Approved 3/15/99)
Preapproved Checks
16,510.69
Total Expenses 1239,867.69
Ending Cash Balance March 31,1999 $352,628.75
INVESTMENTS
CD #9226 — Development Corporation — matures 4/23/99
CD #300373 — (AFD) matures 7/l/99
CD #22202 matures 4/7/00 @ 5.15%
Dain Bosworth Investments (3/31/99)
TOTAL UNVESTMENTS
Money Market Savings Account (3/31/99)
7,960.60
21,364.96
626,616.61
1,322,465.33
$1,978,407.50
491,866.48
PreApproved Checks for March
1999
Check No. Vendor
Purpose
'Amount
11537-11539 Regular Payroll
$
3,137.47
11540 MN Dept. of Revenue
February Income Taxes
$
362.62
11541 PERA
Pay Period 2/13 -2/26
$
422.09
11542 Security State Bank
February Federal Taxes
$
2,718.57
11585-11587 Regular Payroll
$
3,137.47
11588 B & B Roofing
Replaces Check #11545
$
697.25
11589 PERA
Pay Period 2/27 - 3/12
$
422.09
11590 VOID
$
_
11591 Albertville Villains
Lions Donation
$
1,500.00
11592-11594 Regular Payroll
$
3,143.47
11592-11594 Council/P&Z Payroll
February
$
969.66
TOTAL
$
16,510.69
Ald
SECTION IV. IF APPLYING FOR THERAPEUTIC MASSAGE THERAPIST
LICENSE, PLEASE COMPLETE THIS SECTION:
Social Security Number:
Weight: 130 _ Height: 5 4 Color Hair AIDA Eye Color
Current Employer: M 4.___--
Please submit evidence of the following:
a. Current insurance coverage over $1,000,000 for professional liability in the
practice of massage.
b. Affiliation with, employment by or owner of a therapeutic massage enterprise
licensed by the city.
c. Completion of 400 hours of certified therapeutic massage training from a
recognized school that has been approved by the City Council.
d. One year experience practicing massage as established by an affidavit and must
document within two years of obtaining the license that you have completed 400
hours of certified therapeutic massage training from a recognized school.
Signatureof Applicant 39
FIL"ILcuo;. / I
ccj
The undersigned, having filed an application with the City of Albertville for a
Shl� ptu�fi+ �. Mean�gb license, realizing that the City has need to investigate the
background and history dF the applicant in order to better evaluate his or her application
for the above license, does hereby authorize and request every law enforcement official
and every other person, firm, officer, corporation, association, organization or institution
having control of any documents, records, or other information pertaining to me to
famish the original or copies of such documents, records and other information to the
City or any of its representatives to inspect and make copies of any such documents,
records and other information, I further authorize any such persons to answer any
inquiries, questions, or interrogations concerning the undersigned which my be submitted
to them by the City or its authorized representative, I fully understand that the
information so obtained by the City may be used by it in its evaluation of my application.
I hereby release and exonerate any person who shall; comply tithe the authorization and
request made herein from any and all liability of every nature and kind growing out of an
in any way ping to the furnishing or inspection of such documents, records, and
other information.
Dated this 'l day of/t� Air ( ;1999
Signature of Applicant: (9A,6yrrah K J�.wiYT
PLEASE PRINT:
Name: KAW 4 Un+
Fast Middle Last Name
FW4 _"
,. LAY♦ YN
PINIa•
Date of Birth:
Name of Organization Associated With:
I '
Northern Li
School of Massage Therapy
March 31, 1999
To Whom it May Concern:
Deborah Kuntz has completed over 400 hours of our 600 hour massage therapy training
program. She is expected to graduate in June of this year. If you have further questions, please
do not hesitate to call me.
Sin ly,
Deni Dautis
Dean of Students
612/379-3822 1313 SE Fifth Street, Suite 209, Minneapolis, MN 55414
fax: 612/379-5971
n
■ �_.
attter'tan mamiast Qerapp Sm9otiatiW
1998 -1999
This verifies that
Deborah Kuntz
is an Associate member in good standing of the American Massage Therapy Association and is hereby granted this
certificate of membership.
In witness whereof, this Officer has affixed her hand.
E. Houston LeBrun
Organized 1943-Incorporated in the State of Delaware 1960. This verification expires"50/1999
saagl3 palaAaag •sat41AIlau s,zaldLgD tnoA ut uot;edTDI sled
tuoU) A(IietuI d epgy� puL ;uauzaAtonut u$nojui uoi;L aosse
avail?eald
mugaZ uoasnog g
k a4aadduuoj pUV a VD o; pa};iuzWo'
uolpaloossd Ade.IetLL eBesseW uealiewb
•U.VIII puV IFIVI p a9vald
-pie:) digszaquzaW inoA st stu,I,
znoA upim zaulied an1139 ue aulooaq o} noA
a$Linoaua aM •uoimaossV Adlexaq.L aSLsspW
uLauatuV au; ;o ;aoddns inoA zo; noA xueq.L
AVDSSV U0TIP3jJ!SSPjD
85508 # .zagwaW
t:P"-t0Z09 siouijJI 'uO4SuLIng
001 a4!% 'paj4S STAsQ 0Z8
uollelaossd Xdeaeyl
efiesseW ueolaawv
� r
City of Albertville
TO: Mayor and City Council
FROM: Tim Guimont, Public Works
DATE: April 15, 1999
SUBJECT: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT REPORT
• Struts Street sweeping has been completed. We started crackseaiing due
to inclement weather we were unable to finish. We should finish by the end
of April 19, 1999,
• P s Most all of the parks and grass areas have been aerated and
fertilized
• Lawn Mower New Taro mower is here.
• Salt Shed I have received two bids for the salt shed building. They came in
around the same amount of $10,000. We are still waiting for a couple more
bids to come in.
• LMC Ken and I attended a League of Minnesota Cities Loss Control
Workshop held in St. Cloud on Wednesday, April 14, 1999. It was a very
informative workshop.
TG:bmm
CITY OF ALBERTV LLE 4-7-99
Applicants Name: Donald Anderson
Request: Donald Anderson has requested a 5 (five) foot minor variance to the required
side yard setback in a R 1 zoning district Section 3300.6 (c) (2) a. of the City of
Albertville Zoning Ordinance requires a 10 (ten) foot side yard setback from the property
line. Mr. Andersons home is presently 20 (twenty) feet from the west side property line, he
is proposing to build a 15'x15' three season porch on the existing deck on the west side of
his home. Section 1105 (a) (3) of the Zoning) Ordinance does allow only uncovered
porches to encroach not more than 5 (five) feet into the required side yard setback.
Recommendation: Based on the above information and the fact that the existing lot size or
budding location do not cause undue hardship I would recommend that the minor variance
request be denied.
If you have any questions please feel free to contact me at 295-6099
Kevin Mealhouse
Zoning Administrator
CITY OF AL 3ERTVII.LE ■ ZONING REQUEST APPLICATION
5975 Main Avenue NE Case No:
P.O. Box 9 Base Fee: Pd
Albertville, MN 55301-0009 EscrowAmt: Pd.
(612) 497-3384 fax(612) 497-3210 DateFiled:
Please read carefully and answer all questions thoroughly. Only complete applications will be accepted after validation by
the City Clerk and prior to acceptance of required processing fees/deposits.
Street Location of Property;(IrC
Legal Description of Property
(Attach additional shy V nec mu-y):
Owner: Name: )b tit 11 LJ %y AJ
Address: �91�,2 16='J /end .- e
city. , bU &"ie-7-y 1 L C State: ��-, zip:
Telephone (Home): 4-r-7 - ,�ga'i' (Business): 7 (Fax): f 7 -
Applicant (If other than owner):
Name:
City: State:
Telephone(Home): (Business):
Type of Request(s):
Zip:
(Fax):
Site and Building Plan Review Rezoning
Minor Subdivision/Consolidation _ C� Variance C .A(,,.R,
Preliminary Plat Conditional Use Permit
Final Plat Interim Use Permit
Comprehensive Plan or Other
Ordinance Amendment Description of Request(s): la r i CwtCe ��o M 5�Cycv^ 1 Se
?k c,1 L (401) 5` / 6-67 f AGu ti ; f o
.fjd C' 1&,4 y t ;k, L"c,,a - /lc y ��,%t'j /v'
Reason Why Request Should Be Granted: � c 9 S H O �S e �Jf-�1 �� i C-'� ` eS
JxC, -(o be 0-) 'S Ld le 0 -C 1-6j n s '? -'-c
Page Two, City of Albertville Planning/Zoning Application
Existing of the Property / Nature of Facility or Business: 9-1—
If
When?
Project Name, Vappliicable:
I hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the information and materials submitted with this application
are in compliance with City Ordinance and Policy Requirements and are complete and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
1 understand that the application will be processed for the next available meeting agenda after review of the information
submitted to determine if any other data is needed and after completion of a staff report.
I understand that all City incurred professional fees and expenses associated with the processing of this request are the
responsibility of the property owner and/or applicant and should be promptly paid If payment is not received from the
applicant, the property owner acknowledges and agrees to be responsible for the unpaid fee balance either by direct
payment or a special assessment against the property.
(If the property fee owner is not the applicant, the applicant must provide written authorization by the owner to make
application.)
Sixty (60) Day Waiver: The City hereby notifies the applicant that development review may not be completed within the
required 60 days due to public hearing requirements and agency review, therefore, the City is taking an automatic 60-
day extension for development review. Development review will be completed within 120 days unless additional review
extensions are approved by the applicant:
Signature(s) of Owner(s): Zl/ Date: G'` —
47
Signature(s) of Applicant(s):
Date:
Date: -
Approved Denied by the Planning Commission on:
(date)
Approved Denied by the City Council on:
(date)
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE 4-8-99
Applicants Name: Mike Savitsid
Request: Mike Savitsld has requested a variance to install 3 (three) 4'x8' wall signs on the
west side of his building located on 61st sheet. Section 10 Subd. 4. of the City of
Albertville Sign ordinance allows each tenant in a multiple tenant building to display a
business sign on the front of the building. (Building front is defined as the side of the
building that fronts the public right-of-way).
Because this building is unique in the fact that there are tenant spaces with separate
entrances on the side of the building, I believe that approval of this variance request should
be granted with the following restrictions.
1. No more than 3 (three) 4'x$' signs be permitted on the west side of the building.
2. All signs must be located at the same height.
3. no ovarian for signs are granted for this building
Kevin Mealhouse
Zoning Adminastator
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE ■ ZONING REQUEST APPLICATION
5975 Main Avenue NE
P.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301-0009
(612)497-3384 fax(612)497-3210
Case No:
Base Fee: 5'570. 6D Pd.
EscrowAmt• Pd.
DateFt`led:
Please read carefully and answer all questions thoroughly. Only complete applications will be accepted after validation by
the City Clerk and prior to acceptance of required processing fees/deposits.
Street Location of Property:
Legal Description of Property
(Attach additional died if necessary):
Address: /oj�
city, /L/.�' State: Zip:.s37
Telephone ftmc): (/3 cl9f - (Business): 1/? 7 (Fax); 97-- 50l0
Applicant (If other than owner):
Name:
Address:
City: State: Zip:
Telephone(Home): (Business): (Fax):
Type of Request(s):
Site and Building Plan Review Rezoning
Minor Subdivision/Consolidation _ f Variance
Preliminary Plat Conditional Use Permit
Final Plat Interim Use Permit
Comprehensive Plan or Other
Ordinance Amendment
Description of Request(s):
Reason Why Request Should Be Granted:
Page Two, City of Albertville PI Application
Existing Use of the Property / Nature of Facility usiness: &&-2=
If a request for a planningfaoning action on the subject site or any part thereof has been previously sought, please
describe it below:
What?
When?
Project Name, if appbcable:
I hereby apply for the above consideration and declare that the information and materials submitted with this application
are in compliance with City Ordinance and Policy Requirements and are complete and accurate to the best of my
knowledge.
I understand that the application will be processed for the next available meeting agenda after review of the information
submitted to determine if any other data is needed and after completion of a staff report.
I understand that all City incurred professional fees and expenses associated with the processing of this request are the
responsibility of the property owner and/or applicant and should be promptly paid If payment is not received from the
applicant, the property owner acknowledges and agrees to be responsible for the unpaid fee balance either by direct
payment or a special assessment against the property.
(If the property fee owner is not the applicant, the applicant must provide written authorization by the owner to make
application.)
Sixty (60) Day Waiver: The City hereby notifies the applicant that development review may not be completed within the
required 60 days due to public leearing requirements and agency review, therefore, the City is taking an automatic 60-
day exMnsiun for development review. Development review be completed within 120 days unless additional review
extensions are approved by the applicanj(
Signature(s) of Owner(s):
Signature(s) of Applicant(s):
D
s�
Date:
Date:.
Date:
Approved Denied by the Planning Commission on: - Y//'I /,?"-/
( e)
Approved Denied by the City Council on:
(date)
♦ J.
CITY OF ALBERTVH LE
COUNTY OF VARiCEIT
STATE OF MiNNFSOTA
RESOLUTION # 1999-.U—
WHEREAS, the A%ermBe City Council has received a &astibility study
he City t,'f 14 ...«i .»a to 14; cost to pave► 1 « ..}f1en«City wd=Wn t.«t ft
:,rf = lutetswe 94, east through s Street ali► .w s-,►i iw County Higirwayand
«r...f.Asmtory sewer«. ►ilt x= •' i +11 ► ►+rtf ►il in r t .. east Lff « ..". County
fthway 37, all:::# Li1?«i « .: Et..+tfs: located If1Ul the t of Albertville;and
The Enginea's fessilft study is hereby received and accepted by the Albertville
city council.
public hearing " sball be heard ► onsaid Flk it « - :il/ .tk on the '' day of
1999, at !2�a pxa., at the City Hall and the clerk shall hwe
«1-: ' « and« «. sSenoticeofsuch heating and flit« f :rlile ►..as required by
AbOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCEL OF THE CITY OF ALBERWELLE THIS
ATTEST:
Linda Loeb, City Clerk
John Olson, Mayor
5do
Development Program approved by
City Council ,1999
TIF Plan, TIF District No. 11 approved by
City Council ,1999
MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.1 "
and
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.11
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA
May .1999
This Instrument Drafted by.
RENNE'DY & GRAVEN, CHARTERED (SJB)
470 Pillsbury Center
200 South Sixth Street
Min lis, Minnesota 55442
Telephone: (612) 337--9340
sts-16W4
ataxy -is
SECTION I. MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT,PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICTNO.11........................................ ...... ..........1
Subsection 1.1. Definitions ...................................
Subsection 1.2. Statement and Finding of Public Purpose ........................................................... 2
Subsection 1.3. Statutory Authority................................................................ . ............. 2
Subsection 1.4. Statement of Objectives ................................................ ..... .. ..... . 3
Subsection 1.5. Estimated Public Costs and Supportive Data ...................................................... 4
Subsection 1.6. Environmental Controls .................................................. 4
Subsection 1.7. Proposed Reuse of Property ............................................. ......................... 4
Subsection 1.8 Public Improvements and Facilities to be Constructed Within
Development District No. 1 .................. ... 4
Subsection 1.9. Administration and Maintenance of the Development District ........................... 4
Subsection 1.10. Rehabilitation...................................................................................................... 5
Subsection 1.1 L Relocation 5
Subsection 1.12. Open Space to be Created ......................................... ............................... • 5
Subsection 1.13. Boundaries of the Development District............................................................. 5
Subsection 1.14. Parcels to be Acquired or May be Acquired In Whole or in Part
Within the Development District.................................................................... 5
SECTION H.
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX
INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 11... ....
.............................. 6
Subsection 2.1.
Statutory Authority ...................................
.. 6
Subsection 2.2.
Statement of Objectives ............................
.................. 6
Subsection 2.3.
Statement of Public Purpose ....................
. 6
Subsection 2.4.
Development District Program .....................................
........................
7
Subsection 2.5.
Description of TIF District...................._...........................................................
7
Subsection 2.6.
Development Contracts ........ ...........
....... 7
Subsection 2.7.
Classification of TIF District..........................................................................
8
Subsection 2.8.
Modification of TIF Plan....................................................................................
8
Subsection 2.9.
Use of Tax Increment..........................................................................................
8
Subsection 2.10.
Limitation on Collection of Increment ......... .......
.......... .... ....... 9
Subsection 2.11.
Limitation on Administrative Expenses..............................................................
9
Subsection 2.12.
Limitation on Boundary Changes ............................... ......
.............10
Subsection 2.13.
Relocation ........................................... .................
...... ..............10
Subsection 2.14.
Parcels to be Acquired Within the TIF District ...................................................
10
Subsecction 2.15.
TIF Account........................................................
....10
Subsection 2.16.
Estimate of Project Costs ................. . .....
10
Subsection 2.17.
Estimate of Bonded Indebtedness..................................................
.................. 10
Subsection 2.18.
Original Tax Capacity and Ors Tax Capacity Rate ............I
I
Subsection 2.19.
Estimate of Captured Tax Capacity and Tax Increment
11
Subsection 2.20.
Duration of the TIF District .................................................
....... ...............121
Subsection 2.21.Estimate
of Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions ..............................................
12
Subsection 2.22.
Annual Financial Report .....................................................
.......12
Subsection 2.23.
Notification of Prior Planned Improvements ...................
................12
Subsection 2.24.
Assessment Agreements ................... ........... ..... ...
...... ...12
SM16067d
AIJ41-29
Subsection 2.25. Local Government Aid/Homestead and
Agricultural Credit Aid (LGA/HACA)...........................................................12
Subsection 2.26. TIF Account......................................................................12
EXHIBIT A MAP OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 AND
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. 1
EMMIT B DESCRIPTION OF TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO. I I
EXHIBIT C TAX INCH SCHEDULE
EXHIBIT D IMPACTTABLE
srs-ia
AU41-24
SECTION I MODIFIED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
NO. l
Subsection 1.1. Definitions. _For the purposes of the Development District Program, the
following terms shall have the meanings specified below, unless the context otherwise requires:
"City" means the City of Albertville, a municipal corporation under the laws of the State
of Minnesota.
"Comprehensive Plan" means the City's Comprehensive Plan, including the objectives,
policies, 'standards and programs to guide public and private land use, development,
redevelopment and preservation for all lands and water within the City.
"City Council" or "Council" means the Albertville City Council;
"City Development District Act" or "Act" means Minnesota Statute, Sections 469.124
through 469.134, as amended.
"County" means Wright County, Minnesota.
"Development District" means Development District No. 1 which was initially approved
by the Council in April, 1981 pursuant to and in accordance with the City Development District
Act, and as it has been or may be modified.
"Development District Program" or "Program" means the program for development of
the District adopted by the City pursuant to the Development District Act.
"Project Area„ or "Project" means the property within Development District No. 1, as
described in the Development Program.
"State" means the State of Minnesota.
`Tax Increment Financing Act" or `TIF Act" means Minnesota Statutes, Sections
469.174 through 469.179, inclusive, as amended.
`Tax Increment Bonds" means any general obligation or revenue tax increment bonds or
notes issued by the City to finance the public costs associated with Development District No. 1 as
stated in the Program and in the Tax Increment Financing Plan for the Tax Increment Financing
Districts within Development District No. 1, or any obligations issued to refund the Tax
Increment Bonds.
`Tax Increment Financing District" or `TT District" means any Tax Increment Financing
District created and established pursuant to the TIP Act within Development District No. 1.
SIB-16W4
AL141.29
a
'Tax Increment Financing Plan" or "Plan" means the TIF Plan adopted by the Council for
any TIF District within Development District No. 1.
Subsection 1.2. Slakd= and H ing of Public Purpo_ The Council of the City
determines that there is a need for development and redevelopment within the corporate limits of
the City and within the Development District to provide employment and housing opportunities,
to improve the tax base, and to improve the general economy of the State. It is found that the
area within the District is potentially more useful and valuable than is being realized under
existing development, is less productive than is possible under this Program and, therefore, is not
contributing to the tax base to its full potential.
Therefore, the City has determined to exercise its authority to develop a program for
improving the Development District of the City to provide an impetus for private development,
to maintain and increase employment, to utilize existing potential and to provide other facilities
as are outlined in the Development Program adopted by the City.
The Council finds that the welfare of the City as well as the State of Minnesota requires
active promotion, attraction, encouragement and development of economically sound industry,
housing, and commerce to carry out its stated public purpose objectives.
Subsection 1.3. Statutory Authority. The Council reaffirms its determination that it is
desirable and in the public intent to establish, develop and administer a Development Program
for the Development District in the City, pursuant to the provisions of the Act.
Funding of the necessary activities and improvements in the Development District may be
accomplished in whole or in part through tax increment financing in accordance with the TIF
Act
The City has designated a specific area within the corporate limits of the City as
Development District No. 1 as authorized by Section 469.126 of the Act, as outlined in this
document. Within the Development District, the City has previously created TIF District Nos. 1,
2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10.
The original Development Program for Development District No. 1 was approved in
Apra, 1981 and has been modified subsequently. On July 17, 1989, the Development Program
was modified to expand the area of the Development District. On July 15, 1996 and May 20,
1997, the Development Program was again modified to expand the area of the Development
- District.
The City has now determined that, in order to address changing development needs
throughout the City, it is in the public interest to provide for additional expenditures and
development within Development District No. 1. This modified Development Program is
intended to restate and expand on the original program and all prior amendments hereto, which
are incorporated herein by reference. Nothing in this modification is intended to supersede or
alter the activities described in the original Development Program.
sm t6W4
ataal-as
Subsection 1.4. SItement of Objectives The Council determines that the Development
District will provide the City ` with the ability to achieve certain public purpose goals not
otherwise obtainable in the foreseeable future without City intervention in the normal
development process. The public purpose goals include; restore and improve the tax base and
tax revenue generating capacity of the Development District; increase employment and housing
opportunities; realize comprehensive planning goals; remove blighted conditions revitalize the
property within the Development District to create an attractive, comfortable, convenient, and
efficient area for industrial, commercial and related use.
The City and Council seek to achieve the following Development District program
objectives:
I. Promote and secure the prompt development of certain property in the
Development District, which property is not now in productive use or in its highest and best use,
in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and -with the minimum adverse
impact on the environment, and thereby promote and secure the development of ether land in the
City.
2. Promote and secure additional employment and housing opportunities within the
Development District and the City for residents of the City and the surrounding area, thereby
improving living standards, reducing unemployment and the loss of skilled and unskilled labor
and other human resources in the City.
3. Secure the increase of commercial/industnal property subject to taxation by the
City, Independent School District No. 885, Wright County, and other taxing jurisdictionsin order
to better enable such entities to pay for governmental services and programs required to be
provided by them.
4. Provide for the financing and construction of public improvements in the
Development District necessary for the orderly and beneficial development of the Development
District and adjacent areas of the City.
5. Promote the concentration of commercial, office, and other appropriate
development in the Development District so as to maintain the area in a manner compatible with
its accessibility and prominence in the City.
b. Encourage local business expansion, improvement, and development, whenever
r possible,
7. Create a desirable and unique character within the Development District thorough
quality land use alternatives and design quality in new and remodeled buildings.
8. Encourage and provide maximum opportunity for private redevelopment of
existing areas and structures that are compatible with the Development Program.
9. Encourage redevelopment of substandard buildings, to improve employment
sr 16M4
AU41.29
opportunities in the Development District and the City, where compatible with other planning
and development goals
Subsection 1.5. Lstm&tee Public Costs and Sup rove Data. The public costs and
development plans for the Development District have been described in detail in each TIF Plan,
which are incorporated herein by reference.
The City now anticipates additional public costs to be financed in part with tax
increments from TIF District No. 11. Estimated costs and related data for such efforts are set
forth in the TIF Plan for TIF District No. 11. The TIF Plan for TIF District No. 11 is attached to
this modified Development Program.
Subsection 1.6. FaLvinalmaW Controls. The proposed development activities in the
Development District do not present significant environmental concerns. All municipal actions,
public improvements and private development shall be carried out in a manner consistent with
existing environmental standards:
Subsection 1.7. PMnoW Reuse of Progeny. The proposals for reuse of property within
the Development District are described in the documents referenced in Section 1.5 herein. Tl>e
City may acquire additional parcels for development, as identified in Subsection 1.14 herein.
Unless otherwise specified, the Development Program does not contemplate the
acquisition of private property Until such time as a private developer presents an economically
feasible program for the reuse of that property. Proposals, in order to be considered, must be
within the framework of the above cited goals and objectives, and must clearly demonstrate
feasibility as a public program. Prior to formal consideration of the acquisition of any property,
the City Council will require a binding contract, performance bond and/or other evidence or
guarantees that a supporting tax increment or other funds will be available to repay the public
cost associated with the proposed acquisition. It is the intent of the City to negotiate the
acquisition of property whenever necessary. Appropriate restrictions regarding the reuse and
redevelopment of property shallbe incorporated into any land sale contract to which the City is a
part.
Subsection 1.8. b c., ro�vements and Facilities to be Coa tryct —WIIWu
PmWgVM= District &. I 'M public improvements and facilities to be constructed within
Development District No. I include streets, water, sanitary sewer and storm sewer, utilities, soils
correction, parking and landscaping. All public improvements are more particularly described in
the documents referenced in Subsection 1.5 herein.
Subsection 1.9. Administration and MWRVMM. of the j velomot q-
Maintenance and operation of the public improvements will be the responsibility of the
Administrator of the City who shall serve as Administrator of the Development District. The
Administrator will administer the Development District pursuant to the provisions of Section
469.131 of the Act; provided, however, that such powers may only be exercised at the direction
of the Council. No action taken by the Administrator pursuant to the above -mentioned powers
shall be effective without authorization by the Council.
srh-ta
AL141.29
Subsection 1.10. Rgh MM 'on Owners of properties within the Development District
will be encouraged to rehabilitate `their property to conform with the applicable state and local
codes and ordinances, as well as any design standards. Owners of the properties who purchase
property within the Development District from the City may be required to rehabilitate their
properties as a condition of sale of land. The City will provide such rehabilitation assistance as
may be available from federal, state or local sources.
Subsection 1.11. Le QrgIAM. The City does not anticipate the need to relocate any
residents or businesses, but if such need arises, provisions for relocation will be made in
accordance with,Minnesota Statutes, Section 117.50 through 117.56 and, any rules adoptedby the .
City Council.
Subsection 1.12. Q= Space to be Created. The City, in carrying out the objectives of
the Development Proms, proposes to encourage the beautification of open spaces through the
development of criteria which shall be incorporated into any land sale or development
agreements entered into by the City of Albertville.
Subsection 1.13. ftMWh&& of the Development District Boundaries of Development
District No. l are: unchanged by this modification. A map of the Development District is
attached at Exhibit A.
Subsection 1.14. kgggh D Be #Muire
d or M bS A uired In Wholg pr In W' '
the Development District. The City may acquire any parcels in any TIF District or in the
Development District as a whole if necessary to carry out the goals and objectives of the
Development Program.
sn3•I6W4
AL141.29
1
4
SECTION 11 TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PLAN FOR TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT NO. 11
Subsection 2.1. agUMfthority Pursuant to the TIF Act, the Authority seeks to
create TIF District No. 11 and adopt a TIF Plan for that TIF District
Subsection 2.2 &&== of Ob' 'ves The objectives for the Development
District set forth in Subsection 1.4 of the Development Program are incorporated herein by
reference.
Subsection 2.3 S ent of Public Pumose In adopting the TIF Plan for IV
District No. 11, the City Council will make the following findings:
1. Anticipated development would not reasonably be expected to occur
solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and the
increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the
use of tax increment financing would be. less than the increase in the market value
estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of
the projected tax iwrements, for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the
TIF Plan,
Fa#ual Basis:
Anticipated development would not reasonably be expected to occur solely
through private. investment within the reasonably foreseeable future
The proposed development is a large manufacturing facility, located at a site that
requires street, curb and water improvements. The project financing requires an
SBA loan, and the developer has also submitted a letter from its primary mortgage
lender indicirting that financing would not proceed without the assistance provided
by the City under this plan. Tax increment is necessary to help defray land costs
and the cost of public improvements that will be assessed against the property.
The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur
without the use of tan increment, financing would be less than the increase in the
market value estimated to result from the proposed develpement after subtracting
the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the
district permitted by the 77F Flan
'This site has failed to develop despite a good location near interstate 94. It has
changed ownership several times, and no development proposals have came to
fruition. Any significant development would require extension of water and street
improvements. The site has been zoned commercial, but the City has determined
that such use is unlikely given historical patterns. The site is therefore being
rezoned for industrial use as proposed by Land of Lakes Stone Company.
