2003-02-27 Alternate Urban Areawide Review
,
.~
RI.K. . Engineering. Planning. Surveying. Landscape Architecture
( KUUSISTO LTD )
~
ft,
February 27,2003
AUAR Distribution List
(Attached)
Re: Alternate Urban Areawide Review
Albertville Business, Park Project - Albertville, MN
RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd. Project No. 2001-239-:M
Dear Sir or Madam:
On behalf of the City of Albertville, RLK -Kuusisto, Ltd. is forwar~ing a copy of the Alternate
Urban Areawide Review (AUAR)prepared for the Albertville Business Park Project. The AUAR
has been prepared to address potential environmental impacts at this site.
As required, comments on theADAR will be received for 30 days through April 2, 2003.
Comments should be directed to:
Peter J. Carlson, PE
City Engineer
SEH, Inc.
1220 25th Avenue South
P.G.Box 1717
St. Cloud; MN 55302-1717
Phone: 320-229-4320
Fax: 320-229-4301
Email: pcarlson@sehinc.com
If you have any questions, please contact Peter J. Carlson, PE, City Engineer, 320-229-4320,
email pcarlson@sehinc.com or myself, Michele Caron, 952-:933-0972, email mcaron@rlk-
kuusisto.com.
Sincerely,
RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
~~
Michele Jackson Caron, PE
Senior Professional Engineer
Attachment:
Enclosure:
ADAR Distribution List
ADAR
Offices: Hibbing . Minnetonka . Ham Lake . Twin Ports
(952) 933-0972 . 6110 Blue Circle Drive. Suite 100 . Minnetonka, MN 55343 . FAX (952) 933-1153
Equal Opportunity Employer
,
City of Albertville
Linda Goeb, City Administrator
5975 Main Avenue NE
P. O. Box 9
Albertville, MN 55301-0009
Environmental Quality Board
Environmental Review Program
300 Centennial Office Building
658 Cedar Street
St. Paul, MN 55155
AUAR Distribution List
Albertville Business Park Project - Albertville, MN
(4-Copies)
Department of Transportation (3-Copies)
Mn/DOT Environmental Services
Gerald Larson
395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 620
St. Paul, MN 55155
(I-Copy)
Minnesota Historical Society (I-Copy)
State Historical Preservation Office
345 West Kellogg Boulevard, Level A
St. Paul, MN 55102
Board of Water and Soil Resources (I-Copy)
Jim Haertel
Lynda Peterson
One West Water Street, Suite 200
St. Paul, MN 55107
Department of Agriculture
Becky Balk
90 West Plato Boulevard
St. Paul, MN 55107
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (3-Copies)
Beth Lockwood, Supervisor
Environmental Review Unit
520 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, MN 55155
(I-Copy)
Environmental Conservation Library (2-Copies)
Minneapolis Public Library
300 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, MN 55401
Department of Health (I-Copy)
Environmental Health Division
Policy, Planning and Analysis Unit
121 East 7th Place, Suite 230
St. Paul, MN 55101
Legislative Reference Library
Carol Blackburn
645 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
(2-Copies)
Department of Public Works (I-Copy)
Marya White
85 7th Place East, Suite 500
St. Paul, MN 55101-2198
u.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Tamara Cameron
Regulatory Functions Branch
Army Corps of Engineers Center
190 5th Street East
St. Paul, MN 55101-1638
(I-Copy)
Department of Natural Resources (3-Copies)
Thomas W. Balcom
Environmental Review Unit
500 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, MN 55155-4010
u.S. Environmental Protection Agency (I-Copy)
William D. Franz
Chief of Environmental Review
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago,IL 60604-3590
of
u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service
Twin Cities Field Office E.S.
4101 East 80th Street
Bloomington, MN 55425-1665
(I-Copy)
SEH, Inc.
Pete Carlson, PE
1200 25th Avenue South
P. O. Box 1717
S1. Cloud, MN 56302-1717
Metropolitan Council (5-Copies)
Referrals Coordinator
Planning & Technical Assistance Unit
230 East 5th Street
S1. Paul, MN 55101
SEH, Inc.
Todd Udvig
3535 Vadnais Center Drive
S1. Paul, MN 55110
Wright County Highway Department
Wayne Fingalson, County Engineer (I-Copy)
1901 Highway 25 North
Buffalo, MN 55313
(2-Copies)
(I-Copy)
Pinnacle Engineering (I-Copy)
Scott Thelen
101 Broadway Street West, Suite 100
Osseo, MN 55369
Wright Soil and Water Conservation District
Kerry Saxton ( I-Copy)
Colleen Allen
306C Brighton Avenue
Buffalo, MN 55313
City of Otsego
Mike Robertson, Administrator
8899 Nashua Avenue NE
Elk River, MN 55330-7314
MnDOT (St. Cloud District)
Bob Nibbe, Drainage Engineer
1991 Industrial Park Road
Baxter, MN 56425
(I-Copy)
Wright Hennepin Electric Co.
Wayne Bauemschmitt
P. O. Box 330
Rockford, MN 55373-0330
Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc.
Alan Brixius (I-Copy)
5775 Wayzata Boulevard, Suite 555
S1. Louis Park, MN 55416
Great River Regional Library
Ginny Clark
405 S1. Germain Street
S1. Cloud, MN 56301-3697
Couri & MacArthur Law Office (I-Copy)
Michael Couri
705 Central Avenue East
P. O. Box 369
81. Michael, MN 55376
RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
Michele Caron
Chris Carda
John Dietrich
Darkenwald Real Estate
John Darkenwald
7535 NE River Road
Elk River, MN 55330
(2-Copies)
(I-Copy)
(I-Copy)
(I-Copy)
(3-Copies)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW
for the
Albertville Business Park Project
Prepared for the City of:
~,
N~f2~l~HL€
February 20, 2003
for March 3, 2003 Distribution
Prepared by
~
RLK
( KUUSISTO LTD )
\,~
Project No. 2001-239~M
Offices: Hibbing . Minnetonka . Ham Lake . Twin Ports
Tel. 952-933-0972. 6110 B[ue Circle Drive, Suite 101) . Minnetonka, MN 554343 . Fax 952-933-1153
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Proj ect Title ............ ......... ............. ...... ................... .......... ............ .............. ................... 1
2. Proposer.... ...... .................. ............... .............. .......... ..... ...... .......................... ................ 1
3. RGU. .......... ............ .... ..... ................................ ..... ... ...... ...... ................ .......... ...... ..... ..... 1
4. Reason for EA W Preparation ....................................................................................... 1
5. Proj ect Location ........... .... ........ ....... .................. ........... ......... ..... ............................ ...... 1
6. Description ......................... ..... .... ............... ......... .... ........ .... .............. ........ ... ................. 2
7. Proj ect Magnitude Data... ......... .......................... ....... ...... ..... ......................... ......... ...... 4
8. Permits and Approvals Required. ............... ........ ......... ............ ...... ......... .......... ............4
9. Land Use ....... .............. .......... .................................................................. .... ................. 5
10. Cover Types ....... .................... .... ................. ......... ................ ........................................ 6
11. Fish, Wildlife and Ecologically Sensitive Resources................................................... 6
12. Physical Impacts on Water Resources....... ..... .... ........... ........ ..................... ............ ...... 7
13 . Water Use.... ............................. ......................... .......... ..... ................. .... ........ ............... 8
14. Water-Related Land Use Management District ........................................................... 8
15 . Water Surface Use...... .... ........... ... ......... ....... .... .................. ............. ....... ...................... 8
16. Erosion and Sedimentation......... ..... .......... .................. ....... ........................... ............... 9
17. Water Quality: Storm Water Runoff ............................................................................ 9
18. Water Quality: Wastewaters.............. ......................................................................... 11
19. Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions.......................................................................12
20. Solid Wastes, Hazardous Wastes, Storage Tanks....................................................... 14
21. Traffic.......................... ..... ................................ .......................................................... 16
22. Vehicle-Related Air Emissions ......................................................... ......................... 19
23. Sanitary Source Air Emissions...................................................................................19
24. Odors, Noise and Dust............................................................................................. ... 19
25 . Nearby Resources....................................................................................................... 19
26. Visual Impacts........... ............... ............................ ...................................................... 20
27. Compatibility with Plans and Land Use Regulations................................................. 20
28. Impact on Infrastructure and Public Services......................."....................................21
29. Cwnu1ative Impacts.................................................................................................... 21
30. Other Potential Environmental Impacts ..................................................................... 21
31. Summary of Issues.................................. ................................................................... 21
RGU Certification............... .............................................................................................. 22
EXHmITS
Exhibit 1 -
Exhibit 2 -
Exhibit 2.1-
Exhibit 3 -.Exhibit 4 -
Exhibit 5 -
Exhibit 6 -
Exhibit 7 -
Exhibit 8 -
Exhibit 9 -
Exhibit 10 -
Exhibit 11 -
Location Map
USGS Map
Regional Road System
Comprehensive Development Plan
Water Master Plan
Sanitary Sewer Master Plan
Zoning Map
Wetland Impact / Replacement Plan
Existing Conditions
Grading and Erosion Control Plan
Offsite Drainage Routing Map
Wright County Soils Map
Alternative Urban Areawide Review
Albertville Business Park - Albertville, MN
I
I
I
ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW
I
Note to pre parers: An electronic version ofthisform is available atwww.mnplan.state.mn.us. EAW
Guidelines will be available in Spring 1999 at the web site. The Alternative Urban Areawide Review
provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects. The
A UAR is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents. The project proposer must supply
any reasonably accessible data for - but should not complete - the final worksheet. If a complete answer
does not fit in the space allotted, attach additional sheets as necessary. The complete question as well as
the answer must be included if the A UAR is prepared electronically.
Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 3D-day comment period following
notice of the AUAR in the EQB Monitor. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of
information and potential impacts that warrant further investigation.
I
I
I
The preparation of this Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) has been completed according to
guidance prepared by the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) and is based on the directive of 4410.3610,
subp. 4 that "the content and format (of an AUAR document) must be similar to that of an EA W, but must
provide for a level of analysis comparable to that of anEIS for impact typical of urban residential,
commercial, warehousing and light industrial development and associated infrastructure."
I
The AUAR responses are numbered based on the items listed in the standard EA W form. When an EA W
item is not applicable to an AUAR, it is so stated. Figure and Table numbers correspond to the EA W
question. All exhibits and appendices are located together and follow the AUAR text.
I
1. Title: An appropriate descriptive title for the geographical area of the A UAR should be chosen.
I
Albertville Business Park, a mixed use development on approximately III acres of farmland located
along the north side ofI-94 and west of the Outlets at Albertville retail center in Albertville,
Minnesota.
I
Project title: Albertville Business Park
2. Proposer Darkenwald Real Estate
Contact person Mr. John Darkenwald
Title President
Address 7535 NE River Road
City, state, ZIP Elk River, MN 55330
Phone 763-441-3700
Fax 763-441-3751
E-mail darkenwa1dsriverbend@att.net
3. RGU City of Albertville
Contact person Peter 1. Carlson
Title City Engineer
Address SEH, Inc.
City, state, ZIP 1220 25th A venue$outh
P. O. Box 1717
St. Cloud, MN 55302-1717
Phone 320-229-4320
Fax 320-229-4301
E-mail pcarlson@sehinc.com
4. Reasonfor EAWpreparation. Not applicable to AUAR.
5 Project location: County: Wright City: Albertville
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 1 of 22
I
I
NE '/4 ofthe SW '/4, and NW '/4 of Section 35 Township 121 Range 24
I
Attach each of the following to the AUAR:
· County map showing the general location of the project not requiredfor AUAR;
· Site Location Map (Exhibit I)
· Us. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (Exhibit 2)
USGS Map;
· Regional Road System (Exhibit 2.1) .
· Site plan showing all significant project and natural features (Exhibit 3) Comprehensive
Development Plan
· City of Albertville Zoning Map (Exhibit 6)
I
I
I
6. Description. Instead of the information called for on the form, the description section of an A UAR
should include the following elements for each mqjor development scenario included:
anticipated types and intensity (density) of residential and commercial/warehouse/light industrial
development throughout the AUAR area:
irifrastructure planned to serve development (roads, sewers, water, storm water system, etc.)
Roadways intended primarily to serve as acijointng land uses within an A UAR area are normally
expected to be reviewed as part of an AUAR More "arterial" types of roadways that would cross
an A UAR area are an optional inclusion in the A UAR analysis: if they are included, a more
intensive level of review, generally including an analysis of alternative routes is necessary.
Information about the anticipated staging of various developments, to the extent known and of the
irifrastructure and how the infrastructure staging will influence the development schedule.
I
I
I
Note: the RGUmust assure that the development described complies with the requirements of
4410.3610, subpart 3 (and also that it properly orders the AUAR and sets the description in that order
as required by 4410.3610, subpart 3).
I
Provide a project summary of 50 words or less to be published in the EQB Monitor.
I
Response. Darkenwald Real Estate proposes a mixed use development on approximately 111 acres of
farmland located along the north side ofI-94 and west of the Outlets at Albertville retail center in
Albertville, Minnesota. The project will involve approximately 750,000 square feet of building
including light industrial, office/ warehouse and commercial use.
I
b. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new construction. Attach
additional sheets, as necessary. Emphasize construction, operation methods and features that will
cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes. Include modifications to
existing equipment of industrial processes and significant demolition, removal of remodeling of
existing structures. Indicate the timing and duration of construction activities.
I
I
Description of Development Scenario
The Albertville Business Park is located on a site of approximately 111 acres adjacent to and north
ofI-94, at the southeast quadrant of Kadler Avenue and 70th Street in Albertville, Minnesota. The
property is within Planning District Seven of the City of Albertville Comprehensive Plan and is
currently guided and planned for commercial and industrial use. At the southeast comer ofthe
project, 25 acres have recently been rezoned to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and designated
as Phase 1 of the Albertville Business Park. The Phase 1 area has been platted as a subdivision
with four buildable lots, one outlot encompassmg an existing wetland and mitigation area, and
public right of way for a road and public utilities. Construction of the Phase 1 subdivision began
in the spring of2002 and is anticipated to be completed this year. Construction ofa retail multi-
tenant building on Lot 1 of the subdivision is also under construction and is anticipated to be open
this year.
I
I
I
I
The project will involve approximately 750,000 square feet of building including light industrial,
office/ warehouse and commercial use. A concept site plan that illustrates potential development
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 2 of22
I
I
I
is included in Exhibit 3. Except as noted above, specific end users have not been identified for the
majority ofthe site. Parcels will be identified ranging from 1.5 acres to 12 acres within the
unplatted 86 acres during future phases as needed for the potential users and as allowed by code.
Rezoning of the property will most likely be completed in phases at the time of the parcel
developments, to be consistent with the proposed uses. The concept site plan identifies surface
parking lots with approximately 3,750 stalls shown.
I
Considering wetlands, right of way requirements and proposed storm pond area, approximately 75
acres of the Ill-acre site are developable. Proposed building coverage is anticipated to be 25
percent of the net developable area.
I
Infrastructure Requirements
Access, water main and sanitary sewer trunk piping have been provided to the site as part of the
City of Albertville 2002 Northwest Commercial Park project completed this year. The City
project included the construction of a public road connecting to County Road 19 through the
Albertville Business Park, Phase 1 area. Water and sanitary sewer facilities have been constructed
within the roadway right of way to the Albertville Business Park project to serve the Phase I
development. The sanitary sewer flows into anew wastewater lift station in the Town Lakes
subdivision east of County Road 19. The roadway and utility systems are planned to be extended
through the remaining Albertville Business Park site as development progresses within the project.
The roadway system will ultimately connect to 70th Street on the north and Kadler A venue on the
west. The project will not have direct access to 1-94 on the south.
I
I
I
I
Wetland / Drainage Impacts
The site is currently undeveloped agricultural land that has been in production since before 1920.
Except for the homestead, farm buildings and gravel driveway, the entire site is pervious. The
property has access on the north to 70th Street via the driveway. There are seven delineated
wetlands within the site totaling approximately 19.2 acres. A copy of the Wetland Delineation
Report by Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. is attached in Appendix A for reference. The project
proposes to fill a number of the smaller, lowest quality wetlands and provide wetland mitigation
on-site by expanding the existing larger, higher quality wetlands at the required 2: 1 ratio according
to the Wetland Conservation Act and local requirements. The area of wetland fill proposed is
approximately 1.5 acres. The plan identifies approximately 8 percent of the wetlands in the site to
be filled and mitigated, as required. A complete sequential design process for wetland
replacement will be prepared as part of the wetland impact and mitigation plan. In the
predevelopment drainage conditions, the on-site wetlands are an integral part of the stormwater
routing system. The on-site wetlands function as stormwater treatment for runoff from the
MnDOT right of way on the south, and for runofffrom Kadler Avenue and 70th Street. The post-
construction drainage conditions will minimize impacts of the new development to the existing
wetlands proposed to remain, and maintain the current discharge rates and the general stormwater
routm.g of the existing site.
I
I
I
I
I
I
Development Phasing
Prior to grading in the area of the existing buildings, the homestead and farm buildings will be
demolished.
I
Construction of the proposed building pads and parking lots will include grading the majority of
the site except for the wetlands and buffer areas to be preserved. Earthwork will involve moving
existing material around on the site and removing material unsuitable for fill as required, in
accordance with current regulations. Where applicable, proposed pond basins will be subcut in
order to generate additional suitable material to use as fill elsewhere on site. Soils unsuitable for
building, parking, and roadway areas will be used to fill the voids created by over-excavating the
ponds, used as topsoil, or removed from the site. All material placed in the public right of way
shall be in accordance with City specifications. Currently, the site drains into numerous wetlands
that are located within the site. Proposed improvements will direct the surface runoff into
proposed stormwater treatment ponds durmg construction and after the facilities are operational.
I
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 3 of22
I
I
Erosion control measures will be implemented during construction to prevent sediment from
exiting the site.
I
As previously noted, the infrastructure in the Phase 1 development is complete and Lot 1 is
currently under construction and scheduled to be open soon. Construction on the remaining lots
within Phase 1 and on the remaining project area is not currently scheduled, and is anticipated to
occur in phases over the next five years.
I
I
7. Project magnitude data. The cumulative totals of the parameters called for should be given for each
major development scenario, except that information on "manufacturing, " "other industrial, "
"institutional, " and "agricultural. "
I
Total project acreage: :!: 111 acres
Number of residential units: unattached N/ A attached N/ A maximum units per building N/ A
Commercial, industrial or institutional building area (gross floor space): approximately 750,000 total
square feet
I
Indicate areas of specific uses (in square feet
Office
Retail
Warehouse
Light industrial
Other commercial (specifY):
Manufacturing .
Other industrial
Institutional
Agricultural
I
I
Specific uses and building square footages have not yet been identified for the majority of the site. The
master plan includes a range of potential development types that are consistent with the comprehensive
plan as shown on Exhibit 3 including commercial, light industrial, office, retail and warehouse. Final
development plans will address market demands and will be in accordance with code requirements.
I
I
Building height: Will vary between 18 feet and 35 feet
If over 2 stories, compare to heights of nearby buildings:
I
The majority of the buildings will be one story. Motel/ hotel and office buildings may be up to three
stories, which is in compliance with the zoning ordinance for the B-3 and industrial zoning districts
planned for the adjacent areas which allow buildings up to 35' in height. The existing Albertville outlet
mall buildings located southeast of the project area are also up to 35 feet in height.
I
8. Permits and approvals required. A listing of major approvals and public financial assistance and
infrastructure likely to be required by the anticipated types of development projects should be given.
The /ist will help orient reviewers to framework that will protect environmental resources. The list can
also serve as a starting point for the development of the implementation aspects of the mitigation plan
to be developed as part of the A UAR.
I
I
Unit of f!overnment
Tvpe of aoplication
Status
US Army Corps of Engineers
Section 404 Approval! Waiver (Phase 1) Approved
Section 404 Approval! Waiver (Future phases) To be applied for
Grading Permit (Phase I) Approved
Grading Permit (Future phases) To be applied for
Plat Approval (Phase 1) Approved
Plat Approval (Future phases) To be applied for
Well Closure Certificate(s) To be applied for
Watermain Extension (Phase I) Approved
Watermain Extension (Future phases) To be applied for
Underground Storage Tank Notification To be applied for
NPDES Permit (Phase 1) Approved
I
Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MnDOT)
I
Minnesota Dept of Health (MDH)
I
Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA)
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 40f22
I
I
NPDES Permit (Future phases)
Sanitary Sewer Extension (Phase 1)
Sanitary Sewer Extension (Future phases)
To be applied for
Approved
To be applied for
I
City of Albertville
Environmental Assessment Worksheet Under Review
Traffic Impact Study Under Review
Rezoning Approval/Planned Unit Dev. (Ph. 1) Approved
Rezoning Approval/Planned Unit Dev. (Future)To be applied for
Conditional Use Permit for Wetlands Systems
Overlay District To be applied for
Stormwater Management Plan (Phase 1) Approved
Stormwater Management Plan (Future phases) To be applied for
Preliminary and Final Plat (Phase 1) Approved
Preliminary and Final Plat (Future phases) To be applied for
WCA Permit Application (Phase 1) Approved
WCA Permit Application (Future phases) To be applied for
Public Roadway and Utilities (Phase 1) Approved
Public Roadway and Utilities (Future phases) To be applied for
Development Agreement (Phase 1) Approved
Development Agreement (Future phases) To be applied for
Construction Permits (Phase 1) Approved
Construction Permits (Future phases):
Water Connection Permit
Sanitary Sewer Connection Permit
Building Demolition Permit
Building Permits
Utility Permits
To be applied for
To be applied for
To be applied for
To be applied for
To be applied for
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9. Land use. Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent
lands. Discuss project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses. Indicate whether any potential
conflicts involve environmental matters. IdentifY any potential environmental hazards due to past site
uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks, or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid
or gas pipelines.
I
I
Response.
I
Current and Past Land Use
The site has been used for agricultural purposes since before 1920. The property is occupied by a
farmstead consisting of one house and outbuildings including sheds, a garage, storage buildings, a barn
and milk house, and grain silos. The house and several of the outbuildings were built in 1919, with
additional construction of structures on the property occurring at later dates. A gravel driveway
accesses the farmstead from 70th Street. As previously noted, approximately 25 acres in the southeast
comer of the Ill-acre property have been recently platted as a commercial subdivision and
infrastructure, roadways and utilities have been constructed. The remaining property consists of
wetland areas and fields currently farmed with row crops. Past use includes agricultural crop
production, a dairy cow milking operation and pig, cattle and chicken husbandry. The majority of the
property is currently zoned A-I for Agricultural Rural use. The property in the southeast comer of the
site is zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD). The land adjacent to the PUD zoning is currently
zoned 1-1 Light Industrial. The City of Albertville Comprehensive Plan designates the proposed land
use of commercial for a portion of the Phase 1 area in the southeast comer ofthe property, with the
remainder of the site designated for industrial.
I
I
I
I
A Phase One Environmental Site Assessment was performed by Liesch Associates, Inc. (see
Appendix B) that identified no environmentally hazardous conditions on the property. However,
several items of environmental note were identified and are described in Response 20. Additionally,
high voltage power lines are located along the north boundary and a portion of the east boundary that
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 5 0/22
I
I
are operated by Wright Hennepin Electric.
I
Adiacent Land Use
Adjacent lands to the north and northwest of the site are within the City of Otsego and in the Otsego A-
I (Agricultural Rural Service Area) Zoning District, with a land use of agricultural production. The
land southwest of the site, south of 1-94 and west of Kadler Avenue is also within the City ofOtsego
limits and is zoned 1-2, General Industrial District.
I
I
Current zoning for adjacent properties in the City of Albertville east of the project includes PUD
zoning on the southeast property that encompasses the Outlets at Albertville mall. 1-1, Light Industrial
zoning is east of the project, and encompasses wetlands/ undeveloped property that is planned to be
platted as industrial lots in the future by the City of Albertville. A-I, Agricultural Rural zoning is north
and northeast of the project currently in agricultural production. Interstate 94 runs along the south
project boundary. The properties southofI-94 across from the project are zoned A-I, 1-1 and R-5,
Medium Density Multiple Family residential. The area southeast ofthe project south ofI-94 is zoned
PUD. Current land uses south of 1-94 include residential areas consisting of single family homes and
townhomes and commercial uses. (see Exhibit 6 for zoning map)
I
I
A dump is located directly adjacent to the property to the east. The dump contains rocks, concrete,
wood and other miscellaneous debris.
I
Compatibility with Adiacent and Nearby Land Uses
The site and vicinity is guided and planned for commercial and light industrial use. This project is in
conformance with the planned use.
I
10. Cover types. Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the follOWing cover types before and after
development:
I
Types 1-8 wetlands
Wooded/forest Brush/Grassland
Cropland
Lawn/landscaping
Impervious surfaces
Other (describe) Storm water Ponds
TOTAL
Before
19.2 acres
0.3 acres
90.8 acres
After
19.2 acres
15.7 acres
0.0 acres
12.0 acres
60.0 acres
4.1 acres
111.0 acres
I
0.7 acres
0.0 acres
111.0 acres
I
If Before and After totals are not equal, explain why: N/ A
I
11. Fish, wildlife and ecologically sensitive resources
I
a. The description of wild life andfish resources should be related to the habitat types depicted on the
cover types maps (of Item 10). Any differences in impacts between development scenarios should
be highlighted in the discussion.
I
Response. There are no fish resources on or within a half -mile of the site that could be affected
by this Project. The site has been used for agricultural purposes; therefore, much of the natural
wildlife habitat has been degraded due to the past crop production. A wetland delineation report
prepared by Kjholhaug Environmental Services Company dated January 21,2000, identified nine
wetlands on the site; however, at the request of the RGU, Pinnacle Engineering re-delineated the
site on August 30, 2002 and determined that there was a hydrologic and/or vegetative connection
between three of the basins identified by Kjolhaug Environmental. The three basins are connected
to form a larger wetland complex, which is identified as Wetland 2 in the revised delineation. As
a result, Wetlands 5 and 6 are no longer referenced in the report. The revised delineation
determined that there are 19.2 acres of wetland on the entire site (Phases I & remaining area) (see
Appendix A). Impacts to Wetlands 7,8, and 9 are associated with Phase I of this development and
have received all the appropriate permits. Wetlands 1 through 4 are within the area encompassed
I
I
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 60f22
I
I
I,
by current and future phases of development.
I
The majority of the Site is currently utilized as agricultural land with minimal amounts of wildlife
habitat present. While agricultural land does represent a wildlife resource, it is a more seasonal
and a less valuable resource than wetlands or woodland. All of the wetlands not yet permitted (1
through 4) are of medium-low quality. Although the conversion of agricultural land to industrial
and commercial development will decrease the overall area available for wildlife habitat, there
will be an increase in the acreage of habitable wetland available at the site, in addition to
permanent areas of vegetation. .
I
The site wetlands are degraded by near monotypic stands of invasive reed canary grass observed
in all of the basins. Only where open water is present does the dominant vegetation exhibit some
species diversity and change from reed canary grass to cattails, broad-leaved arrowhead, and wool
grass. The project includes increasing the acreage and quality of the large wetland (Wetland 1) by
means of mitigation for any wetland impact areas. Aggressive management of the existing
vegetation and the addition of high quality seeding and plantings should increase species diversity.
I
I
I
b. For an A UAR, prior consultation with the DNR Natural Heritage program for information about
reports of rare plant and animal species in the vicinity is required If such consultation indicates
the need, an on-site habitat survey for rare species in the appropriate portions of the A UAR area
is required Areas of on-site surveys should be depicted on a map, as should any "protection
zones" established as a result.
I
Describe measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts.
I
Response. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources - Heritage Program reviewed their
data base for the Albertville Business Park property. Based on this review, there are no known
occurrences of rare species or natural communities in the area searched. Therefore, the project
will have no impact to state-listed species, rare plant communities or other sensitive ecological
resources See response letter in Appendix C.
I
12. Physical impacts on water resources. The information called for on the EA W form should be supplied
for in any of the infrastructure associated with theAUAR development scenarios and for any
development expected to physically impact any water resources. Where it is uncertain whether water
resources will be impacted depending on the exact design of future development, the A UAR should
cover the possible impacts through a "worst case scenario" or else prevent impacts through the
provisions of the mitigation plan.
I
I
Response. As noted in Response lla, a revised wetland delineation report prepared by Pinnacle
Engine~ring ~atedSepteI11ber26, 2002, identified seven wetlands on site totaling approximately 19.2
acres (see Appendix A). Impacts related to Wetlands 7,8, and 9 are associated with Phase I of this
development and have received the appropriate permits for filling approximately 1.0 acre of low
quality wetland. A functions and values assessment prepared by Pinnacle Engineering is included in
Appendix D. No DNR protected waters or wetlands are located at the Site.
I
I
The concept plan for the remaining area calls for impacting portions of wetland 2 and all of wetland 3,
which were classified as medium-low quality and exhibited monotypic stands of reed canary grass, for
an impact of approximately 1.4 acres (see Exhibit 7). As a result, total impacts to wetlands included
in Phase I and the remainder of the site will approximate 2.4 acres offill.
I
I
Roadways, building placement, building density, and parking areas were arranged and rearranged to
minimize wetland impacts. However, where wetland impacts are proposed, on-site mitigation at a
ratio of over 2: I (remove ratio) will be accomplished with a combination of new wetland credit and
public value credit.
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 70f22
I
I
I
On-site mitigation will include increasing the size and quality of Wetland 1 by adding an upland buffer
around the wetland and improving the site drainage with stormwater ponds. The design of the project
will include a storm water management plan that provides ponds to detain and treat the storm water
prior to discharge into the remaining wetlands. The drainage patterns of the existing site will be
maintained for the most part. Surficial runoffwill be treated and routed to the existing and created
wetlands to ensure hydration. Existing farm ditches may be preserved as natural drainage features or
replaced with storm sewer piping to maintain drainage conditions.
I
I
I
I
13. Water use. If the area requires new water supply wells, specific information about that appropriation
and its potential impacts on groundwater levels should be given: if groundwater levels would be
affected, any impacts on other resources should be addressed
Response.
I
I
Water Wells
There are two wells existing on the property that are not registered with the Minnesota Department of
Health. One well is located near a tool shed and is~urrently active, providing water for the homestead
and farming operation. The second well is reportedly inactive. The existing well locations are shown
on Exhibit 8, Existing Conditions. Both wells will be capped in accordance with Minnesota
Department of Health regulations when they are abandoned at the time of development of the existing
homestead site.
I
Water Supply Changes
Water supply piping improvements recently completed by the City are illustrated on Exhibit 4, Water
Master Plan. A 12-inch diameter water main connects to the existing main on the mall property and
extends along 67th Street from CR 19 to the project. The public water main in County Road 19 crosses
1-94 south of the mall, connecting to the City of Albertville public water supply system on the south
side of the freeway. The new main within the project extends from 67th Street along the Phase 1
project to the south across 1-94 and connects to the City water supply system, and provides a looped
service. The City of Albertville has confIrmed that the looped potable water piping system
accommodates the demands of the project.
I
I
The remainder of the proposed public water piping within the Albertville Business Park project will be
designed in coordination with the phasing of the project and identifIcation of roadway alignments.
Private water piping loops will be constructed on each of the lots by the individual developers to
service the domestic and fIre protection needs of the new buildings. The pipe will be designed to meet
the demands as follows:
I
Dewatering
De\V<tt~riIlg)l1ay.berequiredatcertain locations during excavation, particularly during the excavation
of unsuitable soils from beneath the proposed building and pavement areas due to a possible perched
water table beneath portions of the site. The water table may extend up to elevation 950 or higher in
locations, as noted in the Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration dated June 25, 2001 by GME
Consultants, Inc. (See Appendix E) Dewatering methods will be determined by the contractor and
approved by the City of Albertville and the DNR as required, prior to construction.
I
I
I
14. Water-related land use management district Does any part of the project involve a shoreland zoning
district, a delineated JOO-year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land
use district? Such districts should be delineated on appropriate maps and the land use restrictions
applicable in those districts should be described Ifany variances or deviations from these restrictions
within the AUAR area are envisioned, this should be discussed
I
Response: The project will not impact any referenced water-related land use management district.
I
15. Water suiface use.
This item need only be addressed if the A UAR area would include or adjoin recreational water bodies.
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 8 of22
I
I
Response: Not applicable.
I
I
16. Erosion and sedimentation. The number of acres to be graded and number of cubic yards of soil to be
moved need not be given; instead, a general discussion of the likely earthmoving needs for
development of the area should be given, with an emphasis on unusual or problem areas. In
discussing mitigation measures, both the standard requirements of the local ordinances and any
special measures that would be added for A UAR purposes should be included
I
Response. Except for approximately 16.8 acres of wetland area and adjacent buffers that is proposed
to be preserved, the remainder of the entire property encompassing as much as 94 acres of farmed land
will be graded. Due to the type of soil on the site, large quantities of material are anticipated to be
moved and redistributed during site development, roadway construction, wetland fills, and soil
corrections.
I
I
Existing contours and a concept grading and drainage plan are illustrated on Exhibit 9, Grading and
Erosion Control Plan. The site is characterized by gently sloping topography with slopes generally less
than 7% and a total change in elevation over the site of approximately 16 feet. The surface of the site
is currently covered with crops and other vegetation characterized by transient grass species and
vegetation typical of wetlands in the larger wetland areas. The project involves grading the site to
result in maximum slopes of 5% in paved areas, but typically around 2%. The development will not
result in any steep slopes. Best Management Practices (BMP's) will be designated during the
permitting process for implementation during construction and as part of the final improvements.
Minimum erosion control measures to be used during construction are shown on Exhibit 9. Proposed
BMP's will minimize erosion and manage sedimentation as required by the City of Albertville and the
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). During construction, erosion control
measures will likely include silt fencing, hay bales, temporary rock construction entrances and
temporary sediment basins that will minimize and slow down runoff. Permanent BMP's will include
prompt sodding/ seeding of areas not planned for pavement. Swales and ditches will be designed,
graded and surfaced to minimize sediment transportation into the proposed public storm water
treatment ponds. The public stormwater ponds will have the capacity to provide storage and
sedimentation management for runoff from the entire fully developed site. A summary of the master
drainage plan including potential stormwater pond contributing areas is attached in Appendix F.
Drainage improvements for the Phase 1 project are currently under construction.
I
I
I
I
I
17. Water quality: stormwater runoff. For an A UAR, the following additional guidance should be
followed in addition to that in "EA W Guidelines. "
it is expected that an A UAR will have a detailed analysis of storm water issues:
a map of the proposed storm water management system and of the water bodies that will receive
stormwater should be provided:
the description of the starmwater systems would identifY on-site and "regional" detention ponding
and also indicate whether the various ponds will be new water bodies or converted existing ponds
or wetlands. Where on-site ponds will be used but have not yet been designed, the discussion
should indicate the design standards that will be followed
I
I
I
Water quality: surface water runoff
a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe permanent
controls to manage or treat runoff. Describe al1)1 storm water pollution prevention plans.
I
I
Response. The site encompasses approximately III acres. Currently, the site is entirely pervious,
except for the farmstead buildings and gravel driveway to the farmstead and open water areas in the
existing wetlands. In the past, the quality of the runoff has depended upon the amount and type of
chemicals used on the crops during agricultural production. In the winter, the runoff impacting the site
includes a significant amount of salt from 1-94, which greatly reduces the water quality. In general, the
runoff on the site is currently of poor quality and is directly discharged into the on-site wetlands for
treatment via overland flow and ditches. See Exhibit SWMP 1, Existing Drainage in Appendix F,
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 90f22
I
I
. Drainage Report.
I
I
Runoff from the proposed development will be defined by two separate contributing areas that
generally follow the existing drainage area boundaries. The south area currently drains into Wetland 9,
a large wetland in the southeast comer of the site. The north area encompasses the contributing area
currently draining into Wetland I at the northwest comer of the site and the wetland ditch flowing
from Wetland I to the east. The north area includes Wetland 4 drainage from the northeast comer of
the site that also drains into the wetland ditch carrying outfall from Wetland 1. Propose4 drainage
areas and routing are illustrated in Appendix F, Drainage Report, on SWMP 2 Concept Drainage Plan.
I
I
Stormwater from the proposed developments will be routed to on-site stormwater retention ponds that
are designed to accommodate the fully developed site in accordance with National Urban Runoff
Program (NURP) standards for treatment and detention as described below. The treated water will be
discharged from the NURP ponds to recharge the on-site wetlands. Runoffultimately leaving the site
through this integrated system of ponds and wetlands will be of high quality and will not exceed the
predevelopment rate of discharge.
I
South Drainage Area
The limits of the existing south drainage area will generally be maintained in the fully developed
condition.
I
I
A significant amount of off-site runoff is currently routed through the site along the south and
southwest from the Interstate 1-94 right of way. Stormwater runoff from developments to the south
flows through existing culverts beneath 1-94, and discharges into the MnDOT ditch on the north side of
1-94. These ditches and 1-94 then flow into several wetlands on the project site. The wetlands
generally discharge overflow through farm ditches in an easterly direction into Wetland 9, which
discharges into a ditch on the property east of the project. The existing wetland basins on site are
currently functioning as the stormwater basins for MnDOT and the drainage area south ofI-94.
I
I
In the proposed condition, Wetland 9 and the majority of Wetland 2 will be preserved. Flow from the
1-94 right of way on the west side of the project will continue to be discharged into Wetland 2.
Overflow from Wetland 2 will be carried within a piping system into the Phase I storm pond north of
67th Street which discharges into Wetland 9. Flow from the 1-94 right of way on the east half of the
project will be carried in a channel along the south project boundary that discharges through storm
sewers into Wetland 9. The channel and storm sewer piping for the east off-site flows were built as
part of the Albertville Business Park Phase 1 improvements. Runoff from the proposed parcels will be
captured by surface drains and routed to several on-site NURP ponds through a subsurface piping
system that will be designed as the project development occurs. Each NURP pond will be discharged
via a system of storm sewers and ditches into Wetland 9 as with the constructed Phase 1 ponds.
Tre~t~d runoff will continue to exit Wetland 9 over the east property boundary and into the existing
ditch on the adjacent property.
I
I
I
North Drainage Area
Runoff overflow from significant off-site areas north and west of the site is routed across the north
portion of the site. Higher ground to the west of Kadler A venue naturally drains toward the site and is
carried beneath the roadway via culverts. Additionally, existing wetlands north of 70th Street are
connected via culverts beneath the roadway and overflow into Wetland 1 and Wetland 4 on the site.
Wetland 1 overflows via a ditch that flows to the east where the runoff exits the site. Wetland 4
discharges into a farm ditch that flows along the east property line to the south and into the Wetland 1
outlet ditch, carrying flow off -site to the east.
I
I
I
A drainage report is included in Appendix F that details the existing and approximate proposed
drainage conditions. Proposed development will result in approximately 60 acres of impervious area
such a,s parking lots, roof areas and streets. Based on the rational method of calculation, existing and
post-development runoff flow rates for the 100-year rainfall event are estimated to be 89 cfs and 62
cfs, respectively. Preconstruction runoff volume is approximately 103.9 acre-feet; the runoff volume
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 10 of22
I
I
anticipated after project completion is approximately 109.5 acre-feet. The project will significantly
reduce the rate ofrunofffrom the site while resulting in a minimal increase in volume of flow off the
site. Each phase of development will include drainage design that provides for NURP requirements.
I
I
b. Identify routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site; include major downstream water
bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters. Estimate impact of the runoff on the quality of
receiving waters.
I
Response. The site is in the Otsego Creek Watershed. Runoff currently flows off-site from two points on
the east project boundary identified as the Wetland 9 outfall ditch on the south, and the ditch carrying
outfall from Wetland 1 and Wetland 4 on the north. Both outfalls discharge into the existing ditch system
on the adjacent property east of the site. The runoff is carried through several existing wetlands and ditches
on the adjacent property, then routed through the wetlands south of the outlet mall, ultimately discharging
across County Road 19 via culverts and into School Lake east of County Road 19. School Lake overflows
into Mud Lake to the east, which discharges into Otsego Creek, which then discharges into the Mississippi
River. The city is currently designing a permanent outlet/rate control structure at the Mud Lake outlet into
Otsego Creek. The treated runoff of the proposed devdopment will continue to be routed through the ditch
and wetland system into School Lake, and will be of improved quality compared to the existing condition.
I
I
I
18. Water quality: wastewaters. Observe the following points of guidance in an A UAR:
only domestic wastewater should be considered in an AUAR1industrial wastewater would be
coming from industrial uses that are excluded from review through an A UAR process;
wastewater jlows should be estimated by land use subareas of the A UAR area; the basis of the
jlow estimates should be explained;
the major sewer systemfeatures should be shown on a map and the expectedjlows should be
identified;
ifnot explained under item 6, the expected staging of the sewer system construction should be
described;
the relationship of the sewer system extension to the RGU's comprehensive sewer plan an (for
metro area A UARs) to Metropolitan Council regional systems plans, including MUSA
explanations, should be discussed For no-metro area AUARs, the AUAR must discuss the
capacity of the RGU's wastewater treatment system comparted to thejlowsfrom the AUAR area;
any necessary improvements should be described;
if on-site systems will serve part of the A UAR the guidance in "EA W Guidelines" (pages 16-17)
should be followed
I
I
I
I
I
Water quality: wastewaters
a. Describe sources, composition and quantities of all sanitary, municipal and industrial
wastewater produced or treated at the site
I
Response. Currently there is sanitary wastewater produced by the single family homestead on the site
that is discharged into an on-site sanitary septic system and drain field southeast of the existing house.
As part of the new project development, the existing homestead and septic system will be abandoned
and removed in accordance with regulations.
I
The daily sanitary sewage discharge from the new development will include urban type wastewater.
The maximum quantity of wastewater to be produced within the project area is estimated to be in the
range of93,750 gallons per day. This calculation is based on an average of25 gallons per day per
parking space proposed on the concept site plan, and represents an average daily demand factor for all
uses that may be included on the development including light industrial, commercial and office/
warehouse developments. Maximum peak flows based on a peaking factor of2.5 are anticipated to
equal 0.75 cubic feet per second.
I
I
I
b. Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of
composition after treatment. Identify receiving waters, including major downstream water bodies,
and estimate the discharge impact on the quality of receiving waters. If the project involves on-site
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 11 of22
I
I
sewage systems, discuss the suitability of site conditions for such systems.
I
Response. The project will result in the discharge of urban-type wastewater (domestic) from the
proposed light industrial, office/warehouse and commercial uses. Effluent will be discharged into 8-
inch and lO-inch diameter public gravity sanitary sewer pipes within the 67th Street and Keystone
A venue rights of way that will run through the project and flow through the sanitary trunk piping
within City property located east of the site as shown on Exhibit 5, Sanitary Sewer Master Plan. The
specific pipe sizing within the project limits will be identified as each phase is develope4, and will
consider the potential upstream discharge to be carried in the piping system. The sanitary sewer trunk
will carry effluent east across County Road 19, continuing to the east to discharge into the Town Lakes
Lift Station currently under construction. The lift station will discharge effluent into the existing
public sanitary sewer piping system that currently carries flow to the wastewater treatment ponds
owned and operated by the City of Albertville. Each of the proposed developments within the
Albertville Business Park will discharge via a private sanitary seWer piping system into connections to
the proposed public sanitary sewer trunk. Public sanitary sewer trunk piping is currently being
constructed within the project area as noted on Exhibit 5. Individual private piping systems including
any required pretreatment will be designed by the individual lot developers and approved by the City
of Albertville prior to connection to the public sanitary trunk piping.
I
I
I
I
I
c. If wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identifY the facility, describe
any pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the volume and composition
of wastes, identifYing any improvements necessary.
I
I
Response. The project will discharge into the existing City of Albertville wastewater treatment ponds.
The project is within the service area of the Towne Lakes lift station currently being constructed by the
City of Albertville as part of a public improvements project. At this time, there are no known
pretreatment requirements for the anticipated waste from this site. 'The City of Albertville has
confirmed that the public piping system, lift station and treatment ponds have the capacity to
accommodate the wastewater discharge from the fully developed Ill-acre Albertville Business Park
site.
I
d. If the project requires disposal of liquid animClI manure, describe disposal technique and location
and discuss capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure. IdentifY any improvements
necessary. Describe any required setbacks for land disposal systems.
I
Response. Not applicable to this project.
I
19. Geologic hazards and soil conditions. A map should be included to show any groundwater hazards
identified A standard soils map for the area should be included
I
a. Approximate depth (infeet) to ground water: 14 feet minimum, (unknown) averafIe.
To bedrock: (unknown) minimum, 200 feet averafIe.
I
Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and also identifY them on the
site map: sinkholes, shallow limestone formations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid
or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards.
I
Response. Based on the preliminary geotechnical exploration conducted on the site there is no
evidence of sinkholes, shallow limestone formations or karst conditions. Therefore, no measures
will be required to mitigate these types of subsurface conditions.
I
b. Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications, ifknown. Discuss soil
granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or
spilled onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination.
I
As noted on Exhibit II-Wright County Soils Map, the following soils are located on the property:
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 12 of22
.
I
I
I
Gc Glencoe silty clay loam
This very poorly drained soil is found in depressions and drainageways in the upland. The surface
soil is black silty clay loam about 21 inches thick, and the subsoil is very dark gray and olive-gray
silty clay loam about 15 inches thick. Below is olive-gray clay loam or silty clay loam. The
fertility and content of organic matter is high. The seasonal water table and moisture-supplying
capacity are also high. Permeability is moderately slow; however, these soils can be effectively
drained with tile. Unless drained, these soils are periodically ponded, and in wet years some areas
are flooded the year round. In reaction the surface soil and subsoil range from slightly acid to
mildly alkaline. These soils belong to building site group 10.
I
I
HlB: Hayden loam
HlB2: Hayden loam. moderately eroded
The Hayden series are extensive on undulating to hilly areas in the upland. The plow layer is dark
grayish-brown loam about 7 inches thick. (This layer loses 3-6 inches in the moderately eroded
classification.) Just below is a somewhat lightf;:lr gray loam, about 3 inches thick, that grades to
dark grayish-brown clay loam at a depth of about 20 inches. The underlying material is olive-
brown loam or clay loam. Fertility is moderate, as the content of organic matter is low;
nevertheless, these soils are productive (for crops) if well managed. Internal drainage is medium,
and permeability is moderate. The slopes are mild, but the soil is subject to erosion and practices
are needed for control of erosion. Hayden soils have a slightly acid surface layer and a slightly
acid to strongly acid subsoil. These soils belong to building site group 4.
I
I
I
I
Pm Peat and muck, shallow over loam
Peat consists of the organic remains of marsh grasses, sedges, and reeds in low, wet areas. Muck
consists of well-decomposed, finely divided peat that has a higher mineral content than peat and
also is more silty. This series is found in depressions and drainageways throughout the upland in
layers 1 to 3.5 feet thick. All areas are too wet for crops unless artificially drained. Fertility is
low, but crops on Peat and muck respond well if fertilizer is applied in large amounts. Most of the
Peat and muck is slightly acid to slightly alkalirie. These soils belong to building site group 10.
I
I
Cw Cordova and Webster silty clay loams
Cordova soils are deep and are poorly drained. They are mainly on nearly level, broad areas and
in shallow drainageways in the uplands. The surface layer is black silty clay loam about 10 inches
thick. Below is about 18 inches of very dark gray and olive-gray silty clay mottled with olive.
The underlying material is olive and olive-gray clay loam. The water table is seasonally fairly
high, and Runoff and internal drainage are slow, and permeability is moderately slow to slow.
Water moves slowly through these soils, but they can be effectively drained for crop production
with tile. Cordova soils are neutral to slightly acid in the surface soil and slightly acid to strongly
acid in the subsoil. These soils belong to building site group 9.
I
I
I
Ma Mama silty clay loam
The Mama series consists of deep, poorly drained soils on nearly level flats and in slightly
depressed drainageways in the upland. The surface layer is black silty clay loam about 10 inches
thick. Below is dark-gray silty clay mottled with olive gray and gray that is about 20 inches thick.
The underlying material is olive-gray silty clay loam or clay loam. The fertility, content of
organic matter, and moisture-supplying capacity are high. Runoff and internal drainage are slow,
and permeability is moderately slow. Mama soils are neutral to medium acid in the surface soil
and the subsoil. These soils belong to building site group 9.
I
I
II
Du Dundas and Ames silt loams
Dundas soils are deep, nearly level, and somewhat poorly drained soils located on small flats
adjacent to drainageways in the upland. The plow layer is silt loam about 7 inches thick. The
subsoil is dark grayish-brown and olive-gray silty clay that is mottled with olive and is about 28
inches thick. The underlying material is olive and olive-gray clay loam. These Dundas and Ames
soils are fair to good for corps and good for pasture, but wetness is a problem. Runoff and internal
,I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 13 of22
I
I
drainage are slow, and permeability is moderately slow to slow. The surface layer of these soils is
neutral to medium acid, and the subsoil is slightly acid to very strongly acid. These soils belong to
building site group 10.
I
I
The potential for releases of pollutants to groundwater for this site is considered to be low based
on the high clay content and low permeability of the majority of the developable area of the site.
There will be no storage or handling of significant volumes of chemicals or other hazardous
materials as part of the potential commercial/retail/restaurant, office, warehouse and service
operations.
I
Potential light industrial uses may generate hazardous waste as part of operations, and will be
designed to meet all applicable local and state regulations regarding environmental control. Prior
to commencing operations, procedures will be in place to address and mitigate any release of
hazardous or other waste material into the environment.
I,
I
In the event that there is a release, the responsible property owner will be required to properly
address and mitigate the release. Darkenwald Real Estate has a clause in its construction
specification packages requiring contractors to be in compliance with all applicable environmental
regulations.
I
20. Solid wastes, hazardous wastes, storage tanks.
a. For "a", generally only the estimated total quantity of municipal solid waste generated and
information about recycling or source separation programs of the RGU need to be included.
I
Response. Solid wastes will be generated as part of the construction process such as wood pallets,
scrap wood, metal and plastic materials and empty containers. The contractor will be responsible
for providing temporary on-site storage of the solid waste and arranging for periodic collection
and disposal of the waste in accordance with federal, state and local requirements. The limited
hazardous wastes that may be generated during construction will be handled, stored and disposed
of as required by law.
I
I
A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was completed for the property by Liesch
Associates. The ESA identified several potential environmental items that may require future
environmental compliance as follows:
I
· Five above-ground storage tanks were observed on the property. Three of the tanks are active
and hold petroleum products. No staining or leakage was observed in the vicinity of the
tanks. Soil sampling and/or well sampling will be completed as required to identify any
subsurface contamination and required remediation as part of abandonment / demolition
activities ofthe site development.
I
I
· Chemicals currently stored on site included oil, gasoline, diesel fuel, fuel oil, painting
supplies, car batteries and miscellaneous cleaning supplies and household hazardous wastes.
Chemicals stored on the property will be properly disposed of at the time of abandonment!
demolition of the existing homestead and farm operation.
I
I
· One pole-mounted transformer was observed on the Property that is owned and maintained by
Wright Hennepin Electric Cooperative. No staining or leakage was observed near the
transformer.
I
· The buildings contain various pieces of farm equipment, a generator and an air compressor
containing petroleum products. At the time of site development, the equipment will be
removed and the area will be checked for subsurface leakage and assessed for compliance
requirements.
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 14 of22
I
I
· Materials in the home were identified as potentially containing asbestos. As part of the
building demolition, a complete demolition survey will be completed including an asbestos
and lead paint survey and assessment of hazardous materials located on the property. All
materials identified in the survey will be removed and disposed of in accordance with
regulations.
I
I
· Two abandoned cars, abandoned farm equipment, piles of wood debris and pieces of
corrugated metal sheeting as well as piles of 55-gallon drums were found on th~ site. The
property east of the site contains a dump that does not appear to be impacting the project. The
site assessment noted above will include identifying locations for soil samples to be taken in
the vicinity ofthe abandoned drums and other items to identify possible soil contamination,
mitigation measures and disposal requirements prior to site development.
I
I
· A septic system is located east of the homestead. The tank and drainfield will be abandoned
and removed in accordance with regulations during the site development.
I
During operation of the new facilities, municipal solid waste will be generated. Individual
property owners will arrange for collection/ disposal service consistent with all applicable
environmental regulations and requirements. A limited amount of hazardous waste is anticipated
during operation of the office and retail facilities such as used florescent light bulbs and cleaning
supplies. Light industrial facilities may generate certain hazardous wastes during operations. It
will be the responsibility of the individual property owners to perform any recycling or hazardous
waste minimization! waste reduction planning and implementation required to meet applicable
environmental regulations.
I
I
I
b. IdentifY any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identifY measures to
be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. If the use of toxic or hazardous
materials will lead to a regulated waste, discharge or emission, discuss any alternatives
considered to minimize or eliminate the waste, discharge or emission.
I
Response. During construction, limited amounts of hazardous materials typically used on this
type of construction project are anticipated to be used. The Contractor will be responsible to
ensure that applicable environmental regulations and requirements for the use, storage, handling
and disposal of any such materials are met.
I
The hazardous materials used during the operaticlll of the facilities as noted in (a) above will be
stored, handled and disposed of in accordance with requirements to prevent leaking that would
contaminate groundwater. Each individual property owner and facility operator generating
hazardous wastes will be responsible for maintaining a program to minimize hazardous waste
generation, recycle wastes where possible and provide for disposal in compliance with applicable
envirorimental regulations and local requirements.
I
I
c. Indicate the number, location, size and use of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum
products or other materials, except water. Describe any emergency response containment plans.
I
Response. As noted in Response No. 20a., there are a number of existing above ground storage
tanks currently located on the property. As partofthe abandonment and demolition of the
homestead and farming operation, the area around the tanks will be assessed for possible existing
contamination and, if required, remediation measures will be identified.
I
I
During construction, there may be small quantities of fuel stored above ground onsite. The
contractor will be responsible for fuel storage that is in compliance with state and local
regulations.
I
There may be above or below ground storage tanks required for operation of potential facilities
within the project. The applicable facilities will be required to develop an emergency response
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 15 0122
I
I
containment plan as required by regulations prior to delivery and storage of fuel onsite.
I
21. Traffic
I
EQB guidance specifies for most AUAR reviews a relatively detailed traffic analysis will be needed,
especially if there is to be much commercial development in the AUAR area or if there are major
congested roadways in the vicinity. The results of the traffic analysis will be used in the responses to
item 23 and to the noise aspect of item 25.
I
Instead of the information required under this heading in an EA W; EQB guidance requests the
following information be provided:
- A description and map of the existing and proposed roadway system, including state, regional, and
local roads to be affected by the development of the AUAR area. This information should include
existing and proposed roadway capacities and existing and projected background (i.e., without the
AUAR development) traffic volumes;
- Trip generation data -- trip generation rates and trip totals -- for each major development scenario
broken down by land use zones and/or other relevant
subdivisions of the area. The projected distributions
onto the roadway system must be included;
- Analysis of impacts of the traffic generated by the AUAR area on the roadway system, including:
comparison of peak period total flows to capacities
and analysis of Levels of Service and delay times at
critical points (if any);
- A discussion of structural and non-structural improvements and traffic management measures that
are proposed to mitigate problems;
NOTE: in the above analyses, the geographical scope must extend outward as far as the traffic to be
generated would have a significant effect on the roadway system and traffic measurements and
projections should include peak days and peak hours, or other appropriate measures related to
identifYing congestion problems, as well as ADTs.
I
I
I
I
I
I
A detailed traffic impact analysis has been conducted by Short, Elliot & Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) for the
subject area and is included as Appendix G. The following discussion summarizes the information
contained in the report.
I
Existing Roadway System
One existing principal arterial roadway serves the study area:
I
>- Interstate-94 (1-94), to the south and west of the study area, is a four-lane interstate freeway with a full
interchange at County State-Aid Highway 37 (CSAR 37), and a partial interchange at CSAH 19,
serving traffic
to and from the west.
I
>- Two minor arterials serve the study area:
I
>- CSAH 19 is a two-lane undivided arterial with signalized intersections at CSAH 37 and Outlet Mall
Road. Speed limits range from 40 mph to 55 mph.
>- CSAH 37 is a two-lane undivided arterial with a signalized intersection at CSAR 19. The ramp
terminal intersections at the CSAR 37/1-94 interchange are stop-controlled.
I
Two city streets access the site:
I
>- 70th Street is a two-lane undivided city street running east/west from the site to CSAH 19.
>- 67th Street is a two-lane undivided city street running east/west from the site to CSAH 19.
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 16 of22
I
I
Figure 1 located in Appendix G, the SEH Traffic Report, illustrates the primary roadway system serving
the study area.
I
Planned and Programmed Roadway Improvements
I
Information provided to SEH by the City of Albertville, Wright County and MnDOT identified the
following programmed improvements:
I
>- CSAH 19 will become a divided 4-lane facility from north of 67th Street to south of 57th Street. (2003)
>- CSAH 19 at 57th Street will become a signalized intersection. (2003)
>- CSAH 19 at 6ih Street will become a signalized intersection. (2003)
I
Additional improvement projects are planned, but are not yet programmed:
I
>- Interchange modification at CSAH 19/1-94 to provide eastbound access to and westbound access from
1-94.
>- Signalization of the ramp terminal intersections at CSAH 19/1-94.
>- Widening of CSAH 19 north from Outlet Mall Road to beyond 67th Street.
I
Existing and Planned Transit Services
Metro Transit does not currently offer transit service to the Albertville/St. Michael Area. However,
existing options for commuters to the Twin Cities include:
I
· Service to and from the metro area from park and ride lots in Champlin and Maple Grove.
· Commuter bus service from Elk River.
· Ridesharing set up and sponsored by Metro Commuter Services.
I
Discussions have been ongoing and concept plans have been developed for the creation of a Northwest
Corridor Transit route. Although no plans are programmed at this time, possibilities include commuter rail
and bus service extending to St. Cloud with the possibility of access in or near Albertville/St. Michael (per
discussion with Metro Transit).
I
I
Transportation Study
I
A detailed Transportation Analysis has been conducted be SEH to fully investigate the effects of the
proposed land use scenarios on the local and regional roadway systems. This report has been included as
Appendix G.
I
Traffic information and forecasts in the SEH report were based on the City of Albertville Traffic Model.
The model was developed in 2002 for the City to assess the impacts of traffic growth within Albertville, as
well as the surrounding region, including parts of the Cities of Otsego and St. Michael.
I
Traffic generation estimates were prepared by SEH using the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip
Generation (6th Edition). Potential land use for the Darkenwald site was used to compile traffic generation
estimates for the property (See Table 4 in Appendix G.) Upon full build-out of the AUAR area, the daily
trip generation potential, per SEH, Inc., is approximately 17,467 trips. The existing roadway network
currently serves approximately 13,500 trips (per Mn/DOT data and discussions with Wright County). It is
noted the timing of the development of the project area is uncertain other than it is expected to occur within
the next twenty years. Further, development on the proposed Darkenwald site will result in approximately
1,860 PM peak hour trips, which are assigned to the adjacent street system based on the City's Traffic
Model.
I
I
The traffic generated by the project during the weekday AM and PM peak hours was distributed as shown
on Figure 4 in Appendix G, the SEH Traffic Report. The entrance chosen by traffic to access the
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 17 of22
I
I
development was assigned based on the destination or origin of the traffic and on the shortest estimated
travel time.
I
Estimated background traffic forecasts were developed from the City of Albertville's Traffic Model, created
by SEH. In addition to these forecasts, an estimate of potential new City of Otsego traffic, as a result of
new sewer service, has been included in the future conditions forecast. Further, the additional traffic due to
the development of the 93.9-acre Vetch Mixed-Use Development was included (see SEH Traffic Report,
Appendix G, for detailed discussion.)
I
I
I
The build year PM peak hour levels of service were analyzed at seven existing and future intersections and
are summarized in Table 22.1. Analysis was conducted using both SYNCHRO 5.0 and SIMTRAFFIC
traffic operations analysis software. In general, a peak hour Level of Service D or better is considered
acceptable in the Twin Cities area.
Table 21.1 : Intersection Level of Service
I
I
Intersection County 19 @
70m Street
67''' Street/Laketown Drive
Outlet Mall Road
1-94 Westbound On Ramp
1-94 Eastbound Off Ramp
CSAH 37
57m Street
Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
PM Peak Hour
Background Growth Only
V /c Ratio Delay/LOS
n/a n/a
n/a n/a
0.54 26.8/C
0.60 3.4/A
0.77 18.7/B
0.89 48.6/D
0.71 25.3/C
Full Development
V/c Ratio Delay/LOS
0.68 22.3/C
0.84 37.5/D
0.85 35.0/D
0.69 6.3/A
0.90 16.2/B
1.21 94.2/F
0.79 26.7/C
I
I
I
The SEH Traffic Report indicates modification to the surrounding roadway infrastructure may be required
as follows to mitigate growth in background traffic as well as site-generated traffic within the next twenty
years:
I
CSAH 19/CSAH 37
Enhanced access to eastbound and from westbound 1-94 will be necessary to accommodate future growth in
the Albertville/St. Michael's area. This improvement may include the addition of an eastbound on ramp
from CSAH 19 and a westbound off ramp to CSAH 19. Alternatively, the expansion ofCSAH 37 to a
four-lane facility with additional turn lanes at critical intersections as well as dual left turn lanes from
southbound CSAH 19 to CSAH 37 may be considered. Either improvement will need to be undertaken as a
joint venture including the cities of Albertville, St. Michael, and Otsego, Wright County, MnDOT, and the
Federal Highway Administration.
I
I
CSAH 19 and 70th Street
The intersection of CSAH 19 and 70th Street will require mitigation as a result of the development of the
Darkenwald AUAR area. Suggested improvements include the following:
I
>- Provide dedicated southbound right and northbound left turn lanes from CSAH 19 to
westbound 70th Street.
>- Provide a dedicated left turn lane and a shared through plus right turn lane on the west
approach to the intersection.
>- Provide a fully-actuated traffic control signal with protected/permitted left turn phasing which
can be interconnected with the 67th Street signal to the south.
I
I
The City of Albertville will coordinate with Wright County on behalf of the Darkenwald development for
the timing and implementation of these improvements. The developer is expected to participate in the
mitigation discussed for CSAH 19 at 70th Street.
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawit;le Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 18 of22
I
I
I
Re2;ional System Impacts
I
Interstate 94, the principal arterial serving the site, currently operates near capacity in the peak hours and
will continue to be congested as region develops, regardless of development of the site. Development of
the site will increase PM peak/peak direction traffic on 1-94 by nearly 5 percent near the site. The
development will provide a benefit to the regional system by increasing the potential work opportunities
associated with the office park portion of the site. This will provide opportunities for shorter commutes.
I
The regional Transportation Development Guide includes improvements to 1-94, but these have not been
programmed at this time. In the near term, the effects of the additional demand due to the development of
site would need to be mitigated by:
I
>- The addition of the Albertville 1-94 interchanges to the Metro Ramp Metering System.
>- Implementation of travel demand management elements such as distributing information regarding
alternate modes of transportation and working with Metro Transit to enhance transit opportunities as
demand is produced.
I
22. Vehicle-related air emissions. Estimate the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality,
including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation
measures on air quality impacts. The guidance provided in "EA W Guidelines" should also be
followed for an A UAR. Mitigation proposed to eliminate any potential problems may be presented
under item 2 I and merely referenced here.
I
I
Response. Refer to the SEH, Inc. Traffic Study (Appendix G) and item 21.
I
23. Stationary source air emissions. This item is not applicable to an A UAR. Any stationary air emissions
source large enough to merit environmental review requires individual review.
Not applicable to AUAR.
I
24. Odors, noise and dust. Dust, odors and construction noise need not be addressed in an A UAR, unless
there is some unusual reason to do so. The RGU might want to discuss as part of the mitigation plan,
however, any dust control or construction noise ordinances in effect.
I
If the area will include or adjoin major noise sources a noise analysis is needed to determine if any
noise levels in excess of standards would occur, and if so, to identifY appropriate mitigation measures.
With respect to traffic-generated noise, the noise analysis should be based on the traffic analysis of
item 21.
I
I
Response. 1-94 on the south is the most noticeable noise generator in the area and is not expected to
result in levels in excess of standards.
I
25. Sensitive resources / Nearby resources. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the
site?
I
Archaeological, historical or architectural resources? Yes lNo
Prime or uniquefarmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? _Yes XNo
Designated parks, recreation areas or trails? l Y es _No
Scenic views and vistas? _Yes XNo
Other unique resources? 2L Y es _No
I
Archeolo$!ical. historic and architectural resources. For an AUAR, contact with the State Historic
Preservation Office is required to determine whether there are areas of potential impacts to these
resources. If any exist, an appropriate site survey of high probability areas is needed to address the
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 19 of22
I
I
issue in more detail. The mitigation plan must include mitigation for any impacts identified.
I
Prime or unique farmlands. The extent of conversion of existing farmlands anticipated in the AUAR
should be described. If any farmland will be preserved by special protection programs, this should be
discussed.
I
Designated parks. recreation areas. or trails. If development of the A UAR will interfere or change the
use of any existing such resource, this should be described in the AUAR. The RGU may also want to
discuss under this item any proposed parks, recreation areas, or trails to be developed in conjunction
with development of the AUAR area.
I
Scenic views and vistas. Any impacts on such resources present in the AUAR should be addressed.
This would include both direct physical impacts and impacts on visual quality or integrity. "EA W
Guidelines: contains a list of possible scenic resources (page 20).
I
I
Response. The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) was contacted and provided a letter
response stating that there are no properties listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places,
and no known or suspected archaeological properties in the area that will be affected by this project.
Refer to letter in Appendix C.
I
The City of Albertville Comprehensive Park and Trail System Plan designates a proposed trail through
the project, that is anticipated to follow the proposed public road alignment and connect the future
development east of the project to a proposed trail along the south side of 70th Street. The fmal
alignment of the trail will be determined during site planning and development. The Developer may
be required to design and construct the trail within the project as part of the Park Dedication
requirements of the City.
I
I
The project site includes significant wetland resources as identified in Response Nos. 11 and 12. As
noted, the majority of the existing, higher quality wetland areas will be preserved and new wetland
creation areas will be constructed to provide the required mitigation on-site per the Wetland
Conservation Act.
I
26. Visual impacts. If any non-routine visual impacts would occur from the anticipated development, this
should be discussed here along with appropriate mitigation.
I
Response. There will be typical visual impacts during construction including minor vehicle exhaust
plumes and safety lighting. However, the visual impacts will be insignificant and are not considered to
be adverse.
I
27. Compatibility with Plans. The AUAR must include a statement of certification from the RGUthat its
comtJrehensiveolancom.vlies with the requirements set out at 4410.3610. subvart 1. The AUAR
document should discuss the proposed AUAR area development in context of the comprehensive plan.
development scenarios should be noted. If there are any management plans of any other local, state,
or federal agencies applicable to the AUAR area, the document must discuss the compatibility of the
plan with the various development scenarios studied, with emphasis on any incompatible elements.
I
I
Response. The City of Albertville certifies that its Comprehensive Plan complies with the
requirements in Minnesota Rules Chapter 4410.3610,
Subpart 1. The proposed project and development scenario is compatible with the following:
I
Comprehensive Plan for the City of Albertville
Provisions of the Zoning Ordinance
City of Albertville Comprehensive Park & Trail System Plan
City of Albertville Wetland Conservation Act Application
Best Management Practices Handbook
Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District
I
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 20 of22
I
I
I
28. Impact on infrastructure and public services. This item should first of all summarize information on
physical infrastructure presented under items (such as 6, 17, 18 and 21). Other major infrastructure
or public services not covered under the other items should be discussed as well this includes major
social services such as schools, police, fire, etc. The RGU must be careful to include project-
associated infrastructure as an explicit part of the A UAR review if it is to exempt from project-specific
review in the future.
I
Response.
I
I
Roadways
As previously noted, the project is served by 6ih Street, a public roadway system that connects to
County Road 19 and extends through the City property east of the site, providing access to the
proposed lots in the Albertville Business Park. 67th Street will extend through the site as part of future
phases and will connect to 70th Street on the north and Kadler A venue on the west. A storm sewer
system will be constructed as part of the phased roadway improvements to capture drainage and pipe it
to on-site ponds for treatment and retention. The Phase 1 roadway and storm sewer system has been
completed and discharges to a new storm pond.
I
I
Utilities
Water and sanitary sewer piping systems and a sanitary lift station have been constructed to the
Phase I project and will be extended to serve the demands of this site as noted in Responses 13 and 18.
I
Gas, electric, communications and cable utilities are located in the vicinity of the project and have been
brought to the site to serve the development.
I
Police and Fire Protection Services
The Albertville Business Park development will require additional police and fIre services, which the
City of Albertville has planned for.
I
29. Cumulative impacts. This item does not require a response for an A UAR since the entire A UAR
process deals with cumulative impacts from related developments within the A UAR area.
I
Not required for AUAR.
I
30. Other potential environmental impacts. If the project may cause any adverse environmental impacts
not addressed by items 1 to 28, identifY and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation.
Response. No additional impacts
I
31. Summary of issues. The RGU may answer this question as asked by the form or instead may choose
to provide an Executive Summary to the document that basically covers the same information. Either
way, the major emphasis should be on potentially significant impacts, the differences in impacts
between major development scenarios and the proposed mitigation.
I
Response. The following impacts and issues need to be addressed as the development program and
layout are defined:
· Final roadway alignments and lot layout within the AUAR project area will be established with
the future phased development plans.
· The City of Albertville has planned for utility and roadway infrastructure improvements that have
adequate capacity for the project development scenario and the needs of the anticipated
developments in the vicinity of the project in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. The City
of Otsego traffIc impacts have been considered in the development of the SEH, Inc. Traffic Study
in Appendix G. The developer will install the required utility and roadway improvements within
the project area limits that are identifIed during the site planning efforts as part of the phased
development.
I
I
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 21 of22
I
I
I
· Specific wetland impacts will be identified during the development process for each phase of
development. A wetland permit application will be submitted to identify proposed wetland
impacts for the remaining area outside of Phase I area. The Phase I development has already
received a permit for wetland impacts.
· Individual lot developments will be permitted separately, and will be required to meet the
conditions and stipulations of the proposed Planned Unit Development zoning.
I
Certification by the RGU. In an AUAR document, no certifications as listed at the end oftheEAWform are
necessary. (The RGU is legally responsible for the accuracy and completeness of the document and for
properly distributing it nonetheless).
I
Not required for AUAR.
I
I
Mitigation Plan. The final A UAR document must include an explicit mitigation plan. At the RGU's option,
a draft plan may be include in the draft A UAR document; of course, whether or not there is a separate item
for a draft mitigation plan, proposed mitigation must be addressed through the document.
I
It must be understood that the mitigation plan in the final document takes on the nature of a commitment by
the RGU to prevent potentially significant impacts from occurring from specific projects. It is more than
just a list of ways to reduce impacts-it must include information about how the mitigation will be applied
and assurance that it will. Otherwise, the AUAR may not be adequate and/or specific projects may lose
their exemptionfrom the individual review. The RGU'sfinal action on the AUAR must specifically adopt
the mitigation plan; therefore, the plan has a "political" as well as a technical dimension.
I
I
Response to comments on the draft A UAR document. Thefinal AUAR document must include a section
specifically responding to each timely and substantive comment on the draft that indicates the way in which
the comment has been addressed. Similar comments may be combined for purposes of responding.
I
Environmental assessment Worksheet was prepared by the staff of the Environmental Quality Board at
Minnesota Planning. For additional information, worksheets or for EA W Guidelines, contact:
Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar St., St. Paul, MN 55155,651-296-8253, or
www.mnplan.state.mn.us Revised 2/99
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Albertville Business Park
Page 22 of22
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I !
;:
I
c
.2
o
11
./
"'
a
a
I i
w
LL
./
I~
'j;
o
o
II
I
a
a
I~
;;;
w
o
'"
I ~
o
~
c
'"
-"
o
a
I~
E
n.
:;:
18 ~
~RLK
<D (__.. III'D ) Pheme: 19S1!1 933-0872
t'" \. J ::~.r1k~J"::;.=
.0 ~
~ 8110 BlUe a",le Dr.' Suite '100' IIlnnetonlta, ilK _3
~
~
"
JL
I
(N.E. 70th ST.)
~L
01
..
,
:r:
~
-.
g
l:l
J
I
1
"
Duluth, ilK
Ham Lake, MN
H'....'''I. ilK
IIlnnetonlta. ilK
SHEET I
EXHIBIT 1
ALBERTVILLE BUSINESS PARK
SITE LOCATION MAP
PRo.ECT I
2001239M
--1
-'"
L
I
II
/'
'"
o
o
I~
(])
w
"-
/'
'"
I~
.~
o
o
I~
I
o
11
w
"
Ii
~
"
I~
E
Q.
N
.,.
I~~
ill ( KtJU!IISTO LTD ) Phone: lllUl 933-0972
N Fax: lIU 933-1163
I '\. I www.rlk-kuusisto.com
.D ~
.1' 8110 Blue Circle Dr.' Suite Itoo, Minnetonka. MN 553.3
L
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I !
~
1
1
Duluth. MN
Ham Lake, tiN
Hlbblnl. MN
Mlnnetonka. MN
SHEET II
EXHIBI T 2
ALBERTVILLE BUSINESS PARK
USGS MAP
PROJECT II
2001239M
~
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 0'
~
-0
""
f
-0
0
e
I 0
c
0
";;,
..
I
N
0
./
I ..,
0
0
'"
>-
<<
<(
::l
<>:
m
I !oJ
LL
./
~
<(
!oJ
-;;;
0'
c
I "i
0
<;
./
:::;;
I
Ol
..,
N
I I
0
0
N
./
:l
0
...
w
I 0
..
<<
-0
0
~
c
I ~
0
0
./
c:;
E
I "-
'"
v
ti:i
..,
0
0
'"
I <Ii
'"
.,
..
LL
i
IL-
I
PROJECT LOCATION
r
~,
RLK
( ... ... )
\~
8118 _ _ 1Ir.- __ fl'" -
........ -
... ..... -
---~=
ALBERTVILLE BUSINESS PARK
REGIONAL ROAD SYSTEM
ElHBlT ,
2.1
't:" =1 ===
-.d(---.& . 11 ....
PRO.ECT ,
2001239M
. ~ --
~
1---
I
&.C"'ol'N""llUOtaUUIl"OG1'allnS"J(l~11i
rjl~gr~l:rr::td
"N" "111" ...... ! -xrnl
:~S :;~lr~,~ "--/
~~jk~~~Mlj'J CI
.. ...~h._..:/.
.j .~~.\,:~.,~,.~.I_I'.
/ (,/ ,.. ,.......'c~l
" , /' ">:m,~
-~,~. \..
~:! -,.
!' .
,!
i... _
'j :.
'I.
'\
I
L_
6.olo_.IOI..\_\....'lIVl.~I-IlIOt\.~..J ...'.......-...a\~i;~~ll)~
NV1d J.N3V1dO"G\30 3fl1SN3H3l1dVlOO ~6r~';'ooz
llN!:l:.'OtId
Y!0S3NNIl't 'mNlDB1V
C; 3SVHd->l~Vd SS3NISne
3111AL~3elV
1"'1
I-
eo
I
X
W
o
L()
,...
C")
II
Cl
UJ
Cl
:>
g 0
O. (t:
o a..
L() Cf)
,... --'
II --'
u.. ~
Cf) C/)
<.9 <.9
z z
Z 0 S2
<( --' (t:
I ::l <(
....... OJ a..
e.. Cl Cl
L- W UJ
r- I- l-
e.. <( <(
:iE :iE
W i= i=
() Cf) C/)
UJ W
Z --' --'
o ~ ~
() 0 0
I- I-
~ ~
t>:~~
~{~'. ;;:;
z ~
~
o '"
~
-------------------
I
cte" NK -.,,0018UU," -001' .llns .'.10 8,3.1':) anlS 0119
WOO'ol'Jsnn}(-"I.I'AUUI,. ~
CQll-CC8 .IZ06) ;x.A ( a.L""I o.r..msnct)J )
aL60-cce age) :.uaqd
'X'nI
"'--./
'ON ':)11 31'9'0
I
NMYlIO
NV'ld C131 SV' V'l
C131 V'M
~6~2: lOO2:
Ol~~lHO
, !~3I'O~d
NK -."U0l8oUI"
Nil 'Ju,qqlH
Nit '.,.., weH
Nil ',"nIno
'OlOsauU!" JO &ilDlS all} JO SMO)
",n Japun pasu&:t!1 ,(t"P 0
wo I lOl.ll pUG uotl!^J8dns \:)8JIP ,(w Jepun JO aw
.<q pltJodeJd SOM UDld I!lIt lOll) .(J!lJ9~ .(qaJ8l.1 I
OlNOISlO
IflOS3NNIt"l '311IAHI3811f
C; 3SV'Hd->iClV'd SS3NIsns
3lll^1 C13SlV'
L/ L
OlAlA~ns
, !33HS
:1: i i
1'1 II
1111- -
11.1-- I
f;'L.J--
~ L__
11--1 _ I /
III ~ IlJ /
f)-: ~t~ Y-
I ~.
1,1. \ \ I \ \-
~! ;jjc
:n- ~ -f I +-n ~ -)
III
J= ~
--i
,
o:;!-
I-
m
I
x
W
/r-
,I
/1
/ I
. i
~
ci
l-
..J
<5
Cil
'iij
;::)
:>
o
o
to
I-
W
W
u..
o
W
...J
<(
U
(I)
6Mp'~iJ-1DM-UDS-tO\l:oot-!<~\tn~83"\M'\1'3\SOUIMDJ.O\V'l_61:;: - LOO;:\ a)D)S3 IDa~ PIDMUa~JDO\::)
wdn:1: 1:00;: '9;: qaj
L ~
-------------------
~
NMV~O
N'v'ld t13IS'v'~
t13M3S Al t1'v' IIN'v'S
I
CtCgg Nit '8)(U018UUln -OOtl .llng ....a 8'QoIt~ enlS ono
UJOo.Ol.'.nn'l-:lI(t........ ~_
C911-CC8 li98l ,....
iUO-CC8 298 ,"uoqd ( <LI:1 o.t.SIStlll>I )
Nit 'W)(U0l8UUI" ~
N" "UIQqlH ~
Nit '8,.., We"
N" ',"nIno
'ON ':J1l 31'0'0
03'~3H~
Vi6~1: LOO1:
N !~3I'0~d
'OlosauuJV'l JO 8,01S at.{1 jO SMOI
a~l Japun pasueo!1 '<Jnp 0
wo I lDt.{J puo uo!s!^Jadns }:I'J!P '<W J.pun JO IW
Aq paJodeJd SOM UOld S!I,n lot.{l ,(mJltO ,(q8J8l.l I
03N!lIS30
'tlOS3NNIVi '311IAH:l381't
Z 3S'v'Hd-)itl'v'd SS3NISn8
3111AItl381'v'
l/ l
03A3A~ns
N !33HS
/
/
/I
If)
I-
m
I
x
w
, ,
(- -I~ -!
If- -i- I
C / t:- =:,= ::-,
'f 1\. .LNO~
f I';)t'l 1-1- I
, ,1../--, .- ---,- -,
: ....;-, !-- --1- ~
I 0'1:--i I~_ --/
, 01-.'- -'--'
fir I'
r (ilIaBWl'/ ./r1
\ /
/
"~Of /
.8
VI
'ii)
:>
:>
o
o
10
I-
W
W
lL.
c::i
I-
..J
~
W
..J
<(
U
(J)
5MPW-10M-UOS-to\rOOl^l:IV'm;H33j\MV'3\s5UIMOja\~_6rl_ WOl\ajojS3 loal:l PIOMUa~JOa\:o
wdrl:r roo<: '9<: qaj
L
------
~
-------------
>-
-l
-
>- ~
-l <l: to
-' >- ....
<l: t- -' ~
z z - <l: W
0 -' w ~ LL -l <l: f-
\/l <{ :;:;: <{ (L W
V> z n ,. '" - cr -
w 0 0 -' t- <{ CO
-' \/l Z -' -' - -' W (L -'
<{ Z - <{ <I t- W -' => >- -
0: <l: \/l \/l \/l -' => > <.:> t- :;:;: <I \/l J:
=> 0: => \/l U \/l <I 0: t- W Z -' -' t-
cr I lD W cr W - t- O - => >- 0: i X
z w Z 0: \/l t- >- \/l :;:;: t- O W
-' -' 0 :;:;: t- => \/l t- -' - z > W
<I <I 0 \/l :;:;: \/l \/l 0 Z >- >- \/l - 0 -'
0: 0: 0 => 0 => => z z :;:;: t- t- Z \/l
=> => I III U III 0 => <{ W => 0 W
!- >- Ct: Z " L<- V> \/l 0 0 Z !-
-' -' 0 0 >- -' - -' 0 Z Z I <I <I
::J ::J lD W <I <I <{ U W W W W :;:;: -' 0:
U U I t- ~ 0: t- o: - z -' 0 0 => 0 0: W 0
0 - I W I W --1 Z 0 w W 0: (L
0: 0: - ~ ~ z <.:> Z lD <I ~ ~ ~ 0 X t- O 0:
0 0 W W W ::J -' U U W ~ "" I U
<{ <{ Z --1 I 0 --1 <.:l (L (L Vl --1 -' ~ ~ Vl u
~
<
~
0
Z
~
Z
0
N
~
~
~
~
>
~
~
~
P=l
~
<
~ ....
0 I
lD
~
f-1 ~
~ "I
U
5
~
r.i
~
\:i~
WI-
<3""
[g
"I
~~11~~01~~~~11~1
~~
ffi~
~i
rj1:~irr~1:r::td
CtllQI) 'N" '.lluolaUIII". 00" anns. '411 al~J':l anlS OIU
~
'5fni'
"--../
OCCSS NW 'Ha.\IH ~13 'aVOH H3^IH '3'N SCSl
a
a.,.,..... .....I~\""-...\III-<<I.IOOI\_.~ _-..o\~g-.~'lll
~O/9~/111 I
NV1d .LN3VGONV1d311! .LOVdrll ONV1I.3M "6r~':'oo~
'ONtO~d
<( ---
z a:: 0
0 l.lJ l.lJ Z
t= a:: lJ.. 0
< lJ..
< :::> a..
l.lJ 0 CD
a:: z '-' :::E a::
(.) a:: l.lJ
< ~ ~ CD
....J 0 r= :::E
....J Z ~ a.. CIl :::>
G: <( 0 0 z
0 r= <-' l.lJ l.lJ 0
Z ~ CIl CIl z.
< z 0 0 <
r= t= a.. a.. r=
~ CIl 0 0
~ l.lJ X a:: a:: l.lJ
z l.lJ a.. a.. ~
I I ,'-~ @
I I
I I
\'-'
3 1 V 1 S 3 l V 3 ~
PleMua>tJep
~
i
i
i
j
i
V!OS3NNIYI '3'11I\J.!I3ll1V
c: 3SVHd->l~Vd SS3NIsna
3111AHf381V
'N" '0"'1 wOll
'NJI'O,,"OlOUUIJl
'Nft'OlJOdul.o..t
'N" 'JuWUH
,1:,':::';;";':\'
'k:::':"'"
.<:~~
,
"
,
,.......
I-
CD
:r:
x
w
'-\
rj)
~W
.....,>~,'~
, . : oJ
CIl
cnW
0:::
f-U
0<
....J
ex:>
C'I
~ tl
~
-4 (i~ ~
'"
~
0 ~
~~5
~II.~
f---S
o
<
....
'"
ci
o
<
....
'"
ci
51
on
'"
o
o
<
on
'"
ci
~-~ .....,~~.
~Z
'"
II.
o
<
J .,
,.,
>-
'"
!i :i ~
~ ~ g
~
.;
~
~
~
~
"
W
....J
lD
~
Z
o
~U)
J:! -~-~i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
:ZI ~ -e. ~ r2 00,,: R ~
~ ::r:: ----~ g..; ci:-
Cl a.
Zw
:S ~ ~ffi
tu I- Jt!
~ 2 Ii'
~---.~ ~ ~ ~
PJG: ~ ~ ~
l!: 0 0 0
51
J on
:3
~ ~
... Ie
o 0
II!
In
o j!;
< iE
I ~ :i
o <
~
Ntn
- N ~ ..,. ~~
If?
....
Z
~~~~~
~~~~~
w ~
U) Jj!
<( <
:r: -V) ~
a.. t" f> ;n ~~ ~
it/? ~
L.
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
r-
I
,
'H" "lII., wO"l
'NIII ''''lU01''''''"
'NIII "l~od "1a.L
'NIII 'JuWUH
Ctc<.lIl'NW""'''Ol.''\I1'''OOI''1Inll''J([~1l1
~n::in~:rr:~d
'xni'
"-../
OCCSS Nil 'H3h1H )113 'OYOH H3AIH '3'N SCSl
a
"'__~~.,*,_J"'~~~iO'l
~O/9t/lL I I
SNOUIONOO ONu.slllJ W8t~'I'oo~
"OM101"OIld
3 1 V 1 S 3 l V 3 ~
PleMUa~Jep
,
(:::.:."...
:>~';.""......,
"\, v
,
"
ro
I-
en
I
x
W
<(
w
cc
<(
o
z
<(
...J
f-
W
:s:
C>
z
f=
U1
x
w
/
,/
". ~
~Y.
"
;,,,,..
,f
.:~:.~.;.:~:.~:::,:.:::~:::~~~~:~::::~':'~~.~~?:::~:~:'r"y m..::':.:'";...._~ .._.~ <..... ,.-
"... ... A..:.::;.-....~.:::;.:;.~:.;" .:: :..~:::"'.:-.<.;J~;:.
I I .." 1
/ ...f>"v', L;r:l~;:~~~:~"~~~';.
/,\<r . I
\ I..",' I:, .,"
\ v r ..' \
,\ ;\ :
\. I!
J: (/ !
(' ~\' .,,'.,
,/./.,i:v H I ;~/
': xJ
), ("/1
/~~<.7.r Ii. / /./
....,,-- "'1 '!,J '/
I]t~,~
/ !frO! r
j')&J:i
"" .,,;t,. . I
/ --,--_----;../ 'J,;,',."( \
lr-- -" .' '\", \
/: .,.dO- -:~, .i: { ',..J: \ \.... \
I ' .~><\
: '~~ i J .) ::
I ''';''^. ;.' ..~ . . I
: /j ,.' ", "; :
: : I) . ...., /
, ''',i
! \Jf//
)'/J'. ' "l';'
/ " '.:~, : of I,' I
>:<":' \ </,,:;('l\i>j;;:::/
".1. . \. I:' ': :l'/"
",..:, ;\ ~i"'" ' " " ,
.\' : ;':<. i
'I '.",././,/,,:..1
J Y / ~I
j ". . ,', /..j I '
'1 i, .', . (
I /// :'~~/..
"r __.~~:-;~~~J:/ ',. . ./ / ,
;"~:'":'"
. .,;'
.. ,.. .~,..". .'
'rA . .,'':'> "
&)\ '({
J\
<.j
t
,
/
"
'.
/
/
/
Z<(
- LU:
o 0::: "
......lJ,J~
p
<(0
o:~
OW
....J r-')
(f) (f) ·
....J:::2:.
....J 0:::/'
LU.<C
su..
N
t.
;< i~
'\
"~
,..0
I"~
j:'
,iff.
':"\\.:
~ @
~(i~ ~
..
~
o ~
"1.
I
1_.
~
~
~
"
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ruE~=r~1:r;~d
&t&911 'NK "lIuOl;UUUI: '0011 '11nS' '4ij a!:).l!;) ;n18 0118
~
'5fnj'
'---../
o~~ss NW 'H3^IH ~'3 'aYOH H3^IH '3'N S~Sl
a
....,,_ ..."'\..-o\.....IO\"-tn~_.lOlO1..q _-..d\"IO\I..---....,~ I
to/st/lll I
NYld llNIQVlI9 Ld>>NO:l 1'I6'~'I~t
'ON .1;)J'Cnld
'N" 'Ill., IU'"
'NI'( "lIu01auUll'(
'NI'I "Vlld ",....
'NM '1ulq'lItl
Y!0S3NNII'l 'nllll.l.li:3lrIV
Z; 3SVHd->ll:lVd SS3NIsns
311lAll:l3S1V
(;'" ;:,:.:
UJ Z
U 0
z 1=
<l;
~ ~
z z <( 0 UJ
..J
UJ 0 UJ Z UJ
1= a:: 0
z <( <( a.. a::
0 UJ 0
1= a:: 0 ::E ~
U U z a::
::l <( g
~ ..J 0 F! 0
..J Z Ul
Ul G: <( ~ UJ
z F! 0 J:
0 0 C> UJ Ul
U Z ~ Z Ul Z
<( 0 G:
::.::: F! 1= a..
u :l; Ul 0 I-
0 ~ UJ X a:: a..
a:: z UJ a.. UJ
u
z
I I I ~'-~ 0
)i:~li? u
I I II
,',I,',',',' t I
',',',1,1,', ~
:::;:;:;;;;' \'.'
': \
ll)
..t "
:''':>~~~-,..:'.
O"l
f-
CD
:c
x
w
ll)
..~.. ~~.~..~~..~:.~:.~)~/
, .1fr \_,~.,~'.... " - , ~,
:/;e' ,.. ,..--..,.c..,-; }
/ z ,/" ~m.~
"~I~'/ \"
~ m
(i!:~ ~
-4 ~ ~
~ e
~
w 0')-
o ~El
z ~,.,
w ~~
z ~~
:;;: ~~
~ ~~
- 1".'"
<( I"~ .
:E ~t'S~
-J s~~
o i'!5~
c::: <O:..J
J- e:~
z ~,,~
o ;;;~<
(.) tj~~
z e,.i5
Q ~~~
CJ) Vit;~
o t<a::
0:=: It'~~
W III~",
~<o:
III
:::i ~ffi
~ Ot)
tnoli ~g
~~~ ~~
~~~ t:~
~~~
~~:S
~ffi~
~iLOj
1.J~~
9g~
ail!~
iJiliJ~
~t;e
g~~
o~~
~~~
~~~
~~~
zo:
i~
,.!1i
FI%>
~~
o
0:'"
o.i5
O~
tjliJ
:5~
e;F
O:U
'"
"'...
I%>~
'"
9~
a~>,
iJi~!1i
g~t2
0:1%>'"
~i5~
~ ~
~sm~
i5~~,.
ti~o:
~~~G
~llie;il!
i7I::Ig:i5
1.J< .~
~iJi~x
m~t3:i
t...1.Jt)O
<wz~
oZi=rn
i~E~
~e1.JO:
~~~~
~~~~
~~:2W
lX\'!i5~
~~~~
<t...uJ:
~
o:r
",III
';1.J~
0&'"
~V:o
~~~
~o~ .
ffi~~~
ffil&.~j!
~~~~
88@z
~~"'~
~~~~
"'a IIII!'
i",o",
~;S~&
~i~~
wl-I-<(
~:~~
~l50:i5
~~~~
L__
.-J
UJ
...J
::>
Cl
w
:I:
(.)
'r/)
...J
o
a::
.....
z
o
()
z
o
Ci3
o
a::
w
g z
Ii. ~",;1 ~ .s,.
fu 3iil @;>!1i
i:':;;ml5~ ~t~~f!l~
tnx:)-I--I m5~~~:L<
!5~~~~ tn~~O~~vi
::I%>~. l5 5UJ,l5~~o::l
:ffiO;~ j:8Q:f~w~
~ff!&s:: ~8~15~i~
i1l~8~; t;l;aH,:?(.~
~~iE<tn !;S~~2~~
y w ~ 4: 53~~~0~!i
"j:::::E ~ 0:..........0:.-
ii!i~~< fo"o~Vi~~(5ii
g~~.h80 ~~~liJl!':g
J 4 ~~Fi~~h
~!l!i5alll OZZiJi"''''U
o t:i I/') I:X-~ f5 < ;:) F= ~ ~
d~~oa ~t'J~~~o~
t........ u-~ z-p <(:S()~wl2a::
~~~g:;:G i5~g !1itj'"
1"'" !lOw o.-aO"'zi'!
~t3_8_a::~: ~~()i~~~
~~!~e.. ~~~~~~~
0:
i'!o
I:"':;;~
:::;~a";;!
s~~s~~
o~olX~:;
go~wo5
~tI)~~~~
ffi6lf~lS;;
It'B~~~~
ii)~OUl~~
~tn~~o5
~g!;l!1i~:s
o~g~~~
~~i~~~
~~~~O;!
(!) z ....a::-
~~i:\~~!;!
U i'! .~'"
g~i1i~~i5
8~~i~~
I-w~u~
~~~~~l3
;;
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.-~.
OTSEGO CREEK "DISCHARGES, '
INTO MISSISSIPPI RIVER
APPROXIMATELY 2.5 MILES
'\:~
TO THE NORTHEAST.4}tt,
"'.'C'-:',,,,,,.,;;;.-,.
1
1
DuluUa, 11M
JIam Lab, 11M
18DD~ ::
~ (llII2) lI3ll-l1ll72
\.; Po: (llII2) 883-U158
~ __.rJII:-~_
~ IUO Blue Cll'Ole Dr.' Ila1te '100' 18DDetont:a, IIN lilIlUS
ALBERTVILLE BUSINESS PARK
OFF-SITE DRAINAGE ROUTING MAP
SHEET #
EXHIBIT 10
PROJECT I
2001239M
Dulutla, UN
Ham lAke, UN
IIIDD=: ::
I'b_ (lIII2) 1I8lHIlI7llI
'\. I p.,.. (lIII2) __11418
............", ........rIk-............_
euo _ _ Dr.' lhatte '100' IIl1m<ltoaIra, UN lIl5lU8
ALBERTVILLE BUSINESS PARK
SOILS MAP
1
r
SHEET IF
EXHIBIT 11
PROJECT IF
2001239M
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ Pinnacle
Y Engineering
Pinnacle Engineering, Inc.
101 Broadway Street West
Suite 100
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55369
Tel: 763315-4501
Fax: 763315-4507
www.pineng.com
December 2, 2002
1560 First Avenue Northeast
Rochester, Minnesota 55906
Tel: 507280-5966
Fax: 507280-5984
Ms. Michelle Caron
RLK-Kuusisto LTD
6110 Blue Circle Drive, Suite 100
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
~~1d[Conll[[fn)
r:f DEe 0 il 2002 HI/
" ~'il
"",~....j
Dw;..:.J wU OL:r" ,
---~--------------------
RE:
Wetland Delineation
Darkenwald Retail Center
Albertville, Minnesota
Pinnacle Project Number: MN02190.00
Dear Michelle,
Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. (Pinnacle) has performed a Wetland Determination and
Delineation on the proposed retail development project site (Site), which consists of
approximately 100 acres of land, located north of Interstate 94, south of 70th Street
(Kadler Avenue) in Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota. The delineation was
conducted in accordance with the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual, updated February 25, 1997. The following report indudes the
methods of the delineation.
This delineation was requested by Todd Udvig of Short, Elliot, and Hendrickson (SEH),
the local goverrnnental unit (LGU) for the City of Albertville, after a site visit indicated
the Kjolhaug Envirornnental wetland delineation, which was conducted out of the
growing season (December, 1999), may not represent the existing conditions at the Site.
The Kjolhaug delineation indicated six separate wetlands located on the site. However,
the data of our delineation indicates that three of Kjolhaug wetlands are, in fact,
separate basins of one wetland complex. Wetland 2 of the Kjolhaug delineation
(Wetland 4 in this report) was not re-delineated since the LGU felt the original
delineation was accurate.
The LGU also requested that suspect areas A -E, of the Kjolhaug Envirornnental
wetland delineation also be evaluated for accuracy. Pinnacle acquired the Farm Service
Agency aerial photographs for the Site from 1979 to 2000 and reviewed them to
determine if the suspect areas and portions of the wetlands were considered wetlands.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Caron
Pinnacle Project No.: MN02190.00
September 26, 2002
Page 2
This delineation determined that four areas met the wetland criteria of hydric soils,
wetland hydrology, and a dominance of hydrophytic vegetation. The estimated
wetland boundaries were flagged for survey and were confirmed by the LGU. Suspect
areas A-E were determined not to meet the wetland criteria.
If you have any questions or wish to discuss any particular aspect of the project, please
contact Matt Bartus or me at (763) 315-4501. We look forward to being of continued
service to you.
Sincerely,
PINNACLE ENGIN~ERING, INC.
j(-/ ~~~,.
. Scott Thelen
Environmental Scientist
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WETLAND
DETERMINA TION
AND DELINEATION
For:
Darkenwald Retail Center
Albertville, MN
Prepared for:
RLK-KUUSISTO
6110 Blue Circle Drive, Suite 100
Minnetonka, MN
Pinnacle Engineering, Inc.
101 Broadway Street West
Suite 100
Minneapolis, MN 55369
1500 First Avenue N E
Rochester, MN 55906
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WETLAND DETERMINATION AND DELINEATION
Prepared By:
/ ~-;;"1
/A~7/i(~-7
1.1 --
Scott Thelen
Environmental Scientist
FOR:
DARKENW ALD RETAIL CENTER
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA
PREPARED FOR:
RLK-KUUSISTO
6110 BLUE CIRCLE DRIVE, SUITE 100
MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343
PREPARED_BY:
PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC.
101 BROADWAY STREET WEST, SUITE 100
OSSEO, MN 55369
PINNACLE PROJECT NUMBER: MN02190.00
September 26/ 2002
Reviewed By:
I . I j~ '1~
1 \ ,-, Ii.
; "\ vc' '. l'
I \ L--. . . C "",__
/
Mike Hultgren
Manager-Environmental Engineering
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Ms. Michelle Caron of RLK-Kuusisto retained Pinnacle Engineering, Inc. (Pinnacle) to
conduct a wetland delineation on the approximate 100-acre parcel of land located north
of Interstate 94, south of 70th Street (Kadler Avenue) in Albertville, Wright County,
Minnesota. (Site). Kjolhaug Environmental Services (Kjolhaug) completed a wetland
determination and delineation on the site in January 2000. The City of Albertville's
consultants, Short, Elliot, and Hendrickson (SEH), who serve as the local governmental
unit (LGU), requested that wetlands 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Kjolhaug delineation report
be re-delineated after an August 9, 2002 field visit indicated the possibility of additional
wetland areas located on the site. Pinnacle's delineation determined that three of the
previously delineated wetlands had a hydrologic and/or vegetative connection and
were considered one wetland complex. This complex is discussed in further detail in
this report as Wetland 2 (Wetlands 4-6 in the Kjolhaug report). Wetland 4 (Kjolhaug
Wetland 2) was not re-delineated since the LGU determined the previous delineation
was accurate.
The LGU also requested that suspect areas A-E, of the Kjolhaug wetland delineation be
evaluated for accuracy. Pinnacle acquired the Farm Service Agency aerial photographs
for the Site from 1979 to 2000 to aid in determining the presence of wetlands. Pinnacle
then reviewed them to determine if the suspect areas exhibited wetland signatures over
those years.
1.2 Scope
Pinnacle conducted the Wetland Determination and Delineation in accordance with the
criteria established in the 1987 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland delineation
manual, updated in 1997, and the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Circular 39. The
work included the following items:
· An initial site reconnaissance.
· Review of Farm Service Agency aerial photographs.
· Review of the Site utilizing County Soil Surveys, USGS topographic maps,
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory (PWI)
maps, and National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps.
· Assessment and delineation of the potential wetlands identified in the
background review.
· Preparation and submittal of this report summarizing the findings of our work.
PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INe.
WETLAND DELINEATION
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION
2.1 Site Location and Use
The Site is situated just north of Interstate 94, south of 70th Street (Kadler Avenue) in
Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota. The Site is within the northwest quarter of
Section 35, Township 121 North, Range 24 West, as reviewed on the St. Michael and Big
Lake, Minnesota quadrangle maps (Figure 1).
The Site consists of approximately 100 acres of undulating, undeveloped land, which is
comprised of wetlands, agricultural fields, and a farmstead. The Site is situated in a
developing area of Albertville and is bound by agricultural fields on the north and
northeast, an outlet mall to the east, Interstate 94 to the south and southwest, and
agricultural fields to the west.
2.2 Surveys and Maps
Pinnacle conducted a review of soil survey, tbpographic, PWI and NWI maps for the
vicinity of the Site. The following sections summarize the information available at the
time of this review.
2.2.1 Soil Survey
The Wright County Soil Survey was reviewed for soils information pertaining to the
Site. The Soil Survey indicated that the Site soils are comprised of Angus-Cordova
complex, 2 to 6% slopes (1094B), Cordova loam, (1156), Glencoe clay loam (114),
Klossner muck (539), and Glencoe soils, ponded (1080) (Figure 2). Of the five identified
soil types, all are listed on the state and federal hydric soils lists and the soils within the
identified wetland areas exhibited hydric soil indicators, such as low chroma color,
mottling, oxidized root channels, and gleying. Soil samples collected during the
wetland delineation were characterized and recorded on the data forms, which are
included in Appendix A.
2.2.2 USGS Topographic Maps
The topography of the Site is undulating with a range in elevation from 950 to 960 feet
above mean sea level (MSL), as reviewed on the St. Michael and Big Lake, Minnesota
Quadrangle maps. Based on contour intervals on the quadrangle map, and our Site
observations, surficial drainage appears to flow to the east and northeast, following the
private drainage ditches and wetlands.
PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC.
WETLAND DELINEATION
2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.2.3 National Wetland Inventory Maps
The St. Michael and Big Lake, Minnesota NWI maps depicted eight wetland basins
present on the Site (Figure 3). The northern basin (Wetland1) was depicted just south of
70th Street (Kadler Avenue). The western portion of Wetland 1 is mapped as a
Palustrine Emergent Seasonally Flooded drained (PEMCd) basin with the eastern
portion of the complex mapped as a Palustrine Emergent Temporarily Flooded drained
(PEMAd) basin.
Three small basins are located in the central portion of the Site (suspect areas A,B,D).
These central basins are mapped as Palustrine Emergent Temporarily Flooded drained
(PEMAd). Three additional basins are located south of the three central basins, in the
south central portion of the Site. These three basins are mapped as Palustrine Emergent
Seasonally Flooded drained (PEMCd) and were identified in the Kjolhaug delineation
as wetlands 4, 5, and 6. Pinnacle determined that these separate basins are vegetatively
connected but do not share the same hydrologic regime and make up the Wetland 2
complex. One additional basin along the southern border was mapped as Palustrine
Emergent Temporarily Flooded basin (PEMA) (Wetland 3).
2.2.4 Protected Waters Inventory Maps
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources has designated protected waters in
Minnesota and identifies them on Protected Waters Inventory (PWI) maps. The PWI
map for Wright County, Minnesota indicated no protected waters are present at the Site
(Figure 4).
3.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION
3.1 Methodology
The wetland determinations were made utilizing the techniques of the Routine Method,
as suggested in the 1987 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,
updated February 25, 1997. The conclusions derived in this report are consistent with
and respect the wetland criteria recorded in the manual. Determination of hydric soils,
Site hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation were made according to the procedures
and guidelines described in the manual. Sampling locations were selected to be
representative of wetland/ upland transition areas.
Mr. Scott Thelen of Pinnacle conducted an assessment of the wetlands at the Site on
August 30 and September 3, 2002. The assessment included probing the soils and
observing the color and moisture, as well as other available indicators of hydric soil
PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INe.
WETLAND DELINEATION
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
conditions, such as mottling, gleying, and oxidized root channels. The characteristics
noted for each sampling location are documented in the wetland determination data
forms, which are included as Appendix A. Survey markers were placed along the
approximate edge of the wetlands.
A wetland determination was conducted for all potential wetland areas. Four wetlands
were determined to meet all three wetland criteria and their boundaries were flagged
and surveyed. The general wetland descriptions are discussed below with wetland
locations shown in Figure 5.
3.2 Wetland Descriptions
WetIand 1
Wetland 1 is a flow through wetland complex featuring a Type 3 - shallow marsh
wetland or, under the Cowardin classification system, a Palustrine Emergent Persistent
Seasonally Flooded that is drained (PEMICd) with a Type 1 - seasonally flooded or
Palustrine Emergent Persistent Temporarily Flooded that is drained (PEMIAd) wetland
along the fringe of the Type 3 wetland. The Wetland 1 complex is located in the
northwestern portion of the Site. Water enters the wetland through a culvert under the
road in the northwest and runs to the southeast through an excavated ditch to an
existing wetland along the eastern border of the Site. This provides much of the
hydration for the Type 3 wetland adjacent to the excavated ditch. The surrounding
wetland areas gently slope into the excavated ditch, forming much of the Type 1
wetland basin, which receives the majority of hydration from surficial runoff from the
adjacent fields.
Soils were saturated to the surface in the wetland and open water was visible along the
excavated ditch at the time of the site visit. The western portion was vegetated with
cattails (Typhina spp.) and reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). Other hydrophytic
plants observed included smartweed (Polygonum spp.) and willow (Salix spp.). The
vegetation in this wetland changed from hydrophytic to upland vegetation comprised
of Kentucky blue grass (Poa prantensis), common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), and
soybeans (Glycine max) at the wetland/upland transition area. The change in vegetation
was consistent with the area topography.
The clay-loam soils within the Wetland 1 sampling point had a matrix color of 5Y 4/1 in
the B-horizon with 10YR 4/6 mottles being abundant and distinct. These soils exhibited
hydric soil indicators such as oxidized root channels in the upper 12 inches, reducing
conditions, and low chroma colors. This area was mapped as Angus-Cordova complex
in the Wright County Soil Survey, which was consistent with our field observations.
PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INe.
WEfLAND DELINEATION
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Wetland 2
Wetland 2 is an area located south of Wetland 1 in the central portion of the Site.
Wetland 2 was formerly listed as wetlands 4, 5, and 6 in the Kjolhaug delineation;
however, the LGU and Pinnacle determined that reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea)
connects the three separate wetland basins into one wetland complex, The three
wetland types in this wetland complex are hydrated by different processes.
The central basins of Wetland 2 are flow-through wetlands featuring a Type 3 - shallow
marsh wetland or Palustrine Emergent Persistent Seasonally Flooded that is drained
(PEM1Cd) by an excavated ditch that connects the basins. Water enters the wetland
from a culvert under Interstate 94 and flows through the basins via the excavated ditch
to the recent construction at the eastern edge of the site. The drainage ditch provides
the Type 3 wetlands with the hydrology from an area south of the site. Open water was
present throughout the ponded areas at the time of the Site visit. The western basin of
Wetland 2 (Kjolhaug Wetland 5) was vegetated with cattails (Typha spp.) - OBL while
the eastern basin (Kjolhaug wetland 6) was dominated with cattails (Typha spp.) - OBL,
with arrowhead (Sagittaria lanfolia) - OBL, wool grass (Scripus cyperinus) - OBL, water
plantain (Alisma subcordatum) - OBL, and lesser duck weed (Lemma minor) - OBL also
present. The entire Type 3 wetland was surrounded by a monotypic stand of reed
canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) - FACW+.
A Type 2 - wet meadow or Palustrine Emergent Persistent Saturated that is drained
(PEM1Bd) wetland surrounds the Type 3 wetland. The topography of this Type 2
wetland dictates that it is hydrologically supported by surficial flow from the
surrounding fields. Soils were saturated within 12 inches of the surface at the time of
the Site visit. The wetland vegetation consisted of nearly 100% reed canary grass
(Phalaris arundinacea) - FACW. The vegetation in this wetland changed from
hydrophytic to upland vegetation comprised of Kentucky blue grass (Poa prantensis) -
FAC-, common dandelion (Taraxacum offidnale) - FACU, and Bull Thistle (Cirsium
vulgare) - FACU-.
An arm associated with this complex is yet a third type of wetland. This arm features a
Type 1 - seasonally flooded or Palustrine Emergent Persistent Temporarily Flooded
(PEM1A) wetland. The topography of this Type 1 wetland dictates that it is
hydrologically supported by surficial flow from the surrounding fields. Soils were
saturated within 12 inches of the surface at the time of the site visit. As this wetland fills
with water in very wet years, such as this year, a swale connects this wetland to the
Type 3 western basin. The wetland vegetation consisted of a monotypic stand of reed
canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) - FACW, with Kentucky blue grass (Poa prantensis)-
PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC.
WEfLAND DELINEATION
5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FAC-, common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) - FACU, Bull Thistle (Cirsium vulgare) -
F ACU- and Brome grass (Bromus inermis) - UPL observed in the upland area. The
change in vegetation was consistent with the area topography.
The clay-loam soils within the Wetland 2 sampling points had a matrix color of 5Y 4/1
in the B-horizon with 10YR 4/6 mottles being abundant and distinct. These soils
exhibited hydric soil indicators such as oxidized root channels in the upper 12 inches,
reducing conditions, and low chroma colors. This area was mapped as Cordova clay
loam in the Wright County Soil Survey, which was consistent with our field
observations.
For the purpose of clarification in this report, Pinnacle has identified the Type 3 wetland
as 2A, the Type 2 wetland surrounding the Type 3 as 2B, and the lone Type 1 basin as
2C.
Wetland 3
Wetland 3 is a depressional Type 1 - seasonally flooded or Palustrine Emergent
Persistent Temporarily Flooded (PEM1A) basin located in the southern portion of the
Site. Surficial water runoff enters the wetland from the adjacent Interstate 94 along the
south boundary and from the surrounding topography. The surrounding areas gently
slope into the wetland basin.
The vegetation within Wetland 3 was dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris
arundinacea) - FACW, with smartweed (Polygonum spp.) - OBL also present. The
vegetation in this wetland changed from hydrophytic to upland vegetation dominated
by soybeans (Glycine max) - UPL with lesser amounts of common dandelion (Taraxacum
officinale) - F ACU- present. The edge of the plowed field was at the wetland/ upland
transition area.
Soils were saturated in the wetland area at the time of the Site visit. The clay-loam soils
within the Wetland 3 sampling point had a matrix color of 5Y 4/1 in the B-horizon with
10YR 4/6 mottles being abundant and distinct. These soils exhibited hydric soil
indicators such as oxidized root channels in the upper 12 inches, reducing conditions,
and low chroma colors. This area was mapped as Angus-Cordova complex in the
Wright County Soil Survey, which was consistent with our field observations.
Wetland 4
As previously mentioned above, Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company
previously delineated Wetland 4 on January 21, 2000 and was named Wetland 2 in their
report. The LGU determined that the delineation was accurate for this basin; therefore,
Pinnacle did not re-delineate Wetland 4. During the August 9, 2002 field visit, Wetland
PINNACLE ENGINEERING, 1Ne.
WETLAND DELINEATION
6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4 was dominated by a near monotypic stand of reed canary grass (Phalaris arundenacea).
Since Pinnacle did not delineate this basin, no hydrologic or soils information was
collected. I
Suspect Areas A-E
Pinnacle acquired the Farm Service Agency aerial photographs for the Site from 1979 to
2000 and the University of Minnesota climatological data for rainfall from 1979 to the
present for Wright County. Pinnacle reviewed the photographs to determine if the
suspect areas exhibited wetland signatures. None of the suspect areas exhibited
wetland signatures for the majority of the years. However, a portion of Wetland 1
along the northern edge of the excavated ditch near the drive way did appear in a
majority of the photographs and was flagged for survey.
4.0 CONCLUSION
Pinnacle has performed a Wetland Determination and Delineation of the approximate
100-acre parcel of land located north of Interstate 94, south of 70th Street (Kadler
Avenue) in Albertville, Wright County, Minnesota. The delineation was conducted in
accordance with the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,
updated February 25, 1997.
Three wetland areas were determined to have met the wetland criteria of hydric soils,
hydrology, and hydrophytic vegetation. The estimated wetland boundaries were
flagged and surveyed and were confirmed by Mr. Todd Udvig of SEH, representing the
City of Albertville, and Ms. Colleen Allen from the Wright County Conservatiun
district. The City of Albertville serves as the LGU administering the Wetland
Conservation Act.
5.0 STANDARD OF CARE
Environmental services performed by Pinnacle for the project have been conducted in a
manner consistent with the degree of care and technical skill appropriately exercised by
environmental professionals currently practicing in this area under similar budget and
time constraints. Recommendations or opinions contained in this report represent our
professional judgment and are generally based upon available information and
currently accepted practices for environmental professionals. Other than this, no other
warranty is implied nor is it expressed.
PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INe.
WETLAND DELINEATION
7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6.0 REFERENCES
USGS. 1967, Revised 1993 St. Michael, Minnesota Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series
(Topographic), U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
USGS. 1967, Revised 1993 Big Lake, Minnesota Quadrangle, 7.5 Minute Series
(Topographic), U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
National Wetlands Inventory Map (NWI), 1991 St. Michael, Minnesota Quadrangle, 7.5
Minute Series (Topographic) , U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife
Service.
National Wetlands Inventory Map (NWI), 1991 Big Lake, Minnesota Quadrangle, 7.5
Minute Series (Topographic) , U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife
Service.
Protected Wetlands Inventory Map (PWI), 1996 Wright County Protected Water,
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
Eggers, Steve D. and Reed, Donald M., Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of
Minnesota and Wisconsin, 1997, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District.
Lyon, John Grimson, Practical Handbook for Wetland Identification and Delineation, 1993,
Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation
Manual, 1987, updated on February 25,1997, Washington, D. C.
U.S. Dept of Agriculture, Soil Survey of Wright County, Minnesota, 1983
Farm Service Agency 1979 through 2000 aerial photographs for Section 35, Township
121 North, Ran e 24 West, Wri ht Coun ; Minnesota
PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INe.
WETLAND DELINEATION
8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table of Contents
(
1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................1
1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................1
1.2 SCope...............................................................................................................................1
2.0 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ... ....................... .................... ................. ...............2
2.1 Site Location and Use ............................ ............... ............... ...... ........ .............. .......... ...2
2.2 Surveys and Maps................. ...... ..... ...... .... .......................... ....... ... ..... .... .... .......... ........2
2.2.1 Soil Survey............................ ............ ............................. ..... ..... ...... .... '...... ... ........ ..2
2.2.2 USGS Topographic Maps....................... ........ ............. ........ .... ...... .................. .....2
2.2.3 NWI Maps .................................... ............................................................ ..............3
2.2.4 PWI Maps. ....................................... .......................................................................3
3.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION...................................................................................3
3.1 Methodology ... ............... ..... ......... ....... ..........................................................................3
3.2 Wetland Descriptions... ............. ......... ......... ..... ........ ...................................... ..............4
Wetland 1 ... ................... ......... ............ ...... ... .... '" ..... ... ...... ....... ... ... ......................... ....... ....... ..4
Wetland 2 ...... ............................. ........... ..... ........ ............... .................. ..... ................. .............5
Wetland 3 ...............................................................................................................................6
Wetland 4 ...............................................................................................................................6
Suspect Areas.......... ............................................................................................................... 7
4.0 CONCLUSION................................................................................................................. 7
5.0 STANDARD OF CARE.. ............... ............. ..................... .................... ......... ............. .....7
6.0 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................8
DISTRIBUTION .......... .............. ..... ...... .............................................. ..Last Page of Document
PINNACLE ENGINEERING, INC.
WETLAND DELINEATION
i
I
I ~ .
0
CD 0
0
0 c-l .;
Wt- 0
0::<1( N
I <l(u> ..I"') iU II
a.. ~....
W C.
0:: <l(m Jl....
a.. 0
I
,.
+-'
()
.~O
o+-'
>,LO
+-,o....(f.)
L (l)
.,.- (()._ C
CLoC
WO+-'L
o:::L(l)
:)0....0:::
0c-o(l)
LL(l)-
-00>
03:t
o:::C(()
(l)..D
-t<t
o
o
I
I
:.r'
t .. ~
t .
I
1- '
I ,
I'
I
"~~7~
r\ j
/ \.;-~.
v (, CJ<',:". ,.\
...... "', 'to ~ I',.. " - i I.
I ' :1: ...... '\,j 1.'" .
! l -.... (. \"., 1
I.': -.\.: .) < \~>;,..
.~;': . I 1'" ..
" '.:' ) ,:..'. f
; "'- 1...-' ........." '.". l
I : /. ~ I'~~r:'~\ "':,. "-
o. ;"/' ",-:\
} r / "\,
.6 :~ /r- /- i i' \.. .~.-
/.i I ..~/ I....; .- '..... \ ,.:..
....- J I 0 I l '.o"
J\/..i)../ -'. .
. ~ -...-..' :.: fj~. :!
~..,... --- ........ ~--."..
. / ~~ -. . ":',,-,
. "."",\ .'"''
Ii". t r"')' I:
i t' (..', ',(" r !'"
\'/f" "--,J', '~~'-f~.\\,,-J!
i ,j -I '. \ '1"\
If [' \ (~'.:.':.':'\ t--.- '-....; .. 'I .! \.,-- \) -I;
,/" -'.,..-..:~' :' 1-' \._- i',.:
!("~~:': .~ ..' - - '-: )\, /"I (,I . . -. -.;i.~.ii~ s:
~.'" .. ._~'-"'.'I "\-.. ..: i : /lr," .. '"" I';
.;.. I __ -.. ~ _" - %0.. ../ ~;,..c;......~ ~ ...".
.. ( ,'<' ,/.: '.. "-. > !.c.{.: ,~/ /~' '\,j' :'j "'-1
I J" '.' ...::\ (' .... -- ~'':'J'L '-::-" /' \
,t jl ..... -" ,.I' ) /" , .,-~....,
.) .i :'" ,"}.: " ~.w. t'- .... '\ ..( (.. - {.) ...., I,. ".r. t ..~.:-
I :r~,~~I/ I,'!' 4' \.;....,.. W
, \ I . 1 \ I '.' .) I . ( , .p\~ t.:.
'\ \ I) ...._.- _:..., .) \ .
.. (.- _w."t..' .:< ...I." ;'. - w ) ~".... .' ,-j"~Ij," .....-.....~
I .... '. :\1 "', \ ., 1\ n. 'j .:i,' . ......}.(:.. ", -.-
~ I ('-'" " \ 1 ' '-' I l;:!Ii I I' ".) ( . ; , I A,il
. _' , I , _ I J. . "I) I . . '..:' ~ , V )
...... C . l'I'''-'lt'~//'l/' I \ {':) ;"'\~. . I
(i 1".,/ i "]1/(-1;-, J " .; '-'/y'\ .,) J ~/ / .,' t!~) .." ,; '.: l~' ',,\ . /' .',
'. i' .ll','/ .. _ It... t', -:' " . I .i I ,./. I ~ · (.: "- 1;:"/
I -1 :" .~ r~~- ..",,~~,-:,,=="w.'l._. ..._w;'...... -~t~ ~/r~
. (.'_.._.' "~""'_ fi"'''.'',.;' . . ...1 : ,.... I.. .,.~ .--
.~. .. . /)' '. r ,'/'/ ...... ',../""~; '- ,.. ' . I.f... '.J'~'" '~', . .' . \ '-'-'-~.- #'
. . . ,'f ' ~ ". .l -", :','. . - . ~~t... 't'
( i : 'l~ ,II \ ' ::"1 \.,I./."~ '...~'"~::"~"I'1t.-~"..~\. ;II"'? '. ,f I
"'1 \-- I:, /! \ I '..:.., \~,.' · "\: ) "~' .-~. ~~'")' ,,:'/., I / ~ i ,; ".
._.... ._....... ',' .... .- . II' - .' {.... . *" ' 1\ I ... ......1
- ...~..., "/. ~~ "'.J. _. \ 1"...1 : I ," ~-.~..:~ ":1' .: ,I ~ I I '."
I ':;'j' ./... /h:\ ~.; '.\ ",) j /: ", '~"'~~(.. . I....': ...
:':' ~ :...... '.." _" _ . 0 I I ...... i" i ill' .... ....: -. ,/ .-
. .... .'.\\ ".. '._' \,>,~(_'.\. I' '.) " ,.' H-j-r:'I.'f ,..
'. \ .-J"" -.. . ". '-, ~ \ ,'I'. ", . ,', " '.',.,'
....' ...~:,.... I ,. '-, (, "-:\. "..-.:\. r .. .;....:..' .... n' ..;':. ..-..-,: .. ";,' I
':'>\.'\. : L'\ '1:.- ---.:::: :~..... t.r;' t-... ..,~ ( I 6~ ,(,f. .,/,.,...\:1 :.~J
'- ..~ ..w,.'~' \ '\ ~.. " _ . .,..,.,' , I ~ .. t.. rt I ,~..... '" '!
I ',J' '.(. ',' ;;,,-.: .....i;' .,' ,. ./.." I hr. ,{ r I .
.. ..~. ',.~. .~.... ' .~: .... ".. \ 'l l' \':t.~'~ ../ ". I: {:... ,..~ .I. ,/ Ii... :
,"'...... ..... . ( .. ..\",i \ ../ (., ,.~ ~...:-; ....' ..~_..'. -~ . ''', '" '" '. . ''''''if- k : ..-. I ~....
__....... - ", I ' _..') '-.~ !' -.... -;....:., .,...-. . iI',' '. ~,--.. ..~ .:..-~ I '. ~ ~" ~. ..... '. ....".
"~,_ ~:" ..', '1\'" ; ~-;,,'-___':-:;'''~'' ,.:,~' ;,.... ..t-,; i q ,_' ;", . ~~ ":~'~ .4/ . -.-..l- ,.
1fI" ....:.,: . "'. . ;-...-.... ....-r__) )\.. .:.:::..,1 ;.. ~'l"(''\.\' / I'll .' (/).1' ~l -.: · ' w"'-..
./." _-0" L.;:J ., ," . '\. ...~U4.... I" ''- ...{ .. ~ " \ I . f' . '.' fi/ :"..... . ,'.1 . ').. ..
r ',- "".,',. 1.'~'..:-'I:' f:: .: ,",.!".:"',' , ',J''' /. . ,,''"-'.l
'. < '- R' ".' ,&" , . ,-' . -.' ',"" , ~ I' -
I J ", \.. , ',-. ,'/" ~ ~.:,.j.'~", ~. .~ ". ':-,.' i ~... '"'f ~
'. :......... '" ";::' \i I"V \; . -/,,' '. ',' ./' ","~.':__,".'~
'''I':~'' .:.~~ , ,-. .. ~ I~"'''''-' ,~,,-~/ 'o.." . : ~ /~.l ~ --- .
-' -,= - ~"- .':..:...-,;,;:..'" .~ -f"" \)
I l(. \; -""<~.~.I:"...5:~:~, ~_.--/- if;' 1
I ".) " .,.'1 ~ ..r ..... L ~.
-;', :. ~''-'''''''' \..,,\, "'-, ~:\.. .i' /\
'~b"l-~.....,..~.!\..,.2." .~ -.--;"
'(;~' ~;";;I ./ ( ....;- \...~. ; \ .',11 ~~J
..
~~
1 ~._.. r
I
,
.L~ .~.~
I
,'.-:
0)
CD
t')
10
10..-
o
10
.....z~
....
o
....
___z-
I
.{
:t
,
.-j'll
~
t.' '1
-,' , "
~\, ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:>-:
lD
o
w
0::::
<(
Q
w
0::::
Q
(lJ
o
(J
l/)
o
W'--Qj--
I- -~
<( 0 0
o ~:z
>-, +-'
GJ U
> GJ
L '-, 0
::JO+--'
(f)LO
0- (f)
Q)
0:-= C
(f) O,c
+-'
>-,GJ2
+-,0::::
c a5
G::J"D==
0-'-
U 0 >
3;:+--'
L
+-' C Q)
..cGJ-D
.:::L -
.Q1 L <t
L 0
sO
O~ 2 0)
@)~ ~~
c:::::::s~Jl<n~
@@)-:z~
~ fr=::J ~ ~ i
fr=::J C::::::l'" If)
t::::::J Ot::::::J Vi I;i ;;;
fr=::J ~ >. 0 --
o t::::::J '(fliP 0 0:::: ..,
!;::::it::::::J ~<:>tD
@bnnn g ~ t:
d:~
---- z-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
III
~ ~ ~
~ ~ QjIJ
w ':'rn o.
a::: ....-. u.
n. 0 (/)~
-+-'
()
())
. --.. 0
o-+-'
L 0
0.... (J)
Q)
r-r) :=C
0.. 0 .S
WO-+-'~
n::2())
:::::> n::_
r.... - Q)
~3:-o=
LL z O'S;
3:"t
C Q) .
()).o
~-
L<t
o
o
~o
~o
_01
Q!:;:::5 CO
~fS~:ri
r::::;:s ~ ~ It') 5
@Q ..:z~
-- CIl:::E
tJ~l ~ CIl I
~~ "'.It')
or-=-w-
-~ (/) > I')
(;::::J~>.o_
~ "$:9l1 0 a::: I')
Q!:;:::5~ ~Cl~
~n nli g ~ '-'
d:~
~z-
~ {3
~~S1
~~~
r=4~~
CUi CUi CUi
~~~
III
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-;.:
00 Q)
N "0
o u
'-. Vl
n 0
W'- Qj.....
~Ol '00
(:) Jl2
o...-+-'
o ~
2'-- 0
O+..J
(f) L. 0
""0 0..- (f)
OJ
.;:tc:=c
o 0 c
w :;::; -+-' . -
cr (() (() ~
:::JScr
o as
_""O""O=:
lL. (() 0 '>
-+-'3:-+-'
u L
(() C OJ
-+-,(()..o
o~-
L.L.<(
0..- 0
o
~z-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CD
N '0
~ ~
,.., 0
W"" ......
1-0) .!?....
< 0 0
o ~Z
-I-'
()
.~O
UlO-l-'
C ~ 0
o 0... Ul
:;:; Q)
0== C
W () .E o~
0::: 0 Q) ~
~-'o:::
'-'-g-oai
I.J.... 0 0 oS;
:;::;:=-1-'
Q) C ~
:5:Q)Q)
.:::{..o
~<C
o
o
~
G=:::I8
D~ ... 0)
t(j1t\ tic ~ Q) co
~~~ ~~
@ Q ~105
<wQ ":ZIO
~ G=:::I Q).... 'It
s::::. Q) ""'" I
cr::::. Dr--.;: Z . 10
t::::::J :--I Ul W ...
~~ >'"
>,0_
D!;::::i G=:::I 0 a:: ",
@1t::::::J ;tC)CO
Q [!!Qj "8 W ....
~:(
---- Z-
I
DATA FORM
I ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
I Project/Site: Roden Property - Darkenwald , Date: 8/30/02
Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, LTD County: Wright
Investigator. Pinnacle Er;gineering State: MN
I Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Transect 10: WI -Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Plot 10: WIA
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Ye: @ Flags: 85
(If needed, explain on reverse.) Wetland Type: Circular 39 Type 2/3
I VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator
I 1. Glycine Willd Soybeans Herb UPL
2. Po/ygonumn spp. Smartweed Herb FACW
3. Phalaris arundacea Reed canary grass Herb F ACW+
I 4.
5.
6.
I 7.
8.
9.
Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 70%
I Remarks: The soybeans were distressed and newly emergent smartweed was present.
I
HYDROWGY
I XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
I XXX Aerial Photographs _Inundated
Other K-Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_No Recorded Data Available - Water Marks
_Drift Lines
I Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits
_Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
K- Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
I Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves
_Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
I Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SOILS
Transect ID: WI-Wetland
Plot ID: Type 2/3
# of Flags: 85
Map Unit Name Cordova
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Argiaquolls
Profile Description:
Depth
(inches)
0-18
18-24
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
A
B
5Y 2/1
5Y 5/1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
XXX Reducing Conditions
XXX Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Remarks:
Mottles increase with depth
WETLAND DETERMINA nON
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Drainage Class: Very poorly drained
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? ~ No
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc,
IOYR4/6
10YR4/6
few faint
many /distinct
Clay loam
Clay
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
XXX Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain: in Remarks)
es No (Circle)
l~No
~No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland~ No (Circle)
Remarks:
Distinct boundary between wetland and plowed field.
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
I
I DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(l987COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
I Project/Site: Roden Property - Darkenwald , Date: 8/30/02
.
Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, L TD County: Wright
Investigator. Pinnacie Engineering State: MN
I Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Transect 10: WI -Upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Plot 10: WIA
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Ye: @ Flags: 85
I (If needed, explain on reverse.) Wetland Type: Circular 39 Type 2/3
VEGETATION
I Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator
1. Glycine Willd. Soybeans Herb FAC
2. Taraxacum officinile Common Dandelion Herb FACU
3. Poa pratensis Kentucky blue grass Herb FAC-
I 4.
5.
6.
I 7.
8.
9.
I Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 0%
Remarks: agricultural field planted with soybeans. Residual com stalks were abundant in the field. Wetland boundary at
edge of field.
I
I HYDROLOGY
XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
I Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
XXX Aerial Photographs _Inundated
Other _Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_No Recorded Data Available ~ Water Marks
I _Drift Lines
Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits
_Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
I Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18 (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves
_Local Soil Survey Data
I Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
I Remarks: Topography slopes upward from the wetland edge
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SOILS
Transect ID: WI-Upland Plot 10: Type 2/3
# of Flags: 85
Map Unit Name 1094B-Angus-Cordova complex, 0 to 5 % slopes
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Mollie Hapludalfs- Typic Argiaquolls
Profile Description:
Depth
(inches)
0-16
16-24
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
A
B
5Y 2/1
5Y 5/1
IOYR 4/6
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
Few, faint
Clay loam
Loam
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain: in Remarks)
Remarks:
No hydric soil indicators within upper 12 inches
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Yes (Circle)
Yes
Yes~
Remarks:
Com stubble from previous year had large stalks - not flooded
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ~(Circle)
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
I
DATA FORM
I ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
I Project/Site: Roden Property - Darkenwald , Date: 8/30/02
Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, L TD County: Wright
Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN
'I Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Transect 10: WI -Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Plot 10: WIB
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Ye: @ Flags: 85
(If needed, explain on reverse.) Wetland Type: Circular 39 Type 2/3
I VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator
I 1. Phalaris arundacea Reed canary grass Herb FACW+
2. Po/ygonumn spp. Smartweed Herb FACW
3.
I 4.
5.
6.
I 7.
8.
9.
I Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 100%
Remarks: mostly Reed canary grass with smartweed in the plowed area
I HYDROWGY
I XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
XXX Aerial Photographs Inundated
I Other XSaturated in Upper 12 Inches
_No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks
XDrift Lines
I Field Obsetvations: ~ Sediment Deposits
_Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
K- Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
I Depth to Free Water in Pit: 0 (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves
_Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 10 (in.) K-FAC-Neutral Test
I Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
I This areas appears to have flooded some time this growing season,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SOILS
Transect 10: WI-Wetland
Plot 10: Type 2/3
# ofFlags: 85
Map Unit Name Cordova Drainage Class: Very poorly drained
(Series and Phase):
Field Observations
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Argiaquolls Confirm Mapped Type? ~ No
Profile Description:
Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions,
(inches) Horizon (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc.
0-18 A 5Y 2/1 10YR4/6 few faint Clay loam
18-24 B 5Y 5/1 IOYR4/6 many /distinct Clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol Concretions
Histic Epipedon High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
Sulfidic Odor Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Aquic Moisture Regime XXX Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
XXX Reducing Conditions Listed on National Hydric Soils List
XXX Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors Other (Explain: in Remarks)
Remarks:
Mottles increase with depth
WETLAND DETERMINA nON
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ~ No (Circle) Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland~ No (Circle)
Wetland Hydrology Present? (~ No
Hydric Soils Present? bNo
Remarks:
wetland extends into plowed field.
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
I
DATA FORM
I ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
I Project/Site: Roden Property - Darkenwald , Date: 8/30/02
Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, L TD County: Wright
Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN
I Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Transect ID: WI -Upland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Yes @ Plot 10: WlB
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Flags: 85
(If needed, explain on reverse,) Wetland Type: Circular 39 Type 2/3
I VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator
I 1. Glycine Willd Soybeans Herb FAC
2. Taraxacum officinile Common Dandelion Herb FACU
3.
I 4.
5.
6.
I 7.
8.
9. -
Percent of Dominartt Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 0%
I Remarks: agricultural field planted with soybeans. .
!
I HYDROLOGY
I XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
I XXX Aerial Photographs _Inundated
. Other _Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks
_Drift Lines
I Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits
_Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
I Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18 (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves
_Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
I Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Topography slopes upward from the wetland edge
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SOILS
Transect ID: WI-Upland Plot ID: Type 2/3
# of Flags: 85
Map Unit Name 1094B-Angus-Cordova complex, 0 to 5 % slopes
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Mollie Hapludalfs- Typic Argiaquolls
Profile Description:
Depth
(inches)
0-18
18-24
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
A
B
5Y 2/1
5Y 5/1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
I OYR 4/6
Drainage OI.ass: Moderately well drained
Field Observations ~
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes l No)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
Few, faint
Clay loam
Clay
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain: in Remarks)
Remarks:
No hydric soil indicators within upper 12 inches
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Remarks:
sample point above drift mark area.
Yes~(Circle)
Yes~
Yes~
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ~(Circle)
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
I
DATA FORM
I ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
I Project/Site: Roden Property - Darkenwald , Date: 9/3/02
Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, L TD County: Wright
Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN
I Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Transect 10: W2 -Wetland
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Ye: @ Plot 10: W2
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Flags: 85
I (If needed, explain on reverse.) Wetland Type: Circular 39 Type 2/3
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator
I 1. Phalaris arundacea Reed canary grass Herb F ACW+
2.
3.
I 4.
5.
6.
I 7.
8. -
9.
I Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-), 100%
Remarks: Reed canary grass in the type 2 wetland, type 3 wetland contains cattails, arrowhead, wool grass, lesser duck weed,
smartweed, and water plantain in the pond area
1
I HYDROLOGY
XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
I Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
XXX Aerial Photographs _Inundated
Other XSaturated in Upper 12 Inches
_No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks
I X Drift Lines
Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits
_Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
I ~Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
Depth to Free Water in Pit: 12 (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves
_Local Soil Survey Data
I Depth to Saturated Soil: 3 (in.) X FAC-Neutral Test
Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
I wetland area is saturated just below surface,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
SOILS
Transect 10: WI-Wetland
Plot 10: Type 2/3
# of Flags: 55
Map Unit Name Cordova
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic ArgiaquoIls
Profile DescriPtion:
Depth
(inches)
0-18
18-24
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
A
B
5Y 2/l
5Y 5/1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
XXX Reducing Conditions
XXX Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Drainage Glass: poorly drained
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? ~ No
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc,
IOYR4/6
IOYR4/6
common /distinct
many /distinct
Clay loam
Clay
Concretions
XXX High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
XXX Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain: in Remarks)
Remarks:
Mottle frequency and contrast increase with depth,
WETLAND DETERMINA nON
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
~es) No (Circle)
l s No
~No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland~ No (Circle)
Remarks:
Variable but distinct wetland boundary.
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I,
I
I
I
I
I
DATA FORM
ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Roden Property - Darkenwald
Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, L TD
Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site?
Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)?
Is the area a potential Problem Area?
(If needed, explain on reverse.)
es No
Ye: @
Date: 9/3/02
County: Wright
State: MN
Transect ID: W2 -Upland
Plot ID: W2
Flags: 55
Wetland Type: Circular 39 Type 2/3
VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator
1. Poa prantesis Kentucky Blue grass Herb FAC-
2. Taraxacum officinile Common Dandelion Herb FACU
3. Phalaris arundacea Reed canary grass Herb F ACW+
4. Cirsium vulgare Bull Thistle Herb FACU-
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, F ACW or F AC (excluding F AC-). 20%
Remarks: Distinct wetland boundary where vegetation change is present.
HYDROLOGY
xxx Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks):
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge
XXX Aerial Photographs
Other
_No Recorded Data Available
Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators:
_Inundated
_Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
Water Marks
_Drift Lines
_Sediment Deposits
_Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
_Water-Stained Leaves
_Local Soil Survey Data
_FAC-Neutral Test
Field Observations:
Depth of Surface Water:
o
(in.)
Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18 (in.)
Depth to Saturated Soil:
>18 (in.)
Remarks: Topography slopes upward from the wetland edge
Other (Explain in Remarks)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SOILS
Transect 10: WI-Upland Plot 10: Type 2/3
Map Unit Name Cordova
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic Argiaquolls
Profile Description:
Depth
(inches)
0-18
18-24
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
A
B
5Y 2/1
2,5Y 4/1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Remarks:
No hydric soil indicators within upper 12 inches
WETLAND DETERMINA nON
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
# of Flags: 55
Drainage Glass:poorIydrained
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
10YR 4/6
Clay loam
common, distinct Clay
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain: in Remarks)
Yes (Circle)
Yes
Yes~
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ~(Circle)
Remarks:
Distinct vegetation change at wetland boundary
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
I
DATA FORM
I ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Roden Property - Darkenwald , Date: 9/3/02
I Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, LID County: Wright
Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering . State: MN
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Transect 10: W2 - Wetland
I Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Plot 10: W2B
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Ye: @ Flags: 55
(If needed, explain on reverse,) Wetland Type: Circular 39 Type 2/3
I VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator
I 1. Phalaris arundacea Reed canary grass Herb F ACW+
2.
3.
I 4.
5.
6.
7.
I 8.
9.
Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, F ACW or F AC (excluding F AC-). 100%
I Remarks: Reed canary grass in the type 2 wetland
I HYDROWGY
I XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
XXX Aerial Photographs _Inundated
I Other XSaturated in Upper 12 Inches
_No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks
XDrift Lines
Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits
I _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
~Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
I Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18 (in.) _Water-Stained Leaves
_Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 12 (in.) ~FAC-Neutral Test
I Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
wetland area is saturated just below surface.
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SOILS
Transect ID: WI-Wetland
Plot ID: Type 2/3
Map Unit Name Cordova
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Profile Description:
Depth
(inches) Horizon
Typic Argiaquolls
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
0-18
18-24
A
B
5Y 2/1
5Y 5/1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
XXX Reducing Conditions
XXX Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
.
Remarks:
Mottle frequency and contrast increase with depth,
WETLAND DETERMINATION
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
# of Flags: 55
Drainage Class: poorly drained
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? ~ No
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
XXX
XXX
10YR4/6
10YR4/6
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
common /distinct
many /distinct
Clay loam
Clay
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain: in Remarks)
I ~es) No (Circle)
@ENo
~No
Remarks:
Variable but distinct wetland boundary.
..=
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland~ No (Circle)
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SOILS
Transect ID: WI-Upland Plot ID: Type 2/3
Map Unit Name Cordova
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup): Typic ArgiaquoIls
Profile Description:
Depth
(inches )
0-18
18-24
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
A
B
5Y 2/1
2.5Y 4/1
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Remarks:
No hydric soil indicators within upper 12 inches
WETLAND DETERMINA nON
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
I OYR 4/6
# of Flags: 55
Drainage OIass: poorly drained
Field Observations ~
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes ,-No)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure. etc,
common. distinct
Clay loam
Clay
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain: in Remarks)
Yes~(Circle)
Yes~
Yes~
Remarks:
Distinct vegetation change at wetland boundary
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes ~(Circle)
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
I
DATA FORM
I ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
I Project/Site: Roden Property - Darkenwald ( Date: 9/3/02
Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, L TD County: Wright
Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Transect ID: W2 -Upland
I Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Ye: @ Plot ID: W2B
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Flags: 55
{If needed, explain on reverse,) Wetland Type: Circular 39 Type 2/3
I VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator
I I. Poa prantesis Kentucky Blue grass Herb FAC-
2. Cirsium vulgare Bull Thistle Herb F ACU-
3. Achillea mil/efolium Yarrow Herb FACU
I 4. Bromus inermis Smooth Brome Herb UPL
5.
6.
7.
I 8.
9.
Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 20%
I Remarks: Distinct wetland boundary where vegetation change is present.
I HYDROLOGY
I XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
XXX Aerial Photographs _Inundated
I Other _Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks
_Drift Lines
Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits
I _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
I Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 12 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
I Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Topography slopes upward from the wetland edge
I
I
I
I
-- - --- - -- -- -- --
I
DATA FORM
I ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Roden Property - Darkenwald , Date: 9/3/02
I Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, LTD County: Wright
Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Transect 10: W3 -Wetland
I Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Ye: @ Plot 10: W3
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Flags: 7
(If needed, explain on reverse.) Wetland Type: Circular 39 Type 2
I VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator
I 1. Phalaris arundacea Reed canary grass Herb FACW+
2. Polygonumn spp. Smartweed Herb FACW
3.
4.
I 5.
6.
7.
I 8.
9.
Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, FACW or FAC (excluding FAC-). 100%
I Remarks: Reed canary starts were plowed field ends
I ~
HYDROLOGY
I XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
XXX Aerial Photographs _Inundated
I Other lLSaturated in Upper 12 Inches
_No Recorded Data Available _Water Marks
_Drift Lines
Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits
I _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
lL Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
I Depth to Free Water in Pit: > 18 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: 6 (in.) lLFAC-Neutral Test
I Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SOILS
Transect 10: W3-Wetland
Plot 10: Type 2/3
# of Flags: 7
Map Unit Name 1094B-Angus-Cordova complex, 0 to 5 % slopes Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup):
Profile Description:
Depth
(inches) Horizon
Field Observations
ConfIrm Mapped Type? ~ No
Mollie Hapludalfs- Typic Argiaquolls
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
0-18
18-24
A
B
5Y 2/1
5Y 5/1
IOYR4/6
IOYR4/6
few faint
many /distinct
Clay loam
Clay
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
SulfIdic. Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
XXX Reducing Conditions
XXX Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
XXX Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain: in Remarks)
Remarks:
Mottles increase with depth
WETLAND DETERMINA nON
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
~l No (Circle)
(~ No
~No
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland'C!.9 No (Circle)
Remarks:
Distinct boundary between wetland and plowed fIeld.
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
I
DATA FORM
I ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION
(1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual)
Project/Site: Roden Property - Darkenwald , Date: 9/3/02
I Applicant/Owner: RLK-Kuusisto, L TD County: Wright
Investigator. Pinnacle Engineering State: MN
Do Normal Circumstances Exist on the site? ~ No Transect 10: W3 -Upland
I Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? Ye: ~ Plot 10: W3
Is the area a potential Problem Area? Flags: 7
(If needed, explain on reverse.) Wetland Type: Circular 39 Type 2
I VEGETATION
Dominant Plant Species Wetland Common name Stratum Indicator
I 1. Glycine Willd. Soybeans Herb UPL
2. Taraxacum officinile Common Dandelion Herb FACU
3.
I 4.
5.
6.
7.
I 8.
9.
Percent of Dominant Species in wetland sampling point that are OBL, F ACW or F AC (excluding F AC-). 0%
I Remarks: agricultural field planted with soybeans. Wetland boundary at edge of field.
I HYDROLOGY
I XXX Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks): Wetland hydrology Indicators:
Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators:
XXX Aerial Photographs _Inundated
I Other _Saturated in Upper 12 Inches
_No Recorded Data Available Water Marks
_Drift Lines
Field Observations: _Sediment Deposits
I _Drainage Patterns in Wetlands
Depth of Surface Water: 0 (in.) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required):
_Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12"
I Depth to Free Water in Pit: >18 (in.) Water-Stained Leaves
_Local Soil Survey Data
Depth to Saturated Soil: >18 (in.) _FAC-Neutral Test
I Other (Explain in Remarks)
Remarks: Topography slopes upward from the wetland edge
I
I
, I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
SOILS
Transect 10: WI-Upland Plot 10: Type 2/3
# of Flags: 85
Map Unit Name 1094B-Angus-Cordova complex, 0 to 5 % slopes
(Series and Phase):
Taxonomy (Subgroup); Mollie Hapludalfs- Typic Argiaquolls
Profile Description:
Depth
(inches)
0-16
16-24
Horizon
Matrix Color
(Munsell Moist)
A
B
5Y 2/1
5Y 5/l
Hydric Soil Indicators:
Histosol
Histic Epipedon
Sulfidic Odor
Aquic Moisture Regime
Reducing Conditions
Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors
Remarks:
No hydric soil indicators within upper 12 inches
WETLAND DETERMINA nON
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present?
Wetland Hydrology Present?
Hydric Soils Present?
Yes
Yes
Yes~
Remarks:
Soybeans were healthy to edge of field.
Mottle Colors
(Munsell Moist)
I OYR 4/6
Drainage Class: Moderately well drained
Field Observations
Confirm Mapped Type? Yes No
Mottle
Abundance/Contrast
Texture, Concretions,
Structure, etc.
Few, faint
Clay loam
Loam
Concretions
High Organic Content in Surface Layer Sandy Soils
Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils
Listed on Local Hydric Soils List
Listed on National Hydric Soils List
Other (Explain: in Remarks)
(Circle)
Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? Yes e:>(Circle)
Approved by HQUSACE 3/92
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-=
o
.:'ti
! EhN
.ec.3 8
U~N
~~..=
~ = bO
~gg
='fi..t!
o ~
U ~~
.w=0'\
ib -= t""l
.t: tU
~'-
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
j
i
I
I
i
I
!
I
i
i
I
I
I ~.
.II!'
Il:l
Ct')
~.9'
<~
~,
<~
6><.
.9~
I 66>,9.1
~
<::>
Ct')
~.
~
<::>
N ~
(S3lpUJ) UOHVt!dpaJd
<::>
~
U')
%"
~
t5'"
d1
3>6:
'I'
<db:
'I'
-%&"
%"
~"
~"
~
t5'"
~
t5'"
Odb:
'I'
~
0 'I'
~~
~..t.:
~'1
~ t-.
Cbc"
~
p.
OCb
p.
6'66
'I'
0>66
'I'
<66
'I'
..966
'I' ld
Q)
~66 ~
'I' >.
$-<
$66 0
'I'
~ D
'I'
~
'I'
~
'I'
~
<lI
,.
ld
Q)
~
..
~
~
~
tf}
Q)
&::
ld
Q)
~
iI'V
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE
ASSESSMENT
PROPOSED 110-ACRE ALBERTVILLE
BUSINESS PARK
SOUTHEAST OF KADLER AVE. AND 70TH ST.
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA
Prepared for:
RLK KUUSISTO, LTD.
MINNETONKA,MINNESOTA
May 2002
Prepared by:
-
-
Liesch Companies
Minneapolis, MN · Madison, WI · Scottsdale, AZ
LIED
....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PHASE ONE
ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
PROPOSED 1l0-ACRE ALBERTVILLE BUSINESS PARK
SOUTHEAST OF KADLER AVENUE AND 70th STREET
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA 55301
Prepared for:
RLK KUUSISTO LTD.
6110 BLUE CIRCLE DRIVE
SUITE 100
MINNETONKA, MINNESOTA 55343
Prepared by:
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
13400 15TH AVENUE NORTH
PLYMOUTH, MINNESOTA 55441
763/489-3100
MAY 20, 2002
Project Number: 52792.00
This report was prepared by me
or under my direct supervision.
--
plkd/.d~
Mark S. Miller
Project Manager
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................. .... ...... ......................................... ........ ......... .......... 1
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK................... ........................................ ........................................ .......... 1
3.0 PHYSICAL SETTmG .. ... ..................... .......... ................................. .............. ........ ...... ....... 2
3.1 TOPOGRAPHy..... ................ ................ ................... ................ ... ..... ........... ................ 3
3.2 GEOLOGY!lIYDROGEOLOGY .......... .......... .......................................................... ....... 3
3.3 WETLANDS ........................................ .............. ................................................. .... .... 3
4.0 REGULATORY AGENCY RESPONSES ......................................................................... 3
4.1 EDR RESPONSE..... ............................ .... ........................ .......... ............ ........ ............. 3
4.2 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESPONSE................................................... ...... ....... ............. 7
4.3 WRIGHT COUNTY RESPONSE ...... .............................................................................. 7
5 .0 WALK-OVER SURVEy................................................................... ....... ..... ..................... 7
6.0 HISTORICAL RESEARCH ................. ............ ........ ............. ..... .... ...... ...... ........... ........... 10
6.1 CITY DIRECTORIES REVIEW...................................................................... .............. 10
6.2 SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY MAPS REVIEw........................................... 11
6.3 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS REvIEw..................................................................... 11
6.4 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW............................................................................... 11
6.5 WELL LoG SEARCH............... .......... ..... ......... ........ ......... ............................ ...... ...... 12
7.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS .................................................................12
7.1 "RODEN PROPERTY, ALBERVILLE, MINNESOTA, WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT,
PREPARED FOR DARKENWALD REAL ESTATE BY KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICE COMPANY (KJOLHAUG), DATED JANUARY 21, 2000 (KJOLHAUG
JANUARY 21, 2000 REpORT) ...................................................................... 12
7.2 "PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION: DARKENW ALD DEVELOPMENT, RODEN
PROPERTY"; GME CONSULTANTS, JUNE 2001 .......................................... 12
7.3 "SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND FOUNDATION EVALUATION: PROPOSED WELCOME
FURNITURE STORE"; MIDWEST ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., MARCH 200212
8.0 CONCLUSIONS......................................................................................................... ...... 13-
8.1 RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS .............................................:........... 13
8.2 ITEMS OF ENVIRONMENTAL NOTE .......................................................................... 13
9 .0 QUALIFICATIONS OF AUTHORS ................................................................................ 16
10.0 REFERENCES.. .............................. ................ ......... ....... ....... ............... ............ ................ 17
I
I
,1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Liesch Associates, Inc. (Liesch) conducted this Phase One Environmental Site Assessment (ESA),
on behalf of RLK Kuusisto Ltd. (RLK) for the proposed Albertville Business Park property, located
at the southeast comer of the intersection of Kadler Avenue and 70th Street, Albertville, Wright
County, Minnesota (the Property). The Property is a 110-acre parcel located in part of the northwest
Y.. of Section 35, Township l21N, Range 24W. Figure 1 in Appendix A illustrates the location of
the Property. Among the purposes of this Phase One ESA report is to potentially qualify RLK, its
successors and assigns, for the innocent landowner defense to CERCLA liability.
The Property is occupied by a fannstead consisting of one house and outbuildings including sheds, a
garage, storage buildings, a barn and milk house and grain silos. The house and several of the
outbuildings were built in 1919, with additional construction of structures on the Property occurring
at later dates. A dirt driveway accesses the farmstead from 70th Street. The remaining areas of the
Property consist of wetland areas and fields in fallow. Figure 2 in Appendix A depicts the Property
layout. The Bernard Roden Family currently owns and occupies the Property. Past use of the
Property includes agricultural crop production, a dairy cow milking operation and pig, cattle and
chicken husbandry.
The Property is bounded on the north by 70th Street with residential property and undeveloped land
beyond; on the east by the Albertville Outlet Mall and undeveloped land with a City of Albertville
dumping ground located adjacent to the Property; on the south by Interstate 94 with residential
development beyond; and on the west by a residence and Kadler Avenue with a Minnesota
Department of Transportation test road and outdoor pavement laboratory beyond.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
The following work items were completed for this Phase One ESA ofthe Property:
· Visual on-site walkover assessment at the Property, identifying existing surface conditions and
any obvious signs of contamination.
· Visual survey of adjacent properties for current land use and any obvious SIgnS of
contamination.
· Contacts with state, county, and city regulatory agencies to determine if any environmental
problems or spills have been reported on or adjacent to the Property.
May 2002
Page 1
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, 1Ne.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· Review of U.S.G.S. quadrangle map for location of pipelines and other features which may
potentially impact the Property.
· Review provided plans and specifications, drawings, site plans, surveys and similar materials
pertaining to the: Property.
· Review historical aerial photographs, city directories and Sanborn Maps {if available).
· Review available historic Property records made available to Liesch by RLK others.
· Assess the presence of underground storage tanks and water wells on the Property.
· Conduct a visual assessment for the possible presence of asbestos containing materials (ACMs).
· Assess the possible presence of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) at the Property.
· Review available environmental permits, licenses and filings from the MPCA, and City and
County regulatory agencies.
· Review provided previously prepared environmental reports and/or letters.
· Preparation and submittal of a written report summarizing the factual findings of the assessment
and recommendations for further actions, if necessary.
The scope of these services provided conform with ASTM E 1527-00.
The following sections discuss the results of the investigation and summarize the information
obtained for this Phase One ESA. This assessment does not include a comprehensive compliance
analysis with local, state or federal environmental laws, rules or regulations.
3.0 PHYSICAL SETTING
A site's ability to impact surrounding properties is largely dependent on the direction of groundwater
flow from the site. To assess groundwater flow to the Property from sites of environmental concern
in the area, Liesch reviewed the East Central Geologic Map of Minnesota (Geologic Map) published
by the University of Minnesota and two subsurface investigations completed for the Property (refer
to Section 7.0 for additional information). The USGS 7.5 Minute S1. Michael, MN and Big Lake,
May 2002
Page 2
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INe.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MN topographic quadrangle maps (1991 revised) was also used to identify topographic features
such as hills, streams and lakes which may influence site-specific shallow groundwater flow
direction.
3.1 TOPOGRAPHY
The Property is characterized by relatively flat to gently rolling terrain. No significant topographic
features are present on or near the Property. The elevation of the Property is approximately 950 to
960 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD).
3.2 GEOLOGY/IIYDROGEOLOGY
The subsurface investigations indicate that surficial deposits in the vicinity ofthe Property consist of
clayey silt and silty clay with organics in the topsoil layer, which is underlain by firm to very stiff
silty clay with varying amounts of sand. Bedrock in the vicinity of the Property consists of
undivided sedimentary rocks of the Upper Cambrian age including Jordan Sandstone, St Lawrence
Formation, Franconia Formation, Ironton Sandstone, Galesville Sandstone, Eau Claire Formation
and Mt. Simon Sandstone.
According to available documentation, the depth to regional groundwater in the area of the Property
has been reported to range from nine feet below ground surface (bgs) to more than 25 feet bgs.
Based on available documentation, regional groundwater flow is assumed to be in a north-
northeasterly direction toward the Mississippi River. However, local groundwater flow direction is
often influenced by topography and local drainage features such as lakes, streams and wetland areas
and may vary from the regional groundwater flow direction.
3.3 WETLANDS
A computer file search organization, Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), provided Liesch
with a map generated using the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) map for the Property (see
Appendix B, Executive Summary Overview Map and Detail Map). The map, as provided by EDR,
shows wetlands located on and adjacent to the Property. Visual observation and review of available
surveys indicates possible wetland areas located on the Property.
Liesch was provided a wetland delineation report for the area of the Property that identified nine
wetlands on the Property. For additional information, see Section 7.1, page 12.
4.0 REGULATORY AGENCY RESPONSES
4.1
EDR RESPONSE
May 2002
Page 3
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EDR was requested by Liesch to conduct a database search to determine if there were any regulatory
sites on, or within a one-mile radius of, the Property. Liesch requested that EDR increase the search
radius by 1/8- mile due to the size ofthe Property. The search meets the specific requirements of the
ASTM practice E 1527-00. The EDR response, dated April 18, 2002, is included as Appendix B.
The EDR response consisted of an examination of the following federal and state databases
including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EP A), the Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency (MPCA), the National Technical Information Service (NTIS), the Department of Labor,
United States Department of Transportation (USDOT), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)
and the Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA):
A) Databases searched to one mile:
. EPA-
. EPA-
. EPA-
National Priorities List (NPL);
Corrective Action Report (CORRACTS);
Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) permitted
Treatment, Storage, Disposal (TSD);
Superfund Permanent List of Priorities (SHWS/PLP);
Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program (VIC);
Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees (CONSENT);
Record of Decision (ROD);
Delisted NFL sites;
List of Sites (MN LS);
Generators Associated with Enforcement Logs (MN Enforcement);
Fonner manufactured gas (coal gas) sites;
. MPCA -
. MPCA-
. EPA-
. NTIS-
. EP A-
. MPCA -
. MPCA -
. EDR -
B) Databases searched to ~- mile:
· EP A - Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability
Information System (CERCLIS);
· MPCA - Solid Waste Landfills, Incinerators, Transfer Stations (SWF/LF);
· MPCA - Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST);
· EP A - Federal Superfund Liens (NPL Liens);
· MPCA - Active TSD Facilities (MN HWS Permit);
· MPCA - Closed Landfills Priority List (MN LCP);
C) Databases searched to ~- mile:
· EP A-NTIS - CERCLIS sites designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned" (CERC-
NFRAP);
· EP A - RCRIS registered small-quantity generators of hazardous waste (RCRIS-
SQG);
· EP A - RCRA registered large-quantity generators of hazardous waste (RCRIS-
LQG);
· MPCA - Underground Storage Tanks (UST);
. Dept. of Labor - Mines;
May 2002
Page 4
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. MPCA - Spills log (MN Spills);
. MDA - Bulk Facilities Database (BULK);
· MDA - fucidents involving agricultural chemicals (MN AG SPILLS);
D) Databases searched for the Property:
. EP A - Proposed NFL;
· EP A - Emergency Response Notification System of Spills (ERNS);
. EP A - Facility fudex System (FINDS);
· USDOT - Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System (HMIRS);
· Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Material Licensing Tracking System (ML TS);
· EP A - PCB Activity Database System (pADS);
· EP A - RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System (RAA TS);
. EP A - Toxic Chemical Release fuventory System (TRIS);
. EP A - Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA);
· EP A - Federal Insecticide, Fungicide & Rodenticide ActITSCA Tracking System
(FTTS);
. MPCA - Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks (AST); and
· MPCA - Sites deleted from the State Superfund Permanent List of Priorities (MN
Deleted SHWS).
EDR did not identify the Property in any of the searched databases.
EDR did not identify any sites within the ASTM search radius of the various databases.
Orphan Sites
EDR noted 16 sites on an orphan listing, which could not be platted due to poor or inadequate
address information. Liesch reviewed these sites and determined that none of these sites are located
on or adjacent to the Property.
Four of the orphan sites are listed as RCRIS Small Quantity Generators (SQG) or Large Quantity
Generators (LQG). None of the SQG or LQG sites have violations listed by EDR. fuclusion on the
RCRlS-SQG or RCRlS-LQG lists does not imply the facility has environmental problems or that a
release has occurred. The hazardous waste generation at these sites is not anticipated to represent a
recognized environmental condition for the Property.
Three of the orphan sites are listed in the Underground Storage Tank (UST) database, which contains
registered USTs. None of these UST sites are located directly adjacent to the Property. Inclusion on
the UST list does not imply a release has occurred or that the site has environmental problems.
Regulated USTs must be registered with the MPCA. These UST sites are not anticipated to
represent a recognized environmental condition for the Property.
May 2002
Page 5
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, 1Ne.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Two of the orphan sites are listed in the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database,
which includes incident reports containing an inventory of reported leaking underground storage
tank incidents. All of the LUST sites listed in the EDR report have been granted closure by the
MPCA. Closed sites have been remediated to levels acceptable to the MPCA, have an on-going
remedial action in place, or it was determined that enviromnental conditions on the site had not been
impacted by the reported release. Closed sites are not anticipated to represent a recognized
environmental condition for the Property.
One of the orphan sites is listed as a "No Action" Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (MN VIC)
Program site. No Action sites have been remediated to levels acceptable to the MPCA, have an on-
going remedial action in place, or it was determined that environmental conditions on the site are
not a threat to human health and the enviromnent. No Action sites are generally not anticipated to
represent a recognized enviromnental condition for the Property.
One of the orphan sites is listed as a Solid Waste Facility/ Landfill (SWF/LF). The Lindala Sanitary
Landfill is located in French Lake Township, which is not in the vicinity of the Property. Based on
the distance from the Property, this site is not anticipated to represent a recognized environmental
condition for the Property.
One of the orphan sites is listed as a Minnesota Department of Agriculture Spill site (MN
AGSPILLS). The All Green Lawn Management site is located in St. Cloud, which is not in the
vicinity of the Property. Based on the distance from the Property, this site is not anticipated to
represent a recognized environmental condition for the Property.
One of the orphan sites is listed in the Facility Index System (FINDS) database, which contains both
facility information and "pointers" to other sources of information that contain more detail. The site
appears to be listed in the Permit Compliance System and is located at least ~-mile from the
Property. Based on the distance from the Property, this site is not anticipated to represent a
recognized enviromnental condition for the Property.
Three of the orphan sites are listed in the Minnesota List of Lists (MN LS), which acts as a database
clearing-house for multiple MPCA databases. One of the sites was discussed earlier and is a No
Action VIC Site. The remaining two sites are listed on the METRO DUMP Inventory and are
located in Monticello, which is not in the vicinity of the Property. Based on the distance from the
Property, these sites are not anticipated to represent a recognized enviromnental condition for the ,
Property.
May 2002
Page 6
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologists' Engineers' Environmental Scientists
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Based on review of the information provided by EDR, none of the sites are anticipated to represent a
recognized environmental condition for the Property.
4.2 CITY OF ALBERTVILLE RESPONSE
Liesch contacted Ms. Cindy Sherman, City of Albertville Planner, Mr. Pete Carlson, City of
Albertville Engineer, Mr. Jon Sutherland, City of Albertville Building fuspector and Ms. Linda
Goeb, City of Albertville Administrator, regarding possible environmental concerns identified for
the Property. Ms. Sherman was unaware of any environmental concerns associated with the
Property. Ms. Goeb reported the Property had been fanned and she was unaware any environmental
concerns associated with. the Property. As of the writing of this report, neither of the other City of
Albertville officials had responded to the request for information.
4.3 WRIGHT COUNTY RESPONSE
Liesch contacted Mr. Chuck Davis, Environmental Health Officer with Wright County to detennine
if there are environmental concerns identified for the Property. Mr. Davis reviewed the Wright
County database for information regarding the Property. Mr. Davis reported the County has no
environmental information regarding the Property and that he is unaware of environmental concerns
associated with the Property.
5.0 WALK-OVER SURVEY
Liesch representative Erin Greenwood conducted a walk-over survey of the Property on April 22,
2002. Ms. Greenwood was accompanied by Mr. Bernard Roden, Property Owner. The purpose of the
walk-over survey was to identify any readily apparent indications of environmental concern on or
immediately adjacent to the Property. Appendix C contains a copy of the completed walk-over survey
form for the Property. Appendix D contains selected photographs taken during the walk-over survey.
fuformation provided by Mr. Roden during the walk-over survey is included throughout the following
summary.
The Property is occupied by a fannstead consisting of one house and outbuildings including sheds, a
garage, storage buildings, a barn and milk house and grain silos. The house and several of the
outbuildings were built in 1919, with additional construction of structures on the Property occurring
at later dates. A dirt road accesses the fannstead from 70th Street. The remaining areas of the
Property consist of wetland areas and fields in fallow. Figure 2 in Appendix A depicts the Property
layout. The Bernard Roden Family currently owns and occupies the Property. Past use of the
Property includes agricultural crop production, a dairy cow milking operation and pig, cattle and
chicken husbandry.
May 2002
Page 7
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers' Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Property is bounded on the north by 70th Street with residential property and undeveloped land
beyond; on the east by the Albertville Outlet Mall and undeveloped land with a City of Albertville
dumping ground located adjacent to the Property; on the south by Interstate 94 with residential
development beyond; and on the west by Kadler Avenue with a Minnesota Department of
Transportation test road and outdoor pavement laboratory beyond.
Access to several structures on the Property was limited due to materials storage. Therefore, a
complete inventory of chemicals was not completed.
The following items of environmental note were observed:
Stained or Stressed Vegetation/Soil
No stained or stressed vegetation or soil was observed during the walk-over survey.
Chemicals! Hazardous Waste
The chemicals currently stored on-site include: used oil, motor oil, gasoline, diesel fuel, fuel oil,
paint thinner, paint, car batteries and other miscellaneous cleaning supplies and household
hazardous wastes. Chemicals were stored in containers smaller than five gallons. No agricultural
chemicals were observed on the Property, although, as noted, a complete inventory of household
hazardous wastes was not completed. 55-gallon drums are stored in various locations on the
Property with a large pile composed of 10 to 15 drums located near a tool shed. Reportedly, the
drums are empty, however, it was not possible to inspect all the drums to verify the presence of
contents at the time of the walk-over survey.
Polychlorinated Biohenyls (PCBs)
Typical PCB-containing items include dielectric fluids in electrical equipment and lubricating or
hydraulic oils in machinery. In addition, fluorescent light ballasts manufactured prior to 1979 often
included PCB-containing dielectric fluids.
One pole-mounted transformer was observed on the Property. The transformer is owned by Wright-
Hennepin, who is responsible for maintenance. No staining or leakage was observed near the
transformer. Liesch contacted Wright-Hennepin to determine if the transformer has been tested for
PCBs. As of the writing of this report, Wright-Hennepin has not responded to the request for
information.
One air compressor and one generator were observed on the Property. Miscellaneous farm
implements that may contain lubricating oil were also observed on the Property. Surficial staining
May 2002
Page g
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INe.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
on the concrete in several of the work areas on the Property was observed.
No other suspect PCB-containing items were observed or reported to be located on the Property.
Suspect Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM)
Suspect ACM was observed on the Property, including floor tile, ceiling tile, stucco siding,
sheetrock and taping compound and roofing materials. Based upon the age of construction it is
possible that ACMs are present in building materials.
When a structure is to be renovated, repaired or demolished, federal and state laws require removal
of all regulated asbestos-containing material (ACM), which would be affected by the activities, prior
to beginning work. The regulated ACM must be removed or repaired following all applicable ACM
removal and disposal regulations. In addition, current OSHA regulations require that all ACM must.
be maintained in good condition. Sampling and analysis is the definitive way to determine if
asbestos is present.
Old Foundations/Dumoing
Evidence of old foundations and/or dumping was not observed or reported on the Property with the
exception of two abandoned cars, an abandoned combine and several piles of brush and wood debris
and several pieces of corrugated metal sheeting. Several areas used for storage of reportedly empty
55-gallon drums were observed on the Property. According to Mr. Roden, a city-owned dump is
located adjacent to east of the Property. Dumping in the area consisted of rocks, cement, wood and
other miscellaneous debris and appeared to be limited in area The dump did not appear to encroach
onto the Property and based on the anticipated groundwater flow direction, the dump appears to be
located in a side to down gradient location with respect to the Property.
Wells/ /Septic Systems
Two wells are reportedly located on the Property. One well is currently active and located near a
tool shed and two ASTs. The second well is reportedly inactive and located in a pit in a tool shed.
Liesch was unable to view the second well due to materials blocking access to the interior of the
tool shed.
Septic system drainfield cleanouts/vents were observed near the southeast comer of the house. Floor
drains in the house are reportedly connected to the septic system.
USTs/ ASTs
No evidence of items such as fill or vent pipes, indicative of USTs, were observed or reported to be
located on the Property. A total of five ASTs were observed on the Property. Three of the ASTs are
currently active and include the following: a 265-gallon fuel oil AST is located in the basement of
May 2002
Page 9
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
the house. No staining or leakage was observed on the concrete in the vicinity of the AST. Two
ASTs are located in the yard near a tool shed: one of the ASTs is an approximate 500-gallon steel
AST containing diesel fuel and the second AST is an approximate 300-gallon steel AST containing
gasoline and is elevated on scaffolding. No staining or leakage was apparent in the vicinity of the
two outdoor ASTs.
Two reportedly empty and inactive ASTs were also observed on the Property. Liesch was unable to
inspect these ASTs to verify the presence of contents at the time of the walk-over survey.
Reportedly, one of these ASTs was used to store motor oil temporarily. No staining or leakage was
apparent in the vicinity of these ASTs.
Pits. Sumos. Dry Wells. Catch Basins
No pits, sumps, dry wells or catch basins were observed on the Property. The well located in the tool
shed, which could not be observed, is reportedly located in a pit. The size and condition of the well
pit could not be determined.
High Voltage Power Lines
High voltage power lines were observed on the Property along the northern Property boundary. A
service line leading from the main line to the farmstead buildings was also observed. High voltage
power lines emit electromagnetic fields (EMF) that may interfere with some electrical equipment.
Liesch contacted Wright-Hennepin to determine if EMF readings are known to exist for the power
lines located on the Property. As of the writing of this report, Wright-Hennepin has not responded to
the request for information.
Surface Water/ Wetlands
Visual observation indicated possible wetland areas located on the Property. No permanent water
features were observed on the Property.
6.0 HISTORICAL RESEARCH
6.1 CITY DIRECTORIES REVIEW
Liesch reviewed the EDR City Directory Abstract for the Property and the surrounding area. City
Directories list occupants of addresses from the early 1900s to the present and cover urban and
suburban areas. The EDR response dated March 7, 2002 is included as Appendix E. The directories
listed addresses on alphabetical indices from 1856 through 1928. The Property was listed in the
1989, 1994 and 1999 city directories as a residence. The following surrounding addresses were
identified in the 1989, 1994 and 1999 city directories: 10388 70th Street (residence), 10544 70th
Street (residence) and 10795 70th Street (residence).
May 2002
Page 10
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The review of city directories for the Property and adjacent areas did not readily indicate the
'presence of environmental concerns for the Property.
6.2 SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY MAPS REVIEW
Sanborn Fire Insurance Company Maps were prepared for various communities from the late 1800s
through the 1980s. These maps show addresses, structures and other improvements, such as utilities
and storage tanks, for the areas covered. According to EDR, coverage for the Property does not
exist. The EDR response, dated April 19, 2002 is included as Appendix F.
6.3 USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS REVIEW
The Rockford, MN 1909 IS-minute topographic map; the Big Lake, MN 1961, 1961 photorevised
1980 and 1991 and St. Michael 1981 and 1991 7.S-minute topographic maps were reviewed to
identify past land use and any readily apparent environmental concerns. The topographic maps, as
provided by EDR, are included in Appendix G.
No areas of readily apparent environmental concern were noted on the Property on the maps
reviewed. The Property appeared undeveloped in the 1909 map reviewed with wetland areas shown
on the Property. The remaining maps show the Property developed with several structures and an
unimproved road in an approximate configuration and location as the current configuration. Power
lines are shown on the northern portion of the Property. Wetland areas are also shown on the
Property.
The review of historical topographic maps for the Property and adjacent areas did not readily
indicate the presence of environmental concerns for the Property.
6.4 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH REVIEW
Aerial photographs were ordered from EDR in order to identify past land use and readily apparent
environmental concerns on or near the Property. Liesch reviewed aerial photographs from the years
1937, 1940, 1957, 1963, 1970 and 1991, as provided by EDR. The aerial photographs are included
as Appendix H.
The Property and surrounding areas appeared to be used for agricultural purposes in the photographs
reviewed. A farmstead on the Property consisting of several structures and Interstate 94, 70th Street
and Kadler A venue are visible in each photograph adjacent to the Property. Access roads are shown
running from the north and the south across the Property on the 1937, 1940, 1957 1963 and 1970
May 2002
Page 11
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
photographs and the former County Road 19 is visible running southeast to northwest across the
Property in each photograph. The 1991 photograph shows the Property in its current configuration
with the exception of the former County Road 19, which no longer bisects the Property. No areas of
readily apparent environmental concern were noted on the Property on the photographs reviewed.
6.5 WELL LOG SEARCH
Liesch reviewed the well log index obtained from the Minnesota Geologic Survey as provided by
EDR. No registered wells were listed for the Property. However, as noted in Section 5.0, two wells
exist on the Property.
7.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS
7.1 "RODEN PROPERTY, ALBERVILLE, MINNESOTA, WETLAND DELINEATION REpORT,
PREPARED FOR DARKENWALD REAL ESTATE BY KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL
SERVICE COMPANY (KJOLHAUG), DATED JANUARY 21,2000 (KJOLHAUG JANUARY
21, 2000 REpORT)
According to the Kjolhaug January 21, 2000 Report, the Property was examined for the presence
and extent of possible wetlands one December 1, 1999. The Kjolhaug January 21, 2000 Report
identified and delineated nine wetland areas on the Property. The Kjolhaug January 21,2000 Report
did not identify the areas of the nine wetlands delineated. According to the Kjolhaug January 21,
2000 Report, on December 3, 1999 the wetland boundaries were reviewed by Mr. Mark McNamara
ofthe Wright County Soil and Water Conservation District and were approved as delineated.
7.2 "PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION: DARKENWALD DEVELOPMENT,
RODEN PROPERTY"; GME CONSULTANTS, JUNE 2001
Liesch reviewed the "Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration" for indications of environmental
concerns associated with the Property. GME advanced nine soil borings on a 25-acre portion of the
Property located southeast of the intersection of Kadler Avenue and 70th Street. Groundwater was
encountered at a depth of nine feet (approximately 950 feet NGVD) in one of the boreholes.
Groundwater was not encountered in any of the remaining eight boreholes. No indications of non-
native fill or impacted soils were identified.
7.3 "SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION AND FOUNDATION EVALUATION: PROPOSED
WELCOME FuRNITURE STORE"; MIDWEST ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC., MARCH
2002
Liesch reviewed the "Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation" for indications of
May 2002
Page 12
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC,
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
environmental concerns associated with the Property. Midwest Engineering Services, Inc. (MES)
advanced five soil borings to approximately 15 feet below grade. Groundwater was not encountered in
any of the five boreholes. Organic odors were identified in boring one (B-1) in the 15 to 16.5 foot
interval and trace amounts of organics were observed in B-3. Liesch contacted Mr. Jeffrey Manninen
of MES regarding the organic odors and trace organics encountered during the evaluation. Mr.
Manninen stated the organic odor was a natural topsoil-type odor and the trace organics consisted of
roots and plant detritis. No indications of non-native fill or impacted soils were identified.
8.0 CONCLUSIONS
Work performed for this Phase One ESA included review of state, county and city information on
the Property, a walk-over.survey of the Property to identify readily-apparent environmental concerns
on or adjacent to the Property, review of historical data for the Property utilizing available aerial
photographs, USGS topographic maps, city directories, Sanborn Fire Insurance Company maps and
a review of well log files. Liesch has performed a Phase One ESA in conformance with the scope
and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-00 for the proposed Albertville Business Park property,
located at the southeast comer of the intersection of Kadler Avenue and 70th Street, Albertville,
Wright County, Minnesota (the Property), located in part of the northwest y.. of Section 35,
Township 121N, Range 24W. Any exceptions from or deletions from this practice are noted in
Section 2.0 of this ESA.
8.1 RECOGNIZED ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
This assessment has revealed no recognized environmental conditions on the Property.
8.2 ITEMS OF ENVIRONMENTAL NOTE
Liesch observed the following items of environmental note, which do not rise to the level of a
recognized environmental condition, but may require existing or future environmental compliance
activities.
· A total of five ASTs were observed on the Property. Three of the ASTs are currently active and
include the following: a 265-gallon fuel oil AST is located in the basement of the house. No
staining or leakage was observed on the concrete in the vicinity of the AST. Two ASTs are
located in the yard near a tool shed: one of the ASTs is an approximate 500-gallon steel AST
containing diesel fuel and the second AST is an approximate 300-gallon steel AST containing
gasoline and is elevated on scaffolding. No staining or leakage was apparent in the vicinity of
the two outdoor ASTs. Liesch recommends collecting soil samples from underneath the two
May 2002
Page 13
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
active ASTs located outside and sampling the active well for the purpose of laboratory analysis
for the presence of petroleum products.
· The chemicals currently stored on-site include: used oil, motor oil, gasoline, diesel fuel, fuel oil,
paint thinner, paint, car batteries and other miscellaneous cleaning supplies and household
hazardous wastes. Chemicals were stored in containers smaller than five gallons. No agricultural
chemicals were observed on the Property, although, as noted, a complete inventory of household
hazardous wastes was not completed. Chemicals stored on the Property should be properly
disposed of according to applicable regulations. Should unknown chemicals, indications of spills
or leakage or impacts associated with chemicals stored on the Property be discovered during
development, an environmental consultant should be retained in order to assess the need for
further investigation and to identify proper disposal methods.
· One pole-mounted transformer was observed on the Property. The transformer is owned by
Wright-Hennepin who is responsible for maintenance. No staining or leakage was observed near
the transformer. Liesch contacted Wright-Hennepin to determine if the transformer has been
tested for PCBs. As of the writing of this report, Wright-Hennepin has not responded to the
request for information.
· One air compressor and one generator were observed on the Property. Miscellaneous fann
implements that may contain lubricating oil were also observed on the Property. Surficial
staining on the concrete in several of the work areas on the Property was observed. Should
extensive staining or indications of subsurface leakage be detected during development, an
environmental consultant should be retained in order to assess the need for further investigation.
· Suspect ACM was observed on the Property, including floor tile, ceiling tile, stucco siding,
sheetrock and taping compound and roofing materials. Based upon the age of construction, it is
possible that ACMs are present in the building.
When a structure is to be renovated, repaired or demolished, federal and state laws require
removal of all regulated asbestos-containing material (ACM), which would be affected by the
activities, prior to beginning work. The regulated ACM must be removed or repaired following
all applicable ACM removal and disposal regulations. In addition, current OSHA regulations
require that all ACM must be maintained in good condition. Because Liesch understands the
structure on the Property is to be demolished, a complete demolition survey, including an asbestos
and lead paint survey and an assessment of hazardous materials located on the Property, should be
completed prior to demolition.
May 2002
Page 14
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INe.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· Two abandoned cars, an abandoned combine and several piles of brush and wood debris and
several pieces of corrugated metal sheeting. 55-gallon drums are stored in various locations on
the Property with a large pile composed of 10 to 15 drums located near a tool shed. Reportedly~
the drums are empty, however, it was not possible to inspect all the drums to verify the presence
of contents at the time of the walk-over survey. Liesch recommends collecting soil samples from
underneath the large pile of drums located near the tool shed for the purpose of laboratory
analysis for the presence of petroleum products.
· Reportedly, a dump owned by the City of Albertville, is located directly adjacentto the Property
to the east. Dumping in the area consisted of rocks, cement, wood and other miscellaneous
debris and visually appeared to be limited in area. The dump did not appear to encroach onto the
Property. Based on the anticipated groundwater flow direction, the dump appears to be located
in a side to down gradient location with respect to the Property. Should unknown materials or
indications of impacts associated with the dumping be encountered during development, an
environmental consultant should be retained in order to assess the need for further investigation
and to identify proper disposal methods.
· Two wells are reportedly located on the Property. One well is currently active and located near a
tool shed and two ASTs. The second well is reportedly inactive and located in a pit in a tool
shed. Liesch was unable to view the second well due to materials blocking access to the interior
of the tool shed. The active well should be properly abandoned if not anticipated to remain in
use. If the well is to remain in service, Liesch recommends that it be sampled and analyzed for
drinking water criteria. The reported inactive well should be verified as properly abandoned in
accordance to Minnesota Department of Health regulations. A well disclosure fonn must be
submitted at the time of closing.
· Septic system drainfield cleanouts/vents were observed near the southeast corner of the house.
Floor drains in the house are reportedly connected to the septic system. The septic system should
be abandoned in accordance to applicable regulations if not to remain in-use.
· High voltage power lines were observed on the Property along the northern Property boundary.
A service line leading from the main line to the farmstead buildings was also observed. High
voltage power lines emit electromagnetic fields (EMF) that may interfere with some electrical
equipment. Liesch contacted Wright-Hennepin to determine if EMF readings are known to exist
for the power lines located on the Property. As of the writing of this report, Wright-Hennepin
has not responded to the request for information.
May 2002
Page 15
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INe.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
· Visual observation and National Wetland Inventory Maps indicated wetland-type areas located
on the Property. Additionally, the Kjolhaug January 21, 2000 Report identified nine wetland
areas on the Property, which were approved by the Wright County Soil and Water Conservation
District. Liesch recommends if any of the wetland areas are to be impacted by the proposed
development, a sequencing and mitigation plan be developed and submitted to the appropriate
regulatory agencies for approval prior to development.
9.0 QUALIFICATIONS OF AUTHORS
The resume of the author of this ESA is included in Appendix I.
May 2002
Page 16
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INe.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
10.0 REFERENCES
University of Minnesota, East-Central Minnesota, Geologic Map of Minnesota, 1981.
United States Geological Survey, Topographic Quadrangle Maps, 7.S Minute Series, Big Lake, MN
1961, 1961 photorevised 1980 and 1991 7.S-minute topographic maps; and the St. Michael 1981
and 1991 7.S-minute topographic maps.
United States Geological Survey, Topographic Quadrangle Maps, IS-minute Series, Rockford, MN
1909.
Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), The EDR Radius Map Report, Proposed Albertville
Business Park, SE ofKadler Avenue and tdh Street, Albertville, MN 55301, April 18, 2002.
EDR, City Directory Abstract, April 24, 2002.
EDR, Sanborn Map Report, April 19, 2002.
EDR, Aerial Photographs, 1937, 1940, 19S7, 1963, 1970 and 1991.
"Preliminary Geotechnical Exploration: Darkenwald Development, Roden Property"; GME
Consultants, June 2001.
"Subsurface Exploration and Foundation Evaluation: Proposed Welcome Furniture Store";
Midwest Engineering Services, Inc., March 2002.
W:\sa\52792\Albertville PhaseOne Report.doc
May 2002
Page 17
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
,:
o.~
o~r
)-\ \\~
~o~ ~
~
-.1.
.~11:"'"
. 0
00
i.
..-1:-
"'
'" IS70
~-- ....
j--
I
'''0
.....3
q -~-'--_.'-"._~"'--""--'-'
....-. .
,
I
.. -'.~ I
. i
I
I
!
I
I
I
I
.isH
j .."
I
I
I
;
. I
Lei
!
___ I
... .. s621
. w .. .
Jl";c:-
LliEXCH Hydrogeologisls · Engineers. Environmenllll Scientists
.
Scale: 1" = 2000'
Proposed Albertville Business Park
May 02
6000 Gishoh Dr, Suile 203
Modison, WI 53713
(608) 223-1532
13400 J 5'" A venue N
MinnCllpolis. MN 55441
(763) 489-3100
4300 N Miller Rd, Suile 200
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
(480) 42 J .0853
Property Location Map
Figure
#1
I~-. _.--"~-I
~~ ""'"~
:!!!-- X'IH
i:E=' "-./
1 oJ 1- '*' -....
~ ..... ~ "2=?~S:.E
yJ.OSlNNil't 'rnIAIll38'IV
31VJ.S3 1V3l:1 OlVMN3>Il:IVO
A1H3dOlld ~
1US TlVlB\O
~I/t
"'"
UlllZ
....-
_.... H" .......IU ...a "d.... III>>AIY ..... ....
~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ , ~ ~ ~
PIBN\Ue>1.Jep
CI
Ii
-----<;p-. 8
s e~
~ ~ =81:
~ ~
I !.l
--
~
If
~
.-
m
=
=
~
-
~
1::
~
.c
<
"l::I
~
l-
e
~
:;
!
t'
!.
~
"J i
J I /
( '.. )
,
t lro~
,
%l ~-
..
...
c:
.!l .4 :Q...
J; .."'~
""00
'3 :~-
! !Ji
if ~
;:
~ S
.
==
"
.5 zi
~ 1:::8
. z;;;
U <:Eil
.~ t, .t ..
J il~
~ :E
:c
f:!...
.ij;;j;l
"""'v>
,- d:i~
.' 1~~
~-1a
~-
I
"-. - u -... - _ _ _ _ _.. .__ _ _. -_._1.__ ..
..1..........
! ...
i(- ;:
.~..
~
-
. ..
-
_.
..
-".._, ..
1IIt- -
.. ..
-: -: .-: :-...
~.~~ -
-
'E
~
sa
lI.l
'(ii
::s
::s
~
~
ij
~
o
CI)
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
@: Environmental
: Data
: Resources, Inc.
The EDR Radius Map
with GeoCheck@
Proposed Albertville Business Park
SE of Kadler Ave and 70th St
Albertville,~ 55301
Inquiry Number: 0764896.3r
The Source
For Environmental
Risk Management
Data
April 18, 2002
3530 Post Road
South port, Connecticut 06490
Nationwide Customer Service
Telephone: 1-800-352-0050
Fax: 1-800-231-6802
Internet: www.edrnet.com
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION
PAGE
Executive Summary. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. ES1
Overview Map. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 2
Detail Map_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 3
Map Findings Summary_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. 4
Map Findings. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 6
Orphan Summary. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. 7
Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ GR-1
GEOCHECK ADDENDUM
Physical Setting Source Addendum.. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. A-1
Physical Setting Source Summary. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. A-2
Physical Setting Source Map. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. A-6
Physical Setting Source Map Findings. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ A-7
I Physical Setting Source Records Searchecl_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. A-8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Thank you for your business.
Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050
with any questions or comments.
Disclaimer
Copyright and Trademark Notice
This report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED,
IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES INC. SPECIFICALL Y
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS
FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL EDR BE LIABLE TO
ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY
LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES.
Entire contents copyright 2001 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, In whole
or In part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and the edr logos are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or Its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the
property of their respective owners.
TC0764896.3r Page 1
I
I
I
I
A search of avail,'2ble environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources. Inc.
(EDR). The report meets the government records search requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for
Environmental Site Assessments, E 1527-00. Search distances are per ASTM standard or custom
distances requested by the user.
TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION
I
ADDRESS
I
SE OF KADLER AVE AND 70TH ST
ALBERTVILlE, MN 55301
COORDINATES
I
Latitude (North): 45.249800 - 45' 14' 59.3"
Longitude (West): 93.678200 - 93' 40' 41.5"
Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 15
UTM X (Meters): 446778.7
UTM Y (Meters): 5010707.0
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY
I
I
Target Property:
Source:
2445093-B6 SAINT MICHAEL, MN
USGS 7.5 min quad index
TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS
I
The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.
I
DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES
No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ( "reasonably ascertainable ") govemment
records either on the target property or within the ASTM E 1527-00 search radius around the target
property for the following databases:
I
I
FEDERALASTMSTANDARD
NPL___u___u___u____h____ National Priority List
Proposed NPL______Uh____ Proposed National Priority List Sites
CERCLlSu_______u_______u. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information
. System
CERC-NFRAPuuu__n___u. CERCLlS No Further Remedial Action Planned
CORRACTS__uu____n_n__. Corrective Action Report
RCRIS.TSDu___u__u_____n Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System
RCRIS.LQGu__n__________u Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System
RCRIS.SQGn_______uu__u. Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System
ERNSuu____________________ Emergency Response Notification System
I
I
I
STATE ASTM STANDARD
SHWS_______________________. Superfund Permanent List of Priorities
MN VIC_______________u_____. Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program
SWFILF_______u_________uu Permitted Solid Waste Disposal Facilities
LUST_______uu____uh___n. Leak Sites
I
I
TC0764B96.3r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
I
I
I
I
UST_______u_____________m_ Underground Storage Tank Database
I
FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL
CONSENT___m_____________ Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
RODm_____u____u__m____ Records Of Decision
Dellsted NPL m u _ _ __ __ _ _ __. National Priority List Deletions
FINDSu_m__m_________m. Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report
HMIRS__ __ u __ __ _ _ __ m _ ___ __ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
MLTS_m_mmmm_m___ Material Licensing Tracking System
MINESm_________mum___ Mines Master Index File
NPL L1ens__________mm___ Federal Superfund Liens
PADS_m_u__mu__m_____ PCB Activity Database System
RAATSm____m__umu___. RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
TRIS____________mm___m_ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
TSCA..______u__________m__ Toxic Substances Control Act
FTTS_m___m________u_____ FIFRAI TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, &
. Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
I
I
I
I
STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL
AST__________u________m_u Aboveground Storage Tanks
MN Spllls.mu__-m___m__ Spills Database
MN HWS PermlL_nmum Active TSD Facilities
MN Deleted SHWSum_u___ Permanent List of Priority Deletions
MN LCP_umu__m_________ Closed Landfills Priority List
MN LS_m__u__u__mu____ List of Sites
MN EnforcemenL___u_____. Generators Associated with Enforcement Logs
BULK.mu__________________ Bulk Facilities Database
MN AGSPILLS___uum_____ Department of Agriculture Spills
I
I
I
EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES
Coal Gas.______u______m__. Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites
I
SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS
Surrounding sites were not identified.
I
I
I
I
I
I
TC0764896.3r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
! I
I
I
I
I
Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped:
Site Name
L1NDALA SANITARY LF
ROYAL TIRE
BANYAI REPAIR
SUPERAMERICA #4479
LARSON MFT CO/OAKWOOD INDUSTRAIL PARK
LAKE MARIA STATE PARK
U OF MN MONTICELLO ECOLOGICAL
MONTICELLO MIDDLE SCHOOL
FERRELLGAS
SOUTHS IDE DENTAL eTR
ALBERTVILLE
SUNRISE COMMERCIAL PARK
MONTICELLO DUMP
GOVERNMENT LOTS
SUNRISE COMMERCIAL PARK
ALL GREEN LAWN MANAGEMENT
Database(s)
SWF/LF
LUST
LUST
UST
UST
UST,AST
RCRIS-SOG, FINDS
RCRIS-SOG
RCRIS-SOG
FINDS, RCRIS-LOG
FINDS
MNLS
MNLS
MNLS
MNVIC
MN AGSPILLS
TC0764896.3r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3
I
OVERVIEW MAP. 0764896.3r. Liesch Associates, Inc
-
.a.. ,
a: f '-
.. .
...
.. ~
'C .. ,
.. .
....1 / tl II> "
"
.. rf """
...
, '. \.
.. '"
... , ..
. ." ~ \ 1\
. /
l
, .... ~
..~ ~
I
I
I
,-
.
..
'ft ~
~
I ~~
I
I
4~
Qi
I ~ ·
~",'
1< Target Property
I... Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
. Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
I ... Coal Gasification Sites
D National Priority List Sites
EJ Landfill Sites
I
o 1/2
I
" ;
dV
/V
~
~
f7'71
~
III
Power transmission lines
Oil & Gas pipelines
1 DO-year flood zone
SOD-year flood zone
Wetlands
~
I
TARGET PROPERTY:
ADDRESS:
CITY/STATE/ZIP:
LAT/LONG:
Proposed Albertville Business Park
SE of Kadler Ave and 70th St
Albertville MN 55301
45.2498/93.6782
CUSTOMER:
CONTACT:
INQUIRY #:
DATE:
Uesch Associates. Inc
Erin Greenwood
0764896.31'
April 18. 2002 2:02 pm
I
I
* Target Property
I ... Sites at elevations higher than
or equal to the target property
. Sites at elevations lower than
the target property
I ... Coal Gasification Sites
. Sensitive Receptors
D National Priority Ust Sites
I 0 Landfill Sites
I
I
I
.
II
. B
II
,
I
~ &
m
I !
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
DETAIL MAP. 0764896.3r . Liesch Associates, Inc
1/4111101&
I
t\ i
. .
Iv
~
f77]
~
II
~
Power transmission lines
Oil & Gas pipelines
100-year IIood zone
5OO-year flood zone
Wetlands
TARGET PROPERTY:
ADDRESS:
CITY/STA TE/ZIP:
LAT/LONG:
Proposed Albertville Business Park
SE of Kadler Ave and 70th St
Albertville MN 55301
45.2498/93.6782
CUSTOMER:
CONTACT:
INQUIRY #:
DATE:
Uesch Associates, Inc
Erin Greenwood
0764896.3r
April 18, 2002 2:03 pm
I
.
I
I Search
Target Distance Total
, Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 -1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted
I FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD
,
I NPL 1.125 0 0 0 0 0 0
Proposed NPL 0.125 0 NR NR NR . NR 0
CERCLlS 0.625 0 0 0 0 NR 0
, CERC-NFRAP 0.375 0 0 0 NR NR 0
I CORRACTS 1.125 0 0 0 0 0 0
RCRtS-TSD 1.125 0 0 0 0 0 0
RCRtS Lg. Quan. Gen. 0.375 0 0 0 NR NR 0
RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen. 0.375 0 0 0 NR NR 0
ERNS 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
I STATE ASTM STANDARD
~
I State Haz. Waste 1.125 0 0 0 0 0 0
MNVIC 1.125 0 0 0 0 0 0
State Landfill 0.625 0 0 0 0 NR 0
LUST 0.625 0 0 0 0 NR 0
UST 0.375 0 0 0 NR NR 0
I FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL
I CONSENT 1.125 0 0 0 0 0 0
ROD 1.125 0 0 0 0 0 0
Delisted NPL 1.125 0 0 0 0 0 0
FINDS 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
HMIRS 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
I MLTS 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MINES 0.375 0 0 0 NR NR 0
NPL Liens 0.625 0 0 0 0 NR 0
PADS 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
I RAATS 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TRIS 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
TSCA 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
FTTS 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
I STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL
AST 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
I MN Spills 0.375 0 0 0 NR NR 0
MN HWS Permit 0.625 0 0 0 0 NR 0
MN Deleted SHWS 0.125 0 NR NR NR NR 0
MN LCP 0.625 0 0 0 0 NR 0
I MNLS 1.125 0 0 0 0 0 0
MN Enforcement 1.125 0 0 0 0 0 0
BULK 0.375 0 0 0 NR NR 0
MN AGSPILLS 0.375 0 0 0 NR NR 0
I EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES
Coal Gas 1.125 0 0 0 0 0 0
I
I TC0764896,3r Page 4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>
cr
<
~
:J
U>
Z
<
iE
cr
o
Q
~
u
~
.....
&
:.
,..
--
-CO)
~~
~
>
CO)
8
-
-
..
l')
m
~
o
g
(II
~
';)
I
j
U> Cl
~ 9
ii: rh u>
c; Clii:S2 :l
LL ~ ~~?;) 1-35
u>~u>!,:! u> rhu;rhoo CIl~Cl
...J>OILl-tiii:I-ii:Oii:...Jti..J...=<
~~~~~3~~~~~~3~~~
~I
~~
Itlltl
Itlll)
O~~~~~Nf)!~~~~-
co)M(lSMCO)~l5!(lSCO)CO)CO)CO)fil
ll)1tlll)1tl1tl Itlltlltlltlltlltlltl
Itlltlltlltlltl Itlltlltlltlltlltlltl
0)
j
I-
~
If
LL LL
~ 0 ~oo
ci ~ 0 :i~~
cr Itl cr -crW
o ~ ~ ~b~
~ lL id~ ~~j!:
~ ~ iS~ ;!~15 w
w ~~ ~J: ~<~ d
~ ~o,.. <3: ~~~ g;
o .1-- 0 "';s 0..<00 U
U zw;cr ::lllltl<ti:<<f >
I- N~~ 0..,..0 N.,;.;::: Z
~ -::J~ U>Ncr-~""'03:.-O
w ":J:~Itl~~>15::~uz::5
J: l5!uuN"'o!zoJ:::15.;ou
~- Zo!l~~lll:JZu>J: ;::crN
o 15 @ ~ ~ :: :: 0 0 w - Z I-u W 0 .-
U>..JU>LL..:..J:J:o..UU>:5P....,f!.u~
CD
""
u>
CD
e
'"
Z
CD
""
u>
l.:
cr
<
0..
...J
~
...JI-
<u>
U:J I-
ao Z
l.:l.: g~5 ~
crcr 000 w
~~ @8iScr l.:~
;J.;J. LL'" 0~U>13 ~z
-- ...J'" ::l W..J 0..<
~~ >:l 5< 0.. ~w~
ww cr" ~Qol- ~ Ol-;Z:
~~ << _o-z :Jcr..J<::
~~w!::~ !zu~~u>o<!zti:5
88;Jj~~~~~~~~~~~ffi
~~~:5~i=~z~~~~<~~~
crcrwi:!iW~u.~!z~cr!z>~wCl
~~~z~oo!iiooffio~o~::l
U>U><::;U>cr:J...J~U>U.~lllCl..J<
l:;8~fflm~8~gl;1;~gJ8lB8~
~SJ;!15l~:2gl~~8g:5a;~~:e
I,() 0.... co Il);bOCO('l')....(I').......... C\I..... a
~8~~~o~~~8~!fn~8~~
mCii~Ci):)cn....::>~~~U;UiCii::>u;
Q
cr
o
w
~
U
...
:E
u>
~
~w~~ooooogogogg
::!;J::!:5::l::l::l::l::l..J::l...J::l...J..J0
>>> WWWWWWWWWWW:J
I-l-l-GUUUUUUUUUUUo
ffiffiffiz~~~~~~~~~~~d
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ti
I
...:~~~i~_~~t~~:W:.
I
I
To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate govemmental agency
on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.
Elapsed ASTM days: Provides confirmation that this EDR report meets or exceeds the 90-day updating requirement
of the ASTM standard.
I
FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD RECORDS
I
NPL: National Priority List
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLlS and identifies over 1.200 sites for priority
Cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon
coverage for over 1.000 NPL site boundaries produced by EP A's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center
(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.
Date of Govemment Version: 01/29102
Date Made Active at EDR: 02/25/02
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 02/04/02
Elapsed ASTM days: 21
Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/04/02
I
I
NPL Site Boundaries
Sources:
EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)
Telephone: 202-564-7333
EP A Region 1
Telephone 617-918-1143
EPA Region 3
Telephone 215-814-5418
EPA Region 4
Telephone 404-562-8033
EPA Region 6
Telephone: 214-655-6659
EPA Region 8
Telephone: 303-312-6774
I
I
I
Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites
Source: EPA
Telephone: N/A
Date of Govemment Version: 01/17102
Date Made Active at EDR: 02/25/02
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 02/04/02
Elapsed ASTM days: 21
Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/04102
I
I
CERCLlS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-413-0223
CERCLlS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities,
private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLlS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities
List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.
Date of Govemment Version: 11/21/01 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 12/26/01
Date Made Active at EDR: 02/04/02 Elapsed ASTM days: 40
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/26/01
I
I
I
CERCLlS-NFRAP: CERCLlS No Further Remedial Action Planned
Source: EPA
Telephone: 703-413-0223
As of February 1995, CERCLlS sites designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned" (NFRAP) have been removed
from CERCLlS. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination was found,
contamination was removed quickly without the need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination
was not serious enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration. EPA has removed approximately
25.000 NFRAP sites to lift the unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these properties and has archived them
as historical records so EPA does not needlessly repeat the investigations in the future. This policy change is
part of the EPA's Brownfields Redevelopment Program to help cities, states, private investors and affected citizens
to promote economic redevelopment of unproductive urban sites.
I
I
I
I
TC0764896.3r Page GR-1
I
I
I
Date of Govemment Version: 11/21/01
Date Made Active at EDR: 02104/02
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly
Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 12/26101
Elapsed ASTM days: 40
Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/16/01
I
CORRACTS: CorrllC\lve Action Report
Source: EPA
Telephone: 800-424-9346
CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.
Date of Govemment Version: 11/14/01 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 11/14/01
Date Made Active at EDR: 01/14/02 Elapsed ASTM days: 61
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date ot Last EDR Contact: 03/11/02
I
I
RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System
Source: EPAlNTIS
Telephone: 800-424-9346
Resource Conservation and Recovery Infonnation System. RCRtS includes selective intonnation on sites which generate,
transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA).
I
Date of Govemment Version: 12/01/01
Date Made Active at EDR: 04108102
Database Release Frequency: Varies
Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 02/04/02
Elapsed ASTM days: 63
Date ot Last EDR Contact: 01/14/02
I
ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System
Source: EPAlNTIS
Telephone: 202-26Q.2342
Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores intonnation on reported releases of oil and hazardous
substances.
I
Date of Govemment Version: 08108/00
Date Made Active at EDR: 09/06/00
Database Release Frequency: Varies
Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 08/11/00
Elapsed ASTM days: 26
Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/01/02
I
FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS
I
BRS: Biennial Reporting System
Source: EPAlNTIS
Telephone: 800-424-9346
The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation
and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)
and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.
Date of Govemment Version: 12/31/99
Database Release Frequency: Biennially
Date ot Last EDR Contact: 03/18/02
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06117/02
I
I
CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees
Source: EPA Regional Offices
Telephone: Varies
Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released
periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.
Date of Govemment Version: N/A Date of Last EDR Contact: N/A
Database Release Frequency: Varies Date ot Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A
I
I
ROD: Records Of Decision
Source: NTIS
Telephone: 703-416-0223
Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical
and health information to aid in the cleanup.
I
I
I
I
TC0764896.3r Page GR-2
I
I
I
Date of Govemment Version: 09130/00
Database Release Frequency: Annually
Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/07/02
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/08102
I
DELlSTED NPL: National Priority Ust Deletions
Source: EPA
Telephone: N1A
The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 3oo,425.(e), sites may be deleted from the
NPL where no further response is appropriate.
Date of Govemment Version: 01/29/02
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly
Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/04/02
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06102
I
I
FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report
Source: EPA .
Telephone: N/A
Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more
detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric
Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial
enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal
Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities
Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).
Date of Government Version: 10/29/01 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/07/02
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/08/02
I
I
I
HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System
Source: U.S. Department of Transportation
Telephone: 202-366-4526
Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.
Date of Government Version: 09/30/01 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/21/02
Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/22102
I
ML TS: Material Ucensing Tracking System
Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Telephone: 301-415-7169
ML TS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which
possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,
EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 02/14/02
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly
Date of Last EDR Contact 01/07/02
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04108102
I
I
I
MINES: Mines Master Index File
Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration
Telephone: 303-231-5959
Date of Government Version: 12/14/01
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/02/02
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/01/02
I
NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens
Source: EPA
Telephone: 205-564-4267
Federal Superfund Uens, Under the authority granted the USEPA by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Uability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order
to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner receives notification of potential liability.
USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.
I
I
I
I
I
TC0764896.3r Page GR-3
I
1
I
I
Date of Government Version: 10/15/91
Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned
Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/26102
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 051Z7/02
I
PADS: PCB Activity Database System
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-260-3936
PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers
of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.
Date of Government Version: 12/01/01
Database Release Frequency: Annually
Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/12/02
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05113/02
I
RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System
Source: EP A
Telephone: 202-564-4104
RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA
pertaining to major violators and Includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration
actions after Septembar 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of
the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources
made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.
Date of Government Version: 04117/95 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/11102
Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06110102
I
I
I
TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-260-1531
Toxic Release Inventory System. TRtS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and
land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/99
Database Release Frequency: Annually
Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/26101
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03125/02
I
I
TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-260-5521
Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA Identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the
TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant
site.
I
I
Date of Government Version: 12/31/98
Database Release Frequency: Every 4 Years
Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/22/02
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/22/02
I
FTTS: FIFRAlTSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federallnsectlcide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)fTSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
Source: EPAlOffice of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances
Telephone: 202-564-2501
FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,
TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the
Agency on a quarterly basis.
Date of Government Version: 01/11/02
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly
Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/26/01
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/25102
I
I
FTTS INSP: FIFRAI TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide. Fungicide. & Rodenticide Act)fTSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)
Source: EPA
Telephone: 202-564-2501
Date of Government Version: 01/14/02
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly
Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/26/01
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/25/02
I
I
I
I
TC0764896.3r Page GR-4
I
I
STATE OF MINNESOTA ASTM STANDARD RECORDS
I
SHWS: Superfund Permanent Ust of Priorities
Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Telephone: 651-296-6139
State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLlS. These sites
mayor may not already be listed on the federal CERCLlS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds
(state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially
responsible parties. Available information varies by state,
Date of Govemment Version: 06/01/01
Date Made Active at EDR: 10/12/01
Database Release Frequency: Annually
Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 09/10/01
Elapsed ASTM days: 32
Date of Last EDR Contact: 03112/02
I
I
I
VIC: Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program
Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Telephone: 651-296-7291
Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) Program Ust.
Date of Government Version: 12/31/01
Date Made Active at EDR: 01/31/02
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly
Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/08/02
Elapsed ASTM days: 23
Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/07/02
I
I
SWFILF: Permitted Solid Waste Disposal Facilities
Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Telephone: 651-296-7276
Solid Waste Facilitiesllandfill Sites. SWFILF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal
facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities
or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle 0 Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal
sites.
I
I
Date of Government Version: 12/01/00
Date Made Active at EDR: 02/02/01
Database Release Frequency: Varies
Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/03/01
Elapsed ASTM days: 30
Date of Last EDR Contact: 03112/02
I
LUST: Leak Sites
Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Telephone: 651-649-5451
Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an Inventory of reported leaking underground
storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state.
Date of Government Version: 02/07/02 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 03/08/02
Date Made Active at EDR: 03/27/02 Elapsed ASTM days: 19
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/15/02
I
I
UST: Underground Storage Tank Database
Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Telephone: 651-649-5451
Registered Underground Storage Tanks. usrs are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available
information varies by state program,
Date of Govemment Version: 10/13/99
Date Made Active at EDR: 11/04/99
Database Release Frequency: Varies
Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 10/19/99
Elapsed ASTM days: 16
Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/29/02
I
I
STATE OF MINNESOTA ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS
I
AST: Aboveground Storage Tanks
Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Telephone: 651-296-0930
Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks.
I
I
I
TC0764896.3r Page GR-5
I
r
I
I
Date of Govemment Version: 10/13/99
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/29102
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/15/02
I
SPILLS: Spills Database
Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Telephone: 651-297-8617
Date of Govemment Version: 08/01/01
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly
Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/04102
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/06102
I
MN HWS PERMIT: Active TSD Facilities
Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Telephone: 651-297-8470
Active TSD Facilities.
Date of Govemment Version: 01/02102
Database Release Frequency: Annually
Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/15/02
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/15/02
I
I
MN Deleted SHWS: Permanent Ust of Priority Deletions
Source: Minnessota Pollution Control Agency
Telephone: 651-296-6139
The PLP rules specify that to delist a site, either all response actions required at a site have been completed,
or that the site no longer poses a threat to public health or welfare or the environment.
Date of Govemment Version: 06/01/01 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03112/02
Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/10/02
I
I
LCP: Closed Landfills Priority List
Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Telephone: 651-296-9543
The Minnesota Legislature enacted a law to manage and clean up the state's closed Mixed Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills. Under that law, the MPCA is required to create and periodically revise a priority list of qualified
landfills, based on the relative health and environmental risks they present. The MPCA established the first such
priority list in December, 1994.
Date of Govemment Version: 07/31/01
Database Release Frequency: Annually
Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/26/01
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/25/02
I
I
LS: Ust of Sites
Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Telephone: 651-297-2731
The Ust of Sites includes: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
(CERCLlS), No Further Remedial Action Planned (NFRAP), National Priorities List (NPL), Permanent Ust of
Priorities (PLP), sites delisted from the Permanent List of Priorities (DPLP), Hazardous Waste Permit Unit
Project Facilities (HW PERM), List of Permitted Solid Waste Facilities (SW PERM), 1980 Metropolitan Area Waste
Disposal Site Inventory (METRO), 1980 Statewide Outstate Dump Inventory (001), Voluntary and Investigation
Program (VIC), and Closed Landfill Sites Undergoing Cleanup (LCP).
I
I
Date of Government Version: 11/19/01
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/12/02
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/10/02
I
ENFORCEMENT: Generators Associated with Enforcement Logs
Source: Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
Telephone: 651-297-8332
Regulatory Compliance, Hazardous Waste Enforcement Log and Hazardous Waste Permit Unit Project Identification
List.
I
Date of Government Version: 02108/02
Database Release Frequency: Quarterly
Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/15/02
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/15/02
I
I
I
I
TC0764896.3r Page GR-6
I
I
I
BULK: Bulk Facilities Database
Source: Department of Agriculture
Telephone: 651-297-3997
Facilities that use bulk pesticides and fertilizers
Date of Govemment Version: 03111/02
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually
Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/11/02
Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06110/02
I
AG SPILLS: Department of Agriculture Spills
Source: Department of Agriculture
Telephone: 651-297-3997
This data is a list of pesticidelfertllizer incidents reported to have occurred in Minnesota.
Date of Govemment Version: 12/13101 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03112/02
Database Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06110/02
I
I
I
EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES
I
Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites: The existence and location of Coal Gas sites is provided exclusively to
EDR by Real Property Scan, Inc. @Copyright 1993 Real Property Scan, Inc. For a technical description of the types
of hazards which may be found at such sites, contact your EDR customer service representative.
I
Disclaimer Provided by Real Property Scan, Inc.
The information contained in this report has predominantly been obtained from publicly available sources produced by entities
other than Real Property Scan. While reasonable steps have been taken to insure the accuracy of this report, Real Property
Scan does not guarantee the accuracy of this report. Any liability on the part of Real Property Scan is strictly limited to a refund
of the amount paid. No claim is made for the actual existence of toxins at any site. This report does not constitute a legal
opinion.
I
OTHER DATABASE(S)
I
Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases mayor may not be
complete. For example, the existence of wetlands Information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the
area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily
mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.
I
OIl/Gas PlpellnesJElectrlcal Transmission Unes: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by
USGS as GeoData Digital Une Graphs from 1 :100,OOO-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including
some oil, but primarily gas pipelines and electrical transmission lines.
I
Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity
to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all
sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,
and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located,
I
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EOR in 1999 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA,
I
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 1999 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
I
I
I
I
TC0764896.3r Page GR-7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS
PROPOSED ALBERTVILLE BUSINESS PARK
SE OF KADLER AVE AND 70TH ST
ALBERTVILLE, MN 55301
TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES
Latitude (North):
Longitude (West):
Universal Tranverse Mercator:
UTM X (Meters):
UTM Y (Meters):
45.249S02. 45' 14' 59.3"
93.678200 - 93' 40' 41.5"
Zone 15
446nS.7
5010707.0
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum has been developed to assist the environmental professional
with the collection of physical setting source information in accordance with ASTM 1527-00, Section 7.2.3.
Section 7.2.3 requires that a current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map (or equivalent, such as the USGS Digital
Elevation Model) be reviewed. It also requires that one or more additional physical setting sources be sought
when (1) conditions have been identified in which hazardous substances or petroleum products are likely
to migrate to or from the property, and (2) more information than is provided in the current USGS 7.5 Minute
Topographic Map (or equivalent) is generally obtained, pursuant to local good commercial or customary practice,
to assess the impact of migration of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property. Such
additional physical setting sources generally include information about the topographic, hydrologic, hydrogeologic,
and geologic characteristics of a site, and wells in the area.
Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principle investigative components:
1. Groundwater flow direction, and
2. Groundwater flow velocity.
Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics
of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the geologic strata.
EDR's GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in
forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.
TC0764896.3r Page A-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GROUNDWATER FLOW DIREC110N INFORMATION
Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site-specific well ,1ata. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other
sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data
collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to
assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,
should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE
Target Property: 2445093-B6 SAINT MICHAEL, MN
Source: USGS 7.5 min quad index
GENERAL TOPOGRAPHIC GRADIENT AT TARGET PROPERTY
Target Property:
General NNW
Source: General Topographic Gradient has been determined from the USGS 1 Degree Digital Elevation Model and
should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of
close proximity should be field verified.
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist
the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways
and bodies of water).
FEMA FLOOD ZONE
Taroet Property County
WRIGHT, MN
FEMA Flood
Electronic Data
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
Flood Plain Panel at Target Property:
Additional Panels in search area:
2707470001 A I CBPP
2705340018C I CBPP
2705340031 C I CBPP
2707470003A I CBNP
00000000000 I UNMC
2705430001 C I CBPP
NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY
NWI Quad at Taroet Property
SAINT MICHAEL
NWI Electronic
Data Coveraoe
YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail Map
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator
of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the
environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should
contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.
TC0764896.3r Page A-2
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SIte-8peclflc Hydrogeological Data.:
Search Radius: 2.0 miles
Status: Not found
AQUIFLOW~
Search Radius: 2.000 Miles.
EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory
authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined
hydrogeological/y, and the depth to water table.
MAPID
Not Reported
LOCATION
FROM TP
GENERAL DIRECTION
GROUNDWATER FLOW
GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION
Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional
using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary
to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil
characteristics data col/ected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes
move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed
at which contaminant migration may be occurring.
ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT
GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION
Era:
System:
Series:
Code:
Paleozoic Category: Stratified Sequence
Cambrian
Cambrian
C (decoded above as Era, System & Series)
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology
of the Conterminous U.S. at 1 :2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman
Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).
DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSmON IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil
Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information
for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns
in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps.
The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service ST A TSGO data.
. O1~~r:=. ~:r:=~I.:::a~~~nL~~~~il:~in=t~~~~I(~tA~lg~::;~~: All of the information and opinions presented are those 01 the cited EPA report(s), which ~ ~Ieted W1der
TC0764896.3r Page A.3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Soil Component Name:
Soil Surface Texture:
CORDOVA
silty clay loam
Class C/D . Drained/undrained hydrology class of soils that can be
drained and classified.
Hydrologic Group:
Soil Drainage Class:
Poorly. Soils may have a saturated zone, a layer of low hydraulic
conductivity, or seepage. Depth to water table is less than 1 foot.
Hydric Status: Soil meets the requirements for a hydric soil.
Corrosion Potential. Uncoated Steel: HIGH
Depth to Bedrock Min:
Depth to Bedrock Max:
> 60 inches
> 60 inches
Soli Layer Information
Boundary Classification
Layer Upper Lower Soli Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soli Permeabll!~ Soli Reaction
Rate (Inlhr) (pH)
1 o inches 14 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay FINE.GRAINED Max: 0.60 Max: 7.30
Materials (more SOILS, Silts Min: 0.20 Min: 6.10
than 35 pet. and Clays
passing No. (liquid limit
200), Clayey less than 50%),
Soils. Organic Clay or
Oraanic Silt.
2 14 inches 35 inches silty clay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 0.60 Max: 6.50
Materials (more SOILS, Silts Min: 0.20 Min: 5.10
than 35 pet. and Clays
passing No. (liquid limit
200), Clayey less than 50%),
Soils. Lean Clav
3 35 inches 60inehes elay loam Silt-Clay FINE-GRAINED Max: 2.00 Max: 8.40
Materials (more SOILS, Silts Min: 0.60 Min: 7.40
than 35 pet. and Clays
passing No. (liquid limit
200), Clayey less than 50%),
Soils. Lean Clav
OTHER SOIL TYPES IN AREA
Based on Soil Conservation Service STATSGO data, the following additional subordinant soil types may
appear within the general area of target property.
Soil Surface Textures: clay loam
loam
sill loam
muck
Surficial Soil Types: clay loam
loam
silt loam
muck
Shallow Soil Types: No Other Soil Types
Deeper Soil Types:
loam
TC0764896.3r Page A-4
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
hemic material
silty clay loam
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES
According to ASTM E 1527-00, Section 7.2.2, .one or more additional state or local sources of environmental
records may be checked, in the discretion of the environmental professional, to enhance and supplement federal
and state sources... Factors to consider in determining which local or additional state records, if
any, should be checked include (1) whether they are reasonably ascertainable, (2) whether they are sufficiently
useful, accurate, and complete in light of the objective of the records review (see 7.1.1), and (3) whether they
are obtained, pursuant to local, good commercial or customary practice." One of the record sources listed in Section
7.2.2 is water well information. Water well information can be used to assist the environmental professional in
assessing sources that may impact groundwater flow direction, and in forming an opinion about the impact of
contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.
WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION
DATABASE
Federal USGS
Federal FRDS PWS
State Database
SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)
0.125
Nearest PWS within 1 mile
0.125
FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION
MAPID
No Wells Found
LOCATION
FROM TP
WELL ID
FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION
MAPID
No PWS System Found
LOCATION
FROM TP
WELL 10
Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.
STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION
MAPID
No Wells Found
LOCATION
FROM TP
WELL 10
TC0764896.3r Page A.5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP - 0764896.3r
r
\
\
"'~
~'~~ \\ /"---" /
\ Ii / /\" ---~
~/ ~~j
{'/ -,' "-i //
/' '~,
I '
j"
,
(
I
,M_'-
ROAD ~ HE
60TH sr HE
60TH sr HE
.I
/
//
/
I
I
I
I
j
I
I
I
!
;
II
;
/
i
N Major Roads
!'I Contour Unes
~ Water Wells
@ Publio Water Supply Wells
t Groundwater Flow Direction
@ Indeterminate Groundwater Flow at Location
~ Groundwater Aow Varies at Location
. Cluster of Multiple Icons
r
,
8
!
!
/'....w
,
/
-
OD
\
\
I
/~
~<F/' __" "/-'-""
~....... ""-/
~"l ~
.' \
,;,
;'
/
,,/
..--"
/
I
!
i
j
I
I
,
\
...
z
~
...
i
:5
,
\
'\
........
\
\
I
J
I
///
~\ /~
\ // I
~ ,,---' J
//
o
I
1/2
,
~
@ Earthquake epicenter, Richter 5 or greater
<HID Closest Hydrogeological Data
TARGET PROPERTY:
ADDRESS:
CITY/STA TElZIP:
LATILONG:
Proposed Albertville Business Park
SE of Kadler Ave and 70th St
Albertville MN 55301
45.2498/93.6782
CUSTOMER:
CONTACT:
INQUIRY #:
DATE:
Uesch Associates, lnc
Erin Greenwood
0764896.3r
April 18. 2002 2:03 pm
I
I
HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION
I
Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties aeross the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Oata depicts 100.year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.
I
NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in seleet counties across the country, was obtained by EDR
in 1999 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
I
HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION
AQUIFLOwR Information System
Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information
EOR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater
flow at specifie points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has
extraeted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direetion and depth to water table
information.
I
I
GEOLOGIC INFORMATION
I
Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit
Source: P .G. Schruben, R.E. Amdt and W.J. Bawiee, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1 :2,500,000 Scale - A digital
representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Oata Series ODS -11 (1994).
I
ST A TSGO: State Soil Geographie Oatabase
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the national Cooperative
Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey
information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a sail survey is a representation of
soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are eompiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil
survey maps.
I
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD SOURCES
FEDERAL WATER WEllS
I
PWS: Publie Water Systems
Source: EPA/Office of Orinking Water
Telephone: 202-260-2805
Publie Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system whieh provides water to at
least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.
I
PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data
Source: EPA/Office of Orinking Water
Telephone: 202.260-2805
Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after
August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Oata System (FRDS).
I
I
USGS Water Wells: In November 1971 the United States Geological Survey (USGS) implemented a national water resouree
information tracking system. This database eontains deseriptive information on sites where the USGS eolleets or has collected
data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data ineludes information on more than 900,000 wells, springs, and
other sourees of groundwater.
I
I
I
I
I
TC0764896.3r Page A-8
I
I
.
STATE RECORDS
I
Minnesota Groundwater Database
Source: Minnesota Geologieal Survey County Water Well Index (CWI)
Telephone: 612-6~!7-4780
I
RADON
I
Area Radon Information: The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Proteetion Agency
(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPAlState Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The
study covers the years 1986 -1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by lnfonnation colleeted at private sources
such as universities and research institutions.
I
EPA Radon Zones: Seetions 307 & 309 of IRM directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for
elevated indoor radon levels.
I
OTHER
Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Riehter 5 or greater
Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanie and Atmospheric Administration
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TC0764896.3r Page A-9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
>
IX:
<
~
~
::l
00
~
:I:
Q..
IX:
o
....
I
9
~
'Ii
If
<II
~
C')
~
-
...
(0)
&i
!i
Ie
~
t:
-~
~~
o
:8
~
>
0'
Qj'
..
11
~
00 Cl
~ 9
~ ClO~Cl ~
o 0 0 -
CI} ooIX:CI} ~3s
00 cblf50000 ~<Cl
Ii) Ii) 5 Iii 5 ~ 5.~ Iii z Ii ~
::l3a:::la:U:IX:~3:E::l:E
o IL
~>~iE
zzz~
:E~U:oo
~I
00
t')t')
:g:&
~~~~~~~~~t)lt)l~o
ltlf6f6:612ltlf6:6:6121212:6
It) U)1t)1t)1t)1l)1O 10 1t)U')U') 1l)U')
..
..
!
..,
~
11
00
~ ~
~ :g
d ~
~ a:-
o :E
a: 00
~ ~~
~ ~gt:
o zw-
Iii t\is~
~ t=J:~
i!: ~~~~
abfdll!~~
oo...IoolL..1.....
....
~
o
IX:
IL
~o~
~ltl:!t
~ -~w
< >..00
00 ulow
ul~ ~~i!:
o~ ~~~ w
C:I: a<:!t ...I
~~ a:w- 0
C CD~ R:~~ ~
a: ::i5ltl<li)-i >
a.. r-- 0 N ati' .;:: z
~<IIa:;;:>""'o~-o
;:;>0~?;OZ::5
l!?o!zc~~~::;fca:o
~al::lZ- <II
~oow_Z""wo-
:I:Q..ooo519~~o~
Gl
E
...
Z
~
~~
~~
Q..Q..
...1...1
<<
~~
ww
~~
:E~
00
00
ww
0000
1C1C
ZZ
::l::l
0000
~
a:
<
Q..
...I
<
a:
~Iii
O::l
(;~...1
0-0
580
fd~~g:
IL'" Os::wO
...I~.. ::1<...1...1 Q.. 00....
>'01' woc< ~
~< Qog!z ::l 9
1::0 !zo:Ew c!!;....
~~ffiwa:olL9~~gfuifi
-oo~ ~~...ICCl...l ~
~<<i=zzWii)::IW~z
a:..Ja:...I~oQ:I:wQ<IX:
w~w)!:ILt/)!z""a:!z>~
~~~ffg~~@~~~g
!z
W
~
W
~~
IX:z
<<
~~
~z
Ii)~
:$z
a:w
<w
~a:
wCl
~...1
:5~
9
a:
C
w
~~~~~~:g~!il;1;~~~~g~
m~_13t;S!~t\I~~i~~~~;;;
"''''_<II~i:bt\li.....~.....t')Ill'Ol't\l8'''
~8~8go8cs~o88~8o~
(j)Ui~Cii::>u;~:)~~_Cii(j)a;:>Ui
~
o
....
:E
00
~
g
~~~~go::lo::lgggggggg
---::J...I ...I...1...1...1...1...l...l...lo
>>>~wwwwwwwwwwW::l
................000000000000
ffiffiffi~~~~~~~~~~~~...1
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I
I
Site
SUNRISE COMMERCIAL PARK
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CO. RD. 19
ALBERTVILLE, MN 55301
MNLS:
CERCLlS:
No Further Remedial Action Planned:
National Priorities Ust:
Delisted From PLP By MPCA:
Hazardous Waste Permit:
Solid Waste Permit:
Open Dump Inventory:
Voluntary Cleanup & Investigation:
HWIC:
RCRA Treatment Storage & Oisposal:
METRO Oump Inventory:
No Further Action:
Entity Type:
MPCA 10:
County Code:
EPAID:
PLP:
Facility Name 2:
UnklO:
Method:
LCP:
Brown:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OETAILEO ORPHAN USTING
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
VIC
MNPTOOOO8080
86
Not reported
No
Not reported
4550
11
N
N
EOR 10 Number
Oatabase(s) EPA 10 Number
MN LS S102659507
N1A
I
SUNRISE COMMERCIAL PARK
LOT 1
ALBERTVILLE, MN 55301
MN Voluntary Investigation Cleanup Program:
I
Faeility 10:
Aetive:
EPAld:
MPCA Id:
Alpha Sort:
Province:
Legal Oistt:
Congressional Distt:
Size Acres:
MPCA Region:
Program Reffered from:
Program Interest:
Physical Location:
Natural Source damage:
Clean up Cost:
Indian Reservation:
MPCA Owned Wells at site:
Created By:
Date Created:
Date Last Updated:
Federal Facility:
Primary Funding Source:
Unkld:
Faeility Type:
HRS Score:
Enforcement Lead Agency:
Federal Oefferal Plot:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
VP8080
False
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
86
Not reported
Not reported
1
Metro
Not reported
VIC
None
False
o
False
False
Unknown
3/10/1997
3/30/1998
False
Not reported
4550
Other
o
Not reported
False
MN VIC S103909205
N1A
TC0764896.3r Page 8
I
I
Site
->
I
OETAILED ORPHAN LISTING
SUNRISE COMMERCIAL PARK (Continued)
Contact Phone:
Contaet Phone Ext:
Contact Fax :
Contact E-mail :
Site Info Last Updated:
Misc Contaet Info:
Provinee :
Country :
Postal code:
Contamination Info
Facid : VP8080
Contaminant Id : Anthracene
Contaminated Media: Soil
Req Cleanup Cone: 0
Cleanup Lvi Measure Units: mglKg
Basis For Req Cleanup Lvi: Not reported
Max Residual ContaminationO
Date Info Last Updated: 02104/1999
Faeid : VP8080
Contaminant Id : Phenanthrene
Contaminated Media: Soil
Req Cleanup Cone: 0
Cleanup Lvi Measure Units: mg/Kg
Basis For Req Cleanup Lvi : Not reported
Max Residual ContaminationO
Date Info Last Updated: 02104/1999
Facid: VP8080
Contaminant Id : Fluoranthene
I
Site Classification:
Emergency:
RO/RA:
RLlFS:
Fund financed:
Npl:
Pip:
Oistriet:
Notes:
Contaets
Contaet Name:
Type Of Contaet :
Name Of Company:
Contact Address:
I
I
I
Contact Phone:
Contact Phone Ext:
Contact Fax :
Contact E-mail:
Site Info Last Updated:
Misc Contaet Info:
Provinee :
Country :
Postal code:
Contact Name :
Type Of Contaet :
Name Of Company:
Contact Address:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
False
False
False
False
False
False
False
Metro
Not reported
Karen Kromar
Staff PLlPM (Projeet Leader/Projeet Manager)s
MPCA
520 Lafayette Rd
St. Paul, MN 55155
(651) 297-3080
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
03130/1998
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
David Faweett
Former Staff T A
MPCA
520 Lafayette Rd
St. Paul, MN 55155
(651) 297.1788
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
03130/1998
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
EOR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
S103909205
TC0764896.3r Page 9
I
I
DETAILED ORPHAN LISTING
Site
I
SUNRISE COMMERCIAL PARK (Continued)
Contaminated Media: Soil
Req Cleanup Cone: 0
Cleanup Lvi Measure Units: mglKg
Basis For Req Cleanup Lvi : Not reported
Max Residual ContaminationO
Oate Info Last Updated: 02104/1999
Facid : VP8080
Contaminant Id : Pyrene
Contaminated Media: Soil
Req Cleanup Cone: . 0
Cleanup Lvi Measure Units: mglKg
Basis For Req Cleanup Lvi : Not reported
Max Residual ContaminationO
Oate Info Last Updated: 02104/1999
Faeid : VP8080
Contaminant Id : Benzo[a]anthracene
Contaminated Media: Soil
Req Cleanup Cone: 0
Cleanup Lvi Measure Units: mglKg
Basis For Req Cleanup Lvi : Not reported
Max Residual ContaminationO
Date Info Last Updated: 02104/1999
Facid : VP8080
Contaminant Id : Chrysene
Contaminated Media: Soil
Req Cleanup Cone: 0
Cleanup Lvi Measure Units: mglKg
Basis For Req Cleanup Lvi : Not reported
Max Residual ContaminationO
Date Info Last Updated: 02104/1999
Facid : VP8080
Contaminant Id : Benzo[b]fluoranthene
Contaminated Media: Soil
Req Cleanup Cone: 0
Cleanup Lvi Measure Units: mglKg
Basis For Req Cleanup Lvi : Nat reported
Max Residual ContaminationO
Date Info Last Updated: 02104/1999
Facid : VP8080
Contaminant Id : Benzo[k]f1uoranthene
Contaminated Media: Soil
Req Cleanup Cone: 0
Cleanup Lvi Measure Units: mglKg
Basis For Req Cleanup Lvi : Not reported
Max Residual ContaminationO
Date Info Last Updated: 02104/1999
Faeid : VP8080
Contaminant Id : Benzo[a)pyrene
Contaminated Media: Soil
Req Cleanup Cone: 0
Cleanup Lvi Measure Units: mg/Kg
Basis For Req Cleanup Lvi: Not reported
Max Residual ContaminationO
Date Info Last Updated: 02104/1999
Faeid : VP8080
Contaminant Id : Benzo[ghi)perylene
Contaminated Media: Soil
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EDR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
S103909205
TC0764896.3r Page 10
I
I
OETAILEO ORPHAN LISTING
Site
.-l'
I
SUNRISE COMMERCIAL PARK (Continued)
Req Cleanup Cone: 0
Cleanup Lvi Measure Units: mg/Kg
Basis For Req Cleanup Lvi: Not reported
Max Residual ContaminationO
Oate Info Last Updated: 02104/1999
Event Log
Event: VIC Program Participation Dates (Start/End)
Start Date: 3/1011997
End Oate : /I
Planned Start Date: Not reported
Planned End Date: Not reported
Oate Info Last Updated: 02111/1998
Record Number: 3995
Additional Information : None
Event: No Action Letter Sent
Start Date: Not reported
End Date: 05127/1997
Planned Start Oate : Not reported
Planned End Oate : Not reported
Oate Info Last Updated: 02111/1998
Record Number: 3996
Additional Information : None
Event: Work Plan Approval Letter
Start Date: Not reported
End Date: 04/07/1997
Planned Start Date: Not reported
Planned End Oale : Not reported
Oate Info Last Updated: 02104/1999
Record Number: 6739
Additional Information : None Entered
Impacts and Response Aetions
GW Recepts Prot by Rem Aetn : Not reported
Ecological receptors present: False
Type of ecological reeeptors : Not reported
Acres of contaminated soil: Not reported
Volume of contaminated soil: Not reported
Aeres of surface water impaeted: Not reported
Acres of wetland impaeted : Not reported
Acres of sediment Impacted: N01 reported
GW Plume Area Aeres : Not reported
Cleanup Conducted: False
Acres of Contam Soil remediate : Not reported
Volume of Soil Cleaned : Not reported
# People proteet by soil remedy: Not reported
# Municipal wells contamd : Not reported
# Mun wells poten contamd : Not reported
# Oom wells contam : Not reported
# Dom wells poten contam : Not reported
# SW intakes contamd : Not reported
# SW intakes polen eontamd : Not reported
# People Impaet mun well eontam :Not reported
# People Impaet dom well contam :Not reported
# People Impct SW intake eon tam: Not reported
# Orums Revolved from site : Not reported
Yr Soil Remediated: Not reported
Aeres of Soil w/ Restriet Access: Not reported
Yr IC remedy complete: Not reported
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EDR 10 Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
S103909205
TC0764896.3r Page 11
I
I
OETAILED ORPHAN LISTING
Site
EDR ID Number
Oatabase(s) EPA 10 Number
I
I
SUNRISE COMMERCIAL PARK (Continued)
# of people proteet by GW remedy Not reported
Yr GW remedy completed: Not reported
# of people proteeted by IC : Not reported
Year GWIC completed: Not reported
Number of jobs kept/ereated : Not reported
Project Development cost: Not reported
Environmental Costs: Not reported
Amt of taxbase incease : Not reported
Publie finanelng : False
Assurance help: False
Land use Classfn At Site: Not reported
Land use Vicinity Of Site: Not reported
Oeed notif Present On Site: False
Restrietive Covenant Present: False
GW Pump & Treat Used at site: False
Restrictive Covenant Present: Not reported
Miscellaneous Comments: Not reported
Quatemary Perched: False
Quatemary Water Table: False
Quatemary Confined: False
Cretaceous: False
Plattville : False
St. peter: False
Prairie Duehien : False
Jordan: False
IrontonlGalesville : False
Mt Simon Hinekley : False
Precambrian Undefferentiated : False
Other/Unknown Aquifier : False
Aquatie Plants: False
Benthie Inverterbrates : False
Fish: False
Fish eating animals: False
Terresterial plants: False
Soil inverterbrates : False
Plant eating animals: False
Predatory animals(Not Fish Eat): False
Burrowing Animals: False
Information Last Updated: 03/30/1998
Acres of wetland of sediment remediated: Not reported
S103909205
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ALBERTVILLE
SEC 36, T121N, R24W
ALBERTVILLE, MN
FINOS:
Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site:
Permit Compliance System (PCS)
FINDS 1004111424
000008201642
I
I
L1NDALA SANITARY LF
FRENCH LAKE TOWNSHIP, MN 55301
FRENCH LAKE TOWNSHIP, MN 55301
SWF/LF S103283658
N/A
I
I
TC0764896.3r Page 12
I
I
I
DETAILED ORPHAN LISTING
Site
I
L1NOALA SANITARY LF (Continued)
I
LF:
Facility 10:
Contaet:
Faeility Status:
Facility Phone:
Facility Type:
Region:
Class:
Prior Score:
Fill Acres:
SW.117
Edward Undala
Closed
(320) 274.5573
Sanitary Landfill
STATE
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
I
I
I
SUPERAMERICA #4479
1-94 & CSAH #117
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
UST:
Facility 10: 19131
Tank 10: 001
Tank Number: 001
Tank Status: ACTIVE
Install Date: 28-apr.1995
Remove Oate: Not reported
Last Update: 10/04/1999
Tank Location: Under Ground
Closed Oate: Not reported
Overfill Protect: Not reported
Tnk 2nd Cntnmnt: Ooublewall Tank
Tank Cathodic: Not Needed
Tank Remedial: Interstitial Monitoring
Pipe Remedial: Auto Une Leak Oeteet
Owner: SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
Owner Address: 500 SPEEDWAY DRIVE
ENON, OH 45323
I
Telephone:
Capacity:
Material:
Produet:
Dispense Type:
Spill Containment:
I
Faeility Type:
Pipe Material:
Proteetion Type:
Pipe 2nd Cntnmnt:
Pipe Cathodic:
I
I
I
I
Facility 10: 19131
TanklD: 002
Tank Number: 002
Tank Status: ACTIVE
Install Date: 28-apr.1995
Remove Oate: Not reported
Last Update: 10/04/1999
Tank Location: Under Ground
Closed Oate: Not reported
Overfill Protect: Not reported
Tnk 2nd Cntnmnt: Ooublewall Tank
Tank Cathodic: Not Needed
Tank Remedial: Interstitial Monitoring
Pipe Remedial: Auto Une Leak Detect
Owner: SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC
Owner Address: 500 SPEEOWAY DRIVE
ENON, OH 45323
Telephone:
Capaeity:
Material:
Produet:
Dispense Type:
Spill Containment:
I
I
Faeility Type:
Pipe Material:
Proteetion Type:
Pipe 2nd Cntnmnt:
Pipe Cathodie:
I
I
I
I
6128876100
12000
FIBERGLASS
ALCOHOL BLEND
SUBMERSIBLE
Yes
SERVICE STATION/BULK
FIBERGLASS
Ballfloat
Ooublewall Pipe
Not Needed
6128876100
10000
FIBERGLASS
ALCOHOL BLENO
SUBMERSIBLE
Yes
SERVICE STATION/BULK
FIBERGLASS
Ballfloat
Ooublewall Pipe
Not Needed
EDR 10 Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
S103283658
UST UOO2257088
N1A
TC0764896.3r Page 13
I
I
I
I
OET AILED ORPHAN LISTING
Site
Database(s)
EDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
SUPERAMERICA #4479 (Continued)
I
Faeility ID: 19131
Tank 10: 003
Tank Number: 003
Tank Status: ACTIVE
Install Date: 28-apr-1995
Remove Date: Not reported
Last Update: 10104/1999
Tank Location: Under Ground
Closed Date: Not reported
Overfill Protect: Not reported
Tnk 2nd Cntnmnt: Doublewall Tank
Tank Cathodie: Not Needed
Tank Remedial: Interstitial Monitoring
Pipe Remedial: Auto Line Leak Oetect
Owner: SPEEOWAY SUPERAMERICA UC
Owner Address: 500 SPEEOWAY ORIVE
ENON, OH 45323
I
Telephone:
Capaeity:
Material:
Product:
Oispense Type:
Spill Containment:
I
Facility Type:
Pipe Material:
Protection Type:
Pipe 2nd Cntnmnt:
Pipe Cathodie:
I
I
Facility 10: 19131
Tank ID: 004
Tank Number: 004
Tank Status: ACTIVE
Install Date: 28-apr-1995
Remove Date: Not reported
Last Update: 10/04/1999
Tank Location: Under Ground
Closed Date: Not reported
Overfill Proteet: Not reported
Tnk 2nd Cntnmnt: Doublewall Tank
Tank Cathodie: Not Needed
Tank Remedial: Interstitial Monitoring
Pipe Remedial: Auto Line Leak Oetect
Owner: SPEEOWAY SUPERAMERICA UC
Owner Address: 500 SPEEOWAY ORIVE
ENON, OH 45323
Telephone:
Capacity:
Material:
Product:
Oispense Type:
Spill Containment:
I
I
Faeility Type:
Pipe Material:
Protection Type:
Pipe 2nd Cntnmnt
Pipe Cathodie:
I
U002257088
6128876100
10000
FIBERGLASS
ALCOHOL BLENO
SUBMERSIBLE
Yes
SERVICE STATION/BULK
FIBERGLASS
Ballfloat
Ooublewall Pipe
Not Needed
6128876100
10000
FIBERGLASS
OIESEL
SUBMERSIBLE
Yes
SERVICE STATION/BULK
FIBERGLASS
Ballfloat
Doublewall Pipe
Not Needed
I
ROYAL TIRE
HWY 25
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
LUST:
Leak ID:
MPCA ID:
Report Oate:
Closed Date:
Contact:
Contaet Title:
I
8526
144635
07/06/1995
12/28/1995
Not reported
Not reported
I
LUST S101648517
N/A
I
U OF MN MONTICELLO ECOLOGICAL
HWY 75 NSP RD
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
I
I
I
RCRIS-SQG 1000209305
FINDS MN6680031162
TC0764896.3r Page 14
I
I
OETAlLED ORPHAN LISTING
Site
EDR 10 Number
Oatabase(s) EPA 10 Number
I
U OF MN MONTICELLO ECOLOGICAL (Continued)
I
RCRIS:
Owner:
I
NAME NOT REPORTED
(312) 555-1212
MN6680031162
JOHN ARTHUR
(612) 295-5145
Classification: Small Quantity Generator
Used Oil Recye: No
TSDF Activities: Not reported
Violation Status: No violations found
EPAID:
I
Contaet:
1000209305
I
FINOS:
Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site:
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information system (RCRAINFO)
I
LARSON MFT CO/OAKWOOD INDUSTRAIL PARK
PO BOX 127
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
UST:
Facility 10: 12022
Tank 10: 001
Tank Number: 001
Tank Status: ABANDONEO/EMPTY
InstallOate: 01-jan-1978
Remove Oate: Not reported
Last Update: 10/04/1999
Tank Location: Under Ground
Closed Date: Not reported
Overfill Proteet: Not reported
Tnk 2nd Cntnmnt: Not Applicable
Tank Cathodic: Anoderrank
Tank Remedial: Not reported
Pipe Remedial: European Suction
Owner: LARSON MANUFACTURING CO
Owner Address: 2333 EASTBROOK OR
BROOKINGS, SD 57006
I
Telephone:
Capacity:
Material:
Produet:
Oispense Type:
Spill Containment:
I
I
Facility Type:
Pipe Material:
Protection Type:
Pipe 2nd Cntnmnt:
Pipe Cathodle:
I
I
UST UOO0882482
N1A
6122953850
1000 '
BARElPAINT/ASPH COAT STEEL
OIESEL
SUCTION
Not reported
INOUSTRY/MANUFACTURING
GALV ANIZEO STEEL
No Info
Unknown
No
I
MONTICELLO MIDDLE SCHOOL
COUNTY RD 118 AND CHELSA RD
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
RCRIS:
Owner:
I
ISO 882 MONTICELLO PUBLIC SCHOOLS
(612) 295-5184
MN0985761295
RICAHRD WEIRES
(612) 295-5184
EPAIO:
Contact:
I
Classifieation: Small Quantity Generator
Used Oil Recye: No
TSDF Activities: Not reported
I
I
I
RCRIS-80G 1004734393
MND985761295
TC0764896.3r Page 15
I
I
OETAILED ORPHAN LISTING
Site
EDR 10 Number
Database(s) EPA 10 Number
I
MONTICELLO MIODLE SCHOOL (Continued)
Violation Status: No violations found
1004734393
I
I
SOUTHSIDE DENTAL CTR
S END OF 1 BLK W HWY 25
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
RCRIS:
Owner:
FINDS 1000910354
RCRIS-LQG MNOOO0854737
I
EPAIO:
Contaet:
ERLANDSON JOHN
(612) 295-5400
MNOOOO854737
JOHN ERLANDSON
(612) 295-5400
I
Classification: Large Quantity Generator
Used Oil Recye: No
TSDF Activities: Not reported
Violation Status: No violations found
I
FINOS:
Other Pertinent Environmental Activity Identified at Site:
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information system (RCRAINFO)
I
I
FERRELLGAS
501 S HWY 25
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
RCRIS:
Owner:
RCRIS-SQG 1004738094
MNR000060194
I
EPAIO:
Contaet:
FERRELLGAS
(612) 427-6650
MNROOOO60194
STEVE KOLQUIST
(612) 427-6650
I
Classification: Small Quantity Generator
Used Oil Recye: No
TSDF Activities: Not reported
Violation Status: No violations found
I
I
MONTICELLO DUMP
.ON HWY 75, APPROXIMATELY 1 MILE FROM TH
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
MNLS:
CERCLlS: No
No Furtl)er Remedial Aetion Planned: No
National Priorities List: No
Delisted From PLP By MPCA: No
Hazardous Waste Permit: No
Solid Waste Permit: No
Open Dump Inventory: No
Voluntary Cleanup & Investigation: No
HWIC: No
RCRA Treatment Storage & Oisposal: No
METRO Dump Inventory: Yes
MN LS S103315023
NIA
I
I
I
I
TC0764896.3r Page 16
I
I
I
Site
I
MONTICELLO OUMP (Continued)
No Further Action:
Entity Type:
MPCA 10:
County Code:
EPAID:
PLP:
Faeility Name 2:
UnklO:
Method:
LCP:
Brown:
I
I
I
OETAILEO ORPHAN LISTING
No
MOl
MNOOlOO01372
86
Not reported
No
Not reported
2691
11
N
N
EOR ID Number
Database(s) EPA 10 Number
S103315023
I
BANYAI REPAIR
JCTOFCO. STATEAID2/CO: RD50
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
LUST:
Leak 10:
MPCA 10:
Report Oate:
Closed Oate:
Contact:
Contact Title:
I
9510
145582
07126/1996
01/06/1997
Not reported
Not reported
I
LUST S102518105
N/A
I
GOVERNMENT LOTS
.NE1/4, NW1/4,SW1/4 OF THE SE1/4 OF
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
MNLS:
CERCLlS:
No Further Remedial Action Planned:
National Priorities Ust:
Oelisted From PLP By MPCA:
Hazardous Waste Permit:
Solid Waste Permit:
Open Oump Inventory:
Voluntary Cleanup & Investigation:
HWIC:
RCRA Treatment Storage & Disposal:
METRO Oump Inventory:
No Further Action:
Entity Type:
MPCA 10:
County Code:
EPAID:
PLP:
Faeility Name 2:
Unk ID:
Method:
LCP:
Brown:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Yes
No
No
No
No
VIC
MNPToo010970
86
Not reported
No
Not reported
5034
11
N
N
MN LS S103424869
N/A
TC0764896.3r Page 17
I
I
Site
OETAILED ORPHAN LISTING
EDR 10 Number
Oatabase(s) EPA ID Number
LAKE MARIA STATE PARK
CO RD 111
MONTICELLO, MN 55362
UST:
Facility 10: 11093
Tank 10: 001
Tank Number: 001
Tank Status: ACTIVE
InstallOate: 01-jul-1974
Remove Date: Not reported
Last Update: 10/04/1999
Tank Location: Under Ground
Closed Date: Not reported
Overfill Proteet: Not reported
Tnk 2nd Cntnmnt: Not Applicable
Tank Cathodie: No
Tank Remedial: Not reported
Pipe Remedial: European Suction
Owner: MN OEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCEs/FORESTRY
Owner Address: PO BOX 29 - 500 LAFAYETTE RD
SAINT PAUL, MN 55155
Faeility 10: 11093
Tank 10: 002
Tank Number: 002
Tank Status: REMOVED
Install Date: 01-oct-1978
Remove Date: OS-apr-1993
Last Update: 10/04/1999
Tank Location: Under Ground
Closed Date: Not reported
Overfill Protect: Not reported
Tnk 2nd Cntnmnt: Not Applicable
Tank Cathodie: No
Tank Remedial: Not reported
Pipe Remedial: European Suction
Owner: MN DEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES/FORESTRY
Owner Address: PO BOX 29 - 500 LAFAYETTE RO
SAINT PAUL. MN 55155
Facility ID: 11093
Tank 10: 003
Tank Number: 003
Tank Status: ACTIVE
Install Oate: 16-sep-1977
Remove Date: Not reported
Last Update: 10/04/1999
Tank Location: Under Ground
Closed Date: Not reported
Overfill Proteet: Not reported
Tnk 2nd Cntnmnt: Not Applieable
Tank Cathodie: Anoderrank
Tank Remedial: Not reported
Pipe Remedial: European Suction
Owner: MN OEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES/FORESTRY
Owner Address: PO BOX 29 - 500 LAFAYETTE RO
SAINT PAUL. MN 55155
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Telephone:
Capaeity:
Material:
Product:
Oispense Type:
Spill Containment:
Facility Type:
Pipe Material:
Protection Type:
Pipe 2nd Cntnmnt:
Pipe Cathodic:
Telephone:
Capacity:
Material:
Produet:
Oispense Type:
Spill Containment:
Facility Type:
Pipe Material:
Protection Type:
Pipe 2nd Cntnmnt:
Pipe Cathodie:
Telephone:
Capacity:
Material:
Produet:
Oispense Type:
Spill Containment:
Faeility Type:
Pipe Material:
Proteetion Type:
Pipe 2nd Cntnmnt:
Pipe Cathodie:
UST UOO0272505
AST N1A
6128782325
1000
BARElPAINT/ASPH COAT STEEL
FUEL OIL
SUCTION
Not reported
GOVERNMENT/STATE
GALVANIZEO STEEL
No Info
Unknown
No
6128782325
1000
BARElPAINT/ASPH COAT STEEL
GASOLINE
SUCTION
Not reported
GOVERNMENT/STATE
GALVANIZEO STEEL
No Info
Unknown
No
6128782325
565
BARElPAINT/ASPH COAT STEEL
FUEL OIL
SUCTION
Not reported
GOVERNMENT/STA TE
FIBERGLASS
No Info
Unknown
Not Needed
TC0764896.3r Page 18
I
DETAILED ORPHAN LISTING
I
EOR ID Number
Database(s) EPA ID Number
Site
I
LAKE MARIA STATE PARK (Continued)
Uoo0272505
Facility ID: 11093
TanklD: 004
Tank Number: 004
Tank Status: ACTIVE
Install Date: 01-nov-1981
Remove Oate: Not reported
Last Update: 10/04/1999
Tank Location: Under Ground
Closed Oate: Not reported
Overfill Protect: Not reported
Tnk 2nd Cntnmnt: Not Applicable
Tank Cathodic: AnodelTank
Tank Remedial: Not reported
Pipe Remedial: European Suction
Owner: MN OEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCEs/FORESTRY
Owner Address: PO BOX 29 - 500 LAFAYETTE RD
SAINT PAUL, MN 55155
I
Telephone:
Capacity:
Material:
Product:
Oispense Type:
Spill Containment:
6128782325
500
BARElPAINT/ASPH COAT STEEL
FUEL OIL
SUCTION
Not reported
I
Facility Type:
Pipe Material:
Protection Type:
Pipe 2nd Cntnmnt:
Pipe Cathodie:
GOVERNMENT/STATE
FIBERGLASS
No Info
Unknown
Not Needed
I
I
I
AST:
Facility ID:
Telephone:
Location:
Owner:
11093
(612) 878 - 2325
B
MN OEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCES/FORESTRY
PO BOX 29 - 500 LAFAYETTE RD
SAINT PAUL, MN 55155
Tank Status: ACTIVE
Tank Location: A
Tank Material: DOUBLEWALL CONCRETE
Tank Capaeity: 500
Install Oate: 3O-jun-1993
Closed Oate: Not reported
Dike Side Mtrl: OOUBLE WALLED
Spill Prvntn Cntrl: No
Rack Paved: Not reported
Pipe Material: OTHER
Last Update: 10/04/1999
Pipe Cathodie: Not reported
Tank 10:
Facility Type:
1001
GOVERNMENT/STATE
I
Tank Level:
Tank Number:
Product Stored:
Oispenser Type:
Remove Date:
Above Ground
1001
GASOLINE
Not reported
Not reported
I
I
Dike Bottom Mtrl:
Load Rack:
Raek Curbed:
Pipe Level:
DOUBLE WALLED
No
Not reported
Not reported
I
Pipe Db! Walled:
Not reported
I
ALL GREEN LAWN MANAGEMENT
2512 COLONY CIRCLE
ST CLOUD, MN 55301
MN AG SPILLS:
Faeility 10: Not reported
Oate Reported: 5/13/93
Number of Containers:
Chemical Common Name:
Container Type:
Chemicle Type:
Chemical Trade Name:
Chemical Amount:
Township Name:
Other Agencies Involved:
Type of Soil Where Ineident Occurred:
Was Soil Excavated:
Material Recovered Was Land Applied:
Nearest Surface Water to Ineident:
Oistance to Nearest Surfaee Water:
MN AGSPILLS S104991634
N/A
I
Time Reported
10:32 AM
1.0
CARBARYL
APPLICATION TANK
Not reported
SEVIN
ounees - 4.00
Not reported
NONE
ASPAHL T
No
No
STORM SEWER
3.0
I
I
I
I
TC0764896.3r Page 19
I
I
I
Site
ALL GREEN LAWN MANAGEMENT (Continued)
Distance to Nearest Well: 0.0
Well Type Nearest Investigation: UNKNOWN
Distance to Nearest Residence: 10.0
Oid Any Injuries Occur: Not reported
Multiple Locations: True
Company 10: 011134
Coordinate Typa: Z1
Report Field: No
Impact: Not reported
Phase: Not reported
Coutny Code: 145
Section: Not reported
Township: Not reported
Active: True
Mailing Address:
I
I
I
I
I
I
Incident Project Manager:
Incident Technical Staff:
Min Env Responsible Uability Act:
Date Incident Occured:
Time Incident Occured:
Unit Generating:
Modified By:
Modified Oate:
Modified Time:
Chem EPA Registration:
Chemical Units:
Chemicals:
Quantity of Chemical:
Middle Initials:
Incident Rechnieian
Date Initiated
Location Oeseription
Utm 8315 East
Utm 8315 North
Duplicate Id
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DETAILED ORPHAN LISTING
Contingent:
Location:
Contain:
Subsection:
Range:
OBA NITRO GREEN
3685 QUAIL NE STE 136
SAUK RAPIDS, MN 56379
041
Not reported
F
5/13/93
01
10
Not reported
I I
Not reported
UNKNOWN
OZS
Not reported
40Z
Not reported
079
05/13/1993
Not reported
448832.32
5012285.17
Not reported
False
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Not reported
Database(s)
eDR ID Number
EPA ID Number
S104991634
TC0764896.3r Page 20
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PROPERTY
WALK-OVER SURVEY FORM
Conducted By: Erin Greenwood
Weather: Partly Cloudy. 45 degrees
On-Site Representative: Bernard Roden
Date: April 22. 2002
Time: 1:00 pm
Title: Property Owner
GEOGRAPHIC SETTING
Site Address or Description: SE of Intersection of Kadler A venue and 70th Street. Albertville. MN
Surrounding Land Use: N: 70th Street with residential property and undeveloped land beyond; E:
Albertville Outlet Mall and undeveloped land with a City of Albertville dumping ground located
adiacent to the Property: S: Interstate 94 with residential development beyond; W: by Kadler
A venue with Minnesota Department of Transportation testing grounds beyond.
Natural Resources: Wetlands
Environmental Considerations: ASTs. wetlands. drum storage. ACM. septic system. wells
Site Histo :
Current Owner:
Bernard Roden
Previous Owner(s):
Roden Estate
Usa e:
Period:
Residential! A . cultural
1966- resent
Residential! Agricultural!
Animal Husban
1919-1966
Current Occu antes):
Roden Famil
Previous Occu antes):
Roden Family
Residential! A . cultural
1996- resent
Residential! Agricultural!
Animal Husband
1919-1966
On-Site Structures (date, if possible): 1919
PhotosNideo Taken: IXI Yes 0 No
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Soil: See Text
Groundwater: See Text
Surface Water Apparent: No
Wetlands Apparent: Yes
Any Documentation? Yes
Surface Soil and Vegetation (staining/stressed): No
Other Observations/Comments:
April. 02 Page 1
UESCH ASSOCIATES. INC.
Hydrogeologists . Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Y = Yes, N = No, U = Unknown (Record date when service be an)
Wastewater Water Stormwater
N Sanitary Sewer N Municipal Service Y Storm Sewer (note discharge
ointif os sible)
en Ditch
Pondin Area On-Site
D Well(s)
Previous Site Assessment Work: No
Geotechnical W ork: Yes
Building Plans: No
Construction Specifications: No
UTILITIES
Are pipelines present on-site or nearby?: No obvious indications.
Y
N
N
N
y
y
N
Y
N
On-Site Well
Other
Wastewater S stem (Note where located):
N Oil Water Se arator:
N CistemIHoldin Tank
Y Floorrrrench Drains: floor drains in basement connected to se tic s stem
On-Site Wells (Note whether re . stered, in-service or abandoned):
Y Production: 2 wells; one active and one re ortedl inactive
N Monitorin :
N Irri ation:
N Observation:
Testin Results (if conducted):
Electrical Devices (note whether PCB containin ):
Y Transformers; ownershi : one ole-mounted transformer owned b
N Coolin Com ressors:
N Ca acitors:
N Li ht ballasts:
Y Other oil filled electrical devices: one enerator unit in ara e
Other Oil Filled Devices (note whether PCB containin ):
Y Air Com ressors: one air com ressor unit in tool shed
N H draulic JackslLifts:
N Elevator S stems:
N Com actor Mechanism:
April. 02
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologists · Engineers · Environmental Scientists
Page 2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Other
y
N
N
N
Fuel Source:
Power Source:
es, describe):
Are an
N
N
N
N
N
N
of the followin wastes enerated on-site? Where is it dis osed of and b whom?
Process or Industrial Wastewater:
Coolin Water:
Hazardous Wastes:
Process or Industrial Slud es or Solid Wastes:
Air Dischar es: .
Infectious Waste:
Describe anyon-site waste storage, treatment or disposal system: N/ A
Does the Facilit have an of the followin ennits or licenses?
N NPDES N NPDES Stormwater Permit
N RCRA NAir
N Count N - EP A Hazardous Waste In #
N Wastewater Dis N Other
Have any violations, environmental enforcement actions, investigations, clean-ups, litigation been
documented and/or conducted on-site? No
Have there been any spills on-site? No
ON-SITE MATERIALS
Are the followin materials resent or likel to be resent based on observations?
Y Hazardous MaterialslPetroleum Products (provide a general list of chemicals! compounds
resent): miscellaneous car maintenance, cleanin and other household hazardous waste
Y Asbestos Containing Materials (ACM): floor tile, ceiling tile, sheetrock and taping
com ound
N Urea Formaldeh de Foam:
Y Lead Paint:
N Fluorescent or Hi h-Intensi
Has an ACM survey/sampling been conducted? No
Are any Halon gas systems in use? No
Where? N/ A
Do any of the HV AC systems or refrigeration equipment employ ozone depleting chemicals e.g.
freon? Most likely
Where? Refrigerator/ freezer units
April, 02
Page 3
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologists · Engineers · Environmental Scientists
I
Are mercury switches present or likely? Yes
I Are any drinking water coolers present? No
Have they been tested for lead? N/A
,
I Have radon gas measurements been taken? No
If yes, describe results: N/ A
I Has an, evidence of the followinJ?; been reported or observed?
N Excavations:
I N Filled Areas:
N Old Foundations:
I If yes, describe: N/ AS
Are high voltage electrical substations or powerlines present? Yes
Have EMF measurements been taken? Unknown
I
STORAGE TANKS- 3 in-use ASTs
I Describe inventory control methods, tank testing - monitoring results. Gauge monitorin~
Has a tank leak ever been reported? If yes, describe situation and status. No
I Have soil borings or monitoring wells been completed on-site as part of a tank investigation? No
If yes, find out when and who completed the work. N/ A
Have closure or excavation reports been completed or filed for out of service tanks? No
I Does a site diagram displaying UST/AST information exist? No
Are the ASTs over 2,000 gallons labeled? N/A
I Do ASTs over 2,000 gallons have gauging equipment? N/ A
NOTES: Uncharacterized debris including drums. wood. cars. tractors. miscellaneous chemical
I containers found on the Property inside and outside of the buildings.
I
I I
I
I
I
I April, 02 Page 4
LIESCH ASSOCIATES, INC.
Hydrogeologists · Engineers. Environmental Scientists
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
--
"0
~ ~
000
- e
sa e
u~
rOlil~
= c
U ~
Z~
Oe
- ~
~ (/J
i~
o~
~-
-
~B
Z..2
<0..
~ g
U
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i:!
{.j
~ 6
enU
I: =
o 0
's 05
t: B
8~
...
=
.!2
~~
~~
......
I:
~ ~
-.- =
iE~_'B
~e=a15
Oc.enU
..
II)
'"
=
8,'"
'" 8,
Q~
....
'1:J
~
B
'"
'60
II)
CI::
...
'"
:3
~
~
'1:J
II)
lU=a
= ~
0.5
};
..-..
'"
I:
o
lU-
Nca
.- IlIl
en '-"
'1:JU
lU ::l
..-0
13 e
enQ.
lU
0.
~
...10:
~
lU lU lU
6 I: I::
Z ~ ~
e! 1
~ lU >
- 5 II)
.5 z m
GJ GJ II)
I: I: C
000
z z z
II) GJ GJ
C I: I::
000
z z z
~ ~ ~
000
eel:
...10: ...10: ...10:
eel:
;:J ;:J ;:J
o '0 0
Z Z Z
.~ .~ ~
t) t) t>
< < <
C C ~
~ ~ ~
g g g
...10: ...10: ...10:
C C C
;:J ;:J ;:J
i i i
~ CI5 1ii
on 0 0
\C on 0
N on M
"ii
'0 .a ,5
"ii (5
'0 ~ (I')
tf Q 0
< < <
- N M -.to
on \C r- 00
<<>
:0
C':l
.S::!
Q.
Q.
C':l
o
C
II
<
Z
C
.9
]
'y
C
o
o
e
>.
...
B
C
a>
>
.5
"';i
o
'';::
.~
~ 19
a> en
-0 II
~ ~
"';i -
~ tf.l
a> CD
:0 'E
g B
"'0 'c
,.:; 0
~ E
E=: :E
tf.l C
en 0
~ E
g II
;; ::E
.9 c ::E
U QJ ...
::l E gf
l:: c.-
~ 45 ~
o = _
o >. 0 en
"'0 -; .-= u ~
3 'y ~ ::: s
e & So ~"fo
e.o .: II II'';::
~.~ 0 U II
C "'0 .VlE-
::lOa> c"E-
II : > .9 B.:..:
~ ] ~ tl '';:: e
-"oe 5lBc
r::'.~lIe8
g ~ .~ g Vl Q. >.
'--......::at: ..-....
COCOoce;;:B
a> i> ~ ::l 5l i> 5
~ @ .- 0 en > >
.0 O'ceoc
C':l ..: > . Q. II .-
II 8'';:: en II" II
_OGJ -u
_< ...,Vl ...< ? oR-< '000...-
on
l
!5
'"
-:::
5
'13
rn
.s
tJC
Z ~
- C
. e
~ 'S:
<&i
g~
en~
en I::
<"611
:c I::
UlU
fa;
- '"
..J .-
~
I
~
:c
tI)
~
o
z
(,)
o
-0
S
..
<9
0.
e
c..
-;;;
E
...
<9
-
o
.!:!'
~
8
'2
Q.
<
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1) Active ASTs near building site.
I
I
I
~
i
<Il$
,
N
I
~
I
i
I
I
2) Inactive AST and empty drum near storage building.
Proposed Albertville Business Park
6000 Gilbolt Dr, Suite 203
MIdiaoIl, WI 53713
(608) 223-1532
13400 IS"' AoclllC N
Minneapolis, MN 5S441
(763) 489-3100
4300 N Miller Rd, Suite 200
Scottsdale. AX 85251
(480)421-0853
Property Photographs
May 02
Page
1
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3) Drums in storage building.
I
I
~
i
<Il:l
i
J
i
~
I
11
I
I
4) Abandoned drums near storage building at building site.
.tt=-
LIE~ Hydrogeologists. Bngineers . Bnvironmental Scientists
Proposed Albertville Business Park
6000 OiIbolt Dr, Suite 203
M8diIon, WI 53713
(608) 223-1532
1~IS"'A_N
MiIlllCllJlOJis, MN 5S441
(763)489-3100
4300 N Miller Rd, Suile 200
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
(480) 421.os53
Property Photographs
May 02
Page
2
I
I
,I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
:>
S
r
5) Well near building site.
6) Central Portion of the />ropeny and building site, view west.
Proposed Albertville Business Park
May 02
Page
3
I OUholt Dr. Suile 203 13400 15. AYenue N 4300 N Miller Rd, Sui"'200
IatJUoII, WI 53?13 MilUlclapolil, MN 5S441 Scoct.daJe. AZ 852S1
(608) 223-1532 (763) 489-3100 (480) 421-D853
~
Property Photographs
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
<Ill
t
,
~
I
i
6000 GlIboIt Dr. Suite 203
ModiIoa, WI 53713
(608) 223-1532
7) Air compressor in storage building.
8) Interior of garage.
Hydrogcologists . En mccrs. Environmental Scientists
Proposed Albertville Business Park
May 02
Page
4
1:l4OO I" Ayc_ N
MiIllle8pOUs, MN 5S441
(763)489-3100
4300 N MiUcr Rd, Suite 200
ScoIudaIc. AZ 85251
(480) 421.os53
Property Photographs
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
9) Southeast portion of the Property, view east-southeast.
I
10) Central portion of the Property, view east.
I
I
i
c.
cIIJ
I
j
I
~
I
I
<=>
I
I
Proposed Albertville Business Park
6000 Oisboll Dr, Suite 203
MadiOOIl, WI 53713
(608) 223-1532
13400 IS"' AYCIIJe N
Mill11CllpOlia, MN 5S441
(763)489-3100
4300 N Mi1Ier Rd, Suite 200
ScoIlSdale, AZ 85251
(480) 421-0853
Property Photographs
May 02
Page.
5
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
cId
I
Ji
,
~
I
,
I
I
11) Building site, adjacent to the southwest portion of the Property.
12) Southwest portion of the Property, view south toward Interstate 94.
LIE.f&i:I Hydrogeologiats · BngineeJll . Bnvironmental Scientists
Proposed Albertville Business Park
6000 Oiaboh Dr, Suile 203
M8diaon, WI 53713
(608) 223-1 532
13400 I~ Amuc N
MillllC8pOlis, MN 5S441
(763)489-3100
4300 N Miller Rd. Suile 200
ScoalodaIe, AZ 8S2SI
(480) 421-0853
Property Photographs
May 02
Page
6
I.
,
I
.
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
EijI.: Environmental
. . ... . : Data .. ,
.. . . : ReSQUfCes. Inc.
The EDR-City Directory
Abstract
The Source
For Environmental
Risk Management
Data
Proposed Albertville Business
10395 70th 8t
Albertville, MN 55301
3530 Post Road
Southport, Connecticut 06490
April 24, 2002
Nationwide Customer Service
Inquiry Number: 764896.7
Telephone: 1-800-352-0050
Fax: 1-800-231-6802
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.
City Directory Abstract
Environmental Data Resources, lnc.'s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to
assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. ASfM E 1527-00,
Section 73 on Historical U~ Infunnation, identifies the pri<r use requirements for aPha<;e I enviroomental site assessment The ASIM
standard requires a review of reasonably ascertainable standard historit:a1 sources. Reasonobly ascertainable means iriformation
that is publicly available, obtainable from a source with reasonable time and cost constraints, and
practically reviewable.
To meet the prior use requirements of ASTM E 1527-00, Section 7.3.4, the following standard historical sources
may be used: aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, property tax files, land title records (although these cannot be the sole
historical source consulted), topographic maps, city directories, building department records, or zoninglland use records.
ASTM E 1527-00 requires "All obvious uses of the property shall be identifiedfrom the present, back to the property's
obvious first developed use. or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. This task requires reviewing only as many of the standard historit:a1
sources as are necessary, and that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be usejid." (ASIM E 1527-00, Section 73.4, page 12)
EDR's City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data.
City Directories
City directories have been published for cities and towns across the U.S. since the 1700s. Originally a list of residents, the
city directory developed into a sophisticated tool for locating individuals and businesses in a particular urban or suburban
area. Twentieth century directories are generally divided into three sections: a business index. a list of resident names and
addresses, and a street index. With each address, the directory lists the name of the resident or. if a business is operated
from this address, the name and type of business (if unclear from the name). While city directory coverage is
comprehensive for major cities. it may be spotty for rural areas and small towns. ASTM E 1527-00 specifies that a
"review of city directories (standard historical sources) at less than approximately five year intervals is not required by
this practice." (ASTM E 1527-00, Section 7.3.4. page 12.)
Please call EDR Nationwide Customer Service at
1-800-352-0050 (8am-8pm ESn
with questions or comments about your report.
Thank you for your business!
Disclaimer
Copyright and Trademark Notice
This report contains information from a variety of public and other sources. Environmental Data
Resources. Inc. (EDR) has relied on the information provided to it from such sources. EDR has not reviewed and does not
warrant or guarantee the completeness, accuracy, timeliness or authenticity of such information in preparing this report.
mEINFORMATlON AND MEl1IODOWGY USED TO COMPlLEmlS REPORT, AND mEANALYSISANDSERVICES INTENDED
TO BE PROVIDED BymlS REPOKf ARE PROVIDED 'i\S ISn wrmourWARRANIY OR GUARANTY OF ANY KIND. EDR DISCWMS
ANYOIHEREXPR8SORIMPllEDWARRANlTESWTmRFSPEX:I7.DTHEREPOKl ANDAlL7HEINFORMA1XJNWNfAINEDHERFJN,1NCllJDI/'KJ,
wrmour UMrrATlON,lMPUED WARRAN11ES OF MERCHANfABIUlY OR FITNESS FOR A PAKI7CUIAR PURPOSE In no event
shall EDR be liable for any indirect, special, punitive or consequential damages. whether arising out of contract, tort or
otherwise, arising oul of this report and the information contained herein even if EDR has been advised of the
possibility that such damages may arise.
Entire contents copyright 2fXXJ by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) All rights reserved Reproduction in 01lY media or fOl7l1llt,in whole or
in pan, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.
EDR and the edr logos are registered trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the
property of their respective owners.
I
I
I
I
I
0)
c:
--
-
0)
E
~
I
I
I
8
t
o
C-
O)
a:
0)
en
::>
I
I
I
I
~
o
I
--
~
a..
I
I
- cj
! .5
;J rn
i 2
e=
-Eli
..DOG;
......illll
I
I
I
I
I
~
2:
iij
'1:
~
1:1
.E
...
o
iij
'e
Q)
E
E
8
II
o
'"
'"
g
:m
i:
Q)
1:1
.~
a:
II
o
00
'"
CI\I
>.
1::
CD
c..
e
a..
o
t-
'"
~
-Jc
it
~ -1.0
!!:...,..
CIl
Co
tU
::::E
<(
::::E
w
~
I:
e
a..
'8
o
u::
II
~-Jc
Q)
:c
.!!!
~
o
.e
o
or;
a..
Iii
;::
~
"
o
V'I
'"
1:1
Q)
1:1
:::l
'0
.E
CIl
.sa
o
.c
a..
iij
'1:
Q)
<(
II
+-'
CD
e>
~
o
~
o
...,
'"
~
B+
t
~
~
,,;
:i-
s
~
~
I
~
-Jc ~
~~i
j::" -;;:.S; 'R
e. ~ Cl~
"'" ~ .
g. ~lts
::::E .sa ll,,g
o 5i Ja ~
:E > {l.1;!
Co .E c:: =
e 1:1 a.
Cl I: .,j
8. tU ~'i
{2 ~ ~.~
Iii !'i
.g ~ S:i
.e 0': 6
'C :f ~ 'il
C " II a.!!!
Go)~ _:l.1f
0) U)Cl
Go) .
..J
o
M
'"
o
'"
8
'"
o
'"
00
or-
CD
0)
as
Q.
o
.E
ui
S"O
aso
.- 0
g~
(/)C
(/)CD.....N
<(Q) .0
~<OO
"fi C) O)~
(/)cCX).q-
CD'- ~N
::Jw.....~
li
t
l!!
" ..
~ .. ..
,~ CD .._
~ E'G ~
o ca._ ..
~ 1i)'C ;-~
I ::so ca
~ 00.50
(/)
(/)
CD
C
'0
~
CD ~
o
CD C")
~ ~
Q)-z
:8(/)::\E
<(..c::
"000)
CD..... :=
~LO ~
Q. 0) CD
e8:8
0....-<(
~ Q.
Go) _
g. t:!
.....cu
Q.0';
_0_
Go)!se
O)'C >-
ti;'C:t:
Fcto
I
I
I
Date EDR Searched Historical Sources:
City Directories Apr 24, 2002
I
Target Property:
10395 70th St
Albertville, MN 55301
I
PUR 1D
Year Uses
1979 Address not Listed in Research Source
I
1983
Address nOl Listed in Research Source
1989
Residence
I
1994
Residence
1999
Residence
I
Adjoining Properties
I
SURROUNDING
Multiple Addresses
Albertville, MN 55301
PURID
Year Uses
I
1979 Address not Listed in Research Source
I 1983 Address not Listed in Research Source
1989 .'7OTH STREET..
I Address not listed in research source (10100)
Residence (10388)
Residence (10544)
I Residence (10795)
Address not listed in research source (10880)
I 1994 .'70TH STREET"
Address nOllisted in research source (10100)
Residence (10388)
I Residence (10544)
Residence (10795)
Address not listed in research source (10880)
I ]999 "70TH STREET"
No addresses listed priorlo 10100
I Residence (10100)
Residence (10388)
Residence (10544)
I
I
Portion-Findings
(FIM [",formation Only)
Source
Coles City Directoly
Coles City Directory
Coles City Directory
Coles City Directory
Coles City Directory
Portion-Findings
(FIM Information Only)
Source
Coles City Directory
Coles City Directory
Coles City Directory
Coles City Directory
Coles City Directory
764896-7
3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Glossary of Terms
A.A.A.
Aerial photograph flyer: Agriculture Adjustment Administration (Federal).
A.S.C.S
Aerial photograph flyer: Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (Federal)
Address in Research Source
Indicates that a property is listed at a different address than the one provided by the user. Generally occurs
when a property is located on a comer or, when the physical address of a property is different than its mailing address.
Address Not Listed in Research Source
Occurs when a specific site address is not listed in city directories and/or fire insurance maps.
Adjoining
Any property that is contiguous, or a property that would be contiguous if not for a public thoroughfare, to the
target property. To differentiate from each adjoining property, stand at the tarcet property's ''front door"
facing the street.
Adjoining Back
Property directly to the rear of the target property. (Applies only to fire insurance map data)
Adjoining Front
Property directly in front of the target property. (Applies only to fire insurance map data)
Adjoining Left
Property directly to the left of the target property. (Applies only to fire insurance map data)
Adjoining Right
Property directly to the right of the target property. (Applies only to fire insurance map data)
Adjoining Surrounding Area
Property that may adjoin the target property but due to lack of specific map information cannot be located
precisely. This situation typically occurs when city directory information, but not fire insurance map
information, is available.
C.A.S
Aerial photograph flyer: Chicago Aerial Survey (private).
C.S.S.
Aerial photograph flyer: Commodity Stabilization Service (Federal).
Cartwright
Aerial photograph flyer: Cartwright (private)
CD
City Directory
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Commercial
Any property including, but not limited to, property used for industrial, retail, office, agricultural, other
commercial, medical, or educational purposes; property used for residential purposes that has more than four
residential dwelling units.
Commercial or Industrial
Property that has either a commercial or an industrial use. Examples include retail stores, manufacturing
facilities, factories, and apartment buildings. .
D.N.R.
Aerial photograph flyer: Department of National Resources (state).
D.O.T.
Aerial photograph flyer: Department of Transportation (state).
Fairchild
Aerial photograph flyer: Fairchild (private).
FIM
Fire Insurance Map
Flood Insurance Rate Maps
Flood Insurance Rate Maps are produced by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). These
maps indicate special flood hazard areas, base flood elevations and flood insurance risk zones.
Flood Prone Area Maps
Flood Prone Area maps are produced by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). Areas identified as
flood prone have been determined by available information gathered from past floods.
F.S.
Aerial photograph flyer: Forest Service (Federal).
Geonex
Aerial photograph flyer: Geonex (private).
M.C.
Aerial photograph flyer: Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities Area (state).
Mark Hurd
Aerial photograph flyer: Mark Hurd (private)
N.A.P.P.
Aerial photograph flyer: National Aerial Photography Program (Federal).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
National Wetland Inventory Maps
National Wetland Inventory Maps are produced by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, a division of the U.S.
Department of the Interior. Wetland and deepwater habitat information is identified on a 7.5 minute U.S.G.S.
topographic map. The classification system used categorizes these habitats into five systems: marine,
estuarine, riverine, lacustrine and palustrine.
No Return
Indicates that site owner was unavailable at time of surveyor's contact. (Applies only to city directories.)
No Structure Identified on Parcel
Used when site boundaries and/or site address is indicated on a fire insurance map; no structure details exist.
Other
Occurs when the site's classification is different that EDR's standard categories. Examples may include
undeveloped land and buildings with no specified function.
P.M.A.
Aerial photograph flyer: Production and Marketing Administration (Federal).
Pacific Aerial
Aerial photograph flyer: Pacific Aerial (private)
Portion
Refers to the fire insurance map information identified on the four quadrants of a target or adjoining property.
The portions are referred to as Frontright, Frontleft, Backright, and Back/eft and are determined as if one
were standing at the front door, facing the street.
Property Not Defined
Used when property is not clearly demarcated on a fire insurance map.
Residential
Any property having fewer than five dwelling units used exclusively for residential purposes.
Residential with Commercial Uses (a.k.a. Multiple Purpose Address)
A business (firm) and residence at the same address. Examples include a doctor, attorney, etc. working out of
hislher home.
Sidwell
Aerial photograph flyer: Sidwell (private).
Site Not Mapped
Occurs when an adjoining property has not been mapped by fire insurance map surveyors. (AwJiesonlytofire~tmpdata.)
Teledyne
Aerial photograph flyer: Teledyne (private)
Topographic Maps
Topographic maps are produced by the United States Geological Survey (USGS). These maps are color coded
line and symbol representations of natural and selected artificial features plotted to scale.
Turnbow
Aerial photograph flyer: Michael Turnbow (private)
I
I
~~ Environmental
: Data
: Resources, Inc.
I
"Linking Technology with Tradition"
I
Sanborn@ Map Report
I Ship to: Erin Greenwood
Liesch Associates, Inc
I 13400 15th Ave. North
Plymouth, MN 55441
Order Date: 4/18/2002
Inquiry #: 764896.4S
P.O. #: NA
Site Name: Proposed Albertville Business Park
Address: SE of Kadler Ave and 70th St
Completion Date: 04/19/2002
I
I
1018059SMI
763-559-1423
City/State: Albertville, MN 55301
Cross Streets:
I
This document reports that the largest and most complete collection of Sanborn fire
insurance maps has been reviewed based on client-supplied information, and fire
insurance maps depicting the target property at the specified address were not
identified.
I
I
NO COVERAGE
I
I
I
I
I
I
All maps provided pursuant to a Sanborn<8> Map Report are currently reproducible of tire insurance maps owned or licensed by Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED IS MADE WHATSOEVER. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES. INC. SPECIFICALLY
DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION. WARRANTIES AS TO ACCURACY, VALIDITY, COMPLETENESS,
SUITABILITY, CONDITION, QUALITY, MERCHANTABILITY, OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE WITH RESPECT TO THE REPORT, THE MAPS,
THE INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN, OR THE RESULTS OF A SEARCH OR OTHERWISE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. assumes no liability to any party for any loss or damage whether arising out of errors or omissions. negligence, accident or any other cause. In
no event shall Environmental Data Resources. Inc.. its affiliates or agents. be liable to anyone for special, incidental, consequential or exemplary damages.
I
I
Copyright 2002, Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format of any map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.
(whether obtained as a result of a search or othelWise) may be prohibited without prior written pennission from Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Sanbom and
Sanbom Map are registered trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Edt.: Environmental
: Data
: Resources, Inc.
The EDR-Historical
Topographic Map
Report
The Source
For Environmental
Risk Management
Data
3530 Post Road
Southport, Connecticut 06490
Inquiry Number: 7'" Z , , #' ~
Nationwide Customer Service
Telephone: 1-800-352-0050
Fax: 1-800-231-6802
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.
Historical Topographic Map Report
Environmental Data Resources, Inc.'s (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist
professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property, and its surrounding area, resulting from
past activities. ASTM E 1527-00, Section 7.3 on Historical Use Information, identifies the prior use
requirements for a Phase I environmental site assessment. The ASTM standard requires a review of
reasonably ascertainable standard historical sources. Reasonably ascertainable is defined as
information that is publicly available. obtainable from a source with reasonable time and cost
constraints, and practical{v reviewable.
To meet the prior use requirements of ASTM E 1527-00, Section 7.3.2, the following standard historical
sources may be used: aerial photographs, city directories, frre insurance maps, topographic maps, property
tax fUes, land title records (although these cannot be the sole historical source consulted), building
department records, or zoning/and use records. ASTM E 1527-00 requires "All obvious uses of the
property shall be identified from the present, back to the property's obvious first developed use, or back
to 1940, whichever is earlier. This task requires reviel1,ing only as many of the standard historical
sources as are necessary, and that are reasonably ascertainable and likely to be useful." (ASTM E
1527-00, Section 7.3.2 page 11.)
EDR's Historical Topographic Map Report includes a search of available public and private color
historical topographic map collections.
Topographic Maps
A topographic map (topo) is a color coded line-and-symbol representation of natural and selected artificial
features plotted to a scale. Topos show the shape, elevation, and development of the terrain in precise
detail by using contour lines and color coded symbols. Many features are shown by lines that may be
straight, curved. solid, dashed. dotted. or in any combination. The colors of the lines usually indicate
similar classes of infonnation. For example, topographic contours (brown); lakes, streams, irrigation
ditches, etc. (blue); land grids and important roads (red); secondary roads and trails, railroads, boundaries,
etc. (black); and features that have been updated using aerial photography, but not field verified, such as
disturbed land areas (e.g., gravel pits) and newly developed water bodies (purple).
For more than a century, the USGS has been creating and revising topographic maps for the entire country
at a variety of scales. There are about 60,000 U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) produced topo maps
covering the United States. Each map covers a specific quadrangle (quad) defmed as a four-sided area
bounded by latitude and longitude. Historical topographic maps are a valuable historical resource for
documenting the prior use of a property and its surrounding area, and due to their frequent availability can
be particularly helpful when other standard historical sources (such as city directories, frre insurance maps,
or aerial photographs) are not reasonably ascertainable.
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7.5 minute series
Scale = 1: 24,000
N
Quadrangle Relation Chart
Inquiry # 7'1{ 1'''-9
Target Quadrant
BI6- t...A. ~6) M tJ
@
l'
Adjoining Quadrant
CST. h I Coo:/-{ A c.L.. ,..." Ai
(
( lLoc..t=--F-o~.h, /,--,.J --tS k I'" '0
'._ l'
~ . L
~- ~?
" '.. '..:R 24 W
" =7--
(I"
'1
i
>t\
, +.
~
'-..-'
~a: "--
I
I
I
,
~I , :'
. lof:. l
':_~L~';_';I" ',.:".1."', ,~
I!"~' ",",~~1~-~~?~~~-.t~~j-\
',J ' i ,: 056',/' ; \_,/ \
l-~- --
';Z H
I
H ".
/):
~'
.-\
.'
.
----1.. .....__~
I \.
I
"
-;~
"
~
<
<
~
C
f-
! ~
'"
C
I
'/ '--"
,I.",
,-
I
, .....
:
. a .,
,,60
I
I
I
I
i
l" ,
, ,
I
j ... ~
" ....
\'Ii. ...,J
~'!~~ S:
~ I. .....
~ I.; :5
, '"
...
<{
~
I
;,
.
"
l-'
,
,
, Q
i ...
.,
..:
I'
. '"
...
'"
,
,
O~6' 1
,
,
I
;
..:
,
)1
"
" '
II'
II
II.
1~ ;--
IL-____
~~. '
'.
I,," -,'
, \
, 0
, ""
i " en
I
I
I
t-:
~
11__0 ~".
" .
'"
:'
O'
o "
, "c
--=-----
. "
I I
I )2 I
I 01 I
I I
II
~_~- -~-,~--'---'-::-,-~,-:7__j
- I
I
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
O~?i
~ .. -r /
O I' ~
~ ;' .'
7---~-~~-,,---- ~
,- cO ':' I c"
(\J "
/1
" I
o~;_::;~~_;~J~'
I f 'k' ,
I, ; I i
,,'; I J.
I
I
I
I
k_-;_j
0..9<9-_
"q)
-",
"'" e.
~
;-.t 't)- O'l
(\J
~
'"
I
, :' ,I +, i,;
~,..I:.:'
.-' Y , ,.'.,1"/."
'.... .....-" ,,-~-"
. /, --:0' '~':""i-2..:-:;'~",
b~ ::=:: ,--.._/ ,-./ I'
" L '
..~, ! -' .Ll I -, . ,
f-
. d
<~
ll",
, ~N
ea:
"
" I ,
ti~
i:..,.
i!!N
Z '
-a:
1---
'#
1-0' O'
06-
< ,
. ~ - '
I
'"
10
:i
<:
~
e
'g
'"
ti
"
'o:t
,
..
t~
,
,
LO ~
(Y):
\
,
/j~
J~
I
<,7
',~ \'-" 'I
i
t
/'~
/"' II
, ,p~ ~ ~
,., ~! Q
<0 ~" ~
"\~ ,'.' I;' g;;
II; t' il 1./ 1r"JAI.
If -'"-~1"\ c-.l~
II r ,'11.;\ <0;
II ,..-. ;/~ ..:.:'~
:1 /r/ Q:
" it
II , " o~
'~~/
.01
"
I,
t.~,__
I a.. '
-# - (-Qi" )
~,~> /.'
_J
I
'-"j,
1"
! 960/- '.
I
.....
">,~) ~.
.;..,. '-~ ~'"
,.....0 l.t)
~ to:)
.~
'\ "
I
"._,1':
,.b
\_--'
.'
1 C'o.9(!1 . ...:
U)
.1/
, ')
r r-
: LLJ
'"
ie' )/'" - :0'~' "~ll '~1.1i: '\'~~' a. .L~'----D--~-T.- --~~"---i~~
I : ,-<' ;~ . -', I V . - L..Jt . "~. ~: t . /, ; I, ':. D )t?~~
- ~.. , :: I .. [\. 1 rjY1' ""/("" ,.....-.; c, " !O . '. Ii?" . ~ . 1 ~"fi
' I ~ ,'; .~"-, " - -'-- ~_.,. 1:: : ~ !X'~:. . ( .-L..c 1'\" ~ '~, ;; , . ~ _ '" '.fb;.
I ~ ,.- "~'.l!O !i ~~ i;'J /II. '-, \\~X&,i ~., . X'[ '------I ~ _0" ~~
Hr. 'tl ~ .. r ' c \. ~~t. I =__~
- 'j'J CIlO - . I) "'. \'":::.r 11 _ .
I'~I cil?-o 1, ' >-:--41--. ~# ~~ t ' ?(~. ./\ ,G',. ,- j' g ".ol )1>
N I? .. II · 'If'^' .,_ . _ 0. l'::JL
a:
I~ :~
' !i '~, '".--; ..6.,,\1' 1fY:~"';hi..S ~lf\ o~~l ~~'~{ ',_ /i'J ,~:J.II~
I / "~ , ~ I . rJ. · -=-=-,/ '" \'~~, ,,-< _,\:~ j l'b0 'C'JI " ,'C:- I l '-' t.Y
I \)~ ___.'~, '. I ) 'i'" .'.IL< ~,o, . -IL 0 c \_~l~~~~uft::,f:!/-.:/-~i7:'~ '..::..-L'!::._--'---_ -.e; ~
I I ~'l -' ~ ~ '.J ./.., ""'--.. I //{; , II V>,lv
~ I ' ./ I ',. . . Jl I ~". ... I / D I
J. " " >o"~ '-. ' " " :I/t.:::::. '.' . r- I~I/ .. .,'l'-;:.'----"~o.~ f-- "
,!a;~f 111, 1I")':'.i~ -(",'-;- c,'ll' ~ ,\ r/ \,.
p.:,lO' , 1 ~ I " ~ J III I,.,) r: ~ ,11. , I 0", I _ : Il/ii))' J,o'
ilol,' ',o~... , }I '7-.'T '(-', I : . . j I J _ .' 1. " ,,' ) IY ,-./: '
I 1 ' ( I " /00 I if ~ ~ , - ,"' l' / ,'-"" I '-:", \,;. ~.-"" V- ' '-_ v--
,~..I , Y.JS '1 W ' L~_~-'ltL,J' ';J \\=:=: ~ "..;) ~ Ci
'--'!':~ ~~f'L.ljl ,.e' 'v::.: / '1,'~,T'~,,' tlt0\\ /(.A:.,....-..
' Vi I~ ~ z ,I... < [< 1~ \ C_/ ,--,. .----;::." Ijl??~'i ~l~'~ ,\'~~ 0-'~,1 . l'1 ~,
Xlj~IP v l!.' '/. '-_~S) 'I' :, 11.,,/ :) 'I ,,\\~./ ~---::----" ~'~_ ',' .' i
I <t o. 'II, \ <"" - . , l-- ',', ._; _ _,,' )
.- ~ C'.:::::, ~~ I.. ',---- I > iVL 'J0,-- ;;.. '.1" ''''~ '''1[
~ , n~ ;::-....;;::. -..J.. v,. ,.. '- . r~' 1 I"J \~. . -'~" '-""~f~" ~
( I /",; !I' Ij I' I'~~ -' .-),' ~t :. ", ,_ \. .,; ,..~ .. ~1i1~'[1 r(~ ~>~'\' . "~' "
~I "'~":,' J I /\ . C'" ~':' , 'Tlo~"'I'--\" \~('c..l\,.! ',I! :" J
'-7'" ,( ( /'....>.:.. '~" "',~J ' i ,..,Ip ,,,I,!,~~" ~, ; ")1~ ~
IJ ~o!:lv< I J /:"~"'0\: ;~/: c.:.., 5j1~1.j,111 illI1~itlll~ bj) '--)\~: v:~ "il ~'o});
J '/01:::1. j , #. \~~.; ,- , -, 1lI (' 'II Tlo'll j "I : J.',\, I I~"~~ ,J::\ ~
t ~i;:. ",I ~ I ~~ r /1'\ ,.~... oJ ill.,Tlr,;jl, '-1>,1,._ " ',"""!__" , .2'). ~
- ~~it: 'J ' / 1/ (, \ ",) ,,-' (' 1/ ,~,,), 1!11 ~I~ \ i (~ ~-;:7 '-r~~. \'---.:2/-
...J X.11 ~ 'r ;'" i '. '" I "N "... .\1,' / ~'--, ,_ ,....\, ,i'q5 . \.. {
I '< (\ r r - '. " 'i" ,,/1 \ \j " ,\ 1 ,-' I .() / "1 -. / rI./..J "'J ,'~ ) il ;;~. 2/
Yclll~ ~ tJ 1 "'.Cl 1..._ r c fV~tp~ /p '. '1:'~ ~h;~~~~:\II_~~~~~~~~o
":) ',-\ / ""."\~~- ), I I~' '_' 'I' ~,
I'! 1 rl /v ,/ v 'I I "I ;(:' 0"'6':c.,;~-;~ / ,
. I \. I 0<., , , , . [\' 1 ./ -'I(___;7'j, , ,
r:--:-I '''\'" / I . " I -Ij r-,---~ I ,
... /, --- / / I , , . , ,
I I I ~-~)_,/, (\ ~ I If I"', :';-" I
!', /. ~~ '''--~-f-t D'j . . 1:L I 4.. ~..-:;,--d;:~__ _~
.I I..~,J,-- ;---I-----D------V--c-,,),"'- --/'rr...::.---- ---- ,_ 1f:::J-'---- 1~, 1\( , f'c
I'/') 00,; ", :, -' . r' 1\ \... I (
I .{ , r) ,\ \ " \. " ,
· , / if 6 '- 'f) '\j )1\ .\ ": ....~...;.. c.! Jj ,
~ / . [ , , \~~.J'~ .iJv",..", ,
~,?'J, N i) ,J i ," " .\. I \ / ; /) J
J:U../~ID", "'I, ,L ' /- " , \
I ~/.. \~'j\\~;~~\i)~i(tJ;~:')~( i(H~Jm )J~i!~~~'~'
~~~. t~ \;ILirt~(J,lff~'~s~'j ,'0 ," I ; ',h~ .\ z.~ (
I C/'-J\J 10 -) ~J!i/- )J~V-- f\,:\jr..::!{~I;'--:-~~ ~, = I ,~. l. V'g \ '\ ~/"~'~ (
\ I r '\>5' < () ) I (. I. ,Ij' I!, , '. t .... J) , "~I I
YCn4rlli?=t' P .!~ iT t~ /;'fj .. ~_.;: ~$< \ ..~\
I \, -, --J"", 'lOW. . 'In j",L '}'.1.1-." L~ of, _!: __ .
.J"i' \. ~'P' '\ 2. ',~ I" '1'/ c.. \ _ /-------- . ',;- ,I'
I - \ (( !I VJ \~) ,J If'" (\ I . J.c, j ) ,_, 15' /' [ ~ (
l ' ) ~ . --~/ I r' \ I I ;:::1":' " li ~_ \J J . ,
lA) j! ""'r'f' ~-'\ \.------' r--) ~\ ~ _L.;-_J ,,-~-- I\~I' -,"--=:':;::::-'I( ~ (~ I I --l ~....... ~
n~ ' r: ( 0 I -~::J..=-'---0 (I l---::.:: / ~ I ( , 1 ,J.. -' j I~A
~ (~- \... ~ \ , 0 ~~ DS\5": /\.~J M -::. " / l / -- \' I \ ~~ I,', ':.
I ~' ---..... "'..----" ~(/' ,l'J:. ) \ V "" c Ii ,\ ii :, ' I .~ . ',;/~
./---------, I., ~...~~ : " lj" // g, ,) It! I, I, ~" ---')' .~ L_',
-~, yJt-'./ - -":-"' / ~.J\ ...~ ~,' ", ~ 1;-'" 00-
I ',~ U2 'PI~- 1 (-"';'.\"7;0"- 1) ( /) ~', i ' , I"., v~_-, ) I-...L
i ) W" I /1' -', C' / i I,... -, . I, .: ,"~
li~~J~I~~J;~~~~ \~:j:;oj;' ) '~:3+-'~;:.~:~- ~:Lp'~i~
~ S$~- ,~(') ~ \ \l C0. 0';'\ i~ "Oi- . 1'" , G, C\
' ~ ~~/.<' . ~ i' '0 biL.U ~ ~7...) J k~YL' :J. \....Y ("" ~ c..'J) _Q" ! .
Ilil~$~~~~ ~-;;: ~4~' I~;~ i ~\ 00 \;;: "~-,>r~--^'---~ :~,.//~~ '.?Jc;
~~,),~ b..~ ,"'i ~. I ic' ::1 0 . .-, (\ f) ~b":::A
I llj,j\li,i\~~- \' nl '. ~\\ ! ~'~-~1 ---~~~+~'1'::'T:' T~\t-~~r~~
) )J. 8. ~ )) ;J / " I \ i ! \...... P \-.~ ,_\-- _ I (
I
I ~ :.Ii
('0')
N
cc
- ~'--"-
S :' ::J.
I "
N
cc
I 0')
~
I-
ILl
ILl
....
I 0
0
0
0
'"
0
N
I
I 00
~
.
'~:II 0
I 0 /1
~
, I
,
,
r '-
I I
I
I
I~
~
//
,./
" ~II.
. -.-c
'--
.
.~ I .'
'0
'. 0' J
c \ > :,~t 'i
. ( '0'-- Ii
. ~. I, .......-'.'
II . (,
Ii "
" 'I V) l ',--,,/,..
:: \ 01 \f""" Ivr\...
11./ .. ~'-..-:-
:i,--_c:=~ _L "'> :i:~
o ~ '~~--;i~-- \ ~i,
2c_/-~~
~~'J"
.'-,
j Nj
,;7'
( /'--~\
"
@
. .
.
li!:lU
">><
-...
~~
'~
o
~...
I
~"<<=Wl
.m
- ~-
o ,''<:t
o\\t~~'i:Q (Y)
-~-:-~'-
;-
f: 41
j, '
<Y)
:&
01
I
.'
,.Ia
oj 0
~f.P '
"
'1
,
I
I
',j
"
/
~.
:1
c)i
d-
j~'
l
1/
-1/
1/
II ~
Ii
Ii
U')
~
o
oC>
I
,
,j
J
=;'=T===~=~~C
, '
i', -"
Ql
01
f~i
0\;
..
'"
01
I
,
, ,
. .,
oc,..:>-
- //-
/~/
,.()' o.
; ,I .',',:
~It!}~
',fV'~ ~!;, ,
l111~ f:> i
,I, ~";")'
, :~:~ :~i~!::i-)ci
{ :;
,(".j
)
o
I
i
()
(};
, !,
."
\i-II
"
"
"
1/
1/
II
1/
+
~
.on
<:)
"
'"
o ;
0"
1/
1/
"
II
'ii
_/ --/711
;?
0'. 0 o.
~~.
, -;'-(l
00
" ,
.,
"i.
\,'"
1/
;, ::
\. 1/
- ;11
I 'I !~.., 1/: :
; \ 'J !_,,~\
" /1,1,,)
i: 1,1,
,IJ,
"
. .. . ,A/ .-.j
-,
i . ..', ~' 1,,'
I
,
f--- ;"
~'I"'.II
./} i'o'
\ i
I '. \, .
, ,
\ (,
I ".,"'.
\,~
i
../
.- ~ i
",,;./''\.,../(
-,' \
'-.........1
,.'
(..~:
, "
J /
o 1~
}It,
(I :
'r~~
-_/'~ .
"
"
r
i
i
I I
" ,
{ i
(---
I,. ,-~'"
\"'_ ~(...,O-'. ,,,--0",;-_,
. u 0". ~
.~ "', IV!
- ~ '1); '~,4 ~~ ". I ~ Oa~f
/' ~n~1-' c-,;~ / : ,;' ~I ; ~'!'$t.~31r~ ~~;l~> ".N;~
'J "'-;t; '~~ I:0J \ t:J\ ; '. ~~:;>il>f4:1/\.:::,s,:--~ ~\:~
r; I .~?ln;.,~\\)r ~~~u'-f ~ ..!)' ~''i!\.s' SJ-,-;, i_~.'':'~ ~. (fA' :(.foj~J1WYdt~ ~'1' 'ii4~~ d.......gA~:J~~
C', ~ U Ifi l~)n~, !, :::"\] \ .. 'JJ' 'F, _,. ">.1. ,
I\jOfl').~ ~hl~. ";" I (C,., ~, j I'" . " j' L. ......,
OW " ".v '06\. ~ ~" >.. II,;, ,. . .,i,_ .' I' '''l...f''
~"~v--~ '-, 'WOL,<< .~' " (V .f,1;{ (,,~ ~~ - .o~. -- '..'l'j~ "'"'4' '"rI:i.
:'''-->{'-.1 '" ~ .if "F ft' - -- hPk .. 1.0 ". '"1:, % "".1. _. .' _. 'v"
.--'@. (fc;' ~S H"--- -, ':L ~ ,".;, fU . fi . . '~0' 1.;() ~r :'1t'~~)
r.;; " ?'4'\ , '--. i,.l ,'.\ m~'" ~ y ~~,V~ ., t~ .. ~1' r u <' .!'l,i'I::,\ X'~
t,l,. ",:: D "" (J,M!: ...... ,-. ~ .(;;] ~" rz i~;;", ""*~
1~~;1l~&J""' . "". j,{t:;.. d"'.v;t0-.. ..V,",l:!h'JL S2.~
. -0__, .. r . ~ ,"" (;..1J C"\ 'i' . b ~(4-.J. r,.'A~ = . ~DO.,,,~O
~ ~~1" . " , ~' ..."....,' \ '\"b-'~'I r-- '~I~IJ~~_~lD._
ft p. \" '.. OS, ~. ~=--. " '\../~... ,'i' . .t,." if.\, ~F~
· w. ::r I:! - . " "'lL ~ . ,:1,,1;" ~t '
· . "" -', -- -.oil'" · '\ " "".;-",, '!." 0" . '. ~<J
~:' ...u "f'>,s,J C'-:/. w. 00 \:; l\'ti'f:'L.i C:'fi . ~t~c ^;
.. . I . a V ;<..:;; D,.,.). --... 00,..,., ,V
~ l dJ'. "'. ,e.o/ . 0 1.,0, .., .""'~~" .l~ . ~ ,,-~J:l... ~ i-
f ":, ~c "'"'. '. ". . li:"""if '-,.
, ~~, · - , >;' ~ . d~ ",{!--~. ". . , , D . ._ '~;ji".,O ' ....
' .,.'..&..l' ~~ 5'L,,-:.x .-"- :.,,;~' ':' 4''''~I''' '.'f'\)- ',. ~ ~
o' !( -;;'1J(((f/(f'Q ." :1W' ?~' u "'? .! Ie , ~, "rs [ ~\.~ . ~[
.. · '0 , r-->I '" . . , ... I . . "l '0'. t'C.' i"
1': "'. ~. - ~, . "" '" _ . . ~.' C7 .
' ll" ..Jt ~.L)'~' ()lo? on r ~'_~ . _ l:)
\.f~ - c;.. . Cl' y~ ' '~~~_11r~"11I;;'~':..j. ' q, "i::>;~ ',~ ~ . ( ,
~ /' 0 .~ I i1....1: \\.."~m.'r:'0.'1ff~q, ~ ~ '.1 .... f
'-'1. ~'.~~ 'v,' "1\ :~ ~c..,~ ~--\S,~. 0 , " ,'_.~
'.~"~I' ',\ ~CJ ~\f"-cj~ .... 2:! G. ~a; I ~!,... . :.....;~_
f,;{'r .. \\t., (c . .'\ L;c, . f/1' 's. ,! '(
~~b: - .~J'~~I' lO?^~~ .... 00 ~~. .,\(l..~~~.~J...~T '.. ~..'.~ 5.. I'"[~*3\",, -b....
..., ", "~ ~ ~ ""'0 ." .'0"-. ". b~1
I .'""".,u ...." 0." '" ~ '~j,j ?". ~
.') :t:.... . ;~'.. '''''~",'. . : '-J ~21~~..n; ~.t;l\. E "
' f\ · La:. >'<I~.. 'Oll1.' ~..u~ J ~'.. '~V(fY1
I <'t.......\ f~'. ": ......t.l" ~'If'~.... . f '. 0 ,to' (()~)~.~ ~ ~t '''o\..~!
~~r:.~," . . .~..I.n.....,.i.f5.'.l'...'.:....;..D. .l-., D';'.I(.t;...)).~ ..M. i't.. ".' .' :. ?-O.. . .... '. ~~ '\0..' ., "." /..!.~i
I itltft-'/-.!I!; .......... '...1........... 'c'..'.....7=...... . .y'..It~ I'~<?'. ~~,.. J.. _ ~.
'..g, ." '.'..fiH9. Q~=.. -- :--C 0
'Ip~ ~. ;..L...~......\....~.... .~.:..;..."'.:...... .... ".:).:d"" "" .,;..",,' ok.: r ~ . ';~( p .
II ,"':';:~J~~'{;i '~' ,,, 8 ~' ~Pj~l&;~ " !~ ~~~f. '0 '02 ~\0~ ~i~
.~....'.....'..'.... .'..-....,.:.:. ",y. t.".o;.t">~)I,)',~"" ..' ;~'.'~__
"'~ ...... iii' '~~ '" "., " .... .(
I ~ '.'. . · ."i'" ';'''' ...,~. . .
j2i;1:,., "t, ",..
ill"" . .. ..' .
14,..... ....
R ~ 0" ~
I C"li.... ..:...'. '-'.;
"."";<
.....,..,
I
I
I~:
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. ':";~"
'::.~'~~-~';
~
..
, (
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I The EDR-Aerial Photography
Print Service
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
Proposed Albertville Business
SE of Kadler Ave and 70th St
Albertville, MN 55301
April 22, 2002
Inquiry Number: 764896.5
R : Environmental
: Data
: Resources, Inc.
.
: an.ill8drcomp.ny
The Source
For Environmental
Risk Management
Data
3530 Post Road
Southport, Connecticut 06490
Nationwide Customer Service
Telephone: 1-800-352-0050
Fax: 1-800-231-6802
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
.... ", " -:.-. ':
..- ',,". ',-.:.::--.'
. .' - ". .
EDVir..ODIll.....e.....,.D..... tal Data Re sCJ.i#rces,.1 ...D.....C.
. . . . . " -. .' .
Aerial Photography PrilliSemce
Enviromnen1al Data Resources, Inc.' s (EDR) Aerial Photography Print Service is a screening tool designed to assist professionals in
evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. AS1M E 1527-00, Section 7.3 on Historical
Use Information, identifies the prior use requirements for a Phase I environmental site assessment The AS1M standard
requires areview of reasonably ascerflJinable standard histcricaJ sources. Reasonably ascertainable means ir(ormation
that is publicly available. obtainable from a source with reasonable time and cost constraints, and practically reviewable..
To meet the prior use requirements of AS1M E 1527-00, Section 7.3.4, the following standard historical sources
may be used: aerial photographs, fire insurance maps, property tax files, land title records (although these cannot be the sole
historical source consulted), topographic maps, city directories, building department records, or zoninglland use records.
ASlM E 157:7-00 requires "Allobvious uses of the property shall be identijiedfrom the present, back to the property s
obvious first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier. This task requires reviewing only as many oj the standard
historical sources as are necessary, and that are reasonably ascerflJinable and likely to be useful. "(AS1M E 157:7-00,
Section 7.3.4, page 12.
Aerial Photographs
Aerial photographs are a valuable historical resoW"Ce for documenting past land use and can be particularly helpful when
other historical sources (such as city directories or ftre insurance maps) are not reasonably ascertainable. The EDR
Aerial Photograph Print Service includes a search of aerial photograph collections flown by public and
private agencies for the state of Minnesota. EDR's professional field-based researchers provide digitally
reproduced historical aerial photographs at approximately ten year intervals.
Disclaimer
Copyright and Trademark Notice
This report contains information from a variety of public and other sources. Environmental Data
Resources, Inc. (EDR)@ has relied on the infonnation provided to itfrom such sources. EDR has not reviewed and does not
warrant or guarantee the completeness. accuracy. timeliness or authenticity of such irifonnation in preparing this report.
17fE INFORMATION AND ME17fODOLOOY USED TO COMPILE TlfIS REPORT. AND TlfE ANALYSIS AND SERVICES INTENDED
TO BE PROVIDED BrTlfIS REPORT ARE PROVIDED "AS IS" wrmOCff WARRANrY OR GUARANTY OF ANY KIND. EDR DISCUlMS
ANYOlHFRE:XPRE::8CR/MPllFD WARRANlTESWllHRE9'Fa7DTHlSREPOKJ.4NDAIL THElNFDRMA11aVcmrADVEDHEREIN,IM:1J.I[)JMJ,
WTJHOUT UMll'ArrON, /MPUED W ARRANl7ES OF MERCHANTABIUfY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. In no evem
shall EDR be liable for any indirect. special. punitive or consequential damages, whether arising out of contract. ton or
otherwise, arising out of this report and the information contained herein even if EDR has been advised of the
possibility that such damages may arise.
Entire conten1s copyright 2000 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) AD rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or fol'T1/01,in whole or
in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources. Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written pennission.
EDR and the edr logos are registered trademarks of Environmental Data Resourr:es, Inc. or its affiliates. AD other trrJdernarks used herein are the
property of their respective owners.
IJ':.'?:' ','{ ,;~~,-i.
'\,' ,.I/:>:' , . .'Ill
./;:.4~,~ "l'~-
:"l
.f
1'~"''''I',;,~-lC
. " 'f....,
" +: ~".
. .". -. [4'
I
I
ERIN M. GREENWOOD
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST
I
I
I
EDUCA nON
1995-1999, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
B.A. Environmental Studies/ English Literature
SPECIALIZED TECHNICAL TRAINING
OSHA Hazardous Waste Operations Health and Safety Training, 29 CPR
1910.120
I
Minnesota Asbestos Inspector Accreditation Course
I
SELECTED PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
Areas of specialty include:
I
I
Underground Storage Tank: Conducts UST removal, on-site testing and
Petro fund reimbursement applications.
Field Experience: Experience in soil and groundwater monitoring and
sampling and geoprobe/hollow stem auger oversight. Preparing well logs,
bore logs and measuring field parameters.
I
I
Environmental Assessment Services: Conducts phase I and phase II
envirownental site assessment research. Develops costs estimates and
proposals.
I
I
Environmental Research: Completes extensive envirownental research
including historical resource collection and analysis, internet research, aerial
photograph review, groundwater receptor surveys and well log review,
regulatory agency file review and online file retrieval and review.
Wastewater Services: Performs compliance monitoring for the
Metropolitan Airport Commission.
I
SELECTED COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
St. Paul Chamber of Commerce Member
I
I
I
I
I
13400 15m AVENUE NORTH. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55441
PHONE (763) 559-1423 . FAX (763) 559-2202. E.-MAIL LIESCH@LIESCH.COM
I
I
MARJe S. MILLER
PROJECT MANAGER/ AQUATIC BIOLOGIST
I
EDUCATION
I
1979, Bemidji State University, Bemidji, 11N
B.S. / Aquatic Biology
1996, Environmental Technology Center
Corp! of Engineer! Wetland Delineation CourJe
I
I
REGISTRA TIONSjCERTIFICA TIONS
Certified Fisheries Scientist
Asbestos Inspector, 11N and NE
Provisional Certification - Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Design
I
PROFESSIONAL rvfEMBERSHIPS
American Fisheries Society; American Society of Limnology and
Oceanography; North American Lake Management Society; Minnesota
Wetland Delineators Association; Sensible Land Use Coalition
I
I
SELECTED PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
~ Has over twenty years of experience as an environmental scientist and
project manager.
I
~ Is project manager for NPDES storm water runoff monitoring
programs at the Metropolitan Airport Commission;
delineation/identification of wetland areas; identification of impacts to
damaged biological systems; enhancement of existing wetlands;
creation of artificial wetlands; and the collection, analysis and
interpretation of biological and water quality data for investigations to
reduce nutrient and sediment loadings and to mitigate the effects of
acid rain on aquatic ecosystems and to reduce nutrient and sediment
loadings. Activities include preparation of monitoring plans,
monitoring site selection/evaluation, analysis/interpretation of water
quality data, development and implementation of fish management
plans, aquatic biota collection and analysis and report writing.
I
I
I
~ Has experience in conducting and managing phase I and II
environmental site assessments, regulatory compliance audits and
underground storage tank investigation.
I
I
~ Completes projects for area watershed districts that include: managing
restoration projects, preparing monitoring programs, designing
restoration alternatives, conducting nutrient and sediment loading
studies and preparing annual watershed reports for the watersheds.
Presents information obtained from watershed projects to the
watershed boards.
I
I
I
I
1340015111 AVENUE NORTH' MINNEAI)OLIS, MN 55441
PHONE (763) 559-1423 . FAX (763) 559-2202' E-MAIL LIESCH@LIESClI.COM
I
I
JOHN C. LICHTER, P.E.
PROJECT MANAGER/ENGINEER
I
EDUCATION
I
1972, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois
B.s. I Civzl Engineering, Emphasis in Environmental Engineering
I
REGISTRA TIONS/CERTIFICA nONS
Professional Engineer, MN, WI, IA, MI, NE, KS, MO, AZ, SD, CO, NV,
UT, IL, IN, NC, and MS
Registered Environmental Site Assessor, CA
Registered Groundwater Professional, IA
I
I
PROFESSIONAL IvfEMBERSHIPS
Air and Waste Management Association, American Society of Civil
Engineers
I
I
SELECTED PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE
~ A Principal of the firm with twenty-five years of experience as a project
manager on engineering design, site remediation, site assessment and
environmental compliance projects.
~ Responsible for: process engineering design, utility design and
management, rate study preparation, pretreatment system design, water
supply and distribution design, environmental site assessment work for
property transfer and environmental compliance, UST removal
projects, SARA compliance work, contract administration, land
disposal site design, hydrogeological investigation, waste to energy
system analyses and implementation, materials recovery analysis, RCRA
and CERCLA site investigation compliance work and permitting.
I
I
I
Environmental Site Assessment: Has significant expertise and experience in
Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments (ESA). He has
conducted ESAs on over 500 sites varying from open, undeveloped land to
occupied commercial and industrial sites covering several square city
blocks. Successfully completed soill groundwater remediation, hazardous
waste clean-up, tank-removals and remedial work at affected sites to the
satisfaction of developers and their lenders. Experienced with all types of
interested parties (buyers, developers, lenders, lessees, and stockholders).
Has assessed potential environmental compliance issues for companies in
several states. Mr. Lichter has managed environmental remediation projects
at several "Brown fields" sites.
I
I
I
I
Process Engineering: Experience in process engineering includes designing
and developing pretreatment facilities for industrial waste treatment, paper
felt operations and metal fmishers. Assists in the completion of sanitary
sewer inflltration/inflow (III) studies for municipalities. His III experience
includes approximately thirty projects in the upper Midwest. These projects
included all phases of III and sewer system evaluation survey 'work, many
of which were located in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area.
I
I
I
13400 15T11 AVENUE NORTH. MINNE-::APOLlS, MN 55441
PHONE (763) 559-1423. FAX (763) 559-2202. E-~L\IL LIESCH@LIESCH.COM
I
I
JOHN C. LICHTER, P.E.
I
Storage Tank Removal/Reg:ulat01:}' Compliance: Has managed dozens of
tank removals and site remediation projects throughout the United States.
Assists clients with all types of regulatory compliance issues including
closure, monitoring, site remediation, financial assurance and Petro fund
reimbursement. Tank projects he has managed include petroleum fuels,
chlorinated solvents, non-halogenated solvents, acid/caustic solutions,
pesticide products, raw materials and reactive compounds at military
facilities.
I
I
Solid Waste: Completes the preparation of solid waste management plans;
feasibility studies for solid waste processing facilities; review of
Environmental Assistance applications; landfill siting, evaluation,
hydrogeological investigation and design; transfer station design and
construction. Waste disposal sites, transfer stations composing and
recycling facilities have been designed and permitted as part of his project
activities.
I
,I
I
Hazardous Waste: Prepares RCRA Part B permit applications for facilities
containing hazardous materials, closure plans for hazardous waste storage
facilities, and UST notifications. Conducts remedial investigations of
contaminated sites and coordinates emergency response actions for clean-
up, preplanned environmental audits, RCRA compliance and permit
records for various clients.
I
I
Industrial Waste: He has prepared pretreatment feasibility studies for
industries generating wastes regulated under federal categorical standards
and subject to strength surcharges from local wastewater authorities.
Develops discharge monitoring programs and has played an integral role in
facility permitting and landfill co-disposal permitting. In addition, has
completed the design of operating pretreatment systems.
I
I
Groundwater: Has participated in several water utilization and management
projects. Experience ranges from the design of municipal water supply
wells to troubleshooting groundwater and foundation problems.
Participated in a study to determine the effect of foundation drain
discharges and peak flow prediction to a typical sanitary sewer system.
I
I
Site Remediation: He has managed or been on the design team of several
site remediation projects. Affected media include soil and groundwater
from landfills, storage tanks, junkyards, and industrial activities.
Remediation methods employed include excavation, thermal treatment, soil
vapor extraction, air sparging, air stripping, groundwater extraction and
treatment, solvent washing, bioventing and bioremediation.
I
I
Environmental Compliance: Has participated in a wide variety of
environmental compliance activities. Compliance areas include air
permitting, SARA reporting, stormwater NPDES permitting, spill
prevention control and counter measure planing, RCRA and waste disposal
compliance, asbestos management, storage tank issues and wastewater
discharge issues.
I
I
I
13400 15TfI AVENUE NORTH. MINNEJ\POLIS, MN 55441
PHONE (763) 559-1423. FAX (763) 559-2202' E-r.L\IL LIESCII@LIESCI-I.COM
I
I
JOHN C. LICHTER, P.E.
I
Industrial Facilities: Has completed environmental work for the following
industries: agricultural operations and retail sales, construction and
brownfields redevelopment, food processing (meat, dairy, egg, vegetable
and brewing), lumber and wood products, metal products and metal
finishing, mining, munitions manufacturing, public utilities, pulp and paper
manufacturing, waste treatment, hazardous waste processing, landfills,
medical supplies, glass, fiberglass and ceramics manufacturing, automobile
and truck parts manufacturing, cement and concrete products, chemical
manufacturing, dry cleaning, printing, leather products, electronic
equipment, telecommunications, railroads, pipe line, fuel storage and
industrial machinery.
I
I
I
PUBLICATIONS i\ND PRESENTATIONS
"Going Beyond ASTM Phase I Environmental Assessments" Presented at
a seminar entitled Managing Environmental Risk sponsored by Lindquist &
Vennum PliP, September 9,1999.
I
I
"Dealing with On-site Contamination as Part of a Real Estate Transaction"
Presented at the MPCA Annual Hazardous Waste Conference, May 20,
1999.
I
"Stormwater NPDES Permitting" Presented to Aggregate Ready Mix
Membership at three meetings in August 1992.
I
"Environmental Audits" Presented at the Environmental Solutions
Exposition in Minneapolis, September 17, 1992.
I
DEPOSITIONS AND TRI.AL EXPERIENCE
Angeles Corp. vs Yocum Oil, et al.
Represented defendant. Provided deposition 19981
I
Great Dane vs City ofRoseville, et al.
I
Represented defendant. Provided deposition 19971
I
Sylvester Brothers Development Company vs Great Central Insurance Co.,
et al. --
State of Minnesota-District Court
Anoka County-Tenth Judicial District
I
Represented plaintiff. Provided deposition testimony in 1990.
I
I
I
13400 15TH AVENUE NORTH. MINNEAPOLIS, l\lN 55441
PHONE (763) 559-1423. FAX (763) 559-2202. E-MAILLIESCH@LlESCII.COM
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l'Il1JH-Wl:.LL 1'11'11.:11'11'11 UI'I11 r ax ; 0::>1- "a:>-U';::I n:s
JUl .:> 'UL
~:l(
I"'.Ul
Environmental Health Division
P.O. Box 64975
51. Paul, Minnesota 55164..0976
WELL MANAGEMENT SECTION
, Facsimile Cover Sheet
Fax Number: (651) 215..0978
DATE:
7-~-rJ?--
Ch ~ ~ ~ POI.vJ Of.
TO:
ADDRESS:
FAX NO:
FROM:
PHONE: (651) :;}"1. ~-('J )?;;J. 'it
Number of pages, including cover sheet:
REMARKS:
If transmission is incomplete or illegible,
please call sender (shown at "FROM" above).
I, O:\Wcllmgml\origll\faxcovcr lOIOOR
~cra1ln1Onn\1ti()n: (eSS1) 21S-5800 · 'rDDITrY: (651) 215-8980 . Minnesota R,day Semce: (800) 627.~;29 . www;hca1m.srare...nm.us
For direcdo.os to u)" of the MOM loc::adODl;, call (651) 215-5800 . An equal opportrmity employer
I
MDH-WELL MN(jMNI UN11 t-ax:l:)~l-Ll~-U'::l(~
I Ii!,-r...~ {.f"''i~ ~e'~:;:~'~
~7 \;:r... .l!1I f" _'
. WELL~IONNCILOcA"" '~~ . DEPAllTMENTOFHEALlli
QQlJNImI . WELL AND BORING SEALING RECORD ~
I \...11> ~ -1 "1""" ~...... aw,.r 1_ ':l
TGwMI1lPNIInIlt T.....Ha. ,....,. NIl. 8Mb (Im.. jI,J ~...... .I, .t
I"Z.IIJ IZJ.IJ ~ 4 I ~q · '7fbO~ t::t ...
I ;~ 8lIMtAdIDM llI'..............cavOltWIIIIlf8oq1.G5lbo ,_
1./ . ~....~ "2.. E
IiIlOw _1DaaIIon0lt "'1II'1Iadna ..... .......111'..... AGIIIWl(t)
1n-1IIId wIlh 'X". blIIIan, ..... pIlDPIItf [J",,,,, CJ........,
I "'---lUlrJnoI, '-._fIIlA
I N
1 0 __...... 0 MoM. w.I
. [] ......... "'* . 0 0IlIIf
Iii CMlNlil 'IWeCI)
. ;. T [:J ..... [J..... [) TIa 0 ok
. ! i.. ~
i . i 1 w; ~
~1~--+ ~llI.hnI~D~ll.
~/:1 kl""':. -n."r~~ r~.ll .L..~ _In.hm_ D_to
1-1 ~Ol~~61T~1O ::;;;-=-=- '"_t
?1- 1-0" ~~ 'h"VL.. Mtl ea--.' tD to DpenH*fr1lm
I r-u-~HANe' ss...-u,
w.I__.......--lf.............-..___................. T.."~
T_
I .....04aICAI.;IIATIIItAI. 00l.0R la:a,.::-.... 10 [J......... IJ.'"'-'t [J ~ .
IlIII--...... .........~..._-....fJ/I...... I5IHaD UMDl'OIULANIIIILM.w:e....... CAIIM.~ CAIIfO.,.. eoRI!lIClUIl:
!LA...... .-..,,~ '. \ rt.. ~ "I ~-t. 0 ,C ~""""""E* .
[] ......... gRlIDd...........
I L... ,... ..LAJ '1lAJ ~...... Iqt' 2.' [] ~I"tdIlI.l.,....1M
~ 1&-1'" .' ~ L~,' /9J ~ In.... ~ ..~..
7 RnJ D ,,"',"IIJ ~~ t~ ~o
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
w
I
~~
~~~,'l
ii II. Ifli"~. v
Q t/Ih.-.-c!'
~ ...., 41u
"~~"
8ClGlDE O'F'1IaTA, 1JlIIIIIICUl............
f;Jv\t PM -sec..'(' tJs I ('~JI
I - 30 I f,.t-; ~
I _1lEPI" OF......lHOOPY I H
F1~
109800
JUl .::> 'UL
~;l(
t'.UL
-
i.tti:'" ~ 10~800
llIlI WllIII'.... I
"111:.0 J, l:} ~
~
J
to ~o.th
tTA1ICWAftR l.IMfL
..
CJ....... ~
"'~tJ lL )lJ-. 0 "'-........
s.1ft___",*,
eVa. 6
c~~
cv.
[]v..
IJYM
DfoIt
eND
OMo c~
[] No 0 lInIiIIoWn
[]V.
_II>>
to.
~
CJ~ CD6lo C,.. ONl>~
~--.tr [J YM 0 No
.......
IJ........, [] ~
afllllll
It.
[J.......... D.....
tD
1p1lf.........
CJ 0..-
....1IIIIALtI)
~....... $Itl G, J"f!'i.'fa --2- .~ t._ )lIIdI ~ ...
.....-II;t-.._r-lt_llIiIII
flrIllI_tD_"_~_1lIga .
llllm _ tD_ ft._ ,... _ lIIOI
-.u.MD_
Ohr..-.s_....IDlngOft~ 0 'fa D No
~CM-......... ~1'IDII
lllIIWII or badn8-.....In_.. "--'1luIN. CllIpIIIr.Qlll, n..~ tIOlIIUlId 1n1Nl ",",,'-
........ ....tL"'t.....
~r~~ /~... J 1.,.__1~ & M 0101
Irt~ ~ J: ~ ~~*~-k.
~ OUt I
~f-V I JJ ~.;~ .u,.
,.".fII,...,.....MftJtlllMtf ~
-.... .----- - .---- - . - ---
1G/8SR
I
MDH-WELL MNGMNI UNll I-a?<:b~l-ll~-U'='(~
~(::1C~lt~Y
~ ~ti1 .r"nlllf........W.rt\
JUl
~ 'Ul
~:l(
.t'.U~
I
UK . .. ..... ~ -
I WATEll WilL lltCOIlD U~~ .y.a at.. &. " ,
"-'1 ] nf fkr ".-- '" .
~........,... fff"M
f_ ~...... --' - r~?fr~r --iI-~;' i- ~ .. _n__.=-__.
_11 .. II ,8"t-<-c.-~ '1'~"".....~~.rc..",
I
.--.,-....-..---.-....,......-....- - ~ 1./ l" ,; J'...._c..-...- O-.,-e.,./ ,
. U-e_6-"-c...:r. ...~_e.-/
..""'.....~-4....~......f'M..... lilt," lIO__.,__ ... ....1.LKi'fli_ J-"~'"
/~C} ,. It. t:, . ;J. S -!i' '1
. --
.1.. . . -I.."
I . '-10......_ .0_ ..0...- .oC.,.
. . . I '
" .'- ft' . ... -,... E -,- JCNoA-_ .0_ .o_ liO
. .-1 '
. ; . ,fool.
- -. . . . ; -t-;- .c -... .0_ .c:I__
. 1
. . wo- o, UK
..t. .. -,o. -., .. ..--
I .0_ .0_.._ 10,_
S aC~.. 10.._ ~,....,."..,..
-1'-:",_
t. YO".AIIGtlI.OO! t'O._ ~1IIll'~ .- to .0,.. ...... OC....~ oQ
'.- .._,~- MOI.tllla"
121..... .c-
.a...... .0_ s.oo.. ...
- ;ODUlOHAl DATA IWUWI ..0"..... oC __, fM_ ...-
~. _:J..-'...._ -.....-n.
... n.~..._ II ........ -
...... - - - ~.. --.JJ:
FEe 24191' .... II. - - - '*-II.
'. ,--'~ I~--
- -- ...... -~.
'- ...
..- JII" ~ ~
! -- .....
FrDllt~ "",-,
...-.- - ....., _fL
- 11..... II.
.. sZ'...'t'ft; W~.!A ...YIU.
9'0 ~o-- --
... "'_l.lVa.___1
...- -- K"-
...- -- II....
.1. _..........~QUII
. .0___ -
.0__ 'OA6.....I...~...
...~~
~o...
~o.-. ~_ .0
-- -_to ........
-
- -
"'~--or~iCIllMY~
.... -- -
----....... v..c ...0
. ...-
r
-- c..._
-
~-
-- ""--
~."'....- a._. .......
Xc -lJ,a ~ ~.,,--
TJ... .0....- QLa,_ .0_...
,clot ~ to
~.__.- .... _T"'_"CDMnM:IOII~DJm..":t_
IL MIIINHUL ~A_lIIX/JIo;IIarDl\__ .........----..----..-..
-
9c . ~u.;l~ '- ..._01_--......_
,13~ ~--'-"
-
. ~~'w. --- -,...,
~a-L.l.....-L. iN IJtT~.,,,, .
- .
, c;; &VfO ~" --~~~
-Ci--,-,->-<- ,-vt: ..z-~Cilt-q .;
t;::; . ~ if~ ,:l.
''"l.~,,;> ~ "-, a-:;: ~~.. Duo
. -l ...... .. ......
WORK COPY JofE-QI21B-Ol
"N..r"~rOl """"no
_r. 1tIIIl!IfC-v.L
\J ~'l ,,1,.(
~
1 ..",
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MDH-WELL MNGMNT UNIT
C~~~f
::~ l~..il \~, I;~~ \::.'~
,...~ ~U .
Fax:651-21~-o9(~
STATE OF IUNNESOTA IeMDENT OF HEALTH
ABIUmOftED WElL RECORD
. JUl .:> 'UL
~:HS
t'.U4
L/
1. LIltATJGI OIIC~L I Ml~~J~~'~~\ ~] KG. I tv' 1" '/1 J
Qutlty 111M .. - .~ I
To""rlll~ II... t_,hfp IIUeIler ".p ~l' SeR1DII ... Frtcn.. 4_ lllU. DE"" (c.pJI\tIlIl illite subd
II " .. 0' 41
121;" 24- Dr :J4. 110 - ft. 4-26-90
OtsBgO If
......tca' s~...t Mil..." Ill" Ctuo af ~II LOclt1n Of' lI1JUftC' fr. llN. S. amUn IlETIIOIl (ff "-I
Intlructfon JO e.",. tIltl .0 "vir. J[J Drl_In ltQ OkO
94(JO - 65th StJree1; N.EI .A2b8rtuU.1e./tN 55301 l[] l1li11... lIIeI o Air l(J1D"" no
SluIu IN..r. l.cul.... of ...11.l!J:Df!214-10D-342402 ~ IIIU.-, I[J "-"Uol SO '_r .cug"..
(In 1..1;fOll ,rtd vi tlI .,l.1 Skttcll .~ ,f ..U lucnf,. I. omllJl;T[1IXS
M -----=------ ...\"\ v.n .utnIC~ 0 'I' R II,.
. Ollstruc~lll1ll rtlllOYM 0 Yn o !to 11 oOn..uct1on:s c.~t lie
~ L . - . . . .- . ...
. . . ~'\ "IIIOnd. COnfact IlllH
I I . . "'el... JelIU.,.
'II . . . -. . .. . ...- E . n D
.
, . . T X, 7. aS~
. .- ... . . - -- .... tm Oo.enfc 4Q 1I01IltOrfll' I[J R,n ~
. . . .
. 1 "*3"'1 2[J frrfganoll o ..,1I11c (J IlIlIUltl'1
. .1. . . .'. . - .,., .. -,. ..
, . J[] Tin lieU f[] MIIa1e111111 lICJ l:DMtn; 1&1
-,~'" ~ 70 Air Contlf&1oAlAg 10
2. PIVlan OlIQ'S IIA/ll; IIIolllnl AdIIrIu ff 4tff'rellt tlllA t. QSJQ(S) J
Doug~a$&Da.l.e Vetac1 p",lIIIr~ .......15 fndtCIUd lbove tS'''CIl 4[] 'nor....1I '0
~ sue: . (J 1I.lv. !tJ V.l..
(Ve1;sCh Pcrtnsr.th.~j ~ P'utie ICI St6tlll...~ Staal
IIUIIIIESS Of' .4.. fa. C. 11t} ft.
3_ fIIJl1UIOIl UIG QIl..OR. FCJIlMTIDIt '. TO
I' na~ ~n. ladh:l~ 111l'l1ltfDJI lel' ,,... ..... woll It' a~.rIt1...n. fn. td fl.
INEY 1fE[,L ZOfJ. ~J'06? t. 5C1!Elr
o Sa......d ...11 frM 10~ ft. to ..1.19"-.
(If~1
1:1 Opa. .It. f.... _ R. to _ 't.
10. STATIC \lATU UVU
55.. ft. fa ..tl. [J oboy. 4-26-jJ{J
lol1d ",rtu;a ft. Htasll.'"
- 11. IiRLIlI'O ClJllltmOlt ,
ua MtllSl M'JOr CI FlIVlIC Buried
ao lUMen ottnc ,0
~ lItU pft .
&. ~. tuYATIOlI. sOUllCC OF IIATA . ~Slll6S lWIIIYm. CASrkGS 'Of_TO. m. 12. YIlIITll1C rlI'ClRMl'ID/I
I e Ileac ClMII& CJ "'"tantu 0
Pump and S' 01 1" {JCJ.v.. drop p1.1JfJ Iirllut ..cart., fNII_ta_ fe. Cu. T4:S_
j rB1llDDed fr07II. 411 w1.1. 9J _gs_ _
ars..2.l grouted. =oth 9i btJg(I oj' portlan4 -
U. 1I....1lEST ~M'tI1If
ceme:nt ~ trtll.1tne pt]MI fro.", ~ fl.' '"I'O,101la $tl'UJe" t)'llt .
boff01ll. 1;0 'tOp. IIeII tlf.far.ctU e.t'In ".Ull'!' f! y..
PIpe l.eft 21' bs.lOlD ground. .
14.,1IM' IZIlltwftd a IIDt ,"Rllt
r".; 111 rul.l'1nta tJ L.S. 'l'llrlllae (] Rtd~.Cin,
2[] .Jet (J telltl"'.l I(J
15. OISTII4 ViU.S ('l.... sk"CIl lllUClalls af .OAftdonld oIJId
"'he ifill. fa ......" SKti.. 0.. ... ...ck.l
. 0\he1' 1III,,11Id .Ut.) III ".....~1r 0 'II Ji9 No I
rA:~ . "'~fotIlldt 0 ...-.... [J T........ry 0 JIq~ ,..1,. I
' 4 . -.. '. -:,
I.. I.,;; ~ t1. IIATSR IC~.. tIIII'l'UCTOl$ (I~lnCATIIlII
r.... .-."'" nts lieU .... ...111I ..... 1\7 jll..lIl1l1:t101l ...d thfJ repor;
t....-:.. "-
'... '.. " \ Is ...... ta tile .,t of . '-ledt. and "I let' .
.'Q..."I. . \
. ., .~...,~ ..';>>- ~. JlAC'S ULL 4' P1JNp SERVIC8 /lt86596
.. .\r~..~~J ,
.~;....t e.' I,' :JU:J~"':rl'm.IIf' .~ I.'U'IS. II...
"\ '...."... ,:.: A~
. J.
. .r =~~~2~90 I
, "-
, .
.
llIFIC;lAL .......llIllIO MD.!' UcallD (Illy" IIIINt 'lIP '"',.~ T"..5r.,.) II.- .f Drln...
~. r.z;y W.l'a' _
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, Box 25
500 Lafayette Road
51. Paul, Minnesola 55155-40_
Phone: (651) 296-7863 Fax: (651) 296-1811 E-mail: sarah.hoffmann@dnr.state.mn.us
June 20, 2002
Michele Jackson Caron
RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
611 0 Blue Circle Drive # 1 00
Minnetonka, MN 55343
---.---_~__w__________~_
Re: Request for Natural Heritage information for vicinity of proposed Albertville Business Park, T121N
R24W Section 35, Wright County
NHNRP Contact #: ERDB 20020932-0002
Dear Ms. Caron,
The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed to determine if any rare plant or
animal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one-mile
radius of the area indicated on the map enclosed with your information reqliest. Based on this review, there
are no known occurrences of rare species or natural communities in the area searched.
The Natural Heritage database is maintained by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research
Program, a unit within the Division of Ecological Services, Department of Natural Resourc~s. IUs
continually updated as new information becomes avanabie; an.dis,the inostcomplete souree'of data on
Minnesota's rare or otherwise significant species, natUfaJ. cOmInunities, 'and other natural features. lts
purpose is to foster better understanding and protection of these features.
Because our information is not based on a comprehensive inventory, there may be rare or
otherwise significant natural features in the state that are not represented in the database. A county-by-
county survey of rare natural features is now underway, and has been completed for Wright County. Our
information about natural communities is, therefore, quite thorough for that county. However, because
survey work for rare plants and animals is less exhaustive, and because there has not been an on-site survey
of all areas of the county, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist on the
project area.
Please be aware that review by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program focuses only
on rare natural features. It does not constitute review or approval by the Department QfNatural Resources
as a whole. If you require further information on the environmental review process for other wildiife-
related issues, you may contact your Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist, Mike North, at (218)
828-2433.
An invoice for the work completed is enclosed. You are being billed for map and database search
and staff scientist review. Please forward this invoice to your Accounts Payable Department. Thank you
for consulting us on this matter,. and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources.
,:=~6;;",..'..:.....~,...'...t-
'Eri4ang~fed' Species E~vkoIl~ei1tiI Review. C~rdll1ator
:'. .... . . . '. , " ,',"- . -,...'. ~. ...
end:
Invoice .,,'
DNR Information: 651-296-6157 · 1-888-646-6367 · TrY: 651-296-5484 · 1-800-657-3929
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Who Values Diversity
o
Printed on Recycled Paper Containing a
Minimum of 10% Post-Consumer Waste
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
~Rffif~Xfrs8t!lE?WCE
July 3, 2002
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
RLK Kuusisto, Ltd.
6110 Blue Circle Drive
Suite 100
Minnetonka, MN 55343
RE: RLK No. 2001-239-M
Pre-EAW - Darkenwald Real Estate; construct commercial/officelwarehouse lots
Albertville, Wright County
SHPO Number: 2002-2715
Dear Ms. Caron:
Thank you for consulting with our office during the preparation of an Environmental
Assessment Worksheet for the above referenced project.
Based on our review of the project information, we conclude that there are no properties
listed on the National or State Registers of Historic Places, and no known or suspected
archaeological properties in the area that will be affected by this project.
Please contact us at (651) 296-5462 if you have any questions regarding our comments
on this project.
Sincerely,
\h-~
-Dennis. A. Gimme~tad , ., .. .. .. ..
'Government Programs and Compliance Officer.
:\4;' KEI.LO(;(; U()liI.EVAnnWEST I SAIN'T PAlIL. MINNESOTA :;;;1n:.1-I'IIl(i I TELEPIIONE: ('!)I-:.1%-61:U.
I
I
I
I
I
'1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
n Pinn.acllJ.
Y EnglnlJlJflng
MINNESOTA ROUTINE
ASSESSMENT METHOD
(MnRAM)
For:
Darkenwald Retail Development
Albertville, Minnesota
Prepared for:
RLK-KUUSISTO, LTD
6110 Blue Circle Drive,
Suite 100
Minnetonka, Minnesota
Pinnacle Engineering, Inc.
101 Broadway Street West
Suite 100
Minneapolis, MN 55369
1500 First Avenue NE
Rochester, MN 55906
I
I
I
I
I
MINNESOTA ROUTINE ASSESSMENT METHOD (MnRAM)
FOR EVALUATING WETLAND FUNCTIONS - Version 2.0
FOR:
Darkenwald Retail Development
NW 1/4 of Section 35, Township 121 North, Range 24 West
Albertville, Minnesota
I The Site is situated just north of Interstate 94, south of 70th Street (Kadler Avenue) in Albertville,
Wright County, Minnesota (Figure 1). The Site consists of approximately 100 acres of undulating,
I undeveloped land, which is comprised of wetlands, agricultural fields, and a farmstead. The Site is
situated in a developing area of Albertville and is bound by agricultural fields on the north and
northeast, an outlet mall to the east, Interstate 94 to the south and southwest, and agricultural fields
I to the west.
The following are the summary pages for the Routine Assessment Method (MnRAM-version 2.0) for
I evaluating wetland functions and values for the wetlands associated with the Darkenwald Retail
. Development Site in Albertville, Minnesota. All pages of the completed MnRAMs are stored, via
computer, at Pinnacle Engineering's offices and are available upon request.
I Two wetland complexes and one isolated wetland were identified during the wetland delineation for
the Site. The hydrologic regime of the wetlands was determined with the aid of Farm Service Agency
I aerial photographs that indicated the wetland persistence over 20 years, historical precipitation data,
soils, and topography. The Wetland 1 complex consists of a flow through wetland with an excavated
I ditch that floods a Type 3 wetland basin and is fringed with a Type 1 wetland. However, the Type 1
fringe varies in width and is hydrated mainly by the drainage ditch. Therefore, only one MNRAM
was prepared for this wetland complex. A MNRAM was also completed for the third isolated
I wetland, Wetland 3.
The Wetland 2 complex is influenced by more than one hydraulic regime and has more than one
I basin, therefore, Wetland 2 has separate MNRAMs prepared for each of the hydraulic regimes. The
Wetland 2 complex consists of a flow through Type 3 basin hydrated by an excavated drainage ditch.
I Surrounding the Type 3 basin is a Type 2 wetland hydrated from surficial runoff from the
surrounding fields more than from the drainage ditch. A Type 1 basin forms an arm of the complex
and occasionally connects to the Type 2 wetland via a variable swale dominated by reed canary grass
I (Phalaris arundinacea) FACW+. For the purpose of clarification, Pinnacle has identified the Type 3
wetland as 2A, the Type 2 wetland as 2B, and the Type 1 basin as 2C.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I GENERAL INFORMATION:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MINNESOTA ROUTINE ASSESSMENT METHOD
FOR EVALUATING WETLAND FUNCTIONS (MnRAM) - Version 2.0
Wetland Number:
1
SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS:
1. Description of temporal factors of this assessment due to seasonal considerations and/or existing
hydrologic and climatologic conditions (e.g., after heavy rains, snow or ice cover, frozen soil, during drought period,
during spring flood, during bird migration). Circle those that apply and list others (use back of page if necessary):
This assessment was completed after a month of heavy rains (June 2002) and the temperature was
approximately 80-85 degrees F.
2. Description of the Wetland Assessment Area: the project site, the wetland, wetland portion or wetland
complex being evaluated. (If the evaluation area consists of more than one wetland type it may be necessary to
complete an assessment for more than one Wetland Assessment Area.) (Use back of page if necessary):
The lt1.58-acre Site is comprised primarily of agricultural land and also includes a single family home,
wetlands, an excavated ditch system, and an abandoned pasture.
3. Description of the Wetland Comparison Domain: the geographic area (e.g., the political boundary, major
or local watershed boundary or ecoregion subsection) used for functional comparison. Briefly explain the reason(s)
for the choice of the Wetland Comparison Domain. The Wetland Comparison Domain should generally be of a size
so as to include some relatively undisturbed Reference Standard Wetlands. (Use back of page if necessary.):
Wright County has no reference standard wetlands area for use as a wetland comparison domain. As such
Pinnacle has used the descriptions of the wetland communities presented in the book Wetland Plants and Plant
Communities of Minnesota and WISconsin, second edition by Eggers and Reed as a reference standard for
comparison purposes when conducting the MNRAM.
4. Describe the purpose of this assessment: i. regulatory/impact determination; lacementlmiti
design; iii. restoration; iv. monitoring; v. inventory/planning/classification; vi. educational; vii. 0
ii. Replacement/mitigation design
5
I
I WETLAND CLASSmCATION:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Based on the results of the attached functional assessment and best professional judgement, rate the significance of
each of the functions for the subject wetland and check the appropriate box. Complete the table as a summary
after doing the functional assessment and consulting the user guidance.
Indicate whether the evaluation isfor "actual" or "projected" conditions. Place a check mark in the box indicating
the estimatedfunctionallevel. ffthe.functionallevel is determinedfor "projected" rather than "actual" conditions
put the check mark in parentheses (x). The functional level for "actual" conditions is the highest level of functioning
possible given the local constraints of disturbance history and current land use. For certain applications of the
assessment it may be relevant to evaluatefor both "actual" and ''projected'' conditi(Jns. lfthe evaluation is donefor
''projected'' conditions, describe the ''projected'' conditions and the reasons for and timelines of the expected
changes in the space immediately below the summary table.
CONDmONS actuaI_ FUNCTIONAL LEVEL *
nroiected
FUNCTIONS N/A Low Medium lIigh Exceptional. Comments
(and Related Values) .
Vegetative DiversitylIntegrity* X ~hallow Marsh
Plant Comm.. #1
Plant Comm.. #2 X ~easonallyFlooded
lBasin
Plant Comm.. #3
Plant Comm.. #4
Maintenance ofHvdroloJdc ReJtime X
J.<1ood1Stormwaterl Attenuation X
Water vwuitv Protection X
Shoreline Protection X -
Ground-water Interaction X
Wildlife Habitat X
Fisherv Habitat X
AestheticsIRecreationlEduc.lCultural X
Commercial Uses X
· if there are distinct plant communities rate each of them separately
Projected conditions (if applicable):
List any Special/Unique Features of the wetland as compared to others in the Wetland Comparison Domain (from
pg.9):
* Functional level is based on a comparison with a REFERENCE STANDARD WETLAND. A REFERENCE STANDARD WETLAND is a wetland
judged to have the highest level of overall sustainable functional capacity for a particular type (based on a classification system such
as Circular 39, Cowardin/NWI or HGM) within the Wetland Comparison Domain. See page 1 for more iriformation about Referencl:
Standard Wetlands.
6
I
I
I I.
IA.
I
I
I B.
I
I
I
I D.
I E.
I F.
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE DESCRIPTION
HYDROLOGIC SETTING
Describe the hydrogeomorphology of the wetland (check those that apply):
l Depressional
_ Riverine (within the river/stream banks)
_ Lacustrine Fringe (edge of deepwater areas)
Extensive Peatland
_ Slope
_ Floodplain
Other
c.
The hydrology source is primarily: Ground water only
See Appendix B Both (Surface and Ground water)
Additional Observations/Descriptions:
c:siuface water o~
Unknown
Has the h drolo of a.) the wetlan~ or (b.) the wetland's immediate watershe~ been substantially altered
by xcavati ditchin He dams, culverts, pumping, diversion of surface fl~r changes to runo~in
the imme iate watershed (circle those that apply)?
a.) Ves.x. No_ IrVes; when and how? Agricultural use
b.) Vesl No_ IrVes; when and how? Agricultural use
Historically, Both the wetland and the immediate watershed have been altered from agricultural practices.
Does the wetland have discemable inlets or outlets? Ves If Yes, describe each inlet and outlet.
inlets: Water enters the wetland from the northwest through culverts under the roads
outlets: It appears water flows east, out of Wetland I via an excavated ditch and eventually ends up in School
Lake.
Does the wetland have standing water? ~ If yes, maximum depth (ifknown)? ~24"
Approximately how much of the wetland is inundated? 40 % Date of observation 7/15/02
What is the predominant hydroperiod (seasonal water level pattern) of the wetland(s)?
_ Permanently Inundated (surface water present all year in every year)
l Intermittently Exposed (surface water present all year, except during severe droughts)
_ Semi-Permanently Inundated (surface water present throughout growing season in most years)
l Seasonally Inundated (sur:tace water present for extended periods in early growing season but absent by end of the growing season in most years)
...I.. Temporarily Inundated (surface water present for brief periods during the growing season, water table usually below soil surface)
_ Permanently Saturated (surface water seldom present but substrate pennanently saturated except during severe drought)
~ Saturated (surface water seldom present but substrate saturated for extended periods during the growing season)
_ Artificially Inundated (surface water controlled or induced by pumps/dikes/dams, etc.)
G.
List any waters or wetlands in close proximity to the wetland. Note approximate distance from the wetland
and if there is a surface water connection to other surface waters or wetlands.
School Lake and Mud Lake are located approximately % mile east of the Site. The ditch system at the Site
has a surface water connection to the west side of School Lake.
7
I
I
IA.
I
I 0%
I 40%
I
I 0%
I 0%
0%
I ·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I V. SURROUNDING LAND USES
A. What is the estimated area of the wetland's immediate watershed in acres landscape (optional)?
I
ll.
VEGETATION
IdentifY the type and amount of vegetation species present by dominant species in each stratum (can be
>100%).% cover
0%
floatin leaved dominants:
50%
emer ent dominants: Cattails
10%
shrub dominants: Willows
deciduous tree dominants:
coniferous tree dominants:
Natural vegetation altered: 70 % of area
list method of alteration and frequency of occurrence. .A2riculture. annuallv for last 100 years
.
InvasivelExotic species: 30 % of area
list species: Reed Canary Grass
m. SOILS
General Description of Soil(s) from Soil Survey and on Site:
., AeJ"acent UPLANDArea '
.. wtTLAND Area
Soil Survey Classification(s):
Is the area an inclusion? Y G;) u
Angus-eordova complex
Klossner muck, Cordova loam
Soil texture and drainage characteristics
Loam- weD to poorly drained
Muck-very poorly drained
il disturbed? If es, describe below.
Field Observations:
Yes
Soil has been disturbed from
ricultural activities.
Yes
Soil has been disturbed from
a ricultural activities.
8
I
I
I B. Describe the surrounding land uses in the table:
LAND-USE
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I VI. SITE SKETCH or Photograph
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Estimated % of Wetland's Immediate Watershed
(Can be >100%)
Develo ed IndustriaJ/CommerciallResidential
0%
70%
A 'cultural: feedlots
0%
0%
Forested
0%
Grassed without
)
0%
Recreation areasl arks
0%
Hi wa s/Roads
20%
0%
Water and wetlands
10%
Other (specify)
View of Wetland 1 looking east
View, of Wetland 1 looking west
9
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT
The following assessment requires the evaluator to examine site conditions and document that a particular wetland
function or related value is present and to assess the capability of the wetland to perform those functions or related
values. Positive answers to questions generally indicate the presence of factors important for a function or related
value. The questions are only provided to guide and document the evaluation. After completing each section, the
trained evaluator should consider the factors observed and use best professional judgement to rate their capability as
compared to a Reference Standard Wetland in the same wetland comparison domain. The ratings should be
recorded on the page 5 summary.
Special Features
Is the wetland part of, or directly adjacent to, an area of special natural resource interest? Check those that
apply:
a. Designated trout streams or trout lakes (see MNDNR Commissioners Order 2450 Part
6262.0400 subparts 3 and 5);
b. State or Federal designated wild and scenic river (see MN Rule Ch. 7050);
c. Calcareous fen (see MN Rule Ch. 7050)
d. Scientific and natural area or rare natural community (see MN Rule Ch. 7050);
e. A high priority wetland, environmentally sensitive area or environmental corridor identified in a
local water management plan,
f. Federally identified special area management plan, special wetland
inventory study, or an advanced delineation and identification study;
~. Public park, forest, trail or recreation area;
_h. State or Federal fish and wildlife refuges and fish and wildlife management areas;
i. State or Federal designated wilderness area;
---I. An archeological or historic site as designated by the State Historic Preservation Office.
k. Federal or state listed endangered, threatened or species of concern in or using the wetland or
known adjacent lands. If yes, list the species of concern:
l. A State Coastal Zone or Shore land Management Plan area.
m. A shoreland area identified in a zoning ordinance (generally within 1000 feet from a
waterbasin and 300 feet from a watercourse).
_no A floodplain area identified in a zoning ordinance or map.
_0. A wetland restored or preserved under a conservation easement.
--.p. A wetland restored or created for mitigation purposes;
_q. A Wellhead Protection Area;
r. A sensitive ground-water area;
10
I
I
I
I GENERAL INFORMATION:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MINNESOTA ROUTINE ASSESSMENT METHOD
FOR EVALUATING WETLAND FUNCTIONS (MnRAM) - Version 2.0
Wetland Number:
2A
15,2002
SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS:
1. Description of temporal factors of this assessment due to seasonal considerations and/or existing
hydrologic and climatologic conditions (e.g., after heavy rains, snow or ice cover, frozen soil, during drought period,
during spring flood, during bird migration). Circle those that apply and list others (use back of page ifnecessary):
This assessment was completed after a month of heavy rains (June 2002) and the temperature was
approximately 80-85 degrees F.
2. Description of the Wetland Assessment Area: the project site, the wetland, wetland portion or wetland
complex being evaluated. (If the evaluation area consists of more than one wetland type it may be necessary to
complete an assessment for more than one Wetland Assessment Area.) (Use back of page if necessary):
The 1l1.58-acre Site is comprised primarily of agricultural land and also includes a single family home,
wetlands, an excavated ditch system, and an abandoned pasture.
3. Description of the Wetland Comparison Domain: the geographic area (e.g., the political boundary, major
or local watershed boundary or ecoregion subsection) used for functional comparison. Briefly explain the reason(s)
for the choice of the Wetland Comparison Domain. The Wetland Comparison Domain should generally be ofa size
so as to include some relatively undisturbed Reference Standard Wetlands. (Use back of page if necessary.):
Wright County has no reference standard wetlands area for use as a wetland comparison domain. As such
Pinnacle has used the descriptions of the wedand communities presented in the book Wetland Pltmts and Plant
Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin, second edition by Eggers and Reed as a reference standard for
comparision purposes when conducting the MNRAM.
4. Describe the purpose of this assessment: i. regulatory/impact determination; r. replacement/mitigation
design; Hi. restoration; iv. monitoring; v. inventory/planning/classification; vi. educationa, ..
ii. Replacement/mitigation design
I
I. WETLAND CLASSIFICATION:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Regulatory Jurisdictions (if relevant): USACOE/404-L LGU/WCA l. DNRlPWI _ USDA _ local zoning
Based on the results of the attached functional assessment and best professional judgement, rate the significance of
each of the functions for the subject wetland and check the appropriate box. Complete the table as a summary
after doing the functional assessment and consulting the user guidance.
Indicate whether the evaluation is/or "actual" or "projected" conditions. Place a check mark in the box indicating
the estimatedfunctionallevel. Ifthefimctionallevel is determined/or ''projected'' rather than "actual" conditions
put the check mark in parentheses (x). The functional level for "actual" conditions is the highest level of functioning
possible given the local constraints of disturbance history and current land use. For certain applications of the
assessment it may be relevant to evaluate for both "actual" and "projected" conditions. If the evaluation is done for
"projected" conditions, describe the ''projected'' conditions and the reasons for and timelines of the expected
changes in the space immediately below the summary table.
CONDmONS actuaI_ FUNCTIONAL LEVEL *
projected
FUNCTIONS N/A Low Medium High Exceptional Comments
(and Related Values)
Vegetative DiversitylIntegrity* X basin
PIantComm. #1
PIant Comm. #2 X Western basin
Plant Comm. #3
Plant Comm. #4
M9.Urtenance ofHvdrologic Rel!im.e X
FIoodIStormwaterl Attenuation X
Water V"""';LY Protection X
Shoreline Protection X
Ground-water Interaction X
Wildlife Habitat X
Fisherv Habitat X
AestheticslRecreationlEducJCultural X
Commercial Uses X
· if thsre are distiru:t plant communities rate each of them separately
Projected conditions (if applicable):
List any SpeciallUnique Features of the wetland as compared to others in the Wetland Comparison Domain (from
pg. 9):
"Functional level is based on a comparison with a REFERENCE STANDARD WETLAND. A REFERENCE STANDARD WETLAND is a wetland
judged to have the highest level of overall sustainable functional capacity for a particular type (based on a classification system such
as Circular 39, CowardinINWI or HGM) within the Wetland Comparison Domain. See page 1 for more information about Reference
Standord Wetlands.
I
I
I I.
I A.
I
I
I B.
I
c.
I
I
I D.
I
E.
I F.
I
I
I
I G.
I
I
SITE DESCRIPTION
HYDROLOGIC SETTING
Describe the hydrogeomorphology of the wetland (check those that apply):
l Depressional
_ Riverine (within the river/stream banks)
_ Lacustrine Fringe (edge of deepwater areas)
Extensive Peatland
_ Slope
_ Floodplain
Other
The hydrology source is primarily: Ground water only
See Appendix B Both (Surface and Ground water)
Additional Observations/Descriptions:
CSiirrace water o~
Unknown
Has the hYdrO~ o~) the wetland, or (b.) the wetland's immediate watershed, been substantially altered
by excavation, ilitchin tiles, dams, culverts, pumping, diversion of surface fl~ changes to runo~in
the immediate watershed (circle those that apply)?
a.) Yes.x. No_ IlVes; when and how? Agricultural use and excavated ditch
b.) Yes..x.. No_ IlVes; when and how? Agricultural use and excavated ditch
Historically, Both the wetland and the immediate watershed have been altered from agricultural practices by
means of tiles and ditching.
. Does the wetland have discernable inlets or outlets? Xu If Yes, describe each inlet and outlet.
inlets: Culvert under 1-94 supplies most of this wetlands hydrology from the west
outlets: Excavated ditch that flows off site eastward toward to School Lake
Does the wetland have standing water? Xu.. If yes, maximum depth (if known)? =8"
Approximately how much of the wetland is inundated? 100 % Date of observation 7/15/01 & 9/5/02
What is the predominant hydroperiod (seasonal water level pattern) of the wetland(s)?
_ Permanently Inundated (surface water present all year in every year)
_ Intermittently Exposed (surface water present all year, except during severe droughts)
....K. Semi-Permanently Inundated (surface water present throughout growing season in most years)
_ Seasonally Inundated (surface water present for extended periods in early growing season but absent by end of the growing season in most years)
_ Temporarily Inundated (surface water present for brief periods during the growing season, water table usually below soil surface)
_ Permanently Saturated (surface water seldom present but substrate permanently saturated except during severe drought)
_ Saturated (surface water seldom present but substrate saturated for extended periods during the growing season)
_ Artificially Inundated (surface water controlled or induced by pumpsldikesldams, etc.)
List any waters or wetlands in close proximity to the wetland. Note approximate distance from the wetland
and if there is a surface water connection to other surface waters or wetlands.
School Lake and Mud Lake are located approximately % mile east of the Site. The ditch system at the Site
has a surface water eounectiOD to the west side of School Lake.
I
I
n VEGETATION
I A.. IdentilY the type and amount ofvegetation species present by dominant species in each stratum (can be > 100%).
I % cover
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I list method of alteration and frequency of occurrence. A2riculture. annuallv for last 100 vears
5% floatin leaved dominants: lesser duck weed
0% submer ed a uatic dominants
0% herbaceous
95% emer ent dominants: Cattails, Wool rass
0% shrub dominants:
0% deciduous tree dominants:
0% coniferous tree dominants:
0%
Natural vegetation altered: 22:L,% of area
· InvasivelExotic species: !!.% of area
I m. SOILS
list species:
I General Description of Soil{s) from Soil Survey and on Site:
Ad acent UPLAND Area
I
I
I
I
I
I
WETLAND Area
Soil Survey Classification(s):
Is the area an inclusion? y <:N u
Angus-eordova complex
Cordova loam
Soil texture and drainage characteristics
Loam- weD to poorly drained
Loam-poorly drained
il disturbed? If es, describe below.
Field Observations:
Yes
SoD has been disturbed from
agricultural activities.
Yes
SoD has been disturbed from
a ricultural activities.
I V. SURROUNDING LAND USES
A. What is the estimated area of the wetland's immediate watershed in acres landscape (optional)?
I B. Describe the surrounding land uses in the table:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I VI. SITE SKETCH or Photograph
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAND-USE
Estimated % of Wetland's Immediate Watershed
(Can be >100%)
Develo ed (IndustriaVCommerciaJ/Residential
0%
A
70%
A icultural: feedlots
0%
0%
Forested
Grassed without
Recreation areasl arks
0%
)
0%
()o1o
Hi wa slRoads
20%
0%
Water and wetlands
Other (specify)
10%
View of Wetland 2A-East basin, looking south
View of Wetland 2A-West basin looking east
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT
The following assessment requires the evaluator to examine site conditions and document that a particular wetland
function or related value is present and to assess the capability of the wetland to perform those functions or related
values. Positive answers to questions generally indicate the presence of factors important for a function or related
value. The questions are only provided to guide and document the evaluation. After completing each section, the
trained evaluator should consider the factors observed and use best professional judgement to rate their capability as
compared to a Reference Standard Wetland in the same wetland comparison domain. The ratings should be
recorded on the page 5 summary.
Special Features
Is the wetland part of, or directly adjacent to, an area of special natural resource interest? Check those that
apply:
a. Designated trout streams or trout lakes (see MNDNR Commissioners Order 2450 Part
6262.0400 subparts 3 and 5);
b. State or Federal designated wild and scenic river (see MN Rule Ch. 7050);
_c. Calcareous fen (see MN Rule Ch. 7050)
_d. Scientific and natural area or rare natural community (see MN Rule Ch. 7050);
e. A high priority wetland, environmentally sensitive area or environmental corridor identified in a
local water management plan,
f. Federally identified special area management plan, special wetland
inventory study, or an advanced delineation and identification study;
...J. Public park, forest, trail or recreation area;
_h. State or Federal fish and wildlife refuges and fish and wildlife management areas;
_i. State or Federal designated wilderness area;
--.J. An archeological or historic site as designated by the State Historic Preservation Office.
k. Federal or state listed endangered, threatened or species of concern in or using the wetland or
known adjacent lands. If yes, list the species of concern:
1. A State Coastal Zone or Shore land Management Plan area.
m. A shoreland area identified in a zoning ordinance (generally within 1000 feet from a
waterbasin and 300 feet from a watercourse).
_no A floodplain area identified in a zoning ordinance or map.
_0. A wetland restored or preserved under a conservation easement.
---p. A wetland restored or created for mitigation purposes;
_ q. A Wellhead Protection Area;
r. A sensitive ground-water area;
I
I
I
I GENERAL INFORMATION:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MINNESOTA ROUTINE ASSESSMENT METHOD
FOR EVALUATING WETLAND FUNCTIONS (MnRAM) - Version 2.0
Wetland Number: 2B
NW ~ Section 35, T121N, R24W
15,2002
SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS:
1. Description of temporal factors of this assessment due to seasonal considerations and/or existing
hydrologic and climatologic conditions (e.g., after heavy rains, snow or ice cover, frozen soil, during drought period,
during spring flood, during bird migration). Circle those that apply and list others (use back of page if necessary):
This assessment was completed after a month of heavy rains (June 2002) and the temperature was
approximately 80-85 degrees F.
2. Description of the Wetland Assessment Area: the project site, the wetland, wetland portion or wetland
complex being evaluated. (If the evaluation area consists of more than one wetland type it may be necessary to
complete an assessment for more than one Wetland Assessment Area.) (Use back of page if necessary):
The 111.58';'acre Site is comprised primarily of agricultural land and also includes a single family home,
wetlands, an excavated ditch system, and an abandoned pasture.
3. Description of the Wetland Comparison Domain: the geographic area (e.g., the political boundary, major
or local watershed boundary or ecoregion subsection) used for functional comparison. Briefly explain the reason{s)
for the choice of the Wetland Comparison Domain. The Wetland Comparison Domain should generally be of a size
so as to include some relatively undisturbed Reference Standard Wetlands. (Use back of page if necessary.):
Wright County has no reference standard wetlands area for use as a wetland comparison domain. As such
Pinnacle has used the descriptions of the wetland communities presented in the book Wetland Plants and Plant
Communities of Minnesota and WISconsin. second edition by Eggers and Reed as a reference standard for
comparison purposes when conducting the MNRAM.
4. Describe the purpose of this assessment: i. regulatory/impact determination; ii. replacement/mitigation
design; iii. restoration; iv. monitoring; v. inventory/planning/classification; vi. educational; vii. other
ii. Replacement/mitigation design
I
I WETLAND CLASSIFICATION:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Regulatory Jurisdictions (if relevant): USACOE/404-L LGU/WCA ...x. DNR/PWI _ USDA _ local zoning
NWIlCowardin classification s : PEMA Circular 39 Classification s : e 1
Wetland Type(s): (see "Wetland Plants and Plant Communities ofMN and WI". 2nd Edition: USACOE-
St. Paul District. E ers and Reed shallow open water, deep marsh, shallow marsh, sedge meadow,
et meado wet to wet-mesic prairie, calcareous fen, open bog, coniferous bog, shrub-carr, alder thicket,
hardwood swam , coniferous swam , flood lain forest, seasonall flooded basin circle those that a I
Estimated size s of entire wetland(s) in acres or s uare feet:
Based on the results of the attached functional assessment and best professional judgement, rate the significance of
each of the functions for the subject wetland and check the appropriate box. Complete the table as a summary
after doing the functional assessment and consulting the user guidance.
Indicate whether the evaluation isfor "actual" or "projected" conditions. Place a check mark in the box indicating
the estimated functional level. Jf the functional level is determined for ''projected'' rather than "actual" conditions
put the check mark in parentheses (x). Thefunctionallevelfor "actual" conditions is the highest level offunctioning
possible given the local constraints of disturbance history and current land use. For certain applications of the
assessment it may be relevant to evaluate for both "actual" and ''projected'' conditions. Jf the evaluation is done for
''projected'' conditions, describe the "projected" conditions and the reasons for and timelines of the expected
changes in the space immediately below the summary table.
CONDITIONS actual_ FUNCTIONAL LEVEL *
oroiected
FUNCTIONS N/A Low Medium High Exceptional Comments
(and Related Values)
Vegetative DiversitylIntegrity* X ~et Meadow
PlantComm. #1 teed bv drain tiles
Plant Comm. #2
Plant Comm. #3
Plant Comm. #4
Maintenance ofHvdrolocic Re2ime X
FloodlStormwater/Attenuation X
Water uuali.tv Protection X
Shoreline Protection X
Ground-water Interaction X
Wildlife Habitat X
Fisherv Habitat X
AestheticsIRecreationlEducJCultural X
Commercial Uses X
· if there are distinct plant communities rate each of them separately
Projected conditions (if applicable):
List any SpeciallUnique Features of the wetland as compared to others in the Wetland Comparison Domain (from
pg. 9):* Functional level is based on a comparison with a REFERENCE STANDARD WETLAND. A REFERENCE STANDARD WETLAND is a
wetland judged to have the highest level of overall sustainable functional capacity for a particular type (based on a classification
system such as Circular 39, Cowardin/NWI or HGM) within the Wetland Comparison Domain. See page 1 for more iriformation
about Reference Standard Wetlands.
I
I
I
I A.
I
I
I
B.
I
I C.
I
I D.
I
E.
I
F.
I
I
I
I G.
I
I
SITE DESCRIPTION
I.
HYDROLOGIC SETTING
Describe the hydrogeomorphology of the wetland (check those that apply):
l Depressional
_ Riverine (within the river/stream banks)
_ Lacustrine Fringe (edge of deepwater areas)
Extensive Peatland
..x Slope
_ Floodplain
Other
The hydrology source is primarily: Ground water only
See Appendix B Both (Surface and Ground water)
Additional Observations/Descriptions:
~ace water o~
Unknown
Has the hydrology of (a) the wetland, or (b.) the wetland's immediate watershed, been substantially altered
by excavation, ditchin~s, culverts, pumping, diversion of surface flo~changes to runoff~in
the immediate watershed (circle those that apply)?
a.) Yes..x. No_ If Yes; when and how? Agricultural use
b.) Yes -X... No_ ICYes; when and how? Agricultural use
Historically, Both the wetland and the immediate watershed have been altered from agricultural practices.
Does the wetland have discernable inlets or outlets? No If Yes, describe each inlet and outlet.
inlets: Drain tiles and swales from the surrounding fields
outlets: excavated ditch in Wetland 2A
Does the wetland have standing water? No If yes, maximum depth (if known)? _
Approximately how much of the wetland is inundated? 0 %) Date of observation 7/15/02
What is the predominant hydroperiod (seasonal water level pattern) of the wetland(s)?
_ Permanently Inundated (surface water present all year in every year)
_Intermittently Exposed (surface water p~ent all year, except during severe droughts)
_ Semi-Permanently Inundated (surface water present throughout growing season in most years)
~ Seasonally Inundated (surface water present for extended periods in early growing season but absent by end of the growing season in most years)
..x Temporarily Inundated (surface water present for brief periods during the growing season, water table usually below soil surface)
_ Permanently Saturated (surface water seldom present but substrate pennanently saturated except during severe drought)
~ Saturated (surface water seldom present but substrate saturated for extended periods during the growing season)
_ Artificially Inundated (surface water controlled or induced by pumpsldikes/dams, etc.)
List any waters or wetlands in close proximity to the wetland. Note approximate distance from the wetland
and if there is a surface water connection to other surface waters or wetlands.
This wetland is adjacent to on site wetland 2A. School Lake and Mud Lake are located approximately % mile
east of the Site. The ditch system at the Site has a surface water connection to the west side of School Lake.
I
I
n VEGETATION
I A. IdentifY the type and amonnt ofvegetation species present by dominant species in each stratum (can be > 100'10).
I % cover
0%
floatin leaved dominants:
I
I
I
I
I
0%
I .
I
0%
uatic dominants
100%
herbaceous
rass
0%
emer ent dominants:
0%
shrub dominants:
0%
deciduous tree dominants:
0%
coniferous tree dominants:
Natural vegetation altered: 100 % of area
List method of alteration and frequency of occurrence. A2riculture. annuallv for last 100 years
· Invasive/Exotic species: 100 % of area
I ffi. SOILS
list species: Reed Canary Grass
I General Description of Soil(s) from Soil Survey and on Site:
Ad'acent UPLAND Area
WETLAND Area
I
I
I
I
I
I
Soil Survey Classification(s):
Is the area an inclusion? y (N u
Angus-cordova complex
Angus-eordova complex
Soil texture and drainage characteristics
Loam- well to poorly drained
Loam- well to poorly drained
oil disturbed? If es, describe below.
Field Observations:
Yes
Soil has been disturbed from
a ricultural activities.
Yes
Soil bas been disturbed from
a ricultural activities.
I
I.
I V. SURROUNDING LAND USES
A. What is the estimated area of the wetland's immediate watershed in acres landscape (optional)?
I B. Describe the surrounding land uses in the table:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAND-USE Estimated % of Wetland's Immediate Watershed
(Can be > 1 00%
Develo ed IndustriaVCommercialJResidential 0%
50%
A . cultural: feedlots 0%
0%
Foc~red 0%
) 0%
Recreation areasl arks 0%
Hi wa slRoads 10%
0%
Water and wetlands 40%
Other (specifY)
View of Wetland 28, looking north View of Wetland 28 looking south east
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT
The following assessment requires the evaluator to examine site conditions and document that a particular wetland
function or related value is present and to assess the capability of the wetland to perform those functions or related
values. Positive answers to questions generally indicate the presence of factors important for a function or related
value. The questions are only provided to guide and document the evaluation. After completing each section, the
trained evaluator should consider the factors observed and use best professional judgement to rate their capability as
compared to a Reference Standard Wetland in the same wetland comparison domain. The ratings should be
recorded on the page 5 summary.
Special Features
Is the wetland part of, or directly adjacent to, an area of special natural resource interest? Check those that
apply:
a. Designated trout streams or trout lakes (see MNDNR Commissioners Order 2450 Part
6262.0400 subparts 3 and 5);
b. State or Federal designated wild and scenic river (see MN Rule Ch. 7050);
c. Calcareous fen (see MN Rule Ch. 7050)
d. Scientific and natural area or rare natural community (see MN Rule Ch. 7050);
e. A high priority wetland, environmentally sensitive area or environmental corridor identified in a
local water management plan,
f. Federally identified special area management plan, special wetland
inventory study, or an advanced delineation and identification study;
.....,g. Public park, forest, trail or recreation area;
_h. State or Federal fish and wildlife refuges and fish and wildlife management areas;
i. State or Federal designated wilderness area;
~. An archeological or historic site as designated by the State Historic Preservation Office.
k. Federal or state listed endangered, threatened or species of concern in or using the wetland or
known adjacent lands. If yes, list the species of concern:
_I. A State Coastal Zone or Shoreland Management Plan area.
m. A shoreland area identified in a zoning ordinance (generally within 1000 feet from a
waterbasin and 300 feet from a watercourse).
_no A floodplain area identified in a zoning ordinance or map.
_0. A wetland restored or preserved under a conservation easement.
--p. A wetland restored or created for mitigation purposes;
_q. A Wellhead Protection Area;
r. A sensitive ground-water area;
I
I
I
I GENERAL INFORMATION:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MINNESOTA ROUTINE ASSESSMENT METHOD
FOR EVALUATING WETLAND FUNCTIONS (MnRAM) - Version 2.0
Wetland Number: 2C
Date(s) of Site Visit(s Ju 15,2002
SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS:
1. Description of temporal factors of this assessment due to seasonal considerations and/or existing
hydrologic and climatologic conditions (e.g., after heavy rains, snow or ice cover, frozen soil, during drought period,
during spring flood, during bird migration). Circle those that apply and list others (use back of page if necessary):
This assessment was completed after a month of heavy rains (June 2002) and the temperature was
approximately 80-85 degrees F.
2. Description of the Wetland Assessment Area: the project site, the wetland, wetland portion or wetland
complex being evaluated. (If the evaluation area consists of more than one wetland type it may be necessary to
complete an assessment for more than one Wetland Assessment Area.) (Use back of page ifnecessary):
The Ill.58-acre Site is comprised primarily of agricultural land and also includes a single family home,
wetlands, an excavated ditch system, and an abandoned pasture.
3. Description of the Wetland Comparison Domain: the geographic area (e.g., the political boundary, major
or local watershed boundary or ecoregion subsection) used for functional comparison. Briefly explain the reason(s)
for the choice of the Wetland Comparison Domain. The Wetland Comparison Domain should generally be of a size
so as to include some relatively undisturbed Reference Standard Wetlands. (Use back of page if necessary.):
Wright County has no reference standard wetlands area for use as a wetland comparison domain. As such
Pinnacle has used the descriptions of the wetland communities presented in the book Wetland Plants and Plant
Communities of Minnesota and WIsconsin, second edition by Eggers and Reed as a reference standard for
comparison purposes when conducting the MNRAM.
4. Describe the purpose of this assessment: i. regulatory/impact determination; ii. replacement/mitigation
design; Hi. restoration; iv. monitoring; v. inventory/planning/classification; vi. educational; vii. other
ii. Replacement/mitigation design
I
I
I Regulatory Jurisdictions (if relevant): USACOE/404...x... LGU/WCA l DNRlPWI _ USDA _ local zoning
NWIlCowardin classification s : PEMA Circular 39 Classification s : e 1
I Wetland Type(s): (see "Wetland Plants and Plant Communities ofMN and WI". 2nd Edition: USACOE-
St. Paul District: Eggers and Reed) shallow open water, deep marsh, shallow marsh, sedge meadow,
wet meadow, wet to wet-mesic prairie, calcareous fen, ope . 0 , shrub-carr, alder thicket,
I hardwood swam , coniferous swam , flood lain forest, easonall flooded basi circle those that a I
Estimated size s of entire wetland(s) in acres or uare feet:
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION:
Based on the results of the attached functional assessment and best professional judgement, rate the significance of
each of the functions for the subject wetland and check the appropriate box. Complete the table as a summary
after doing the functional assessment and consulting the user guidance.
Indicate whether the evaluation is for "actual" or "projected" conditions. Place a check mark in the box indicating
the estimatedfunctionallevel. If the functional level is determinedfor ''projected'' rather than "actual" conditions
put the check mark in parentheses (x). The functional level for "actual" conditions is the highest level of functioning
possible given the local constraints of disturbance history and current land use. For certain applications of the
assessment it may be relevant to evaluate for both "actual" and ''projected'' conditions. If the evaluation is done for
''projected'' conditions, describe the ''projected'' conditions and the reasons for and timelines of the expected
changes in the space immediately below the summary table.
CONDITIONS actual_ FUNCTIONAL LEVEL *
pl'Qiected
FUNCTIONS N/A Low Medium High Exceptional Comments
(and Related Values)
Vegetative DiversitylIntegrity* X Seasonally flooded
PIantComm. #1 basin
Plant Comm. #2
Plant Comm. #3
Plant Comm. #4
Maintenance ofHydroloJrlc ReJrlme X
FloodlStormwater/Attenuation X
Water Protection X
Shoreline Protection X
Gro1Uld-water Interaction X
Wildlife Habitat X
Fishery Habitat X
AestheticslRecreation/Educ.lCuItural X
Commercial Uses X
· if there are distinct plant communities rate each of them separately
Projected conditions (if applicable):
List any SpeciallUnique Features of the wetland as compared to others in the Wetland Comparison Domain (from
pg. 9):* Functional level is based on a comparison with a REFERENCE STANDARD WETLAND. A REFERENCE STANDARD WETLAND is a
wetland judged to have the highest level of overall sustainable functional capacity for a particular type (based on a classification
system such as Circular 39. Cowardin/NWI or HGM) within the Wetland Comparison Domain. See page 1 for more information
about Reference Standard Wetlands.
I
I
I
I A.
I
I
I
B.
I
I C.
I
I D.
'I
E.
I
F.
I
I
I
I G.
I
I
SITE DESCRIPTION
I.
HYDROLOGIC SETTING
Describe the hydrogeomorphology of the wetland (check those that apply):
l Depressional
_ Riverine (within the river/stream banks)
_ Lacustrine Fringe (edge of deepwater areas)
Extensive Peatland
_ Slope
_ Floodplain
Other
The hydrology source is primarily: Ground water only
See Appendix B Both (Surface and Ground water)
Additional Observations/Descriptions:
C:S-urface water o~
Unknown
Has the hydrology of (a.) the wetland, or (b.) the wetland's immediate watershed, been substantially altered
by excavation, ditching, tiles, dams, culverts, pumping, diversion of surface flo~changes to runo~in
the immediate watershed (circle those that apply)?
a.) Yes.x. No_ ICYes; when and how? Agricultural use
b.) Yesl No_ ICYes; when and how? Agricultural use
Historically, Both the wetland, and the immediate watershed have been altered from agricultural practices.
Does the wetland have discemable inlets or outlets? No If Yes, describe each inlet and outlet.
inlets:
outlets: Swale to the northwest
Does the wetland have standing water? No If yes, maximum depth (if known)? _
Approximately how much of the wetland is inundated? ~ Date of observation 7/15/02
What is the predominant hydroperiod (seasonal water level pattern) of the wetland(s)?
_ Pennanently Inundated (surface water present all year in every year)
_ Intennittently Exposed (surface water present all year, except during severe droughts)
_ Semi-Pennanently Inundated (surface water present throughout growing season in most years)
_ SekSOnally Inundated (surface water present for extended periods in early growing season but absent by end of the growing season in most years)
-X.. Temporarily Inundated (surface water present for brief periods during the growing ~D, water table usually below soil surface)
_ Pennanently Saturated (surface water seldom present but substrate pennanently saturated except during severe drought)
_ Saturated (surface water seldom present but substrate saturated for extended periods during the growing season)
_ Artificially Inundated (surface water controlled or induced by pumpsldikes/dlims, etc.)
List any waters or wetlands in close proximity to the wetland. Note approximate distance from the wetland
and if there is a surface water connection to other surface waters or wetlands.
School Lake and Mud Lake are located approximately % mile east of the Site. The ditch system at the Site
has a surface water connection to the west side of School Lake.
I
I
I II VEGETATION
A." IdentifY the type and amount of vegetation species present by dominant species in each stratum (can be > 100%).
I % cover
I
I
I
I
I
0%
I .
I
I m. SOILS
0% floatin leaved dominants:
0% submer ed a uatic dominants
100% rass
0% emer ent dominants:
0% shrub dominants:
0% deciduous tree dominants:
0% coniferous tree dominants:
other (includin altered conditions):
Natural vegetation altered: 100 % of area
List method of alteration and frequency of occurrence. A2riculture. annuallv for last 100 years
.
Invasive/Exotic species: 100 % of area
list species: Reed Canary Grass
I General Description of Soil(s) from Soil Survey and on Site:
Ad'acent UPLAND Area
I
I
I
I
I
I
WETLAND Area
Soil Survey Classification(s):
Is the area an inclusion? y G;) u
Angus-cordova complex
Angus-eordova complex
Soil texture and drainage characteristics
Loam- well to poorly drained
Loam- well to poorly drained
oil disturbed? If es, describe below.
Field Observations:
Yes
SoU has been disturbed from
a icultural activities.
Yes
Soil has been disturbed from
a ricultural activities.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
v. SURROUNDING LAND USES
A. What is the estimated area of the wetland's immediate watershed in acres landscape (optional)?
B. Describe the surrounding land uses in the table:
LAND-USE
Estimated % of Wetland's Immediate Watershed
(Can be> 1 00%
Develo ed (IndustriallCommerciaJ/Residential
0%
A
70%
A 'cultural: feedlots
0%
A
0%
Forested
0%
0%
Recreation areas! arks
0%
Hi wa s/Roads
20%
0%
Water and wetlands
10%
Other (specify)
VI. SITE SKETCH or Photograph
View of Wetland 2C, looking southeast
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1.
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT
The following assessment requires the evaluator to examine site conditions and document that a particular wetland
function or related value is present and to assess the capability of the wetland to perform those functions or related
values. Positive answers to questions generally indicate the presence of factors important for a function or related
value. The questions are only provided to guide and document the evaluation. After completing each section, the
trained evaluator should consider the factors observed and use best professional judgement to rate their capability as
compared to a Reference Standard Wetland in the same wetland comparison domain. The ratings should be
recorded on the page 5 summary.
Special Features
Is the wetland part of, or directly adjacent to, an area of special natural resource interest? Check those that
apply:
a. Designated trout streams or trout lakes (see MNDNR Commissioners Order 2450 Part
6262.0400 subparts 3 and 5);
b. State or Federal designated wild and scenic river (see MN Rule Ch. 7050);
c. Calcareous fen (see MN Rule Ch. 7050)
d. Scientific and natural area or rare natural community (see MN Rule Ch. 7050);
e. A high priority wetland, environmentally sensitive area or environmental corridor identified in a
local water management plan,
f. Federally identified special area management plan, special wetland
inventory study, or an advanced delineation and identification study;
-.J. Public park, forest, trail or recreation area;
_h. State or Federal fish and wildlife refuges and fish and wildlife management areas;
i. State or Federal designated wilderness area;
---i. An archeological or historic site as designated by the State Historic Preservation Office.
k. Federal or state listed endangered, threatened or species of concern in or using the wetland or
known adjacent lands. If yes, list the species of concern:
_I. A State Coastal Zone or Shoreland Management Plan area.
_ m. A shoreland area identified in a zoning ordinance (generally within 1000 feet from a
waterbasin and 300 feet from a watercourse).
~. A floodplain area identified in a zoning ordinance or map.
_0. A wetland restored or preserved under a conservation easement.
---p. A wetland restored or created for mitigation purposes;
_q. A Wellhead Protection Area;
r. A sensitive ground-water area;
I
I
I
I GENERAL INFORMATION:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MINNESOTA ROUTINE ASSESSMENT METHOD
FOR EVALUATING WETLAND FUNCTIONS (MnRAM) - Version 2.0
Wetland Number:
3
Date(s of Site Visit(s Jul 15,2002
SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS:
1. Description of temporal factors of this assessment due to seasonal considerations and/or existing
hydrologic and climatologic conditions (e.g., after heavy rains, snow or ice cover, frozen soil, during drought period,
during spring flood, during bird migration). Circle those that apply and list others (use back of page if necessary):
. This assessment was completed after a month of heavy rains (June 2002) and the temperature was
approximately 80-85 degrees F.
2. Description of the Wetland Assessment Area: the project site, the wetland, wetland portion or wetland
complex being evaluated. (If the evaluation area consists of more than one wetland type it may be necessary to
complete an assessment for more than one Wetland Assessment Area.) (Use back of page if necessary):
The 111.58-acre Site is comprised primarily of agricultural land and also includes a single family home,
wetlands, an excavated ditch system, and an abandoned pasture.
3. Description of the Wetland Comparison Domain: the geographic area (e.g., the political boundary, major
or local watershed boundary or ecoregion subsection) used for functional comparison. Briefly explain the reason(s)
for the choice of the Wetland Comparison Domain. The Wetland Comparison Domain should generally be of a size
so as to include some relatively undisturbed Reference Standard Wetlands. (Use back of page if necessary.):
Wright County has no reference standard wetlands area for use as a wetland comparison domain.
As such Pinnacle has used the descriptions of the wetland communities presented in the book
Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin, second edition by Eggers and
Reed as a reference standard for comparison purposes when conducting the MNRAM.
4. Describe the purpose of this assessment: i. regulatory/impact determination; r. rep acementlmitigatIon
design; Hi. restoration; iv. monitoring; v. inventory/planning/classification; vi. educationa ; VIl. 0 er
ii. Replacement/mitigation design
I
I WETLAND CLASSIFICATION:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Regulatory Jurisdictions (if relevant): USACOE/404-L LGUIWCA ..x... DNRlPWI _ USDA _ local zoning
NWI/Cowardin classification s : PEMA Circular 39 Classification s : e 1
Wetland T s: see "Wetland Plants and Plant Communities ofMN and WI" 2nd Edition' USACOE-
St. Paul District: Eggers and Reed) shallow open water, deep marsh, shallow marsh, sedge meadow,
wet meadow, wet to wet-mesic prairie, calcareous fen, o~ . 0 , shrub-carr, alder thicket,
hardwood swam , coniferous swam , flood lain forest, easonall flooded basi circle those that a I
Estimated size s of entire wetland s in acres or s uare feet:
Based on the results of the attached functional assessment and best professional judgement, rate the significance of
each of the functions for the subject wetland and check the appropriate box. Complete the table as a summary
after doing the functional assessment and consulting the user guidance.
Indicate whether the evaluation is for "actual" or "projected" conditions. Place a check mark in the box indicating
the estimated functional level. ff the functional level is determined for "projected" rather than "actual" conditions
put the check mark in parentheses {xJ Thefunctionallevelfor "actual" conditions is the highest level offunctioning
possible given the local constraints of disturbance history and current land use. For certain applications of the
assessment it may be relevant to evaluate for both "actual" and "projected" conditions. ffthe evaluation is donefor
"projected" conditions, describe the ''projected'' conditions and the reasons for and timelines of the expected
changes in the space immediately below the summary table.
CONDmONS actua1_ FUNCTIONAL LEVEL*
projected
FUNCTIONS N/A Low Medium High Exceptional Comments
(and Related Values)
Vegetative DiversitylIntegrity* X Seasonally flooded
PlantComm. #1 ~in
Plant Comm. #2
PIant Comm. #3
Plant Comm. #4
Maintenance of Hydrologic ReJrime X
FloodlStonnwater/Attenuation X
Water .. Protection X
Shoreline Protection X
Ground-water Interaction X
Wildlife Habitat X
Fishery Habitat X
AestheticsIRecreationlEducJCulturaI X
Commercial Uses X
... if there are distinct plant communities rate each of them separately
Projected conditions (if applicable):
List any SpeciallUnique Features of the wetland as compared to others in the Wetland Comparison Domain (from
pg. 9):
*Functionallevel is based on a comparison with a REFERENCE STANDARD WETLAND. A REFERENCE STANDARD WETLAND is a wetland
judged to have the highest level of overall sustainable fimctional capacity for a particular type (based on a classification system such
as Circular 39, Cuwardin/NWI or HGM) within the Wetland Comparison Domain. See page 1 for more i11formation about Reference
Standard Wetlands.
-
I
I
I
IA.
I
I
I
I
I C.
I
I D.
I E.
I F.
I
I
I
I
I
I
SITE DESCRIPTION
I. .
HYDROLOGIC SETTING
Describe the hydrogeomorphology of the wetland (check those that apply):
l Depressional
_ Riverine (within the river/stream banks)
_ Lacustrine Fringe (edge of deepwater areas)
Extensive Peatland
_ Slope
_ Floodplain
Other
B.
CSDnace water o~
UnlalOwn
The hydrology source is primarily: Ground water only
See Appendix B Both (Surface and Ground water)
Additional Observations/Descriptions:
Has the hydrology of (a.) the wetland, or (b.) the wetland's immediate watershed, been substantiallvaltered
by excavation, ditching, tiles, dams, culverts, pumping, diversion of surface flow, ~anges to nmoffwi]!iW
the immediate watershed (circle those that apply)?
a.) Yes.x. No_ ICYes; when and how? Agricultural use
b.) Yes l No_ ICYes; when and how? Agricultural use
Historically, Both the wetland and the immediate watershed have been altered from agricultural practices.
Does the wetland have discernable inlets or outlets? No If Yes, describe each inlet and outlet.
inlets:
outlets:
Does the wetland have standing water? No If yes, maximum depth (if known)? _
Approximately how much of the wetland is inundated? 0 % Date of observation 7/15/02
What is the predominant hydroperiod (seasonal water level pattern) of the wetland(s)?
_ Pennanently Inundated (surface water present all year in every year)
_ Intennittently Exposed (surface water present all year, except during severe droughts)
_ Semi-Permanently Inundated (surface water present tbroughout growing season in most years)
_ Seasonally Inundated (surface water present for extended periods in early growing season but absent by end afthe growing season in most years)
..x. Temporarily Inundated (surface water present for brief periods during the growing season, water table usually below soil surface)
_ Pennanently Saturated (surface water seldom present but substrate permanent1y saturated except during severe drought)
_ Saturated (swface water seldom present but substrate saturated for extended periods during the growing season)
_ Artificially Inundated (surface water controlled or induced by pumps/dikes/dams, etc.)
G.
List any waters or wetlands in close proximity to the wetland. Note approximate distance from the wetland
and if there is a surface water connection to other surface waters or wetlands.
School Lake and Mud Lake are located approximately % mile east of the Site. The ditch system at the Site
has a surface water connection to the west side of School Lake.
I
I
II.
VEGETATION
I A. Identify the type and amount of vegetation species present by dominant species in each stratum (can be > I 00%).
% cover
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ·
I ·
0% floatin leaved dominants:
0%
100%
rass
0%
emer ent dominants:
0%
shrub dominants:
0%
deciduous tree dominants:
0%
coniferous tree dominants:
o % other includin altered conditions :
Natural vegetation altered: 100 % of area
List method of alteration and frequency of occurrence. A2riculture. annuallv for last 100 years
Invasive/Exotic species: 100 % of area
list species: Reed Canary Grass
I m. SOILS
General Description of Soil(s) from Soil Survey and on Site:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ad"acent UPLAND Area
WETLAND Area
S()i1 Survey Classification(s):
Is the area an inclusion? Y @ U
Angus-cordova complex
Angus-cordova complex
Soil texture and drainage characteristics
Loam- well to poorly drained
Loam- well to poorly drained
il disturbed? If es. describe below.
Field Observations:
Yes
Soil has been disturbed from
a ricultural activities.
Yes
Soil has been disturbed from
a ricultural activities.
I V. SURROUNDING LAND USES
A. What is the estimated area of the wetland's immediate watershed in acres landscape (optionaf)?
I B. Describe the surrounding land uses in the table:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I VI. SITE SKETCH or Photograph
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LAND-USE
Estimated % of Wetland's Immediate Watershed
(Can be >100%)
Develo ed (IndustriaIlCommerciaI/Residential
0%
70%
A icultural: feedlots
0%
0%
Forested
Grassed without
Recreation areas! arks
Hi wa slRoads
0%
)
0%
0%
20%
0%
Water and wetlands
10%
Other (specify)
View of Wetland 3, looking southeast
View of Wetland 3, looking west
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT
The following assessment requires the evaluator to examine site conditions and document that a particular wetland
function or related value is present and to assess the capability of the wetland to perform those functions or related
values. Positive answers to questions generally indicate the presence of factors important for a function or related
value. The questions are only provided to guide and document the evaluation. After completing each section, the
trained evaluator should consider the factors observed and use best professional judgement to rate their capability as
compared to a Reference Standard Wetland in the same wetland comparison domain. The ratings should be
recorded on the page 5 summary.
Special Features
Is the wetland part of, or directly adjacent to, an area of special natural resource interest? Check those that
apply:
a. Designated trout streams or trout lakes (see MNDNR Commissioners Order 2450 Part
6262.0400 subparts 3 and 5);
b. State or Federal designated wild and scenic river (see MN Rule Ch. 7050);
c. Calcareous fen (see MN Rule Ch. 7050)
d. Scientific and natural area or rare natural community (see MN Rule Ch. 7050);
e. A high priority wetland, environmentally sensitive area or environmental corridor identified in a
local water management plan,
f. Federally identified special area management plan, special wetland
inventory study, or an advanced delineation and identification study;
~. Public park, forest, trail or recreation area;
_h. State or Federal fish and wildlife refuges and fish and wildlife management areas;
i. State or Federal designated wilderness area;
__j. An archeological or historic site as designated by the State Historic Preservation Office.
_ k. Federal or state listed endangered, threatened or species of concern in or using the wetland or
known adjacent lands. If yes, list the species of concern:
1. A State Coastal Zone or Shoreland Management Plan area.
_ m. A shore land area identified in a zoning ordinance (generally within 1000 feet from a
waterbasin and 300 feet from a watercourse).
_no A floodplain area identified in a zoning ordinance or map.
_0. A wetland restored or preserved under a conservation easement.
---p. A wetland restored or created for mitigation purposes;
_q. A Wellhead Protection Area;
r. A sensitive ground-water area;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I I
M:\MNRAM\MNRAM2.JJ September 11, 1998
MINNESOTA ROUTINE ASSESSMENT METHOD
FOR EVALUATING WETLAND FUNCTIONS (MnRAM) - Version 2.0
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Wetland Number: 4
15,2002
SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS:
1. Description of temporal fadors of this assessment due to seasonal considerations and/or existing
hydrologic and climatologic conditions (e.g., after heavy rains, snow or ice cover, frozen soil, during drought period,
during spring flood, during bird migration). Circle those that apply and list others (use back of page ifnecessary):
This assessment was completed after a month of heavy rains (June 2002) and the temperature was
approximately 80-85 degrees F.
2. Description of the Wetland Assessment Area: the project site, the wetland, wetland portion or wetland
complex being evaluated. (If the evaluation area consists of more than one wetland type it may be necessary to
complete an assessment for more than one Wetland Assessment Area.) (Use back of page if necessary):
The tll.58-acre Site is comprised primarily of agricultural land and also includes a single family home,
wetlands, an excavated ditch system, and an abandoned pasture.
3. Description of the Wetland Comparison Domain: the geographic area (e.g., the political boundary, major
or local watershed boundary or ecoregion subsection) used for functional comparison. Briefly explain the reason(s)
for the choice of the Wetland Comparison Domain. The Wetland Comparison Domain should generally be of a size
so as to include some relatively undisturbed Reference Standard Wetlands. (Use back of page if necessary.):
Wright County has no reference standard wetlands area for use as a wetland comparison domain. As such
Pinnacle has used the descriptions of the wetland communities presented in the book Wetland Plants and Plant
Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin. second edition by Eggers and Reed as a reference standard for
comparison purposes when conducting the MNRAM.
4. Describe the purpose of this assessment: i. regulatory/impact determination;<i(iiplacement/mitigatiQii::>
design; iii. restoration; iv. monitoring; v. inventory/planning/classification; vi. educational; vii. other
ii. Replacement/mitigation design
I
I
I Regulatory Jurisdictions (if relevant): USACOE/404-X- LGUIWCA l DNRlPWI _ USDA _ local zoning
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WETLAND CLASSIFICATION:
Circular 39 Classification s :
Based on the results of the attached functional assessment and best professional judgement, rate the significance of
each of the functions for the subject wetland and check the appropriate box. Complete the table as a summary
after doing the functional assessment and consulting the user guidance.
Indicate whether the evaluation is for "actual" or "projected" conditions. Place a check mark in the box indicating
the estimated functional level. If the functional level is determined for "projected" rather than "actual" conditions
put the check mark in parentheses (x). The functional level for "actual" conditions is the highest level of functioning
possible given the local constraints of disturbance history and current land use. For certain applications of the
assessment it may be relevant to evaluate for both "actual" and "projected" conditions. If the evaluation is done for
''projected'' conditions, describe the ''projected'' conditions and the reasonsfor and timelines of the expected
changes in the space immediately below the summary table.
CONDmONS actua1..L FUNCTIONAL LEVEL *
.ected
FUNCTIONS .N/A Low Medium . High Exceptional
and Related Values
Vegetative DiversitylIntegrity* X
Plant Comm. #1
Plant Comm. #2 X
Plant Comm. #3 X
Plant Comm. #4
Maintenance ofH drolo 'c Re . e X
F1ood/Stormwater/Attenuation X
Water Protection X
Shoreline Protection X
Ground-water Interaction X
Wildlife Habitat X
Fish Habitat X
AestheticsIRecreationlEduc.lCultura1 X
Commercial Uses X
· if there are distinct plant communities rate each of them separately
Projected conditions (if applicable):
List any SpeciallUnique Features of the wetland as compared to others in the Wetland Comparison Domain (from
pg. 9):
I
I
I
I
I I.
I A.
I
I
IB.
I
I c.
I
I
I
I F.
I
I
I
I
*Functionallevel is based on a comparison with a REFERENCE STANDARD WETLAND. A REFERENCE STANDARD WETLAND is a wetland
judged to have the highest level of overall sustainable functional capacity for a particular type (based on a classification system such
as Circular 39, Cowardin/NWlor HGM) within the Wetland Comparison Domain. See page 1 for more information about Reference
Standard Wetlands.
SITE DESCRIPTION
HVDROLOGIc SETTING
Describe the hydrogeomorphology of the wetland (check those that apply):
l Depressional
_ Riverine (within the river/stream banks)
_ Lacustrine Fringe (edge of deepwater areas)
Extensive Peatland
_ Slope
_ Floodplain
Other
The hydrology source is primarily:
See Appendix B
CSDrrace water o~
Unknown
Ground water only
Both (Surface and Ground water)
.
Additional ObservationslDescriptions:
Has the hydrology of (a.) the wetland, or (b.) the wetland's immediate watershed, been substantially altered
by excavation, ditching, tiles, dams, culverts, pumping, diversion of surface fl~r changes to run~ithin
the immediate watershed (circle those that apply)?
a.) Yes,X No_ IfVes; when and how? Agricultural use
b.) Yes l No_ IfVes; when and how? Agricultural use
Historically, Both the wetland and the immediate watershed have been altered from agricultural practices.
D.
Does the wetland have discernable inlets or outlets? Ves If Yes, describe each inlet and outlet.
inlets:A culvert is located to the southwest of the most westerly basin
outlets:
Does the wetland have standing water? X!L.. If yes, maximum depth (if known)? ~12"
Approximately how much of the wetland is inundated? _ 4~ Date of observation 9/17/02
What is the predominant hydroperiod (seasonal water level pattern) of the wetland(s)?
E.
_ Permanently Inundated (surface water present all year in every year)
_Intermittently Exposed (surface water present all year, except during severe droughts)
.A.. Semi-Permanently Inundated (surface water present throughout growing season in most years)
_ Seasonally Inundated (surface water present for extended periods in early growing season but absent by end of the growing season in most years)
..K. Temporarily Inundated (surface water present for brief periods during the growing Season, water table usually below soil surfiIce)
Permanently Saturated (surface water seldom present but substrate permanently saturated except during severe drought)
- Saturated (surface water ~ldom present but subs1rate saturated for extended periods during the growing season)
-
_ Artificially Inundated (surface water controlled or induced by pumps/dikes/dams, etc.)
I
I
G.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
List any waters or wetlands in close proximity to the wetland. Note approximate distance from the wetland
and ifthere is a surface water connection to other surface waters or wetlands.
School Lake and Mud Lake are located approximately ~ mile east of the Site. The ditch system at the Site
has a surface water connection to the west side of School Lake.
ll.
VEGETATION
A. Identify the type and amount of vegetation species present by dominant species in each stratum (can be > 1 00%).
% cover
-
ill.
0%
floatin leaved dominants: Lesser duck weed
0%
submer ed a uatic dominants
100%
herbaceous ound layer: Reed cana
rass
40%
emer ent dominants: Cattails, Arrow head, wool
0%
shrub dominants:
0%
deciduous tree dominants:
0%
coniferous tree dominants:
0%
other (includin altered conditions :
Natural vegetation altered: 100 % of area
list method of alteration and frequency of occurrence. At!riculture. annuallv for last 100 years
Invasive/Exotic species: 100 % of area
list species: Reed Canary Grass
SOILS
General Description of Soil(s) from Soil Survey and on Site:
Ad'acent UPLAND Area
WETLAND Area
Soil Survey Classification(s):
Is the area an inclusion? Y (N u
Angus-cordova complex
Glencoe clay loam
Soil texture and drainage characteristics
Loam- well to poorly drained
Claylloam-very poorly drained
il disturbed? If es, describe below.
Field Observations:
Yes
Soil bas been disturbed from
agricultural activities.
Yes
Soil bas been disturbed from
a ricultural activities.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
V. SURROUNDING LAND USES
A. What is the estimated area of the wetland's immediate watershed in acres landscape (optional)?
B. Describe the surrounding land uses in the table:
LAND-USE
Estimated % of Wetland's Immediate Watershed
(Can be >100%)
Develo ed IndustriaVCommerciallResidential
0%
70%
A 'cultural: feedlots
A 'cultural:
0%
0%
Forested
0%
0%
Recreation areas! arks
0%
Hi wa slRoads
20%
0%
Water and wetlands
10%
Other (specify)
VI. SITE SKETCH or Photograph
View of Wetland 4 (Kjolhaug Wetland 2) looking south
I
I
I
I
I
I
I 1.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT
The following assessment requires the evaluator to examine site conditions and document that a particular wetland
function or related value is present and to assess the capability of the wetland to perform those functions or r~lated
values. Positive answers to questions generally indicate the presence of factors important for a function or related
value. The questions are only provided to guide and doctunent the evaluation. After completing each section, the
trained evaluator should consider the factors observed and use best professional judgement to rate their capability as
compared to a Reference Standard Wetland in the same wetland comparison domain. The ratings should be
recorded on the page 5.summary.
Special Features
Is the wetland part of, or directly adjacent to, an area of special natural resource interest? Check those that
apply:
a. Designated trout streams or trout lakes (see MNDNR Commissioners Order 2450 Part
6262.0400 subparts 3 and 5);
b. State or Federal designated wild and scenic river (see MN Rule Ch. 7050);
c. Calcareous fen (see MN Rule Ch. 7050)
d. Scientific and natural area or rare natural community (see MN Rule Ch. 7050);
e. A high priority wetland, environmentally sensitive area or environmental corridor identified in a
local water management plan,
f. Federally identified special area management plan, special wetland
. inventory study, or an advanced delineation and identification study;
~. Public park, forest, trail or recreation area;
_h. State or Federal fish and wildlife refuges and fish and wildlife management areas;
i. State or Federal designated wilderness area;
~. An archeological or historic site as designated by the State Historic Preservation Office.
k. Federal or state listed endangered, threatened or species of concern in or using the wetland or
known adjacent lands. If yes, list the species of concern:
1. A State Coastal Zone or Shoreland Management Plan area.
m. A shoreland area identified in a zoning ordinance (generally within 1000 feet from a
waterbasin and 300 feet from a watercourse).
_no A floodplain area identified in a zoning ordinance or map.
o. A wetland restored or preserved under a conservation easement.
-p. A wetland restored or created for mitigation purposes;
_q. A Wellhead Protection Area;
r. A sensitive ground-water area;
I
+.J
o
.~ 0
O+.J
>-oLO
+.JCLC/)
L ())
(!)-c
0.. .-
o O.c
L())~
~
())
~z-
I
~ III
al ""6
N 0
01- !? (I)
W<( ......
ll::U) I") .2
~ .~ a>....
w ~0l""6 0
ll:: <( OZ
a.. 0 U)
+-'
o
.~o
(/)O+-'
C L 0
o 0.. Ul
.- Q)
,,..... +-' - C
.. J 0 .-
o o.C
WO+-'L
O::::--.JQ)
:::::> 0:::: ft
Q)
0-0-0-
- c-;o=
LLoo>
+-,3:1:::
Q)CQ)
~Q)-O
.::1. -
L<(
o
o
~o
(,:::::J 0 Ol
o~ ..... <0
i:t-' III t")
rQ1t\ <....:::::J ~ lO
~@)~lO5
@@)..;z~
0Y ~ $ ~ ,
\:l~ L. _ It)
g; Ol::::::J (j) ~ ;;;
g; ~~~-;;)
O!;::::i g; ~ C> ~
@:~ e ~..,
~;~
....... z-
I
I ~~
~~
"1b
I ~
e-
~
I e-
~c
I ~
'f
<P~
'f
I <~
'f
I ..9~ ~
'f
~~ Q)
~
'f >.
I' ~
~~ 0
=
Q 'f I
.: ~ ~
I ~ 6hN 'f
. ;$ 8 ~
.~< N
'f ta
J:ib~ QJ
I ~ >t
;$ ;$ 'f
I i!J ~I' ~
Q ....
u i~ Q)
~ ~
.... 0\ 'f .....
I 1b I; ,-4 ~I' ~
~~ I
<~
I 'f
~ -a
~ Q)
I ell
,t
~I' ~
I ~
~I' 1I'V
I ~I'
~
'f
I ~I'
0' LO 0 %-1'
~ ~ ~ 0 LO 0
N t""'4 .,....
(8CllpUJ) UO!lVUdpald
I
-I
'.1
'I
fl
'I
:1
:1
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
14000 21 st Ave. No. / Minneapolis. MN 55447
Phone (763) 559-1859 / Fax (763) 559-0720
June 25, 2001
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron, P.E.
Senior Professional Engineer
RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
6110 Blue Circle Drive, Suite 100
Minnetonka, Minnesota 55343
GME Project No. 9491
RE: Preliminary geotechnical exploration for the Dark~nwald
Development on the Roden Property in Albertville, Minnesota .
Dear Ms. Caron:
Following your acceptance of our proposal of June 1, 2001, we have
completed this preliminary geotechnical exploration. In this
report, we present the results of our field and laboratopy testing,
and our recommendations .for foundation and earthwork design and
construction. We are submitting three copies of this report to you;
this report is the instrument of service defined in our proposal.
We have enjoyed working with you on this phase of the development.
If you have questions regarding this report, please contact us.
Sincerely,
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
/:J!6
Jay P. Brekke, P.E.
Project Engineer
JPB:smc:spk
W:\jpb\9491 Prel. DTR.smc.doc
WILLIAM C. KWASNY, RE.
GREGORY R. REUTER, RE., RG.
MARK D. MILLSOp, RG.
THOMAS R VENEMA, R E.
BRYAN J. RIPP. RE.. RG..
TIMOTHY F. McGLENNEN
TAMMY A. LANDERS, RE.
WILLIAM E. BLOEMENDAL, RE.
ERIN J. O'BRIEN, P.E.
An Equal Opportunity Employer
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION
DARKENWALD DEVELOPMENT
RODEN PROPERTY
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA
GME PROJECT NO. 9491
SECTION
PAGE
AS FE Notes. Regarding Geotechnical Engineering Reports
Discussion
Site Preparation
Foundation Design
Floor Slab Subgrade
Exterior Underground Utilities
Exterior Entry Slabs/Sidewalks
Pavement Subgrade
CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
1
2
3
4
5
5
5
6
7
7
8
10
11
.
13
13
14
15
15
16
17
17
18
19
20
INTRODUCTION
SCOPE OF SERVICES
FIELD EXPLORATION
LABORATORY TESTING
SITE CONDITIONS
Topography/Surface Features
Soil Conditions
Groundwater Conditions
REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Groundwater
Equipment Selection/Soil Disturbance
Winter Construction
Construction Safety
Construction Testing
GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS
STANDARD OF CARE
APPENDIX
8MI CON8ULTANT8,INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.,1
GME CONSU~TANTSJ INC.
IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR GEOTECHNICAL
ENGINEERING REPORT
As the client of a consulting geotechnical engineer, you should know that site subsurface conditions cause more
construction problems than any other factor. ASFE/The Association of Engineering Firms Practicing in the
Geosciences offers the following suggestions and observations to help you manage your risks.
A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Based OnA Unique Set Of Project-Specific FactorS
Your geotechnical engineering report is based on a subsurface exploration plan designed to consider a unique
set of project-specific factors. These factors typically include: the general nature cjf the structure involved, its
size, and configuration; the location of the structure'on the site; other improvemen~s, such as access roads,
parking lots, and underground utilities; and the additional risk created by scope-of-s~rvice limitations i"mposed
by the client. To help avoid costly problems, ask your geotechnical engineer to evaluate how factors that change
subsequent to the date of the report may affect the report's recommendations. .
Unless your geotechnical engineer indicates otherwise, do not use your geotechnical ~ngineering report:
· when the natureof the proposed structure is changed, for example, if an office building will be erected instead
of a parking garage, or a refrigerated warehouse will be built instead of an unrefrigerated one;
· when the size, elevation, or configuration of the proposed structure is altered;
· when the location or orientation ofthe proposed structure is modified;
· when there is a change of ownership; or
· for application to an adjacent site.
Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility for problems that may occur i.f they are not consulted after
factors considered in their report's development have changed. .
Subsurface Conditions Can Change
A geotechnical engineering report based on conditions that existed at the time of subsurface exploration. Do
not base construction decisions on a geotechnical engineering report whose adequacy may have been affected
by time. Speak with your geotechnical consultant to learn if additional tests are advisable before construction
starts. Note, too, that additional tests may be required when subsurface conditions are affected by construction
operations at or adjacent to the site, orby natural events such as floods, earthquakes, or ground water fluctu-
ations. Keep your geotechnical consultant apprised of any such events.
Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional Judgments
Site exploration identifies actual subsurface conditions only at those points where samples are taken. The data
were extrapolated by your geotechnical engineer who then applied judgment to render an opinion about overall
subsurface conditions. The actual interface between materials may be far more gradual or abrupt than your
report indicates. Actual conditions in areas not sampled may differ from those.predicted in your report. While
nothing can be done to prevent such situations, you and your geotechnical engineer can work together to help
minimize their impact. Retaining your geotechnical engineer to observe construction can be particularly bene-
ficial in this respect. .
A Reports Recommendations Can Only Be Preliminary
The construction recommendations included in your geotechnical engineer's report are preliminary, because
they must be based on the assumption that conditions revealed through selective exploratory sampling are
indicative of actual conditions throughout a site. Because actual subsurface conditions can be discerned only
during earthwork, you should retain your geotechnical engineer to observe actual conditions and to finalize
recommendations. Only the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report is fully familiar with the background
information needed to determine whether or not the report's recommendations are valid and whether or not the
contractor is abiding by applicable recommendations. The geotechnical engineer who developed your report
cannot assume responsibility or liability for the adequacy of the report's recommendations if another party is
retained to observe construction.
Geotechnical Services Are Perfonned For Specific Purposes And Persons
Consulting geotechnical engineers prepare reports to meet the specific needs of specific individuals. A report
prepared for a civil engineer may not be adequate fora construction contractoror even another civil engineer.
Unless indicated otherwise, your geotechnical engineer prepared'yourreporfexprefisly for you and expressly for
purposes you indicated. No other than you should apply this reportfoi" its intended purpose without first
conferring with the geotechnical engineer. No party should apply this report for any purpose other than that
originally contemplated without first conferring with,the geotechnical engineer. .
GME CONSULTANTS,INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ -
Geoenvlronmental Concerns Are Not.At .Issue . .., .
Your geotechnical engineering report is not likely to relatea"y findings, conclusions, or recommendations about
the potential for hazardous materials existing at the site. The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to
perform a geoenvironmental exploration differ substantially from those. applied in geotechnical engineering.
Contamination can create major risks. If you have no information about the potential for your site being contam-
inated, you are advised to speakwith your geotechnical consultant for information rela~ing to geoenvironmental
issues.. . .
. .
A Geotechnical Engineering Report Is Subject To Misinterpretation
Costly problems can occur when other design professionals develop their plans based on misinterpretations of a
geotechnical engineering report. To help avoid misinterpretations, retain your geotechnical engineer to work
with other project design professionals who are affected by the geotechnical report. Have your geotechnical
engineer explain report implications to design professionals affected by them, and !hen review those c;lesl,gn
professionals' plans and spec,ifications to see how they have incorporated geotechnic~1 factors. Although certain
other design professionals may.be familiar with geotechnical concerns, none knows as much about them as a
competent geotechnical erigineer. .
Boring Logs Should Not .Be Separated From The Report
Geotechnical engineers develop final boring logs based upon their interpretation of the field logs (assembled by
site personnel) and laboratory evaluation Of field samples. Geotechnical engineers customarily include only final
boring logs in their reports. Final boring logs should not under any circumstances be redraWn for inclusion in
architectural or other design drawings, because drafters may commit errOrs Or omissions in the transfer process.
Although photographic reproduction eliminates this problem, it does nothing to minimize the possibility of
contractors misinterpreting the logs during bid preparation. When this occurs, delays, disputes; and unantici-
pated costs are the all-too-frequent result.
To minimize the likelihood of boring log misinterpretation, give contractors ready access to the complete
geotechnical engineering report prepared or authorized for their use. (If access is provided only to the report
prepared for you, you should advise contractors of the report's limitations, assuming that a contractor was not
one oHhe specific perSons for whom the report was prepared and that developing construction cost estimates
was not one of the specific purposes for which it was prepared: In other words, while a contractor may gain
important knowledge from 'a report prepared for another party, the contractor would be well~advised to discuSS
the report with your geotechnical engineer and to perform the additional or alternative work that the contractor
believes may be needed toobtaili the data specifically appropriate for constructiOn cost estimating purposes.)
Some clients believe that itis unwise or unnecessary to give contractors access to their geotechnical engineer-
ing reports because they hold the mistaken impression that simply disclaiming responsibility for the accuracy of
subsurface information always insulates them from attendant liability. Providing the best available information to
contractors helps prevent costly construction problems. It also helps reduce the adversarial attitudes that can
aggravate problems to disproportionate scale.
.. .
t
. .
Read Responsibility Clauses Closely
Because geotechnical engineering is based extensively on judgment and opinion, it is far less exact than other
design dlsci.plines. This situation has resulted in wholly unwarranted claims being lodged against geotechnical
engineers. To help prevent this problem, geotechnical engineers have developed a number of clauses for use in
their contracts, reports, and other documents. Responsibility clauses are. not exculpatory clauses designed to
transfer geotechnical engineers' liabilities to other parties. Instead, they are definitive clauses that identify where
geotechnical engineers' responsibilities begin and end. Their use helps all parties involved recognize their
individual responsibilities and take appropriate action. Some of these definitive clauses are likely to appear in
your geotechnical engineering report. Read them closely. Your geotechnical engineer will be pleased to give full
and frank answers to any questions.
Rely On The Geotechnical Engineer For Additional Assistance
Most ASFE-rIiember consulting geotechnical engineering firms are familiar with a variety of techniques arid
a.pproachesthat can be used to help reduce risks for all parties foa construction project, frOm design through
construction. Speak with your geotechnical engineer not only about geotechnical issues, but others as well, to
learn about approaches that may be of genuine benefit. You may also wish to obtain certain ASFE publications.
Contact a member of AS FE for a complimentary directory of ASFE publications. - .
. A. I!!!!FE~:E~~i~~~~FIRMS .
. . iiiij;I. PRACnCING IN THE GEOSCIENCES
8811 COlESVllLE ROAD/SUITE G106/SILVER SPRING, MD 20910
TELEPHONE: (301) 565-2733 FACSIMilE: (301) 589-2017 .
{
t
GME CONBULTANTS.INC.
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTRODOCTION
RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd. is currently preparing' concept plans and
preliminary platting for Darkenwald Real Estate for a commercial
development on a site of approximately 25 acres, at 70th Street and
Kadler Avenue in Albertville, Minnesota. The first phase of the
development would take place in the southeast corner of the site, on
Lots 1, 2, and 3, immediately west of the existing Outlet Mall.
As of the date of this report, final building plans are not yet
available. We anticipate that the sales/showroom/warehouse buildings
would be one-story, slab on-grade structures of masonry bearing
wall/precast bearing wall and steel frame construction. Typically,
these buildings would impart loads of 2 to 5 kips per. lineal foot for
the footings, with column loads of 75 to 100 kips.
A site access road would be constructed from east to west across the
development, with a north-south access road in the eastern portion of
the site, extending southward from 70th Street. The typical traffic
pattern on these roads would probably consist of numerous daily
passes of automobiles and light trucks, with additional heavier
vehicles such as waste collection trucks, delivery trucks, and semi-
tractor trailers (HS20 and HS25 loads) .
GMI caN.ULTANT8..NC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
2
June 25, 2001
SCOPE OF SERVICES
Our scope of services, as outlined in our proposal, is limited to the
following elements.
1. Drill and sample nine borings to depths of 15 to
25 feet. Five of the borings were drilled within
the proposed roadways and building locations
wi thin the Phase I development area; one boring
was drilled in a potential wetland mitigation
area; and three borings were drilled in future
roadway and potential borrow areas
2. Return representative portions of recovered soil
samples to our laboratory for review, testing,
and final classification, and preparation of the
boring logs
3. Prepare a geotechnical engineering report describing
the subsurface conditions encountered, and
presenting our foundation recommendati.ons for the
building
The purposes of this report are to describe the soil and groundwater
conditions encountered; to review and evaluate these conditions with
respect to the proposed construction; and to present our geotechnical
engineering recommendations.
8MI COIIBULTANT8, 11Ie.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
3
June 25, 2001
FIELD EXPLORATION
We drilled nine borings for' this project, as shown on the enclosed
Soil Boring Location Diagram. You specified the number and locations
of the borings; we recommended the boring depths based on the proposed
construction. A Survey Crew from RLK-Kuusisto staked the borings in
the fi~ld, and shot the surface elevations in National Geodetic
Vertical Datum (NGVD). Before we drilled, we contacted Gopher State
One Call to locate public underground utilities on this site.
We drilled the borings with a Boart Longyear BK-51HD rig mounted on a
Bombardier tracked carrier. The crew used hollow stern augers to
advance the boreholes and sampled by the split barrel method
(ASTM: D 1586). They kept field logs noting the methods of drilling
and sampling, along with the Standard Penetration values (N-values,
"blows per foot "), preliminary soil classifications, and observed
groundwater levels. Representative portions of the recovered samples
were sealed in jars to reduce moisture loss, and submitted to our
laboratory for review, testing and final classification by a
Geotechnical Engineer.
The drill crew backfilled the boreholes with
cuttings to comply with current Minnesota Department of Health
regulations.
G.ICD..ULTANT~IN~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
4
June 25, 2001
LABORATORY TESTING
The laboratory testing program was initiated by. a Geotechnical
Engineer reviewing each of the recovered samples to evaluate the
major and mino~ soil components, while also noting the color, degree
of saturation, and lenses or seams found in the samples. Selected
samples were tested for moisture co~tent and unconfined compressive
strength (by hand penetrometer); the test results are shown on the
respective logs. We collected bulk samples from the upper 10 feet of
borings 8 and 9, and performed laboratory gradation and Proctor tests
to assess the suitability of this soil as fill.
The samples were visually/manually classified on the basis of texture
and plasticity in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification
.
System (USCS). The capital letters in parentheses following the
written soil descriptions on the boring logs are the estimated group
symbols based on this system. A chart describing this classification
system is included in the Appendix.
The Engineer grouped the soils by type into the strata shown on the
boring logs. The stratification ~ines shown on the logs are
approximate; in situ, the transition between soil types may be gradual
or abrupt in the horizontal or vertical directions.
liME CON8ULTANTS,INC.
-I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
5
June 25, 2001
We will retain the soil samples from this program for 30 days after
the date of this report. If you wish to have the samples retained
beyond this time, we ask that you please advise us; otherwise, the
samples will be discarded.
SITE CONDITIONS
Topography/Surface Features
The site covers approximately 25 acres, located north of I-94 and east
of Kadler Avenue in Albertville, Minnesota. At the time of our field
exploration, the site was planted in corn. A farmstead was located in
the east-central portion of the site; there were several wetlands on
the site.
The topography of the site was gently rolling; we found
about 10 feet of difference in elevation among our nine borings.
Soil Conditions
The soil conditions that we found in the borings are shown on the logs
in the Appendix of this report. The conditions that we describe and
discuss in this report are pertinent only at the boring locations and
under the environment at the time of our field exploration.
GMICON.ULTAIIT8,'NC.
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron 6 June 25, 2001
GME Project No. 9491
In each of the borings, we found a 0.5 to 1.2 foot thick surficial
topsoil layer consisting of brown to black clayey silt and silty clay
wi th organics. The topsoil may be thicker in areas between the
borings. Underlying the topsoil, we encountered firm to very stiff
silty clay with varying amounts of sand to the termination depths of
the borings. The N-values in the silty clay ranged from 6 to 32; the
moisture contents ranged from 15% to 31%.
An important feature of these soils is the elevated moisture contents.
Based on bulk samples collected from borings 8 and 9, the optimum
moisture content by the Standard Proctor test (ASTM: D 698) is about
15% to 16%. Thus, the soils are 5% to 15% above the optimum, and will
require discing and drying to lower the moisture to the recommended
range of no more than 2% above the optimum.
We also encountered
occasional strata of silty sand, sandy silt, and clayey sand.
Groundwater Conditions
We encountered groundwater at a depth of 9 feet, corresponding to
elevation 950 feet, in boring 3. Groundwater was not encountered to
the termination depths of the remaining eight borings. Because of the
low permeability of the silt and clay on this site, an extended period
of time (on the order of days or weeks) would be required for the
IIMI CDII8ULTANTS.IIIC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I,
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
7
June 25, 2001
groundwater to reach equilibrium in the boreholes. For reference, Mud
Lake and School Lake, located approximately 1 mile east of the site
/
have a normal surface water elevation of 948 . feet.
We recommend
installing piezometers in supplementary borings on this site to permit
extended groundwater level observations.
The groundwater tables on this site, perched and hydrostatic, will
vary in elevation seaspnally and annually depending on local amounts
of precipitation, evaporation, surface runoff, and infiltration.
Depending on final grading plans, perched or hydrostatic groundwater
may be encountered in the building excava.tions and utility trenches on
this site.
REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Discussion
Based on our understanding of the project and the soil conditions we
found, it is our opinion that after proper site preparation, the
buildings can be supported on conventional spread footing foundations.
The site preparation should include stripping of topsoil, vegetation,
and soft or unsuitable soils below the topsoil, densification of the
GME CONSULTANT"'NC.
I
I
I
I'
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
8
June 25, 2001
exposed subgrade, and placement of new compacted fill to form building
pads.
The contractor should expect difficulty in working with the silty clay
on this site. These cohesive soils have high moisture contents and
are extremely sensitive to disturbance from construction equipment and
workers' foot traffic; care must be exerted when working on and.with
.
these soils.
If the contractor is .not careful, excessive amounts of
soil disturbance will occur, requiring remedial subcutting and
backfilling. The use of this clay as compacted fill would require
discing. and drying, or treatment with Class C fly ash or hydrated
lime.
Site Preparation
We recommend stripping the topsoil, vegetation, and soft or unsuitable
soils from under the building footprints and under the new pavement
areas, extending to a distance of at least 5 feet beyond the building
p.erimeters and 2 feet beyond theeqges of pavements. The topsoil
would not be reusable as fill under the building or pavements; it
could be used for landscaping, or hauled from the site.
GMI CON.ULTAllTB,'NC.
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
9
June 25, 2001
The anticipated stripping depths range from 0.5 feet to 1.2 feet, but
the actual depths may be greater. This cannot be determined until
excavation is started. A Geotechnical Engineer or Senior Materials
Technician should perform full-time observation and testing during the
earthwork for this proj ect . Soft, wet, or loose soil should be
disced, -dried, and compacted, or sub cut and replaced with new fill.
The exposed soil afterstrippingjsubcutting should be carefully
surface-compacted with a vibratory sheepsfoot roller before placing
new fill.
Preparation of this site will require cut and fill.
You propose to
use soil cut from the area of borings 8 and 9 as fill under the
buildings and roadways. If the non-organic silty clay soils are to be
re-used as fill, they must be placed at a moisture content within 2%
of the optimum as determined by the Standard Proctor. This will
require drying of the soils prior to compaction. If the on-site soils
cannot be dried sufficiently by conventional discing and land
spreading, they could be treated on the site with Class C fly ash or
hydrated lime, or drier fill could be imported. Fill under the roads
and buildings should be placed in loose lifts about 6 to 8 inches
thick, with each lift uniformly compacted to at least 98% of the
maximum Standard Proctor dry density (ASTM: D 698).
Under buildings,
8ME CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron 10 June 25, 2001
GME Project No. 9491
the thickness of silty clay fill should be limited to 8 feet; if
additional fill is required, it should be imported granular soil.
Perched or hydrostatic groundwater may infiltrate into the subcut
excavations, utility trenches and possibly footing excavations. This
groundwater should be completely removed before fill, concrete or
utility placement. In our opinion, the water could be removed by
pumping from sump pits extending below the subcut, but the method of
dewatering is-the contractor's responsibility to choose.
Foundation Design
As of the date of this report, specific foundation loadings,
elevations, and locations are not known.
It is our opinion that the
foundations could bear on the naturally-occurring non-organic soils
that are undisturbed during excavation, or on compacted fill over a
suitable subgrade. We recommend using a net allowable design bearing
pressure of 2,000 to 2,500 pounds per square foot to limit post-
construction settlement to 1 inch or less.
When specific building
locations are chosen, we recommend that additional soil borings be
drilled.
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
11
June 25, 2001
We recommend that the bottom of perimeter footings for the heated
portions of the buildings bear at least 4 feet below final outside
grade for protection from frost penetration.
Interior footings may
bear at 18 to 24 inches below finished floor elevation, provided they
would not be subjected to freezing conditions during or after
construction.
Exterior footings for signs, light poles, wing walls,
and loading docks should bear at least 5 feet below final grade
because deeper frost penetration can occur in areas away from the
heated building, especially in areas kept free of snow and ice.
We recommend that continuous wall footings have a minimum width of 2
feet and that isolated column footings have a minimum width of 3 feet,
regardless of contact pressure, to avoid excessively narrow footings.
Floor Slab Subgrade
The recommended site preparation should provide a subgrade with
adequate support for the floor slabs, if the soils are not disturbed
or frozen. We recommend that backfill around the footings and in
underslab utility trenches be imported granular soil, for ease of
compaction in confined spaces.
This backfill should be placed in
loose lifts about 4 to 6 inches thick, and should be compacted with
manually-operated vibratory plate equipment to at least 95% of the
8MECON.ULTANT~IN~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
12
June 25, 2001
maximum Standard Proctor dry density. We recommend not using heavy
towed or self-propelled compactors within 4 feet of newly constructed
foundation walls or loading dock walls; such equipment can damage the
new walls. For preliminary design purposes, we recommend that the
slabs be designed with a modulus of subgrade reaction of 150 pounds
per cubic inch.
We recommend that the final 6 inches of fill under the floor slabs be
a well-graded, clean granular soil having. less than 5% passing the
No. 200 sieve, to reduce the migration of moisture upward toward the
base of the slab.
In areas where floor coverings or coatings are used, we recommend
placing a vapor barrier under the slab, to reduce the potential for
the upward migration of water vapor through the slab.
One method of vapor barrier construction is given in Part 2, Section
302, of the ACI Manual of Concrete Practice.
We recommend that you
ask the manufacturers of the specified floor coverings for their
opinion on vapor barrier placement. Their preferred method may differ
from the ACI procedure.
There is also a commentary on alternative
methods of vapor barrier construction in the April 2001 issue of
Concrete International.
8ME CON8ULTANT8.INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
13
June 25, 2001
We recommend that the floor slabs be designed and built in accordance
with the recommendations of the Portland Cement Association and the
American Concrete Institute. The slabs should have construction
joints and control joints at appropriate spacings to reduce the
potential for uncontrolled shrinkage. cracking. The floor slabs should
Exterior Underground Utilities
The excavated non-organic silty clay can be used as backfill for new
utility line trenches. The backfill should be placed in lifts not
exceeding 6 inches thick, and compacted to at least 95% of the maximum
Standard Proctor dry density. Within 3 feet of the pavement subgrade
elevation, the compaction should be increased to at least 98%.
Cohesive backfill should be placed at a moisture content within 2% of
optimum.
Exterior Entry SlabS/Sidewalks
The silty clay soils on this site are frost-susceptible; they can
heave upon freezing each winter, raising slabs built over such soils.
8MI CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
14
June 25, 2001
Exterior slabs that abut the buildings should be cast on select non-
frost susceptible (NFS) sand having less than 5% passing the No. 200
sieve. The NFS sand zone should be at least 5 feet thick . Plastic
drainpipes should be placed at the base of the sand, connected to the
storm sewer system to remove infiltrating water.
As an al ternati ve, the slabs and sidewalks could be constructed as
structural slabs, supported on frost footings bearing at least 5 feet
below final grade. The sidewalks and slabs should have a minimum 4-
inch thick air gap between the slab and the subgrade. Insulation
should be placed along all sides of the vertical foundation walls to
prevent adfreezing of the backfill to the walls.
Pavement Subgrade
Preparation of the street pavement subgrade has been described
previously in the Site Preparation section of this report. Based on a
subgrade consisting of silty clay, we recommend using a Stabilometer
value (R-value) of 6 for the pavement design.
along with your predicted traffic volumes
You may use this value,
and the City's desired
pavement life, to design the sections. We strongly recommend designing
the streets with a subbase of select, free-draining NFS sand at least 2
feet thick. As a second alternative, but one which will not provide
.
GME CON8ULTANT8tINC.
:1
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
15
June 25, 2001
the same degree of internal drainage, a geofabric could be placed over
the subgrade before the granular base course is placed.
Prior to placing the subbase, the subgrade should be test rolled with a
fully loaded dump truck. Soft soils detected during test rolling
should be subcut and replaced. Fill used to replace the subcuts and to
reach design subgrade elevation should consist of cohesive soils,
moisture conditioned as previously described, to avoid "birdbaths" in
the subgrade.
CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS
Groundwater
Based on the conditions found in our borings, it is our opinion that
groundwater could be encountered during excavation of foundations and
utilities for this project. Any water that enters excavations from
groundwater seepage, surface runoff, or precipitation should be
promptly pumped out. Water should not be allowed to stand ponded over
the foundation bearing soils, or the floor slab or the pavement
subgrade soils, since this water can soften and disturb the soils.
8ME COIl8ULTAIITI,INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
16
June 25, 2001
The contractor should not be permitted to place fill or concrete into
standing water or over softened soils in an attempt to displace these
materials. This technique can result in trapping softened soils under
the building causing excessive post-construction settlement, even if
the softened zone is only a few inches thick.
Equipment Selection/Soil Disturbance
The soil types at this site can be easily disturbed by construction
equipment, especially when the soils are saturated or during
freeze/thaw
conditions.
is
the
It
earthwork
contractor's
responsibility to choose equipment and work procedures that will not
disturb the subgrade soils.
The contractor should also route
construction traffic away from foundation soils, and areas of pavements
and slabs, to minimize soil disturbance.
If the equipment the contractor selects causes rutting or pumping, it
is the earthwork contractor's responsibility to switch to other types
of equipment or methods. The responsibility toY properly select
construction equipment to avoid disturbing soils on the site lies
solely with the contractor. A note to this effect should be included
in the project specifications.
GME CONSULTANTS.INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
17
June 25, 2001
Winter Construction
We strongly recommend that the project specification contain a section
dealing with winter earthwork, foundation construction, and
masonry/concrete construction for the project. The contractors should
be required to submit documentation that they have read and understand
the conditions.
Only unfrozen fill and backfill should be used, and contraotors may
charge extra for importing unfrozen soil or keeping backfill from
freezing. Placement of fill and/or foundation concrete must not be
permitted on frozen soil, nor should bearing soils under footings or
slabs be allowed to freeze after concrete is placed, because
excessive post-construction settlement could occur as the frozen
soils thaw. The concrete and masonry used in the building must be
placed and protected in accordance with pertinent industry standards
for winter construction.
Construction Safety
All excavations for this project must comply with the requirements of
OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, "Excavations and Trenches." This
document states that excavation safety is the sole responsibility of
GMI CONSULTANTS,INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron 18 June 25, 2001
GME Project No. 9491
the contractor. Reference to this OSHA requirement should be
included in the job specifications.
The responsibility to provide safe working conditions on the site,
for earthwork, building construction, or any associated operations,
is not borne in any manner by GME Consultants, Inc.
Construction Testing
We recommend that the Owner retain the services of a geotechnical
engineering firm at the time of construction to provide full-time
observation and testing. This should include observation and
documentation of topsoil stripping, subcutting of unsuitable soils,
and placement of compacted fill for the building pad and pavement
areas. The Geotechnical Engineer or Materials Technician should also
test the foundation bearing soils before forming and placement of the
footings and slabs. Testing of building materials in accordance with
Chapter 17 of the 1997 Uniform Building Code should also be carried
out. We welcome the opportunity to provide the observation and
testing services for this project.
8MI CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
19
June 25, 2001
GENERAL QUALIFICATIONS
This preliminary report has been prepared based on the soil and
groundwater conditions found in our borings, and on the design data
available from RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd. As of the date of this report,
specific building locations, size, elevations, or loads have not been
selected. Thus, we have prepared our recommendations based on our
experience with similar types of developments, and the soil
conditions we found on the sites. Additional exploration should be
carried out on the sites when building locations are chosen.
We determined the soil and groundwater conditions at nine locations
for this project. The conditions that we describe. and discuss in
this report are pertinent only at the boring locations and under the
environment of our field exploration. Some variations in the
subsurface conditions were found, and it is probable that additional
variations exist that cannot be determined from our borings or from
our site reconnaissance. These variations will not become apparent
until excavation is started. No warranty , express or implied, is
presented in this report with respect to the soil and groundwater
conditions on this site.
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Ms. Michele Jackson Caron
GME Project No. 9491
The
20
June 25, 2001
STANDARD OF CARE
recommendations
our
contained
in
this
report
represent
professional opinions. The soil testing and geotechnical engineering
services performed for this proj ect have been conduc.ted in a manner
consistent with that level of skill and care ordinarily exercised by
other members of the profession currently practicing in this area,
under similar budgetary and time constraints.
No other warranty,
express or implied, is made.
Prepared by:
Reviewed by:
JPB:smc:spk
W:\JPB\9491 Prel. DTR.spk
~u
J~ P Brekke, P.E.
Project Engineer
(j.
William C. Kwasn~, P.E.
Principal Engineer/President
I hereby certify that this plan, specification,
or report was prepared by me or under my
direct supervision and that I am a duly
Licensed Professional Engineer under the
laws of the State of Minnesota
License #: 25631
8ME CDNSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ! !
__ I ~ ~.~-=:.. _ . .
"~'. II
8-7 . /' : ~ . . J- . ~ : :
\\ l -------1 I ~______.
. .; '-I. . .I :l~ ','
/. ~ .-- - ~
.. ~..o~. .I - '-.:S:--"-"
/ '~O'.' . III
'. f' .rs~ ~l \ ~\
/ '~4b' \~\
/ ~. '. a..
/"~"- j \-"-"
/ / '----.8-S. .. -.
.f .. "\
/ A: ~8
/ 8!-2 . \
j'
~L
70TH STREET
18ta
UJ
=>
z
UJ
~
0::
UJ
~
-..-..
-..---
/
/
/
8t1
8726.DWG
APPROXIMATE
SCALE
I
0'
I
FEET
I
400'
GME CONSULTANTS, INC. fi
Geotechnical-Materials -Environmental
14000 21st Avenue N.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447
(763) 559-1859
SOIL BORING LOCATION DIAGRAM
DARKENWALD DEVELOPMENT
ALBERTVILLE, MINNESOTA
VJL JUNE 01 GME Project No. 9491
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~I
I
I
I
I
"I
'I
:1
I
.1
I
I
GENERAL NOTES
DRilLING & SAMPLING SYMBOLS:
SL SS with Liner
SS Split Spoon - 13/." 1.0., 2" 0.0., unless
otherwise noted
ST Shelby Tube - 2" 0.0., unless otherwise noted
PA Power Auger
DB Diamond Bit - NX: BX: AX
AS Auger Sample
JS Jar Sample
VS : Vane Shear
Standard UN" Penetration: Blows per foot of a 140 pound hammer falling 30 inches on a 2 inch 00 split spoon, except
where noted.
OS
HS
WS
FT
RB
BS
PM
Osterberg Sampler - 3" Shelby Tube
Hollow Stem Auger
Wash Sample
Fish Trail
Rock Bit
Bulk Sample
Pressuremeter test - in situ
WATER lEVEL MEASUREMENT SYMBOLS:
WL: Water Level
WCI: Wet Cave In
DCI: Dry Cave In
WS: While Sampling
WD: While Drilling
BCR : Before Casing Remvoal
ACR : After Casing Removal
AB : After Boring
Water levels indicated on the boring logs are the levels measured in the boring at the times indicated. In previous soils, the
indicated elevations are considered reliable ground water levels. In impervious soils, the accurate determination of ground
water elevations is not possible in even several days observation, and additional evidence of ground water elevations must be
sought.
GRADATION DESCRIPTION & TERMINOLOGY
Coarse Grained or Granular Soils have more than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are described as:
boulders, cobbles, gravel or sand. Fine Grained Soils have less than 50% of their dry weight retained on a #200 sieve; they are
described as: clays or clayey silts if they are cohesive, and silts if they are non-cohesive. In addition to gradation, granular
soils are defined on the basis of their relative in-place density and fine grained soils on the basis of their strength or
consistency, and their plasticity.
Major Descriptive Term(s}
Component (Of Components Also Percent of
Of Sample Size Range Present In Sample) Dry Weight
Boulders Over 8 in. (200mm) Trace 1-9
Cobbles 8 in. to 3 in. Little 10 - 19
(200mm to 75mm)
Gravel 3 in. to #4 sieve Some 20-34
(75mm to 2mm)
Sand #4 to #200 sieve And 35-50
(2mm to .074mm)
Silt Passing #200 sieve
(0.074mm to 0.005mm)
Clay Smaller than 0.OO5mm
CONSISTENCY OF COHESIVE SOilS:
RELATIVE DENSITY OF GRANULAR SOILS:
Unconfined
Compo
Strength, Qu,
tsf
Consistency
Very Soft
Soft
Medium (Firm)
Stiff
Very Stiff
Hard
Very Hard
N - Blows/ft.
Relative Density
Very Loose
Loose
Medium Dense
Dense
Very Dense
Extremely Dense
<0.25
0.25 - 0.49
0.50 - 0.99
1.00-1.99
2.00 - 3.99
4.00 - 8.00
>8.00
0-3
4-9
10 - 29
30 - 49
50 - 80
80+
GME CONSULTANTS. INC.
I
'I
:1
'I
:1
'I
'I
:1
I
I
'I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,---- B.1 ~TA' ~~"
PROJECT SITE 7~th St~ftet
Darkenwald Development A berMI e, Minnesota
CLIENT ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
RLK - Kuusisto RLK
ti:i Qp (tsI)
w ~ - -0- -
LL 1 2 3 4 5
a: W DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL ~ ,
w (!) WATER
CD ..J Z !;;
ti:i :z w <( CONTENT %
=> ~ J: W .e,. - -e--
w zw 0 I-en
LL ~Q. ..J ..J W
[ a: ~ <(!:i => STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT)
Q.~ W o=> ..J
:ZO !;( ~ SURFACE ELEVATION wen ::; - -@- -
w <(z !;; + Q.w
0 en<( ~ 966.8 en a: :Z 10 20 30 40 50
- 1SS 1.0 Brown CLAYEY SILT WITH ORGANICS, 8 (g .
- \SAND - stiff - (ML-OU (ToDsoil)
- / f\
Brown SILTY CLAY WITH SAND, trace gravel \
- - very stiff to hard - (CL) ~ it
- 2SS 16
-
:=s: I 2
3SS 16 @( It
-
\
- ~
- 4S$ 17 It
-
- I
I
pn: 5SS 18 ~ Iv
I--
I-- I
'--- I
e----
- I
e----
I
35: ass 19 ~ Iv
-
\
- \
-
- \
- 2~ \
- 7SS 32 29
?O
End of boring at 20 feet
Hollow stem auger used full depth
Borehole backfilled with cuttings
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6/14/01
W.L. Groundwater not encountered ~ GIIE CONSULTAHlS, INC. BORING COMPLETED 6/14/01
W.L. while drilling or after HSA GeotechnlcaJ Materials environmental RIG BK51 HD DRILLER MH
14000 21st Avenue No.
W.L. removal Minneapolis, MN 55447 DRAWN KMB APPROVED JPB
(763) 559-1859
JOB# 9491 SHEET 1 of 1
The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries
between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual.
.1
:1
:1
1
:1
I
:1
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I -- R. ~ ~TA' itI64
PROJECT SITE 7~ S~~et
Darkenwald Development A bertvtl e, Minnesota
CLIENT ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
RLK - Kuusisto RLK
tu Qp (Isf)
W ~ -- -0-
LL. 1 2 3 4 5
a: ui DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL en
W C) ~ WATER
a:l ..J Z I-
tu :E ~ ~ I/) ..J CONTENT %
=> W e -e- -
w zw 0 ~I/)
LL. wo.. ..J W
~ K~ a: ~ ~!:i => STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT)
~ ..J
~ o=> ~ -@-
:EO SURFACE ELEVATION WI/) -
W ~~ ~ ti , 959.6 o..w ,
0 I/) a: z 10 20.,,, 30 40 50
- ^~ \~ark brown CLAYEY SILT WITH ORGANICS, I .
~.~ Q9
- 1SS trace sand - (ML-OLl (TODsoil) 7
-
2.4 Brown SIL TY CLAY, trace sand - firm - \ 1I.
- \ICL-MLl / ~ [it
- 2SS Brown and gray SILTY CLAY WITH SAND, 12
-
trace gravel- stiff to very stiff - (CL) \
:=s: 3SS 17 ~ .
f---
f--- ~
r---- 4SS 17
r----
I
r---- 9.0 I
PIT 5SS Gray brown SILTY CLAY WITH SAND, trace 14 ~ ~
f--- gravel - stiff - (CL)
\
I- \
I--
I-- \
I--
- 14.1
:=IS: 6SS Brown SILTY SANDY CLAY, trace gravel - 24 l' ~
- very stiff to hard - (SC-CL)
- \
-
- \
\
- 16 ~
- 7SS 39 e
20
End of boring at 20 feet
Hollow stem auger used full depth
Borehole backfilled with cuttings
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6/14/01
W.L. Groundwater not encountered ~ GIIE CONSULTANTS, INC. BORING COMPLETED 6/14/01
W.L. while drilling or after HSA . Geotechnical Malerlals Environmental RIG BK51 HD DRILLER MH
14000 21sl Avenue No.
W.L. removal MinneapoUs, MN 55447 DRAWN KMB APPROVED JPB
(763) 559-1859
JOB# 9491 SHEET 1 of 1
The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries
between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual.
,I
:1
'I
~I
.1
:1
;1
:1
I
I
I
I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
LOG B.3 STA' ~1R~
PROJECT SITE 7~th St'1~et
Darkenwald Development A bertvll e, Minnesota
CLIENT ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
RLK - Kuusisto RLK
li:i Qp (tsf)
W ~ -- -0- -
U. 1 2 3 4 5
ex: u.i DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL ~ -
w (!) WATER
lD ..J Z I- CONTENT %
li:i :!! w ~ en ..J
:J (ii W !; - -e--
w zw () ~en
LI. wa.. ..J w
::t ~~ ex: ~ <(~ :J STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT)
W O:J ..J
I- ~ ~ -@-- -
a.. :!!o !( SURFACE ELEVATION , wen
w <(Z s: 959.2 a..w .
0 en<( en en ex: z 10 .,~o 30 40 50
- 07 Dark brown SIL TV SANDY CLAY WITH 4
- 1SS \ORGANICS - lCL-DL) lToDsoil) / 6 Q9
-
Brown SIL TV CLAY, trace sand, gravel- firm \
- to stiff- (CL) ~D 3.
- 2SS 9
c-- 4.0
Q: Brown and gray SIL TV CLAY WITH SAND, \ 2.
3SS trace gravel- stiff to very stiff - (CL) 14 Q9
~ \
f--- ~2
~ 4SS 16 .
I---
V i
f--- 9.0 I
::J:n: Brown SIL TV CLAY, trace sand, brown fine to ~ 26
5SS medium clayey sand seam - very stiff - (CL) 17 e
-
-
- \
- \
- ~ \
- 14.0
Brown SIL TV SANDY CLAY, trace gravel - \
::::IS:: 15 ~D
6SS very stiff - (SC-CL) 29 e
-
I
- I
- I
-
I
- , 15 ~~
- 7SS 30 e
?n
End of boring at 20 feet
Hollow stem auger used full depth
Borehole backfilled with cuttings
.
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6/14/01
W.L. 1\i19 feet while drilling ~ OM'CONSULTANTS,INC, BORING COMPLETED 6/14/01
W.L. Y 13.9 feet after HSA removal Geotechnical Maler1a1s Environmental RIG BK51HD DRILLER MH
14000 21st Avenue No.
W.L. Minneapolis, MN 55447 DRAWN KMB APPROVED JPB
(763) 559-1859
JOB# 9491 . SHEET 1 of 1
Boring caved at 11.7 feet after HSA The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries
removal between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual.
_I
:1
~I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
lOG OF R..t
PROJECT SITE 7~th Str,fEet
Darkenwald Development A bertvll e, Minnesota
CLIENT ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
RLK - Kuusisto RLK
tu Qp (1st)
-- - -O-
w ~
U. 1 2 3 4 5
0: u.i DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
w Cl ~ WATER
!Xl ..J ~ 1-. CONTENT %
tu :E w lIJ
:::l ~ W e. -- -e- -
w zw () I-lIJ
U. wc.. ..J ~!:i w
~ ~~ 0: ~ ::l STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT)
..J
Ii: w ~ ()::l ~ - -0-
~~ I- SURFACE ELEVATION WlIJ
W ~ l- f 957.8 c..w , ~:\
0 lIJ lIJO: Z 10 30 40 50
- ^'" \~ark brown CLAYEY SILT WITH ORGANICS / .
v.v Q9
- 1SS . (ML:..oU lToDSOil) 7
-
Brown SIL TV CLAY WITH SAND, trace gravel \
- - firm to stiff - (CL) ~d
- 2SS 12 ~
- 4.0
=:5: Brown SIL TV CLAY, trace sand, gravel- stiff \
3SS to very stiff - (CL) 15 (g)2C ~
- \
- ~
- 4SS 17 ~
- "-
"-
- 9.0 "-
3lI Gray brown and brown SANDY SILT WITH 13 "-J~ b
5SS CLAY - dense - (SM-ML) 40 e
- /
/
-
- /
- /
- /
-
14.2 /
=r.s: 6SS Brown fine to medium SIL TV SAND, trace clay 12 ~/
- - medium dense - damp - (SM) \
--: \
- \
-
\
-
- 7SS 17 @
"""?i1
End of boring at 20 feet
Hollow stem auger used full depth
Borehole backfilled with cuttings
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6/14/01
W.L. Groundwater not encountered ~ GME CONSULTANTS, INC. BORING COMPLETED 6/14/01
W.L. while drilling or after HSA Geotedlnical Materials Environmental RIG BK51 HD DRILLER MH
14000 21st Avenue No.
W.L. removal Minneapolis, MN 55447 DRAWN KMB APPROVED JPB
(763) 559-1859
JOB# 9491 SHEET 1 of 1
Boring caved at 17.4 feet after HSA The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries
removal between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual.
-I
-I
'I
-I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I R.I;
PROJECT SITE 7?ith Sffi1:et
Darkenwald Development A bertvll e, Minnesota
CLIENT ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
RLK . Kuusisto RLK
I- Qp (tsf)
W ~ - -0.-
w I
u.. 1 2 3 4 5
a: u.i DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
w C> WATER
m ....I ~ t;
lu :E ~ CONTENT %
;:) w ~ -- e- -
w zw 0- I-en
u.. wo. ....I W
~ ....II- STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT)
~ ~~ a: ~....I ;:)
~ ....I
5: ~ 0;:) ~ .- Q9 - .
:EO SURFACE ELEVATION , wen
w ~~ ;: 957.5 o.w I
0 en en a: z 10 20 30 .40 50
~ Dark brown CLAYEY SILT WITH ORGANICS, fl?\ 31.
~ 1SS 1.2 trace sand - stiff - (ML-OU (Tonsoil) 1r
I--
Brown and gray CLAYEY SIL T, trace sand - /
I-- firm - (ML) ~(D \
~ 2SS 6
I--
b: 4.5 I
3SS Brown SIL TV SANDY CLAY, trace gravel- 6 Q9 0 "it
i--- 6.0 firm - (Cl) I
I-- Brown SIL TV CLAY WITH SAND, trace gravel ~ 28
i--- 4SS . firm - (CL) 7 0 e
i---
~ 9.0 \
bIT 5SS Gray brown SIL TV CLAY WITH SAND, trace 16 (g)( it
gravel - very stiff - (CL)
I--
i
i---
I-- I
I-- I
I--
I-- I
rn I
6SS 16 rgl .
I-- \
I--
~ \
I-- \
~ 18.5
I-- 7SS Brown fine to medium SIL TV SAND, trace 29 (2
~ clayey silt seams - medium dense - damp -
\(SM) . /
End of boring at 20 feet
Hollow stem auger used full depth
Borehole backfilled with cuttings
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6/14/01
W.L. Groundwater not encountered ~ GME CONSULTANTS,INC. BORING COMPLETED 6/14/01
W.L. while drilling or after HSA Geotechnical Materials Environmental RIG BK51 HD DRILLER MH
14000 21s1 Avenue No.
W.L. removal Minneapolis, MN 55447 \ DRAWN KMB APPROVED JPB
(763) 559-1859
JOB# 9491 SHEET 1 of 1
The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries
between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual.
:1
:1
:1
:1
:1
:1
:1
:1
'I
tl
I
I
~I
'I
I
I
I
'I
I
1-- -- A.1t ~T4' :ItI~1
PROJECT SITE 7~th S~~et
Darkenwald Development A bertvll e, Minnesota
CLIENT ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
RLK - Kuusisto RLK
Iii Qp (ts!)
...... - -0-- -
w i
u. 1 2 3 4 5
a::: ui DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
w C) WATER
m ....I ~ I-
Iii ::!l ~ en CONTENT %
:J W e -- -e- -
w zw w () I-en
u. wn. ....I w
~ cr~ a::: ~ ~!:i :J STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWSlFOOT)
W ....I
~ ():J ~ -Q9- -
~~ !;( SURFACE ELEVATION + wen
w ~ 957.1 . fJ5~ I
C ene( z 10 20 30 40 50
- ~- Tonsoil
- 1SS V.V Brown SILTY CLAY, trace sand -firm - (CL) 6 Q9 0 ..
- 2.0 \
'--- Brown and gray SILTY CLAY, trace sand, @ 24
- 2SS gravel - stiff - (CL) 14 e
- 4.0
t=5: 3SS Brown and gray SILTY CLAY WITH SAND, 15 ~ ~
f-- trace gravel - stiff to very stiff - (eL)
~ ~.
i--- 4SS 17
i---
,
i--- I
:=In: 9.5
5SS Brown SILTY CLAY WITH SAND, trace gravel 16 oQfJt
~ - very stiff - (CL)
\
~
~ \
~ 13.0 \
-.-..:. t Brown fine to medium SILTY SAND, trace ~
~ 6SS clay, gravel - medium dense - damp - (SM) 19
~
End of boring at 15 feet
Hollow stem auger used full depth
Borehole backfilled with cuttings
-
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6/14/01
W.L. Groundwater not encountered ~ GIIE CONSULTANTS, INe. BORING COMPLETED 6/14/01
W.L. while drilling or after HSA Geotechnical Meterials Environmental RIG BK51HD DRILLER MH
14000 21st Avenue No.
W.L. removal Minneapolis, MN 55447 DRAWN KMB APPROVED JPB
(763) 559-1859
JOB # 9491 SHEET 1 of 1
The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries
between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual.
:1
-I
'I
:1
.1
:1
~I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
LOr. OF: I:l. '7 ~TA' :fi1J:;7
PROJECT SITE 70th S~~et
Darkenwald Development Albertvll e, Minnesota
CLIENT ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
RLK - Kuusisto RLK
jjj Qp(tsl)
w ~ - -0--' -
U. 1 2 3 4 5
a: ui DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
w C) ~ WATER
m ...I z I-
jjj :E w c( en CONTENT %
=> (ij :c ~en e - -e-- -
w zw 0
U. wQ. ...I W
~ ~~ a: ~ ~!:i => STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT)
~ ...I
~ o=> ~ - -@-
~~ SURFACE ELEVATION wen
w ~ + 955.7 Q.w ,
0 en en a: z 10 20 30 40 50
- 1SS 0.9 Black SIL TV CLAY WITH ORGANICS - stiff - 13 ~ "iI
- \lCL-OU lToDsoil) /
- I
Gray and brown SIL TV CLAY, trace sand -
- stiff - (CL) ~ 28
- 2SS 12 e
-
I
=:5: 3SS 12 (~ ~
- 6.0
- Gray brown SIL TV CLAY WITH SAND, trace \ 2~ 0
- 4SS gravel- stiff to very stiff - (CL-ML) 14 @
I--
\
I--- \
ill 5SS 16 @2 it ()
"-
I
f-- I
f--
f-- I
"--
"-- I
tIs: 14.5 I
6SS Dark gray SIL TV SANDY CLAY, trace gravel- 10 G~ .
f-- stiff to very stiff - (CL) \
"-- \
f--
f-- \
f-- \
"--
\
b11 7SS 16 1~ 0
-
- \
-
- 23.0 \
- Dark gray CLAYEY SILT WITH SAND - very 15 \
- ass stiff - (CL-ML) 25 e @ 0
~
End of boring at 25 feet
Hollow stem auger used full depth
Borehole backfilled with cuttings
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6/14/01
W.L. Groundwater not encountered ~ GME CONSULTAHTS,INC. BORING COMPLETED 6/14/01
W.L. while drilling or after HSA Geotechnical Materials Environmental RIG BK51 HD DRILLER MH
14000 21st Avenua No,
W.L. removal . Minneapolis. MN 55447 DRAWN KMB APPROVED JPB
(783) 559-1859
JOB # 9491 SHEET 1 of 1
The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries
between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual.
:1
:1
:1
"I
,I
:1
:1
:1
:1
II
,I
'I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I nr.: ns: B.8 ~'PA. "'''Il!O A___\ .
PROJECT SITE 7~th Str.eet
Darkenwald Development A bertvllle, Minnesota
CLIENT ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
RLK - Kuusisto RLK
Iii Qp (1st)
~ - -0-.
W ~
U. 1 2 3 4 5
0:: ui DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
W G ~ WATER
a:I ...J Z t;
. Iii ::! ~ ~ ...J CONTENT %
::> W e. -. -e- .
w zw W 0 I-l/)
U. ~Q. ...J W
:r: 0:: ~ ~~ ::> STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT)
I- o..~ W ~ 0::> ...J -- @---
0.. ~~ !;( SURFACE ELEVATION , Wl/) ~
W ~ 966.1 o..w ,
c l/) l/)O:: Z 10 20 30 40 50
I-- ~~ TODsoil
v.v Q9 "it
I-- 1SS Brown SILTY CLAY WITH SAND, trace gravel 5 0
--- 2.0
- firm - lCU "-
--- Brown mottled SILTY SANDY CLAY, trace "-
--- 2SS 14 @1')
I-- gravel - stiff - (CL) I
b 3SS 11 (~ 2~ K)
--- 6.0 "
,
I-- Brown and gray SILTY CLAY WITH SAND, 2~. " 1ib
I-- 4SS trace gravel- very stiff - (CL) 30
I-- ,/
,/
I-- ,/
9.5 ,/
ill 5SS Brown SILTY SANDY CLAY, trace gravel, 8 ~ dtt
I-- sand seams - stiff - (CL)
\
--- \
I--
---
--- \
I-- 14.0
tIs: ass Gray brown SILTY SANDY CLAY, trace gravel 12 ~ 21
~ - stiff - (CL)
I.- \
f-- \
f-- \
f--
~ 19.0 \
::::21l Gray brown SILTY CLAYEY SAND, trace \
7SS gravel - medium dense to very dense - 25 Q9"
---'
(SC-CL) "
- "
- "
- "
"
- 13 C [9
- ass 51 e
~
End of boring at 25 feet
Hollow stem auger used full depth
Borehole backfilled with cuttings
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6/14/01
W.L. Groundwater not encountered ~ GME CONSULTANTS, INe. BORING COMPLETED 6/14/01
W.L. while drilling or after HSA Geotechnical Materials environmental RIG BK51 HD DRILLER MH
14000 21st Avenue No.
W.L. removal Mlnneapofis. MN 55447 DRAWN KMB APPROVEDJPB
(763) 559-1859
JOB# 9491 SHEET 1 of 1
The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries
between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual.
:1
:1
'I
. ..,
'I
'I
:1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,---- 8. 9 STA~ #150 A___\
PROJECT SITE 7~th Str.eet
Darkenwald Development A bertvllle, Minnesota
CLIENT ARCHITECT-ENGINEER
RLK - Kuusisto RLK
I- ap (\sf)
w .... -- -0.- -
w i
u. 1 2 3 4 5
0:: ui DESCRIPTION OF MATERIAL
w C) WATER
ID ..J ~ I-
Iii :E ~ en CONTENT %
:::> w fa. - -..- .
w zw 0 I-en
u. wo.. ..J W
~ ~~ 0:: i! ~!:i :::> STANDARD PENETRATION (BLOWS/FOOT)
W ~ 0:::> ~ - -@- .
~~ !( SURFACE ELEVATION + wen
w 3: I- 964.7 D..W I
C en 0( en en 0:: z 10 20 30 40 50
- n7 Dark brown SILTY CLAY, trace organics- .,,,
- 1SS I \lCL-OLl lToDsoil) / 7 Q9 (D .
-
2.2 Brown SILTY CLAY. trace sand - firm - lCLl "-
- Brown SILTY CLAY, trace silt seams - very ~t
- 2SS 19
- 4.0 stiff - (CL-ML)
r::=:s: 3SS Brown and gray SILTY SANDY CLAY, trace 11 (~ 1;' D
gravel - stiff to very stiff - (CL)
I--- "-
,
I--- 2! .'@
I- 4SS 25
f----
/
f---- 9.1 /
PIT SSS Brown mottled SILTY CLAY WITH SAND, 12 ~ 11)
I--- trace gravel, sand seams - stiff - (CL)
f--- \ \
I--- \
I--- \
f----
- 14.0 \
=:IS: 6SS Gray brown SILTY SANDY CLAY, trace gravel 15 @~ it
- stiff - (CL)
-
\
- \
-
- 18.0 \
-
- Gray brown SILTY CLAY, trace sand - very \
=:2n: stiff - (CL-ML) l' 9
7SS 20 <D
- \
- \
- \
I--- 23.0 \
f--- Gray CLAYEY SILT WITH SAND - hard - 15 R90
I--- ass (CL-ML) 32 .
t?h
End of boring at 25 feet
Hollow stem auger used full depth
Borehole backfilled with cuttings
WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS BORING STARTED 6/14/01
W.L. Groundwater not encountered fJi) GIIE CONSULTANTS,INC. BORING COMPLETED 6/14/01
W.L. while drilling or after HSA Geotechnical Materials Environmental RIG BK51 HD DRILLER MH
14000 21st Avenue No.
W.L. removal Minneapolis, MN 55447 DRAWN KMB APPROVED JPB
(763) 559-1859 .
JOB# 9491 SHEET 1 of 1
The stratification lines represent approximate boundaries
between soil types; insitu the transition may be gradual.
:1
:1
'I
I
:1
~I
I
I
;1
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
140
fi] ~~n~~~:~~~~~~~S, INC.
14000 21st Avenue North
M" ors M'nnesota 55447
\ \ lnneap I, I
[6121559-1859
\ 1\ MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONS OF SOILS A
1\ \
\ \ SOIL-AGGREGATE MIXTURES
.\ ~
1\ \ DATE: 6/22/01 GME PROJECT NO. 9491
1\ \
\ , PROJECT: Darkenwald Development
\ \
1\ \ ~ LOCATION: Albertville, Minnesota
\ \
\ , GRAPH NO. 1 SAMPLE NO. 1
\ ~ On site: Boring 9, Depth 2-10
1\ \ SOURCE OF MATERIAL:
\ \ ,SOIL DESCRIPTioN: Brown SILTY SANDY CLAY
\
\ ,
\ \
I 1\ \ UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION: CL
1\ \
, 1\ I \ METHOD OF TEST: ASTM:.O 698 Method B
\ \ ~
\ \.CLAY PREPARATION: Yes
1\ \ ,
\ \NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT: 18.7
\ 'lERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE:
\
'\ ~ OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT: 15.1
'\ \
1\ , MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY: 105.
\ 1\
'\ ~
'\ ~
\ "
.... \ I\.
..J :'il 1\ '\ Zero air void curve for
I '\ \. \. 2,8CifiC gravities of
/ \ .80
2.70
/ " 2.60
II \ I,
.. \. \ \.
\ ,
\ , .
\. '\
'\. \
\ 1'\
'\. \
1"- "
\ \. "
1\ '-
\. \.
'\ '\
t\.
'\
'\
NO
~ 135
130
125
l-
e
e
LL 120
u
en
::::>
u
a::
w
c-
~ 115
z
::::>
e
c-
o
%
%
%
>-
l-
V; 110
z
w
o
>-
a::
o
3 pef
105
100
95
90
85
o
5
10 15 20 25 30
MOISTURE CONTENT - PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT
35
.1
;1
.1
,I
'I
,I
;1
jl
:1
I
I
.1
,I
J
I
.1
,I
I
I
140
Eli ~~c:ni:~a~r:I~:~~~~S, INC.
14000 21st Avenue North
Minneapolis Minnesota 55447
1\ \ ,
(612) 559-1859
\ \ MOISTURE - DENSITY RELATIONS OF SOILS AN
\ \
1\ \ SOIL-AGGREGATE MIXTURES
. \ 1\
\ \ DATE: 6/22/01 GME PROJECT NO. 9491
1\ \
\ 1\ PROJECT: Darkenwald Development ,
\ ,
\ , 1\ LOCATION: Albertville, Minnesota
\ 1\ \
\ , GRAPH NO.2 SAMPLE NO. 2
\ \ On site: Boring 8, Depth 2-10
, [\ ,.SOURCE OF MATERIAL:
\ \ \SOIL DESCRIPTION: Brown SILTY SANDY CLAY
\
\ ,
\ ~
'\ \. UNIFIED CLASSIFICATION: CL
\ ."
\ 1 \ METHOD OF TEST: ASTM: 0 698 Method B
\ \ \.CLAY PREPARATION: Yes
\
\ ,
\ !\NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT: 19.9
\ 'lERCENT PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE:
\
\ , OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT: 15.5
\ \
1\ , MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY: 109.
\ \.
/.. '- !\ ,
,. I\. \ I\.
\ ~
.. \ 1\ "
\ \ Zero air void curve for
\. '- specific gravities of
1\ \ 2.80
2.70
" 2.60
\ !'-
\. \
1\ '"
'\ \. .
\ \
\.. \
'\ r\.
\. \.
\. "
\. \. '\..
'\. ~
\. \. ..
1'\ '\
'\ r\.
.'"
1'\
135
130
125
I-
o
o
LL 1 20
(J
iii
::J
(J
a:
w
0..
~ 115
z
::J
o
0..
I
>-
l-
e;; 110
z
w
C
>-
Il:
C
105
100
95
90
85
o
5
10 15 20 25 30
MOISTURE CONTENT - PERCENT OF DRY WEIGHT
o
%
%
%
2 pef
35
:1
.1
'I
:1
I
11I818M .<q J8SJe~ IU~J8d
,
iii
=
~
=c
&I
o
~
I
i
I
,
..
~-f r;
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - -
/
./
A
II
'I
8
'I
;1
~I
:1
J
I
:1
,I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
.
!
~
51
j~
E
"
i~
iillil
l!
II
'0
c.,
61:
00-
:i
~
.,
l!I
,h
u
.5
.5
f;.;
'2
8.-
o
h
iil-
~N
-g
61..
00
:i
~ ~ 8 ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ 2 m $ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
II) o~
145!8M.<q JeUI.:IlU8OJ8d
88
d
o
d
...
d
I!
GI
!
~
.5
11
lIJ
c a
'i! ~
Cl IIJ E
i
~
..J
W
~
Cl
~
o
...
o
~
in
z
I 5 5
(J (J
s ~ ~
u
~ Z Z
CC ~
~ rn
5 5
z
:) US US
~ I
co
..J -I
(J (J
wl
llC15 m ....
~!Z Gi 00
... ...
:110
U
~,~
~ ~~
Q,
~ u
~ ~i:;i
~ ~:'i::;
Q,
Q,
01-
g~g
0 0
:1:- ci ci
~l "i "i
0 C! 0
N N
~ffi .
Q,CD N
~~ ...
l)ffi cp ell
~CD
0::& co co
CDj!
...
0
~ CD . B
:.:~
GI
C
u::
~
~
!
u:
GI
I!
l!l
o
GME CONSULTANTS, INC.
Geotechnical-Materlals-Environmental
14000 21st Avenue North
Minneap()lis, Minnesota 55447
(763) 559-1859
fiJ
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS (ASTM: 0 422)
Darkenwald Development
Albertville, Minnesota
MLH
6/21/2001
#9491
I
I
CLASSIFICATION OF SOILS FOR ENGINEERING PURPOSES
(ASTM: D 2487 and 2488)
Major divisions Group Typical names Laboratory classification criteria
symbols
tI Well-graded gravels, gravel-eand D60 (DaoJ2
GW Cu=-greater Ihan 4; Cc=-between 1 and S
mixtures, little or no fines ..
iii D'0 D,oXD6O
C I!o i ~
II I:IIc "
8~ I! !
i 'J:
"5
:= GP Poorly graded gravels, gravel- ~ Not meeting all gradation requirements for GW
fi! ;. sand mixtures, IiUle or no fines 8
~t)1
I I:~j i (I)~
~I.
i CJ:!j Ii d .
= - !:
c_ GM - Silty gravels. gravel-sand-silt a:t)~'!! Atterberg limits below "A"
. -.. . CJCJl.8
I 5~ =E mixtures . line or RI. less than 4 Above "A" line with RI.
5-" u !I ~:i 0 E
5.!1 Iii CJCJID ~ between 4 and 7 are borde,.
0 Go
z !. I 0 line cases requiring use
.IC I~ of dual symbols
11 ..Do GC Clayey gravels, gravel-sand-clay ,- Atterberg limits below "A"
l' CJ~ mixtures .5: line or RI. greater than 7
I!"
1:11,1
II E -
o E
.. . D60 (D30)2
Well-graded sands, gravelly =c
~I SW ~.9 Cu=-greaterthan6;Cc=-between 1 andS
sands, little or no fines I!o
c= 1:IIl! D'0 D,oXD6O
c.... ,,:::.
0 ~I :~ e.
= C" ..
I Jl! 10 ".5
u~ c- ..
j SP Poorly graded sands, gravelly 10; . .
!. a "0 &~ . 1: . Not meeting all gradation requirements for SW
~8~ sands, little or no fines
I! lS.9i l'l :
!. coi ell.....
S ~ .. &..:
c:=c ~ &I!~ ~
II c d
c.. :8 SM - Silty sands, sand-silt mixtures &15llilia. Atterberg limits below "A"
It .5E . !ii 5 5 N line or RI. less than 4 Limits plotting in hatched
-'.- u zone with RI. between 4
I!(j 5G11! .5'6l!l:I!'"
o. 11= Ei.GI~.9 and 7 are borderline cases
!,.- GI .. ..I 1ft
.-- ~ll~ requiring use of dual sym-
~~o Clayey sands, sand-clay mlx- Atterberg limits below "A"
_Do SC bols.
(I)~ tures line or RI. greater than 7
Inorganic silts and very fine
ML sands, rock flour, silty or clay-
~ ey fine sands or clayey silts
e with slight plasticity 60 ---T I
~I -For classification of fine-grained 7
.!I- Inorganic clays of low to me- 7
.... dlum plasticity, gravelly clays, = solis and fine fraction of coarse- 7
~.!! CL 50 _grained soils.
.... .= sandy clays, silty clays, lean /
! !! clays -Atterberg Limits plotting In 7
. 0:!i! = ~atched area are borderline classl- CH 7
I ~ _ flcatlons requiring use of dual
IE /
0 d. Organic silts and organic silty 40 _ symbols 7
Z OL i = Equation of A-line: 7
c clays of low plasticity _ PI=0.7S (LL - 20)
.:5 .5 7
,.,
llSO '"
j,l Inorganic silts, micaceous 1i 7
. or
15 . ~~7
S' MH diatomaceous fine sandy or ii:
-.. ..;./ OH and MH
.- 1ft silty soils, elastic silts
&1 e 20 7
.
!.!! ~5 7
1&:1 .!Is CL 7
'0 .... Inorganic clays of high plas- 7
"I! CH 10
- cI:II tlclty, fat clays 7
iii ;=
&: : _Ef~~_~_ - ML and OL
c -E
. 0=
5 "
"5
I! 0" Organic clays of medium to o I /'
0 2- OH
:l! high plasticity, organic silts 0 10 20 SO 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
liquid Limit
_.2 Peat and other highly organic Plasticity Chart
&:c.!! PI
.2'e.1 soil
:1:0
.
I
1
1
fl
:1
:1
'I
II
,I
:1
:1
:1
:1
'I
I
I
I
:1
;1
:1
:1
:1
~I
:1
:1
:1
tl
.1
:1
:1
il
:1
:1
[I
:1
~I
. . .
SPECIAL NOTES ONPLACEMISNT::OFCOMPACTI;D FILL SOIL
. '. f . _. ". . .... .. ,_
:. ....
. ,,' ~.., . .~}
GENERAL, . .
The placement'of compacted fill for support of foundations, floor slabs, pavements, or earth structures should be
carried out by an experlen.ced excavator with the proper eqUipment..The excavator must be prepared .to adapt his
procedures, equipment, alid riiat~ria1s to the type of prOject; to weather conditions, alKHhe structural requirements of
the architect andengirieer. Methods. and matetlals used in summer may not be applicable. in winter; fill used In dry
excavations may not be 'suitable in wet excavations. or during perIods of precipitation; proposed fill soil may require
wetting or drying for proper placement and compaction. Conditions may also vary during-the cOurse of a project or in
different areas ofthesite. These needs shouk;t b~ address~ in the project ~rawi"'gs, and specifications.
, . .., EXCAVATION/BACKFILL BELOW THE WATER TABLE.. .
. . . . ~, . . . . I .;.. .......",. . : . ~. \ ~ . .
It is common to have. to exc~va!~ and i'eplace~ur:i.suitable $oils.bEll<;>""t~e ~ater table forslte correction. As a general
rule of prudent (:~!'lstructiontechn.lqu.e, we reC.9mm~nd that. excavati9n/b~ckfill'b~IOW t",ew~ter table not be permitted,
unless the excavation is deiNate'red. Numerous problems can develop when this procedure is attempted without
dewatering.
- !nability, of the. eq4Ipmentoperato~. anc:t. soil . t.~crinic.iar)is. to
. 'obS8r.vethataU unSUitable soil/materials have been 'removed from
. the base of the excavation~ ' .. .::q ". , . .. > ..
- Inability to observe and measure th~t proPer lateral oversizlngis
provided.,.;,.... .: ';, . .'.:~ I," . .:': :".,.' t" ..:::
. - InaQllity to prevent or correct sloughing of ~xcavationsidewaUs,
:" wh~c~~ea~: ~sult in;:, unsuitab~es6l1s trap~d within the' sel~!
,..'. backflll..., ,.,q ".':.'. "
- Inability of the contractor to adequately and uniformly compact
the. bacl,<fil.l. , . .
- PossjbiJityof di$turbance>of.the stlitable solis at the base of the
excavation. . ... .., . .
The dewatering methods,normallichoSeh. at the .coMlractor's: option, shO:u-rtJ. JQ!Jow. prudent cons.truction practice.
~eava.tioris In claY"~an ,often be'deWatared with.slJmp pits ~hd PUrTlps;this t~phniqu~. W09,ld: no~ be applica~le .for
excavation extendirig into permeable granular soli, especially'for depths significantly below the water table. Dewater-
Ing granular soils should normally be done with well points or wells. When dewatering is needed, we strongly
recommend that the procedures. b~ d.iscuss,eq !it. pre-bid pr pr~qonstf1Jction.. meetings. The dewatering technique
chosen by the contractor should.berevieWed by the arcl'litec;t arid engineer before construction starts; it should not be
left until. excavation is under way.: .'
Tlieselection of proper backfill ma1erial~: lsirri.portant when wO'l'klng'indewatered ex~avations: Even withdew8tering,
the base,ls.Usually'wehhd the dontracformust be carefull)ot to dishirb'the base. We,recomme'nd that the first lifts of
backfill be a' clean. medium to course grain sand with leSs thiln 5% passing the #200 sieve. The use of silty sand, clayey
sand, or cohesh,e!semi:'coheslve sOlls.is not recommended for s'uch situatio'ns. Th~:~xdavator should be required to
~ub'1lit $8mples of thepropo~d mate{ial(s)'hf:l,pliln~ to use as t:>ackfill ~fore thefUl is hauled to lhe site, so that It can
be tested for sultabiHty. . " . ..' .: _ .,: ,... . -., .
. . ~ .. .: '. t t :..,
". ,. ",f :. "" ..,
. . "'. . .,WfNTER EAR;rHWORK CONSTRUCTlo.N.. , .' :
. . I .: . ~. .. . :. . '! ). 0".1. . ,., . . ~ '. ~. ~ . "'. '," . ;.. " . _ ,
W1ntere~rt~work pr~s~rit~. its ~wJ;i'.r'f1ngeof prObr~,!,s Which lJ'lu~t be overcome; the.. sltu~tjon ma,'y bec~mplicated by
the' need for dewatermgdlscussed above.. .. . . ,. :.. .
During freezing conditions, the fill used must not be frozen when delivered to the site. It also must not be allowed to
freeze during or after compaction. Since the ability to work the soil while keeping It from freezing depends in part on
the soil type, the specifications should require the contractor to submit a sample of his proposed fill before construc-
tion starts, for laboratory testing. If the soil engineer and structural engineer determine that it Is not suitable, it should
be rejected. In general, silty sand, clayey sand, and cohesive/semi-coheslve soils. should not be used as fill under
freezing conditions. All frozen soil of any type should be rejected for use as compacted fill.
It is important that compacted. fill be protected from freezing after it is placed. The excavator should be required to
submit a plan for protecting the soil. The plan should include details on the type and amount of material (straw,
blankets, extra loose fill, topsoil, etc.) proposed for use as frost protection. The need to protect the soil from freezing is
ongoing throughout construction and applies both before and after concrete is placed, until backfilling for final frost
protection is completed. Foundations placed on frozen soil can experience heaving and significant settlement, rota-
tion, or other movement as the soil thaws. Such movement can also occur If the soil Is allowed to freeze after the
concrete is placed and then allowed to thaw. The higher the percentage of fines (clay and silt, P-2oo material) in the fill,
the more critical Is the need for protection from freezing. '
"..,.... .' .' 1.. ~ I ;. . :" '" "
&ME CONSULTANTS,INC.
MOISTURE CONTROL OF FILL, .
The contractor shoul'd be required to adjust the. mOI~ure conteht of th~ soil to within anarr-ow range near the optimum
moisture content (as defined by the applicable Proctor or MSHTO Test). In general, fill should be placed within about
2% of optimum. The need for moisture control Is more critical as the percentage of fines increases. Naturally-occurring
clayey sand or coheslve/seml-cohesive soil are. often much wetter than. the optlmuni~ Placing and attempting to
compact such SOlis. to the specified density IT)ay be difficult, or not possible. Even U compacted to thesp8clfied density,
excessively wet solis may not be suitable as floorsli!lb or pavetnentsubgrades due to plinipln'gurider appUed load, This
Is.especially truEPlvhen wet cOhesive/seml-coheslve'soil is used as backfill in utilitY ti'enqh~s. under $treets. excessively
wet soli in thick fill sections may causErpost~onstruction settlementbEiy6nd thatestiniatedfor fll1 placed at or near
(:!:2%) the optimum moistUre content.. . .. -, . . . .
.. .
An exception to this would .be low permeability soil placed as a' pond liner or for a dam. Such soli should usually be
placed at 2% to 4% above the optlmul'J:! mols.ture coment,to proyide for,a.lo""er insitu permeability. Also, shrinking/
swelling soils (expansive clay) should be placed at about 2%to 4% above optl'ri1urinnoisture to reduce the possibility of
soli expansion. Clayey Slit, silt, or. very 'silty fine sand shoulc:t be' placed exceSsively dry~ Such soils can.undergo
post-constructionconsolidatlon upon being wetted, even iUheSpeclfled density had been aChieved; This is caused by
the collapse of flocoulantsoil particle arrangement, and can result in settlement of buildings or slabs constructed over
the soil.
Proper control of fill soli moisture is the responsibility ,of the excavator. The excavator should evaluate the need for
wetting or drying the solis, based either on the data In the soil report, orhis Own slte.testing. If the excavator is bringing
In off-site fill, it is also his responsibility to evaluate the moisture content of the soli; and the need for wetting or drying.
We recommend that this rratter ~ addres$.8din the project specificatloI:lS:,
. .. . .
CONSTRUCTION ON COMPACTED $OIL
After the select fill has been placed(compacted, and t~ted, it rh!Jst be n)~lntain~d al')Clprotected In order to properly
support structures. The suitability of compacted fill soil can be greatly dirriinishedifitJs allowed to freeze, become
saturated while unconfined (Such as in footing excavations orat the surface of slab/plac~ment subgrade), or disturbed
by construction equipment. . . , . ... . . . .'
. The responsibility for protecting the soli, odor correcting any disturban~e, Sho~.I~ b,e clearly defined in the specifica-
tions. Solis which beconie wet and soft after compaction testing do hOt nece~sarily reflect inaccurate field density
tests. Especially with non~xpansive cohesive/semi-cohesive soils, saturation when unconfine~ can severely reduce
the shear strengthwhile the density remains adequate. The reduced shear strength can cause foottngs, floOr slabs, or
pavements to settle or failunder'l()ad. We strongly recommend that aU pavement subgrade be,test rolled (MN/DOT
Sp~itication 2111) immediately before paving to determine if the subgrade has !,lOt been protected and soft spots have
developed. '
FLOOR SLABSUBGRADE AND UTILITY TRENCHES.
This facet of construction presents special problems, especially if the slab subgrade IS allowed to freeze. When the soil
thaws, it undergOes a period of temporarily lower shear strength. FlOor siaM should '.;olbe cast over soil in such a
weakened or frozen condition (reference pertinent PCA andACI publications). To do'sa'can result ihcracked and
failing slabs. The time period to neat and thaw a building: may place: the construction setledule and/or costs in
jeopardy: We strongly recommend !hatthis matter be revlewed-:'n~re-bi~.and p~~nS!~ctiofl"meetirigs.' ..
. .'. .. : . ." '. . ".., ... ,".". . .' ..... . "'. l ",.,.'. ....- .... .... .... .", .
Backfilling of utility trenches In the floor-slab subgrade can be dIffIcult. If the sOil IS wet, compaction to ttle specified
density may be difficult, or not possible. The narrowly cut trenches may preclude the use' of proper compaction
~quipmen!. With th~ use of small equ_i~meotinc~r;'lfi\ne~are~4, !h$) c8nt.rac,9Lr:nust place the soil in thin lifts (4 to 6
Inches), WIth the SOil at the proper mOisture content. ThIS work IS tyPlcally'camed out by contractors other than the
mass grading or earthwork.contractor. We strongly recomniend thaUhe responsibtlity to carry out the compaction be
clearly detailed in the applicable sectiOn of the specifications, and reviewed with the appropriate contractor and
subcontractor. .
'."
?,',
;. .
.;
_. CONSULTANTS, INC.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
..
Concept
Drainage Report
for
. AI.bertville Business Park
Albertville, MN
November, 2002
C . Creating
( Extraord~n~ry
Communtttes
""
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
I ·
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
ALBERTVILLE BUSINESS PARK
ALBERTVILLE, MN
DRAINAGE REPOgT
RLK-KUUSISTO, LTD.
PROJECT NO. 2001-239-M
November, 2002
I here certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by
. me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Registered
Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota
~~
Michele Jackson Caron, P .E.
Date: JI- zs ..0 Z- -
Lic. No.26254 .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARy OF DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
SWMP t - Existing Drainage
SWMP 2 - Proposed Drainage
Appendix A - Summary of Pond and Wetland Data for t OO-yr event
Appendix B - Summary of Existing and Proposed Flows Exiting the Site
Appendix C - Existing Conditions Hydrocad Data for tOO-year event
Appendix D - Proposed Conditions Hydrocad Data for tOO-year event
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ALBERTVILLE BUSINESS PARK
RLK-KUUSISTO, LTD. PROJECT NO. 2001-239-M
SUMMARY OF DRAINAGE CONDITIONS
November, 2002
EXISTING CONDITIONS
The site encompasses approximately 110 acres located along the north side ofInterstate Highway 94, west
of the existing outlet mall. It is bounded by Kadler Avenue on the west and 70lh Street NE on the north.
The site and surrounding area is generally flat. The primary current use of the site is agricultural with the
cultivation of row crops, mainly com and soybeans. There is a fannstead located m the center of the site.
A gravel driveway provides the farmstead access to 70lh Street NE. Existing vegetation on the property in
addition to the crop production includes dense patches of prairie grass and typical wetland vegetation in a
number of the delineated wetland areas.
This report sunnnarizes the drainage conditions of the entire site prior to the recent Phase I development at
the southeast comer of the site.
There are three separate routes in which stormwater traverses through the site:
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
South: Runoff that is routed through WetIand 9
Off-site runoff impacts the site from approximately 45 acres of area to the west and south of the project and
theI-94 right of way (see SWMP 1, Existing Drainage). There are four existing culverts routing off site
drainage across 1-94 that discharge onto and across the property. Two culverts carry runoff across the
highway from development areas south ofI-94, and two culverts carry runoff from over half a mile ofI-94
right of way adjacent to the south property line.
Drainage information for the offsite development areas south ofI-94 was obtained from the City Engineer
and incorporated into the project HydroCAD analysis. The drainage data for the Kollville Estates
development south ofI-94 is included in Subcatchments 810 and 730 and Ponds 810 and 730 in the project
analysis. The drainage data for the Karston Property, located south of the site and west of Kollville Estates,
is included in the analysis in links 811 and 812.
Several delineated wetland basins and a system of drainage channels and piping are located on the site.
Wetlands are referenced on the exhibits by the wetland numbers designated in the wetland delineation
report prepared by Pinnacle Engineering. Wetland 9, a large wetland located on the east side of the
property, extends over the property line onto the adjacent properties. There are a number of small,
Albertville Business Parle
Drainage Report
Page 1
RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
Project No. 2001-239-M
I
I
I
I
I
I
channelized wetlands located along the south boundary of the property that discharge into wetland 9.
These upstream wetlands have been functioning as storm ponds and drainage channels for runoff from the
MnDOT right of way and pass-through flows from the developments south ofI-94. Runoff from the
southwest comer of the site is routed through the two cells of Wetland 2 and into Wetland 9. Runofffrom
the south-central part of the site is routed along the south property line and into Wetlands 7 and 8. This
area also drains to Wetland 9. Wetland 3 is isolated within its own drainage area and overflows into
Wetlands 7 and 8, which drain to Wetland 9. Wetland 9 drains offsite through a swale to the east into
wetlands on the adjacent City property. These wetlands drain via a ditch system into the wetlands south of
the outlet mall buildings and ultimately into School Lake and then Mud Lake east of County Road 19.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,I
I
Northeast: Runoff routed through Wetland 4
There are approximately 100 acres north of 70th Avenue NE that flow south toward the site. This area is
mostly comprised of cropland and prairie grass. Runoff from this area collects in a low-lying area north of
70th Avenue NE and overflow is broughton-site through a culvert dTaining into Wetland 4. Wetland 4 is
located in the northeast comer of the site and extends. east onto the adjacent property, draining to the east
and off-site through a swale. A small portion of the site (Catchment 400 on SWMP 1) drains to Wetland 4.
North: Runoff routed throuro Wetland 1 and to the east
Runoff from significant off-site areas north and west of the site is routed to Wetland 1 on site. Higher
ground to the west ofKadler Avenue naturally drains toward the site and is carried beneath the roadway via
culverts to Wetland 1. Additionally, existing wetlands and ponds north of 70th Street are connected via
culverts beneath the roadway and overflow into Wetland 1 on the site. Wetland 1 overflows east across the
property via a ditch and exits. the site into the ditch system on the adjacent property previously described.
PROPOSED CONDITIONS
The proposed project encompasses approximately .110 acres and will consist of individual commercial lots
served by a public road system connecting to Kadler Avenue, 70th Street NE, and 67th Street as shown in
SWMP 2: Concept Drainage Plan. A HydroCAD analysis was completed for the proposed development
and is included in Appendix D.
Storm ponds will be designed and constructed as part of the individual developments to detain and treat
runoff from the proposed lots and public roadway prior to discharging into the wetlands. The ponds will be
designed to Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) standards and will provide treatment to remove
sediment and nutrients. The ponds will also provide rate control for discharge into the wetlands from the
increased runoff over proposed impervious areas. . SWMP 2: Concept Drainage Plan illustrates the
proposed storm ponding and routing for the project.
Albertville Business Park
Drainage hpott
Page 2
RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
Project No. 200l-239-M
I
I
I
I
Wetlands 3, 7, and 8, all low quality wetlands, are to be mitigated in the proposed plan. Wetland 2 will be
slightly reduced in size and the cells will be split to allow access to lot 5. Mitigation for the impacted
wetland areas will occur by expanding Wetlands I and 9. A wetland permit will be obtained that will
clarify limits of proposed impacts and mitigation.
I
I
In summary, the normal water and high water elevations for the wetlands for the post-development
conditions are similar to existing water levels. The three major routes for on-site runoff will be maintained
in the post development conditions. Rates of stonnwater discharge will be approximately maintained.
Water elevations in the MnDOT right of way will not be impacted by the project.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Albertvillo Business Park
Drainage Report
Page 3
RLK.-Kuusisto, Ltd.
Project No. 2OO1-239-M
nC:99 .~" "lfUO,,.u"''''' 001' ~I"S'
5!:"'(i'Jr!:1;..
....~.,-'lI
'NJI"~II
....~-sa.r.
..,. "hIu1ll
.0 '1~.IJ '''18 0110
~
'5rfij'
'--..-/
~~~L~~lJ~ a
V.lOS3NNlll '3'T1IWI3lnV
~ 3SVHd-)I~Vd SS3NISn&
3"lI\L~381V
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
II I V
I 'J
-' "-
~ ')'
/" '
<(
w
cr
<(
w
<:J
<(
Z
<C
cr
o
o
z
o
a..
I-
Z
w
::if
::c
u
I-
<(
U
!l)
::>
(f)
/0
I I 1(.::\\
I //--l (i\ iiO~1 \
I ( \ '\ \ \ I I /
! / '\ \ \! \ l/'
c___) \\~,
)""'" ~'\ \ -~j~--,
)/---- '\ 0..; '\
( , '\
I (t"" \ \
J' l' l,j) i
--~ /
I
I
-_J l
\
1
(
::c
I-
~
<(
w.
crZ
<(0
i=
0<(
Zz
<(<:J
~iJi
~~
<:;0
ZZ
1=5
VJI-
B~
~ @.
8.
.' : ,:
.' .
. .
I I
I I
\.~
.\
\
.I
--\ I
\ I
,
\ ,
,--
F',-,
.:: '.~:~~~~':'.::::{i:';/ /-- '--', / \
_____j;_'___-----__/// \,__~'..';:I //!
--:::- -~~ ) \ f I ~
/'" /-, '\ \_----, - ; / ! \
1"/ijJ/~ I \/_-~, '~:- I! /)@o
, ~ \ - --[ I \ \ ~ I 2
,/~ '\ \ /' " 1 -\ \...;;/\ I \JrI
I (--- \ \ / /---/ -+--1 l ',.....___1\ I
I ___J _J \. t /.......... // (,' "-
~L~"""" _.:::':: ....__/ ...__"";;) -......., "'-~~-____,.,,--'\
/-::"--------,-;;.=--=;;,--, ..,""") ~ \" /
/ / \ } I 1 " I
'I I I I 1 _.&'-~~"-~ "\ I
III (...._---/ / I . -..., '.-...;;:
/1 ....-.... I / /~~~~....\:.:::. :lll ,/
I / \, /! I \...,,' . . S ""I L_ ~
I', · / I " · '::., \ \
, / ,-------". - / ! II) . : : :}' \
) I / ',-- J \ (..:.::. (,..,\\\\ I
\ ~ -- : .::.: i : ' I
", J /// IN:.::j.), j i / ,-"~'
\ I // j!. ' '. . '1; ( At' I. ,'I \ \ "
../1 I '-:.:-----j / ;'::.::. : IJ ,\ \..._j ,.- ) ]
" ----/ /'. !: : . : : } I' II i \ I (/,) !J~ <.;.,---------
\ '\...... / /' ' 'l .' / 11 I \ /
....._-..... \\ ~--_ / <", . .\ . ' . I lJ !' I
"') \ --_C:_~~Vj~?~:~ j ~, t ('t~t0z:\~)
~-j ) !l1/ /- '-" (,I . .:: :.::'.:1 / ...
/"\ \, " 1/'\ ,1/: \" j\, I (" I f':.'~." :'..:..J (, ~--'"'-
I' \', '\ ""'--'_1/ I J/.': ......'\ // \ \, I \\. :_t~.. . .(. ~ 7
',,- I, _, / fI.: k)/ 1\ I \ \ \1.'. . . . \
,,' /- " ,- 'j \ ) ) ~: :.:. /
I" \ \ ( ',I j.' ., \ '\ , ~/' . I
/ \ \ \ \ // / l: :( ~-,,-' \ /I/.f' .......t/)...~., 1\
' \ I I \ / I 'I .11 /------ \ ~ '\1
( 1 I '" 1 , .' ., \ I
I 'I -~ / ,'/' : : 'l) \ I'" n 1
\ ~/ I / t.. j 1 I'~ I (r:::'.:' ."1
I \,,/ I _/-------" .II::. . / \j I I.:::~': .)-j!
\ / I / /:. .::{ // .;1'/"\ ~ ( I '\. " .' :If}
// / / /----;-;;-';'.::-:~: . : '{' .: :~, ( (', /,,! t /1 ~.:::':: (,'dt.. ,
\ 1 ( 1 ( ~.~. ....... ..', .... 1/ ,\ .., .....N... r I
/ / I . /. . .:: . . : : . . : : .' :.., ~ '...... ~....l/ I'" '-, "' . . . '1
'--,I' I ~ I " , . . . . \\ , ", J .
, , 'f' : . . . . :. . . ' . . : :. ::.,: \\.. ,/ / \........." ,.... ~ '('
, I' If ...... .'. .... \ ~ I ..../ / I )'.
/ r..................... J J / _-' \' , I
// I ,f . . . : . . . : . . . : . . . : . . . : : . '" I ",/ _--- _---\ {_____- ,
_./ J! I ,'. .' ..' .'....... , I / ( // /' "" \', _- \
/'" J I . .' , .' . ' . , ' . 'j J I I I ~/ /...., ~ ') -
/ I" :...:.... ..:...:..,: I / 1/'('(/ \))'
'" I',.. ................... ..1 I / I I I I
, \. .' .' . .' .' ./1 , I \'
/ ".' . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . )/ ' /'! I,
j )J':::::'::::':::::':::'::::I?irlr/ I / I j \
r----- (. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '. . . ..11 I ' , 1/ \
I --, \......... "1/ '11 //
'\ C_) f. : : : . : : : . : : : . : : : . : : : '.1/ g "/>~:' 1 /
\-~----... " ).::. . ::. . ::. .: :. . :,',,' <:' ~ /'( v' ! ( 1
", \ i. . : : . ':.1,'): :. .)/ 1 ~ I \ )
\ \"::':':':7':' .:: :.":'./L__... \ \ t. "...... ('\..." /
\ Il..,:...:. .::.,: ) \ \ "'" --/
\ !'I.:::.:. :.:::./ , 1\ \ \ ',> ''\
')'.........../ ' \' '--~-'
I.:...:...:...,. I II. '; ,) )
.,./....1 (t . " " .' ... .. ",f : J '7 I / / ...., / )
...--------."... I!.' . ....., . ," .'. ./ ,j /....1 1"/' ~... II 1-
__--- '. .' ..' ..'; - // ,,I' I" j' I I"
."""'-:::~:::.-:._/~.::::::::::I // / / / / I / /1/
:::::,.::::....::::......::..:ll"r ....,......... / /"'..../ I I 11"',/"
. . ' ' , ' ' ' , . ' . . '.A, ' .' "j ....... "",/ I .,,-_, I 1,/' I I
. . '. .' '/11' . '. ''JI1.1. . . .:. '. ,/ ---- '/' l I /
.::. .::. .::. .:. .::. ./' ! ( /1 ( "',..._1/ r....
. ,,' "'/' ,.' ..:'" / I I ...- ... ~/........... ,. I I
/~J <_I~~;~~::~)/
.' .' .' ...~ ' I I
. . .: 'Ii.:' . .:. . .:. / / (\
-,i~~ cLLLil""l,:..:--<__ L-=-
~ ~
~
-4 ell>--- ~ ~
~
-/1
I
',.... I
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
'>
~
I
,
I
I
.,,)
I 1,7;
"
(- I 'II
) I' If,
0" II I"
, 1 T II
II "
,....., 11 I!
III -II
.\ III ~
, Ii I 'I
J J'II II'
I' I
v~ II I,
II Ii
III ,I
," '
/1l1 I
" ,
" I
II I
I i I
"'J: I
J I
~..:.;=..-
------3~~~'Dl.=-)-=
\
, .
-
-
-
..
-
..
..
'-
-
- ...
-
--
..
..
-
___~~.R _ ,.....,..."
, .;1
~
_lOOZ
--
30VNMICI OIlUSllCJ
....
0-
~
en
o
en
W
0::
~
o
T'"
II
~~
o::~
~u..
00
T"'I-
T"'J:
~(!)
<0::
wC
o::W
<(J)
....0
<Q.
b~
I-Q.
--1
-
-
..
i:1lltcc, 'NI( '.lil'I01fClVtK. 0011 ~II'S' '''!(f ~1U1':) ~nlll: Glltl
~~r=-r..\."1l't~ ~
IU,-.. fiNl ~-".. (<u.. ~ I
:=:::~~ ~
~A :=,:'"" "-/
oeellll HI'! '~3^1~ 1I13 'aYo~ ~3AI~ lI'N lIl:l1l
a
.............~~------ ~.~
NYld ~YNIYllO J.c13:lNO:l ~_
--
V10S3NN1'1 '3TlNlI38'lY
Z 3SVHd-~Vd SS3NISne
3"fAU1381V
3 1 V 1 S 3 l V 3 ~
PIBMU8>1Jep
V
i
r
\ I ~i
\ I g
.... .""0.
r \
, I
.... /
{;;,~~-" .'~l11fmtrfWU~HlmUHW /
, ..~.,':lJ;..... j
o:lllrJIIIIIIII~~~I'Ai'f .:;~...,
t, .
o:IIIIH1/JljHIIIIII.!!WJ.. T \
o:ll!iJ).lfll1fl"nrlll"&~ '.
0:/1 will II 1I/1l1111r9 'f
~\
~
~.........{~-
,
j;~~~~4~;:>
i
<( 1Ij;
w
ct:
<(
Z <( 0 w
0 W
>= ct: Z (:>
<( 0 <(
<( a.. z
! w 0 <(
ct: ~ f-
I u z ct: ct: Z
<( 0 0 w
, -' 0 -' f- ::E
f-
-' Z ~ (11 0 J:
G: <( w
, (fl u
-' 0 0 f-
I 0 f- Cl W 0 Z <(
Z w Z (11 a.. 0 u
I <( S: 0 0
-' ;:::: 15 ct: a.. CD
! f- S: (11 a.. =>
~ w X ct: (11
I z w C\- D
I @
\ I ,'-, ~
I . :tI:.. -~ j
J I I
\,.,j
,
\
,
"
I
I
\.
......
.'.
_.:-::..
....... '-"'-.
..
//'
...
~ ,.-'" "
../.......'..'...
.: ."~..'o?\ '\
~ i FII.,,}} , \
, /,,,,'911 ...
I { t..~ I ~
\ ~t.! i ..'
\ TJ f~: t .,'
I \ I..; \ '..'
1 \ r.' \
:/
\ /
'.......'
........N....
\
.......//,..N........
i ;......\
\ .... .
\ '.!
, ..'
,
\
\
........-
_:.::.~:::.:~. ....... "-
'--'. '\ )
I !
; i
I
1
/
,
.;'....
I 'j, ~
......; .
......'1 i
(J~~} ,.'
,. ,':;3' ,.
;.:.j'1. (
:.;J:x,...
,J / ~9'~
.' t;;)
I ii,'"
"'...) //'1'
,
,
/
,'"\!l
!
I
I
I
I
I
,(
...... I
'.
. /1
,,' ~ T-
i!
...../,
.I,
II I
Ii I
'\ III
" ;::
iI,
:\ ,
II j
..J i i
i I
, .1
II'
~.,;p
ffl
'i'
fl
11
, .
f i
, ,
1 f
..11
.1,
I
;:>-
. ."~ .~~.
i
,
...;:::/
:/{;.::
/.....
.'.?'
~ m
--4 (if>-- ~
lE
~
" ~
~ ....~::....:::..._'7:.:..~.::."'.... .~ _.~..._~..::::::';":.:-.l":...~.
..:iIIW'::'H"'~'H. _. ". .~...
3nN3~~..~J..Ov.>t...... .7-'"
8
..
)',
-
-
-
..
-
-
'.
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
-
-
N
a..
~
(/)
./ ;!
(: ../ /'
,
.\.
~
w
a..
o
0::
a..
z
f2
en
c:::
~
00
w
0:::
()
<(
o
"'""
II
f3~
o:::~
~u..
00
"'""I-
"'"":I:
~~
<(0:::
we
o:::w
<(00
.....0
~&
00:::
1-0-
-.J
-
-
-
'ffi
III
I
I
"
1_
"
6/7
~...-
s:: ~ j....J
CD.v ~/~ U/I';!
rCf lee.. I b 0 iA./t U2 )
l'jl
111 ...--
,
,
lA~
dk ';) ;)05,
- WhQ1-
l'Y)e~+- ce rA1q tYI~j oS
~
D./\
,
,.
1\
II
~-----~---,---"--
--'"-----^~- ...._._.------_.--.~.
-...=-_.__._-~--
- --'~-.----.,..~----~~-.~_..-_~~~~.____ h__
--------~._-~._.~.~~
--_._-_..-,.~~.-
I
I STORMWATER RUNOFF EXITING SITE FOR
I 2, 10, AND 100 - YEAR STORM EVENTS
I EXISTING
2.5" 4.2" 5.9"
2-YR 10- YR 100- YR
I (cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
WETLAND 4 6.4 15.9 26.2
I WETLAND 9 10.7 20.9 33.6
DITCH 50 5.2 16.2 29.2
I' TOTAL 22.3 53.0 89.0
I PROPOSED
2.5" 4.2" 5.9"
2-YR 10- YR 100- YR
I. (cfs) (cfs) . (cfs)
WETLAND 4 3.0 9.8 . 17.9
I WETLAND 9 14.3 24.2 32.0
DITCH 50 2.2 8.7 13.3
I. TOTAL 19.5 42.7 63.2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-EXISTING SOOTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 1
14 Nov 02
WATERSHED ROUTING
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
e~ /~~~
&9~\
/'.J.
e~~ A. e
l' ~/I ~~~
/'~ 1'\ ~ ~f'--M
~ ~ l\~~ ~ ~
9/ I ~ ~ ~r::::-. e 9
581 ~ ez:J ~ ~
~
o SuBCATCHMENT D REACH
6. FOND
[J LINK
SUBCATCHMENT 200 = Onsite area draining to west Wetland 2 -> POND 200
SUBCATCHMENT 201 Area to east Wetland 2 -> POND 201
SUBCATCHMENT 501 Offsite area S. of 1-94, N. of CSAH 37 -> POND 501
SUB CATCHMENT 720 = Hwy runoff in median to ~8" culvert (#4) -> POND 720
SUBCATCHMENT 730 Offsite area, Kell ville Estates(SC 20) -> POND 730
SUBCATCJQmNT 800. Area draining to wetland 8 ~> POND 800
SUBCATCHMENT 802 Hwy runoff in median to 18" culvert (#2) -> REACH 802
SUBCATCHMENT 810 Offsite area, Kolville Estates(SC 10) -> POND 810
SUBCATCHMENT 900 Area draining to Wetland 9 -> POND 900
REACH 200 Flow from Wetland 2 to Wetland 9 -> POND 900
REACH 501 18" culvert (#1) under 1-94, to Wetland 5 -> POND 200
REACH 701 Ditch to Wetland 7 -.> POND 800
REACH 802 = 18" culvert (#2) under 1-94 to Wetland 3 -> REACH 803
REACH 803 = Ditch to Wetland 8 -> POND 800
RBACH 810 = 36" cuivert (#3) under 1-94 to wetland 8 -> POND 800
POND 200 = West Wetland 2 -> POND 201
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-EXISTING SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepa~ed by RL~-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 3
14 Nov 02
SUBCATCHMENT 200
Onsite area draining to west Wetland 2
PEAK= 20.72 CFS @ 12.03 HRS, VOLUME =
1. 29 AF
ACRES
6.40
.50
6.90
CN
65
98
67
cropland
paved interstate 94
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 - HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND
Short Grass Pasture Kv=7
TR-55 SHEET FLOW
Grass: Dense n=.24
Comment
Segment
s=.Ol
Segment
P2=2.5 in
Tc (min)
4.8
FLOW
L=200'
ID:
'/ I
ID:
s=.06
V=.7 fps
10.4
'/ I
L=100'
Total Length= 300 ft
Total Tc=
15.2
SUBCATCHMENT 201
Area to east Wetland 2
II PEAK= 36.25 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME = 2.11 AF
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ACRES CN
9.80 .65
1.10 98
10.90 68
undeveloped lots
wetland
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method Comment
TR-55 SHEET FLOW Segment ID:
Grass: Dense n=.24 L=100' P2=2.5 in s=.06 '/'
SHALLOW CONCENTRATBD/UPLAND FLOW Segment ID:
Short Grass Pasture Kv=7 L=150' s=.0133 '/' V=.81 fps
Tc (min)
10.4
3.1
Total Length= 250 ft
Total Tc=
13.5
SUBCA'l'CRMBNT 501
Offsite area S. of 1-94, N. of CSAR 37
PEAK= 5.79 CFS @ 16.90 HRS, VOLUME= 2.43 AI'
ACRES
20.00
CN
65
Farmstead
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 - HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method Comment
SHALLOW CONCENTRA'l'ED/UPLAND FLOW
Short Grass Pasture Kv=7 L=1500' s=.OOOl 'I'
Tc (min)
357.1
V=.07 fps
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-EXISTING SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOOR RAINJrALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 4
14 Nov 02
SOBCATCHMENT 720
Hwy runoff in median to 18" culvert (#4)
PEAK= 9.10 CFS @ 11.88 HRS,
VOLUME =
.39 AF
ACRES
1. 30
.50
1. 80
CN
60
98
71
Median grass
Impervious
ses TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
CHANNEL FLOW
a=180 sq-ft
s=.0026 'I'
Comment
Segment ID:
Tc (min)
2.7
Pw=61 ,
n=.027
r=2.951'
V=5.77 fps
L=920'
Capacity=1039.2 cfs
SUB CATCHMENT 730
Offsite area, Ko1lville Estates(SC 20)
PEAK= 34.74 CFS @ 12.56 HRS, VOLUME = 4.82 AF
ACRES
12.05
4.90
16.95
CN
86 Townhome area
70 Row crop area offsite south
81-
ses TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Method Comment
TR-55 SHEET FLOW AB
Grass: Dense n=.24 L=300' P2=2.7 in s=.OI 'I'
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW BC
Grassed Waterway Kv=15 L=280' s=.OI 'I' V=1.5 fps
CJ:RCULAR CHANNEL CD
12" Diameter a=.79 sq-ft Pw=3.1' r=.25'
s=.003 'I' n=.OI3 V=2.48 fps L=550' Capacity=2 cfs
CIRCULAR CHANNEL DE
18" Diameter a=1.77 sq-ft Pw=4.7' r=.375'
s=.003 'I' n=.013 V=3.26 fps L=500' Capacity=5.8 cfs
Tc (min)
49.4
3.1
3.7
2.6
Total Length= 1630 ft
Total Tc=
58.8
SUBCATCHHBNT 800
Area draining to wetland 8
.
PEAK= 19.54 CFS @ 12.44 HRS, VOLUME = 2.40 AF
ACRES CN
.90 98
1. 00 70
10.70 65
12.60 68
Interstate Pavement
Wetlands
Cropland and grassy ditches
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 - HOUR
. RAINFALL= 5. 90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Method
SHALLOW COHCENTRATED/upLAND PLOW
Short Grass Pasture Kv=7 L=900'
Comment
Segment ID:
s=.002 'I'
Tc (min)
47.9
V=.31 fps
I
I
1
I
1
I
I
I
.1
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-EXISTINGSOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOOR RAINPALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 {c} 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 5
14 Nov 02
SUB CATCHMENT 802
Hwy runoff in median to 18" culvert {#2}
PEAK= 13.45 CFS @ 11.87 HRS, VOLUME =
.58 AF
ACRES
1. 70
.70
2.40
CN
65 median grasses
98 impervious
75
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
CHANNEL PLOW
a=180 sq:-ft..
s=.008 '/'
Comment
Tc {min}
2.1
Pw=61 ,
n=.027
r=2.951'
V=10.13 fps
L=1250'
Capacity=1822.9 cfs
SUBCATCHMENT 810
Offsite area, Ko1ville Estates{SC 10)
PEAK= 21.96 CFS @ 12.13 HRS, VOLUME = 1.73 AF
ACRES
5.40
CN
86 Townhome dev. area
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method Comment
~-SS SHEET PLOW AB
Grass: Dense n=.24 L=130' P2=2.7 in s=.016 '/'
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND PLOW BC
. Paved Kv=20.3282 L=200' s=.005' /' V=1.44 fps
CJ:RCULAR CHANNEL CD
15" Diameter a=1.23 sq-ft Pw=3.9' r=.313'
s=.003 'I' n=.013 V=2.88 fps L=330' Capacity=3.5 cfs
Tc {min}
.21.0
2.3
1.9
Total Length= 660 ft
Total Tc=
25.2
SUBCATCHHBNT 900
Area draining to Wetland 9
PEAK= 66.35 CFS @ 11.93 BRS, VOLUME= '3.40 AF
ACRES .CN
5.00 70
13.90 65
18.90 66
wetland
cropland
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 - HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l BRS
Method
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND PLOW
Cultivated Straight .Rows Kv=9
Comment
Segment ID:
L=400' s=.Ol '/'
Tc {min}
7.4
V=.9 fps
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-EXISTING SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE I:t 24 -HOUR RAINI'ALL= 5. 90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
REACH 200
Qin =
Qout=
DEPTH
(FT)
0.00
.20
.40
.60
.86
1.20
1.60
2.00
REACH 501
Qin =
Qout=
DEPTH
(FT)
0.00
.15
.30
.45
1.05
1.20
1.35
1.41
1.46
1.50
REACH 701
Page 6
14 Nov 02
Flow from Wetland 2 to Wetland 9
7.94 CFS @ 12.61 HRS,
7.90 CFS @ 12.84 HRS,
END AREA
(SQ-FT)
0.00
4.40
9.60
15.60
24.60
38.40
57.60
80.00
DISCH
(CFS)
0.00
4.62
15.30
31. 42
60.69
113.98
200.37
.314.85
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
3.56 AF
3.46 AF,
20' x 2' CHANNEL
SIDE SLOPE= .1 'I'
n= .027
LENGTH= 600 FT
SLOPE= .0035 FT/FT
ATTEN=
0%,
LAG =
14.0 MIN
DISCH
(CFS)
0.00
.06
.27
.60
2.57
3.00
.3.27
3.30
3.27
3.06
STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD
PEAK DEPTH= .26 FT
PEAK VELOCITY= 1.3 FPS
TRAVEL TIME 7.6 MIN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
18" culvert (#1) under 1-94, to Wetland 5
5.76 CFS @ 17.10 HRS,
3.15 CFS @ 15.04 HRS,
END AREA
(SO-FT)
0.00
3.87
8.48
13.84
21. 91
34.36
51.76
72.12
DISCH
(CFS)
0.00
5.42
17.92
36.81
71.15
133.83
235.73
371.12
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
2.27 AF
1.49 AF,
18" PIPE
n=.024
LENGTH= 200 FT
SLOPE= .0029 FT/FT
Ditch to Wetland 7
Qin = 10.42 CFS @ 14.80 HRS,
Qout= 10.41 CFS @ 14.95 HRS,
END AREA
(SO-FT)
0.00
.09
.25
.45
1.32
1.52
1.68
1. 72
1.75
1. 77
VOLUME=
VOLUME =
4.80 AF
4.76 AF,
10'x 3.5' CHANNEL
SIDE SLOPE= .33 'I'
n=.027
LENGTH= 600 FT
SLOPE= .003 FT/FT
ATTEN= 45%,
LAG =
0.0 MIN
DEPTH
(FT)
0.00
.35
.70
1.05
1.51
2.10
2.80
3.50
STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD
PEAK DEPTH= 1.50 FT
PEAK VELOCITY= 2.0 FPS
TRAVEL TIME 1.7 MIN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
ATTEN=
0%,
LAG=
9.2 MIN
STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD
PEAK DEPTH= .49 FT
PEAK VELOCITY= 1.8 FPS
TRAVEL TIME = 5.5 MIN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-EXISTING SOOTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepa~ed by RL~-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
REACH 802
Page 7
14 Nov 02
18" culvert (#2) under 1-94 to Wetland 3
Qin = 13.45 CFS @ 11.87 HRS,
Qout= 12.07 CFS @ 11.87 HRS,
DEPTH
(FT)
0.00
.15
.30
.45
1.05
1.20
1.35
1.41
1.46
1.50
REACH 803
END AREA
(SQ-FT)
0.00
.09
.25
.45
1.32
1.52
1.68
1.72
1. 75
1. 77
DISCH
(CFS)
0.00
.25
1.03
2.31
9.88
11.53
12.58
12.69
12.57
11. 80
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
.58 AF
.58 AF, ATTEN= 10%,
LAG =
o . 0 MIN
18" PIPE
STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD
PEAK DEPTH= 1.50 FT
PEAK VELOCITY= 7.5 FPS
TRAVEL TIME .2 MIN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
rl= .024
LENGTH= 85 FT
SLOPE= .043 FT/FT
Ditch to Wetland 8
Qin = 12.07 CFS @ 11.87 HRS, VOLUME =
Qout= 8.31 CFS @ 12.11 HRS, VOLUME =
DEPTH
(FT)
0.00
.35
.70
LOS
1.51
2.10
2.80
3.50
REACH 810
END AREA
(SQ-FT)
0.00
3.99
8.96
14.91
24.11
38.64
59.36
84.00
DISCH
(CFS)
0.00
4.49
15.13
31.60
62.31
119.84
215.71
345.64
.58 AF
.58 AF, ATTEN= 31%, LAG=
14.3 MIN
10' x 3.5' CHANNEL
SIDE SLOPE= .25 'I'
n= .027
LENGTH= 800 FT
SLOPE= .002 FT/FT
STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD
PEAK DEPTH= .48 FT
PEAK VELOCITY= 1.4 FPS
TRAVEL TIME 9.3 MIN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
36" CUlvert (#3) under 1-94 to wetland 8
Qin = 21.59 CFS @ 12.29 HRS,
Qout= 21.44 CFS @ 12.32 HRS,
DEPTH
(FT)
0.00
.30
.60
.90
2.10
2.40
2.70
2.82
2.91
3.00
END AREA
(SQ-FT)
0.00
.37
1.01
1.78
5.29
6.06
6.70
6.90
7.01
7.07
DISCH
( CFS )
0.00
.45
1.90
4.25
18.15
21.19
23.10
23.32
23.10
21. 68
VOLUME=
VOLUME =
6.34.AF
6.32 AFI.
ATTEN=
1%,
LAG=
1. 8 MIN
36" PIPE
STOR-IND+TRANS
PEAK DEPTH=
PEAK VEI.,.OCITY=
TRAVEL TIME
SPAN= 10-20
METHOD
2.46 FT
3.5 FPS
.9 MIN
HRS, dt=.l HRS
n= .024
LENGTH= 190 FT
SLOPE= .0036 FT/FT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-BXISTING SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
POND 200
Page 8
14 Nov 02
West Wetland 2
Qin 20.73 CFS @ 12.03 HRS, VOLUME = 2.78 AF
Qout= 3.59 CFS @ 18.32 HRS, VOLUME = 2.17 AF, ATTEN= 83%, LAG = 377.6 MIN
ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM.STOR STOR-INn METHOD
(FT) (AC) (AF) (AF) PEAK STORAGE = 3.23 AF
955.9 1.20 0.00 0.00 PEAK ELEVATION= 957.9 FT
956.0 1. 50 .14 .14 FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
958.0 1. 80 3.30 3.44 START ELEVATION= 957.5 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
# ROUTE INVERT OUTLET DEVICES
1 P 957.5' S' BROAD-CRBSTED RECTANGULAR WEIR X 1.81
Q=C L H^1.5 C=1.72, 1.88, 1.98, O~ 0, 0, 0, 0
POND 201
Qin =
Qout=
ELEVATION
(FT)
955.9
956.0
958.0
# ROUTE
1 P
POND 501
Qin =
Qout=
Bast Wetland 2
37.49 CFS @ 12.01 HRS,
7.94 CFS @ 12.61 HRS,
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
4.28 AF
3.56 AF,
ATTEN= 79%,
LAG=
35.6 MIN
AREA
(AC)
.60
1.30
1.80
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
.10
3.10
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
.10
3.20
STOR-INn METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 3.47 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 958.2 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 957.5 FT
SPAN= 10-20 ERS, dt=.l ERS
Tdet= 393 .MIN (1.13 AF)
INVERT OUTLET DEVICES
957.5' 10' BROAD-CRESTED RECTANGULAR WEIR X .81
Q=C L H^1.5 C=1.72, 1.88, 1.98, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
Offsite Wetland S. of 1-94
5.79 CFS @ 16.90 ERS, . VOLUME=
5.76 CFS @ 17.10 ERS, VOLUME=
2.43 AF
2.27 AF,
1%',
ATTEN=
LAG=
11 . 8 MIN
.ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM.STOR STOR-IND METHOD
(FT) (SF) (CF) (CF) PEAK STORAGE = 106534 CF
955.0 15000 0 0 PEAK ELEVATI ON= 960.3 FT
958.0 19000 51000 51000 FLo.OD ELEVATION= 961. 0 FT
960.0 27000 46000 97000 START ELEVATION= 960.0 FT
961. 0 32000 29500 126500 SPAN= 10-20 ERS, dt=.l ERS
Tdet= 423 MIN ( . 04 AF)
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT OUTLET DEVICES
960.0' 10' BROAD-CRESTED ~BCTANGULAR WEIR X 1.81
Q=C L H^1.5 C=1.72, 1.88, 1.98, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-EXISTING SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOOR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
POND 72 0
Page 9
14 Nov 02
1-94 median East of 36 in. culvert
Qin = 14.84 CFS @ i3.25 HRS,
Qout= 10.42 CFS @ 14.80 HRS,
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
4.87 AF
4.80 AF,
ATTEN= 30%,
LAG=
93.2MIN
ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM.STOR STOR-IND METHOD
(FT) (SF) (CF) (CF) PEAK STORAGE = 49364 CF
958.0 1388 0 0 PEAK ELEVATION= 961.7 FT
959.0 6288 3838 3838 FLOOD ELEVATION= 960.4 FT
960.0 16463 11376 15214 START ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
960.4 23582 8009 23222 SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 59 . 4 MIN (4.75 AF)
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
958.0'
OUTLET DEVICES
18" CULVERT
n=.024 L=70' S=.009'/'
POND 73 0
Ke=.5
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
Offsite pond, Ko1vi11e estates (Pond 2)
Qin 34.74 CFS @ 12.56 HRS,
Qout= 14.42 CFS @ 13.28 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
958.0
960.0
961.0
962.0
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
.95
1.50
2.12
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
958.0'
OUTLET DEVICES
18" CULVERT
n=.012 L=30' S=.005'/'
POND 800
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
4.82 AF
4.48 AF,
ATTEN= 58%,
LAG=
43.5 MIN
Ke=.5
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE ~ 1.89 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 961.6 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 962.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 88.7 MIN (4.48 AF)
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
Wetlands 7 and 8 combined
Qin =47.83 CFS @ 12.36 HRS,
Qout= 24.85 CFS @ 13.28 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
955.0
956.0
958.0
AREA
(AC)
.20
.31
2.90
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
.26
3.21
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
955.5'
OUTLET DEVICES
5' BROAD-CRES~BD RECTANGULAR WEIR
Q=C L H^1.5 C=1.72, 1.88, 1.92, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
VOLUME= 14.07 AF
VOLUME= 12.91 AF,
CUM. STaR
(AF)
0.00
.26
3.41
ATTEN= 48%,
LAG=
55 . 4 MIN
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 2.48 AF
'PEAK ELEVATION= 957.4 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 955.5 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Tdet= 71.1 MIN (12.78 AF)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-EXISTING SOUTB-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR. RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
POND 810
Page 10
14 Noy 02
Offsite Pond, Kolville Estates (Pond 1)
Qin =
Qout=
21.96 CFS @ 12.13 BRS,
4.18 CFS @ 12.74 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
959.3
960.0
962.0
963.0
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
.31
1.30
1. BB
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
959.3'
OUTLET DEVICES
12 ", CULVERT
n=.013 L=30' S=.005'/'
POND 900
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
1. 73 AF
1.50 AF,
Ke=.5
Wetland 9
Qin 70.94 CFS @ 11.94 BRS,
Qout= 33.62 CFS @ 13.94 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
953.0
954.0
956.0
AREA
(AC)
1.53
2.70
7.90
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
2.12
10.60
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
954.0'
OUTLET DEVICES
28' BROAD-CRESTED RECTANGULAR WEIR X 1.81
Q=C L H^1.5 C=O, 0, 0, 1.94, 1.921 1.89, 1.92, 1.97
VOLUME= 19.77 AF
VOLUME= 1B.01 AF,
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
2.12
12.72
ATTEN= 81%,
LAG =
36.4 MIN
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = .91 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 961.2 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 963.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 959.3 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 144.1 MIN (1.5 AF)
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
ATTEN= 53%,
LAG= 120.0 MIN
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 4.70 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 954.5 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 956.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 954.0 FT
SPAN= 10-20 BRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 110.9 MIN (15.74 AF)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPBRTY-EXISTING SOUTH-6/26/02 Page 11
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd. 14 Nov 02
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
LINK 811 Offsite EX. Area DE, Karston Property
Qout= 14.80 CFS @ 12.24 HRS, VOLUME = 1. 51AF, SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
101 Points Entered
.
HOUR 0.00 .10 .20 .30 .40 .50 .60 .70 .80 .90
10.00 .44 .46 .49 .52 .56 .60 .64 .69 .74 .80
11.00 .87 .94 1. 02 1.12 1.24 1.39 1.68 2.31 3.60 6.24
12.00 9.66 12.62 14.60 14.45 12.77 10.91 8.91 6.86 4.93 3.34
13 .00 2.51 2.24 2.02 1.84 1. 71 1.60 1.51 1.43 1. 35 1. 29
14.00 1.22 1.17 1.11 1.07 1. 03 .99 .96 .94 .92 .90
15.00 .88 .86 .84 .82 .81 .79 .77 .75 .73 .71
16.00 .70 .68 .66 .64 .63 .62 .61 .60 .59 .58
17.00 .58 .57 .56 .56 .55 .54 .54 .53 .52 .52
18.00 .51 .51 .50 .49 .49 .48 .47 .47 .46 .45
19.00 .45 .44 .43 .43 .42 .41 .41 .40 .39 .39
20.00 .38
LINK 812 Offsite EX. Pond DE, Karston Property
Qout= 5.06 CFS @ 14.80 HRS, VOLUME = 3.33 AF, SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
101 Points Entered
HOUR 0.00 .10 .20 .30 .40 .50 .60 .70 .80 .90
10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 .62 .75 .86 .96 1.06
11. 00. 1.14 1.18 1.22 1.27 1.33 1.40 1.48 1.60 1. 73 1.97
12.00 2.32 2.75 3.18 3.60 3.81 3.99 4.14 4.27 4.38 4.47
13.00 4.54 4.61 4.67 4.72 4.77 4.82 4.86 4.89 4.92 4.95
14.00 4.97 4.99 5.01 5.02 5.03 5.04 5.05 5.05 5,06 5.06.
15.00 5.06 5.06 5.06 5.06 5.06 5.06 5.06 5.05 5.05 5.05
16.00 5.04 5.04 5.03 5.02 5.02 5.01 5.00 5.00 4.99 4.98
17.00 4.97 4.96 4.95 4.94 4.93 4.92 .4.91 4.90 4.89 4.88
18.00 4.87 4.86 4.85 4.84 4.83 4..81 4.80 4.79 4.78 4.76
19.00 4.75 4.74 4.72 4.71 4.70 4.68 4.67 4.66 4.64 4.63
20.00 4.61
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
01
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-EXISTING NORTH-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-HOOR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 1
14 Nov 02
WATERSHED ROUTING
----------------------~--------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------
e
G \
1
~ ~
~ \
if~~
G
G
/
~
~
~~~
~
)~
'\
@
OSUBCATCHMENT D REACH
D. POND
[:J LI NK
SUBCATCBMENT 50 On-site area directly into east ditch sect -> REACH 50
SUBCATcmmNT 100 Onsite area draining to Wetland A -> POND 100
SUBCATCBMENT 110 Offsite area draining to ditch west of Kad -> POND 110
SUBCATcmmNT 120 Off site area draining to Wetland A, culver -> POND 120
SUBCATcmmNT 150 = Offsite area N. of 70th St. draining to We -> POND 150
SUBCATcmmNT 400 = Onsite area draining to Wetland 4 _0> POND 400
SUBCATCIDIEN'l' 410 = Offsite Area N. of 70th. St. draining to cu -> POND 410
RBACB 50 = Channel draining offsite from Wetland 1 ->
POND 100 Wetland 1 -> REACH 50
POND 110 = Ditch on W. side of Kadler Ave. -> POND 100
POND 120 = Offsite Ponding in Wetland at NW corner of -> POND 110
POND 150 = Ponding in Wetland at NE corner of into -> POND 100
POND 400 = Wetland 4 ->
POND 410 = Offsite ponding in Wetland NE corner of si -> POND 400
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-EXISTING NORTH-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-HOURRAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
SUBCATCHMENT 50
Page 2
14 Nov 02
PEAK= 42.76 CFS @ 11..95 HRS,
On-site area directly into east ditch sect
VOLUME = 2 .28 AF
ACRES
7.70
.10
.20
8.00
CN
80
85
98
81
Row Crops
Wetlands
Impervious
Method
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW
Cultivated Straight Rows Kv=9
Comment
Segment J:D:
L=350' s=.005 '/'
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 1.0-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tc (min)
9.2
V=.64 fps
StJBCATCHMENT 100
Onsite area draining to Wetland A
PEAK= 195.7 CFS @ 12.17 HRS, VOLUME= 16.54 AF
ACRES
50.00
3.00
5.00
58.00
CN
80
98
85
81
Row Crops
Impervious
Wetland
Method
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/U~LAND .FLOW
Cultivated Straight Rows Kv=9
Comment
Segment ID:
. L=1516, s-.01 '/'
SUBCATCHMBNT 110
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
To (min)
28.1
V-.9 fps
PEAK- 49.89 CFS @ 12.63 HRS, VOLUME= 7.43 AF
Offsite area draining to ditch west of Kad
ACRES
44.00
CN
65
mixed offsite
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL. 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=..1 HRS
Method Comment
S~LOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND' FLOW Segment ID:
Short Grass Pasture Kv-7 L-2100' s=.0125 'I' V=.7B fps
TR-55 SHEET FLOW Segment ID:
Cultivated: Residue<-20% n-.06 L=300' P2-2.5 in s-.01 '/'
To (min)
44.7
16.9
Total Length- 2400 ft
Total To=
61.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. Data for RODEN PROPERTY-EXISTING NORTH-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 3
i4 Nov 02
SUB CATCHMENT 120
Offsite area draining to Wetland A, culver
PEAK= 51.03 CFS @ 12.63 HRS,
ACRES
45.00
VOLUME=
7.60 AF
CN
65
mixed offsite
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l
HRS
Method
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND
Short Grass Pasture Kv=7
TR-55 SHEET FLOW
CUltivated: Residue<=20%
ACRES
95.00
5.00
100.00
Comment
Tc (min)
44.7
FLOW
L=2100' S=.0125 '/' V=.78 fps
Segment ID:
n=.06 L=300' P2=2.5 in s=.Ol '/'
16.9
Total Length= 2400 ft
Total Tc=
61.6
SUBCATCHMENT 150
Offsite area N. of 70th St. draining to We
II PEAK= 121.4 CFS @ 12.64 HRS, VOLUME= 18.25 AF
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CN
65
98
67
mixed offsite
Impervious
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
I
I
Method Comment
S~LOW CONCBNTRATBD/UPLAND FLOW
Short Grass Pasture Kv=7 L=2600' s=.0096 '/'
Tc (min)
63.2
V=.69 fps
StJBCATCHMBNT 400
Onsite area draining to Wetland 4
PEAK= 28. 70 CFS @ 11. 99 HRS I VOLUME = 1. 60 AF
ACRES
4.80
.70
.10
5.60
CN
80
85
98
81.
Row crops
Wetlands
Impervious
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Method Comment
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW
CUltivated straight Rows Kv=9 L=400' s=.0037 '/'
Tc (min)
12.2
V=.55 fps
I
I
I
I
I
I":
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I"
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-EXISTING NORTB-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
POND 100
Wetland 1
Qin 198.3 CFS @ 12.18 HRS,
Qout= 15.17 CFS @ 20.00 HRS,
VOLUME= 38.13 AF
VOLUME = 7.54 AF,
Page 6
14 Nov 02
ATTEN= 92%,
LAG= 469.3 MIN
ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM. STOR STOR-IND METHOD
(FT) (AC) (AF) (AF) PEAK STORAGE = 37.55 AF
952.0 1.00 0.00 0.00 PEAK ELEVATION= 956.9 FT
954.4 5.10 7.32 7.32 FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
956.0 12.70 14.24 21. 56 START ELEVATION= 954.3 FT
958.0 23.00 35.70 57.26 SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 556.4 MIN (.52 AF)
# ROUTE INVERT OUTLET DEVICES
1 P 957.0' 999' BROAD-CRESTED RECTANGULAR WEIR X 1.81
Q=C L H^1. 5 C=1.58, 1.75, 1.79, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
2 P 954.3' 24" CULVERT
n=.013 L=25' S=.OOOl'/' Ke=.5 Cc=.9 Cd=.6
POND 110
Ditch on W. side of Kadler Ave.
Qin 52.99 CFS @ 12.66 HRS,
Qout= 24.24 CFS @ 13.66 HRS,
ELEVATION
CFT)
954.7
956.0
958.0
AREA
(AC)
.40
.80
.90
INC.STOR
CAF)
0.00
.78
1. 70
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
954.7'
OUTLET DEVICES
24" CULVBRT
n=.024 L=30' S=.022'/'
POND 120
VOLUME= 11. 85 AF
VOLUME= 10.84 AF,
CUM. STOR
(AF)
0.00
.78
2.48
Ke=.5
ATTEN= 54%,
LAG =
59 . 9 MIN
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 2.95 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 958.5 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 954.7 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.lHRS
Tdet= 76.5 MIN (10.73 AF)
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
Offsite ponding in Wetland at NW corner of
Qin
Qout=
51.03 CFS @ 12.63 HRS,
8.34 CFS @ 14.59 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
955.0
956.0
958.0
AREA
(AC)
1.20
2.50
4.50
INC. STOR
(AF)
0.00
1.85
7.00
#: ROUTE
1 p.
VOLUME=
VOLUME=
7.60 AF
4.42 AF,
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
1.85
8.85
INVERT
955.0'
OUTLET DEVICES
24- CULVBR'l
n=.024 L-sO' S=.0066'/'
Re=.s
ATTEN= 84%,
LAG=
11 7 . 6 MIN
STOR-IND. METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 4.38 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 956.7 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 955.0 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 209.8 MIN (4.42 AF)
CC=.9
Cd=.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-EXISTING NORTH-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
POND 150
ponding in Wetland at NE corner of into
Qin 121.4 CFS @ 12.64 HRS,
Qout= 19.30 CFS @ 14.64 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
955.3
956.0
958.0
AREA
(AC)
2.00
3.50
5.50
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
1. 93
9.00
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
955.3'
OUTLET DEVICES
24" CULVERT
n=.024 L=50' S=.066'/'
POND 400
VOLUME= 18.25 AF
VOLUME= 10.75 AF,
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
1. 93
10.93
Ke=.5
Wetland 4
Qin = 28.85 CFS @ 11.99 HRS,
Qout= 26.20 CFS @ 12.03 HRS,
ELEvATION
(FT)
954.2
956.0
AREA
(AC)
.55
1.43
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
1. 78
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
954.2'
OUTLET DEVICES
300 I BROAD-CRESTED RECTANGULAR. WEIR X 1.81
Q=C L H^1.5. C=1.53,1.64, 1.77, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
POND 410
VOLUME = 9.19 AF
VOLUME = 9.14 AF,
CUM. STOR
(AF)
0.00
1. 78
ATTEN= 84%,
LAG =
Page 7
'14 Nav 02
120.1 MIN
STOR-INn METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 10.61 AF
PEAK ELEVATI ON= 957.9 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 955.3 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 211.4 MIN (10.75 AF)
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
ATTEN= 9% ,
LAG=
2.4 MIN
STOR-INn METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = .10 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 954.3 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 956.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 954.2 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Tdet= 2.7 MIN (9.05 AF)
Offsite ponding in Wetland.NB corner of si
Qin = 141.9 CFS @ 12.84 HRS,
Qout= 13.39 CFS @ 16.63 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
955.4
956.0
958.0
AREA
(AC)
3.50
6.50
8.50
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
3.00
15.00
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
955.4'
OUTLET DEVICES
24" CULVERT
n=.024 L=50' S=.0062'/'
VOLUME= 24.61 AF
VOLUME= 7.59 AF, ATTEN= 91%,
CUM. STOR
(AF)
0.00
3.00
18.00
Ke=.5
LAG= 227.8 MIN
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE =
PEAK ELEVATION=
FLOOD ELEVATION=
START ELEVATION..
SPAN= 10-20 HRS,
Tdet= 250.4 MIN
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
17.88 AF
958.0 FT
958.0 FT
955.4 FT
dt=.1 HRS
(7.52 AF)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE :II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (cl 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 1
14 Nov 02
WATERSHED ROUTING =============================================================
SUBCA'l'CHKBNT 3
. SUBCA'l'cmmNT 4
SUBCA'l'CBMBN'l' 5
SUBCA'l'CJIIIBN'l' 7 0
SUBCA'l'CJIIIBN'l' 75
SUBCA'l'CHIIBN'l' 201
SUBcA'l'CHIIBN'l' 500
SUBCA~CBMBN'l' 501
SUBCA'l'CHMBNT 720
SUBCA'l'CHMEN'l' 730
SUBCA'l'CHIIBN'l' 802
SUBCA'l'CBMBN'l' 810
SUBCA'l'CHMBN'l' 900
RBACH 301
RBACB 501
RBACB 802
Q. e 9 ~
~ ')1& j 0 9
~A :y \,
\ & ~~& 1
~ 0~ffi A~
8J "'" - - - - > B &'--(5)
/'~ 1 ~~~M
~ ~ l\~~ 9 ~
d I~~~~ @
~ t::::\ ez:J ~ . ~
~
o SUBCATCHMENT 0 REACH
~ POND
[::J LINK
Lots 3 and 16 and Outlot B -> POND 3
Lots 2 and 4 -> POND 4
= Lot 1 - > POND 5
Lot 5 -> POND 70
= Lot 6 -> POND 75
= Area around east Wetland 2 -> POND 201
= Area draining to Wetland 5 -> POND 200
= Offsite area S. of I-94, N. of CSAH 37 -> POND 501
HwY runoff in median to 18" culvert (#4) -> POND 720
Offsite area, Kollville Estates(SC 20) -> POND 730
= Hwy runoff in median to 18" culvert (#2) -> REACH 802
Offsite area, Kolville Estates(SC 10) -> POND 810
Onsite area draining to Wetland 9 -> POND 900
Emergency OVerflow -> POND 900
= 1l3" culvert (#1) under I-94, to Wetland 5 -;;. POND 200
IS" culvert (#2) under I-94 to Wetland 4 -> POND 301
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY~PROPOSBD SOOTH-6/26/02 Page 2
TYPE II 24~HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd. 14 Nov 02
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
RBACH 810 36" Culvert (#3) under 1-94 to wetland 8 -> POND 301
POND 3 Proposed Pond 3 (collection from lots 3, 1 -> POND 900
POND 4 Proposed Pond 4 (Collection from lots 2 an -> POND 900
POND 5 Proposed Pond 5 (Collection from lot 1) -> POND 900
POND 70 Pond for lot 5 -> POND 200
POND 75 Pond for lot 6 -> POND 201
POND 200 WETLAND 2 - WEST -'> POND 201
POND 201 WETLAND 2 - EAST -> POND 3
POND 301 Drainage Ditch -> POND 900
POND 301 secondary Drainage Ditch -> REACH 301
POND 501 Offsite Wetland S. of 1-94 -> REACH 501
POND 720 1-94 median East of 36 in. culvert -> POND 301
POND 730 Offsite pond, Kol ville estates (Pond 2) -> POND 720
POND 810 Offsite Pond, Kol ville Estates (Pond 1) -> REACH 810
POND 900 Wetland 9 ->
L:tNK 811 = Offsite EX. Area DE, Karston Property -> REACH 810
L:tNK 812 Offsite EX. Pond DE, Karston Property -> REACH 810
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 ec) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
SUB CATCHMENT 3
Lots 3 and 16 and Outlot B
PEAK= 65.08 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME = 3.96 AF
ACRES
.56
.60
8.20
2.14
11.50
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
SUBCATCHMBNT 4
CN
98
65
98
65
90
Pond - NWL
Greenspace around pond
80% Impervious Area
Greenspace
Comment
Segment ID:
Lots 2 and 4
PEAK= 36.15 CFS @ 12.01 BRS, VOLUME = 2.21 AF
ACRES
.30
4.72
1.18
6.20
Method
DZRECT BNTRY
SUBCATCHMBHT 5
CN
98
98
65
92
Pond - NWL
80% Impervious Areas
Greenspace
Comment
Lot 1
PEAK= 32.07 CFS @ 12.01 BRS, VOLUME =
ACRES . CN
.23 98
4.20 98
1.07 65
5.50 92
Method
DZRBCT ENTRY
1. 96 AF
Pond - NWL
80% Impervious Area
Greenspace
Comment
Page 3
14 Nov 02
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Tc (min)
15.0
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 BRS, dt=.1 BRS
Tc {min}
~ 15.0
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TY:PE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tc (min)
15.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOOR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
. Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
. SUB CATCHMENT 70
Lot 5
PEAK= 18.59 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME =
ACRES
.14
.30
2.30
.60
3.34
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
SUB CATCHMENT 75
1. 13 AF
CN
98
65
98
65
89
Pond Area - NWL
Greenspace around Pond
80% Impervious Area
Greenspace
Comment
Segment ID:
Lot 6
PEAK= 25.94 CFS @. 12.01 HRS,
ACRES
.22
.44
3.20
.80
4.66
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
SUBCATCHMENT 201
VOLUME = 1.58 AF
CN
98
65
98
65
89
Pond Area - NWL
Greenspace around pond
80% Impervious area
Greenspace
Comment
Segment 1D:
Area around east Wetland 2
PEAK= 7.05 CFS @ 11~97 HRS, VOLUME=
ACRES
1.75
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
.38 AF
CN
n
Wetland area
Comment
Segment ID:
Page 4
14 Nov 02
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l
HRS
Tc (min)
15.0
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tc {min}
15.0
SCS TR-20.METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tc (min)
10.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
SUBCATCHMENT 500
Area draining to Wetland 5
PEAK= 19.88 CFS @ 12.02 HRS, VOLUME = 1.23 AF
ACRES
3.25
.50
2.16
5.91
CN
65
98
71
70
I-94 ditch and farmstead
paved interstate 94
wetland area
Method
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND
Short Grass Pasture Kv=7
TR-55 SHEET FLOW
Grass: Dense n=.24
Comment
Segment
s=.01
Segment
P2=2.5 in
FLOW
L=200'
10:
'/ I
10:
s=.06
L=100'
Total Length=
Page 5
14 Nov 02
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Tc {min}
4.8
V=.7 fps
10.4
'/ '
300 ft
Total Tc= 15.2
PEAK= 5.79 CFS @ 16.90 HRS, VOLUME = 2.43 AF
Offsite area S. of 1-94, N. of CSAH 37
SUB CATCHMENT 501
ACRES
20.00
CN
65
Farmstead
Method
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW.
Short Grass Pasture Kv=7 L=1500'
Comment
s=.OOOl '/'
SUBCATCHHENT 720
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Tc {min}
357.1
V=.07 ips
Bwy runoff in median to 18n culvert (#4)
. PEAK= 9.10 CFS @ 11..88 HRS, VOLUME=
.39 AF
ACRES CN
1.30 60
.50 98
1. 80 71
Median grass
Impervious
Method
CHANNBL FLOW
a=180 sq-ft
s=.0026 '/'
Comment
Segment 10:
Pw=61 ,
n=.027
r=2.951'
V=5.77 fps
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tc (min)
2.7
L=920'
Capacity=1039.2 cfs
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED SOOTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HQOR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 6
14 Nov 02
SUBCATCHMENT 730
Offsite area, Kollville Estates(SC 20)
PEAK= 34.74 CFS @ 12.56 HRS, VOLUME = 4.82 AF
ACRES
12.05
4.90
16.95
CN
86
70
81
Townhome area
Row crop area offsite south
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 -HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method Comment
TR-55 SHEET FLOW AB
Grass: Dense n=.24 L=300' P2=2.7 in s=.Ol '/'
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW BC
Grassed Wate~way Kv=15 L=280' S=.Ol '/' V=1.5 fps
CIRCULAR CHANNEL CD
12" Diameter a=.79 sq-ft Pw=3.1' r=.25'
s=.003 '/' n=.013 V=2.48 fps L=550' Capacity=2 cfs
CIRCULAR CHANNEL DE
18" Diameter a=1.77 sq-ft Pw=4.7' r=.375'
s=.003 'I' n=.013 V=3.26 fps L=500' Capacity=5.8 cfs
Tc (min)
49.4
3.1
3.7
2.6
Total Length= 1630 ft
Total Tc=
58.8
SUBCATCBMENT 802
Hwy runoff in median to 18" culvert (#2)
PEAK= 13.45 CFS @ 11.87 HRS,
VOLUME =
.58 AF
ACRES
1. 70
.70
2.40
CN
65
98
75
median grasses
impervious
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l
HRS
Method
CHANNBL FLOW
a=180 sq-ft
s=.008 '/'
Comment
To (min)
2.1
Pw=61 ,
n=.027
r=2.951'
V=10.13 fps
L=1250'
Capaoity=1822.9 cfs
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE :II 24-HOUR RA:INFALL= 5.90 :IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754. (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 7
14 Nov 02
SOB CATCHMENT 810
Offsite area, Kolville Estates(SC 10)
PEAK= 21.96 CFS @ 12.13 HRS, VOLUME = 1.73 AF
ACRES
5.40
CN
86
Townhome dev. area
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 - HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method Comment
TR-SS SHEET FLOW AB
Grass: Dense n=.24 L=130' P2=2.7 in s=.016 '/'
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW BC
Paved Kv=20.3282 L=200' s=.005 '/' V=1.44 fps
C:IRCULAR CHANNEL CD
15" Diameter a=1.23 sq-ft Pw=3.9' r=.313'
s=.003 '/' n=.013 V=2.88 fps L=330' Capacity=3.5 cfs
Tc (min)
21. 0
2.3
1.9
Total Length= 660 ft
Total Tc= 25.2
SOB CATCHMENT 900
Onsite area draining to Wetland 9
I PEAK= 41.37 CFS @ 11. 89 HRS, VOLUME= 1.80 AF
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ACRES.
2.70
4.10
6.80
CN
98
65
78
Wetland - NWL
Greenspace around wetland
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Method Comment
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW .
Short Grass Pasture Kv=7 L=200' s=.0144 '/'
Tc . (min)
4.0
V=.84 fps
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24 -HOUR RAINFALL. 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (e) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer
REACH 301
Page 8
14 Nov 02
Systems
Emergency OVerflow
Qin = 0.00 CFS @ 0.00 HRS, VOLUME = 0.00 AF
Qout= 0.00 CFS @ 0.00 HRS, VOLUME = 0.00 AF, ATTEN= O~ LAG = 0.0 MIN
0,
DEPTH END AREA DISCH
(FT) (SO-FT) (CFS) 2.4' x 2' CHANNEL STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD
0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= .33 '/' PEAK DEPTH= 0.00 FT
.20 .60 .54 n= .027 PEAK VELOCITY= 0.0 FPS
..40 1.44 1.92 LENGTH= 330 FT TRAVEL TIME = . 0 . 0 MIN
.60 2.53 4.19 SLOPE= .003 FT/FT SPAN=
.86 4.31 8.67
1.20 7.24 17.54
1.60 11. 60 33.06
2.00 16.92 54.88
REACH 501
Qin =
Qout=
18" culvert (#1) under 1-94, to Wetland 5
5.76 CFS @ 17.10 HRS,
3.15 CFS @ 15.04 HRS,
0.0 MIN
DEPTH
(FT)
0.00
.15
.30
.45
1.05
1.20
1.35
1. 41
1.46
1.50
REACH 802
END AREA
(SO-FT)
0.00
.09
.25
.45
1.32
1.52
1.68
1. 72
1. 75
1.77
DISCH
(CFS)
0.00
.06
.27
.60
2.57
3.00
3.27
3.30
3.27
3.06
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
2.27 AF
1.49 AF,
ATTEN= 45%,
LAG=
18" PIPE
STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD
PEAK DEPTH= 1.50 FT
PEAK VELOCITY= 2.0 FPS
TRAVEL TIME 1.7 MIN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
n= .024
LENGTH= 200 FT
SLOPE= .0029 FT/FT
18" culvert (#2) under I~94 t9 Wetland 4
Qin = 13.45 CFS @ 11.87 HRS,
Qout= 12.07 CFS @ 11.87HRS,
DEPTH
(FT)
0.00
.15
.30
.45
1.05
1.20
1.35
1.41
1.46
1.50
END AREA
(SO~FT)
0.00
.09
.25
.45
1.32
1.52
1.68
1.72
1. 75
1.77
DISCH
(CFS)
0.00
.25
1.03
2.31
9.88
11.53
12.58
12.69
12.57
11.80
VOLUME=
VOLUME =
.58 AF
.58 AF,
ATTEN= 10%,
LAG=
0.0 MIN
18" PIPE
STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD
PEAK DEPTH= 1.50 FT
PEAK VELOCITY= 7.5 FPS
TRAVEL TIME = . 2 MIN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
n= .024
LENGTH=' 85FT
SLOPE= .043 FT/FT
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED SOOTR-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-ROl7R RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK:-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 10
14 Nov 02
POND 3
Proposed Pond 3 {collection from lots 3, 1
Qin 65.12 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME = 5.28 AF
Qout= 3.80 CFS @ 20.00 HRS, VOLUME = 2.52 AF, ATTEN= 94%, LAG = 479 . 4 MIN
ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM.. STOR STOR-IND METHOD
(FT) (AC) (AF) (AF) PEAK STORAGE = 2.76 AF
954.0 .56 0.00 0.00 PEAK ELEVATION= 958.2 FT
956.0 .65 1. 21 1.21 FLOOD ELEVATION= 960.0 FT
958.0 .75 1.40 2.61 START ELEVATION= 954.0 FT
960.0 .85 1.60 4.21 SPAN= 10~20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 246.9 MIN (2.49 AF)
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
954.0'
OUTLET DEVICES
12M CULVERT
n=.013 L=235' S=.OOOl'/'
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
Ke=.5
POND 4
Proposed Pond 4 {Collection from lots 2 an
Qin
Qout=
36.15 CFS @ 12.01 HRS,
3.72 CFS @ 12.64 HRS,
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
2.21 AF
1. 82 AF,
ATTEN= 90%,
LAG=
38 . 1 MIN
ELEVATION
(FT)
954.0
956.0
958.0
AREA
(AC)
.30
.35
.43
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
.65
.78
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
.65
1.43
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 1.30 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 957.7 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 954.0 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 188.3 MIN {1.82 AF}
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
954.0'
OUTLET DEVICES
12- coLVERT
n=.013 L=200' S=.OOOl'/'
CC=.9
Cd=.6
Ke=.5
POND 5
Proposed Pond 5 {Collection from lot 1}
Qin = 32.07 CFS @ 12.01 HRS,
Qout= 3.25 CfS @ 12.65 HRS,
VOLUME=
VOLUME=
1. 96 AF
1.65 AF,
ATTEN=90%,
LAG=
38.6 MIN
ELEVATION
(FT)
954.0
956.0
958.0
AREA
(AC)
.23
.30
.56
INC. STOR
(AF)
0.00
.53
.86
CUM. STOR
(AF)
0.00
.53
1.39
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 1 :15 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 957.4 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 954.0 FT
SPAN~ 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 187.1 MIN (1.65 AF)
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
954.0'
OUTLET DEVICES
12 n CULVERT
n=.013 L=250' S=;OOOl'/'
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
Ke=.5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I.
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED SOUTR-6/26/02
TYPE II 24.-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HYdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
POND 70
Page 11
14 Nov 02
Pond for lot 5
Qin
Qout=
18.59 CFS @ 12.01 HRS,
2.86 CFS @ 12.48 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
957.5
960.5
AREA
(AC)
.14
.34
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
.72
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
957.5'
OUTLET DEVICES
12" CULVERT
n=.013 L=200' S=.OOOl'/'
POND 75
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
1. 13 AF
.98 AF,
ATTEN= 85%, LAG =
28.2 MIN
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
.72
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = .62 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 960.1 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 960.5 FT
START ELEVATION= 957.5 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 144.5 MIN (.98 AF)
Ke=.5
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
Pond for lot 6
Qin
Qout=
25.94 CFS @ 12.01 HRS,
4.44 CFS @ 12.44 HRS,
ELEVATION
CFT)
957.5
960.5
AREA
(AC)
.22
.45
INC.STOR
CAF)
O.Op
1.01
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
957.5'
OUTLET DEVICES
12. CULVERT
n=.013 L=50' S=.OOOl'/'
POND 200
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
1. 58 AF
1.38 AF,
ATTEN= 83%,
LAG=
25 . 8 MIN
CUM. STOR
CAF)
0.00
1.01
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = .84 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 960.0 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 960.5 FT
START ELEVATION= 957.5 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 134.1 MIN (1.38 AF)
Ke=.5
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
WETLAND 2 - WEST
Qin = 21.77 CFS @ 12.03 HRS,
Qout= 3.47 CFS @ 20.00 HRS,
VOLUME=
VOLUME=
3.70 AF
1.47 AF,
ATTEN= 84%,
LAG=
478.1 MIN
ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM.STOR STOR-IND METHOD
(FT) (AC) CAF) CAF) PEAK STORAGE = 3.73 AF
956.5 1.40 0.00 0.00 PEAK ELEVATION= 958.8 FT
957.5 1.60 1.50 1.50 FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.5 FT
958.5 1.90 1. 75 3.25 START ELEVATION= 957.5 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=,l HRS
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
957.5'
OUTLET DEVICES
21" CULVERT
n=.013 L=lOO' S=.OOOl'/'
Ke=.5
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
01
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED SOOTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 12
14 Nov 02
POND 201
WETLAND 2 - EAST
Qin
Qout=
9.61 CFS @ 12.00 HRS,
3.34 CFS @ 20.00 HRS,
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
3.22 AF
1.32 AF,
ATTEN= 65%, LAG =
480.2 MIN
ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM. STOR STOR-IND METHOD
(FT) (AC) (AF) (AF) PEAK STORAGE = 3.25 AF
956.5 1.10 0.00 0.00 PEAK ELEVATION= 95B.6 FT
957.5 1.60 1. 35 1.35 FLOOD ELEVATION= 95B.5 FT
95B.5 1. 90 1. 75 3.10 START ELEVATION= 957.5 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
# ROUTE . INVERT
1 P 957.5'
OUTLET DEVICES
15" CULVERT
n=.013 L=250' S=.005'/'
CC=.9
Cd=.6
Ke=.5
POND 301
Drainage Ditch
Qin 27.23 CFS @ 12.35 ERS,
Qout= 22.46 CFS @ 12.74 ERS,
VOLUME= 11. 70 AF
VOLUME= 11.45 AF, ATTEN= IB%, LAG=
22.B MIN
ELEVATION
(FT)
954.0.
956.0
958.0
AREA
(SF)
4500
15000
62500
CUM.STOR
(CF)
o
19500
97000
STOR -IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 2B05SCF
PEAK ELEVATION= 956.2 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 95B.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 954.0 FT
SPAN= 10-20 ERS, dt=.1 HRS
Tdet= 18.2 MIN (11.33 AF)
# ROUTE INVERT OUTLET DEVICES
1 P 954.0' 24" CULVERT
n=.013 1..=465' S=.002'/' Ke=.5 Cc=.9 Cd=.6
2 P 954.0' 24" CULVERT
n=.013 1..=465' S=.002'/' Ke=.5 Cc=.9 Cd=.6
POND 501
Offsite Wetland S. of 1-94
Qin =
gout =
5.79 CFS @ 16.90 ERS,
5.76 CFS @ 17.10 BRS,
VOLUME=
VOLUME=
2.43.AF
2.27 AF,
ATTEN=
1% ,
LAG=
11.B .MIN
ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM.STOR STOR-IND METHOD
(FT) (SF) (CF) (CF) PEAK STORAGE = 106534 CF
955.0 15000 0 0 PEAK ELEVATION= 960.3 FT
958.0 19000 51000 51000 FLOOD ELEVATION= 961. 0 FT
960:0 27000 46000 97000 START ELEVATION= 960.0 FT
961.0 32000 29500 126500 SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet=423 MIN ( . 04 AF)
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
960.0'
OUTLET DEVICES
10 I BltOAD-CRBSTED RBC'rANGULAR RIR X 1.81
Q=C 1.. ~^1.5 C=1.72, 1.88, 1.98, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
POND 72 0
Page 13
14 Nov 02
1-94 median East of 36 in. culvert
Qin 14.84 CFS @ 13.25 HRS,
Qout= 10.42 CFS @ 14.80 HRS,
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
4.87 AF
4.80 AF,
ATTEN= 30%,
LAG =
93.2 MIN
ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM. STOR STOR-INn METHOD
(FT) (SF) (CF) (CF) PEAK STORAGE = 49364 CF
958.0 1388 0 0 PEAK ELEVATION= 961.7 FT
959.0 6288 3838 3838 FLOOD ELEVATION= 960.4 FT
960.0 16463 11376 15214 START ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
960.4 23582 8009 23222 SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 59.4 MIN (4.75 AF)
# ROUTE
1 P
POND 73 0
INVERT
958.0'
. OUTLET DEVICES
18n CULVERT
n=.024 L=70' S=.009'/'
Ke=.5
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
Offsite pond, Kolville estates (Pond 2)
Qin 34.74 CFS @ 12.56 HRS, VOLUME =
Qout= 14.42 CFS @ 13.28 HRS, . VOLUME=
ELEVATION
(FT)
958.0
960.0
961.0
962.0
# ROUTE
1 P
POND 810
Qin
Qout=
ELEVATION
(FT)
959.3
960.0
962.0
963.0
# ROUTE
1 P
4.82 AF
4.48 AF,
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
.95
1. 50
2.12
INVERT.
958.0'
'OUTLET DEVICES
18 n CULVERT
n=.012 L=30' S=.005'/'
Ke=.5
ATTEN= 58%,
LAG=
43.5 MIN
STOR-INn METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 1.89 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 961.6 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 962.0 FT
. START ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Tdet= 88.7 MIN (4.48 AF)
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
Offsite Pond, Ko1ville Bstates (Pond 1)
21.96 CFS @ 12.13 HRS,
4.18 CFS @ 12.74 HRS,
VOLUME=
VOLUME=
1.73 AF
1.50 AF,
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
.31
1.30
1.88
INVERT
959.3'
OUTLET DEVICES
12" CULVERT
n=.013 L=30' S=.005'/'
Ke=.5
ATTEN= 81%,
LAG=
36.4 MIN
STOR-INn METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = .91 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 961.2 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 963.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 959.3 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 144.1 MIN (1.5 AF)
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
POND 900
Page 14
14 Nov 02
Wetland 9
Qin 59.44 CFS @ 11.90 HRS,
Qout= 32.04 CFS @ 13.85 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
953.0
954.0
956.0
AREA
(AC)
1. 53
2.70
7.90
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
2.12
10.60
# ROUTE
1 .p
INVERT
954.0'
OUTLET DEVICES
28' BROAD-CRESTED RECTANGULAR WEIR X 1.81
Q=C L H^1.5 . C=O, 0, 0, 1.94, 1.92, 1.89, 1.92, 1.97
VOLUME= 19.23 AF
VOLUME= 17.60 AF, ATTEN= 46%,
LAG =
11 7 . 0 MIN
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
2.12
12.72
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 4.62 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 954.5 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 956.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 954.0 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 112.1 MIN (15.33 AF)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSBD SOUTH-6/26/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR.RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
LINK 811
Offsite EX. Area DE, Karston Property
Page 15
14 Nov 02
Qout= 14.80 CFS @ 12.24 HRS, VOLUME = 1.51 AF, SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
101 Points Entered
HOUR
10.00 I
11.00 I
12.00 I
13.00 I
14.00 I
15.00 I
16.00 I
17.00 I
18.00 I
19.00 I
20.00 I
LINK 812
0.00
.44
.87
9.66
2.51
1.22
.88
.70
.58
.51
.45
.38
.10
.46
.94
12.62
2.24
1.17
.86
.68
.57
.51
.44
.20
.49
1.02
14.60
2.02
1.11
.84
.66
.56
.50
.43
.30
.52
1.12
14.45
1. 84
1.07
.82
.64
.56
.49
.43
.40
.56
1. 24
12.77
1. 71
1. 03
.81
.63
.55
.49
.42
.50
.60
1. 39
10.91
1. 60
.99
.79
.62
.54
.48
.41
.60
.64
1.68
8.91
1. 51
.96
.77
.61
.54
.47
.41
.70
.69
2.31
6.86
1.43
.94
.75
.60
.53
.47
.40
Offsite EX. Pond DE, Karston Property
.80
.74
3.60
4.93
1.35
.92
.73
.59
.52
.46
.39
.90
.80
6.24
3.34
1. 29
.90
.71
.58
.52
.45
.39
Qout= 5.06 CFS @ 14.80 HRS, VOLUME = 3.33 AF, SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
101 Points Entered
HOUR
10.00
11.00
12.00
B.OO
14.00
15.00
16.00
17.00
18.00
19.00
20.00
0.00
0.00
1.14
2.32
4.54
4.97
5.06
5.04
4.97
4.87
4.75
4.61
.10
0.00
1.18
2.75
4.61
4.99
5.06
5.04
4.96
4.86
4.74
.20
0.00
1.22
3.18
4.67
5.01
5.06
5.03
4.95
4.85
4.72
.30
0.00
1.27
3.60
4.72
5.02
5.06
5.02
4.94
4.84
4.71
.40
0.00
1.33
3.81
4.77
5.03
5.06
5.02
4.93
4.83
4.70
.50
.62
.1.40
3.99
4.82
5.04
5.06
5.01
4.92
4.81
4.68
.60
.75
1.48
4.14
4.86
5.05
5.06
5.00
4.91
4.80
4.67
.70
.86
1.60
4.27
4.89
5.05
5.05
5.00
4.90
4.79
4.66
.80
.96
1.73
4.38
4.92
5.06
5.05
4.99
4.89
4.78
4.64
.90
1.06
1.97
4.47
4.95
5.06
5.05
4.98
4.88
4.76
4.63
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED NORTH-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL=5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 1
14 Nov 02
WATERSHED ROUTING
===========;=================================================
G
8
1
~
1
.~
@ I
'::,1.61.
G
1 G
g ~
\f~'
~~
e~ I '\
/ ~
~A. \
@ @
)~ >GJ
d
i
@
~
~
G >~
o SUBCATCHMENT D REACH
6 POND
c:J LI NK
SOBCATCIDIBNT 10 Lots 11 and 12 -> POND 10
SOBCATCIDIBNT 20 Lots 9 and 10 -> POND 20
SOBCATCHMBNT30 = Lots 13, 14, 16, and 17 -> POND 30
SOBCATCHMENT 40 Lots 15, 19, and 20 -> POND 40
SOBCATCHMENT 60 Lots 7 and 8 -> POND 60
SOBCATCHMENT 100 = Onsite area draining to Wetland A -> POND 100
StlBCATCIDIBNT 110 = Offsite area draining to ditch west of Kad -> POND 110
SOBCATCHMENT 120 Offsite area draining to Wetland A, culver -> POND 120
SOBCATCHMENT 150 = Offsite area N. of 70th St. draining to We -> POND 150
SUBCATCBIIBNT 410 = Offsite Area N. of 70th St. draining to cu -> POND 410
RBACB 1 = Exit Site ->
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED NORTH-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-HOtrR RA:&NFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
REACH 50
POND 10
POND 20
POND 30
POND 40
POND 60
POND 100
POND 110
POND 120
POND 150
POND 400
POND 410
Channel draining off site from Wetland A
Pond on Lot 11
Pond on Lot 10
Pond for lots 13, 14, and 17
Pond for Lots 15 and 19
Pond on lots 7 and 8
Wetland 1
Ditch .on W. side of Kadler Ave.
Page 2
14 Nov 02
-> REACH 1
-> POND 400
-> REACH 1
-> POND 100
-> POND 100
-> POND 100
-> REACH 50
Ponding in Wetland at NE corner of into
Offsite Ponding in Wetland at NW corner of -> POND 110
-> POND 100
Wetland 4
-> POND 100
->
Offsite ponding in Wetland NE corner of si ->
POND 400
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
Data for RODENPROPERTY-PROPOSBD NORTH-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
SUB CATCHMENT 10 Lots 11 and 12
PEAK= 53.05 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME = 3.24 AF
ACRES CN
.40 98 Pond - NWL
6.96 98 80% Paved areas and Buildings
1. 74 65 Greenspace
9.10 92
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
Comment
Segment ID:
SUBCATCHMENT 20
Lots 9 and 10
PEAK= 43.14 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME = 2.63 AF
ACRES
.35
5.60
1.45
7.40
CN
98 Pond - NWL
98 80% Impervious Areas
65 Greenspace
92
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
Comment
Segment ID:
SUBCATCHHENT 30
Lots 13, 14, 16, and 17
PEAK= 103.8 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME= 6.33 AF
. ACRES
.70
13.70
3.40
17.S0
CN
98 Pond - NWL
98 .SO\ Impervious Areas
65 Greenspace
92
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
Conunent
Segment ID:
SUBCATCHMENT 40
Lots 15, 19, and 20
PEAK= 46.06 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME = 2.81 AF
ACRES
.32
6.06
1.52
7.90
CN
98 Pond - NWL
98 80% Impervious Areas
65 Greenspace
92
Method
DIRBCT ENTRY
eo~ent
Segment ID:
Page 3
14 Nov 02
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tc (min)
15.0
SCS .TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 -HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tc (min)
15.0
ses TR- 2 0 METHOD
TYPE II 24 - HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tc {mini
15.0
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 - HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.9.0 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
Tc (min)
15.0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED NORTH-6/2S/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 .IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
SUBCATCHMENT 60
Page 4
14 Nov 02
Lots 7 and 8
PEAK= 95.10 CFS @ 12.01 HRS, VOLUME = 5.81 AF
ACRES
.71
12.88
2.51
16.10
CN
98 Pond - NWL
98 80% Impervious Area
65 Greenspace
93
ses TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
DIRECT ENTRY
SUBCATCHMENT 100
Comment
Segment ID:
Tc (min)
15.0
PEAK= 80.18 CFS @ 12.03 HRS, VOLUME = 5.16 AF
Onsite area draining to Wetland A
ACRES
16.50
0.00
0.00
16.50
CN
85 Wetland
o 0
o 0
85
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24 -HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, .dt=.l HRS
Method
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW
Grassed Waterway Kv=15 L=1516,
SUBCATCHMBNT 110
Comment
Segment ID:
S=.Ol '/' V=1.5 fps
Tc (min)
16.8
PEAK= 49.89 CFS @ 12.63 BRS, VOLUME= 7.43 A?
Offsite area dra~ning to ditch west of Kad
ACRES ' CN
44.00 65 .mixed offsite
Method
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND
Short Grass Pasture Kv=7
TR-SS SHEET FLOW
CUltivated: Residue<=20%
SCS TR- 2 0 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOtJR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 BRS, dt=.l BRS
Comment
FLOW Segment ID:
L=2100' s=.0125 'I' V=.78 fps
Segment ID:
n=.06 L=300' P2=2.5 in s=.Ol 'I'
Tc (min)
44.7
16.9
Total Length= 2400 ft
Total Tc=
61.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED NORT~-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-BOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HvdroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 5
14 Nov 02
SUBCATCHMEln' 120
Offsite area draining to Wetland A, culver
PEAK= 51.03 CFS @ 12.63 HRS, VOLUME = 7.60 AF
ACRES
45.00
CN
65 mixed offsite
ses TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND
Short Grass Pasture Kv=7
TR-55 SHEET FLOW
Cultivated: Residue<=20%
Comment
To (min)
44.7
FLOW
L=2100' S=. 0125 '/' V=. 78. fps
Segment ID:
n=.06 L=300' P2=2.5 ins=.Ol '/'
16.9
Total Length= 2400 ft
Total Tc=
61.6
SUBCATCHMENT 150
Offsite area N. of 70th St. draining to We
PEAK= 121.4 CFS @ 12.64 HRS, VOLUME= 18.25 AF
ACRES
95.00
5.00
100.00
CN
65 mixed offsite
98 Impervious
67
SCS.TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10~20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method Comment
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW
Short Grass Pasture Kv=7 L=2600' s=.0096 'I'
To (min)
63.2
V=.69 fps
SUBCATCBHBNT 410
Offsite Area N. of 70th St. draining to cu
PEAK= 141. 9 CFS @ 12.84 HRS, VOLUME= 24.61 AF
ACRES
95.00
5.00
100.00
CN
75 mixed offsite
98 Impervious
76
SCS TR-20 METHOD
TYPE II. 24-HOUR
RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
SPAN= 10-20. HRS, dt=.l HRS
Method Comment
SHALLOW CONCENTRATED/UPLAND FLOW
Cultivated Straight Rows Kv=9 L=3600' 8=.007 '/'
Tc (min)
79.7
V=.75 fps
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
Data for
RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED NORTB-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 6
Prepared
HydroCAD
14 Nov .02
REACH 1
Exit Site
REACH 50
Channel draining offsite from Wetland A
Qin = 12.29 CFS @ 20.00 HRS, VOLUME = 5.49 AF
Qout= 11.90 CFS @ 20.00 HRS, VOLUME= 4.93 AF, ATTEN= 3%, LAG= 0.0 MIN
DEPTH END AREA DISCH
(FT) (SO-FT) (CFS) 10' x 3.5' CHANNEL STOR-IND+TRANS METHOD
0.00 0.00 0.00 SIDE SLOPE= 1 ' I' PEAK DEPTH= 1.86 FT
.35 3.62 .73 n= .035 PEAK VELOCITY= .5 FPS
.70 7.49 2.33 LENGTH= 550 FT TRAVEL TIME 16 .7 MIN
1.05 11. 60 4.57 SLOPE= .0001 FT/FT SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
1.51 17.32 8.37
2.10 25.41 14.72
2.80 35.84 24.16
3.50 47.25 35.70
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I'
Data for RODEN PROPERT~-PROP08ED NORT~-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-BOUR RAINFALL=5.90 IN
Prepared byRLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754. (c). 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
POND 10
Pond on Lot 11
Qin
Qout=
53.05 CFS @ 12.01 HRS,
5.75 CFS @ 12.62 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
954.5
957.5
AREA
(AC)
.40
.75
INC. STOR
(AF)
0.00
1. 73
#: ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
954.5'
OUTLET DEVICES
12 n CULVERT
n=.013 L=50' S=.005'/'
POND 20
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
3.24 AF
2.73 AF,
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
1. 73
Ke=.5
Pond on Lot 10
Qin
Qout=
43.14 CFS @ 12.01 HRS,
5.33 CFS @ 12.56 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
954.5
957.5
AREA
CAC}
.34
.68
INc.STOR
CAF}
0.00
1.53
#: ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
954.5'
OUTLET DEVICES
12. CULVERT
n=.013 L=50' 8=.005'/'
POND 30
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
2.63 AF
2.29 AF,
Page 7
14 Nov 02
ATTEN= 89%,
LAG =
36.7 MIN
CUM. STOR
CAF}
0.00
1.53
Ke=.5
STOR-IND METHO!)
PEAK STORAGE = 1.89 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 957.8 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 957.5 FT
START ELEVATION= 954.5 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=:l HRS
Tdet= 181 MIN (2.7 AF)
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
ATTEN= 88%,
LAG=
33.0 MIN
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 1.50 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 957.4 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 957.5 FT
START ELEVATION= 954.5 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 163.6 MIN (2.26 AF)
CC=.9
Cd=.6
Pond for lots 13, 14, and 17
Qin = 103.8 CFS @ 12.01 HRS,
Qout= 15.20 CFS @ 12.49 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
955.0
958.0
AREA
CAC)
.64
.99
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
2.45
#: ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
955.0'
OUTLET DEVICES
lS. CULVERT
0=.013 L=80' S=.005'/'
VOLUME=
VOLUME=
6.33 AF
5.65 AF,
CUM. STOR
(AF)
0..00
2.45
Ke=.5
ATTEN= 85%,
LAG=
29.1 MIN
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 3.47 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 959.3 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 955.0 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 143 MIN (5.6 AF)
CC=.9
Cd=.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED NORTH-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK~Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
Page 8
14 Nov 02
POND 40
Pond for Lots 15 and 19
Qin
Qout=
46.06 CFS @ 12.01 HRS,
8.14 CFS @ 12.43 HRS,
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
2.81 AF
2.56 AF,
ATTEN= 82 % ,
LAG =
25.1 MIN
ELEVATION
(FT)
955.0
958.0
AREA
(AC)
.32
.65
INC. STOR
(AF)
0.00
1.46
CUM. STOR
(AF)
0.00
1.46
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 1.47 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 955.0 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS[ dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 119.4 MIN (2.53 AF)
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
955.0'
OUTLET DEVICES
15 n CULVERT
n=.013 L=70' S=.005'/'
Cd=.6
Ke=.5
CC=.9
POND 60
Pond on lots 7 and 8
Qin
Qout=
95.10 CFS @ 12.01 HRS,
7.94 CFS @ 12.79 HRS[
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
5.81 AF
4.48 AF,
ATTEN= 92%,
LAG=
46.9 MIN
ELEVATION
(FT)
957.0
960.0
AREA
(AC)
.71
1.09
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
2.70
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
2.70
STOR.,.IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 3 .54 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 960.9 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 960.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 957.0 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 213 MIN (4.48 AF)
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
957.0'
OUTLET DEVICES
15 n CULVERT
n=.013 L=180' S=.005'/'
Cd=.6
Ke=.5
Cc=.9
POND 100
Wetland 1
Qin = 103.3 CFS @ 12.05 HRS, VOLUME= 39.44 AF
Qout= 12.29 CFS @ 20.00 HaS, VOLUME= 5.49 AF, ATTEN= 88%, LAG= 476.9 MIN
ELEVATION AREA INC.STOR CUM. STOR STOR-IND METHOD
(FT) (AC) (AF) (AF) PEAK STORAGE = 40.88 AF
952.0 1.00 0.00 0.00 PEAK ELEVATION= 957.1 FT
954.4 5.10 7.32 7.32 FLOOD ELEVATloN= 958.0 FT
956.0 12.70 14.24 21.56 START ELEVATION= 954 . 3 FT
958.0 23.00 35.70 57.26 SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.1 HRS
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
954.3'
OUTLET DEVICES
24n CULVERT
n=.014 L=150' S=.0001'/'
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
Ke=.5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED NORTH-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuus!sto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 (e) 1986-1999 Applied. Mierocomputer Systems
POND 110
Page 9
14 Nov 02
Ditch on W. side of Kadler Ave.
Qin 52.99 CFS @ 12.66 HRS,
Qout= 24.24 CFS @ 13.66 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
954.7
956.0
958.0
AREA
(AC)
.40
.80
.90
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
.78
1. 70
# ROUTE INVERT
1 P 954.7'
VOLUME= 11.85 AF
VOLUME= 10.84 AF,
CUM. STOR
(AF)
0.00
.78
2.48
OUTLET DEVICES
24" CULVERT
n=.024 L=30' S=.022'/'
POND 120
Ke=.5
ATTEN= 54% I
LAG=
59.9 MIN
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 2.95 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 958.5 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 954.7 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 76.5 MIN (10.73 AF)
CC=.9
Cd=.6
Offsite Ponding in Wetland at NW corner of
Qin
. Qout=
51. 03CFS @ 12.63 HRS,
8.34 CFS @ 14.59 aRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
955.0
956.0
958.0
AREA
(AC)
1.20
2.50
4.50
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
1.85
7.00
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
955.0'
OUTLET DEVICES
24" CULVBRT
n=.024 L=50' S=.0066'/'
POND 150
VOLUME =
VOLUME =
7.60 AF
4.42 AF,
ATTEN= 84%,
LAG=
11 7. 6 MIN
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
1.85
8.85
Ke=.5
STOR..,IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 4.38 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 956.7 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 955.0 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 209.8 MIN (4.42 AF)
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
Ponding in Wetland at NB corner of into
Qin = 121.4 CFS @ 12.64 HRS,
Qout= 19.30 CFS @ 14.64 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
955.3
956.0
958.0
AREA
(AC)
2.00
3.50
5.50
INC. STOR
(AF)
0.00
1.93
9.00
# ROUTE
1 P
INVERT
955.3'
OUTLET DEVICES
24" CULVBRT
n=.024 L=50' S=.066'1'
VOLUME= 18.25 AF
VOLUME= 10.75 AF,
CUM. STOR
(AF)
0.00
1. 93
10.93
Ke=.5
ATTEN= 84%,
LAG= 120.1 MIN.
STOR-INn METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 10.61 AF
PEAK ELEVATION=957.9 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 955.3 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 211.4 MIN (10.75 AF)
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
.1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.1
I
I
Data for RODEN PROPERTY-PROPOSED NORTH-6/25/02
TYPE II 24-HOUR RAINFALL= 5.90 IN
Prepared by RLK-Kuusisto, Ltd.
HydroCAD 5.11 000754 (c) 1986-1999 Applied Microcomputer Systems
POND 400
Page 10
14 Nov 02
Wetland 4
Qin 17.88 CFS @ 14.83 HRS,
Qout= 17.88 CFS @ 14.86 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
954.2
956.0
# ROUTE
1P
POND 410
AREA
(AC)
.55
1.43
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
1. 78
VOLUME= 10.32 AF
VOLUME= 10.27 AF,
ATTEN=
0% ,
LAG =
2.0 MIN
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
1. 78
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = .07 AF
PEAK ELEVATION= 954.3 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 956.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 954.2 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS
Tdet= 2.7 MIN (10.27 AF)
INVERT OUTLET DEVICES
954.2' 300' BROAD-CRESTED RECTANGULAR WEIR X 1. 81
Q=C L H^1.5 C=1.53, 1.64, 1.77, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0
Offsite ponding in Wetland HE corne~ of si
Qin 141.9 CFS @ 12.84 HRS,
Qout= 13.39 CFS @ 16.63 HRS,
ELEVATION
(FT)
955.4
956.0
958.0
# ROUTE
1 P
AREA
(AC)
3.50
6.50
8.50
INC.STOR
(AF)
0.00
3.00
15.00
INVERT
955.4'
VOLUME= 24.61 AF
VOLUME = 7.59 AF,
ATTEN= 91%,
LAG= 227.8 MIN
CUM.STOR
(AF)
0.00
3.00
18.00
STOR-IND METHOD
PEAK STORAGE = 17.88 AF
PEAK ELEVATI ON= 958.0 FT
FLOOD ELEVATION= 958.0 FT
START ELEVATION= 955.4 FT
SPAN= 10-20 HRS, dt=.l HRS.
Tdet= 250.4 MIN (7.52 AF)
OUTLET DEVICES
24n CULVBRT
n=.024 L=50' 5=.0062'/'
Ke=.5
Cc=.9
Cd=.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EH
MEMORANDUM
3535 Vadnais Center Drive, St. Paul, MN 55110-5196
651.490.2000 800.325.2055 651.490.2150 FAX
TO:
Pete Carlson, P .E.
FROM:
Jaimison Sloboden, P.E.
DATE:
January 27, 2003
RE:
Albertville Traffic Study for Darkenwald and Vetch Propoerties
SEH No. AALBEV0301.00 14.00
This study is being prepared for the City of Albertville in conjunction with the planning and
approval process for developments proposed for the Darkenwald properties and Vetch properties
located north ofI-94 in the City of Albertville. The properties are identified in Figure 1.
The study has taken a comprehensive look at the traffic effects these properties will have at full
development on the planned roadway system. Included in the analysis was additional traffic
growth attributed to anticipated growth in Otsego, Outlet Mall phase III, all remaining residential
development in Albertville, and partial development of commercial development in Albertville
along County Road 19 south ofI-94.
With all of the development mentioned taking place there will be traffic congestion along County
Road 19 and County Road 37. There is a pending study to develop a comprehensive
transportation system in Eastern Wright County including additional and revised access to the
Interstate system. Until the additional study is completed, there will be a limit to the system
improvements that can be accounted for in this study.
Methodology
The study was developed using the City of Albertville Traffic Model. The model was developed
by SEH in 2002 for the City to assess impacts of traffic growth scenarios including the growth in
traffic associated with development within Albertville, development in the City of Otsego
western sewer service area, and parts of St. Michael.
The Albertville model consists of two models; the first model is a traffic operations model using
the SYNCHRO traffic program, the second model is a traffic forecast model in a series of Excel
spreadsheets. The models include County Road 19 from 70th Street to 50th Street; County Road
37 from Kadler Avenue to the 1-94 Interchange; and 50th Street from County Road 37 to Main
Street.
The first step for this study was to develop traffic projections for a typical weekday PM peak
hour for two conditions. The first condition was existing traffic plus traffic growth as a result of
Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc.
Your Trusted Resource
Equal Opportunity Employer
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Albertville Traffic Study for Darkenwald and Vetch Propoerties
January 27,2003
Page 2
other background development not associated with the two proposed developments. The second
condition was existing traffic plus the background and proposed developments.
The second step was to update the SYNCHRO model with the two traffic volume conditions.
The Synchro model was truncated to include only County road 19 from the intersection of 57th
Street to 70th Street. The first analysis was to determine individual intersection capacities using
Highway Capacity Manual techniques. SYNCHRO provides these calculations. This level
analysis provides an indication of how the intersections pertaining to the development would
work if there were no traffic congestion on the system.
The third step was to analyze the same intersection using SimTraffic. SimTraffic is a
microscopic traffic operations program that analyzes individual vehicles on a second by second
basis. This type of analysis is more detailed and will analyze the effects that a bottleneck will
have on the system.
Panned Developments
The planned developments are two large properties that will contain a mix of commercial,
industrial, and residential developments. The properties and plan are described below.
. The Albertville Business Park otherwise known, as the Darkenwald Property is a 110-acre
development located alongside of the north side of 1-94 and west of the existing Outlet Mall.
The site is currently programmed to have approximately 750,000 square feet of buildings.
The exact uses of these buildings are unknown at this time. The analysis estimated a mix of
commercial retail, office, and light industrial as the uses. The primary access road is 67th
Street to CSAH 19 there is another internal north-south street.
. Town Lakes Phase II otherwise known, as the Vetch Mixed Use Development is a 93.9-acre
development located east of CSAH 19 is a defined mix of residential, retail, office, motel.
The primary access road is 67th Street.
Background Growth
The proposed developments will not likely be built out until 2010. During this time frame there
will be other growth in the City of Albertville and in the surrounding communities that will have
an impact on the transportation system. The planned developments that are part of this study
include the following:
. Albertville Outlet Mall Phase III
. Town Lakes Phase I
. The City of Otsego has planned a sewer service expansion along the City of Albertville's
northern border, this expansion is referred to as the 'western sewer service area'. There is
over 2,600 housing units, and an industrial park platted for this area. At this time, it is not
clear how quickly this area will develop, estimates ranged from 40 units per year to 400 per
year. For this study 679 residential units were estimated based on the high growth scenario
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Albertville Traffic Study for Darkenwald and Vetch Propoerties
January 27,2003
Page 3
of 97/units per year for 7 years. Almost all of the regional traffic from Otsego will pass
through the City of Albertville on county Road 19.
. All remaining residential development in Albertville south of 1-94, which includes 1,398
residential units.
. 50% of commercial/industrial development in Albertville south ofI-94, which was estimated
at 954,000 square feet of commercial, and 102 Acres of industrial property.
Existing Roadway System
The existing principal roadway system consists of County Road 19, County Road 37, and
Interstate 94. County Road 19 is the major artery for the City of Albertville that provides direct
acc;ess to the 1-94 to the west and 1-94 to the east via County Road 37. County Road 19 also
provides the same access to 1-94 for the western half of the City of Otsego, and northwest parts
of the City of St. Michael. There is a bottleneck condition on County Road 19 at the intersection
of County Road 37. This is a result of the traffic demands between County Road 19 and 1-94 to
the east and the right-of-way constraints at the intersection prohibiting the construction of
multiple turn lanes.
County 19 is a 2 lane-undivided arterial with signalized intersections at County .19/37, and outlet
mall intersections. Speed limits range from 40 mph to 55mph. Over time it is anticipated that the
speed limit will be 40 mph along the entire length of County 19 within the City of Albertville.
County Road 37 is a 2 lane un-divided arterial with no signalized intersections. There is a full
access diamond type interchange with 1-94 a nd County Road 37. The ramp terminal
intersections are currently un-signalized, with stop control on the ramp approaches.
Planned Roadway System
The roadway system in eastern Wright County including the City of Albertville is in the process
of being re-defined. There will be a major study beginning in February of 2003 that will
consider additional inter-city corridors and the future of interstate access for the Albertville Area.
The study will be a joint study with the City of St Michael, the City of Otsego, and Wright
County. The City of Albertville's main desire from this planning effort will be the construction
of a full access interchange at County 19. However, the FHW A has indicated that there would
be no approval of new or modified interstate access without a comprehensive local road plan in
Eastern Wright County. Until the transportation study and Mn/DOT and FHW A approval is
obtained, the full access interchange cannot be considered as a committed improvement at this
time.
In advance of the major transportation study, The City of Albertville is proceeding with County
Road 19 improvements for 2003; these improvements include one additional through lane in
each direction from south of 57th Street to north of the Outlet Mall Road Intersection. The
widening project will include the addition of a traffic signal at 57th Street and signal
modifications at the Outlet Mall Road intersection and the intersection with County Road 37.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Albertville Traffic Study for Darkenwald and Vetch Propoerties
January 27,2003
Page 4
As part of this study it was assumed that the county road widening would be extended beyond
67th Street, in addition, the 1-94 ramp intersections at County 19 would be signalized. These
improvements are lower cost improvements that require a minimal approval process.
Traffic Volumes
Future traffic volumes were developed using the Albertville Traffic Model. The model is a
spreadsheet tool that applies ITE Trip Generation manual techniques across the entire city. The
City of Albertville was divided into a number traffic analysis zones (TAZ's), within each zone
the specific land use types were identified and quantified. Each Land Use was applied a trip
generation rate from ITE's Trip Generation Manual 6th Edition. Table A-I in the appendix
contains the typical land use types used in the traffic model.
The traffic volumes that were calculated in each zone were assigned to the primary roadway
network based on two levels of assignment, the fIrst level was internal to internal (I-I) trips
within the City of Albertville. This was conducted to eliminate duplicate trips generated by each
zone, for instance if a residential trip was generated in Zone A and was destined to a commercial
use in Zone B, the commercial trip would not be generated twice. The second level of
assignment is trips destined to or originating from Beyond the City of Albertville, these are
identified as External to Internal trips (E-I). The direction of approach for these trips was based
on the percentages summarized in Table 1. The estimated traffic was combined with existing
traffic that was counted in April of 2002, the existing counts are illustrated in Figure 2. Figure 3
illustrates the projected background growth in traffic.
Table 1
Direction of Approach for
Traffic In and out of Albertville
Location Inbound Outbound
East 1-94 27% 29%
West 1-94 32% 17%
North County 19 7% 13%
South County 19 17% 17%
East County 37 6% 9%
West County 37 4% 11%
Naber Avenue 7% 4%
100% 100%
I
I Albertville Traffic Study for Darkenwald and Vetch Propoerties
January 27, 2003
Page 5
I
I Proposed Development Traffic
The trip generation for the proposed developments was developed using lTE Trip generation
I rates. Calculations for the Vetch Mixed Use Development were provided by the developer's
consultant and are summarized in table 3. These calculations were reviewed and incorporated
into the analysis. An internal capture rate (trips that go between uses and do not go onto County
I.. 19) was estimated at 15%, the higher rate was a result of the mix between retail and residential
uses.
Table 3
I Vetch Mixed Use Development Trip Generation
Use ITE Unit Number Daily PM Peak Hour Daily Trip PM Peak Hour
Code of Units TriDs/Unit Trips/Unit Generation Trip Generation
Single-family 210 Dwelling 115 9.57 1.01 1,101 116
I Residential
Multi~family 230 Dwelling 102 5.86 0.54 598 55
Residential
Specialty Retail 814 1,000 sf 100 40.67 4.93 4,067 493
I General Office 710 1,000 sf 120 11.01 1.56 1,321 187
Motel 2 320 1.000 sf 30 12.15 0.77 365 23
I High-turnover Sit~ 832 1,000 sf 15 130.34 10.86 1,955 163
down Restaurant
Total 9,407 1,037
I The trip generation calculations for the Albertville Business Park were estimated based on
assumed uses for individual parcels within the development. Specific uses for this site has not
been determined, but based on discussions and the demands in the area there will likely be a mix
I of commercial retail in the parcels clos~ to the Outlet mall and 1-94, and a mix of Office and light
industrial uses further away from 1-94. Table 4 summarizes the estimate in Land Use allocations
and corresponding trip generation rates. The internal capture rate for this development was 6%.
I Table 4
Albertville Business Park Traffic Volumes
I Use ITE Unit Number Daily PM Peak Hour Daily Trip PM Peak Hour Trip
Code of Units Trips/Unit Trips/Unit Generation Generation
Retail 820 1 ,000 sf 315 42.92 4.25 13,505 1,338
I Office 710 1 000 sf 166 12.54 1.60 2,075 265
.iaht Industrial 130 1,000 sf 271 6.96 0.95 1,886 257
Total 17.467 1.860
I Figure 4 in the back of the report illustrates the assignment of the development related traffic on
the roadway system. Figure 5 illustrates existing plus background growth and Figure 6
I illustrates existing plus background, plus the proposed development.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Albertville Traffic Study for Darkenwald and Vetch Propoerties
January 27, 2003
Page 6
Capacity Analyses
The intersections analyzed as part of this study includes the intersections on CSAH 19 from 70th
Street north of Albertville and 57th Street in Albertville south of 1-94. The intersections are
summarized in Table 5 along with the volume to Capacity ratios (v/c), total intersection delays
and level of service.
The analysis indicated the need to extend the widening of County road 19 through the
intersection of 67th Stree/Laketown Drive. Also, the intersection of County Road 19 and 70th
Street would need to be signalized.
This isolated intersection analysis indicates that the intersections providing direct access to the
developments would opoerate sufficiently given no other system congestion. The 67th
Street/Laketown intersection will require two-through lanes in each direction on County Road
19, the westbound approach will require an exclusive left turn lane, and a shared through/right
lane. The eastbound approach will require an exclusive left, through and right turn lane.
The capacity analysis indicated problems with the intersection with County Road 37 and County
Road 19. Table 5 shows a volume to capacity (V/c) ratio of 1.21 with Full development
conditions. The V/c ratio with existing plus background traffic was only 0.89, however, the
southbound left-turn movement exceeded capacity. The effects of the poor left turn movements
were realized in the operations analysis.
Table 5
Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis
PM Peak Hour
Intersection Background Growth Only Full Develooment
County 19 @ V/c Ratio Delay/LOS V/c Ratio Delav/LOS
70th Street nla nla 0.68 22.3/C
67th Street! nla N/a 0.84 37.5/D
Laketown Drive
Outlet Mall Road 0.54 26.8/C 0.85 35.0/D
1-94 North Ramp 0.60 3.41 A 0.69 6.3/A
1-94 South Ramp 0.77 18.7/B 0.90 16.2/B
County Road 37 0.89 48.6/D 1.21 94.2/F
57th Street 0.71 25.3/C 0.79 26.7/C
N/a: These intersections are unsignalized with minimal cross-street traffic without the
developments in place
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Albertville Traffic Study for Darkenwald and Vetch Propoerties
January 27,2003
Page 7
Traffic Operations
Traffic operations were evaluated using Simtraffic software. This program is a micro simulation
traffic program that analyzes individual vehicles instead of using equations to estimate groups of
vehicles. This program analyzes the overall levels of congestion on the system when there are
bottlenecks at intersections that potentially impact other intersections. In this study, the
constraints at the intersection of County Road 19 and 37 creates a bottleneck that has a
significant impact on County Road 19 north past 67th Street.
Table 6 summarizes the vehicle delay and corresponding level of service for the intersections in
the study area. The County Road 37 intersection does not operate adequately with existing plus
background growth, however the congestion is contained to this intersection and does not
significantly impact the surrounding intersections. When the proposed developments are in
place, the added traffic creates extreme congestion at County Road 37. The congestion is so
severe that intersection operations are affected all the way to the 67th Street/Laketown Drive
intersection. The congestion has an affect on the 1-94 off ramp at County Road 19 and would
likely impact the operations at 1-94 and County Road 37.
The crux of this problem is the concentration of traffic at the intersection of County Road 19 and
37 and the lack of space to adequately widen the intersection to accommodate the demand. The
major traffic pattern that can potential be relocated and would reduce the overall congestion on
County Road 19 is traffic destined to 1-94 eastbound. If this traffic were to be relocated to a full
access interchange at County road 19, overall congestion would be reduced.
Table 6
Signalized Intersection Operations Analysis
PM Peak Hour
Intersection BackfUound Growth Only Full Development
County 19 @ Delay LOS Delay LOS
70th Street nla nla 26.2 C
67th Street! nla nla 213.4 F
Laketown Drive
Outlet Mall Road 18.6 B 65.0 E
1-94 North Ramp 7.1 A 30.0 C
1-94 South Ramp 14.5 B 211.8 F
County Road 37 139.5 F 360.1 F
57th Street 18.0 B 18.0 B
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Albertville Traffic Study for Darkenwald and Vetch Propoerties
January 27, 2003
Page 8
Staging of Development
The timing of development between the proposed developments and other developments that
were part of the background growth would likely extend out over the next ten years. The
development patterns likely to' develop the quickest would be residential development. It is
unlikely that the commercial and industrial development would be fully developed in the next ten
years, given the amount of supply being proposed and the current market conditions. Over the
next 5 years the significant traffic impacts would not likely be realized.
Jrs
x:\aelalbevI030J OOlvetch-busin... park lJaffic studylreportleaw traffic memo.doc
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.,/ ~ L--
V \
. / r- ~ [
/ 1 rn ... n
C J J )J \ - III IL l{{ i;::=J
? r --;::J = I...< ~ r /'"
;= ~ ~ I j
. :J 7
.
./ r ....
'/ ""- JL l I ..J /
~ / (City of Otsego d
~~ ~ I- ~
~ 1= I--
-ll 1= IF
~
Darkenwald Site r u dDT\\ l~ n
0') etch Site
_(Albertville Buisness Park) ~ (Towne Lakes Phase II)
U ~ I I I ::r: ---- , ~ W
I----' I \ I 1<( )
trJ~ UJ_
~ Q D I I w ~ o. I
~ ~ f7(
~ ~I ;;4 I I
, ~~ Mr"J ~
I-- 0
1 b,~ 0 Coun tv Rd 37
lJ ~City of Albertville '~
1loN"N h"...........
rt.INI<: ..... " ~ ;=;:l./ II no-
14 ~, I III
. ~
I l j
-----
[ ~
, -r
I ~ / t
/"- I~ 50th St
'\ '-" \ 1= L ~
- II i) - I- r:::tr -=
r- (I"........
0 ..l---
~ City of St. Michael
~ I ~
r :.L.,..J-.J L- ~ In
I;~ r===:::: ~
-
v ~
. J~
"'SeH
Traffic Study
Vetch & Darkenwald Properties
Figure 1
Site Locations
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
I
I
I
70th Street
67th Street
10 L5
o~o ..- 0
..-JtL. ("""5
5J ~ ,.
5 --+- 10 10 10
15 , N~
Lo
o
("""0
oJ t,.
o --+- o~o
0, ~
Laketown Drive
Outlet Mall Road
en
10 ~
1C)~ '"0
1-94 WB on-ramp <ON
..-Jt <tl
0
~t 0:: Legend
010 ~
-.tN
~C') C 000 PM Peak Hour
~
0 Traffic Volume
() t
10
~
1-94 WB off-ramp N
55J t North
130, 0
~
-.t
61 st Street
. "'SeI
IC)g~ L 115
10 ~ ~ ..- 225
..-J t L. (""" 105 County Road 37
40 J ~ ,.
100 --+- 10 10 0
65, CO~1C)
Traffic Study
Vetch & Darkenwald Properties
Figure 2
Exsiting Traffic
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
70th Street
Ct) Lo
o{:::;.., +- 0
~ t'" t 37
oJ ., ,..
0-+ It) <0 0
19. "<tg
67th Street
L9
o
49
Laketown Drive
Outlet Mall Road
0>
..- N "("-
<0 ..-
1-94 WB on-ramp ..- It) "'0
~t co
0
.,t 0::: Leoend
Ct)N >.
<Xl <Xl -
Ct)<Xl c: 000 PM Peak Hour
:J
0 Traffic Volume
() t
N
.....
1-94 WB off-ramp It)
211 J t North
360. ~
0
.....
61 st Street
<Xl <Xl <0 L 380
~~N +- 226
~ t L-. t 386 County Road 37
85 J ., ,..
63 -+ .....0)Ct)
77. ~~~
"'SeI
Traffic Study
Vetch & Darkenwald Properties
Figure 3
Background Growth
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
70th Street
Lo
~~~ +- 0
.-I t L. t 178
58.J ~ ,..
o -+ ~!Oo
266, ....
67th Street
Laketown Drive
Outlet Mall Road
(j)
0('1) ~
('I)N "0
1-94 WB on-ramp ('1)0)
.-It co
0
~t c:: Leqend
ON >.
10 - 000 PM Peak Hour
co c:
~
0 Traffic Volume
() t
('I)
N
1-94 WB off-ramp 0)
222 .J t North
0, 0
('I)
<0
61 st Street
0('1)0 L 315
~~re +- 0
.-I t L. t 0 County Road 37
48 .J ~ ,..
0-+ 01'-0
0, ~
"'seJ
Traffic Study
Vetch & Darkenwald Properties
Figure 4
Vetch &
Darkenwald Traffic
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
70th Street
co L5
O~oo;t '-0
.-I + L. t 42
5J ., ,.
5 -. O......LO
"""'"1. ........
34., co
67th Street
Laketown Drive
Outlet Mall Road
0)
co.... ~
NN
1-94 WB on-ramp N.... -0
.-1+ co
.,t 0
c::: Leaend
C"l.... >-
NO
LON - 000 PM Peak Hour
...... c.:
::J Traffic Volume
0
0 t
....
N
1-94 WB off-ramp ....
266J t North
490, ;Z
oo;t
......
61 st Street
C"l co co L 495
~:g~ .- 451
.-I + L. t 491 County Road 37
125J ., ,.
163-' ~~8
142, oo;t COC"l
"SeH
Traffic Study
Vetch & Darkenwald Properties
Figure 5
Existing Plus
Background Growth
I
I
I
,
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e
I
I
I
I
70th Street
I'- L5
~~~ +- 0
~ + L. -r220
63.J ~ ~
5 -+ ~~IO
300. <"II'-
67th Street
0>
CIOO
CIOCION
~ L.
25.J
38-+
595.
L59
21
-r 288
11:
.....ON
M 0> 10
Laketown Drive
Outlet Mall Road
0 0")
(010 -,:-
10(0
1-94 WB on-ramp 10..... "'C
~+ co
0
~t ~ Legend
MO> ~
NIO
100 C 000 PM Peak Hour
<"I ::J
0 Traffic Volume
u t
0
10
(0
1-94 WB off-ramp .....
488 .J t North
490. ..,.
0>
0
<"I
61 st Street
M.....(O L 810
~~g +- 451
~ + L. -r 489 County Road 37
173.J ~ ~
162-+ ~~g
136. ""~M
Figure 6
Total Traffic
Existing, Background. &
Vetch/Darkenwald Traffic
Traffic Study
Vetch & Darkenwald Properties
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table A-1
T . IT' G f R t
IVOlca riD enera Ion aes
ITE Average Rates
LAND USE
CODE UNITS
DESCRIPTION (6th Ed.) DAILY AM PEAK PM PEAK
Residential
Single Family 210 Dwelling Units 9.57 0.77 1.02
Medium Density 220 Dwelling Units 6.63 0.56 0.67
(Apartment)
High Density 222 Dwelling Units 4.20 0.34 0.40
(High Rise)
Commercial
Single Tenant Office Building 715 Building Size: 11.57 1.78 1.72
1,000 SF
Shopping Center 820 Building Size: 42.92 1.03 3.74
1,000 SF
High Turnover 832 Building Size: 130.34 14.62 19.38
Restaurant 1,000 SF
Fast-Food 834 Building Size: 496.12 54.81 46.28
WID rive Through 1,000 SF
Apparel Store 870 Building Size: 66.40 1.00 4.80
1,000 SF
Industrial
Light Industrial 110 Acres 51.80 7.51 7.26
Heavy Industrial 120 Acres 6.75 1.98 2.16
Warehousing Acres
Manufacturing 140 Acres 38.88 9.30 9.21