1988-08-02 Minutes of Informational Mtg Re: County Ditch No. 9
,
,
INFORMATIONAL MEETI~ ON
OOUNTY DITCH NUMBER 9
AOOUST 2, 1988
Mayor Loretta Roden called the informational meeting regarding County
Ditch NumtJer 9 to order and introduced Thore Meyer of Meyer-Rohlin, who was to
present the finding of facts regarding the storm water run off from the
WESTWIND development. The list of those attending has been attached to the
back of this docurrent.
Thore explained that this meeting had been called at the County
Commissioner r s and Di tch 9 Commi tteP...s request so that the property owners
along County Ditches Numbers 9 and 21 could hear what is being proposed for
the area that had been the Michael Becker farm prior to being p.lrchased and
developed by .John-('.;l€l()rge, Inc.
Thore first introduced those present to the details of the plans for
Phase I of WESTWIND and the proposal for the subsequent phases of II and III,
which include the possible installation of a detention pond to hold the storm
water run off. The discussion included these findings of facts:
* That the development of WESn-./IND will be completed in phases, at
which t:i.me storm sewer, streets, sewer and water will be desi@1ed to
adequately handle the development as it OC'...curs.
INFORMATION MEE'l'IOO
PAGE 2
* That WESTWIND (Phase I) consist of 52 single-family lots, 4 9Altiple
family lots and 14.2 acres of park land (Attachment A), which
consists of approximately 18 acres of land.
* That approximately two-thirds of the entire plat (105 acres) drains
to the south into County Ditch 9, while the remaining one-third
drains northeasterly into School Lake.
* That in designing a system that can adequately handle rain for a
development the Engineers design the storm sewer system for a five
year storm Thore went on to explain that it is standard engineering
practice to size storm sewer system in this manner because of the
expense involved in installation. In the event that the storm
brings the water faster then the sewer system can handel it
temporary ponding ocx::urs in the street, which will then eventually
drain away (typically water does not stand for more than an hour or
so) .
* That the purpose of a detention pond is to hold water in a confined
area until the water can drain away at the same rate it would have
if the land had been left in its natural state. This is accomplished
by restricting the water and forcing it to outlet through a downsize
culvert which is lccated at the bottom of the pond.
* That the design of proposed detention pond was done only after doing
the necessary calculations to determine the nUlnber of acre feet
needed to adequately handle the storm water run-off from the
WESTWIND development. The Engineers calculations indicat~ that the
INFORMATION MEETIOO
PAGE 3
pond needs to be approximately 11.5 acre feet to detention, which
can be obtained in a variety of ways, either by a large shallow
pond or a pond that takes up less land mass rot is roil t deeper to
retain the water.
* The Engineers explained that the actual design of the pond has not
.
been determined rot it appears that in all likelihood the pond would
be developed so that the base of the pond would be approximately 2
feet above the base of the County Ditch and would have a substantial
dike system around the three sides of it as well as around the
entire park so not to create any hardship to the adjoining
properties. (Attachment B). It is important to note that the
detention pond would be done in conjunction with the park, knowing
that in the event of heavY downpours the pond could have a potential
t..o back up into the playing fields.
* It was pointed out as an example that with the dike system around
the pond that if water reached the top of the dike that the area
would be holding some 45 acre feet or 4 times the amount of water
going lllto the ditch, which is a reality to an unlikely extreme.
At this time the discussion was opened for questions, which included some
of the following:
* Has the drainage system been adequately designed for Phases II and
III?
INFORMATION MEETIOO
PAGE 4
Thore explained that the actual design of the detention pond/storm sewer
system will be designed and calculated so that it will be able to handle
the storm water run-off. It was also pointed out the definition of a 1021
year storm is 6 inches of rain in 24 hours.
* Harry Welter, Mayor of St. Michael expressed his City r s concern
regarding the impact of the City of Albertville r s water on Regal
.
Creek which runs through their corporate boundaries and asked what
assurance they have that there will not be problems further down the
road?
Again it was pointed out that by the use of the detention pond the rate
of discharge will not change, therefore the City of Michael should not
receive any additional water from the City of Albertville. It was pointed
out that the basis for this statement relys on the fact that the County
ditch system is cleaned and is being maintained properly by the County
Board, because it falls under their jurisdiction.
* The question was asked regarding how the water would be controlled?
Thore explained that the control for such a structure will be done by
placing a culvert in at the bottom of the pond which would then let the
water out at a prescribed rate. It was pointed out that there would be no
gate valve lccated on the outlet to allow water to be released at a
faster rate then allowed.
INFORMATION MEETIOO
PAGE 5
* Someone asked what the differences in elevations would be between
the County ditch, the detention pond and the tops of the dikes?
The floor of the ditch apPears to be at an elevation 944 feet above sea
level J the base of the pond would be constructed at approximately 946
feet above sea level and the tops of the dikes would be about 3 or 4 feet
.
higher then the pond (or approximately 952 feet above sea level).
* The concern was expressed that work would be done and the other land
owners would not know anYthing about it.
Ar lyn Nelson, County Commission, stated that under the proceedings of
ditch law, any time work is done on a County ditch that the benefitting
property owners IWSt receive notice of improvement. So those present,
who are on the County ditch have the assurances that they will be aware
of what is happening.
* Someone questioned who would be responsible for cleaning out the
ditch?
It was pointed out that the City has no control over the cleaning of a
County ditch, that it would be the responsibility of the Board to arrange
for the cleaning and that work would be assessed back to the benefitting
property owners 'once a Redetermination of Finding had been completed.
, .
INFORMATION MEETIOO
PAGE 6
At this tiJre Thore reminded everyone that the original p.lrp06e for
ditches were to RECLAIM lands for farming that without proper drainage
would not be tillable. He also pointed out that these di tc'..hes were
designed so that they followed the natural drainage ways, therefore not
disrupting the laws of nature. And under current practices the ditches
are also used for drainage outlet storm water J without the benefit of
clear Statutory language to define what is acceptable practices.
* One of the parties present pointed out that in fact the ditch is not
draining properly because of not being cleaned out. It appears that
the last time the ditch was cleaned out was in 1983.
Ar lyn Nelson pointed out that the County does not go forth with ditch
cleaning unless it is requested by those that will benefit from the work.
* There was some questions regarding the City's sewer system and
whether or not the storm water run-off could go through those
lines?
It was explained that the WES'IWIND project would be serviced with City
sewer and water, rot that it is not allowable under Minnesota Pollution
Control Agency regulations to discharge st..orm water run-off into the
sewer sys-tP..m.
INFORMATION MEETIOO
PAGE 7
At this time City staff went through the materials which were handed out
to the P9.rticipates in the meeting. The packet included the following:
1. A letter from Mr. George Yankoupe of John-George J Inc. discussing
the platting of WESTWIND (Phase I) and its impact on County Ditch
Number 9.;
.
2. A letter from Meyer-Rohlin Engineers-Land Surveyors which provides
the findings for the basis of the Yankoupe letter;
J. . "//1
3. A portion of the minutes of the' /{ I /\! /. J 1988 County Board
minutes regarding the City of Albertville's assurance that to take
full liability/resPonsibility for findings of the Engineer with
regards to the impact of Phase I on County Ditch Number 9; and
4. The City of Albertville's RESOLUTION RELATIOO TO SURFACE WATER IN
WESTWIND DEVELOPMENT J which provides written assurance that the City
of Albertville does indeed warrant the findings of the City Engineer
and will accept liability and responsibility resulting from surface
water drainage from proposed developrrent as such development (first
phase) impacts on Ditch Number 9.
The resolution provides additional assurances that as a condition of
further development, the developer will need t..o join in a PI'OCP...ss
which will include the interested parties (i. e. the City J Wright
County J the drainage authority and the owners of benefitted
landowners) to address the impact of Fhases II and II I, including
INFORMATIC~ MEETING
PAGE 8
phYE;ica 1 facil itiefc; > costs and other matters relating: to the proper and
appropri3.t~e resolution oft-he drainage and discharge of su.rface WD.ters into
Ditch Number ;:1.
At this tirrJt.:': Bc.b Mi ller > the City AU..oITley, addressed the Gi ty' s st..andirJg
on tbiJ'j lri[;ue. He p<)intoo out that the Council t;uppc)rts the findingc; of the
FXJgineer and p3.ssed the resolution regardirJg this IrBtt.er af':i the vote of
confidence in the findings. He pointf-.Jd out that the Ci ty has never taken Hie
stand that a petition for outlet shcll.lld not be filed and in fact rieL forth
aSfjUraIlCes Hlat prior to any future platting being apprcNed that t.he Ci 1:,y wil1
.[>rcx::;eed tnld~-,r the :3tatutory regulations for completing the process.
TIle representative of the City of St. Michael stated that if their City
waro not satisfied with the solutioDf.:j presented that they w.JUld be forced to
st--<,:)P the water from draining through Regal Cn::,->ek. He stated that no one had
eVF~r appr'.ach,:0 them to see if they approved of the drainage plan.
It Wafj .:'.\gain POirlted out that the development of WESTWIND does not" char!g:e
the natt.lral drainage flow bU.t rather changes the rates at which the wat,er
l:I..II1fj, Lut that through the controls established throL-,gh th."; F:venings
d' .
~ lSClJfjfj lJ)rlf;
ShCli))d not h'ive any adverfje iIrlpclct on the peciple downstream of the
devel':)l:>rnent.
I t Has queGtioned whet,her or not the City of St. Michael was attempting
tu t;!:,C'f.' A 1 rJE:t'1;vU]e from developing thrc)IJgh the prc"..::et;/3 of tying the; drainage
i E;f-oUe up, There waf3 no rea 1 COlnrrent back in resp<:lnse to thiG sthternent.
INF(iRl'1.ATION r1EB7I'nr;
. ,
PAGE 9
At this time Bob Miller pointed out that the City of Albertville has
ordered a feasibility report on the storm water drainage plan for the
undeveloped areas of the City. I t is the City's intent to use the findings of
this study to determine which is the best outlet for storm water run-off.
In an effort to sl..urmarize the issue at hand, Bob reviewed with the
parties present that the project (Phase I) is on the table, the engineering
studies no adverse impact on Ditch 9. the City has agreed to take the
.
responsibility for Phase I and the City is currently undertaking the study for
future storm water drainage. He asked what more needed to be done or said
before the County and the land owners had enough assurances that the City is
working in the best interest of those involved.
Bob also explained that all coam.mities are faced with the problem of
what to do with storm water and that in most situations the problems can be
resolved without hurting anyone.
Some other questions that where brought up included:
* Who would maintain the detention pond?
The group was informed that it would be part of the City's general
maintenance program. The group was also informed that when the pond is
drairJ.ed dry that the City will keep the aI'f"...a mowed 80 not to effect the
detention pond st..orage space.
INFORMATION MEETH-lJ
. .
PAGE 10
* Someone coomented on whether or not that meant the farmers would be
doubled t..axes?
It was explained that the maintenance of storm sewer systems is a regular
maintenance i teln which makes up part of the tax levY. It was pointed out
that the development will generate additional tax dollars which in effect
will compensate for any additional costs.
.
* Someone asked if the City was planning on lining the base of the
detention pond in the same fashion as the WasteWater Treatment
Facility was lined?
It was explained that there was no reason to go to that eXPense because
the purpose of that liner is keep from contaminating the soils. Storm
water run-off does not need to be separated and treated before
discharging.
Again the purpose of the detention pond was explained, that the reason
for this type of system is to provide for short-term storage of water
until the ditch or the ground around the ponds can take on the water. It
was also pointed out that detention ponds are used in most cities and are
accepted as a standard method of storm water removal.
At this point someone expressed their concern that this issue has been
taking place without anyone knowing about it. In an effort to clarify what has
happened up to this point J Ar lyn Nelson presented a chronology of events.
INFORMATION MEETING
P~E 11
1. County Officials noticed that Preliminary Plat for the entire WESTWIND
project showed outlet of water into County Ditch tbnber 9.
2. Representatives of the City and the Developer met with the County
Board to explain the proposal and attelQpted to come up with a solution which
would be satisfactory to all those involved.
3. Ar lyn Nelson called to order the meeting of the County Ditch 9
ocmnittee to review with them the issue of WESTWIND. This meeting was held at
the Frankfort Town Hall.
4. The City and the developers met again with the County Board to discuss
and update them on the events to date. I t was at this meeting that the City
Attorney gave the City's assurance that Albertville would take the
responsibility of liability .with regards to the impact of H1ase I on the
County ditch.
5. The City of Albertville passed the resolution supporting the
Attorney's assurances.
6. A meeting was held at the WESTWIND site with the County Ditch 9
Ccmni ttee J Ar lyn Nelson . City representatives and the developers to see hands
on the effects to the ditch. It was at this meeting the City agreed to h06t
the informational meeting.
