1987-08-17 CC Agenda/PacketPermit
45
46
47
48
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
AUGUST 17, 1987
I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER
II. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA
III. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES--JULY 31, 1987
*AUGUST 3, 1987
IV. COMMUNITY FORUM
7:05 .joint PbWer!':s Update --Approved Plans & Specifications
7:15 Lion's Club --Approval of 3.2 BeeriLicense for Pig Roast
on Sunday August 23, 1987
Lion's Club --Authorization to Sell Pull -Tabs at Pig
Roast on August 23, 1987
7:20 Jaycees --Approval of 3.2 Beer License for Friday, i(
August 21, 1987. Queen Coronation &...Dance
7:30 Preliminary Findings from Staff Report (RE: Hordis Bros.)
V* DEPARTMENT BUSINESS
a. Administration
*-Income Received/Bills to be Paid
*-Preliminary findings from Bruce Nelson
-League's Regional Meeting'
-Need to set Public Hearing on Sign Ordinance
Approval of Building Permits
Type of Amounts of
Name Construction Address Permit
District #885 School Addition 5386 Main Avenue $ 4,023.62
Tom Haller New Home 11577 50th Street 913.90
Jim Leuer Const. 1 ,New Home 5555 Lake Avenue 1,007.40
Barthel Const. New Home Locust Court 962.30
-Administrator's Report
b �e9a1
er business
c. Engineering
-Findings on Open Ditch in Barthel's Addition
-Findings on Culvert Closing on Co. Rd. 19
d. Maintenance
-Other Business
VI. MEMBER'S ROPORT
-Loretta Roden --Community Celebration
Others
VII. OTHER BUSINESS
-Wedding Invitation from Barry Johnson
VIII. CALL FOR ADJOURNMENT
I
COUNCIL MINUTES
AUGUST 17, 1987
The regular meeting of the Albertville City Council was called to order by
Mayor Loretta Roden. Members present included Gary Schwenzfeier, Donatus
Vetsch, Don Cornelius and Bob Braun. Others present included Maureen Andrews,
Bob Miller, Thore Meyer, and Ken Lindsay.
There was a motion to approve the agenda. The motion was made by Gary Schenz-
feier and seconded by Don Cornelius. All were in favor and the motion carried.
There was motion to approve the minutes of the July 31, 1987 and August
3, 1987 meetings of the Council. The motion was made by Don Cornelius and
seconded by Donatus Vetsch. All were in favor and the motion carried.
Gary Schwenzfeier updated the Council on the August meeting of the Joint
Powers Board. The first item discussed was the status on the construction
of the new well. The project is expected to be completed within the next
month. There had been some additional work that needed to be done for the
construction of the well.
The Plans and Specifications for the Barthel Manor 2nd Addition have been
reviewed and approved by the Joint Powers Board.
The biggest issue discussed by the Board was the problem with the Waterline
in St. Michael. The Board will have to decide at the next meeting whether
or not there will need to be a lawsuit to resolve the problems that have
occured in St. Michael. Another issue that will have to be decided is wheth-
er or not other areas of the line will have to be tested to assure that
they were installed properly.
The next issue discussed by the Council was an application for a 3.2 Beer
License for the August 23, 1987 Pig Roast. The motion to approve the 3.2
Beer License was made by Bob Braun and seconded by Gary Schwenzfeier. All
were in favor and the motion carried.
In addition to the 3.2 Beer License the Lion's requested permission to sell
pull -tabs on the site of the Pig Roast for 1 day only on August 23, 1987.
The motion to allow the sale of Pull tabs at the 1987 Pig Roast was made
by Gary Schwenzfeier and seconded by Don Cornelius. All were in favor and
the motion carried.
There was a request for a 3.2 Beer license made by the Albertville Jaycees
for the August 21,1987 to allow the sale of 3.2 beer at the Queen's Coronation
and Dance. At the time the Council discussed the matter no member of the
Jaycees were present nor the application completed. A motion to approve
the 3.2 Beer License was made by Gary Schwenzfeier and seconded by Donatus
Vetsch, pending the completion of the application and the payment of the
license fee. All were in favor and the motion carried.
The Council reviewed some of the preliminary information on the report that
is being drafted to respond to the Hordis Brothers, Inc. letter of August
5, 1987. A meeting of the task force was scheduled for Wednesday August
19, 1987 at 7:00 p.m. to work on the report.
COUNCIL MINUTES
PAGE 2
The income recieved and bills to be paid were reviewed by the Council. There
was a motion made by Donatus Vetsch and a second by Don Cornelius to approve
the bills. All were in favor and checks 8121 through 8145 were approved.
The Council received in their Council packets the preliminary findings from
Bruce Hall -Nelson. No action was taken on the material, the Council was
just asked to review it.
The council was informed that the KC's had gotten the bid for the League
of Minnesota cities Regional Meeting. There was only one bid submitted
to do the work. a meeting will be scheduled to discuss what has to be done.
There was a motion made to set the Public Hearing on the Sign Ordinance.
The motion was made by Bob Braun and seconded by Don Cornelius to set the
hearing for September 8, 1987 at 8:00 p.m. All were in favor and the motion
carried.
Building Permits 45 through 48 were approved on a motion made by Don Cornelius
and a second by Donatus Vetsch. All were in favor and the motion carried.
Bob Miller reviewed with the Council the changes made to the Parkland ordinance.
Bob pointed out that a fee for residential development had been established
using a formula of $500 per acre + 3 lots = $170.00 per lot. It was also
discussed that that is a need to increase the amount for multiple dwelling
units because of the increase the amount for multiple dwelling units because
of the increase in population, that is, more people living in a smaller
area so a step up provision was included in the ordinance. It was also
clearified that the money earned through Parkland dedication will need to
go into a seperate account and not be put in the general fund. (Our accounting
system will allow us to keep this money seperate).
There was no other discussion of the ordinance so there was a motion to
adopt Ordinance 1987-2, An ORDINANCE REGULATING THE DEDICATION OF LAND FOR
PONDING AREAS AND FOR PARKS OR IN LIEU OF PARK DEDICATION A CASH PAYMENT
TO BE USED IN ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF PARKS IN THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE.
Themotion was made by Bob Braun and seconded by Gary Schwenzfeier. All
were in favor and the motion carried.
The next item discussed by the Council was the letter to MPCA regarding
a shift of dollars from one catagory to Engineering to cover the costs created
by the NOV. This request is NOT for additional dollars but is a reapportionment
of money awarded to the City. The City will need to hold on this matter
until we hear from MPCA.
The next item discussed was the letter from Meyer-Rohlin regarding the Waste -
Water Treatment Facility. Thore Meyer reviewed the firms findings and what
needed to be done on each of the following items:
Chemical Feed Pump - In reviewing the original plans there were no
indications that the motors would not maintain a charge to operate
the chemical feed pump. It was not until the Chemical feed system
was used that it was determined that it did not work.
In order to correct the problem a portable generator will need to be
mounted on the pontoon. Meyer-Rohlin agreed to participate in the
cost sharing of the generator.
COUNCIL MINUTES
PAGE 3
A question was asked regarding the why the City's should share in the
cost since the system was suppose to work.
Thore stated that he did not believe the problem was a design error
and therefore they should not have to bear the full cost of the correct-
ion.
It was asked when the final inspection took place, and the Council
was informed that it was completed in August and the plant went on
line in September.
Gary Schwenzfeier questioned why the experts from the suppliers did
not point out that the design would not work so that right equipment
could be installed right of way. It was asked if the Engineers knew
what size generator would be needed to correct the problem, because
of problems with undersized equipment. It was also suggested that
the City might consider looking a little larger generator which could
be used in other parts of the City.
Manual Trim Control - A manual trim control was supplied because of
the constraints put on by MPCA and the EPA.
Venting of Chemical Tank - The design of the storage tank was designed
so that it would be done through the manway hatch with the building
doors open, so that other venting would not be required. If the City
chooses to change the way teh storage tank is filled it would fall
entirely on the City and the engineers would not be responsible for
any cost incurred.
Transfer Pump - There was a problem with the transfer pump which has
been corrected and will be tested before the next discharge.
Minor Items - Pontoon - At the time the project was designed all possible
equipment was installed to allow by constraints of the MPCA and EPA.
It may have been possible to include some of these items on change
orders if they had been pointed out before the system went into operation.
Control Panel - The issue regarding the panel has been discussed on
numerous occasions and that at the time the meters were installed the
Council was informed and no action was necessary.
The letter from Meyer-Rohlin Also pointed out that had the panel been
installed in the building it wuold require 2 people to check out the
lift station and that Control panels for the lift stations such as
Albertvilles are normally mounted outside in a weather-proof enclosure.
It was agreed however that the present location of the panel is dangerous
and should be raised and turned 180 degrees. This will be done at
the Engineer's expense. This proposal was found acceptable by Ken
Lindsay.
It was agreed that Meyer-Rohlin would get back to the City with the
cost of the portable generator first by phone and then with a follow
up letter. The Council would like to know what is being purchased
before it is ordered to assure proper operation.
COUNCIL MINUTES
PAGE 4
There was no other engineer business pertaining to the pond so the
letter from the engineer was accepted and made part of the record.
Ken Lindsay next updated the Council on the problem of what appears to be
power surges on the line. On the weekend of August 15-16, the system went
down pumps went out. It appears that there was problems with high voltage
because the connections were welded together. 100 amp fuse were blown out
as well as both capacitors.
In checking with NSP they believe that it is not their problem, saying that
there must be something faulty int he system. According Ken just about
everything has been changed or replaced.
It is the City's contension that the problem is directly tied to the work
done by NSP at the end of June because prior to that there had not been
any problems. The city has requested NSP to put in a new transformer in
hopes that it would resolve the problem. NSP says they will not change
the equipment until the City proves NSP at fault.
It appears that the City has three options: 1) Continue to change equipment
when failure occurs. 2) Ask NSP to put another recorder on the line until
such time there is a problem and, 3) Have NSP change the transformer.
Waldorf Pump representatives had been out to see if equipment was functioning
normal and everything checked out o.k.
— The City wants to know what kind of proof NSP needs before they will change
teh transformer. It was agreed that if the City does not get any cooperation
from the St. Cloud office that the Minneapolis office be contacted to see
what they can do.
Ken Lindsay also suggested that the City look into an alarm system for teh
Wastewater Treatment Facility in case there additional problems in the future.
No action was taken on the suggestion.
Ken Lindsay next informed teh Council that had been vandelism done to the
City Hall, Water Tower, County Garage, and the side of Vetsch's Scout.
The Sheriff's office had been notified and are investigating.
There was some discussion regarding the condition of Psyks 4th Addition.
Ted LaTour is suppose to have someone in to correct the problem with the
water holes developing. It was pointed out that someone had been out dragging
the road and as a result two crowns have started to develop. Ken Lindsay
stated taht the City has not bladed the road because of the one year warranty
where teh contractor is responsible for amintaining the road.
Mayor Roden discussed with the Council the Community Celebration meeting
she had attended on August 8, 1986, and informed the Council that another
meeting had been scheduled for Tuesday the 18th. The Council briefly discussed
the proposed ideas and what activity the council would like to be responsible
for promoting. It was agreed that the City would be in charge of the "Buttons"
and would attempt to tie in a logo contest as well. As more information
becomes available the Council will be kept informed.
Mr. Jim Walsh was present to express his concern to the Council regarding
the purchase of the John Deere Tractor. He stated that he did not believe
that he tractor should have been purchased because it had not been budgeted
for in 1987. In addition, Jim questioned why a tractor had not been bid
out and why had, not. the Council used the liquidated damages to cover
COUNCIL MINUTES
PAGE 5
the costs fo the back sewer billing.
The City Attorney stated that process used by the City, that is getting
2 written quotes meeting state law. Jim Walsh pointed out that it had been
the City's policy to bid out all items.
In addition Jim wanted to know why the City had looked only at John Deere
equipment. Gary Schwenzfeier stated that other equipment had been looked
at but did not meet the needs of Albertville. Jim Walsh disagreed and said
there was, but no other brands were mentioned.
It was pointed out htat the repair issue had been discussed and it was agreed
that Scherber in Rogers would be easily accessable.
Jim Walsh stated again that he has concern with how the process took place
and that the Council's decision surprised him. He also stated that the liquid-
ated damages money would be set aside for a new truck and that when the
Toro mower had been purchased that it had been agreed that another mower
wuld not be needed. Don Cornelius pointed out that the "Grounds Master"
and that the City needed equipment that would work on the slopes.
Jim Walsh requested that the minutes show that he protested the procedures
used in purchasing the tractor and that he did not believe the equipment
should have been purchased.
Jim Walsh also requested a copy of the Wastewater Treatment Facility Statement
showing income and expenses as soon as it is available.
Jim Walsh then reviewed some of the same Joint Powers issues discussed by
Gary Schwenzfeier. New joint Powers information was that Hickok and Associates
had been named the temporary Engineers for the Joint Powers until Jan. 1,
1988.
Gary Schwenzfeier is to point out to Munitec that when flushing water lines
in Albertville about yard of gravel of mud was blown out into the street
right of way.
Loren Kohnen said that he had been out by Andy's and that some of the work
has been done, but that there is still more to be done. No action was taken
on this matter.
There was no other new business so there was a motion to adjourn the motion
was made by Gary Schwenzfeier and seconded by Don Cornelius. All were in
favor and the motion carried.
GORDON BERNING
WRIGHT TITLE GUARANTEE CO.
THOMAS HALLER
ALBERTVILLE LIONS CLUB
SHURBURNE COUNTY ABSTRACT
MEINY'S DIGGERS, INC.-
WRIGHT TITLE GUARANTEE CO.
SHERBURNE COUNTY ABSTRACT
PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL 5
MEINY'S DIGGERS, INC.
SEWER ACCOUNT
INCOME RECEIVED
AUGUST 17, 1987
$ 25.00
1,786.93
913.90
25.00
CO. 10.00
50.00
7,193.88
CO. 10.00
1,268.00
25.00
4.482.30
SUBTOTAL $ 15,790.01
BILLS TO BE PAID
AUGUST 17, 1987
CHAPIN PUBLISHING COMPANY
MEYER & MILLER
THE SHOP
CROW RIVER RENTAL
MEYER & MILLER
IRS
ST. MICHAEL INSURANCE AGENCY
MN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
KILIAN HARDWARE HANK
MASON CONSTRUCTION, INC.
CROW RIVER NEWS
FEED -RITE CONTROLS, INC.
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES
HACKENMUELLER'S, INC.
CHOUINARD OFFICE MACHINES & SUPPLIES
MEINY'S DIGGERS, INC.
MTI
SCHARBER'S & SONS, INC.
MAUREEN ANDREWS
KEN LINDSAY
MIKE MERGES
PERA
LORI RODEN
BRUCE NELSON
84.24
190.00
62.90
35.00
100.00
111.50
95.00
124.91
55.33
300.00
11.85
43.00
10.75
106.11
29.80
125.00
454.94
9,545.00
535.47
629.52
310.20
133.42
255.71
386.09
SUBTOTAL $ 13,735.74
ORDINANCE NO. 1987-2
AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE
DEDICATION OF LAND FOR PONDING AREAS AND FOR PARKS
OR IN LIEU OF PARK DEDICATION
A CASH PAYMENT TO BE USED
IN ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT
OF PARKS IN THE CITY OF ALBERTVILLE
The City Council of the City of Albertville, Minnesota ordains:
Section. 1. Purpose. The purpose of this ordinance is to
establish the regulations governing the conveyance of land, or in
lieu of, cash payment to be used in the acquisition and
development of parks in the City of Albertville.