SJB-160674
AU41-29
As noted in the tax increment cash flow in Exhibit C, the proposed development
will create an increase in market value of $1,250,000. The present value of the
tax increments for the maximum duration of the plan is $264,677. For the
reasons cited above, the City does not anticipate any increase in market value on
this site that would exceed $985,323 (the proposed increases less the present value
of the tax increment). In fact, the proposed development is the largest industrial
facility built in the City in over ten years. Any other development under current
commercial zoning would create far less market value. The City believes that any
other industrial development would also require assistance, and would almost
certainly create less value than the substantial project proposed by Land of Lake
Stone Company.
2. The TIF Plan will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound
needs of the Authority as a whole, for development of the District by private enterprise;
and
Factual Bads:
The tax increment assistance provided in the TIF Plan will permit development of
a long underutilized site in the City and will substantially increase jobs and tax
base in the City.
3. The TIF Plan conforms to general plans for development of the City as a
whole.
( Factual Basis:
The City Planning Commission at its meeting on April 13, 1999 found than the
development propose4 in the plan is consistent with the general plans for the City
as a whole.
Subsection 2.4 DevelOWMA Dish P"gram. Actions taken with regards to TIF
District No. 11 will be fully consistent with the Plan for Development District No. 1, as
modified.
Subsection 2.5 Dogd000f ME District. TIF District No. 11 consists of the property
described in Exhibit B. A map of the approximate boundaries of TTF District No. 11 is included
in Exhibit A.
Subsection 2.6. PMMkgMrO Coat= The Authority has not yet entered any
development contracts regarding property within the TIF District. The Authority expects to enter
a development contract with Land of Lakes Stone Company or a related entity providing for the
development described in more detail in Section 2.17 of this TIF Plan.
sl&161 74
AL14149
Subsection 2.7. Q&jW_qMjM of TIP District The City finds that TIF District No. 11 is
an economic development, district pursuant to Section 469.174, subdivision 12 of the TIF Act
muse the proposed tax increment assistance will discourage commerce, industry, and
manufacturing from moving their overations from the Ci , increased emp oyment`
` ? wi fate, and will in the preservation and enhancement of the tax base of the State:
Further, revenue derived from tax increment from the TIF District will not be used for to provide
assistance in any farm to developments consisting of buildings or ancillary facilities if more than
15 percent of the buildings and facilities (determined on a square footage basis) are used for a
purpose other than:
1. the manufacturing, storage and distribution of tangible personal property,
including processing resulting in the change in condition of the property;
2. warehousing, storage and distribution of tangible personal _ property,
excluding retail. sales;
3. research and development related to the activities listed in clause 1 or 2;
4. telemarketing, if that activity is the exclusive use of the property;
5. tourism facilities (if the conditions specified in Section 469.174, subd. 22
are met); and
6. space necessary for and related to the activities listed in clauses 1 to 5.
Subsection 2.8. M%Ufiafio of TIF Plan The TfF Plan for TIF District No. I 1 may be
modified by the City, prove that any reduction or enlargement of geographic area of TIF
District No. 11, increase in amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred, including a
determination to capitalize intemst on the debt if that determination was not a part of the original
plan, or to increase or decrease the amount of interest on the debt to be capitalized, increase in
the portion of the captured assessed value to be ;retained by the City, increase in total estimated
tax increment expenditures, or designation of additional property to be acquired by the City, shall
be approved upon the notice and after the discussion, public hearmg and findings required for
approvalof the original plan.
Subsection 2.9. UM of IM,bcrement
1. Pursuant to Section 469.176, Subd. 4 of the TIF Act, all revenues derived.
from the tax increment from TTP District No. 11 shall be used in accordance with the TIF
Plan. The revenues shall be used to finance or otherwise pay the capital and
administrative costs of development activities within the Development District as
identified in the TIF Plan.
2. Pursuant to Section 469.1763, Subd. 2 of the TIP Act, at least 80 percent
of the revenue derived from tax increments paid by properties in TIF District No. 11 will
be expended on activities ("Activities") in the TIF District or to pay bonds, to the extent
sra-1a
AU41.29
that the proceeds of the bonds were used to finance Activities in the TIF District or to
pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds (as defined in the TIF
Act). No more than 20 percent of the revenue derived from tax increments paid by
properties in TIF District No. 11 will be. expended, through a development fund or
otherwise, on Activities outside of the TV District but within Development District No. 1
except to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced bonds.
3. Revenues derived from tax increment will be expended in accordance with
the five-year rule as set forth in Section 469.1763 of the Tax Increment Act.
Subsection 2.10. &M Tax Increment Pursuant to Sections 469.176, Subd. 2 of the TIF
Act, in any year in which the increment exceeds the amount necessary to pay the casts authorized
by the TIF Plan, the City will use the excess amount to do any of the following, in the order
determined by the City: ro
1. Prepay the outstanding bonds;
2. Discharge the pledge of tax increment therefor,
3. Pay into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of bonds;
4. Retained by the City for future development purposes; or
5. Return the excess amount to the Wright County auditor, who shall distribute the
excess amount to the City, the County and Independent School District No. 885 in direct
proportion to their respective tax capacity rates.
In addition, and subject to the limitations set forth in Subsections 2.7 and 2.9 herein, the
City may choose to modify the TIF Plan in order to provide for other economic development
activities within the TIE District.
Subsection 2.11. Limitation on Collection of Increment
1. No increment shall be paid to the City from TIF District No I 1 after three
years from the date of certification of the original tax capacity of the taxable real property
in the TIF District by the county auditor unless within the three year period (a) bonds
have been issued in aid of Development District No. 1 pursuant to Section 469.178 of the
TIF Act or any other law except revenue: bonds issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Sections 469152 to 469.165, or (b) the City has acquired property within TIF District No.
11 or (c) the City has constructed or caused to be constructed public improvements within
TIF District No.11.
sis-4
AL141-29
2. If, after four years from the date of certification of the original tax capacity
of TIF District No. 11, no demolition, rehabilitation, or renovation of property or other
site preparation, including qualified improvement of a street or right-of-way adjacent to a
parcel but not installation of underground utility service, including sewer or water
systems, have been commenced on a parcel located within TIF District No. 11 by the
City, or by the owner of the parcel in accordance with the TIF Plan, no additional
increment may be taken from that parcel, and the original tax opacity of that parcel shall
be excluded from the original tax capacity of the TIF District. If these activities
subsequently commences, the City will so certify to the county auditor, and the tax
capacity of the property as most recently certified by the commissioner of revenue will be
added to the TIF District's original tax capacity.
3. No tax increment will in any event be paid to the City from TIF District
No. 11 after J years from the date of receipt of the first increment, or 11 years from the
date of approval of this TIF Flan, whichever occurs first.
Subsection 2.12. JjMiJ&fiM on Administrative EgPgm Pursuant to Section 469.176,
Subd.3 of the TIF Act, administrative expenses are limited to 10 percent of the total tax
increment expenditures for Development District No. 1. Each time the City increases the budget
of TIF Distract No. 11, the amount of tax increment money allocated to administrative costs may
be increased as long as the total of administrative expenditures does not exceed IQ :percent of the
total budget of the TiF District.
Subsection 2.13. LjMgMfiM on BMOM Chanow The geographic area of TIF District
No. 11 may be seduced, but it may not be enlarged after five years following the date of .
certification of the original tax capacity by the Wright County auditor. Thus, the TIF District
may not be enlarged after approximately September 2003.
Subsection 2.14. &&&gffl While no relocation is currently anticipated, the City
adepts as binding its obligadons under state law for relocation and will administer relocation
services for families, individuals and businesses displaced by public action.
Subsection 2.15. bto -be AgWdEW.. Within the 37F District The City may acquire
any property within the TIP District in order to carry out the objectives of this 'TIF Plana
Subsection 2.16. TIF The tax increment received with respect to TIF District
No. 11 shall be segregated by the City in a special account on its official books and records or
held by'a trustee for the befit of holders of bonds issued to finance development activities.
Subsection 2.17. Estimate gL Eject Costs The City intends to facilitate development of
the Land of Lakes Stone Company manufacturing facility. The total estimated costs to be
financed in part with tax went, exclusive of interest, are as follows:
Land acquisition =50�,000
Street, curb, and water improvements
Administration 3,
TOTAL $385,000
The above are estimates, which may shift among categories without modification of this
TIF Flan, provided that the total costs will not exceed the total listed, and that the City will
comply with Section 469.1763, Subd. 2. Costs within each category are deemed to include
capitalized interest which will vary depending on when or if bonds are issued, but in any event
will not exceed three years as required by Minn. Stat. Ch. 475.
Subsection 2.18. LqjMa 4f drA Iq.&kAdness The City may finance the project
costs identified in this TIF Plan through issuance of revenue notes, pay as you go obligations in
any form, or general obligation bonds in a principal amount not to exceed the budget provided
for in this TIF Galan.
Subsection 2.19. pacity and Original Tax Capes ly Rate As of the time
of the request for certification, the original tax capacity of T1F District No. 11 is expected to be
$2,795, representing the valuation for taxes payable in 1999. The original tax capacity rate of
TIF District No. i 1 is estimated to be 136.404%. This rate is an estimate of the aggregate tax
capacity rate applicable to property within the TIF District for taxes payable in 1999, though the
actual rate may vary from that figure.
The original tax capacity will. be increased each year by a factor estimated to be 27.34%,
representing the average percent •increase in market value of property within the TIF District in
the five years prior to establishment of the TIF District.
The County auditor will also increase or decrease the original tax capacity of TIF District
No. 11 as a result of
1. Change in the tax exempt status of property within the TIF District;
2. Reduction or enlargement of the geographic boundaries of the TIF District;
3. Reduction of valuation by means of a court -ordered abatement, stipulation
agreement, voluntary abatement nt made by the assessor or auditor or by order of the Minnesota
commissioner revenue; or
4. Change inthe classification of property within the TIF District to a classification
that has a different class rife.
expects the improvements in the TIF District to be completed by December 31, 1999. As of that
date, the captured capacity is estimated to be $41,637. The fast full tax increment is estimated to
be $56,795 payable in 2001. The tax increment is expected to decline annually due to the annual
adjustment in the original tax opacity, unless the completed project increases in market value as
s r6W4
AL141.29
well. A complete schedule of estimated tax increment from the TIF District is sh6wn in Exhibit
C.
Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subd. 2 of the TIF Act, it is found and de ' ;. all of
the captuied tax capacity genaated within T7F District No. i 1 is necessary to finance or
otherwise make peerrnisaft ditutes authorized by Section 469.176, Subd. 4 of the "T'1F" .act.
Subsection 2.21. DgMio of the T F District In accordance with Section 469.176, Subd.
1(b) of the TIF Act, the City may continue to receive TIF payments until the earlier of 9 years
jafter the date of ' , of the fug increment, or 11 years after the date of approval of this TIF
Plan. The City expects the first receipt in 2001 and: the last receipt in 2009, but may collect
increments through May, 201-0 at the latest.
Subsection 2.22. F M -of „ get on QJhK "&Qg. hfig = The City believes
that, b=use then development would not have occurred without tax inurement assistance, the TIF
District has no impacton other ming jurisdictions. However, assuming the development would
have occurred without tint inurement assistance, making the anticipated captures tax capacity
available to other Junsdicdow, the hypothetical impacts ` on other jurisdictions are presented in
Exhibit D.
I�
Subsection 2.23. AMW bnjagW Bg= The City will file the annual reports with the
State Auditor regarding all TEF Districts in the City, as required in Sections 469.175, subds. 5, 6,
and 6a of the TTF Act
Su `on 2.24. NZifi9fio.of Eft P'M.AI W32rjtents Pursuant to Section
469.177, Subdivision 4 of the TIF Act, the City reviewed_ its record with regard to the property
within TIF District No. l l and found that no building permits were issued during the 18 months
immediately preceding approval of the TIF Flan by the City.
Subsection 2.25. Pursuant to Section 469.177, Subdivision 8 of
the TIF Act, the :City may execute an assessment, agreement in recordable form with the
developer which establishes a minimum Market value of land and improvements for the duration
of TIF District No. 11. The Assessment agreement; if any, shall be ted to the Wright
County assessor who shall review the plans and sFecifications for the improvements to be
constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land upon which the
improvements_ are to be constructed and so long as the minimum marlaet vale contained in the
assessment agreement nt appears in the judgment of the assessor to be a reasonable estimate, the
assessor may certify the minimum maritet valise agreement. The asseesment agreement sail be
filed of rem in the office of the county recorder or the registrar of Cities of Wright County.
Rwmftg or filing of an assessment agreement complyng with the terms of Section 469.177,
Strad. 8 of the TIF Ace shall. constitute notice of the agreement to any subsequent purchaser or
F encumbrance,vof the lad or any part thereof, whether voluntary or involuntary, and shall be
wnftg upon them.
Subsection 2.26. Q,tM Aid/li Coral
ti tsseNAC`, ant to hfinnuota Statutes, Section 273.13", subd. 6(d), the City elects to
s�-rrs
AJ4i 29 ,.
make a local contribution pay costs of the proms finummd under,this 'TiF Plan, ;in the amount
equal to 10 percent tax increment Therefore, the City anticipates that the T IF
District will be exempt frmn LaAJHACA loss.
The local cog do will, be made from unrestricted funds of the City, and not from tax
increments or devel payments. The local contribution will not be used for general
government purposes or for -improvements or costs that the City or the City planned absent the
project.
The City curtly, = . tes>that the contribution will be made through City payment of
consultant fees in connection with the development (to the extent paid with funds other than tax
increment or, developerents), along with additional payments to the Developer for
development costs similar to Own financed by tax mcmments under this plan. However, the
City reserves the right to satisfy, its local match requirement through any means permitted under
Section 273.1399, subd b(d).
SJB-16067+1
AU41-29
EXHIBIT A
MAPOF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.1
and
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING DISTRICT NO.11
Was#e WSW Tree ce
& PublicYVMN .
,
QIr
At
w ..
z r
...
sm
5462 11646 t
5672
Uon's
city
$774
5597
a
5672 5625 1172
5647 "62 6021 5627 5622
5616 � 8618 �s:
g t145 SSQ7 «. 5�56 $562 5559 $060
S 5558
56 $64 5662
Sam "70
5845 1 54 5544 5541 5844
11447 $4163 1156 1167 = - = r- ^r 5456 s�A
.�.......� r..
5494 5494out
44M ca® ..1
» ..»... $476 54 1
< 5474 5470 547+1In
P $334
8406
6464
64
r .
'" d t s �,� e• �. � :.trR' s4 w-' �.,. ,�yi ` I t
62P
S266 82
S37
wA
i
SJB-IWP4
AU41-27,
rt
Ai unl #(ons Re
of AlbedvMe, Minnesata
Taos Increment
Olnencing (Economic Owelopneni) Dishict
fiend of Lakes Stone Pfoject
Scena ft A
Type of Tax inctsinent Franc
Economic Development
Maximum Duration of TIF District
Lesser of 11 yrs. fto n TIF plan appwM
-w- 0 year* from 1st Increment
CoMficallon Request Date
06t30/99
Deoertillicallon Date
12/01109 (9 Years of Increment)
1998/1999
Base Esf Bled
$114,100
Times: First $150,000 2.
S%
Z,795
Excess 2.
0
tkiginad Net Tex Ca
$2.795
AsseserneptACallection Year
1999 WO
2000V2001 2001/2002
Base Estimated Market Value
$114.100
$114.100 $114,100
$114,1100
Increase in EsfMtiated Market Value
0
1,250400000 1,250,0
1.250,000
Total Es*aatecf Market Value
$114,100
$1,364.100 $1,364.100
$1.364,100
Tknes. First ' : $150,000 $.
% 2,795
3,675 3,675
3,675
Excess i.
% 0
42,494 42A"
42,494
Total Net Taut CapaW
$2.795
$46.189 $46.169
$46,189.
fnflaflon Facto
27.34%
Local Tax CapaW FWU
136.404% (Pay 1999)
Fiscal tkxl From TIF District
0.
Adml°eistradve° (maexdrnum ;lfi>
0.0014
Pooling Percent
0.00'K
City Taut Raele (Only 9 Local-Eftrt. TIF)
N
.(p.8v, YeM,.ar3Q�
Bonds Hated
to
tree dated 06/30/99
First Interest Dais 02Ab
Note Rate 7.50'i4
Undervnit rs Diacount. t.
WIN Annual Local Contribution Be Meds(Y*s of
)?
Yes ;
t.S.D 0720 IRWalizedlAx Capes+ Rate
NA
I.S.D #0728 Soft Ratio
NA
City Sales Ratio & Tumble tit Tax Capadty
NA NA
Present Value Date A Rade
OGrXw 5.00%
O a
AV N CO m K f r 4 O 4 4 o O O 4 a 4 O 4 O O 4 O a O
l�
W
p p
0 0< M N
N
z Cm
O W v
�Cf
C z
C
`�'
ON O CS G 4 a O O O 0
a
d
O O eA
N KO pM mm N to
I
gCmj�
if
O n r m {9 r
Naa"Or V xAP4
4
O O db.
O O O O O O O O O O O d a 0 0 0 0 0 O 4 O O.O a s
M
O O 4V
N m A N f r 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 g 0 4 a O O 4 O O
e!0
O d to
M O N A v Yf N O O O O O O 4 O O. O O CI O d. O O O
ty91±
�J
'qP
w pN P N ¢�pN
a
eY1
N ®
1f7
M Q
WS
�P�
KP�eR�iRi�eta4iRaR�RPrR�O7R�tl,IiRK�`6*+P�
D��a
„_ ,�.
vf�K
oogc�a�o4�oa"^�oac�iodo44c�oa�4
V
r r w w r w. r r r r r r r r r r r r r w
w
L
'e�
O d Iw
a3+®
O O N N A A 0 a 4 O 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 O O O O 4 0 a
cNv r a a f Y1 N
rq cda ao es
rc
�
a x A 20 N N r
C
iw
f'
4 p
coo
1aQ
N N O O p �p A OS A d W W O W Aw W
y q f ID ip n n m m m m m
lh r w M r r
a
N e$ v
r. p1 r r rr
r w w r r � r1 r r t t`spp
P a6 m N a v v v v v v v v v v v is � v v v v
r Z
mad
OM a
anmesato$aaaaraaomo,waa>a,�uaoaom
n n n n n 0 n n n n n m m � n® m n n Ci n n n
.
r r r r r w r r r r w r r r r w r
pr qarp6 TiQ> one v V TD n v v v e v v of v v v V: v v v v in Ti f f a f f
p Grp p p
2 V
1► m n P O r N !9 f m n A n 01 N (l�'y9 �♦y RCy! A
f e e ! tiri. 4 Vri. 1rw. 1 'Srw Th: is �i Si N
'
w r w
w �- �- y- w w g- r r i- w ¢- r �r-�- w w fir% '- w Sri �- awl
- - - - - - - N 9- - l- N !� � N N +h�
IRS$
r w w
—
w w w r r r r r e� w r w w w w w w w r w w
r —
40dY
Note
City of Afrrtvilie, Minnesota
Tax indent
Financing (Economic Devetopmont) District
Land of Lakes Stone Project
Sicerwarlo A
Note DOW.
ftft Raw.
7.50%
Amount
Loan
Net
Capitalized
Date
Ptlndpai
P do i
pmenue
1
"
1
4
5
6
2K?00.00
OW01100
0.00
.00.
O.W
0.00
12,602.85
299
011W
0.00
xw
0.00
0.00
11,223.E
31%W.71-
02MI101
0.00
.W
0.00
0.00
11,644.75
322.171.46
0810110i
19,077.57 1
A3
31,159.00
31,159.00
0.00
V%003.89
02 OIJ02
19.792.98 1
02
31,159.00
.31.159.IX1'
0.00
283,300.91
OW/02
19,607.72
76
30231.50
30,231.50
0.00
263,693.19
02001/03
20,343.01
9
30231.50
30,231.50
0.00 '
243,3W.18
08f01103
1 37
63
29.051.00
29,051.00
0.00
223,424.81
0201104
20.672.57
29,051.00
20,051.00
0.00
20Z752.24
OWi104
19,942.79
1
27.546.00
27,546 00
0.W
iSZ989.45
02/01/05
20,690.65
355
27,546.00
27,546.00
0.00
162,118.80
tM101i05
i9.552.04
46
25,631.50
25,631.60
0.00
14Z.586.76
02101106
20.M.26
.
25,031.50
25.631.50
0.00
1 ,281.51
O8f01106
18,WW&94
,
AS
23,192.50
23.192.50
0.00
103,674.57
02101/07
19,304.70
.80
23.192.50
23,192.50
0.00
8413"A7
08M 107
16,923.13
,
20A67.00
20.067.E
O.W
67,446.74
02 011tM
17.557,75
2D.067.00
20,087.00
0.00
49AN.99
06f01�M
14261.16
16,432.00
16,132.00
0.00
35,SV.83
0201109
14,795.96
16,132.W
16.13Z.W
OAM
204i31.67
lm
10,314,30
20
11.095.50
11.095.50
0.00
10,517.57
0201110
10.517.57
.41;
10,911.98
1%911.98
0.00
0.00
08/01110
0.00
UO'-
0.00'
0.00
0.00
0.00
02/O11i i ,;
0.00
.100
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.W
O8d01111
0.00
4.W
0.00
0.00
0.00
O.W
1 ,171 OftWI.02
$428.066.48
$428,088.48 `
$35,471.46
FJWM Tax ixnarAw
18152
Totat Not Revenue
$428,252300
Prepared bv: etch Incorporamt
4
ice' at 8.:03 Atd}
T#fs.xNr
11111110tot Vakw Analysis R
City of Albertville, Minnesota
Tax lncr*m� *JFInancMq (Economic Development) District
Land of Lakes Stone Project
Scenario A
i
AMM
Presets Value Date
i
06/30/99
P.V. Rate -- Gmss
f.1.
7.50%
Increase in EMV With
nib
District $1,250,000
Less: P.V of Grp To
x Increment
264,677
subtotal
Lou: t In E
W"
$985.323
TIF -. 0
Dii%rence
I
'$985,323
Annual Present
Gross Tax Value
Year Increment 7.50%
i'
2000 0 0
2
2001 56.795 48,256
3
2002 55,104 43,553
4
2003 52,952 38,932
5
2004 50,210 34,341
6
2005 46,720 29,724
7
2006 42,274 25,019
8
;
2007 36,614 20,158
9
2008 29,405 15,059
10
2009 20,225 9,635
11
i
2010 0 0
12
2011 0 0
13
2012 0 0
14
2013 0 0
15
1
2014 0 0
16
!;
2015 0 0
17
2016 0 0
18
I
2017 0 0
19
j
2018 0 0
20
2019 0 0
21
2020 0 0
22
2021 0 0
23
2022 0 0
24
2023 0 0
25
2024 0 0
$390,299 $264,677
Prepared by; Springsted incorporated 1419J9�1
1
I
K
5Wca)
OF ALBERTVILLE
REVO , G LOAN FUNbS POLICY
The City of Albertville establishes a Revolving Loan Fund OUX), to be
funded with the proceeds of Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic
D"ielopment loan to Fraser feel Company and other fkmds as the City Couw l so
designates in the fire.
PURPOSE AND GOALS
The purpose of the RLF is to create new employment or to maintain existing
employment and for business start up, expansions, and retention. This may be
accomplishedbythe following means:
1 .) Creation or retention of p eamanent private -sector jobs m order to create above
average economic ;growth;
2.) Stimulation or leverage of private investment to ensure economic renewal and
competitiveness;
3.) Increasing the local tax
4.) Improvement of e>anployment and economic opportunity for citizens in the
region to create a reasonable standard of living; and
5.) Stimulation of productivity growth through improved manufacturing or new
technologies.
ELIGIBLE EXPENDI"S
RLFs may be used to provide assistance for infrastructure, loans, loan guarantees,
interest buy -downs, and other, forms of participation with private sources of
financing, The RLF assistae can be for no more than one-half of the cost of the
project.
The grant or lava baiddon
the follow +criteria:
1•) Creation: of new ,o '
r retention of existing jobs;
2.) Increase in dw tax bin;
3.) JU prqject tomdenaw
soft that invesunew of public dollars induces
private
4.) Tbe.pw,t icon
an excessive public infrastrtnwtire or
cat
the means of the affected community and private
in the
wage lt%vb to the community of will add values
tQ C1tr�' ens ' ,
6.) ka ass- U
to retain- existing business; and
7,) Wb ar assistance it
to tract out-of-state ' ess.
The,grant or loan aumot be .
based solely on a finding that the -conditions in
clause (6) or (7) exist. A
', � must be made that a condition in clause 1.), 2.),
3.), 4.), or 5.) also exists.
ELI+GIRLE ACTPIMEs
RLFs may be a ed fcor the Mlowing
activities:
1.) Acquisition of land,
2.) `' Construction or rehabilitation
of manufacturing facilities;
3.) Site improv ;
4.) Utilities of invs tz
re;
5.) Macbinery;nd Equip
lent
6.) Workforce developma
it
7.) Housing development
muGmLE A .
RLF assis anm may not b+t usied
for the following:
1.) Operation or
a€a casino.
2.) Operation or
of a store which is used solely or principally for
resEs►ii ;udts.
2
X
3.) For a project related; a sports facility. "Sports facility" mesas a building
that has a professi+oual sports team as a principal tenant,
PRW_FE n V*f WT_VN
The City may give greater vft'
within the City of Albatville c
applicants -must demonstratet
to manufacturing projects which creaftiobs
r distribution and other proposed ..uses. All
,d for the RLF.
i
TERMS OF LOANS
�( It is the intent of the City ths RLFs be low -interest loans with a five to twenty
year term. The City Council have the discretion to set the interest rage and
term of each loan on a pro' a -by-project basis. The City may vary the tinning of
repayment and the interest ra e from year to year for any particular loan. As a
condition of approval of aay the City may require that said loan be
personally paranteed by one or more owners, principals, investors, shareholders,
partners, or governors if the entity applying is operating under a form of business
other than a sole proprietorship.
�._ a 1. ' t r • ���jr;.�
The City Council shall have complete discretion in approving or denying a RLF
Xrequest, or may modify a RIe,� request as the City Council deems appropriate. The
City Council shall have the ority to modify the terms of existing RLFs with
the agreement of the botrowc r. All loan approvals and modifications shall be,
passed by City Council Reso ution.
REMESTMENT OF INTEREST
All interest generated by RU
Fund for future use.
WAGE GOALS
Businesses receiving RLF',aas
including benefits not
least 110 % of the federal pm
1998 was $8.71 per how. Th
shall be reinvested in the City's Revolving Loan
kance must pay each employee total compensation,
bad by law, that on an annualized basis is equal to at
tarty level for a family of four, which as of July 1,
federal poverty level changes annually.
3
SECUREDposmON.01MBECITY ,
#. iq..
f # 1 Mi .. Is Ns
off; W:. f N i 9 tx
.1 :H i A H A i F 71 F,4ti W SfN ��
Olkilit if
Y
" i -. §;. # • - #y,".
if i i'i/# 1' i # - i F# ". ;t## # fi ►: if # i i i
of ,1 i.. if+ ##.. #" .n .tt Y,rt iA,{#
1 ;.! `H .�-}#@,f Hi of
## i t P `. �tii, +.f i4
Y
is; s: f fii 1•f i{i 1 N # 4if i # ♦ #
if
1
Is fN+.+•i # 1 s.
...,.e #A i i ii ! i i1 # ' # F '
# "�fi W � # • #._#:' 1 iii� -�i
i ��# F 1 Y - # i A# 1 S 11 i i W • W :. # #3 !
i 1 i1 # i i • ; t'.+
,. rlF.IJC TV-1 T
fs:�-` Hb � itt•.... as W rha
�.....,.. #i 11 # �. # # #1 � # # ! #
iiN,Ni, ! # • # f° 8 i iii#'w#:
"
i 4'II # i i` ! i i i 1 �iN 1 N N.
N`. is - # # • i. Ni f '1 i r' itii
9 li # f i A aN i rA 6 .. i # ;ii #W i1
# �#-: A # # t" :.{.. 1 �1-.++.
ii i f 1 i � ►#-li :i/ t1 1 i "
!.�#, #. #' i,:.N - Af W�4;
.. •+ {...N � ♦1 # i i. `. -. # 1 i1
♦`6k#. FN, fi � 1�# »-4^,
.m`t ::ii # F 1 i# ( F:. Y 1 i N ': A R Nf A �. # i Wi
# ff ii# # ,:A+B;i
# f 11 Din 1 :ffN i Nf isi �# 6 i i W
`c-':- :i ».. h `i.:iii- #1 loans in anamount "! Y than 0 NW 0
_ n f # - ;�i 'i## i7 # 'y 1 o fN it job i Nf ... .;N. Wii i
of #flff
DEPUSiTS REQUlRElk}0g CONS'1'RUGTiON�CONTRACTS
5
APPLICATION
All applicants shall request R,F money via a letter to the City or via a completed
RLF application if the C�Zpit=
de such applications available. The City may
' the applicant to its request with business plans, projected
require app
employment hiring sch financial for the past three years,
financial projections for the r five years, bank references, bank letters of
cointnitnten applicant letter of
c�►mmitment spec&ying the amount of investment
in and jobs to be created by project, feasibility studies, sources and uses of
finds, and credit reports of,�t applicant and/or the applicant's principals. The
City Council may refer the ",hi cation to the City's Economic Development
Authority for review and emendation prior to final decision by the City
Council.
OTHER ELIGIBLE USES`
Powers Agreement with any Minnesota Investment
rule charter or statutory city, county, township, or
establishment of a regional revolving loan fund.
d by a designated entity named by the Joint Powers
The city has the authority to IRLF funds to a regional development
commission to provide the loud match required for capitalization of a regional
revolving loan fund. The city does not have the authority to turn over to another
entity, such as Port Authority, Economic Development Authority, Housing
Authority, etc. revolving loas funds for any purpose.
PUBLIC ASSISTANCE TO BUSINESS: WAGE AND JOB
REQUIREMENTS
For all projects, where the 'stance exceeds $25,000 from the RLF, the city must
establish wage level and job tcation goals which are to be met by the business
receiving the assistance. At a minimum, the business must create a net increase in
jobs in Minnesota within two years after receiving the assistance. If the business
fails to. meet the wage and job goals, it must repay the assistance.
4
In the situation that the coct exceeds $100,000 and a non -Minnesota
construction contractor has a�n hired to perform the work, the city must do one of
the following:
1.) Deposit with the Dr nrtment of Revenue, 8 percent of every payment made
to the contractor, or
2.) Have in its possession a Waiver of Withholding from the Department of
Revenue.
FINANCIAL'ASSISTANCk LIMITATIONS PREVAILING WAGE
Laborers and mechanics at the project site during construction, installation
remodeling, and repairs mmo be paid the state prevailing wage if the financial
assistance is greater than $2€ 0,000 for a grantor $S for a loan.
All contracts for publicly owned infrastructure using � RLF must comply with
the prevailing wage provisio6s.
MUNICIPAL RIGHTS, F`WERS AND DUTIES
An officer of the city may not have a personal financial interest or personally
benefit financially from the business to be assisted.
GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES
(
Information contained in the 'application for assistance will become a matter of
public record with the excep ion of those items protected under the Minnesota
Government Data practices Act.
s
To: The
City
of Albertville
Attention- Lin& Loeb, City Clerk
From GEM Deveknment Coo any LLC.
Regarding application for a loan From the City of Albertville Revolving Loan
Dear Linda,
At the first staff meeting with GEM Development, City Attorney Michael Couri
mentioned that The City of Ajbertville has about seventy six thousand dollars in a
revolving loan fund that was goierated through fiuiding from the Department of Trade
and Economic Development ). Mr. Couri also mealtioned-.that this money was
available at a low interest rate 1, assist qualifying businesses with financing and that our
proposed Sbrication facility should qualify for assistance.
At this time, GEM Development Company LLC. would lice to formally apply for a loan
from the cty's revolving loan . We propose to borrow seventy five thousand dollars
at 2% ale interest for a twes#-year term
IU City of Albertville would hilt a position behind Stearns Bank, The Small Business
and The Coal Minnesota Iuirtistive Fund. The money from the
revolving loan fid would be used as gap financing to assist in the completion of our
project, thus helping to create jobs in the Albertville ar= and broaden the tax base.
Without such gap financing our project is in jeopardy.
We would lice ,to thank the City of Albertville for the opportunity to bring our new
business to the area and the staff for their help and hard work on this project. We look
forward to being :responsible members of your corporate community.
Respectfiilly Submitted April 13, 1999
Eric E. Dudley ,,,.�•
Vice President, GEM Development Company LLC.
a
j
V
SJCa)
CITY OF ALBERINULE DEVELOPER'S AGUEMENT
Albertville Crossing
Tf�IIS AGREEMENT, e d into this day of 1999 by and
retween Cascade Ii Land Comp y, LLC, collectively referred to herein as "Developer";
end the CITY OF ALBERTViL ' County of Wright, State of Minnesota, hereinafter
eferred to as "City";
W nNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Developer is the fee owner and developer of the real property
lescribed in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, which real
)roperty is proposed to be subdivided and platted for development, and which subdivision,
which is the subject of this Agreement is intended to bear the name "Albertville Crossing"
and shall her6nafter be referred to in its entirety as "Said Plat" or "Subject Property"; and
WHEREAS, the City , has', given Preliminary approval of Developer's plat of
klbertville Crossing contingent upon compliance with certain City requirements including,
)ut not limited to, matters set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, the City requires that certain public improvements including, but not
invited to bituminous street and M' dl(s), curb and gutty, grading, sanitary sewer, water,
►torm sewer and drainage ponds "Municipal Improvements") be installed to serve
he Subject Property and other properties affected by the development of Developer's land,
o be installed and financed by Developer; and
WHEREAS, the City fin*ex requires that certain on and off -site improvements be
1
f �. ! ► fk- r �}.� tkt
! f f ! f} KaiI[ ti f :!tom} a If
ff h%i t Gw .lf t !"lostk
NOW', s t. + r
AGREED, inconsideration o
follows:
1.
A. The Developer. l
Improvements loc
Specifications for
as pied by
improvements to
water mains, sati
grading.' Develc
improvements and
the Wright Cotmt
special assessmerm
three year period.
they come due.
B. The City shall, at
inspection P
necessary) during
Improvements.
Said Plat, which improvements consist of boulevards, top
ot, bituminous or concrete driveways, parking lot,
igns, street cl=W during project development erosion
is: and
Mttis enteredinto forthe purpose ofsetting fe1 wt and
subsequent owum the and covenants of
�'fl .fl of the } and the ! f !t t ! f t3 tit ; } e C ! f
17 IS HEREBY 1 HEREIN
t! promises and fconsiderationsherein forth,
as petitioned the City to construct those Municipal
ited on and off Said Plat as detailed in the Plans and
>7th Street and Lambert Avenue, dated
EH -RCM, Inc. and on file with the City Clerk, said
aclude installation of bituminous street, curb and gutter,
pry and storm sewers, storm water ponding, and site
xr has agreed to be assessed for the cost of said
has agreed to waive the right to appeal said assessment to
District Court Developer and City anticipate that the
f for said Municipal Improvements shall be levied over a
developer agrees to timely pay said special assessments as
option, have the City Engineer present on Said Plat for
at all times (or such times as the City may deem
e construction and installation of said Municipal
2. Construction of On- and -Site Improvements.
A. Developer
! law€ t.'.. !;k tall on- and i i 'Yt.: improvements including
installationloft ! 4t } greet signs,traffic signs, 't topsoil,sod or !
f allyards, control per !' bituminous or ! t - e drivewaysand
parking lots, i7 :.tt -swales,ha ff f ' and items a
Jea
4 ! during development,+N ! "1 !nf f } t !. f ! landscaped bernt
Block as required by City ordinance.
Said tar and off ' kwo shall be installed no later than October 31,
2002, with the 'on of erosion control, drainage swales and bermng,
which shall be installed upon initial grading of Said Plat.
B. Developer at its own expense, cause the following items to be installed
within the development, all such items to be installed under ground, within
the s reetright of y or such other location as maybe approves by the City
En +c=, sib to all lots and in compliance with all applicable state and
localregulations: �I
i. Electrical power supply, to be provided by Northern States Power or
other such carrier,
I Natural gas ly, to be provided by Minnegasco or other such
carrier;
iii. Telephone service, to be provided by Sprint/United Telephone
Company other such carrier,
iv. Cable TV sei�vice, to be provided by a local carrier,
In addition, the Developer shall, at its own expense, cause street lights and
street sips to be o� such type and to be installed at such locations as required
by the City Engineer and in conformance with the Manual on Uniform Traffic
Control Devices.
C. Devei er has 'tied a utility plan for Said Plat showing all existing and
oP
proposed utility . and easemen% attached and incorporated herein as
Exhibit B. Devel agrees to have all utilities installed according to this
Exhibit B.
Developer shall install silt fencing in back of all curbing within 30 days after
said curbing is installed, or 7 days after the "small utilities" (gas, phone,
electrical and cable television) have been installed, whichever occurs sooner.
Developer shall be allowed to substitute hay bales for a 22-foot section of silt
fencing on each lot for the purpose of mowing construction vehicles to pass
from the street to lot No construction vehicles shall pass from the street
to the lots except gh such designated 22-foot section of hay bales.
Developer shad ve all hay bales and silt fencing from each lot as sad is
3
installed upon said lot.
E. Pdotwiti • g the requm ements of agraph 2A above, the Developer
shad install to the City's satisfaction improvements for each lot or parcel prier
to the m of a certificate of occutpmey (temporary or went) by the
City for a building looted on the lot. In the event the certificate of ocpancy
is issned arAver Ocwlw 1st and before March 30th in any given yea, said on
. and pff- site iunprovements shall be shall be so completed by the following
June 15dt.
F. Developer shall 'install storm water retention/water quality ponds and basins
upon Said Plat as shown on the Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan
attached as Exhibit C. Said ponds and basins shall be dedicated to the City,
and Developer shall provide the City with perpetual drainage easements over
such ponds. Said remotion ponds and basins shall be installed prior to the
installation of utilities.
3. Inteaded Use of Subdivision Lots. It is the Developer's and City's intent that the
following lots be used in the following manner -
A. Lots 1 and 2, Block 2; Lots 1 and 2, Block 3; Lots 1 and 2, Block 4, Lots 1-5,
Block 5; Lots 1-4, block 6, Lots 1-10, Block 7 and Lots 1-10, Block 8: to be used
for single-family detached dwelling units only (one unit one each lot). Developer
agrees that it shall not construct any units other than said single-family detached
dwelling units on said lots.
B. Lot 1, Block 1 this lot crosses into two zoning districts. The Developer's use of
this lot shall conform to the appropriate zoning district where the use is located.
In the event Developer desires to place more than one building on said lot,
Developer must first obtain the appropriate City approvals for said buildings
pursuant to the then existing Albertville City Ordinances.
C. O utlots A, B, C, D, E shall remain unbuildable until replatted into numbered lots
and blocks. The City may require a separate developer's agreement for each plat
which replats one or more of said uutlots.
D. O?utlot F is a wetland area which shall be deeded to the City.
E. Outlots C and H shall be deeded to the City trail purposes.
4
F. The Developer is hereby granted a lot width variance for Lots 7, 8 and 9 of Block
5. Said variance shall allow the lots to be platted at the widths shown on Said
plat.
4. Surely Requirements.
fl/�Iq�141Y.�ii�1�� 11�iIF�M�Y�ll�ll��
A. Developer will provide the City with an irrevocable letter of credit (or other
surety as approved by the City Attorney) as security that the obligations of the
Developer under this contract shall be performed and that the assessments
levied upon Developer's property for said Municipal hnprovements shall be
paid timely. Said letter of credit or surety shall be in the amount of
$ representing % of the $
estimated cost of the Municipal Improvements to be assessed against
Developer (the cost of 57* street has been excluded for purposes of
determining the surety amount). Said letter of credit or surety must meet the
approval of the City attorney as to form and issuing bank.
B. The City may draw on said letter of credit or surety to complete work not
performed by Developer (including but not limited to on and off -site
improvements, erosion control, and other such measures), to reimburse itself
for costs incurred in the drafting, execution, administration or enforcement of
this Agreement; to pay special assessments not timely paid by Developer, or
to otherwise fidfill the obligations of Developer under this Agreement.
C. In the event that any cash, irrevocable letter of credit, or other surety referred
to herein is ever utilized and found to be deficient in amount to pay or
reimburse the City in total as required herein, the Developer agrees that upon
being billed by the City, Developer will pay within thirty (30) days of the
mailing of said billing, the said deficient amount If there should be an
overage in the amount of utilized security, the City will, upon making said
determination, refund to the Developer any monies which the City has in its
possession which are in excess of the actual costs of the project as paid by the
City.
D. Developer hereby agrees to allow the City to specially assess Developer's
property for any and all costs incurred by the City in enforcing any of the
terms of this agreement should Developer's letter of credit or surety prove
insufficient or should Developer fail to maintain said letter of credit or surety
in the amount required above within 30 days of marling of written request by
the City. Should the City assess Developer's property for said costs,
5
Developer .ragreesnotto contestor pa,suchassessmentand
statutory !' y ' iw! appealunderMinnesotaStatutes, including Minnesota
♦`
respectE That portion of said =* irrevocable letter of credit or o&a surety with
to the formanceof Site Improvementsshall ► ereleased upon
certification of h Engineer and approval of the Council 69
-such {:al{ are completed pnmiant 10 thisAgreement
F. The City s not require the Developer to post a surety for the on and off -
site inrproveasents to be installed on Said Plat. In lieu of posting a surety for
this purpose, Developer hereby agrees that the City shall have the right to
refuse to issue a certificate of occupancy for those properties not complying
with paragraph 2.E. of this agreement.
5. Surety Release.
A. Periodically, as payments are made by the Developer for the completion of
portions of the Municipal Improvements and/or On and Off --.site
improvements, and when it is reasonably prudent, the Developer may request
of the City that the surety be proportionately reduced for that portion of the
Municipal Improvements which have been fully completed and payment
made therefor. Allsuch decisions shall be at: the discretion of the City
Council. The City's cost for processing reduction request(s) shall be billed to
the Developer. Such cost shall be paid to the City within thirty (30) days of
the date of mailing of the billing.
B. The Developer may request of the City a reduction or release of any surety as
follows:
i. When another acceptable letter of credit or surety is furnished to the
City to replace a prior letter of credit or surety.
ii. When all or a portion of the Municipal Improvements or the on- and
off --site improvements have been installed, the letter of credit or surety
may be reduced by the dollar amount attributable to that portion of
imlamvctnems so installed, except that the City shall retain the letter of
credits or, shy in the amount of 14°la of the estimated construction
price of the M micipal Improvements during the first year of the
ty mod and 50A of the estimated construction price of the
6
Municipal Improvements doming the second year of the warranty
period.
iii As to all requests brought under this paragraph, the City Council shall
have comgleft discretion whether to reduce or not to reduce said letter
of credit or surety.
C. _ U costs incurred by the City in processing any reduction request shall be
billed to the Developer and paid to the City within thirty (30) days of billing.
6. Abandonment of Pra�ct Costs and Expenses. In the event Developer should
irpilr 1 rr.rrlM rrrl■I r
abandon the proposed development of the Subject Property, the City's costs and
eqxnm related to attorney's fees, professional review, drafhig of this Agreement,
preparation of the feasibility report, plans and specifications, and any other expenses
undertaken in reliance upon Developer's various assertions shall be paid by said
Developer within thirty (30) days after receipt of a bill for such casts from the City. In
addition, in the event the Developer abandons the project, in whole or in part, ceases
substantial field work for more than nine (9) months, fails to provide sufficient ground -
cover to prevent continuing soil erosion from the Said Plat, or fails to leave the
abandoned property in a condition which can be mowed using conventional lawn
mowing equipment, Developer agrees to pay all costs the City may incur in i►g
whatever action is reasonably necessary to provide ground -cover and otherwise restore
Said Plat to the point where undeveloped grounds are level and covered with permanent
vegetation sufficient to prevent continuing soil erosion from Said Plat and to facilitate
mowing of Said Plat. In the event that said costs are not paid, the City may withdraw
funds from the above -mentioned surety for the purpose of paying the costs referred to in
this paragraph.
7. Developer to Pay City's Costs and Expenses. It is understood and agreed that the
Developer will reimburse the City for all reasonable administrative, legal, planning,
engineering and other professional costs incurred in the creation, administration,
enforcement or execution of this Agreement and the approval of Said Plat, as well as all
reasonable engineering expenses incurred by the City in designing, approving,
installing, and inspecting said Improvements described above. Developer agrees to pay
all such casts within 30 days of billing by the City. If Developer fails to pay said
amounts, Developer agrees to allow the City to reimburse itself from said surety and/or
assess the amount owed against any or all of the Said Plat without objection. Developer
has the right to request time sheets or work records to verify said billing prior to
payment.
7
8. Erosion t t and,Sikation Control. Before t grading is str; t! on any site,! ! t
control measuresasshown t !"i the approved- Drainage " and ErosionControl :tt
shallbe t c 1 tkt! 1 tt as setforth ti I1..,.. attachedExhibit Developer shall
also installall erosioncontrol measures e. deemed necessary by the City Engineer :+wd should
!
the 4 `t ! t.control plan prove inadequate it any respect
•Developer shall comply with all requirementsforthfordrainage
into any county! s t or other >+ ditch through which water from Subject Property tt
ay
dram, and i : make e: necessary improvementsor g! through any necessary
procedures to ensure with any federal,tcountyor city requiremenM
all
at Developer'sexpense.
ell
10. Maintain Public Property Damaged or Cluttered During Construction,. Developer
irnnn�+r�r�.nn�rr�n � r m i
agrees to assume full financial responsibility for any damage which may occur to public
property including but not limited to streets, street sub- base, base, bituminous surface,
curb, utility system including but not limited to watermain, sanitary sewer or storm
sewer when said damage occurs as a result of the activity which takes place during the
development of Said Plat. The Developer further agrees to pay all costs required to
repair the streets and/or utility systems damaged or cluttered with debris when occurring
as a direct or indirect result of the construction that takes place in Said Plat. In the event
the Developer fails to clean up, maintain or repair the damaged public property
mentioned above, the City shall provide the Developer with a Notice of its intent to
clean up, repair, or maintain such public property. Developer shall have ten (10) days
from the date of mailing of such notice to effect such cleanup, repair or maintenance of
said public property to the satisfaction of the City Council. In the event that Developer
fails to so clean up, repair or maintain said public property, the City may undertake
making or causing it to be cleaned up, repaired or maintained When the City
undertakes suchh activity, the Developer shall reimburse the City for all of its expenses
within thirty (30) days of its billing to the Developer. if the Developer fails to pay said
bill within thirty (30) days, fiords sufficient to pay the bill may be withdrawn by the City
from the surety described above and/or specially assessed against any or all lots within
Said Plat.
11. Te.mpora Easement E!dts. Developer shall provide access to the Subject Property
at all reasonable to the City or its representatives for purposes of inspection or to
accomplish any necessary work pursuant to dais Agreement.
12. Miscellaneous.
8
I
A. Developer agrees tip an conmuction items required under this Agreement
are items for which Developer is responsible for completing and all work
shall be done at Developer's expense.
B. If any portion, section, Subsection, score, clause, Paragraph Or Phrase of
this Contract is for any reason held invalid by a Court of comfit
jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portion of this contract
C. if building permits are issued prior to the completion and acceptance of public
improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and the costs resulting in
delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public
improvements caused by the City, Developer, its contractors, subcontractors,
matmialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. '
D. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment
to the provisions of this Contract To be binding, amendments or waivers
shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of
the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce
this Contract shall not be a waiver or release.
E. This Contract shall run with the land and shall be recorded against the title to
the property. After the Developer has completed all work and obligations
required of it under this Contract (including the expiration of the warranty
period), at the Developer's request, the City will execute and deliver to the
Developer a release of its obligations under this Agreement
F. The Developer represents to the City that Said Plat complies with all City,
county, state and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to:
subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If
the City determines that Said Plat does not comply, the City may, at its
option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the plat until the
Developer so complies. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease
work until there is compliance.
G. Prior to the execution of this Agreement and prior to the start of any
construction on the Subject Property, Developer shall provide the City with
evidence of good and marketable title to all of Subject Property. Evidence of
good and marketable title shall consist of a Title Insurance Policy or
Commitment from a national title insurance company, or an abstract of title
9
updated by an abstract company registered under the laws of the State of
Minnesota.
H. Developer shall comply with all water, ponding and wetland related
restrictions, if any, required by the City of Albertville and/or any applicable
provisions of State and Federal law.
I. -The Albertville City Council reserves the right to allocate wastewater
treatmentcapacity in a manner it funds to be in the best interests of the public
safety and welfare.
J, shall not place any structure at an elevation such that the lowest
grade opening is less than two feet above the highest known surface water
level or ordinary high water level or less than one fobt above the 100-year
flood level of any a4jacent water body or wetland. If sufficient data on high
water levels is not available, the elevation of the line of permanent aquatic
vegetation shall be used as the estimated high water elevation When fill is
required to meet this elevation, the fill shall be allowed to stabilize and
construction shall not begin until the property has been approved by the
Building InspecW or a professional soils engineer.
K. Developer is required to and represents that he will, in writing, inform
potential buyers of lots within Said Plat of the proposed trail to be located on,
over, across or adjacent to the lot under consideration for purchase prior to
signing a purchase agreement.
13. Draw on ExEiring Letter of Credit. In the event a surety referred to herein is in the
form of an irrevocable letter oftredit, which by its terms may become null and void
prior to the time at which all monetary or other obligations of the Developer are paid or
completed, it is agreed that the Developer shall provide the City with anew letter of
credit or other surety, acceptable to the City, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the
expiration of the expiring letter of credit. If a new letter of credit is not received as
required above, the City may declare a default in the terms of this Agreement and thence
draw in part or in total, at the City's discretion, upon the expiring letter of credit to avoid
the loss of surety for the continued obligation. The form of said irrevocable letter of
credit must be approved by the City Attorney prior to as issuance.
14. Violation of Agreement.
10
i
A. In case of default by the Developer, its successors or assigns, of any of the
covenants and agreements herein contained, the City shall give Developer
thirty (30) days mailed notice thereof (via certified mail), and if such default
is not cured within said thirty (30) day period, the City is hereby granted the
and the privilege to declare any deficiencies governed by this Agreement
clue and payable to the City in fnll. The thirty (30) day notice period shall be
deemed to run from the date of deposit in the United States Mail. Upon
failure to cure by Developer, the City may thence immediately and without
notice or consent of the Developer use all of the deposited cash, irrevocable
letter of credit or other surety fiords to complete the Developer's obligations
under this Agreement, and to bring legal action against the Developer to
collect any sums due to the City pursuant W this Agreement; plus all costs and
attorneys fees incurred in enforcing this agreement.
B. Paragraph 14A of this section shall not apply to any ants or rights of the City
under the preceding paragraph 13 above, and no notice need be given to the
Developer as a condition precedent to the City declaring a default or drawing
upon the expiring irrevocable letter of credit as therein authorized The City
may elect to give notice to Developer of the City's intent to draw upon the
surety without waiving the City's right to draw upon the surety at a future
time without notice to the Developer.
C. Breach of any of the terns of this Contract by the Developer shall be grounds
for denial of building permits.
15. Dedications to the City.
A. Municipal Improvement Dedications.
The Developer, upon presentation to the City of evidence of good and
marketable title to Subject Property, and upon completion of all pond
construction work and certification of completion by the City Engineer, shall
dedicate ponds, to the City. Specifically, Developer shall deed outlots F, G
and H to the City. Acceptance by City of any dedication shall occur upon
passage of a resolution to such effect by the City Council.
B. Park Dedications
Developer acknowledges and agrees that in order to satisfy the City's park K
11
dedication requirements for Said Plat, Developer shall pay the City a cash
payer totaling $ , consisting of $45,�?.00 in park
dedication fees attributable to the residential portion of Said Plat (35 lots x
$1,300.00 per lot) and $ attributable to Lot l; Block 1(10%
of the estimated value of said Lot 1, Block 1), the commercial portion of
Said Plat.. All such park dediciition fees shall be paid prior to release of
Said Flat by the City.
16. Landscapiag. In addition to required ground cover and soil erosion measures that may
be required by City Enginw, and after grading and sodding of all front and side
yards following home construction, Developer shall plant at least one shade tree or large
evergreen. tree per residential lot which conforms to the following size re ' .
V
Shade Trees:. 2 inch diameter trunk
Evergreen Trees: 3 feet high
17. Phased Development. If the plat is a phase of a multi -phased preliminary plat, the City
may refuse to approve final plats of subsequent phases until public improvements for all
prior phases have been satisfactorily completed Development of subsequent phases
may not proceed until Development Contracts for such phases are approved by the City.
Approval of this phase of the Development shall not be construed as approval of future
phases nor shall approval of this phase bind the City to approve fimnre Development
phases. All future Development phases shall be governed by the City's Comprehensive
Plan, Zoning ordinance, Subdivision ordinance, and other ordinances in effect at the
time such future Development phases are approved by the City.
M Indemnity. Developer shall hold the City and its officers and employees harmless from
claims made by Developer and third parties for damages sustained or casts incurred
resulting from Said Plat approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the
City and its officers and employees for all costs, damages or expanses which the City
may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attomey's fees. Third parties
shall have no recourse against the City under this contract.
19. Assignment of Contract. The obligations of the Developer under this Contract cannot
YIY�IYs.Y I..�lYYYYY piYl YYulY11YYYYYYI�Y
be assigned without the express written consent of the City Council through Council
resolution.
20. Limited Approval. Approval of this Agreement by the City Council and issuance of
the Conditional Use Permit which is the subject of this agreement in no way constitutes
12
approval of anything other than that which is explicitly specified m this Agreement.
21. Professional Fees. The Developer will pay all reasonable professional fees sowed by
as a result of City efforts to enforce the tams of this Agreement. Said fees
includes attowey's fees, engineer's fees, planner's fees, and any other professional fees
incurred by the City in attempting to enforce the terms of this Agreement. The
Developer will also pay all reasonable attorney's and professional fees fixurred by the
City in the event an action is brought upon a letter of credit or other surety furnished by
the Developer his provided herein.
22. Plans AaSW as Exhibits. All plans attached to this Agreement as Each. are
iticor this Agreement by reference as they appear. Unless odm-wise
specified m this Agreement, Developer is bound by said plans and responsible for
implementation of said plans as herein
23. Irnt n Clause, Modification by Written Agre went Only. This Agreement
.��rr.rY rrirr,rr�ir i r r
represent the full and complete understanding of the parties and neither party is relying
on any prior agreement or statement(s), whether oral or written Modification of this
Agreement may occur only if in writing and signed by a duly authorized agent of both
parties.
24. Notif mtion Information. Any notices to the parties herein shall be in writing,
delivered by hand (to the City Clerk for the City) or registered mail addressed as follows
to the following parties:
City of Albertville
c/o City Clerk
F.O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301
Telephone: (612) 497-3384
Cascade 11 Land Company, LLC
555 3'd Street N.W.
Elk River, MN 55330
Telc ne: (612) 441-8591
25. Agreement Effect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and extend to the
13
representatives, heirs, successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
CITY OF ALBERTVILLE,
- By
Its Mayor
By
Its Clerk
CASCADE II LAND COMPANY, LLC
By
Its President
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
1999, by John Olson as Mayor of the City of Albertville, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the city and pursuant to the authority of the
City Council.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
1999, by Linda Goeb, as Clerk of the City of Albertville, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the city and pursuant to the auffiority of the
City Council.
14
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA
) ss.
COUNTY OF WRIGHT )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
1999, by , as of Cascade 11
Land Company, LLC .
D
Couri and MacArthur Law Office
P.O. Box 369
705 Central Avenue East
St. Michael, MN 55376
(612)497-1930
AMENDMENT NO.1 TO
DECLARATION OF COMMON INTEREST COMM gITY NO. 20
PLANNED COMMUNITY
COTTAGES OF ALBERTVILLE
THIS AMENDMENT NO, 1 TO THE DECLARATION OF COMMON INTEREST
COMMUNITY NO. 20, PLANNED COMMUNITY, COTTAGES OF ALBERTVILLE (the
"Amendment") is made as of this day of .1999, by and between
COTTAGES OF ALBERTVILLE, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, whose Chief
Manager is Daniel G. Feneis (the " t"), the CITY OF ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA (the
"City") and the undersigned owners of the units subject to the Declaration which have consented to
the Amendment (the "Cor senting (N►ners")
The parties recite and declare as follows:
A. The Declarant has subjected the following described property to a Declaration of
Common Interest Community No. 20, Planned Community, Cottages of Albertville dated the I 1 1'
day of February, 1998, recorded the 24h day of February,1998, in the office of the Wright `County
Recorder, as Document No. 637424 (the "Declaration").
Lots 1-37, Block 1, Cottage of Albertville according to the Plat
thereof on file and of record in the office of the Wright County
Recorder.
B. There are thirty -sit (36) units subject to the Declaration.
C. Section 17 of the Declaration provides that the Declaration may be amended by the
consent of the Owners of the Units which are allocated at least sixty-seven percent (67%) of the
votes of the Cottages of Albertville Association, a non-profit corporation. To obtain the consent of
sixty-seven percent (67%) of the Owners, it is necessary to obtain the consent of the Owners of
twenty-five (25) Units.
D. Section 19 of the Declaration requires the written consent of the City to any
Amendment to the Declaration.
E. A portion of Section 17 of the Declaration, requires the Consent of Eligible
Mortgagees. Eligible Mortgagee Consent is not required to the Amendment.
F. The Declarant is the Owner of ten (10) Units.
G. The Declarant, the City and Consenting Owners ,%ish to amend paragraph 7.7 titled
"Animals" of the Declaration as described below.
1
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts set forth in the above recitals which
parties acknowledge are true and correct, which recitals are incorporated herein by this reference and
in consideration of the covenants and conditions contained herein the parties agree as follows:
1. Paragraph 7.7 of the Declaration is amended in its entirety and is restated below:
7.7 Arum&•
A. No animal may be bread, kept or maintained for business or
commercial purposes anywhere on the Property.
B. Each Unit may have one dog provided it weighs twenty (20) pounds
or less.
C. Each Unit may have two (2) cats provided the combined weight is
twenty (20) pounds or less.
Any Unit Ownerwhich chooses to have a pet dog or cat as described above, shall be responsible for
disposal of all of the pets waste, inchxUng any waste deposited by the animal in any portion of the
Property.
2. Except for the Amendment restating paragraph 7.7 of the Declaration, all of the other
terms and conditions of the Declaration shall remain: in hill force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement to be effective as of the
date first referenced above.
DECLARANT CITY
COTTAGES OF ALBERTVILLLE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
BY �c.., ��.,_. By
Daniel . Feneis Its City Administrator
Its Chief Manager
1 '
11015,11023,11029,11035
Cottages of Albertville, LLC is the Owner of Units 0915,10917,10925, ,10943,11011
constituting ten (10) votes and consents to the Amendment to the Declaration
COTTAGES OF ALBERTVILLE
By � C---
aniel . eneis
Its Chief Manager
STATEOFMiNNESOTA ) �"
) ss.
COUNTY OF
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of , 1999,
by Daniel G. Fends, the Chief Manager of Cottages of Albertville, a limited liability company under
the laws of the State of Minnesota on behalf of the company.
s
A� DEW K XERFEtD
rootah►��oto Notary Publi
qW*W Court
+ar a. JW 31,aovo
4
i
KALLAW AVENUE
e
rM * *Nor
.1............. r •••. • ........
... .
3c
—+
517. i
Izo
Ix
1
i
I
I
•
507.60
'
� I I I i ,
I
A�AMA A A s A A�,�ArA�A"94009ttt 94Nwelm ���AA>IIft1 A
•i
i
•
N
O
co
'
* `
w
to
�
0
d
.'
w
w
j
t0
w
w
w
w
v w
w
•
,
,7
co
N
CD
tii !VN
cCs
1
. j
*w
W
to
I
�
•i
y
c71
W
N
w
O
N�N
Q)
CO?
w
O
N
~
O
w1
i
~
N
tU
fMt
N
•
Ui
i AAA Ali A�A�M A A�1A>11A �A�A�A A •A>I#*am o
9.4f(
MIST CMWff MMMM'Y MD. ' 19 (LA WAM AVE. ME)
p
r
of W21 Plot Number 30 t,
'.......,.a�wa••':.".f+w.4Hr�..+wwY.ww+dr•.ww ..�/WA..w. ... .... ...f....ww...f. w..w-�+..wlii�lw�wrL�.lr.I. R*rJ.w.+.tw+twwu rr. �
Y
MON. 02:.16„PM_ STEVE FEN E,IS RQaILv 202 9000
1 ' `- Poll
� � tJ�6 p 4 Y lly6�ry "yy
MINUTES OF TIM SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF.
COTTAGES OF ALBERTVILLE ASSOCIATION
1
P.01
The undersignH,
being the only member of the Board ofDirectors of Cottages of Albertville
Association doss hereby
unanimously adopt the following resolutions, effective as of the 1 day
Of March" 1998.
Upon motion
my made, seconded and carried, it was
RESOLVED, t
W certain prospective purchasers of Units have expressed a desire to
have a pet or
ts. Pursuant to the authority granted to the Board p=uant to
Paragraph 7.7
t Page 13 of the Declaration of Common Interest Copamunity No. 20,
Cottages of A
bertville, the Board does hereby adopt the following rules and
regulations reg
ading maintaining pets in the Common Interest Community:
1 •3ach
Unit may have one dog provided it weighs 20 lbs. or
2.
ess.
Uch Unit May have two cats provided their combined weight e
20 lbs. or less.
Any Unit own
(s) which chooses to have a pet dog or cat shall be responsible for
disposal of all c
f the pens waste including any waste deposited by the animal in any
portion of the Common
Interest Commutfity. The Board expressly retains its right
to pass futther
es and regulations regarding the keeping of animals in the Common
interest Comm
'ty.
Upon motion duly
made, seconded and carried, it was
.� �.._.... _a._.., RESOLVED, t
iat the annual assessment for each Unit for 1998 shall be in the
amount of
S `=' 1 and notice shall be provided by the Secretary of the
Corporation to i
ach Member of the annual assessment and the required term for its
Payment.
Upon motion d
y made, seconded and carried, it was
RESOLVED, t
iat the acts of the original Director of the Corporation, Cottages of
Albertville, LL
, prior to this date are ratified as and for the acts of the Corporation.
PILOT
LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
April 5, 1999
Mr. Mayor & Mern rs of the City Council
C/o Ms. Linda Goeb
City Clerk\Administrator
5975 Main Avenue'PM.
Albertville, MN 553 1
Dear Mr. Mayor, C ncil Members and Staff:
This letter serves to confirm numerous telephone conversations with the City Attorney and
City Engineer as it relates to proposed work on lands south of 118. As an adjacent
property owner we have the following requests prior to anything more than concept
endorsement.
1. During our planning process we had to submit an EAW, receive its comments and
address a variety of issues such as ditch crossings and sewer flows prior to any
preliminary plat or guide plan amendment. We remind the City the EQB rules are the
same, which will require an EAW of the project as currently proposed.
2. During the creation of sewer benefit areas, the City concluded there was little
likelihood of development in this area. So, a boundary was stopped at Highway 118,
which created a payback to Kenco for sewer under Highway 19 through Barthell's
land. This was a 12-year payback period of which 1.5 years are over. We request the
City expand the benefited area prior to any final plats with a rebate.to Kenco under the
terms of the Par side 3`d agreement. We do believe that a sewer capacity question
should be addressed as it relates to flows from these new sites through Cedar Creek,
Center Oaks, Parkside 1,2,3,4, Summerfield and across Highway 19.
3. During 1998, Pilot spent $35,000 to NSP in order to extend three-phase poser from
Highway 19 up tie right of way to serve golf course pumps. Should the city use this
power source for a lift station (which will create lower maintenance costs) we would
expect a rebate to be part of the feasibility study since a pro rats benefit can be
determined.
4. During 1998, the farmers along ditch 9 believed they could not afford a ditch cleaning,
so Pilot land offered to do so. It was discussed with the attorney, the City
Administrator at the time, and the Engineer, that Pilot be eligible for a fair share rebate
of costs from trunk utility fees, since the ditch cleaning benefited the City for the next
avtmkfe.doc
13736 Johnson Street NE • Ham Lake, MN 55304 • 757-9816 • Fax: 757-4094
20 years and served more than just new development that Pilot was undertaidng. We
will be presenting Engineer supported billing in May for consideration. We believe
that work done in the area South of Highway 118 should be under a substantial rebate
if development proceeds, since it clearly benefits their property both for agriculture in
the short term and development in the long term.
5. Last, with development concepts pending, we wish to hear what the City has
discovered regarding joint trail construction with Wright County Highways as they
upgrade the road. They should be involved now if any new intersections, accel or
decel lanes are required, especially as they may affect a lift station siting.
These are the most significant planning and financial issues, which we dealt with during
our approvals, and we would expect similar results from the new project.
Sincerely,
Land Development Director
Cc: Kent Roessler
\\saverol MWRTWENOPERAT10%utedqua.doc
d1beriville
LIONS CLUB
P.0. Ax , 82
c+�l6erEville, .N 55301
5e (a)
City of Albertville
Mayor and City Council
April, 1999
We wddld like to make the request, that if ever another Gambling
site for, Pulltabs, should become available in Albertville.
That the Albertville Lions be considered to obtain that site.
All proceeds would go back into the community of Albertville.
Thank you,
4-0�_
Floyd Roden
Lions Club President
a
6e'
ex 4 se Na
ALBERTVILLE. MINNESOTA 55301
• TELEPHONE: (612 ) 497.2474
April"13, 1999
The Honorable John Olson, Mayor,
& Members of the City Council
Albertville City Hall
5975 Main Ave. N.E.
Albertville, MN 55301
Telephone: (612) 497-3384
Dear Mayor Olson & City Council Members:
As pastor of St. Albert's Parish, I am following with interest
the 57th Street Development Project which is scheduled to get
underway during the spring and summer season of 1999.
I would like to inquire whether or not the City of Albertville
would consider selling the parish an acre of half acre of land,
contiguous with the present western property line and the con-
tinuation of 57th Street, with a view to the expansion of church
parking space?
Naturally, the second part of this inquiry is the price for such
a piece of land and the assessment that would eventually be due
on it for the 57th Street Project.
Aware that the Church of St. Albert sold much of if not all of
the land that comprises the City Park to the City of Albertville
in 1976 for the sum of $6,885.50, I trust that you and your
Council will give serious consideration to this inquiry and pro-
posal.
Sincerely yours,
Father Ronald R. Harrer, O.M.I.,
Pastor.
(Corporate Vice -President)
Office of
PLANNING ANL
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION.
WRIGHT COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
10 N.W. Second Street, Buffalo, MN 55313-1193
(612) 682-7338
To Whom It May Concern:
Attached are the proposed revisions to the Sewage Disposal Standards for Wright County. The
current code is being eliminated and replaced by the new one. Chapter 7080 State Rules are
being adopted by reference. This is required by the Pollution Control Agency (PCA). The PCA
also requires language beyond just simple adoption.
Text that is not underlined or in bold comes from Chapter 7080 and Minnesota Statutes 115, and
are required by the PCA to be included and addressed in our code. Items that are in bold differ
from Chapter 7080, but have already been adopted in other parts of the Wright County Zoning
Ordinance, or our current sewer code. Underlined items also differ from Chapter 7080.
However, these items are mainly sizing requirements for on -site sewage treatment systems and
have been an accepted practice. These differences were arrived at between our office, site
evaluators and installers.
The Environmental Health Department believes that this is a fair and reasonable code, aimed at
protecting public health and safety, while still allowing for flexibility in designing and installing
septic systems. Thank you for your time and consideration. -
Printed on recycled paper.
Equal Opportunity / Affirmative Action Employer
ROUGH DRAFT Dated 4-9-99
716 Sewage and Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Standards
716.1 Purpose and Intent
The purpose of the Sewage and Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Standards shall be to
provide minimum standards for and regulation of individual sewage treatment systems
(ISTS) and septage disposal including the proper location, design, construction,
operation, maintenance and repair to protect surface water and groundwater from
contamination by human sewage and waterborne household and commercial waste; to
protect the public's health and safety, and eliminate or prevent the development of public
nuisances pursuant to the authority granted under Minnesota Statues Chapters 115 and
145A and Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 as amended that may pertain to sewage and
wastewater treatment.
716.2 General Provisions
(1) Standards adopted by reference. The County hereby adopts, by this reference,
Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080 and Minnesota Statutes Section 115.55, along
with any future amendments.
(2) Permits. No person shall install, alter, repair or extend any individual sewage
treatment system in Wright County without first applying for and obtaining a
permit from the Environmental Health Office (EHO) and at the same time paying
a fee as listed in the fee schedule determined by the County Board of
Commissioners. Staff will notify the permittee of an incomplete application,
when the requirements are met a permit will be issued. Such permit shall be valid
for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of issuance. A full design must
be submitted before a permit for new construction is approved. When weather
does not allow a full site evaluation to be completed, a design of the worst case
scenario shall be submitted. Worst case scenario shall be a mound system, septic
tank(s) and lift station. If Wright County Soil Survey is consulted and research of
neighboring systems indicates that an in ground system is appropriate, that may
be designed. Verification is required when weather permits.
(3) Inspections. The permittee shall notify the EHO prior to the completion and
covering of the ISTS. The installation and construction of the ISTS shall be in
accordance with the permit requirements and application design. Inspections will
be made at least once during the construction of the ISTS at such time to assure
that the system has been constructed per submitted and approved design.
(A) No part of the system shall be covered until it has been inspected and
accepted by the Inspector unless prior arrangements have been made.
(B) Proposals to alter the permitted construction shall be reviewed and the
proposed change accepted in writing by both the designer and the EHO.
(C) It shall be the responsibility of the property owner or authorized agent to
notify the Inspector on the workday preceding the day inspection is
desired.
(D) If proper notice is given and the Inspector does not appear for an
inspection within two hours after the time is set, the permittee may
complete the installation. The permittee shall then file a signed As -Built,
including photographs of the system prior to covering, with the EHO
within five working days. The As -Built shall include a certified statement
that the work was installed in accordance with submitted design and
permit conditions and that it was free from defects.