7. The Information meeting was held.
INFORMATION MEETIN3
PAGE 12
Ar lyn pclinted out that in order tfj st>op the work from rJE:ing done. the
(f.>unty wou] d have to prove harm is rJE:ing done from the result of the
improvement. There would have to a different finding of fact that the
F,ngineer ," s report is incorrect and that these costs would have to be borne by
those on the dit~h. It was her feelir~ that this was not n~~essary"
p'jtential impact on the
l"F'--@;ards to the::;e phases
pref~ued the IX)jnt that
Bob Miller again stated that the City realizes that Phaf~e 1] and I f] haVt'~
di tch and agree tha t before .;;my work is done with
that the dit(:~h issue will have to be resolvwl. He
this is required in the stat.ut(~ at; w'l J'lL; r~.;i ng
reSI=>ons i b Ie af; a Cit,y. He st~ated that this waf; prc;bably just the beg inn :Lng in
the ww rrJt'~et.ingc ly:gardir~ this issue and that the CH,y wi 11 tfj<ove cauUi)lJf;ly
in making any decir::;ij.')nf:J.
At this pcdnt Bob asked that the rrV.J.tter rJe wrapped up hy a sllpplrt~ of
confidence in the findings of the meet. iDg. Hfe: asked that FtllYODf; f;t~rongly
OPI)()f~ed to the ide.'::! indicat,f'..; it by a show of bands. The notef..i f~h()tdd r.;how that
only one person raised their hand.
There were no other comrrents so the meetir~ adjourned.
", darkenwald, inc.
Industrial arid Commercial Real Estate
m
""'trQl-
7767 N.E. River Road
Elk River, Minnesota 55330
(612) 4jt~.go 8, 1988
darkenwald
REAL ESTATE
D
~right County Auditor
Wright County Courthouse
Buffalo, MN 55312
Dear Sir,
R e : P I a I. 0 f We 5 t win d, C i t y 0 f ft. I b e r l v i I I e
('olmly Di tch 119
John George Inc.
entirely by John
is now the owner
in the Southeast
Section 2-120-24.
prior to Becker.
is a Minnesota Business Corporation that is owned
F. Darkenwcdd and George W. Yankoupe. The corporation
of the former Mike Becker farm consisting of 105 acres
1/4 of Section 35-121--:24 and the Northeast 1/4 of
The Clemens Dehmers EstClte was the:.owner of the farlO
The portion of the farm within the County 9 ditch watershed wa5
assessed for benefits when the ditch I"as fir'st constll.lcl.ed. The farm
was also included in the 1983 assessment.
An 18 acre portion of the farm was recently platted as Westwind. The
plat lies entirely withi-n the City of Albertville. It is unlikely
that the platted area would use the existing Ditch 9 as an outlet since
the storm drainage outlet for the portion of the plat thC't draifls to
the South would outlet onto relatively flat land at a distance of
approximCltely 1760' from County Ditch 9. (cf. attached Engineer report.
dated May 31, 1988)
When, if and as SLlbsp.quent platting and development OCCUlS on the lands
immediately west and south of the plat of Westwind, it mClY become
(le<';t:l:osary to use Ditch 9 as an out.let for storm drClinC::lge. We '",ould
like to therefore suggest that Clppropriate county representatives meet
with our engineer to determine to what extent if any. it would be
necessary to use Ditch 9 as an ou1:let. Based on their findings '",t?
would then be in position to fi Ie an outlet petition and have the
matter determined by the County Board in a timely fashion befor~
subsequent development occurs.
We are prepared to meet with you and the County Board in oJde~ lo
expedite handling of this matter.
~
Sincer ly, ~
( , '-,
i \ ~Lr--
Ger) ge W. YankOlJpe
CAPT CEe USI" yTIET)
Professional En!ineer
MEMBER MINNEAPOLIS BOARD OF REALTORS
, .
MEYER-ROHLIN, INC.
ENGINEERS-LAND SURVEYORS 1111 Hwy. 25N., Buffalo, Minn.55313 Phone 612-682-1781
May 31, 1988
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The former Becker farm located in the southwest corner of
County Roads 19 and 37, Albertville, Minnesota, is currently being
developed into proposed single-family residential, multiple-family
residential, and commercial properties, to be known as Westwind
Development. Concerns have been expressed regarding the impact of
this development upon County Ditch NO.9, as it currently exists
within the city of Albertville, Minnesota.
County Ditch No. 9 starts approximately t mile south of County
Road #37 and approximately t mile west of County Road #l9, and flows
in a southerly direction. The existing conditions of County Ditch #9
are not conducive to a proper drainage flow. stagnant water now
stands approximately 2 feet deep in the upper reaches of the ditch.
Obviously the lower reaches of County Ditch #9 and the outlet
ditches (County Ditch #21 and Regal Creek) need cleaning to provide
proper operation.
Phase I of the Westwind Development includes 52 single-family
residential lots and 4 multiple residential lots. The drainage of
the multiple lots is to the north, away from County Ditch #9. The 52
single-family residential lots will drain to the south and outlet
onto overland flow approximately one-third of a mile from the start
of County Ditch #9. Considering the condition of the existing County
Ditch #9, the long distance of overland flow at a very flat gradient
and the restricted outlet of the Phase I drainage, we would expect
no appreciable impact upon County Ditch #9. At the time of the
development of Phases II and III (the single-family residential
portion only), a detention pond can be constructed, if deemed
necessary. The proposed multiple residential and con~ercia1 areas of
Phase II and III are designed to flow to the north and not included
in the County Ditch #9 watershed.
Respectfully submitted,
3!:~Y " ROHLIN, INC.
\.. " . ,&u.~71(~ tJ ~ '-
hore Meyer /
sl
cc: Darkenwald Real Estate
City of Albertville
Thore P. Meyer, Professional Engineer Robert Rohlin, Licensed Land Surveyor
=c~lllewaert to appoInt Dr. Ronald Brown as Wright County Ccroner.
as follows: Mc.~l pine, Sch ill ewaert, Engstrom Aye. Nel ~on
Motion carried 3-1.
\ '-.- -
I' ' -
- i'~ 2& -~..i .
O.J.. 'Arii~n, Auditor/Treasurer, presented agenda items at 9:05 A.M.
A lengthy d i :5 C Ll S S ion evolved on the Al b 2 r t../ ill e City II ';oJ est win d II P 1 :.:'
item and its impact on County Ditch #9 with many interested partIes i~
attendance. Thore Meyer, as spokesffian, noted that since their previews
County Board appearance on May 3rd, tney have completed 5c~e
calculations and have submitted a letter to the developer and the City
of Albertville analyzing their findings and their feeling that t~er2
will be no impact on County Ditch #9 from Phase I. He added that with
Phases II ~ III they may have to consider a detention pond, so they
would like some direction from the Board today. Nelson commented that
the main issue is whether or not all systems are going to be able to
accommodate the kind of water runoff from this size development in the
wet years of the future as well d$ t~e present dry years. Arlien ~aij
he had suggested to the developer at the recent meeting at the Town Hall
to submit a Petition for an outlet far Ditch #9 similar to the situaticn
with Ditch ~20 in Maple Lake a few ypars ago. MacPhall commented that
he left that meeting thinking they would be submitting a petition as _
form of cooperation to handle the situation, but no ~etition was filed.
He added that they maintain it would have no impact on the ditch, ~nd
if the County finds that to be true, perhaps we do not have a problem.
He said it should be made clear that any future develepment may result
in delay and inconvenience to the developer and the impac~ becomes
greater on Ditch #9. George Yankoupe, representing ~~~ developer
made several statements clarifying the objective of ~ll three phases o~
the project. McAlpine commented th~~ the County is fully responsible
for a County ditch. Ma~Phail said the County simply manages the
ditches. Bu~ Miller, legal counsel far the City of Albertville, mad~
the statel:~nt that the Ci~y_~ould warrant to the County Board that
should the data represented by their Engineer prove not to be trLle, the
City would accept ful~ liab{li~;%r~sponsibility. Nelson stated that
she would like the opportunity to convene a meeting of that local group
of people who have had a historic interest in Ditch #9 including the
people of St. Michael. Nelson then moved to table any further
discussion about County Ditch #9.and the Westwind Plat until next week
providing an opportunity tc meet wi~h the people of both Ditches 9 & 21
and the people of the St. Michael area. McAlpine seconded the motion
and it carried unanimously by those present.
Arlien presented the Board with ~ copy of a Resolution adopted by
Ottertail County urging that Wright COLlnty consider a similar resolution
voicing objection to the 1988 tax law and requesting their legislators
to repeal that law and work for meaningful and effective property tax
reform. Arlien Said he was not ~sking fer action on it today. He
recommended they review it for a week and he will place it on the
agenda again next week.
On a motion by McAlpine, seconded by Schillewaert, all prasent voted to
approve the application for Game ~ FiSh Agent for the Clear~ater Travel
Plaza, Clearwater, MN.
Paul Jordan, Woodland Township resident, met with the Beard to reques~
approval of an easement on Section 12 in the area of the County Park to
construct a bridge on the property. Arlien said the matter was cleared
; .... t-. .... . __ _ Tl-' _, ,.,
.;.
. ..
. .
.
t::. .
eln 0' ALlIIlTVILLI
IeaOlut10ft 10. ~
1I8OLU~IOI llLATIMG TO SURPACI
.AftI II .."'IID DlYlLOPIIBllf
88 IT RISOLVID by tb. City Council of th. City of
Albertvill., COunty.' .c1gbt, Stat. of Minne.ot., .. follows.
1. Th.t th. d..tloper. of tb.t cert.in residential .nd
co..ercial d...lo~.t ift tbe City of Alb.rtvill., co..only known
.. the ....twiad a...lo....t. ba.. r.cord.d th. pl.t of tb. fir.t
pU.. of tbe proj.." Mi. plat '..ignat.d .. .W..tvind..
2. 'Tb.t ..y.r-Iobli., Inc., tb. Ingin..r. for tbe City of
Alb.rtvill., ba.. r.port.' to tbi. Council tb.t tbe proposed
drain.g. pl.n for ,ur'". .at.r for tb. fir.t pb... of the
de.elo~ent ha. no appreciable iapact on Dr.inage Ditch No.9.
fhat for .ub.equent pba... hlo.etia.. de.ign.ted Pba... II and
III) the dev.loper. ,ropo.. to con.truct a r.tention pond to
acco.-odat. dr.ina,. of aurface ..t.r. fro. tb.t p.rt of tb.
project flowing i. a ,...~ally eoutb.rly direction.
3. Tb.t tb. Board of CO..i88ion.r. for wright County bav.
.xpr....d con~.rn a. to'""tb. i.pact of th. w..twind Develop.ent on
Drainage Ditch 10. I. ~. Council repr.sents to tbe County. ~~.
Board of .rigbt County ~at .bould the data repre..nted by the
City Ingin.er proy. not to be true (tb.t there i. no appreci.ble
l.pact on Dr.inag. Ditcb Jo. I fro. the d..elopm.nt of the
W..twind Pl.t), th.t tb. Clty would .cc.pt li.bility and
r..pon.ibility r..ultlng froa .urf.ce vater dr.inage from the
propo..d de.elopaent a. .ucb de..lo~.nt (first pbase) impacts on
Drainage Ditcb 10. I.
.. Th.t tb. City .hall require a. . condition for the
furtber de.elopa.nt 0' tb. W..t.lnd project, that tbe developer.
joln in . proc... wbic~ .ball lnvolv. tb. City, Wrigbt County,
tb. dr.ina,e .utbority and own.r. of tbe b.nefitted land for
Dltcb Ho. I, to .ddre.. tb. iapact of Ph.... II .nd III (or
.ub.equ.nt pb.... inyolv" in tbe d.v.lopa_nt of the Westwind
project), inc~udin, pby.ic.l f.cilitie., co.t. and other matters
rel.tlng to tbe proper and approrriate resolution of the drain.ge
and discbarge of .ucfac. .at.c, nto Drainag_ Ditch No.9. .
5. Th.~ tbe City ~ni.trator i. hereby directed to
-1-
..-
pre.ent to the Board of Co..iaaionera of Wright County and to the
deyelopers a copy of this aesolution.
Adopted tbie ~ dey of ~~______, 1988.
~~-
Mayor
(SIAL)
rRR!,I.I!'J-CATI.pH
I, Maureen Andrews, being the duly appointed
Administrator/City Clert of tbe City of Albertville, hereby
certify tbat tbe above .eeolutlon is a true and correct copy of a
Resolution relating to surface waters of Westwind Project, duly
adopted by the ~!~Y Council 01 tbe\~ity of Albert8ville,
Minnesota, tbe _~_~ day of ---t~---~------' 198 .
.... \ )
, \ t. '
. I ' \, . r, \ . t' . I . J
I SIAL) iiiii~efi~~;;;-;:..l.._.~..J.j.i'l.L,,",
Adaini;trator/City Clerk
\. J
-2-
..i,' Ii"
Of) \'1\ EE-r- I WG
8-1- C5
AoId e.oS5
Q60~OlL:
k~J~
aaLYt~
~ /.~ Jill
Clj. (/(/ 2li/(L~lV
5~~/
~
U~~
JJ~L~ . -
.'~.....:.IJ1. ~
~L)
11
II
!I
II
'!
Ii
,I
'j
:
/