Se.ction_.2. Definitions. For the purpose of this ordinance,
the terms defined in this section shall have the meaning herein
given them.
Subdivision 1. Parks. "Parks" mean parks, playgrounds,
trails or open spaces within the City, owned, leased or used,
wholly or in part, by the City for park and recreational purposes
or of which is designated by the City Council as a park.
Section.3. Public.Us.es. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 462.358, Subd. 2b, the City of Albertville requires all
owners or developers, as a prerequisite to approval of a plat,
subdivision or development of any land, to convey to the City, or
dedicate to the public use, a reasonable portion of any such
proposal for public use as streets, roads, sewers, electric, gas
and water facilities, storm water drainage and holding areas or
ponds, similar utilities and improvements, or parks, playgrounds,
trails or open space. These portions are to be approved and
acceptable to the City.
Section.4. Park Dedication Requirements. Subdividers and
developers of land within the City of Albertville shall be
required to dedicate to the City of Albertville for park,
playground, trail and public open space purposes the following
minimum amounts of land or cash, or both, whichever the City, at -
its option, shall require. The required dedication shall be made
prior to the City's release of the final plat for filing. The
amount of any required cash contribution shall be calculated
based upon rates established by the City and in effect as of the
date of the release of the final plat for filing.
Subdivision 1. Residential dedications.
(a) Ian shall be dedicated pursuant to the following
schedule wherein density is calculated by considering
-1-
the total acreage of the entire plat, subdivision or
development being considered:
Dwelling Units Per
Cross. Acre.... _ . _ Dedication Requirement
(A) less than 9 5% of subdivision area
(B) 9 and more 5-1/2% of subdivision area
+ an additional 1/2% for
each additional dwelling
unit per acre over 9
(b) A cash contribution in lieu of land dedication may be
required pursuant to a standard formula established by
the City, which formula takes into consideration such
things as, but not necessarily limited to, the fair
market value of the property in the plat, subdivision
or development. The City Council shall establish from
time to time by Resolution the amount of required cash
contribution, and until changed by Resolution hereafter
adopted, the amount of cash contribution shall be
$170.00 per dwelling unit.
(c) Combination land and cash dedication. The City may
require the subdivider or developer to make a
combination cash and land dedication pursuant to the
following formula:
(i) The amount of land which could be required in
accordance with this ordinance shall be
calculated.
(ii) From the total calculated in Subdivision l(a)
above, the actual amount of land the City
determines to be needed to fulfill the purposes of
this Subdivision 1(c) shall be subtracted.
(iii) The balance arrived at in subparagraph (c)(ii)
above shall be converted into a cash contribution
in lieu of land dedicated pursuant to a standard
formula established by the City, which formula
takes into consideration such things as, but not
necessarily limited to, the fair market value of
the property in the plat, subdivision or
development and the percentage of the total park
dedication obligation represented by the said
balance.
-2-
Subd. 2. Commercial and industrial dedication requirements.
(a) Land dedication, if required, shall be five percent
(5%) of the subdivision or development.
(b) If the City requires payment of fees in lieu of land
dedication, that fee shall equal five percent (5%) of
the City's calculated fair market value for the
property as if zoned in the classification requested by
the developer.
(c) Where a combination land and cash dedication is made,
the lands dedicated will be deducted from the total
park dedication land requirement and the balance of
acreage will be multiplied by the current per acre
dedication rate.
Subd. 3. Mi sc el l aneo-us RecTui rpments for Park Dedications.
The following requirements apply to all dedications or
conveyances for park, playground, trail or public open space
purposes.
(a) Land conveyed or dedicated pursuant to the provisions
_ of this Subdivision 3 must be located outside of
drainage ways, flood plains and ponding areas after the
site has been developed.
(b) As part of their development contract or site plan
approval responsibilities, subdividers and developers
shall be responsible for making certain improvements to
the developments for park, playground, trail and public
open space purposes including, but not limited to,
finished grading and ground cover for all park,
playground, trail and public open spaces within their
developments.
(c) Dedication credit shall not be granted for the
construction of recreational facilities unless a
specific agreement granting credit is approved by the
City Council. This paragraph does not affect the
requirements of Section 4, Subdivision 3(b) above.
(d) The City Council may adopt standards and guidelines for,
determining what geographic location of each such
development should reasonably be required to be so
conveyed or dedicated. Such standards and guidelines
may take into consideration the zoning classification
to be assigned to the land to be developed, the
particular use proposed for such land, amenities to be
provided and factors of density and site development as
proposed by the owners or developers.
-3-
(e) Where private open space for park, playground, trail,
open space or other recreation purposes is provided in
a proposed subdivision and such space is to be
privately owned and maintained by the future residents
of the subdivision, such areas may be used for credit
at the discretion of the City Council against the
requirement of dedication for purposes described in
this Section 4 provided the City Council finds it is in
the public interest to do so and that the following
standards area met:
(1) That yards, court areas, setbacks and other open
space required to be maintained by the Zoning and
Building Regulations shall not be included in the
computation of such private open space; and
(2) That the private ownership and maintenance of the
open space is adequately provided for by written
agreement; and
(3) That the private open space is restricted for
park, playground, trail, open space or
recreational purposes by recorded covenants which
run with the land in favor of the future owners of
property within the tract and which cannot be
eliminated without the consent of the City
Council; and
(4) That the proposed private open space is reasonably
adaptable for use for such purposes, taking into
consideration such factors as size, shape,
topography, geology, access and location of the
private open space land; and
(5) That facilities proposed for such purposes are in
substantial accordance with the provisions of the
recreational element of the comprehensive plan,
and are approved by the City Council; and
(6) That where such credit is granted, the amount of
credit shall not exceed twenty-five percent (25%)
of the amount calculated in Subdivision 1 or 2
above, whichever is applicable.
(f) The City Council shall establish a separate fund into
which all cash contributions received from owners and
developers in lieu of conveyance or dedication of land
for park, playground, trail and open space purposes
shall be deposited. The City Council shall establish
separate budgeting and accounting procedures for such
fund and shall make from time to time appropriations
for such purposes, for developing existing park,
-4-
total subdivision area, except streets, alleys or easements other
than those leading directly to such sites, shall be dedicated by
the time of approval of the final plat for the first addition
unless otherwise approved by the City Council. All other lands
contemplated to be dedicated under this subdivision shall be
dedicated by the time of final plat.
Saction..8. Minimum Condition of Areas to be Dedicates3.
Areas to be dedicated for public park, trail, or ponding shall be
brought to a suitable condition by the subdivider prior to
acceptance by the City. (1) All dead trees, trash, junk,
unwanted structures or similar undesirable elements shall be
removed by the owner at his expense. On grades or exposed areas
which are not sodded, lawn grass seed shall be sown at not less
than four (4) pounds to each one thousand (1,000) square feet of
land area. Seeding and germination testing shall take place on a
schedule set forth by the City at the time of the conveyance.
Seeding shall consist of a maximum of ten (10) percent rye grass
by weight and a minimum of ninety (90) percent of permanent
bluegrass and/or fescue grass by weight. The applicant shall
submit an agreement in writing signed by the developer that
respreading of soil and seeding of lawn will be done during the
immediately following planting season as set forth in this
section and provide a performance bond to guarantee said seeding.
Said condition shall also be in accordance with the City's
resolution on condition of acceptance of public parks in
Albertville.
(a) Lands dedicated for public park, trail or ponding shall
be accompanied by a certificate of survey or shall be designated
as a park, trail or ponding area on the plat as determined by the
City.
(b) Further, such lands shall be free and clear of all
liens and encumbrances including special assessments as evidenced
by an up-to-date abstract of title or registered property
abstract to be submitted at developer's cost to the City for its
examination.
(c) Such dedication shall be in the form and manner as
prescribed by the City.
,Sec.tion.10. Where fees are not specifically stated
in this ordinance, said fees shall be established by reason of
the City Council which may revise from time to time.
Sp.c.tion. ll. City Council Vo.te. All actions related to this
ordinance, including amendments, variances, waivers and plat
approvals, shall require a majority vote of the members of the
City Council present at a duly constituted City Council meeting.
Section_ 1.2. Waiv-er. In the event the City waives the
requirement that a subdivider or developer proposing to subdivide
land plat the same, the City Council may require the subdivider
or developer, as a condition of granting such waiver, to dedicate
parks (or pay cash in lieu thereof) and ponding areas in a manner
consistent with the provisions of this ordinance.
Sec.tion.23. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be enforced from and after its passage and publication
according to law.
Passed b the City Council of the City of Albertville this
�j day of ".,C.., , +� , 1987.
ATTEST:
Maureen Andrews
Administrator/Clerk
Loretta Roden, Mayor
-7-
�BRUCE HALL NELSON
COPYWRIT!NC, AND PHOTOGRAPHY 603 FOURTH AVENUE NORTHWEST
BUrFALO MN 55313
612-682-5113
Albertville City Council
Albertville Development Corporation
The following is a compilation of commentary from the citizen meetings
to date.
The report -in -the -making can be expanded upon in the remaining meetings
and a page -by -page review with the City Council and Development
Corporation.
As, you will note, several themes have emerged that both reflect
community attitudes and offer a basis for marketing efforts.
I look forward to reviewing this summary and future additions with
you.
Sincerely,
/;- --Z'.
Bruce Hall Nelson
Aug. 4, 1987
Albertville Citizen
Meeting Input Report
To Date
Bruce Hall Nelson
Aug. 4, 1987
I. INTRODUCTION
I. INTRODUCTION
Over the past several months I've met with the City Council/
Development Corp., Lions, Jaycees, Park Board, Planning Commission,
Fire Dept. and Planning Commission and dug into data salient to
a city marketing effort.
The meetings to date reveal tremendous civic pride among residents
and, moreover, many critical strengths the city can utilize in a
marketing effort.
At the same time, research has reflected resident views of both
city strengths and needs. What's more -- and fortunate -- those
needs can mostly be the goals of a marketing effort (eg. industry)
while the strengths are just the tools we need to sell the city.
In other words, the problems and the challenges the city faces are
solvable.
The information being compiled herein constitutes a base for a
city marketing effort and some in -town improvements. While not
a scientific sample, this information can also serve as one
vehicle for future decision -making.
During the meetings the residents were asked to:
A. Take an inventory of aspects of Albertville that they think
are strong selling points.
B. Assess city needs,citing areas in which Albertville can be
improved... -through marketing or other means.
C. Share their perceptions of Albertville in a word or phrase
that best describes the city.
D. Discuss the future of Albertville... what they want the city
to be like in 20♦ years, what kind of industry and jobs are
wanted, what kind of development tools ought to be used, what
apprehensions and concerns they have about growth.
1
II. MEETING INPUT SUMMARIES
II. MEETING INPUT SUMMARIES (to date)
As comments unfolded through the various meetings, several consistent
themes emerged. The following pulls out those repeated themes and
summarizes community input.
A. Inventory
1. People
Although marketing something as subjective as "people" is potentially
less persuasive to a business than dollars and cents, many of the
people -related testimonials will carry weight. As examples, the
results of civic organization projects and crime statistics will
provide clear evidence of this outstanding resource.
In addition, the data from our labor survey and population growth
patterns and projections will add ammunition. And the many
testimonials found under perceptions will add color to marketing
materials.
2. Schools
There is almost unanimous pride in the school district. Themes
such as smallness equals local control, sports successes and
curriculum can be backed up by specifics.
I suggest interviews with school administrators to bolster curriculum
and activities statements, provide specifics for community input
into school decisions and characterize the public -parochial
relationship.
Easy access to several post secondary institutions is a strong point
worth utilizing.
3. Access
Being located right on I-94 is perceived as a big seller. For
businesses this location is as good as -- and often better than --
higher priced suburban spots.
Many cited drive times to the likes of the airport (45 minutes)
and Metrodome (35 minutes) that are better -- with less of a hassle --
than from many suburban locations.
Indeed, Albertville has the best of both worlds; metropolitan
convenience and the open spaces of country living.
Access and open spaces must be principal selling points. Graphics
can be used to illustrate botY qualities. This combination of
strengths is one few other cities can so emphatically sell.
4. Utilities
With many other cities on long waiting lists for grant monies,
Albertville can boast of sewer and water plants of high quality
and capacity and low cost. Rates and service for natural gas and
electricity also separate Albertville from other cities. And, for
those with a mind to a non -metro location, Albertville's metro
phone is a potentially strong incentive.
Streets and sidewalks are worth mention. Because main streets are
county owned and of high capacity, businesses should be pitched
that service and tax benefit.
5. Retail -Entertainment
While more retail is ultimately a goal of this marketing effort,
many cited access to area retail as a strength. Within short
distances are Brookdale (20 minutes), discount stores (20 minutes)
and three theaters, for examples.
It is critical in pitching this resource to compare hassle -laden
drive times in the suburbs to easy shots on low traffic/well main-
tained county highways and freeway.
6. Parks and Recreation
People are proud of city parks and programs and they should be
highlighted. But the meetings revealed a strong identification with
regional parks as well.
Indeed, the draws of rural life -- fishing, hunting, etc. -- can
be marketed best from a regional scope.
It is clear that many people tie city parks and recreation to the
strength of civic organizations and the school.
Selling the city's amenities should be wrapped in a package that
presents Albertville as a community of people. Indeed, parks
and recreation was seldom mentioned without citing the city's
resources of people and organizations.
3
7. Safety
Good fire protection was cited by several groups. A marketing
package should include the equipment and people that make fire
protection an asset.
Crime data -- especially when compared to Hennepin County -- should
be used as clear incentives for locating here. Sheriff response
time to emergency and crime -in -progress calls is excellent and must
be stressed.
8. Taxes and Cost of Living
Research is backing up resident impressions of low taxes and cost
of living indicators, such as land prices and utilities.
Such data -- along with a breakdown of available development tools --
will be persuasive in competing with suburban alternatives.
9. Health Care
The FamilyCare Center with two doctors and the proximity of four
four hospitals is viewed as an asset. Emergency care is minutes
away. This resource is viewed as critical and a measure of
community strength by many looking to relocate.
10. Housing
Forty-three housing starts last year tells business that Albertville
is growing. There is a paucity of rental housing in the city, but
we can offset that to a degree by quoting low rents in nearby
cities and townships for a short commute.
A goal of this marketing effort should include targeting rental
housing development.
!]
B. Needs
Residents identified needs in Albertville that can be adressed:
--Through in -town initiatives
--Via a marketing effort combined with using development tools
--With both 1 and 2
1. Emergency Services
Although the city can rightly boast of strong health care services,
including access to four nearby hospitals, the meetings did reveal
a need for a more local ambulance service and certified first
responders in the VFD. It was noted that because ambulance
personnel from Helath Central of Buffalo are rotated in from
metro facilities, they often lack sufficient knowledge of the
area and lose critical time finding emergency sites.
While the Fire Dept. was often given high marks, there are at
present no certified First Responders in the department
2. Retail/Entertainment
Many cited the need for in -town retail businesses. The best
ammunition, obviously, for bringing in retail is bringing in more
people. Hence, some marketing materials must be directed at
prospective residents with a secondary objective of attracting
retail.
At the same time, current growth and building data can be used to
solicit retail.
Many cities find the most intitial success by looking right in
their own backyards. An exploration of on -the -farm welders or
equipment repair operation, for example, might turn up candidates
for in -town relocation.
3. Parks and Recreation
Residents are proud of their parks. There is a desire, however, to
develop additional park land for varying uses (eg. quiet space,
ball fields). Park land throughout the city is wanted. Developers
also will want to know what the city expects of them in dedicating
land or money from parks.
5
4. Utilities
Extending sewer lines to County Road 19 was cited by several
groups.
5. Controls
Residents are strong advocates of a careful zoning ordinance and
controls to ensure a moderate growth rate.
6. Industry/Growth
People want Albertville to grow, but grow within carefully
prepared standards. Untying the Industrial Park for other builders
was seen as a key to unlocking commercial -industrial business
growth. Small companies are preferred.
There is a clear desire for more local jobs -- particularly skilled.
7. Housing
Albertville has few rental units. This need is a clear opportunity
for attracting multiple family building construction, but could
present an obstacle for attracting some companies. Short commute
times and the strength of the local work force should offset this
lacking.
Most groups noted a need for senior/retirement home housing.
8. Identity
Several groups want a memorable image created for Albertville. The
idea would be extended throughout existing and new city buildings
and promotions. Indeed, such a theme could be a common thread for
city logos, promotions/events and marketing.
It is important, however, not to create a new and alien identity.
It must emerge from the heart and traditions of the town.
9. Summary
Controlled growth underlaid nearly every needs assessment. Develop-
ment tools should be used judiciously.
0
C. Perceptions
Strong marketing themes emerged from how residents view the city.
The presentation of marketing materials should follow the tone
offered by these perceptions. The result will be marketing that is
both effective and championed by residents.
Testimonials gathered at the meetings will give a human dimension
to empirical quality of life indicators. and highlighted
comments from residents will add impact to data used in any materials
we produce.
Perceptions often cited include safety, cleanliness, small town/
rural, privacy, caring people, close to metro. See the next section
for spec if ics .
7
D. Future
Residents want Albertville to grow, BUT there is a clear and
emphatic desire to keep Albertville's small town, rural character.
People want an identity created that reflects and enhances the
city's charm.
They look forward to an Albertville with a strong commercial-
inductrial base, more jobs, more retail and more people with
businesses that are good, nonpolluting neighbors. They see,
moreover, the preservation of rural amenities now enjoyed ...
the quiet, safety, farm land and woods ... as critical.
The key, cited over and over, is controlled and careful growth.
Development tools should be used strategically to attract businesses
that will grow with the community without exploiting the environment
or people (eg. low wage jobs, hazardous wates).
M
III. MEETING INPUT COMMENTS
III. MEETING INPUT COMMENTS (to date)
The following is a compilation of comments from the meetings to
date.
Following most comments abbreviations appear to signify the sources
CD = City Council/Development Corp. meeting
PC = Planning Commission
JC = Jaycees
FD = Volunteer Fire Dept.
PB = Park Board
LN = Lions
LS = Lioness
AA = Athletic Association
AL = At large
OB = Other businesses, not involved with the Development Corp.
E7
A. Inventory (Empirical things we can sell about Albertville)
1. People and Organizations
The various civic organiations have each contributed greatly to
the community... moreover they work together to bring tremendous
resources and amenities to the city (FD, JC, LN, PC
--For example:hockey rink and hockey program, fitness court,
second meeting room at city hall, basketball court, fence around
softball, slide, etc. in park, softball league, broomball, play-
ground equipment, picnic shelter
--The organizations are vehicles through which community money is
raised and put back into the community as improvements
--The two churches are considered a foundation for community social
life.
People was one of the first assets cited eith each organization.
Here are descriptions used:
*Friendly (FD, JC
*People watch out and help out one another (PB, LN
*Caring, concerned, help in crisis (CD
*New people accepted (PC
*Neighborly (LN
2. Schools
Every organization had positive comments about the school system/
district here:
--A consistent theme was the smallness of the district, allowing for
more control, greater input (CD,FD, PC
--The elementary school being located in Albertville was a source of
pride for many
--Generating particular pride are the sports teams, especially
championship -playoff teams such as wrestling, volleyball, football
--Within short driving times are the Vo Tech (Buffalo), St. Cloud
State, U of M (as quick as from many suburbs), and West Hennepin
(CD
--New cable TV capabilities supports an already stong public
school curriculum (CD
--Teachers live in the community (CD
10
--Caring staff at St. Michael -Albertville (CD
--Good relationship between parochial and public schools (CD
3. Access
The easy access via I-94 to the metropolitan area was considered
an asset by each organizations. Also noted:
--Most residents work in the cities (JC
--Being right on the freeway gives Albertville an edge over other
cities (CD, PC
--Drive times are short...45 minutes to the airport, 35 minutes to
the Metrodome, 40 minutes to St. Cloud
4. Safety
--The city's low crime rate was noted (IN, CD, JC, PC
(Research supports this assertion for all types of crime... the
data are particularly attractive when compared to Hennepin County)
According to the 1986 Wright County Sheriff's Annual Report,
Albertville had one business burglary, one residential burglary,
25 thefts and nine instances of property destruction. In
marketing materials we should consider constrasting local crime
data to the likes of Plymouth and Maple Grove.
People in Albertville, in 1986, called the Sheriff only 123 times
with over half those calls for animal complaints, citizen aid, fire
calls, lost and found, medical aid, motorist aid, traffic and
unfounded thefts. There were no instances of reported sexual
offenses. A closer look at the likes of murder, stolen cars,
narcotics, terroristic threats, assault and robbery should prove
useful to promoting the safe life here.
Albertville's contract with the Wright County Sheriff for police
protection appears more than adequate. Indeed, Sheriff Wolff
said response time to immediate assistance calls never exceeds
five minutes ... thats comparable to suburbs with their own police
departments.
--Good fire protection was noted (PB, FD, PC
5. Parks and Recreation
The two parks are considered a plus for Albertville, although a need
for additional park land was frequently mentioned (see Needs)
--A list of park assets appears under People and Civic Organizations
--Good fishing lakes (LN, CD
--Hunting within minutes (LN
--Swimming beach at Beebe Lake (PB
--Two primitive ball fields (PB
--Children's programs, although mostly tied to the school, are
considered fair to goods summer youth, independent use of park,
--Bible School
--Many look at the area not just the city for readily available
park and recreation opportunities (CD
--Seniors are active with trips, etc (PC
--Open space: Many moved out here because of openness... woods,
picnic areas, hiking
****A map of nearby opportunities will be useful in marketing
materials
6. Rural Life
--Likely to know neighbor....and still have privacy (CD, LN, FD
--People watch out for one another (IN
--Small town flavor (ALL
7. Utilities/Infrastructure
Utilities are considered a tremendous asset in bith quality and
and cost:
--Sewer was cited by PB, PC, CD
--Water system is the largest in Wright County through Joint Powers
with St. Michael, Hanover, Frankfort... called one of the finest
in the state. The inexhaustable acquif er and new well were cited
^ (CD
one (united)
--Having a metro ph greatly reduces business costs and
etitive vs. other non -metro cities
makes Albertville more comp
(eg. Monticello and Buffalo) (PC, CD, JC
12
--Natural gas through Minnegasco and electricity through NSP offer
better rates than many other non -metro cities or REA's... more in
line with metropolitan costs (CD, PC
--Streets..... nine ton roads adequate for truck traffic
.....main street maintained by county for tax advantage (PC
--Sidewalks, particularly near the school and "downtown" add
convenience and safety (PC
--landscaping noted (PC
8. Taxes and Cost of Living
--Land prices said to be better than competitive (PC
--Taxes are great when compared to Hennepin, Scott and Carver
Counties... where they're said to be 1/3 higher... Double in Plymouth
(PC, CD .....figures should be checked and used
--Harder burden here with smaller school district and higher
proportion of residential to business (see Needs)
9. Retail/Entertainment
--Retail not keeping up with population (PC
--Three theaters within 15 to 20 minutes (CD
--Brookdale 20 minutes away
--Shopping adequate for basic needs here (CD
--Cub, County Market both 20 minutes away
--Cable TV (JC
10. Social Life
Two churches, Parish Center... dinners
Kids programs (see Park and Recreation)
Civic Organizations strong (see People and Organizations)
13
11. Development Tools
--Industrial Park (CD, PC, PB
--Good local builders (PC
--Topo map (PC
--City staff ... city administrator, city engineer, maintenance....
city administrator can grease steps (CD
--Comprehensive Plan... zoning ordinance on the way (PC
--Tax increment financing, industrial revenue bonds are among
tools used (CD, PC
--Active Development Corporation (CD
12. Health Care
--Albertville FamilyCare Center with two doctors (CD, PC
--Four hospitals within 20 minutes... Health Central of Buffalo,
Unity, Mercy, Monticello -Big Lake (CD
--Ambulance from more than one area (CD
Helicpotor ten minutes away for major crises (CD
14
B. Needs (To be sought in marketing efforts or via in -town improvemen'
1. Retail/Entertainment
--Restaurants (family) FD, IN
--Grocery store (FD
--Movie theater (PB
--Shooping, general...convenience (PB, CD, PC JC
2. Emergency Services
--Ambulance service (FD, PC
--VFD has no certified First Responders
3. Development Tools
--Airport (FD
--Controlled growth (FD, CD
---industrial and residential
--Good,tight ordinance for development (PC, CD, LN
--Untie industrial park for other developers (CD
--Foresightedness of people for future so town can accept growth
and not be outdated (PC, CD
--Incentives.... use local bank -(CD
--Help small businesses with tax breaks that are fair to all (CD
--Look at flat tax rate as an alternative to tax increment financing,
etc. to make it more economical for city to develop (CD
4. Housing
--Rental, multiple unit (FD, PB, LN
--Senior housing - retirement center (FD, PB LN
While Albertville has a paucity of rental housing, there are an
15
4. Housing (continued)
increasing number of units within relatively short commutes
(eg. Buffalo in 15 minutes and Monticello in ten). Moreover,
rental rates are more than comeptitve with the metro area. The
1980 census shows nearby units f-A
�v�
Cd/Y`
New apartments are renting for in Buffalo
As with other services not offered in Albertville, it is important
to stress travel time rather than distance
5. Identity -- Image
--An image that is associated with Albertville with similar
store fronts, logos, promotions that tie into its theme
(Annandale, Nantucket and Carmel were cited as examples) (FD, PC, CD
6. Industry
More commercial industrial (LN, CD
Fill industrial park (PC, CD, LN
Job opportunities ... usually skill jobs were mentioned (LN, PB CD
More industry is needed to offset imbalance of tax burden on
residential
7. Parks and Recreation
--More programs for children (JC
--Park near southwest side development
--Active and quiet parks for better choice ... ball parks, picnic
areas, quiet walks, etc.
--Complete the park system (PB
16
8. Utilities
--Sewer extension to County Highway 19 was frequently mentioned
along with lift station to serve the new area (PB, PC, CD, LN
17
C. Perceptions (Impressions to be used to bolster and give
flavor to inventory)
1. Safe (FD, JC, PB, PC, CD
--Women not afraid to be on city streets
--Don't have to lock door
--Don't have to look over your shoulder
--There's a free feeling here
--Little burglary
--No fear of robbery
--"Biggest fear is a 3-Wheeler across the lawn"
2. Quality of Life -- Rural
--"Every spring the fields tell you what's so nice about living
out here" (FD)
--The fresh smell of spring (JC)
--Albertville has the best of both worlds -- country and city (JC)
--"Part of living out here is to relax" (PB)
--"Down home" (JC)
--Not crowded (PB)
--Seems more rural than it really is (CD)
--Clean (JC)
--Close to the city yet better off (CD)
--Small town atmosphere (PB)
--"We've got it made here" (PB)
3. Quality of Life -- People
--"Nice, pleasant town to raise a family in (PB)
--There's privacy here (PB)
--A lot of people are not Catholic and they are accepted (PC)
--There's a feeling of being needed here (CD)
--Caring,concerned people who watch out for one another and help
in a crisis (CD, LN
--Neighborly (LN
M.
4. Mentioned as sources of special pride
Rural surroundings
New development
Industry
Parks
Elementary school
Clinic
Churches
Parish Center
19
D. Future (What people hope to see in 20 - 30 years
1. Identity
Many hope to see some kind of style or imagery consistently used
in city development. The image would help put Albertville on
the map. People would comment, "This is neat or a work of art."
Such an identity or theme would indeed tell developers that this
is a city with a future. It would also serve as a focal point
for city pride and help generate metro media exposure.
The theme would carry overto the city logo, water tower, signage
and vehicles.
2. Keep Albertville Rural
--It's important to maintain farmland around town and not be
totally developed like Brooklyn Park, for example (CD,JC,PB, FD
--Keep growing and still keep charm of small town (PB
--Hope town stays pretty much the same (JC
3. Moderate, Controlled Growth
--Want moderate growth, but should keep up with the times (JC
--Want well planned and laid out community... even growth (CD, PC
3. Jobs and Industry
--Prefer new businesses with skill jobs (JC
--Looking for addition of small manufacturing businesses with
10-15 employees... companies that will "grow with us" (CD
--Mixed, diversified businesses for healthy local economy (CD
20
E. Concerns About the Future
1. Pollution
Every group voiced concern over the influx of polluting industries.
Specifically mentioned were:
--Air
--Noise
--Hazardous wastes
--Junk
--Sloppy property maintenance
2. Critical Questions for New Businesses
--Wages (JC, PB
--Stability... types of financing ... making sure that when the city
helps a new business that that business is also investing
significantly and has a financial stake in making it or losing it. (F
--How many people will be employed ... growth projections (PC, CD F
--The reputation of the company ... how people like working
for it (CD, JC
--Why is the company relocating and what is its relationship with
the city(ies) where it now operates (CD
--What type of buildings are planned (CD
--What level of city funding are they looking for ... are they able to
move without hitches (CD
--Will they succeed (CD
--What local ties will the company have here so that management
will be concerned about the community (Positive example is Hordis)
(CD
3. Overall concerns
--Growing too fast... utilities and schools will be able to support
growth
21
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS
IV. RECOMMENDATIONS
At this point six basic themes have emerged around which marketing
materials should revolve:
1. Location
Direct access to I-94 provides suburban -like proximity to urban
amenities and markets while the city stays rural ... within a couple
minutes of farm land and woods. Albertville enjoys the best of
both worlds: Metropolitan convenience and rural, small town life
2. Utilities/Cost of living and doing business
The capacity, quality and cost of sewer, water, gas and metro
telephone make Albertville attractive to the relocating business-
person. A tax comparison should be presented. These and other
costs (eg. transportation) can favorably be contrasted to suburban
offerings. Again, location is a key.
3. Safety
A comparison of Albertville/Wright County crime with Hennepin
County will appeal to any prospect. Sheriff response times should
further alleviate fears regarding local police.
4. Identity
Creating and building on a clear and appealing identity will be
a common thread for all marketing and promotions
5. Development Tools
We must clearly spell out how the city has and will help new and
relocating businesses.
6. Quality of Life
A common denominator, probably reflected in identity imagery,
must be the oft cited intangibles that make living and working
in Albertville so special.
Whatever we do, it must be simple and direct to provide the kinds
of information our audiences need. Visuals, such as maps, charts
and photos can tell the Albertville story. Copy should be short
and to the point under clear organization.
22
VaA-)2
w
PaA-,)2 LprylAd
Aielz,�l /��,
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC.
ENGINEERS -LAND SURVEYORS 1111 Hwy. 25 N., Buffalo, Minn.55313 Phone 612-682-1781
City of Albertville
c/o Maureen Andrews, Administrator
Box 131
Albertville, MN 55301
Re: Wastewater Treatment Project
Special Council Minutes
July 28, 1987
Dear Members of the City Council
p LJ 0
August 16, 1987
The Engineers have examined the contents of the minutes from
the Special Council Meeting of July 28, 1987. We also examined
the specification and design file, and talked to other persons
involved with design and construction of the Albertville project.
The following are the Engineers' comments on their review:
The Albertville Wastewater Project was designed in 1983.
Several people involved with some of the design process are no
longer with the Engineering firm and equipment manufacturers.
Many of the Engineers' comments are based on memory. Design
features used in the Albertville project were based on economic
and design constraints that had to be followed. It is the
Engineers' opinion that the present operational problems are not
design errors.
Chemical Feed Pumps
In talking to the project designer, he remembers that the
outboard motor manufacturer did not indicate that the motors would
not maintain a charge on the batteries to operate the chemical
feed pump. Also, the chemical feed equipment manufacturer did not
indicate that the proposed electrical system would not handle the
chemical feed pump. Based on the research that was done, all
indications are that the present system should have worked. If it
was known that the motors would not keep the electrical charge on
the batteries to operate the chemical feed equipment, then
something else would have been provided during the design
phase. If this problem was known before final inspection, it
could have been changed by way of a change order. One way to
correct this problem is the use of a portable generator. The
Thore P. Meyer, Professional Engineer Robert Rohlin, Licensed Land Surveyor
Engineers are willing to participate in cost sharing in the
purchase of a portable generator to be mounted on the pontoon.
Manual Trim Control
The designer indicated that the manual trim control was
provided because of the design constraint that had to be followed.
Venting of Chemical Tank
During the design phase of this project it was determined
that filling the storage tank would be done through the manway
hatch. While filling the storage tank through the manway hatch,
it was anticipated that the building doors would be open and no
other venting would be required or recommended. Therefore, if the
City wishes to change the way the storage tank is filled, the
Engineers do not object.
Transfer Pump
Yes, there was a problem with the transfer pump earlier this
year. The chemical feed company has repaired the problem and will
be testing it.
Minor Items - Pontoon
Based on the designer's knowledge, everything that was
provided on the pontoon was all that was allowed. What is allowed
now in 1987 may not have been allowed in 1983. If these items
were a big concern then, why were they not brought to the
Engineer's attention during the construction phase of the
project? The Engineer could have provided a change order to
obtain these items.
Control Panel
We have heard many different comments as to why the control
panel was moved from the building to its present location. For
whatever reason, the panel was moved from the building to the
present location and it was approved. Before approval, there were
a couple of meetings on the project site with City Officials
(James Walsh, Maureen Andrews and Ken Lindsay), Engineers and the
Contractor. The concession that was made to allow the control
panel to remain by the lift station was that the Contractor was to
provide remote time meters in the building. The Contractor agreed
to provide the time meters and they were installed. According to
Mr. Barry Johnson, the City Council was informed, but no Council
action was necessary.
If the control was installed in the building, it would
require two persons to check out the lift station. With the
control panel outside, one person can check out the lift
station. Control panels for lift stations of this type are
normally mounted outside in a weather-proof enclosure. A weather-
proof enclosure was provided for the project. The Engineers agree
that the existing location of the control panel is dangerous. We
have talked to the supplier of the lift station and they have
recommended that the control panel should be turned 1800 and
raised; therefore the Engineer will have this done.
The Engineers object to persons saying that the Engineers did
not look at all possible solution in design and necessary
equipment required for this project. For example, the Engineers
looked at providing gravel for the dike tops, as all of our pond
designs have, but MPCA said "no". We provided the design and
equipment that EPA and MPCA would approve. Since the Engineers
enjoy working with the City of Albertville, we are willing to
participate in cost sharing or take corrective action as necessary
as mentioned within the above.
Very truly yours,
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC. 2
&"
JOJ
Charles Eberhard
^ sl
cc: E-8401-E
HORDIS
BROTHERS, INC. 5334 BARTHEL DRIVE 612-497-3212
P.O. BOX 130 800-328-9749
ALBERTVILLE, MN 55301
August 5, 1987
Members of the City Council
City of Albertville
Albertville, MN 55301
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Thank -you for allowing me the time at the August 3, 1987
meeting to voice my opinions and concerns over the over-
ruling of the Planning Committee by the City Council on
the subject of safety fence and sound control which was
to be installed on Barthel Drive. The other subject
matter we discussed was the astronomical increase of
water, sewer, and taxes that were levied to Hordis
Brothers, Inc.
Starting from the beginning, I would like to go through
the chronology of events as I remember them happening.
Subject: Rezone
*Jerry O'Leary, Plant Manager of Albertville, and I
met with the Planning Commission and voiced our
disapproval of Rezoning to Single Family Dwelling.
*Representative from Barthel gave his "dog & pony"
show on why it should be rezoned - Planning Com-
mission approves Rezoning.
*Discussion continues and we point out noise
concerns and safety hazzard from trucks and cars.
*We recommend a.burm, 4 ft. fence, and trees to
reduce noise.
*Much discussion followed on safety and at that time
we all agreed to the installation of the burm, the
4 ft. fence, and the trees; including all members
of the Planning Committee and the representative
from Barthel.
*City Council unanimously overrules the Planning
Committee and none of the recommendations have to
be installed.
Members of the City Council
August 5, 1987
Page 2
*No notification given to participants as to the
overruling of the agreement.
The following questions were asked:
1) Why was Hordis Brothers, Inc. not given the
common or professional courtesy as to the
overruling by the City Council?
2) Because of this lack of concern for the safety
Of its citizens, are the individuals on the
council legally responsible if an accident
happens?
3) How can an individual/corporation trust in the
decisions of the City Council when they
overrule the group whose duty or obligation it
is to protect all concerned; the individual,
the corporation, the city, especially when a
compromise had been reached and agreed upon by
all parties who understood it to be an
agreement.
4) It took us to defend the citizens by our
insistence on safety measures and sound control
be installed. When you overruled the agree-
ment, you demonstrated, by your actions, that
you were not concerned for the safety and
welfare of its citizens. Why? Your elected
positions, by their definitions, say you must
be.
I would like to have the answers to these questions in
writing.
The second topic that we brought up was the subject of
taxes, water and sewer costs.
I began with a brief history and corporate organization
of Hordis Brothers, Inc.
*12 plants throughout the U.S.
*5 divisions, Albertville within the Central
Division
Members of the City Council
August 5, 1987
Page 3
*Each plant & division are totally autonomic (ie.
stand on their own profits)
*Responsibility and authority of Division President
*We previously rented from Scherer Bros.
*Doubled the size of the operation $1 1/2 million
addition
*When building, used all local suppliers and con-
tractors when possible.
*In December, 1986, we purchased the building
*Employment of 125-130 people
*$1 1/2 million payroll
*Stable in community
*We use all local support - from hardware to gas
to food to bank.
Pointed out in all aspects how we have tried to be good
corporate citizens.
In'the past we have had to tear down offices because they
were not in city specifications, move fire hydrants that
we didn't put there, remove and stop using our incinera-
tor. We have done all of this with no complaints.
Coupled with this, our taxes have risen from $35,000 to
$62,700 to $75,000 to probably $100,000 in 1988. Water
has recently increased from $.43/1000 gallons to $1.05/
1000 gallons - a 250% increase.
The sewer has risen from $30/quarter to $3,030/quarter, a
1000% increase. We have just received a backcharge of
$9,090 for sewer usage for 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quarter of
1986. I still have not received the backcharge for the
1st half of 1987. I'm assuming a $1,000/month payment.
This means for 7 quarters, the sewer bill has increased
from $210 to $21,000+.
And again, not even the professional courtesy of a noti-
fication that this was happening.
I asked the following questions:
1) Where do we stand in the community? Are you
indirectly, by your actions, asking us to
leave?
Members of the City Council
August 5, 1987
Page 4
2) What does our existence here mean? In payment
of taxes, water, sewer and school bonds?
3) What are you going to do about the backcharges
levied to this company?
4) What is going to happen in the future?
5) Is there a future for Albertville and Hordis
Brothers?
Summary -
It's probably obvious by my letter and appearance at
the meeting that I am fairly upset with some of the
decisions made by the City Council. I cannot, in good
conscience, allow possible dangerous situations to
continue unprotected. I absolutely believe and insist
that the City Council recognize these situations and
correct them accordingly.
I must also ask that the City Council relook at the costs
that have been assessed to this company. If these costs
continue, and continue to escalate in the future, I must
prepare this plant to vacate its present site and move to
a city where we can afford to take roots and where our
business is appreciated.
Thank -you for your time and I look forward to your
answers to these most important questions.
Sincerely,
HORDIS BROTHERS, INC.
J
Larr Kunkel
President/Central Division
LJK:JJO:ck
HORDIS BROTHERS, INC.
Jerome J. O'Leary
Plant Manager
PRELIMINARY INFORMATION
FOR
STAFF REPORT
Residential/Commercial Users 258
Industrial Users 7
Total Number of Hookups 265
Residential/Commercial Water Consumption
1st Quarter 4,098,520
2nd Quarter (New Hookups) 65,000
Actual Water Used (for one quarter) 4,163,520
*Residential/Commercial Water Consumption
for Sewer Billing Purposes
lst Quarter 4,698,000
2nd Quarter 75,000
4,773,000
*This total is the result all gallons used to the nearest 1,000
and also take into account the 15,000 gallon minimum per account.
t--A Sewer Income
for
Residential/Commercial Users
Quarterly_ Income
(based on 1',000) X Sewer Rate = Quarter Income
4,698 X 2.10 = 9,865.80
75 X 2.10 = 157.00
Yearly Income
Quarterly Rate X # of Quarter = Yearly Income
9,865.80 X 4 = 39,463.20
157.50 X 3 = 630.00
Total Residential/Commercial Income 40,093.20
w
le,
Z_ , Z 4'7, 5 (30
A)I(Dl:jalls
ClIUOcl-,3gS
—�r"lc�� lei SI Ic I C'1.�, �'�� � l �►'Y�� �`L OY�
P L�
_ �► Q�� �--���' cal (�A'1
(L-aud c-;-n
4-)�b6
? 29 e)
1 �
141 coo
T►�C�r�LE
Q,,3 r7Z 3
S 2C end Ha-
` 1-- (bo,-.ad o-) L°
q, U �)a
-Z 9),3fic a�),
t,tsA i O-L T-4-)CO ran E
Est T-- c�,l J t J E r2 I qC OUA
I& ` qz 5
����1. 4CD,0g3. 2U
TO-} c-t_ t 836. U
i
C�.L
S7
�a `z
41
Tc,
! 3
DG. �
PE -
ati
Ig4.o
Jlw l c ak
qci q l
1 l
ObJ j a(y 0 -nd aik�(X.
0
CLn ck L , r,�.e Mo-a nto ror, , �,
a , �S ► G to c4
d
4 4
9 91L
C,
�31 (opt
and a-,c)
► o. oo
ago. CC
Ubtaa�o
W 5
103a .q-
brly.so
}
r T►�I�,(�4ns (817 L414 16D5.CSC)
v k.()
r
n
ll 1
+lck-V'-�J-
jo-K &,L�T
I q Mil tIV lal lCl L_1z4 o $ 1z.
c7b ,-AQ-76ouu-C6-
ttu k�cun Q-
0,00&J-�r --QC)emu- IC&:) CkL,tdlfcc k ��),k
, l0- 6 1 , 2-3i ha,�) �-jur)
3� -tom- �C.Q_� ck (� - C�
� J
Cd
A15
NEW WATER AND SEWER RATES FOR 1987
SUB
WATER
SEWER
TOTAL
GARBAGE
TOTAL
.` 0- 71000
15.00
16.50
1' 31.50
17.00
48.50
7,000- 8,000
16.00
16.50
32.50
17.00
49.50
8,000- 9,000
17.00
17.50
34.50
17.00
51.50
91000-10,000
18.00
18.50
36.50
17.00
53.50
10,000-11,000
19.00
19.50
38.50
17.00
55.50
11,000-12,000
20.00
20.50
40.50
17.00
57.50
12,000-13,000
21.00
21.50
42.50
17.00
59.50
13,000-14,000
22.00
22.50
44.50
17.00
61.50
14,000-15,000
23.00
23.50
46.50
17.00
63.50
15,000-16,000
24.00
24.50
48.50
17.00
65.50
16,000-17,000
25.00
25.50
50.50
17.00
67.50
17,000-18,000
26.00
26.50
52.50
17.00
69.50
18,000-19,000
27.00
27.50
' 54.50
17.00
71.50
19,000-20,000
28.00
28.50
56.50
17.00
73.50
20,000-21,000
29.00
29.50
58.50
17.00
75.50
21,000-22,000
30.00
30.50
60.50
17.00
77.50
22,000-23,000
31.00
31.50
62.50
17.00
79.50
23,000-24,000
32.00
32.50
64.50
17.00
81.50
24,000-25,000
33.00
33.50
66.50
17.00
83.50
25,000-26,000
34.00
34.50
68.50
17.00
85.50
26,000-27,000
35.00
35.50
70.50
17.00
87.50
27,000-28,000
36.00
36.50
72.50
17.00
89.50
28,000-29,000
37.00
37.50
74.50
17.00
91.50
29,000-30,000
38.00
38.50
76.50
17.00
93.50
30,000-31,000
39.00
39.50
78.50
17.00
95.50
31,000-32,000
40.00
40.50
80.50
17.00
97.50
-32,000-33,000
41.00
41.50
82.50
17.00
99.50
33,000-34,000
42.00
42.50
84.50
17.00
101.50
34,000-35,000
43.00
43.50
86.50
17.00
103.50
35,000-36,000
44.00
44.50
88.50
17.00
105.50
36,000-37,000
45.00
45.50
90.50
17.00
107.50
37,000-38,000
46.00
46.50
92.50
17.00
109.50
38,000-39,000
47.00
47.50
94.50
17.00
111.50
39,000-40,000
48.00
48.50
96.50
17.00
113.50
40,000-41,000
49.00
49.50
98.50
17.00
115.50
41,000-42,000
50.00
50.50
100.50
17.00
117.50
42,000-43,000
51.00
51.50
102.50
17.00
119.50
43,000-44,000
52.00
52.50
104.50
17.00
121.50
44,000-45,000
53.00
53.50
106.50
17.00
123.50
45,000-46,000
54.00
54.50
108.50
17.00
125.50
46,000-47,000
55.00
55.50
110.50
17.00
127.50
47,000-48,000
56.00
56.50
112.50
17.00
129.50
48,000-491000
57.00
57.50
114.50
17.00
131.50
49,000-50,000
58.00
58.50
116.50
17.00
133.50
50,000-51,000
59.00
59.50
118.50
17.00
135.50
51,000-52,000
60.00
60.50
120.50
17.00
137.50
52,000-53,000
61.00
61.50
122.50
17.00
139.50
53,000-549000
62.00
62.50
124.50
17.00
141.50
54,000-55,000
63.00
63.50
126.50
17.00
143.50
55,000-56,000
64.00
64.50
128.50
17.00
145.50
56,000-57,000
65.00
65.50
130.50
17.00
147.50
57,000-58,000
66.00
66.50
132.50
17.00
149.50
,8,000-59,000
67.00
67.50
134.50
17.00
151.50
591000-60,000
68.00
68.50
136.50
17.00
153.50
601000-61,000
69.00
69.50
138.50
17.00
155.50
611000-62,000
70.00
70.50
140.50
17.00
157.50
of