(E) Upon satisfactory completion and final inspection of the system the
Inspector shall issue a Certificate of Compliance. If upon inspection the
Inspector discovers that any part of the system is not constructed in
accordance with the minimum standards provided in this Ordinance, the
Inspector shall give the applicant written notification describing the
defects. The applicant shall be responsible for the correction or
elimination of all defects, and no system shall be placed or replaced in
service until all defects have been corrected or eliminated.
(4) Neither the issuance of a permit nor the inspection of a system shall constitute any
warranty or guarantee of operation of the system.
(5) Existing System Compliance Inspections. An ISTS shall require a compliance
inspection when any one of the following conditions occur:
A. Any time that a permit is applied for in a Shoreland Management Area
(1000 feet of a lake, pond or flowage; or 300 feet of a river or stream or
the landward extent of a floodplain).
B. No owner of a tract of land on which a dwelling is located, or tract of
land on which a structure which is required to have an ISTS is
located, shall sell or transfer to another party said tract of land unless
requirements as stated in the Wright County Point of Sale
Certification Ordinance for On -Site Septic Systems are met.
C. Addition of a bedroom on the property, or variance issued in accordance
with Minnesota Rules Chapter 7080.0305 Subp. 3 (General Requirements
for Local Units of Government).
If a request for an additional bedroom or variance is received
between November 1 and April 30 the County may issue a permit
or variance immediately with the requirement that a compliance
2
inspection be completed by the following June 1 and the applicant
submits a certificate of compliance by the following September 30.
If a system constructed between May 27, 1989 and January 23,
1996 does not comply with applicable requirements, and is not an
imminent public health threat, a property owner applying for a
zoning permit to construct a bedroom addition has five years from
the date of issuance of such zoning permit to bring the system into
compliance.
D. If an existing system (constructed prior to April 1, 1996) is not an
immediate public health threat, the tank is watertight and provides at least
two feet of soil separation, the system need not be upgraded, repaired or
replaced or its use discontinued, as long the system is not located in the
shoreland area, wellhead protection areas (200 feet from any public water
supply well, that is any well serving 25 persons or more for sixty days of
the year) and serving food/beverage/lodging facilities. The three foot rule
applies in those circumstances.
E. Certificates of Compliance or Notices of Noncompliance shall be issued
on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Inspection Form for
Existing Septic Systems. Copies shall be provided to the property owner
and County within 30 days.
(6) Failing septic systems must be properly abandoned according to part 7080.0176
within the following time frames:
A. A failing ISTS shall be upgraded, replaced or its use discontinued within
one 1) year. The Environmental Health Office will give consideration to
weather conditions as it establishes compliance dates.
B. An ISTS posing an imminent threat to public health or safety shall be
abated within 10 days of notice. The system shall be upgraded, replaced,
or repaired or its use discontinued, within 6 months.
(7) License requirements. No person shall engage in the evaluation, inspection,
design, installation, construction, alteration, extension, repair, maintenance or
pumping of on -site individual sewage treatment systems without first obtaining a
license to perform such tasks from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency,
except as provided under part 7080.0700, subpart 1. An individual may be
permitted to install or repair an ISTS on their own property if the system is
designed by a licensed Designer_and said Designer oversees their work.
Pressurized systems cannot be constructed by anyone other than a licensed
installer.
(8) Additional soil treatment area requirements. On lots created after January 23,
1996, the system design shall include at least one designated additional soil
treatment area which can support a standard soil treatment system.
(9) Holding Tanks
(A) Holding tanks shall not be used as a sanitary system for new
residential construction or for improvements greater than 50% of the
assessed value of the structure at the time of the application for the
improvement. Subsequent improvements shall count towards the
50% value limit for improvement.
(B) Holding tanks shall only be used as a corrective action for sewage disposal
for pre-existing uses when a standard treatment system cannot be
installed.
(C) Undeveloped lots of record on which a holding tank is the only
practical means of sewage disposal are unsuitable for residential use.
(D) Holding tanks shall not be installed on undeveloped lots of record for
recreational uses unless the lot has been found to be suitable for a
dwelling and can support a full septic system.
(E) Holding tanks must have a visual or audio alarm for the prevention of
overflow.
716.3 Standard systems shall take priority for new construction and on upgrades where those
systems can be reasonably installed.* Systems classified as other, performance, and/or
experimental shall meet the requirements of Chapter 7080. Warrantied systems are
allowed if sized according to Tables 1 and 2. If a non-standard system is installed on a
site where more than one sewer site is available and a standard system could be installed,
a design for a standard system must also be included and that site must be reserved for
that sewer.
*Standard systems shall be defined as systems constructed in unaltered soils and are
drainfields, pressure beds, at -grades, and mounds
716.4 Site Evaluation and Design Requirements.
(1) Chapter 7080 must be followed.
(2) A minimum of two soil borings are to be conducted within the primm treatment
area and one soil boring in the secondary treatment area.
(3) The larger soil sizing factor must be used when there is a discrepancy between the
soil texture and percolation test or a justification for a smaller sizing shall be
submitted with the design report.
(4) Include the percent and direction of slope on site evaluations along with
4
I
Table 1
elevations of the trenches, corners of the pressure bed or rock bed of the mound
Septic Tank Requirements
Garbage
Lift in
Lift and
Bedrooms
Gravity
Disposal
Basement*
Disposal
with Split Tank)
(with Split Tank)
with Split Tank)
2-4
1250 (1000)
1500
1500* (1000)
2000
5-6
1500
2250
1500*
3000
7-9
2000
3000
2000*
4000
* Dosing volume has to be 1 % or less of first compartment. If dosing volume exceeds 1 % and is
not over 5%, tank capacity must be 2000 gallons split for 2 to 4 bedrooms, 3000 gallons split for
5 to 6 bedrooms and 4000 gallons split for 7 to 9 bedrooms. Capacity can be achieved with
multiple tanks.
Table 2
(5_) At minimum a 1000 gallon pump tank is needed for lifting the effluent to the soil
treatment area. The EHO may make exceptions to this provision for upgrades on
existine lots of record/platted lots.
�6) All mounds/pressurized systems require a minimum of a compartmented tank
before the pump tank.
Drainfield Sizing
Bedrooms
0.83
1.27
1.67
2.00 �C
2.20
2
600 (249)
600 (381)
600 (501)
600
660
3
700 (373.5)
800 (571.5)
800 (751.5)
900
990
4
800 (498)
900 (762)
1002
1200
1320
5
900 (622.5) 1
1000 (952.5)
F 1253
1500
1650
(77) Trenches designed to have twelve inches of rock under the distribution_ pipe shall
be sized according the above chart.
Each trench must have a minimum of a two inch inspection pipe located at the
opposite end from where the effluent enters the medium.
(9) Mound systems are to be sized at 1.0 sq.ft.1GPD.
Table 3
All mounds shall have at least 3 laterals to distribute the effluent more evenly.
Mounds must have a vertical inspection line of at least four inches in diameter.
Minimum Setback Distances (Feet)
Sewage or Soil Treatment Building
Holding or Absorption Sewer or
Tank Area Supply Pipes
Water Supply Wells* 50 50
(50 feet of continuous casing or encountering 10 feet of impervious material)
Water Supply Wells* 50 100
(less than 50 feet of continuous casing)
Buried water suction pipe* 50 50
Buried pipe distributing water under pressure* 10 10
Buildings* * * 10 20
Property Lines* * * * 10 10
Subsurface drainage systems such as field tile lines 50 50
Surface drainage systems such as open ditches 30 30
The ordinary high water mark of the following types of lakes:
Natural Environmental Lakes and 150 150
Transitional River Segments
Recreational Development Lakes, 75 75
Mississippi River, Agricultural Rivers and Tributaries as defined in Section 612.4
General Development Lakes 50 50
All public water wetlands as defined by 50 50
Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.005, Subd. 15a or successor statute
50**
50**
50**
10
* Setbacks from buried water pipes and water supply well as governed by Minnesota Rules, Chapters 4715 and 4725,
respectively.
** The setback can be reduced from 50 to 20 feet if the building sewer or supply pipe is air tested by holding 5 pounds of
air pressure for 15 minutes.
*** These setbacks may be reduced if necessary due to site conditions (as determined by the EHO), but in no case shall any
part of the individual sewage treatment system be located under or within the structure. In no case shall a sewage tank
be located less than three feet from a footing or an absorption area less than ten feet from an occupied building.
**** These setbacks may be reduced if necessary due to site conditions (as determined by the EHO). Infringement on
property line setbacks requires written permission from affected property owner(s) using Wright County's Property
Line Administrative Form, written agreement on location of property lines between affected parties and approval by
the EHO.
716.5 Setbacks and Placement of Building Sewer
(1) The building sewer pipe extending from the house to the tank shall not be
less than four (4) inches in diameter and must meet the strength
R
requirements of Schedule 40 plastic pipe. The pipe shall be supported in
such manner so that there is no deflection during backfilling and subsequent
settling of the soil between the building foundation and the inlet to the septic
tank. Construction of the line shall provide a grade of not less than 1/8 inch
per foot for minimum grades as recommended by the Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency. No 90 degree ells shall be permitted, and where the
direction of the sewer is changed in excess of 22 1/2 degrees accessible
cleanouts shall be provided.
(2) The building sewer pipe extending from the tank to the first drop box shall
not be less than four (4) inches in diameter and must meet the strength
requirements of Schedule 40 plastic pipe. Sewer pipe lines, manholes and
other appurtenances shall be constructed in accordance with the State
Plumbing Code and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency requirements.
716.6 Septage Disposal. See Section 770.8 Item 6-Land Application of Septage.
716.7 Enforcement
(1) Any person who violates any of the provisions of this Ordinance or who makes
any false statement on a Certificate of Compliance, shall be guilty of a
misdemeanor, punishable by imprisonment or a fine or both as defined by law.
(2) In the event of a violation of this Ordinance, in addition to the other remedies, the
County Attorney may institute appropriate actions or proceedings to prevent,
restrain, correct or abate such violations.
716.8 Subject to Change
The requirements of this Ordinance are intended to be comparable to the Environmental
Protection Agency and Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards. Should this
Ordinance differ from other agency standards or should EPA or MPCA standards change,
the more strict standards shall apply.
7
R F .
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that on Thursday, April 29, 1999 the Wright County
Planning Commission will hold a hearing in Meeting Room 120 of the Courthouse
Annex, in the City of Buffalo, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. to consider the
following amendments to the Wright County Zoning Ordinance:
Replace section 716 Sewage Treatment and Disposal Standards with a new
section 716 Sewage and Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Standards.
The new standards will update the County regulations to comply with state
rules, establish standards and practices for Wright County and codify
practices which have become standard in Wright County. A complete copy of the
proposed amendments is available from the Office of Planning and Zoning.
Such persons that desire to be heard with reference to the proposed amendment
will be heard at this time. If you do not attend the hearing or submit
written comment, it will be assumed that you have no objections to the
proposal. If there are any questions, please contact the Planning and Zoning
Office in Buffalo. Interpreter services for the hearing impaired will be
provided on request for public meetings and other county -sponsored classes
and events.
WRIGHT COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING OFFICE
WRIGHT COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
10 2nd STREET NW RM 140
BUFFALO MINNESOTA 55313-1185
PHONE: 682-7338
A 1 ,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC. --HEARING - WRIGHT COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
The Wright County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing at their
regular meeting on April 29, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. in Meeting Room 120 of the
Courthouse Annex in Buffalo to consider amendments to the Wright County
Zoning Ordinance as follows.
Replace section 716 Sewage Treatment and Disposal Standards with a new
section 716 Sewage and Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Standards
(Copy enclosed)
The new standards will update the County regulations to comply with state
rules, establish standards and practices for Wright County and codify
practices which have become standard in Wright County. A complete copy of the
proposed amendments is available from the Office of Planning and Zoning.
THE CITY COUNCIL/TOWN BOARD SHOULD COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING. IF NO WRITTEN
RESPONSE IS RECEIVED BEFORE THE HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL
ASSUME THAT THE CITY COUNCIL/TOWN BOARD HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS.
CITY/TOWNSHIP APPROVES OF THE REQUEST BECAUSE:
CITY/TOWNSHIP DISAPPROVES OF THE REQUEST BECAUSE:
COMMENTS:
SIGNED: '
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that on Thursday, April 29, 1999 the Wright County
Planning Commission will hold a hearing in Meeting Room 120 of the Courthouse
Annex, in the City of Buffalo, Minnesota at 7:30 p.m. to consider the
following amendments to the Wright County Zoning Ordinance:
Replace section 716 Sewage Treatment and Disposal Standards with a new
section 716 Sewage and Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Standards
The new standards will update the County regulations to comply with state
rules, establish standards and practices for Wright County and codify
practices which have become standard in Wright County. A complete copy of the
proposed amendments is available from the Office of Planning and Zoning.
Such persons that desire to be heard with reference to the proposed amendment
will be heard at this time. If you do not attend the hearing or submit
written comment, it will be assumed that you have no objections to the
proposal. If there are any questions, please contact the Planning and Zoning
Office in Buffalo. Interpreter services for the hearing impaired will be
provided on request for public meetings and other county -sponsored classes
and events.
WRIGHT COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING OFFICE
WRIGHT COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER
10 2nd STREET NW RM 140
BUFFALO MINNESOTA 55313-1185
PHONE: 682-7338
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINr - WRIGHT COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
The Wright County Planning Commission will conduct a public hearing at their
regular meeting on April 29, 1999 at 7:30 P.M. in Meeting Room 120 of the
Courthouse Annex in Buffalo to consider amendments to the Wright County
Zoning Ordinance as follows.
Replace section 716 Sewage Tr atment and Disposal Standards with a new
section 716 Sewage and Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Stand ra_dS
(Copy enclosed)
The new standards will update the County regulations to comply with state
rules, establish standards and practices for Wright County and codify
practices which have become standard in Wright County. A complete copy of the
proposed amendments is available from the Office of Planning and Zoning.
THE CITY COUNCIL/TOWN BOARD SHOULD COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING. IF NO WRITTEN
RESPONSE IS RECEIVED BEFORE THE HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION WILL
ASSUME THAT THE CITY COUNCIL/TOWN BOARD HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED
AMENDMENTS.
CITY/TOWNSHIP APPROVES OF THE REQUEST BECAUSE:
CITY/TOWNSHIP DISAPPROVES OF THE REQUEST BECAUSE:
COMMENTS:
SIGNED: