Loading...
1997-06-18 Denial of Zoning Requests <- r' .'h~ I" ., . . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING This is to certify that the attached letter and copies of the attached resolutions were mailed at the u.s. Post Office at Albertville, Minnesota, on the 19th da f June, 97, at 3:00 PM by Linda Houghton. Dated this 19th day of June, 1997 ALBERTVILLE COUNTY OF WRIGHT STATE OF MINNESOTA . 5975 Main Avenue N.E. P.O. Box 9 Albertville, MN 55301 (612) 497-3384 Fax: (612) 497-3210 June 18, 1997 Don Jensen Pilot Land Development 13736 NE Johnson street Ham Lake, MN 55304 RE: Denial of Zoning Requests Center Oaks Cedar Creek North Dear Mr. Jensen: This letter will serve to notify you that the City Council approved the attached resolutions denying your rezoning and preliminary plat requests for the Center Oaks and Cedar Creek North properties. Please refer any questions you may have relating to the Council action to City Administrator Garrison Hale. Linda Houghton City Clerk Enclosures 1 " ~ ' t f' .~.... . . RESOLUTION NO. 1997-34 (' A RESOLUTION DENYING THE REQUEST FOR A REZONING FROM R-1A TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL AS REQUESTED BY PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT CO. FOR THE CENTER OAKS PROPERTY WHEREAS, the City of Albertville is a municipal corporation, organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Albertv111e has adopted Ordinance 1988-12 to promote the orderly, economic and safe development and utilization of land within the city: and WHEREAS, Pilot land Development Co. has made application for rezoning of the Center Oaks property from R-1 A, Low Density Single Family to Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, landowners also made application for preliminary plat approval; and WHEREAS, the property is legally described as: The south 30 acres of the Northeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 120, Range 24, and known and described as lot 2 of said Northeast Quarter, as per plat of record, and also the Northwest Quarter of Southeast Quarter of Section 2, Township 120, Range 24, Wright County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning requires the Planning Commission and City Councl1 to consider the impacts of that adjustment; and WHEREAS, the A1bertvi11e Planning Commiss'ion reviewed the application and conducted a public hear-ing relative to the appllcation on 13 May 1997 and voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the application: and WHEREAS, the A1bertv1ne City Council reviewed the appllcation information and Planning Commission recommendations at their meeting on 3 June 1997; and WHEREAS, the Albertville City Council hereby makes the following findings of fact: 1. The property is currently zoned R-1 A, low Dens-ity Single Faml1y which would allow for the development of 15,000 square foot lots with a minimum frontage of 100 feet. 2. Development of the property for residential use would be allowed with the current zoning. 3. The 1996 Comprehensive Plan guides the property for low density residential development which would include the R-1 A zoning classification. 4. The requested rezoning is not -in keeping with the R-1 A zone as it would al10w some lots below the 15,000 square foot lot size and numerous lots without the required 100 foot lot width (and varied front setback distances); and ... ''', .... . . RESOLUTION NO. lqq7-~LL PILOT LAND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - CENTER OAKS ( 10 JUNE 1997 PAGE 2 5. The proposed project would increase the overall density of the site beyond that which would result under the R-1 A zoning designation. 6. The benefits of the "coving design" are untested and may not outweigh the negative aspects such as reduced lot widths, limited rear yard areas, and deviation from standard house placement. 7. The project does not create a development pattern in harmony with the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 8. The project is not tied to the golf course as was originally represented by the developer, and therefore deviation is not warranted from R-1 A standards. 9. The project is in opposition to the Planned Unit Development process which requires approval of a concept plan for the entire parceVproject area. 10. Env-ironmental concerns of drainage to property immediately abutting the project to the south must be further investigated and resolved as 1t relates to water runoff into the private drainage ditch in this location. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOl VCD, that the City Councl1 of the City of Albertv111e hereby denies the requested rezoning and preliminary plat approval based upon the above l1sted findings of fact; This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Albe'rtv111e on the 17th day of June 1997, by a vote of ~ Ayes and ---LL Nays. ATTEST: